Mitigating amphibian disease: strategies to maintain wild populations and control chytridiomycosis

dc.contributor.authorWoodhams, Douglas C.
dc.contributor.authorBosch, Jaime
dc.contributor.authorBriggs, Cheryl J.
dc.contributor.authorCashins, Scott
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Leyla R.
dc.contributor.authorLauer, Antje
dc.contributor.authorMuths, Erin
dc.contributor.authorPuschendorf, Robert
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Benedikt R.
dc.contributor.authorSheafor, Brandon
dc.contributor.authorVoyles, Jamie
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-06T19:16:26Z
dc.date.available2013-09-06T19:16:26Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractBackground: Rescuing amphibian diversity is an achievable conservation challenge. Disease mitigation is one essential component of population management. Here we assess existing disease mitigation strategies, some in early experimental stages, which focus on the globally emerging chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. We discuss the precedent for each strategy in systems ranging from agriculture to human medicine, and the outlook for each strategy in terms of research needs and long-term potential. Results: We find that the effects of exposure to Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis occur on a spectrum from transient commensal to lethal pathogen. Management priorities are divided between (1) halting pathogen spread and developing survival assurance colonies, and (2) prophylactic or remedial disease treatment. Epidemiological models of chytridiomycosis suggest that mitigation strategies can control disease without eliminating the pathogen. Ecological ethics guide wildlife disease research, but several ethical questions remain for managing disease in the field. Conclusions: Because sustainable conservation of amphibians in nature is dependent on long-term population persistence and co-evolution with potentially lethal pathogens, we suggest that disease mitigation not focus exclusively on the elimination or containment of the pathogen, or on the captive breeding of amphibian hosts. Rather, successful disease mitigation must be context specific with epidemiologically informed strategies to manage already infected populations by decreasing pathogenicity and host susceptibility. We propose population level treatments based on three steps: first, identify mechanisms of disease suppression; second, parameterize epizootiological models of disease and population dynamics for testing under semi-natural conditions; and third, begin a process of adaptive management in field trials with natural populations.
dc.format.extent8
dc.identifier1742-9994
dc.identifier.citationWoodhams, Douglas C., Bosch, Jaime, Briggs, Cheryl J., Cashins, Scott, Davis, Leyla R., Lauer, Antje, Muths, Erin, Puschendorf, Robert, Schmidt, Benedikt R., Sheafor, Brandon, and Voyles, Jamie. 2011. "<a href="https://repository.si.edu/handle/10088/21165">Mitigating amphibian disease: strategies to maintain wild populations and control chytridiomycosis</a>." <em>Frontiers in Zoology</em>, 8, (1) 8. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-8-8">https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-8-8</a>.
dc.identifier.issn1742-9994
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10088/21165
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Zoology 8 (1)
dc.titleMitigating amphibian disease: strategies to maintain wild populations and control chytridiomycosis
dc.typearticle
sro.description.unitSTRI
sro.identifier.doi10.1186/1742-9994-8-8
sro.identifier.itemID101031
sro.identifier.refworksID99279
sro.identifier.urlhttps://repository.si.edu/handle/10088/21165
sro.publicationPlaceLondon; 236 Grays Inn Rd, Floor 6, London WC1X 8HL, England

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
stri_1742-9994-8-8.PMC3098159.pdf
Size:
3.9 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format