Local and regional disturbances associated with the invasion of Chesapeake Bay marshes by the common reed <I>Phragmites australis</I>

dc.contributor.authorSciance, M. Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorPatrick, Christopher J.
dc.contributor.authorWeller, Donald E.
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Meghan N.
dc.contributor.authorMcCormick, Melissa K.
dc.contributor.authorHazelton, Eric L. G.
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-27T18:34:59Z
dc.date.available2016-04-27T18:34:59Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractThe invasion of wetlands by Phragmites australis is a conservation concern across North America. We used the invasion of Chesapeake Bay wetlands by P. australis as a model system to examine the effects of regional and local stressors on plant invasions. We summarized digital maps of the distributions of P. australis and of potential stressors (especially human land use and shoreline armoring) at two spatial scales: for 72 subestuaries of the bay and their local watersheds and for thousands of 500 m shoreline segments. We developed statistical models that use the stressor variables to predict P. australis prevalence (% of shoreline occupied) in subestuaries and its presence or absence in 500 m segments of shoreline. The prevalence of agriculture was the strongest and most consistent predictor of P. australis presence and abundance in Chesapeake Bay, because P. australis can exploit the resulting elevated nutrient levels to enhance its establishment, growth, and seed production. Phragmites australis was also positively associated with riprapped shoreline, probably because it creates disturbances that provide colonization opportunities. The P. australis invasion was less severe in areas with greater forested land cover and natural shorelines. Surprisingly, invasion was low in highly developed watersheds and highest along shorelines with intermediate levels of residential land use, possibly indicating that highly disturbed systems are uninhabitable even to invasive species. Management strategies that reduce nutrient pollution, preserve natural shorelines, and limit nearshore disturbance of soils and vegetation may enhance the resilience of shorelines to invasion.
dc.format.extent2661–2677
dc.identifier1387-3547
dc.identifier.citationSciance, M. Benjamin, Patrick, Christopher J., Weller, Donald E., Williams, Meghan N., McCormick, Melissa K., and Hazelton, Eric L. G. 2016. "<a href="https://repository.si.edu/handle/10088/28529">Local and regional disturbances associated with the invasion of Chesapeake Bay marshes by the common reed <I>Phragmites australis</I></a>." <em>Biological Invasions</em>, 18, (9) 2661–2677. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1136-z">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1136-z</a>.
dc.identifier.issn1387-3547
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10088/28529
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.relation.ispartofBiological Invasions 18 (9)
dc.titleLocal and regional disturbances associated with the invasion of Chesapeake Bay marshes by the common reed <I>Phragmites australis</I>
dc.typearticle
sro.description.unitSERC
sro.identifier.doi10.1007/s10530-016-1136-z
sro.identifier.itemID139270
sro.identifier.refworksID80379
sro.identifier.urlhttps://repository.si.edu/handle/10088/28529

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ScianceEtAl2016BiolInvSpatialPhragInvasion.pdf
Size:
2.54 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: