Improving the odds: Assessing bait availability before rodent eradications to aid in selecting bait application rates

dc.contributor.authorPott, Madeleine
dc.contributor.authorWegmann, Alexander S.
dc.contributor.authorGriffiths, Richard
dc.contributor.authorSamaniego-Herrera, Araceli
dc.contributor.authorCuthbert, Richard J.
dc.contributor.authorBrooke, M.
dc.contributor.authorPitt, William C.
dc.contributor.authorBerentsen, Are R.
dc.contributor.authorHolmes, Nick D.
dc.contributor.authorHowald, Gregg
dc.contributor.authorRamos-Rendón, Karina
dc.contributor.authorRussell, James C.
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-20T15:15:32Z
dc.date.available2015-04-20T15:15:32Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractRodent eradications undertaken on tropical islands are more likely to fail than eradications undertaken at higher latitudes. We report on 12 independent rodent eradication projects undertaken on tropical islands that utilized the results of an in situ bait availability study prior to eradication to inform, a priori, the bait application rate selected for the eradication. These projects also monitored bait availability during the eradication. The results from our analysis verified the utility of bait availability studies to future rodent eradication campaigns and confirmed the influence of two environmental factors that can affect bait availability over time: precipitation prior to the study and the abundance of land crabs at the study site. Our findings should encourage eradication teams to conduct in-depth assessments of the targeted island prior to project implementation. However, we acknowledge the limitations of such studies (two of the projects we reviewed failed and one removed only one of two rodent species present) and provide guidance on how to interpret the results from a bait availability study in planning an eradication. Study design was inconsistent among the twelve cases we reviewed which limited our analysis. We recommend a more standardized approach for measuring bait availability prior to eradication to provide more robust predictions of the rate at which bait availability will decrease during the eradication and to facilitate future comparisons among projects and islands.
dc.format.extent27–35
dc.identifier0006-3207
dc.identifier.citationPott, Madeleine, Wegmann, Alexander S., Griffiths, Richard, Samaniego-Herrera, Araceli, Cuthbert, Richard J., Brooke, M., Pitt, William C., Berentsen, Are R., Holmes, Nick D., Howald, Gregg, Ramos-Rendón, Karina, and Russell, James C. 2015. "<a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320714003668">Improving the odds: Assessing bait availability before rodent eradications to aid in selecting bait application rates</a>." <em>Biological Conservation</em>, 185 27–35. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.049">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.049</a>.
dc.identifier.issn0006-3207
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10088/25335
dc.publisherApplied Science Publishers Oxford; Elsevier
dc.relation.ispartofBiological Conservation 185
dc.titleImproving the odds: Assessing bait availability before rodent eradications to aid in selecting bait application rates
dc.typearticle
sro.description.unitNZP
sro.identifier.doi10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.049
sro.identifier.itemID131073
sro.identifier.refworksID71068
sro.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320714003668
sro.publicationPlaceBarking, Essex England

Files

Collections