In-Solution Hybridization for Mammalian Mitogenome enrichment: Pros, Cons, and Challenges Associated with Multiplexing Degraded DNA

dc.contributor.authorHawkins, Melissa T. R.
dc.contributor.authorHofman, Courtney A.
dc.contributor.authorCallicrate, Taylor
dc.contributor.authorMcDonough, Molly M.
dc.contributor.authorTsuchiya, Mirian T. N.
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez, Eliécer E.
dc.contributor.authorHelgen, Kristofer M.
dc.contributor.authorMaldonado, Jesús E.
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-01T12:10:03Z
dc.date.available2015-09-01T12:10:03Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractHere we present a set of RNA-based probes for whole mitochondrial genome in-solution enrichment, targeting a diversity of mammalian mitogenomes. This probes set was designed from 7 mammalian orders and tested to determine the utility for enriching degraded DNA. We generated 63 mitogenomes representing five orders and 22 genera of mammals that yielded varying coverage ranging from 0 to > 5,400X. Based on a threshold of 70% mitogenome recovery and at least 10X average coverage, 32 or 51% of samples were considered successful. The estimated sequence divergence of samples from the probe sequences used to construct the array ranged up to 20%. Sample type was more predictive of mitogenome recovery than sample age. The proportion of reads from each individual in multiplexed enrichments was highly skewed, with each pool having one sample that yielded a majority of the reads. Recovery across each mitochondrial gene varied with most samples exhibiting regions with gaps or ambiguous sites. We estimated the ability of the probes to capture mitogenomes from a diversity of mammalian taxa not included here by performing a clustering analysis of published sequences for 100 taxa representing most mammalian orders. Our study demonstrates that a general array can be cost and time effective when there is a need to screen a modest number of individuals from a variety of taxa. We also address the practical concerns for using such a tool, with regard to pooling samples, generating high quality mitogenomes, and detail a pipeline to remove chimeric molecules. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
dc.format.extent1173–1188
dc.identifier1755-098X
dc.identifier.citationHawkins, Melissa T. R., Hofman, Courtney A., Callicrate, Taylor, McDonough, Molly M., Tsuchiya, Mirian T. N., Gutiérrez, Eliécer E., Helgen, Kristofer M., and Maldonado, Jesús E. 2016. "<a href="https://repository.si.edu/handle/10088/26855">In-Solution Hybridization for Mammalian Mitogenome enrichment: Pros, Cons, and Challenges Associated with Multiplexing Degraded DNA</a>." <em>Molecular Ecology Resources</em>, 16, (5) 1173–1188. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12448">https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12448</a>.
dc.identifier.issn1755-098X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10088/26855
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.relation.ispartofMolecular Ecology Resources 16 (5)
dc.titleIn-Solution Hybridization for Mammalian Mitogenome enrichment: Pros, Cons, and Challenges Associated with Multiplexing Degraded DNA
dc.typearticle
sro.description.unitNH-Anthropology
sro.description.unitNH-Vertebrate Zoology
sro.description.unitNMNH
sro.identifier.doi10.1111/1755-0998.12448
sro.identifier.itemID136911
sro.identifier.refworksID23096
sro.identifier.urlhttps://repository.si.edu/handle/10088/26855
sro.publicationPlaceHoboken

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Hawkins et al. (2016) MER (hybridization mtgenome enrichment).pdf
Size:
1.08 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: