Testing the growth rate vs. geochemical hypothesis for latitudinal variation in plant nutrients

dc.contributor.authorLovelock, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorFeller, Ilka C.
dc.contributor.authorBall, M. C.
dc.contributor.authorEllis, J.
dc.contributor.authorSorrell, B.
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-10T14:41:22Z
dc.date.available2012-02-10T14:41:22Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.format.extent1154–1163
dc.identifier1461-023X
dc.identifier.citationLovelock, Catherine, Feller, Ilka C., Ball, M. C., Ellis, J., and Sorrell, B. 2007. "<a href="https://repository.si.edu/handle/10088/17706">Testing the growth rate vs. geochemical hypothesis for latitudinal variation in plant nutrients</a>." <em>Ecology Letters</em>, 10, (12) 1154–1163. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01112.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01112.x</a>.
dc.identifier.issn1461-023X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10088/17706
dc.relation.ispartofEcology Letters 10 (12)
dc.titleTesting the growth rate vs. geochemical hypothesis for latitudinal variation in plant nutrients
dc.typearticle
sro.description.unitSERC
sro.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01112.x
sro.identifier.itemID160271
sro.identifier.refworksID55454
sro.identifier.urlhttps://repository.si.edu/handle/10088/17706

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
serc_Lovelock_etal_2008_EcolLett_10_1154_1163.pdf
Size:
213.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format