Comprehensive profiling of retroviral integration sites using target enrichment methods from historical koala samples without an assembled reference genome

dc.contributor.authorCui, Pin
dc.contributor.authorLöber, Ulrike
dc.contributor.authorAlquezar-Planas, David
dc.contributor.authorIshida, Yasuko
dc.contributor.authorCourtiol, Alexandre
dc.contributor.authorTimms, Peter
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Rebecca N.
dc.contributor.authorLenz, Dorina
dc.contributor.authorHelgen, Kristofer M.
dc.contributor.authorRoca, Alfred L.
dc.contributor.authorHartman, Stefanie
dc.contributor.authorGreenwood, Alex D.
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-27T18:35:06Z
dc.date.available2016-04-27T18:35:06Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractBackground. Retroviral integration into the host germline results in permanent viral colonization of vertebrate genomes. The koala retrovirus (KoRV) is currently invading the germline of the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) and provides a unique opportunity for studying retroviral endogenization. Previous analysis of KoRV integration patterns in modern koalas demonstrate that they share integration sites primarily if they are related, indicating that the process is currently driven by vertical transmission rather than infection. However, due to methodological challenges, KoRV integrations have not been comprehensively characterized. Results. To overcome these challenges, we applied and compared three target enrichment techniques coupled with next generation sequencing (NGS) and a newly customized sequence-clustering based computational pipeline to determine the integration sites for 10 museum Queensland and New South Wales (NSW) koala samples collected between the 1870s and late 1980s. A secondary aim of this study sought to identify common integration sites across modern and historical specimens by comparing our dataset to previously published studies. Several million sequences were processed, and the KoRV integration sites in each koala were characterized. Conclusions. Although the three enrichment methods each exhibited bias in integration site retrieval, a combination of two methods, Primer Extension Capture and hybridization capture is recommended for future studies on historical samples. Moreover, identification of integration sites shows that the proportion of integration sites shared between any two koalas is quite small.
dc.format.extente1847
dc.identifier2167-8359
dc.identifier.citationCui, Pin, Löber, Ulrike, Alquezar-Planas, David, Ishida, Yasuko, Courtiol, Alexandre, Timms, Peter, Johnson, Rebecca N., Lenz, Dorina, Helgen, Kristofer M., Roca, Alfred L., Hartman, Stefanie, and Greenwood, Alex D. 2016. "<a href="https://repository.si.edu/handle/10088/28635">Comprehensive profiling of retroviral integration sites using target enrichment methods from historical koala samples without an assembled reference genome</a>." <em>PeerJ</em>, 4 e1847. <a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1847">https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1847</a>.
dc.identifier.issn2167-8359
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10088/28635
dc.publisherPeerJ
dc.relation.ispartofPeerJ 4
dc.titleComprehensive profiling of retroviral integration sites using target enrichment methods from historical koala samples without an assembled reference genome
dc.typearticle
sro.description.unitNH-Vertebrate Zoology
sro.description.unitNMNH
sro.identifier.doi10.7717/peerj.1847
sro.identifier.itemID139442
sro.identifier.refworksID39313
sro.identifier.urlhttps://repository.si.edu/handle/10088/28635

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Cui et al. (2016) KoRV integration sites (PeerJ).pdf
Size:
1.38 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: