DSpace Repository

Old growth and secondary forest site occupancy by nocturnal birds in a Neotropical landscape

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sberze, M. en
dc.contributor.author Cohn-Haft, Mario en
dc.contributor.author Ferraz, Goncalo N. en
dc.date.accessioned 2010-04-05T13:58:49Z
dc.date.available 2010-04-05T13:58:49Z
dc.date.issued 2010
dc.identifier.citation Sberze, M., Cohn-Haft, Mario, and Ferraz, Goncalo N. 2010. "<a href="https%3A%2F%2Frepository.si.edu%2Fhandle%2F10088%2F8906">Old growth and secondary forest site occupancy by nocturnal birds in a Neotropical landscape</a>." <em>Animal Conservation</em>. 13 (1):3&ndash;11. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00312.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00312.x</a> en
dc.identifier.issn 1367-9430
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10088/8906
dc.description.abstract High rates of old growth (OG) forest destruction and difficult farming conditions result in increasing cover of secondary forests (SF) in the Amazon. In this setting, it is opportune to ask which animals use newly available SF and which stay restricted to OG. This study presents a comparison of SF and OG site occupancy by nocturnal birds in terra firme forests of the Amazon Guianan shield, north of Manaus, Brazil. We tested species-specific occupancy predictions for two owls (Lophostrix cristata/Glaucidium hardyi), two potoos (Nyctibius leucopterus/Nyctibius griseus) and two nightjars (Caprimulgus nigrescens/Nyctidromus albicollis). For each pair, we predicted that one species would have higher occupancy in OG while the other would either be indifferent to forest type or favor SF sites. Data were collected in 30 OG and 24 SF sites with monthly samples from December 2007 to December 2008. Our analytic approach accounts for the possibility of detection failure and for spatial autocorrelation in occupancy, thus leading to strong inferences about changes in occupancy between forest types and between species. Nocturnal bird richness and community composition were indistinguishable between OG and SF sites. Owls were relatively indifferent to forest type. Potoos followed the a priori predictions, and one of the nightjars (C. nigrescens) favored SF instead of OG as predicted. Only one species, Nyctib. leucopterus, clearly favored OG. The landscape context of our SF study sites, surrounded by a vast expanse of continuous OG forest, partially explains the resemblance between SF and OG fauna but leaves unexplained the higher occupancy for SF than OG sites for several study species. The causal explanation of high SF occupancy remains an open question, but the result itself motivates further comparisons for other groups, as well as recognition of the conservation potential of SF. en
dc.relation.ispartof Animal Conservation en
dc.title Old growth and secondary forest site occupancy by nocturnal birds in a Neotropical landscape en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.srbnumber 81726
dc.identifier.doi 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00312.x
rft.jtitle Animal Conservation
rft.volume 13
rft.issue 1
rft.spage 3
rft.epage 11
dc.description.SIUnit STRI en
dc.description.SIUnit BDFFP en
dc.description.SIUnit Encyclopedia of Life en
dc.description.SIUnit Forces of Change en
dc.citation.spage 3
dc.citation.epage 11


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account