dc.contributor.author |
Niven, Jeremy |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2010-02-12T19:34:00Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2010-02-12T19:34:00Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2008 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Niven, Jeremy. 2008. "<a href="https%3A%2F%2Frepository.si.edu%2Fhandle%2F10088%2F8598">Response to Kohler et al.: Impossible arguments about possible species?</a>." <em>Trends in Ecology & Evolution</em>. 23 (1):8–9. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.004">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.004</a> |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10088/8598 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
First paragraph I welcome the response of Ko"hler et al. [1] to my recent article [2], in which I discussed the controversy surrounding the interpretation of Homo floresiensis, a fossil hominin from the island of Flores [3]. Ko"hler and colleagues present alternative arguments and interpretations of the evidence. However, these arguments rely on assumptions that under close scrutiny do not justify revising the status of H. floresiensis. |
en |
dc.relation.ispartof |
Trends in Ecology & Evolution |
en |
dc.title |
Response to Kohler et al.: Impossible arguments about possible species? |
en |
dc.type |
Journal Article |
en |
dc.identifier.srbnumber |
55610 |
|
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.004 |
|
rft.jtitle |
Trends in Ecology & Evolution |
|
rft.volume |
23 |
|
rft.issue |
1 |
|
rft.spage |
8 |
|
rft.epage |
9 |
|
dc.description.SIUnit |
Encyclopedia of Life |
en |
dc.description.SIUnit |
Forces of Change |
en |
dc.description.SIUnit |
STRI |
en |
dc.citation.spage |
8 |
|
dc.citation.epage |
9 |
|