Merchants of doubt in the free-ranging cat conflict

Loss, Scott R.; Marra, Peter P.

dc.contributor.author	Loss, Scott R.	en
dc.contributor.author	Marra, Peter P.	en
dc.date.accessioned	2018-02-08T10:01:22Z
dc.date.available	2018-02-08T10:01:22Z
dc.date.issued	2018
dc.identifier.citation	Loss, Scott R. and Marra, Peter P. 2018. "<a href="https://repository.si.edu/handle/10088/35023">Merchants of doubt in the free-ranging cat conflict</a>." <em>Conservation Biology: The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology</em>. 32 (2):265–266. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13085">https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13085</a>	en
dc.identifier.issn	0888-8892
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10088/35023
dc.description.abstract	Separating fact from misinformation is a major barrier to public understanding of science and institutional adoption of evidence-based policy (UCS 2017). As described in Merchants of Doubt (Oreskes & Conway 2010), there are myriad examples of industry and special interests manufacturing doubt about scientific consensus to keep controversies alive and hinder policy changes regarding environmental and public health issues such as DDT, cigarette smoking, and climate change. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.	en
dc.relation.ispartof	Conservation Biology: The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology	en
dc.title	Merchants of doubt in the free-ranging cat conflict	en
dc.type	Journal Article	en
dc.identifier.srbnumber	145312
dc.identifier.doi	10.1111/cobi.13085
rft.jtitle	Conservation Biology: The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
rft.volume	32
rft.issue	2
rft.spage	265
rft.epage	266
dc.description.SIUnit	NZP	en
dc.description.SIUnit	Peer-reviewed	en
dc.citation.spage	265
dc.citation.epage	266