DSpace Repository

The energetic and nutritional yields from insectivory for Kasekela chimpanzees

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author O'Malley, Robert C. en
dc.contributor.author Power, Michael L. en
dc.date.accessioned 2015-04-20T15:16:05Z
dc.date.available 2015-04-20T15:16:05Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.identifier.citation O'Malley, Robert C. and Power, Michael L. 2014. "The energetic and nutritional yields from insectivory for Kasekela chimpanzees." <em>Journal of Human Evolution</em>. 71:46&ndash;58. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.09.014">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.09.014</a> en
dc.identifier.issn 0047-2484
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10088/25788
dc.description.abstract Insectivory is hypothesized to be an important source of macronutrients, minerals, and vitamins for chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), yet nutritional data based on actual intake are lacking. Drawing on observations from 2008 to 2010 and recently published nutritional assays, we determined the energy, macronutrient and mineral yields for termite-fishing (Macrotermes), ant-dipping (Dorylus), and ant-fishing (Camponotus) by the Kasekela chimpanzees of Gombe National Park, Tanzania. We also estimated the yields from consumption of weaver ants (Oecophylla) and termite alates (Macrotermes and Pseudacanthotermes). On days when chimpanzees were observed to prey on insects, the time spent in insectivorous behavior ranged from &lt;1 min to over 4 h. After excluding partial bouts and those of &lt;1 min duration, ant-dipping bouts were of significantly shorter duration than the other two forms of tool-assisted insectivory but provided the highest mass intake rate. Termite-fishing bouts were of significantly longer duration than ant-dipping and had a lower mass intake rate, but provided higher mean and maximum mass yields. Ant-fishing bouts were comparable to termite-fishing bouts in duration but had significantly lower mass intake rates. Mean and maximum all-day yields from termite-fishing and ant-dipping contributed to or met estimated recommended intake (ERI) values for a broad array of minerals. The mean and maximum all-day yields of other insects consistently contributed to the ERI only for manganese. All forms of insectivory provided small but probably non-trivial amounts of fat and protein. We conclude that different forms of insectivory have the potential to address different nutritional needs for Kasekela chimpanzees. Other than honeybees, insects have received little attention as potential foods for hominins. Our results suggest that ants and (on a seasonal basis) termites would have been viable sources of fat, high-quality protein and minerals for extinct hominins employing Pan-like subsistence technology in East African woodlands. en
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Human Evolution en
dc.title The energetic and nutritional yields from insectivory for Kasekela chimpanzees en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.srbnumber 119241
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.09.014
rft.jtitle Journal of Human Evolution
rft.volume 71
rft.spage 46
rft.epage 58
dc.description.SIUnit NZP en
dc.description.SIUnit Peer-reviewed en
dc.citation.spage 46
dc.citation.epage 58


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account