DSpace Repository

Agricultural Implements and Machines in the Collection of the National Museum of History and Technology

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Schlebecker, John T. en
dc.date.accessioned 2007-09-27T18:28:36Z en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2013-03-18T18:02:13Z
dc.date.available 2007-09-27T18:28:36Z en_US
dc.date.available 2013-03-18T18:02:13Z
dc.date.issued 1972
dc.identifier.citation Schlebecker, John T. 1972. "<a href="https://repository.si.edu/handle/10088/2416">Agricultural Implements and Machines in the Collection of the National Museum of History and Technology</a>." <em>Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology</em>, (17) 1–58. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810258.17.1">https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810258.17.1</a>. en
dc.identifier.issn 0081-0258
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.5479/si.00810258.17.1
dc.description.abstract Museums must collect and exhibit the tools, implements, and machines which farmers use in their business. These items, however, seldom make up the core of real agricultural activity. The catalog here presented shows something of the range of items that farmers use and that can be preserved and shown. The variety nearly equals the volume. Most museums try to avoid duplication. Even so, few museums manage to collect a continuous series of things showing any one line of development. The discontinuity of farm objects on hand virtually rules out the telling of a coherent and complete history of agriculture. Nevertheless, the museum can show something about the major technological developments in agriculture. The evolution of the plow, the reaper, or the tractor can be suggested even if not fully illustrated. Hitting the highlights has to suffice. The full history of technological change also involves several social and economic conditions. First, changes in implements, tools, and methods results from the accumulation of knowledge. Device builds upon device: first came the wheel, and then, much later, the tractor. Secondly, the potential user of the device must feel a need for it. The new method or device not only must save him work but must clearly increase his well-being. If any device or change merely increases the wealth of someone else (a tax collector or a landlord for example), the farmer seldom will adopt the new technology. Thirdly, since, at first, the new technology almost invariably costs more than the old, the user must have or be able to get the capital to buy and use the newer devices and methods. Of these conditions for technological change, only the cumulative nature of the knowledge can be shown by the objects. Even here, however, missing objects make it possible to present only the most obvious changes, and then not all of them. Still, seeing the things once used—no matter how crude or how few—can sometimes help us understand the way changes took place. Also, this knowledge sometimes can help us guess how other changes will take place. en
dc.format.extent 20719650 bytes en_US
dc.format.extent 4009661 bytes en_US
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en_US
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology en
dc.title Agricultural Implements and Machines in the Collection of the National Museum of History and Technology en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.srbnumber 113120
dc.identifier.eISSN 1948-6006 en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.5479/si.00810258.17.1
rft.jtitle Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology
rft.issue 17
rft.spage 1
rft.epage 58
dc.description.SIUnit nmah en
dc.citation.spage 1
dc.citation.epage 58


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account