DSpace Repository

What Noseleaves Do for FM Bats Depends on Their Degree of Sensorial Specialization

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Vanderelst, Dieter en
dc.contributor.author De Mey, Fons en
dc.contributor.author Peremans, Herbert en
dc.contributor.author Geipel, Inga en
dc.contributor.author Kalko, Elisabeth Klara Viktoria en
dc.contributor.author Firzlaff, Uwe en
dc.date.accessioned 2013-09-06T19:16:59Z
dc.date.available 2013-09-06T19:16:59Z
dc.date.issued 2010
dc.identifier.citation Vanderelst, Dieter, De Mey, Fons, Peremans, Herbert, Geipel, Inga, Kalko, Elisabeth Klara Viktoria, and Firzlaff, Uwe. 2010. "<a href="https%3A%2F%2Frepository.si.edu%2Fhandle%2F10088%2F21187">What Noseleaves Do for FM Bats Depends on Their Degree of Sensorial Specialization</a>." <em>Plos One</em>. 5 (8):e11893. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011893">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011893</a> en
dc.identifier.issn 1932-6203
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10088/21187
dc.description.abstract Background: Many bats vocalizing through their nose carry a prominent noseleaf that is involved in shaping the emission beam of these animals. To our knowledge, the exact role of these appendages has not been thoroughly investigated as for no single species both the hearing and the emission spatial sensitivities have been obtained. In this paper, we set out to evaluate the complete spatial sensitivity of two species of New World leaf-nosed bats: Micronycteris microtis and Phyllostomus discolor. From an ecological point of view, these species are interesting as they belong to the same family (Phyllostomidae) and their noseleaves are morphologically similar. They differ vastly in the niche they occupy. Comparing these species allows us to relate differences in function of the noseleaf to the ecological background of bat species. Methodology/Principal Findings: We simulate the spatial sensitivity of both the hearing and the emission subsystems of two species, M. microtis and P. discolor. This technique allows us to evaluate the respective roles played by the noseleaf in the echolocation system of these species. We find that the noseleaf of M. microtis focuses the radiated energy better and yields better control over the emission beam. Conclusions: From the evidence presented we conclude that the noseleaves serve quantitatively different functions for different bats. The main function of the noseleaf is to serve as an energy focusing mechanism that increases the difference between the reflected energy from objects in the focal area and objects in the periphery. However, despite the gross morphological similarities between the noseleaves of the two Phyllostomid species they focus the energy to a different extent, a capability that can be linked to the different ecological niches occupied by the two species. en
dc.relation.ispartof Plos One en
dc.title What Noseleaves Do for FM Bats Depends on Their Degree of Sensorial Specialization en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.srbnumber 92374
dc.identifier.doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0011893
rft.jtitle Plos One
rft.volume 5
rft.issue 8
rft.spage e11893
dc.description.SIUnit STRI en
dc.citation.spage e11893


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account