DSpace Repository

Extensions and evaluations of a general quantitative theory of forest structure and dynamics

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Enquist, Brian J. en
dc.contributor.author West, Geoffrey B. en
dc.contributor.author Brown, James H. en
dc.date.accessioned 2012-08-08T12:40:25Z
dc.date.available 2012-08-08T12:40:25Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.identifier.citation Enquist, Brian J., West, Geoffrey B., and Brown, James H. 2009. "<a href="https%3A%2F%2Frepository.si.edu%2Fhandle%2F10088%2F18700">Extensions and evaluations of a general quantitative theory of forest structure and dynamics</a>." <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</em>. 106 (17):7046&ndash;7051. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812303106">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812303106</a> en
dc.identifier.issn 0027-8424
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10088/18700
dc.description.abstract Here, we present the second part of a quantitative theory for the structure and dynamics of forests under demographic and resource steady state. The theory is based on individual-level allometric scaling relations for how trees use resources, fill space, and grow. These scale up to determine emergent properties of diverse forests, including sizeâ frequency distributions, spacing relations, canopy configurations, mortality rates, population dynamics, successional dynamics, and resource flux rates. The theory uniquely makes quantitative predictions for both stand-level scaling exponents and normalizations. We evaluate these predictions by compiling and analyzing macroecological datasets from several tropical forests. The close match between theoretical predictions and data suggests that forests are organized by a set of very general scaling rules. Our mechanistic theory is based on allometric scaling relations, is complementary to â demographic theory,â ? but is fundamentally different in approach. It provides a quantitative baseline for understanding deviations from predictions due to other factors, including disturbance, variation in branching architecture, asymmetric competition, resource limitation, and other sources of mortality, which are not included in the deliberately simplified theory. The theory should apply to a wide range of forests despite large differences in abiotic environment, species diversity, and taxonomic and functional composition. en
dc.relation.ispartof Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America en
dc.title Extensions and evaluations of a general quantitative theory of forest structure and dynamics en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.srbnumber 110521
dc.identifier.doi 10.1073/pnas.0812303106
rft.jtitle Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
rft.volume 106
rft.issue 17
rft.spage 7046
rft.epage 7051
dc.description.SIUnit STRI en
dc.citation.spage 7046
dc.citation.epage 7051


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account