DSpace Repository

Sex differences in response to nonconspecific advertisement calls: receiver permissiveness in male and female tungara frogs

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bernal, Ximena E. en
dc.contributor.author Rand, Austin Stanley en
dc.contributor.author Ryan, Michael J. en
dc.date.accessioned 2012-04-03T19:50:03Z
dc.date.available 2012-04-03T19:50:03Z
dc.date.issued 2007
dc.identifier.citation Bernal, Ximena E., Rand, Austin Stanley, and Ryan, Michael J. 2007. "<a href="https://repository.si.edu/handle/10088/18239">Sex differences in response to nonconspecific advertisement calls: receiver permissiveness in male and female tungara frogs</a>." <em>Animal Behaviour</em>. 73 (6):955&ndash;964. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.10.018">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.10.018</a> en
dc.identifier.issn 0003-3472
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10088/18239
dc.description.abstract In many species, males advertise to both male and female audiences. Given the asymmetry in fitness costs of recognition errors in response to mating signals for the sexes, usually higher for females than males, males are expected to be more permissive than females in their responses to signals. Few studies, however, have investigated such differences and there is no consensus on which sex is more permissive to signal variation. We examined the evoked vocal responses of male tu&#39;ngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus, to 14 species of heterospecific and ancestral male mating calls to evaluate the influence of call similarity and phylogenetic distance on their responses. We also compared male calling responses to female phonotactic responses to examine the propensity of response errors between the sexes. Recognition errors were higher for males than females, as predicted by the different costs associated with recognition errors for each sex. Males responded to the calls of most species with mating calls, and produced aggressive calls in response to two other heterospecific/ancestral calls. The responses of males were explained by phylogenetic distance but not by overall call similarity. Similarly, females were more likely to show phonotaxis to calls of species and ancestors that were more closely related. Therefore, evolutionary history has left a perceptual footprint on the brain of both sexes but the details seem to differ. We discuss proximate reasons underlying sexual differences in receiver permissiveness in tu&#39;ngara frogs and potential factors leading to their evolution. en
dc.relation.ispartof Animal Behaviour en
dc.title Sex differences in response to nonconspecific advertisement calls: receiver permissiveness in male and female tungara frogs en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.srbnumber 55404
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.10.018
rft.jtitle Animal Behaviour
rft.volume 73
rft.issue 6
rft.spage 955
rft.epage 964
dc.description.SIUnit NH-EOL en
dc.description.SIUnit STRI en
dc.citation.spage 955
dc.citation.epage 964


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account