DSpace Repository

Dynamics of carbon, biomass, and structure in two Amazonian forests

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pyle, Elizabeth Hammond en
dc.contributor.author Santoni, Gregory W. en
dc.contributor.author Nascimento, Henrique E. M. en
dc.contributor.author Hutyra, Lucy R. en
dc.contributor.author Vieira, Simone en
dc.contributor.author Curran, Daniel J. en
dc.contributor.author van Haren, Joost en
dc.contributor.author Saleska, Scott R. en
dc.contributor.author Chow, V. Y. en
dc.contributor.author Carmago, Plinio B. en
dc.contributor.author Laurance, William F. en
dc.contributor.author Wofsy, Steven C. en
dc.date.accessioned 2011-02-28T13:13:21Z
dc.date.available 2011-02-28T13:13:21Z
dc.date.issued 2008
dc.identifier.citation Pyle, Elizabeth Hammond, Santoni, Gregory W., Nascimento, Henrique E. M., Hutyra, Lucy R., Vieira, Simone, Curran, Daniel J., van Haren, Joost, Saleska, Scott R., Chow, V. Y., Carmago, Plinio B., Laurance, William F., and Wofsy, Steven C. 2008. "<a href="https%3A%2F%2Frepository.si.edu%2Fhandle%2F10088%2F12907">Dynamics of carbon, biomass, and structure in two Amazonian forests</a>." <em>Journal of Geophysical Research. G. Biogeosciences</em>. 113:G00B08&ndash;G00B08. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000592">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000592</a> en
dc.identifier.issn 0148-0227
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10088/12907
dc.description.abstract Amazon forests are potentially globally significant sources or sinks for atmospheric carbon dioxide. In this study, we characterize the spatial trends in carbon storage and fluxes in both live and dead biomass (necromass) in two Amazonian forests, the Biological Dynamic of Forest Fragments Project (BDFFP), near Manaus, Amazonas, and the Tapajos National Forest (TNF) near Santarem, Para. We assessed coarse woody debris (CWD) stocks, tree growth, mortality, and recruitment in ground-based plots distributed across the terra firme forest at both sites. Carbon dynamics were similar within each site, but differed significantly between the sites. The BDFFP and the TNF held comparable live biomass (167 +/- 7.6 MgC.ha(-1) versus 149 +/- 6.0 MgC.ha(-1), respectively), but stocks of CWD were 2.5 times larger at TNF (16.2 +/- 1.5 MgC.ha(-1) at BDFFP, versus 40.1 +/- 3.9 MgC.ha(-1) at TNF). A model of current forest dynamics suggests that the BDFFP was close to carbon balance, and its size class structure approximated a steady state. The TNF, by contrast, showed rapid carbon accrual to live biomass (3.24 +/- 0.22 MgC.ha(-1).a(-1) in TNF, 2.59 +/- 0.16 MgC.ha(-1).a(-1) in BDFFP), which was more than offset by losses from large stocks of CWD, as well as ongoing shifts of biomass among size classes. This pattern in the TNF suggests recovery from a significant disturbance. The net loss of carbon from the TNF will likely last 10 - 15 years after the initial disturbance (controlled by the rate of decay of coarse woody debris), followed by uptake of carbon as the forest size class structure and composition continue to shift. The frequency and longevity of forests showing such disequilibruim dynamics within the larger matrix of the Amazon remains an essential question to understanding Amazonian carbon balance. en
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Geophysical Research. G. Biogeosciences en
dc.title Dynamics of carbon, biomass, and structure in two Amazonian forests en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.srbnumber 76815
dc.identifier.doi 10.1029/2007JG000592
rft.jtitle Journal of Geophysical Research. G. Biogeosciences
rft.volume 113
rft.spage G00B08
rft.epage G00B08
dc.description.SIUnit STRI en
dc.citation.spage G00B08
dc.citation.epage G00B08


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account