DSpace Repository

To avoid or deter: interactions among defensive and escape strategies in sabellid worms

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kicklighter, Cynthia E. en
dc.contributor.author Hay, Mark E. en
dc.date.accessioned 2011-02-09T20:04:17Z
dc.date.available 2011-02-09T20:04:17Z
dc.date.issued 2007
dc.identifier.citation Kicklighter, Cynthia E. and Hay, Mark E. 2007. "<a href="https://repository.si.edu/handle/10088/11969">To avoid or deter: interactions among defensive and escape strategies in sabellid worms</a>." <em>Oecologia</em>. 151 (1):161&ndash;173. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0567-0">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0567-0</a> en
dc.identifier.issn 0029-8549
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10088/11969
dc.description.abstract Numerous studies demonstrate how sessile marine organisms utilize chemical, structural, and nutritional deterrents to persist in predator-rich environments. Little is known, however, about how mobile, more behaviorally complex species minimize predation by integrating avoidance and deterrence strategies. We investigated this using sabellid polychaete worms from the Caribbean and temperate western Atlantic. Sabellids extend their feather-like radioles beyond their protective tubes for feeding and respiration; the body remains inside the tube and the radioles retract when threatened. We used co-occurring consumers to determine the palatability of radioles and bodies for each of the eight species tested. In addition, we examinedchemical or structural traits aVecting palatability and evaluated predator escape traits, such as tube strength, speed of radiole retraction, completeness of retraction,and sensitivity to a nearby disturbance. All species had unpalatable radioles that were chemically or structurally defended, but only two species had unpalatable bodies. Thus, most species allocated defenses to tissues that were most exposed to predation. The two species with chemically defended bodies, Bispira brunnea and Bispira variegata, relied less on behavioral escapes than the other species. Their tubes were weak, they did not retract until disturbances were very close, and B. brunnea retracted slowly and incompletely even when touched. Other species generally had stronger tubes and/or retracted when disturbances were farther away. This trade-oV of deterrence versus escape even occurred within a single species when populations diVered in palatability. Populations of B.variegata from North Carolina and Georgia were chemically deterrent to both temperate and tropical consumers, while populations from Panama and Florida were palatable. The more palatable Panama population retracted in response to distant movement, while the unpalatable North Carolina population did not retract until nearly touched. Thus, most species utilize a combination of predator avoidance and deterrence strategies, but more deterrent populations of species utilized avoidance less. en
dc.relation.ispartof Oecologia en
dc.title To avoid or deter: interactions among defensive and escape strategies in sabellid worms en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.srbnumber 55530
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s00442-006-0567-0
rft.jtitle Oecologia
rft.volume 151
rft.issue 1
rft.spage 161
rft.epage 173
dc.description.SIUnit NH-EOL en
dc.description.SIUnit STRI en
dc.citation.spage 161
dc.citation.epage 173


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account