DSpace Repository

Social organization and variation in cooperative alliances among male lance-tailed manakins

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Duval, Emily H. en
dc.date.accessioned 2011-02-09T20:02:49Z
dc.date.available 2011-02-09T20:02:49Z
dc.date.issued 2007
dc.identifier.citation Duval, Emily H. 2007. "<a href="https%3A%2F%2Frepository.si.edu%2Fhandle%2F10088%2F11872">Social organization and variation in cooperative alliances among male lance-tailed manakins</a>." <em>Animal Behaviour</em>. 73 (3):391&ndash;401. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.05.017">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.05.017</a> en
dc.identifier.issn 0003-3472
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10088/11872
dc.description.abstract In species where males form cooperative alliances for the purposes of reproduction, there may be considerable variation in the strength and size of alliances observed within one population. Male lance-tailed manakins, Chiroxiphia lanceolata, form long-term cooperative alliances to court females on group-occupied display areas. I investigated male status and alliance structure in a colour-banded population. Each display area was a group territory attended by multiple adult and subadult males. Alpha males were present at display areas more often than other males, performed solo courtship displays for females, and vocalized distinctively in paired displays. Alphaebeta pairs had high duetting association index values and performed two types of paired courtship displays for females. I combined these characteristics in a predictive logistic regression model to assess male status probabilistically when not all key behaviours were observed. Typically, one alpha and one beta male occupied each display area, but males also formed multiple alliances (one alpha paired with multiple high-ranking subordinates) or were solitary, with no distinct alliances. Both alliances and solitary alphas attracted females for courtship displays. Alphas were generally older than their beta partners, but age did not absolutely predict status. Individual alpha males were involved in different alliance types in different years, showing that alliance variation is not the result of fixed differences in individual strategies. Instead, variation apparently results from changing opportunities for partnership formation and territory acquisition. en
dc.relation.ispartof Animal Behaviour en
dc.title Social organization and variation in cooperative alliances among male lance-tailed manakins en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.srbnumber 55453
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.05.017
rft.jtitle Animal Behaviour
rft.volume 73
rft.issue 3
rft.spage 391
rft.epage 401
dc.description.SIUnit Encyclopedia of Life en
dc.description.SIUnit Forces of Change en
dc.description.SIUnit Chiroxiphia lanceolata en
dc.description.SIUnit cooperation en
dc.description.SIUnit courtship display en
dc.description.SIUnit Naos en
dc.description.SIUnit STRI en
dc.description.SIUnit filename_problems en
dc.citation.spage 391
dc.citation.epage 401


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account