DSpace Repository

Who is working on ant physiology? There is room to improve international collaborations

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Virola-V, Brenda Sofia
dc.contributor.author Abrego, Jeancarlos
dc.contributor.author Castillo, Dilma
dc.contributor.author Bonilla, Eleodoro
dc.contributor.author Gálvez, Dumas
dc.date.accessioned 2022-09-09T01:31:07Z
dc.date.available 2022-09-09T01:31:07Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier 1994-4136
dc.identifier.citation Virola-V, Brenda Sofia, Abrego, Jeancarlos, Castillo, Dilma, Bonilla, Eleodoro, and Gálvez, Dumas. 2022. "<a href="https://repository.si.edu/handle/10088/114526">Who is working on ant physiology? There is room to improve international collaborations</a>." <em>Myrmecological News</em>, 32 115–125. <a href="https://doi.org/10.25849/myrmecol.news_032:115">https://doi.org/10.25849/myrmecol.news_032:115</a>.
dc.identifier.issn 1994-4136
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10088/114526
dc.description.abstract Ants are an abundant and diverse group with worldwide distribution. Given their omnipresence, ecosystem services, and potential applications, ants may be excellent models for multiple lines of research such as physiology. However, the focus and worldwide distribution of ant physiology research are unknown. Given the evidence of scientific colonialism in multiple scientific areas -where credit and reward are not given to local scientists from developing nations when scien-tist s from wealthier nations travel for research -we examined the potential for such trends in studies of ant physiology. We investigated the frequency of studies and collaborations across countries during 2015 -2019, which simultaneously allowed us to estimate the most studied taxa. We found that the largest proportion of studies was done in Europe and North America. Collaboration trends were mainly among high-income countries. Nearly one third of the countries that served as sampling sites were not represented in authorship (mostly low-and middle-income). Furthermore, low-and middle-income countries show a lower proportion of authorship or co-authorship when these countries served as sampling sites, as compared with high-income countries. This disparity might indicate scientific colonialism in the field. However, collaborations between institutions from the sampling country and their foreign counterparts increased with the per capita Gross Domestic Product, suggesting a link between country&#39;s participation in international collaboration and its economic prosperity. How publications are circulated may further influence trends in scientific colonialism. Both the probability that a study reaches the public sphere (Altmetric) and the number of citations increase with the impact factor (IF) of the journal in which the article was published. Unfortunately, high-IF journals often show the highest Article Processing Charges, which can be a financial impediment for institutions in low-and middle-income countries. Our study highlights factors that influence the process of research in this field. The evidence of scientific colonialism in ant physiology that we highlight in this study calls for urgent measures to promote more equitable collaborative efforts.
dc.format.extent 115–125
dc.publisher Oesterreichische Gesell Entomofaunistik
dc.relation.ispartof Myrmecological News 32
dc.title Who is working on ant physiology? There is room to improve international collaborations
dc.type article
sro.identifier.refworksID 94235
sro.identifier.itemID 166244
sro.description.unit STRI
sro.identifier.doi 10.25849/myrmecol.news_032:115
sro.identifier.url https://repository.si.edu/handle/10088/114526
sro.publicationPlace Wien, Austria


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account