DSpace Repository

Ecogeographic variation and taxonomic boundaries in Large Treeshrews (Scandentia, Tupaiidae: <I>Tupaia tana</I> Raffles, 1821) from Southeast Asia

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Juman, Maya M. en
dc.contributor.author Woodman, Neal en
dc.contributor.author Olson, Link E. en
dc.contributor.author Sargis, Eric J. en
dc.date.accessioned 2021-09-16T02:01:07Z
dc.date.available 2021-09-16T02:01:07Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.citation Juman, Maya M., Woodman, Neal, Olson, Link E., and Sargis, Eric J. 2021. "<a href="https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article/102/4/1054/6301373">Ecogeographic variation and taxonomic boundaries in Large Treeshrews (Scandentia, Tupaiidae: <I>Tupaia tana</I> Raffles, 1821) from Southeast Asia</a>." <em>Journal of mammalogy</em> 102 (4):1054-1066. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyab059">https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyab059</a> en
dc.identifier.issn 0022-2372
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/10088/111322
dc.description.abstract The Large Treeshrew, Tupaia tana Raffles, 1821, is a small mammal (~205 g) from Southeast Asia with a complicated taxonomic history. Currently, 15 subspecies are recognized from Borneo, Sumatra, and smaller islands, and many were originally differentiated based on minor pelage differences and small sample sizes. We explored intraspecific variation in T. tana using quantitative osteological data obtained from the hands and skulls of museum specimens. Multivariate analyses reveal extensive overlap among T. tana populations in morphospace, indicating that the majority of currently recognized subspecies are not morphometrically distinct. In contrast, the separation between Bornean and Sumatran populations of T. tana is sufficient to recognize them as different subspecies. Comparisons of Bornean specimens to those on small, offshore islands reveal that the latter average smaller body size. This pattern is inconsistent with Foster's island rule, which predicts that island populations of small mammals (&lt; 5 kg) will average larger body size relative to mainland forms. A similar lack of support for ecogeographic rules has been noted in T. glis (Diard, 1820), suggesting that these "rules" are poor predictors of geographic variation in treeshrews. en
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of mammalogy en
dc.title Ecogeographic variation and taxonomic boundaries in Large Treeshrews (Scandentia, Tupaiidae: <I>Tupaia tana</I> Raffles, 1821) from Southeast Asia en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.srbnumber 160435
dc.identifier.doi 10.1093/jmammal/gyab059
rft.jtitle Journal of mammalogy
rft.volume 102
rft.issue 4
rft.spage 1054
rft.epage 1066
dc.description.SIUnit NMNH en
dc.description.SIUnit NH-Vertebrate Zoology en
dc.citation.spage 1054
dc.citation.epage 1066
dc.relation.url https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article/102/4/1054/6301373


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account