Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics VOLUME 5, NUMBER 14 THE SPACE DENSITY OF ATMOSPHERIC DUST IN THE ALTITUDE RANGE 50,000 TO 90,000 FEET by PAUL W. HODGE AND FRANCES W. WRIGHT SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Washington, D.C. 1962 Publications of the Astrophysical Observatory This series, Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics, was inaugurated in 1956 to provide a proper communication for the results of research con- ducted at the Astrophysical Observatory of the Smithsonian Institution. Its purpose is the "increase and diffusion of knowledge" in the field of astro- physics, with particular emphasis on the problems of the sun, the earth, and the solar system. Its pages are open to a limited number of papers by other investigators with whom we have common interests. Another series is Annals of the Astrophysical Observatory. It was started in 1900 by the Observatory's first director, Samuel P. Langley, and has been published about every 10 years since that date. These quarto volumes, some of which are still available, record the history of the Observatory's researches and activities. Many technical papers and volumes emanating from the Astrophysical Observatory have appeared in the Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections. Among these are Smithsonian Physical Tables, Smithsonian Meteorological Tables, and World Weather Records. Additional information concerning these publications may be secured from the Editorial and Publications Division, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. FEED L. WHIPPLE, Director, Astrophysical Observatory, Smithsonian Institution. Cambridge, Mass. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. - Price 30 cents The Space Density of Atmospheric Dust in the Altitude Range 50,000 to 90,000 Feet' By Paul W. Hodge2 and Frances W. Wright3 The importance of collecting and analyzing meteoritic dust particles has been enhanced by the recent suggestion of a remarkably localized dust cloud about the earth (Whipple, 1961a), and by the likelihood that this dust has a lunar origin (Whipple, 1961b). Artificial satel- lites efficiently provide the evidence for the probable existence of the earth's dust belt; however, they are not yet capable of capturing samples of this material and returning them to earth for analysis. For such highly desirable samples we must at present rely on the earth's atmosphere to act as a cushion, braking the high-velocity particles and concentrating them in sufficient numbers for collection on high- flying aircraft and balloons. The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory has been employing jet aircraft and balloons to collect particles from various levels of the stratosphere. In previous publications we have described a series of particle collections made at altitudes of 30,000 to 50,000 feet (Hodge and Rinehart, 1958; Hodge, 1961; Wright, Hodge, and Fireman, 1961). Fireman and Kist- ner (1961) and Riggs, Wright, and Hodge (1962) have made chemical analyses of some of these particles. The present paper presents results 1 This work was supported in part by Contract AF 19(604)-6627 with the Qeophysical Research Directorate, Air Force Cambridge Research Center, Cambridge, Mass. We wish to acknowledge the excellent assistance of the Flight Research Center of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Edwards, California, and of Mr. Terry Larson of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 1 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and Berkeley Astronomical Department, University of California. * Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and Harvard College Ob- servatory, Cambridge, Mass. of the first of a series of collections at altitudes between 50,000 and 90,000 feet, made in cooperation with the Flight Research Center of the National Aeronautics and Space Adminis- tration. Collecting procedure The collector.?The device used in the present collecting program is a refinement of our first collector, which was flown on a U-2 (see photograph in the paper by Rados, 1960, that describes our U-2 program). It is nearly identical with the device flown on the B-52 (Hodge, 1961), although mounted on the air- craft differently. Air is admitted to an ex- pansion chamber and filtered by a Millipore filter, which retains all particles down to the submicron range. The shutter mechanism and filter housing are so designed that exposure of the filter to air at times other than the period during which the shutter is open in flight is minimized. Location on aircraft.?The collector was flown on an F-104A aircraft by the Flight Research Center of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, out of Edwards, Calif. Plate 1 shows the device in place on the tip of the right wing of the aircraft; an identical collector was also mounted on the left wing, but it was not in operation. The wing tip was chosen as a prime location because contamination of the sample by the body of the craft was minimized. Flight characteristics.?A pressure switch in- stalled on the wing activated the shutter at an altitude of about 55,000 feet, so that dust was collected continuously at all heights above this limit. The flights of the F-104A on which 231 644484?62 232 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ASTROPHYSICS VOL. B collections were made were typically short- duration, high-altitude climbs to above 80,000 feet. Collections were made on nine such flights. Heights, velocities, temperatures and wind characteristics for each flight are shown in table 5. Examination of samples Microscope procedure.?We made a general survey of each filter (40 mm in diameter) from edge to edge, with a microscope of 200 X magni- fication, and measured, described, and recorded the position of all types of particles larger than 6/* (mean diameter). Then, within the central exposed portion of the filter (a circle of 14-mm diameter), we made a survey under 400 X magnification, and meas- ured, described, and recorded the positions of all opaque particles with mean diameters larger than 3/x. The numerical results of these two scannings are shown in table 1. Classification of particles.?We found that all particles examined were included in the follow- ing classification scheme: 1. Black, shiny metallic particles; they may be rough or smooth. Designation, M. 2. Black, non-shiny particles. Designation, B. 3. Dark brown and dark gray particles. Designation, Z>. 4. Gray, stone-colored chunks. Designation, Gy. 5. Colored particles, usually with smooth outlines; most of these seem to be semitransparent. Designation, C. 6. Transparent, clear particles. Designation, T. 7. Aluminum chips, from the walls of the collector. Designation, Al. 8. Green-black ovals. Designation, Gn-B. 9. Metallic particles similar in appearance to iron filings. Designation, M(C). The second scan, within the 14-mm circle, excluded the very numerous colored and trans- parent particles. The complete scanning data are given in table 4. Results Description of flights and collections.?The characteristics of the nine flights were all very nearly the same. Exposure times averaged 95 seconds, with a dispersion of about 20 percent; maximum altitudes averaged 83,000 feet with a dispersion of only 9 percent. The small differences in the exposure times or alti- tudes of different flights are not expected to affect greatly the number or nature of particles. For this reason the observed numbers of par- ticles are expected to reflect primarily differ- ences in space density rather than in flight characteristics. Table 1 summarizes the individual flight characteristics and scanning results, details of which are given more completely in table 5. Table 1 shows the total numbers of particles (with mean dimensions greater than 3M) on the exposed portions of each filter; this value was computed from counts on smaller areas, and over a different size range, by applying the appropriate multiplication factors (e.g., the known size distribution). The numbers of opaque particles given in table 1 are those directly observed and measured. TABLE 1.?Flight characteristics and number of non- aluminum particles Filter no. G8 G16 N l N2 N3 N4 N5 N7 N9 Exposure(sees) 103 77 92 94 87 96 100 102 103 Alt. range(1000 ft) 51 to 85 52 to 82 51 to 83 53 to 85 56 to 78 52 to 83 52 to 78 52 to 85 52 to 87 Total no. particles(mean di- ameter >3M) 80 560 2080 160 40 80 80 5200 120 No. opaque particles(mean di- ameter >3M) 43 69 359 81 15 40 18 510 63 From the data of table 1 three facts are evident. (1) The total number of particles and the number of opaque particles vary widely, over a range of two orders of magnitude. (2) The two values agree in their differences; when the number of all types of particles is high, the number of opaque particles is high. (3) The ratio of total to opaque varies between 2 and 10, and is larger when the actual values are larger. Computed space densities.?Because the col- lector's altitude and velocity varied widely during the collections, we cannot obtain straightforward space densities as a function of height. Instead, we obtain a mean value, weighted according to altitude by the volume encountered as a function of altitude. This space density is computed by HODGE AND WRIGHT PLATE 1 SPACE DENSITY OF ATMOSPHERIC DUST 233 where p is the weighted mean density, k is the efficiency of the collector, NQ is the number of collected particles (total minus contamination), and V is the volume encountered by the col- lector (kV is the volume swept out). In our case, iV0 is taken as equal to the value given in table 1 if we assume no contamination (thus giving an upper limit to p). The volume encountered is taken to be TABLE 2.?Particles per cubic meter (mean diam- eter >3M). V=A V\(t)dt, where A is the area of the opening of the col- lector (3X10-6m2); v(t) is the aircraft's velocity as a function of time; and tx is the time of the beginning, and t2 the time of the end of the exposure. We do not have direct values for v(t), but we do know M(t), the Mach number as a func- tion of time. This value is related to the velocity of the plane with respect to the air by v(t)=20.lM(t)JT(t), where M(/) is the Mach number and T(t) is the temperature in absolute units. Thus we can compute the average space density of particles by the equation 6X10" 'M(t) particles/m3 This has been done numerically for the flights, and results are given in table 2. The volume of air sampled in each case is nearly one cubic meter, and the value for kp~ is normally of the order of 150 particles per cubic meter for all particles with diameters greater than 3;u- The average value is 156, excluding Nl and N7 (see below). The efficiency k of the collector has been de- termined from wind-tunnel tests carried out by P. Stroom of General Mills. He made an ex- perimental calibration by injecting particles into the air stream, and then comparing the number collected by our device and that col- lected by a collector of known efficiency. The calibration showed that at Mach 0.6 and alti- tude 50,000 feet our collector is 15 percent Filter no. G8 G16 N l N2 N3 N4 N5 N7 N9 kp 80 480 2290 192 38 82 85 5720 132 efficient. This low efficiency results from the very small pore-size of the filters and from some loss on the walls and other portions of the col- lector. The central part of the collector re- tained 7 percent of the particles; the remainder were concentrated near the edges. Calcula- tions based on pressure differentials measured in the wind tunnel indicate that the efficiency of filtering increases with velocity and decreases with height. For a typical F-104A flight this efficiency varies between 0.7 and 4.1 times that of the nights at 50,000 feet and Mach 0.6. Experimental tests with particles were not carried out for Mach numbers greater than 0.6, so that we estimate the efficiency from the pressure data. We believe that a realistic time average for the F-104A flights is an efficiency of approximately 15 percent ? 3 . We adopt a value of 0.15 for k; the derived space density p is nearly 7 times the values of kp tabulated in table 2. Thus the space density is normally of the order of 1000 particles larger than 3/x per cubic meter. 0.0 70 H (1000 ft . ) FIGURE l.?The volume of air, F, encountered by the collector between heights H and H-f 5,000 feet, expressed as a function of altitude. 234 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ASTROPHYSICS In figure 1, the volume of air encountered is shown as a function of altitude for the typical flight on which filter G8 was flown. The dia- gram indicates that the volume of air is not a rapidly varying function of altitude, and that, within the accuracy to which we can discuss the present data, the computed p is very nearly equivalent to a mean space density for altitudes between 55,000 and 85,000 feet. On two filters, Nl and N7, the calculated values of k~p are much greater than the average. This seems to be the result not of contamina- tion, but of the encounter of the aircraft with a dust-enriched portion of air. We have found that accidentally contaminated samples, such as N6 and N8 (see table 4), contain large amounts of aluminum particles, while the amount of aluminum dust on filters Nl and N7 was equal to the normal background count. In each case, and especially for filter Nl , there is a large cluster of particles, nearly centered on the filter, where most of the dust is located (fig. 2). The remainder of the filter has the density of particles typical of the other filters. Thus the unusually high count is due ex- clusively to the compact cluster, which appears to consist of fragments of a larger, conglomerate particle that may have disintegrated on contact with the filter or while entering the collector. Such a particle must have been relatively fragile and of low density, with a diameter of the order of 100/z and mass of the order of 10~7 gm. It is tempting to enquire whether such a particle can be extraterrestrial in origin. Meteor studies suggest that meteoroids are primarily low-density, fragile bodies derived from comets. Fragments of such bodies might well have the appearance of the object we collected. It is of great importance to check such a possibility by means of more collections. TABLE 3.?The size distribution of particles with mean diameters larger than 3M; the limiting mean diameter of opaque particles collected on these filters was 21ft. TABLE 4.?Complete scanning data Mean diameter (microns) 3.0 to 5.9 6.0 to 8.9 9.0 to 11.9 12.0 to 14.9 15.0 to 17.9 18.0 to 20.9 Percent of total sample 67.3 26.2 4.8 1.2 0.4 0.1 Filter No. G8 G16 N l N2 N3 N4 N5 N6* N7 N8* N9 No. particles of all types in 14 mm2 with mean diam. > 6 M 1 7 26 2 0.5 1 1 131.2 65 5 1.5 No. particles in 140 mean diameter Total: all but CandT 43 69 359 81 15 40 18 441 510 260 63 B and M 34 40 309 38 12 24 6 86 227 32 28 Gy 3 12 87 5 1 1 1 36 39 35 3 mm2 > 3 M M(O 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 133 6 151 2 with Al 27 143 99 75 16 16 16 1592 122 947 2 ? Unexposed and heavily contaminated; flown on left wing, new collector. From our limited data, assuming k=l for this encounter, we calculate tentative space den- sities of 0.1 such particle per cubic meter. This corresponds to a rate of fall on the earth of about 104 tons/day, using the method of estimating the mass rate of fall described by Fireman and Kistner (1961). Conclusions From microscopic studies of particles collected in the upper atmosphere, we find that at alti- tudes of 50,000 to 90,000 feet there are per cubic meter approximately 1000 particles larger than 3M in diameter. This is approximately one-fourth of the value derived by identical methods at altitudes of 40,000 to 50,000 feet. The space density may fluctuate widely. A maximum of roughly 30 percent of these are opaque particles, so that the upper limit for the space density of meteoritic dust in the atmos- phere must be approximately 300 particles larger than 3n per cubic meter. Using the assumptions of Fireman and Kistner (1961), we calculate an upper limit to the influx rate of meteoritic material of roughly 104 tons/day. The tentatively identified meteoric particles give a lower limit of 104 tons/day for their influx rate. We plan to make further collections with a more refined collecting device. These will attempt to determine (1) the nature and num- ber of the large fragile particles, such as those SPACE DENSITY OF ATMOSPHERIC DUST 235 S " X ? 2 m m FIGURE 2.?The distribution of 359 opaque particles on filter Nl , showing the dump of particles believed to have resulted from the disintegration of a larger fragile particle on impact or while entering the collector. 236 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ASTROPHYSICS on filter N l ; (2) the distribution with height of the opaque particles to test the present indica- tion of a lack of decrease with height; and (3) the chemical composition of those particles that from their distribution with height appear to be extraterrestrial. TABLE 5.?Flight data far filters Explanation of column heads: (2), time after take-off; (3), Mach number for plane's velocity; (4), the dynamic pressure of the air on the aircraft, measured in pounds per square foot. The figures in columns (5), (6), and (7) were obtained by a meteorological balloon on the day of the plane flight.] FILTER G8 Date of flight, June 21, I960. Altitude range at which filter was exposed, 51,600 to 85,400 feet. Mach number range during the exposure of the fllter,0.65tol.70. Airplane beading, from magnetic north, 0.65?. Take- ofl time, 0815 P.S.T. Length of time filter was exposed, 102.7 seconds. General atmospheric conditions, clear, ground haze. Time of tempera- ture and wind data, 0810 P.S.T. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Altitude (ft.) 50,000 55,000 60,000 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 85,000 85,000 80,000 75,000 70,000 65,000 60.000 55,000 50,000 Time (sec.) 75.5 79.8 84.0 88.7 93.3 98.8 107.8 122.5 130.0 146.0 154.0 159.5 164.5 169.7 174.5 179.5 Mach no. 1.75 1.66 1.54 1.40 1.25 1.08 0.89 0.66 0.66 0.90 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.46 1.44 q (p.s.f.) 515 370 250 145 100 60 30 15 12 35 60 95 140 205 285 355 Fn/TEB O1S Temp. (C) -68 .3? - 6 5 . 9 - 6 3 . 1 - 6 6 . 7 - 5 4 . 0 - 5 2 . 6 ?49.3 - 4 5 . 8 Wind speed (knots) 35 14 03 12 18 21 30 31 Wind direction 260? 265 040 099 104 100 080 090 Date of flight, July 15,1960. Altitude range, 51,600 to 82,000 feet. Mach no. range, 0.75 to 1.58. Airplane heading, from magnetic north, 065?. Take-off time, 0940 P.S.T. Length of time filter was exposed, 76.7 seconds. Oenerel atmospheric conditions, clear. Time of temperature and wind data, 0820 P.S.T. (U (2) (3) (4) (5) (8) (7) FILTER N l Date of flight, August 2, 1960. Altitude range, 51,000 to 83,200 feet. Mach no. range, 0.44 to 1.65. Airplane heading, from magnetic north, 245?. Take-off time, 0949 P.S.T. Length of time filter was exposed, 91.7 seconds. General atmospheric conditions, clear. Time of tem- perature and wind data, 0820 P.S.T. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) 50,000 55,000 60,000 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 85,000 80,000 75,000 70,000 65,000 60,000 55,000 50,000 21.5 25.6 29.7 33.8 38.1 43.6 52.6 ? 86.5 97.2 102.7 107.1 111. 114.8 118.2 1.80 1.66 1.51 1.37 1.21 1.07 0.90 ? 0.67 1.00 1.17 1.30 1.40 1.49 1.57 550 365 240 155 92 61 32 ? 18 50 90 ? 205 295 410 -65 .8? - 6 5 . 4 - 6 0 . 8 - 5 8 . 4 - 5 3 . 2 - 5 1 . 9 - 4 8 . 3 - 4 7 . 8 18 16 12 16 19 29 24 27 203? 150 130 105 106 098 124 092 FILTER N2 Date of flight, August 9, 1960. Altitude range, 52,700 to 85,400 feet. Mach no. range, 0.57 to 1.69. Airplane heading, from magnetic north, 265?. Take-off time, 0958 P.S.T. Length of time filter was exposed, 94 seconds. General atmospheric conditions, clear. Time of tempera- ture and wind data, 0925 P.S.T. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) 50,000 65,000 60,000 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 85,000 85,000 80,000 75,000 70,000 65,000 60,000 55,000 60,000 30.4 35.0 39.2 43.6 48.7 55.7 61.8 76.0 86.5 100.5 107.2 113.0 120.4 123.0 127.1 131.0 1.83 1.69 1.51 1.36 1.16 0.95 0.83 0.59 0.59 0.82 0.99 1.13 1.35 1.42 1.51 1.56 550 370 235 160 95 46 28 11 11 28 50 84 190 220 300 400 FILTER N 3 -68 .4? - 6 8 . 6 - 6 3 . 5 - 6 7 . 3 - 5 4 . 5 - 5 1 . 8 - 4 7 . 7 - 4 5 . 6 16 9 7 15 25 25 23 24 300' 114 062 096 090 097 090 094 Date of flight, August 12, 1960. Altitude range, 55,500 to 78,000 feet. Mach no. range, 1.19 to 1.73. Airplane heading, from magnetic north, 246?. Take-off time, 1200 P.S.T. Length of time filter was exposed, 87 seconds. General atmospheric conditions, clear. Time of temperature and wind data, 0730 P.S.T. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) 50.000 55.000 60.000 65.000 70,000 75,000 80.000 85.000 80.000 75,000 70,000 65,000 60.000 55,000 50.0P0 26.0 30.0 34.7 39.5 45. 3 51.2 61.0 ? 82.0 93.5 101.0 106.8 112.2 117.0 121.8 1.71 1.61 1.46 1.30 1.14 1.00 0. SI ? 0. S7 1.10 1.26 1.36 1.45 1.48 1.47 ? ? ? 146 86 53 28 ? 26 50 87 132 ? ? ? - 6 7 . 7? - 6 6 . 4 - 6 4 . 7 - 5 8 . 8 - 5 6 . 3 - 5 3 . 7 ?50. 1 - 4 6 . 1 16 15 13 17 22 29 33 26 245? 188 156 108 72 84 90 90 50,000 55,000 60,000 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 85,000 80,000 75,000 70,000 65,000 60,000 55,000 60,000 235.4 241.2 247.0 253.7 262.3 273.0 _ _ 301.4 310.3 318.2 325.5 331.3 336.3 1.80 1.74 1.65 1.53 1.38 1.25 _ 1.25 1.35 1.46 1.57 1.65 1.69 555 420 285 190 115 75 80 120 175 265 385 480 -69 .9? - 7 0 . 8 - 6 3 . 5 - 5 8 . 8 - 5 6 . 7 - 4 9 . 6 - 5 0 . 7 - 4 6 . 5 03 12 15 12 20 23 24 21 231 106 088 080 070 083 100 094 SPACE DENSITY OF ATMOSPHERIC DUST 237 TABLE 5.?Flight data for filters?Continued FILTER N4 Date of flight, August 25, 1960. Altitude range, 51,600 to 82,700 feet. Macb no. range, 0.66 to 1.74. Airplane heading, from magnetic north, 245?. Take-ofl time, 1150 P.S.T. Length of time filter was exposed, 96 seconds. General atmospheric conditions, clear. Time of tempera- ture and wind data, 0935 P.S.T. Airplane missed runway on landing; possible contamination by dust from crash trucks. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) 50,000 55,000 60,000 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 85,000 80,000 75,000 70,000 65,000 60,000 55,000 50,000 36.4 41.4 46.6 62.0 58.7 66.0 72.0 ? 99.3 104.6 112.7 119.3 124.7 130.2 135.0 1.78 1.64 1.43 1.25 1.07 0.91 0.80 ? 0.77 0.86 1.05 1.23 1.35 1.49 1.57 530 350 215 125 75 40 30 ? 30 40 70 125 190 295 430 FILTER N5 -67 .3? -67 .0 -60 .6 -57 .9 -53 .2 -51 .2 -48 .9 -45 .0 30 18 06 07 12 21 25 24 250? 257 190 143 120 100 100 090 Date of flight, August 31, 1960. Altitude range, 51,600 to 78,200 feet. Mach no. range, 0.66 to 1.75. Airplane beading, from magnetic north, 245?. Take-off time, 1015 P.S.T. Length of time filter was exposed, 99.5 seconds. General atmospheric conditions, clear. Time of tempera- ture and wind data, 0835 P.8.T. Dusty landing. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) 50,000 55,000 60,000 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 85,000 80,000 75,000 70,000 65,000 60,000 55,000 50,000 34.5 40.0 45.6 51.5 58.6 68.5 ? ? ? 104.5 113.5 120.4 126.3 131.7 136.8 1.80 1.63 1.45 1.28 1.07 0.82 ? ? ? 0.88 1.07 1.22 1.32 ? ? 550 380 205 140 75 35 ? ? ? 40 80 125 185 ? ? -61.8? -64 .9 -61 .2 - 5 4 . 9 -54 .9 -53 .0 -50 .2 -47 .3 28 14 12 12 15 18 19 24 197 185 171 118 090 100 086 090 FlLTEB N7 Date of flight, October 4, 1960. Altitude range, 52,000 to 85,200 feet. Mach no. range, 0.65 to 1.73. Airplane heading, from magnetic north, 245?. Take-off time, 0935 P.S.T. Length of time filter was exposed, 101.5 seconds. General atmospheric conditions, very clear, calm. Time of temperature and wind data, 1000 P.S.T. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) 50,000 55,000 60,000 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 85,000 85,000 80,000 75,000 70,000 65,000 60,000 55,000 50,000 35.0 39.7 40.5 49.6 54.8 59.9 08.3 84.0 91.0 108.0 115.5 122.0 127.0 132.5 137.5 143.0 1.85 1.71 1.69 1.39 1.23 1.11 0.87 0.66 0.65 0.88 1.06 1.22 1.31 1.41 1.46 1.46 575 390 370 360 100 60 30 12 12 28 60 95 135 210 280 360 -60.3? -62 .2 - 6 0 . 2 -57 .7 24 14 07 04 2.WO 230 224 229 Data not acquired for higher altitudes. FlLTEB N 9 Date of flight, October 4, 1960. Altitude range, 52,500 to 86,600 feet. Mach no. range, 0.76 to 1.80. Airplane beading from magnetic north, 245?. Take-off time, 1345 P.S.T. Length of time filter was exposed, 102.6 seconds. General atmospheric conditions, clear, wind at 10 knots. Time of temperature and wind data, 1000 F.S.T. (1) 50,000 65,000 60,000 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 85,000 85,000 80,000 75,000 70,000 65,000 60,000 55,000 50.000 (2) 33.5 38.7 43.3 48.3 53.2 59.8 66.8 77.8 97.8 108.4 116.3 122.0 127.4 132.3 137.2 142.5 (3) 1.90 1.76 1.65 1.47 1.32 1.14 0.99 0.81 0.81 0.99 1.14 1.27 1.37 1.45 1.52 1.57 (4) 625 420 285 175 115 60 40 20 20 40 70 105 155 215 305 410 (5) -60.3? - 6 2 . 2 - 6 0 . 2 -57 .7 (6) 24 14 07 04 (7) 250? 230 224 229 Data not acquired for higher altitudes References FIREMAN, E. L., AND KISTNEK, G. 1961. The nature of dust collected at high alti- tudes. Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, vol. 24, pp. 10-22. HODGE, P. W. 1961. Sampling dust from the stratosphere. Smithsonian Contr. Astrophys., vol. 5, No. 10, pp. 145-152. HODGE, P. W., AND RlNEHART, J. S. 1958. High-altitude collection of extraterrestrial particulate matter Paper presented at 100th meeting of the American Astro- nomical Society, Madison, Wis., June 29- July 2. (Abstract published in Astron. Journ., vol. 63, p. 306). RADOS, R. M. 1960. The U-2 as an instrumented aircraft for geophysical research. Weatherwise, vol. 13, p. 232 ff. RIGGS, F. G., JR.; WRIGHT, F. W.; AND HODGE, P. W. 1962. Chemical analysis of 643 particles collected by high-altitude aircraft and balloons. Smithsonian Astrophys. Obs., Special Report No. 99, 41 pp. WHIPPLE, F. L. 1961a. The particulate contents of space. In P. Campbell, ed., Medical and biological aspects of the energies of space, pp. 49- 70. Columbia University Press, New York. 1961b. The dust cloud about the earth. Nature, vol. 189, pp. 127-128. WRIGHT, F. W.; HODGE, P. W.; AND FIREMAN, E. L. 1961. A search for micrometeorites in the earth's atmosphere. Paper presented at 108th meeting of the American Astronomical Society, Nantucket, Mass., June 18-21. (Abstract published in Astron. Journ., vol. 66, pp. 298-299). 2 3 8 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ASTROPHYSICS VOL. B Abstract Collections of participate matter have been made in the altitude range from 50,000 to 90,000 feet by means of high-altitude, short-duration flights of an F-104A jet aircraft of the NASA Flight Research Center. The average space density of particles larger than 3/x in diameter is estimated to be 1000 particles per cubic meter at these altitudes. The derived space density varies considerably, as previously found for altitudes in the range from 40,000 to 50,000 feet. Only a small percentage of these particles are possibly meteoritic.