Oecologia (BerJ.) 5, 85-95 (1970) Spatial Competition among Porifera: Solution by Epizoism* KLAUS RUTZLER Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. 20560 Received March 15, 1970 Summary. Sponges settling on solid substrates which are separated by sediment bottoms compete for the limited space. Some species have solved this problem by occurring as epizoans, thus avoiding the risk of being expelled from the habitat. The supporting species on the other hand, are specialized in that they possess skeletogenous ectosomal structures and aquiferous processes to maintain their integrity and to escape starvation or suffocation. Although specimens are sometimes intimately interwoven no chimaerid mixing of tissues was observed. Introduction In sponges, as in all sedentary organisms, the dispersal of free? swimming larval stages is controlled by a number of physical and chemical parameters. Success of settlement and subsequent metamorphosis depends on the duration of favorable conditions. If these sensitive stages of the life history are completed successfully, only extreme forces will endanger the further development of the organism. . The availability of a suitable substrate is one of the critical factors for sponge colonization. In shallow water or wherever strong water movement occurs it should be solid or at least stable enough to permit development of the organism until sexual maturity is reached. Occa? sionally, the sponge itself contributes to the stabilization of its substrate by attaching to and thereby connecting several pieces of substrate (sand grains, shells, gravel, etc.) unless a sudden storm during estab? lishment of the colony prevents this effort. The influence of substrate stability on the species composition of shallow-water sponges in the Adriatic Sea has been demonstrated in an earlier contribution (Riitzler, 1965a). There also, some mechanisms of spatial competition were discussed. The most common situation is that fast growing and otherwise .. This work was supported in part by Smithsonian Research Foundation Grant Sg 068104. I thank Dr. H. Forstner (Innsbruck) for his assistance in the field. Miss M. Dwyer prepared the drawings. 7 Oecologia (Berl.), Vol. 5 86 K. Riitzler: robust species over-grow and suffocate their less vigorous neighbors, although several observations have been made on sponges which over? grow each other to a varying degree without any harm to eilher specimen. It is the purpose of this communication to discuss such species, and to present quantitative data and anatomical findings on these interspecific relationships. Materials and Methods Spatial competition among sponges was studied in three Adriatic localities (Istria, Yugoslavia) in May 1962, September 1964 and March 1968. The moderately wind-exposed bays of Korrente Cape and Andrija Island (Riitzler, 1965 b, Fig. 25) contain stable rocks of 15-200 liters volume in 1-10 m depth. They could be turned over by two divers in order to reach the sponge-covered lower surfaces. At the exposed Cape of Cuvi blocks of 5---':'15 liters were collected from 1 m depth where they were securely anchored in rock channels (Riitzler, 1965b, Figs. 25, 30). In Polari Bay several large boulders (1-3 m3 ) protrude from the sandy bay bottom in about 1.5-2 m of depth (Riitzler, 1965b, Figs. 25, 32). Numerous miniature caves measuring 15-40 cm across were eroded at the bases of the boulders. The sponges clustered on the upper surface of the cavities. The sponge crusts and clusters were measured (covered surface area in cm2, to nearest 0.5 cm), removed with a knife or scalpel, fixed in 4 % formalin in sea-water and, after a week, transferred to 80% ethylene alcohol. The specimen complexes were photographed or drawn in the laboratory and then roughly dissected with razor blades for gross anatomy. Representatiye samples were embedded in paraffin, or 12% gelatin with subsequent freezing (cryostat) and cut at 7 I.I.m. Mallory's stain and haemotoxylin-eosin were used for staining. Results Species Composition and Quantitative Data. The species composition on blocks from Korrente, Andrija and Cuvi was quite uniform. Only encrusting and low-growing (pillow-shaped) specimens were present, due to the limited vertical spaces between lower rock surface and sediment of the sea-floor. Tidal and wind-generated currents provide abundant nutrients and keep the crevices clear of sediments. The substrate itself provides protection from solar radiation and therefore inhibits growth of competing algae. The spatial limitations of these habitats exclude most scraping predators (e.g. echinoids, fishes). In summary, we are dealing with miniature cave habitats which provide all favorable conditions for abundant sponge growth but only restricted substrate areas which are separated by dynamic sediment bottoms. Spatial Competition among Porifera 87 Fig. 1. Sponge assemblage from miniature cave in Polari Bay (drawing after photo? graph and preserved specimens before dissecting). The main supporter of most of the assemblage is Fasciospongia cavernosa (a). Epizoic species which in parts are also supporters are: Ircinia spinosula (b), Crambe crambe (c), Ircinia oms (d), Clathrina falcata (e), Buskia sp. (Bryozoa, f), Bycon sp. (g), Antho involvens (h), Leuconia solida (i), Cornularia cornucopiae (Anthozoa, i) (1/2 x) The following six of a total of 34 sponge species are dominant in this environment (values in % of the area covered by the total sponge population) : 1rcinia oros ~ascios~ia cavernosa Crambe crambe A ntho involvens 1rcinia spinosula Spongia virgultosa 24.7% 14.2% 12.3% 6.8% 6.6% 6.6% One hundred and thirty four incidences in 54 species combinations were noted where specimens of the same or of different species were growing upon each other (Fig. 1). Where necessary, the healthy state of the overgrown sponge could be confirmed by histological sections. 7? Table I. Qualitative and quantitative data on sponge epizoism 00 Suppor~ing species Total size Over- Epizoic species Total size Epizoic Degree of 00 (cm2) grown (cm2) area attachment (No. of area (No. of (cm2) L=Low specimens) (cm2) specimens) M=Medium H=High Penares helleri (0. Schm.) 92.0 (2) 86.0 Prosuberites longispina Tops. 4.0 (I) 4.0 H Antho involvens (0. Schm.) 109.0 (I) 82.0 H Pachastrella monolilera 28.5 (3) 24.0 Terpios lugax Duch. and Mich. 4.5 (1) 4.5 H O. Schm. Myxilla rosacea (Lieberk.) 12.0 (1) 5.0 M Crambe crambe (0. Schm.) 14.5 (1) 14.5 H Placospongia decorticans 34.0 (1) 5.5 Clathrina clathrus (0. Schm.) 2.0 (1) 2.0 L (Hanitsch) Dysidea avara (0. Schm.) 3.5 (1) 3.5 L Mycale 7nassa (0. Schm.) 18.0 (1) 4.0 Haliclona viscosa Sara 11.5 (1) 4.0 H ~ Antho involvens (0. Schm.) 7.5 (1) 2.5 Clathrina lalcata (H.) 2.5 (1) 2.5 L ~ Agelas oroides (0. Schm.) 53.0 (1) 18.5 Oscarella lobularis (0. Schm.) 18.5 (1) 18.5 M =,.. N Gelliuslibulatus (0. Schm.) 72.0 (1) 4.5 Aplysilla sui/urea F. E. Schulze 4.5 (4) 4.5 H CD... Haliclona viscosa Sara 37.0 (2) 7.0 Mycale'rnassa (0. Schm.) 8.5 (1) 7.0 H Aplysilla sullurea F. E. Schulze 3.5 (6) 3.5 Gellius libulatus (0. Schm.) 122.0 (2) 3.5 H Dysidea avara I. pallescens 9.0 (1) 2.0 Clathrina lalcata (H.) 2.0 (1) 2.0 L Spongia virgultosa (0. Schm.) 189.0 (7) 172.0 CI!Lthrin!L clathrus (0. Schm.) 2.5 (1) 2.5 L Clathrina lalcata (H.) 6.5 (3) 6.5 L Oscarella lobulari.s (0. Schm.) 6.5 (1) 6.5 M Spirastrella cunctatrix O. Schm. 15.0 (1) 15.0 M Crambe crambe (0. Schm.) 56.0 (2) 56.0 M A nchinoe tenacior Tops. 23.5 (I) 23.5 M Antho involvens (0. Schm.) 24.0 (I) 17.0 M Gellius libulatus (0. Schm.) 8.0 (1) 8.0 1\'1 Dysidea avara I. pallescens (0. Schm.) 7.0 (1) 70 L Ircinia lascicutata (Pallas) 16.5 (1) 9.5 M Ircinia oros (0. Schm.) 16.5 (1) 16.5 L lrcinia (S.) spinosuta (0. Schm.) 4.0 (I) 4.0 L Hippospongia com1nunis (Lam.) 16.5 (1) 8.5 Anchi1we ten!tcior Tops. 8.5 (1) tl.5 1\1 Cucospongia scalar-is O. Schm. 6.5 (I) 4.5 Ircini!t oros (0. Schm.) 4.5 (I) 4.5 L lrcinia oros (0. Schm.) 476.0 (17) 287.0 Clathrina falcuta (H.) 3.0 (I) 3.0 L Leuconia solida (0. Schm.) 15 (I) 1.5 1\1 Sycon sp. 0.5 (I) 0.5 L Geodia cydonium (Jam.) 16.0 (I) 16.0 L Crambe crambe (0. Schm.) 56.0 (1) 56.0 H Antko involvens (0. Schm.) 22.5 (I) 12.5 H Haliclona cratera (0. Schm.) 43.0 (I) 33.0 1\1 Petrosia ficiformis (Poiret) 178.0(1) 26.0 L Aplysilla sulfurea F. E. Schulze 1.0 (2) 1.0 1\1 Ul ." Dysidea avara (0. Schm.) 7.5 (I) 7.5 1\1 '".,..lrcinia oras (0. Schm.) 163.0 (3) 123.0 1\1 E lrcinia (S.) spinosula (0. Schm.) 7.0 (I) 7.0 1\1 ?? lrcinia (S.) 1nuscarum 17.5 (I) 1.5 Aplysilla sulfurea F. E. Schulze 1.5 (I) 1.5 1\1 8'g(0. Schm.) .,..;;: lcinia (S.) spinosula 211.5 (9) 89.5 Clatkrina falcata (H.) 6.5 (I) 6.5 L o':l (0. Schm.) Leuconia solida (0. Schm.) 1.5 (I) 1.5 M '"3 0 Hemimycale columella (Bow.) 14.0 (I) 14.0 H :lO