THE INDIAN TRIBESOF NORTH AMERICA Q-r jn J SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ' ' BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGYBULLETIN 145THE INDIAN TRIBESOF NORTH AMERICA ByJOHN R. SWANTON SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESSCITY OF WASHINGTON Standard Book Number 87474-092-4Library of Congress catalog card number 52-61970Distributed in the United States and Canada byRandom House, Inc.Distributed in the United Kingdom and Europe byDavid & Charles (Publishers), Ltd., South Devon House,Newton Abbot, DevonOriginally published 1952Reprinted 1968, 1969Printed in the United States of America CONTENTS PAGEIntroduction 1Maine 13New Hampshire 17Vermont 18Massachusetts 19Rhode Island 27Connecticut 29New York 33New Jersey 48Pennsylvania 55Delaware 57Maryland and the District of Columbia 57Virginia 61West Virginia 74North Carolina 74South Carolina 90Georgia 104Florida 120Alabama 153Mississippi 174Louisiana 196Arkansas 212Tennessee 215Kentucky 229Ohio 230Indiana 230Illinois 240Michigan 243Wisconsin 250Minnesota 260Iowa 265Missouri 269North Dakota 273South Dakota 278Nebraska 285Kansas 292Oklahoma 299Texas 307New Mexico 327Arizona 349Colorado 370Utah 372Nevada 375Wyoming 384V VI BUEEATJ OP AMEKICAN ETHNOLOGY PAGEMontana 387Idaho 398Washington 412Oregon 451California 478Alaska 529Canada 544The West IndiesIndian tribes of Haiti 608Indian tribes of Cuba 610Indian tribes of Puerto Rico 611Indian tribes of Jamaica 611Mexico and Central America 611Bibliography 643Index 683 ILLUSTRATIONSMAPS PAGE1. Outline map of North America showing relative position of the four fol-lowing maps illustrating the locations of the Indian tribes of NorthAmerica 112. Northwestern North America (section 1 of map 1) 263. Northeastern North America (section 2 of map 1) 1064. Southwestern North America (section 3 of map 1) 1865. Southeastern North America (section 4 of map 1) 298 THE INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICABy John R. SwantonINTRODUCTIONFrom the date of its first appearance in 1891 the Powell map of "Linguistic Families of American Indians North of Mexico" hasproved of the widest utility. It has been reissued several times andcopied into numerous publications. There has, however, been almostequal need of a map giving the location of the tribes under the severalfamilies.To one familiar from his readings in early American history withthe names and locations of our prominent eastern "tribes," such asthe Delaware, Iroquois, Cherokee, and Choctaw, the preparation of atribal map would seem to be simple, and it would indeed be so if allIndians had been grouped into bodies as clearly marked as thosementioned. But even in the eastern United States the term "tribe"is quickly found to have no uniform application. The Creeks were aconfederation of a few dominant tribes and a number of subordinatebodies, each formerly independent. The name "Delaware" is com-monly said to have covered three tribes or subtribes, but while two ofthese seem never to have been independent of each other, the third,the Munsee, is often treated as if it were entirely separate. The name"Powhatan" was applied to about 30 tribes or subtribes which hadbeen brought together by conquest only a few years before Virginiawas settled, and the term "Chippewa," or "Ojibwa," is used for amultitude of small bands with little claim to any sort of governmentalunity. In the case of the Iroquois, on the other hand, the tribe wasonly a part of the governmental unit, the Iroquois Confederation, orLonghouse.The northern Plains tribes present a certain coherence but farthersouth and west our difficulties multiply. An early explorer in Texasstates that in that region, by "nation" was to be understood only asingle town or perhaps a few neighboring villages, and in fact thenumber of tribal names reported from this section seems almostendless. In the governmental sense, each Pueblo community was atribe, and if we were to attempt a complete list we should have in thefirst place a large number of existing, or at least recently existing,1 2 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 tribes, little and big, and a still greater number kno\vii only throughthe early writers or by tradition. In California, Kroeber (1925) statesthat there were no tribes in the strict sense of the term except amongthe Yokuts of the San Joaquin Valley and their immediate neighbors.Elsewhere in California, and in western Oregon and Washington aswell, tribe and town might be considered convertible terms. As thenumber of these was continually shifting, it would be impracticableto enter them in that capacity in a work of the present kind.North of the International Boundary, conditions are, if possible,worse, except in the southernmost section of Canada where lived tribessimilar to those in the eastern parts of the United States, such as theHuron, Chippewa, Assiniboin, and Blackfoot, though the Chippewa,as aheady mentioned, require a somewhat elastic extension of ourcommon concept of a tribe. On the north Pacific coast, however, theconditions noted in western Oregon and Washington are continued.We have numerous local groups associated into several major divisionson linguistic grounds alone. Still farther north and east, among theAlgonquians, Athapascans, and Eskimo, we are confronted with abewildering array of bands and local groups, usually confined to onetown and taking their name from it or from a certain territory overwhich its members hunted, and the numbers and names of these areuncertain even at the present time. Nothing remotely resemblingscientific accuracy is possible in placing these bands, if we aim atchronological uniformity, and we must either enter great Hnguisticgroups, embracing sometimes almost an entire stocK, or make anarbitrary selection of bands with the idea of including those whichwe esteem the most important.Northeastern Mexico and some parts of Central America may alsobe defined as band areas, but most of North America below the RioGrande was occupied by well-recognized tribal divisions.From all of the West Indies except Haiti, Cuba, and Puerto Riconothing like a complete list of tribes has survived, and even for thebest documented of these, Haiti, it is impossible to say how many ofthe caciquedoms mentioned should be given tribal status.A short study of the conditions above outlined shows that onlytwo alternatives are open in a work like the present. Either onemust, in effect, alter it to a town and band map, entering the mostminute recorded subdivisions and setting his results forth, not on onemap but on dozens, or he must be satisfied with a relatively conven-tional classification, having in view popular convenience rather thanscientific uniformity, and making the best gi-ouping he can of thosepeoples which did not have real tribal organizations. In the presentundertaking the latter plan has been followed, but clues to the morescientific study have been given by including lists of "subdivisions" SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 3and "villages," There is no profession that these lists are complete; aperfect presentation of them would demand an investigation forwhich there is as yet no opportunity. The rest of the accompanyingtext has been devoted to certain items of information likely to becalled for first by the general reader, including: the origin of the tribalname and a brief list of the more important synonyms, the linguisticconnections of the tribe?it has not seemed feasible to try to includethe physical and cidtural connections?its location, a brief sketch ofits history, its estimated and actual population at different periods(based mainly on Mooney's (1928) study and the reports of theUnited States and Canadian Indian Offices), and the "connection inwhich it has become noted," particularly the extent to which itsname has been perpetuated geographically or otherwise. I have alsoincluded references to the more important sources of information.Two works have been used as basal authorities. One, the Handbookof American Indians (Hodge, 1907, 1910), is general in scope and maybe assumed throughout except for the tribes of Mexico, CentralAmerica, and the West Indies. The other, Kroeber's Handbook ofthe Indians of California (1925), is the basal authority used in treatingthe Indian groups of that State. In the Gulf area I have utilized theresults of my own studies, published and unpublished.As far as possible each tribe, or group has been treated by itself,but in Washington, Oregon, California, and Alaska, to avoid needlessrepetition, the history of the tribes is considered as a whole. Thesection on Mexico, Central America, and the West Indies representsan afterthought. Both map and text material were drawn originallyfrom the "Indian Languages of Mexico and Central America"(Thomas and Swanton, 1911), and Dr. Lehmann's (1920) monumentalwork on"Zentral Amerikas," but they have been made over thoroughlyin the light of the classification and map of Dr. J. Alden Mason (1940)and Frederick Johnson (1940), and no attempt has been made totake up the history of the several tribes or indicate other authorities.A brief history of the present undertaking will perhaps enable thereader to obtain a better understanding of it, appreciate the difficultiesencountered in the compilation, and in consequence view its short-comings, of which as the compiler I am keenly aware, with due charity.It represents an evolution both in method of procedure and in theextent of territory covered. In the beginning I was governed by theolder tradition regarding map work of the kind, the idea of enteringa tribe in the place where it was first encountered by Wliites, but anattempt to carry .out this plan soon presented difficulties becauseneighboring tribes were often encountered a centmy or more apartand their relative positions may have changed utterly in the interval.There is no certainty, for instance, that the Indians outside of the 4 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 narrow strip of territory opened to our vision by De Soto's army in1539-43 were in the same relative position when Carohna wassettled about 1670 and Louisiana in 1699. It is particularly to benoted that, while De Soto found eastern Arkansas full of towns, itwas almost deserted when Marquette and La Salle visited it in 1673and 1682, We also know that great alterations took place in theSt. Lawrence Valley between the voyages of Cartier in 1534-43 andChamplain's appearance there in 1603.In view of these difficulties, I gave up this plan and tried the deviceof putting each tribe in the region with which it was most closelyassociated historically. But with what region were the Shawnee,Cheyenne, Arapaho, Kiowa, Comanche, and some other tribes mostclosely associated? The Middle West or the Plains are rather toogeneral terms. Moreover, tribes acquired this close association withcertain sections at very different periods and, if this plan were carriedout, the map as a whole would be historically inaccurate. Thus theDelaware upon the whole were associated most closely with the valleyof the river which bears their name, but when the Foxes had reachedIowa and the Dakota had occupied South Dakota, where they are bestknown, the Delaware had removed many hundred miles from thisregion. The Abnaki were most closely associated with western Mainebut were uprooted in the middle of the eighteenth century and movedto Canada. The Huron are most closely connected historically withthe region of Lake Simcoe, Ontario, but they were driven from therein the middle of the seventeenth century, and a hundred years laterunder the name Wyandot they, or at least part of them, came to be "closely associated" with Ohio. Thus we have here two associationsof the same tribe.For a time it seemed as if some of these inconsistencies were un-avoidable and that any attempt at chronological accuracy was outof the question. Such is indeed the case if we insist upon absolute,documented accuracy, because Alaska, western Canada, and thenorthwestern part of the United States were almost wholly unknownuntil the latter half of the eighteenth century and there is no authenticinformation regarding many tribes until the beginning of the nine-teenth when many eastern tribes, and some of those on the Plains,had been displaced or destroyed. But on experimenting along thisline I discovered that if we select the year 1650, or rather a few yearsprior to that date and assume a fairly static condition for 30 or 40years afterward, we can determine the location of most of the tribesof the eastern and southern United States and eastern Canada in afairly satisfactory manner, and this arrangement was finally decidedupon. Up to 1649 the Hurons were stiU in Ontario; the Erie, theNeutral Nation, and the Susquehanna had not been destroyed by the SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 5Iroquois; and King Philip's War, which was to scatter the NewEngland Indians, did not break out until 1675. The Virginia Indianshad suffered very much as a result of their risings in 1622 and 1644but continued to occupy the same general territories in which thecolonists found them. By 1650 the Gulf region had been traversedby Spanish expeditions and Florida had been settled nearly a hundredyears, but there had been Uttle displacement of the aborigines evenin Florida, and between the accounts of the Spanish chroniclers andthe later narratives of Virginia traders, and the South CaroUna colo-nists after 1670 we are able to get a fair idea of the position of theprincipal Southeastern peoples at that date. Meantime the Frenchpenetrated into the Ohio Valley and as far south on the Mississippias the mouth of the Arkansas by 1673, and to the ocean by 1682,and they founded Louisiana in 1699. La SaUe's Texas colony, estab-lished in 1685, however unfortunate for himself and the other partici-pants in the venture, gives a more than fair view of the Indians ofthat great territory, soon supplemented by the reports of those whoaccompanied the later Spanish expeditions. Moreover, this data maybe checked in some measure by the much earher reports of Cabezade Vaca bearing on the years 1528 to 1536 and the chroniclers ofMoscoso's invasion of east Texas in 1542. Moving still farther west,we find that New Mexico had been occupied by Spaniards long beforethe date selected, that Coronado had crossed the southern Plains,and that travelers by sea and land had visited southern California.In the meantime eastern Canada had been penetrated by two Euro-pean nations from two directions?by the French along St. LawrenceRiver and the Great Lakes and by the English Hudson's Bay Com-pany through their posts on the body of water which gives them theirname. Moose Factory was founded in 1671, Fort Nelson in 1682,and Fort Churchill in 1688. From these as bases explorers and traderssoon worked their way far inland, and on the other hand the com-mandants collected considerable information from the natives them-selves regarding the regions from whence they came.As has been said, there was beyond a great tract of country whichremained unvisited by Europeans until well into the eighteenth cen-tury, but over much of this area there is no evidence of recent tribalmovements, and some movements are known sufficiently well to justifyan attempt to reconstruct the earlier conditions. Thus the migrationof Haida from the northern end of the Queen Charlotte Islands toPrince of Wales Island evidently occurred in recent times, not earlierthan the eighteenth century, and it is clear that they replaced theTlingit there since the names of their towns in the invaded country areall derived from Tlingit. Whether the movement of the Tsimshianto the coast of British Columbia and the, probably contemporary, 6 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bdll. 145 removal of a part of the Tlingit northward, happened before or after1650 we shall never know, but it seems to have taken place long be-fore the Haida emigration just mentioned. It was formerly believedthat mass migrations of impressive character took place in the Colum-bia River Valley about the beginning of the nineteenth century.This idea was perhaps set in motion by George Gibbs (1877) in speak-ing of the migrations of Klikitat Indians, and was suggested in someparticulars by Mooney (1928) but elaborated by James Teit (1928)and adopted and amplified by Berreman (1937). This involved theassumption that before that time both banks of Columbia River fromThe Dalles to the mouth of Snake River were in possession of Salishantribes, that south of them lay the Cayuse and Molala, and south ofthem again the ancestors of all of the Shahaptian peoples except theNez Perces; and that about the beginning of the nineteenth centurythe Shoshoneans of the interior moved northward, pushing the Sha-haptians ahead of them; and that these in turn, after disrupting theCayuse and Molala, expelled the Salishans from the valley of theColumbia in the region just indicated. More recent researches byRay, Murdock, Blyth, and Steward (1938) seem to indicate that thisis entirely erroneous and that, except for a displacement of the Mo-lala and a relatively recent expansion of Shahaptians toward thesouth at the expense of the Shoshoneans, the tribes and stocks seemto have occupied substantially the same areas in the earliest timesof which we have any record as they did when the reservations wereestablished. At any rate, supposition of stability in tribal locationmakes the work of the cartographer much simpler, and we will acceptthe tribal distribution shown by Ray in his paper published in 1938as being as near the probable situation in 1650 as can now be deter-mined. From the fact that he indicates the northern boundary ofShoshonean peoples in the eighteenth century, it is assmned that heregards the rest of his map as valid for that century.For the position of the interior Athapascan tribes before they wereattacked by the Cree, I am indebted to Dr. Diamond Jenness, formerlyChief of the Department of Anthropology of the National Museumof Canada, who was also kind enough to go over most of my Canadiansection and has made many valuable suggestions and amplifications.The scope of the work has also been expanded territorially as itprogressed. Originally it was intended merely as a convenient guideto the tribes of the several states of the American Union and Alaska,demand for such a work being considerable. But since the originallinguistic map of the Bureau had included the Dominion of Canadaand Greenland, it was later determined to make this of the same ex-tent. And finally, owing to the representations of a leading anthro- SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 7pologist, it was amplified to take in Mexico, Middle America, and theWest Indies.The method of treatment for Canada and Greenland has beenpractically identical with that for the United States, but it was thoughtbest to represent on the map not merely the tribes but the band divi-sions of the larger northern tribes, such as the Chippewa, Cree, Algon-kin, Montagnais, and several of the Athapascan groups, including theKutchin and K!hotana of the far Northwest and Alaska. Many ofthese band names are English and wholly modern, but it is highlyprobable that some of them correspond to more ancient divisionsand, since they have found a place in literature, the identification oftheir locations will be convenient. For the placing of those in theNortheast I am particularly indebted to the late anthropologists Dr.Frank G. Speck, of the University of Pennsylvania, and Dr. JohnM, Cooper, of the Catholic University of America.Objection has been made to entering the names of Eskimo tribes orbands on the map, since almost all refer simply to "people living atsuch-and-such a place," most of them had little permanence, and therewas an enormous number of them, the ones I have mentioned beingmerely a selection. On the other hand, it may be urged that somegroups, notably those in Alaska, had considerable continuity, thatmost of them probably owed their existence to certain natural foodsupplies which would tend to reproduce other tribes at the same spotseven though these were broken up, and that finally most of the tribeshere entered have obtained a place in Eskimo literature and it isconvenient to know where they lived even though they may havebeen no more important than other tribes not mentioned. Besides,if this were not done, the map would have little more value, so far asthe Eskimo country is concerned, than the linguistic map. In thetext I have indicated the relative lack of importance of the Eskimotribes by treating all under the one head "Eskimo," and their names,like the band names of the northern Indians just mentioned, are indifferent type. The West Greenland names are, of course, quitemodern but are thought to represent the principal bands of an earlierdate.As already stated, that portion of the map south of the territory ofthe United States is based on the map of Mexico and Central Americapublished by Dr. Thomas and myself (1911), on the work of Lehmann(1920) mentioned above, but particularly on the papers of Mason(1940) and Johnson (1940). Although European influence in thisregion goes back to the early part of the sixteenth century, relativelylittle tribal displacement had taken place by 1650. On the WestIndies, however, it was very different, and, if we were to note only thetribes extant there in 1650, little could be inserted. However, it 8 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bdll. 145has seemed best to submit to the anachronism here by giving thetribes in occupancy when Spaniards first came among them at the endof the fifteenth century and beginning of the sixteenth. In this partof the map I have followed Lehmann except in Jamaica and Haiti,but I have omitted several of his Jamaica names which seem to bemerely those of towns. The tribal distribution in Haiti is the resultof my studies of Peter Martyr's "De Orbo Novo," and I have increasedthe five "provinces" given by Las Casas (1875-76) because it seems tome that Marien in the northwest and Maguana in the center shouldhave independent status. Probably the caciquedoms here and inthe other islands were in a constant state of flux.In treating the linguistic stocks, considerable compromise has beenfound necessary. Since the publication of Powell's map (1891) theinvestigations of various students have rendered certain changesnecessary, but other proposed changes have not been accepted byall students, and some are violently opposed.The connection between Shahaptian, Waiilatpuan, and Lutuamian,first suggested by Hewitt (1897) and recently confirmed by Jacobs(1937), has made it necessary to put these three groups of languagesinto one stock which is here called Shapwailutan, a name made up ofthe first three syllables of the original stock names and in that formsuggested by Hewitt many years ago. The connection of Natchezwith the Muskhogean family, originally proposed by Brinton andconfirmed by me, has been recognized in the present classification.I have also placed the former Tonikan, Chitimachan, and Attacapanstocks under the stock name Tunican in accordance with the resultsof my own researches though the inclusion of the first mentioned isnot entirely beyond question. Dr. J. P. Harrington's studies (1910)have made the relationship between Kiowan and the Tanoan tonguesso evident that they have been placed in one family and given thename Kiowa-Tanoan. There no longer seems to be any excuse forkeeping the old Shoshonean, Piman, and Nahuatlan stocks apart,and I have followed Buschmann (1859) and Brinton (1891) in unitingthem as Uto-Aztecan. Kiowa-Tanoan is probably related to thisbut the fact has still to be demonstrated.In California we are confronted by some puzzling questions as torelationships, which have been made the basis of violent differences ofopinion. Some of our ethnologists have been very skeptical regardingthe Algonquian connection of Yurok and Wiyot but I let it stand as onKroeber's Handbook (1925) pending exact determination. On theother hand, the validity of the so-called Penutian stock seems to berecognized by all of those who have had the best opportunities to studythe languages composing it and is admitted here. The relationshipbetween some of the languages of the other great stock created by SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 9Dixon and Kroeber (1919), the Hokan, is also allowed by other stu-dents. A doubt still remains whether all of the languages classifiedunder this head, even in the original and most conservative usage of theterm, should go with it. Or rather, it seems doubtful whether ourinformation is sufficient to justify the erection of this stock over againstthe Penutian. Mr. J. P. Harrington (personal information) is of theopinion that the distinction betweem Hokan and Penutian is artificialand that the languages of both groups and of various others not asyet brought together are probably related. But since the name Hokanhas received literary recognition, it seems best to continue it provision-ally for the forms of speech first placed in that category. Kroeber'sconfirmation of Brinton's suggestion regarding the Serian and Te-quistlatecan stocks has served to add them to the Hokan familythrough Yuman, and Sapir proposed extension to Subtiaba andCoahuilteco. I am favorably disposed toward very considerable ex-tensions of the present family boundaries but feel that more una-nimity of opinion is desirable before including the more radical sugges-tions in a general work of this kind. Personally, I am convinced thata very large part of the vocabulary and structure of the Siouan andMuskhogean languages has had a common origin and believe that itwill ultimately be found best to consider them as branches of onestock, but adequate proof has not yet been presented. The Tunicanstock also shares certain well-marked structural peculiarities withMuskhogean while having connections also with the ancient Texasstocks, but the meaning of this has yet to be determined. It is plainthat the structural parallelism between Athapascan and Tliiigit is notaccidental, and some striking similarities extend to Haida. Whetherthe somewhat similar parallelism between Salishan, Chimakuan, andWakashan means genetic relationship is another problem, but theanswers to these are not as yet sufficiently assured to incorporate anychanges from the older classification in this work. It is evident thata future map devoted to the distribution of languages in NorthAmerica must give something more tban stocks or supposed stocks.It must show the degree of relationship between languages as well in-side as outside of stock boundaries.No doubt the positions assigned to certain tribes in the present mapwill surprise many ethnologists. This will be particularly true of theplacing of some of those of the Plains like the Arapaho, Kiowa, KiowaApache, and Arikara. In fact, some of these locations are extremelyspeculative but they are governed by the necessity of harmonizingthem with the locations of other tribes at the time selected as standard,1650. In the case of certain tribes removed from their original seatsbefore 1650, or whose locations were learned only at a considerablylater time, the date of known occupancy is indicated in parentheses. 10 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bdli,. 145The present work was well under way before it was learned thatsomething similar was being undertaken by Professor Kroeber, andKroeber's work has since appeared (1939) as "Cultural and NaturalAreas of Native North America." This magnificent publication willundoubtedly continue to occupy a place all by itself f6r a long timebut it is evidently intended mainly for the universitv student, thoughits usefulness will by no means be confined to such students, and inother particulars the purposes of that study were quite distinct fromthose which the present writer has entertained. "It aims," says Prof. Kroeber, "first, to review the environmentalrelations of the native cultures of North America. Its second purposeis to examine the historic relations of the culture areas, or geographicalunits of cultures." My own compilation has no such ambitiouspurposes. It is merely intended to inform the general reader whatIndian tribes occupied the territory of his State and to add enoughdata to indicate the place they occupied among the tribal groups ofthe continent and the part they played in the early period of ourhistory and the history of the States immediately to the north andsouth of us. It attempts to be rather a gazetteer of present knowledgethan a guide to the attainment of more knowledge.The preparation of this manuscript extended over several yearsand some new material was added indeed until my retirement fromactive membership on the staff of the Bureau of American Ethnologyin 1944. It is admittedly defective in the use of material publishedduring the years since that date.In the synonymy only those forms have been given which differso much from the popular designation of the tribe as to make identifi-cation difficult.Although I have usually leaned very largely on Mooney's popula-tion figures (1928) in my over-aU estimates, my own for the South-eastern tribes, as shown by those on map 3 of Bulletin 137 (Swanton,1946), would generally be considerably smaller.The work has been done from the point of view of the UnitedStates, and therefore the Chippewa have been treated under Minne-sota, the Huron under Ohio, and the Assiniboin under Montana,although their centers were rather north of the International Boundary.On the maps the boundary lines between modern political nationsand states are indicated by long dashes; those between linguisticstocks or major divisions of that type by short dashes and divisionsbetween smaller tribal or group bodies by dots.^ I Note: This has not been consistently carried through on the maps.? J. E. S. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 11 Map 1.?Outline map of North America showing relative position of the fourfollowing maps illustrating the locations of the Indian tribes of North America:Section 1, Northwestern North America (map 2, facing p. 26); section 2,Northeastern North America (map 3, facing p. 106) ; section 3, SouthwesternNorth America (map 4, facing p. 186) ; section 4, Southeastern North America(map 5, facing p, 298). MAINEAbnaki. Properly Wabanaki, "those living at the sunrise," "thoseliving at the east," "easterners." Also called:Alnanbal, own name, meaning "Indians," or "men."Aquannaque, Wabanaki as pronounced by Huron.Bashabas, name given them from a principal chief.Cannon-gageh-ronnons, name given by Mohawk.Moassones, from a name applied to their country; perhaps from PenobscotMaweshenook, "berry place."Narankamigdok epitsik arenanbak, "villages of the Narankamigdog,"said to be a collective name for all the Abnaki villages.Natio Luporum, "Wolf Nation."Natsdgana, name given by Caughnawaga Iroquois.Onagungees, Onnogonges, Anagonges, or Owenagunges, name given bythe Iroquois.Skacewanilom, name given by the Iroquois.Tarrateens, name given by the tribes of southern New England.Connections.?The Abnaki belonged to the Algonquian linguisticfamily, their closest connections being with their neighbors to theeast and west. Indeed their name has very commonly been extendedto include the Malecite, Penobscot, and Pennacook, and even theMicmac, though on the other hand the Sokoki have sometimes beenleft out.Location.?The main body was in western Maine, in the valleysof the Kennebec, Androscoggin, and Saco Rivers and on the neighbor-ing coast, overlapping also into Carroll County, N. H. A singletribe, the Missiassik, was in northwestern Vermont, representingprobably a late intrusion. (See also New Hampshire and Vermont.)SubdivisionsAmaseconti, on Sandy River, Franklin County.Arosaguntacook, on the lower course of Androscoggin River.Missiassik, in the valley of Missisquoi River, Franklin County, Vt.Norridgewock, on Kennebec River.Ossipee, on Ossipee River and Lake in Maine and New Hampshire.Pequawket, on Lovell's Pond and the headwaters of Saco River, Maine andNew Hampshire.Rocameca, on the upper course of Androscoggin River.Sokoki, on Saco River and in the adjacent parts of Cumberland and York Counties.Wawenoc, on the seacoast of Sagadahoc, Lincoln, and Knox Counties.VillagesAmaseconti; there were two villages of this tribe, at Farmington Falls and NewSharon, respectively.Aquadocta, westward of Saco.Arosaguntacook town, probably near Lewiston. 13 14 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145Cobbosseecontee, a town or band on the stream of that name, which emptiesinto the Kennebec River at Gardiner.Ebenecook, at Ebenecook Harbor, Southport Island.Kennebec, between Augusta and Winslow.Ketangheanycke, near the mouth of Kennebec River.Masherosqueck, near the coast and not certainly Abnaki.Mecadacut, on the coast between Penobscot and Kennebec Rivers.Missiassik, belonging to the Missiassik tribe, on Lake Champlain at the mouthof Missisquoi River, Vt.Moratiggon, probably on the Maine or New Hampshire coast and possibly notAbnaki.Moshoquen, on or near the coast.Muscongus, on the coast and probably near Muscongus Island.Negusset, about the site of Woolwich.Ossaghrage, Iroquois name of an Abnaki village.Ossipee, probably on Ossipee Lake.Ouwerage, probably on Ossipee Lake.Pasharanack, probably on the coast.Pauhuntanuc, probably on the coast.Pemaquid, near Pemaquid, Lincoln County.Pequawket town, about Fryeburg.Pocopassum, probably on the coast.Sabino, at the mouth of the Kennebec River, possibly on the west side.Sagadahoc, at the mouth of the Kennebec River.Satquin, on the coast southwest of the Kennebec River.Segotago, probably identical with Sagadahoc.Sowocatuck, perhaps the chief village of the Sokoki, Saco River.Taconnet, at the falls of the Kennebec near Waterville.Unyjaware, Iroquois name for an Abnaki village.Wacoogo, probably on or near the coast.History.?The Abnaki and their neighbors claim to have immigratedinto their historic seats from the southwest. Aside from possibleNorse visitants in 1000-1010, John Cabot, during his second voyagein 1498, probably brought the first white men within sight of Abnakiterritory, but he seems to have had no dealings with the people.From that time on, Breton, Basque, Norman, and English fishermenconstantly visited the coast. In 1604 Champlain passed along itfrom north to south and visited several Abnaki bands, and in 1605Waymouth penetrated the Wawenoc country. In 1607-08 came anabortive attempt on the part of the Plymouth Company to make apermanent settlement at the mouth of the Kennebec River, but it isprobable that English fishermen were on Monhegan Island almostcontinuously after that date. Pemaquid was also occupied at anearly period. The Abnaki were soon afterward missionized fromCanada and became attached to the French interest. For a timethey were successful in driving the English colonists away but laterthey suffered several severe defeats?particularly the capture ofNorridgewock in 1724 and the defeat of the Pequawket in 1725 ? were much reduced in numbers, and finally withdrew to Canada where SWANXON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 15they were settled at B^cancour and Silleiy, and later at St. Francis,along with other refugee tribes from the south.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates this at 3,000 in 1600, includ-ing the Penobscot and Passamaquoddy. The St. Francis Indians,including remnants of other New England tribes, numbered 395 in1903, and 280 in 1924.Connection in which they have become noted.?The activities of themissionary Rasles, compilation by him of the Abnald dictionary, thedestruction of Norridgewock, and the defeat of the Pequawket onLovell Pond, as mentioned above, have made the Abnaki famous.Malecite. They extended into the northeastern part of the State ofMaine from Canada (q. v.).Passamaquoddy. Signifying "Those who pursue the pollock," butstrictly "pollock-plenty-place" (Eckstorm). Also called:Machias Tribe, applied to some living on Machias River.Quoddy, abbreviation of Passamaquoddy.St. Croix Indians, from one of the rivers they inhabited.Scotuks, from the name of the Schoodic Lakes.Unchechauge or Unquechauge.Connections.?The Passamaquoddy belong to the Algonquian lin-guistic family, their closest connections being the Malecite, and theirmore remote relatives the Abnaki, Penobscot, and Pennacook.Location.?On Passamaquoddy Bay, St. CroLx River, and theSchoodic Lakes. (See also Canada.)VillagesGunasquamekook, on the site of St. Andrews, N. B.Imnarkuan, on the site of Pembroke, Washington County.Sebaik, at Pleasant Point, Passamaquoddy Bay, near Perry, Washington County.Other towns were on Lewis Island and at Calais, in Maine, and on the NewBrunswick side of St. Croix River.History.?The early history of the Passamaquoddy was identicalwith that of the Malecite (q. v.). When the territory of the 13colonies was separated from English rule, the greater part of thistribe was left on the south side of the boundary. They enjoy, jointlywith the Penobscot, the privilege of having a representative in theMaine State legislature, though he speaks only on matters of concernto the two tribes.Population.?The population of the Passamaquoddy was estimatedat about 150 in 1726, 130 in 1804, 379 in 1825, 400-500 in 1859; andwas enumerated as 386 in 1910. In 1930, 435 Indians were returnedfrom Washington County, and practically all of these must havebelonged to this tribe.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Passamaquoddyhave given their name to Passamaquoddy Bay, which forms part of 16 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145the eastern boundary of the State of Maine and are the easternmostbody of Indians in the United States.Pennacook. The Accominta and Newichawanoc of the extremesouthwestern part of the State belonged to this tribe. (See NewHampshire.)Penobscot. Meaning "the rocky place," or "the descending ledgeplace" (Eckstorm), referring to the falls between Oldtown andBangor. Also called:Pentagouet, from the name of their principal village near Castine.Connections.?The Penobscot belonged to the Algonquian linguisticstock, their nearest connections being the Abnaki, Passamaquoddy,Malecite, and Pennacook, with whom they were frequently clasicedunder the name of the fu"st mentioned.Location.?On both sides of Penobscot Bay and in the entire drain-age area of Penobscot River. SubdivisionsA body of Penobscot on Moosehead Lake were known as "Moosehead LakeIndians," but their separation from the rest was probably temporary.VillagesAgguncia, said to have been a small settlement near Brewer, Penobscot County,from which the fabulous city of "Norumbega" derived its name.Asnela, a settlement on an island of the same name in Penobscot Bay.Catawamtek, at Rockland.Kenduskeag, at Bangor, near the site of the Penobscot Exchange Hotel.Mattawamkeag, about Mattawamkeag Point, Penobscot County.Meecombe, on the lower course of Penobscot River.Negas, in Penobscot County.Olamon, on an island in Penobscot River near Greenbush.Oldtown, the present village on an island of the same name.Passadumkeag, on an island in Penobscot River near the present Passadumkeag.Pentagouet, at or near Castine.Precaute, on the southeast coast of Maine; it may have been a Passamaquoddytown.Segocket, near the mouth of Penobscot River.Wabigganus, probably near the mouth of the Penobscot River.History.?Native tradition brings the Penobscot from the South-west. They were encountered by French and Enghsh fishermen andexplorers early in the sixteenth century, and one of their to\vns cameto have a European reputation as a city of fabulous size and impor-tance under the name of Norumbega. In the seventeenth centurytheir chief, known to the Whites as Bashaba, seems to have extendedhis authority, probably his moral authority only, over the tribes tothe westward as far as the Merrimac. The Penobscot were visitedby Champlain in 1604 and by numerous later explorers. They assistedthe French against the English until 1749, when they made peace SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 17and in consequence did not remove to Canada with the Abnaki.They have remained in their old country to the present day, theirprincipal settlement being on Oldtovvn Island. Conjointly with thePassamaquoddy, they have a representative at the sessions of theMaine State legislature privileged to speak on tribal affairs only.Population.?The followmg are early estimates of the Penobscotpopulation: 650 in 1726, 1,000 in 1736, 700 in 1753, 400 in 1759, 700in 1765, 350 in 1786. According to the United States Census of 1910,there were 266, including 13 scattered outside of the State of Maine.The census of 1930 returned 301 Indians from Penobscot County,practically all belonging to this tribe.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Penobscot havegiven their name to a bay, a river, and a county in the State of Maine, toa post village in Hancock County, and a branch post office in Detroit.The title of the chief above mentioned, Bashaba or Bessebes, becamethe center of a myth among the Whites in which he was elevated tothe dignity of a local king or emperor. The widely quoted myth ofNorumbega should also be mentioned in this comiection. This tribeand the Passamaquoddy constitute the only bodies of Indians of anysize remaining in New England.NEW HAMPSHIREAbnaki. Parts of Grafton County were occupied by the Ossipee andPequawket bands, affiliated wdth the Sokoki of the Abnaki tribe.(See Maine.)Pennacook. Gerard (Hodge, 1910) says the name is ''cognate withAbnaki pendkuk, or pena^'kuk, 'at the botton of the hill or higliland,' "but Speck says simply "down hill." Also called:Merrimac, from the river of that name.Nechegansett, name given by Gookin (1792).Owaragees, Iroquois name (fide Golden (1747)).Connections.?The Pennacook belonged to the Algonquian linguisticstock, their nearest relatives being the Abnaki, with whom they werefrequently classed, and the Penobscot, Passamaquoddy, and Malecite.Location.?In southern and central New Hampshire, northeasternMassachusetts, and the southernmost part of Maine. (See alsoMaine, Massachusetts, and Vermont.)Siihdivisions and VillagesAccominta, at or near the site of York, Maine.Agawam, at Ipswich, Mass.Amoskeag, at Amoskeag Falls on the Merrimack River,Coosuc, a division along Gonnecticut River between Upper and Lower Ammo-noosuc Rivers, the principal village apparently near the mouth of the latter. 18 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145Nashua, a division along the upper course of Nashua River, the village being nearLeominster, Mass.Naumkeag, at Salem, Mass.Newichawanoc, a division on upper Piscataqua River and Salmon Falls River inMaine and New Hampshire, the principal village being near Berwick, Maine.Pennacook, a division on both banks of Merrimack River above and below Concord,the village of the same name being on the site of Concord.Pentucket, at Haverhill, Mass.Piscataqua, on Piscataqua River near Dover.Souhegan, a division on Souhegan River, Hillsborough County, with the villageof the same name probably near Amherst, formerly called Souhegan.Squamscot, on Exeter River near Exeter, Rockingham County.Wachuset, a division on the upper Nashua River, Mass., the village of the samename being located probably near Princeton.Wamesit, a division on the south bank of Merrimack River below the mouth ofConcord River, Mass., the village of the same name being near Lowell.Weshacum, at Weshacum Ponds, near Sterling, Mass.Winnecowet, in Rockingham County.Winnipesaukee, around the lake of the same name.History.?The early history of the Pennacook was like that of theAbnaki except that they were earlier affected by the English settle-ments on Massachusetts Bay. In King Philip's War (1675-76) theNashua and Wachuset tribes joined the hostiles, but the greater partof the Pennacook, under Wannalancet, remained on friendly termsuntil the treacherous seizure of about 200 of their number by Waldronin 1676. They then abandoned their country and the greater partremoved to Canada, where they ultimately joined the Abnaki and otherIndians of St. Francis. The remainder were finally settled at Scati-cook, Rensselaer County, N. Y.Population.?The number of Pennacook is estimated by Mooney(1928) at 2,000 in 1600 and 1,250 ui 1676. The remnant is includedamong the 280 St. Francis Indians returned in 1924.Connection in which they have become noted.?The town of Penacookand Lake Penacook, Merrimack County, are named after the Penna-cook, as well as a branch station of the Concord Post Office, and theirname also appears in Whittier's poem "The Bridal of Pennacook."VERMONTAbnaki. An Abnaki band known as the Missiassik was at one timesettled on Missisquoi River in Franklin County. (See Maine.)Mahican. Bands of the Mahican hunted in the southwestern andwestern parts of the State and made temporary settlements fromtime to time. One Mahican village (Winooskeek) is thought tohave been located at the mouth of Winooski River. (See NewYork.) SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 19Pennacook. The eastern margins of Vermont were occupied by thePennacook, who must have hunted considerably within its borders.(See New Hampshire.)Pocomtuc. The northernmost bands of the Pocomtuc extendedinto the southern parts of the State. (See Massachusetts.)MASSACHUSETTSMahican. The Mahican extended over most of Berkshire County,where they were represented mainly by the Housatonic or Stock-bridge Indians, (See New York.)Massachuset. Meaning "at the range of hills," by which is meantthe hills of Milton.Connections.?The Massachuset belonged to the Algonquian lin-guistic stock, their tongue being an 7i-dialect, and formed one groupwith the Narraganset, Niantic (East and West), and Wampanoag, andprobably the Nauset.Location.?In the region of Massachusetts Bay between Salem onthe north and Marshfield and Brockton on the south. Later theyclaimed lands beyond Brockton as far as the Great Cedar Swamp,territories formerly under the control of the Wampanoag.SubdivisionsJohnson (1881) says that there were "three kingdoms or sagamoreships havingunder them seven dukedoms or petty sagamores." Some of these undoubtedlycorrespond to the divisions recently worked out by Speck (1928) by means of pro-vincial documents. He identifies six main divisions, two of them further subdi-vided, all called by the names of their chiefs, as follows:(1) Band of Chickataubut (including the later bands of Wampatuck and someother of his heirs and a district and band earlier controlled by Obatinnewat orObtakiest), all of the Massachuset territory south of Charles River and west ofthe neighborhood of Ponkapog Pond.(2) Band of Nanepashemet, all the Massachuset territory north of CharlesRiver. Nanepashemet's domain was afterward divided among his three sons:Winnepurkit, owning about Deer Island and in Boston Harbor; Wonohaquaham,owning about Chelsea and Saugus; and Montowampate, owning about Lynnand Marblehead.(3) Band of Manatahqua, about Nahant and Swampscott.(4) Band of Cato, a tract 5 miles square east of Concord River.(5) Band of Nahaton, around Natick.(6) Band of Cutshamakin, Cutshamequin, or Kutchamakin, about Dorchester,Sudbury, and Milton. VillagesConohasset, about Cohasset.Cowate, "Praying Indians," at the Falls of Charles River.Magaehnak, probably "Praying Indians," 6 miles from Sudbury.Massachuset, location uncertain.Mishawum, at Charlestown.Mystic, at Medford. 20 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bdll. 145Nahapassumkeck, in the northern part of Plymouth County, probably on thecoast.Natick, "Praying Indians," near the present Natick.Neponset, on Neponset River about Stoughton.Nonantum, on Nonantum hill, in Newton.Pequimmit, "Praying Indians," near Stoughton.Pocapawmet, on the south shore of Massachusetts Bay.Punkapog, "Praying Indians," near Stoughton.Sagoquas, south of Cohasset.Saugus, near Lynn.Seccasaw, in the northern part of Plymouth County.Titicut, "Praying Indians," possibly Wampanoag, in Middleborough town.Topeent, on the north coast of Plymouth County.Totant, at or near Boston.Totlieet, on the north coast of Plymouth County.Wessagusset, near Weymouth.Winnisimmet, at Chelsea.Wonasquam, near Annisquam, Essex County, perhaps a later outvillage.History.?The Massachuset were visited by several voyagers, be-ginning at least as far back as the time of John Cabot but were firstparticularly noted by Captain John Smith, who coasted their terri-tory in 1614. In 1617 they were much reduced by a pestilence andabout the same time they were depleted by wars with their north-eastern neighbors. The Puritans settled in their country in 1629,and mission work was soon begun among them, and was pursuedwith particular zeal b}'' John Eliot. The converts were gathered intoseparate villages, where they gradually declined in numbers andpresently disappeared as distinct bodies, though a few descendants ofthe Punkapog town people are still living in Canton, Mattapan, andMansfield.Population.?The number of Massachuset is estimated by Mooney(1928) to have been 3,000 in 1600. In 1631 it was reduced to about500, and soon considerably below that figure by smallpox.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Massachuset gavetheir name to Massachusetts Bay and through that to the presentCommonwealth of Massachusetts. The Massachuset are also notedas the tribe in which the famous apostle to the Indians, John Eliot,labored, through whom a large part of them were gathered into vil-lages of "Praying Indians." The "Eliot Bible" and other works byhim have preserved a knowledge of the Massachuset language to ourown day. Crispus Attucks, who was killed in the Boston massacreand is generally regarded as the first victim of the American Revolu-tion, was of mixed Negro-Massachuset ancestry. The marriage ofWinnepurkit, a Massachuset chief whose lands were about BostonHarbor, to the daughter of Passaconavv^ay, chief sachem of thePennacook, was made by Whittier the subject of a poem, "TheBridal of Pennacook." SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 21Nauset. Meaning unknown. Also called:Cape Indians, from their situation.Connections.?(See under discussion of the IVIassachuset.)Location.?All of Cape Cod except the extreme western end.SubdivisionaSpeck (1928) has identified the following: lyanough, Wiananno, or Hyannis(centering about Barnstable); Manomoy, or Monomoy (about Chatham);Nauset (from Eastham to Truro). VillagesAquetnet, at Skauton Neck, Sandwich, Barnstable County.Ashimut or Ashimuit, at a large spring near the junction of Falmouth, Mashpee,and Sandwich Townships, Barnstable County.Coatuit, near Osterville, Barnstable County.Codtaumut or Cataumut, in Mashpee Township.Cummaquid, at Cummaquid Harbor.Manamoyik, near Chatham.Mashpee, on the coast of Mashpee Township.Mattakees or Mattakeset, in Barnstable and Yarmouth Townships.Meeshawn, in Provincetown or Truro Township.Nauset, near Eastham.Nemskaket, on or near Nemskaket Creek.Nobsqussit or Nobscusset, near Dennis.Pamet, near Truro.Pawpoesit, near Barnstable.Pispogutt or Pispoqutt, in the western part of Barnstable County, near Buz-zards Bay.Poponesset, near Poponesset Bay.Potanumaquut, on Pleasant Bay near Harwich.Punonaknit, at Billingsgate near Wellfleet.Satuit, on Cotuit River near Mashpee.Sawkatuket or Satucket, in Brewster or Harwich.Skauton, near Sandwich, probably on Buzzards Bay,Sokones or Succonesset, near Falmouth.Wakoquet, or Waquoit, near Waquoit or Weequakit, in Barnstable Township.Wessquobs or Weesquobs, near Pocasset.Many of these contained Wampanoag Indians and some Indians of othertribes.History.?Yrom. the exposed position of the Nauset on Cape Codtheir territory came under the observation of many of the earliestexplorers, but actual contact with the people was not so simple amatter. In 1606 Champlain had an encounter with them. In 1614Hunt carried off 7 Nauset Indians and 20 Patuxet of the Wampanoagtribe whom he sold into slavery. They seem to have escaped the greatNew England pestilence of 1617. Although they behaved in a hostilemanner toward the Pilgrims at their first landing in 1620, they soonbecame firm friends and even rendered some assistance against KingPhilip (1675-76). Most of them had been Christianized before this 22 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145time and collected into churches. In 1710 many died of fever, but thenumber of Indians in Nauset territory was increased by additionsfrom other tribes driven from their proper territories, so that thepopulation of the principal Indian settlement at Mashpee has notfallen below 200 down to the present day, though a great deal ofmixture with other races has taken place.Population.?The number of the Nauset was estimated by Mooney(1928) at 1,200 in 1600. In 1621 they were believed to number 500;in 1674, 462 were reported in the various inhabited centers on CapeCod, containing Nauset, Wampanoag, and other Indians. In 1698,515 Indians were reported from Mashpee, mainly Nauset and Wam-panoag. In 1767, 292 were reported at the same place and thenumber has varied between 200 and 300 down to 1930. The UnitedStates Census of 1910 reported 206 Indians of this band, all but 5 inMassachusetts, Speck (1928) estimates that there were 230 in 1920,all of whom were mixed-bloods. The census of 1930 returned only38 Indians from Barnstable County and 54 from Massachusetts, butit may be incomplete.Connection in which they have become noted.?As already remarked,it was in the Nauset territory and in considerable measure throughtheir blood that the Massachusetts aborigines maintained theirexistence longest. Nauset Beach, Nauset Harbor, and Nauset Lightperpetuate the name.Nipmuc. From Nipmaug, "fresh water fishing place."Connections.?The Nipmuc belonged to the Algonquian linguisticfamily, their language being an Z-dialect. Their nearest relativeswere the other tribes of Massachusetts and the tribes of Rhode Island,Connecticut, and the Hudson River VaUey.Location.?The Nipmuc occupied the central plateau of Massachu-setts, particularly the southern part of Worcester County, but theyextended into northern Rhode Island and Connecticut. (See alsoConnecticut and Rhode Island.)Subdivisions and VillagesAcoomemeck, location uncertain.Attawaugan, near Attawaugan in the town of Killingly, Conn.Chabanakongkomun, near Dudley.Chachaubunkkakowok, location uncertain.Coweset, in northern Rhode Island west of Blackstone River.Hassanamesit, at Grafton.Magunkaquog, at Hopkinton.Manchaug, near Oxford.Manexit, near Thompson, Conn.Mashapaug, at Mashapaug Pond in the town of Union, Conn.Medfield, at Medfield, native name unknown. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OP NORTH AMERICA 23Menemesseg, near New Braintree.Metewemesick, near Sturbridge.Missogkonnog, location uncertain.Muskataquid, location uncertain.Nashobah, near Magog Pond, in Littleton.Nichewaug, about Nichewaug, near Petersham.Okommakamesit, near Marlborough.Pakachoog, near Worcester, probably in Millbury.Quabaug, near Brookfield.Quadick, near the present Quadick Reservoir, Thompson County, Conn.Quantisset, on Thompson Hill, near Thompson, Conn.Quinebaug, on Quinebaug River near Quinebaug Station, town of Thompson,Conn.Quinetusset, near Thompson in northeast corner of Connecticut.Segunesit, in northeastern Connecticut.Tatumasket, west of Mendon, in the southern part of Worcester County.Wabaquasset, about 6 miles from Quinebaug River, south of Woodstock, Conn.,sometimes regarded as an independent tribe.Wacuntug, on the west side of Blackstone River, near Uxbridge.Wenimesset, at New Braintree.History.?There was no coherence among the people bearing thename of Nipmuc and some of them were from time to time attachedto the more powerful tribes in their neighborhood, such as the Massa-chuset, Wampanoag, Narraganset, and Mohegan. The Whitesfirst met them after Plymouth and the Massachusetts Bay were settled.In 1674 there were seven villages of Christian Indians among theNipmuc but in 1675 practically all took part with King Philip againstthe colonists and at its close fled to Canada or to the tribes on HudsonRiver.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that there were 500 inde-pendent Nipmuc in 1600. If we consider as Nipmuc the Indians re-turned from Worcester County, Mass., and Windham and TollandCounties, Conn., in 1910, there were then 81.Pennacook. The following bands of Pennacook lived in the north-eastern part of Massachusetts: Agawam, Nashua, Naumkeag,Pentucket, Wachuset, Wamesit, and Weshacum. (See NewHampshire.)Pocomtuc. Meaning unknown.Connections.?The Pocomtuc belonged to the Algonquian linguisticfamily, and spoke an r-dialect, their nearest relatives probably beingthe Wappinger.Location.?The Pocomtuc home was in the present counties ofFranklin, Hampshire, and Hampden, Mass., and in the neighboringparts of Connecticut and Vermont. 24 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145Subdivisions and VillagesAgawam, aVjout Springfield, their principal village of the same name being onLong Hill.Mayawaug, near W. Suffield, town of Suffield, Conn.Nameroke, in the town of Enfield, east of Thompsonville, Conn.Nonotuc, a division and village about Northampton.Pocomtuc, a division in Deerfield River Valley and the adjacent parts of theConnecticut River Valley, the principal town of the same name being nearDeerfield. (See also Vermont.)Scitico, near the place of that name in the eastern part of the town ol Enfield,Conn.Squawkeag, on both sides of Connecticut River in the northern part of FranklinCounty, their principal village, of the same name, being near Northfield.History.?The fort of the Pocomtuc proper, on Fort Hill nearDeerfield, was destroyed by the Mohawk in 1666. The Pocomtuccombined with the Narraganset and Tunxis in attacks on the Moheganchief, Uncas, and later joined the hostile Indians under King Philip.At the close of the war they fled to Scaticook on the Hudson, wheresome of them remained until 1754, going then to St. Francis, Canada.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that there were 1,200Pocomtuc in 1600. If we count as Pocomtuc the Indians returnedfrom Hampden and Hampshu-e Counties in 1910, there were then 23left, but they may have been of qaite other origin.Wampanoag. The name has the same meaning as Abnaki, "easternpeople." Also called:Massasoits, from the name of their famous chief.Philip's Indians, from King Philip.Connections.?The Wampanoag belonged to the Algonquian lin-guistic stock, speaking an n-dialect like the neighboring Massachuset,Narranganset, Niantic (East and West), and the Nauset.Location.?The Wampanoag occupied Rhode Island east of Narra-gansett Bay; Bristol County, Mass.; the southern part of PlymouthCounty, below Marshfield and Brockton; and the extreme westernpart of Barnstable. The Indians of Martha's Vineyard should also beadded to them, and it wiU be convenient to treat under the same headthose of Nantucket and the Saconnet, or Sakonnet, of Sakonnet Point,R. I., whose connection was more remote. They controlled RhodeIsland in Narragansett Bay until the Narraganset tribe conquered itfrom them. (See also Rhode Island.)SubdivisionsSpeck (1928) gives the following mainland subdivisions:(1) Band of Massasoit, in a territory called Sowwams on the east side of Narra-gansett Bay; the western part of Bristol County, Mass.; all of BristolCounty, R. I.; and the eastern part of Providence County, R. I.(2) Band of Annawon, about Squannaconk swamps in Rehoboth Township. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 25 (3) Band of Weetamoe, a chieftainess, their territory being called Pocasset, insoutheastern Rhode Island, about Tiverton and adjacent parts of BristolCounty, Mass.(4) Band of Corbitant or Caunbatant, about Swansea.(5) Band of Tispaquin or Tuspaquin, lands called Assawampset, about Assa-wampset Pond*.(6) Band of Tyasks or Tyashk, about Rochester and Acushnet.(7) Band of Totoson, in a territory centering about Mattapoisett and Rochester.(8) Band of Coneconam or Cawnacome, in a territory known as Manomet,extending from Manomet to Woods Hole.(9) Band of Piowant or Plant, between Assonet Bay and Taunton River.There were several vacant tracts not occupied by any of the above. In 1861there were bands of Wampanoag at Herring Pond, Dartmouth, MamatakesettPond, Tumpum Pond, and Watuppa Pond.Speck (1928) gives the following bands on Martha's Vineyard, but the classi-fication applies to a time when Indians from various parts of the mainland hadbegun to settle there:(1) Band of Nohtooksaet who came from Massachusetts Bay, about Gay Head.(2) Band of Mankutquet (including the bands of Wannamanhut who came fromnear Boston (Christian town) and Toohtoowee, on the north shore ofChilmark), in the western part of Martha's Vineyard excluding the pre-ceding.(3) Band of Tewanticut (including the bands of Cheesehahchamuk, aboutHomes' Hole; Wampamag, of Sanchakankachet; and Tom Tyler, aboutEdgartown), in the eastern section of Martha's Vineyard.(4) Band of Pahkepunnasso, on the island of Chappaquiddick.There were two bands on Nantucket, the names of which are unknown, and wemust also add the Sakonnet, on Sakonnet Point, R. I., and the Indians of theEHzabeth Islands. VillagesMainland: Mainland?ContinuedAcushnet, about Acushnet. Mattapoiset, near Mattapoiset, Plym-Agawam, about Wareham. outh County.Assameekg, probably near Dart- Munponset, location unknown.mouth. Namasket, about Middleboro.Assawompset, in Middleborough Nasnocomacack, on the coast andTownship. probably a few miles north ofAssonet, conjectural village near the Plymouth.present Assonet. Nukkehkummees, near Dartmouth.Coaxet, near Little Compton, R. I. Pachade, near Middleboro.Cohannet, about Fowling Pond near Patuxet, at Plymouth.Taunton. Pocasset, near Tiverton, R. I.Comassakumkanit or Herring Pond, Pokanoket, on Bristol Peninsula, R. I.Herring Pond, Plymouth County. Quittaub, in the southwestern part ofCooxissett, probably in Plymouth Plymouth County.oun y. . ^, , ^ , , Saltwater Pond, in Plymouth County.Cowsumpsit, m Rhode Island.Jones' River, in Kingston Township. Shawonet, near Somerset.Kitteaumut, near Monument Pond, Wauchimoqut, probably near See-Plymouth County. konk.Loquasquscit, near Pawtucket, R. I. Wawayontat, on Weweantitt RiverMattakeset, near Duxbury. near Wareham. 26 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Martha's Vineyard: Nantucket?ContinuedChaubaqueduck, on the main island Quays, a district and probably village,or on Chappaquiddick Island. Sasacacheh, a district and probablyGay Head, at Gay Head, village.Nashamoiess, in the southeastern Shaukimmo, a district and probablypart of the island. village, south of Nantucket Harbor,Nashanekammuck, at Chilmark, Siasconsit, a district and probablyNunnepoag, location uncertain, village, including the site of theOhkonkemme, near Tisbury, present Siasconset,Sanchecantacket, near Edgartown. Squam, a district and probably village.Seconchqut, location uncertain, r,^ ? . , , ?T-T ^ , , Talhanio, location uncertain,Nantucket:Miacomit, location uncertain, Tetaukimmo, a district and probablyPodpis, a district and probably village.village, Toikiming, location uncertain.History.?With many older writers on the Norse voyages to America,Mount Hope Bay, in the territory of the Wampanoag, was a favoritesite for the supposed Icelandic colony (ca, 1000-1010), but the theoryis now less popular. In 1602 Gosnold touched at Martha's Vineyardand was kindly treated by the natives. Soon after the Pilgrims hadestablished themselves at Plymouth in 1620 they made a treaty offriendship with the Wampanoag head chief, Massasoit, who playeda great part in the early history of the colony. He died in 1662 andwas succeeded by two sons in succession, the second of whom, Meta-comet or Metacom, is the King Philip of history. Observing thesteady influx of White colonists into Indian lands. King Phihp organ-ized a native confederacy against them and a bloody war followed(1675-76), in which King Phihp was killed and the power of thetribes of southern New England finally destroyed. The Wampanoagsurvivors settled with the Sakonnet, who had remained neutral,and formed towns with the Nauset in the western part of BarnstableCounty, In 1763 they suffered severely from an epidemic, but anumber of bands have preserved their autonomy, in a much mixedcondition, to the present day. The Indians of Martha's Vineyardand Nantucket, like the Sakonnet, had refused to join the confederacyand consequently maintained their numbers relatively intact for alonger period. They continued to dechne, however, and in 1764 two-thirds of the Nantucket Indians were destroyed by a fever. Two orthree mixed-bloods were left in 1809, and in 1855 Abram Quary, thelast of these, died. The Indians of Martha's Vineyard, on the otherhand, received considerable accessions from the mainland and havemaintained themselves down to our day though, like the mainlandIndians, much mixed with other tribes and other races.Population.?Of Wampanoag proper Mooney (1928) estimated thatthere were 2,400 in 1600. They probably suffered severely in the SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 27 epidemic of 1617, but in 1630 they are said to have had about 30villages. In 1700 the Sakonnet Indians, including most of theWampanoag remnants, were estimated at 400. In 1861 a partialcensus gives 258, and we may suppose that the total was about 300.Martha's Vineyard: The estimates of the Indian population ofMartha's Vinej'^ard vary greatly. Mooney (1928) estimated thenumber of Indians at 1,500 in 1600, perhaps taken from an estimateof 1642, which gives the same figure, while a later writer places theirnumber as "not less than 3,000" (Hare, 1932, p. 44). An estimatemade in 1698 gave 1,000. In 1764, 313 were returned; in 1807, 360,only about 40 of whom were full-bloods. In 1861, 393 were returned,but in 1910 only 147. Nantucket: Mooney estimates the Indianpopulation of Nantucket to have been 1,500 in 1600 and Mayhew(Speck, 1928) gives the same number in 1642. Hare (1932, p. 44)also estimates the Indian population to have been 1,500. In 1763there were 358; in 1790, 20; in 1809, 2 or 3. An informant of Dr.Speck gives the total number of Indians in Barnstable, Plymouth,and Bristol Counties in 1928 as 450.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Wampanoagmade their mark in history chiefly through the activities of theirchiefs, Massasoit and King Philip, One of the two largest bodies ofIndians in southern New England to maintain their identity down tothe present day were the Wampanoag of Martha's Vineyard.RHODE ISLANDNarraganset. Their name means "people of the small point."Connections.?The Narraganset belonged to the Algonquian lin-guistic family and spoke an n- dialect like the neighboring Massa-chuset, Wampanoag, and probably the Niantic (East and West)and the Nauset.Location.?The Narraganset occupied the greater part of RhodeIsland west of Narragansett Bay, between Providence and PawcatuckRivers. At one time they dominated the Coweset (see Nipmuc)north of them and the Eastern Niantic, and they drove the Wampa-noag from the island which gives its name to the State of Rhode Islandand the Pequot from some territory they held in the west. (See alsoMassachusetts and Connecticut.)SuhdiviiionsThere are said to have been eight chiefs over as many territorial divisions, allunder one head chief. VillagesChaubatick, probably within a few miles of Providence.Maushapogue, in Providence County. 28 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Mittaubscut, on Pawtuxet River, 7 or 8 miles above its mouth.Narraganset, above the site of Kingston.Pawchauquet, in western Rhode Island.Shawomet, near Warwick.History.?The Narraganset traced their origin to the Southwest.They escaped the great pestilence of 1617 and were in. fact increasedin numbers by bands of refugees. In 1633 the Narraganset lost 700in a smallpox epidemic. In 1636 Roger Williams settled among themand through their favor was enabled to lay the foundations of thepresent State of Rhode Island. They remained on good terms withthe Whites until King Philip's war (1675-76), into which they threwtheir whole strength. In the celebrated swamp fight at Kingstonthey lost nearly 1,000 killed and captured, and the remnants of thetribe were soon forced to abandon the country. Some probablyjoined the Mahican and Abnaki or even got as far as Canada andnever returned to their own people, but others obtained permission tocome back and were settled among the Eastern Niantic who had takenno part in the contest. From that time on the combined tribes wereknown as Narraganset. In 1788 many of these united with theBrotherton Indians in New York, and a few have gone to live with theMohegan in Connecticut. The remainder are near Charlestown,R.I.Population.?The Narraganset are estimated by Mooney (1928) tohave numbered 4,000 in 1600, including the Eastern Niantic, and wereperhaps as numerous in 1675. Along with the Eastern Niantic, theyhad a total population of about 140 in 1812, and 80 in 1832, while thecensus of 1910 returned 16. The same year, however, 284 Indiansall told were returned from Rhode Island, and in 1930, 130.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Narraganset werefamed as the most powerful tribe of southern New England and becamenoted also on account of Roger Williams' dealings with them and hisreport regarding them. Narragansett Bay, the Town of Narragansettin Washington County, and Narragansett Pier, the well-knownsummer resort, were named after them.Niantic, Eastern. The word Niantic signifies, according to Trumbull(1818) "at a point of land on a (tidal) river or estuary."Connections.?The Eastern and the Western Niantic were parts ofone original tribe split in two perhaps by the Pequot; the nearestrelatives of both were probably tlie Narraganset.Location.?The western coast of Rhode Island and neighboringcoast of Connecticut. VillageWekapaug, on the great pond near Charlestown. SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 29 History.?As has just been stated, the Eastern Niantic were closelyconnected with the Narraganset, but they refused to join them inKing Philip's war and at its close the remnants of the Narragansetwere settled among them. Their subsequent history has been givenunder Narraganset.Population.?(See Narraganset.)Connection in which they have become noted.?Niantic, in the town ofWesterly, Washington County, R. I., perpetuates the name. (SeeNiantic, Western, under Connecticut.)Nipmuc. The Coweset and some other bands of Nipmuc extendedinto the northwestern part of the State but most of these wereunder the domination of the Narraganset. (See Massachusetts.)Pequot. - The Pequot originally occupied some lands in the westernpart of Rhode Island of which the Narraganset dispossessed them.(See Connecticut.)Wampanoag. The Wampanoag occupied the mainland sections ofRhode Island east of Narragansett Bay and Providence River.At one period they also held the island which gives this State itsname but they were driven from it by the Narraganset. (SeeMassachusetts.) CONNECTICUTMahican. The northwestern corner of Litchfield County was occu-pied by the Wawyachtonoc, a tribe of the Mahican Confederacy ofthe upper Hudson, though their main seats were in Columbia andDutchess Counties, N. Y. (See New York.)Mohegan. The name means "wolf." They are not to be confusedwith the Mahican. Also called:River Indians.Seaside People.Unkus [Uncas] Indians, from the name of their chief.Upland Indians.Connections.?The Mohegan belonged to the Algonquian linguisticstock and spoke a y-dialect closely related to Pequot.Location.?The Mohegan originally occupied most of the upper val-ley of the Thames and its branches. Later they claimed authorityover some of the Nipmuc and the Connecticut River tribes, and in theold Pequot territory. (See also New York.)VillagesAshowat, between Amston and Federal.Catantaquck, near the head of Pachaug River.Checapscaddock, southeast of the mouth of Shetucket River in the town ofPreston.Kitemaug, on the west wide of Thames River between Uncasville and Massapeag.Mamaquaog, on Natchaug River northeast of Willimantic. 30 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Mashantackack, near Palmertown, town of Montville.Massapeag, at the place now so-called on the west side of Thames River.Mohegan, at the present town of Mohegan on the west side of Thames River.Moosup, at the present Moosup in the town of Plainfield.Nawhesetuck, on Fenton River north of Willimantic.Pachaug, at the present Pachaug in the town of Griswold.Paugwonk, near Gardiner Lake in the town of Salem.Pautexet, near the present Jewett City in the town of Griswold.Pigscomsuck, on the right bank of Quinebaug River near the present line betweenNew London and Windham Counties.Poquechanneeg, near Lebanon.Poquetanock, near Trading Cove, town of Preston.Shantuck, on the west side of Thames River just north of Mohegan.Showtucket or Shetucket, near Lisbon in the fork of the Shetucket and QuinebaugRivers.Wauregan, on the east side of Quinebaug River in the town of Plainfield.Willimantic, on the site of the present city of Willimantic.Yantic, at the present Yantic on Yantic River.History.?The Mohegan were probably a branch of the Mahican.Originally under Sassacus, chief of the Pequot, they afterward becameindependent and upon the destruction of the Pequot in 1637, Uncas,the Mohegan chief, became ruler also of the remaining Pequot andset up pretensions to territory north and west beyond his originalborders. At the end of King Philip's War, the Mohegan were theonly important tribe remaining in southern New England, but asthe White settlements advanced they were reduced progressively bothin territory and in numbers. Many joined the Scaticook, and in 1788a still larger body united with the Brotherton in New York, where theyformed the largest single element in the new settlement. The restcontinued in their old town at Mohegan, where a remnant of mixed-bloods still survives.Population.?The number of Mohegan were estimated by Mooney(1928) at 2,200 in 1600; in 1643, including the remnant of the Pequotand perhaps other tribes, at between 2,000 and 2,500. In 1705they numbered 750; in 1774, 206 were reported; in 1804, 84; in 1809,69; in 1825, 300; in 1832, about 350; in 1910, 22.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Mohegan becamecelebrated on account of the services rendered the Whites by Uncas.Today their name is perpetuated in Mohegan, on Thames River, andthe name of their chief in Uncasville on the same stream. There isa post village of this name in McDowell County, W. Va., and aMohegan Lake in Westchester County, N. Y., but this is namedafter the Mahican.Niantic, Western. Regarding the name, see Niantic, Eastern, underRhode Island. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 31Connections.?These were the same as for the Eastern Niantic.(See Rhode Island.)Location.?On the seacoast from Niantic Bay to Connecticut River.VillagesNiantic or Nehantucket, near the present town of Niantic. There was anothernear Old Lyme.History.?Originally the Western Niantic are thought to have con-stituted one tribe with the Eastern Niantic and to have been cut apartfrom them by the Pequot. They were nearly destroyed in thePequot war and at its close (1637) were placed under the control ofthe Mohegan. About 1788 many joined the Brotherton Indians.A small village of Niantic was reported as existing near Danbury in1809, but this perhaps contained remnants of the tribes of westernConnecticut, although Speck (1928) found several Indians of mixedNiantic-Mohegan descent living with the Mohegan remnant, de-scendants of a pure-blood Niantic woman from the mouth of NianticRiver.Population. The Western Niantic population was estimated byMooney (1928) at 600 in 1600; there were about 100 in 1638; 85 in1761.Connection in which they have become noted.?The name of the West-ern Niantic is perpetuated in Niantic village, Niantic River, andNiantic Bay, in New London County. Post villages in MaconCounty, 111., and Montgomery County, Pa., bear the name Niantic.Nipmuc. Some bands of this tribe extended into the northeasternpart of the State. (See Massachusetts.)Pequot. The name means, according to Trumbull (1818), "de-stroyers." Also called:Sickenames, in a Dutch deed quoted by Ruttenber (1872).Connections.?The Pequot belonged to the Algonquian linguisticstock, and spoke a ^/-dialect closely related to Mohegan.Location.?The Pequot occupied the coast of New London Countyfrom Niantic River nearly to the Rhode Island State line. Untildriven out by the Narraganset, they extended into Rhode Islandas far as Wecapaug River. (See also Rhode Island.)VillagesAsupsuck, in the interior of the town of Stonington.Aukumbumsk or Awcumbuck, in the center of the Pequot country near GalesFerry.Aushpook, at Stonington.Cosattuck, probably near Stonington.Cuppanaugunnit, probably in New London County.Mangunckakuck, probably on Thames River below Mohegan. 32 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bdll. 145Maushantuxet, at Ledyard.Mystic, near West Mystic on the west side of Mystic River.Monhunganuck, near Beach Pond in the town of Voluntown.Nameaug, near New London.Noank, at the present place of that name.Oneco, at the place of that name in the town of SterUng.Paupattokshick, on the lower course of Thames River.Pawcatuck, probably on the river of the same name, Washington County, R. I.Pequotauk, near New London.Poquonock, inland from Poquonock Bridge.'Sauquonckackock, on the west side of Thames River below Mohegan.Shenecosset, near Midway in the town of Groton.Tatuppequauog, on the Thames River below Mohegan.Weinshauks, near Groton.Wequetequock, on the east side of the river of the same name.History.?The Pequot and the Mohegan are supposed to havebeen invaders from the direction of Hudson River. At the periodof first White contact, the Pequot were warlike and greatly dreadedby their neighbors. They and the Mohegan were jointly ruled bySassacus until the revolt of Uncas, the Mohegan chief. (SeeMohegan.) About 1635 the Narraganset drove them from a cornerof the present Rhode Island which they had previously held, and2 years later the murder of a trader who had treated some Indiansharshly involved the Pequot in war with the Whites. At that timetheir chief controlled 26 subordinate chiefs, claimed authority overaU Connecticut east of Connecticut River, and on the coast as farwest as New Haven or Guilford, as well as all of Long Island exceptthe extreme western end. Through the influence of Roger Williams,the English secured the assistance or neutrality of the surroundingtribes. Next they surprised and destroyed the principal Pequotfort near Mystic River along with 600 Indians of all agesand both sexes, and this disaster crippled the tribe so much that,after a few desperate attempts at further resistance, they determinedto separate into small parties and abandon the country (1637).Sassacus and a considerable body of followers were intercepted nearFairfield while trying to escape to the Mohawk and almost all werekilled or captured. Those who surrendered were divided amongthe Mohegan, Narraganset, and Niantic, and their territory passedunder the authority of Uncas. Their Indian overlords treated themso harshly, however, that they were taken out of their hands bythe colonists in 1655 and settled in two villages near Mystic River,where some of their descendants still live. Numbers removed toother places?Long Island, New Haven, the Nipmuc country, andelsewhere?while many were kept as slaves among the English inNew England or sent to the West Indies. SwA.NTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 33Population.?The Pequot population was estimated by MooneyC1928) at 2,200 in 1600; in 1637, immediately after the Pequot war,there were said to be 1,950, but the figure is probably too high.In 1674 the Pequot in their old territory numbered about 1,500; in1762, 140. In 1832 there were said to be about 40 mixed-bloods,but the census of 1910 gave 66, of whom 49 were in Connecticut and17 in Massachusetts.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Pequot areremembered principally on account of the bitter and, to them,disastrous war related above. The name is borne by a post villagein Crow Wing County, Minn.Wappinger. The valley of Connecticut River was the home of anumber of bands which might be called Mattabesec after the nameof the most important of them, and this in turn was a part of theWappinger. (See New York.)NEW YORKDelaware. Bands of two of the main divisions of the DelawareIndians, the Munsee and Unami, extended into parts of NewYork State, including the island of Manhattan. (See New Jersey.)Erie. The Erie occupied parts of Chautauqua and CattaraugusCounties. (See Ohio.)Iroquois. From Algonkin Iri?akhoiw, "real adders," with the Frenchsuffix -ois. Also called:Ongwano?sionni', their own name, meaning "We are of the extendedlodge," whence comes the popular designation, "People of the long-house."Canton Indians.Confederate Indians.Five Nations, from the five constituent tribes.Mat-che-naw-to-waig, Ottawa name, meaning "bad snakes."Mingwe, Delaware name.Nadowa, name given by the northwestern Algonquians and meaning "adders."Six Nations, name given after the Tuscarora had joined them.Connections.?The Iroquois belonged to the Iroquoian linguisticstock, their nearest relations being the Tuscarora, Neutral Nation,Huron, Erie, and Susquehanna.Location.?In the upper and central part of the Mohawk Valleyand the lake region of central New York. After obtaining guns fromthe Dutch, the Iroquois acquired a dominating influence among theIndians from Maine to the Mississippi and between the Ottawa andCumberland Rivers. (See also Indiana, Kansas, Ohio, Oklahoma,Pennsjdvania, Wisconsin, and Canada.) 34 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145SubdivisionsThere were five tribes, as follows: Cayuga, about Cayuga Lake; Mohawk, inthe upper valley of Mohawk River; Oneida, about Oneida Lake; Onondaga, inOnondaga County and the neighboring section; Seneca, between Lake Senecaand Genesee River. Later there were added to these, for the most part not onterms of perfect equality, the Tuscarora from North Carolina, some Delaware,Tutelo, Saponi, Nanticoke, Conoy, New England Indians, and other fragmentsof tribes, besides entire towns from the Huron, Erie, Andaste, and other conqueredpeoples. VillagesCayuga:Chondote, on the east side of Cayuga Lake a few miles south of Cayuga.Gandasetaigon, near Port Hope, Ont.Ganogeh, at Canoga.Gayagaanhe, near the east shore of Cayuga Lake 3}^ miles south of UnionSprings.Gewauga, at Union Springs, town of Springport.Goiogouen, on the east side of Cayuga Lake on Great Gully Brook, about 4miles south of the present Union Springs, and 4 leagues from the town ofTiohero.Kawauka, (?), Kente, on Quinte Bay, Lake Ontario, Ont.Neodakheat, at Ithaca.Oneniote, at Oneida on Cayuga Lake.Onnontare, probably east of Seneca River and at Bluff Point, near Fox Ridge,Cayuga County.Owego, on the right bank of Owego Creek, about 2 miles from the SusquehannaRiver, in Tioga County.Skannayutenate, on the west side of Cayuga Lake, northeast of Canoga,Seneca County.Tiohero, 4 leagues from Goiogouen.Mohawk : Canajoharie, on the east bank of Otsquago Creek nearly opposite Fort Plain.Canastigaone, on the north side of Mohawk River just above Cohoes Falls.Canienga, near the bank of Mohawk River.Caughnawaga, on Mohawk River near the site of Auriesville.Chuchtononeda, on the south side of Mohawk River?named from a band.Kanagaro, on the north side of Mohawk River in Montgomery County orHerkimer County.Kowogoconnughariegugharie, (?) . Nowadaga, at Danube, Herkimer County.Onoalagona, at Schenectady.Osquake, at Fort Plain and on Osquake Creek, Montgomery County.Saratoga, about Saratoga and Stillwater.Schaunactada, at and south of Albany.Schoharie, near Schoharie.Teatontaloga, on the north side of Mohawk River and probably near the mouthof Schoharie Creek in Montgomery County.Tewanondadon, in the peninsula formed by the outlet of Otsego Lake andShenivas Creek. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 35Oneida:Awegen.Cahunghage, on the south side of Oneida Lake.Canowdowsa, near junction of Lackawanna and Susquehanna Rivers.Chittenango, on Chittenango Creek, Madison County.Cowassalon, on creek of same name in Madison County.Ganadoga, near Oneida Castle, Oneida County.Hostayuntwa, at Camden.Oneida, name of several of the main towns of the tribe, in the valleys of OneidaCreek and Upper Oriskany Creek.Opolopong, on the east branch of Susquehanna, about 30 miles above Shamokinand 10 miles below Wyoming, Pa.Oriska, near Oriskany in Oneida County.Ossewingo, a few miles above Chenango, Broome County.Ostogeron, probably above Toskokogie on the Chenango River.Schoherage, probably on the west branch of Chenango River (?) below Tuskokogie.Sevege, a short distance above Owego on the west side of the east branch ofthe Susquehanna River.Solocka, about 60 miles above Shamokin, on a creek issuing from the GreatSwamp north of the Cashuetunk Mountains, Pa.Tegasoke, on Fish Creek in Oneida County.Teseroken, (?).Teiosweken, (?).Tkanetota, (?).Onondaga:Ahaouet, (?).Deseroken, traditional.Gadoquat, at Brewerton, Onondaga County.Gannentaha, a mission on Onondaga Lake about 5 leagues from Onondaga.Gistwiahna, at Onondaga Valley.Onondaga, the principal town of the tribe, which occupied several distinct sites,the earliest known probably 2 miles west of Cazenovia and east of WestLimestone Creek, Madison County.Onondaghara, on Onondaga River 3 miles east of Onondaga Hollow.Onondahgegahgeh, west of Lower Ebenezer, Erie County.Onontatacet, on Seneca River.Otiahanague, at the mouth of Salmon River, Oswego County.Teionontatases, (?).Tgasunto, (?).Touenho, south of Brewerton, at the west end of Lake Oneida.Tueadasso, near Jamesville.Seneca:Buckaloon, on the north side of Allegheny River near the present Irvine,Warren County, Pa.Canadasaga, near Geneva.Canandaigua, near Canandaigua.Caneadea, at Caneadea.Catherine's Town, near Catherine.Cattaraugus, on a branch of Cattaraugus Creek.Chemung, probably near Chemung.Cheronderoga, (?). 36 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Chinklacamoose, probably mainly Delaware but frequented by Seneca, on thesite of Clearfield, Pa.Chinoshahgeh, near Victor.Condawhaw, at North Hector.Connewango, 2 villages, one at Warren, Pa., and one on the left bank of Alle-gheny River above the site of Tionesta, Pa.Dayoitgao, on Genesee River near Fort Morris.Deonundagae, on Livingston River west of Genesee River.Deyodeshot, about 2 miles southeast of East Avon, on the site of Keinthe.Deyohnegano, 2 villages: one near Caledonia; one on Allegheny Reservation,Cattaraugus County.Deyonongdadagana, on the west bank of Genesee River near Cuylerville.Dyosyowan, on Buffalo Creek, Erie County, Pa.Gaandowanang, on Genesee River near Cuylerville.Gadaho, at Castle.Gahato, probably Seneca, in Chemung County.Gahayanduk, location unknown.Ganagweh, near Palmyra.Ganawagus, on Genesee River near Avon.Ganeasos, (?).Ganedontwan, at Moscow.Ganos, at Cuba, Allegany County.Ganosgagong, at Dansville.Gaonsagaon, (?).Gaousge, probably Seneca, on Niagara River.Gaskosada, on Cayuga Creek w^est of Lancaster.Gathtsegwarohare, (?).Geneseo, near Geneseo.Gistaquat, (?).Goshgoshunk, mainly Munsee and Unami, 3 villages on Allegheny River in theupper part of Venango County, Pa.Hickorytown, mainly Munsee and Unami, probably about East Hickory orWest Hickory, Forest County, Pa.Honeoye, on Honeoye Creek, near Honeoye Lake.Joneadih, on Allegheny River nearly opposite Salamanca.Kanagaro, 2 villages, one on Boughton Hill, directly south of Victor, N. Y.;one with several different locations from 1}^ to 4 miles south from the first,and southeast from Victor, on the east side of Mud Creek.Kanaghsaws, about 1 mile northeast of Conesus Center.Kannassarago, between Oneida and Onondaga.Kashong, on Kashong Creek at its entrance into Lake Seneca.Kaskonchiagon, (?).Kaygen, on the south bank of Chemung River below Kanestio River.Keinthe, on the north shore of Lake Ontario, later transferred to Bay of Quinte.Lawunkhannek, mainly Delaware, on Allegheny River above Franklin, VenangoCounty, Pa.Mahusquechikoken, with Munsee and other tribes, on Allegheny River about20 miles above Venango, Pa.Middle Town, 3 miles above the site of Chemung.New Chemung, at or near the site of Chemung.Newtown, on Chemung River near Elmira.Oatka, at Scottsville, on the west bank of Genesee River. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 37Old Chemung, about 3 miles below New Chemung.Onnahee, on the east side of Fall Brook, in the western part of lot 20, town ofHopewell, Ontario County.Onoghsadago, near Conewango (?).Onondarka, north of Karaghyadirha on Guy Johnson's map of 1771.Owaiski, near Wiscoy on the west bank of Genesee River, Allegheny County.Sheshequin, about 6 miles below Tioga Point, Bradford County, Pa.Skahasegao, at Lima, Livingston County.Skoiyase, at Waterloo.Sonojowauga, at Mount Morris, Livingston County.Tekisedaneyout, in Erie County.Tioniongarunte, (?).Tonawanda, on Tonawanda Creek, Niagara County.Totiakton, on Honeoye outlet not far from Honeoye Fails in Monroe County.Venango, at Franklin, at the mouth of French Creek, Venango County, Pa.Yorkjough, about 12 miles from Honeoye and 6 from New Genesee, probablyin Livingston County.Yoroonwago, on upper Allegheny River near the present Corydon, WarrenCounty, Pa. Iroquoian villages of unspecified tribeAdjouquay, (?).Anpuaqun, (?).Aratumquat, (?).Cahunghage, on the south side of Oneida Lake.Caughnawaga, on Sault St. Louis, Quebec Province, Canada.Chemegaide, (?).Churamuk, on the east side of Susquehanna River, 18 miles above Owego.Codocararen, (?).Cokanuk, (?).Conaquanosshan, (?),Conihunta, 14 miles below Unadilla.Connosomothdian, (?).Conoytown, of mixed Conoy and Iroquois, on Susquehanna River between Bain-bridge and Sunbury, Pa.Coreorgonel, of mixed Tutelo and Iroquois, on the west side of Cayuga Lake inletand on the border of the Great Swamp 3 miles from the south end of CayugaLake.Cowawago, (?).Cussewago, principally Seneca, on the site of the present Waterford, Erie County,Pa.Ganadoga, near Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Ganagarahhare, at Venango, Crawford County, Pa.Ganeraske, at the mouth of Trent River, Ontario, Canada.Ganneious, at the site of Napanee, Ontario, Canada.Glasswanoge, (?).Indian Point, at Lisbon, N. Y.Janundat, on Sandusky Bay, Erie County, Ohio.Jedakne, Iroquois or Delaware, on the west branch of Susquehanna River, prob-ably at Dewart, Northumberland County, Pa.Johnstown, location not given. 38 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bdll. 145Jonondes, location unknown.Juaniata, on Duncan Island in Susquehanna River, near the mouth of the Juniata.Juraken, 2 villages, one on the right bank of the Susquehanna at Sunbury, Pa.,the other on the left bank of the east branch of the Susquehanna.Kahendohon, location unknown.Kanaghsaws, about 1 mile northwest of Conesus Center, N. Y.Kannawalohalla, at Elmira, N. Y.Kanesadageh, a town of the Turtle Clan mentioned in the Iroquois Book of Rites.Karaken, location unknown.Karhationni, location unknown.Karhawenradonh, location unknown.Kayehkwarageh, location unknown.Kickenapawling, mixed Delaware (?) and Iroquois, 5 miles north of the presentStoyestown, Pa., at the fork of Quemahoning and Stony Creeks.Kittanning, mixed Iroquois, Delaware, and Caughnawaga, about the presentKittanning, Armstrong County, Pa.Kuskuski, mixed Delaware and Iroquois, on Beaver Creek, near Newcastle, Pa.La Montague, on a hill on Montreal Island, Quebec Province, Canada.La Prairie, at La Prairie, Quebec, Canada.Logstown, Shawnee, Delaware, and Iroquois, on the right bank of the Ohio River,14 miles below Pittsburgh.Loyalhannon, on Loyalhanna Creek, Pa.Manckatawangum, near Barton, Bradford Count}', Pa.Matchasaung, on the left bank of the east branch of the Susquehanna River, about13 miles above Wyoming, Pa.Mingo Town, near Steubenville, Ohio.Mohanet, probably Iroquois, on the east branch of the Susquehanna River, Pa.Nescopeck, mixed Iroquois, Shawnee, and Delaware, formerly at the mouth ofNescopeck River, Luzerne County, Pa.Newtown, 4 towns: one, probably of the Seneca, on Chemung River near Elmira,N. Y. ; one, probably of Iroquois and Delaware, on the north bank of LickingRiver, near Zanesville, Ohio; one, probably of Iroquois and Delaware, onMuskingum River near Newtown, Ohio; and one, probably of Iroquois andDelaware, on the west side of Wills Creek, near Cambridge, Ohio.Newtychanning, on the west bank of the Susquehanna River and the north sideof Sugar Creek, near North Towanda, Pa.Ohrekionni, (?).Oka, mixed Iroquois, Nipissing and Algonkin, on Lake of the Two Mountains,near Montreal, Quebec, Canada.Onaweron, location unknown.Onkwe lyede, location unknown.Opolopong, on the east branch of the Susquehanna River about 30 miles aboveShamokin and 10 miles below Wyoming, Pa.Oskawaserenhon, location unknown.Ostonwackin, Delaware and Iroquois, at the mouth of Loyalstock Creek on thewest branch of the Susquehanna River, at Montoursville, Pa.Oswegatchie, at Ogdensburg, N. Y.Otsiningo, on Chenango River, Broome County, N. Y.Otskwirakeron, location unknown.Ousagwentera, "beyond Fort Frontenac."Pluggy's Town, a band of marauding Indians, chiefly Mingo, at Delaware, Ohio,Runonvea, near Big Flats, Chemung County, N. Y. SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OP NORTH AMERICA 39Saint Regis, on the south bank of the St. Lawrence River at the internationalboundary and on both sides.Sault au Recollet, near the mouth of the Ottawa River, Two Mountains County,Quebec, Canada.Sawcunk, mixed Delaware, Shawnee, and Mingo, on the north bank of the OhioRiver near the mouth of Beaver Creek and the present town of Beaver, Pa.Schohorage, on the west bank of the Susquehanna River, a short distance abovethe Indian town of Oquaga, Pa.Sconassi, on the west side of the Susquehanna River below the west branch,probably in Union County, Pa.Scoutash's Town, Mingo or Shawnee, near Lewistown, Logan County, Ohio.Seneca Town, Mingo, on the east side of Sandusky River in Seneca County, Ohio.Sevege, a short distance above Owego on the west side of the east branch ofSusquehanna River, N. Y.Sewickley, a Shawnee town occupied in later years by a few Mingo and Delaware,on the north side of Allegheny River about 12 miles above Pittsburgh, nearSpringdale, Pa.Shamokin, Delaware, Shawnee, and Iroquois, a short distance from the forks ofthe Susquehanna and on the northeast branch.Shenango, 3 towns: one, on the north bank of the Ohio River a short distancebelow the present Economy, Pa.; one, at the junction of the Conewangoand Allegheny Rivers; and one, some distance up the Big Beaver near Kuskuski(see above).Sheshequin, Iroquois and Delaware, about 8 miles below Tioga Point, Pa.Sittawingo, in Armstrong County,* Pa.Skenandowa, at Vernon Center, Oneida County, Pa.Solocka, about 60 miles above Shamokin on a creek issuing from the Great Swampnorth of the Cashuetunk Mountains, Pa.Swahadowri, (?).Taiaiagon, near Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Tioga, at Athens, Pa.Tohoguses Town, at junction of Plum and Crooked Creeks, Armstrong County, Pa.Tonihata, on an island in the St. Lawrence River supposed to be Grenadier Island,Leeds County, Ontario, Canada.TuUihas, mixed Delaware, Mahican, and Caughnawaga, on the west branch ofthe Muskingum River, Ohio, above the forks.Tuskokogie, just above Schoherage (q. v.) on Chenango River (?).Unadilla, near Unadilla, Otsego County.Wakerhon, (?).Wauteghe, on upper Susquehanna River between Teatontaloga and Oquaga.Youcham, (?).History.?In Cartier's time the five Iroquois tribes seem to havebeen independent and in a state of constant mutual warfare. At alater period, not before 1570 according to Hewitt (1907), they wereinduced by two remarkable men, Dekanawida and Hiawatha, to forma federal union. While the immediate object of the league was tobring about peace between these and other neighboring tribes, thestrength which the federal body acquired and the fact that they weresoon equipped with guns by the Dutch at Albany incited them toundertake extensive wars and to build up a rude sort of empire. 40 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145The related Tuscarora of North Carolina joined them in successivemigrations, the greater part between 1712 and 1722, and the remainderin 1802. In the French-English wars they took the part of the Englishand were a very considerable factor in their final victory. Later allbut the Oneida and part of the Tuscarora sided against the Americancolonists and as a result their principal towns were laid waste bySullivan in 1779. The Mohawk and Cayuga, with other Iroquoiantribes in the British interest, were given a reservation on Grand River,Ontario. The remainder received reservations in New York exceptthe Oneida, who were settled near Green Bay, Wis. The so-calledSeneca of Oklahoma consist of remnants from all of the Iroquoistribes, the Conestoga, Hurons, and perhaps others, which Hewitt{in Hodge, 1910) thinks were gathered around the Erie and perhapsthe Conestoga as a nucleus.Population.?In 1600 the Iroquois are estimated by Mooney (1928)to have numbered 5,500; in 1677 and 1685 their numbers were placedat about 16,000; in 1689 they were estimated at about 12,850; in1774, 10,000 to 12,500; in 1904 they numbered about 16,100, of whom10,418 were in Canada; in 1923 there were 8,696 in the United Statesand 11,355 in Canada; total, 20,051. By the census of 1910 therewere reported in the United States 2,907 Seneca, 2,436 Oneida, 365Onondaga, 368 Mohawk, 81 Cayuga, 1,219 St. Regis, and 61 unspeci-fied, a total of 7,437, besides 400 Tuscarora. In 1930 the figure,including Tuscarora, was 6,866. In 1937, 3,241 Oneida were hvingin Wisconsin and 732 "Seneca" in Oldahoma.Connection in which they have become noted.?The group of tribesknown as the Iroquois is famous from the fact that it had attained thehighest form of governmental organization reached by any people northof the valley of Mexico. It is also noted, largely in consequence of theabove fact, for the dominating position to which it attained among theIndian tribes of northeastern North America, and for its long contin-ued alliance with the English in their wars with the French. Hia-watha, the name of one of the founders of the confederation, wasadopted by Longfellow as that of his hero in the poem of the name,though the story centers about another people, the Chippewa. LewisH. Morgan (1851) based his theories regarding the rfature of primitivesociety, which have played a very important part in ethnology andsociology, on studies of Iroquois organization. The name Iroquoishas been given to a branch of the Kankakee River, 111., to an IllinoisCounty and a village in the same, and to villages in South Dakotaand Ontario. The names of each of the five constituent tribes havealso been widely used. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 41Mahican. The name means "wolf." This tribe is not to be con-fused with the Mohegan of Connecticut (q. v.), though the namesare mere varieties of the same word. Also called:Akochakanefi, meaning "Those who speak a strange tongue." (Iroquoisname.)Canoe Indians, so called by Whites.Hikanagi or Nhfkana, Shawnee name.Loups, so called by the French.Orunges, given by Chauvignerie (1736), in Schoolcraft (1851-57, vol. 3,p. 554).River Indians, Dutch name.Uragees, given by Golden, 1747.Connections.?The Mahican belonged to the Algonquian linguisticfamily, and spoke an r-dialect, their closest connections being withthe southern New England Indians to the east.Location.?On both banks of the upper Hudson from Catskill Creekto Lake Champlain and eastward to include the valley of theHousatonic. (See also Connecticut, Massachusetts, Vermont, andWisconsin.) SubdivisionsMahican proper, in the northern part of the territory.Mechkentowoon, on the west bank of Hudson River above Catskill Creek.Wawyachtonoc, in Dutchess and Columbia Counties and eastward to theHousatonic River in Connecticut.Westenhuck (or Housatonic?), near Great Barrington, Mass.Wiekagjoc, on the eastern bank of the Hudson River near Hudson.VillagesAepjin, at or near Schodac.Kaunaumeek, in New York about halfway between Albany and Stockbridge,Mass.Kenunckpacook, on the east side of Housatonic River a little above Scaticook.Maringoman's Castle, on Murderer's Creek, at Bloominggrove, Ulster County.Monemius, on Haver Island, in Hudson River near Cohoes Falls, Albany County,Nepaug, on Nepaug River, town of New Hartford, Litchfield County, Conn.Peantani, at Bantam Lake, Litchfield County, Conn.Potic, west of Athens, Greene County.Scaticook, 3 villages in Dutchess and Rensselaer Counties, and in LitchfieldCounty, Conn., the last on Housatonic River near the junction with Ten MileRiver.Wequadnack, near Sharon, Litchfield County, Conn.Wiatiac, near Salisbury, Litchfield County, Conn.Wiltmeet, on Esopus Creek, probably near Kingston,Winooskeek, on Lake Champlain, probably at the mouth of Winooski River, Vt.Wyantenuc, in Litchfield County. Conn.History.?The traditional point of origin of the Mahican was inthe West. They were found in occupancy of the territory outlinedabove by the Dutch, and were then at war with the Mohawk who, in 42 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 1451664, compelled them to move their capital from Schodac near Albanyto the present Stockbridge. They gradually sold their territory andin 1721 a band was on Kankakee River, Ind., while in 1730, alarge body settled close to the Delaware and Munsee near Wyoming,Pa., afterward becoming merged with those tribes. In 1736 those inthe Housatonic Valley were gathered into a mission at Stockbridgeand were ever afterward known as Stockbridge Indians. In 1756 alarge body of Mahican and Wappinger, along with Nanticoke andother people, settled in Broome and Tioga Counties under Iroquoisprotection. In 1788 another body of Indians drawn from New York,Connecticut, and Rhode Island, including Mahican, settled near theStockbridges at Marshall, N. Y. The Stockbridge and BrothertonIndians later removed to Wisconsin, where they were probably joinedby part at least of the band last mentioned. A few Mahican re-mained about their old home on Hudson River for some years afterthe Revolution but disappeared unnoticed.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that there were about 3,000Mahican in 1600; the Stockbridges among the Iroquois numbered300 in 1796, and 606 in 1923, including some Munsee. The census of1910 gave 533 Stockbridges and 172 Brotherton. The census of 1930indicated about 813.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Mahican tribehas probably attained more fame from its appearance in the title ofCooper's novel. "The Last of the Mohegans," than from any cir-cumstance directly connected with its history. There is a villagecalled Mohegan in the northern part of Westchester County, N. Y.,and another, known as Mohican in Ashland County, Ohio, whilean affluent of the Muskingum also bears the same name.Mohegan. (See Connecticut.)Montauk. Meaning "uncertain."Connections.?The Montauk belonged to the Algonquian linguisticfamily and spoke an r-dialect like that of the Wappinger.Location.?In the eastern and central parts of Long Island.SubdivisionsCorchaug, in Riverhead and Southold Townships.Manhasset, on Shelter Island.Massapequa, in the southern part of Oyster Bay and Huntington Townships.Matinecock, in the townships of Flushing, North Hempstead, the northern partof Oyster Bay and Huntington, and the western part of Smithtown.Merric, in the eastern part of Hempstead Township.Montauk proper, in Southampton Township.Nesaquake, in the eastern part of Smithtown and the territory east of it.Patchogue, on the southern coast from Patchogue to Westhampton.Rockaway, in Newtown, Jamaica, and Hempstead Townships. SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 43Secatogue, in Islip Township.Setauket, on the north shore from Stony Brook to Wading River.Shinnecock, on the coast from Shinnecock Bay to Montauk Point.VillagesAquebogue, on a creek entering the north side of Great Peconic Bay.Ashamomuck, on the site of a White town of the same name in SufiFolk County.Cutchogue, at Cutchogue in Suffolk County.Massapequa, probably at Fort Neck.Mattituck, on the site of the present Mattituck, Suffolk County.Merric, on the site of Merricks, Queens County.Montauk, above Fort Pond, Suffolk County.Nesaquake, at the present Nissequague, about Smithtown, Suffolk County.Patchogue, near the present Patchogue, Suffolk County.Rechquaakie, near the present Rockaway.There were also villages at Flushing, Glen Cove, Cold Spring, Huntington,Cow Harbor, Fireplace, Mastic, Moriches, Westhampton, and on Hog Island inRockaway Bay.History.?The Montauk were in some sense made tributary to thePequot, until the latter were destroyed, when they were subjectedto a series of attacks by the Narraganset and took refuge, about 1759,with the Whites at Easthampton. They had, meanwhile, lost thegreater part of their numbers by pestUence and, about 1788, mostof those that were left went to live with the Brotherton Indians inNew York. A very few remained on the island, whose mixed-blooddescendants are still officially recognized as a tribe by the State ofNew York, principally under the name Shinnecock.Population.?Including Canarsee, the Montauk are estimated byMooney (1928) at 6,000 in 1600. In 1658-59 an estimate gives about500; in 1788, 162 were enumerated; in 1829, 30 were left on LongIsland; in 1910, 167 "Shinnecock," 29 "Montauk," and 1 "Possepa-tuck." In 1923, 250 were returned, including 30 Montauk, 200Shinnecock, and 20 Poospatock (Patchoag).Connection in which they have become noted.?The name of theMontauk is perpetuated in that of the easternmost point of land onLong Island, a post village in the same county, and one in DentCounty, Mo. They were among those tribes most active in themanufacture of siwan or wampum.Neutrals. So called by the French because they remained neutralduring the later wars between the Iroquois and Huron. Also called:Hatiwa?ta-runh, by Tuscarora, meaning "Their speech is awry"; inform it is close to the names applied by the other Iroquois tribes andmore often quoted as Attiwandaronk.Connections.?The Neutrals belonged to the Iroquoian linguisticstock; their position within this is uncertain. 44 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Location.?In the southern part of the province of Ontario, thewesternmost part of New York, in northeastern Ohio, and in south-eastern Michigan. (See also Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Canada.)SubdivisionsIt seems impossible to separate these from the names of the villages, exceptperhaps in the cases of the Aondironon (in Ontario bordering Huron territory),and the Ongniaahra (see below). VillagesThere were 28, but only the names of the following have been preserved:Kandoucho, in Ontario near the Huron country, i. e., in the northern part ofNeutral territory.Khioetoa, apparently a short distance east of Sandwich, Ontario.Ongniaahra, probably on the site of Youngstown, N.Y.Ounontisaston, not far from Niagara River.Teotongniaton, in Ontario.History.?Shortly after the destruction of the Huron, the Neutralsbecame involved in hostilities with the Iroquois and were themselvesdestroyed in 1650-51, most of them evidently being incorporatedwith their conquerors, though an independent body is mentioned aswintering near Detroit in 1653.Population.?The Neutrals were estimated by Mooney (1928) tonumber 10,000 in 1600; in 1653 the independent remnant included800. They were probably incorporated finally with the Iroquoisand Wyandot.Connection in which they have become noted.?The chief claim of theNeutrals to permanent fame is the fact that the name of one of theirsubdivisions, the Ongniaahra, became fixed, in the form Niagara, tothe world-famous cataract between New York and Ontario.Saponi. Some years after leaving Fort Christanna, Va., the Saponisettled among the Iroquois and were formally adopted by the Cay-uga tribe in 1753. (See Virginia.)Tuscarora. After their defeat in the Tuscarora War, 1712-13, bandsof this tribe began moving north and in course of time the majoritysettled in New York so that the Iroquois came to be known after-wards as the "Six Nations" instead of the "Five Nations." (SeeNorth Carolina.)Tutelo. The Tutelo accompanied the Saponi from Virginia andwere adopted by the Cayuga at the same time. (See Virginia.)Wappinger. From the same root as Abnaki and Wampanoag, andmeaning "Easterners"Connections.?The Wappinger belonged to the Algonquian linguisticfamily and spoke an r-dialect, their nearest allies being the Mahican,the Montauk, and next the New England tribes. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 45Location.?The east bank of the Hudson Kiver from ManhattanIsland to Poughkeepsie and the territory eastward to the lowerConnecticut Valley. (See also Connecticut.)Subdivisions or "Sachemships"Hammonasset, west of the Connecticut River, Conn., at its mouth.Kitchawank, in the northern part of Westchester County beyond Croton Riverand between Hudsoo River and the Connecticut.Massaco, in the present towns of Simsbury and Canton on Farmington River, Conn.Menunkatuck, in the present town of Guilford, Conn.Nochpeem, in the southern part of Dutchess County, N. Y.Paugusset, in the eastern part of Fairfield County and the western edge of NewHaven County, Conn.Podunk, in the eastern part of Hartford County, Conn., east of Connecticut River.Poquonock, in the towns of Windsor, Windsor Locks, and Bloomfield, HartfordCounty, Conn.Quinnipiac, in the central part of New Haven County, Conn.Sicaog, in Hartford and West Hartford, Conn.Sintsink, between Hudson, Croton, and Pocantico Rivers.Siwanoy, in Westchester County and part of Fairfield County, Conn., betweenthe Bronx and Five Mile River.Tankiteke, mainly in Fairfield County, Conn., between Five Mile River andFairfield and extending inland to Danbury and even into Putnam and DutchessCounties, N. Y.Tunxis, in the southwestern part of Hartford County, Conn.Wanguuk, on both sides of Connecticut River from the Hartford city line toabout the southern line of the town of Haddam.Wappinger proper, about Poughkeepsie in Dutchess County, N. Y.Wecquaesgeek, between the Hudson, Bronx, and Pocantico Rivers.VillagesAlipconk, in the Weckquasgeek sachemdom, on the site of Tarrytown, N. Y.Appaquag, on the Hockanum River east of Hartford, Conn., in the Podunksachemdom.Aspetuck, near the present Aspetuck in Fairfield County, Conn., in the Tankitekesachemdom,Canopus, in Canopus Hollow, Putnam County.Capage, near Beacon Falls on Naugatuck River, Conn., in the Paugusset sachem-dom.Cassacuhque, near Mianus in the town of Greenwich, Conn., Siwanoy sachemdom.Cockaponset, near Haddam in Middlesex County, Conn., in the Wangunk sachem-dom.Coginchaug, near Durham, Conn., in the Wangunk sachemdom.Cossonnacock, near the line between the towns of Haddam and Lyme, Conn.,in the Wangunk sachemdom.Cupheag, given as the'probable name of a town at Stratford, Conn., but this wasperhaps Pisquheege.Hockanum, at the mouth of Hockanum River, Hartford County, Conn., in thePodunk sachemdom.Keskistkonk, probably on Hudson River, south of the highlands, in PutnamCounty, in the Nochpeem sachemdom. 46 BUREAIi OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bdll. 145Kitchiwank, about the mouth of Croton River, N. Y., in the Kitchiwank sachem-dom.Machamodus, on Sahnon River in Middlesex County, Conn., in the Wangunksachemdom.Massaco, near Simsbury on Farmington River, Conn., in the Massaco sachemdom.Mattabesec, on the site of Middletown, Conn., in the Wangunk sachemdom.Mattacomacok, near Rainbow in the town of Windsor, Conn., in the Wangunksachemdom.Mattianock, at the mouth of Farmington River in the Poquonock sachemdom.Menunketuck, at Guilford, Conn., in the Menunketuck sachemdom.Meshapock, near Middlebury, C6nn., in the Paugussett sachemdom.Mioonktuck, near New Haven, Conn,, in the Quinnipiac sachemdom.Namaroake, on Connecticut River in the town of East Windsor, Conn., in thePodunk sachemdom.Naubuc, near Glastonbury, Conn., in the Podunk sachemdom.Naugatuck, near Naugatuck, Conn., in the Paugussett sachemdom.Newashe, at the mouth of Scantic River, in the Podunk sachemdom.Nochpeem, in the southern part of Dutchess County.Noroaton, at the mouth of Noroton River, in the Siwanoy sachemdom.Norwauke, at Norwalk, Conn., in the Siwanoy sachemdom.Ossingsing, at the site of Ossining, N. Y.Pahquioke, near Danbury, Conn., in the Tankiteke sachemdom.Pashesauke, on Lyndes Neck at the mouth of the Connecticut River in theHammonassett sachemdom.Pasquasheck, probably on the bank of Hudson River in Dutchess County.Pataquasak, near Essex Post Office, Conn., in the Hammonassett sachemdom.Pattaquonk, near Chester, Conn., in the Hammonassett sachemdom.Paugusset, on the bank of Housatonic River about 1 mile above Derby, Conn.,in the Paugusset sachemdom.Pauquaunuch, in Stratford Township, Fairfield County, Paugusset sachemdom,apparently the same town as Pisquheege.Pequabuck, near Bristol, Conn., in the Tunxis sachemdom.Pisquheege, near Stratford, Fairfield County, in the Paugusset sachemdom,Pocilaug, on Long Island Sound near Westbrook, Conn., in the Hammonassettsachemdom.Pocowset, on Connecticut River opposite Middletown, Conn., in the Wangunksachemdom.Podunk, at the mouth of Podunk River, Conn., in the Podunk sachemdom.Pomeraug, near Woodbury, Conn., in the Paugussett sachemdom.Poningo, near Rye, N. Y., in the Siwanoy sachemdom,Poquannuc, near Poquonock in Hartford County, Conn,, in the Poquonocksachemdom.Potatuck, the name of one or two towns on or near Potatuck River, in the townof Newtown, Fairfield County, Conn., in the Paugusset sachemdom.Pyquag, near Wethersfield, Conn., in the Wangunk sachemdom.Quinnipiac, on Quinnipiac River north of New Haven, Conn,, in the Quinnipiacsachemdom,Ramapo, near Ridgefield, Conn., in the Tankiteke sachemdom,Sackhoes, on the site of Peekskill, N. Y., in the Kitchawank sachemdom.Saugatuck, at the mouth of Saugatuck River, Conn., in the Tankiteke sachemdom.Scanticook, on Scantic River near its junction with Broad Brook, Hartford Coun-ty, Conn., in the Podunk sachemdom.Senasqua, at the mouth of Croton River, in the Kitchawank sachemdom. SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 47Sbippan, near Stamford, Conn., in the Siwanoy sachemdom.Sioascauk, near Greenwich, Conn., in the Siwanoy sachemdom.Squantuck, on the Housatonic River, above Derby, Conn., in the Paugussettsachemdom.Suckiauk, near W. Hartford, Conn., in the Sicaog sachemdom.Titicus, near Titicus in the town of Ridgefield, Conn., in the Tankiteke sachem-dom.Totoket, near Totoket in the town of N. Branford, New Haven County, Conn.,in the Quinnipiac sachemdom.Tunxis, in the bend of Farmington River near Farmington, Conn., in the Tunxissachemdom.Turkey Hill, near Derby, Conn., in the Paugussett sachemdom, perhaps givenunder another name.Unkawa, between Danbury and Bethel, Conn., in the Tankiteke sachemdom.Weantinock, near Fairfield, Conn., in the Tankiteke sachemdom.Wecquaesgeek, at Dobbs Ferry, in the Wecquaesgeek sachemdom.Weataug, near Weatogue in the town of Simsbury, Conn., in the Massaco sachem-dom.Wepowaug, near Milford, Conn., in the Paugusset sachemdom.Werawaug, near Danbury, Conn., in the Tankiteke sachemdom.Woodtick, near Woodtick in the town of Wolcott, New Haven County, Conn.,in the Tunxis sachemdom.Woronock, near Milford, Conn., in the Paugusset sachemdom, evidently anothername for Wepowaug.History.?The Wappinger were found by Henry Hudson in 1609 inoccupancy of the lands above mentioned. The Connecticut bandsgradually sold their territory and joined the Indians at Scaticook andStockbridge. The western bands suffered heavily in war with theDutch, 1640-45, but continued to occupy a tract along the coastin Westchester County until 1756, when most of those who wereleft joined the Nanticoke at Chenango, Broome County, N. Y.,and were finally merged, along with them, into the Delaware. Somejoined the Moravian and Stockbridge Indians while a few were stillliving in Dutchess County in 1774, and a few mixed-bloods live now onHousatonic River below Kent. These belong to the old Scaticooksettlement founded by a Pequot Indian named Mauwehu or Mahwee,and settled mainly by individuals of the Paugusset, Unkawa, andPotatuck towns of the Paugusset sachemdom.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates the population of the NewYork divisions of Wappinger at about 3,000 in 1600, and places thatof the various Connecticut bands at 1,750, a total of 4,750. The warwith the Dutch is said to have cost the western bands 1,600, but wehave no estimates of their population at a later date, except as partsof the Stockbridge, Brotherton, and Iroquois Indians, and a fewmixed-bloods at Scaticook, Conn., a few miles below Kent.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Wappinger bandswere among those particularly engaged in the manufacture of siwan 48 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 or wampum. They occupied much of the mainland territory of thepresent Greater New York but not Manhattan Island. WappingersFalls in Dutchess County, N. Y., preserves the name.Wenrohronon. Probably meaning "The people or tribe of the placeof floating scum," fromthe famous oil spring of the town of Cuba,Allegany County.Connections.?The Wenrohronon belonged to the Iroquoian linguisticstock. Their closest affiliations were probably with the NeutralNation, which part of them finally joined, and with the Erie, whobounded them on the west.Location.?Probably originally, as indicated in the explanation oftheir name, about the oil spring at Cuba, N. Y. (See also Penn-sylvania.)History.?The Wenrohronon maintained themselves for a long timein the above territory, thanks to an alliance with the Neutral Nation,but when the protection of the latter was withdrawn, they left theircountry in 1639 and took refuge among the Hurons and the mainbody of the Neutrals, whose fate they shared.Population.?Before their decline Hewitt {in Hodge, 1910) estimatesthe Wenrohronon at between 1,200 and 2,000. Those who soughtrefuge with the Hurons in 1639 numbered more than 600.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Wenrohronon arenoted merely on account of their association with the oil spring abovementioned. NEW JERSEYDelaware. The name is derived from that of Delaware River, whichin turn, was named for Lord Delaware, second governor of Virginia.Also called:Abnaki or Wabanaki, "Easterners," from their position relative to manyother Algonquian tribes. (See Abnaki under Maine, Wampanoag underMassachusetts, and Wappinger under New York.)A-ko-tca-ka'ng", "One who stammers in his speech," the Mohawk name.The Oneida and Tuscarora names were similar.Anakwan'kl, Cherokee name, an attempt at Wabanaki.Lenni Lenape (their own name), meaning "true men," or "standard men,"Loup, "wolf," so called by the French.Mochomes, "grandfather," name given by those Algonquian tribes whichclaimed descent from them.Nar-wah-ro, Wichita name.Renni Renape, a form of Lenni Lenape.Tca-kS,'n6?, shortened form of Mohawk name given above. (The namesin the languages of the other four Iroquois tribes are about the same).Connections.?The Delaware belonged to the Algonquian linguis-tic stock, their closest relatives being the Nanticoke, Conoy, andPowhatan Indians to the south and the Mahican, Wappinger, and SwAXTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 49 southern New England Indians on the north. The dialect of thenorthernmost of their major divisions, the Munsee, differed consid-erably from that of the southern groups.Location.?The Delaware occupied all of the State of New Jersey,the western end of Long Island, all of Staten and Manhattan Islandsand neighboring parts of the mainland, along with other portions ofNew York west of the Hudson, and parts of eastern Pennsylvania,and northern Delaware. (See also Delaware, Illinois, Indiana,Kansas, Marjdand and the District of Columbia, Missouri, NewYork, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Oklahoma, and the Munsee under Kansas,Oklahoma, and Wisconsin.) SubdivisionsThere were three major divisions or subtribes, the Munsee in northern NewJersey and adjacent portions of New York west of the Hudson, the Unalachtigoin northern Delaware, southeastern Pennsylvania, and southern New Jersey,and the Unami in the intermediate territory, extending to the western end ofLong Island. Each comprised a great many minor divisions which it is notalways easy to classify under the three main heads. As Munsee may probablybe reckoned the following:Catskill, on Catskill Creek, Greene County, N. Y.Mamekoting, in Mamakating Valley, west of the Shawangunk Mountains, N. Y.Minisink, on the headwaters of Delaware River in the southwestern part of Ulsterand Orange Counties, N. Y., and the adjacent parts of New Jersey and Penn-sylvania.Waranawonkong, in the country watered by the Esopus, Wallkill, and Shawan-gunk Creeks, mainly in Ulster County, N. Y.Wawarsink, centered about the junction of Wawarsing and Rondout Creeks,Ulster County, N. Y.We may class as Unami the following:Aquackanonk, on Passaic River, N. J., and lands back from it including thetract called Dundee in Passsaic.Assunpink, on Stony Creek near Trenton.Axion, on the eastern bank of Delaware River between Rancocas Creek andTrenton.Calcefar, in the interior of New Jersey between Rancocas Creek and Trenton.Canarsee, in Kings County, Long Island, on the southern end of ManhattanIsland, and the eastern end of Staten Island, N. Y.Gachwechnagechga, on Lehigh River, Pa.Hackensack, in the valleys of Hackensack and Passaic Rivers.Haverstraw, on the western bank of the lower Hudson, in Rockland County, N. Y.Meletecunk, in Monmouth County.Mosilian, on the eastern bank of Delaware River about Trenton.Navasink, on the highlands of Navesink, claiming the land from Barnegat to theRaritan.Pompton, on Pompton Creek.Raritan, in the valley of Raritan River and on the left bank of Delaware Riveras far down as the falls at Trenton.Reckgawawanc, on the upper part of Manhattan Island and the adjacent main-land of New York west of the Bronx. 50 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Tappan, on the western bank of Hudson River in Rockland County, N. Y., andBergen County.Waoranec, near Esopus Creek, Ulster County, N. Y.The following may be considered as Unalachtigo, though I am in some doubtabout the Neshamini:Amimenipaty, at site of a large pigment plant of the Du Pont Company at Edge-moor, Del.Asomoche, on the eastern bank of Delaware River between Salem and Camden.Chikohoki, at site of Crane Brook Church, on west side of Delaware River nearits junction with the Christanna River.Eriwonec, about Old Man's Creek in Salem or Gloucester County.Hopokohacking, on site now occupied by Wilmington, Del.Kahansuk, about Low Creek, Cumberland County.Manta, about Salem Creek.Memankitonna, on the present site of Claymont, Del., on Naaman's Creek,Nantuxet, in Pennsylvania and Delaware.Naraticon, in southern New Jersey, probably on Raccoon Creek.Neshamini, on Neshaminy Creek, Bucks County, Pa.Okahoki, on Ridley and Crum Creeks, Delaware County, Pa.Passayonk, on Schuylkill River, Pa., and along the western bank of DelawareRiver, perhaps extending into Delaware.Shackamaxon, on the site of Kensington, Philadelphia, Pa.Siconesse, on the eastern bank of Delaware River a short distance above Salem.Tirans, on the northern shore of Delaware Bay about Cape May or in CumberlandCounty.Yacomanshaghking, on a small stream about the present Camden.VillagesIt will not be practicable to separate the villages belonging to the three greatdivisions in all cases. The following are entered in the Handbook of AmericanIndians (Hodge, 1907, 1910) : Achsinnink, Unalachtigo village on Hocking River, Ohio, about 1770.Ahasimus, probably Unami, in northern New Jersey.Alamingo, a village, probably Delaware, on Susquehanna River.AUaquippa, possible name of a settlement at the mouth of the YoughioghenyRiver, Pa., in 1755.Anderson's Town, on the south side of White River about Anderson, Ind.Au Glaize, on a southeastern branch of Maumee River, Ohio.Bald Eagle's Nest, on the right bank of Bald Eagle Creek near Milesburg, Pa.Beaversville, near the junction of Buggy Creek and Canadian River, Okla.Beavertown, on the east side of the extreme eastern head branch of HockingRiver near Beavertown, Ohio.Black Hawk, probably Delaware, about Mount Auburn, Shelby County, Ind.Black Leg's Village, probably Delaware, on the north bank of Conemaugh Riverin the southeastern part of Armstrong County, Pa.Buckstown, probably Delaware, on the southeast side of White River, about 3miles east of Anderson, Ind.Bulletts Town, probably Delaware, in Coshocton County, Ohio, on MuskingumRiver about halfway between Walhonding River and Tomstown.Cashiehtunk, probably Munsee, on Delaware River near the point where it ismet by the New Jersey State line. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 51Catawaweshink, probably Delaware, on or near Susquehanna River, near BigIsland, Pa.Chikohoki, a Manta village on the site of Burlington, Burlington County, N. J.Chilohocki, probably Delaware, on Miami River, Ohio.Chinklacamoose, probably Delaware, on the site of Clearfield, Pa.Clistowacka, near Bethlehem, Pa.Communipavv, village of the Hackensack, at Communipaw.Conemaugh, probably Delaware, about Conemaugh, Pa.Coshocton, on the site of Coshocton, Ohio.Crossweeksung, in Burlington County, probably about Crosswicks.Custaloga's Town, Unalachtigo, two villages, one near French Creek, oppositeFranklin, Pa., the other on Walhonding River, near Killbucks Creek in Coshoc-ton County, Ohio.Edgpiiliik, in western New Jersey.Eriwonec, about Old Man's Creek in Salem or Gloucester County.Frankstown, probably Delaware, about Frankstown, Pa.Friedenshiitten, a Moravian mission town on Susquehanna River a few milesbelow Wyalusing, probably in Wyoming County, Pa.Friedensstadt, in Beaver County, Pa., probably near Darlington.Gekelemukpechuenk, in Ohio, and perhaps identical with White Ej^es' Town.Gnadenhiitten, three Moravian Mission villages, one on the north side of Mahon-ing Creek near its junction with the Lehigh about the present Lehighton; asecond on the site of Weissport, Carbon County, Pa. ; and a third on the Mus-kingum River near the present Gnadenhutten, Ohio. (Brinton (1885) saysthere were two more towns of the same name.)Goshgoshunk, with perhaps some Seneca, on Allegheny River about the upperpart of Venango County, Pa.Grapevine Town, perhaps Delaware, 8 miles up Captina River, Belmont County,Ohio.Greentown, on the Black Fork of Mohican River near the boundary of Richlandand Ashland Counties, Ohio.Gweghkongh, probably Unami, in northern New Jersey, near Staten Island, oron the neighboring New York mainland.Hespatingh, probably Unami, apparently in northern New Jersey, and perhapsnear Bergen or Union Hill.Hickorytown, probably about East Hickory or West Hickory, Pa.Hockhocken, on Hocking River, Ohio.Hogstown, between Venango and Buffalo Creek, Pa., perhaps identical withKuskuski.Jacobs Cabins, probably Delaware, on Youghiogheny River, perhaps near JacobsCreek, Fayette County, Pa.Jeromestown, near Jeromesville, Ohio.Kalbauvane, probably Delaware, on the headwaters of the west branch of Susque-hanna River, Pa.Kanestio, Delaware and other Indians, on the upper Susquehanna River, nearKanestio Creek in Steuben County, N. Y.Kanhangton, about the mouth of Chemung River in the northern part of BradfordCounty, Pa.Katamoonchink, perhaps the name of a Delaware village near West Whiteland,Chester County, Pa.Kickenapawling, probably Delaware and Iroquois, at the junction of StonyCreek with Conemaugh River, approximately on the site of Johnstown, Pa. 52 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Kiktheswemud, probably Delaware, near Anderson, Ind., perhaps identical withBuckstown or Little Munsee Town.Killbuck's Town, on the east side of Killbuck Creek, about 10 miles south ofWooster, Ohio.Kishakoquilla, two towns successively occupied by a chief of the name, one aboutKishacoquillas, Mifflin County, Pa., the other on French Creek about 7 milesbelow Meadville, Crawford County, Pa.Kiskiminetas, on the south side of lower Kiskiminetas Creek, near its mouth,Westmoreland County, Pa.Kiskominitoes, on the north bank of Ohio River between the Hocking and SciotoRivers, Ohio.Kittanning, divided into several settlements and mixed with Iroquois andCaughnawaga, near Kittanning on Allegheny River, Armstrong County, Pa.Kohhokking, near "Painted Post" in Steuben County, N. Y., or Elmira, ChemungCounty, N. Y.Kuskuski, with Iroquois, on Beaver Creek, near Newcastle, in Lawrence County,Pa.Languntennenk, Moravian Delaware near Darlington, Beaver County, Pa.Lawunkhannek, Moravian Delaware on Allegheny River above Franklin, Ve-nango County, Pa.Lichtenau, Moravian Delaware on the east side of Muskingum River, 3 milesbelow Coshocton, Ohio.Little Munsee Town, Munsee, a few miles east of Anderson, Ind.Macharienkonck, Minisink, in the bend of Delaware River, Pike County, Pa.,opposite Port Jervis.Macocks, some distance north of Chikohoki, which was probably at Wilmington,Del., perhaps the village of the Okahoki in Pennsylvania.Mahoning, on the west bank of Mahoning River, perhaps between Warren andYoungstown, Ohio.Mechgachkamic, perhaps Unami, probably near Hackensack, N. J.Meggeckessou, on Delaware River at Trenton Falls, N. J.Meniolagomeka, on Aquanshicola Creek, Carbon County, Pa.Meochkonck, Minisink, on the upper Delaware River in southeastern New York.Minisink, Minisink, in Sussex County, N. J., near where the State line crossesDelaware River.Munceytown, Munsee, on Thames River northwest of Brantford, Ontario, Canada.Muskingum, probably Delaware, on the west bank of Muskingum River, Ohio.Nain, Moravian Indians, principally Delaware, near Bethlehem, Pa.Newcomerstown, village of Chief Newcomer, about the site of New Comerstown,Tuscarawas County, Ohio.Newtown, the name of three towns probably of the Delaware and Iroquois, oneon the north bank of Licking River, near the site of the present Zanesville,Ohio; a second about the site of Newtown, Ohio; and a third on the west sideof Wills Creek near the site of Cambridge, Ohio.Nj^ack, probably Canarsee, about the site of Fort Hamilton, Kings County,Long Island, afterward removed to Staten Island.Nyack, Unami probably, on the west bank of Hudson River about the presentNyack, N. Y.Ostonwackin, with Cayuga, Oneida, and other Indians, on the site of the presentMontoursville, Pa.Outaunink, Munsee, on the north bank of White River, opposite Muncie, Ind.Owl's Town, probably Delaware, on Mohican River, Coshocton County, Ohio.Pakadasank, probably Munsee, about the site of Crawford, Orange County, N. Y. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 53Papagonk, probably Munsee, in Ulster County, N. Y., also placed near Pepacton,Delaware County, N. Y.Passycotcung, on Chemung River, N. Y.Peckwes, Munsee or Shawnee, about 10 miles from Hackensack.Pematuning, probably Delaware, near Shenango, Pa.Pequottink, Moravian Delaware, on the east bank of Huron River, near Milan,Ohio.Playwickey, probably Unalachtigo, in Bucks County, Pa.Pohkopophunk, in eastern Pennsylvania, probably in Carbon County.Queenashawakee, on the upper Susquehanna River, Pa.Ramcock, Rancocas, in Burlington County.Raystown, (?).Remahenonc, perhaps Unami, near New York City.Roymount, near Cape May.Salem, Moravian Delaware, on the west bank of Tuscarawas River, l}i milesmiles southwest of Port Washington, Tuscarawas County, Ohio.Salt Lick, probably Delaware, on Mahoning River near Warren, Ohio.Sawcunk, with Shawnee and Mingo, near the mouth of Beaver Creek, about thesite of the present Beaver, Pa.Sawkin, on the east bank of Delaware River in New Jersey.Schepinaikonck, Minisink, perhaps in Orange County, N. Y.Schipston, probably Delaware, at the head of Juniata River, Pa.Schoenbrunn, Moravian Munsee, about 2 miles below the site of New Philadel-phia, Ohio.Seven Houses, near the ford of Beaver Creek just above its mouth, Beaver County,Pa.Shackamaxon, on the site of Kensington, Philadelphia, Pa.Shamokin, with Shawnee, Iroquois, and Tutelo, on north sides of SusquehannaRiver including the island at the site of Sunbury, Pa.Shannopin's Town, on Allegheny River about 2 miles above its junction with theMonongahela.Shenango, with other tribes, the name of several towns, one on the north bank ofOhio River a little below Economy, Pa.; one at the junction of Conewango andthe Allegheny; and one some distance up Big Beaver, near Kuskuski (q. v.).Sheshequin, with Iroquois, about 6 miles below Tioga Point, Bradford County, Pa.Soupnapka, on the east bank of Delaware River in New Jersey.Three Legs Town, named from a chief, on the east bank of Muskingum Rivera few miles south of the mouth of the Tuscarawas, Coshocton County, Ohio.Tioga, with Nanticoke, Mahican, Saponi, Tutelo, etc., on the site of Athens, Pa.Tom's Town, on Scioto River, a short distance below the present Chillicothe andnear the mouth of Paint Creek, Ohio.Tullihas, with Mahican and Caughnawaga, on the west branch of MuskingumRiver, Ohio, about 20 miles above the forks.Tuscarawas, with Wyandot, on Tuscarawas River, Ohio, near the mouth of BigSandy River.Venango, with Seneca, Shawnee, Wyandot, Ottawa, etc., at the site of Franklin,Venango County, Pa.Wechquetank, Moravian Delaware, about 8 miles beyond the Blue Ridge,northwest from Bethlehem, Pa., probably near the present Mauch Chunk.Wekeeponall, on the west bank of the Susquehanna River, about the mouth ofLoyalstock Creek in Lycoming County, Pa., probably identical with QueenEsther's Town.Walagamika, on the site of Nazareth, Lehigh County, Pa. 54 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bdli,. 145White-eyes Village, named from a chief, on the site of Duncan's Falls, 9 milesbelow Zanesville, Ohio.White Woman's Town, near the junction of Walhonding and Killbuck Rivers,about 7 miles northwest of the forks of the Muskingum River, in CoshoctonCounty, Ohio.Will's Town, on the east bank of Muskingum River at the mouth of Wills Creek,Muskingum County, Ohio.Woapikamikunk, in the valley of White River, Ind.Wyalusing, Munsee and Iroquois, on the site of Wyalusing, Bradford County, Pa.Wyoming, with Iroquois, Shawnee, Mahican, and Nanticoke; later entirelyDelaware and Munsee; principal settlement at the site of Wilkes-Barre, Pa.History.?The traditional history of the Delaware set forth in thefamous Walam Olum (see Brinton, 1882-85, vol. 5), gave them anorigin somewhere northwest of their later habitat. They were foundby the earliest white voyagers in the historic seats above given.The Dutch came into contact with the Unami and Munsee Delawarein 1609 and the Swedes with the Unalachtigo in 1637. Both weresucceeded by the English in 1664, but the most notable event inDelaware history took place in 1682 when these Indians held theirfirst council with William Penn at what is now Germantown, Phila-delphia. About 1720 the Iroquois assumed dominion over them andthey were gradually crowded west by the white colonists, reaching theAllegheny as early as 1724, and settling at Wyoming and other pointson the Susquehanna about 1742. In 1751, by invitation of the Huron,they began to form villages in eastern Ohio, and soon the greater part ofthem were on the Muskingum and other Ohio streams. Backed by theFrench and by other western tribes, they now freed themselves fromIroquois control and opposed the English settlers steadily until thetreaty of Greenville in 1795. Notable missionary work was doneamong them by the Moravians in the seventeenth and eighteenth cen-turies. About 1770 they received permission from the Miami andPiankashaw to settle between the Ohio and White Rivers, Ind. In1789, by permission of the Spanish government, a part moved toMissouri and later to Arkansas, along with a band of Shawnee, and by1820 they had found their way to Texas. By 1835 most of the bandshad been gathered on a reservation in Kansas, but in 1867 the greaterpart of these removed to the present Oklahoma, where some of themoccupied a corner of the Cherokee Nation. Others are with the Caddoand Wichita in southwestern Oklahoma, a few Munsee are with theStockbridges in Wisconsin, and some are scattered in other parts ofthe United States. In Ontario, Canada, are three bands?the Dela-wares of Grand River, near Hagersville; the Moravians of the Thames,near Bothwell; and the Munceys of the Thames, near Muncey ? nearly all of whom are of the Munsee division.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that there were 8,000Delaware in 1600 not including the Canarsee of Long Island; estimates SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 55made during the eighteenth century vary between 2,400 and 3,000;nineteenth-century estimates are much lower, and the United StatesCensus of 1910 returned 914 Delawares and 71 Munsee, or a total of985, to which must be added the bands in Canada, making perhaps1,600 all together. 140 Delaware were reported on the WichitaKeservation, Okla., in 1937.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Delaware arenoted as one of the very few tribes which have come to be known byan English term, and as one of the chief antagonists of the Whiteswhile the latter were forcing their way westward, but in later years asfurnishing the most reliable scouts in White employ. A different sortof fame has been attained by one of their early chiefs, Tamenend,whose name, in the form Tammany, was applied to a philanthropicsociety, a place of meeting, and a famous political organization.Delaware chiefs signed the famous treaty with Penn under the oakat Shackamaxon, and their tribes occupied Manhattan Island and theshores of New York Harbor at the arrival of the Dutch. The nameDelaware has been used for postoffices in Arkansas, Iowa, Kentucky,Missouri, New Jersey, Ohio, and Oklahoma, besides the State ofDelaware. Lenape is a post village in Leavenworth County, Kans.,and Lenapah in Nowata County, Okla.PENNSYLVANIADelaware. In early times this tribe occupied the eastern parts ofPennsylvania along Delaware River; later they were, for a time,on the Susquehanna and the headwaters of the Ohio. (See NewJersey.)Erie. The Erie extended over the extreme northwestern corner ofthe State. (See Ohio.)Honniasont. An Iroquois term meaning "Wearing something roimdthe neck." Also called:Black Minqua, the word "black" said to refer to "a black badge on theirbreast," while "Minqua" indicated their relationship to the WhiteMinqua, or Susquehanna (q. v.).Connections.?The Honniasont belonged to the Iroquoian hn-guistic family.Location.?On the upper Ohio and its branches in western Penn-sylvania and the neighboring parts of West Virginia and Ohio. (Seealso Ohio.)History.?The Honniasont appear first as a tribe which assisted theSusquehanna in war and traded with the Dutch, but a little laterthey are reported to have been destroyed by the Susquehanna andSeneca. The remnant seems to have settled among the Seneca, and 56 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 a Minqua to%vn, probably occupied by their descendants, is mentionedfrom time to time among the latter and in the neighborhood of theirformer country.Population.?This is unknown, but as late as 1662 the Honniasontmust have been fairly numerous if the testimony of five Susquehannachiefs taken in that year is to be relied upon, which was to the effectthat they were then expecting 800 Honniasont warriors to join them.Iroquois. In very early times these Indians entered Pennsylvaniaonly as hunters and warriors, but at a later period they madenumerous settlements in the State. (See New York.)Saluda. A band of "Saluda" Indians from South Carolina moved toConestoga in the eighteenth century. They may have been Shawnee.(See South Carolina.)Saponi. The majority of the Saponi lived at Shamokin for a fewyears some time after 1740 but then continued on to join theIroquois. (See Virginia.)Shawnee. Bands of Shawnee were temporarily located at Conestoga,Sewickley, and other points in Pennsylvania. (See Tennessee.)Susquehanna. A shortened form of Susquehannock, meaning un-known.Akhrakouaehronon, given in Jesuit Relations, from a town name. SeeAtra'kwae'ronnons' below.Andasteor Conestoga, from Kanast6ge, "at the place of the immersed pole."Atra'kwae'ronnons, from the name of a town, and probably signifying "atthe place of the sun," or "at the south."Minqua, from an Algonquian word meaning "stealthy," "treacherous."White Minqua, to distinguish them from the Black Minqua. (See Hon-niasont above.)Connections.?The Susquehanna belonged to the Iroquoian lin-guistic stock.Location.?On the Susquehanna River in New York, Pennsylvania,and Maryland. SubdivisionsOriginally Susquehanna may have been the name of a confederacy of tribesrather than a single tribe. Hewitt (m- Hodge, 1910) suggests that the Wyoming(in the territory about the present Wyoming) may have been such a subtribe.The barely mentioned Wysox, on a small creek flowing into the Susquehanna atthe present Wysox, was perhaps another. Mention is made of the Turtle, Fox,and Wolf "families," evidently clans, and of the Ohongeeoquena, Unquehiett,Kaiquariegahaga, Usququhaga, and Seconondihago "nations," also perhaps clans.VillagesSmith (1884) mentions several, but Hewitt (in Hodge, 1910) is of the opinionthat the names really belong to independent tribes. Champlain says that therewere more than 20 villages, though the only one named is Carantouan, thoughtto have been on the site of the present Waverly, N. Y. SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 57History.?When encountered by the English, French, and Dutchearly in the seventeenth century, the Susquehanna were a numerouspeople, but even then they were at war with the Iroquois by whomthey were conquered in 1676 and forced to settle near the Oneida inNew York. Later they were allowed to return to the SusquehannaRiver and reoccupy their ancient country, but they wasted awaysteadily and in 1763 the remnant, consisting of 20 persons, wasmassacred by Whites inflamed with accounts of Indian atrocities onthe far frontier.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that the Susquehannanumbered 5,000 in 1600. In 1648 they are said to have had 550warriors.Connection in which they have become noted.?The name Susquehannais perpetuated in that of the Susquehanna River and in the namesof a county and a town. Conestoga is the designation of two places inLancaster County, Pa., and one in Chester County, and was givento a widely used type of wagon.Tuscarora. These Indians on their way to join the Iroquois bands ofNew York stopped from time to time in the Susquehanna VaUey.(See North Carolina.)Tutelo. Most of these Indians lived at Shamokin with the Saponiand accompanied them to the Iroquois Nation. (See Virginia.)Wenrohronon. This tribe occupied some parts of the State along thenorthwestern border. (See New York.)DELAWAREDelaware. The Unalachtigo division of the Delaware occupied allof the northern parts of this State when it was first visited byEuropeans. (See New Jersey.)Nanticoke. Bodies of Indians classed under this general head ex-tended into the southern and western sections. Unalachtigo andNanticoke are two forms of the same word though, as differenti-ated, they have been applied to distinct tribes. (See Maryland.)MARYLAND AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIAConey. Probably a synonym of Kanawha, but the meaning is un-known; also spelled Canawese, and Ganawese. Also called:Piscataway, from a village on Piscataway Creek where the Conoy chiefresided.Connections.?The Conoy belonged to the Algonquian linguisticstock and were probably intermediate between the Nanticoke andPowhatan Indians. 58 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Location.?Between the Potomac River and the western shore ofthe Chesapeake. SubdivisionsAcquintanacsuak, on the west bank of Patuxent River in St. Marys County.Conoy proper or Piscataway, in the southern part of Prince Georges County.Mattapanient, on Patuxent River, probably in St. Marys County.Moyawance, on the west bank of the Potomac River above the Conoy proper.Nacotchtank, on the eastern branch of the Potomac, in the District of Columbia.Pamacocack, about the mouth of Mattawoman Creek and the present Pomonkey,Charles County.Patuxent, in Calvert County.Potapaco, in the southern and central parts of Charles County.Secowocomoco, on Wicomico River in St. Marys and Charles Counties.VillagesThe principal settlement of each of the above subdivisions was generally knownby the same name. In addition we have the following:Catawissa, at Catawissa, Columbia County, Pa.Conejoholo, on the east bank of the Susquehanna on or near the site of Bain-bridge, Lancaster County, Pa.Conoytown, on Susquehanna River between Conejoholo and Shamokin (Sun-bury), Pa.Kittamaquindi, at the junction of Tinkers Creek with the Piscataway a fewmiles above the Potomac, Prince Georges County, the principal village of theConoy proper.History.?If the name of the Conoy is identical with that of Kana-wha River, as appears probable, they must have lived at some periodalong that stream. They were found by Smith and the Marylandcolonists in the location above given and missions were establishedamong them by the Jesuits on the first settlement of Maryland in1634. They decreased rapidly in numbers and were presently as-signed a tract of land on the Potomac, perhaps near the site of Wash-ington. In 1675 they were attacked by the Susquehanna Indianswho had been driven from their own territories by the Iroquois,retired up the Potomac River, and then to the Susquehanna, wherethey were finally assigned lands at Conejoholo near the Nanticokeand Conestoga. Some of tbem were living with these two tribes atConestoga in 1742. They gradually made their way northward,stopping successively at Harrisburg, Shamokin, Catawissa, and Wyo-ming, and in 1765 were in southern New York, at Owego, Chugnut,and Chenango, on the eastern branch of the Susquehanna. Theymoved west with the Mahican and Delaware and soon became knownonly as constituting a part of those tribes. They used the Turkeyas their signature at a council held in 1793.Population.?The number of Conoy was estimated by Mooney(1928) at 2,000 in 1600; in 1765 they numbered only about 150.Connection in which they have become noted.?The name Conoy is SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 59perpetuated by Conoy, 2 miles north of Falmouth, Lancaster County,Pa., and probably (see above) by the Great and Little KanawhaRivers, Kanawha County, Kanawha Ridge, and several places inWest Virginia, besides post villages in Hancock County, Iowa, andRed River County, Tex.Delaware. They probably occupied, or at least hunted over, someterritory in the extreme northeastern part of the State. (See NewJersey.)Nanticoke. From Nentego, a variant of Delaware Unechtgo, orUnalachtigo, "Tidewater people," the neighboring division ofDelaware being known by the same name. Also called:Doegs, Toags, or Taux, by some early writers, probably shortened fromTavvachgudns.Ganniataratich-rone, Mohawk name.Otaydchgo, Tawachgudns, Mahican and Delaware name, meaning "Bridgepeople."Skaniadaradighroonas, "Beyond-the-sea people," Iroquois name.Connections.?The Nanticoke belonged to the Algonquian Hnguisticfamily, their closest connections probably being with the UnalachtigoDelaware?as the name implies?and also with the Conoy.Location.?Although the Nanticoke are frequently more narrowlydelimited, it will be convenient to group under this head all of theIndians of the Eastern Shor6 of Maryland and southern Delaware.SubdivisionsAnnamessicks, in the southern part of Somerset County.Choptank, on Choptank River.Cuscarawaoc, at the head of Nanticoke River in Maryland and Delaware.Manokin, on Manokin River in the northern part of Somerset County.Nanticoke proper, on the lower course of Nanticoke River.Nause, in the southern end of the present Dorchester County.Ozinies, on the lower course of Chester River; they may have been part of oridentical with the Wicomese.Tocwogh, on Sassafras River, in Cecil and Kent Counties.Wicocomoco, on Wicocomoco River in Somerset and Wicocomoco Counties.Wicomese, in Queen Anne's County, VillagesAbabco, a subtribe or village of the Choptank on the south side of Choptank Riverin Dorchester County, near Secretary Creek.Askimimkansen, perhaps Nanticoke, on an upper eastern branch of PocomokeRiver, probably in Worcester County.Byengeahtein, probably in Dauphin or Lancaster County, Pa.Chenango, a mixed population on Chenango River about Binghamton, N. Y.Hutsawap, a village or subtribe of the Choptank, in Dorchester County.Locust Necktown, occupied by a band of Nanticoke proper known as Wiwash, onChoptank River, in Dorchester County. 60 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Matchcouchtin, consisting of Nanticoke proper, probably in Pennsylvania.Matcheattochousie, Nanticoke proper, probably in Pennsylvania.Natahquois, Nanticoke proper, probably on the eastern shore of Maryland oron the Susquehanna, Pennsylvania.Nause, belonging to the tribe of the same name, on the north bank of NanticokeRiver near its mouth.Pekoinoke, Nanticoke proper, still existing in Maryland in 1755.Pohemkomeati, on lower Susquehanna River, Pennsylvania.Teahquois, Nanticoke proper, probably on lower Susquehanna River, Pennsyl-vania.Tequassimo, a subtribe or village on the Choptank, on the southern shore ofChoptank River.Tocwogh, the principal village of the tribe of that name, said to be on the southside of Chester River in Queen Anne County, but, unless this is a later location,probably on the south side of Sassafras River in Kent County.Witichquaom, Nanticoke proper, near Susquehanna River in southern Pennsylvania.History.?Traditionally, the Nanticoke are supposed to have comefrom the west at about the same time as the Delaware, but they werefound in the location above given by the earliest white explorers andsettlers. They were at war with the Maryland colonists from 1642to 1678. In 1698 reservations were set aside for them. Soon after1722 the greater part of them began to move north, stopping for atime on the Susquehanna at its junction with the Juniata. In 1748the greater part of the tribe went farther up, and, after campingtemporarily at a number of places, settled under Iroquois protectionat Chenango, Chugnut, and Oswego. In 1753 part of these joined theIroquois in western New York, and they were still living ^vith them in1840, but the majority, in company with the remnants of the Maliicanand Wappinger, emigrated west about 1784 and joined the Delawarein Ohio and Indiana, with whom they soon became incorporated,disappearing as a distinct tribe. Yet a part did not leave their oldcountry. Some were living in Maryland in 1792 under the name ofWiwash, and some mixed-bloods still occupy a small territory onIndian River, Delaware. The Choptank, or a part of them, also re-mained in their old country on the south of Choptank River, DorchesterCounty, where a few of their descendants, their blood much mixedwith that of Negroes, were to be found in 1837. Some Wicocomocomust also have stayed about their ancient seats, since a few mongrelsare said to retain the name.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated a total Indian population onthe eastern shore of Maryland in 1600 of 2,700, including 700 Tocwoghand Ozinies, 400 Wicocomoco, and 1,600 Nanticoke and their moreimmediate neighbors. In 1722 they are said to have numbered about500 and in 1765 those who had emigrated to New York were supposedto count about 500 more. In 1792 the Nanticoke proper left in Mary-land were said to comprise only 30 persons, but in 1911 Speck (1915)estimated their descendants in southern Maryland at 700. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 61Connection in which they have become noted.?The name Nanticokeis perpetuated in that of Nanticoke River between Wicomico andDorchester Counties, and by the town of Nanticoke in the former.There are also places of the name in Broome County, N. Y., andLuzerne County, Pa.Powhatan. The Accohanoc Indians of the panhandle of Virginia,who extended over into Worcester County, were the only repre-sentatives of the Powhatan Indians in Maryland, though theConoy were closely related to them. (See Virginia.)Shawnee. Shawnee Indians settled temporarily in western Mary-land near the Potomac and in the northeastern part of the Stateon the Susquehanna. (See Tennessee.)Susquehanna. They lived along and near the Susquehanna River.(See Pennsylvania.) VIRGINIACherokee. This tribe claimed territory in the extreme southwesternpart of the State. If not actually occupied by them, it at leastformed part of their hunting territories. (See Tennessee.)Manahoac. Meaning "They are very merry," according to Tooker(1895), but this seems improbable. Also called:Mahocks, apparently a shortened form.Connections.?The Manahoac belonged to the Siouan linguisticfamily; their nearest connections were probably the Monacan,Moneton, and Tutelo.Location.?In northern Virginia between the falls of the rivers andthe mountains east and west and the Potomac and North AnnaRivers north and south. SubdivisionsSubtribes or tribes of the confederacy as far as known were the following:Hassinunga, on the headwaters of the Rappahannock River.Manahoac proper, according to Jefferson (1801), in StaflFord and SpottsylvaniaCounties.Ontponea, in Orange County.Shackaconia, on the south bank of the Rappahannock River in SpottsylvaniaCounty.Stegaraki, on the Rapidan River in Orange County.Tanxnitania, on the north side of the upper Rappahannock River in FauquierCounty.Pegninateo, in Culpeper County, at the head of the Rappahannock River.Whonkentia, in Fauquier County, near the head of the Rappahannock.VillagesMahaskahod, on the Rappahannock River, probably near Fredericksburg, isthe only town known by name. 62 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145History.?Traditional evidence points to an early home of theManahoac people in the Ohio Valley. In 1608 John Smith discoveredthem in the location above given and learned that they were alUedwith the Monacan but at war with the Powhatan Indians and theIroquois (or perhaps rather the Susquehanna). After this theysuddenly vanish from history under a certainly recognizable name,but there is good reason to beUeve that they were one of those tribeswhich settled near the falls of the James River in 1654 or 1656 anddefeated a combined force of Whites and coast Indians who had beensent against them. They seem to have been forced out of their oldcountry by the Susquehanna. Probably they remained for a timein the neighborhood of the Monacan proper and were in fact theMahock encountered by Lederer (1912) in 1670 at a point on JamesRiver which Bushnell seems to have identified with the site of theold Massinacack town, the fact that a stream entering the James atthis point is called the Mohawk rendering his case rather strong.Perhaps the old inhabitants had withdrawn to the lower Monacantown, Mowhemencho. In 1700 the Stegaraki were located by Gov-ernor Spotswood of Virginia at Fort Christanna, and the Mepontsky,also placed there, may have been the Ontponea. We hear of theformer as late as 1723, and there is good reason to beheve that theyunited with the Tutelo and Saponi and followed their fortunes, andthat under these two names were included all remnants of theManahoac.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that there were 1,500Manahoac in 1600 but this is probably rather too high, since theirnumbers and those of the Tutelo together seem to have been 600-700in 1654. However, it is possible that these figures cover only theManahoac, while Mooney's include part of the Saponi and Tutelo.Meherrin. Meaning unknown.Connections.?The Meherrin belonged to the Iroquoian linguisticfamily, their closest connections probably being the Nottaway.Location.?Along the river of the same name on the Virginia-NorthCarolina border.History.?The tribal name Meherrin first appears in the form"Maharineck" in the account of an expedition by Edward Blandeand others to North Carolina in 1650, and next in an Indian censustaken in 1669. Later they seem to have adopted a body of Conestogaor Susquehanna fleeing from Pennsylvania after their dispersal bythe Iroquois about 1675. This is the only way to account for thefact that they are all said to have been refugee Conestoga. Theywere living on Roanoke River in 1761 with the southern bands ofTuscarora and Saponi, and the Machapunga, and probably went SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 63 north in the last Tuscarora removal in 1802. (For informationregarding another possible band of Mcherrin see "Nottaway.")Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates the Meherrin population at700 in 1600. In 1669 they are said to have had 50 bowmen, or approximately 180 souls. In 1755 they were said to be reduced to 7 or 8fighting men, but in 1761 they are reported to have had 20.Connection in which they have become noted.?Meherrin River, anaffluent of the Chowan, running through southern Virginia and north-eastern North Carolina, and a Virginia town perpetuate the nameof the Meherrin.Monacan. Possibly from an Algonquianword signifying "digging stick,"or ''spade," but more likely from their own language. Also called:Rahowacah, by Archer, 1607, in Smith (1884).Connections.?The Monacan belonged to the Siouan linguistic stock.Their nearest connections were the Manahoac, Tutelo, and Saponi.Location.?On the upper waters of James River above the falls atRichmond. Villages(Locations as determined by D. I. Bushnell, Jr.)Massinacack, on the right bank of James River about the mouth of MohawkCreek, and a mile or more south of Goochland.Mohemencho, later called Monacan Town, on the south bank of James Riverand probably covering some of "the level area bordering the stream in theextreme eastern part of the present Powhatan County, between BernardsCreek on the east and Jones Creek on the west."Rassawek, at the confluence of the James and Rivanna Rivers and probably "on the right bank of the Rivanna, within the angle formed by the two streams."Two other towns are sometimes added but as they afterward appeared aswholly independent tribes, the Saponi and the Tutelo, it is probable that theirconnection with the Monacan was never very intimate. Thej" seem to havebeen classed as Monacan largely on the evidence furnished by Smith's map, inwhich they appear in the country of the "Monacans" but Smith's topography,as Bushnell has shown, was very much foreshortened toward the mountains andthe Saponi and Tutelo towns were farther away than he supposed. Again, whileMassinacack and Mohemencho are specifically referred to as Monacan townsand Smith calls Rassawek "the chiefe habitation" of the Monacan, there is nosuch characterization of either of the others.History.?Capt. John Smith learned of the Monacan in the courseof an exploratory trip which he made up James River in IMay 1607.The people themselves were visited by Captain Newport the yearfollowing, who discovered the two lower towns. The populationgradually declined and in 1699 some Huguenots took possession ofthe land of Mowhemencho. The greater part of the Monacan hadbeen driven away some years before this by Colonel Bornn (Byrd?).Those who escaped continued to camp in the region until after 1702, 64 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 as we learn from a Swiss traveler named F. L. Michel (1916). It isprobable that the remnant finally united with their relatives theSaponi and Tutelo when they were at Fort Christanna and followedtheir fortunes, but we have no further information as to their fate.Population.?The number of the Monacan was estimated byMooney (1928) at 1,200 in 1600 including part of the Saponi andTutelo, but they can hardly have comprised over half as many. In1669 there were still about 100 true Monacan as they were creditedwith 30 bowmen.Connection in which they have become noted.?The name Monacan isperpetuated by a small place called Manakin on the north bank ofJames River, in Goochland County, Va.Nahyssan. A contraction of Monahassano or Monahassanugh,remembered in later times as Yesa?.Connections.?The Nahyssan belonged to the Siouan linguisticstock, their nearest relatives being the Tutelo, Saponi, and probablythe Monacan and Manahoac.Location.?The oldest kno\vn location of the Nahyssan has beenidentified by D. I. Bushnell, Jr. (1930), within very narrow limits as "probably on the left bank of the James, about 1% miles up thestream from Wingina, in Nelson County."History.?In 1650 Blande and his companions noted a site, 12miles south-southwest of the present Petersburg, called "ManksNessoneicks" which was presumably occupied for a time by theNahyssan or a part of them, since "Manks" may be intended for "Tanks," the Powhatan adjective signifying "little." In 1654 or1656 this tribe and the Manahoac appeared at the falls of JamesRiver having perhaps been driven from their former homes by theSusquehanna. They defeated a force of colonials and PowhatanIndians sent against them but did not advance further into thesettlements. In 1670 Lederer (1912) found two Indian towns onStaunton River, one of which he calls Sapon and the other Pintahae.Sapon was, of course, the town of the Saponi but it is believed thatPintahae was the town of the Nahyssan Indians, though Lederergives this name to both towns. Pintahae was probably the Hana-thaskie or Hanahaskie town of which Batts and Fallam (1912) speak ayear later. About 1675 the Nahyssan settled on an island below theOccaneechi at the junction of the Staunton and Dan Rivers. Before1701 all of the Siouan tribes who had settled in this neighborhoodmoved into North Carolina, and it is thought that the Nahyssan fol-lowed the Saponi and Tutelo to the headwaters of the Yadkin and thattheir subsequent fortunes were identical with those of these two. (SeeSaponi and Tutelo.)Population.? (See Saponi and Tutelo.) SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 65Nottaway. Meaning "adders," in the language of their Algonquianneighbors, a common designation for ahen tribes by peoples ofthat linguistic stock. Also called:Cheroenhaka, their own name, probably signifying "fork of a stream."Mangoak, Mengwe, another Algonquian term, signifying "stealthy," "treacherous."Connections.?The Nottaway belonged to the Iroquoian linguisticfamily, their closest connections probably being the Meherrin,Tuscarora, and Susquehanna.Location.?On the river of the same name in southeastern Virginia.History.?The Nottaway were found by the Virginia colonists inthe location given above. Though they were never prominent incolonial history, they kept up their organization long after the othertribes of the region were practically extinct. In 1825 they arementioned as living on a reservation in Southampton County andruled over by a "queen." The name of this tribe was also applied toa band of Indians which appeared on the northern frontiers of SouthCarolina between 1748 and 1754. They may have included thoseSusquehanna who are sometimes confounded with the Meherrin, andare more likely to have included Meherrin than true Nottawayalthough they retained the name of the latter (see Swanton, 1946).Population.?The number of Nottaway, exclusive of those lastmentioned, was estimated by Mooney (1928) at 1,500 in the year1600. In 1709 Lawson reported one town with 30 fighting men, butin 1827 Byrd estimated that there were 300 Nottaway in Virginia.In 1825, 47 were reported. The band that made its appearance onthe frontiers of South Carolina was said to number about 300.Connection in which they have become noted.?The name of the Notta-way is preserved by Nottoway River, Nottoway County, and two towns,one the county seat of the above, the other in Sussex county. Thereis a Nottawa in St. Joseph County, Mich.Occaneechi. Meaning unknown.The Botshenins, or Patshenins, a band associated with the Saponi andTutelo in Ontario, were perhaps identical with this tribe.Connections.?The Occaneechi belonged to the Siouan linguisticstock; their closest connections were probably the Tutelo and Saponi.Location.?On the middle and largest island in Roanoke River, justbelow the confluence of the Staunton and the Dan, near the site ofClarksville, Mecklenburg County, Va. (See also North Carolina.)History.?Edward Blande and his companions heard of them in1650. When first met by Lcderer in 1670 at the spot abovementioned, the Occaneechi were noted throughout the region astraders, and their language is said to have been the common speech 66 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145both of trade and religion over a considerable area (Lederer, 1912).Between 1670 and 1676 the Occaneechi had been joined by the Tuteloand Saponi, who settled upon two neighboring islands. In the latteryear the Conestoga sought refuge among them and were hospitablyreceived, but, attempting to dispossess their benefactors, they weredriven away. Later, harassed by the Iroquois and English, theOccaneechi fled south and in 1701 Lawson (1860) found them on theEno River, about the present Hillsboro, Orange County, N, C.Later still they united with the Tutelo and Saponi and followed theirfortunes, having, according to Byrd, taken the name of the Saponi.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that there were 1,200Occaneechi in the year 1600, There is no later estimate, but in 1709this tribe along with the Shakori, Saponi, Tutelo, and Keyauweewere about 750.Connection in which they have become noted.-?The name Occaneechi isassociated particularly with the Occaneechi Trail or Trading Path,which extended southwest through North and South Carolina fromthe neighborhood of Petersburg, Va . Powhatan. Said by Gerard to signify "falls in a current of water,"and applied originally to one tribe but extended by the English toits chief Wahunsonacock, and through him to the body of tribeswhich came under his sway. Also called:Sachdagugh-roonaw, Iroquois name.Connections.?The Powhatan belonged to the Algonquian linguisticstock, their nearest relatives probably being the Algonquian tribes ofCarolina and the Conoy.Location.?In the tidewater section of Virginia from PotomacRiver to the divide between James River and Albemarle Sound, andthe territory of the present eastern shore of Virginia. (See alsoMaryland and District of Columbia.)SubdivisionsSubtribes constituting this group are as follows:Accohanoc, in Accomac and part of Northampton Counties, Va., and probablyextending slightly into Maryland.Accomac, in the southern part of Northampton County, Va.Appomattoc, in Chesterfield County.Arrohattoc, in Henrico County.Chesapeake, in Princess Anne County.Chickahominy, on Chickahominy River.Chiskiac, in York County.Cuttatawomen, in King George County.Kecoughtan, in Elizabeth City County.Mattapony on Mattapony River.Moraughtacund, in Lancaster and Richmond Counties. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 67Mummapacune, on York River.Nansemond, in Nansemond County.Nantaughtacund, in Essex and Caroline Counties.Onawmanient, in Westmoreland County.Pamunkey, in King William County.Paspahegh, in Charles City and James City Counties.Pataunck, on Pamunkey River.Piankatank, on Piankatank River.Pissasec, in King George and Westmoreland Counties.Potomac, in Stafford and King George Counties.Powhatan, in Henrico County.Rappahannock, in Richmond County.Secacawoni, in Northumberland County.Tauxenent, in Fairfax County.Warrasqueoc, in Isle of Wight County.Weanoc, in Charles City County.Werowocomoco, in Gloucester County.Wicocomoco, in Northumberland County.Youghtanund, on Pamunkey River. VillagesAccohanoc, on the river of the same name in Accomac or Northampton Counties.Accomac, according to Jefferson (1801), about Cheriton, on Cherrystone Inlet,Northampton County.Acconoc, between Chickahominy and Pamunkey Rivers, in New Kent County.Accoqueck, on Rappahannock River, above Secobec, in Caroline County.Accossuwinck, on Pamunkey River, King William County.Acquack, on the north bank of Rappahannock River, in Caroline County.Appamattoc, on the site of Bermuda Hundred, in Prince George County.Appocant, on the north bank of Chickahominy River, in New Kent County.Arrohattoc, in Henrico County on the James River, 12 miles below the falls atRichmond.Askakep, near Pamunkey River in New Kent County.Assaomeck, near Alexandria.Assuweska, on the north bank of the Rappahannock in King George County,Attamtuck, between the Chickahominy and Pamunkey Rivers in New KentCounty.Auboraesk, on the north bank of the Rappahannock in Richmond County.Aureuapeugh, on Rappahannock River in Essex County.Cantaunkack, on York River in Gloucester County.Capahowasic, about Cappahosic in Gloucester County.Cattachiptico, on Pamunkey River in King William County.Cawwontoll, on the north bank of the Rappahannock River in Richmond County.Chawopo, at the mouth of Chipoak Creek, Surry County.Checopissowo, on Rappahannock River above Tobacco Creek, in Caroline County.Chesakawon, above the mouth of Corotoman River, in Lancaster County.Chesapeake, according to Jefferson on Linnhaven River in Princess Anne County,a small stream flowing north into Chesapeake Bay.Chiconessex, about Wiseville, in Accomac County.Chincoteague, about Chincoteague Inlet, in Accomac County.Chiskiac, on the south side of York River, about 10 miles below the junction ofthe Mattapony and Pamunkey. 68 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Cinquack, near Smiths Point on the Potomac, in Northumberland County.Cinquoteck, in the fork of Mattapony and Pamunkey Rivers, in King WilliamCounty.Cuttatawomen, (1) on the Rappahannock River at Corotoman River in LancasterCounty; (2) about Lamb Creek on the Rappahannock, in King George County.Gangasco, near Eastville, in Northampton County.Kapawnich, on the north bank of the Rappahannock, about Corotoman River inLancaster County.Kerahocak, on the north bank of the Rappahannock River in King George County.Kiequotank, on the eastern shore of Accomac County, north of Metomkin.Kupkipcock, on Pamunkey River in King William County.Machapunga, (1) in Northampton County; (2) on Potomac River.Mamanahunt, on Chickahominy River, in Charles City County.Mamanassy, at the junction of Pamunkey and Mattapony Rivers in King andQueen County.Mangoraca, on the north bank of the Rappahannock in Richmond County.Mantoughquemec, on Nansemond River, in Nansemond County.Martoughquaunk, on Mattapony River in Caroline County.Massawoteck, on the north bank of Rappahannock River in King George County.Matchopick, on the north bank of the Rappahannock River in Richmond County.Matchut, on Pamunkey River, in New Kent County.Mathomauk, on the west bank of James River, in Isle of Wight County.Matomkin, about Metomkin Inlet in Accomac County.Mattacock, on the north bank of York River in Gloucester County.Mattacunt, on the south side of Potomac River in King George County.Mattanock, on the west side of Nansemond River, near its mouth, in NansemondCounty.Maysonec, on the north bank of the Chickahominy in New Kent County.Menacupunt, on Pamunkey River, in King William County.Menaskunt, on the north bank of Rappahannock River in Richmond County.Meyascosic, on the north side of James River in Charles City County.Mohominge, near the falls of James River, in Richmond County.Mokete, on Warrasqueoc Creek, in Isle of Wight County.Moraughtacund, near the mouth of Moratico River in Richmond County.Mouanast, on the north bank of Rappahannock River, in King George County.Mutchut, on the north bank of the Mattapony River in King and Queen County.Muttamussinsack, on the north bank of Rappahannock River in Caroline County.Myghtuckpassu, on the south bank of Mattapony River in King William County.Namassingakent, on the south bank of Potomac River in Fairfax County.Nameroughquena, on the south bank of the Potomac River in Alexandria County,opposite Washington, D. C.Nansemond, probably about Chuckatuck in Nansemond County.Nantapoyac, on the south bank of James River in Surry County.Nantaughtacund, on the south side of the Rappahannock River in either EssexCounty or Caroline County.Nawacaten, on the north bank of the Rappahannock River in Richmond County.Nawnautough, on the north bank of the Rappahannock River in RichmondCounty.Nechanicok, on the south bank of the Chickahominy in the lower part of HenricoCounty.Nepawtacum, on the north bank of the Rappahannock in Lancaster County.Onancock, near Onancock in Accomac County.Onawmanient, probably on Nominy Bay, in Westmoreland County. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 69Opiscopank, on the south bank of the Rappahannock River in Middlesex County.Oquomock, on the north bank of the Rappahannock River in Richmond County.Orapaks, in New Kent County, between the Chickahominy and Pamunkey Rivers.Ottachugh, on the north bank of the Rappahannock River in Lancaster County.Ozatawomen, on the south bank of the Potomac River in King George County.Ozenic, on Chickahominy River in New Kent County.Pamawauk, perhaps identical with Pamunkey.Pamuncoroy, on the south bank of Pamunkey River in New Kent County.Pamunkey, probably near West Point in King William County.Papiscone, on the north bank of the Rappahannock in King George County.Pasaugtacock, on the north bank of York River in King and Queen County.Paspahegh, (1) on the south bank of Chickahominy River in Charles City County;(2) on the north bank of James River in Charles City Countj'.Passaunkack, on the south bank of Mattapony River in the northwestern part ofKing William County.Pastanza, on or near Potomac River, possibly on Aquia Creek, in Stafford County.Pawcocomac, on the north bank of Rappahannock River at the mouth of the Coro-toman in Lancaster County.Peccarecamek, an Indian settlement reported on the southern Virginia border,perhaps mythical.Pemacocack, on the west bank of Potomac River in Prince William County about30 miles below Alexandria.Piankatank, on Piankatank River in Middlesex County.Pissacoac, on the north bank of Rappahannock River above Leedstown in West-moreland County.Poruptanck, on the north bank of York River in Gloucester County.Potaucac, in New Kent County between the Chickahominy and PamunkeyRivers.Potomac, about 55 miles in a straight line from Chesapeake Bay, on a peninsulain what is now Stafford County, formed by Potomac River and PotomacCreek.Powcomonet, on the north bank of Rappahannock River in Richmond County.Powhatan, on the north bank of James River at the falls on ground now formingan eastern suburb of Richmond.Poyektauk, on the north bank of Rappahannock River in Richmond County.Poykemkack, on the north bank of Rappahannock River in Richmond County.Pungoteque, in Accomac County, probably near Metomkin Inlet.Quackcohowaon, on the south bank of the Mattapony in King William County.Quioucohanock, probably on an eminence now called Wharf Bluff just east ofUpper Chipoak Creek in Surry County.Quiyough, on the south bank of Aquia Creek near its mouth, in Stafford County.Rappahannock, at the mouth of a creek on Rappahannock River in RichmondCounty.Rickahake, probably in Norfolk County.Righkahauk, on the west bank of Chickahominy River in New Kent County.Ritanoe, probably Powhatan, in Virginia or North Carolina.Roscows, in Elizabeth City County.Secacawoni, at the mouth of Coan Creek on the south bank of the Potomac inNorthumberland County.Secobec, on the south bank of Rappahannock River in CaroUne County.Shamapa, on Pamunkey or York River.Sockobeck, on the north bank of Rappahannock River in King George County.Tantucquask, on Rappahannock River in Richmond County. 70 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Tauxenent, about Mount Vernon in Fairfax County.Teracosick, on the west bank of Nansemond River in Nansemond County.Utenstank, on the north bank of Mattapony River in Caroline County.Uttamussac, on the north bank of Pamunkey River in King WiUiam County.Uttamussamacoma, on the south bank of Potomac River in WestmorelandCounty.Waconiask, on the north bank of Rappahannock River in King George County.Warrasqueoc, on the south bank of James River at the mouth of WarrasqueocCreek in Isle of Wight County.Weanoc, below the mouth of Appamattox River at the present Weyanoke inPrince George County.Wecuppom, on the north bank of Rappahannock River in Richmond County.Werawahon, on the north bank of Chickahominy River in New Kent County.Werowacomoco, on the north bank of York River in Gloucester County aboutopposite the mouth of Queen Creek.Wicocomoco, at the mouth of Wicomico River in Northumberland County.Winsack, on the north bank of Rappahannock River in Richmond County.History.?The Powhatan were visited by some very early explorers,including probably the Cabots in 1498. Their territory was wellknown to the Spaniards in the latter part of the sixteenth century anda Jesuit mission was established among them in 1570 though soonextinguished by the Indians. In 1607 the Vii'ginia colony wasplanted on James River and from that time on relations between theWhites and Powhatans were of the most intimate character, friendlyat first, but later disturbed by the exactions of the newcomers. Peacewas restored for a time by the marriage of Powhatan's daughterPocahontas to John Rolfe, and lasted until Powhatan's death in 1618.In 1622 Powhatan's second successor, Opechancanough, led an up-rising against the colonists, as a result of which all of the White set-tlements except those immediately about Jamestown were destroyed.War continued until 1636 when exhaustion of both sides led to peace,but in 1644 Opechancanough led another uprising as destructive asthe first. He was captured and was killed the same year. The tribesmade peace separately, and they were placed upon reservations,where they gradually dwindled away. In 1654 or 1656 the Pamunkeyassisted the English in resisting an invasion of some inland people,but the allied army was severely defeated (see Manahoac). In 1675these Indians were accused of having committed certain depredations,really caused by the Conestoga, and several unauthorized expeditionswere led against them by Nathaniel Bacon. In August 1676, agreat body of them gathered in a fort near Richmond which was car-ried by storm, and men, women, and cliildren indiscriminately mas-sacred. Peace was made with the survivors on condition that anannual tribute be paid by each village. In 1722 in a treaty made atAlbany between the English and Iroquois, the latter agreed to ceasetheir attacks upon the Powhatan Indians, but the Powhatans already SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 71had been greatly reduced and they continued to decline. Those onthe eastern shore of Virginia, who had become very much mixed withNegroes, were driven away in 1831 during the excitement caused bythe slave rising under Nat Turner. In 1785 Jefferson reported thePowhatan Indians reduced to two tribes, the Pamunkey and Matta-pony, embracing only about 15 men, but he must have overlookedgreat numbers of these Indians, for at the present time there areseveral bands, including the Chickahominy, Nansemond, Pamunkey,Mattapony, Upper Mattapony, Rappahannock, Wicocomoco, Poto-mac, Powhatan, and Werowocomoco (Speck, 1925).Population.?The Powhatan population was estimated by Mooney(1928) as 9,000 in 1600; Smith (1884) allows them 2,400 warriors; in1669 a census gave 528 warriors or about 2,000 population, the Wico-comoco being then the largest tribe. In 1705 the Pamunkey bythemselves numbered 150 souls. Jefferson in 1785 represented thetwo tribes which he mentions as having but 15 men; Mooney, however,believed that there must have been a population of something like1,000 because of the number of mixed-bloods still surviving. Thecensus of 1910 returned 115 Chickahominy and 85 Pamunkey. TheUnited States Office of Indian Affairs Report for 1923 includes stillother bands, giving in all a population of 822, and Speck (1925) givesthe names of 10 bands aggregating 2,118 in 1923. The census of1930 returned only 203 Indians from Virginia but evidently missednearly all except the Pamunkey.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Powhatan Con-federacy is famous as embracing those Indians among whom thefirst permanent English settlement in North America was made; forthe personal character of its chief, Powhatan, who had conqueredabout 24 tribes, in addition to the 6 under him at his accession, beforethe appearance of the Europeans; on account of the dealings of theWhites with both Powhatan and his brother Opechancanough, aswell as the massacre of the settlers by the latter in 1622 and again in1644; and not least from the fame attached to Powhatan's daughter,Pocahontas. There are post villages named Powhatan in JeffersonCounty, Ala.; Lawrence County, Ark.; Natchitoches Parish, La.;McDowell County, W. Va. ; a county and county seat of the name inVirginia; Powhatan Point in Belmont County, Ohio; and Powhattanin Brown County, Kans.Saponi. Evidently a corruption of Monasiccapano or Monasuka-panough, which, as shown by Bushnell, is probably derived in partfrom a native term "moni-seep" signifying "shallow water." Paa-nese is a corruption and in no way connected with the word "Pawnee."Connections.?The Saponi belonged to the Siouan linguistic family,their nearest relations being the Tutelo. 72 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bdll. 145Location.?The earliest known location of the Saponi has beenidentified by Bushnell (1930) with high probability with "an extensivevillage site on the banks of the Rivanna, in Albemarle County,directly north of the University of Virginia and about one-half mileup the river from the bridge of the Southern Railway." This wastheir location when, if ever, they formed a part of the MonacanConfederacy. (See also North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and New York.)VillagesThe principal Saponi settlement usually bore the same name as the tribe or,at least, it has survived to us under that name. In 1670 Lederer reports anotherwhich he visited called Pintahae, situated not far from the main Saponi town afterit had been removed to Otter Creek, southwest of the present Lynchburg (Lederer,1912), but this was probably the Nahyssan town.History.?As first pointed out by Mooney (1895), the Saponi tribeis identical with the Monasukapanough which appears on Smith'smap as though it were a town of the Monacan and may in fact havebeen such. Before 1670, and probably between 1650 and 1660, theymoved to the southwest and probably settled on Otter Creek, asabove indicated. In 1670 they were visited by Lederer in their newhome and by Thomas Batts (1912) a year later. Not long afterwardthey and the Tutelo moved to the junction of the Staunton and DanRivers, where each occupied an island in Roanoke River in Mecklen-burg County. This .movement was to enable them to escape theattacks of the Iroquois, and for the same reason they again movedsouth before 1701, when Lawson (1860) found them on Yadkin Rivernear the present site of Salisbury, N. C. Soon afterward they leftthis place and gravitated toward the White settlements in Virginia.They evidently crossed Roanoke River before the Tuscarora War of1711, establishing themselves a short distance east of it and 15 mileswest of the present Windsor, Bertie County, N. C. A little laterthey, along with the Tutelo and some other tribes, were placed byGovernor Spotswood near Fort Christanna, 10 miles north of RoanokeRiver about the present Gholsonville, Brunswick County. The nameof Sappony Creek in Dinwiddle County, dating back to 1733 at least,indicates that they sometimes extended their excursions north ofNottoway River. By the treaty of Albany (1722) the Iroquoisagreed to stop incursions on the Virginia Indians and, probably about1740, the greater part of the Saponi and the Tutelo moved northstopping for a time at Shamokin, Pa., about the site of Sunbury.One band, however, remained in the south, in Granville County,N. C, until at least 1755, when they comprised 14 men and 14 women.In 1753 the Cayuga Iroquois formally adopted this tribe and theTutelo. Some of them remained on the upper waters of the Susque-hanna in Pennsylvania until 1778, but in 1771 the principal section SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 73had their village in the territory of the Cayuga, about 2 miles southof Ithaca, N. Y. They are said to have separated from the Tuteloin 1779 at Niagara, when the latter fled to Canada, and to havebecome lost, but a portion, at least, were living with the Cayuga onSeneca River in Seneca County, N. Y., in 1780. Besides the PersonCounty Indians, a band of Saponi Indians remained behind in NorthCarolina which seems to have fused with the Tuscarora, Meherrin,and Alachapunga and gone north with them in 1802.Population.?The Saponi and the Tutelo are identified by Mooney(1928) as remnants of the Manahoac and Monacan with an estimatedpopulation of 2,700 in 1600. In 1716 the Huguenot Fontaine found200 Saponi, Manahoac, and Tutelo at Fort Christanna. In 1765, whenthey were living on the upper Susquehanna, the Saponi are said to havehad 30 warriors. The main North Carolina band counted 20 warriorsin 1761, and those in Person County, 14 men and 14 women in 1755.Connection in which they have become noted.?A small place calledSapona, in Davidson County, N. C, east of the Yadkin River,preserves the name of the Saponi.Shakori. They seem to have lived in the State at one time. (SeeNorth Carolina.)Shawnee. Indians of this tribe were settled for a time in the Shen-andoah Valley. (See Tennessee.)Tutelo. Significance unknown but used by the Iroquois, who seemto have taken it from some southern tongue. Also called:Kattera, another form of Tutelo.Shateras, a third form of the name.Connections.?The Tutelo belonged to the Siouan linguistic family,their nearest connections being the Saponi and probably the Monacan.Location.?The oldest known town site of the Tutelo was nearSalem, Va., though the Big Sandy River at one time bore their nameand may have been an earlier seat. (See also North Carolina, NewYork, and Pennsylvania.)History.?In 1671 Fallam and Batts (1912) visited the town abovementioned. Some years later the Tutelo moved to an island inRoanoke River just above the Occaneechi, but in 1701 Lawsonfound them still farther southwest, probably about the headwaters ofthe Yadkin (Lawson, 1860). From that time forward they accom-panied the Saponi until the latter tribe separated from them atNiagara as above noted. In 1771 they were settled on the east sideof Cayuga Inlet about 3 miles from the south end of the lake. Thisvillage was destroyed by Sullivan in 1779, but the Tutelo continuedto live among the Cayuga sufficiently apart to retain their ownlanguage until 1898, when the last individual who could speak it 74 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145fluently died. A certain amount of Tutelo blood flows in the veins ofsome of the Iroquois. (For further information, see Swanton (1937).)Population.?(See Saponi.) In 1701-9, according to Lawson (1860),the Tutelo, Saponi, Keyauwee, Occaneechi, and Shakori numberedtogether about 750. In 1715 Governor Spotswood reported that theIndians at Fort Christanna, including the Tutelo, Saponi, Occaneechi,and Manahoac, numbered 300. In 1763 the Tutelo, Saponi, Nanti-coke, and Conoy had 200 men, probably less than 1,000 souls.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Tutelo are note-worthy chiefly as the principal body of Siouan Indians from Virginiato retain their integrity and preserve a knowledge of their languagelate enough for a permanent record of it to be made.WEST VIRGINIAMoneton. Meaning "Big Water" people.Connections.?The Moneton belonged to the Siouan linguisticfamily; their nearest connections were probably the Manahoac andMonacan of Virginia and perhaps the Ofo of Ohio and Mississippi.Location.?Probably on the lower course of Kanawha River,History.?The Moneton were first mentioned by Thomas Batts in1671. (See Alvord and Bidgood, 1912.) Three years later they werevisited by Gabriel Arthur, an indentured servant of the trader AbrahamWood, and this is the last we hear of them as an independent tribe.They probably united with the Siouan people in the Piedmont regionof Virginia.Population.?Unknown. Arthur calls the principal Monetonsettlement "a great town."Cherokee (see Tennessee), Conoy (see Maryland), Delaware(see New Jersey), Honniasont and Susquehanna (see Pennsylvania),and Shawnee (see Tennessee) settled in various parts of West Virginiafrom time to time, but none of them was established there at an earlydate for an appreciable period except perhaps the Conoy, whose nameappears to be perpetuated in that of the Kanawha River. There isno information regarding the Moneton residence there other than thepreservation of their name.NORTH CAROLINABear River Indians. A body of Indians mentioned by Lawson andassociated with Algonquian tribes. They may have been a part ofthe Machapunga (q. v.). Rights (1947) calls them the Bear Riveror Bay River Indians. Lawson (1709) gives the name of their townas Raudauqua-quank and estimates the number of their fightingmen at 50. Mooney (1928) places them with the Pamlico in hisestimate as of the year 1600 and gives the two a population of 1,000.(See also California for another tribe of the same name.) SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 75Cape Fear Indians. Named from Cape Fear, their native designationbeing unknown or indeed whether they were an independent tribeor a part of some other.Connections.?No words of the language of the Cape Fear Indianshave been preserved, but early references clearly associate them withthe eastern Siouan tribes, and they may have been a part of the Wac-camaw, since Waccamaw River heads close to Cape Fear, Theywould then have been connected with the Siouan linguistic familyand probably with the southern Atlantic division of which Catawbais the typical member.Location.?On Cape Fear River, as above stated. (See also SouthCarolina.) VillagesThe only village mentioned by name is Necoes, about 20 miles from the mouthof Cape Fear River, probably in Brunswick County. In 1715 five villages werereported.History.?While the Cape Fear Indians were probably met by sev-eral of the early voyagers, our first specific notice of them comes fromthe narratives of a New England colony planted on Cape Fear Riverin 1661. These settlers seized some of the Indian children and sentthem away under pretense of instructing them in the ways of civiliza-tion and were themselves in consequence driven off. In 1663 a colonyfrom Barbadoes settled here but soon left. In 1665 a third colonyestablished itself at the mouth of Oldtown Creek in BrunswickCounty, on the south side of the river, on land bought from the Indians,but, though the latter were friendly, like the others this attempt atsettlement was soon abandoned. They were visited by Capt. WilliamHilton in 1663. In 1695 they asked to be taken under the protectionof Governor Archdale. The protection was granted and shortlyafterward they rescued 52 passengers from a wrecked New Englandvessel who formed the nucleus of Christ Church Parish north ofCooper River. A few Cape Fear Indians accompanied Barnwell onhis Tuscarora expedition in 1711-12. They were active in his behalfas scouts and also guarded the region around Port Royal. After theYamasee War they were removed to South Carolina and settled inlandfrom Charleston, probably in Williamsburg County (Milling. 1940).In the latter part of the eighteenth century, a remnant of this tribeand the Pedee lived in the Parishes of St. Stephens and St. Johns undera chief called King John. By 1808 only a half-breed woman remainedof these two tribes, though others may have removed to the Catawba.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates a population of 1,000 CapeFear Indians in 1600. The census of 1715, above mentioned, gives206. In 1808 White neighbors remembered when as many as 30Pedee and Cape Fear Indians lived in their old territories. 76 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bdll. 145Catawba. This tribe occupied parts of southwestern North Carolinanear Catawba River. (See South Carolina.)Cheraw. Significance unknown. Also called:Ani'-Suwa'li, Cherokee name.Saraw, Suali, synonyms even more common than Cheraw.Xuala, Xualla, Spanish and Portuguese forms of the word, the x beingintended for sh.Connections.?The Cheraw are classed on circumstantial grounds inthe Siouan linguistic family though no words of their tongue have beenpreserved.Location.?The earliest known location of the Cheraw appears tohave been near the head of Saluda River in Pickens and OconeeCounties, S. C, whence they removed at an early date to the presentHenderson, Polk, and Rutherford Counties.VillagesThe names given are always those of the tribe, though we have a "Lower SauraTown" and an "Upper Saura Town" on a map dating from 1760.History.?Mooney (1928) has shown that the Cheraw are identicalwith the Xuala province which De Soto entered in 1540, remainingabout 4 days. They were visited by Pardo at a later date, and almosta hundred years afterward Lederer (1912) heard of them in the sameregion. Before 1700 they left their old country and moved to theDan River near the southern line of Virginia, where they seem tohave had two distinct settlements about 30 miles apart. About theyear 1710, on account of constant Iroquois attacks, they movedsoutheast and joined the Keyauwee. The colonists of North Carolina,being dissatisfied at the proximity of these and other tribes, GovernorEden declared war against the Cheraw, and applied to Virginia forassistance. This Governor Spotswood refused, as he believed theCarolinians were the aggressors, but the contest was prosecuted bythe latter until after the Yamasee War. During this period complaintwas made that the Cheraw were responsible for most of the depre-dations committed north of Santee River and they were accused oftrying to draw the coast tribes into an alliance with them. It wasasserted also that arms were being supplied them from Virginia. TheCheraw were then living upon the upper course of the Great Pee Dee,near the line between the two colonies and in the later Cheraw dis-trict of South Carolina. Being stiU subject to attack by the Iroquois,they finally?between 1726 and 1739?became incorporated with theCatawba, with whom at an earlier date they had been at enmity.In 1759 a party joined the English in their expedition against FortDuquesne, but the last notice of them is in 1768 when the remnantwas still living with the Catawba. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 77Population.?During the Spanish period the Cheraw appear tohave been of considerable importance but no estimate of their num-bers has come down to us. Mooney (1928) gives 1,200 as a probablefigure for the year 1600. The census of 1715 gives 140 men and atotal of 510, probably including the Keyauwee and perhaps some othertribes. In 1768 the survivors numbered 50 to 60.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Cheraw are famousas one of the few tribes in the Carolinas mentioned by De Soto'schi'oniclers which can be identified and located with fair precision.They were noted later for their persistent hostility to the Englishand have left their name in vSuwali Gap in the Blue Ridge Mountains,N. C; in Saura Town Mountains, Stokes County, N. C; in the townof Cheraw, Chesterfield County, S. C. ; and possibly in the UwaharrieRiver and Uwaharrie Mountains of North Carolina. There is alocality named Cheraw in Otero County, Colo.Cherokee. The Cherokee lived in the mountainous parts of theState in the west. (See Tennessee.)Chowanoc. Meaning in Algonquian "(people) at the south."Connections.?The Chowanoc belonged to the Algonquian linguisticfamily and were evidently most nearly allied to the other NorthCarolina Algonquians.Location.?On Chowan River about the junction of Meherrin andBlackwater Rivers. VillagesMaratoD, on the east bank of Chowan River in Chowan County.Ohanoak, on the west side of Chowan River not far below Nottoway Riverprobably in Hertford County.Catoking, (probably) near Gatesville, in Gates County.Metocaum, on Chowan River in the present Bertie County.Ramushonok, apparently between the Meherrin and Nottoway Rivers in HertfordCounty.History.?In 1584-85, when first known to Europeans, the Chow-anoc were the leading tribe in northeastern North Carolina. In1663 they entered into a treaty with the English by which they sub-mitted to the English Crown, but they violated this in 1075 and aftera year of warfare were compelled to confine themselves to a reserva-tion on Bennett's Creek which became reduced by 1707 from 12 squaremiles to 6. They sided with the colonists in the Tuscarora War, andat about the same time were visited by a Church of England mis-sionary, Giles Rainsford. In 1723 a reservation of 53,000 acres wasset aside for them conjointly with the Tuscarora and in 1733 theywere given permission to incorporate with that tribe. They con-tinued to decline in numbers until in 1755 Governor Dobbs statedthat only 2 men and 3 women were left. 78 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Population.?In 1584-85 one of the Chowanoc towns, Ohanoak,was said to contain 700 warriors, and Mooney (1928) estimates theirnumbers at about 1,500 in 1600, In 1707 they were reduced to onetown with about 15 fighting men, but at the end of the TuscaroraWar their numbers were placed at 240. In 1731 less than 20 familieswere reported and by 1755 only 5 individuals, as above noted.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Chowanoc seemto have been the most powerful Algonquian tribe south of the Pow-hatan, Their memory is preserved in the names of Chowan Riverand Chowan County, and in the -designation of a small post office inthe county of the name, all in North Carolina,Coree, or Coranine. Meaning unknown.Connections.?As the final stage of the Coree existence was passedwith an Algonquian tribe, some have thought that the affiliations ofthis people were also Algonquian, On the other hand Lawson (1860)notes that their language and that of a tribe to the north were mutuallyintelligible and there is reason for thinking that this northern tribebelonged to the Iroquois Confederacy, At least the Coree wereclosely associated in many ways with the Iroquoian Tuscarora,Location.?On the peninsula south of Neuse River in Carteret andCraven Counties, VillagesCoranine, probably on the coast in Carteret County,Narhantes, among the Tuscarora, 30 miles from Newbern,Raruta, probably on the coast of Carteret County, south of Neuse River.History.?When the Coree and the Whites first met is unknown,but they appear in the records of the Raleigh colony under the nameCwarennoc, They were greatly reduced before 1696 in a war withanother people. They took part with the Tuscarora in their waragainst the colonists, and in 1715 the remnant of them and what wasleft of the Machapunga were assigned a reservation on MattamuskeetLake in Hyde County, where they occupied one village, probablyuntil they became extinct. A few of them appear to have remainedwith the Tuscarora,Population.?The population of this tribe and the Neusiok wasestimated by Mooney (1928) at 1,000 in 1600, In 1707 Lawson saysthey had 25 fighting men and were living in 2 villages. No laterenumeration is known.Connection in which they have become noted.?Although some distancefrom the Coree country, Core Creek Station in Craven County, N. C,may perpetuate the name of the Coree. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 79Eno. Significance unknown, but Speck suggests i'nare, "to dislike,"whence, "mean," "contemptible"; ye?i'nare, "People disliked,"Haynokes, synonym from Yardley (1654).Connections.?The Eno were probably of the Siouan linguisticstock, though, on account of certain peculiarities attributed to them,Mooney (1895) casts some doubt upon this. Their nearest relativeswere the Shakori.Location.?On Eno River in the present Orange and DurhamCounties. (See also South Carolina.)VillagesThe only village name recorded, distinct from that of the tribe, is Adshusheer,a town which they shared with the Shakori. It is located by Mooney (1928) nearthe present Hillsboro. Lawson (1860) speaks in one place as if it were a tribe butas there is no other mention of it, it is more likely that it was simply the name ofthe town which the Eno and Shakori occupied.History.?The Eno are first mentioned by Governor Yeardley ofVirginia, who was told that they had valiantly resisted the northwardadvance of the Spaniards. From this it appears possible that theyhad formerly lived upon the Enoree River in South Carolina, whichlay on the main trail from St. Helena to the Cheraw country at thefoot of the Appalachian INIountains. Lederer (1912) mentions themin 1671 and Lawson (1860) in 1701 when they and the Shakori werein the town of Adshusheer. About 1714, together with the Shakori,Tutelo, Saponi, Occaneechi, and Keyauwee, they began to movetoward the Virginia settlements. In 1716 Governor Spotswood ofVirginia proposed to settle the Eno, Cheraw, and Keyuawee at Enotown "on the very frontiers" of North Carolina but the project wasdefeated by the latter province on the ground that all three tribeswere then at war with South Carolina. From the records it is notclear whether this Eno town was the old settlement or a new onenearer the Albemarle colonists. Owing to the defeat of this plan, theEno moved into South Carolina. Presumably they finally unitedwith the Catawba, among whom, Adair (1930) states, their dialectwas still spoken in 1743.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates the combined Eno, Shakori,and Adshusheer at 1,500 in 1600. In 1714 the Eno, Shakori, Tutelo,Saponi, Occaneechi, and Keyauwee totaled 750. There is no otherrecord of their numbers.Connection in which they have become noted.?In marked distinctionfrom their neighbors, the Eno had taken to a trading life. Theirname was given to Eno River in Orange and Durham Counties, N. C,and perhaps to a place called Enno in the southwestern part of WakeCounty, and to Enoree River in South Carolina (see above), as alsoto a post village near the last mentioned. 80 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Hatteras. Meaning unknown.Connections.?The Hatteras belonged to the Algonquian Hnguisticfamily.Location.?Among the sandbanks about Cape Hatteras east ofPamlico Sound and frequenting Roanoke Island.VillageSandbanks, on Hatteras Island.History.?Lawson (1860) thought the Hatteras showed traces ofWhite blood and therefore they may have been the Croatan Indianswith whom Raleigh's colonists are supposed to have taken refuge.They disappeared soon after as a distinct tribe and united with themainland Algonquians. In 1761, the Rev. Alex. Stewart baptized 7Indians and mixed-blood children of the "Attamuskeet, Hatteras, andRoanoke" tribes and 2 years later he baptized 21 more.Population.?The Hatteras population has been estimated with theMachapunga and other tribes at 1,200 in 1600; they had 16 warriorsin 1701, or a total population of about 80.Connection in which they have become noted.?The possible connec-tion of the Hatteras with the Croatan has been mentioned and theirname has become perpetuated in the dangerous cape at the angle ofthe outer sand islands of their old country.Keyauwee. Meaning unknown.Connections.?From the historical affiliations of Keyauwee, they arepresumed to have been of the Siouan linguistic family.Location.?About the points of meeting of the present Guilford,Davidson, and Randolph Counties. (See also South Carolina.)VillagesNo separately named villages are known.History.?The Keyauwee do not appear to have been noted bywhite men before 1701 when Lawson (1860) found them in a palisadedvillage about 30 miles northeast of Yadkin River near the presentHighpoint, Guilford County. At that time they were preparing tojoin the Saponi and Tutelo for better protection against their enemies,and, shortly afterward, together with the last mentioned tribes, theOccaneechi, and the Shakori, they moved toward the settlementsabout Albemarle Sound. As mentioned already. Governor Spots-wood's project to settle this tribe together with the Eno and Cherawat Enotown on the frontier of North Carolina was foiled by the opposi-tion of the latter colony. The Keyauwee then moved southward tothe Pee Dee along with the Cheraw, and perhaps the Eno and Shakori.In the Jefferys atlas of 1761 their town appears close to the boundaryline between the two Carolinas. They do not reappear in any of the SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 81historical records but probably united ultimately in part with theCatawba, while some of their descendants are represented among theRobeson County Indians, often miscalled Croatan.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates 500 Kcyauwee in ICOO. In1701 they are said to have numbered approximately as many as theSaponi, but the population of that tribe also is unknown. Shortlyafterward it is stated that the Keyauwee, Tutelo, Saponi, Occaneechi,and Shakori totaled 750 souls. This is all the information that wehave.Machapunga. Said to mean "bad dust," or "much dirt," in thenative Algonquian language.Connections.?The Machapunga belonged to the Algonquian lin-guistic stock.Location.?In the present Hyde County and probably also inWashington, Tyrrell, and Dare Counties, and part of Beaufort.VillagesThe only village named is Mattamuskeet (probably on Mattamuskeet Lakein Hyde County). However, we should probably add Secotan on the north bankof Pamlico River in Beaufort County, and perhaps the town of the Bear RiverIndians (q. v.).History.?The Machapunga seem to have embraced the larger partof the descendants of the Secotan, who lived between Albemarle andPamlico Sounds when the Raleigh colony was established on RoanokeIsland (1585-86) though the Pamlico may also have been includedunder the same head. They were reduced to a single village by 1701,took part with other Indian tribes of the region in the Tuscarora War,and at its close were settled on Mattamuskeet Lake with the Coree.In 1761 a small number were still living in North Carolina, evidentlyat the same place, and the Rev. Alex. Stewart reported that he hadbaptized seven Indian and mixed-blood children belonging to the "Attamuskeet, Hatteras, and Roanoke." On a second visit 2 yearslater he baptized 21 more.Population.?The Machapunga are estimated by Mooney (1928) tohave numbered 1,200, including some smaller tribes, in 1600. In 1701Lawson gives 30 warriors, probably less than 100 souls (Lawson,1860). In 1775 there were said to be 8 to 10 on the mainland and asmany more on the off-shore banks. In 1761 the number of warriorswas only 7 or 8. The Bear River Indians (q. v.) may have combinedwith these.Connection in which they have become noted.?In the form Machi-pongo, the name is applied to a post village in Northampton County,Va. 82 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145Meherrin. This tribe extended across from Virginia into North-ampton and Hertford Counties. (See Virginia.)Moratok. A place name, but the meaning otherwise unknown.Connections.?There is little doubt that the Moratok belonged tothe Algonquian linguistic stock and were closely related to the otherAlgonquian tribes of the sound region of North Carolina.Location.?On Roanoke River and apparently on the north side, andestimated to be 160 miles up the river, though the distance is evidentlyreckoned from the Raleigh settlement on Roanoke Island.VillagesThe village bearing the name of the tribe is the only one known.History.?The sole mention of the Moratok is in the narratives ofthe Raleigh expeditions. They were first recognized as an independenttribe by Mr. Maurice Mook (1943 a).Population.?Unknown but reported as large.Natchez. Part of the Natchez Indians sought refuge with the Chero-kee after their tribe had been broken up by the French, and most ofthem appear to have lived along Hiwassee River. They accom-panied those Cherokee who moved to Oklahoma and settled on thewestern margin of the Cherokee Reservation, where a few of themretained their language long enough to have it recorded. (SeeMississippi.)Neusiok. Probably a place name.Connections.?The form of this name suggests that the Neusiok wereof the Algonquian stock, but they may have been Iroquoian like theirneighbors the Tuscarora and Coree (?).Location.?On lower Neuse River particularly on the south side, inCraven and Cartaret Counties.VillageChattooka, on the site of Newbern, and Rouconk, exact location unknown.History.?In 1584 Amadas and Barlowe heard of the Neusiok as awar with the tribes farther north. The later settlers speak of themas Neuse Indians. They dwindled away rapidly after White contactand perhaps united finally with the Tuscarora.Population.?With the Coree the Neusiok are estimated by Mooney(1928) at 1,000 in the year 1600. In 1709 they numbered but 15warriors although occupying two towns.Connection in which they have become noted.?The name Neusiok isconnected with that of the River Neuse in North Carolina, and apost village. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA S3Occaneechi. When the Occaneechi lived on Roanoke River, Va.,they probably ranged over into Warren, Halifax, and NorthamptonCounties, N. C. In 1701 they were in Orange County, N. C. (SeeVirginia.)Pamlico. Meaning unknown.Connections.?The Pamlico belonged to the Algonquian linguisticstock.Location.?On Pamlico River.History.?The Pamlico are mentioned by the Raleigh colonists in1585-86 under the name Pomouik. In 1696 they were almost de-stroyed by smallpox. In 1701 Lawson recorded a vocabulary fromthem which shows their affiliations to have been as given above(Lawson, 1860). In 1710 they lived in a single small village. Theytook part in the Tuscarora war, and at its close that part of theTuscarora under treaty with the English agreed to destroy them. Aremnant of the Pamlico was probably incorporated by the Tuscaroraas slaves.Population.?The Pamlico are estimated by Mooney (1928),together with "Bear River" Indians, as 1,000 in 1600. In 1710 theynumbered about 75.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Pamlico havegiven their name to or shared it with the largest sound in NorthCarolina and a North Carolina county. They are also noteworthyas having been almost if not quite the most southerly Algonquian tribeon the Atlantic seaboard, and the most southerly one from which avocabulary has been collected.Saponi. This tribe lived on Yadkin River and in other parts of theState for a certain period. (See Virginia.)Shakori. A native name but its significance unknown, though perhapsthe same as Sugari, "stingy or spoiled people," or "of the river-whose-water-cannot-be drunk." Also called:Cacores, a misprint.Connections.?The Shakori belonged to the Siouan linguistic family,their closest connections being evidently with the southern divisionof the Siouan tribes of the East. Barnwell (1908) identified themwith the Sissipahaw (q. v.).Location.?The Shakori moved so frequently and there is so muchuncertainty regarding their early history, that this is hard to give,but, as they usually kept company with the Eno, tenancy of thecourses of Shocco and Big Shocco Creeks in the present Vance,Warren, and Franklin Counties is perhaps the location most closelyconnected with them in historic times. (See South Carolina andVirginia.) 84 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145History.?It is possible that the Shakori gave their name to theprovince of Chicora visited by Aj^llon and his companions in 1521.If so, we must suppose that they moved north later in the sixteenthcentury or early in the seventeenth, perhaps as a result of the Pardoexpeditions. In 1650 Edward Blande and his associates found the"Nottoway and Schockoores old fields" between Meherrin and Notto-way Rivers, but the Indians were not there. In 1654 Governor Yeard-ley of Virginia was told by a Tuscarora Indian of an inland peoplecalled the "Cacores," probably an attempt to indicate this tribe.In 1672 Lederer found them living in a village 14 miles from that of theEno (Lederer, 1912), and in 1701 Lawson says these two tribes (theShakori and Eno) were in one village called Adshusheer on Eno River(Lawson, 18G0). The later fortunes of the Shakori were bound upwith those of the Eno (q. v.).Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates the Shakori, Eno, and "Adshusheer" at 1,500 in 1600.Connection in which they have become noted.?The two creeks, Shoccoand Big Shocco, and a post office 9 miles south of Warrenton, WarrenCounty, perpetuate the name of the Shakori. If Chicora refers to thesame tribe, it appears prominently in Spanish narratives of Americanexploration, particularly because of the information regarding Indiancustoms obtained by Peter Martyr from an Indian, Francisco ofChicora.Sara, see Cheraw.Sissipahaw. Meaning unknown.Connections.?The Sissipahaw were probably of the Siouan linguisticfamily though no words of their language are known.Location.?l^Xie principal Sissipahaw settlement appears to havebeen about the present Saxapahaw on Haw River in the lower part ofAlamance County. (See also South Carolina.)History.?The name of this tribe is possibly preserved in the Sauxpamentioned by the Spanish officer Vandera in 1569 as a place visitedby Juan Pardo. Lawson (1860) spoke of them in connection with histravels through Carolina in 1701, but he did not visit them. Barn-well (1908) identified them with the Shakori with whom they weredoubtless nearly allied and of whom they may have been a branch.They united with other tribes of the region against the English in theYamasee war of 1715, and later with other Siouan remnants probablyjoined the Catawba.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates the Sissipahaw at 800 in1600. "Haw Old Fields" constituted the largest body of fertileland in the region. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 85Connections in which they have become noted.?The name Sissipahawhas been brought down to our times by Haw River and the towns ofHaw River and Saxapahaw on the same, in Alamance County, N. C.Sugeree. This tribe occupied parts of Mecklenburg County. (SeeSouth Carohna.)Tuscarora. From their own name Sk3,-ru'-re?, signifying according toHewitt {in Hodge, 1910), "hemp gatherers," and applied on accountof the great use they made of Apocymim cannahinum. Also called : A-ko-t'5.s'-kii-ro'-r6"', Mohawk name.Ani'-SkaiS'll, Cherokee name.A-t'as-kii-lo'-l6?', Oneida name.Tewohomomy (or Keew-ahomomjO, Saponi name.Connections.?The Tuscarora belonged to the Iroquoian linguisticfamily.Location.?On the Roanoke, Tar, Pamlico, and Neuse Rivers.(See also Pennsylvania and New York.)SubdivisionsThe Tuscarora should be considered a confederacy with three tribes or a tribewith three subtribes as follows: Ka'tS'nu'a'ka', "People of the submerged pinetree"; AkawSntca'ka', meaning doubtful; and Skaru'r6?, "hemp gatherers,"i. e., the Tuscarora proper. VillagesThe following were in North Carolina, a more precise location not being possibleexcept in the cases specified:Annaooka.Chunaneets.Cohunche.Conauhcare.Contahnah, near the mouth of Neuse River.Cotechney, on the opposite side of Neuse River from Fort Barnwell, about themouth of Contentnea Creek.Coram.Corutra.Harooka.Harutawaqui.Kenta.Kentanuska.Naurheghne.Neoheroka, in Greene County.Nonawharitse.Nursoorooka.Oonossoora.Tasqui, a day's journey from Cotechney on the way to Nottaway village.Tonarooka, on a branch of Neuse River between "Fort Narhantes" and Cotech-ney.Torhunte, on a northern affluent of Neuse River.Tosneoc. 86 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Ucouhnerunt, on Pamlico River, probably in the vicinity of Greenville, in PittCounty.Unanauhan.Later settlements in New York were these:Canasaraga, on Canaseraga Creeli on the site of the present Sullivan.Ingaren.Junastriyo.Jutaneaga.Kanhats.Kaunehsuntahkeh.Nyuchirhaan, near Lewiston, Niagara County.Ohagi, on the west side of Genesee River a short distance below Cuylersville,Livingston Count5\Oquaga, on the east branch of the Susquehanna on both sides, in the town ofColesville, Broome County.Oyonwayea, also called Johnson's Landing, in Niagara County, about 4 mileseast of the outlet of Niagara River at the mouth of Four Mile Creek.Shawiangto, on the west side of the Susquehanna not far from Windsor, BroomeCounty.Tiochrungwe, on the "main road" from Oneida to Onondaga.Tuscarora, the name of three villages: one a short distance east of "Anatsagane,"probably the present Stockbridge, in Madison County; the second about 3 milesbelow Oquaga, in Broome County, approximately on the site of Windsor; andthe third 12 miles by land and 20 by water below Oquaga, in the vicinity ofGreat Bend, in Susquehanna County.The location of Ganatisgowa is uncertain.History.?The place or manner of separation of the Tuscarora fromthe Iroquois tribes of New York is not known, and they were foundin the tract indicated above when the country was first entered bywhite colonists. John Lawson, Surveyor General of North Carolina,lived in close contact with these Indians for many years and hisHistory of Carolina gives us our earliest satisfactory picture of them.(See Lawson, 1860.) It was his capture and execution b}^ the tribein September 1711, however, which brought on the first TuscaroraWar, though behind it lay a series of encroachments by the Whiteson Tuscarora territory, and the kidnaping and enslavement of num-bers of Indians. Immediately after Lawson's death, part of theTuscarora, headed by chief Hencock, and the Coree, Pamlico, Ma-chapunga, and Bear River Indians conspired to cut off the whitesettlers and, in consequence, on September 22, 1711, they rose andmassacred about 130 of the colonists on Trent and Pamlico Rivers.Colonel Barnwell, with 33 white men and about 500 Indians, marchedagainst the hostiles, by direction of the colony of South Carolina,drove them from one of their towns with great loss, and investedHencock's own town, Cotechney. But having suffered severely intwo assaults upon the place and fearing lest the white captives in thehands of the Indians would be killed, he made peace and returned SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 87home. Dissatisfied with the treatment accorded him by the NorthCarolina authorities, however, he violated the treaty during his retreatby seizing some Indians and sending them away as slaves. This broughton the second Tuscarora War, 1712-13. South Carolina was againappealed to for assistance, and Colonel James Moore set out for thenorth with about 900 Indians and 33 white men, a number whichwas considerably swelled before he reached the seat of trouble.March 20 to 23 he stormed the palisaded town of Neoheroka, inflictinga loss upon the enemy of about 950. The Tuscarora became soterrified at this that part of them abandoned Fort Cohunche, situatedat Hencock's town and started north to join their relatives, theIroquois. This was only the beginning of the movement, bands ofTuscarora being noted at intervals as moving north or as havingarrived among the Five Nations. They were adopted by the Oneidabut, contrary to the general impression, were not granted coordinaterights in the League before September 1722. A part of the Tuscaroraunder a chief named Tom Blunt (or Blount), had, however, remainedneutral. They received recognition by the government of NorthCarolina, and continued in their former homes under their own chiefs.In 1766, 155 removed to New York, and the 105 remaining werebrought north in 1802 while a deputation of northern Tuscarora werein Carolina to obtain payment for the lands they had formerly occu-pied. When the Tuscarora first moved north they were settled atvarious places along the Susquehanna in Pennsylvania and in NewYork, some in the Oneida country itself. In 1875, by the treaty ofFort Herkimer, the Oneida sold to the State of New York, the landson which their adopted children, the Tuscarora, had settled, and for atime the Tuscarora were dispersed in various settlements in New YorkState, and even in Pennsylvania. At the outbreak of the AmericanRevolution, the majority of Tuscarora and Oneida espoused the causeof the colonists and in consequence they were attacked by Indiansin the British interest, including even some of their Iroquois brethren,their houses were burned, their crops and other property destroyed,and they themselves scattered. A large band of them settled, how-ever, at a place called Oyonwayea or Johnson's Landing, on LakeOntario. Later a party from this settlement discovered a place inthe northeastern part of the present Tuscarora Reservation whichpleased them so much that they decided to winter there and theywere presently joined by the rest of the inhabitants of Oyonwayea.At the treaty held at Genesee, September 15, 1797, between RobertMorris and the Seneca tribe, Morris reserved to the tribe, by grant,2 square miles, covering their new settlements, and the Seneca there-upon granted them an additional square mile. As a result of theirappeal to the legislature of North Carolina above mentioned, they 88 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 were able to lease lands in the south, and they devoted the proceedsto the purchase of 4,329 acres adjoining their New York reserve.The Tuscarora who had sided with Great Britain were granted landsin severalty on Grand River, Ontario.Population.?There were 5,000 Tuscarora in 1600 accordmg to anestimate by Mooney (1928). In 1708, Lawson gives 15 towns and1,200 warriors (Lawson, 1860). Barnwell in 1712 estimates 1,200 to1,400 fightmg men (Barnwell, 1908); Chauvignerie in 1736, 250 war-riors, not including those in North Carolina, and on the Susquehannaand Juniata Rivers (Chauvignerie, in Schoolcraft, 1851-57, vol. 3,p. 555). In 1752 the southern Tuscarora were said to number 300men; in 1754 there were said to be 100 men and 200 women andchildren and these figures are repeated in 1761. In 1766 there weresaid to be 220 to 230 all told in the south; next year we read that 155southern Tuscarora had removed and that 105 remained. Otherestimates place the total Tuscarora population at 1,000 in 1765, 2,000in 1778, 1,000 in 1783, and 400 in 1796. In 1885 there were 828(evenly divided between New York and Canada). In 1909 therewere 364 in New York and a year later 416 in Canada, a total of 780.In 1910, 400 were reported in the United States and in 1923, 376 inNew York alone. The number in Canada is not separately given.Connection in which they have become noted.?This tribe is notedhistorically for its prominence among the peoples of eastern NorthCarolina, for the two wars which it waged with the colonists, and forthe rather spectacular migration of the greater part to the north andits union with the Five Iroquois Nations. The name Tuscaroraocciu-s applied to settlements in Frederick County, Md.; CravenCounty, North Carolina; Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania; LivingstonCounty, N. Y.; Elko County, Nev.; and Ontario; and to a creek andmountain in Pennsylvania.Tutelo. This tribe lived for a while on the upper Yadkin and later inBertie County. (See Virginia.)Waccamaw. They probably ranged across into North Carolina fromthe head of Waccamaw River. (See South Carolina.)Wateree. According to Lederer (1912) they were Uving in 1670 onthe upper Yadkin. (See South Carolina.)Waxhaw. They extended over into Union County from South Car-olina. (See South Carolina.)Weapemeoc. Meaning unknown, but evidently a place name. Alsocalled:Yeopim, a shortened and more usual form.Connections.?The Weapemeoc were almost certainly of the Algon-quian linguistic family and related to the Powhatan Indians to thenorth and the Chowan, Machapunga, and Pamlico to the south. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 89Location.?Most of the present Currituck, Camden, Pasquotank,and Perquimans Counties, and part of Chowan County north ofAlbemai-le Sound. SubdivisionsIn the same section in later times are given the following tribes which must beregarded as subdivisions of the Weapemeoc:Pasquotank, on Pasquotank River.Perquiman, on Perquimans River,Poteskeet, location uncertain.Yeopim, or Weapemeoc proper, on Yeopim River.VillagesChepanoc, on Albemarle Sound in Perquimans County.Mascoming, on the north shore of Albemarle Sound, in Chowan County.Metachkwem, location unknown,Pasquenock, perhaps identical with Pasquotank, on the north shore of Albe-marle Sound, perhaps in Camden County.Weapemeoc, probably in Pasquotank County.History.?The Weapemeoc first appear in history in the narrativesof the Raleigh colony of 1585-86, Later they are spoken of underthe various subdivisional names. They parted with some of theirland in 1662. In 1701, according to Lawson (1860), only 6 of theYeopim survived though there were 40 warriors of the other sub-divisions, including 10 Pasquotank and 30 Potekeet,Population.?In the time of the Raleigh colony the Weapemeocare said to have had between 700 and 800 warriors. They wereestimated by Mooney (1928) at 800 in 1600, From their numberas given by Lawson in 1701 Rights (1947) estimates 200 at that date.Connection in which they have become noted.?In the form Yeopimthe name has been preserved in that of a railroad station in Per-quimans County, N, C.Woccon. Significance unknown.Connections.?The Woccon belonged to the Siouan linguistic stock,their closest relations being the Catawba,Location.?Between Neuse River and one of its affluents, perhapsabout the present Goldsboro, Wayne County. VillagesTooptatmeer, supposed to have been in Greene County.Yupwauremau, supposed to have been in Greene County.History.?The first mention of the Woccon appears to be by Lawsonwriting about 1701, who recorded 150 words of their language. Theseshow that it was nearer Catawba than any other known variety of 90 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145 speech. Lack of any earlier mention of such a large tribe lendsstrength to the theory of Dr. Douglas L, Rights that they wereoriginally Waccamaw (q. v., under South Carohna). They tookpart against the Whites in the Tuscarora Wars and were probablyextinguished as a tribe at that time, the remnant fleeing north withthe Tuscarora, uniting with the Catawba, or combining with otherSiouan remnants in the people later known as Croatan.Population.?The number of Woccon was estimated by Mooney(1928) at 600 in 1600. Lawson (1860) gives 120 warriors in 1709.Connection in which they have become noted.?The sole claim of theWoccon to distinction is from the fact that it is the only one of thesouthern group of eastern Siouan tribes other than the Catawbafrom which a vocabulary has been preserved.Yadkin. Meaning unknown.Connections.?The Yadkin probably belonged to the Siouan lin-guistic family.Location.?On Yadkin River.History.?The Yadkin first appear in history in a letter by theIndian trader, Abraham Wood, narrating the adventures of two men,James Needham and Gabriel Arthur, whom he had sent on an explor-ing expedition to the west. They passed this tribe and town, whichthey call "Yattken," in the summer of 1674. Lawson (1860) givesthe name as Reatkin but applies it to the river, and there is no latermention of the people.Connection in which they have become noted.?Their name Yadkin isperpetuated by the Yadkin River, Yadkin County, and the townsand villages of Yadkin College, Yadkin Falls, Yadkin Valley, andYadkinville, all in the State of North Carolina.Yeopim, see Weapemeoc.SOUTH CAROLINACatawba. Significance unknown though the name was probablynative to the tribe. Also called:Ani'ta'gua, Cherokee name.Iswa or Issa, signifying "river," and specifically the Catawba River; orig-inally probably an independent band which united early with theCatawba proper.Oyadagahroenes, Tadirighrones, Iroquois names.Usherys, from iswahere, "river down here"; see Issa.Connections.?The Catawba belonged to the Siouan linguisticfamily, but Catawba was the most aberrant of all known Siouanlanguages, though closer to Woccon than any other of which a vocab-ulary has been recorded. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 91Location.?In York and Lancaster Counties mainly but extendinginto the neighboring parts of the State and also into North Carolinaand Tennessee. SubdivisionsTwo distinct tribes are given by Lawson (1860) and placed on early maps, theCatawba and Iswa, the latter deriving their name from the native word meaning "river," which was specifically applied to Catawba River.VillagesIn early days this tribe had many villages but few names have come down to us.In 1728 there were six villages, all on Catawba River, the most northerly of whichwas known as Nauvasa. In 1781 they had two called in English Newton andTurkey Head, on opposite sides of Catawba River.History,?The Catawba appear first in history under the nameYsa, Issa (Iswa) in Vandera's narratives of Pardo's expedition intothe interior, made in 1566-67. Lederer (1912) visited them in 1670and calls them Ushery. In 1711-13 they assisted the Whites in theirwars with the Tuscarora, and though they participated in the Yamaseeuprising in 1715 peace was quickly made and the Catawba remainedfaithful friends of the colonists ever after. Meanwhile they declinedsteadily in numbers from diseases introduced by the Whites, the useof liquor, and constant warfare with the Iroquois, Shawnee, Delaware,and other tribes. In 1738 they were decimated by smallpox and in1759 the same disease destroyed nearly half of them. Through themediation of the Whites, peace was made at Albany in 1759 betweenthem and the Iroquois, but other tribes continued their attacks, andin 1763 a party of Shawnee killed the noted Catawba King Haigler.The year before they had left their town in North CaroHna andmoved into South Carolina, where a tract of land 15 miles square hadbeen reserved for them. From that time on they sank into relativeinsignificance. They sided with the colonists during the revolutionand on the approach of the British troops withdrew temporarily intoVirginia, returning after the battle of Guilford Court House. In 1826nearly the whole of their reservation was leased to Whites, and in1840 they sold all of it to the State of South Carolina, which agreed toobtain new territory for them in North CaroHna. The latter Staterefused to part with any land for that purpose, however, and most ofthe Catawba who had gone north of the State line were forced toreturn. Ultimately a reservation of 800 acres was set aside for themin South Carolina and the main body has lived there ever since. Afew continued in North CaroHna and others went to the Cherokee,but most of these soon came back and the last of those who remaineddied in 1889. A few Catawba intermarried with the Cherokee inlater times, however, and still live there, and a few others went to the 92 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Choctaw Nation, in what is now Oklahoma, and settled near Scully-ville. These also are reported to be extinct. Some families estab-lished themselves in other parts of Oklahoma, in Arkansas, and nearSanford, Colo., where they have gradually been absorbed by theIndian and White population. About 1884 several Catawba wereconverted by Mormon missionaries and went to Salt Lake City, andin time most of those in South Carohna became members of theMormon Church, although a few are Baptists. Besides the twodivisions of Catawba proper, the present tribe is supposed to includeremnants of about 20 smaller tribes, principally Siouan.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates the number of Catawba in1600, including the Iswa, at 5,000. About 1682 the tribe was sup-posed to contain 1,500 warriors or about'4,600 souls; in 1728, 400 war-riors or about 1,400 souls; and in 1743, after incorporating severalsmall tribes, as having less than that number of warriors. In 1752we have an estimate of about 300 warriors, or about 1,000 people;in 1755, 240 warriors; in 1757, about 300 warriors and 700 souls;and in 1759, 250 warriors. Although there is an estimate accreditingthem with 300 warriors in 1761, King Haigler declared that they hadbeen reduced by that year, after the smallpox epidemic of 1760, to60 fighting men. In 1763 fewer than 50 men were reported, and in1766 "not more than 60." In 1775 there was estimated a totalpopulation of 400; in 1780, 490; in 1784, 250; in 1822, 450; in 1826,110. In 1881 Gatschet found 85 on the reservation and 35 on ad-joining farms, a total of 120. The census of 1910 returned 124, andin 1912 there were about 100, of whom 60 were attached to the reser-vation. The census of 1930 gave 166, all but 7 in South Carolina.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Catawba, whetheroriginally or by union with the Iswa, early became recognized asthe most powerful of all the Siouan peoples of Carolina. They arealso the tribe which preserved its identity longest and from whichthe greatest amount of linguistic information has been obtained.The name itself was given to a variety of grape, and has become applied,either adopted from the tribe directly or taken from that of the grape,to places in Catawba County, N. C; Roanoke County, Va.; MarionCounty, W. Va.; Bracken County, Ky.; Clark County, Ohio; CaldwellCounty, Mo.; Steuben County, N. Y.; Blaine County, Okla.; YorkCounty, S. C; and Price County, Wis. It is also borne by an island inOhio, and by the Catawba River of the Carolinas, a branch of theWateree.Cherokee. The extreme northwestern portion of the State wasoccupied by Cherokee Indians. (See Tennessee.)Chiaha. A part of this tribe lived in South Carolina at times. (SeeGeorgia.) SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 93Chickasaw. The Chickasaw territory proper was in northernMississippi, at a considerable distance from the State under dis-cussion, but about 1753 a body of Chickasaw Indians settled onthe South Carolina side of Savannah River, to be near the Englishtrading posts and to keep in contact with the English, who weretheir allies. Before 1757 most of them moved over to the imme-diate neighborhood of Augusta and remained there until the periodof the American Revolution. In that war they sided against thecolonists and their lands were confiscated in 1783. (See Mississippi.)Congaree. Meaning unknown.Connection.?No words of this language have been preserved butthe form of the name and general associations of the tribe leave littledoubt that it was a Siouan dialect, related most closely to Catawba.Location.?On Congaree River, centering in the neighborhood ofthe present State Capital, Columbia.VillageThe only village mentioned bore the same name as the tribe and was sometimesplaced on the Congaree opposite Columbia, sometimes on the north side of theriver.History.?The Congaree are mentioned in documents of the seven-teenth century as one of the small tribes of the Piedmont region. In1701 Lawson (1860) found them settled on the northeast bank ofSantee River below the mouth of the Wateree. They took partagainst the WMtes in the Yamasee War of 1715, and in 1716 overhalf of them were captured and sent as slaves to the West Indies.The remnant appear to have retreated to the Catawba, for Adair(1930) mentions their dialect as one of those spoken in the CatawbaNation.Population.?The Congaree are estimated by Mooney (1928) at800 in 1600. A census taken in 1715 gives 22 men and a total popu-lation of about 40.Connection in which they have become noted.?Congaree River anda railroad station in Richland County, S. C, preserve the name;Columbia, the State capital, was originally known as the Congarees.Creeks. In the time of De Soto, Cofitachequi, which seems tohave been either Kasihta or Coweta, and a few other Creek townsincluding perhaps Hilibi and part of the Chiaha Indians were inthe territory of the present State of South Carolina near Savan-nah River. The Coosa of Coosawhatchie, Edisto, and AshleyRivers may have been Creek in origin, and in later times Creeksconstantly resorted to the provincial settlements in this area.(See Alabama.) 94 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Cusabo. Meaning perhaps "Coosawhatchie River (people)."Connections.?There is httle doubt that the Cusabo belonged to theMuskhogean linguistic family. Their closest connections appear tohave been with the Indians of the Georgia coast, the Guale.Location.?In the southernmost part of South Carolina betweenCharleston Harbor and Savannah River and including most of thevalleys of the Ashley, Edisto*, Ashepoo, Combahee, Salkehatchie, andCoosawhatchie Rivers. SubdivisionsThese people should be divided first into the Cusabo proper, who occupied allof the coast, and the Coosa, who were inland upon the rivers above mentioned.The Cusabo proper seem to have consisted of a northern group of tribes or sub-tribes, including the Etiwaw (on Wando River), Wando (on Cooper River),Kiawa (on the lower course of Ashley River), and perhaps the Stono (aboutStono Entrance); and a southern group including the Edisto (on Edisto Island),Ashepoo (on lower Ashepoo River), Combahee (on lower Combahee River),Wimbee (between the latter and the lower Coosawhatchie River), Escamacu(between St. Helena Sound and Broad River), and perhaps a few others. Some-times early writers erroneously include the Siouan Sewee and Santee as Cusabo.VillagesAhoya or Hoya, on or near Broad River.Ahoyabi, near the preceding.Aluste, near Beaufort, possibly a form of Edisto.Awendaw, near Awendaw Creek; it may have been Sewee (q. v.).Bohicket, near Rockville.Cambe, near Beaufort.Chatuache, 6-10 leagues north of Beaufort.Mayon, probably on Broad River.Talapo, probably near Beaufort.Touppa, probably on Broad River.Yanahume, probably on the south side of Broad River.History.?While their country was most likely skirted by earliernavigators, the first certain appearance of the Cusabo in history isin connection with a slave-hunting expedition sent out by Vasquesde Ayllon. This reached the mainland in 1521, probably a littlenorth of the Cusabo territory and introduced the blessings of Whitecivihzation to the unsuspecting natives by carrying away about 70of them. One of these Indians was finally taken to Spain andfurnished the historian Peter Martyr with considerable informationregarding his country and the names of a number of tribes, someof whom were certainly Cusabo. In 1525 Ayllon sent a second expedi-tion to the region and in 1526 led a colony thither. Dissatisfiedwith his first landing place, probably near the landfall of the expeditionof 1521, he moved the colony "40 or 45 leagues," perhaps to theneighborhood of Savannah River. But it did not prosper, AyUon SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 95died, trouble broke out among the survivors, and finally they returnedto Haiti in the middle of the following winter. In 1540 De Sotopassed near this country, but apparently he did not enter it, and thenext European contact was brought about by the settlement ofRibault's first colony at Port Royal in 1562. The small numberof people left by Ribault managed to maintain themselves for sometime with the assistance of friendly natives, but, receiving no relieffrom France, they became discouraged, and built a small vessel inwhich a few of them eventually reached home. In 1564 a Spanishvessel visited this coast for the purpose of rooting out the Frenchsettlement. Later the same year a second Huguenot colony wasestablished on St. Johns River, Florida, and communication wasmaintained with the Cusabo Indians. In 1565 this colony wasdestroyed by the Spaniards who visited Port Royal in quest of certainFrench refugees, and the year following Fort San Felipe was builtat the same place. From this time until 1587 a post was maintainedhere, although with some intermissions due to Indian risings. In1568-70 a vain attempt was made to missionize the Indians. In 1576a formidable Indian uprising compelled the abandonment of the fort,but it was soon reoccupied and an Indian town was destroyed in1579 by way of reprisal. Next year, however, there was a seconduprising, making still another abandonment necessary. The fortwas reoccupied in 1582 but abandoned permanently 5 years later;and after that time there was no regular post in the country butcommunication was kept up between the Cusabo and St. Augustineand occasional visits seem to have been made by the FranciscanFriars. Between 1633 and 1655 we have notice of a new mission inCusabo territory, called Chatuache, but when the English settledSouth Carolina in 1670 there appears to have been no regular missionthere and certainly no Spanish post. Charleston was founded onCusabo soil, and from the date of its establishment onward relationswere close between the English and Cusabo. In 1671 there was ashort war between the colonists and the Coosa Indians and in 1674there was further trouble with this people and with the Stono. In1675 the Coosa Indians surrendered to the English a large tract ofland which constituted Ashley Barony, and in 1682 what appearsto have been a still more sweeping land cession was signed by severalof the Cusabo chiefs. In 1693 there was another short war, this timebetween the Whites and the Stono. A body of Cusabo accom-panied Colonel Barnwell in his expedition against the Tuscarorain 1711-12, and this fact may have quickened the consciences of thecolonists somewhat, because in 1712 the Island of Palawana, "nearthe Island of St. Helena," was granted to them. It appears thatmost of their plantations were already upon it but it had inadvertently 96 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145been granted to a white proprietor. The Cusabo here mentionedwere those of the southern group; there is reason to think that theKiawa and Coosa were not included. Early in 1720 "King Gilbertand ye Coosaboys" took part in Col. John Barnwell's punitive expedi-tion against St. Augustine (Barnwell, 1908). In 1743 the Kiawawere given a grant of land south of the Combahee River, probablyto be near the other coast Indians. Part of the Coosa may haveretired to the Catawba, since Adair (1930) mentions "Coosah" asone of the dialects spoken in the "Catawba Nation," but othersprobably went to the Creeks. At least one band of Cusabo may havegone to Florida, because, in "A List of New Indian Missions in theVicinity of St. Augustine," dated December 1, 1726, there is mentionof a mission of San Antonio "of the Cosapuya nation and otherIndians" containing 43 recently converted Christians and 12 pagans.Two years later we are informed that "the towns of the CasapullasIndians were depopulated," though whether this has reference to theones in Florida or to those in their old country is not clear.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates the number of southernCusabo, exclusive of the Edisto, at 1,200 in 1600, the Edisto at 1,000,the Etiwaw at 600, and the Coosa at 600. He classifies the Stonowith the Westo, thereby falling into a common error. The colonialcensus of 1715 gives the number of southern Cusabo as 295, including95 men, in 5 villages, while the Etiwaw (probably including the othernorthern Cusabo) had 1 vUlage, 80 men, and a total populationof 240. There were thus 535 Cusabo over all. The Coosa arenowhere mentioned by name and were probably included with oneor the other of these. The 55 Indians at the Florida mission abovementioned, consisting of individuals of "the Cosapuya nation andother Indians," included 24 men, 13 women, and 18 children.Connection in which they have become noted.?The first part of thename Coosa is identical in origin with the first part of the name ofCoosawhatchie River, S. C, and a post village. The people them-selves are noted in history as the first in eastern North America northof Florida among whom European settlements were begun. They hadan earlier and longer contact with Europeans than any other Indianson the Atlantic seaboard except those of the Gulf of St. Lawrence.Eno. This tribe moved into the northern part of the State after 1716and perhaps united ultimately with the Catawba. At some pre-historic period they may have lived on Enoree River. (See NorthCarolina.)Keyauwee. They settled on the Pee Dee after 1716 and probablyunited with the Catawba. (See North Carolina.) SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 97Natchez. A band of Indians of this tribe lived for several years ata place called Four Hole Springs in South Carolina but left in 1744fearing the vengeance of the Catawba because of seven of that tribewhom they had killed. (See Mississippi.)Pedee. Meaning unloiown, but Speck (1935) suggests from Ca-tawba pi'ri, "something good," or pi'here, "smart," "expert," "capable."Connections.?No words of the language have survived but there isevery reason to suppose that it was a dialect of the Siouan linguisticfamily.Location.?On Great Pee Dee River, particularly its middle course.VillageNo village names are known apart from the tribal name, which was sometimesapplied to specific settlements.History.?The Pedee are first mentioned by the colonists of SouthCarolina. In 1716 a place in or near their country called Saukey(perhaps Socatee) was suggested as the site for a trading post but theproposition to establish one there was given up owing to the w^eaknessof the Pedee tribe, who were thought to be unable to protect it. In1744, the Pedee, along with Natchez Indians, killed some Catawbaand were in consequence driven from their lands into the Whitesettlements. Soon afterward most of them joined the Catawba, butsome remained near the Whites, where they are mentioned as late as1755. In 1808 the Pedee and Cape Fear tribes were represented byone half-breed woman.Population.?Mooney, 1928, estimates the number of Pedee as 600in 1600. The census of 1715 does not give them separate mention,and they were probably included among the 610 Waccamaw or the106 Winyaw.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Great and LittlePee Dee Rivers and a station in Marion County, S. C, also a postvillage in Anson County, N. C, perpetuate the name of the Pedee.Saluda. Meaning unknown.Connections.?These are uncertain but circumstantial evidenceindicates strongly that the Saluda were a band of Shawnee, andtherefore of the Algonquian stock.Location.?On Saluda River.History.?Almost all that we know regarding the Saluda is containedin a note on George Hunter's map of the Cherokee country drawn in1730 indicating "Saluda town where a nation settled 35 years ago,removed 18 years to Conestogo, in Pensilvania." As bands ofShawnee were moving into just that region from time to time duringthe period indicated, there is reason to think that this was one of them, 98 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 all the more that a "Savana" creek appears on the same map flowinginto Congaree River just below the Saluda settlement.Population.?Unlaiown.Connection in which they have become noted.?The name Saluda ispreserved by Saluda River and settlements in Saluda County, S. C. ; Polk County, N. C. ; and Middlesex County, Va.Santee. Named according to Speck (1935), from iswa?'ti, "theriver," or "the river is there." Also called:Seretee, by Lawson (I860).Connections.?No words of the Santee language have come down tous, but there is little doubt that they belonged to the Siouan linguisticfamily.Location.?On the middle course of Santee River.VillagesThe only name preserved is Hickerau, on a branch of Santee River.History.?The Santee were first encountered by the Spaniardsduring the seventeenth century, and in the narrative of his secondexpedition Captain Egija places them on Santee River. In 1700 theywere visited by John Lawson, who found their plantations extendingfor many miles along the river, and learned that they were at war withthe coast people (Lawson, 1860). They furnished Barnwell (1908)with a contingent for his Tuscarora campaign in 1711-12, but are saidto have taken part against the Whites in the Yamasee War of 1715. In1716 they were attacked by the Etiwaw and Cusabo, acting in theinterest of the colonists, and the greater part of them were carriedaway captive and sent to the West Indies. The remainder wereprobably incorporated with the Catawba.Population.?The number of Santee was estimated by Mooney(1928) at 1,000 in 1600. In 1715 an Indian census gave them 43warriors and a total population of 80 to 85 in 2 villages.Connection in which they have become noted.?The, name Santee hasbeen given permanency chiefly by its application to the Santee River,S. C, but it has also been applied to a village in OrangeburgCounty, S. C.Sewee. Significance: perhaps, as Gatschct suggested, from sawe', "island."Connections.?No words of their language have survived, but theSewee are regarded as Siouan on strong circumstantial grounds, inspite of the fact that they are sometimes classed with the Cusabo.Location.?On the lower coiu-se of Santee River and the coastwestward to the divide of Ashley River about the present MonksCorner, Berkeley County. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 99 VillagesLawson, writing about 1700, mentions a deserted village in Sewee Bay calledAvendaughbough which may have belonged to them (Lawson, 1860). The nameseems to be still preserved in the form Awensdaw.History.?Possibly Xoxi (pronounced Shoshi or Shohi), one of theprovinces mentioned by Francisco of Chicora, an Indian carried fromthis region by the Spaniards in 1521, is a synonym of Sewee. Thename is mentioned by Captain E^ija in 1609. They may have beenthe Indians first met by the English expedition which founded thecolony of South Carolina in 1670, when they were in Sewee Bay.They assisted the English against the Spaniards, and supplied themwith corn. Lawson (1860) states that they were formerly a largetribe, but in his time, 1700, were wasted by smallpox and indulgencein alcoholic liquors. Moreover, a large proportion of the able-bodiedmen had been lost at sea in an attempt to open closer trade relationswith England. Just before the Yamasee War, they were still living intheir old country in a single village, but it is probable that the warput an end to them as a distinct tribe. The remnant may have unitedwith the Catawba.Population.?Mooney (1928) gives an estimate of 800 Sewee for the3^ear 1600. In 1715 there were but 57.Connection in which they have become noted.?At an earlier periodthis name was applied to the body of water now called Bulls Bay.There is a post hamlet with this designation in Meigs County, Term.,but the name is probably of independent origin.Shakori. This tribe is thought to have moved south with the Enoafter 1716 and to have united ultimately with the Catawba. Atsome prehistoric period the}'^ perhaps lived on or near Enoree River,and there is reason to think that they or a branch gave their nameto the Province of Chicora. (See North Carolina.)Shawnee. In 1680, or shortly before, a band of Shawnee, probablyfrom the Cumberland, settled on Savannah River, and the yearfollowing they performed a great service to the new colony ofSouth Carolina by driving off the Westo Indians, whom I considerto have been Yuchi. These Shawnee appear to have been of theband afterward known as Hathawekela. They remained longenough in the neighborhood of Augusta to give their name toSavannah River, but by 1707 some of them had begun to move intoPenns3dvania, and this movement continued at intervals until 1731,when all seem to have been out of the State. The Saluda (q. v.)were perhaps one of these bands. In 1715, as a result of theYamasee War, a body moved from the Savannah to the Chatta-hoochee, and thence to the Tallapoosa. (See Tennessee.) 100 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Sissipahaw. Possibly they were the Sauxpa mentioned by the Span-ish officer Vandera in 1569, and if so they may then have been inSouth Carohna, a proposition considerably strengthened if Chicorais to be identified \vith the Shakori, since Barnwell (1908) equatesthese tribes. (See North Carolina.)Sugeree. Speck (1935) suggests Catawba ye?si'grihere, "peoplestingy," or "spoiled," or "of the river whose-water-cannot-be-drunlc." (Cf. Shakori.) Also caUed:Suturees, a synonym of 1715.Connections.?No words of their language have been preserved, butthere is every reason to suppose that they belonged to the Siouanlinguistic family and were closely related to the Catawba, and perhapsstill more closely to the Shakori.Location.?On and near Sugar Creek in York County, S. C, andMecklenburg County, N. C. VillagesThere were said to be many but their names have not been preserved.History.?The Sugeree are hardly mentioned by anyone beforeLawson in 1701. They probably suffered in consequence of theYamasee War and finally united with the Catawba.Population.?No separate enumeration or estimate of the Sugereeappears ever to have been made, and Mooney (1928) seems to haveincluded them in the population of 5,000 allowed the Catawba.Connection in which they have become noted.?The name Sugeree hasbeen preserved in Sugar Creek, an affluent of Catawba River in Nortliand South Carolina.Waccamaw. Meaning unknown.Connections.?Nothing of their tongue has been preserved but evi-dence points to a connection of the Waccamaw with the Siouanlinguistic family, and presumably with the Catawba dialectic group.The Woccon may have been a late subdivision, as Dr. Rights hassuggested. (See North Carolina.)Location.?On Waccamaw River and the lower course of the PeeDee. (See North Carolina.) VillagesThe Waccamaw were reported to have had six villages in 1715, but none ofthe names is preserved.History.?The name of the Waccamaw may perhaps be recordedin the form Guacaya, given by Francisco of Chicora as that of a "province" in this region early in the sixteenth century. In 1715 theCheraw attempted to incite them to attack the English, and theyjoined the hostile party but made peace the same year. In 1716 a SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 101trading post was established in their country at a place called Uauenee(Uaunee, Euaunee), or the Great Bluff, the name perhaps a synonymof Winyaw, although we know of no Winyaw there. There was ashort war between them and the colonists in 1720 in which they lost60 men, women, and children killed or captured. In 1755 the Chero-kee and Natchez are reported to have killed some Pedee and Wacca-maw in the White settlements. Ultimately they may have unitedwith the Catawba, though more probably with the so-called CroatanIndians of North Carolina. There is, however, a body of mixed bloodsin their old country to whom the name is applied.Population.?The Waccamaw are estimated by Mooney (1928) at900 in 1600 along with the Winyaw and some smaller tribes. Thecensus of 1715 gives 210 men and 610 souls, and in 1720 they are saidto have had 100 warriors. (See Cape Fear Indians under NorthCarolina.)Connection in which they have become noted.?Waccamaw River inNorth and South Carolina and Waccamaw Lake in North Carolina,which empties into the river, perpetuate their name.Wateree. Gatschet suggests a connection with Catawba, wateran, " tofloat on the water." Also called:Chickanee, name for a division of Wateree and meaning "little."Guatari, Spanish spelling of their name.Connections.?The Wateree are placed in the Siouan linguistic stockon circumstantial evidence.Location.?The location associated most closely with the Watereehistorically was on Wateree River, below the present Camden. (SeeNorth Carolina.)History.?The Wateree are first mentioned in the report of an ex-pedition from Santa Elena (Beaufort) by Juan Pardo in 1566-67.They lived well inland toward the Cherokee frontier. Pardo made asmall fort and left a corporal there and 17 soldiers, but the Indianssoon wiped it out. In 1670 Lederer (1912) places them very muchfarther north, perhaps on the upper Yadkin, but soon afterward theyare found on Wateree River where Lawson met them. In 1711-12they furnished a contingent to Barnwell in his expedition against theTuscarora. In a map dated 1715 their village is placed on the westbank of Wateree River, possibly in Fairfield County, but on the Mollmap of 1730 it is laid down on the east bank. The Yamasee War re-duced their power considerably, and toward the middle of the eight-eenth century they went to live with the Catawba, with whom thesurvivors must ultimately have fused. They appear as a separatetribe, however, as late as 1744, when they sold the neck of land betweenCongaree and Wateree Rivers to a white trader. 102 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145Population.?The number of Wateree is estimated by Mooney(1928) at 1,000 in 1600. There is no later enumeration.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Wateree were oneof the most powerful tribes of central South Carolina as far back asthe time of the Spanish settlements at St. Helena. Their name ispreserved in Wateree River, S. C, and in a post village in RichlandCounty in the same State.Waxhaw. Meaning unknown. Also called:Flatheads, a name given to this tribe and others of the Catawba connectionowing to their custom of deforming the head.Connection.?Nothing of their language has been preserved, butcircumstantial evidence points to a close relationship between theWaxhaw and the Catawba and hence to membership in the Siouanlinguistic stock. Their closest contacts appear to have been withthe Sugeree.Location.?In Lancaster County, S. C, and Union and Mecklen-burg Counties, N. C. VillagesLawson mentions two villages in 1701 but the names are not given.History.?The Waxhaw were possibly the Gueza of Vandera, wholived in western South Carolina in 1566-67. Lederer (1912) writingabout 1670, speaks of the Waxhaw under the name Wisacky and saysthat they were subject to and might be considered a part of theCatawba. They were probably identical with the Weesock, whosechildren were said by Gabriel Arthur (1918) to be brought up inTamahita (Yuchi) families "as ye lanesaryes are mongst ye Turkes."Lawson (1860) visited them in 1701. At the end of the YamaseeWar, they refused to make peace with the English and were set uponby the Catawba and the greater part of them killed. The rest fled tothe Cheraw, but a band numbering 25 accompanied the Yamasee toFlorida in 1715 and are noted as still there in 1720.Population.?The Waxhaw are included by Mooney (1928) in the5,000 estimated population of the Catawba. No separate estimateof their numbers is given any^vhere.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Waxhaw were dis-tinguished in early times on account of their custom of deforming theheads of their children, Their name is preserved in Waxhaw Creekand in the name of a post town, both in Union County, N. C; by ahamlet in Lancaster County, S. C.,; and a place in Bolivar County,Miss.Winyaw. Meaning unknown.Connections.?The Winyaw are placed in the Siouan Unguistic SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 103family on circumstantial evidence. Their closest connections werewith the Pedee and Waccamaw.Location.?On Winyaw Bay, Black River, and the lower course ofthe Pee Dee.History.?Unless this tribe is represented by the Yenyohol of Fran-cisco of Chicora (1521), the Winyaw were first mentioned by the colo-nists of South Carolina after 1670. In 1683 it was charged thatcolonists had raided them for slaves on an insufficiently supportedcharge of murder by some of their people This unfriendly act didnot prevent some of them from joining Barnwell's army in the firstTuscarora War. Along with other Indians they, indeed, withdrewlater from the expedition, but they claimed that it was for lack ofequipment. In 1715 the Cheraw tried to induce them and the Wac-camaw to side against the colonists in the Yamasee War. A yearlater a trading post was established in the territory of the Waccamawnot far from their own lands. (See Waccamaw.) About the sametime some of them settled among the Santee, but they appear to havereturned to their own country a few years later. Some assisted theWhites in their war with the Waccamaw in 1720. They soon disap-pear from history and probably united with the Waccamaw.Population.?Mooney (1928) includes the Winyaw in his estimateof 900 for the "Waccamaw, Winyaw, Hook, &c." as of the year 1600.The census of 1715 gives them one village of 36 men and a totalpopulation of 106.Connection in which they have become noted.?Winyaw Bay, S. C.,preserves the name. It was from this tribe or one in the immediateneighborhood that Francisco of Chicora was carried away by thefirst AyUon expedition and from which one of the earliest ethno-logical descriptions of a North American tribe was recorded Thename by which the Spaniards knew the province, however, Chicora,was probably derived from the Shakori, Sugeree, or a branch of oneof them.Yamasee. The Yamasee Indians lived originally near the southernmargin of the State and perhaps at times within its borders, butthey are rather to be connected with the aboriginal history ofGeorgia. In 1687, having become offended with the Spaniards,they settled on the north side of Savannah River on a tract after-ward known as the Indian land and remained there in alliance withthe colonists until 1715, when they rebelled and fled to St. Augustine.(See Georgia.)Yuchi. The Yuchi probably did not enter South Carolina until afterthe year 1661. The Westo, whom I consider to have been a partof them, were driven away by the Shawnee in 1681, but there was 104 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 a band of Yuchi higher up the Savannah River which did not moveuntil 1716, and later another body settled between Silver Bluff andEbenezer Creek. Hawkins says that they had villages at Ponponand Saltkechers, but that is all the evidence we have of settlementsso far east, and these probably belonged to the Yamassee. In 1729the Yuchi began to move west to join the Creeks and by 1751completed the evacuation. (See Georgia.)GEORGIAApalachee. After the English and Creeks destroyed the Apalacheetowns in Florida in 1704, they established a part of the tribe in avillage not far below the present Augusta. In 1715, when theYamasee War broke out, these Apalachee joined the hostile Indiansand went to the Chattahoochee to live near that faction of theLower Creeks which was favorable to Spain. Soon afterward,however, the English faction gained the ascendency among theCreeks, and the Apalachee returned to Florida. (See Florida.)Apalachicoia. From Hitchiti "Apalachicoh" or Muskogee "Apala-chicolo," signifying apparently "People of the other side," withreference probably to the Apalachicoia River or some nearby stream.Also called:Talwa lako or Italwa lako, "big town," name given by the Muskogee Indians*Palachicola or Parachukla, contractions of Apalachicoia.Connections.?This was one of those tribes of the Muskhogeanlinguistic stock which spoke the Atsik-hata or Hitchiti language, andwhich included in addition the Hitchiti, Okmulgee, Oconee, Sawokli,Tamali, Mikasuki, Chiaha, and possibly the Osochi (but see Osochi).Location.?The earliest laiown home of the Apalachicoia was nearthe river which bears their name in the center of the Lower Creekcountry. Later they lived for a considerable period at the pointwhere it comes into existence through the junction of the Chatta-hoochee and Flint Rivers. (See also Alabama and Florida.)Subdivisions and VillagesThe following names of towns or tribes were given by a Tawasa Indian, Lam-hatty, to Robert Beverley (1722) and may well have belonged to the Apalachicoia:Aul^dley, Ephfppick, Sonepdh, and perhaps Socso6ky (or Socs6sky). The censusof 1832 returned two distinct bodies of Indians under the synonyms Apalachicoiaand Talwa iako.History.?According to Muskogee legend, the ancestors of theMuskogee encountered the Apalachicoia in the region above indicatedwhen they entered the country, and they were at first disposed to fightwith them but soon made peace. According to one legend the CreekConfederacy came into existence as a result of this treaty. Spanish SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 105documents of the seventeenth century are the earliest in which thename appears. It is there used both as the name of a town (as earlyas 1675) and, in an extended sense, for all of the Lower Creeks. Thisfact, Muskogee tradition, and the name Talwa lako all show the earlyimportance of the people. They were on more friendly terms withthe Spaniards than the Muskogee generally and hence were fallenupon by the Indian allies of the English and carried off, either in1706 or 1707. They were settled on Savannah River opposite MountPleasant, at a place which long bore their name, but in 1716, justafter the Yamasee War, they retired into their old country and estab-hshed themselves at the junction of Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers.Later they moved higher up the Chattahoochee and lived in RussellCounty, Ala., remaining in the general neighborhood until theyremoved to new homes in the present Oklahoma in 1836-40. Therethey established themselves in the northern part of the Creek Reser-vation but presently gave up their ceremo'nial ground and were grad-ually absorbed in the mass of Indians about them.Population.?In 1715 just before the outbreak of the Yamasee War,there were said to be 2 settlements of this tribe with 64 warriors anda total population of 214. A Spanish census of 1738 also gave 2settlements with 60 warriors in ojie and 45 in the other; a French censusof 1750, more than 30 warriors; a British enumeration of 1760, 60;one of 1761, 20; an American estimate of 1792, 100 (including theChiaha); and the United States Census of 1832, a total population of239 in 2 settlements.Connection in which they have become noted.?Apalachicola River,Apalachicola Bay, and the name of the county seat of FranklinCounty, Fla., are derived from this tribe. The Spaniards appliedtheir name to the Lower Creeks generally, and they were also notedas one of the tribes responsible for the formation of the Confederation.Chatot. Some of these Indians lived at times in the southwest cor-ner of this State. (See Florida.)Cherokee. From early times the Cherokee occupied the northernand northeastern parts of Georgia, though from certain place namesit seems probable that they had been {preceded in that territoryby Creeks. (See Tennessee.)Chiaha. Meaning unknown though it may contain a reference tomountains or highlands. (Cf. Choctaw and Alabama tcaha,Hitchiti tcaihi, "high.") Also called:Tolameco or Solameco, which probably signifies "big town," a namereported by the Spaniards. 106 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bdll. 145Connections.?The Chiaha belonged to the Muskhogean Hnguisticstock and in later times spoke the Muskogee tongue, but there is everyreason to class them in the Hitchiti group. (See Apalachicola.)Location.?In later historic times the Chiaha were on the middlecourse of Chattahoochee River, but at the earliest period at whichwe have any knowledge of them they seem to have been divided intotwo bands, one on Burns Island, in the present State of Tennessee,the other in eastern Georgia near the coast. (See also South Carolinaand Florida.) SubdivisionsThe Mikasuki of northern Florida are said to have separated from these people.VillagesHawkins (1848) gives the following:Aumucculle, on a creek of the same name which enters Flint River "45 miles belowTimothy Barnard's."Chiahutci, Little Chiaha, a mile and a half west of the Hitchiti town, near AuhegeeCreek.Hotalgihuyana, occupied jointly with the Osochi, on the right bank of FlintRiver 6 miles below Kinchafoonee.History.?Some confusion regarding this tribe has been occasionedby the fact that in the sixteenth century there appear to have beentwo divisions. The name first appears in the De Soto narrativesapplied to a "province" on an island in Tennessee River which J. Y.Brame has identified in a very satisfactory manner with Burns Islandclose to the Tennessee-Alabama line. They were said to be "subjectto a chief of Coga," from which it may perhaps be inferred that theCreek Confederacy was already in existence. Early in 1567 Boyano,Juan Pardo's lieutenant, reached this town with a small body ofsoldiers and constructed a fort, Pardo joining him in September.When Pardo returned to Santa Elena shortly afterward he left asmall garrison here which was later destroyed by the Indians. PossiblyChehawhaw Creek, an eastern affluent of the Coosa indicates a laterlocation of this band. The only remaining reference which mightapply to them occurs in the names of two bodies of Creeks called"Chehaw" and "Chearhaw" which appear in the census rolls of1832-33, but they may have gotten their designations from formerresidences on or near the creek so called. In 1727 there was a traditionamong the Cherokee that the Yamasee Indians were formerly Cherokeedriven out by the Tomahitans, i. e., the Yuchi, and in this there maybe some reminiscence of fhe fate of the Chiaha.In the Pardo narratives the name "Lameco or Solameco" is givenas a synonyxQ for the northern Chiaha, and this may have beenintended for Tolameco, which would be a Creek term meaning "ChiefTown." This was also the name of a large abandoned settlement iLv. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 107 near Cofitachequi on the middle course of Savannah River visited byDe Soto in 1540. Since we know that Chiaha were also in this region,it is a fair supposition that this town had been occupied by people ofthis connection. There is a Chehaw River on the South Carolinacoast between the Edisto and Combahee, and as "Chiaha" is usedonce as an equivalent for Kiawa, possibly the Cusabo tribe of thatname may have been related. Moreover, we are informed (S. C.Docs.) that the Chiaha had their homes formerly among the Yamasee.In 1715 they ^vithd^ew to the Chattahoochee with other upper Creektowns, probably from a temporary abode on Ocmulgee River. Afterthe Creeks moved to Oklahoma the Chiaha settled in the northeasterncorner of the Creek Reservation and maintained a square groundthere until after the Civil War, but they have now practically losttheir identity. Some of them went to Florida and the Mikasuki aresaid by some Indians to have branched off from them. In the countryof the western Seminole there was a square ground as late as 1929which bore their name.Population.?There are no figures for the northern band of Chiahaunless they could have been represented in the two towns of the1832-33 census given above, which had total populations of 126 and306 respectively. For the southern division a Spanish census of 1738gives 120 warriors but this included also the Osochi and Okmulgee.In 1750 only 20 were reported, but in 1760, 160, though an estimatethe following year reduces this to 120. In 1792 Marbury gives 100Chiaha and Apalachicola, and the census of 1832-33 returned 381of the former. In 1799 Hawkins states that there were 20 Indianfamilies in Hotalgi-huyana, a town occupied jointly by this tribe andthe Osochi, but in 1821 Young raises this to 210. He gives 670 forthe Chiaha proper.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Chiaha tribe isof some note on account of the prominence given to one branch of itin the De Soto narratives. As above mentioned, its name, spelledChehawhaw, is applied to a stream in the northern part of TalladegaCounty, Ala. ; it is given in the form Chehaw to a post hamlet of MaconCounty, Ala.; to a stream in Colleton County, S. C; and also toa small place in Seminole County, Okla.Chickasaw. A band of Chickasaw lived near Augusta from about1723 to the opening of the American Revolution, and later they werefor some time among the Lower Creeks. (See Mississippi andSouth Carolina.)Creeks. A part, and perhaps a large part, of the Indians who after-ward constituted the Creek Confederacy were living in the sixteenth 108 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 century in what the Spaniards called the province of Guale on thepresent Georgia coast. Some of them moved inland in consequenceof difficulties with the Whites, and in the latter half of the seven-teenth century most of those afterward known as Lower Creekswere upon Chattahoochee and Ocmulgee Rivers, the latter riverbeing then called Ocheese Creek, from the Hitchiti name given tothe Indians living on it. After the Yamasee War (1715) all assem-bled upon Chattahoochee River and continued there, part on theGeorgia side of the river, part on the Alabama side, until theyremoved to the present Oklahoma early in the nineteenth century.(See Creek Confederacy and Muskogee under Alabama.)Guale. Meaning unknown, though it resembles Muskogee wahali, "the south," but it was originally applied to St. Catherines Island, orpossibly to a chief living there. Also called:Ouade, a French form of Guale.Ybaha, Yguaja, Ibaja, Iguaja, Yupaha, Timucua name.Connections.?The names of villages and the title "mico" appliedto chiefs leave little doubt that these Indians belonged to the Musk-hogean linguistic family. Part of them were probably true Creeksor Muskogee. (See Alabama.) Their nearest connections otherwiseappear to have been with the Cusabo Indians. (See South Carolina.)Location.?On the Georgia coast between St. Andrews Sound andSavannah River, though the section between St. Catherines Soundand Savannah seems to have been little occupied. (See also Florida.)SubdivisionsThree rough divisions appear to be indicated by Governor Ibarra of Florida,but this is very uncertain. (See below under Villages.)VillagesSo far as they can be made out, the villages in each of the three groups men-tioned above were as follows:Northern group:Asopo, apparently a form of Ossabaw but stated to have been on St. Cath-erines Island.Chatufo.Couexis, given in the French narratives as near St. Catherines.Culapala.Guale, not, it appears, on the island of that name but "on an arm of a riverwhich is a branch of another on the north bank of the aforesaid port in SantaElena in 32? N. lat.," probably on Ossabaw Island.Otapalas.Otaxe (Otashe).Posache, "in the island of Guale."Tolomato, said to have been on the mainland 2 leagues from St. CatherinesIsland and near the bar of Sapello. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 109Uchilape, "near Tolomato."Uculegue.Unallapa.Yfusiniquc, evidently on the mainland.Yoa, said to have been 2 leagues up a river emptying into an arm of the seaback of Sapello and St. Catherines Sound.Central group:Aleguifa, near Tulufina.Chucalagaite, near Tulufina.Espogache, near Espogue.Espogue, not more than 6 leagues from Talaxe.Fasquiche, near Espogue.Sapala, evidently on or near Sapello Island.Sotequa.Tapala.Tulufina, probably on the mainland.Tupiqui, probably the original of the name Tybee, but this town was verj' muchfarther south.Utine.Southern group:Aluque.Asao, probably on St. Simons Island.Cascangue, which seems to have been reckoned as Timucua at times and hencemay have been near the Timucua border.Falquiche.Fuloplata, possibly a man's name.Hinafasque.Hocaesle.Talaxe, probably on St. Simons Island or on the Altamaha River, both ofwhich were known by the name Talaxe.Tufulo.Tuque.Yfulo.To the above must be added the following town names which cannot be allo-cated in any of the preceding divisions:Alpatopo.Aytochuco.Ayul.Olatachahane, perhaps a chief's name.Olatapotoque, given as a town, but perhaps a chief's name.Olataylitaba, perhaps two names run together, Olata and Litabi.Olocalpa.Sulopacaques.Tamufa.Yumunapa.History.?The last settlement of the Ayllon colony in 1526 was onor near the Guale country, as the name Gualdape suggests. Whenthe French Huguenot colony was at Port Royal, S. C, in 1562, theyheard of a chief called Ouade and visited him several times forprovisions. After the Spaniards had driven the French from Florida,they continued north to Guale and the Cusabo territory to expel 110 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 several Frenchmen who had taken refuge there. In 1569 missionarywork was undertaken by the Jesuits simultaneously among theCusabo and Guale Indians and one of the missionaries, DomingoAugustin, wrote a grammar of the Guale language. But thespiritual labors of the missionaries proved unavailing, and they soonabandoned the country. In 1573 missionary work was resumed bythe Franciscans and was increasingly successful when in 1597 therewas a general insurrection in which all of the missionaries but one werekilled. The governor of Florida shortly afterward burned very manyof the Guale towns with their granaries, thereby reducing most of theIndians to submission, and by 1601 the rebellion was over. Mission-ary work was resumed soon afterward an^ continued uninterruptedly,in spite of sporadic insurrections in 1608 and 1645 and attacks ofnorthern Indians in 1661, 1680, and even earlier. However, as aresult of these attacks those of the Guale Indians who did not escapeinland moved, or were moved, in 1686, to the islands of San Pedro,Santa Maria, and San Juan north of St. Augustine. Later anotherisland called Santa Cruz was substituted for San Pedro. The Quaker,Dickenson, who was shipwrecked on the east coast of Florida in 1699,visited these missions on his way north. At the time of the removalsome Guale Indians appear to have gone to South Carolina, and in1702 a general insurrection of the remainder took place, and theyjoined their kinsmen on the outskirts of that colony under the leader-ship of the Yamasee. A few may have remained in Florida. Inany event, all except those who had fled to the Creeks were unitedafter the outbreak of the Yamasee in 1715 and continued to live inthe neighborhood of St. Augustine until their virtual extinction. In1726 there were two missions near St, Augustine occupied by Indiansof the "Iguaja nation," i. e., Guale, but that is the last we hear ofthem under any name but that of the Yamasee iq, v.).Population.?Mooney (1928), who was not aware of the distinctionto be drawn between the Guale Indians and the Yamasee, gives anestimate of 2,000 Guale in the year 1650. For the two tribes this isprobably too low. The Guale alone, before they had been depletedby White contact and Indian invasions from the north, might well havenumbered 4,000, but some of these were later added to the Creeks. In1602 the missionaries claimed that there were more than 1,200 Chris-tians in the Guale province, and in 1670 the English estimated that theSpanish missions contained about 700 men. The first accurate censusof the Yamasee and Guale Indians together, made in 1715, perhapsomitting some few of the latter stiU in Florida, gives 413 men and atotal population of 1,215.Connection in which they have become noted.?Aside from the abortivemissionary undertakings of the friars who accompanied Coronado, SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA HIand a short missionary experience among the Calusa, the provinces ofGuale and Orista (Cusabo) were the first north of Mexico in whichregular missionary work was undertaken, and the grammar of theGuale language by Domingo Augustin was the first of any languagein that region to be compiled.Hitchiti. Perhaps from Atcik-hata, a term formerly apphed to allof the Indians who spoke the Hitchiti language, and is said to referto the heap of white ashes piled up close to the ceremonial ground.Also called:At-pasha-shliha, Koasati name, meaning "mean people."Connections.?The Hitchiti belonged to the Muskhogean linguisticfamily and were considered the mother town of the Atcik-hata group.(See Apalachicola.)Location.?The Hitchiti are oftenest associated with a location inthe present Chattahoochee County, Ga., but at an earlier periodwere on the lower course of the Ocmulgee River. (See also Floridaand Oklahoma.) VillagesHihaje, location unknown.Hitchitoochee, on Flint River below its junction with Kinchafoonee Creek.Tuttallosee, on a creek of the same name, 20 miles west from Hitchitoochee.History.?The Hitchiti are identifiable with the Ocute of De Soto'schroniclers, who were on or near the Ocmulgee River. Early Englishmaps show their town on the site of the present Macon, Ga., but after1715 they moved to the Chattahoochee, settling first in Henry County,Ala., but later at the site above mentioned in Chattahoochee County,Ga. From this place they moved to Oklahoma, where they graduallymerged with the rest of the Indians of the Creek Confederacy.Population.?The population of the Hitchiti is usually given inconjunction with that of the other confederate tribes. The followingseparate estimates of the effective male Hitchiti population arerecorded: 1738, 60; 1750, 15; 1760, 50; 1761, 40; 1772, 90; in 1832 theentire population was 381.Connection in which they have become noted.?In early days, asabove mentioned, the Hitchiti were prominent as the leaders in thatgroup of tribes or towns among the Lower Creeks speaking a languagedistinct from Muskogee. Hichita, Mcintosh County, Okla., pre-serves the name.Kasihta. One of the most important divisions of the Muskogee,possibly identical with the Cofitachequi of the De Soto narratives.(See Muskogee under Alabama.) 112 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Oconee. Significance unknown.Connections.?The Oconee belonged to the Muskhogean linguisticstock, and the Atcik-hata group. (See Apalachicola.)Location.?SvLsi below the Rock Landing on Oconee River, Ga.(But see also Florida.)History.?Early documents reveal at least two bodies of Indiansbearing the name Oconee and probably related. One was on or nearthe coast of Georgia and seems later to have moved into the Apalacheecountry and to have become fused with the Apalachee tribe beforethe end of the seventeenth century. The other was at the pointabove indicated, on Oconee River. About 1685 they were on Chatta-hoochee River, whence they moved to the Rock Landing. A morenortherly location for at least part of the tribe may be indicated inthe name of a Cherokee town, though that may have been derivedfrom a Cherokee word as Mooney supposed. About 1716 they movedto the east bank of the Chattahoochee in Stewart County, Ga., anda few years later part went to the Alachua Plains, in the presentAlachua County, Fla., where they became the nucleus of the SeminoleNation and furnished the chief to that people until the end of theSeminole war. Most of them were then taken to Oklahoma, butthey had already lost their identity.Population.?The following estimates of effective Oconee men inthe Creek Nation are preserved: 1738, 50; 1750, 30; 1760, 50; 1761, 50.In 1675 there were about 200 Indians at the Apalachee Mission ofSan Francisco de Oconi.Connection in which they have become noted.?The name Oconee isperpetuated in the Oconee River, the town of Oconee, Oconee MiUs,and Oconee Siding, all in Georgia, but not necessarily in the name ofOconee County, S. C, which is of Cherokee origin, although theremay be some more remote relationship. There is a place of thename in Shelby County, 111.Okmulgee. Signifying in the Hitchiti language, "where water boilsup" and referring probably to the big springs in Butts County,Ga., called Indian Springs. Also called:Waiki lako, "Big Spring," Muskogee name.Connections.?The Okmulgee belonged to the Muskhogean linguisticstock and the Atsik-hata group. (See Apalachicola under Georgia.)Location.?In the great bend of the Chattahoochee River, RussellCounty, Ala.; earlier, about the present Macon, Ga. (See alsoAlabama and Oklahoma.)History.?The Okmulgee probably separated from the Hitchiti orone of their cognate towns when these towns were on Ocmulgee Riverand settled at the point above indicated, where they became closely SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 113 associated with the Chiaha and Osochi. They went west with theother Creeks and reestabHshed themselves in the most northeasternpart of the allotted territory, where they gradually lost their identity.Although small in niunbers, they gave the prominent Ferrymanfamily to the Creek Nation and its well-known head chief, PleasantPorter.Population.?A French census of about 1750 states that there wererather more than 20 effective men among the Okmulgee, and theBritish census of 1760 gives 30. Young, quoted by Morse, estimatesa total population of 220 in 1822, There are few other enumerationsseparate from the general census of the Creeks.Connection in which they have become noted.?The name of the cityof Okmulgee and that of Ocmulgee River were derived independentlyfrom the springs above mentioned. The name Okmulgee given to thelater capital of the Creek Nation in what is now Oklahoma was,however, taken from the tribe under consideration. It has nowbecome a flourishing oil city.Osochi. A division of the Lower Creeks which lived for a time insouthwestern Georgia. (See Alabama.)Sawokli. A division of the Creeks belonging to the group of townsthat spoke the Hitchiti language. (See Alabama.)Shawnee. The Sha^\'nee band which settled near Augusta concernsSouth Carolina and Georgia almost equally. Their history hasalready been given in treating the tribes of the former State.(See also Tennessee.)Tamathli. The name is possibly related to that of a Creek clan withthe Hitchiti plural ending, in which case it would refer to ''flyingcreatures," such as birds.Connections.?Tamatlili belonged to the Atsik-hata group in theCreek Confederation.Location.?The historic seats of the Tamathli were in southwesternGeorgia and neighboring parts of Florida.History.?It is beheved that we have our first mention of theTamathh in the Toa or Toalli of the De Soto narratives. WhenDe Soto passed through Georgia in 1540, it is beheved that this tribewas hving at Pine Island in Daugherty County. They may havebeen connected with the Altamaha Yamasee living between Ocmulgeeand Oconee Rivers whose name sometimes appears in the form Tama.They afterward drifted into Florida and were established in a missioncalled La Purificacidn de la Tama on January 27, 1675, by BishopCalder6n of Cuba, in the Apalachee country 1 league from San Luis.In a mission hst dated 1680 appears the name of another mission,Nuestra Senora de la Candelaria de la Tama. The TamathU suffered 114 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145the same fate as the Apalachee in general when the latter were at-tacked by Moore in 1704. At least part of these Indians afterwardmoved to the neighborhood of St. Augustine, where another missionwas established for them, but this was attacked by the Creeks onNovember 1, 1725, while mass was being celebrated. Many Indianswere killed and the remainder moved to other missions. In 1738 wehear of a "Tamaxle nuevo," as the northernmost Lower Creek settle-ment and a southern division called "Old Tamathle," and are informedthat "in the town of Tamasle in Apalachee [i. e., Old Tamathle]there were some Catholic and pagan families." We hear again ofthese Tamathli Indians from Benjamin Hawkins (1848), writing in1799, who sets them down as one of the tribes entering into the forma-tion of the Florida Seminole. A town of the same name alsoappears in the Cherokee country "on Valley River, a few miles aboveMurphy, about the present Tomatola, in Cherokee County, N. C."The name cannot be interpreted in Cherokee and there may oncehave been a northern division of the Tamathli.Population.?The Spanish census dated 1738 enters Old Tamathli,with 12 men, and New Tamathli with 26, but the latter probably wasin the main a Sawokli settlement. The French estimate of 1750entered only the former town with 10 men. In Young's enumerationof Seminole towns {in Morse, 1822) this is given a total population of220.Timucua. One contact between the Timucua Indians and Georgiais mentioned later in connection with the Osochi. When theSpaniards first came in contact with them, the Timucua occupiednot merely northern and central Florida but Cumberland Islandand a part of the adjacent mainland. The Timucua evidentlywithdrew from this territory as a result of pressure exerted bynorthern Indians in the latter part of the seventeenth century orthe very beginning of the eighteenth. (See Utina under Florida.)Yamasee. Meaning unknown, though it has been interpreted byMuskogee yamasi, "gentle." The form given in some earlywritings, Yamiscaron, may have been derived from a Siouan dialector from Timucua, as there is no r in any of the Muskhogean tongues.Connections.?The Yamasee town and chief names indicate plainlythat they spoke a Muskhogean dialect and tradition affirms that itwas connected most closely with Hitchiti, a contention which may beconsidered probable.Location.?The earliest references that we have place the Yamaseeon Ocmulgee River not far above its junction with the Oconee. Theyseem to have ranged or extended northeastward of these rivers to oreven slightly beyond the Savannah, but always inland. (See alsoFlorida, Alabama, South Carolina.) SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 115Subdivisions and VillagesImmediately before the outbreak of the Yamasee War there were the following:Upper Towns:Huspaw, near Huspaw Creek between Combahee River and the Whale Branch.Pocotaligo, near Pocotaligo River.Sadkeche, probably near Salkehatcliie, a hamlet at the Atlantic Coast Linecrossing of the Combahee River.Tomatly, in the neighborhood of Tomatly, Beaufort County, S. C.Yoa, near Huspaw.Lower Towns:Altamaha, location unknown.Chasee, location unknown.Oketee, probaly near one of the places so called on New River, in Jasper andBeaufort Counties, S. C.Pocasabo.Tulafina (?), perhaps near Tulafinny Creek, an estuary of the CoosawhatchieRiver in Jasper County.Other possible Yamasee settlements were Dawfuskee, Ilcombe, and Peterba.History.?The first reference to the Yamasee appears to be a mentionof their name in the form Yamiscaron as that of a province with whichFrancisco of Chicora was acquainted in 1521. The "Province ofAltamaha" mentioned by De Soto's chronicler Ranjel in 1540 probablyincluded at least a part of the Yamasee people. For a hundred yearsafterward the tribe remained practically unnoticed except for a briefvisit by a Spanish soldier and two missionaries in 1597, but in 1633they are reported to have asked for missionaries, and in 1639 peace issaid to have been made between the allied Chatot, Lower Creeks, andYamasee and the Apalachee. In 1675 Bishop Calder6n of Cubafounded two missions in the Apalachee country which were occupiedby Yamasee or their near relatives. The same year there were threeYamasee missions on the Atlantic coast but one of these may havebeen occupied b}^ Tamathli. Later they moved nearer St Augustinebut in the winter of 1684-85 some act of the Spanish governor offendedthem and they removed to South Carolina, where the English gavethem lands on the west side of Savannah River near its mouth. Someof these Indians were probably from the old Guale province, but theYamasee now took the lead. Eighty-seven warriors of this nation tookpart in Barnwell's expedition against the Tuscarora (see NorthCarolina). In 1715 they rose in rebellion against the English andkilled two or three hundred settlers but were defeated by GovernorCraven and took refuge in Florida, where, until the cession of Floridato Great Britain, the Yamasee continued as allies of the Spaniards.Meanwhile their numbers fell off steadily. Some remained in theneighborhood of the St. Johns River until the outbreak of the SeminoleWar. 116 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145The Oklawaha band of Seminole is said to have been descendedfrom them. Another band accompanied the Apalachee to Pensacolaand Mobile, and we find them located near those two places on variouscharts. They may be identical with those who, shortly afterward,appear among the Upper Creeks on certain maps, though this is theonly testimony we have of their presence there. At any rate, theselatter are probably the Yamasee found among the Lower Creeks inthe nineteenth century and last heard of among the Seminole ofwest Florida. Of some historical importance is a small band of theseIndians who seem to have lived with the Apalachicola for a time, afterthe Yamasee War, and in 1730 settled on the site of what is nowSavannah under the name of Yamacraw. There the Georgia colonistsfound them three years later, and the relations between the two peopleswere most amicable. The name Yamacraw was probably derivedfrom that of a Florida mission, Nombre de Dios de Amacarisse, wheresome of the Yamasee once lived. Ultimately these Yamacraw arebelieved to have retired among the Creeks and later may have goneto Florida.Population.?It is impossible to separate distinctly the true Yamaseefrom the Quale Indians. Mooney (1928) gives an estimate of 2,000in 1650, probably too low. A mission list compiled by Gov. Salazarof Florida in 1675 gives 1,190 Yamasee and Tama. In 1708 the twotribes, united under the name Yamasee, were thought to have 500men capable of bearing arms. In 1715 a rather careful census gives413 men and a total population of 1,215. Lists dating from 1726and 1728 give 313 and 144 respectively in the missions about St.Augustine. A fairly satisfactory Spanish census, taken in 1736,indicates that there were then in the neighborhood of St. Augustinemore than 360 Yamasee and Indians of Guale. This does not includethe Yamasee near Pensacola and Mobile, those in the Creek Nation,or the Yamacraw. In 1761 a body of Yamasee containing 20 menwas living near St. Augustine, but by that time the tribe had probablyscattered widely. In 1821 the "Emusas" on Chattahoochee Rivernumbered 20 souls.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Yamasee are famousparticularly on account of the Yamasee War, which marked an epochin Indian and White history in the Southeast. At the end of theseventeenth century a certain stroke was used in paddling canoesalong the coast of Georgia, South Carolina, and Florida, which wascalled the "Yamasee stroke." A small town in Beaufort County,S. C, is called "Yemasee," a variant of this name.Yuchi. Significance unknown, but perhaps, as suggested by Speck(1909), from a native word meaning "those far away," or "at adistance," though it is also possible that it is a variant of Ochesee SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 117 or Ocheese, which was apphed by the Hitchiti and their alHes toIndians speaking languages different from their own. Also called:Ani'-Yu'tsl, Cherokee name.Chiska, probably a Muskogee translation of the name of one of their bands.Hughchee, an early synonym.Round town people, a name given by the early English colonists.Rickohockans, signifying "cavelanders" (Hewitt, in Hodge, 1907), perhapsan early name for a part of them.Tahogal^wi, abbreviated to Hogologe, name given them by the Delawareand other Algonquian people.Tamahita, so called by some Indians, perhaps some of the eastern Siouans.Tsoyaha, "People of the sun," their own name, or at least the name ofone band.Westo, perhaps a name applied to them by the Cusabo Indians of SouthCarolina though the identification is not beyond question.Connections.?The Yuchi constituted a linguistic stock, the Uchean,distinct from all others, though structurally their speech bears acertain resemblance to the languages of the Muskhogean and Siouanfamilies.Location.?The earliest known location of the Yuchi was ineastern Tennessee, perhaps near Manchester, but some of themextended still farther east, while others were as far west as MuscleShoals. On archeological grounds Prof. T. M. N. Lewis believes thatone main center of the Yuchi was on Hiwassee River. We findsettlements laid down on the maps as far north as Green River,Kentucky. In later times a part settled in West Florida, near thepresent Eucheeanna, and another part on Savannah and OgeecheeRivers. (See also Alabama, Florida, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and SouthCarolina.) SubdivisionsThere appear to have been three principal bands in historic times: one onTennessee River, one in West Florida, and one on Savannah River, but only asuggestion of native band names has survived. Recently Wagner has heard ofat least three subdivisional names, including the Tsoyaha, or "Sun People" andthe Root People. VillagesMost of their settlements are given the name of the tribe, Yuchi, or one of itssynonyms. In early times they occupied a town in eastern Tennessee called bythe Cherokee Tsistu'yl, "Rabbit place," on the north bank of Hiwassee Riverat the entrance of Chestua Creek in Polk County, Tenn., and at one time also thatof Hiwassee, or Euphasee, at the Savannah Ford of Hiwassee River. TheSavannah River band had villages at Mount Pleasant, probably in ScrevenCounty, Ga., near the mouth of Brier Creek, 2 miles below Silver Bluff on Savan-nah River in Barnwell County; and one on Ogeechee River bearing the name ofthat stream, though that was itself perhaps one form of the name Yuchi.Hawkins (1848) mentions former villages at Ponpon and Saltketchers in SouthCarolina, but these probably belonged to the Yamasee. The following Yuchisettlements were established after the tribe united with the Lower Creeks: 118 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Arkansaw River, in Oklahoma.Big Pond Town, Polecat Creek, and Sand Creek, in and near Creek County, Okla.Blackjack Town.Deep Fork Creek, Okla.Duck Creek Town.Intatchkalgi, on Opilthlako Creek 28 miles above its junction with Flint River,probably in Schley County, Ga.Padshilaika, at the junction of Patchilaika Creek with Flint River, MaconCounty, Ga.Red Fork, location uncertain.Snake Creek, location uncertain.Spring Garden Town, above Lake George, Fla.Tokogalgi, on Kinchafoonee Creek, an affluent of Flint River, Ga.History.?The chroniclers of the De Soto expedition mention theYuchi under the name Chisca, at one or more points in what is nowTennessee. In 1567 Boyano, an officer under Juan Pardo, had twodesperate encounters with these Indians somewhere in the highlandsof Tennessee or North Carolina, and, according to his own story,destroyed great numbers of them. In 1670 Lederer (1912) heard ofpeople called Rickohockans living in the mountains who may havebeen Yuchi, and two white men sent from Virginia by AbrahamWood visited a Yuchi town on a head stream of the Tennessee in1674. About this time also, English explorers and settlers in SouthCarolina were told of a warlike tribe called Westo (probably a divisionof Yuchi) who had struck terror into all of the coast Indians, andhostilities later broke out betv/een them and the colonists. At thisjuncture, however, a band of Shawnee made war upon the Yv^estoand drove them from the Savannah. For a time they seem to havegiven themselves up to a roving life, and some of them went so farinland that they encountered La Salle and settled near Fort St.Louis, near the present Utica, 111. Later some were located among theCreeks on Ocmulgee River, and they removed with them to theChattahoochee in 1715. Another band of Yuchi came to live onSavannah River about 20 miles above Augusta, probably after theexpulsion of the Westo. They were often called Hogologe. In 1716they also moved to the Chattahoochee but for a time occupied a towndistinct from that of the other Yuchi. It was probably this bandwhich settled near the Shawnee on Tallapoosa River and finallyunited with them. Still later occurred a third influx of Yuchi whooccupied the Savannah between Silver Bluff and Ebenezer Creek.In 1729 a Kasihta chief named Captain Ellick married three Yuchiwomen and persuaded some of the Yuchi Indians to move overamong the Lower Creeks, but Governor Oglethorpe of Georgiaguaranteed them their rights to their old land until after 1740, andthe final removal did not, in fact, take place until 1751.A still earlier invasion of southern territories by Yuchi is noted by SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 119one of the governors of Florida in a letter dated 1639. These in-vaders proved a constant source of annoyance to the Spaniards.Finally they established themselves in West Florida not far from theChoctawhatchee River, where they were attacked by an allied Spanishand Apalachee expedition in 1677 and suffered severely. They con-tinued to live in the same region, however, until some time before 1761when they moved to the Upper Creeks and settled near the Tukabah-chee. Eucheeanna in Walton County, Fla. seems to preserve theirname.A certain number of Yuchi remained in the neighborhood of Ten-nessee River, and at one time they were about Muscle Shoals. Theyalso occupied a town in the Cherokee country, called by the lattertribe Tsistu'yi, and Hiwassee at Savannah Ford. In 1714, theformer was cut off by the Cherokee in revenge for the murder of amember of their tribe, instigated by two English traders. Latertradition afiirms that the surviving Yucfii fled to Florida, but manyof them certainly remained in the Cherokee country for a long timeafterward, and probably eventually migrated west with their hosts.A small band of Yuchi joined the Seminole just before the outbreakof the Seminole War. They appear first in West Florida, near theMikasuki but later had a town at Spring Garden in Volusia County.Their presence is indicated down to the end of the war in the Peninsula,when they appear to have gone west, probably reuniting with theremainder of the tribe.The Yuchi who stayed with the Creeks accompanied them westand settled in one body in the northwestern part of the old CreekNation, in Creek County, Okla.Population.?For the year 1650 Mooney (1928) makes an estimateof 1,500 for the Yuchi in Georgia, Alabama, and Tennessee, but thisdoes not include the "Westo," for whom, with the Stono, he allows1,600. The colonial census of 1715 gives 2 Yuchi towns with 130men and 400 souls, but this probably takes into consideration only 1band out of 3 or 4. In 1730 the band still on Tennessee River wassupposed to contain about 150 men. In 1760, 50 men are reportedin the Lower Creek town and 15 in one among the Upper Creeks.In 1777 Bartram (1792) estimated the number of Yuchi warriors inthe lower to^vn at 500 and their total population as between 1,000and 1,500. In 1792 Marbury (1792) reports 300 men, or a populationof over 1,000, and Hawkins in 1799 says the Lower Creek Yuchiclaimed 250 men. According to the census of 1832-33 there were1,139 in 2 towns known to have been occupied by Indians of thisconnection. In 1909 Speck stated that the whole number of Yuchicould "hardly exceed five hundred," but the official report for 1910gives only 78. That, however, must have been an underestimate as 120 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145the census of 1930 reported 216. Owing to the number of Yuchibands, their frequent changes in location, and the various termsapplied to them, an exact estimate of their numbers at any periodis very difficult. In the first half of the sixteenth century they maywell have numbered more than 5,000.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Yuchi have at-tained an altogether false reputation as the supposed aborigines ofthe Gulf region. They were also noted for the uniqueness of theirlanguage among the Southeastern tongues. The name is preservedin Euchee, a post hamlet of Meigs County, Tenn.; Eucheeanna, apost village of Walton County, Fla.; Euchee (or Uchee) Creek,Russell County, Ala. ; Uchee, a post station of EusseU County, Ala. ; Uchee Creek, Columbia County, Ga.; and an island in SavannahRiver near the mouth of the latter.Yufera. (See Florida.) FLORIDAAcuera. Meaning unknown (acu signifies "and" and also "moon").Connections.?This tribe belonged to the Timucuan or Timuquananlinguistic division of the Muskhogean linguistic family.Location.?Apparently about the headwaters of the OcklawahaRiver.Towns.? (See Utina.)History.?The Acuera were first noted by De Soto in a letter writtenat Tampa Bay to the civil cabildo of Santiago de Cuba. Accordingto information transmitted to him by his officer Baltazar de Gallegos,Acuera was "a large town . . . where with much convenience wemight winter," but the Spaniards did not in fact pass through it,though, while they were at Ocale, they sent to Acuera for corn. Thename appears later in Laudonniere's narrative of the second Frenchexpedition to Florida, 1564-65 (1586), as a tribe allied with the Utina.It is noted sparingly in later Spanish documents but we learn thatin 1604 there was an encounter between these Indians and Spanishtroops and that there were two Acuera missions in 1655, San Luisand Santa Lucia, both of which had disappeared by 1680. Theinland position of the Acuera is partly responsible for the few noticesof them. The remnant was probably gathered into the "Pueblo deTimucua," which stood near St. Augustine in 1736, and was finallyremoved to the Mosquito Lagoon and Halifax River in VolusiaCounty, where Tomoka River keeps the name alive.Population.?This is nowhere given by itself. (See Utina.)Aguacaleyquen, see Utina. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 121Ais. Meaning unknown; there is no basis for Romans' (1775) deri-vation from the Choctaw word "isi" (deer). Also called:Jece, form of the name given by Dickenson (1699).Connections.?Circumstantial evidence, particularly resemblance intown names, leads to the conclusion that the Ais language was similarto that of the Calusa and the other south Florida tribes. (SeeCalusa.) It is believed that it was connected with the Muslvhogeanstock.Location.?Along Indian River on the east coast of the peninsula.VillagesThe only village mentioned by explorers and geographers bears some form ofthe tribal name.History.?Fontaneda (1854) speaks of a Biscayan named Pedrowho had been held prisoner in Ais, evidently during the sixteenthcentury, and spoke the Ais language fluently. Shortly after theSpaniards made their first establishments in the peninsula, a warbroke out with the Ais, but peace was concluded in 1570. In 1597Governor Alendez de Cango, who traveled along the entire eastcoast from the head of the Florida Keys to St. Augustine, reportedthat the Ais chief had more Indians under him than any other. AHttle later the Ais killed a Spaniard and two Indiars sent to them byCango for which summary revenge was exacted, and stiU later adifficulty was created by the escape of two Negro slaves and theirmarriage with Ais men. Relations between the Floridian govern-ment and these Indians were afterward friendly but efforts to mis-sioni'/e them uniformly failed. An ultimate picture of their conditionin 1699 is given by the Quaker Dickenson (1803), who was ship-wrecked on the coast farther south and obliged, with his companions,to travel through their territory. They disappear from history after1703, but the remnant may have been among those who, accordingto Romans (1775), passed over to Cuba in 1763, although he speaksof them all as Calusa.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates the number of Indians onthe southeastern coast of Florida in 1650, including this tribe, theTekesta, Guacata, and Jeaga, to have been 1,000. As noted above,the Ais were the most important of these and undoubtedly thelargest. We have no other estimates of population applying to theseventeenth century. In 1726, 88 "Costa" Indians were reported ina mission farther north and these may have been drawn from thesoutheast coast. In 1728, 52 "Costa" Indians were reported.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Ais were notedas the most important tribe of southeastern Florida, and they were 122 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145probably responsible for the fact that the watercourse on which theydwelt came to be called Indian River.Alabama. Early in the eighteenth century the Pawokti, and perhapssome other Alabama bands, lived near Apalachicola River, whencethey were driven in 1708. After the Creek-American War a partof the Alabama again entered Florida, but they do not seem tohave maintained an independent existence for a very long period.(See Alabama.)Amacano. A tribe or band perhaps connected with the Yamasee,placed in a mission on the Apalachee coast in 1674 with two others,Chine, and Caparaz (q. v.). The three together had 300 souls.Amacapiras, see Macapiras.Apalachee. Meaning perhaps "people on the other side" (as inHitchiti), or it may be cognate with Choctaw apelachi, "a helper."Connections.?These Indians belonged to the Muskhogean linguisticfamily, their closest connections having been apparently the Hitchitiand Alabama.Location.?The Apalachee towns, with few exceptions, were com-pactly situated in the neighborhood of the present Florida capital,Tallahassee. (See also Georgia, Alabama, Louisiana, and Oklahoma.)VillagesAute, 8 or 9 days' journey from the main towns and apparently southwest of them.Ayubale, 77 leagues from St. Augustine.Bacica, probably near the present Wacissa River.Bacuqua, seemingly somewhat removed from the main group of towns.Calahuchi, north of the main group of towns and not certainly Apalachee.Cupayca, location uncertain; its name seems to be in Timucua.Ibitachuco, 75 leagues from St. Augustine.Iniahica, close to the main group of towns, possibly the Timucua name for one ofthe others given, since hica is the Timucua word for "town."Ochete, on the coast 8 leagues south of Iniahica.Ocuia, 84 leagues from St. Augustine.Ospalaga, 86 leagues from St. Augustine.Patali, 87 leagues from St. Augustine.Talimali, 88 leagues from St. Augustine and very likely identical with Iniahica.Talpatqui, possibly identical with the preceding.Tomoh, 87 leagues from St. Augustine.Uzela, on or near Ocilla River.Yapalaga, near the main group of towns.Ychutafun, on Apalachicola River.Yecambi, 90 leagues from St. Augustine.A few other names are contained in various writings or placed uponsundry charts, but some of these belonged to distinct tribes and werelocated only temporarily among the Apalachee; others are not men- Swantonj INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 123tioned elsewhere but appear to belong in the same category; and stillothers are simpl}'^ names of missions and may apply to certain of thetowns mentioned above. Thus Chacatos evidently refers to theChatot tribe, Tama to the TamaH, and Oconi probably to a branch ofthe Oconee mentioned elsewhere. The Chines were a body of Chatotand derived their name from a chief. Among names which appearonly in Spanish we find Santa Fe. Capola and Ilcombe, given on thePopple Map, were probably occupied by Guale and Yamasee refugees.A late Apalachee settlement was called San Marcos.History.?The Apalachee seem to appear first in histoiy in thechronicles of the Narvaez expedition (Bandelier, 1905). The ex-plorers spent nearly a month in an Apalachee town in the year 1528but were subjected to constant attacks on the part of the warlikenatives, who pursued them during their withdrawal to a coast townnamed Ante. In October 1539, De Soto arrived in the Apalacheeprovince and remained there the next winter in spite of the unceas-ing hostility of the natives, who well maintained the reputation forprowess they had acquired 11 years before. Although the provinceis mentioned from time to time by the first French and Spanish col-onists of Florida, it did not receive much attention until the tribesbetween it and St. Augustine had been pretty well missionized. Ina letter written in 1607 we learn that the Apalachee had asked formissionaries and, although one paid a visit to them the next year,the need is reiterated at frequent intervals. It was not until 1633,however, that the work was actually begun. In that year two monksentered the country and the conversion proceeded very rapidly sothat by 1647 there were seven churches and convents and eight ofthe principal chiefs had been baptized. In that year, however, agreat rebellion took place. Three missionaries were killed and all ofthe churches with their sacred objects were destroyed. An expedi-tion sent against the insurgents was repulsed, but shortly afterwardthe movement collapsed, apparently through a counterrevolution inthe tribe itself. After this most of the Apalachee sought baptismand there was no further trouble between them and the Spaniardsexcept for a brief sympathetic movement at the time of the Timucuauprising of 1656. The outstanding complaint on the part of theIndians was that some of them were regularly commandeered to workon the fortifications of St. Augustine. In 1702 a large Apalachee warparty was severely defeated by Creek Indians assisted by some Eng-lish traders, and in 1704 an expedition from South Carolina underColonel Moore practically destroyed the nation. Moore claims tohave carried away the people of three towns and the greater part ofthe population of four more and to have left but two towns and part 124 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145 of another. Most of these latter appear to have fled to Mobile,where, in 1705, they were granted land on which to settle. TheApalachee who had been carried off by Moore were established nearNew Windsor, S. C, but when the Yamasee War broke out theyjoined the hostile Indians and retired for a time to the Lower Creeks.Shortly afterward the English faction among the Lower Creeks be-came ascendant and the Apalachee returned to Florida, some remain-ing near their old country and others settling close to Pensacola tobe near their relatives about Mobile. By 1718 another Apalacheesettlement had been organized by the Spaniards near San Marcos deApalache and close to their old country. In 1728 we hear of twosmall Apalachee towns in this neighborhood. Most of them grav-itated finally to the neighborhood of Pensacola. In 1764, the yearafter all French and Spanish possessions east of the Mississippi passedinto the hands of Great Britain, the Apalachee, along with severalother tribes, migrated into Louisiana, now held by Spain, and settledon Red River, where they and the Taensa conjointly occupied a stripof land between Bayou d'Arro and Bayou Jean de Jean. Most ofthis land was sold in 1803 and the Apalachee, reduced to a smallband, appear to have moved about in the same general region untilthey disappeared. They are now practically forgotten, though a fewmixed-blood Apalachee are still said to be in existence. A fewaccompanied the Creeks to Oklahoma.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates 7,000 Apalachee Indians in1650, a figure which seems to me to be ample. Governor Salazar'smission-by-mission estimate in 1675 yielded a total of 6,130, and aSpanish memorial dated 1676 gives them a population of 5,000. Atthe time of Moore's raid there appear to have been about 2,000. TheSouth Carolina Census of 1715 gives 4 Apalachee villages, 275 men,and 638 souls. As the Mobile Apalachee were shortly afterwardreduced to 100 men, the number of the entire tribe in 1715 must havebeen about 1,000. By 1758 they appear to have fallen to not muchover 100, and in 1814 Sibley reported but 14 men in the Louisianaband, signifying a total of perhaps 50 (Sibley, 1832). Morse's esti-mate (1822) of 150 in 1817 is evidently considerably too high.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Apalachee werementioned repeatedly as a powerful and warhke people, and thischaracter was attested by their stout resistance to Narvaez andDe Soto. The sweeping destruction which overtook them at thehands of the Creeks and Carolinians marks an epoch in Southeasternhistory. Their name is preserved in Apalachee Bay and River, Fla. ; Apalachee River, Ga., Apalachee River, Ala,; and most prominentlyof all, in the Appalachian Mountains, and other terms derived fromthem. Tallahassee, the capital of Florida, the name of which signifies SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 125 "Old Town," is on the site of San Luis de Talimali, the principalSpanish mission center. There is a post village named Apalachee inMorgan County, Ga.Apalachicola. At times some of the Apalachicola Indians lived southof the present Florida boundary line and they gave their name to thegreat river which runs tlirough the panhandle of that State. (SeeGeorgia.)Calusa. Said by a Spaniard, Hernando de Escalante Fontaneda, whowas a captive among them for many years, to mean "fierce people,"but it is perhaps more probable that, since it often appears in theform Carlos, it was, as others assert, adopted by the Calusa chieffrom the name of the Emperor Charles V, about whose greatnesshe had learned from Spanish prisoners.Connections.?From the place names and the few expressionsrecorded by Fontaneda, I suspect that the Calusa were connectedlinguistically with the Muskhogean stock and particularly with thatbranch of it to which the Apalachee and Choctaw belonged, but nodefinite conclusion on this point is as yet possible.Location.?On the west coast of the Peninsula of Florida southwardof Tampa Bay and including the Florida Keys. The Indians in theinterior, about Lake Okeechobee, while forming a distinct group,seem also to have been Calusa.Subdivision*Unknown, except aa indicated above.VillagesIn the following list the letters S and I indicate respectively towns belongingto the seacoast division and those of the interior division about Lake Okeechobee.Beyond this allocation the positions of most of the towns may be indicated merelyin a general manner, by reference to neighboring towns.Abir (I), between Neguitun and Cutespa.Alcola (or Chosa), location uncertain.Apojola Negra, the first word is Timucua; the second seems to be Spanish; loca-tion unknown.Calaobe (S).Caragara, between Namuguya and Henhenguepa.Casitoa (S), between Muspa and Cotebo.Cayovea (S).Cayucar, between Tonco and Neguitun.Chipi, between Tomgobe and Taguagemae.Chosa (see Alcola).Comachica (S).Cononoguay, between Cutespa and Estegue.Cotebo, between Casitoa and Coyobia.Coyobia, between Cotebo and Tequemapo.Cuchiyaga, said to be southwest from Bahia Honda and 40 leagues northeast ofGuarungube, probably on Big Pine Key. 126 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Custavui, south of Jutun.Cutespa (I), between Abir and Cononoguay,Elafay, location uncertain.Enempa (I).Estame (S) , between Metamapo and Sacaspada.Estantapaca, between Yagua and Queyhicha.Estegue, between Cononoguay and Tomsobe.Excuru, between Janar and Metamapo.Guarungube, "on the point of the Martyrs," and thus probably near Key West.Guevu (S).Henhenguepa, between Caragara and Ocapataga.Janar, between Ocapataga and Escuru.Judyi, between Satucuava and Soco.Juestocobaga, between Queyhicha and Sinapa.Jutun (S), between Tequemapo and Custavui.Metamapo (S), between Escuru and Estame.Muspa (S), between Teyo and Casitoa.Namuguya, between Taguagemae and Caragara.Neguitun, between Cayiicar and Abir.No or Non (S).Ocapataga, between Henhenguepa and Janar.Queyhicha, between Estantapaca and Juestocobaga.Quisiyove (S).Sacaspada (S), between Estame and Satucuava.Satucuava, between Sacaspada and Judyi,Sinaesta (S).Sinapa (S) , between Juestocobaga and Tonco.Soco, between Judyi and Vuebe.Taguagemae, between Chipi and Namuguya.Tampa (S), the northernmost town, followed on the south by Yegua, andprobably on Charlotte Harbor.Tatesta (S), between the Tequesta tribe and Cuchiyaga, about 80 leagues northof the latter, perhaps at the innermost end of the Keys.Tavaguemue (I).Tequemapo (S), between Coyobia and Jutun.Teyo, between Vuebe and Muspa.Tiquijagua (?).Tomo (S).Tomsobe (I), between Estegue and Chipi.Tonco, between Sinapa and Cayucar.Tuchi (S).Vuebe, between Soco and Teyo, possibly the same as Guevu.Yagua (S), between Tampa and Estantapaca.History.?Most early navigators who touched upon the west coastof Florida must have encountered the Calusa but the first definiteappearance of the tribe historically is in connection with shipwrecksof Spanish fleets, particularly the periodical treasure fleet fromMexico, upon the Calusa coast. These catastrophes threw numerousSpanish captives into the hands of the natives and along with thema quantity of gold and silver for which the Calusa shortly becamenoted. Ponce de Leon visited them in 1513, Miruelo in 1516, Cordova SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 127in 1517; and Ponce, during a later expedition in 1521, received fromthem a mortal wound from which he died after reaching Cuba,Most of our early information regarding the Calusa is obtained fromFontaneda (1854), who was held captive in the tribe from about 1551to 1569. At the time when St. Augustine was settled attempts weremade to establish a post among these Indians and to missionize them,but the post had soon to be withdrawn and the missionary attemptproved abortive. The Calusa do not seem to have been converted toChristianity during the entire period of Spanish control. Whiletheir treatment of castaways was restrained, in ever\^ other respectthey appear to have continued their former manner of existence,except that they resorted more and more to Havana for purposes oftrade. Outside of a steady diminution in numbers there is little toreport of them until the close of the Seminole War. The Seminole,when hard pressed by the American forces, moved south into theEverglade region and there came into contact with what was left ofthe Calusa. Romans (1775) states that the last of the Calusa emi-grated to Cuba in 1763, but probably the Indians who composed thisbody were from the east coast and were not true Calusa. TheCalusa themselves appear about this time under the name Muspa,which, it will be seen, was the designation of one of their towns. Onthe movement of the Seminole into their country they became involvedin hostilities with the American troops, and a band of Muspa attackedthe camp of Colonel Harney in 1839 killing 18 out of 30 men. July23 of the same year Harney fell upon the Spanish Indians, killed theirchief, and hung six of his followers. The same band later killed a bot-anist named Perrine living on Indian Key and committed other depre-dations. The Calusa may have been represented by the "Choctawband" of Indians, which appears among the Seminole shortly afterthis time. The Seminole now in Oklahoma assert that a body ofChoctaw came west with them when they were moved from Florida,but the only thing certain as to the Calusa is that we hear no moreabout them. Undoubtedly some did not go west and either becameincorporated with the Florida Seminole or crossed to Cuba.Population.?Mooney's (1928) estimate of 3,000 Calusa Indians in1650 is probably as near the truth as any estimate that could besuggested. No census and very few estimates of the population,even of the most partial character, are recorded. An expeditionsent into the Calusa country in 1680 passed through 5 villages saidto have had a total population of 960, but this figure can be acceptedonly with the understanding that these villages were principal centers.In the band that attacked Harney in 1839 there were said to be 250Indians.Connection in which they have become noted.?When first discovered 128 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. i45the Calusa were famous for the power of their chiefs, the amount ofgold which they had obtained from Spanish treasure ships, and fortheir addiction to human sacrifice. Their name persists in that ofCaloosahatchee River and probably also in that of Charlotte Harbor.Another claim to distinction is the adoption by their chief of the nameof the great Emperor Charles?if that was indeed the case. Theonly similar instance would seem to be in the naming of the DelawareIndians, but that was imposed upon the Lenni Lenape, not adoptedby them.Caparaz. A small tribe or band placed in 1674 in connection with adoctrina called San Luis on the Apalachee coast along with twoother bands called Amacano and Chine. Possibly they may havebeen survivors of the Capachequi encountered by De Soto in 1540,The three bands were estimated to contain 300 people.Chatot. Meaning unknown, but the forms of this word greatlyresemble the synonyms of the name Choctaw.Connections.?The language spoken by this tribe belonged, un-doubtedly, to the southern division of the Muskhogean stock.Location.?West of Apalachicola River, perhaps near the middlecourse of the Chipola. (See also Georgia, Alabama, and Louisiana).VillagesFrom the names of two Spanish missions among them it would appear thatthere were at least two towns in early times, one called Chacato, after the nameof the tribe, and the other Tolentino.History.?The Chatot are first mentioned in a Spanish documentof 1639 in which the governor of Florida congratulates himself onhaving consummated peace between the Chatot, Apalachicola, andYamasee on one side and the Apalachee on the other. This, he says, "is an extraordinary thing, because the aforesaid Chacatos nevermaintained peace with anybody." In 1674 the two missions notedabove were established among these people, but the following yearthe natives rebelled. The disturbance was soon ended by the SpanishoflBcer Florencia, and the Chatot presently settled near the Apalacheetown of San Luis, mission work among them being resumed. In1695, or shortly before, Lower Creek Indians attacked this mission,plundered the church, and carried away 42 Christianized natives. In1706 or 1707, following on the destruction of the Apalachee towns, theChatot and several other small tribes living near it were attackedand scattered or carried off captive, and the Chatot fled to Mobile,where they were well received by Bienville and located on the site ofthe present city of Mobile, When Bienville afterward moved theseat of his government to this place he assigned to them land on DogRiver by way of compensation. After Mobile was ceded to the SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 129English in 1763 the Chatot, along with a number of other small tribesnear that city, moved to Louisiana. They appear to have settledfirst on Bayou Boeuf and later on Sabine River. Nothing is heard ofthem afterward though in 1924 some old Choctaw remembered theirformer presence on the Sabine. The remnant may have found theirway to Oklahoma.Popvlation.?I would estimate a population of 1,200-1,500 for theChatot when they were first missionized (1674). When they weresettled on the site of Mobile, Bienville (1932, vol. 3, p. 536) says thatthey could muster 250 men, which would indicate a population of near900, but in 1725-26 there were but 40 men and perhaps a total popu-lation of 140. In 1805 they are said to have had 30 men or about 100people. In 1817 a total of 240 is returned by Morse (1822), but thisfigure is probably twice too large.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Chatot are notedbecause at one time they occupied the site of Mobile, Ala., and becauseBayou Chattique, Choctaw Point, and Choctaw Swamp close by thatcity probably preserve their name. The Choctawhatchee, w^hich is neartheir former home, was probably named for them.Chiaha. A few Creeks of this tribe emigrated from their former townsto Florida before the Creek-American War and after that encountermay have been joined by others. In an early list of Seminole set-tlements they are credited with one town on "Beech Creek," andthis may have been identical with Fulemmy's Town or FinderTown located on Suwanee River in 1817, which was said to beoccupied by Chiaha Indians. The Alikasuki are reported to havebranched off from this tribe. (See Georgia.)Chilucan. A tribe mentioned in an enumeration of the Indians inFlorida missions made in 1726. Possibly the name is derived fromMuskogee chiloki, "people of a different speech," and since one ofthe two missions where they are reported was San Buenaventuraand elsewhere that mission is said to have been occupied by MocamaIndians, that is, seacoast Timucua, a Timucuan connection isindicated. In the list mentioned, 70 Chilucan were said to be atSan Buenaventura and 62 at the mission of Nombre de Dios.Chine. A small tribe or band associated with two others calledAmacano and Caparaz (q. v.) in a doctrina established on the coastof the Apalachee country called San Luis. Other evidence suggeststhat Chine may be the name of a Chatot chief. Later they mayhave moved into the Apalachee country, for in a mission list dated1680 there appears a mission called San Pedro de los Chines. Thistribe and the Amacano and Caparaz were said to number 300individuals in 1674. 130 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Creeks, see Alabama, Chiaha, Hitchiti, Mikasukee, Muskogee,Oconee, Sawokli, Tawasa, and Yuchi.)Fresh Water ("Agua Dulce") Indians. A name applied to the peopleof seven to nine neighboring towns, and for which there is no nativeequivalent.Connections.?The same as Acuera (q. v.).Location.?In the coast district of eastern Florida between St.Augustine and Cape Canaveral.VillagesThe following towns are given in this province extending from north to south,but not all of the native names have been preserved:Anacape, said to have been 20 leagues south of St. Augustine.Antonico; another possible name is Tunsa.Equale, location uncertain.Filache, location uncertain.Maiaca, a few leagues north of Cape Canaveral and on St. Johns River.Moloa, south of the mouth of St. Johns River (omitted from later lists).San Julian, location uncertain.San Sebastian, on an arm of the sea near St. Augustine, destroyed in 1600 by aflood.Tocoy, given by one writer as 5 leagues from St. Augustine; by another as 24leagues.The names Macaya and Maycoya, which appear in the neighborhood of thelast of these are probably synonyms or corruptions of Maiaca, but there seems tohave been a sister town of Maiaca at an early date which Fontaneda (1854) callsMayajuaca or IMayjuaca. In addition to the preceding, a number of town nameshave been preserved which perhaps belong to places in this province. Some ofthem may be synonyms of the town names already given, especially of townslike Antonico and St. Julian, the native names of which are otherwise unknown.These include:Qacoroy, l}'^ leagues from Xocoroco.Caparaca, southwest of Nocoroco.Chimaucayo, south of St. Augustine.Cicale, 3 leagues south of Nocoroco.Colucuchia, several leagues south of Nocoroco.Disnica, probably south of St. Augustine, though not necessarily in the FreshWater Province.Elanogue, near Antonico.Maiaca, south of Nocoroco.Mogote, in the region of Nocoroco.Nocoroco, one day's journey south of Matanzas Inlet and on a river called No-coroco River, perhaps Halifax River.Perqumaland, south of the last mentioned; possibly two towns, Perqui andMaland.Pia, south of Nocoroco.Sabobche, south of Nocoroco.Tomeo, apparently near or in the Fresh Water province.Tucura, apparently in the same province as the last mentioned.Yaocay, near Antonico. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 131History.?The history of this province differed little from that ofthe other Timucua provinces, tribes, or confederacies. Ponce deLeon made his landfall upon this coast in 1513. The French hadfew dealings with the people but undoubtedly met them. Fontaneda(1854) heard of the provinces of Maiaca and Mayajuaca, and laterthere were two Spanish missions in this territory, San Antonio deAnacape and San Salvador de Maiaca. These appear in the missionlist of 1655 and in that of 1680 but from data given with the latterit is evident that Yamasee were then settled at Anacape. All ofthese Indians were converted rapidly early in the seventeenth centuryand the population declined with increasing celerity. The last bodyof Timucua were settled in this district and have left their name inthat of Tomoka Creek, (See Utina.)Population.?There are no data on which to give a separate andfull statement of the Timucua population in this district. In 1602,however, 200 Indians belonging to it had been Christianized and 100more were under instruction. (See Acuera.)Guacata. Meaning unknown.Connections.?On the evidence furnished by place names in thissection, the tribe is classified with the south Florida peoples.Location.?On or near Saint Lucie River in Saint Lucie and PalmBeach Counties.History.?The Guacata are first mentioned by Fontaneda (1854),who in one place speaks of them as on Lake Mayaimi (Okeechobee),but this probably means only that they ranged across to the lakefrom the eastern seacoast. Shortly after his conquest of FloridaAl^enendez left 200 men in the Ais country, but the Indians of thattribe soon rose against them and they moved to the neighborhood ofthe Guacata, where they were so well treated that they called the placeSanta Lucia. Next year, however, these Indians rose against themand although they were at first defeated the Spaniards were so hardpressed that they abandoned the place in 1568. They were still anindependent body in the time of Dickenson, in 1699, but not longafterward they evidently united with other east coast bands, and theywere probably part of those who emigrated to Cuba in 1763.Population.?No separate estimate has ever been made. (See Ais.)Guale. In relatively late times many of these Indians were drivenfrom their country into Florida. (See Georgia.)Hitchiti. The ancient home of the Hitchiti was north of Florida butafter the destruction of the earlier tribes of the peninsula, in whichthey themselves participated, Hitchiti-speaking peoples moved in ingreat numbers to take their places, so that up to the Creek-xVmericanWar, the Hitchiti language was spoken by the greater number of 132 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Seminole. The later immigration, as we have indicated above,reduced the Hitchiti element to a minority position, so that whatwe now call the Seminole language is practically identical withMuskogee. True Hitchiti as distinguished from Hitchiti-speakingpeoples who bore other names, do not appear to have been veryactive in this early movement though Hawkins (1848) mentionsthem as one of those tribes from which the Seminole were made up.The Hitchiti settlement of Attapulgas or Atap'halgi and perhapsother of the so-called Fowl Towns seem to represent a later immigra-tion into the peninsula. (See Georgia.)Icafui. Meaning unknown.Connections.?They were undoubtedly of the Timucuan groupthough they seem to have been confused at times with a tribe calledCascangue which may have been related to the Muskogee or Hitchiti.On the other hand, Cascangue may have been another name of thistribe, possibly one employed by Creeks or Hitchiti.Location.?On the mainland and probably in southeastern Georgianear the border between the Timucua and the strictly Muskhogeanpopulations. VillagesSeven or eight towns are said to have belonged to this tribe but the names ofnone of them are known with certainty.History.?Icafui seems to be mentioned first by the Franciscanmissionaries who occasionally passed through it on their way to orfrom interior peoples. It was a "visita" of the missionaiy at SanPedro (Cumberland Island). Otherwise its history differed in norespect from that of the other Timucuan tribes. (See Utina.)Population.?Separate figures regarding this tribe are wanting.(See Utina.)Jeaga. Meaning unkno'wm.Connections.?The Jeaga are classed on the basis of place namesand location with the tribes of south Florida, which were perhaps ofthe Muskhogean division proper.Location.?On the present Jupiter Inlet, on the east coast of Florida.VillagesBetween this tribe and the Tequesta the names of several settlements are givenwhich may have belonged to one or both of them, viz: Cabista, Custegiyo, Janar,Tavuacio.History.?The Jeaga tribe is mentioned by Fontaneda (1854) andby many later Spanish writers but it was of minor importance. NearJupiter Inlet the Quaker Dickenson (1803), one of our best informantsregarding the ancient people of the east coast of Florida, was cast SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 133 ashore in 1699. In the eighteenth century, this tribe was probablymerged with the Ais, Tequesta, and other tribes of this coast, andremoved with them to Cuba. (See Ais.)Population.?No separate enumeration is known. (See Ais.)Koasati. Appearance of a "Coosada Old Town" on the middlecourse of Choctawhatchee River on a map of 1823 shows that aband of Koasati Indians joined the Seminole in Florida, but this isall we know of them. (See Alabama.)Macapiras, or Amacapiras. Meaning unknown. A small tribewhich was brought to the St. Augustine missions in 1726 along withsome Pohoy, and so apparently from the southwest coast. Therewere only 24, part of whom died and the rest returned to their oldhomes before 1728.Mikasuki. Meaning unkno"WTi.Connections.?These Indians belonged to the Hitchiti-speakingbranch of the Muskhogean linguistic family. They are said by someto have branched from the true Hitchiti, but those who claim thatthey were originally Chiaha (q. v.) are probably correct.Location.?Their earliest known home was about Miccosukee Lakein Jefferson County. (See also Oklahoma.)VillagesAlachua Talofa or John Hick's Town, in the Alachua Plains, Alachua County.New Mikasuki, near Greenville in Madison County.Old Mikasuki, near Miccosukee Lake.History.?The name Mikasuki appears about 1778 and thereforewe know that their independent status had been established by thatdate whether they had separated from the Hitchiti or the Chiaha.They lived first at Old Mikasuki and then appear to have divided,part going to New Mikasuki and part to the Alachua Plains. Somewriters denounce them as the worst of all Seminole bands, but it isquite likely that, as a tribe differing in speech from themselves, theMuskogee element blamed them for sins they themselves had com-mitted. Old Mikasuki was burned by Andrew Jackson in 1817.Most Mikasuki seem to have remained in Florida where they stillconstitute a distinct body, the Big Cypress band of Seminole. Thosewho went to Oklahoma retained a distinct Square Ground as late as1912.Population.?Morse (1822) quotes a certain Captain Young to theeffect that there were 1,400 Mikasuki in his time, about 1817. Thisfigure is probably somewhat too high though the Mikasuki elementis known to have been a large one. They form one entire band amongthe Florida Seminole. 134 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Connection in which they have become noted.?The Mikasuki attainedprominence in the Seminole War. In the form Miccosukee theirname has been applied to a lake in Jefferson and Leon Counties, Fla.,and a post village in the latter county. In the form Mekusuky ithas been given to a village in Seminole County, Okla.Mocoso, or Mucogo. Meaning unknown.Connections.?They belonged with little doubt to the Timucuandivision of the Muskhogean linguistic stock.Location.?About the head of Hillsboro Bay.VillagesNone are mentioned under any other than the tribal name.History.?The chief of this tribe gave asylum to a Spaniard namedJuan Ortiz who had come to Florida in connection with the expedi-tion of Narvaez. When De Soto landed near the Mocogo town itschief sent Ortiz with an escort of warriors to meet him. Ortiz after-ward became De Soto's principal interpreter until his death west ofthe Mississippi, and the M0C090 chief remained on good terms withthe Spaniards as long as they stayed in the neighborhood. Thereare only one or two later references to the tribe. (See Utina.)Connection in which they have become noted.?The contacts of theM0C090 with De Soto and his followers constitute their only claim todistinction.Muklasa. A small Creek town whose inhabitants were probablyrelated by speech to the Alabama and Koasati. They are saidto have gone to Florida after the Creek War. (See Alabama.)Muskogee. The first true Creeks or Muskogee to enter Florida seemto have been a body of Eufaula Indians who made a settlementcalled Chuko tcati. Red House, on the west side of the peninsulasome distance north of Tampa Bay.^ This was in 1761. OtherMuskogee drifted into Florida from time to time, but the greatimmigration took place after the Creek-American War. The new-comers were from many towns, but more particularly those on theTallapoosa River. They gave the final tone and the characteristiclanguage to the Florida emigrants who had before been dominantlyof Hitchiti connection, and therefore the so-called Seminole lan-guage is Muskogee, with possibly a few minor changes in thevocabulary. (See Alabama.)Ocale, or Etocale. Meaning unknown, but perhaps connected withTimucua tocala, "it is more than," a comparative verb. ' A possible exception to this statement was the temporary entrance of a small body of Coweta Indiansunder Secoffee, or the Cowkeeper. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 135Connections.? (See Acuera.)Location.?In Marion County or Levy County north of the bendof the Withlacoochee River. VillagesUqueten (first village approaching from the south), and perhaps Itaraholata.History.?This tribe is first mentioned by the chroniclers of theDe Soto expedition. He passed through it in 1539 after crossingWithlacoochee River. Fontaneda also heard of it, and it seems toappear on De Bry's map of 1591. This is the last inforaiation thathas been preserved.Population.?Unknown. (See Acuera and Utina.)Connection in which they have become noted.?Within comparativelymodern times this name was adopted in the form Ocala as that ofthe county seat of Marion County, Fla. There is a place so called inPulaski County, Ky.Ogita, see Pohoy.Oconee. After leaving the Chattahoochee about 1750 the Oconeemoved into Florida and estabUshed themselves on the AlachuaPlains in a town which Bartram calls Cuscowilla. They constitutedthe first large band of northern Indians to settle in Florida and theirchiefs came to be recognized as head chiefs of the Seminole. Oneof these, Mikonopi, was prominent during the Seminole War, butthe identity of the tribe itself is lost after that struggle. Anotherpart of them seem to have settled for a time among the Apalachee(q. v.). (See Georgia.)Onatheaqua. In the narratives of Laudonniere and Le Moyne thisappears as one of the two main Timucua tribes in the northwesternpart of Florida, the other being the Hostaqua (or Yustaga). Else-where I have suggested that it may have covered the Indiansafterward gathered into the missions of Santa Cruz de Tarihica,San Juan de Guacara, Santa Catalina, and Ajoica, where there were230 Indians in 1675, but that is uncertain. (See Utina.)Osochi. A Creek division thought to have originated in Florida.(See Alabama.)Pawokti. Meaning unknown.Connections.?They were probably afiiliated either with the Tawasaor the Alabama. In any case there is no reason to doubt that theyspoke a Muskhogean dialect, using Muskhogean in the extended sense.Location.?The earliest known location of the Pawokti seems to havebeen west of Choctawhatchee River, not far from the shores of theGulf of Mexico. (See also Alabama.) 136 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145History.?Lamhatty {in Bushnell, 1908) assigns the Pawokti theabove location before they were driven away by northern Indians,evidently Creeks, in 1706-7. Although the name does not appear inany French documents known to me, they probably settled nearMobile along with the Tawasa. At any rate we find them on AlabamaRiver in 1799 a few miles below the present Montgomery and it isassumed they had been there from 1717, when Fort Toulouse wasestablished. Their subsequent history is merged in that of theAlabama (q. v.).Population.? (See Alabama.)Pensacola. Meaning "hair people," probably from their own tongue,which in that case was very close to Choctaw.Connections.?The name itself, and other bits of circumstantialevidence, indicate that the Pensacola belonged to the Muskhogeanstock and, as above noted, probably spoke a dialect close to Choctaw.Location.?In the neighborhood of Pensacola Bay. (See alsoMississippi.)History.?In 1528 the survivors of the Narvaez expedition had anencounter with Indians near Pensacola Bay who probably belonged tothis tribe. It is also probable that their territory constituted theprovince of Achuse or Ochus which Maldonado, the commander ofDe Soto's fleet, visited in 1539 and whence he brought a remarkablyfine "blanket of sable fur." In 1559 a Spanish colony under Tristande Luna landed in a port called "the Bay of Ichuse," (or "Ychuse")undoubtedly in the same province, but the enterprise was soon givenup and the colonists returned to Mexico. The Pensacola tribe seemsto be mentioned first by name in Spanish letters dated 1677. In 1686we learn they were at war with the Mobile Indians. Twelve yearsafterward, when the Spanish post of Pensacola was established, it isclaimed that the tribe had been exterminated by other peoples, butthis is an error. It had merely moved farther inland and probablytoward the west. They are noted from time to time, and in 1725-6Bienville (1932, vol. 3, p. 535) particularly describes the location oftheir village near that of the Biloxi of Pearl River. The last mentionof them seems to be in an estimate of Indian population dated Decem-ber 1, 1764, in which their name appears along with those of six othersmall tribes. They may have been incorporated finally into theChoctaw or have accompanied one of the smaller Mobile tribes intoLouisiana near the date last mentioned.Population.?In 1725 (or 1726) Bienville (1932, vol. 3, p. 535) saysthat in the Pensacola village and that of the Biloxi together, therewere not more than 40 men. The enumeration mentioned above,made in 1764, gives the total population of this tribe and the Biloxi, SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 137Chatot, Capinans, Washa, Chawasha, and Pascagoula collectively as251 men.Connection in which they have become noted.?Through the adoptionof their name first for that of Pensacola Bay and secondly for the portwhich grew up upon it, the Pensacola have attained a fame entirelydisproportionate to the aboriginal importance of the tribe. There areplaces of the name in Yancey County, N. C, and Mayes County,Okla.Pohoy, Pooy, or Posoy. Meaning unknown.Connections.?They were evidently closely connected with theTimucuan division of the Muskhogean linguistic stock. (See Utina).Location.?On the south shore of Tampa Bay.Tovms.?(See History.)History.?This tribe, or a part of the same, appears first in historyunder the names Ogita or Ucita as a "province" in the territory ofwhich Hernando de Soto landed in 1539. He established his head-quarters in the town of the head chief on June 1, and when he marchedinland on July 15 he left a captain named Calder6n with a hundredmen to hold this place pending further developments. These werewithdrawn at the end of November to join the main army in theApalachee country. In 1612 these Indians appear for the first timeunder the name Pohoy or Pooy in the account of an expedition to thesouthwest coast of Florida under an ensign named Cartaya. In 1675Bishop Calder6n speaks of the "Pojoy River," and in 1680 there is apassing reference to it. Some time before 1726 about 20 Indians ofthis tribe were placed in a mission called Santa Fe, 9 leagues south ofSt. Augustine, but they had already suffered from an epidemic andby 1728 the remainder returned to their former homes. (See Utina.)Population.?In 1680 the Pohoy were said to number 300.Connection in which they have become noted.?The only claim of thePohoy to distinction is derived from their contacts with the expeditionof De Soto.Potano. Meaning unknown.Connections.? (See Utina.)Location.?In the territory of the present Alachua County.TownsThe following places named in the De Soto narratives probably belonged tothis tribe: Itaraholata or Ytara, Potano, Utinamocharra or Utinama, Cholupaha,and a town they called Mala-Paz. A letter dated 1602 mentions five towns, andon and after 1606, when missionaries reached the tribe, stations were establishedcalled San Francisco, San Miguel, Santa Anna, San Buenaventura, and SanMartin (?) . There is mention also of a mission station called Apalo. 138 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145History.?The name Potano first appears as that of a provincethrough which De Soto passed m 1539. In 1564-65 the French colon-ists of Florida found this tribe at war with the Utina and assisted thelatter to win a victory over them. After the Spaniards had supplantedthe French, they also supported the Utina in wars between them andthe Potano. In 1584 a Spanish captain sent to invade the Potanocountry was defeated and slain. A second expedition, however,killed many Indians and drove them from their town. In 1601 theyasked to be allowed to retm*n to it and in 1606 missionary work wasundertaken among them resulting in their conversion along with mostof the other Timucua peoples. Their mission was known as SanFrancisco de Potano and it appears in the mission lists of 1655 and1680. In 1656 they took part in a general Timucuan uprising whichlasted 8 months. In 1672 a pestilence carried off many and as thechief of Potano does not appear as signatory to a letter written toCharles II by several Timucua chiefs in 1688, it is possible theirseparate identity had come to an end by that date. Early in theeighteenth century the Timucua along with the rest of the SpanishIndians of Florida were decimated rapidly and the remnant of thePotano must have shared their fate. (See Utina.)Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates the number of PotanoIndians at 3,000 in 1650 and this is probably fairly accurate, as theFranciscan missionaries state that they were catechizing 1,100 personsin the 5 towns belonging to the tribe in 1602. In 1675 there wereabout 160 in the 2 Potano missions. (See Acuera and Utina.)Connection in which they have become noted.?The Potano tribe wasanciently celebrated as, with one or two possible exceptions, the mostpowerful of all the Timucua peoples.Saturiwa. Meaning unknown.Connections.? (See Utina.)Location.?About the mouth of St. Johns River. Some earlywriters seem to include Cumberland Island in their jurisdiction.VillagesLaudonnifere (1586) says that the chief of this tribe ruled over 30 subchiefs, butit is uncertain whether these subchiefs represented villages belonging to the tribe,allied tribes, or both. The Spaniards give the following: San Juan del Puerto, themain mission for this province under which were Vera Cruz, Arratobo, Potaya,San Matheo, San Pablo, Hicachirico ("Little Town"), Chinisca, and Carabay.San Diego de Salamototo, near the site of Picolata, on which no villages seem tohave depended; and Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe, 3 leagues from St. Augustine,may be classed here somewhat uncertainly.History.?The Saturiwa were visited by Jean Ribault in 1562 andprobably by earlier explorers, but they appear first under their propername in the chronicles of the Huguenot settlement of Florida of SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OP NORTH AMERICA 1391564-5. Fort Caroline was built in the territory of the Saturiwa andintimate relations continued between the French and Indians untilthe former were dispossessed by Spain. The chief, known as Saturiwaat this time, assisted De Gourgues in 1567 to avenge the destructionof his countrymen. It is perhaps for this reason that we find theSpaniards espousing the cause of Utina against Saturiwa 10 yearslater. The tribe soon submitted to Spain, however, and was one ofthe first missionized, its principal mission being San Juan del Puerto.There labored Francisco de Pareja to whose grammar and religiousworks we are chiefly indebted for our knowledge of the Timucualanguage (Pareja, 1612, 1613, 1886). Like the other Florida Indians,they sufi^ered severely from pestUence in 1617 and 1672. The nameof their chief appears among those involved in the Timucua rebellionof 1656, and the names of their missions appear in the list of BishopCalderdn and in that of 1680. We hear nothing more of them, andthey evidently suffered the same fate as the other tribes of the group . Population.?No separate figures for the Saturiwa have been pre-served, except that a missionary states in 1602 that there were about500 Christians among them and in 1675 San Juan del Puerto contained "about thirty persons" and Salamototo "about forty." (See Utina.)Connection in which they have become noted.?The prominence of theSaturiwa was due to the intimate dealings between them and theFrench colonists. Later the same people, though not under the samename, became a main support of the Spanish missionary movementamong the Florida Indians.Sawokli. A division of Creek Indians belonging to the Hitchiti-speaking group. Anciently it seems to have lived entirely inFlorida, but later it moved up into the neighborhood of the LowerCreeks. (See Alabama.)Seminole. Meaning "one who has camped out from the regulartowns," and hence sometimes given as "runaway," but there is toomuch onus in this rendering. Prof. H. E. Bolton believes it wasadopted from Spanish cimarron meaning "wild."IkanaMskalgi, "people of the point," a Creek name.Ikanidksalgi, "peninsula people," own name.Isti Seminole, "Seminole people."Lower Creeks, so called by Bartram (1792).Ungiay6-rono, "peninsula people," Huron name.Connections.?As implied above, the Seminole removed from theCreek towns and constituted just before the last Seminole War a fairrepresentation of the population of those towns: perhaps two-thirdsCreek proper or Muskogee, and the remaining third Indians of theHitchiti-speaking towns, Alabama, Yamasee, and besides a band of 140 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 14^Yuchi, latterly a few of the original Indian inhabitants of southernFlorida.Location.?The Seminole towns were first planted about Apalachi-cola River, in and near the old Apalachee country and in the Alachuacountry in the central part of the State, although a few were scatteredabout Tampa Bay and even well down the east coast as far south asMiami. They did not enter the Everglade section of the State untiltoward the end of the last Seminole War. As a result of that war, thegreater part were removed to the territory now constituting SeminoleCounty, Okla. A few remained in their old territory and their descend-ants are there today. VillagesAhapopka, near the head of Ocklawaha River.Ahosulga, 5 miles south of New Mikasuki, perhaps in Jefferson County.Alachua, near Ledwiths Lake.Alafiers, probably a synonym for some other town name, perhaps McQueen'sVillage, near Alafia River.Alapaha, probably on the west side of the Suwannee just above its junction withthe Allapaha.Alligator, said to be a settlement in Suwannee County.Alouko, on the east side of St. Marks River 20 miles north of St. Marks.Apukasasoche, 20 miles west of the head of St. Johns River.Attapulgas: first location, west of Apalachicola River in Jackson or CalhounCounties; second location inland in Gadsden County.Beech Creek, exact location unknown.Big Cypress Swamp, in the "Devil's Garden" on the northern edge of Big CypressSwamp, 15 to 20 miles southwest of Lake Okeechobee.Big Hammock, north of Tampa Bay.Bowlegs' Town, chief's name, on Suwannee River and probably known usuallyunder another name.Bucker Woman's Town, on Long Swamp east of Big Hammock.Burges' Town, probably on or near Flint or St. Marys River, southwesternGeorgia.Calusahatchee, on the river of the same name and probably occupied by CalusaIndians.Capola, east of St. Marks River.Catfish Lake, on a small lake in Polk County nearly midway between Lake Pierceand Lake Rosalie, toward the headwaters of Kissimmee River.Chefixico's Old Town, on the south side of Old Tallahassee Lake, 5 miles east ofTallahassee.Chetuckota, on the west bank of Pease Creek, below Pease Lake, west centralFlorida.Choconikla, on the west side of Apalachicola River, probably in Jackson County,Chohalaboohulka, probably identical with Alapaha.Chukochati, near the hammock of the same name.Cohowofooche, 23 miles northwest of St. Marks.Cow Creek, on a stream about 15 miles northeast of the entrance of KissimmeeRiver.Cuscowilla (see Alachua).Etanie, west of St. Johns River and east of Black Creek. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 141 Etotulga, 10 miles east of Old Mikasuki.Fish-eating Creek, 5 miles from a creek emptying into Lake Okeechobee.Fulemmy's Town, perhaps identical with Beech Creek, Suwannee River.Hatchcalamocha, near Drum Swamp, 18 miles west of New Mikasuki.Hiamonee, on the east bank of Ocklocknee River, probably on Lake lamonia.Hitchapuksassi, about 20 miles from the head of Tampa Bay and 20 miles south-east of Chukochati.Homosassa, probably on Homosassa River,lolee, 60 miles above the mouth of Apalachicola River on the west bank at ornear Blountstown.John Hicks' Town, west of Payne's Savannah.King Heijah's Town, or Koe Hadjo's Town, consisted of Negro slaves, probably inAlachua County.Lochchiocha, 60 miles east of Apalachicola River and near Ocklocknee River.Loksachumpa, at the head of St. Johns River.Lowwalta (probably for Liwahali), location unknown.McQueen's Village, on the east side of Tampa Bay, perhaps identical with Alafiers.Miami River, about 10 miles north of the site of Fort Dallas, not far from Bis-cayne Bay, on Little Miami River.Mulatto Girl's Town, south of Tuscawilla Lake.Negro Town, near Withlacoochee River, probably occupied largely by runawayslaves.New Mikasuki, 30 miles west of Suwannee River, probably in Madison County.Notasulgar, location unknown.Ochisi, at a bluff so called on the east side of Apalachicola River.Ochupocrassa, near Miami.Ocilla, at the mouth of Aucilla River on the east side.Oclackonayahe, above Tampa Bay.Oclawaha, on Ocklawaha River, probably in Putnam County.Oithlakutci, on Little River 40 miles east of Apalachicola River.Okehumpkee, 60 miles southwest from Volusia.Oktahatki, 7 miles northeast of Sampala.Old Mikasuki, near Miccosukee in Leon County.Oponays, "back of Tampa Bay," probably in Hillsboro or Polk Counties.Owassissas, on an eastern branch of St. Marks River and probably near its head.Payne's Town, near Koe Hadjo's Town, occupied by Negroes.Picolata, on the east bank of St. Johns River west of St. Augustine.Pilakhkaha, about 120 miles south of Alachua.Pilatka, on or near the site of Palatka, probably the site of a Seminole town andof an earlier town as well.Red Town, at Tampa Bay.Sampala, 26 miles above the forks of the Apalachicola on the west bank, inJackson County, or in Houston County, Ala.Santa Fe, on the river of the same name, perhaps identical with Washitokha.Sarasota, at or near Sarasota.Seleuxa, at the head of Aucilla River.Sitarky, evidently named after a chief, between Camp Izard and Fort King,West Florida.Spanawalka, 2 miles below lolee and on the west bank of Apalachicola River.Suwannee, on the west bank of Suwannee River in Lafayette County.Talakhacha, on the west side of Cape Florida on the seacoast.Tallahassee, on the site of present Tallahassee.Tallahassee or Spring Gardens, 10 miles from Volusia, occupied by Yuchi. 142 BUREAU OP AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Talofa Okhase, about 30 miles west southwest from the upper part of Lake George.Taluachapkoapopka, a short distance west of upper St. Johns River, probably atthe present Apopka.Tocktoethia, 10 miles above the junction of Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers.Tohopki lagi, probably near Miami.Topananaulka, 3 miles west of New Mikasuki.Topkegalga, on the east side of Ocklocknee River near Tallahassee.Totstalahoeetska, on the west side of Tampa Bay.Tuckagulga, on the east side of Ocklocknee River between it and Hiamonee.Tuslalahockaka, 10 miles west of Walalecooche.Wacahoota, location unknown.Wachitokha, on the east side of Suwannee River between Suwannee and Santa FeRivers.Wakasassa, on the coast east of the mouth of Suwannee River.Wasupa, 2 miles from St. Marks River and 18 miles from St. Marks itself.Wechotookme, location unknown.Welika, 4 miles east of the Tallahassee town.Wewoka, at Wewoka, Qkla.Willanoucha, at the head of St. Marks River, perhaps identical with Alouko.Withlacoochee, on Withlacoochee River, probably in Citrus or Sumter County.Withlako, 4 miles from Clinch's battle ground.Yalacasooche, at the mouth of Ocklawaha River.Yulaka, on the west side of St. Johns River, 35 miles from Volusia or Dexter.Yumersee, at the head of St. Marks River, 2 miles north of St. Marks, asettlement of Yamasee. (See Georgia.)History.?The origin of the Seminole has already been given (p.112). The nucleus of the nation was constituted by a part of theOconee, who moved into Florida about 1750 and were gradually fol-lowed by other tribes, principally of the Hitchiti connection. Thefirst true Muskogee to enter the peninsula were some of the Indiansof Lower Eufaula, who came in 1767^ but these were mixed withHitchiti and others. There was a second Muskogee immigration in1778, but after the Creek-American War of 1813-14 a much greaterimmigration occurred from the Creek Nation, mainly from the UpperTowns, and as the great majority of the newcomers were Muskogee,the Seminole became prevailingly a Muskogee people, what is nowcalled the Seminole language being almost pure Muskogee. Laterthere were two wars with the Whites; the first from 1817-18, in whichAndrew Jackson lead the American forces; and the second, from 1835to 1842, a long and bitter contest in which the Indians demonstratedto its fullest capacity the possibihties of guerrilla warfare in a semi-tropical, swampy country. Toward the end of the struggle the Indi-*ans were forced from northern and central Florida into the Evergladesection of the State. This contest is particularly noteworthy on ac-count of the personality of Osceola, the brains of Seminole resistance,whose capture by treachery is an ineffaceable blot upon all who wereconnected with it and incidentally upon the record of the American ' But see footnote p. 134. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 143Army. Diplomacy finally accomplished what force had failed toeffect?the policy put in practice by Worth at the suggestion of Gen-eral E. A. Hitchcock. The greater part of the hostile Indians sur-rendered and were sent to Oklahoma, where they were later granteda reservation of their own in the western part of the Creek Nation.Both the emigrants, who have now been allotted, and the small num-ber who stayed behind in Florida have since had an uneventful his-tory, except for their gradual absorption into the mass of the popu-lation, an absorption long delayed in the case of the Florida Seminolebut nonetheless certain.Population.?Before the Creek-American war the number of Semi-nole was probably about 2,000; after that date the best estimates giveabout 5,000. Exclusive of one census which seems clearly too high,figures taken after the Seminole war indicate a gradual reduction ofSeminole in Oklahoma from considerably under 4,000 to 2,500 in 1851.A new census, in 1857, gave 1,907, and after that time little change isindicated though actually the amount of Indian blood was probablydechning steadily. In Florida the figures were: 370 in 1847, 348 in1850, 450 in 1893, 565 in 1895, 358 in 1901, 446 in 1911, 600 in 1913,562 in 1914, 573 in 1919, 586 in 1937. In 1930 there were 1,789 inOklahoma, 227 in Florida, and 32 scattered in other States.Connection in which they have become noted.?The chief claim of thistribal confederation to distinction will always be the remarkable warwhich they sustained against the American Nation, the losses in menand money which they occasioned having been out of all proportion tothe number of Indians concerned. The county in Oklahoma wheremost of the Seminole were sent at the end of the great war bearstheir name, as does a county in Florida, and it will always be asso-ciated with the Everglade country, where they made their last stand.Towns or post villages of the name are in Baldwin County, Ala.;Seminole County, Okla. ; Armstrong County, Pa.; and Gaines County,Tex.Sarruque. Meaning unknow^l.Connections.?Somewhat doubtful, but they were probably of theTimucuan linguistic group. (See Utina.)Location.?At or very close to Cape Canaveral.History.?The Surruque appear first in history as the "Sorrochos"of Le Moyne's map (1875), and his "Lake Sarrope" also probablyderived its name from them. About the end of the same century,the sixteenth, trouble arose between them and the Spaniards, inconsequence of which the Spanish governor fell upon a Surruque town,killed 60 persons and captured 54. Later they probably united withthe Timucua people and shared their fortunes.Population.?No estimate is possible. (See Utina.) 144 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Tacatacuru. The meaning is unknown, though it seems to have some-thing to do with "fire" (taca).Connections.? (See Utina.)Location.?On Cumberland Island to which the name Tacatacuruwas applied. VillagesIt is probable that the same name was used for its chief town, which wasmissionized by the Spaniards under the name of San Pedro Mocama. Underthis mission were those of Santo Domingo and Santa Maria de Sena.History.-?The chief of Tacatacuru (now Cumberland Island), or ofthe neighboring mainland, met Jean Ribault in 1562 and seems tohave remained on good terms with the French during their occupancyof Fort Caroline in 1564-65. He, or a successor, is mentioned amongthose who joined De Gourgues in his attack upon the Spaniards in1567, but soon afterward they made peace with Spain and one chief,Don Juan, was of great assistance to the white men in many ways,particularly in driving back the Guale Indians after their rising in1597. This chief died in 1600, and was succeeded by his niece. Thechurch built by these Indians was said to be as big as that in St.Augustine. The good relations which subsisted between the Tacata-curu Indians and the Spaniards do not appear to have been brokenby the Timucua rebellion of 1656. By 1675 the tribe had abandonedCumberland Island and it was occupied by Yamasee. The missionof San Pedro Mocama consequently does not appear in the missionhst of 1680, although it is in that of 1655.* The tribe was subsequentlyamalgamated with the other Timucua peoples and shared theirfortunes. (See Utina.)Population.?There is no estimate of the number of Tacatacurudistinct from that of the other Timucua. The missionary stationedamong them in 1602 notes that there were then 8 settlements and792 Christianized Indians in his province, but this province may nothave been confined to the tribe. In that year Santo Domingoserved 180 Christians and Santa Maria de Sena 112.Tawasa. Meaning unkno^vn.Connections.?They spoke a dialect belonging to the Timucuandivision of the Muskhogean linguistic family, intermediate betweenTimucua proper and Choctaw, Hitchiti, Alabama, and Apalachee.Location.?In 1706-7 in west Florida about the latitude of thejunction of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers; at an earlier timeand again later they were on the Alabama near the present Mont-gomery. (See also Louisiana.) * I have stated elsewhere (Swanton, 1946, p. 187) that the name of this mission was wanting In the listdrawn up in 1665. I should have given the date as 1680. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 145 VillagesThey usually occupied only one town but Autauga on Autauga Creek in thesoutheastern part of Autauga County, Ala., is said to have belonged to them.History.?De Soto found the Tawasa near the Montgomery site in1540. Some time during the next century and a half they moved tothe neighborhood of Apalachicola River, but in 1707 they wereattacked by the Creeks, who captured some of them, while thegreater part fled to the French and were by them given lands nearthe present Mobile. They occupied several different sites in thatneighborhood but in 1717 they moved back to the region whereDe Soto found them, their main village being in the northwesternsuburbs of the present Montgomery. After the Treaty of FortJackson in 1814, they were compelled to abandon this place and moveinto the Creek territories between the Coosa and Talapoosa Rivers,where they remained until the main migration beyond the Mississippi.Previous to this, some of them had gone with other Alabama intoLouisiana and they followed their fortunes. The name was remem-bered by Alabama in Polk County, Tex., until within a few years.Population.?The French census of 1760 returned 40 Tawasa menand the Georgia census of 1792 "about 60." The census of 1832-33gives 321 Indians in towns called Tawasa and Autauga, but all ofthese were quite certainly not Tawasa Indians in the strict apphcationof that term. (See Alabama.)Connection in which they have become noted.?The Tawasa tribe willbe remembered ethnologically on account of the rescue of so muchimportant information regarding the early history of themselves andtheir neighbors through the captive Indian Lamhatty {in Bushnell,1908), who made his way into Virginia in 1708, and on account ofthe still more important vocabulary obtained from him.Tekesta or Tequesta. Meaning unknown.Connections.?The language of this tribe was probably connectedwith the languages of the other peoples of the southeast coast ofFlorida and with that of the Calusa, and may have been Muskhogean.Locati&n.?In the neighborhood of Miami.VillagesBesides Tekesta proper, the main town, four villages are mentioned betweenthat and the next tribe to the north, the Jeaga, to whom some of the villages mayhave belonged. These were, in order from south to north: Tavuacio, Janar,Cabista, and Custegiyo.History.?The Tekesta do not appear in history much before thetime of Fontaneda, who was a captive among the Calusa from 1551to 1569. In 1566 we learn that they protected certain Spaniardsfrom the Calusa chief, although the latter is sometimes regarded as 146 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145their overlord. A post was established in their country in 1566 butabandoned 4 years later. Attempts made to convert them to Chris-tianity at that time were without success. In 1573 they are said tohave been converted by Pedro Menendez Marques, but later theyreturned to their primitive beliefs. It was these Indians who, accord-ing to Romans (1775), went to Cuba in 1763 along with some othersfrom this coast.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that in 1650 there were1 ,000 Indians on the southeast coast of Florida. According to Romansthose who went to Cuba in 1763 had 30 men. Adair (1775) saysthere were 80 families.Connection in which they have become noted.?Although the name hasfound rlo topographical lodgement, the Tekesta may be rememberedas the earliest known body of people to occupy the site of Miami.Tocobaga. Meaning unknown, though toco means in Timucua "tocome out," "to proceed from."Connections.?(See Utina.)Location.?About Old Tampa Bay,VillagesThe main town was at or near Safety Harbor at the head of Old Tampa Bay.History.?Narvaez probably landed in the territory of this tribe in1528, but his chroniclers speak of meeting very few Indians. Elevenyears later De Soto's expedition disembarked just south in Tampa Baybut came into little contact with this tribe. Two years after drivingthe French from St. Johns River in 1565, Menendez visited Tocobaga,and left a captain and 30 soldiers among them, all of whom were wipedout the year following. In 1612 a Spanish expedition was sent topunish the chiefs of Pohoy and Tocobaga because they had attackedChristian Indians, but spent little time in the latter province. Thereis no assured reference to a mission nearer than Acuera, nor do theTocobaga appear among the tribes which participated in the greatTimucua revolt of 1656. Ultimately it is probable that they joinedthe other Timucua and disappeared with them, though they may haveunited with the Calusa. It is also possible that they are the"Tompacuas" who appear later in the Apalachee country, and if sothey may have been the Indians placed in 1726 in a mission nearSt. Augustine caUed San Buenaventura under the name "Macapiras"or "Amacapiras." (See Utina.)Population.?Unknown. (See Utina.)Connection in which they have become noted.?The principal claim tonotoriety on the part of the Tocobaga is the fact that Narvaez landedin their country in 1528. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 147Ucita, see Pohoy.Utina or Timucua. The first name, which probably refers to thechief and means "powerful," is perhaps originally from iiti, "earth,"while the second name, Timucua, is that from which the linguisticstock, or rather this Muskhogean subdivision of it, has receivedits name.Connections.?As given above.Location.?The territory of the Utina seems to have extended fromthe Suwannee to the St. Johns and even eastward of the latter,though some of the subdivisions given should be rated as independenttribes. (See Timucua under Georgia.)TownsLaudonni^re (1586) states that there were more than 40 under the Utina chief,but among them he includes "Acquera" (Acuera) and Moquoso far to the southand entirely independent, so that we are uncertain regarding the status of theothers he gives, which are as follows: Cadecha, Calanay, Chilili, Eclauou, Molona,Omittaqua, and Onachaquara.As the Utina, with the possible exception of the Potano, was the leading Timucuadivision and gave its name to the wliole, and as the particular tribe to wlilcheach town mentioned in the documents belonged cannot be given, it will be wellto enter all here, although those that can be placed more accurately will beinserted in their proper places.In De Soto's time Aguacaleyquen or Caliquen seems to have been the principaltown. In the mission period we are told that the chief lived at Ayaocuto. .\cassa, a town inland from Tampa Bay.Aguacaleyquen, a town in the province of Utina between Suwannee and SantaFe Rivers.Ahoica, probably near the Santa Fe River.Alachepoyo, inland from Tampa Bay.Alatico, probably on Cumberland Island.Albino, 40 leagues or 4 days inland from St. Augustine and within lYz to 2leagues of two others called Tucuro and Utiaca.Alimacani, on an island of the same name not far north of the mouth of St.Johns River.Amaca, inland from Tampa Bay.Anacapa, in the Fresh Water Province 20 leagues south of St. Augustine.Anacharaqua, location unknown.Antonico, in the Fresh Water Province.Apalu, in the province of Yustaga.Arapaja, 70 leagues from St. Augustine, Probably on Alapaha River.Araya, south of the Withlacoochee River.Archaha, location unknown.Assile, on or near Aucilla River.Astina, location unknown.Atuluteca, probably near San Pedro or Cumberland Island.Ayacamale, location unknown.Ayaocute, in the Utina country 34 leagues from St. Augustine.Ayotore, inland from Cumberland Island and probably southwest.Beca, location unknown. 148 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145Becao, location unknown.Bejesi, location unknown, perhaps the Apalachee town of Wacissa.Cachipile, 70 leagues west of St. Augustine.Qacoroy, south of St. Augustine and 1}4 leagues from Nocoroco, probably in theFresh Water Province.Cadecha, allied with Utina.Calany, allied with Utina.Caparaca, south of St. Augustine, southwest of Nocoroco and probably in theFresh Water Province.Casti, location unknown.Cayuco, near Tampa Bay.Chamini, 70 leagues west of St. Augustine.Chimaucayo, south of St. Augustine.Chinica, 134 leagues from St. Augustine.Cholupaha, south of Aguacaleyquen in the Potano Province.Chuaquin, 60 leagues west of St. Augustine.Cicale, south of St. Augustine and 3 leagues south of Nocoroco, perhaps in theFresh Water Province.Cilili, said to be a Utina town.Colucuchia, several leagues south of Nocoroco.Coya, location unknown.Disnica, south of St. Augustine, perhaps should be Tisnica.Egalamototo, on the site of Picolata.Egita, near Tampa Bay, possibly a variant of Ocita.Eclauou, location unknown.Edelano, on an island of the same name in St. Johns River.Elajay, location unknown, perhaps Calusa.Elanogue, in the Fresh Water Province near Antonico.Emola, location unknown.Enecaque, location unknown.Equale, in the Fresh Water Province.Ereze, inland from Tampa Bay.Esquega, a town or tribe on the west coast.Exangue, near Cumberland Island.Filache, in the Fresh Water Province.Guacara, on Suwannee River in northwestern Florida.Guagoco, probably a town on a plain so called in the Urriparacoxl country.Heliocopile, location unknown.Helmacape, location unknown.Hicachirico ("Little town"), one league from the mission of San Juan del Puerto,which was probably at the mouth of St. Johns River in the Saturiwa Province.Hiocaia, the probable name of a town giving its name to a chief, location unknown.Huara, inland from Cumberland Island.Itaraholata, south of Potano, Potano Province.Juraya, a rancheria, apparently in the Timucua territory.Laca, another name for Egalamototo.Lamale, inland from Cumberland Island.Luca, between Tampa Bay and the Withlacoochee River in the Urriparacoxicountry.Machaba, 64 leagues from St. Augustine, near the northern border of the Timucuacountry inland.Maiaca, the town of the Fresh Water Province most distant from St. Augustine,a few leagues north of Cape Canaveral and on St. Johns River. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 149Malaca, south of Nocoroco.Marracou, location unknown.Mathiaqua, location unknown.Mayajuaca, near Maiaca.Mayara, on lower St. Johns River.Mocama, possibly a town on Cumberland Island, province of Tacatacuru, butprobably a province.Mogote, south of St. Augustine in the region of Nocoroco.Moloa, on the south side of St. Johns River near its mouth, province of Saturiwa.Napa, on an island one league from Cumberland Island.Napituca, north of Aguacalej-quen, province of Utina.Natobo, a mission station and probably native town 2}^ leagues from San Juandel Puerto at the mouth of St. Johns River, province of Saturiwa.Nocoroco, at the mouth of a river, perhaps Halifax River, one day's journey southof Matanzas Inlet, Fresh Water Province.Ocale, in a province of the same name in the neighborhood of the present Ocala.O^ita, probably on Terra Ceia Island, on Hillsborough Bay.Onathaqua, a town or tribe near Cape Canaveral.Osigubede, a chief and probably town on the west coast.Panara, inland from Cumberland Island.Parca, location unknown.Patica, on the seacoast 8 leagues south of the mouth of St. Johns River.Patica, on the west bank of St. Johns River in the Utina territory.Pebe, a chief and probably a town on the west coast.Pentoaya, at the head of Indian River.Perquymaland, south of Nocoroco; possibly the names of two towns, Perqui andMaland, run together.Pia, on the east coast south of Nocoroco.Pitano, a mission station and probably a native town a league and a half fromPuturiba.Pohoy, a town or province, or both, at Tampa Bay, and perhaps a sj-nonym ofO^ita.Potano, the principal town of the Potano tribe, on the Alachua plains.Potaya, 4 leagues from San Juan del Puerto at the mouth of St, Johns River.Puala, near Cumberland Island.Punhuri, inland from Cumberland Island.Puturiba, probably near the northern end of Cumberland Island, province ofTacatacuru. There was another town of the same name west of the SuwanneeRiver.Sabobche, near the coast south of Nocoroco.Saint Julian, in the Fresh Water Province.San Mateo, about 2 leagues from San Juan del Puerto at the mouth of St. JohnsRiver, province of Saturiwa.San Pablo, about l}^ leagues from San Juan del Puerto, province of Saturiwa.San Sebastian, on an arm of the sea near St. Augustine.Sarauahi, a quarter of a league from San Juan del Puerto.Sena, on an "inlet" north of the mouth of St. Johns River, perhaps Amelia River.Siyagueche, near Cape Canaveral.Socochuno, location unknown.Soloy, not far from St. Augustine and probably on the river called Seloy by theFrench.Surruque, a town or tribe near Cape Canaveral. 150 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Tacatacuru, the name of Cumberland Island and Province, and perhaps of thechief town, on the mainland side of the island near the southern end, 2 leaguesfrom the Barra de San Pedro.Tafocole, inland from Tampa Bay.Tahupa, inland from Cumberland Island.Tanpacaste, a chief and perhaps town north of Pohoy, i. e., north of Tampa Bay.Tarihica, 54 leagues from St. Augustine, and perhaps in the Onatheaqua Province.Tocaste, on a large lake south of the Withlacoochee River, province of Urri-paracoxi.Tocoaya, very near Cumberland Island.Tocobaga, the chief town of the province so called, in Safety Harbor, Tampa Bay.Tocoy, in the Fresh Water Province 5 leagues south of St. Augustine.Tolapatafi, probably toward the west coast of the peninsula of Florida nearAucilla River.Toloco, location unknown.Tomeo, near the Fresh Water Province.Tucura, near the Fresh Water Province.Tucuro, see Abino.Tunsa, possibly a synonym of Antonico.Ujachile, a town or tribe in the Yustaga Province, perhaps the mother town ofthe Osochi.Uqueten, the southernmost village of the province of Ocale on WithlacoocheeRiver entered by De Soto.Urica, 60 leagues from St. Augustine.Uriutina, just north of the river of Aguacaleyquen, perhaps at Lake City.Urubia, near Cape Canaveral and lyi leagues from the town of Surruque.Utayne, inland from Cumberland Island.Utiaca, see Abino.Utichini, inland from Cumberland Island and within a league and a half ofPuturiba.Utinamocharra, 1 day's journey north of Potano, Potano Province.Vera Cruz, half a league from San Juan del Puerto, province of Saturiwa.Vicela, a short distance south of Withlacoochee River, province of Urriparacoxi.Xapuica, near the Quale country, perhaps a synonym of Caparaca.Xatalalano, inland from Cumberland Island.Yaocay, near Antonico in the Fresh Water Province.Ycapalano, inland from Cumberland Island and probably within half a league ora league of Puturiba.Yufera, inland and probably northwest from Cumberland Island.History.?The Utina were evidently tliose Indians occupying theprovince called Aguacaleyquen which De Soto passed through in 1539.In 1564 the French came in contact with them after the establislimentof Fort Caroline. On one occasion they sent a contingent to helpthem defeat the neighboring Potano. After the Spaniards had sup-planted the French, the Timucua allied themselves with the formerand in 1576 or 1577 a body of soldiers was sent to support them againstseveral neighboring tribes. They were missionized at a comparativelyearly date, and afterward followed the fortunes of the rest of theTimucua.Following is a brief over-all sketch of the history of the tribes consti- SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 151tuting the Timucuan group. They first came mto contact withEuropeans during Ponce de Leon's initial expedition in 1513 when thepeninsula and subsequently the State received its name. Narvaez in1528 and De Soto in 1539 passed through the country of the westerntribes. Ribault visited those on and near St. Johns River in 1562, andthe French settlers of Fort Caroline on that river in 1564-65 were inclose contact with them. A considerable part of our knowledgeregarding these Indians is contained in the records of that colony.The Spaniards supplanted the French in 1565 and gradually conqueredthe Timucua tribes while the Franciscans missionized them. Ourknowledge of the Timucua language is derived mainly from religiousworks by the missionaries Pareja and Mouilla and a grammar com-piled by the former. During the early half of the seventeenth centurythe missions were in a flourishing condition but a general rebellion in1656 occasioned some losses by death and exile. They also sufferedseverely from pestilences which raged in the missions in 1613-17,1649-50, and 1672. It is probable that some decline in populationtook place even before the great rebellion but that and the epidemicsoccasioned considerable losses. Toward the end of the seventeenthcentury, however, all the Florida Indians began to suffer from theinvasion of Creek and Yuchi Indians to the northward, and this wasaccentuated after the break-up of the Apalachee in 1704 by theexpedition under Moore. Most of the remaining Timucua were thenconcentrated into missions near St. Augustine, but this did not secureimmunity against further attacks by the English and their Indianallies. Sometime after 1736 the remnants of these people seem to haveremoved to a stream in the present Volusia County which in theform Tomoka bears their name. Here they disappear from history,and it is probable that they were swallowed up by the invadingSeminole.Population.?The Timucua, in the wide extent of the term, areestimated by Mooney (1928) to have numbered 13,000 in 1650,including 3,000 Potano, 1,000 Hostaqua, 8,000 Timucua proper andtheir allies, and 1,000 Tocobaga. In a letter dated February 2, 1635,it is asserted that 30,000 Christian Indians were connected with the44 missions then maintained in the Quale and Timucua provinces.While this figure is probably too high, it tends to confirm Mooney's(1928) estimate. In 1675 Bishop Calder6n of Cuba states that heconfirmed 13,152 in the four provinces of Timucua, Quale, Apalache,and Apalachicoli, but Qovernor Salazar estimates only 1,400 in theTimucua missions that year. Later, pestilences decimated the Timu-cua very rapidly, and their ruin was completed by attacks of theEnglish and the northern Indians, so that by 1728 the single townwhich seems to have contained most of the survivors had but 15 men 152 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145and 20 women. Eight years later 17 men were reported there. Notlong after this time the tribe disappears entirely, though it is highlyprobable that numbers of individuals who had belonged to it hadmade their homes with other Indians.As to the Utina tribe by itself, we have a missionary letter dated1602 which estimates its population as 1,500, in this case probably anunderstatement.Connection in which they have become noted.?This tribe, known asthe Utina or Timucua, is noteworthy (1) for having given its name tothe peoples of the Timucuan or Timuquanan stock now regarded aspart of the Muskogean family, and (2) as having been, next perhapsto the Potano, the most powerful tribe constituting that stock.The Timucuan group has left its name in that of the river abovementioned.Yamasee. Some tribes aflBliated with the Yamasee settled in theApalachee country in the latter part of the seventeenth century.The great body came to Florida from South Carolina after their warwith the English colonists in 1715, and most of them remained inthe northeastern part of the peninsula. Their final appearance isas the Ocklawaha band of Seminole. Part of them moved west,however, and settled near Mobile, and either this or a third partylived among the Creeks for a time, after which they seem to havereturned to west Florida, where they were represented by the"Yumersee" town of the Seminole. A considerable number of themwere captured by the Creek Indians and incorporated with them.(See Georgia.)Yuchi. In the seventeenth century a body of Yuchi establishedthemselves west of Apalachicola River, but moved north to jointhe Upper Creeks before 1761. At a much later date a body ofeastern Yuchi joined the Seminole and in 1823 had a settlementcalled Tallahassee or Spring Gardens 10 miles from Volusia. Theyprobably moved to Oklahoma at the end of the last Seminole war.(See Georgia.)Yufera. This is the name of a town or group of towns reported aslocated somewhere inland from Cumberland Island, and perhaps inthe present territory of Georgia. The name is derived throughTimucua informants but it may have referred to a part of the Mus-kogee tribe called Eufaula.Yui. Meaning unknown.Connections.?(See Utina.)Location.?On the mainland 14 leagues inland from CumberlandIsland and probably in the southeastern part of the present state ofGeorgia. SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 153 VillagesThey had five villages but the names of these are either unknown or unidenti-fiable.History.?The name of the Yui appears first in Spanish documents.They were visited by the missionary at San Pedro (CumberlandIsland) and appear to have been Christianized early in the seventeenthcentury. No individual mission bore their name and they, are soonlost sight of, their history becoming that of the other Timucua tribes.Popvlation.?The missionaries estimated more than 1,000 Indiansin this province in 1602. (See Utina.)Yustaga. Meaning unknown.Connections.?No words of the Yustaga language have beenpreserved but circumstantial evidence indicates they belonged to theTimucuan branch of the Muskhogean linguistic stock, althoughoccasionally the provinces of Timucua and Yustaga are spoken of asif distinct.Location.?Approximately between Aucilla and Suwannee Rivers,somewhat toward the coast. VillagesThe Yustaga villages cannot be satisfactorily identified though the missions ofAsile, San Marcos, Machaba, and San Pedro seem to have belonged to it.History.?The Yustaga are first mentioned by Biedma {in Bourne,1904), one of the chroniclers of De Soto, who gives the title to a "province" through which the Spaniards marched just before comingto Apalachee. While the French Huguenots were on St. Johns River,some of them visited this tribe, and later it is again mentioned by theSpaniards but no mission bears the name. Its history is soon mergedin that of the Timucuan peoples generally. The last mention of thename appears to be in 1659. It is of particular interest as the provincefrom which the Osochi Indians who settled among the Lower Creeksprobably emigrated in 1656 or shortly afterward.Population.?In 1675, 40 Indians were reported in the mission ofAsile and 300 in each of the others, giving a total very close toMooney's (1928) estimate of 1,000 as of the year 1600.ALABAMAAbihka, see Creek Confederacy and Muskogee.Alabama. Perhaps connected with the native word "albina," mean-ing "to camp," or alba amo, "weed gatherer," referring to the blackdrink. Also called:Ma'-mo a?-ya -di, or Ma'-mo ha?-ya, by the Biloxi.Oke-choy-atte, given by Schoolcraft (1851-57), the name of an Alabamatown, Oktcaiutci. 154 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Connections.?The Alabama language belonged to the southerndivision of the Muskhogean stock, and was perhaps connected withthe tongues of the Muklasa and Tuskegee, which have not been pre-served. It was closely related to Koasati and more remotely toHitchiti and Choctaw,Location.?The principal historic seat of this tribe was on the uppercoiu-se of Alabama River. (See also Florida, Louisiana, Oklahoma,and Texas.) SubdivisionsThe Tawasa and Pawokti, which later formed two Alabama towns, were origi-nally independent tribes (see under Florida), though the former, at least, was notproperly Alabama. The same may have been true of some other Alabama towns,though we have no proof of the fact. VillagesBesides the above:Autauga, on the north bank of Alabama River about the mouth of Autauga Creekin Autauga County.Kantcati, on Alabama River about 3 miles above Montgomery and on the sameside.Nitahauritz, on the north side of Alabama River west of the confluence of theAlabama and Cahawba Rivers in Dallas County.Okchayutci, in Benjamin Hawkins' time (about 1800) on the east bank of CoosaRiver between Tuskegee and the Muskogee town of Otciapofa. (See Hawkins,1848, 1916.)Wetumpka, a branch village reported in 1761,History.?Native tradition assigns the origin of the Alabamato a point at the confluence of Alabama and Tombigbee Rivers, butwe seem to hear of the tribe first historically in what is now northernMississippi west of the Chickasaw countiy. This is in the narrativesof De Soto's chroniclers, which, however, do not altogether agree,since one writer speaks of a province of the name, two others bestowthe designation upon a small village, and only Garcilaso (1723), theleast reliable, gives the title Fort Alibamo to a stockade?west of thevillage above mentioned?where the Spaniards had a severe combat.While this stockade was probably held by Alabama Indians, thereis no certainty that it was. The next we hear of the tribe it is inits historic seats above given. After the French had establishedthemselves at Mobile they became embroiled in some small affraysbetween the Alabama and Mobile Indians, but peace was presentlyestablished and thereafter the French and Alabama remained goodfriends as long as French rule continued. This friendship wascemented in 1717 by the establishment of Fort Toulouse in theAlabama country and the admission among them of one, or probablytwo, refugee tribes, the Tawasa and Pawokti. (See Florida.) About1763 a movement toward the west began on the part of those Indiana SWANTONJ INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 155who had become accustomed to French rule. Some Alabama joinedthe Seminole in Florida. Others accompanied the Koasati to Tom-bigbee River but soon returned to their own country. Still anotherbody went to Louisiana and settled on the banks of the MississippiRiver, where they were probably joined from time to time by more.Later they advanced further toward the west and some are stillscattered in St. Landry and Calcasieu Parishes, but the greatestsingle body finally reached Polk County, Tex., where they occupya piece of land set aside for them by the State. Those who remainedbehind took a very prominent part in the Creek-American War andlost aU their land by the treat}^ of Fort Jackson, 1814, being obligedto make new settlements between the Coosa and Tallapoosa. Theyaccompanied the rest of the Creeks to Oklahoma, and their des-cendants are to be found there today, principally about a littlestation bearing the name just south of Weleetka.Population.?In 1702 Iberville {in Margry, 1875-86, vol. 4, p. 514)estimated that there were 400 families of Alabama in two villages,and the English census of 1715 gives 214 men and a total populationof 770 in four villages. These figures must have been exclusiveof the Tawasa and Pawokti, which subsequent estimates include.About 1730-40 there is an estimate of 400 men in six towns. In1792 the number of Alabama men is given as 60, exclusive of 60Tawasa, but as this last included Kantcati the actual proportionof true Alabama was considerably greater. Hawkins, in 1799, esti-mated 80 gunmen in four Alabama towns, including Tawasa andPawokti, but he does not include the population of Okchaiyutci.(See Hawkins, 1848.) In 1832 only two towns are entered which maybe safely set down as Alabama, Tawasa and Autauga, and these hada population of 321 besides 21 slaves. The later figures given abovedo not include those Alabama who had moved to Louisiana. In 1805Sibley (1832) states there were two villages in Louisiana with 70men; in 1817 Morse (1822) gives 160 Alabama all told in Texas,but this is probably short of the truth. In 1882 the United StatesIndian Office reported 290 Alabama, Koasati, and Muskogee inTexas, the larger number of whom were probably Alabama. In 1900the figure is raised to 470. In 1910 a special agent from the IndianOffice reported 192 Alabama alone. The census of 1910 gave 187in Texas and 111 in Louisiana, a total of 298. The 176 "Creek"Indians returned from Polk County, Tex., in 1930, were mainlyAlabama. The number of Alabama in Oklahoma has never beenseparately reported.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Alabama attainedearly literary fame from Garcilaso de la Vega's (1723) description 156 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 of the storming of "Fort Alibamo." Their later notoriety hasrested upon the fact that their name became attached to AlabamaRiver, and still more from its subsequent adoption by the Stateof Alabama. A railroad station in Oklahoma is named after them,and the term has been appUed to places in Genesee County, N. Y.,and in Polk County, Wis. There is an Alabama City in EtowahCounty, Ala., and Alabam in Madison County, Ark.Apalachee. A part of this tribe lived for a time among the LowerCreeks and perhaps in this State, Another section settled nearMobile and remained there until West Florida was ceded to GreatBritain when they crossed the Mississippi. A few seem to havejoined the Creeks and migrated with them to Oklahoma. (SeeFlorida.)Apalachicola. Very early this tribe lived on the Apalachicola andChattahoochee Rivers, partly in Alabama. Sometime after 1715they settled in Russell County, on the Chattahoochee River w^herethey occupied at least two different sites before removing with therest of the Creeks to the other side of the Mississippi. (See Georgia.)Atasi. A division or subtribe of the Muskogee (q. v.).Chatot. This tribe settled near Mobile after having been drivenfrom Florida and moved to Louisiana about the same time asthe Apalachee. (See Florida.)Cherokee. In the latter part of the eighteenth century some Cher-okee worked their way down the Tennessee River as far as MuscleShoals, constituting the Chickamauga band. They had settlementsat Turkeytown on the Coosa, WiUstown on Wills Creek, andColdwater near Tuscumbia, occupied jointly with the Creeks anddestroyed by the Whites in 1787. All of their Alabama territorywas surrendered in treaties made between 1807 and 1835. (SeeTennessee.)Chickasaw. The Chickasaw had a few settlements in northwesternAlabama, part of which State was within their huntmg territories.At one time they also had a town called Ooe-asa (Wi-aca) amongthe Upper Creeks. (See Mississippi.)Choctaw. This tribe hunted over and occupied, at least temporarily,parts of southwestern Alabama beyond the Tombigbee. (SeeMississippi.)Creek Confederacy. This name is given to a loose organizationwhich constituted the principal political element in the territory ofthe present States of Georgia and Alabama from very early times,probably as far back as the period of De Soto. It was built around SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 157 a dommant tribe, or rather a group of dominant tribes, calledMuskogee. The name Creek early became attached to thesepeople because when they were first known to the Carolina colonistsand for a considerable period afterward the body of them whichthe latter knew best was living upon a river, the present Ocmulgee,called by Europeans "Ocheese Creek." The Creeks were earlydivided geographically into two parts, one called Upper Creeks, onthe Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers; the other, the Lower Creeks, onthe lower Chattahoochee and Ocmulgee. The former were alsodivided at times into the Coosa branch or Abihka and the Talla-poosa branch and the two were called Upper and Middle Creeksrespectively. Bartram (1792) tends to confuse the student bydenominating all of the true Creeks "Upper Creeks" and theSeminole "Lower Creeks." The dominant Muskogee graduallygathered about them?and to a certain extent under them?theApalachicola, Hitchiti, Okmulgee, Sawokli, Chiaha, Osochi, Yuchi,Alabama, Tawasa, Pawokti, Muklasa, Koasati, Tuskegee, a partof the Shawnee, and for a time some Yamasee, not counting brokenbands and families from various quarters. The first seven of theabove were for the most part among the Lower Creeks, theremainder with the Upper Creeks. (For further information, seethe separate tribal names under Alabama, Georgia, and Florida.)Eufaula. A division or subtribe of the Muskogee (q. v.).Fas-hatchee. A division of the Muskogee (q. v.).EUlibi. A division or subtribe of the Muskogee (q. v.).Hitchiti. This tribe lived for considerable period close to, and attimes within, the present territory of Alabama along its south-eastern margin. (See Georgia.)Ean-hatki. A division of the Muskogee (q. v.).Eealedji. A division of the Muskogee (q. v.).Koasati. Meaning unknown; often given as Coosawda and Cou-shatta, and sometimes abbreviated to Shati.Connections.?They belonged to the southern section of the Musk-hogean linguistic group, and were particularly close to the Alabama.Location.?The historic location of the Koasati was just below thejunction of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers to form the Alabamaand on the east side of the latter, where Coosada Creek and Stationstill bear the name. (See also Florida, Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas,and Oklahoma.) VillagesTwo Koasati towns are mentioned as having existed in very early times, oneof which may have been the Kaskinampo. (See Tennessee.) At a later period a 158 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145town known as Wetumpka on the east bank of Coosa River, in Elmore County,near the falls seems to have been occupied by Koasati Indians. During part ofits existence Wetumpka was divided into two settlements, Big Wetumpka on thesite of the modern town of the same name, and Little Wetumpka above the fallsof Coosa,History.?It is probable that from about 1500 until well along inthe seventeenth century, perhaps to its very close, the Koasati livedupon Tennessee River. There is good reason to think that they arethe Coste, Acoste, or Costehe of De Soto's chroniclers whose principalvillage was upon an island in the river, and in all probability thiswas what is now known as Pine Island. There is also a bare mentionof them in the narrative of Pardo's expedition of 1567 inland fromSanta Elena, and judging by the entries made upon maps publishedearly in the eighteenth century this tribe seems to have occupied thesame position when the French and English made their settlementsin the Southeast. About that time they were probably joined by therelated Kaskinampo. Not long after they had become known to theWhites, a large part of the Koasati migrated south and establishedthemselves at the point mentioned above. A portion seems to haveremained behind for we find a village called Coosada at Larkin'sLanding in Jackson County at a much later date. The main bodycontinued with the Upper Creeks until shortly after France ceded allof her territories east of the Mississippi to England in 1763, when alarge part moved to Tombigbee River. These soon returned to theirformer position, but about 1795 another part crossed the Mississippiand settled on Red River. Soon afterward they seem to have splitup, some continuing on the Red while others went to the Sabine andbeyond to the Neches and Trinity Rivers, Tex. At a later date afew Texas bands united with the Alabama in Polk County, wheretheir descendants still live, but most returned to Louisiana andgathered into one neighborhood northeast of Kinder, La. Thegreater part of the Koasati who remained in Alabama accompaniedthe Creeks to Oklahoma, where a few are still to be found. Previousto this removal, some appear to have gone to Florida to cast in theirlot with the Seminole.Population.?The earliest estimates of the Alabama Indians prob-ably included the Koasati. In 1750 they are given 50 men; in 1760,150 men. Marbury (1792) credits them with 130 men. In 1832,after the Louisiana branch had split off, those who remained numbered82 and this is the last separate enumeration we have. Sibley (1806)on native authority gives 200 hunters in the Louisiana bands; in1814 Schermerhorn estimates that there were 600 on the Sabine; in1817 Morse places the total Koasati population in Louisiana andTexas at 640; in 1829 Porter puts it at 180; m 1850 Bollaert gives thenumber of men in the two Koasati towns on Trinity River as 500. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 159In 1882 the United States Indian Office reported 290 Alabama,Koasati, and Muskogee in Texas, but the Census of 1900 raised thisto 470. The Census of 1910 returned 11 Koasati from Texas, 85from Louisiana, and 2 from Nebraska; those in Oklahoma werenot enumerated separately from the other Creeks. The 134 "Creeks"returned from Louisiana in 1930 were mainly Koasati.Connection in which they have become noted.?Coosada, a post villagein Elmore County, Ala., near the old Koasati town, and Coushatta,the capital of Red River Parish, La,, preserve the name of the Koasati.Kolomi. A division of the Muskogee (q. v.).Mobile. Meaning unknown, but Halbert (1901) suggests that itmay be from Choctaw moeli, "to paddle," since Mobile is pro-nounced moila by the Indians. It is the Mabila, Manilla, Mavila,or Mauvila of the De Soto chroniclers.Connections.?The language of the tribe was closely connected withthat of the Choctaw and gave its name to a trade jargon based uponChoctaw or Chickasaw.Location.?When the French settled the seacoast of Alabama theMobile were living on the west side of Mobile River a few miles be-low the junction of the Alabama and Tombigbee.History.?When they make their first appearance in history in 1540the Mobile were between the Alabama and Tombigbee Rivers, andon the east side of the former. Their chief, Tuscaloosa, was a verytall and commanding Indian with great influence throughout thesurrounding country. He inspired his people to attack the invadingSpaniards and a terrific battle was fought October 18, 1540, for thepossession of one of his fortified towns (Mabila), which the Spaniardscarried with heavy losses to themselves in killed and wounded, whileof the Indians 2,500 or more fell. It is probable that the village ofNanipacna, through which a force of Spaniards of the De Lunacolony passed in 1559, was occupied by some of the survivors of thistribe. At a later date they may have settled near Gees Bend of theAlabama River, in Wilcox County, because earl}^ French maps givea village site there which they call "Vieux Mobiliens." A Spanishletter of 1686 speaks of them as at war with the Pensacola tribe.When the French came into the country, the Mobile were, as statedabove, settled not far below the junction of the Tombigbee and Ala-bama. After a post had been established on the spot where Mobilestands today, the Mobile Indians moved down nearer to it and re-mained there until about the time when the English obtained posses-sion of the country. They do not appear to have gone to Louisianalike so many of the smaller tribes about them and were probablyabsorbed in the Choctaw Nation. 160 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Population.?After allowing for all exaggerations, the number ofMobUe Indians when De Soto fought with them must have been veryconsiderable, perhaps 6,000 to 7,000. Mooney (1928) estimates 2,000Mobile and Tohome in 1650, over a hundred years after the greatbattle. In 1702 Iberville states that this tribe and the Tohometogether embraced about 350 warriors; in 1725-26 Bienville (1932,vol. 3, p. 536), gives 60 for the Mobile alone, but in 1730 R^gis deRouillet (1732) cuts this in half. In 1758 De Kerl^rec (1907) esti-mates the number of warriors among the Mobile, Tohome, and Na-niaba at about 100.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Mobile haveattained a fame altogether beyond anything which their later numer-ical importance would warrant: (1) on account of the desperateresistance which they offered to De Soto's forces, and (2) from theimportant Alabama city to which they gave their name. There is aplace called Mobile in Maricopa County, Ariz.Muklasa. Meaning in Alabama and Choctaw, "friends," or "peopleof one nation."Connections.?Since the Muklasa did not speak Muskogee and theirname is from the Koasati, Alabama, or Choctaw language, and sincethey w^ere near neighbors of the two former, it is evident that theywere connected with one or the other of them.Location.?On the south bank of Tallapoosa River in MontgomeryCounty. (See Florida and Oklahoma.)History.?When we first hear of the Muklasa in 1675 they were inthe position above given and remained there until the end of theCreek-American War, when they are said to have emigrated to Floridain a body. Nothing is heard of them afterward, however, andalthough Gatschet (1884) states that there was a town of the namein the Creek Nation in the west in his time, I could learn nothing aboutit when I visited the Creeks in 1911-12.Population.?In 1760 the Muklasa are said to have had 50 men,in 1761, 30, and in 1792, 30. These are the only figures availableregarding their numbers.Muskogee. Meaning unknown, but perhaps originally from Shawneeand having reference to swampy ground. To this tribe the nameCreeks was ordinarily apphed. Also called:Ani'-Gu'sa, by the Cherokee, meaning "Coosa people," after an ancientand famous town on Coosa River.Ku-H'sha, by the Wyandot.Ochesee, by the Hitchiti.Sko'-ki ha?-ya, by the Biloxi.Connections.?The Muskogee language constitutes one division ofthe Muskhogean tongues proper, that which I call Northern. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 161 Location.?From the earliest times of which we have any recordthese people seem to have had to^vns aU the way from the Atlanticcoast of Georgia and the neighborhood of Savannah River to centralAlabama. (See also Florida, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Tennessee,and Texas.) Subdivt^ions and VillagesIt is difficult to separate major divisions of the Muskogee from towns andtowns from villages, but there were certainly several distinct Muskogee tribes ata very early period. The following subdivisional classification is perhaps as goodas any:Abihka (in St. Clair, Calhoun, and Talladega Counties):Abihka-in-the-west, a late branch of Abihka in the western part of the CreekNation, Okla.Abihkutci, on Tallassee Hatchee Creek, Talladega County, on the right bank5 miles from Coosa River.Kan-tcati, on or near Chocolocko, or Choccolocco, Creek and probably not farfrom the present "Conchardee."Kayomalgi, possibly settled by Shawnee or Chickasaw, probably near Sylacauga,Talladega County.Lun-ham-ga, location unknown.Talladega, on Talladega Creek, Talladega County.Tcahki lako, on Choccolocco Creek in Talladega or Calhoun County.Atasi: Location (1) on the upper Ocraulgee River, (2) on the Chattahoochee,(3) on the Tallapoosa in Tallapoosa County, (4) on the south side of the Talla-poosa in Macon County, and (5) on the north side near Calebee Creek inElmore County.Coosa:Abihkutci, a division of Okfuskee, which apparently came into existence afterthe Creeks had removed to Oklahoma.Atcinaulga, on the west bank of Tallapoosa River in Randolph County.Big Tulsa, on the east bank of Tallapoosa River at the mouth of Ufaubee Creekin Tallapoosa County.Chatukchufaula, possibly identical with the last, on Nafape Creek or TallapoosaRiver.Chuleocwhooatlee, on the left bank of Tallapoosa River, 11 miles below Nuyaka,in Tallapoosa County.Holitaiga, on Chattahoochee River in Troup County, Ga.Imukfa, on Emaufaw Creek in Tallapoosa Countj'.Ipisagi, on Sandy Creek in Tallapoosa County.Kohamutkikatsa, location unknown.Little Tulsa, on the east side of Coosa River, 3 miles above the falls, ElmoreCounty.Lutcapoga, perhaps near Loachapoka in Lee County, or on the upper Tallapoosa.Nafape, on a creek of the same name flowing into Ufaubee Creek.Okfuskee, location (1) at the mouth of Hillabee Creek, (2) at the mouth ofSand Creek, both in Tallapoosa County.Okfuskutci, (1) on Chattahoochee River in Troup County, Ga.; (2) on the upperTallapoosa in Tallapoosa County, Ala.; (3) another town of the name or anearlier location of the first somewhere near the lower Tallapoosa.Old Coosa, near the junction of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers. 162 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Otciapofa, on the east side of the Coosa River in Elmore County, just belowthe falls.Saoga-hatchee, on Saogahatchee Creek, in Tallapoosa or Lee County.Suka-ispoga, on the west bank of Tallapoosa River below the mouth of HillibeeCreek, in Tallapoosa Countj'.Tallassehasee, on Tallassee Hatchee Creek in Talladega County.Tcahkilako, on Chattahoochee River near Franklin, Heard County, Ga.Tcatoksofka, seemingly a later name of the main Okfuskee town.Tcawokela, 25 miles east northeast of the mouth of Upatoie Creek, probablynear Chewacla Station, Lee County.Tculakonini, on Chattahoochee River in Troup County, Ga.Tohtogagi, on the west bank of Tallapoosa River, probably in RandolphCounty.Tukabahchee Tallahassee, later called Talmutcasi, on the west side of Talla-poosa River in Tallapoosa County.Tukpafka, on Chattahoochee River in Heard County, Ga., later moved toTallapoosa, settled on the left bank 11 miles above Okfuskee, TallapoosaCounty, and renamed Nuyaka.Tulsa Canadian, a branch of Tulsa on the Canadian River, Okla.Tulsa Little River, a branch of Tulsa near Holdenville, Okla.Coweta (early location on the upper Ocmulgee, later on the west bank of Chatta-hoochee River in Russell County, Ala., opposite Columbus, Ga.):Coweta Tallahassee, later Likatcka or Broken Arrow, probably a former locationof the bulk of the tribe, on the west bank of Chattahoochee River in RussellCounty, Ala.Katca tastanagi's Town "at Cho-lose-parp-kari."Settlements on "Hallewokke Yoaxarhatchee."Settlements on "Toosilkstorkee Hatchee."Settlements on "Warkeeche Hatchee."Wetumpka, a branch of the last on the main fork of Big Uchee Creek 12 milesnorthwest from the mother town, Coweta Tallahassee.Eufaula:A branch among the Seminole called Kan-tcati. (See Florida, Seminole.)A branch village of Eufaula hopai on a creek called "Chowokolohatchee."Eufaulahatchee or Eufaula Old Town, on Talladega Creek, also called EufaulaCreek, 15 miles from its mouth.Lower Eufaula or Eufaula hopai, above the mouth of Pataula Creek, in ClayCounty, Ga.Upper Eufaula, on the right bank of Tallapoosa River 5 miles below Okfuskee,in Tallapoosa County?at one time separated into Big Eufaula and LittleEufaula.Hilibi (at the junction of Hillabee and Bear Creeks, Tallapoosa County) : Anetechapko, 10 miles above Hilibi on a branch of Hillabee Creek.Etcuseislaiga, on the left bank of Hillabee Creek, 4 miles below Hilibi.Kitcopataki, location unknown.Lanutciabala, on the northwest branch of Hillabee Creek, probably in Talla-poosa County.Little Hilibi, location unknown.Oktahasasi, on a creek of the name 2 miles below Hilibi.Holiwahali (on the north bank of Tallapoosa River in Elmore County):Laplako, on the south side of Tallapoosa in Montgomery County nearly oppositeHoliwahali. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 163Kasihta (best-known location on the east bank of Chattahoochee River, at thejunction of Upatoie Creek in Chattahoochee County, Ga.):Apatai, in the forks of Upatoie and Pine Knob Creeks in Muskogee County, Ga.Salenojuh, on Flint River 8 miles below Aupiogee Creek (?).Settlements bearing the same name (Kasihta).Settlements on Chowockeleehatchee Creek, Ala.Settlements on Little Uchee Creek, Ala.Settlements on "Tolarnulkar Hatchee."Sicharlitcha, location unknown.Tallassee Town, on Opillikee Hatchee, perhaps in Schley or Macon Counties,Ga.Tuckabatchee Harjo's Town, on Osenubba Hatchee, a west branch of theChattahoochee, Ala.Tuskehenehaw Chooley's Town, near West Point, Troup County, Ga.Okchai:Asilanabi, on Yellow Leaf Creek in Shelby County.Lalogalga, or Fish Pond, on a branch of Elkhatchee Creek, 14 miles up, inTallapoosa or Coosa County.Okchai, location (1) on the east side of the lower Coosa in Elmore County; (2)in the southeastern part of Coosa County, on a creek bearing their name,which flowed into Kialaga Creek.Potcas hatchee, probably a branch of this on the upper course of HatchetCreek in Clay or Coosa County.Tcahki lako, on Chattahoochee River.Tulsa hatchee, location uncertain.Pakana:Pakan Tallahassee, on Hatchet Creek, Coosa County.The Pakana who settled near Fort Toulouse at the junction of Coosa andTallapoosa Rivers and aftenvard moved to Louisiana, living on CalcasieuRiver for a while.Tukabahchee (in the sharp angle made where Tallapoosa River turns west inElmore County) : Only one small out village is mentioned, Wihili, location unknown.Wakokai (on the middle course of Hatchet Creek in Coosa County) : Sakapadai, probably on Sacapartoy, a branch of Hatchet Creek, Coosa County.Tukpafka, on Hatchet Creek, Coosa County.Wiogufki, on Weogufka Creek in Coosa County.Besides the Muskogee tribes noted above, there were the following:Fus-hatchee. Not a major division; on the north bank of Tallapoosa River inElmore County, 2 miles below HoHwahali. They may have been related tothe Holiwahali.Kan-hatki. Not a major division; just below Kolomi on the north bank ofTallapoosa River in Elmore County. Possibly related to the Holiwahali.Kealedji. Not a primary division; perhaps a branch of Tukabahchee; location(1) on the Ocmulgee, (2) on Kialaga Creek in Elmore County or TallapoosaCounty, having one branch Hatcheetcaba, west of Kealedji, probably in ElmoreCounty.Kolomi. Probably not a major division; location (1) on the Ocmulgee, (2) on themiddle Chattahoochee in Russell County, Ala., (3) on the north side of thelower Tallapoosa in Elmore County. They may have been related to theHoHwahali. 164 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull, 145Wiwohka. Not a primary division but a late town; location (1) near the mouthof Hatchet Creek in Coosa County, (2) on Weoka Creek in Elmore County.In addition to the above there were a number of towns and villages whichcannot be classified, or only with extreme doubt. They are as follows:Acpactaniche, on the headwaters of Coosa River, perhaps meant for Pakana.Alkehatchee, an Upper Creek town.Atchasapa, on Tallapoosa River not far below Tulsa, possibly for ' tcheechubba.Aucheucaula, in the northwestern part of Coosa County.Auhoba, below Autauga. (See Alabama.)Breed Camp, an Upper Creek town, probably meant for the Chickasaw settlementof Ooe-asa.Cauwaoulau, a Lower Creek village in Russell County west of Uchee Post Officeand south of the old Federal road.Chachane, the Lower Creek town farthest downstream.Chanahunrege, between the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers in or near Coosa County.Chananagi, placed by Brannon (1909) "in Bullock County, just south of theCentral of Georgia Railroad near Suspension."Chichoufkee, an Upper Creek town in Elmore County, east of Coosa River andnear Wiwoka Creek.Chinnaby's Fort, at Ten Islands in the Coosa River.Chiscalage, in or near Coosa County, perhaps a body of Yuchi.Cholocco Litabixee, in the Horseshoe Bend of Tallapoosa River.Chuahla, just below White Oak Creek, south of Alabama River.Cohatchie, in the southwestern part of Talladega County on the bank of CoosaRiver.Conaliga, in the western part of Russell County or the eastern part of Macon,somewhere near the present Warrior Stand.Cooccohapofe, on Chattahoochee River.Cotohautustenuggee, on the right bank of Upatoie Creek, Muscogee County, Ga.Cow Towns, location uncertain.Donnally's Town, on the Flint or the Chattahoochee River.Ekun-duts-ke, probably on the south bank of Line Creek in Montgomery County.Emarhe, location uncertain.Eto-husse-wakkes, on Chattahoochee River, 3 miles above Fort Gaines.Fife's Village, an Upper Creek village a few miles east of Talladega, Ala.Fin'halui, a Lower Creek settlement, perhaps the Yuchi settlement of High Log.Habiquache, given by the Popple Map as on the west side of Coosa River.Ikan atchaka, "Holy Ground," in Lowndes County, 2}^ miles due north of WhiteHall, just below the mouth of Holy Ground Creek on the Old Sprott Plantation.Istapoga, in Talladega County near the influx of Estaboga Creek into Choc-colocco Creek, about 10 miles from Coosa River.Kehatches, somewhere above the bend of Tallapoosa River and between it and theCoosa.Kerofif, apparently on the upper Coosa.Litafatchi, at the head of Canoe Creek in St. Clair County.Lustuhatchee, above the second cataract of Tallapoosa River.Melton's Village, in Marshall County, Ala., on Town Creek, at the site of thepresent "Old Village Ford."Ninnipaskulgee, near Tukabahchee.Nipky, probably a Lower Creek town.Oakchinawa Village, in Talladega County, on both sides of Salt Creek, near thepoint where it flows into Big Shoal Creek. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 165Old Osonee Town, on Cahawba River in Shelby Ck)unty.Opillako, on Pinthlocco Creek in Coosa County.Oti palin, on the west bank of Coosa River, just below the junction of Canoe Creek.(See Chinnaby's Fort.)Oti tutcina, probably between Coosa and OpiHako or Pakan Tallahassee and onCoosa River.Pea Creek, perhaps an out settlement of Tukabahchee, location unknown.Pin Huti, somewhere near Dadeville iu Tallapoosa County.Rabbit Town, possibly a nickname, location unknown.St. Taffery's, location unknown.Satapo, on Tennessee River.Talipsehogy, an Upper Creek settlement.Talishatchie Town, in Calhoun County east of a branch of Tallasehatchee Creek,3 miles southwest of Jacksonville.Tallapoosa, said to be within a day's journey of Fort Toulouse at the junction ofthe Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers and probably on the river of that name.Talwa Hadjo, on Cahawba River.Tohowogly, perhaps intended for Sawokli, 8 to 10 miles below the falls of theChattahoochee.Turkey Creek, in Jefferson County, on Turkey Creek north of Trussville, prob-ably Creek.Uncuaula, in the western part of Coosa County on Coosa River.Wallhal, an Upper Creek town given on the Purcell map, perhaps intended forEufaula, or an independent town on Wallahatchee Creek, Elmore County.WeyoUa, a town so entered on the Popple Map, between the Coosa and Tallapoosabut near the former; probably a distorted form of the name of some well-knownplace.History.?Muskogee tradition points to the northwest for the originof the nation. In the spring of 1540, De Soto passed through somesettlements and a "province" called Chisi, Ichisi, and Achese, insouthern Georgia, which may have been occupied by Muskogee becausethey are known to Hitchiti-speaking people as Ochesee. Somewhatlater he entered Cofitachequi, probably either the later Kasihta, orCoweta, and the same summer he entered Coosa and passed throughthe country of the Upper Creeks. Companions of De Luna visitedCoosa again in 1559 and assisted it in its wars with a neighboringtribe to the West, the Napochi. Cofitachequi was visited later byJuan Pardo and other Spanish explorers and some of Pardo's com-panions penetrated as far as Coosa. It is probable that part if notall of the province of Guale on the Georgia coast was at that time occu-pied by Muskogee, and relations between the Guale Indians and theSpaniards continued intimate from 1565 onward. Soon afterwardthe Spaniards also encountered the Creeks of Chattahoochee River.At what time the confederacy of which the Muskogee were the mostimportant part was estabhshed is unknown but the nucleus probablyexisted in De Soto's time. At any rate it was in a flourishing condi-tion in 1670 when South Carolina was colonized and probably con-tinued to grow more rapidly than before owing to the accession of 166 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Creek tribes displaced b}'' the 'Whites or other tribes whom the Whiteshad displaced. Before 1715 a large body were Hving on OcmulgeeRiver but following on the Yamasee outbreak of that year they with-drew to the Chattahoochee from which they had moved previouslyto be near the English trading posts. Occupying as they did a cen-tral position between the Enghsh, Spanish, and French colonies, thefavor of the Creeks was a matter of concern to these nations, and theyplayed a more important part than any other American Indians inthe colonial history of the Gulf region. For a considerable periodthey were allied with the English, and they were largely instrumentalin destroying the former Indian inhabitants of Florida and breakingup the missions which had been established there. Finding the terri-tory thus vacated very agreeable and one abounding in game, theypresently began to settle in it permanently, particularly after it wasceded to Great Britain in 1763. The first of the true Muskogee toemigrate to Florida, except for a small band of Coweta, were someEufaula Indians, and the Muskogee do not seem to have constitutedthe dominant element until after the Creek-American war, 1813-14.In the last decades of the eighteenth century, the internal organizationof the Confederacy was almost revolutionized by Alexander McGiUi-vray, the son of a Scotch trader, who set up a virtual dictatorship andraised the Confederacy to a high position of influence by his skill inplaying off one European nation against another. After his deathfriction developed between the factions favorable to and those opposedto the Whites. Inspired by the Shawnee chief, Tecumseh, a largepart of the Upper Creeks broke out into open hostihties in 1813, butnearly all of the Lower Creeks and some of the most prominent UpperCreek towns refused to join with them and a large force from theLower Creeks under William Macintosh and Timpoochee Barnard,the Yuchi chief, actively aided the American army. This war wasended by Andrew Jackson's victory at Horsehoe Bend on the Talla-poosa River, March 27, 1814. One immediate result of this war wasto double or triple the number of Seminole in Florida, owing to themultitude of Creeks who wished to escape from their old country.Fx'om this time on friction between the pro-White and anti-WhiteCreek factions increased. When the United States Governmentattempted to end these troubles by inducing the Indians to emigrate,the friction increased stiU more and culminated in 1825 when theGeorgia commissioners had induced William Macintosh, leader of thepro-American faction, and some other chiefs to affix their signaturesto a treaty ceding all that was then left of the Creek lands. For thisact formal sentence of death was passed upon Macintosh, and he wasshot by a band of Indians sent to his house for that purpose May 1,1825. However, the leaders of the Confederacy finally agreed to the SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 167 removal, which took place between 1836 and 1840, the Lower Creekssettling in the upper part of their new lands and the Upper Creeks inthe' lower part. The former factional troubles kept the .relations be-tween these two sections strained for some years, but they were finallyadjusted and in course of time an elective government with a chief,second chief, and a representative assembly of two houses was estab-lished, which continued until the nation was incorporated into theState of Oklahoma.Population.?Except where an attempt is made to give the popu-lation by towns, it is usually impossible to separate the Muskogeefrom other peoples of the Confederacy. Correct estimates of allCreeks are also rendered difficult because they were taking in smallertribes from time to time and giving off colonists to Florida andLouisiana. In 1702 Iberville placed the whole number of Creek andAlabama families at 2,000. In 1708 South Carolina officials esti-mated about 2,000 warriors. In 1715 something approaching acensus was taken of the tribes in their vicinity by the government ofSouth Carolina and a total of 1,869 men and a population of 6,522was returned for the Creeks, exclusive of the Alabama, Yuchi, Shawnee,Apalachicola, and Yamasee. A town by town enumeration madeby the Spaniards in 1738 shows 1,660 warriors; a French estimate of1750, 905; another of 1760, 2,620; a North Carolina estimate of 1760,2,000 warriors; an English estimate of 1761, 1,385; one of about 3,000the same year; an American estimate of 1792, 2,850; and finally thecensus taken in 1832-33 just before the emigration of the Creeks totheir new lands across the Mississippi, showed a total of 17,939 inthe true Aluskogee towns. Besides these more careful statements,we have a number of general estimates of warriors in the eighteenthcentury ranging from 1,250 up to between 5,000 and 6,000. Thislast was by Alexander McGillivray and is nearest that shown by thecensus of 1832-33. It would seem either that the earlier estimateswere uniformly too low or that the Confederacy increased rapidly dur-ing the latter part of the eighteenth century and the first part of thenineteenth. After the removal estimates returned by the IndianOffice and from other sources ranged between 20,000 and 25,000.When a new census was taken in 1857, however, less than 15,000 werereturned, and there was a slow falling off until 1919 when there wereabout 12,000. It must be noted that the census of 1910 returnedonly 6,945, a figure which can be reconciled with that of the UnitedStates Indian Office only on the supposition that it is supposed tocover only Indians of full or nearly full blood. The report of theUnited States Indian Office for 1923 gives 11,952 Creeks by blood.Regarding the later population it must be remembered that it hasbecome more and more diluted. The United States Census of 1930 168 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145gave 9,083 but included the Alabama and Koasati Indians of Texasand Louisiana and individuals scattered through more than 13 otherStates outside of Oklahoma, where 8,760 lived. These "generalestimates" include the incorporated tribes.Connection in which they have become noted.?In the form Mus-khogean, the name of this tribe was adopted by Powell (1891) for thatgroup of languages to which the speech of the Muskogee belongs.In the form Muscogee it has been given to a county in western Georgia,and to a railroad junction in it, and to a post-village in EscambiaCounty, Fla. In the form Muskogee it is the name of the capital ofMuskogee County, Okla., the third largest city in that state. Thepolitical organization of which they constituted the nucleus and thedominant element represents the most successful attempt north ofMexico at the formation of a superstate except that made by theIroquois, and the part they played in the early history of our Gulfregion was greater than that of any other, not even excepting theCherokee. They were one of the principal mound-building tribes tosurvive into modern times and were unsurpassed in the elaboratecharacter of their ceremonials (except possibly by the Natchez),while their prowess in war was proven by the great contest whichthey waged with the United States Government in 1813-14, and thestill more remarkable struggle which their Seminole relatives anddescendants maintained in Florida in 1835-1842. Their great warspeaker, Hopohithli-yahola, was probably surpassed in native great-ness by no chief in this area except the Choctaw Pushmataha. (SeeForeman, 1930.)Napochi. If connected with Choctaw Napissa, as seems not unlikely,the name means "those who see," or "those who look out," probablyequivalent to "frontiersmen."Connection.?They belonged to the southern division of the Musk-hogeans proper, and were seemingly nearest to the Choctaw.Location.?Along Black Warrior River.History.?The tribe appears first in the account of an attempt tocolonize the Gulf States in 1559 under Don Tristan de Luna. Apart of his forces being sent inland from Pensacola Bay came toCoosa in 1560 and assisted its people against the Napochi, whomthey claimed to have reduced to "allegiance" to the former. Afterthis the Napochi seem to have left the Black Warrior, and we knownothing certain of their fate, but the name was preserved down tovery recent times among the Creeks as a war name, and it is probablethat they are the Napissa spoken of by Iberville in 1699, as havingrecently united with the Chickasaw. Possibly the Acolapissa ofPearl River and the Quinipissa of Louisiana were parts of the sametribe. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 169Population.?Unknown.Connection in which they have become noted.?The only claim theNapochi have to distinction is their possible connection with theremarkable group of momids at Moundville, Hale County, Ala.Natchez. One section of the Natchez Indians settled among thethe Abihka Creeks near Coosa River after 1731 and went to Okla-homa a century later with the rest of the Creeks. (See Mississippi.)Okchai. A division of the Muskogee (q. v.).Okmulgee. A Creek tribe and town of the Hitchiti connection.(See Georgia.)Osochi. Meaning unknown.Connections.?Within recent times the closest connections of thistribe have been with the Chiaha, though their language is said tohave been Muskogee, but there is some, reason to think that theymay have been originally a part of the Timucua. (See below.)Location.?Their best known historic seat was in the great bend ofChattahoochee River, Russell County, Ala., near the Chiaha. (Seealso Georgia and Florida.) VillagesThe town of Hotalgi-huyana was populated in part from this tribe and in partfrom the Chiaha. The census of 1832 gives two settlements, one on the Chatta-hoochee River and one on a stream called Opillike Hatchee.History.?The suggestion that the Osochi may have been Timucuais founded (1) on the resemblance of their name to that of a Timucuadivision in northwest Florida called by the Spaniards Ossachile orUgachile, (2) on the fact that after the Timucua uprising of 1656some of the rebels "fled to the woods," and (3) the later mention ofa detached body of Timucua in the neighborhood of the Apalachicola.Early in the eighteenth century they seem to have been living withor near the Apalachicola at the junction of the Chattahoochee andFlint. From what Hawkins (1848) tells us regarding them, we mustsuppose that they moved up Flint River somewhat later and fromthere to the Chattahoochee, in the location near the Chiaha abovegiven. They migrated to Oklahoma with the rest of the LowerCreeks, and maintained their separateness in that country for awhile but were later absorbed in the general mass of the Creekpopulation.Population.?The following estimates of the effective male popula-tion of the Osochi occur: 1750, 30; 1760, 50; 1792, 50. The censusof 1832-33 returned a total of 539, but one of the two towns inhabitedby these Indians may have belonged to the Okmulgee. 170 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Pakana. A division of the Muskogee (q, v.).Pawokti. This tribe moved from Florida to the neighborhood ofMobile along with the Alabama Indians and afterward establisheda town on the upper course of Alabama River. Still later theywere absorbed into the Alabama division of the Creek Confederacy.(See Florida.)Pilthlako. A division of the Creeks, probably related to the Muskogee(q. v.), and possibly a division of the Okchai,Sawokli. Possibly meaning "raccoon people," in the Hitchiti language,and, while this is not absolutely certain, the okli undoubtedlymeans "people."Connections.?The Sawokli belonged to the Muskhogean linguisticstock and to the subdivision called Atcik-hata. (See Apalachicola.)Location.?The best known historic location was on ChattahoocheeRiver in the northeastern part of the present Barbour County, Ala.(See Florida and Georgia.) VillagesHatches tcaba, probably on or near Hatchechubbee Creek, in Russell County,Ala.Okawaigi, on Cowikee Creek, in Barbour County, Ala.Okiti-yagani, in Clay County, Ga., not far from Fort Gaines.Sawokli, several different locations, the best known of which is given above.Sawoklutci, on the east bank of the Chattahoochee River, in Stewart County, Ga.Tcawokli, probably on Chattahoochee River in the northeastern part of RussellCounty, Ala.History.?When first known to the Spaniards the Sawokli were livingon Chattahoochee River below the falls. A Spanish mission, SantaCruz de Sabacola, was established in one section of the tribe by BishopCalder6n of Cuba in 1675, and missionaries were sent to a larger bodyamong the Creeks in 1679 and again in 1681. Most of the Indianssurrounding these latter, however, soon became hostile and those whowere Christianized withdrew to the junction of the Chattahoocheeand Flint Rivers, where they were settled not far from the newlyestablished Chatot missions. The Sawokli appear to have remainedin the same general region until 1706 or 1707, when they were displacedby hostile Indians, probably Creeks. At least part lived for a while onOcmulgee River and returned to the Chattahoochee, as did the resi-dents of many other Indian towns, about 1715, after which theygradually split up into several settlements but followed the fortunesof the Lower Creeks. In the seventeenth century there may have beena detached body as far west as Yazoo River, since a map of that periodgives a "Sabougla" town there and the name is preserved to thepresent day in a creek and post village. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 171Population.?In 1738 a Spanish report gives the Sawokh 20 men,evidently an underestimate. In 1750 four settlements are given withmore than 50 men, and in 1760 the same number of settlements and190 men, including perhaps the Tamati, but to these must be added 30men of Okiti-yakani. In 1761, including the neighboring and probablyrelated villages, they are reported to have had 50 hunters. Hawkinsin 1799 gives 20 hunters in Sawoklutci but no figures for the othertowns. (See Hawkins, 1848.) In 1821 Young {in Morse, 1822)estimates 150 inhabitants in a town probably identical with this, and,according to the census of 1832-33, there were 187 Indians in Sawoklibesides 42 slaves, 157 Indians in Okawaigi, and 106 in Hatcheetcaba;altogether, exclusive of the slaves, 450.Connection in which they have become noted.?Sawokla is the name ofa small place in Oklahoma, and a branch of this town has had its nameincorporated in that of a stream, the Chewokeleehatchee, in MaconCounty., Ala., and in a post office called Chewacia in Lee County, Ala.Shawnee. In 1716 a band of Shawnee from Savannah River movedto the Chattahoochee and later to the Tallapoosa, where theyremained until early in the nineteenth century. A second bandsettled near Sylacauga in 1747 and remained there until some timebefore 1761 when they returned north. (See Tennessee.)Taensa. This tribe was moved from Louisiana in 1715 and given alocation about 2 leagues from the French fort at Mobile, one whichhad been recently abandoned by the Tawasa, along a watercoursewhich was named from them Tensaw River. Soon after the cessionof Mobile to Great Britain, the Taensa returned to Louisiana. (SeeLouisiana.)Tohome. Said by Iberville to mean "little chief," but this is evidentlyan error.Connections.?They belonged to the southern branch of theMuskhogean linguistic group, their closest relatives being the Mobile.Location.?About Mcintosh's Bluff on the west bank of TombigbeeRiver, some miles above its junction with the Alabama.SubdivisionsAnciently there were two main branches of this tribe, sometimes called theBig Tohome and Little Tohome, but the Little Tohome are known more oftenas Naniaba, "people dwelling on a hill," or "people of the Forks;" the latterwould be because they were where the Alabama and Tombigbee Rivers unite.VillagesNo others are known than those which received their names from the tribeand its subdivisions. 172 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145History.?Cartographical evidence suggests that the Tohome mayonce have lived on a creek formerly known as Oke Thome, now-contracted into Catoma, which flows into Alabama River a shortdistance below Montgomery. When first discovered by the Whites,however, they were living at the point above indicated. In the DeLuna narratives (1559-60) the Tombigbee River is called "River ofthe Tome." Iberville learned of this tribe in April 1700, and sentmessengers who reached the Tohome village and returned in May.In 1702 he went to see them himself but seems not to have gonebeyond the Naniaba. From this time on Tohome history is identicalwith that of the Alobile and the two tribes appear usually to have beenin aUiance although a rupture between them was threatened upon oneoccasion on account of the murder of a Mobile woman by one of theTohome. In 1715 a Tohome Indian killed an English trader namedHughes who had come overland from South Carolina, had beenapprehended and taken to Mobile by the French and afterwardliberated. A bare mention of the tribe occurs in 1763 and again in1771-72. They and the Mobile probably imited ultimately with theChoctaw.Population.?In 1700 Iberville estimated that the Tohome andMobile each counted 300 warriors, but 2 years later he revised hisfigures so far that he gave 350 for the two together. In 1730 Regis deRouillet estimated that there were 60 among the Tohome and 50among the Naniaba. In 1758 Governor De Kerlerec estimated thatthe Mobile, Tohome, and Naniaba together had 100 warriors. (SeeMobile.)Tukabahchee. One of the four head tribes of the Muskogee (q. v.).Tuskegee. Meaning unknown, but apparently containing theAlabama term taska, "warrior."Connections.?The original Tuskegee language is unknown but itwas probably affiliated with the Alabama, and hence with the southernbranch of Muskhogeans.Location.?The later and best known location of this tribe was onthe point of land between Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers, but in 1685part of them were on the Chattahoochee River near modern Columbusand the rest were on the upper Tennessee near Long Island. (See alsoOklahoma and Tennessee.) VillagesNone are known under any except the tribal name.History.?In 1540 De Soto passed through a town called Tasqui 2days before he entered Coosa. In 1567 Vandera was informed thatthere were two places in this neighborhood near together called Tasquiand Tasquiqui, both of which probably belonged to the Tuskegee. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 173By the close of the seventeenth century the Tuskegee appear to havedivided into two bands one of which Coxe (1705) places on an islandin Tennessee River. This band continued to live on or near the Ten-nessee for a considerable period but in course of time settled amongthe Cherokee on the south side of Little Tennessee River, just abovethe mouth of Tellico, in the present Monroe County, Tenn. Sequoyahved there in his boyhood. Another place wliich retained this name,and was probably the site of an earlier settlement was on thenorth bank of Tennessee River, in a bend just below Chattanooga,while there was a Tuskegee Creek on the south bank of Little Tennes-see River, north of Robbinsville, in Graham County, N. C. Thisband, or the greater part of it, was probably absorbed by the Cherokee.A second body of Tuskegee moved to the location mentioned abovewhere the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers come together. It is possiblethat they first established themselves among the Creek towns on theOcmulgee, moved with them to the Chattahoochee in 1715 and finallyto the point just indicated, for we have at least two documentarynotices of Tuskegee at those points and they appear so situated on anumber of maps. It is more Ukely that these were the Tuskegee whofinally settled at the Coosa-Tallapoosa confluence than a third divisionof the tribe but the fact is not yet established. In 1717 the Frenchfort called Fort Toulouse or the Alabama Fort was built close to thistown and therefore it continued in the French interest as long asFrench rule lasted. After the Creek removal, the Tuskegee formeda town in the southeastern part of the Creek territories in Oklahoma,but at a later date part moved farther to the northwest and estabhshedthemselves near Beggs.Population.?There are no figures for the Tuskegee division whichremained on Tennessee River. The southern band had 10 menaccording to the estimate of 1750, but this is evidently too low.Later enumerations are 50 men in 1760, 40 in 1761, including those ofCoosa Old Town, 25 in 1772 and 1792, 35 in 1799. The census of1832-33 returned a population of 216 Indians and 25 Negro slaves.Connection in which they have become noted.?The name Tuskegeebecame applied locally to several places in eastern Tennessee andwestern North Carolina, and one in Creek County, Okla., but the mostimportant place to receive it was Tuskeegee or Tuskegee, the countyseat of Macon County, Ala. The Tuskegee Normal and IndustrialInstitute for colored people, located at this place, has, under theguidance of the late Booker T. Washington, made the name betterknown than any other association.Wakokai. A division or subtribe of the Muskogee (q. v.). 174 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Wiwohka. A division of the Muskogee made up from several differentsources. (See Muskogee.)Yamasee. There was a band of Yamasee on MobUe Bay shortly after1715, at the mouth of Deer River, and such a band is entered onmaps as late as 1744. It was possibly this same band which appearsamong the Upper Creeks during the same century and in particularis entered upon the Mitchell map of 1755. Later they seem to havemoved across to Chattahoochee River and later to west Florida,where in 1823 they constituted a Seminole town. (See Florida.)Yuchi. A band of Yuchi seems to have lived at a very early datenear Muscle Shoals on Tennessee River, whence they probablymoved into east Tennessee. A second body of the same tribemoved from Choctawhatchee River, Fla., to the Tallapoosa before1760 and established themselves near the Tulcabahchee, but theysoon disappeared from the historical record. In 1715 the WestoIndians, who I believe to have been Yuchi, settled on the Alabamaside of Chattahoochee River, probably on Little Uchee Creek. Theyear afterward another band, accompanied by Shawnee and Apala-chicola Indians, established themselves farther down, perhaps atthe mouth of Cowikee Creek in Barbour County, and not longafterward accompanied the Shawnee to Tallapoosa River. Theysettled beside the latter and some finally united with them. Theyseem to have occupied several towns in the neighborhood in succes-sion and there is evidence that a part of them reached the lowerTombigbee. The main body of Yuchi shifted from the Savannahto Uchee Creek in Russell County between 1729 and 1740 andcontinued there until the westward migration of the Creek Nation.(See Georgia.) MISSISSIPPIAcolapissa. When first known to Europeans, this tribe lived on PearlRiver, partly in what is now Mississippi, -partly in Louisiana, butthey were more closely associated with Louisiana in later times andwill be treated among the tribes of that State. (See Louisiana.)Biloxi. Apparently a corruption of their own name Taneks a?ya, "first people," filtered over the tongues of other Indians. Alsocalled : Ananis, Anaxls, Annocchy, early French spellings intended for Taneks.Polu'ksalgi, Creek name.Connections.?They belonged to the Siouan linguistic family.Location.?Their earUest historical location was on the lower courseof Pascagoula River. (See also Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas.) SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 175 VillagesNone are knowii except those bearing the name of the tribe, unless we assumethe "Moctobi" or "Capinans" to be a part of them. These, however, may havebeen merely synonyms of the tribal name.History.?It is possible that the Biloxi are the Capitanesses whoappear west of Susquehanna River on early Dutch charts. On theDe Crenay map of 1733, a Biloxi town site appears on the right bankof the Alabama River, a little above the present Clifton in WilcoxCounty, Ala. This was probably occupied by the Biloxi during theirimmigration from the north. Individuals belonging to the tribe weremet by Iberville on his first expedition to Louisiana in 1699, and inJune of the same year his brother Bienville visited them. In 1700Iberville found their town abandoned and does not mention encounter-ing the people themselves, though they may have been sharing thePascagoula village at which he made a short stop. A few years later,P^nicaut says (1702-23), St. Denis persuaded the Biloxi to abandontheir village and settle on a small bayou near New Orleans but by1722 they had returned a considerable distance toward their old homeand were established on the former terrain of the Acolapissa Indianson Pearl River, They continued in this neighborhood and close tothe Pascagoula until 1763, when French government east of theMississippi came to an end. Soon afterward, although we do notknow the exact date, they moved to Louisiana and settled not farfrom Marksville. They soon moved farther up Red River and stilllater to Bayou Boeuf, Early in the nineteenth century they soldtheir lands, and, while part of them remained on the river, a largebody migrated to Texas and settled on Biloxi Bayou, in AngelinaCounty. All of these afterward left, either to return to Louisiana orto settle in Oklahoma, A few Biloxi are still hving in Rapides Parish,La., and there are said to be some in the Choctaw Nation, but thetribe is now practically extinct. In 1886 the Siouan relationship oftheir language was established by Dr, Gatschet of the Bureau of Ameri-can Ethnology, and a considerable record of it was obtained by Mr.James O. Dorsey of the same institution in 1892-93. (See Dorseyand Swanton, 1912.)Population.?On the basis of the imperfect records available, I havemade the following estimates of Biloxi population at different periods:420 in 1698, 175 in 1720, 105 in 1805, 65 in 1829, 6-8 in 1908, Mooney(1928) estimated that this tribe, the Pascagoula, and the "Moctobi"might number 1,000 in 1650.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Biloxi are remark-able (1) as having spoken a Siouan dialect unlike all of their neighborswith one possible exception; (2) as the tribe first met by Iberville whenhe reached the coast of Louisiana and estabhshed the French colony 176 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 of that name; (3) as having furnished the names of the first two capitalsof Louisiana, Old and New Biloxi; that of the present Biloxi, Miss.;and the name of Biloxi Bay.Capinans. The name of a body of Indians connected in Frenchreferences with the Biloxi and Pascagoula and probably a branchof one of them.Chakchiuma. Proper spelling Shaktci homma, meaning "RedCrawfish [People]."Connections.?They spoke a dialect closely related to Choctaw andChickasaw. Their nearest relatives were the Houma (q. v.), whoevidently separated from them in very recent times.Location.?In the eighteenth century on Yalobusha River where itempties into the Yazoo but at an early period extending to the headof the Yalobusha and eastward between the territories of the Choctawand Chickasaw tribes as far as West Point.SubdivisionsA French map dated about 1697 seems to call that section of the tribe on YazooRiver, Sabougla, though these may have been a branch of the Sawokli.(See Georgia.)History.?According to tradition, this tribe came from the west atthe same time as the Chickasaw and Choctaw and settled betweenthem. When De Soto was among the Chickasaw, an expedition wasdirected against the Chakchiuma "who the [Chickasaw] Cacique saidhad rebelled," but their town was abandoned and on fire. It wasclaimed that they had planned treachery against the Spaniards. Thechief of the tribe at this time was Miko Lusa (Black Chief). Afterthe French settlement of Louisiana a missionary was killed by thesepeople and in revenge the French stirred up the neighboring tribes toattack them. They are said to have been reduced very considerablyin consequence. Afterward, they remained closely allied with theFrench, assisted them after the Natchez outbreak, and their chiefwas appointed leader of the Indian auxiliaries in the contemplatedattack upon the Chickasaw in 1739. The animosity thus excitedprobably resulted in their destruction by the Chickasaw and absorptioninto the Chickasaw and Choctaw tribes. From De Crenay's map itappears that a part had gone to live with the Chickasaw by 1733.The rest may have gone to the Choctaw, for a band bearing their nameconstituted an important division of that nation. Tradition statesthat they were destroyed by the united efforts of the Chickasaw andChoctaw, but the latter were uniformly alUed with the French andhostile to the Chickasaw when this alliance is supposed to havebeen in existence. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 177Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates 1,200 souls among theChakchiuma, Ibitoupa, Taposa, and Tiou in 1650; exclusive of theTiou, my owti would be 750. In 1699 they are said to have occupied70 cabins. In 1702 it is claimed that there were 400 famihes, whichin 1704 had been reduced to 80, but probably the first figure is anexaggeration. About 1718-30 there were 50 Chakchiuma cabins andin 1722 the total population is placed at 150.Chickasaw. Meaning unknown, though the ending suggests that itmight have been a place name. Also called:Ani'-Td'ksA, Cherokee name.Kasahd unii?, Yuchi name.Tchaktch^n, Arapaho name.Tchfkasa, Creek name.Tci'-ka-sa', Kansa name.Ti-ka'-jS,, Quapaw name.Tsi'-ka-c^, Osage name.Connections.?Linguistically the Chickasaw were closely connectedwith the Choctaw and one of the principal tribes of the Muskhogeangroup.Location.?In northern Mississippi, principally in Pontotoc andUnion Counties. (See South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Arkansas,Kentucky, Oklahoma, and Tennessee.)SubdivisionsAside from some incorporated tribes such as the Napochi and Chakchiuma, nomajor subdivisions other than towns are mentioned until late in Chickasawhistory when we hear of three such subdivisions: those of Tishomingo, Sealy, andMcGilvery, named after their chiefs. These, however, were probably superficialand temporary. VillagesAckia.Alaoute, mentioned only by Iberville.Amalahta. .\peonn6.Apile faplimengo (Iberville).Ashukhuma.Ayebisto (Iberville).Chatelaw.Chinica (Iberville).Chucalissa.Chukafalaa.Coiii loussa, (French Memoir of 1755).Latcha Hoa, on Latcha Hoa Run, an affluent of Ahoola Ihalchubba, a westerntributary of Tombigbee River, northeastern Mississippi.Etoukouma (De Batz).Falatchao.Gouytola (Iberville). 178 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145Ogoula-Tchetoka (Dc Batz).Onthaba atchosa (Iberville).Ooe-asa, in Creek Nation near Sylacauga.Oucahata (Iberville).Oucthambolo (Iberville).Outanquatle (French Memoir of 1755).Tanvachilca (Iberville).Thanbolo (Iberville).Tuckahaw.Tuskawillao.Yaneka.All of the above, with one or two exceptions noted, were close to one anotherin the general location given above.History.?Like most of the other Muskhogean peoples, the Chicka-saw believed they had come from the west. They thought that theyhad settled for a time at a spot in northern Alabama on the northside of the Tennessee River long known as Chickasaw Old Fields.There is little doubt that Chickasaw had once hved at that placew^hether or not the whole tribe was so located. The first Europeansto become acquainted with the tribe were the Spaniards under De Soto,who spent the months of January, February, and March 1541, inthe Chickasaw country, and in the latter month were attacked by thetribe with such fury that they were nearly destroyed. Little is heardof the Chickasaw from this time until French explorers and colonistsarrived, at the end of the seventeenth century. They found the tribein approximately the position in which De Soto had encounteredthem, and they found them as warhke as before. Although the Frenchtried to make peace with them, English traders had effected estabUsh-ments in their country even before the settlement of Louisiana, andthey remained consistent alhes of England while England and Francewere fighting for the possession of North America. In the south theiralliance meant much the same to the English as L*oquois friendshipmeant to them in the north. As practically all of the sm-roundingpeoples were devoted to the French, and the Chickasaw were notnumerous, they were obliged to maintain a very unequal struggleuntil the final victory of England in 1763, and they suffered severelyin consequence. They supported the Natchez when they revoltedin 1729, and when French expeditions from the north and south werehurled upon them simultaneously in 1736, they beat both off withheavy losses. In 1740 a gigantic attempt was made to conquer them,but the greater part of the force assembled dissolved without accom-plishing anything. A small French expedition under Celoron suc-ceeded in obtaining a treaty of peace advantageous to the Frenchbut this soon became a dead letter, and French coromunications upand down the Mississippi River were constantly threatened andFrench voyageurs constantly attacked in the period following. In SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 1791752 and 1753 the French commanders Benoist and Reggio weredefeated by the Chickasaw. At an earUer period, shortly before1715, they and the Cherokee together drove the Shawnee from theirsettlements on the Cumberland, and in 1745 they expelled anotherShawnee band from the same region. In 1769 they utterly routedthe Cherokee on the site of the Chickasaw Old Fields. In 1793-95war broke out with the Creeks, who invaded their territories with1,000 men, but while they were attacking a small stockade, a bandof about 200 Chickasaw fell upon them, whereupon an unaccountableterror took possession of the invaders, and they fled precipitately.There was at one time a detached body of Chickasaw on the lowerTennessee not far from its mouth. They also had a town among theUpper Creeks for a brief period (Ooe-asa), and a settlement nearAugusta, Ga., from about 1723 to the opening of the AmericanRevolution. The Chickasaw maintained friendship with the Ameri-can Government after its establishment, but, being pressed upon bywhite settlers, parted with their lands by treaties made in 1805, 1816,1818, and 1832. The actual migration to new homes in what is nowOklahoma began in 1837 and extended to 1847. The Chickasaw andChoctaw mingled rather indiscriminately at first but their lands wereseparated in 1855 and the Chickasaw set up an independent govern-ment modeled on that of the United States which lasted until mergedin the new State of Oklahoma.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that there were about 8,000in 1600. In 1702 Iberville estimated that there were 2,000 familiesof Chickasaw, but in 1715 a rather careful enumeration made bythe colony of South Carolina, gave 6 villages, 700 men, and a popula-tion of 1,900. In 1761, a North Carolina estimate gives about 400men; in 1766, about 350. Most of the subsequent estimates of thenumber of warriors made during the eighteenth century vary between250 and 800. In 1817 Morse (1822) places the total population at3,625; in 1829 General Peter B. Porter estimates 3,600 {in School-craft, 1851-57, vol. 3); and a more accurate report in Schoolcraftgives 4,715 in 1833. The figures of the United States Indian OflBcebetween 1836 and the present time vary from 4,500 for 1865 to 1870to nearly 11,000 in 1923, but this latter figure includes more than 5,000freedmen and persons intermarried in the tribe, and, when we allowfor mixed bloods, we shall find that the Chickasaw population properhas usually stood at between 4,500 and 5,500 during the entire period.There has probably been a slow decline in the absolute amount ofChickasaw blood owing to constant intermixture with other peoples.The 1910 census returned 4,204 Chickasaw and that of 1930, 4,745.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Chickasaw werenoted (1) as one of the most warlike tribes of the Gulf area, (2) as 180 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bdll. 145the tribe of all those encountered by the Spaniards who came nearestputting an end to De Soto's army, (3) as the constant allies of theEnglish without whom the control of the Gulf region by the latterwould many times have been jeopardized. There are post villagesof the name in Mobile County, Ala., and Mercer County, Ohio,and Chickasha, a variant form, is the name of the county seat ofGrady County, Okla.Choctaw. Meaning unknown, though Halbert (1901) has suggestedthat they received their name from Pearl River, "Hachha". Alsocalled:Ani'-Tsa'ta, Cherokee name.Flat Heads, from their custom of flattening the heads of infants.Henne'sb, Arapaho name.Nabuggindebaig, probably the Chippewa name for this tribe, signifying "flat heads."Pa?s falaya, "Long Hairs," given by Adair.Sanakfwa, Cheyenne name, meaning "feathers sticking up above the ears."Ta-qta, Quapaw name.Tca-qtd, a?-ya-df, or Tca-qta ha''-ya, Biloxi name.Tca-td, Kansa name.T^tes Plates, French equivalent of "Flat Heads."Tsah-ter County or the proximatepart of Neshoba County.Siniasha, location uncertain.Tala, in the southern part of Newton County, between Tarlow and BogueFelamma Creeks.Talahoka, in Jasper County.Yowani, on the east side of Chickasawhay River, in the southern part of ClarkeCounty.Western Division:Abissa, location uncertain.Atlantchitou, location unknown.Ayoutakale, location unknown.Bok chito, probably on Bogue Chitto, in Neshoba and Kemper Counties.Bokfalaia, location uncertain.Bokfoka, location unknown.Boktokolo, location unknown.Cabea Hoola, location unknown.Chunky, on the site of Union, Newton County.Chunky chito, on the west bank of Chunky Creek, about half a mile below theconfluence of that creek with Talasha Creek?later this belonged to thesouthern district.East Kunshak chito, near Moscow, in Kemper County.Filitamon, location unknown.Halunlawi asha, on the site of Philadelphia, in Neshoba County.Hashuk chuka, location unknown.Hashuk homa, location unknown.Imoklasha, on the headwaters of Talasha Creek, in Neshoba County, in sec-tions 4, 9, and 16, tp. 9, range 13, east,lyanabi, on Yannubbee Creek, about 8 miles southwest of De Kalb, in KemperCounty.Itichipota, between the headwaters of Chickasawhay and Tombigbee Rivers.Kafitalaia, on Owl Creek, in section 21, tp. 11, range 13, east, in NeshobaCounty.Kashtasha, on the south side of Custusha Creek, about 3 miles a little south ofWest Yazoo Town.Konshak osapa, somewhere west of West Imoklasha.Koweh chito, northwest of De Kalb, in Kemper County.Kushak, on Lost Horse Creek, 4 miles southeast of Lazelia, liauderdale County.Kunshak bolukta, in the southwestern part of Kemper County some 2 milesfrom Neshoba County line and 1% miles from the Lauderdale County line.Kunshak chito, on or near the upper course of Oktibbeha River.Lushapa, perhaps on Lussalaka Creek, a tributary of Kentarcky Creek, inNeshoba County. 182 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bcll. 145Oka Chippo, location unknown.Oka Coopoly, on Ocobly Creek, in Neshoba County.Oka hullo, probably on or near the mouth of Sanoote Creek, which emptiesinto Petickfa Creek in Kemper County.Oka Kapassa, about Pinckney Mill, in sect. 23, tp. 8, range 11, east, in NewtonCounty?possibly in the southern section.Okalusa, in Romans' time on White's Branch, Kemper County.Okapoola, location unknown.Okehanea tamaha, location unknown.Oklabalbaha, location unknown.Oklatanap, location unknown.Oony, south of Pinckney Mill, in Newton County?possibly in the southerndivision.Osak talaia, near the line between Neshoba and Kemper Counties.Osapa chito, on the site of Dixon Post OfRce, in Neshoba County.Otuk falaia, location unknown.Pante, at the head of Ponta Creek, in Lauderdale County.Shinuk Kaha, about 7 miles a little north or east of Philadelphia, in NeshobaCounty.Shumotakali, in Kemper County, between the two head prongs of Black WaterCreek.Tiwaele, location unknown.Tonicahaw, location unknown.Utapacha, location unknown.Watonlula, location uncertain.West Abeka, location unknown.West Kunshak chito, in Neshoba Covmty, near the headwaters of OktibbehaCreek.Wiatakali, about 1 mile south of the De Kalb and Jackson road, in NeshobaCounty.Yazoo, or West Yazoo, in Neshoba County, near the headwaters of OktibbehaCreek, in sections 13 and 24, tp. 10, range 13, east.Northeastern Divison:Alamucha, 10 miles from Sukenatcha Creek, in Kemper Coimty.Athlepele, location unknown.Boktokolo chito, at the confluence of Running Tiger and Sukenatcha Creeks,about 4 miles northwest of De Kalb.Chichatalys, location unknown.Chuka hullo, on the north side of Sukenatcha Creek, somewhere between themouths of Running Tiger and Straight Creeks, in Kemper County.Chuka lusa, location unknown.Cutha Aimethaw, location unknown.Cuthi Uckehaca, probably on or near the mouth of Parker's Creek, which emp-ties into Petickfa, in sect. 30, tp. 10, range 17, east.East Abeka, at the junction of Straight Creek with the Sukenatcha, in KemperCount}'.Escooba, perhaps on or near Petickfa Creek, in Kemper County.Hankha Ula, on a fiat-topped ridge between the Petickfa and Black WaterCreeks, in Kemper County.Holihta asha, on the site of De Kalb, in Kemper County.Ibetap okla chito, perhaps on Straight Creek, in Kemper County.Ibetap okla iskitini, at the head of the main prong of Yazoo Creek, in KemperCounty. SWAHTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 183Imoklasha iskitiui, on Flat Creek, the eastern prong of Yazoo Creek, in KemperCounty.Itokchako, near East Abeka, in Kemper County.Kunshaktikpi, on Coonshark Creek, a tributary of Kentarky Creek, in NeshobaCounty.Lukfata, on the headwaters of one of the prongs of Sukenatcha River.Oka Altakala, probably at the confluence of Petickfa and Yannubbee Creeks,in Kemper County.Osapa issa, on the north side of Blackwater Creek, in Kemper County.Pachanucha, location unknown.Skanapa, probably on Running Tiger Creek, in Kemper County.Yagna Shoogawa, perhaps on Indiao. branch of Running Tiger Creek.Yanatoe, probably in southwest Kemper County.Yazoo iskitini, on both sides of Yazoo Creek.The following were outside the original town cluster:Bayou Chicot, south of Cheneyville, St. Landry Parish, La.Boutt^ Station, in St. Charles Parish, La.Cahawba Old Towns, in Perry County, Ala., and probably on Cahawba River,Cheponta's Village, on the west bank of the'Tombigbee River in the extremesoutheastern part of Choctaw County, Ala.Chisha Foka, on the site of Jackson.Coila, in Carroll County, probably occupied by Choctaw.Heitotowa, at the site of the later Sculleyville, Choctaw Nation, Okla.Shukhata, on the site of Columbus, Ala.Teeakhaily Ekutapa, on the lowQr Tombigbee River.Tombigbee, on or near Tombigbee River.A few other names of towns placed in the old Choctaw country appear on variousmaps, but most of these are probably intended for some of the villages givenabove.History.?After leaving the ruins of Mabila, De Soto and his fol-lowers, according to the Gentleman of Elvas (see Robertson, 1933),reached a province called PafaUaya, but, according to Ranjel, to achief river called Apafalaya. Halbert is undoubtedly right in be-lieving that in these words we have the old name of the Choctaw,Pa?sfalaya, "Long Hairs," and this is the first appearance of theChoctaw tribe in history. We hear of them again, in Spanish Floridadocuments of the latter part of the seventeenth century, and fromthis time on they occupied the geographical position always asso-ciated with them until their removal beyond the Mississippi. TheFrench of necessity had intimate dealings with them from the timewhen Louisiana was first colonized, and the relations between thetwo peoples were almost invariably friendly. At one time an Englishparty was formed among the Choctaw, partly because the pricescharged by the Carolina traders were lower than those placed uponFrench goods. This was led by a noted chief named Red Shoes andlasted for a considerable time, one of the principal Choctaw townsbeing burned before it came to an end with the defeat of the Britishparty in 1750. In 1763, after French Government had given way to 184 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145that of the English east of the Mississippi, relations between thelatter and the Choctaw were peaceful though many small bands ofIndians of this tribe crossed the Mississippi into Louisiana. TheAmerican Revolution did not alter conditions essentially, and, thoughTecumseh and his emissaries endeavored to enlist the Choctaw inhis favor, only about 30 individuals joined the hostile Creeks. Theabstinence of the tribe as a whole was due very largely to the personalinfluence of the native statesman, Pushmataha, whose remains He inthe Congressional Cemetery in Washington, surmounted by an im-pressive monument. Meanwhile bands of Choctaw continued movingacross the Mississippi, but the great migration occurred after theTreaty of Dancing Rabbit, September 30, 1830, by which the tribeceded their old lands. However, a considerable body of Choctaw didnot leave at this time. Many followed, it is true, at the time of theallotment in Oklahoma, but upward of a thousand still remain, prin-cipally in the neighborhood of Philadelphia, Miss. The westernChoctaw established a government on the model of those of the othercivihzed tribes and that of the United States, and it was not given upuntil merged in the State of Oklahoma early in the present century.Population.?Estimates of the number of Choctaw warriors between1702 and 1814 vary between 700 and 16,000. A North Carolinaestimate made in 1761 says they numbered at least 5,000 men.Conmion estimates are between 4,000 and 5,000, but even thesefigures may be a trifle low since the first rehable census, that of Arm-strong, in 1831, gave 19,554. However, there may have been a shghtincrease in population after the beginning of the nineteenth century,when an end was put to intertribal wars. Figures returned by theIndian Office since that time show a rather unusual constancy. Theygo as low as 12,500, and at the other extreme reach 22,707, but theaverage is from 18,000 to 20,000. The census of 1910 gave 15,917,including 1,162 in Mississippi, 14,551 in Oklahoma, 115 in Louisiana,57 in Alabama, and 32 in other States, but the United States IndianOffice Report for 1923 has 17,488 Choctaw by blood in Oklahoma,1,600 "Mississippi Choctaw" in Oklahoma, and 1,439 in the State ofMississippi, not counting about 200 in Louisiana, Alabama, andelsewhere. A few small tribes were gathered into this nation, butonly a few. The census of 1930 returned 17,757, of whom 16,641 werein Oklahoma, 624 in Mississippi, 190 in Louisiana, and the rest inmore than 14 other States. In 1937 the Mississippi Choctaw num-bered 1,908, from which it seems that many of the Mississippi Choc-taw were missed in 1930 unless the "Mississippi Choctaw" ah'eady inOklahoma are included.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Choctaw werenoted (1) as the most numerous tribe in the Southeast next to the SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 185Cherokee, (2) as depending more than most other tribes in the regionon agriculture, (3) for certain peculiar customs such as head deforma-tion, extensive use of ossuaries for the dead, and the male custom ofwearing the hair long, (4) as faithful allies of the French against theEnglish but always at peace with the United States Government,(5) as having furnished the names to counties in Alabama, Missis-sippi, and Oklahoma, and settlements in the same States, and in VanBuren County, Ark.Choola. Bernard de La Harpe gives this as the name of a smalltribe of 40 individuals on the Yazoo River. There is some reasonto think it was applied to a part of the Ibitoupa tribe (q. v.).The name means "fox" in Chickasaw and Choctaw.Grigra. Said to have been given them from the frequent occurrenceof these two syllables in their speech. They sometimes appear asthe "Gray Village" of the Natchez.Convections.?The fact that the language of this tribe contained anr suggests a probable relationship with the tribes of the Tunicangroup.Location.?When first known to us, it formed one of the Natchezvillages on St, Catherines Creek, Miss.VillagesOnly one village is mentioned called by a shorter form of the name given to thetribe, Gris or Gras.History.?The Grigra had been adopted by the Natchez at an earherperiod than the Tiou (q. v.) and, Uke them, may once have resided onYazoo River, but there is no absolute proof of this. They are men-tioned as one of three Natchez tribes belonging to the anti-Frenchfaction. Otherwise their history is identical with that of the Natchez.Population.?One estimate made about 1720-25 gives about 60warriors.Houma. Literally "red," but evidently an abbreviation of saktcihomma, "red crawfish."Connections.?They spoke a Muskhogean language very close toChoctaw, and it is practically certain from the fact that their emblemwas the red crawfish that they had separated from the Chakchiuma(q. v.).Location.?The earliest known location of the Houma was on theeast side of the Mississippi River some miles inland and close to theMississippi-Louisiana boundary line, perhaps near the present Pinck-ney, Miss. (See also Louisiana.) 186 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145 VillagesAt one time the people of this tribe were distributed between a Little Houmavillage 2 leagues below the bead of Bayou La Fourche and a Great Houmavillage half a league inland from it. This was after thej- had moved from theirearlier home.History.?La Salle heard of the Houma in 1682, but he did not visitthem. Tonti made an alliance with them 4 years later, and in 1699their village was the highest on the Mississippi reached by Iberville be-fore returning to his ships. In 1700 Iberville visited them again andleft a missionary among them to build a church, which was an accom-plished fact when Gravier reached the tribe in November of the sameyear. A few years later the Tunica, who had been impelled to leavetheir old town, were hospitably received by this tribe, but in 1706 theyrose upon their hosts, destroyed part of them, and drove the rest downthe Mississippi. These reestablished themselves on Bayou St. Johnnear New Orleans, but not long afterward they reascended the river tothe present Ascension Parish and remained there for a considerableperiod. In 1776 they sold a part at least of their lands to two FrenchCreoles but seem to have remained in the neighborhood until some yearsafter the purchase of Louisiana by the United States. By 1805 somehad gone to hve with the Atakapa near Lake Charles. Alost of theremainder appear to have drifted slowly across to the coast districtsof Terrebonne and La Fourche Parishes, where their descendants,with Creole and some Negro admixture, still live.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates a Houma population in 1650of 1,000. In 1699 Iberville gives 140 cabins and about 350 warriors,while the Journal of the second vessel in this expedition gives a popu-lation of 600-700. In 1718, after the tribe had suffered from bothpestilence and massacre. La Harpe estimates 60 cabins and 200 war-riors. In 1739 a French officer who passed their town rates thenumber of their warriors at 90-100 and the whole population at 270-300. In 1758 there is an estimate of 60 warriors and in 1784 one of 25while, in 1803, the total Houma population is placed at 60. In 1907the native estimate of mixed-blood population calling itself Houmawas 800-900, but the census of 1910 returned only 125 Indians fromTerrebonne. To these there should probably be added some fromLa Fourche but not a number sufficient to account for the discrepancy.In 1920, 639 were returned and in 1930, 936 from Terrebonne besides1 1 from La Fourche. Speck estimates double the number.Connection in which they have become noted.?Houma, the capital ofTerrebonne Parish, preserves the name.Ibitoupa. Meaning probably, people "at the source of" a streamor river. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 187Connections.?No words of this language are known unless the tribalname itself is native, but from this and Le Page du Pratz's (1758)statement that their language, unlike that of the Tunica group, waswithout an r, there is every reason to class it as Muskhogean and closelyrelated to Chackchiuma, Chickasaw, and Choctaw.Location.?On Yazoo River in the present Holmes County, perhapsbetween Abj^atche and Chicopa Creeks.VillagesOnly one village is known, and that called by the tribal name, though it ispossible that the Choula, (q. v.) mentioned by La Harpe were an offshoot.History.?The Ibitoupa are mentioned in 1699 by Iberville, and inCoxe's Carolana (1705). Before 1722 they had moved higher up andwere 3 leagues above the Chakchiuma (q. v.), who were then probablyat the mouth of the Yalobusha. They probably united with theChickasaw soon after the Natchez War, though they may first havecombined with the Chakchiuma and Taposa. They were perhaps re-lated to the people of the Choctaw towns called Ibetap okla.Population.?All that we know of the population of the Ibitoupa isthat in 1722 it occupied 6 cabins; in the same year there are said tohave been 40 Choula, a possible offshoot.Connection in which their name has become noted.?It seems to havebeen the original of the name of Tippo Bayou, Miss.Koasati. A band of Koasati moved from Alabama to TombigbeeRiver in 1763 but returned to their old country a few years laterimpelled by the hostilities of their new neighbors. (See Alabama.)Koroa. Meaning unknowTi. Also called:Kiilua, Choctaw name, the Muskhogean people being unable to pronouncer readily.Connections.?The name and associations, together with Le Pagedu Pratz's (1758) statement that their language possessed an r sound,are practically conclusive proof that this tribe belonged to the Tunicanlinguistic group.Location.?The Koroa appear oftenest in association with the Yazooon the lower course of Yazoo River, but at the very earliest periodthey were on the banks of the Mississippi or in the interior of what isnow Louisiana on the other side of that river. (See also Louisiana.)VillagesNone are known under any other name.History.?In the De Soto narratives a people is mentioned calledColigua and Colima which may be the one under discussion. If not,the first appearance of the Koroa in history is on Marquette's map 188 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bdll. 145 applying to 1673, though they are there misplaced. The La Sallenarratives introduce us, apparently, to two tribes of the name, one onYazoo River, the other below Natchez, but there are reasons forthinking that the latter was the tribe elsewhere called Tiou. InTonti's account of his expedition overland to the Red River in 1690we learn of a Koroa town west of the Mississippi, and also of a KoroaRiver. In 1700 Bienville also learned of a trans-Mississippi Koroasettlement. From the time of Tonti's expedition to the mouth ofthe Mississippi in 1686 there seems to have been a Koroa town on ornear the lower Yazoo, as mentioned above. When the Natchez out-break occurred, this tribe and the Yazoo joined them and destroyedthe French post on Yazoo River, but they suffered severely fromIndians allied with the French and probably retired soon afterwardto the Chickasaw, though part, and perhaps all of them, ultimatelysettled among the Choctaw. The Choctaw chief Allen Wrightclaimed to be of Koroa descent.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that there were 2,000Koroa, Yazoo, Tunica, and Ofo in 1650. Le Page du Pratz placesthe number of Koroa cabins in his time at 40. In 1722 the totalpopulation of the Koroa, Yazoo, and Ofo is given as 250, and in 1730the last estimate of the Koroa and Yazoo together gives 40 warriors,or perhaps 100 souls.Moctobi. This name appears in the narratives of the first settlementof Louisiana, in 1699, applied to a tribe living with or near the Biloxiand Pascagoula. It is perhaps the name of the latter in the Biloxilanguage, or a subdivision of the Biloxi themselves, and is besttreated in connection with the latter.Natchez. Meaning unknown (the z should not be pronounced).Also called:Ani'-Na'tsT, Cherokee name.Sunset Indians, given by Swan {in Schoolcraft (1851-57)).Theloel or Thecoel, name used by the Natchez but seemingly derived fromthat of a town.Connections.?The Natchez were the largest of three tribes speakingclosely related dialects, the other two being Taensa and Avoyel, andthis group was remotely related to the great Muskhogean family.Location.?The historic seat of the Natchez Indians was along St.Catherines Creek, and a little east of the present city of Natchez.(See also Alabama, Louisiana, North Carolina, Oldahoma, SouthCarolina, and Tennessee.) VillagesIberville gives the following list of Natchez villages: "Natch6s, Pochougoula,Ousagoucoulas, Cogoucoulas, Yatanocas, Ymacachas, Thoucoue, Tougoulas, and SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 189Achougoulas." This list was obtained through the medium of the Mobilian tradelanguage and part of the names are undoubtedly translated into it. Thus wefind the Mobilian and Choctaw word for people, okla, "ougoula," or "oucoula," infive of these. The term Tougoulas probably designates the town of the Tiou (q. v.),an adopted tribe, and one of the others is perhaps a designation for the adoptedtribe of Grigra (q. v.). Later writers usually speak of but five settlements,including that of the Grigra. One of these, the town of the "walnuts," is evi-dently the Ousagoucoulas of Iberville's informants, meaning, in reality, the townof the Hickories. The Great Village was probably the town called Nachds orNatchez, and Pochougoula, the Flour Village, but the others mentioned, Jen-zenaque or Jensenac and the White Apple or Apple Village cannot be identified.A White-earth village is mentioned by one writer, probably intended for theWhite Apple village. The Natchez among the Cherokee lived for a time at atown called Guhlaniyi.History.?Undoubtedly tribes of the Natchez group were encoun-tered by De Soto and his companions in 1541-43, and it is highlyprobable that the chief Quigaltanqui, who figures so prominently inthe pursuit of the Spaniards when they took to the Mississippi, wasleader of the tribe in question or of one of its divisions. The nameNatchez appears first, however, in the narratives of La Salle's descentof the Mississippi in 1682. Relations between the French and Natchezwere at first hostile, but peace was soon made and in 1699 a mis-sionary visited the latter with a view to permanent residence. Thenext year Iberville, who had stopped short of the Natchez in his earlierascent of the Mississippi, opened negotiations with the Natchez chief.A missionary was left among them at this time and the mission wasmaintained until 1706. In 1713 a trading post was established.The next year four Canadians, on their way north, were killed bysome Natchez Indians and this resulted in a war which Bienvillepromptly ended. Inmiediately afterward a stockaded fort was builton a lofty bluff by the Mississippi and named Fort Rosalie. Severalconcessions were granted in the neighborhood and settlers flowed inuntil this was one of the most flourishing parts of the new colony.Between 1722 and 1724 there were shght disturbances in the goodrelations which had prevailed between the settlers and Indians, butthey were soon smoothed over and harmony prevailed until a newcommandant named Ch^part, who seems to have been utterly unfitfor his position, was sent to take command of Fort Rosahe. Inconsequence of his mismanagement a conspiracy was formed againstthe French and on November 28, 1729, the Indians rose and destroyedboth post and settlement, about 200 Whites being slain. Next yearthe French and their Choctaw allies attacked the forts into whichthe Natchez had retired and hberated most of their captives but ac-complished httle else, and one night their enemies escaped across theMississippi, where they established themselves in other forts in themarshy regions of northeastern Louisiana. There they were again 190 BUREAIf OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 attacked and about 400 were induced to surrender, but the greaterpart escaped during a stormy night and withdrew to the Chickasaw,who had been secretly aiding them. Later they divided into twobands, one of which settled among the Upper Creeks while the otherwent to live with the Cherokee. Afterward each followed the fate oftheir hosts and moved west of the Mississippi with them. Those whohad hved with the Creeks Established themselves not far from Eufaula,Okla., where the last who was able to speak the old tongue died about1890. The Cherokee Natchez preserved their language longer, anda few are able to converse in it at the present day (1925).Population.?Mooney's (1928) estimate of Natchez population in1650 is 4,500; my own, as of- 1698, 3,500. In 1731, after the lossessuffered by them during their war with the French, Perrier estimatedthat they had 300 warriors. In 1735, 180 warriors were reportedamong the Chickasaw alone. During the latter half of the eighteenthcentury estimates of the warriors in the Creek band of Natchez varyfrom 20 to 150, and in 1836 Gallatin conjectures that its numbersover aU were 300, which is probably above the fact. There are nofigures whatever for the Cherokee band of Natchez.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Natchez havebecome famous in a number of ways: (1) because they were the largestand strongest tribe on the lower Mississippi when Louisiana wassettled by the French, (2) on account of their monarchical governmentand the peculiar- institution of the Sun caste, (3) on account of thecustom of destroying relatives and companions of a dead member ofthe Sun caste to accompany him or her into the world of spirits, (4) forthe massacre of the French post at Natchez and the bitter war whichsucceeded it, (5) from the name of the city of Natchez, Miss., adoptedfrom them. The name is also borne by post villages in MonroeCounty, Ala.; and Natchitoches Parish, La.; and a post hamlet inMartin County, Ind.Ofo, or Ofogoula, see Mosopelea under Ohio.Okelousa. A tribe living at one time in northern Mississippi. (SeeLouisiana.)Pascagoula. "Bread people." Also called:Miskigiila, Biloxi name.Connections.?They were probably Muskhogeans although closelyassociated with the Siouan Biloxi.Location.?Their earhest known location was on the river whichstiU bears their name, about 16 French leagues from its mouth.(See also Louisiana and Texas.) SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 191VillagesUnknown, but see Biloxi.History.?Iberville heard of the Pascagoula in 1699 when he madethe first permanent settlement in Louisiana. That summer his brotherBienville visited them, and the following winter another brother,Sauvolle, who had been left in charge of the post, received severalPascagoula visitors. Some Frenchmen visited the Pascagoula townthe next spring and P^nicaut (in Margry, 1875-86, vol. 5) has leftan interesting account of them. In Le Page du Pratz's time (earlyeighteenth century) they were on the coast, but they did not movefar from this region as long as France retained possession of thecountry. When French rule ended the Pascagoula passed over toLouisiana and settled first on the Mississippi River and later on RedRiver at its junction with the Rigolet du Bon Dicu. In 1795 theymoved to Bayou Boeuf and established themselves between a bandof Choctaw and the Biloxi. Early in the nineteenth century allthree tribes sold these lands. A part of the Pascagoula remained inLouisiana for a considerable period, Morse mentioning two distinctbands, but a third group accompanied some Biloxi to Texas and hvedfor a time on what came to be called Biloxi Bayou, 15 miles above itsjunction with the Neches. I have been able to find no Indians inLouisiana claiming Pascagoula descent, but in 1914 there were twoamong the Alabama who stated that their mother was of this tribe,their father having been a Biloxi.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that in 1650 there were 1,000all told of the Biloxi, Pascagoula, and Moctobi. My own estimatefor about the year 1698 is 875 of whom I should allow 455 to thePascagoula. In 1700 Iberville states that there were 20 families,which would mean that they occupied the same number of cabins,but Le Page du Pratz raises this to 30. In 1758 the Pascagoula,Biloxi, and Chatot are estimated to have had about 100 warriors.In 1805 Sibley (1832) gives 25 among the Pascagoula alone. Morse(1822) estimates a total Pascagoula population of 240, and Schoolcraft(1851-57) cites authority for 111 Pascagoula in 1829. This is thelast statement we have bearing upon the point.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Pascagoula tribeis of some note as a constant companion of the Siouan Biloxi, andfrom the fact that it has bequeathed its name to Pascagoula River,Pascagoula Bay, and Pascagoula Port, Miss.Pensacola. This tribe moved inland from Pensacola Bay near theend of the seventeenth century and in 1725-26 had establishedthemselves near the Biloxi on Pearl River, (See Florida.) 192 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Quapaw. When the French discovered this tribe in 1673 one townwas on the east side of the Mississippi, but before 1700 it moved tothe western bank. (See Arkansas.)Taposa. Meaning unknown.Connections.?As this tribe is said to have been alhed with theChickasaw and, unlike the Tunica and Tiou, did not have an r soundin their language, there is every reason to suppose that they belongedto the Muskhogean stock. Probably they were most closely affiUatedwith their neighbors, the Chakchiuma and Chickasaw.Location.?Their earliest known location was on Yazoo River afew miles above the Chakchiuma.History.?The Taposa are first mentioned by Iberville and themissionary De Montigny, in 1699. On the De Crenay map of 1733(1910) their village is placed very close to that of the Chakchiuma,whose fortunes they probably followed.Population.?The only hint as to the size of this tribe is given byLe Page du Pratz who says that the Taposa had about 25 cabins,half the number he assigns to the Chakchiuma. Other writers usuallyinclude them with the Chakchiuma (q. v.).Tiou. Meaning unknown. The name has occasionally been mis-printed "Sioux," thus causing confusion with the famous Siouxor Dakota of Minnesota and the Dakotas.Connections.?The Tiou are proved by a statement of Dirond'Artaguiette (1916) to have belonged to the Tunica linguistic groupof the Tunican family.Location.?Their earliest location was near the upper course ofYazoo River; later they lived a little south of the Natchez and thenamong them.History.?Shortly before 1697 the Tiou appear to have been in thelocality first mentioned, and a map of that date seems to give twotowns of Tiou, one above the Tunica and one below them. By 1699part had settled among the Natchez, having been driven from theirformer homes, according to Le Page du Pratz (1758), by the Chicka-saw. Before establishing themselves finally with the Natchez, theyseem to have lived for a time a short distance below them on theMississippi River, where La Salle and his companions speak of them asKoroa. Part of the tribe appears to have remained on the Yazoo forsome years after the rest had left. At a later period the Bayogoulacalled in Tiou and Acolapissa to take the places of the Mugulasha withwhom they had formerly lived and whom they had destroyed. Soonafter Fort Rosalie had been built, the Tiou sold the lands upon whichthey had settled to the Sieur Roussin and moved elsewhere. Afterthe Natchez massacre the hostile Indians sent them to the Tunica in a SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 193 vain endeavor to induce the latter to declare against the French. In1731, if we may trust a statement by Charlevoix, they were utterly cutoff by the Quapaw, and while the completeness of this destruction maywell be doubted, we hear nothing of them afterward.Population.?No estimate of Tiou population separate from that ofthe Natchez is known.Tunica. Meaning "the people," or "those who are the people."Also called:Yoron, their own name.Connections.?They were the leading tribe of the Tunica group ofthe Tunican stock, the latter including also the Chitimacha andAtakapa.Location.?On the lower course of Yazoo River, on the south sideabout 4 French leagues from its mouth. (See also Arkansas.)History.?There is evidence that tribes belonging to the Tunicagroup were encountered by De Soto west of the Mississippi and veryprobably the name of the tribe is preserved in that of the town ofTanico mentioned by Elvas {in Robertson, 1933), where people madesalt, for in later years we find the Tunica engaged in the making andselling of this commodity. An early location for them on the easternside of the Mississippi is indicated by the "Tunica Oldfields" nearFriar Point, not many miles below Helena, Ark. The name appears onMarquette's map (1673) but there they are wrongly placed. In 1682La Salle and his companions learned of this tribe, then located as givenabove, but neither he nor his lieutenant Tonti visited them on this orany subsequent expedition, though they learned of Tunica villages inthe salt-making region of northeastern Louisiana. The Yazoo town ofthe tribe was first seen, apparently, by three missionary priests fromCanada, one of whom, Father Davion, established himself amongthem in 1699. In 1702 he fled from his charges, but two or threeyears later was induced by them to return, and he remained amongthem for about 15 years more. In 1706 this tribe left the Yazoo andwere received into the Houma town nearly opposite the mouth ofRed River, but later, according to La Harpe (1831), they rose upontheir hosts and killed more than half of them, and for a long periodthey continued to live in the region they had thus appropriated. Theywere firm friends of the French and rendered them invaluable servicein all difficulties with the tribes higher up, and particularly against theNatchez, but in 1719 or 1720 Davion was so much discouraged at themeager results of his efforts that he left them. The anger excitedagainst them by their support of the French resulted in an attack by alarge party of Natchez and their allies in 1731 in which both sidessuffered severely and the head chief of the Tunica was killed. The 194 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Tunica remained in the same region until some time between 1784 and1803, when they moved up Red River and settled close to the presentMarksville, La., on the land of the Avoyel Indian village which theyclaimed to have bought from the Avoyel tribe. Before this event tookplace, in company with the Ofo, Avoyel, and some Choctaw, theyattacked the pirogues of a British expedition ascending the Mississippi,killed six men, wounded seven, and compelled the rest to turn back.A few families descended from the Tunica are still settled on the sitejust mentioned, which forms a small reservation. Sibley (1832) saysthat in his time Tunica had settled among the Atakapa, and it wasperhaps some of their descendants of whom Dr. Gatschet heard asliving near Beaumont, Tex., about 1886. Mooney (1928) learned ofsome Tunica families in the southern part of the Choctaw Nation,Okla., but they had lost their old language.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated that in 1650 the totalpopulation of the Tunica, Yazoo, Koroa, and Ofo was 2,000, and thisvery figure, except that it does not include the Koroa, is given by themissionary De Montigny in 1699. My own figure for the same dateis somewhat higher, 2,450, out of which I estimate about 1,575 wereTunica. In 1719 the number of Tunica was conjectured to be 460and in 1803, 50 to 60, though a second statement of about the sameperiod gives 25 warriors. Morse (1822) reports 30 Tunica inLouisiana.The census of 1910 gives 43 Tunica in all, but among these are includedsome Indians of other tribes and there w&re many mixed-bloods.The census of 1930 gives only 1, he being the onlj^ one who couldspeak the old language.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Tunica wereprominent in history (1) from the fact that their language was theprincipal dialect of a stock on the lower Mississippi which receivedits name from them, (2) for their sedentary character, (3) for theirdevotion to the French interest and their part in the Natchez wars,(4) from the perpetuation of their name in Tunica County, andTunica Oldfields, Miss., and a post village of the name in WestFeliciana Parish, La.Yazoo. Meaning unknown.Connections.?The associations of this tribe with the Koroa and thefact that their language contained an r sound make it reasonablycertain that they belonged to the Tunican group and stock.Location.?On the south side of Yazoo River about 4 French leaguesabove its mouth. (See also Ai'kansas.)History.?The Yazoo appear to have been the first of the tribesliving on the lower part of the Yazoo River to have establishedthemselves there, and hence it was from them that the stream received SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 195 its name. They are mentioned by La Salle and his companions inconnection with their voyage to the mouth of the Mississippi in 1682.A French post was established near them in 1718, and in 1727 a Jesuitmissionary, Father Seuel, settled nearby. In 1729, however, theYazoo joined the Natchez in their uprising, murdered the missionary,and massacred the French garrison. Their subsequent fortunes wereidentical with those of the Koroa, and they were probably absorbedinto the Chickasaw or Choctaw. It is not improbable that. there issome connection between the name of this tribe and that of two ofthe Yazoo towns among the Choctaw, but if so it goes back beyondrecorded history.Population.?I have estimated that in 1698 there were somewhatmore than 600 Yazoo and Koroa together. In 1700 Gravier reported30 Yazoo cabins, but a quarter of a century later Le Page du Pratz(1758) estimated 100. In 1722 the Yazoo, Koroa, and Ofo togetherare said to have numbered 250. In 1730, however, the number ofYazoo and Koroa warriors is placed at 40.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Yazoo are notedprincipally from the fact that they have transmitted their name toYazoo River, Miss., and secondarily to Yazoo County and its capitalcity, in the same State. LOUISIANAAcolapissa. Meaning "those who listen and see," indicating possibly "borderers" or "scouts." Also called:Aquelou pissas, by Le Page du Pratz (1758, 2: 219).Cenepisa, by La Salle {in IMargry, 1875-86, 1: 564).Colapissas, in 1699 by P^nicaut {in French, 1869, p. 38).Coulapissas, in 1700 by Sauvole {in Margry 1875-86, 4: 462).Equinipichas, by Sauvole {in French, 1851, 3: 225).Kinipissa, by Tonti {in Margry, 1875-86; 1: 604).Kolapissas, in 1700 by Gravier {in French, 1875, p. 88).Connections.?The Acolapissa belonged to the Muskhogean lin-guistic family and evidently spoke a language closely related toChoctaw and Chickasaw. They may have been more intimatelyconnected with the Napissa who united with the Chickasaw and whowere perhaps identical with the Napochi (q. v.) of De Luna, but theirclosest relatives were the Tangipahoa (q. v.).Location.?Their earliest known location was on Pearl River about11 miles above its mouth. (See also Mississippi.)VillagesIberville was told that they consisted of six villages and that the Tangipahoaconstituted a seventh, but we treat the latter separately, and the names of thesix are not given. 196 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145History.?The Acolapissa are not mentioned among the tribes thatcame to Iberville in 1699 to form an alliance with him, but after hisdeparture for France, Bienville visited them and was well received,although at first they were terrified because of a slave raid made uponthem 2 days before by the English and Chickasaw. In 1702 (or 1705)they moved from Pearl River and settled on a bayou on the northside of Lake Pontchartrain called "Castembayouque" (now CastineBayou). Six months later the Natchitoches Indians (q. v.) de-scended to the French fort on the Mississippi from their town on RedRiver to ask assistance from St. Denis, the commandant there, becauseof the ruin of their crops. St. Denis sent them under the charge ofPenicaut to the Acolapissa, who welcomed them and assigned a placefor them to settle close to their own village. Late in 1713 or early in1714 St. Denis, who had received a commission to proceed to Texasto examine the Spanish settlements, sent for the Natchitoches intend-ing to reestablish them in their former seats, but upon hearing of thisproject the Acolapissa fell upon them and killed and captured a con-siderable number. In 1718, according to Penicaut, but in any casebefore 1722, they moved over to the Mississippi River and settled onthe east side 13 leagues from New Orleans. In 1739 they constitutedpractically one settlement with the Bayogoula and Houma, withwhom they finally merged. Their later history is one with that ofthe Houma (q. v.).Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated that in 1650 the populationof the Acolapissa and the Tangipahoa together was 1,500. My owncalculation as of 1698 is 1,050, based on La Harpe's (1831) estimate of300 Acolapissa warriors in 1699 and Iberville's estimate of 250 families3 years later. In 1722 Charlevoix states that there were 200 warriorsand in 1739 there are said to have been of the Acolapissa, Houma, andBayogoula together 90 to 100 warriors and 270 to 300 people exclu-sive of children.Adai. Meaning unloiown.Connections.?This tribe was at first thought to have constitutedan independent linguistic stock and the name Adaizan was given toit, but later Dr. Gatschet determined that the Adai language was asomewhat aberrant Caddo dialect, and it was therefore placed in theCaddoan stock.Location.?Near the present Robeline in Natchitoches Parish.History.?In 1699 Iberville mentions the Adai under the nameNatao. In 1717 the mission of San Miguel de Linares was establishedamong them by Spanish Franciscan missionaries. The buildings weredestroyed in 1719 by a force of French and Indians, but they wererebuilt 2 years later as San Miguel de los Adaes, and the mission was SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 197 not finally abandoned until 1773. In October 1721 a military postcalled Nuestra Senora del Pilar de los Adaes was located close to themission and continued until the latter was given up. For 50 years thispost was the capital of Texas in spite of, or because of, the fact that itwas on its extreme eastern frontier. In 1778 De M^zieres states {inBolton, 1914) that the tribe was almost extinct, but in 1805 Sibleyreported a small Adai settlement on Lake Macdon near an affluentof Red River. The survivors probably combined with the otherCaddoan tribes of the region and followed their fortunes.Population.?Bienville reported 50 warriors among them in 1700but twice as many in 1718. When the mission of San Miguel wasrebuilt it is said to have served 400 Indians. In 1805 the Adai villagecontained only 20 men but the number of women was much greater.The total Adai population in 1825 was 27. My own estimate for 1698is about 400.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Adai were peculiarin having spoken a dialect so diverse from the other Caddo forms ofspeech that, as already stated, Powell (1891) at first gave them anindependent status as constituting the Adaizan linguistic family.Historically, the Adai Indian and White settlement was noted as theeasternmost outpost of the Spaniards and of the Franciscan Spanishmissions, and it was the capital of the Province of Texas for 50 years.Alabama. Some of this tribe moved to Louisiana shortly after theterritory east of the Mississippi was abandoned by the French.Most of them finally passed on into Texas, but a few are still settledin the southwestern part of the State. (See Alabama.)Apalachee. A band of Apalachee Indians moved from the neighbor-hood of Mobile to Louisiana in 1764, remained for a short time on theMississippi River and then moved up to Red River, where theyobtained a grant of land along with the Taensa. Later they soldthis land and part of them probably removed to Oklahoma, butothers remained in Louisiana and amalgamated with other tribes,(See Florida.)Atakapa. Meaning in Choctaw and MobiUan, "man eater," becausethey and some of the Indians west of them at times ate the fleshof their enemies.Skunnemoke, the name of a chief, extended to the whole people.Ttlk-pa'-ha?-ya-di, Biloxi name.Yuk'hiti ishak, own name.Connections.?The Atakapa were originally placed in an independentlinguistic stock, including also the Bidai, Deadose, and probably theOpelousa, but it has now been determined that they belonged to onefamily ^vith the Chitimacha, their eastern neighbors, and probably 198 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bdll. 145the Tunican group on the Mississippi, the whole being called theTunican stock.Location.?Atakapa bands extended along the coast of Louisianaand Texas from Vermillion Bayou to and including Trinity Bay.(See Akokisa under Texas.)Subdivisions and VillagesThe Atakapa about Trinity Bay and the lower course of Trinity River werecalled Akokisa by the Spaniards, but they diflfered in no respect from the Atakapaof Lake Charles. There was, however, an eastern Atakapa dialect which wasdistinctly different from the one current in the Lake Charles and Trinity Baysections and was spoken by two different bands, one about Vermillion Bay andone on the Mermentou River. There were a number of small villages but theirnames are unknown.History.?In 1528 Cabeza de Vaca learned of the existence of someof these Indians, calling them Han. The portion of the Atakapaliving in Louisiana came to the attention of the French after the latterhad established themselves on the Mississippi River, but it so hap-pened that they had more dealings with the people of Trinity Bay,the Akokisa. This was owing in the first place to the romantic adven-tures of a French officer, Simars de Belle-Isle, left upon this coast in1719. In 1721 Bernard de la Harpe and Captain Beranger accom-panied by Belle-Isle visited the bay and carried some Indians offwith them to New Orleans. Fortunately for us, Beranger recordeda number of words in their language which prove it to have beenalmost identical with the Atakapa of Lake Charles. The Indianssubsequently escaped and are reported to have reached their owncountry. In 1779 the band of Atakapa on Vermillion Bayou fur-nished 60 men and the Mermentou band 120 men to Galvez for hisexpedition against the British forts on the Mississippi. In the latterpart of the eighteenth century numerous plots of land were sold toFrench Creoles by the Atakapa Indians, but the last village of theeasternmost band was not abandoned until early in the nineteenthcentury. The last village of the Atakapa who spoke the easterndialect was on the Mermentou and Indians are said to have livedthere down to 1836. The Calcasieu band held together for a longerperiod, so that in 1908 a few persons were living who once made theirhomes in the last native village on Indian Lake or Lake Prien. Itwas from two of these that Dr. Gatchet, in January 1885, obtainedhis Atakapa linguistic material. (See Gatschet and Swanton, 1932.)Although in 1907 and 1908 I found a few Indians who knew some-thing of the old tongue, it is today practically extinct. (See alsoJ. O. Dyer, 1917.) As early as 1747 a Spanish mission was proposedfor the Akokisa Indians, and in 1756, or about that time, it was estab-lished on the left bank of Trinity River, a short distance below the SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 199present Liberty. It was named Nuestra Senora de la Luz, and nearit was the presidio of San Agustfn de Ahumada erected the same year.Be'fore 1772 both of these had been abandoned. In 1805 the principalAkokisa village was on the west side of Colorado River about 200miles southwest of Nacogdoches, but there was another between theNeches and the Sabine. The ultimate fate of the tribe is unlcnown.Population.?Exclusive of the Akokisa, Mooney (1928) estimates apopulation of 1,500 Atakapa in 1650, which the Akokisa would per-haps swell to 2,000. In 1747 a Spanish report gives 300 Akokisafamilies, a figure which is probably too high. In 1779 the BayouVermillion and Mermentou bands had 180 warriors. Sibley (1832)states that in 1805 there were 80 warriors in the only Atakapa townremaining but that 30 of these were Houma and Tunica. The samewriter adds that in 1760-70 the Akokisa numbered 80 men.Connection in which they have become noted.?The traditional fameof the Atakapa rests upon the sinister reputation it had acquired asa body of cannibals. After the French began to settle southwesternLouisiana, they distinguished as the Atakapas district a section ofsouthern Louisiana including the parishes of St. Mary, Iberia, Ver-million, St, Martin, and Lafayette, a usage which continues in com-mercial reports to the present day. The capital of this district, themodern St. Martinville, was known as the Atakapas Post. In Spar-tanburg County, S. C, is a place called Tucapau, the name of whichmay have been taken from this tribe.Avoyel. The name signifies probably "people of the rocks," referringto flint and very likely applied because they were middlemen insupplying the Gulf coast tribes with flint. Also called:Little Taensa, so-called from their relationship to the Taensa (q. v.).Tassenocogoula, name in the Mobilian trade language, meaning "flintpeople."Connections.?The testimony of early writers and circumstantialevidence render it almost certain that the Avoyel spoke a dialect ofthe Natchez group of the Muskhogean linguistic family.Location.?In the neighborhood of the present Alaxksville, La.History.?The Avoyel are mentioned first by Iberville in the ac-count of his first expedition to Louisiana in 1699, where they appearunder the Mobilian form of their name, Tassenocogoula. He did notmeet any of the people, however, until the year following when hecalls them "Little Taensas." They were encountered by La Harpein 1714, and Le Page du Pratz (1758) gives a short notice of themfrom which it appears that they acted as middlemen in disposing tothe French of horses and cattle plundered from Spanish settlements.In 1764 they took part in an attack upon a British regiment ascending 200 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145the Mississippi (see Ofo), and they are mentioned by some laterwriters, but Sibley (1832) says they were extinct in 1805 except fortwo or three women "who did Uve among the French inhabitants ofWashita," In 1930 one of the Tunica Indians still claimed descentfrom this tribe.Population.?I have estimated an Avoyel population of about 280in 1698. Iberville and Bienville state that they had about 40 warriorsshortly after this period. (See Taensa.)Connection in which they have become noted.?The name of theAvoyel is perpetuated in that of Avoyelles Parish, La.Bayogoula. Meaning "bayou people," either from their location orfrom the fact that their tribal emblem was the alligator.Connections.?Their language was of the southern Mushkogeandivision, not far removed from Houma and Choctaw.Location.?Near the present Bayou Goula, in Iberville Parish,History.?Unless this tribe was the Pishenoa encountered by Tontiin 1686 and not mentioned subsequently, it was first visited by Iber-ville in 1699. It then occupied one town with the Mugulasha (q. v.).In the winter of 1699-1700 the Bayogoula suffered severely from asurprise attack of the Houma. In the spring of 1700, for what causewe know not, the Bayogoula attacked their fellow townsmen, theMugulasha, and destroyed them, but in 1706 they suffered a similarfate at the hands of the Taensa who had sought refuge with them.The remnant of the Bayogoula was given a place near New Orleans,but some time later they moved up the river to the present AscensionParish, where they were found in 1739 between the Houma andAcolapissa. Yet our informant states that the three tribes werevirtually one and the same, the distinction being kept up merelybecause the chief of each band was descended from the tribe men-tioned. The subsequent history of the Bayogoula is identical withthat of the Houma. (See Houma under Mississippi.)Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that in 1650 there were1,500 of the Bayogoula, Quinipissa, and Mugulasha together. Myown estimate for the same tribes, as of 1698, is 875. In 1699 IberviUegave about 100 cabins and 200-250 warriors, and the Journal of hiscompanion ship, Le Marin, has 400-500 people. In 1700, after thedestruction of the Mugulasha, Gravier gives a population of 200, andabout 1715 they are said to have had 40 warriors. For their numbersin 1739, see Houma under Mississippi.Connection in which they have become noted.?This tribe shared withthe Washa the distinction of having been the first Indians within thelimits of the present State of Louisiana to meet Iberville in the yearin which the French colony of Louisiana was founded. The name is SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 201preserved in the post village of Bayou Goula, IberviUe Parish, La.,which seems to be close to the location of the original Indian town.Biloxi. The Biloxi settled in Louisiana about 1764, and a very feware stUl Uving there. (See Mississippi.)Caddo. The Caddo Indians are given under five different heads:the Ada! and the Natchitoches Confederacy in Louisiana; the Eye-ish, the Hasinai Confederacy, and the Kadohadacho Confederacyin Texas.Chatot. The Chatot entered Louisiana about 1764, lived for a whileon Bayou Boeuf, and later moved to Sabine River, after whichnothing more is heard of them. (See Florida.)Chawasha. Meaning unknown, though possibly "raccoon place(people)."Connections.?A reference to this tribe- and the Washa by Bienvilleplaces them in the Chitimacha division of the Tunican linguisticstock. I had erroneously concluded at an earlier period, on slendercircumstantial evidence, that they were Muskhogeans.Location.?On Bayou La Fourche and eastward to the Gulf ofMexico and across the Mississippi.History.?After the relics of De Soto's army had escaped to themouth of the Mississippi River and while their brigantines wereriding at anchor there, they were attacked by Indians, some of whomhad "staves, having very sharp heads of fish-bone." (See Bourne1904, vol. 2, p. 202.) These may have belonged to the Chawasha andWasha tribes. The same two tribes are said, on doubtful authority,to have attempted to attack an English sea captain who ascended theMississippi in 1699, but they were usually friendly to the French.In 1712 ^ they were moved to the Mississippi by Bienville and estab-lished themselves on the west side, just below the English Turn. In1713 (or more probably 1715) they were attacked by a party ofChickasaw, Yazoo, and Natchez, who kiUed the head chief and manyof his family, and carried off 11 persons as prisoners. Before 1722they had crossed to the east side of the river, half a league lower down.In 1730, in order to allay the panic in New Orleans following on theNatchez uprising of 1729 which resulted in the massacre of theWhites at Natchez, Governor Perrier allowed a band of Negro slavesto attack the Chawasha, and it is commonly reported that they werethen destroyed. The French writer Dumont (1753) is probablyright, however, when he states that only seven or eight adult maleswere killed. At any rate they are mentioned as living with theWasha at Les AUemands on the west side of the Mississippi above ? So given by Bienville in an unpublished ms. (See page 294.) 202 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145New Orleans in 1739, and in 1758 they appear as constituting onevUlage "wdth the Washa. Except for one uncertain reference, this isthe last we hear of them, but they may have continued for a con-siderable period longer before disappearing as a distinct body.Population.?Mooney (1928) gives an estimate of 1,400 for theWasha, Chawasha, and Opelousa together in the year 1650. My ownestimate for the first two and the Okelousa, as of 1698, is 700. Thisis based on Beaurain's (La Harpe's) estimate (1831) of 200 warriorsfor the 3 tribes. About 1715 there are said to have been 40 Chawashawarriors; in 1739, 30 warriors of the Washa and Chawasha together;and in 1758, 10 to 12.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Chawasha at-tained temporary notoriety on account of the massacre perpetratedupon them in the manner above mentioned.Chitimacha. Perhaps derived from the name of Grand River in thenative tongue, which was Sheti, though Gatschet (1883) interprets itthrough the Choctaw language as meaning "those who have pots."Connections.?The Chitimacha have given their name to a group oflanguages under the Tunican linguistic stock, including also theChawasha and Washa.Location.?On Grand River, Grand Lake, and the lower course ofBayou La Teche. Subdivisions and VillagesThe earliest French writers couple with this tribe the name of a tribe or supposedtribe called Yakna-Chitto, "Big Earth," but it is not known whether they werea part of the Chitimacha or an entirely independent people. In later times theChitimacha were drawn into two unnamed subdivisions, one near the upper endof Bayou La Fourche and the other on Grand Lake. Following are the knownvillages:Ama'tpan na'mu, two villages: (1) 3 miles east of Charenton on Bayou Teche;(2) on the east side of Grand Lake opposite Charenton.Grosse Tete na'mu, 2 miles from the village at Plaquemine.Hi'pinimsh na'mu, at the Fausse Pointe in the western part of Grand Lake, nearBayou Gosselin.Ka'me naksh teat na'mu, at Bayou du Plomb, near Bayou Chene, 18 miles northof Charenton.Ku'shuh na'mu, on Lake Mingaluak, near Bayou Chfine.Na'mu ka'tsi, the Bayou Ch^ne village, St. Martin's Parish.Ne'kun tsi'snis, opposite He aux Oiseaux, in the Lac de la Fausse Pointe.Ne Pinu'nsh, on Bayou Teche, 2 miles west of Charenton.Oku'nkiskin, probably at some sharp bend on Bayou La Teche judging from theirname.Shatshnish, at Jeanerette.She'ti na'mu, on Grand River west of Plaquemine.Sho'ktangi ha'ne hetci'nsh, on the south side of Graine k Vol^e Inlet, Grand Lake. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 203 Tca'ti kuti'ngi na'mu, at the junction of Bayou Teche with the AtchafalayaBayou.Teat kasi'tunshki, on the site of Charenton.Tsa'htsinshup na'mu, the Plaquemine village, on Bayou des Plaquemines nearGrand River.Waitinimsh, at Irish Bend near Franklin.There are said to have been others at the shell bank on the shore of GrandLake, close to Charenton, and at a place called "Bitlarouges."History.?Iberville made an alliance with the Chitimacha in 1699,shortly after his arrival in the present Louisiana. In August 1706,the Taensa captured some Chitimacha by treachery and enslavedthem, and later the same year a Chitimacha war partly killed St.Cosme, missionary to the Natchez, and three other Frenchmen en-camped with him. War followed between the Chitimacha on onehand and the French and their Indian allies on the other, whichdragged along until 1718. The Chitimacha suffered severely duringthese 12 years and this war was responsible for the fact that in theearly days of the Louisiana colony the greater part of the Indianslaves were Chitimacha. By the terms of the peace concluded in1718, the Chitimacha agreed to settle at a designated spot upon theMississippi, not far from the present Plaquemine. This, they orrather the eastern portion of them, did in 1719. In 1739 they seemto have been farther down, near the head of Bayou La Fourche. In1784 one village is reported on Bayou La Fourche and two on theTeche. By 1881 the only survivors were near Charenton, wherethey occupied a small part of what had once been a considerablereservation. In that year and the year following Dr. A. S. Gatschetof the Bureau of American Ethnology collected from them a consider-able body of linguistic material and some ethnological information.(See Gatschet, 1883.) Descendants of the tribe, mostly mixed-bloods,occupy the same section at the present time, but the Plaquemineband has disappeared.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated that in 1650 the Chiti-macha numbered 3,000 souls. The present writer allowed 750 war-riors to the tribe in 1698, based on Beaurain's estimate of 700-800in 1699, which would mean about 2,625 souls. In 1758 the Mississippiband counted only about 80 warriors and in 1784 Hutchins gives 27.The size of the western band is nowhere indicated separately but thecensus of 1910 gives 69 for the entire tribe, 19 of whom were then atschool in Pennsylvania. In 1930, 51 were returned.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Chitimacha werethe most powerful tribe of the northern Gulf coast west of Florida inUnited States territory. They also attained prominence in earlyLouisiana history on account of their long war with the French 204 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145and the number of Chitimacha slaves in colonial families arising fromthat fact. The survivors are noteworthy as the best basket makersin the whole Gulf region.Choctaw. Choctaw began moving into Louisiana not long after thesettlement of New Orleans, at first temporarily, but later for per-manent occupancy, especially after the territory east of the Mis-sissippi had been ceded lo Great Britain. Some settled on thenorthern shores of Lake Pontchartrain, where a few still remain,while other bands established themselves on the Nezpique, RedRiver, Bayou Boeuf, and elsewhere. Most of these drifted in timeto the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, but a few families are stillscattered about the State of Louisiana. (See Mississippi.)Doustioni. A smaU tribe of the Natchitoches Confederacy (q. v.).Houma. When first encountered by Europeans, the Houma hvednear the present boundary line between Mississippi and Louisiana,if not actually on the Louisiana side. In 1706 or shortly afterwardthey moved altogether within the limits of Louisiana, where theirdescendants have remained to the present day. (See Mississippi.)Koasati. Part of this tribe entered Louisiana near the end of theeighteenth century and lived on Red River and in the western partof the State. At the present day, the largest single band of Koasatiin existence is northeast of Kinder, La. (See Alabama.)Koroa. The Koroa camped, hunted, and had at times more perma-nent settlements in northeastern Louisiana. (See Mississippi.)Mugulasha. This was a tribe which formerly lived in the same townas the Bayogoula on the lower course of the Mississippi. Someearly writers state that they were identical with the Quinipissaand they wUl be treated in connection with that tribe.Muskogee. The true Muskogee were represented by one band, apart of the Pakana tribe, which moved into the colony about 1764.They were settled upon Calcasieu River in 1805. Later theyseem to have united with the Alabama now living in Polk County,Tex., but there are no known survivors at the present day. (SeeAlabama.)Natchez. When this tribe was attacked by the French after they haddestroyed the Natchez post, they escaped into Louisiana and forti-fied themselves at Sicily Island, from which most of them againescaped. A part under the chief of the Flour Village attacked theFrench post at Natchitoches in the fall of 1731, drove the Natchi-toches from their town, and intrenched themselves in it. St. Denis,commander of that post, attacked them, however, having been SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 205previously reinforced by some Caddo and Atakapa, and inflictedupon them a severe defeat. After this no considerable number ofNatchez seem to have remained in Louisiana. (See Mississippi.)Natchitoches Confederacy. The word "Natchitoches" is generally sup-posed to be derived from "nashitosh", the native word for pawpawbut an early Spanish writer, Josd Antonio Pichardo, was told thatit was from a native word "nacicit" signifying "a place where thesoil is the color of red ochre," and that it was applied originally to asmall creek in their neighborhood running through red soil. Thefollowing are synonyms:Nachittoos, Yoakum, 1855-56, vol. 1, p. 392.Nachtichoukas, Jefferys, 1761, pt. 1, p. 164.Nacitos, Linares (1716) in Margry, 1875-86, vol. 6, p. 217.Nactythos, Iberville (1699) in Margry, 1880, 1875-86, vol. 4, p. 178.Nadchito, Bienville (1700), in Margry, 1875-86, vol. 4, p. 434,Naketosh, Gatschet, Caddo and Yatassi MS., p. 77, B. A. E.Napgitache, McKenney and Hall, 1854, vol. 3, p. 82.Naquitoches, Belle-Isle (1721), in Margry, 1875-86, vol. 6, p. 341.Nashi'tosh, Mooney, 1896, p. 1092.Nasitti, Joutel (1687) in Margry, 1875-86, vol. 3, p. 409.Natsytos, Iberville (1699) in Margry, 1875-86, vol. 4, p. 178.Notchitoches, Carver, 1778, map.Yatchitcohes, Lewis and Clark, 1840, p. 142.As part of the Caddo, the same terms were applied to them as appearunder Kadohadacho (q. v.).Connections.?They belonged to the Caddo division of the Caddoanlinguistic stock, their nearest relatives being the Indians of the Kado-hadacho and Hasinai Confederacies.Location.?In northwestern Louisiana.SubdivisionsDoustioni, appearing sometimes as Souchitioni, a small tribe near the presentNatchitoches.Natchitoches, close to the present site of Natchitoches.Ouachita, on Ouachita River not far from the present Columbia.Yatasi, on Red River near Shreveport.A tribe called Capich6 is mentioned by Tonti, but it is otherwise never referredto. Another called Nakasa, Nakas6, Natch^s or Natach^ was probably a part ofthe Yatasi, and Tonti mentions a tribe called Choye, probably the Chaye ofJoutel (1713), as a people associated with the Yatasi. At a relatively late datepart of the Yatasi went to live with the Indians of the Kadohadacho Confedera-tion while the rest settled close to the Natchitoches.History.?Moscoso, De Soto's successor, perhaps encountered someof the tribes of this group though his route lay farther north andwest. On February 17, 1690, Tonti reached the villages of theseIndians coming from the Taensa on Lake St. Joseph, and went onup the river to the Kadohadacho, visiting the Yatasi on the way. 206 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145In March 1700 Bienville followed the same route from the Taensaand reached the Natchitoches Indians in April, stopping at theOuachita town en route. He went up Red River as far as the Yatasiand then returned to Biloxi. In 1702 the Natchitoches tribe, havinglost their crops, descended the Red River and the Mississippi to theFrench fort near the mouth of the latter, then commanded by LouisJuchereau de St, Denis, who received them kindly and sent them tolive with the Acolapissa Indians on Lake Pontchartrain. A fewyears later St. Denis visited the Natchitoches country himself. In1707 four Indians of this tribe took part in an expedition against theChitimacha to avenge the death of the missionary St. Cosme. In1713-14 St. Denis sent for the Natchitoches Indians in order to takethem back to their old country, where "he had planned to establish apost. On learning of the intentions of their neighbors, the AcolapissaIndians fell upon them, killed 17 and captured 50 women and girls,but the latter were apparently recovered soon afterward and all werereturned to their old town, where the post was established accordingto plan in 1714. From this time until his death St. Denis' careerwas intimately bound up with this post and the Indians about it,though he was frequently engaged in expeditions into and acrossTexas. He was formally appointed commandant of the post July 1,1720, and retained it until his death in June 1744. In 1731, with theassistance of his Indians and a detachment of soldiers from theSpanish post of Adai, he won a signal victory over a large body ofNatchez Indians, the only clear-cut advantage which the Frenchgained in the Natchez War. In the meantime Natchitoches hadbecome the center of a flourishing trade with the Indians extendingfar to the north and west, and when St. Denis died his son, Louis deSt. Denis continued to enjoy the advantages of it and to share theprestige of his father. During all of this time, however, the Natchi-toches Indians seem to have been decreasing, and toward the end ofthe eighteenth century they parted with most of their lands to FrenchCreoles, though their relations with the latter seem to have beenuniformly cordial. Part of them remained in their old country per-manently and either died out or mixed with the newcomers, while therest joined their relatives of the Kadohadacho and Hasinai Con-federations and followed their fortunes.Population.?In 1700 Bienville estimated that there were 400-450warriors in the Natchitoches Confederacy, but in 1718 he reportedthat the number had fallen to 80, while La Harpe (1831) reported atotal population of 150-200. In 1805 Sibley (1832) reported 52warriors and for the Natchitoches tribe by itself, 32, and 20 yearslater a total population of 61 was returned. An estimate of 1,000 forall of these tribes before White contact would probably be ample. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 207Connection in which they have become noted.?The city of Natchi-toches, La., is named after this group of tribes and is noteworthy asthe oldest permanent settlement in the State. The victory whichthey enabled St. Denis to win over the Natchez Indians occupies anoteworthy place in the history of the section.Ofo. This tribe entered Louisiana some time in the latter half ofthe eighteenth ccntiu-y and finally united with the Tunica, settlingwith them at Marksville. (See the article Mosopelea under Ohioand Tunica under Mississippi.)Okelousa. Meaning "black water."Connections.?The associations of this tribe were mainly withMuskhogean peoples and this fact, coupled with the Muskhogeanname, indicates their linguistic affiliations with a fair degree ofcertainty.Location.?The Okelousa moved about considerably. The best-determined location is the one mentioned by Le Page du Pratz (1758),on the west side of the Mississippi back of and above Pointe Couple.(See History below.) (See also Mississippi.)History.?After De Soto reached the principal Chickasaw tow^n,the head chief came to him, January 3, 1541, "and promptly gave theChristians guides and interpreters to go to Caluga, a place of muchrepute among the Indians. Caluga is a province of more than 90villages not subject to anyone, with a savage population, very warlikeand much dreaded, and the soil is fertile in that section." (SeeBourne, 1904, 1922, vol. 2, p. 132.) There is every reason to thinkthat Caluga is a shortened form of Okalousa and it is rather likelythat the later Okelousa were descended from these people, but if soeither De Soto's informants had very much exaggerated their numbersor they suffered immense losses before we hear of them again. Thename in De Soto's time may, however, have been applied to a geo-graphical region. Nicolas de la Salle, writing in 1682, quotes nativeinformants to the eflfect that this tribe, in alliance with the Houma,had destroyed a third. La Harpe (1831) mentions them as allied withthe Washa and Chawasha and wandering near the seacoast, a state-ment which led me to the erroneous conclusion that the three tribesthus associated were related. The notice of them by Le Page duPratz has been mentioned above. They finally united with theHouma, the Acolapissa, or some other Muskhogean band on thelower Mississippi.Population.?Unknown, but for an estimate, see Chawasha (p. 202).Opelousa. Probably from Mobilian and Choctaw Aba lusa, "blackabove," and meaning "black headed" or "black haired." 208 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Connections.?No words of the Opelousa language have survived,but the greater number of the earher references to them speak as ifthey were allied with the Atakapa, and it is probable that they belongedto the Atakapan group of tribes.Location.?In the neighborhood of the present Opelousas.History.?The Opelousa seem to have been mentioned first byBienville in an unpublished report on the Indians of the Mississippiand Gulf regions. They were few in numbers and led a wanderinglife. They maintained some sort of distinct tribal existence into thenineteenth century but disappeared by the end of the first quarter of it.Population.?About 1715 this tribe was estimated to have 130warriors; in 1805 they are said to have had 40, and in 1814 the totalpopulation of the tribe is placed at 20.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Opelousa gavetheir name to an important post and the district depending upon it.Ouachita. A tribe of the Natchitoches Confederacy (q. v.).Pascagoula. This tribe entered Louisiana about 1764 and lived onRed River and Bayou Boeuf. Their subsequent history is wrappedin uncertainty. (See Mississippi.)Quapaw. From 1823 to 1833 the Quapaw lived with the Kadohadachoon a southern affluent of Red River. (See Arkansas.)Quinipissa. Signifying "those who see," perhaps meaning "scouts,"or "outpost."Connections.?The Quinipissa belonged to the southern division ofthe Muskhogean stock, and probably were very closely related tothe Choctaw.Location.?On the west bank of the Mississippi River and somedistance above New Orleans.History.?There may have been a connection between this tribe,the Acolapissa (q. v.) and the Napissa or Napochi. (See Mississippi.)They were met first by La Salle and his companions when the latterwere on their way to the Gulf of Mexico in 1682. They treated theexplorers in a hostile manner but made peace with Tonti in 1686.When Iberville ascended the river in 1699, no tribe of the name wasto be found, but later it w^as learned that the chief of the Mugulashatribe, then forming one village with the Bayogoula, was the sameQuinipissa chief who had had dealings with La Salle and Tonti.According to some writers, the Mugulasha were identical with theQuinipissa; according to others, the Mugulasha had absorbed the re-mains of the Quinipissa. In May 1700, the Bayogoula rose againstthe Mugulasha and destroyed them as a tribe, though they probablyadopted many of them as individuals. We hear nothing further re-garding them. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 209Population.?There is no separate estimate of the number of theQuinipissa. (See Bayogoula.)Connection in which they have become noted.?The Quinipissa arenoted only for the encounter, ultimately hostile, which La Salle hadwith them in 1682 when he descended to the mouth of the Mississippi.Souchitioni, see Natchitoches Confederacy.Taensa. Meaning unknown, but the name is evidently derived fromthat of one of the tribe's constituent towns.Connections.?The\'' were one of the three known tribes of theNatchez division of the Muskhogean stock.Location.?At the western end of Lake St. Joseph, in TensasParish. (See also Alabama.) VillagesThe only list of Taensa villages preserved was obtained by Iberville throughthe medium of the Mobilian trade language and it is uncertain how much of eachname is a Mobilian translation. In four of them we recognize the Mobilianword for people, okla. These villages are: Taensas, Ohytoucoulas, Nyhougoulas,Couthaougoula, Conchayon, Talaspa, and Chaoucoula. Gatschet has endeav-ored to interpret all but one of them; Taensas by reference to ta?'tci, "corn";Ohytoucoulas from u'ti, "chestnut"; Couthaougoula from uk'ha'tax, "lake";Conchayon from ko'nshak, "reed"; Talaspa from ta"lapi, "five" or ta"lepa, "hundred"; Chaoucoula from issi, "deer" or ha'tche, "river." Most of theseseem in the highest degree doubtful. All of the towns were situated close togetherin the place above indicated.History.?It is altogether probable that the Spaniards under DeSoto encountered the Taensa or bands afterward affiliated with them,and the probability is strengthened by the fact that La Salle in 1682was shown some objects of Spanish origin by the chief of the Taensa.However, La Salle and his companions are the first Europeans knownto have met them. The French were treated with great kindnessand no war ever took place between the two peoples. The Taensawere subsequently visited by Tonti and by Iberville. When thelatter was in their town in 1700 the temple was destroyed by fire,whereupon five infants were thrown into the flames to appease thesupposedly offended deity. De Montigny undertook missionarywork among them for a brief period but soon went to the Natchezas presenting a larger field and liis place was never filled. In 1706the Taensa abandoned their villages on account of the threateningattitude of the Yazoo and Chickasaw and settled in the town of theBayogoula whom they afterward destroyed or drove away in thetragic manner above described. (See Bayogoula.) The Taensa ap-pear to have moved shortly to a spot in the vicinity of Edgard, St.John Baptist Parish, and later to the Manchac. In 1715 they leftthis latter place and moved to Mobile, where they were assigned a 210 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145townsite 2 leagues from the French post, at a place formerly occupiedby ihe Tavvasa. Before 1744 they had crossed the Tensaw River, towhich they gave their name, and made a new settlement which theyretained until Mobile was surrendered to the British in 1763. Soonafter that event, they moved to Red River. In April 1764, theyasked permission to establish themselves on the Mississippi River atthe upper end of Bayou La Fourche, but they seem never to havegone there. For more than 40 years they occupied a tract of landon Red River adjoining that of the Apalachee. Early in the nine-teenth century both tribes sold their lands and moved to BayouBoeuf. Still later the Taensa seem to have moved farther south toa small bayou at the head of Grand Lake which still bears theirname, where they intermarried with the Chitimacha, Alabama, andAtakapa. Some Taensa blood is known to run in the veins of certainChitimacha, but as a tribe they are entirely extinct.Population.?Mooney's estimate (1928) for the Taensa and Avoyelin 1650 is 800, and my own for 1698 slightly greater or nearly thesame, although De Montigny (in Shea, 1861), writing in 1699, givesonly 700. In 1700 Iberville estimated 120 cabins and 300 warriors,but in 1702 allows them 150 families. Somewhat later Le Page duPratz (1758) says they had about 100 cabins. In 1764 this tribe,with the Apalachee and Pakana Creeks, counted about 200 all told.Sibley (1832) places the number of Taensa warriors in 1805 at 25.Connection in which they have become noted.? The Taensa werenoted for (1) the peculiarity of their customs, which were like thoseof the Natchez, (2) the tragic destruction of their temple in 1700 andthe human sacrifices which followed, (3) the perpetuation of theirname in Tensas Parish, Tensas River, and Tensas Bayou, La., andthe Tensaw River and Tensaw Village in Baldwin County, Ala.Tangipahoa. Meaning probably "corncob gatherers," or "corncobpeople."Connections.?The name of this tribe and its affiliations with theAcolapissa indicate that it belonged to the southern division of theMuskhogean stock.Location.?Probably on the present Tangipahoa River, TangipahoaParish.History.?The original home of the Tangipahoa seems to have beenas given above, and their relations with the Acolapissa must have beenvery close, for Iberville was informed by some Indians that they con-stituted a seventh Acolapissa town. In 1682 La Salle's party dis-covered a town on the eastern side of the Mississippi, 2 leagues belowthe settlement of the Quinipissa, which had recently been destroyed,and one of his companions calls this "Tangibao," while others speak SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 211 of it as Maheouala or Mahehoualaima. The last two terms mayrefer to the name of the town and the first to that of the tribe whichoccupied it. Probably a part of the Tangipahoa only settled here,but, as we hear little of them after this period, we must assume thatthey had been absorbed by some other people, most likely theAcolapissa.Population.? (See Acolapissa.)Connection in which they have become noted.?Tangipahoa Parish,Tangipahoa River, in Amite and Pike Counties, Miss., and Tangi-pahoa Parish, La., and the post town of Tangipahoa preserve thename of the Tangipahoa.Tawasa. Some Tawasa accompanied the Alabama to Louisiana butnot until after the separate existence of the tribe had been ended.(See Alabama.)Washa. Appearing oftenest in literature in the French form Ouacha,meaning unkno"wn.Connections.?The nearest relations of the Washa were the Chawa-sha (q. V.) and both belonged to the Chitimachan branch of theTunican linguistic family.Location.?Their earliest known location was on Bayou La Fourche,perhaps in the neighborhood of the present LabadievHle, AssumptionParish. VillagesNone are known under any but the tribal name.History.?As stated in treating the Chawasha, this tribe and theone just mentioned may have been those which attacked Moscoso'sflotilla at the mouth of the Mississippi. Shortly after Ibervillereached America in 1699, the Washa and three other tribes west ofthe Mississippi came to make an alliance with him and a little later,on his way up the great river, he fell in with some of them. He callsBayou La Fourche "the River of the Washas." In July 1699,Bienville made a vain attempt to establish friendly relations withthem, but we hear little more of them until 1715 ^ when Bienvillemoved them to the Mississippi and settled them 2 leagues aboveNew Orleans on the south side of the Mississippi. In 1739 theWasha and Chawasha were found living together at Les Allemands,and they probably continued in the same neighborhood until a con-siderably later period. Sibley (1832) says the tribe in 1805 wasreduced to 5 persons (2 men and 3 women) scattered in Frenchfamilies. ? So stated in a ms. by Bienville. In Swanton (1911) this date was given erroneously as 1718 on otherauthority. 212 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Population.?^A memoir attributed to Bienville states that in 1715the Washa numbered 50 warriors, having been reduced from 200.This is the only separate estimate of them. (See Chawasha for thecombined population of the two tribes at other periods.)Connection in which they have become noted.?The name Washa ispreserved in Washa Lake, near the seacoast of Terrebonne Parish,La., and it was formerly given to Lake Salvador, southeast of NcavOrleans.Yatasi. A tribe of the Natchitoches Confederacy (q. v.).ARKANSASCaddo. These Indians are treated under the five following heads:Adai and the Natchitoches Confederacy in Louisiana, Eyeish and theHasinai Confederacy in Arkansas, and Kadohadacho Confederacyin Texas. Tribes of the Kadohadacho Confederacy are the onlyones known to have lived in Arkansas.Cahinnio. One of the tribes connected with the KadohadachoConfederacy (q. v. under Texas).Cherokee. Some Cherokee lived in this State while they were ontheir way from their old territories to Oklahoma, and a tract of landin northwestern Arkansas was granted them by treaty in 1817,which in 1828 they re-ceded to the United States Government.(See Tennessee.)Chickasaw. Chickasaw passed through Arkansas on their way toOklahoma but owned no land there. (See Mississippi.)Choctaw. The Choctaw had a village on the lower course of ArkansasRiver in 1805 and they owned a large strip of territory in thewestern part of the State, granted to them by the treaty of Doak'sStand, October 18, 1820. They surrendered the latter in a treatyconcluded at Washington, January 20, 1825. (See Mississippi.)Illinois. When Europeans first descended the Mississippi an Illinoisdivision known as Michigamea, "Big Water", was settled in north-eastern Arkansas about a lake known by their name, probably thepresent Big Lake in Mississippi County. They had probablycome from the region now embraced in the State of Illinois only ashort time before, perhaps from a village entered on some maps as "the old village of the Michigamea." Toward the end of theseventeenth century they were driven north again by the Quapawor Chickasaw" and united with the cognate Kaskaskia. (SeeIllinois.)Kaskinampo. This tribe appears to have been encountered by DeSoto in what is now the State of Arkansas in 1541 . (See Tennessee.) SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 213Michigamea. (See Illinois above.)Mosopelea, see Ofo.Ofo. If these are the Mosopelea, as seems assured, they appear tohave lived for a short time near the end of the seventeenth centuryin the neighborhood of the Quapaw on the lower course of ArkansasRiver before moving farther south. (See Mississippi.)Osage. The Osage hunted over much of the northern, and particu-larly northwestern, part of Arkansas and claimed all lands nowincluded in the State as far south as Arkansas River. They cededmost of their claims to these to the United States Government in atreaty signed at Fort Clark, Louisiana Territory, in 1808, and theremainder by treaties at St. Louis, September 25, 1818, and June 2,1825. (See Missouri.)Quapaw. Meaning "downstream people." They were known bysome form of this word to the Omaha, Ponca, Kansa, Osage, andCreeks. Also called:Akansa, or Arkansas, by the Illinois and other Algonquian Indians, aname probably derived from one of the Quapaw social subdivisions.Beaux Hommes, a name given them by the French.Bow Indians, so-called probably because the bow wood from the Osageorange came from or through their country.Ima, by the Caddo, probably from one of their towns.Papikaha, on Marquette's map (1673).Utsdshuat, Wyandot name, meaning "wild apple," and referring to thefruit of the Carica papaya.Connections.?The Quapaw were one of the five tribes belonging towhat J. O. Dorsey (1897) called the 0egiha division of the Siouanlinguistic stock.Location.?At or near the mouth of Arkansas River. (See alsoLouisiana, Kansas, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Texas.)VillagesTongigua, on the Mississippi side of Mississippi River above the mouth of theArkansas, probably in Bolivar County, Miss.Tourima, at the junction of White River with the Mississippi, Desha County,probably the town elsewhere called Imaha.Ukakhpakhti, on the Mississippi, probably in Phillips County.Uzutiuhi, on the south side of the lower course of Arkansas River not far fromArkansas Post.History.?Before the French became acquainted with this tribe (in1673) the Quapaw had lived on Ohio River above its junction with theWabash, and that portion of the Ohio was known as Arkansas Riverby the Illinois from this circumstance. It was formerly thought thatthe Pacaha or Capaha met by De Soto in this part of Arkansas were 214 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145the tribe in question, but it is not probable that they had left the Ohiothen, and the name Capaha, the form on which the relationship issupposed to be established, is probably incorrect. In 1673 Mar-quette visited them and turned back at their towns without descend-ing the Mississippi any farther. La Salle in 1682, Tonti in 1686, and allsubsequent voyagers down and up the Mississippi mention them,and they soon became firm allies of the French. Shortly after Mar-quette's visit they were ravaged by pestilence and the Ukakhpakhtivillage was moved farther downstream. A few years later and before1700 the people of Tongigua moved across and settled with those ofTourima, and still later all of the towns moved from the Mississippito the Arkansas. Le Page du Pratz (1758) encountered them about12 miles above the entrance of White River. Sibley (1832) foundthem in 1805 on the south side of Arkansas River about 12 milesabove Arkansas Post. By a treaty signed at St. Louis, August 24,1818, the Quapaw ceded all their claims south of Arkansas River excepta small territory between Arkansas Post and Little Rock, extendinginland to Saline River. The latter was also given up in a treatysigned November 15, 1824, at Harrington's, Arkansas Territory, and thetribe agreed to live in the country of the Caddo Indians. The}'' wereassigned by the Caddo a tract on Bayou Treache on the south side ofRed River, but it was frequently overflowed, their crops were oftendestroyed, and there was much sickness, and in consequence theysoon returned to their old country. There they annoyed the whitesettlers so much that by a treaty signed May 13, 1833, the UnitedStates Government conveyed to them 150 sections of land in the ex-treme southeastern part of Kansas and the northeastern part ofIndian Territory, to which they in turn agreed to move. February23, 1867, they ceded their lands in Kansas and the northern part oftheir lands in Indian Territory. In 1877 the Ponca were brought tothe Quapaw Reservation for a short time, and when they removedto their own reservation west of the Osage most of the Quapaw wentwith them. Still later the lands of the Quapaw were allotted inseveralty and they are now citizens of Oldahoma.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated that in 1650 the Quapawnumbered 2,500. In 1750 Father Vivier stated that they had about400 warriers or about 1,400 souls. In 1766, however, the BritishIndian Agent, John Stuart, reported that they had but 220 gunmen.Porter estimated that the total Quapaw population in 1829 was 500.In 1843 it was 476. In 1885 there were 120 on the Osage Reservationand 54 on the Quapaw Reservation, and in 1890, 198 on both. Thecensus of 1910 gave 231, but the Indian OflSce Report of 1916, 333,and that of 1923, 347. The census of 1930 returned 222. SWANTON 1 INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 215Connection in which they have become noted.?The native form of thename of this tribe, Quapaw, is but seldom used topographically, al-though there is a village of the name in Ottawa County, Okla.,but Arkansas^ the term appUed to them by the Illinois Indians, hasbecome affixed to one of the largest branches of the Mississippi andto one of the States of the American Union. It has also been givento a county and mountain in Arkansas and to cities in that State andin Kansas.Tunica. From some names given by the chroniclers of De Soto it isprobable that the Tunica or some tribes speaking their language wereliving in Arkansas in his time. In fact it is not imlikely that thePacaha or Capaha, who have often been identified with the Quapaw,were one of these. In later historic times they camped in the north-eastern part of Louisiana and probably in neighboring sections ofArkansas. (See Alississippi.)Yazoo. Like the Tunica this tribe probably camped at times innortheastern Louisiana and southeastern Arkansas, but there is nodirect evidence of the fact. (See Mississippi.)TENNESSEECatawba. For a brief period in their later history the Catawba Uvedamong the Cherokee and they may have occupied lands in Tennesseeat that time. There are indications that they may have been ineastern Tennessee at a more remote epoch. (See South Carolina.)Cherokee. Meaning unknown, but possibly from Creek tciloki, "people of a different speech." The middle and upper dialects sub-stitute I for r. Also called:Alligewi or Alleghanys, a people appearing in Delaware tradition whowere perhaps identical with this tribe.Ani'-Kltu'hwagI, own name, from one of their most important ancientsettlements, and extended by Algonquian tribes to the whole.Ani'-Y Yanktonai, in-cluding (a) Upper Yanktonai, and (b) Lower Yantonai or Hunkpatina, fromwhom also the Assiniboin are said to have separated, and (7) Teton, including(a) the Brul6 (Upper and Lower), (6) Hunkpapa, (c) Miniconjou, {d) Oglala, (c)Oohenonpa or Two Kettle, (/) San Arcs, (g) Sihasapa or Blackfoot. Numbers 1to 4 constituted the Santee or Eastern division.Minor Bands, Villages, Etc.Black Tiger, near Fort Peck Agency.Broken Arrows, possibly the Cazazhita.Casarba, 35 leagues up St. Peters River in 1804.Cazazhita, probably Tetons and perhaps the same as the Wannawega.Chansuushka, unidentified.Chasmuna, unidentified.Cheokhba, a band of the Hunkpapa Teton.Congewichacha, a Dakota division, perhaps Teton.Farmers Band, probably a band of the Mdewakanton, below Lake Traverse,Minn.Fire Lodge, below Lake Traverse.Flandreau Indians, a part of the Santee who settled at Flandreau, S. Dak.Grey Eagle Band, below Lake Traverse, Minn.Lake Comedu, unidentified.Lean Bear, below Lake Traverse, Minn.Long Sioux, near Fort Peck.Magayuteshni, a Mdewakanton division.Menostamenton, unidentified.Micacoupsiba, on the upper St. Peters, Minn.Minisha, an Oglala band.Neecoweegee, unidentified, possibly Minneconjou.Nehogatawouahs, near St. Croix River in Minnesota or Wisconsin.Newastarton, an unidentified band on the Mississippi above the St. Peters (Minne-sota) River; probably the Mdewakanton.Ocatameneton, an eastern Dakota band.Ohanhanska, a band of the Magayuteshni division of the Mdewakanton onMinnesota River.Oughetgeodatons, a village or subdivision of one of the western bands.Oujatespouitons, west of the Mississippi.Peshlaptechela, an Oglala Teton band.Pineshow, a band of Wahpeton, on Minnesota River, 15 miles from its mouth.Psinchaton, belonging to the Western Dakota in Minnesota.Psinoumanitons, a division of the Eastern Dakota, probably in Wisconsin.Psinoutanhinhintous, a band of Western Dakota in Minnesota.Rattling Moccasin Band, a band of Mdewakanton Dakota on Minnesota Riverbelow Lake Traverse, Minn.Red Leg's Band, a Wahpekute band in Minnesota.Redwood, location uncertain.Star Band, a band of Mdewakanton.Takini, an Upper Yanktonai band.Talonapin, a Hunkpapa band. SWANTONJ INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 283Tashunkeota, a Sihasapa band.Tateibombu's Band, location uncertain,Touchouasintons, a band of the Western Dakota, perhaps the Wazikute.Traverse de Sioux, a part of the Sisseton formerly on Minnesota River, Minn.Waktonila, unidentified.Wazikute, a band of Upper Yanktonai.White Cap Indians, on the south Saskatchewan River, in Assiniboia, Canada.White Eagle Band, location unknown.Wiattacbechah, an unidentified village.History.?The first historical mention of the Dakota is in the JesuitRelation for 1640 when they were probably in the eastern part of theterritory indicated above. Rev. A. L. Riggs, for many years amissionary among them, claims that their traditions pointed to thenortheast as the place of their origin and that they once lived aboutthe Lake of the Woods. There are, however, strong grounds for believ-ing that they pushed their way up into the present Minnesota fromthe southeast, though there is no doubt that the Chippewa forcedthem back in later times from some of the most easternmost landsthey occupied and their expulsion from Mille Lacs is an historicalevent. It is thought that few Dakota crossed the Missouri before1750, yet it is claimed that some of them reached the Black Hills by1765. In 1862 the Eastern Dakota under Little Crow rose upon theWhites and in the war which followed 700 settlers and 100 soldierswere killed, while the hostile bands lost all of the rest of their lands inMinnesota and were forced to move to Dakota and Nebraska. On thediscovery of gold in the Black Hills the rush of miners to that regionbecame the occasion for a war with the Western Dakota renderedfamous by the cutting off of General Custer and five companies ofcavalry on the Little Bighorn, June 25, 1876. An incipient rising atWounded Knee Creek, resulting from the spread of the Ghost Dancereligion, was the last scene of the struggles between the Dakota andthe Whites, and the tribe is now allotted lands in severalty, principallyin South Dakota, but in part in North Dakota and Nebraska.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated that in 1780 there were25,000 Dakota of all divisions, exclusive of the Assiniboin (q. v. underMontana). In 1904 their distribution on agencies and their numberswere as follows: Cheyenne River (Minniconjou, Sans Arcs, and Oohe-nonpa), 2,477; Crow Creek (Lower Yanktonai), 1,025; Fort TottenSchool (Sisseton, Wahpeton, and Yanktonai), 1,013; Riggs Institute(Santee), 279; Fort Peck (Yankton), 1,116; Lower Brul6 (LowerBrul6), 470; Pine Ridge (Oglala), 6,690; Rosebud (Brul6, Waglukhe,Lower Brul6, Northern, Oohenonpa, and Wazhazha), 4,977; Santee(Santee), 1,075; Sisseton (Sisseton and Wahpeton), 1,908; StandingRock (Sihasapa, Hunkpapa, and Yanktonai), 3,514; Yankton (Yank- 284 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 14Ston), 1,702; under no agency (Mdewakanton in Minnesota) 929;total, 27,175. The census of 1930 returned 25,934, of whom 20,918were in South Dakota, 2,307 in North Dakota, 1,251 in Montana,690 in Nebraska, and the remainder in more than 22 other States.The Report of the United States Office of Indian Affairs for 1937gave 33,625, including 27,733 in South Dakota, 2,797 in NorthDakota, 1,292 in Nebraska, 1,242 in Minnesota, and 561 in Montana.Connections in which they have become noted.?The Dakota are oneof the most famous tribes of North America, thanks to their numbersand prowess, their various wars with the Whites and the spectacularcharacter of one of the last encounters with them, the celebrated "Custer massacre," not to mention the conspicuous nature of their con-nection with the Ghost Dance cult and the tragic affray at WoundedKnee Creek which grew out of it. The name is preserved in two ofthe States of our Union, North and South Dakota; by a river whichflows through them; by counties in Minnesota and Nebraska; and byplaces in Stephenson County, lU.; Winona County, Minn.; in Wis-consin and Nebraska; and as Dakota City in Humboldt Coimty, Iowa,and Dakota County, Nebr. The other popular name for this tribe,Sioux, has been given to Sioux City, Iowa, and Sioux Falls, S. Dak.; tocounties in Iowa and Nebraska; and small places in Nebraska, Iowa,and Minnesota; as Sioux in Yancey County, N. C; Sioux Center inSioux County, Iowa; Sioux Rapids in Buena Vista County, Iowa; andSioux Pass in Richland County, Mont. It appears as Lacota (theTeton form of the name) in Marion County, Fla., and Van BurenCounty, Mich., and wdth the spelhng Lakota in Kossuth County,Iowa; Nelson County, N. Dak.; and Culpeper County, Va.Kiowa. The Kiowa hved in and about the Black Hills for a timebefore they were succeeded by the Sutaio and Cheyenne. (SeeOklahoma.)Mandan. According to tradition, this tribe reached the MissouriRiver near the mouth of White River, and settled at several placesalong the former within the borders of this State before passing outof it into North Dakota. (See North Dakota.)Omaha. After having been driven from the region of the PipestoneQuarry in Minnesota, the Omaha settled on the Missouri in theterritory of South Dakota and later moved downstream underpressure from the Dakota to their later seats in Nebraska. (SeeNebraska.)Ponca. This tribe was with the Omaha when it left the region of thePipestone Quarry, but separated from it on the Missouri and wentinto the Black Hills for a time, after which it retired to the Missouriand settled in the present Nebraska. (See Nebraska.) SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OP NORTH AMERICA 285Sutaio. Significance uncertain. A Cheyenne informant of Grinnell(1923) believed it was derived from issuhf, "ridge."Connection.?The Sutaio belonged to the Algonquian linguisticstock, their nearest relatives being the Cheyenne.Location.?When first brought distinctly to the knowledge of Whites,this tribe was west of Missouri River, between it and the Black Hills.History.?The Sutaio may have been the "Chousa" band of Chey-enne of whom Perrin du Lac (1805) heard. At any rate they wereprobably not far distant from the Cheyenne during their migrationsfrom Minnesota to the Alissouri River and beyond, though whetherin front of them, or to one side, it is impossible to tell. Accordingto Cheyenne tradition as reported by Grinnell (1923), the two tribesmet three different times. At any rate we know that they lived sideby side in the region eastward of the Black Hills for some time andthat they finally united there into one body, the Sutaio taking theirplace as one band in the Cheyenne tribal camping circle.Population.?Unknown. (See Cheyenne.)Winnebago. After leaving Minnesota in 1862 and before they tookrefuge with the Omaha, part of this tribe lived for a while on theCrow Creek Reservation. (See Wisconsin.)NEBRASKAArapaho. The Arapaho ranged for a considerable period over thewestern part of this State. (See Wyoming.)Arikara. This tribe lived in the territory now included in Nebraskawith the Skidi Pawnee at some prehistoric period, and after 1823they returned to the same tribe for 2 years. (See North Dakota.)Cheyenne. Like the Arapaho, the Cheyenne ranged to some extentover the western territories of the State. (See South Dakota.)Comanche. At an early day the Comanche must have lived in ornear the western part of Nebraska, before moving south. (SeeTexas.)Dakota. The Dakota had few settlements of any permanency in theterritory of Nebraska but they were constantly raiding into andacross it from the north. (See South Dakota.)Foxes. The Foxes were parties to a land cession made in 1830. (SeeWisconsin.)Iowa. When the Omaha lived about the Pipestone Quarry in Minne-sota, they were accompanied by the Iowa, who afterward wentwith them to South Dakota and thence to Nebraska. They,however, continued southeast into the territory of the presentState of Iowa (q. v.). 286 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 14BKansas. They were parties to a cession of Nebraska land made in1825. (See Kansas.)Kiowa. The Kiowa were at one time on the western margin ofNebraska and later followed the Comanche south. (See Oklahoma.)Missouri. After they had been driven from Missouri by the Saukand Fox, the remnant of this tribe lived for a while in villages southof Platte River. (See IVfissouri.)Omaha. Meaning "those going against the wind or current"; some-times shortened to Maha. Also called:Ho'-m&"-ha?, Winnebago name.Hu-Amdi, Cheyenne name.Onl'h&o, Cheyenne name, meaning "drum beaters" (7).Piik-tis, Pawnee name.U'-aha, Pawnee name.Connections.?The Omaha belonged to that section of the Siouanlinguistic stock which included also the Ponca, Kansa, Osage, andQuapaw, and which was called by J. O. Dorsey (1897) Dhegiha.Location.?Their principal home in historic times was in north-eastern Nebraska, on the Missouri River. (See also Iowa, Minnesota,Missouri, and South Dakota.)History.?According to strong and circumstantial traditions, theOmaha and others belonging to the same group formeriy hved on theOhio and Wabash Rivers. It is usually said that the Quapaw sepa-rated from the general body first, going down the Mississippi, but it ismore likely that they were left behind by the others and later movedout upon the great river. The Osage remained on Osage River, andthe Kansa continued on up the Missouri, but the Omaha, still includingthe Ponca, passed north inland as far as the Pipestone Quarry inMinnesota, and were afterward forced west by the Dakota, into whatis now the State of South Dakota. There the Ponca separated fromthem and the Omaha settled on Bow Creek, in the present Nebraska.They continued from that time forward in the same general region,the west side of the Missouri River between the Platte and the Nio-brara, but in 1855 made their last movement of consequence to thepresent Dakota County. In 1854 they sold all of their lands excepta portion kept for a reserve, and they gave up the northern part of thisin 1865 to the Winnebago. (See Wisconsin.) In 1882, through theefforts of Miss Alice C. Fletcher, they were granted lands in severaltywith prospects of citizenship, and Miss Fletcher was given charge ofthe ensuing allotment. Citizenship has now been granted them.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that there were about2,800 Omaha in 1780. In 1802 they were reduced by smallpox toabout 300. In 1804 the estimated number was 600; in 1829, 1,900; 8WANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 287in 1843, 1,600. Schoolcraft (1851-57) gives 1,349 in 1851; Burrows,1,200 in 1857; and the same number appears in the census returns for1880. In 1906 the United States Indian Office returned 1,228, andthe census of 1910 gave 1,105, The Report of the United States In-dian Office for 1923 showed an increase to 1,440. The census of 1930gave 1,103, principally in Nebraska. The United States IndianOffice reported 1,684 in 1932.Connection in winch they have become noted.?The Omaha will beremembered particularly from the fact that its name has been adoptedby the City of Omaha, Nebr. It has also been given to small placesin Boone County, Ark.; Stewart County, Ga.; Gallatin County, 111.;Morris County, Tex.; Knott County, Ky.; and Dickenson County,Va.It will be remembered furthermore as the scene of the humanitarianlabors of Miss Alice C. Fletcher and the ethnological studies of MissFletcher and Dr. Francis La Flesche.Oto. From Wat'ota, meaning "lechers." It often appears in alengthened form such as Hoctatas or Octoctatas. Also called:Che-wae-rae, own name.Matokatagi, Shawnee name.Motdtatak, Fox name.Wacutada, Omaha and Ponca name.Wad6tata, Kansa name.Watohtata, Dakota name.Watiitata, Osage name.Connections.?The Oto formed, with the Iowa and Missouri, theChiwere group of the Siouan linguistic family and were closely con-nected with the Winnebago.Location.?The Oto moved many times, but their usual location inthe historic period was on the lower course of the Platte or the neigh-boring banks of the Missouri. (See also Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota,Missouri, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin.)History.?From the maps of the Marquette expedition it wouldseem that at the time when they were drawn, 1673, the Oto were somedistance up Des Moines River. Their name was often coupled withthat of the related Iowa who lived north of them, but they alwaysseem to have occupied a distinct area. Shortly after this time theymoved over to the Missouri and by 1804 had established their townon the south side of the Platte River not far from its mouth. Accord-ing to native traditions, this tribe, the Iowa, and the Missouri wereanciently one people with the Winnebago, but moved southwest fromthem, and then separated from the Iowa at the mouth of Iowa Riverand from the Missouri at the mouth of Grand River. Their languageproves that they were closely related to these tribes whether or not 288 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145the separations occurred in the manner and at the places indicated.Their spHt with the Missouri is said to have been brought about by aquarrel between two chiefs arising from the seduction of the daughterof one by the son of the other, and from this circumstance the Oto aresupposed to have derived their name. In 1700 they were, accordingto Le Sueur, on Blue Earth River near the Iowa, and it is probablethat they moved into the neighborhood of the Iowa or Missouri atseveral different times, but their usual position was clearly inter-mediate along a north-south line. In 1680 two Oto chiefs came tovisit La Salle in Illinois and reported that they had traveled farenough west to fight with people using horses, w^ho were evidentlythe Spaniards, a fact which proves their early westward range.By treaties signed July 15, 1830, and October 15, 1836, they andthe Missouri ceded all claims to land in Missouri and Iowa, and byanother signed September 21, 1833, the two ceded all claims to landsouth of the Little Nemaha River. By a treaty signed March 15,1854, they gave up all their lands except a strip 10 miles wide and 25miles long on the waters of Big Blue River, but when it was found thatthere was no timber on this tract it was exchanged on December 9 foranother tract taken from the Kansas Indians. In a treaty signedAugust 15, 1876, and amended March 3, 1879, they agreed to sell120,000 acres off the western end of their reserve. And finally, atreaty signed on March 3, 1881, provided, the consent of the tribebeing obtained, for the sale of all of the remainder of their land inKansas and Nebraska, and the selection of a new reservation. Consentto the treaty was recorded May 4 following, and the tribe removed thefollowing year to the new reservation w^hich was in the presentOklahoma southwest of Arkansas River on Red Rock and Black BearCreeks, west of the present Pa\Miee. The first removal to Oklahomais said to have been due to a fission in the tribe resulting in the forma-tion of two bands, a conservative band called Coyotes and theQuakers, who w^ere progressives. The Coyotes moved m 1880 andthe Quakers joined them 2 years later.Population.?MooneJ (1928) estimated that in 1780 the Otonumbered about 900. In 1805 Lewis and Clark estimated 500 thenliving, but Catlin in 1833 raised this to 1,300, a figure which includesthe Missouri. Burrows in 1849 gives 900, and the United StatesIndian Ofiice in 1843, 931. This and all later enumerations includeboth the Oto and the Missouri. In 1862 they numbered 708; in1867, 511; in 1877, 457; in 1886, 334; in 1906, 390; and by the censusof 1910, 332. The census of 1930, however, showed a marked increaseto a total of 627, all but 13 of whom were in Oklahoma, 376 in NobleCounty, 170 in Pa\\Tiee, 34 in Kay, and 17 in Osage. There were 7 SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 289in California, 1 in Kansas, and 1 in Nebraska. In 1937, 756 werereported in Oklahoma.Connection in which they have become noted.?The name Oto has beenapplied to some small settlements in Woodbury County, Iowa, and inMissouri, and in the form Otoe to a county and post village inNebraska.Pawnee. The name is derived by some from the native word pariki, "a horn," a term said to be used to designate their peculiar mannerof dressing the scalp lock; but Lesser and Weltfish (1932) considerit more likely that it is from parisu, "hunter," as claimed bythemselves. They were also called Padani and Panana by varioustribes. Also known as:Ahihinin, Arapaho name, meaning "wolf people."Awahi, Caddo and Wichita name.Awahu, Arikara name.Aw6, Tonkawa name, originally used by the Wichita.Chahiksichahiks, meaning "men of men," applied to themselves but alsoto all other tribes whom they considered civilized.Ddrazhazh, Kiowa Apache name.Harahey, Coronado documents (somewhat uncertain).Ho-ni'-i-tahi-o, Cheyenne name, meaning "little wolf people."Kuitare-i, Comanche name, meaning "wolf people."Paoneneheo, early Cheyenne name, meaning "the ones with projecting frontteeth."Pdyi", Kansa form of the name.Pi-ta'-da, name given to southern tribes (Grinnell, 1923).Tse-sa do hpa ka, Hidatsa name meaning "wolf people."W6hesh, W^ichita name.Xaratenumanke, Mandan name.Connections.?The Pawnee were one of the principal tribes of theCaddoan linguistic stock. The Arikara (q. v.) were an offshoot, andthe Wichita were more closely related to them than were the Caddo.Location.?On the middle course of Platte River and the Republicanfork of Kansas River. (See also Kansas, Oklahoma, and Wyoming.)SubdivisionsThe Pawnee consisted in reality of four tribes, or four known in historic times,viz: The Chaui or Grand Pa^vmee, the Kitkehahki or Republican Pawnee, thePitahauerat or Tapage Pawnee, and the Skidi or Skiri Pawnee, the first threespeaking the same dialect and being otherwise more closely connected with oneanother than with the last. The Kitkehahki embraced two divisions, the Kitke-hahki proper and the Little Kitkehahki. Murie gives two others, the Black Headsand Karikisu, but Lesser and Weltfish (1932) state that the first was a society andthe second the name of the women's dance or ceremony before corn planting.The Pitahauerat consisted of the Pitahauerat proper and the Kawarakis, some-times said to be villages. 290 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145History.?Some of the Pawnee trace their origin to the southwest,some to the east, and some claim always to have lived m the coimtrywith which later history associates them. The first White men tomeet any members of these tribes were the Spaniards imder Coronadoin 1541. French explorers heard of them again eariy in the eighteenthcentm-y and French traders were estabhshed among them before themiddle of it. The Spaniards of New Mexico became acquainted withthem at about the same time on account of the raids which they con-ducted in search of horses. They lay somewhat out of the track ofthe first explorers from the east, and in consequence suffered lessdiminution in numbers through White influences than did many oftheir neighbors, but they were considerably reduced through warswith the surrounding tribes, particularly with the Dakota. Althoughsome of the early traders and trappers were treated harshly by them,their relations with the United States Government were friendly fromthe first, and they uniformly furnished scouts for the frontier armies.By treaties negotiated in 1833, 1848, and 1857, they ceded all oftheir lands in Nebraska except one reservation and in 1876 this tractwas also surrendered and the entire tribe given new lands in Okla-homa, where they still live. The land has been allotted to them inseveralty and they are now citizens of the United States.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates 10,000 Pawnee in 1780. In1702 Iberville estimated 2,000 families. In 1838 they numberedabout 10,000 according to an estimate of Dunbar and Allis (1880-82),and one authority places the figure as high as 12,500. In 1849, afterthe cholera epidemic, they were reported at 4,500; in 1856, 4,686were returned, but in 1861, only 3,416. In 1879, after sufferingseverely in consequence of the removal to Indian Territory, they haddropped to 1,440, and by 1906 they had fallen to 649. The censusof 1910 returned 633, but according to the Report of the United StatesIndian Office for 1923, they had then increased to 773. The censusof 1930 gave 730. In 1937, 959 were reported.Connection in vMch they have become noted.?The Pawnee tribe isdistinguished (1) for its peculiar language and culture; (2) because ofits numbers and warfike prowess, its constant hostility to the Dakota,and consistent assistance to the American forces operating upon thePlains; and (3) as having given its name to a city in Oklahoma; tocounties in Oklahoma, Kansas, and Nebraska; to streams in Coloradoand Kansas; and to places in Morgan County, Colo.; SangamonCounty, 111.; Montgomery County, Ind.; Pawnee City in PawneeCounty, Nebr.; Pawnee Rock in Barton County, Kans.; PawneeStation in Bourbon Coimty, Kans.; and a creek and buttes in north-eastern Colorado. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 291Ponca. Own name, meaning unknown. Also called:Dibit, Li-hit' or Rfhit, Pawnee name.Kan'ka?, Winnebago name.Tchidxsokush, Caddo name.Connections.?The Ponca spoke practically the same language asthe Omaha and formed with them, the Osage, Kansa, and Quapaw,the Dhegiha group of the Siouan linguistic family.Location.?On the right bank of the Missouri at the mouth of theNiobrara. (See also Iowa, Minnesota, Oklahoma, and South Dakota.)History.?The early hfe of the Ponca seems to have run parallelwith that of the Omaha (q. v.). They are said to have separated fromthe latter at the mouth of White River, S. Dak., and to have movedwest into the Black Hills but to have rejoined the Omaha a little later.These two tribes and the Iowa then descended the Missouri togetheras far as the mouth of the Niobrara, where the Ponca remained whilethe Omaha estabhshed themselves below on Bow Creek. Theyremained in approximately the same situation until 1877 when thelarger part of them were forcibly removed to Indian Territory. Thisaction was the occasion for a special investigation, as a result of whichabout three-quarters continued in the Territory while the remainderpreferred to remain in their old country. Their lands have now beenallotted to them in severalty.Population.?Mooney (1928) gives 800, as the probable size of thePonca tribe in 1780. In 1804 Lewis and Clark estimate only 200 butthey had been greatly reduced just before by smallpox. In 1829 theyhad increased to 600 and in 1842 to about 800. In 1871 they num-bered 747. In 1906 the Ponca in Oklahoma numbered 570 and thosein Nebraska 263; total, 833. The census of 1910 gave 875 in all,including 619 in Oklahoma and 193 in Kansas. The Report of theUnited States Indian Office for 1923 was 1,381, evidently includingother tribes. The census of 1930 returned 939. In 1937 the UnitedStates Indian Office gave 825 in Oklahoma and 397 in Nebraska.Connection in wkUh they have become noted.?The name Ponca ispreserved by a river in South Dakota, Ponca City in Kay County,Okla., and places in Newton County, Ark., and Dixon County, Nebr.Sauk. Like the Foxes, they were parties to the land cession of 1830involving territories in this State. (See Wisconsin.)Winnebago. Part of the Winnebago settled close to the Omahaafter they had been driven from Minnesota following the Dakotaoutbreak of 1862. A reservation was later assigned them thereand in course of time they were allotted land in severalty upon it.(See Wisconsin.) 292 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145KANSASApache, see Jicarilla.Arapaho. The Arapaho ranged at one time over much of the westernpart of this State. (See Wyoming.)Cherokee. By the terms of the Treaty of New Echota, the Cherokeeobtained title to lands in southeastern Kansas, part in one blockknown as the "Neutral land," and the rest in a strip along thesouthern boundary of the State. These were re-ceded to the UnitedStates Government in 1866. (See Tennessee.)Cheyenne. Like the Arapaho they at one time ranged over thewestern part of the State. (See South Dakota.)Chippewa. In 1836 two bands of Chippewa living in Michigan andknown as the Swan Creek and Black River bands were given a tractof territory on Osage River, Kans. They arrived in 1839. In1866 they agreed to remove to the Cherokee country in what is nowOklahoma and to unite with that tribe. A small number of familiesof Chippewa living west of Lake Michigan accompanied the PrairiePotawatomi to southwestern Iowa, but they were either absorbedby the Potawatomi or subsequently separated from them. (SeeMinnesota.)Comanche. They ranged over the western part of the State. (SeeTexas.)Delaware. A strip of land in northeastern Kansas was granted tothe Delaware in 1829 and was again surrendered by treaties madein 1854, 1860, and 1886. In 1867 they agreed to take up theirresidence with the Cherokee in Oklahoma. Four sections of landwere, however, confirmed to a body of Munsee ("Christian Indians"),who in turn sold it in 1857. This sale was confirmed by the UnitedStates Government in 1858, and a new home was found for theseIndians among the Swan Creek and Black River Chippewa whomthey accompanied to the Cherokee Nation in Oklahoma in 1866.Nevertheless, a few Munsee have remained in the State. (SeeNew Jersey.)Foxes. The Foxes lived for a time on a reservation in eastern Kansasbut about 1859 returned to Iowa. (See Wisconsin.)Illinois. The remnants of these people were assigned a reservationabout the present Paola in 1832. In 1867 they removed to thenortheastern corner of the present Oklahoma, where they receivedlands which had formerly belonged to the Quapaw. (See Illinois.)Iowa. This tribe was placed on a reservation in northeastern Kansasin 1836, and part of them continued in this State and were allotted SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 293land here in severalty, while the rest went to Oklahoma. (SeeIowa.)Iroquois. Lands were set aside in Kansas in 1838 for some Iroquois,part of the Munsee, and remnants of Mahican and southern NewEngland Indians but only a few of the Indians involved moved tothem. They were later declared forfeited, and the rights of 32 bonafide Indian settlers were purchased in 1873. (See Seneca and alsoNew York, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut.)Jicarilla. This was one of the so-called Apache tribes. They livedin Colorado and New Mexico and ranged over parts of Texas,Oklahoma, and Kansas. (See Colorado.)Kansa. Name derived from that of one of the major subdivisions; ashortened form Kaw is abouL equally current. Also called:Alah6, Kiowa name.Guaes, in Coronado narratives, thought to be this tribe.Hdtauga, own name.M6htawas, Comanche name, meaning "without a lock of hair on the fore-head."t5^kase, Fox name.Connections.?The Kansa belonged to the Siouan linguistic stockand constituted, with the Osage, Quapaw, Omaha, and Ponca adistinct subgroup called by Dr. J. O. Dorsey (1897) Dhegiha.Location.?They were usually on some part of the Kansas River,which derives its name from them. (See also Nebraska and Okla-homa.) VillagesBahekhube, near a mountain south of Kansas River, Kans.CheghuUn, 2 villages; (1) on the south side of Kansas River, and (2) on a tributaryof Kansas River, on the north side east of Blue River.Djestyedje, on Kansas River near Lawrence.Gakhulin, location uncertain.Gakhulinulinbe, near the head of a southern tributary of Kansas River.Igamansabe, on Big Blue River.Inchi, on Kansas River.Ishtakhechiduba, on Kansas River.Manhazitanman, on Kansas River near Lawrence.Manhazulin, on Kansas River.Manhazulintanman, on Kansas River.Manyinkatuhuudje, at the mouth of Big Blue River.Neblazhetama, on the west bank of the Mississippi River a few miles above themouth of Missouri River, in the present Missouri.Niudje, on Kansas River, about 4 miles above the site of Kansas City, Mo.Padjegadjin, on Kansas River.Pasulin, on Kansas River.Tanmangile, on Big Blue River.Waheheyingetseyabe, location uncertain.Wazhazhepa, location uncertain. 294 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Yuzhemakancheubukhpaye, location uncertain.Zandjezhinga, location uncertain.Zandzhulin, at Kaw Agency, Indian Territory, in 1882.Zhanichi, on Kansas River.History.?According to tradition, the Kansa and the others of thesame group originated on Ohio River, the Kansa separating from themain body at the mouth of Kansas River. If the Guaes of Coronadowere the Kansa, the tribe was first heard of by white men in 1541.During at least a part of the eighteenth century, they were on Mis-souri River above the mouth of the Kansas, but Lewis and Clarkmet them on the latter stream. They occupied several villages insuccession along Kansas River until they settled at Council Grove,on Neosho River, in the present Morris County, where a reservationwas set aside for them by the United States Government in 1846,when they ceded the rest of their lands. They remained on thisreservation until 1873 when it was sold and another reserve purchasedfor them in Oklahoma next to the Osages. Their lands have nowbeen allotted to them in severalty.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates a Kansa population of 3,000in 1780. In 1702 Iberville estimated 1,500 families. Lewis and Clark(1804) give 300 men. In 1815 there were supposed to be about 1,500in all, and m 1822, 1,850. In 1829 Porter estimated 1,200, but thepopulation as given by the United States Indian Office for 1843 was1,588. After this time, however, the tribe lost heavily throughepidemics and in 1905 was returned at only 209. The census of 1910gave 238, but the United States Indian Office Report of 1923 gave420. The census of 1930 returned 318. In 1937 the number wasgiven as 515.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Kansa will beremembered particularly from the fact that they have given theirname to Kansas River and the State of Kansas, and secondarily toKansas City, Mo., and Kansas City, Kans. It is also appHed toplaces in Walker County, Ala.; Edgar County, lU.; Seneca CountyOhio; Seneca and Delaware Comities, Okla.; and in the form Kaw,to a village in Kay County, Okla., and a station out of the KansasCity, Mo., P. O. Kansasville is in Racine County, Wis.Eickapoo. A reservation was granted this tribe in southeasternKansas in 1832, and though it was progressively reduced in area,part of them have continued to live there down to the present time.(See Wisconsin.)Kiowa. Signifying (in their own language) "principal people." Alsocalled:Be'shfltchS, Kiowa Apache name.Dattimpa'ta, Hidatsa name, perhaps a form of Wi'tapaha'tu below. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 295Gahe'wa, Wichita and Kichai name.Ko'mpabi'anta, Kiowa name, meaning "large tipl flaps."KwQ'da, old name for themselves, meaning "going out."Manrhoat, mentioned by La Salle, perhaps this tribe.Na'la'ni, Navaho name, including southern plains tribes generally, but par-ticularly the Comanche and Kiowa.Nl'chihing'na, Arapaho name, meaning "river man."Quichuan, given by La Harpe (1831) and probably this tribe.Te'pda', ancient name for themselves, meaning "coming out."Tepki'nago, own name, meaning "people coming out."Tideing Indians, Lewis and Clark (1904-5).Vi'tapatdi, name used by the Sutaio.Wi'tapahatu, Dakota name, meaning "island butte people." (The Chey-enne name was similar.)Connections.?Though long considered a separate linguistic stock,the researches of J. P. Harrington make it evident that the Kiowawere connected with the Tanoan stock as the Kiowa-Tanoan stockand probably with the Shoshonean stock also.Location.?The best-known historic location of these people was aplot of territory including contiguous parts of Oklahoma, Kansas,Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas. (See also Montana, Nebraska,South Dakota, and Wyoming.)SubdivisionsThe bands constituting their camp circle, beginning on the east and passinground by the south were: Kata, Kogui, Kaigwu, Kingep, Semat (i. e., Apache),and Kongtalyui.History.?According to tradition, the Kiowa at one time lived at thehead of Missouri River near the present Virginia City. Later theymoved down from the mountains and formed an aUiance with theCrows but were gradualy forced south by the Arapaho and Cheyenne,while the Dakota claim to have driven them from the Black Hills.They made peace with the Arapaho and Cheyenne in 1840 and after-ward acted with them. When they reached the Arkansas, they foundthe land south of it claimed by the Comanche. These people were atfirst hostile, but after a time peace was made between the two tribes,the Kiowa passed on toward the south, and the two ever after acted asallies. Together they constantly raided Mexican territory, advancingas far south as Durango. The Kiowa were among the most bitterenemies of the Americans. They were placed on a reservation insouthwestern Oklahoma in 1868 along with the Commanche andKjowa Apache and have now been allotted lands in severalty.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that there were 2,000 in1780. In 1905 their population was 1,165; the census of 1910 gave itas 1,126, and the United States Indian Office Report for 1923, 1,679,including the Kiowa Apache. The census of 1930 returned 1,050, butin 1937 the United States Office of Indian Affairs reported 2,263. 296 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY IBcll. 145Connection in which they have become noted.?The Kiowa were oneof the leading tribes on the southern Plains and were surpassed onlyby the Comanche and Apache in the raids which they undertook intoMexico. The name has become affixed to counties in Colorado andKansas, a creek in Colorado; and small places in Barber County,Kans.; Pittsburg County, Okla.; and Elbert County, Colo.Kiowa Apache. The name is derived from that of the Kiowa and fromthe circumstance that they spoke a dialect related to those of thebetter-known Apache tribes, though they had no other connectionwith them. Also called:Bad-hearts, by Long (1823). (See Kaskaias.)Cancey or Kantsi, meaning "liars," applied by the Caddo to all Apache ofthe Plains, but oftenest to the Lipan.Essequeta, a name given by the Kiowa and Comanche to the MescaleroApache, sometimes, but improperly, applied to this tribe.Gd.ta'ka, Pawnee name.Gina's, Wichita name.Gli'ta'k, Omaha and Ponca name.K'd-patop, Kiowa name, meaning "knife whetters."Kaskaias, possibly intended for this tribe, translated "bad hearts."Kislnahls, Kichai name.MfitsfanS-taniu, Cheyenne name, meaning "whetstone people."Nadfisha-d6na, own name, meaning "our people."Pacer band of Apache, H. R. Doc.Prairie Apaches, common name.S!idals6mte-k'fago, Kiowa name, meaning "weasel people."Tfi'gugdla, Jemez name for Apache tribes including Kiowa Apache.Tagdi, an old Kiowa name.Tdgukerish, Pecos name for all Apache.Tashin, Comanche name for all Apache.Tha'kd-hinS'na, Arapaho name, meaning "saw-fiddle man."Yabipais Natag^, Garc^s Diary (1776).Connections.?The Kiowa Apache belonged to the Athapascanlinguistic family, their nearest relatives being the Jicarilla and Lipan(Hoijer).Location.?'They have been associated with the Kiowa from theearliest traditional period. (See also Colorado, New Mexico, Okla-homa, and Wyoming.)History.?The first historical mention of the Kiowa Apache is byLa Salle in 1681 or 1682, who calls them Gattacka, the term by whichthey are known 1o the Pawnee. As intimated above, their historywas in later times the same as that of the Kiowa, and they occupieda definite place in the Kiowa camp circle. For 2 years only, 1865-67,they were at their own request detached from the Kiowa and adjoinedto the Cheyenne and Arapaho, on account of the unfriendly attitudeof the Kiowa toward the Whites. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 297Population.?Mooney (1928) gives an estimate of 300 KiowaApache as of 1780, adopting the estimate made by Lewis and Clark in1805. In 1891 their population was 325, but like the associatedtribes they suffered heavily from measles in 1892 and in 1905 therewere only 155 left. The census of 1910 returned 139, that of 1930,184, and in 1937 they appear to have increased to 340 but otherApache may be included.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Kiowa Apacheare remarkable merely as an example of a tribe incorporated into thesocial organism of another tribe of entirely alien speech and origin.Miami. In 1832 the Miami subdivisions known as Piankashaw andWea were assigned lands along with the Illinois in Eastern Kansas.In 1840 the rest of the Miami were granted lands in the immediateneighborhood but just south, and all but one band removed therefrom Indiana. In 1854 they ceded part of this territory and in1867 accompanied the Illinois to the present Oklahoma. (SeeIndiana.)Missouri. The remnant of this tribe accompanied the Oto whenthey lived in this State. (See Missouri.)Munsee. A band of Munsee or "Christian Indians" owned land inKansas between 1854 and 1859. (See Delaware in New Jersey,etc.)Osage. The southeastern part of Kansas was claimed by the Osageand was ceded by them to the United States Government intreaties made in 1825, 1865, and 1870. (See Missouri.)Oto. The Oto were on the eastern border of Kansas several times dur-ing their later history. (See Nebraska.)Ottawa. In 1831 two bands of Ottawa were granted lands on Maraisdes Cygnes or Osage River. They relinquished these in 1846 andin 1862 agreed to allotment of land in severalty, giving up theirremaining lands. Further treaties regarding these were made in1867 and 1872. A few families of Ottawa accompanied the PrairiePotawatomi when they removed from Wisconsin to Iowa, but theywere soon absorbed or else scattered. Ottawa bands called Ottawaof Blanchard's Fork and Ottawa of Roche de Boeuf occupied landsin Kansas between 1832 and 1865 when they moved to Oklahoma.(See Michigan.)Pawnee. A part of the Paw^nee occupied the valley of the RepublicanFork of Kansas River. (See Nebraska.)Potawatomi. In 1837 the United States Government entered into atreaty with five bands of Potawatomi living in the State of Indiana 298 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bm-u 145by which it was agreed to convey to them by patent a tract of coun-try on Osage River, southwest of the Missouri, in the present Stateof Kansas. This was set apart the same year and the Indians, thePotawatomi of the Woods, moved into it in 1840, but they cededit back in 1846 and were given a reserve between the Shawnee andthe Delaware, in the present Shawnee County, which they occupiedin 1847. By a series of treaties, culminating in the Treaty ofChicago, 1833, the Potawatomi west of Lake Michigan surrenderedtheir lands and received a large tract in southwestern Iowa. Theywere accompanied by a few Chippewa and Ottawa. In 1846 thisreserve was re-ceded to the United States Government and in1847-48 the Indians, now known as the Prairie Potawatomi,moved to lands in Kansas just east of the lands of the Potawatomiof the Woods. Michigan Potawatomi did not come to this placeuntil 1850. About the end of the Civil War some of the Prairieband moved back to Wisconsin but the greater part of them re-mained and accepted lands in severalty. In 1869 the Potawatomiof the Woods began a movement to secure lands in Oklahoma, andby 1871 most of them had gone thither. (See Michigan.)Quapaw. Between 1833 and 1867 lands in the southeastern tip ofKansas belonged to their reserve in Indian Territory (Oklahoma),but in the latter year they ceded this back to the Government.(See Arkansas.)Sauk. After leaving Iowa, the Sauk and Fox Indians occupied areserve in the eastern part of Kansas, but about 1859 the Foxesreturned to Iowa, and in 1867 the Sauk ceded their Kansas terri-tories and moved to Oklahoma. (See Wisconsin.)Seneca. Seneca Indians were joint owners with other tribes of landin the extreme southwestern part of Kansas. They ceded this tothe United States Government in 1867. (See New York.)Shawnee. In 1825 the Shawnee residing in Missouri received a grantof land along the south side of Kansas River, west of the boimdaryof Missouri. In 1831 they were joined by another body of Shawneewho had formerly lived at Wapaghkonnetta and on Hog Creek,Ohio, In 1854 nearly all of this land was re-ceded to the UnitedStates Government and the tribe moved to Indian Territory, thepresent Oklahoma. (See Tennessee.)Wyandot. The Wyandot purchased land in eastern Kansas on Mis-souri River from the Delaware in 1843 and parted with it again in1850. A few Wyandot also held title to land along with othertribes on the border of Oklahoma and re-ceded it along with themin 1867. (See Ohio.) SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 299OKLAHOMAAlabama. This was one of the tribes of the Creek Confederacy, partof which accompanied the Creeks to Oklahoma early in the nine-teenth century and settled near Weleetka, where a small stationon the Frisco Railway bears their name. (See Alabama.)Apache. The name was given to a tribe or rather a group of tribes.(See Jicarilla under Colorado; Kiowa Apache, under Kansas;Lipan under Texas; also Apache under New Mexico.)Apalachee. A few individuals of this tribe removed to Oklahomafrom Alabama or Louisiana. Dr. Gatschet learned the names oftwo or three individuals about 1884. (See Florida.)Arapaho. In early times the Arapaho ranged to some extent over thewestern sections of Oklahoma, and part of them (the SouthernArapaho) were finaUy given a reservation and later allotted landin severalty in the west central part along with the SouthernCheyenne. (See Wyoming.)Biloxi. A few Biloxi reached Oklahoma and settled with the Choctawand Creeks. (See Mississippi.)Caddo. The Caddo moved to Oklahoma in 1859 and were given areservation in the southwestern part about Anadarko, where theywere allotted land in severalty. (See Texas.)Cherokee. The Cherokee were moved to a large reservation in thenortheastern part of Oklahoma in the winter of 1838-39. Afternearly 70 years of existence under their own tribal government theywere allotted land in severalty and became citizens of the UnitedStates. (See Tennessee.)Cheyenne. The history of the Southern Cheyenne parallels that ofthe Southern Arapaho as given above. (See South Dakota.)Chickasaw. The Chickasaw moved to the present Oklahoma between1822 and 1840. They had their own government for many yearsbut are now citizens. (See Mississippi.)Choctaw. This tribe moved to Oklahoma about the same time as theChickasaw though several thousand remained in their old country.Like the Chickasaw they had their own national government for along time but are now citizens at large of Oklahoma. (SeeMississippi.)Comanche. The western part of Oklahoma was occupied by theComanche during their later history, and they were finally givena reservation in the southwestern part of it, where they were al- 300 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145lotted land in severalty and given the privileges of citizenship.(See Texas.)Creeks. The tribes constituting the Creek Confederacy came toOklahoma between 1836 and 1841 and were given a reservation inthe northeastern part, where they maintained a national govern-ment until early in the present century when their lands wereallotted in severalty, and they became citizens. (See Alabama,Florida, and Georgia.)Delaware. In 1867 a part of the Delaware were removed fromKansas to the northeastern part of what is now Oklahoma andincorporated with the Cherokee Nation, Another band of Dela-ware is with the Caddo and Wichita in southwestern Oklahoma.(See New Jersey.)Foxes. A few Fox Indians accompanied the Sauk (q. v.) to Oklahomain 1867. (See Wisconsin.)Hitchiti. This is a subtribe of the Creek Confederacy. (See Georgia;also Creeks and Creek Confederacy above and under Alabama,Florida, and Georgia.)Illinois. In 1868 the surviving Illinois Indians, principally Peoriaand Kaskaskia, previously united with the Miami bands, Wea andPiankashaw, moved to Oklahoma and occupied a reserve in thenortheastern part of the State under the name Peoria. (SeeIllinois.)Iowa. Part of the Iowa were moved from Kansas to a reserve incentral Oklahoma set apart in 1883; they were allotted land inseveralty in 1890. (See Iowa.)Iroquois. Some Iroquois Indians, together with the Tuscarora, someWyandot, and probably Indians of the former Erie Nation, all underthe name of Seneca Indians, were given a reservation in northeasternOklahoma, where their descendants still hve, now as citizens of theUnited States. (See New York and Ohio.)Jicarilla. This was one of those Athapascan tribes known as Apache.In early times they ranged over parts of western Oklahoma. (SeeColorado.)Kansa. In 1873 the Kansa were moved to Oklahoma and given areservation in the northeastern part of the State. (See Kansas.)Eichai. In very early times this tribe lived on, or perhaps north of.Red River, but later they worked their way south to the head-waters of the Trinity. In 1859 they returned to the north side ofthe river in haste in fear of attack by the Texans and have sincelived with the Wichita in the neighborhood of Anadarko. (SeeTexas.) SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 301Kickapoo. In 1873 some Kickapoo were brought back from Mexicoand settled in the central part of Oklahoma, where all but a certainportion of the Mexican band were afterward gathered. (SeeWisconsin.)Kiowa and Kiowa Apache. These tribes formerly ranged over muchof the western part of this State. (See Kansas.)Koasati. The Koasati were one of the tribes of the Creek Confederacy.They removed to northeastern Oklahoma with the rest of theCreeks and settled in the western part of the Creek territory. (SeeAlabama and Louisiana.)Lipan. The Lipan were the easternmost band of Apache; some ofthem are with the Tonkawa. (See Texas.)Miami. Part of the Miami were brought from Indiana and given areservation in the extreme northeastern part of Oklahoma alongwith the Illinois (q. v.). (See Indiana.)Mikasuki. Some of these Indians accompanied the Seminole toOldahoma and as late as 1914 had a Square Ground of their own.(See Florida.)Missouri. The remnant of the Missouri came to Oklahoma with theOto in 1882 and shared their reservation. (See Missouri.)Modoc. In 1873, at the end of the Modoc War, a part of the defeatedtribe was sent to Oklahoma and placed on the Quapaw Reservationwhere a few yet remain. (See Oregon.)Muklasa. A small Creek division said to have kept its identity inOklahoma. (See Alabama.)Munsee. A few Munsee accompanied the Delaware proper toOklahoma and 21 were reported there in 1910. (See New Jersey.)Muskogee. This was the name of the principal tribe or group oftribes of the Creeks (q. v.).Natchez. A small band of Natchez accompanied the Creeks to Okla-homa and settled near Eufaula, where they later became merged inthe rest of the Creek population. Another band of Natchez settledin the Cherokee Nation, near Illinois River, and a very few stillpreserve something of their identity. (See Mississippi.)Nez Perce. Chief Joseph's band of Nez Perc6 were sent to Oklahomain 1878, but they suffered so much from the change of climate thatthey were transferred to Colville Reservation in 1885. (See Idaho.)Okmulgee. A Creek tribe and town belonging to the Hitchiti divisionof the Nation. Its name is perpetuated in the city of Okmulgee,former capital of the Creek Nation in Oklahoma. (See Georgia.) 302 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145Osage. The Osage formerly owned most of northern Oklahoma andafter they had sold the greater part of it still retained a large reser-vation in the northeast, which they continue to occupy, though theyhave now been allotted land in severalty. (See Missouri.)Oto. In 1880 a part of the Oto moved to the lands of the Sauk andFox Indians in Oklahoma and in 1882 the rest followed. (SeeNebraska.)Ottawa. When they surrendered their lands in Michigan and Ohio,some Ottawa bands including those of Blanchard's Fork and Kochede Boeuf migrated to Kansas, and about 1868, to Oklahoma, settlingin the northeastern part of the State. (See Michigan.)Pawnee. The Pawnee moved to Oklahoma in 1876 and were givena reservation in the north central part of the State, where they havenow been allotted land in severalty. (See Nebraska.)Peoria. (See Illinois.)Piankashaw, see Miami.Ponca. In 1877 the Ponca were moved by force to Oklahoma and,though some individuals were finally allotted land in severalty intheir old country, the greater part settled permanently near theOsage in northeastern Oklahoma.Potawatomi. The Potawatomi of the Woods were moved from Kansasto Oklahoma in 1867-81 and given a reservation in the central partof the State. (See Michigan.)Quapaw. Lands were granted to the Quapaw in the extreme south-eastern part of Kansas and the extreme northeastern part of Okla-homa in 1833. In 1867, they ceded all their lands in Kansas andhave since confined themselves within the limits of Oklahoma, thougha large part have removed to the reservation of the Osage. (SeeArkansas.)Sauk. In 1867 the Sauk ceded their lands in Kansas in exchange fora tract in the central part of Oklahoma, where they have continuedto live down to the present time. (See Wisconsin.)Seminole. The greater part of the Seminole were removed to Okla-homa after the Seminole War in Florida. (See Florida.)Seneca, see Iroquois.Shawnee. The Absentee Shawnee moved from Kansas to what isnow central Oklahoma about 1845; in 1867 a second band, which hadbeen living with the Seneca in Kansas, also moved to Oklahoma butsettled in the extreme northeastern part of the State; and in 1869 SWAifTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 303the third and largest section removed to the lands of the Cherokeeby agreement with that tribe. (See Tennessee.)Tawakoni. Said to refer to "a river bend among red hills," or "neckof land in the water." The synonyms should not be confoundedwith those of the Tonkawa. Also called:Three Canes, an English form resulting from a mistaken attempt to trans-late the French spelling of their name, Troiscannes.Connections.?The Tawakoni belonged to the Caddoan linguisticstock and were most closely connected with the Wichita, the twolanguages differing but slightly.Location.?They were on the Canadian River about north of theupper Washita. (See also Texas.) VillagesFlechazos, on the west side of Brazos River near the present Waco.History.?The Tawakoni were first met in the above location incompany with the Wichita and other related tribes. Within the next50 years, probably as a result of pressure on the part of more northerlypeoples, they moved south and in 1772 they were settled in two groupson Brazos and Trinity Rivers, about Waco and above Palestine. By1779 the group on the Trinity had rejoined those on the Brazos. In1824 part of the Tawakoni were again back on Trinity River. In1855 they were established on a reservation near Fort Belknap on theBrazos, but in 1859 were forced, by the hostility of the Texans, to movenorth into southwestern Oklahoma, where they were officially incor-porated with the Wichita.Population.?Mooney (1928) includes the Tawakoni among theWichita (q. v.). In 1772 M^zieres reported 36 houses and 120warriors in the Trinity village and 30 families in the Brazos village,perhaps 220 warriors in all. In 1778-79 he reported that these twotowns, then on the Brazos, contained more than 300 warriors. Sibley(1832) reported that in 1805 the Tawakoni, probably including theWaco, numbered 200 men. In 1859 they were said to number 204exclusive of the Waco. The census of 1910 records only a singlesurvivor of this tribe.Tawehash. Meaning unknown. Lesser and Weltfish (1932) suggestthat this group was identical with a Wichita band reported to themas Tiwa. They have been given some of the same synonyms asthe Wichita (q. v.).Connections.?The Tawehash belonged to the Caddoan linguisticstock and were related closely to the Wichita, Tawakoni, Waco, andYscani. 304 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Location.?Their earliest knovm home was on Canadian Rivernorth of the headwaters of the Washita. VillagerIn 1778 Mdziferes found two native villages to which he gave the names SanTeodoro and San Bernardo.History.?The Tawehash were encountered in the above situationby La Harpe in 1719. They moved south about the same time as theTawakoni and other tribes of the group and were found on Red Riverin 1759, when they defeated a strong Spanish force sent against them.They remained in this same region until in course of time they unitedwith the Wichita and disappeared from history. Their descendantsare among the Wichita in Oklahoma.Population.?Most writers give estimates of the Tawehash alongwith the Wichita and other related tribes. In 1778 they occupiedtwo villages aggregating 160 lodges and numbered 800 fighting menand youths.Tonkawa. In 1884 the remnant of the Tonkawa were removed toOklahoma and the next year settled on a reservation near Ponca,where they were finally allotted land in severalty. (See Texas.)Tuskegee. A Creek division believed to be connected linguisticallywith the Alabama Indians. It removed to Oklahoma with the otherCreeks and established itself in the northwest^n part of the allottedterritory. (See Alabama.)Waco. According to Lesser and Weltfish (1932), from Wehiko, acorruption of Mexico, and given the name because they were alwaysfighting with the Mexicans. The same authorities report that theWaco are thought to have been a part of the Tawakoni without anindependent village but separated later. Also called:Gentlemen Indians, by Bollaert (1850).Houechas, Huanchan6, by French writers, possibly intended for this tribe.Connections.?The Waco were most closely related to the Tawakoniof the Wichita group of tribes belongiiig to the Caddoan Stock.Location.?They appear first in connection with their village on thesite of the present Waco, Tex., though their original home was inOklahoma with the Wichita. VillagesQuiscat, named from its chief, on the west side of the Brazos on a blufiF orplateau above some springs and not far from the present Waco.History.?According to native informants as reported by Lesserand Weltfish (1932), the Waco are formerly supposed to have con- SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 305 stituted a part of the Tawakoni without an independent village. Ithas also been suggested that they may have been identical with theYscani, but Lesser and Weltfish identify the Yscani with anotherband. Another possibility is that the Waco are descendants of theShuman tribe. (See Texas.) In later times the Waco merged withthe Tawakoni and Wichita.Population.?In 1824 the Waco had a village of 33 grass houses andabout 100 men, and a second village of 15 houses and an unnamednumber of men. In 1859, just before their removal from Texas, theynumbered 171, They are usually enumerated with the Wichita (q. v.),but the census of 1910 returned 5 survivors.Connection in which they have become noted.?Almost the sole claimto special remembrance enjoyed by the Waco is the fact that its namewas adopted by the important city of Waco, Tex. It also appears asthe name of places in Sedgwick County, Kans.; Madison County,Ky.; Jasper County, Mo.; Smith County, Miss.; Haralson County,Ga.; York County, Nebr.; Cleveland County, N. C; Stark County,Ohio; and in Tennessee; but it is uncertain whether the designationsof all these came originally from the Waco tribe.Wea, see Miami.Wichita. From wits, "man." Ms,o known as:Black Pawnee, common early name.Do'gu'at, Kiowa name, meaning "tattooed people."Do'kan&, Comanche name, meaning "tattooed people."Freckled Panis, from above.Guichita, Spanish form of the name.Hindsso, Arapaho name.Hoxsiiwitan, Cheyenne name.Ki'-^i-ku'-jfuc, Omaha name.Kirikiris, Kirikurus, or Kitikitish, reported as own name but properly thename of one of their bands.Mftsitd, Kansa name.Pd^i? wasdbe, Ponca and Omaha name, meaning "Black bear Pawnee."Paneassa, various early writers.Panis noirs, early French name.Panis piqu6s, early French name.Pdnyi Wac4we, Iowa, Oto, and Missouri name.Picks, from Panis piquds.Pitchindvo, Comanche name, meaning "paint-ed breasts."Prickled Panis, referring to their tattooing.Quirasquiris, French form of native name.Quivira, from chronicles of Coronado expedition.S6nik'ni, Comanche name, meaning "grass lodges."Speckled Pawnee, referring to their tattooing.TtixquSt, see Do'gu'at.Connections.?The Wichita were one of the principal tribes of theCaddoan linguistic family. 306 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145Location.?Their earliest certain location was on Canadian Rivernorth of the headwaters of the Washita. (See also Texas.)SubdivisionsMost of the so-called subdivisions of the Wichita were independent tribes,some of which, including the Tawakoni, Waco, Tawehash, and Yscani, have beentreated separately. The others?Akwits or Akwesh, Kirikiris, Isis (see Yscani),Tokane (see Yscani), and Itaz?were probably only temporary bands. Mooney(1928) also mentions the Kirishkitsu (perhaps a Wichita name for the Kichai)and the Asidahetsh and Kishkat, which cannot be identified.History.?The Wichita rose to fame at an early period owing to thefact that they were visited by Coronado in 1541, the Spaniards callingthe Wichita country the province of Quivira. They were then farthernorth than the location given above, probably near the great bendof the Arkansas and in the center of Kansas. A Franciscan missionary,Juan de Padilla, remained 3 years among them in the endeavor toconvert them to Christianity, but he was finally killed by them throughjealousy on account of his work for another tribe. In 1719 La Harpefound the Wichita and several allied tribes on the south CanadianRiver in the territory later embraced in the Chickasaw Nation.Within the next 50 years they were forced south by hostile northernand eastern tribes and by 1772 were on the upper courses of the Redand Brazos Rivers. In 1835 they made their first treaty with theUnited States Government. They continued to live in southwesternOklahoma until the Civil War, when they fled to Kansas until it wasover. In 1867 they returned and were placed on a reservation inCaddo County, Okla., where they have since remained.Population.?In 1772 the Wichita and the Tawehash seem to havehad about 600 warriors. Mooney (1928) estimates that in 1780 theconfederated Wichita tribes had a population of about 3,200. Bolton(1914), on information derived from M^zi^res, estimated about 3,200for the Wichita proper in 1778. In 1805 Sibley estimated the Wichitaat 400 men. In 1868, 572 were reported in the confederated tribes.The census of 1910 gives 318, including the remnant of the Kichai.In 1937 there were 385.Connection in which they have become noted.?Although a tribe ofconsiderable power in early days, the Wichita will be remembered infuture principally from the prominence of the city of Wichita, Kans.,which bears their name. It is also the name of counties in Kansas andTexas, a ridge of hills in southwestern Oklahoma called the WichitaMountains, a river in Texas, and places in Oklahoma, besides WichitaFalls in Wichita County, Tex. The identification of this tribe withthe Province of Quivira gives it additional interest. 8WANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 307Wyandot. In 1867 a part of the Wyandot who had been Uving inKansas was removed to the northeastern comer of Oklahoma wherethey have since remained. It is probable that this body includesmore of the old Tionontati than of the true Wyandot. (See Ohio.)Yscani. Meaning unknown. Also spelled Ascani, Hyscani, Ixcani.Connections.?This was one of the confederated Wichita tribes andtherefore without doubt related to them in speech, and thus of theCaddoan linguistic family.Location.?The Yscani are first mentioned in connection with theWichita and allied tribes on the South Canadian in the territory laterassigned to the Chickasaw Nation. Part, however, were reported tobe Hving 60 leagues farther toward the northwest.History.?The Yscani evidently moved south from the above-mentioned location at the same time as the other tribes. They keptparticularly close to the Tawakoni, with whose history their own isalmost identical. As the name Yscani disappears from the earlyannals shortly before the name Waco appears in them, it has beenthought that the Waco were the Yscani under a new name, but Lesserand Weltfish (1932) identify the Waco with the Isis or Tokane,perhaps both. (See Waco above.)Population.?In 1772 their village was reported to contain 60warriors, and about 1782 the entire tribe was said to have about90 families.Yuchi. Although originally an independent tribe, the Yuchi unitedwith the Creeks before coming west, and they settled in the CreekNation, in the northwestern part of that territory, where theirdescendants still live. (See Georgia.)TEXASAkokisa. The name Akokisa, spelled in various ways, was givenby the Spaniards to those Atakapa hving in southeastern Texas,between Trinity Bay and Trinity River and Sabine River. (SeeAtakapa under Louisiana.)Alabama. Alabama Indians came to Texas early in the nineteenthcentury, and the largest single body of Alabama still lives there ona State reservation in Polk County. (See Alabama.)Anadarko. The name of a tribe or band belonging to the HasinaiConfederacy (q. v.).Apache. The Jicarilla and other Apache tribes raided across theboundaries of this State on the northwest and west in early times,but the only one of them which may be said to have had its head-quarters inside for any considerable period was the Lipan (q. v.). 308 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Aranama. The Aranama were associated sometimes with the Karan-kawa in the Franciscan missions but were said to be distinct fromthem. Although a small tribe during all of their kno\vn history,they held together until comparatively recent times, and Morse(1822) gives them a population of 125. They were remembered bythe Tonkawa, when Dr. A. S. Gatschet visited the latter, and heobtained two words of their language, but they are said to havebeen extinct as a tribe by 1843. While their affiUations are notcertainly known, they were undoubtedly with one of the threestocks, Karankawan, Tonkawan, or Coahuiltecan, probably thelast mentioned, and will be enumerated provisionally with them.(See Coahuiltecan Tribes.)Atakapa, see Akokisa above and under Louisiana.Bidai. Perhaps from a Caddo word signifying "brushwood," andhaving reference to the Big Thicket near the lower Trinity Riverabout which they lived. Also called:Quasmigdo, given as their own name bj^ Ker (1816).Spring Creeks, the name given by Foote (1841).Connections.?From the mission records it appears that the Bidaiwere of the Atakapan linguistic stock.Location.?On the middle course of Trinity River about BidaiCreek and to the westward and southwestward.History.?The Bidai were hving in the region above given when firstknown to the Europeans and claimed to be aborigines of that territory.The Franciscan mission of San Ildefonso was founded for them and theAkokisa, Deadose, and Patiri. In the latter part of the eighteenthcentury they are said to have been chief intermediaries between theSpaniards and Apache in the sale of firearms. The attempt to mis-sionize them was soon abandoned. In 1776-77 an epidemic carriedaway nearly half their number, but they maintained separate existencedown to the middle of the nineteenth century, when they were in avillage 12 miles from Montgomery. They have now entirelydisappeared.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates for them a population of500 in 1690. In 1805 there were reported to be about 100.Connection in which they have become noted.?The name is perpetuatedin that of a small creek flowing into Trinity River from the west andin a village known as Bedias or Bedais in Grimes County, Tex.Biloxi. Some Biloxi entered Texas before 1828. In 1846 a band wascamped on Little River, a tributary of the Brazos. Afterwardthey occupied a village on Biloxi Bayou in the present AngelinaCounty, but later either returned to Louisiana or passed north tothe present Oklahoma. (See Mississippi.) SWANTONJ INDIAN TRIBES OP NORTH AMERICA 309Caddo Tribes. Under this head are included the Adai and the Natchi-toches Confederacy (see Louisiana) ; and the Eyeish, the HasinaiConfederacy, and the Kadohadacho Confederacy in Texas.Cherokee. A band of Cherokee under a chief named Bowl settled inTexas early in the nineteenth century, but they were driven out bythe Texans in 1839 and their chief killed. (See Tennessee.)Choctaw. Morse (1822) reported 1,200 Choctaw on the Sabine andNeches Rivers, and some bands continued to live for a while ineastern Texas. One band in particular, the Yowani Choctaw, wasadmitted among the Caddo there. All the Choctaw finally re-moved to Oklahoma. (See Mississippi.)Coahuiltecan Tribes. The name was derived from that of the MexicanState of Coahuila, the tribes of this group having extended overthe eastern part of that province as well as a portion of Texas.Also called:Tejano, an alternative name for the group.Connections.?As Coahuiltecan are included all of the tribes knownto have belonged to the Coahuiltecan linguistic family and somesupposed on circumstantial evidence to be a part of it. It is probablethat most of the so-called Tamaulipecan family of Mexico were reallyrelated to this, and that the Karankawan and Tonkawan groups wereconnected as well, though more remotely.Location.?The Coahuiltecan tribes were spread over the easternpart of Coahuila, Mexico, and almost all of Texas west of San AntonioRiver and Cibolo Creek. The tribes of the lower Rio Grande mayhave belonged to a distinct family, that called by Orozco y Berra(1864) Tamaulipecan, but the Coahuiltecans reached the Gulf coastat the mouth of the Nueces. Northeast of that point they weresucceeded by Karankawan tribes. Toward the north it is probablethat the Coahuiltecans originally extended for a long distance beforethey were displaced by the Apache and Comanche. (See also Mexico.)SubdivisionsIn considering the Coahuiltecan stock it has been found necessary to changethe original plan of giving separate consideration to each tribe because we arehere confronted bj' an enormous number of small tribal or band names, of manyof which we do not know even the location. In lieu of subdivisions, therefore,we shall give as complete a list as possible of these small tribes or bands, as far asthey are known. They are as follows:Aguastayas. Asan.Alasapas. Atajal.Andacaminos. Atastagonies.Anns'". Borrados.Apayxam. Cabia.Aranama (see above). Cacafes. 310 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Cachopostales.Camai.Cantunas.Casas Chiquitas.Casastles.Chaguantapam,Chagustapa.Chapamaco.Ghemoco.Choyapin (perhaps Tonkawan).Chuapas.Cimataguo.Cluetau.Cocomeioje.Comecrudo.Cotonam.Cupdan.Escaba.Espopolames.Gabilan.Geies.Guanipaa.Gueiquesales.Guerjuatida.Guisoles.Haeser.Hapes.Harames.Heniocane.Hiabu.Hihames.Huacacasa.Huanes.Hume.Juamaca.Jueinzum.Juncatas.Junced.Macapao.Macocoma.Mallopeme.Mamuqui.Manam.Manico.Manos Colorados.Manos de Perro.Manos Prietaa.Maquems.Maraquites.Matucar.Matuime.Maubedan.Mauyga. Mazapes.Menenquen.Mescales.Mesquites.Miiijaes.Morbanas.Mulatoa.Muruam (perhaps Tonkawan).Narices.Natao.Nazas.Necpacha.Nigco (probably meant for Sinicu).Nonapho (perhaps Tonkawan).Obozi (?).Ocana.Odoesmades.Ohaguames.Orejones.Oydican.Paac.Paachiqui.Pabor.Paearuja (given by Uhde, 1861).Pachal.Pachalaque.Pachaloco.Pachaquen.Pachaug.Pacpul.Pacuaches.Pacuachiam.Paguan.Paguanan.Pajalat.Pajarito.Pakawa.Pamaque.Pamaya.Pamoranos.Pampopas.Papanao,Paquache.Parantones.Parchaque.Parchinas.Pasalves.Pasnacanes.Pasqual.Pastaloca.Pastancoyas.Pasteal.Patague. SWAKTOW] INDIAN TRIBES OP NORTH AMERICA 311Patan.Patanium.Pataquilla (perhaps Karankawan).Patou.Patzau.Pausanes.Pausaqui.Pausay.Payaya.PayuguarLPeana.Pelones.Pescado (?).Piedraa Blancas.Piquique.Pinanaca.Piniquu.Pintos.Pita.Pitahay.Pomuluma.Prietos.Psaupsau.Pulacuam (perhaps Tonkawan).Putaay.Quanataguo.Querns.Quepanos.Quesal.Quide (?).Quioborique (?).Quisabas (?).Quitacas.Quivi (?).Salapaque (?).Salinas (?).Samampac.Sampanal.Sanipao.Saracuam (?).Secmoco.Semonan (?).Senisos.Siaguan.Siansi.Sijame (perhaps Tonkawan).Sillanguayas.Simaomo (perhaps Tonkawan).Sinicu.Siupam.Sonaque.Sonayan.Suahuaohes (?). Suanaa.Sulujame.Tacame.Taimamares.Tamcan (7).Tamique (?).Tanpacuazes.Tarequano.Teana.Tecahuistes.Tejones.Teneinamar.Tenicapeme.Tepachuaches.Tepemaca.Terocodame.Tet.Tetaaauoica.Tetecores.Tetzino (perhaps Tonkawan).Tilijaes.Tinapihuayas.Tiopane (perhaps Karankawan).Tiopines.Tishim. (perhaps Tonkawan).Tocas.Tonzaumacagua.Tripaa Blancas.Tuancas.Tumamar.Tumpzi.Tusanes.Tusonid.Tuteneiboica.Unojita (?).Uraoha.Utaca (?).Venados.Vende Flechas.Viayam.Viddaquimamar.Xarame.Xiabu.Yacdossa.Ybdacax.Yem6.Yman.Ymic.Yoricas.Ysbupue.Yni.Yurguimes.Zorquan. 312 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bttll. 145As indicated, some of these were perhaps Tonkawan, Karankawan, or of otheraffiliations. Some were represented by single individuals and no doubt many ofthe names are synonyms or have become distorted in the process of recording.The exact nature of these groups can now never be known. The above list doesnot include a great many names given only by Cabeza de Vaca or La Salle andhis companions in the same region. The multiplicity of tribes and confusion innames is not so serious in any other region north of Mexico.History.?The Coahuiltecan tribes were first encountered by Cabezade Vaca and his companions who passed through the heart of theircountry, and by the Spaniards when they invaded Coahuila andfounded Parral. From the early part of the seventeenth centuryonward, their country was traversed repeatedly. In 1675 the Coa-huiltecan country on both sides of the Rio Grande was invaded byFernando del Bosque, and in 1689 and 1690 the Texas portion wasagain traversed by De Leon and Manzanet. In 1677 a Franciscan mis-sion for Coahuiltecan tribes was established at Nadadores and beforethe end of the century others were started ?vlong the Rio Grande andnear San Antonio. Great numbers of Indians were gathered intothese missions during the first part of the eighteenth century but thechange of life entailed upon roving people, disease, and the attacks ofhostile tribes from the north reduced their numbers rapidly. Todaynone of these Indians are known to survive in Texas. In 1886 Dr.A. S. Gatschet found remnants of two or three tribes on the southside of the Rio Grande and some of their descendants, survive, butthey are no longer able to speak their ancient language.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated that in 1690 the Coahuiltec-an peoples totaled 15,000; no figures embracing all of them occur inthe various narratives.Comanche. Significance unknown. Also called:AUebome, given by Lewis and Clark as the French- name.Bald Heads, so called by Long (1823).Bo'daik' ifiago, Kiowa name, meaning "reptile people," "snake men."Ca'-tha, Arapaho name, meaning "having many horses."Cintu-aluka, Teton Dakota name.Dats6-a?, Kiowa Apache name (Gatschet, MS, BAE).Gyai'-ko, Kiowa name, meaning "enemies."Idahi, Kiowa Apache name (Mooney, 1896).Indd, Jicarilla name.La Plais, French traders' name, perhaps corrupted from T^te Pel6e.La'-ri'hta, Pawnee name.Los Mecos, Mexican name.Mahdn, Isleta name.Mdhana, Taos name.Na"Iani, Navaho name, meaning "many aliens," or "many enemies" (col-lective for Plains tribes).Na'nita, Kichai name.Nar-a-tah, Waco name. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 313Na't&a, Wichita name, meaning "snakes," i. e., "enemies."Ne'me ng, or Nim6nim, own name, or Numa, meaning "people."Padouca, common early name, evidently from the name of the Penatekaband.Sanko, obsolete Kiowa name.Sau'hto, Caddo name.Selakamp6m, Comecrudo name for all warlike tribes but especially for theComanche.ShIshIn6wtitz-hita'neo, Cheyenne name meaning "snake people."Snake Indians, common name.THe Pel6e, French traders' name, identification somewhat doubtful.Yampah or Ya'mpaini, Shoshoni name, meaning "Yampa people," or"Yampa eaters."Connections.?The Comanche belonged to the Shoshonean linguisticfamily, a branch of Uto-Aztecan, its tongue being almost identicalwith that of the Shoshoni.Location.-?In northwestern Texas and the region beyond as faras Arkansas River. (See also Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, NewMexico, Oklahoma, and Wyoming.)SubdivisionsThe following are the names of Comanche bands so far as these are known:Detsanayuka or Nokoni. Pagatsu.Ditsakana, Widyu, Yapa or Yamparika. Penateka or Penande.Kewatsana. Pohoi (adopted Shoshoni),Kotsai. Tanima, Tenawa or Tenahwit.Kotsoteka, Kwahari or Kwahadi. Waaih.Motsai.Various writers also mention the following:Guage-johe. Muvinabore.Ketahto. Nauniem.Kwashi. Parkeenaum.History.?Although differing today in physical type, on account oftheir close linguistic relationship it is supposed that the originalComanche must have separated from the Shoshoni in the neighbor-hood of eastern Wyoming. The North Platte was known as PadoucaFork as late as 1805. In 1719, however, the Comanche are placedby early writers in southwestern Kansas. For a long time the Arkan-sas River was their southern boundary, but finally they moved belowit attracted by opportunities to obtain horses from the Mexicans andpushed on by other peoples. The Apache, who were in the countryinvaded, attacked them but were defeated. In this movement thePenateka Comanche were in advance and from the name of this bandcomes Padouca, one of the old terms applied to the entire people.For a long time the Comanche were at war with the Spaniards and 314 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bulu 145the Apache, and later with the Americans. Texas suffered so muchfrom their depredations that the famous Texas Rangers were organ-ized as a protection against them and proved extremely effective. In1854, by permission of the State of Texas, the Federal Governmentestablished two reservations upon Brazos River and some of theComanche and Kiowa were placed upon the upper reserve. Frictionwith the settlers, however, continued and compelled the abandonmentof these reserves in 1859 and the removal of the Indians to the terri-tory embraced in the present State of Oklahoma. By a treaty con-cluded October 18, 1865, a reservation was set apart for the Comancheand Kiowa consisting of the Panhandle of Texas and aU of Oklahomawest of Cimarron River and the 98th meridian of west longitude. Bya treaty concluded October 21, 1867, they surrendered all of this excepta tract of land in southwestern Oklahoma between the 98th meridian.Red River, the North Fork of Red River, and Washita River. Theydid not settle finally upon this land, however, until after the lastoutbreak of the southern prairie tribes in 1874-75. Their descendantscontinue to live in the same territory.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated that there must have been7,000 Comanche about 1690. The census of 1904 gives 1,400; thecensus of 1910, 1,171; and the United States Indian Office Report for1923 shows a total of 1,697. The census of 1930 returned 1,423. In1937 the figure given is 2,213.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Comanche were oneof the most famous tribes of the Plains, particularly the southernPlains. They were remarkable (1) for their numbers, horsemanship,and warlike character; (2) for the frequent clashes between them andthe White expeditions or bodies of emigrants; (3) as largely instru-mental in introducing horses to the Indians of the northern Plains.They gave place names to counties in Kansas and Texas; a mountainin Texas; and places in Yellowstone County, Mont.; ComancheCounty, Tex.; and Stephens County, Okla. There is a ComancheRiver in Colorado.Creeks, see Muskogee, under Alabama.Deadose. An Atakapa tribe or subtribe in south central Texas.(See Louisiana.)Eyeish, or HIiish. Meaning unknown. Also called Aays, Aix,Aliche, Yayecha, etc.Connections.?The Eyeish belonged to the Caddoan linguistic stock,their closest relatives probably being the Adai, and next to them thepeoples of the Kadohadacho and Hasinai Confederacies, with which,in fact, Lesser and Weltfish (1932) classify them. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 315Location.?On Ayish Creek, northeastern Texas, between the Sabineand Neches Rivers.History.?In 1542 the Eyeish were visited by the Spaniards underMoscoso, De Soto's successor. They are next noted in 1686-87 bythe companions of La Salle. In 1716 the mission of Nuestra Sefiorade los Dolores was established among them by the Franciscans,abandoned in 1719, reestablished in 1721, and finally given up in 1773,the success of the mission having been very small. Their proximityto the road between the French post at Natchitoches and the Spanishpost at Nacogdoches seems to have contributed to their generaldemoralization. Sibley (1832) reported only 20 individuals in thetribe in 1805 but in 1828 there were said to be 160 families. Soonafterward they joined the other Caddo tribes and followed their for-tunes, and they must have declined very rapidly for only a barememory of them is preserved.Population.?In 1779, 20 families were reported; in 1785, a totalpopulation of 300; in 1805, 20 individuals; in 1828, 160 families. (SeeCaddo Confederacy, under Louisiana.)Connection in which they have become noted.?Ayish Bayou, a tribu-tary of the Angelina River on which they formerly lived, perpetuatesthe name of the Eyeish.Guasco. A tribe or band which attained some prominence from theimportance attached to jt in the narratives of the De Soto expedi-tion. (See Hasinai Confederacy.)Hainai. An important band of the Hasinai Confederacy (q. v.).Hasinai Confederacy. Hasinai signifies "our own folk." The nameoften occurs in the forms Assinay or Cenis.Connections.?The Hasinai Confederacy constituted one of themajor divisions of the Caddo, the others being the KadohadachoConfederacy, the Natchitoches Confederacy, and the Adai and Eyeish,the two last probably connected but not confederated. All belongedto the Caddoan linguistic stock.Location.?^In northeastern Texas between the headwaters of theNeches and Trinity Rivers. SubdivisionsThe following tribes or bands were included:Anadarko, northwest of Nacogdoches in the present Rusk County.Guasco, position unknown.Hainai, 3 leagues west of Nacogdoches.Nabedache, 3 to 4 leagues west of Neches River and near Arroyo San Pedro, at asite close to the old San Antonio road, which became known as San Pedro.Nacachau, just north of the Neches tribe and on the east side of Neches River. 316 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Nacanish, north of the Hainai.Nacao, probably part of the Nacanish.Nacogdoche, at the present Nacogdoches.Nacono, southeast of the Neches and Nabedache and 5 leagues frona the former.Namidish or Nabiti, on Angelina River north of the Hainai.Nasoni, two towns: (1) about 27 miles north of Nacogdoches near the Anadarko;(2) in the Kadohadacho Confederacy.Nechaui, southeast of the Nabedache, half a league from the Nacono, and 5leagues from the crossing of the Neches at the Neches village.Neches, the main village 1 league or more east of Neches River, nearly west of thepresent Nacogdoches and near the mounds southwest of Alto, Cherokee County.The following names may belong to other allied tribes but next to nothing isknown of them:Naansi. ^fJadamin. Neihahat.Nabeyeyxa. Natsshostanno. Tadiva.Lesser and Weltfish (1932) speak of a tribe called Kayamaici, but this wasprobably a local group on Kiamichi River.VillagesAs recorded by our authorities, these almost always bore the names of thetribes occupying them.History.?On their way west in 1542 after the death of De Soto, inan endeavor to reach Mexico overland, the Spaniards who had followedhim passed through the Caddo country, and the names of the Nabe-dache, Nasoni, Anadarko, and Nacanish seem to be recognizable. In1686-87 La Salle and his companions spent some time in their villages,and it was near one of them that La Salle was murdered by his ownpeople. In 1690 the Spaniards entered their country and opened thefirst mission among them at the Nabedache village in May of thatyear. A number of missions were established in the other villages.All were abandoned in 1719 in expectation of a French attack, butthey were reestablished in 1721. They did not prove successful, how-ever, and were gradually removed to the neighborhood of San Antonio.Early in the nineteenth century the Hasinai were joined by theLouisiana Caddo, and all were placed upon a reservation on the BrazosRiver in 1855. Threatened with massacre by some of their Whiteneighbors, they fled to Oklahoma 4 years later, were granted new landsnear the present Anadarko, and finally allotted land in severalty.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that in 1690 the entire Caddopopulation, including the Hasinai, the Kadohadacho and NatchitochesConfederacies, and the Adai and Eyeish tribes, amounted to 8,500,700 more than the number I arrived at. He does not give figures forthe Hasinai by themselves, but it is probable that he would have al-lowed between 4,000 and 5,000. The former figure is the one I sug-gested (see Swanton, 1942).Referring to earlier estimates, we are told that a Canadian who hadlived for several years among the Hasinai stated in 1699 that they had SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 317between 600 and 700 warriors, which would indicate a population of2,500-3,000. In 1716 Don Diego Ramon, under whom the missionswere established, gave it as his opinion that they were serving a popu-lation of 4,000-5,000. When x\guayo reestablished them in 1721 hedistributed presents to the inhabitants of the principal towns. Hisfigures are evidently incomplete, but even so they suggest some fallingoff in the 5 years that had elapsed. At any rate it is evident thatthese Indians lost very heavily during the eighteenth century and thattheir numbers did not exceed 1,000 at the opening of the nineteenthcentury. A rather careful estimate by Jesse Stem in 1851 wouldindicate a population of about 350. In 1864 the United States IndianOffice reported 150, and in 1876 and subsequent years still smallerfigures appear which are evidently incomplete. The first seeminglyaccurate census taken by the Indian Office was in 1880, when the figurefor the united Caddo people was given as 538. It varied httle fromthis until after 1910 when it showed steady gains. In 1937, 967Caddo were reported.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Hasinai are notedas the Indians among whom La Salle came to his untimely end, andalong with the Kadohadacho and Natchitoches as makers of the beau-tiful Caddo pottery. (See Kadohadacho Confederacy.) Texas, acommon name applied to them, was adopted as the designation of aRepublic and later State of the American Union. It has been givento places in Washington County, Ky., and Baltimore County, Md.;to Texas City, Galveston County, Tex.; Texas Creek, FremontCounty, Colo.; and in the combined form Texarkana to a city on theboundary line between Texas and Arkansas, entering also into Tex-homa, Texas County, Olda., and Sherman County, Tex.Isleta del Sur, see Pueblos under New Mexico.Jicarilia. The Jicarilla ranged into this State (Texas) at times.(See Colorado.)Kadohadacho Confederacy. The word Kadohadacho signifies in thenative language "real chiefs," kadi being the word for "chief," andit is from an abbreviation of this term that we get the word Caddo.They were also called:At'-ta-wits, by the Comanche, according to Ten Kate (1907).Da'sha-i, or Tdshash, by the Wichita.firawika, by the Pawnee. 'H'-doum-dei-kiH, by the Kiowa.Ka-16X-la'-tce, by the Choctaw.Kalu-xnddshu or Kasseye'i, by the Tonkawa.Kul-hQI-atsI, by the Creeks.Ma'-seip'-kiH, by the Kiowa, signifying "pierced noses."Ni'rls-h&ri's-kl'riki, another Wichita name. 318 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Ota's-ita'niuw', Cheyenne name, signifying "pierced nose people" (orUtds6ta).Su'-d^6, by the Quapaw.Tani'bangn, by the Arapaho, signifying "pierced nose people."Witdne, by the Comanche, according to Gatschet (MS., B. A. E.).Connections.?The Kadohadacho belonged to the Caddo divisionof the Caddoan linguistic stock, the other members being the closely-related Hasinai (q, v.) and Natchitoches (see under Louisiana), andthe more remotely connected Adai of Louisiana and Eyeish of Texas.Location.?The Kadohadacho lived in northeastern Texas andsouthwestern Arkansas at the Great Bend of Red River, though theyare usually associated with the region around Caddo Lake which theyoccupied at a later period. (See also Arkansas and Louisiana.)SubdivisionsCahinnio, near Ouachita River, Ark.Kadohadacho, on the north side of Red River near the point where the presentArkansas-Texas boundary line reaches it.Nanatsoho, on the south side of Red River not far from the point reached by thepresent Arkansas-Oklahoma State line.Upper Nasoni, on the south side of Red River nearly opposite the present Ogden.Upper Natchitoches, on the south side of Red River between the Nanatsoho andNasoni.Upper Yatasi, a part of the Yatasi which joined them in very late times.History.?In October 1541, De Soto and his army entered a provincecalled Tula believed to be the country of the Indians later known asCahinnio, a tribe for whose bravery the Spaniards came to have awholesome respect. The next encounter between these people andwhite men was in the summer of 1687 when, after the murder of theSieur de la Salle, six survivors of his expedition, including Jouteland Father Anastasius Donay, passed through the Kadohadachotowns on their way to the Mississippi, visiting the Nasoni, Kadohada-cho, and Cahinnio. Tonti visited them also 4 years later. In Novem-ber and December 1691, Domingo Teran (Castaneda, 1936) spent amiserable week in this country exploring it and taking soundings ofRed River, and we owe to him the first map of the region. In 1700Bienville undertook to reach them but got no farther than the Yatasivillage halfway between the Natchitoches and Kadohadacho. In1719 the French officer Bernard de la Harpe (1831) spent some timeamong them and established a trading post which endured for a con-siderable period. French traders quickly monopolized the Kadohada-cho trade, the principal trading point being Natchitoches, but nomissions were established. This group of tribes proved to be a strongbulwark against the warlike northern Indians, particularly the Osage,but they suffered much in consequence, and late in the eighteenthcentury the Kadohadacho or a part of them moved to another location SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 319some miles below their ancient village. The town established in thenew location, however, was also attacked by the Osages, who inflictedsuch losses upon its inhabitants that they removed again about 1800and established themselves on Sodo Creek northwest of the presentShreveport. In 1824 a treaty was signed between the United StatesGovernment and the Quapaw Indians by which the latter agreed togive up their lands on the Arkansas and remove to the country of theCaddo Indians. The Quapaw removed the year following but sufferedsuch losses on account of floods in Red River that in 1833 they sur-rendered these lands and removed to Oklahoma, Two years later theKadohadacho and their allies also subscribed to a treaty by whichthey surrendered all of their lands within the territory of the UnitedStates. In consequence, they removed to Texas and settled near theirHasinai kindred, whose fortunes they afterward followed although thetwo parties remained distinct for a considerable period. Some unitedthemselves for a time with the Cherokee under Chief Bowl. Somealso took up their residence with the Chickasaw in the Indian Terri-tory. Those who remained in Texas were fellow victims with theHasinai of the increasing friction with their white neighbors embitteredby Comanche and Apache depredations for which they were in noway responsible. We may now call these united peoples by the simpleterm "Caddo." In an endeavor to end these difficulties a reservationw^as set apart for the Caddo on Brazos River in 1852 but trouble aroseagain of such a violent character that in 1859 the Caddo abandonedTexas and were assigned a new reservation in the southwestern partof the present State of Oklahoma, where their descendants still live,most of the scattered bands having been gathered into one section.Most of the Caddo sided with the Federal Government during theCivil War and went to Kansas, where they remained until it was over,though experiencing many hardships in consequence and losing manyof their people in epidemics. They took considerable interest in theGhost Dance Religion and still more in the Peyote Cult, John Wilson,a mixed-blood Caddo and Delaware, being one of the prominentleaders. The fact that they had always cultivated the ground hasmade their adjustment to the new economic system fairly easy. In1902 they were allotted land in severalty.Population.?My estimate for the Kadohadacho division of theCaddo before WTiite contact is 2,000. Bienville and La Harpe placeit in 1700-1709 between 2,000 and 2,500. In 1718, however, Bienvilleasserts that it had fallen to 200 warriors, which would mean about 800people, and Sibley (1832) indicates the same figures as late as 1805.In 1829 Porter {in Schoolcraft, vol. 3) gives an estimate of 450, andin 1851 Stem (1851) who is likely to be reliable, places it at 476, In1857 Neighbors returns a partial enumeration of 235, and in 1876, 320 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145the last time they were returned separately from the Hasinai, theIndian Ofl&ce reported 467. It is evident, however, that this alsoincludes part of the Hasinai and all of the Adai and Eyeish besides theremnants of the Natchitoches group. After this date the populationof the united Caddo group remained around 500, but during thepresent century it has been steadily increasing and in 1937, 967 werereported.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Kadohadachogroup is noted as containing the tribe which ultimately gave the nameCaddo to the linguistic family of which it is a part. The name Caddohas been applied to a parish and lake in Louisiana; a county in Okla-homa; a creek and gap in Arkansas; to the village of Caddo Gap,Montgomery County, Ark.; and to villages in Bryan County, Olda.,and Stephens County, Tex. ; and in Hunt County, Tex., is Caddo Mills.Earankawan Tribes. The name Karankawa is derived from one ofthe constituent tribes, but the significance is unknown.Nda kun-dad6he, Lipan name, meaning "people walking in the water."Quglancouchis, Clamcoets, names given by the French.Ydkokon kdpai, Tonkawa, meaning "without moccasins," but this nameincludes the coast Coahuiltecan tribes.Connections.?The Karankawan tribes are placed in an independentlinguistic stock, which was connected most closely, it would seem,with the Coahuiltecan group.Location.?On the coast of the Gulf of Mexico between Trinity andAransas Bays. SubdivisionsFive principal tribes constituted the Karankawan stock. They were as follows:Coapite.Coaque or Coco, on Galveston Island and at the mouth of Brazos River.Karankawa, on Matagorda Bay.Kohani, near the mouth of Colorado River.Kopano, on Copano Bay.To these should perhaps be added the Tiopane and Tups, and perhaps also thePataquilla, and the Quilotes mentioned by Cabeza de Vaca (1851).History.?The Karankawan coast was skirted by a number of earlyvoyagers but the first contact with its inhabitants worth noting wasby Cabeza de Vaca and other shipwrecked members of Pamphilo deNarvaez's expedition. There is little doubt that the people amongwhom Cabeza de Vaca was cast away in 1528 were the Coaque orCoco. In 1685 La Salle landed in their country supposing that hewas near the mouth of the Mississippi, and he built a fort (Fort St.Louis) in which the French maintained themselves for 2 years. In1689 the region was visited by a Spanish expedition under De Leonintent upon driving the Frenchmen out of the country. Shortly SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 321 afterward the Spaniards began to colonize Texas and, though fewsettlements were made near the coast, missions were established fromtime to time to gather in the Karankawan Indians. The neophytescould never be induced to remain long at these missions, however,and continued during the Spanish period in about the same conditionof savagery in which they had been fomid, though they decreasedsteadily in numbers. After the American settlements had begun, thecoast tribes annoyed them by constant pilfering, and the reprisalswhich the Karankawans suffered finally destroyed them entirely.The last are said to have perished shortly before the Civil War. Theonly Karankawan vocabulary of undoubted purity was recorded in1720 by the French Captain Beranger. In 1891 Dr. A. S. Gatschetpublished two others, one obtained from Tonkawa Indians and theother, much longer, from a white woman named Oliver who had livednear the last band of Karankawa in her girlhood and had learned aconsiderable number of words. But this band is said to have beenmuch mixed with Coahuiltecan, a contention which an examinationof the material seems to confirm.Population.?Mooney's (1928) estimate of 2,800 for the Karanlvawantribes in 1690 appears to me decidedly too high, but there are prac-tically no data upon which to make a satisfactory determination.Connection in which they haiie become noted.?The Karankawantribes will be longest remembered as those among which Cabeza deVaca and his companions were cast away in 1528, and where La Salle'scolony was established in 1685. The name of one Karanlcawantribe (Kopano) is preserved by Copano Bay.Kichai or (more phonetically) Kitsei. Their own name and said tomean "going in wet sand," but the Pawnee translate their renderingof it as "water turtle." Also called:Gits'ajl, Kansa name.Ki-jii'-tcac, Omaha name.Ki6tsash, Wichita name.Ki'-tchesh, Caddo name.Quichais, Spanish variant.Quidehais, from French sources (La Harpe, 1831).Connections.?The Kichai were a tribe of the Caddoan stock whoselanguage la}' midway between Wichita and Pawnee.Location.?On the upper waters of Trinity River, and between thatstream and Red River. (See also Oklahoma.)History.?It is probable that in the prehistoric period the Kichailived north of Red River but they had gotten south of it by 1701 whenthe French penetrated that country and they continued in the samegeneral region until 1855. They were then assigned to a smallreservation on Brazos River, along with several other small tribes. 322 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bdll. 145In 1858, however, alarmed at threats of extermination on the part ofthe neighboring Whites, they fled to the present Oklahoma, where theyjoined the Wichita. They have remained with them ever since.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates a total Kichai population of500 in 1690. In 1772 the main Kichai village contained 30 housesand there were estimated in it 80 warriors, most of whom were young.In 1778 the number of Kichai fighting men was estimated at 100,The census of 1910 returned a total population of only 10, and thatof 1930 included them with the Wichita, the figure for the two tribes,nearly all Wichita however, being 300.Connection in which they have become noted.?Their name Kichai isperpetuated in the Keeche Hills, Okla.; Keechi Creek, Tex.; a branchof the Trinity, Keechi; a post hamlet of Leon County, Tex.; and per-haps Kechi, a post township of Sedgwick County, Kans.Kiowa. This tribe hunted in and raided across northern Texas.(See Kansas.)Koasati. Early in the nineteenth century bands of Koasati hadworked over from Louisiana into Texas, settling first on the Sabineand later on the Neches and the Trinity. In 1850 the bulk of theentire tribe was in Texas but later, partly it is said on account ofa pestilence, they suffered heavy losses and most of the survivorsreturned to Louisiana, where the largest single body of Koasati isliving. Among the Alabama in Polk County, Tex., there were in1912 about 10 of this tribe. (See Alabama and Louisiana.)Lipan. Adapted from Ipa-n'de, apparently a personal name; n'demeaning "people." Also called:A-tagui, Kiowa name, meaning "timber Apache"; used also for Mescalero.Cances, Caddo name, meaning "deceivers."Hu-ta'-ci, Comanche name, meaning "forest Apache" (Ten Kate, 1884, inHodge, 1907).Hiixul, Tonkawa name. (See Uxul.)Na-izha'fi, own name, meaning "ours," "our kind."Nav6ne, Comanche name (Gatschet, MS., B. A. E.).Shi'Ini, former Mescalero name, meaning "summer people" (?).Tu-tsan-nde, Mescalero name, meaning "great water people."Uxul, Tonkawa name, meaning a spiral shell and applied to this tribebecause of their coiled hair.Yabipai Lipan, so called by Garces in 1776.Connections.?This is one of the tribes of the Athapascan linguisticstock to which the general name Apache was applied. Their closestrelations politically were with the Jicarilla, with whom they formedone Imguistic group.Location.?The Lipan formerly ranged from the Rio Grande inNew Mexico over the eastern part of the latter State and western SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 323Texas southeastward as far as the Gulf of Mexico. (See also NewMexico and Oklahoma.) SubdivisionsThe Lipan were reported during the early part of the nineteenth century toconsist of three bands, probably the same which Orozco y Berra (1864) callsLipanjenne, Lipanes de Arriba, and Lipanes Abajo.History.?The position of the Lipan prior to the eighteenth centuryis somewhat obscure, but during that century and the early part ofthe nineteenth they ranged over the region just indicated. In 1757the San Saba mission was estabhshed for them, but it was broken upby their enemies, the Comanche and Wichita. In 1761-62 the mis-sions of San Lorenzo and Candelaria were organized for the samepurpose but met a similar fate in 1767. In 1839 the Lipan sidedwith the Texans against the Comanche but suffered severely from theWhites between 1845 and 1856, when most of them were driven intoCoahuila, Mexico. They remained in Coahuila until October 1903,when the 19 survivors were taken to northwest Chihauhua, and re-mained there until 1905. In that year they were brought to theUnited States and placed on the Mescalero Reservation, N. Mex.,where they now live. A few Lipan were also incorporated with theTonkawa and the Kiowa Apache.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that the Lipan numbered500 in 1690. In 1805 the three bands were reported to number 300,350, and 100 men respectively, which would seem to be a too hberalallowance. The census of 1910 returned 28.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Lipan were notedas persistent raiders into Texas, New Mexico, and Mexico. Theirname has been given to a post village in Hood County, Tex.Muskogee. A few Muskogee came to Texas in the nineteenth century,most belonging to the Pakana division. Two or three individualslived until recently near Livingston, Tex. (See Alabama.)Nabedache, Nacachau, Nacanish, Nacogdoche, Nadaco, Namidish,Nechaui, Neches, and one section of the Nasoni. Small tribesor bands belonging to the Hasinai Confederacy (q. v.).Nanatsoho, Nasoni (Upper). Small tribes or bands connected withthe Kadohadacho Confederacy (q. v.).Pakana. A Muskogee division. (See Muskogee above and also underAlabama.)Pascagoula. Bands belonging to the Pascagoula, entered Texas fromLouisiana early in the nineteenth century, and one baud lived onBiloxi Bayou, a branch of the Neches, for a considerable period,together with some Biloxi Indians. AU had disappeared in 1912 324 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145 except two Indians, only half Pascagoula, living with the Alabamain Polk County. (See Mississippi).Patiri. A tribe associated with the Akokisa, Bidai, and Deadose inthe mission of San Ildefonso west of Trinity River. Since relatedtribes are said to have been put in the same mission in that period(1748-49), it is believed that the Patiri spoke an Atakapan language.Their former home is thought to have been along Caney Creek.Pueblos. There were two late settlements of Pueblo Indians, Isletadel Sur and Senecii del Sur, near El Paso, Tex., composed principallyof Indians brought back by Governor Otermin in 1681 after anunsuccessful attempt to subdue the Pueblo Indians of the RioGrande. Senecii del Sur was, however, actually in Chihuahua,Mexico. The people of these pueblos are now almost completelyMexicanized. (See New Mexico.)Quapaw. Between 1823 and 1833 the Quapaw lived with the CaddoIndians in northwestern Louisiana and northeastern Texas, and oneband of them known as Imaha were reckoned as a constituent ele-ment of the Caddo Confederacy. (See Arkansas.)Senecfi del Sur. (See Pueblos above.)Shawnee. A band of Shav.Tiee entered eastern Texas for a briefperiod during the middle of the nineteenth century. They wereafterward moved to Oklahoma. (See Tennessee.)Shuman. More often known as Jumano or Humano, significanceunknown. Also called:Borrados, from Spanish sources, "striped" (?).Chouman, French form of name.Humanas, Jumanas, Xumanas, Spanish forms of name.Ipataragiiites, from Mota-Padilla, probably intended for this tribe.Patarabueyes, given by Espejo in 1582.Suma, sometimes regarded as a separate tribe but considered by Sauermerely as a synonym.Connections.?The eastern division of the Shuman, that to whichthe name Jumano is oftenest applied, was once thought to have be-longed to the Caddoan stock, but Sauer (1934) appears to have shownthat in all probability it was Uto-Aztecan. The western section,oftener called Suma, has been classed, erroneously of course, as Tanoan.Location.?In early times most of the Shuman lived along the RioGrande between the mouth of the Concho and the present El Paso butextending westward as far as the Casas Grandes in Chihuahua. Latera part of them entered the Plains in western Texas and eastern NewMexico. (See also New Mexico.) SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 325Subdivisions and VillagesBesides the two main divisions to which the names Shuman or Jumano and Sumahave been applied respectively, the Suma later became separated into two groups,one about El Paso and the other in the region of the Casas Grandes. The onlyvillages named are: Atripuy, Genobey, Quelotetrey, and Pataotrey.History.?The Shuman were first met by Cabeza de Vaca and hiscompanions about the beginning of the year 1536 although De Vacadoes not mention them by name. In 1582 they were visited byAntonio de Espejo and in 1598 by Juan de Onate. At the latter datea part of them at least were near the Salinas, east of the Rio Grande inwhat is now New Mexico. About 1622 they were visited by theFranciscan missionary of the Pueblo of Isleta, and in 1629 an independ-ent mission was established for them. By this time, the eastern sec-tion of the tribe had gotten as far east as the Conchos, a headstream ofthe Nueces. About 1670 there were Shuman not far from PecosRiver, and from that time through the eighteenth century they seemto have resided principally in the region indicated. As late as themiddle of the nineteenth century they are mentioned in connectionwith the Kiowa, and again as living near Lampazas, Nuevo Leon,Mexico. Possibly they were the tribe later known as Waco. Thename of the western Shuman appears in the form Suma as early as1630 when it was used by Benavides, and in 1659 some of the northernSuma were at San Lorenzo. During the Pueblo revolt of 1680 theybecame hostile and united with the Manso and Jano in an outbreak in1684, but they were reduced 2 years later and formed into severalsettlements about El Paso, San Lorenzo being the only one to endure.They declined steadily in numbers until in 1897 only one was known tobe living, at Senecu. The mission of Casas Grandes was establishedamong the southern branch of the Suma in 1664. Then and for someyears afterward they were allied with the Apache and Jocome in raidsagainst the Piman tribes west of them, particularly the Opata, but aresupposed to have been destroyed ultimately by the Apache.Population.?In 1582 Espejo believed that the Shuman numbered10,000, probably an overestimate. Mooney (1928) does not givethem separate entry in his estimates' of population. In 1744 thenorthern branch of that part of the tribe called Suma had become re-duced to 50 families; in 1765 there were only 21 families; and in 1897only one individual was supposed to be left.Soacatino, or Xacatin. A tribe met by the companions of De Soto innorthwestern Louisiana or northeastern Texas. It was undoubtedlyCaddo but has not been identified satisfactorily with any knownCaddo tribe.Tawakoni. The Tawakoni were a subdivision of the Wichita, or atleast a tribe closely afl^iated with them. (See Oklahoma.) 326 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Tonkawan Tribes. The name derived from the most important andonly surviving tribe of the family. Gatschet (1891 a) says thatTonkawa is a Waco word, Tonkaweya, meaning "they all staytogether." The synonyms are not to be confounded with those ofthe Tawakoni. Also called:Kddiko, Kiowa name, probably a corruption of Kdikogo, "man-eating men"(Gatschet, MS., B. A. E.).Kariko, Comanche name, from above.KMnahi-pfako, Kiowa name, meaning "maneaters" (Mooney, 1898).Konkon6 or Komkom^, early French name.Maneaters, common translation of some of above synonyms.Midxsfin, Cheyenne name.N^mer^xka, Comanche name (Gatschet, MS., B. A. E.).Tftskan wdtitch, own name.Connections.?The Tonkawan tribes constitute a distinct linguisticfamily but with affinities for the Coahuiltecan and probably Karan-kawan and Tunican groups.Location.?In central Texas from Cibolo Creek on the southwest towithin a few miles of Trinity River on the northeast. (See alsoOklahoma.) SubdivisionsThe tribes or bands certainly included under this head were the Tonkawa,Yojuane, Mayeye, and Ervipiame, but there should probably be added the Sana,Emet, Cava, Toho, Tohaha, Quiutcanuaha, Tenu, Tetzino, Tishin, Tusolivi, andUjuiap, and perhaps also the Nonapho, Sijame, Siraaomo, Muruam, Pulacuam,and Choyapin, though the last three at least were probably Coahuiltecan.History.?Tribes of Tonkawan stock were undoubtedly encounteredby Cabeza de Vaca early in the sixteenth century; certainly so if theMuruam were Tonkawan for they are evidently his Mariames. In1691 the Tonkawa and Yojuane are mentioned by Francisco Casafiasde Jesus Maria as enemies of the Hasinai (Swanton, 1942, p. 251), andin 1714 the Yojuane destroyed the main fire temple of the Hasinai.Between 1746 and 1749 the Tonkawa were gathered into missions onSan Xavier (San Gabriel) River but these were given up in 1756, and2 years later the Tonkawa assisted in the destruction of the San SabaMission established for the Apache, From that time until well intothe nineteenth century the tribe continued to reside in the samesection, rarely settling down for any considerable period. In 1855they and several other Texas tribes were gathered by the United StatesGovernment on two small reservations on Brazos River. In 1859however, the threatening attitude of their white neighbors resulted intheir removal to Washita River in what is now Oklahoma. On thenight of October 25, 1862, the Tonkawa camp there was fallen uponby a body of Delaware, Shawnee, and Caddo Indians desiring to payoff old scores but pretending that the Tonkawa and their agent werein sympathy with the Southern Confederacy. Out of about 300 SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 327Tonkawa 137 were massacred, and the survivors, after some years ofmiserable wandering, were gathered into Fort Griffin, Tex., where theymight be protected from their enemies. In 1884 all that were leftwere given a small reservation in northern Oklahoma, near the Ponca,where their descendants still Uve.Population.?Moftney (1928) estimated that in 1690 there wereabout 1,600 Tonkawa. A Spanish estimate of 1778 gives 300 warriorsbut the following year, after an epidemic of smallpox, this is cut inhalf. In 1782, 600 were said to have attended a certain meeting andthis was only a portion of the tribe. Sibley (1832) estimated that in1805 they had 200 men. In 1809 there were said to be 250 familiesand in 1828, 80. In 1847 the official estimate was 150 men. Beforethe massacre of 1862 there were supposed to be about 300 all told, butwhen they were placed on their reservation in 1884 there were only 92.In 1908 there were 48 including a few intermarried Lipan; the censusof 1910 gave 42, but that of 1930 restores the figure to 48, and in 1937there were said to be 51.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Tonkawan tribeshave the following claims to remembrance: (1) On account of theuniqueness of their language, (2) for their reputed addiction to can-nibalism, (3) on account of the massacre perpetrated upon thempartly in consequence of this reputation, as above described. The cityof Tonkawa in Kay County, Okla., perpetuates the name.Waco. The Waco were a subtribe or tribe of the Wichita group whichHved near the present Waco for a Umited period before removal toOklahoma (q. v.).Wichita. The Wichita lived for a time along both sides of Red Riverin northern Texas. (See Oklahoma.)NEW MEXICOApache. Probably from ?,pachu, "enemy," the Zuni name for theNavaho who were designated "Apaches de Nabaju" by the earlySpaniards in New Mexico. The name has also been applied tosome Yuman tribes, the Apache Mohave (Yavapai) and the ApacheYuma. Also called:Ahuddjg, Havasupai name for at least Tonto and White Mountain Apache.Ai-a'-ta, Panamint name.Atokiiwe, Kiowa name.Awdtch or Awdtche, Ute name.Chah'-shm, Santo Domingo Keres name.Chishye, Laguna name.Ha-ma-kaba-mitc kwa-dig, Mohave name, meaning "far-away Mohave."H'iwana, Taos name.Igihua'-a, Havasupai name. 328 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Inde or Nde, own name.Jarosoma, Pima name (from Kino).Mountain Comanche, by Yoakum (1855-56).Muxtsuhintan, Cheyenne name.Oop, Papago name.Op, or Awp, Pima name.P6anin, Sandia and Isleta name (Hodge, 1895).P'6nin, Isleta name (Gatschet, MS., B. A. E.).Shis-Inday, own name meaning "men of the woods," because their winterquarters were always in the forest.Td-ashi, Comanche name, meaning "turned up," and having reference totheir moccasins.Tagdi, Old Kiowa name.Tdguker^sh, Pecos name.Tashin, Comanche name (Mooney, 1898).Taxkdhe, Arapaho name.Thah-a-i-nin', Arapaho name, meaning "people who play on bone instru-ments," meaning two bison ribs, one notched, over which the other isrubbed.Tinna'-ash, Wichita name.Tshish6, Laguna name.Utce-cI-nyu-mAh or Utsaamu, or Yotchd-eme, Hopi name.Xa-he'-ta-no', Cheyenne name meaning "those who tie their hair back."Connections.?Together with the Navaho, the Apache constitutedthe western group of the southern division of the Athapascan Hnguisticstock (Hoijer, 1938).Location.?In southern New Mexico and Arizona, western Texas,and southeastern Colorado, also ranging over much of northernMexico. (See also Kansas, Oklahoma, and Mexico.)SubdivisionsOn linguistic grounds Hoijer (1938) divides the southern Athapascans into twomain groups, a western and an eastern. The latter includes the Jicarilla, Lipan,and Kiowa Apache, the two former being more closely related to each other thaneither is to the Kiowa Apache. In the western group Hoijer again distinguishestwo major subdivisions, the Navaho, and the San Carlos-Chiricahua-Mescalero.The Navaho are always regarded as a distinct tribe and will be so treated here.Separate treatment is also being given to the Jicarilla, Lipan, and Kiowa Apache.The rest of the southern Athapascans will be placed under the present head, itbeing freely admitted at the same time that such treatment is mainly a matter ofconvenience and that it is impossible to say how many and what southernAthapascan divisions should be given tribal status. What is here called theApache Tribe may be classified as follows with the locations of the divisions,basing the scheme on the classifications of Hoijer and Goodwin (1935) : 1. San Carlos Group:San Carlos proper:Apache Peaks Band, in the Apache Mountains, northeast of Globe.Arivaipa Band, on Arivaipa Creek.Pinal Band, between Salt and Gila Rivers in Gila and Pinal Counties.San Carlos Band, in the region of San Carlos River between Gila andSalt Rivers. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 329 1. San Carlos Group?Continued.White Mountain Group:Eastern White Mountain Band, in the region of the upper Gila and SaltRivers in southeastern Arizona.Western White Mountain Band, in the same region between the EasternBand and the San Carlos Band.Cibecuo Group:Canyon Creek Band, centering on Canyon Creek in Gila and NavajoCounties.Carrizo Band, on Carrizo Creek in Gila County.Cibicue Band, on Cibecue Creek between the two last.Southern Tonto Group:Mazatzal Band, about the Mazatzal Mountains.Six semibands: north of Roosevelt Lake; on the upper Tonto Creek;between the upper Tonto and the East Verde; west of the precedingbetween the East Verde, Tonto, and Verde; north of the East Verde;and from Cherry Creek to Clear Creek.Northern Tonto Group:Bald Mountain Band, about Bald Mountain, south of Camp Verde.Fossil Creek Band, on Fossil Creek between Gila and Yavapai Counties.Mormon Lake Band, centering on Mormon Lake south of Flagstaff.Oak Creek Band, about Oak Creek south of Flagstaff.2. Chiricahua-Mescalero Group:Gilenos Group:Chiricahua Band, about the Chiricahua Mountains in southeasternArizona.Mimbreno Band, centered in the Mimbres Mountains in southwesternNew Mexico.MogoUon Band, about the MogoUon Mountains in Catron and GrantCounties, N. Mex.Warm Spring Band, at the head of Gila River.Mescalero Group:Faraon or Apache Band of Pharaoh, a southern division of the Mescalero.Mescalero Band, mainly between the Rio Grande and Pecos Rivers,N. Mex.The term Querecho, as well as Vaquero, was applied rather generally to Apacheby the Spaniards but probably more particularly to the Mescalero and theirallies. Under Llanero were included Mescalero, Jicarilla, and even some Coman-che. The term Coyotero has been applied to some of the San Carlos divisionsand recently by Murdock (1941) to all.History.?The Apache tribes had evidently drifted from the northduring the prehistoric period, probably along the eastern flanks ofthe Rocky Mountains. When Coronado encountered them in 1540under the name Querechos, they were in eastern New Mexico andwestern Texas, and they apparently did not reach Arizona until afterthe middle of the sixteenth century. They were first called Apacheby Onate in 1598. After that time their history was one successionof raids upon the Spanish territories, and after the United StatesGovernment had supplanted that of Mexico in the Southwest, thewars with the Apache constituted some of the most sensational 330 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 chapters in our military annals. Except for some Apache in Mexicoand a few Lipans with the Tonkawa and Kiowa in Oklahoma, thesepeople were finally gathered into reservations in New Mexico andArizona.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated that all of the Apacheproper numbered 5,000 in 1680. The census of 1910 gives 6,119Apache of all kinds, excluding only the Kiowa Apache, and theReport of the United States Indian OflEice for 1923 enumerates 6,630.If an increase has actually occurred, it is to be attributed to thecaptives taken by these people from all the surrounding tribes andfrom the Mexicans. The census of 1930 returned 6,537 but thisincludes the Jicarilla and Lipan. The Apache proper would numberabout 6,000. However, the Indian Office Report for 1937 gives6,916 exclusive of the Jicarilla.Connection in which they have become noted.?Apache is one of thebest-known Indian tribal names. This is due (1) to the warlikecharacter of the people bearing it, (2) to their constant depredationsalong the Spanish and American frontiers, and (3) to the severe anddifficult fighting made necessary before they were forced to give uptheir ancient raiding proclivities. The word has, therefore, beentaken over to some extent into literature when it is desired to describefierce and ruthless individuals, and in this sense it has been givenlocal application to some of the criminal elements of Paris. Thename Apache is given to villages in Cochise County, Ariz., and CaddoCounty, Okla., and Apache Creek is a place in Catron County, N. Mex.Comanche. In the Spanish period, the Comanche raided into andacross the territory of New Mexico repeatedly. (See Texas.)Jemez. Corrupted from Ha'-mish or Hae'-mish, the Keresan nameof the pueblo. Also spelled Amayes, Ameias, Amejes, Emeges,Gemes, etc. Also called:Maf-d6c-kT2-ne, Navaho name, meaning "wolf neck."Tu'-wa, own name of pueblo.Uala-to-hua or Walatoa, own name of pueblo, meaning "village of thebear."Wong'-ge, Santa Clara and Ildefonso name, meaning "Navaho place."Connections.?With the now extinct Pecos, the Jemez constituteda distinct group of the Tanoan linguistic family now a part of theKiowa-Tanoan stock.Location.?On the north bank of Jemez River, about 20 miles north-west of Bernalillo. VillagesThe following names of villages have been recorded as formerly occupied bythe Jemez but the list may contain some duplication:Amushungkwa, on a mesa west of the Hot Springs, about 12 miles north of Jemezpueblo. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 331Ajiyukwinu, north of Jemez pueblo.Astialakwa, on the summit of a mesa that separates San Diego and GuadalupeCanyons at their mouths.Bulitzequa, exact site unknown.Catr6o, site not identified.Ceca, not identified.Guatitruti, not identified.Guayoguia, not identified.Gyusiwa, one-half mile north of Jemez Hot Springs, on a slope descending to theriver from the east in Sandoval County.Hanakwa, not identified.Kiashita, in Guadalupe Canyon, north of Jemez pueblo.Kiatsukwa, not identified.Mecastria, not identified.Nokyuntseleta, not identified.Nonyishagi, not identified.Ostyalakwa, not identified.Patoqua, on a ledge of the mesa which separates Guadalupe and San DiegoCanyons, 6 miles north of Jemez pueblo.Pebulikwa, not identified.Pekwiligii, not identified.Potre, not identified.Seshukwa, not identified.Setokwa, about 2 miles south of Jemez pueblo.Towakwa, not identified.Trea, not identified.Tyajuindena, not identified.Uahatzae, not identified.Wabakwa, on a mesa north of Jemez pueblo.Yjar, not identified.Zolatungzezhii, not identified.Hisiory.?The Jemez came from the north, according to tradition,settKng in the valleys of the upper tributaries of the Jemez Riverand at last in the sandy valley of the Jemez proper. Castaneda,the chronicler of Coronado's expedition, mentions seven towns be-longing to the Jemez tribe besides three in the region of Jemez HotSprings. After they had been missionized they were induced toabandon their towns by degrees until about 1622 they became con-centrated into the pueblos of Gyusiwa and probably Astialakwa.Both pueblos contained chapels, probably dating from 1618, butbefore the Pueblo revolt of 1680 Astialakwa was abandoned andanother pueblo, probably Patoqua, established. About the middleof the seventeenth century, in conjunction with the Navaho, theJemez twice plotted insurrection against the Spaniards. After theinsurrection of 1680 the Jemez were attacked by Spanish forces ledsuccessively by Otermin, Cruzate, and Vargas, the last of whomstormed the mesa in July 1694, killed 84 Indians, and after destroyingPatoqua and two other pueblos, returned to Santa F6 with 361 pris- 332 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 oners and a large quantity of stores. Gyusiwa was the only Jemezpueblo reoccupied, but in 1696 there was a second revolt and theJemez finally fled to the Navaho country, where they remained fora considerable time before returning to their former home. Thenthey built their present village, called by them Walatoa, "Village ofthe Bear." In 1728, 108 of the inhabitants died of pestilence. In1782 Jemez was made a visita of the mission of Sia. In 1838 theywere joined by the remnant of their relatives, the Pecos Indians fromthe upper Rio Pecos. Their subsequent history has been uneventful.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates the Jemez population at2,500 in 1680. In 1890 it was 428; in 1904, 498, including the remnantof Pecos Indians; in 1910, 499. In 1930 the entire Tanoan stocknumbered 3,412. In 1937 the Jemez Indians numbered 648.Jicarilla. An Apache tribe which ranged over the northeasterncorner of New Mexico. (See Colorado.)Keresan Pueblos. Keresan is adapted from K'eres, their own desig-nation. Also called:Biernl'n, Sandia name.Cherechos, Ofiate in 1598.Drinkers of the Dew, Zufii traditional name.Ing-we-pi'-ra^-di-vi-he-ma", San Ildefonso Tewa name.Pabiernl'n, Isleta name.Connections.?These Indians constituted an independent stockhaving no affiliations with any other.Location.?On the Rio Grande, in north central New Mexico,between the Rio de los Frijoles and the Rio Jemez, and on the latterstream from the pueblo of Sia to its mouth.Subdivisions and VillagesThe Keresan Indians are divided dialectically into an Eastern (Queres) Groupand a Western (Sitsime or Kawaiko) Group, comprising the following pUeblos:Eastern (Queres) Group:Cochiti, on the west bank of the Rio Grande, 27 miles southwest of Santa F6.San Felipe, on the west bank of the Rio Grande about 12 miles above Ber-nalillo.Santa Ana, on the north bank of the Rio Jemez.Santo Domingo, on the east bank of the Rio Grande about 18 miles aboveBernalillo.Sia, on the north bank of Jemez River about 16 miles northwest of Bernalillo.Western (Sitsime or Kawaiko) Group:Acoma, on a rock mesa or pefiol, 357 feet in height, about 60 miles west of theRio Grande, in Valencia County.Laguna, on the south bank of San Jos6 River, in Valencia County.In addition to the above principal towns, we have the following ancient townsand later out-villages recorded: SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 333Former towns of Cochiti and San Felipe:At the Potrero de las Vacas.At Tyuooyi or Rito de los Frijoles.Haatze, near the foot of the Sierra San Miguel, about Cochiti Pueblo.Hanut Cochiti, about 12 miles northwest of Cochiti Pueblo.Kuapa, in the Cafiada de Cochiti, 12 miles northwest of Cochiti Pueblo.Former towns of Santo Domingo:At the Potrero de la Cafiada Quemada.Gipuy, two towns: (1) on the banks of the Arroyo de Galisteo, more than amile east of the present station of Thornton; (2) west of No. 1.Huashpatzena, on the Rio Grande.Former towns of Sia:Opposite Sia are the ruins of a town called Kakanatzia and south of it anothercalled Kohasaya which may have been former Sia settlements.Former towns of Acoma:Kashkachuti, location unknown.Katzimo or the Enchanted Mesa, about 3 miles northeast of the present .\comaPueblo.Kowina, on a low mesa opposite the spring at the head of Cebollita Valley,about 15 miles west of Acoma.Kuchtya, location unknown.Tapitsiama, on a mesa 4 or 5 miles northeast of their present pueblo.Tsiama, the ruins are situated at the mouth of Canada de la Cruz, at or nearthe present Laguna village of Tsima.Later villages:Acomita, about 15 miles north of Acoma.Heashkowa, about 2 miles southeast of Acoma.Pueblito, about 15 miles north of Acoma.History.?Like the other Pueblo peoples of New Mexico, the Kere-sans traced their origin to the underworld, whence they had emergedat an opening called Shipapu. According to the tradition, they after-ward drifted south slowly to the Rio Grande, where they took uptheir residence in the Rito de los Frijoles, or Tyuonyi, and constructedthe cliff dwellings found there today excavated in the friable volcanictufa. Long before the coming of Europeans, they had abandonedthe Rito and moved farther south, separating into a number of au-tonomous viUage communities. Coronado, who visited them in 1540,reported seven of these. In 1583 Espejo encountered them and in1598 Onate. Missions were estabhshed in most of the principal townsearly in the seventeenth century, but they were annihilated andSpanish dominion temporarily brought to an end by the great Pueblorebellion of 1680, which was not finally quelled until about the end ofthe eighteenth century. Afterward, missionary work was resumed butwithout pronounced success, while the native population itself grad-ually declined in numbers. Although some of the most conservativepueblos belong to this group, they will not be able indefinitely to resistthe dissolving force of American civihzation in which they areimmersed. 334 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Population.?In 1760 there were 3,956 Keresans;ni 1790-93, 4,021;in 1805, 3,653; in 1850, 3,342; in 1860, 2,676; in 1871, 3,317; in 1901-5,4,249; in 1910, 4,027; in 1930, 4,134; in 1937, 5,781.Kiowa. The Kiowa raided into and across New Mexico in the Spanishand early American period. (See Oklahoma.)Kiowa Apache. The Kiowa Apache were an Athapascan tribe in-corporated into and accompanying the Kiowa. (See Oklahoma.)Lipan. The Lipan were the easternmost of the Apache tribes. (SeeApache and also Texas.)Manso. A Spanish word meaning "mild." Also called:Gorretas, by Zarate-Salmeron.Lanos, by Perea (1632-33).Connections.?The Manso belonged to the Tanoan division of theKiowa-Tanoan linguistic stock.Location.?About Mesilla Valley, in the vicinity of the present LasCruces, N. Mex. VillagesThe mission of Nuestra Sefiora de Guadalupe de los Mansos was founded amongthem but none of the native names of their villages are known.History.?Shortly before the appearance of the Spaniards in theircountry, the Manso hved in substantial houses like the Pueblo Indiansgenerally but changed these to dwellings of reeds and wood. Theywere relocated at a spot near El Paso in 1659 by Fray Garcia de SanFrancisco, who established the above-mentioned mission among them.The remnant of the Manso are now associated in one town with theTiwa and Piro.Population.?In 1668, when the mission of Nuestra Sefiora de Gua-dalupe de los Mansos was dedicated, Vetancourt states that it con-tained upward of 1,000 parishioners. Very few of Manso bloodremain.Navaho, Navajo. From Tewa Navahu, referring to a large area of cul-tivated land and applied to a former Tewa pueblo, and by extensionto the Navaho, known to the Spaniards as "Apaches de Navaj6,"who intruded on the Tewa domain or who hved in the vicinity, todistinguish them from other so-called Apache bands. Also called:Bdgowits, Southern Ute name.Dacdbimo, Hopi name.Ddvaxo, Kiowa Apache name.DIn6', own name.Djen6, Laguna name.Hua'amii'u, Havasupai name.I'hl-den6, Jicarilla name.Moshome, Keresan name.Oop, Oohp, Pima name. SW4NTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 335Pdgowitch, southern Ute name, meaning "reed knives."Ta-cdb-cf-nyu-milh, Hopi name.Ta'hli'mnin, Sandia name.Tasdmew^, Hopi name (Ten Kate, 1885) meaning "bastards."Te'li^mnim, Isleta name.Teny^, Laguna name.Wild Coyotes, Zuni nickname translated.Yabipais Nabajay, Carets (1776).Ydtilatldvi, Tonto name.Yoetahd or Yutahd, Apache name, meaning "those who live on the borderof the Ute."Yu-i'-ta, Panamint name.Yutflapd, Yavapai name.Yutilatlawi, Tonto name.Connections.?With the Apache tribes, the Navaho formed thesouthern division of the Athapascan Hnguistic family.Location.?In northern New Mexico and Arizona with some exten-sion into Colorado and Utah.History.?Under the loosely appUed name Apache there may be arecord of this tribe as early as 1598 but the first mention of them bythe name of Navaho is by Zarate-Salmeron about 1629. Missionarieswere among them about the middle of the eighteenth century, buttheir labors seem to have borne no fruits. For many years previousto the occupation of their country by the United States, the Navahokept up an almost constant predatory war with the Pueblo Indiansand the \Miite settlers. A revolution in their economy was broughtabout by the introduction of sheep. Treaties of peace made by themwith the United States Government in 1846 and 1849 were not ob-served, and in 1863, in order to put a stop to their depredations, Col. "Kit" Carson invaded their country, killed so many of their sheep as toleave them without means of support, and carried the greater part ofthe tribe as prisoners to Fort Sumner and the Bosque Redondo on theRio Pecos. They were restored to their country in 1867 and givena new supply of sheep and goats, and since then they have remainedat peace and prospered greatly, thanks to their flocks and the sale oftheir famous blankets.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that there were 8,000Navaho in 1680. In 1867 an incomplete enumeration gave 7,300.In 1869 there were fewer than 9,000. The census of 1890, taken ona faulty system, gave 17,204. The census of 1900 returned more than20,000 and that of 1910, 22,455. The report of the United StatesIndian Office for 1923 gives more than 30,000 on the various Navahoreservations, and the 1930 census 39,064, while the Indian OfliceReport for 1937 entered 44,304.Connection in which they have become noted.?This tribe has acquiredconsiderable fame from its early adoption of a shepherd life after the 336 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145introduction of sheep and goats, and from the blankets woven byNavaho women and widely known to collectors and connoisseurs.The name has become affixed, in the Spanish form Navajo, to a county,creek, and spring in Arizona; a post village in Apache County, Ariz.;a mountain in New Mexico; and a place in Daniels County, Mont.In southwestern Oklahoma is a post village known as Navajoe. Thetribe has attracted an unusual amount of attention from ethnologistsand from writers whose interests are purely literary.Pecos. From P'e'-a-ku', the Keresan name of the pueblo. Alsocalled : Acuy^, Cicuy6, probably the name of a former pueblo, Tshiquit6 ortziquit^.Aqiu, Pecos and Jemez name.HiokQo'k, Isleta Tiwa name.K'ok'-o-ro-t'ii'-yu, Pecos name of pueblo.Los Angeles, mission name.Nuestra Senora de los Angeles de Porciuncula, full church name.Paego, Keresan name of Pueblo.Paequiu or Paequiuala, Keresan name of tribe.P'a-qu-lah, Jemez name.P^ahko, Santa Ana name.PeakQnf, Laguna name of Pueblo.Tamos, from Espejo.Connections.?The Pecos belonged to the Jemez division of theTanoan linguistic family, itself a part of the Kiowa-Tanoan stock.Location.?On an upper branch of Pecos River, about 30 milessoutheast of Santa F6. VillagesThe following are names of ruined Pecos villages:Kuuanguala, a few miles southeast of Pecos, near Arroyo Amarillo, at the presentsite of Rowe.Pomojoua, near San Antonio del Pueblo, 3 miles southeast of San Miguel, SanMiguel Count}'.San Jose, modern Spanish name of locality.Seyupa, a few miles southeast of Pecos, at the site of the village of Fulton, SanMiguel County,Tonchuun, 5 miles southeast of Pecos Pueblo,History.?According to tradition, the Pecos came originally fromsome place to the north of their historic seats, but their last migrationwas from the southeast where they occupied successively the nowruined pueblos at San Jos6 and Kingman before locating at theirfinal settlement. Pecos was first visited by Coronado in 1540 andafterward by Espejo in 1583, Castano de Sosa in 1590-91, and Onatein 1598. During the governorship of Onate, missionaries wereassigned to Pecos, and the great church, so long a landmark of theSanta F6 Trail, was erected about 1617. The town suffered severely SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 337from attacks of the Apache of the Plains and afterward from theComanche. In the Pueblo revolts of 1680-96 it took an active partand suffered proportionately. In 1782 the Pecos mission was aban-doned, the place becominj^ a visita of Santa F^. A few years laternearly every man in the Pecos tribe is said to have been killed in araid by the Comanche, epidemics decreased the numbers of theremainder, and in 1838 the old town of Pecos was abandoned. The17 surviving Pecos Indians moved to Jemez, where their descendantsstiU live.Population.?At the time of Coronado's visit in 1540 the populationwas estimated as 2,000-2,500. In 1630 and 1680 there were 2,000Pecos; in 1760, 599 (including Galisteo); in 1790-93, 152; in 1805,104; in 1838, 17; in 1910, 10.Connection in which they have become noted.?The name Pecos seemsassured of permanent preservation as applied to Pecos River, Tex.,the largest branch of the Rio Grande, as well as to Pecos County,Tex., and its principal town, and also to a place in San Miguel County,New Mex., adjacent to the ruins of the aboriginal village. Thelatter are well known as a result of the archeological work done thereby Dr. A. V. Kidder for the Department of Archeology, PhillipsAcademy, Andover, Mass.Piro Pueblos. Significance of Piro unknovrn. Also called:Nortefios, "northerners" in Spanish, because inhabiting the region ofEl Paso del Norte (may also refer to Tiwa).Tiikahun, Isleta Tiwa name for all pueblos below their village, meaning "southern pueblos."Connections.?They w^ere a division of the Tanoan linguistic family,which in turn is a part of the Kiowa-Tanoan stock.Location and major subdivisions.?In the early part of the seven-teenth century the Piro comprised two divisions, one inhabiting theRio Grande Valley from the present town of San Marcial, SocorroCounty, northward to within about 50 miles of Albuquerque, wherethe Tiwa settlements began; and the other, sometimes called Tompirosand Salineros, occupying an area east of the Rio Grande in thevicinity of the salt lagoons, or salinas, where they adjoined the easterngroup of Tiwa settlements on the south.TownsAbo, on the Arroyo del Empedradillo, about 25 miles east of the Rio Grande and20 miles south of Manzano, in Valencia County.Agua Nueva, on the Rio Grande between Socorro and Servilleta.Alamillo, on the Rio Grande about 12 miles north of Socorro.Barrancas, on the Rio Grande near Socorro.Qualacu, on the east bank of the Rio Grande near the foot of the Black Mesa,on or near the site of San Marcial. 338 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145San Felipe, on the Rio Grande, probably near the present San Marcial, SocorroCounty.San Pascual, on the east bank of the Rio Grande, opposite the present SanAntonio village, Socorro County.Senecu, on the west bank of the Rio Grande, at the site of the present village ofSan Antonio, 13 miles below Socorro.Senecu del Sur (also Tiwa), on the southeast bank of the Rio Grande, a few milesbelow El Paso, in Chihuahua, Mexico.Sevilleta, on the east bank of the Rio Grande about 20 miles above Socorro.Socorro or Pilabo, on the site of the present Socorro.Socorro del Sur, on both sides of the Rio Grande a few miles below El Paso, Tex.Tabira, at the southern apex of the Mesa de los Jumanos, northeast of the presentSocorro.Tenabo, probably at the Siete Arroyos, northeast of Socorro and east of the RioGrande.Teypana, nearly opposite the present town of Socorro, on the east bank of theRio Grande, in Socorro Couuty.Tenaquel (?).Following are names of deserted pueblos near the lower Rio Grande which werealso in all probability occupied by the Piro:Arao. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 339Mejia, 5 leagues below Isleta. San Francisco, on the lower Rio GrandeQuanquiz. between El Paso, Tex., and SanSalineta, 4 leagues from Guadelupe Lorenzo.Mission at El Paso, Tex. Xatoe.San Bautista, on the Rio Grande, 16 Xiamela (?).miles below Sevilleta. Yonalus.All the above pueblos not definitely located were probably situated in theSalinas in the vicinity of Abo.History.?The western or Rio Grande branch of the Piro was visitedby members of Coronado's Expedition in 1540, by Chamuscado in1580, by Espejo in 1583, by Onate in 1598, and by Benavides in1621-30. The establishment of missionaries among them began in1626, and the efforts of the monks combined with the threats ofApache raids to induce the Indians to concentrate into a smallernumber of towns. The first actual mission work among the Pirosof the Salinas began in 1629 and was prosecuted rapidly, but beforethe Pueblo rebellion of 1680 Apache raids had become so numerousthat all of the villages of the Salinas region and Senecu on the RioGrande were abandoned. The Piro were not invited to take part inthe great rebellion and when Governor Otermin retreated to El Pasonearly all of them joined him, while the few who remained subsequently scattered. Those who accompanied the governor weresettled at Senecu del Sur and Socorro del Sur, where their descendantsbecame largely Mexicanized.Population.?The Piro population was estimated at 9,000 early inthe sixteenth century, but is now about 60. (See Tewa.)Pueblo Indians. A general name for those Indians in the Southwestwho dwelt in stone buildings as opposed to the tribes living in morefragile shelters, pueblo being the word for "town" or "village" inSpanish. It is not a tribal or even a stock name, since the Pueblosbelonged to four distinct stocks. Following is the classification ofPueblos made by F. W. Hodge (1910) except that the Kiowa havesince been connected with the Tanoans and a few minor changeshave been introduced:Kiowa-Tanoan linguistic stock:Tewa Group:Northern Division: Nambe, Tesuque, San Ildefonso, San Juan, SantaClara, Pojoaque (recently extinct), Hano.Southern Division: Tano (practically extinct).Tiwa Group: Isleta, Isleta del Sur (Mexicanized), Sandia, Taos, Picuris.Jemez Group: Jemez, Pecos (extinct).Piro Group: Senecu, Senecu del Sur (Mexicanized).Keresan linguistic stock:Eastern Group: San Felipe, Santa Ana, Sia, Cochiti, Santo Domingo.Western Group: Acoma, Laguna, and outlying villages. 340 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bdll. 145Zunian linguistic stock:Zuni Group: Zufii and its outlying villages.Shoshonean linguistic stock, part of the Uto-Aztecan stock:Hopi Group: Walpi, Sichomovi, Mishongnovi, Shipaulovi, Shongopovi,Oraibi.The Pueblo Indians in New Mexico are being considered at lengthunder the following heads: Jemez, Keresan Pueblos, Piro Pueblos,Tewa Pueblos, Tiwa Pueblos, and Zuni; the Hopi are considered underArizona. (See also Colorado, Nevada, and Texas.)Connection in which they have become noted.?The Pueblo Indianshave become famous from the fact that, unlike all of their neighbors,they lived in communal stone houses and in stone dwellings perchedalong the canyon walls; from their peculiar customs and ceremonies,such as the Snake Dance; and from their real and supposed connectionwith the builders of the stone ruins with which their country andneighboring parts of the Southwest abound. In recent years theyhave been subjects of interest to artists and writers and an attempthas been made to base a style of architecture upon the type of theirdwellings. They are of historic interest as occupants of one of thetwo sections of the United States first colonized by Europeans.Shuman. The Shuman lived at various times in or near the southernand eastern borders of New Mexico. (See Texas.)Tewa Pueblos. The name Tewa is from a Keres word meaning "moccasins." Also called:Tu'-ba-na, Taos name.Tu'-vSn, Isleta and Sandia name.Connections.?They constituted a major division of the Tanoanlinguistic family, itself a part of the Kiowa-Tanoan stock.Location.?Along the valley of the Rio Grande in the northern partof New Mexico, except for one pueblo, Hano, in the Hopi country,Arizona. SubdivisionsThey consisted of two main branches, the Northern Tewa, from near SantaT6 to the mouth of the Rio Chama, including also Hano; and the Southern Tewaor Tano, from Santa F4 to the neighborhood of Golden, back from the Rio Grande.TownsNorthern Tewa towns and villages still occupied:Hano, the easternmost pueblo of Tusayan, Ariz.Nambe, about 16 miles north of Santa Fe, on Nambe River, a small tributaryof the Rio Grande.San Ildefonso, near the eastern bank of the Rio Grande, about 18 miles northwestof Santa F6.San Juan, near the eastern bank of the Rio Grande 25 miles northwest of Sante Fe. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 341Santa Clara, on the western bank of the Rio Grande, about 30 miles aboveSanta F6.Tesuque, 8 miles north of Santa F6.Towns and villages formerly occupied by the Northern Tewa:Abechiu, at a place called Le Puente, on a bluff close to the southern bank ofRio Chama, 3 miles southeast of the present town of Abiquiu, Rio ArribaCounty.Agawano, in the mountains about 7 miles east of the Rio Grande, on Rio SantaCruz.Analco, at the place where there is now the so-called "oldest house," adjacent toSan Miguel Chapel, in Santa F6.Axol, location uncertain.Camitria, in Rio Arriba County.Chipiinuinge, on a small but high detached mesa between the Canones andPolvadera Creek, 4 miles south of Chama and about 14 miles southwest of Abi-quiu, Rio Arriba County.Chipiwi, location uncertain.Chupadero, location uncertain.Cuyamunque, on Tesuque Creek, between Tesuque and Pojoaque, about 15 milesnorthwest of Santa Fd.Fejiu, at the site of the present Abiquiu on the Rio Chama, Rio Arriba County.Fesere, on a mesa west or south of the Rio Chama, near Abiquiu, Rio ArribaCounty.Homayo, on the west bank of Rio Ojo Caliente, a small western tributary of theRio Grande, in Rio Arriba County.Howiri, at the Rito Colorado, about 10 miles west of the Hot Springs, near Abiquiu,Rio Arriba County.Ihamba, on the south side of Pojoaque River, between Pojoaque and San IldefonsoPueblos.Jacona, a short distance west of Nambe, on the south side of Pojoaque River,Santa F6 County.Junetre, in Rio Arriba County.Kaayu, in the vicinity of the "Santuario" in the mountains about 7 miles eastof the Rio Grande, on Rio Santa Cruz, Santa F6 County.Keguayo, in the vicinity of the Chupaderos, a cluster of springs in a mountaingorge, about 4 miles east of Nambe Pueblo.Kuapooge, with Analco occupying the site of Santa F6.Kwengyauinge, on a conical hill about 15 feet high, overlooking Chama River,at a point known as La Puenta, about 3 miles below Abiquiu, Rio ArribaCounty.Luceros, partially Tewa.Navahu, in the second valley south of the great pueblo and cliff village of Puye,west of Santa Clara Pueblo, in the Pajarito Park.Navawi, between the Rito de los Frijoles and Santa Clara Canyon, southwestof San Ildefonso.Otowi, on a mesa about 5 miles west of the point where the Rio Grande entersWhite Rock Canyon, between the Rito de los Frijoles and Santa Clara Canyon,in the northeastern corner of Sandoval County.Perage, a few rods from the west bank of the Rio Grande, about 1 mile westof San Ildefonso Pueblo.Pininicangui, on a knoll in a valley about 2 miles south of Puye and 3 miles southof Santa Clara Creek, on the Pajarito Plateau, Sandoval County. 342 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 Pojiuuingge, at La Joya, about 10 miles north of San Juan Pueblo.Pojoaque, on a small eastern tributary of the Rio Grande, about 18 miles north-west of Santa F6.Ponyinumbu, near the Mexican settlement of Santa Cruz, in the northern partof Santa F6 County.Ponyipakuen, near Ojo Caliente and El Rito, about the boundary of Taos andRio Arriba Counties.Poseuingge, at the Rito Colorado, about 10 miles west of the hot springs nearAbiquiu.Potzuye, on a mesa west of the Rio Grande in northern New Mexico, betweenSan Ildefonso Pueblo on the north and the Rito de los Frijoles on the south.Pueblito, opposite San Juan Pueblo, on the west bank of the Rio Grande inRio Arriba County.Pueblo Quemado (or Tano), 6 miles southwest of Santa F6.Puye, on a mesa about 10 miles west of the Rio Grande and a mile south ofSanta Clara Canyon, near the intersection of the boundaries of Rio Arriba,Sandoval, and Santa F6 Counties.Sajiuwingge, at La Joya, about 10 miles north of San Juan Pueblo, Rio ArribaCounty.Sakeyu on a mesa west of the Rio Grande in northern New Mexico, betweenSan Ildefonso Pueblo and Rito de los Frijoles.Sandia, not the Tiwa pueblo of that name.Santa Cruz, east of the Rio Grande, 30 miles northwest of Santa Fe, at the siteof the present town of that name.Sepawi, in the valley of El Rito Creek, on the heights above the Ojo Calienteof Joseph, and 5 miles from the Mexican settlement of El Rito.Shufina, on a castlelike mesa of tufa northwest of Puye and separated from it bySanta Clara Canyon.Teeuinge, on top of the mesa on the south side of Rio Chama, about K milefrom the river and an equal distance below the mouth of Rio Oso, in Rio ArribaCounty.Tejeuingge Ouiping, on the southern slope of the hills on which stands the presentpueblo of San Juan, on the Rio Grande.Tobhipangge, 8 miles northeast of the present Nambe Pueblo.Triapf, location uncertain.Triaque, location uncertain.Troomaxiaquino, in Rio Arriba County.Tsankawi, on a lofty mesa between the Rito de los Frijoles on the south and LosAlamos Canyon on the north, about 5 miles west of the Rio Grande.Tsawarii, at or near the present hamlet of La Puebla, or Pueblito, a few milesabove the town of Santa Cruz, in southeastern Rio Arriba County.Tseweige, location uncertain.Tshirege, on the northern edge of the Mesa del Pajarito about 6 miles west ofthe Rio Grande and 7 miles south of San Ildefonso Pueblo.Yugeuingge, on the west bank of the Rio Grande, opposite the present puebloof San Juan, near the site of the village of Chamita.The following extinct villages are either Tewa or Tano:Chiuma, location uncertain.Guia, on the Rio Grande in the vicinity of Albuquerque.Guika, on the Rio Grande near Albuquerque.Penas Negras, on an eminence west of Pecos Road, near the edge of a forest, 8miles south-southeast of Santa F6. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 343The following were inhabited by either the Tiwa or the Tewa:Axoytre, perhaps the same as Axol above?Camitre, perhaps the same as Camitria above?Paniete, location uncertain.Piamato, location uncertain.Quiotrdco, probably in Rio Arriba County.So far as known the following pueblos belonged to the Southern Tewa:Ci^nega (also contained Keresan Indians), in the valley of Rio Santa F6, 12 milessouthwest of Santa F6.Dyapige, southeast of Lamy, "some distance in the mountains."Gahsteo, l}i miles southeast of the present hamlet of the name and about 22 milessouth of Santa F6.Guika (or Tewa), on the Rio Grande near Albuquerque.Kayepu, about 5 miles south of Galisteo, Santa F6 County.Kipana, south of the hamlet of Tejon, in Sandoval County.Kuakaa, on the south bank of Arroyo Hondo, 5 miles south of Santa F6.Ojana, south of the hamlet of Tejon, Sandoval County.Paako, south of the mining camp of San Pedro, Santa F6 County.Pueblo Blanco, on the west rim of the M6dano, or great sand-flow, east of theRio Grande.Pueblo Colorado, on the south border of the Galisteo plain.Pueblo de los Silos, in the Gahsteo Basin, between the Keresan pueblos of theRio Grande and Pecos.Pueblo Largo, about 5 miles south of Galisteo.Pueblo Quemado (or Tewa), 6 miles southwest of Santa Y6.Puerto (or Keresan).San Crist6bal, between Galisteo and Pecos.San Ldzaro, 12 miles southwest of the present Lamy, on the south bank of theArroyo del Chorro, Santa F^ County.San Marcos, 18 miles south-southwest of Santa F6.Sempoai, near Golden, Santa F6 County.She, about 5 miles south of Galisteo in Santa T6 County.Tuerto, near the present Golden City, Santa F6 County,Tungge, on a bare slope near the banks of a stream called in the mountains farthersouth Rio de San Pedro; lower down, Ufia de Gato; and in the vicinity of theruins Arroyo del Tunque, at the northeastern extremity of the Sandia Moun-tains, in Sandoval County.Tzemantuo, about 5 miles south of Galisteo, Santa F6 County.Tzenatay, opposite the little settlement of La Bajada, on the declivity slopingfrom the west toward the bed of Santa F6 Creek, 6 miles east of the Rio Grandeand 20 miles southwest of Santa F6.Uapige, east of Lamy Station on the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa F6 Railway,some distance in the mountains.History.?When Coronado passed through the southern end ofTewa territory in 1540, he found it had been nearly depopulated bythe Teya, a warlike Plains tribe, perhaps Apache, about 16 years before.The Tewa were next visited by Espejo. In 1630 there were but fiveSouthern Tewa towns remaining and those were entirely broken upduring the Pueblo revolts of L680-96, most of the Indians removing 344 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145to the Hopi in Arizona, after 1694. The greater part of the remainderwere destroyed by smallpox early in the nineteenth centmy, thoughthere are still a few descendants of this group living in the other pueblosalong the Rio Grande, particularly Santo Domingo. The history ofthe NorthernTewa was similar to that of the Southern but they sufferedmuch less and remain a considerable body at the present day thoughwith a stationary population. The Pueblo of Hano was establishedamong the Hopi as a result of the rebellion of 1680-92.Populations.?The population of the Northern Tewa is given asfollows: In 1680, 2,200; in 1760, 1,908; in 1790-93, 980; in 1805, 929;in 1850, 2,025; in 1860, 1,161; in 1871, 979, in 1901-05, 1,200; in 1910,968. In 1930 the entire Tanoan stock numbered 3,412. In 1937,1,708 were returned from the Tewa excluding the Hano, which wereenumerated with the Hopi.In 1630 Benavides estimated the Southern Tewa population at4,000; in 1680 Galisteo, probably including San Crist6bal, had anestimated population of 800 and San Marcos of 600. No later separatefigures are available.Connection in which they have become noted.?Tano, the alternativename of the Southern Tewa, has been used as a designation of the stockto which the entire group?Tewa, Tiwa, Piro, Pecos, and Jemez ? belong, a stock now merged with the Kiowa-Tanoan.Tiwa Pueblos. The name Tiwa is from TiVan, pi. Tiwesh', theirown name. Also spelled Tebas, Tigua, Tiguex, Tihuas, Chiguas.Also called:E-nagh-magh, a name given by Lane (in Schoolcraft, 1851-57) to thelanguage of "Taos, Picuris, Tesuqua, Sandia," etc.Connections.?The Tiwa Pueblos are a division of the Tanoan lin-guistic family, itself a part of the Kiowa-Tanoan stock.Location and Subdivisions.?The Tiwa Pueblos formed three geo-graphic divisions, one occupying Taos and Picuris (the most northerlyof the New Mexican Pueblos) , on the upper waters of the Rio Grande ; another inhabiting Sandia and Isleta, north and south of Albuquerquerespectively; and the third Uving in the pueblos of Isleta del Sur andSenecu del Sur, near El Paso, Tex., in Texas and Chihuahua, Mexico,respectively. Towns and Villages(As far as known)Alameda, on the east side of the Rio Grande about 10 miles above Albuquerque.Bejuituuy, near the southern limit of the Tiwa habitat on the Rio Grande, at thepresent Los Lunas.Carfaray, supposed to have been east of the Rio Grande beyond the saline lakes.Chilili, on the west side of the Arroyo de Chilili, about 30 miles southeast ofAlbuquerque. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 345 Isleta, on the west bank of the Rio Grande about 12 miles south of Albuquerque.Isleta del Sur, on the northeast side of the Rio Grande, a short distance belowEl Paso, Tex.Kuaua, north of the present bridge across the Rio Grande above Bernalillo.Lentes, on the west bank of the Rio Grande near Los Lunas.Manzano, near the present village so called, 6 miles northwest of Quarai and about25 miles east of the Rio Grande.Mojualuna, in the mountains above the present Taos Pueblo.Nabatutuei, location unknown.Nachurituei, location unknown.Pahquetooai, location unknown.Picuris, inhabited, about 40 miles north of Santa F6.Puaray, on a gravelly bluff overlooking the Rio Grande in front of the southernportion of the town of Bernalillo.Puretuay, on the summit of the round mesa of Shiemtuai, or Mesa de las Padillas,3 miles north of Isleta.Quarai, about 30 miles straight east of the Rio Grande, in the eastern part of Valen-cia County.San Antonio, east of the present settlement of the same name, about the centerof the Sierra de Gallego, or Sierra de Carnu6, between San Pedro and Chilili,east of the Rio Grande.Sandia, inhabited, on the east bank of the Rio Grande, 12 miles north of Albu-querque.Santiago, probably about 12^ miles above Bernalillo, on the Mesa del Cangelon.Senecu del Sur, including Piro Indians, on the southeastern bank of the Rio Grande,a few miles below El Paso, in Chihuahua, Mexico,Shumnac, east of the Rio Grande in the vicinity of the present Mexican settle-ments of Chilili, Tajique, and Manzano.Tajique, about 30 miles northeast of Belen, close to the present settlement of thesame name, on the southern bank of the Arroyo de Tajique.Taos, inhabited, on both sides of Taos River, an eastern tributary of the RioGrande, in Taos County.The following pueblos now extinct were probably also Tiwa:Locations entirely unknown: Locations known:Acacafui. Ranchos, about 3 miles from TaodGuayotrf. Pueblo.Henicohio. Shinana, on the Rio Grande nearLeyvia. Albuquerque.Paniete. Tanques, also on the Rio Grande nearPoxen. Albuquerque.Trimati. Torreon, at the modern town of theTuchiamas. same name, about 28 miles east ofVareato. Belen.History.?The first two Tiwa divisions above mentioned occupiedthe same positions when Coronado encountered the Tiwa in 1540-42.Relations between his followers and the Indians soon became hostileand resulted in the capture of two pueblos by his army. In 1581three missionaries were sent to the Tiwa under an escort but all werekilled as soon as the escort was withdrawn. In 1583 Espejo approachedPuaray, which Coronado had attacked, but the Indians fled. Cas- 346 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bdll. 145tano de Sosa visited the Tiwa in 1591 and Ofiate in 1598. Missionary-work was begun among them early in the seventeenth century, and theIndians were withdrawn progressively until only four pueblos wereoccupied by them at the time of the great rebellion of 1G80, in whichihej took part. In 1681 Governor Otermin stormed Isleta and cap-tured 500 Indians most of whom he settled near El Paso. Part of theIsleta fled to the Hopi country and remained there until 1709 or 1718,when the people of Isleta returned and reestablished their town. TheSandia Indians, however, remained away until 1742, when they werebrought back by some missionaries and settled in a new pueblo neartheir former one. Since then there have been few disturbances ofimportance, but the population until very lately slowly declined.Population.?In 1680 there were said to be 12,200 Tiwa; in 1760,1,428 were reported; in 1790-93, 1,486; in 1805, 1,491; in 1850, 1,575;m 1860, 1,163; in 1871, 1,478; m 1901-5, 1,613; in 1910, 1,650; in 1937,2,122. (See Tewa Pueblos.)Ute. The Ute were close to the northern border of New Mexico,extending across it at times and frequently raiding the tribes of theregion and the later white settlements. (See Utah.)Zufii. A Spanish adaptation of the Keresan Siinyyitsi, or Su'nyitsaof unknown meaning. Also spelled Juni. Synonyms are:A'shiwi, own name, signifying "the flesh."Cibola, early Spanish rendering of A'swiwi.La Purisima de Zuni, mission name.Nai-t6'-zi, Navaho name.Narsh-tiz-a, Apache name.Nashtezhg, Navaho name.Nuestra Senora de Guadalupe de Zuni, mission name.Saraf, Isleta and Sandia name of the pueblo; Sardn, Isleta name of thepeople.Saray, Tiwa name of the pueblo.Sa'u'u, Havasupai name.Siete Ciudades de Cibola, or Seven Cities of Cibola.Sti'nyitsa, Santa Ana name of the pueblo.Siinyftsi, Laguna name.TSa Ashiwani, sacred name of tribe, signifying "corn peoples."Xaray, the Tiwa name.Ze-gar-kin-a, given as Apache name.Connections.?The Zuni constitute the Zunian linguistic stock.Location.?On the north bank of upper Zuni River, ValenciaCounty. VillagesHalona (extinct), on both sides of Zuni River, on and opposite the site of ZuniPueblo.Hampasawan (extinct), 6 miles west of Zuni Pueblo. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 347Hawikuh (extinct), about 15 miles southwest of Zuni Pueblo, near the summervillage of Ojo Caliente.Heshokta (extinct), on a mesa about 5 miles northwest of Zuni Pueblo.Heshota Ayathltona (extinct), on the summit of Taaiyalana, or Seed Mountain,commonly called Thunder Mountain, about 4 miles southeast of Zuiii Pueblo.Heshota Hluptsina (extinct), between the "gateway" and the summer village ofPescado, 7 miles east of Zuni Pueblo.Heshota Imkoskwin (extinct), near Tawyakwin, or Nutria.Heshotapathltaie, or Kintyel, on Leroux Wash, about 23 miles north of NavahoStation, on the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa F6 Railway, Ariz.Heshota Uhla (extinct), at the base of a mesa on Zuni River, about 5 miles west ofthe summer village of Ojo Pescado, or Heshotatsina.Kechipauan (extinct), on a mesa east of Ojo Caliente, or Kyapkwainakwin, 15miles southwest of Zuni Pueblo.Kiakima (extinct), at the southwestern base of Thunder Mountain, 4 miles south-east of Zuiii Pueblo.Kwakina (extinct), 7 miles southwest Of Zuili Pueblo.Kwakiuawan (extinct), south-southeast of Thunder Mountain, which lies 4 mileseast of Zuiii Pueblo.Matsaki (extinct), near the northwestern base of Thunder Mountain and 3 mileseast of Zufii Pueblo.Nutria, at the headwaters of an upper branch of Zuiii River, about 23 miles north-east of Zuiii Pueblo.Ojo Caliente, about 14 miles southwest of Zuni Pueblo.Pescado, about 15 miles east of Zuiii Pueblo.Pinawan (extinct), about V/z miles southwest of Zuiii Pueblo, on the road to OjoCaliente.Shopakia (extinct), 5 miles north of Zuni Pueblo.Wimian (extinct), 11 miles north of Zuiii Pueblo.History.?According to Gushing (1896), the Zufii are descended fromtwo peoples, one of whom came originally from the north and waslater joined by the second, from the west or southwest (from thecountry of the lower Colorado), who resembled the Yuman and Pimanpeoples in culture. Although indefinite rumors of an Indian provincein the far north, containing seven cities, were afloat in Mexico soonafter its conquest, the first definite infonnation regarding the Zuniwas supplied by Fray Marcos de Niza, who set out in 1539, with aBarbaiy Negro named Estevanico as guide, to explore the regions ofthe northwest. In the present Arizona he learned that Estevanicowho, together with some of his Indian companions, had been sent onahead, had been killed by the natives of "Cibola," or Zufii. Afterapproaching within sight of one of the Zuni pueblos, Fray Marcosreturned to Mexico with such glowing accounts of the "Kingdom ofCibola" that the expedition of Francisco Vasquez de Coronado wasfitted out the next year. The first Zufii Indians were encountered nearthe mouth of Zuni River, and the Spaniards later carried the Zufiipueblo of Hav/ikuh by storm, but it was discovered that the Indianshad already moved their women and children, together with the 348 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 143greater part of their property, to their stronghold on Taaiyalone Mesa.Thither the men also escaped. The invaders were bitterly dis-appointed in respect to the riches of the country, and, after the arrivalof the main part of the army, they removed to the Rio Grande to gointo winter quarters. Later, Coronado returned and subjugated theZuiii.In 1580 the Zuiii were visited by Francisco Sanchez Chamuscado,and in 1583 by Antonio de Espejo, the first to call them by thename they commonly bear. By this time one of the seven originalpueblos had been abandoned. In 1598, the Zuni were visited byJuan de Onate, the colonizer of New Mexico. The first Zuni missionwas established by the Franciscans at Hawikuh in 1629. In 1632 theZuni murdered the missionaries and again fled to Taaiyalone Mesa,where they remained until 1635. On August 7, 1670, the Apache orNavaho raided Hawikuh, killed the missionary, and burned thechurch. The mission was not reestablished, and it is possible that thevillage itself was not rebuilt. In 1680 the Zuni occupied but threevillages, excluding Hawikuh, the central mission being at Halona, onthe site of the present Zuni pueblo. They took part in the great re-bellion of 1680 and fled to Taaiyalone Mesa, where they remained untiltheir reconquest by Vargas in 1692. From this time on the peoplewere concentrated in the single village now known as Zuni, and achurch was erected there in 1699. In 1703 they killed the missionaryand again fled to their stronghold, returning in 1705. A gaiTison wasmaintained at Zuni for some years after this, and there were troubleswith the Hopi, which were finally composed in 1713. The missioncontinued well into the nineteenth century, but the church was visitedonly occasionally by priests and gradually feU into ruins. In recentyeai"s the United States Government has built extensive irrigationworks and established a large school, where the younger generation arebeing educated in the ways of civilization.Population.?In 1630 the Zuni population was estimated at 10,000,probably much too high a figure; and in 1680, at 2,500. In 1760 it wasgiven as 664; in 1788, 1,617; in 1797-98, 2,716; in 1805, 1,470; inl871,1,530; in 1889, 1,547; in 1910, 1,667; in 1923, 1,911; in 1930, 1,749;in 1937, 2,080.Connections in which they have become noted.?The Zuni have becomewidely loiowTi (1) from their association with the "Kingdom of Ci-bola"; (2) from the size of the pueblo and the unique character of thelanguage spoken there; and (3) from the close study made of them byGushing, Mrs. Stevenson, Kroeber, and others. The name Zuni isborne by a detached range of mountains in the northwestern part ofNew Mexico. Besides Zuni post village in McKinley County, N. Max.,there is a place named Zuni in Isle of Wight County, Va. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 349ARIZONAApache. Bands of Apache occupied the Gila River region in Arizonawithin historic times and periodically overran much of the territoryof the State. (See New Mexico.)Cocopa. Significance of name unknown.Connections.?The Cocopa belong to the Yuman linguistic family,a branch of the Hokan stock.Location.?About the mouth of Colorado River. (See also Mexico.)SubdivisionsRiver Cocopa and Mountain Cocopa. Cuculato and Llagas are also men-tioned, the latter a name applied by the Spaniards to a group of villages.VillagesGiflFord (1923) reports as follows: "Settlement sites on W. bank of Coloradofrom Hardy confluence N. (when river flowed near Colonia Lerdo) : 1, A'u'ewawa;2, Kwinyakwa'a; 3, Yishiyul, settlement of Halyikwamai in 1848; 4, Heyauwah,5 miles N. of Yishiyul and opposite Colonia Lerdo (8 hours' slow walk fromColorado-Hardy confluence); 5, Amanyochilibuh; 6, Esinyamapawhai CNoche Buenaof the Mexicans)." There was also a tovra called Hauwala below or above No. 5. "Settlement sites on W. bank of Hardy from confluence N.: 1, Karukhap; 2,Awiahamoka; 3, Niimischapsakal; 4, EweshespiL; 5, Tamanikwawa, (meaning 'mullet (tamanik) place') on lagoon 4 or 5 miles SE of Cocopah mts; 6, 'wikukapa(Cocopa mt.); 10, Wclsul; 11, Awisinyai, northernmost Cocopa village, about 5miles S. of Mexicali."Lumholtz (p. 251) lists following Cocopa settlements in the first decade of20th century; Noche Buena (20 families), Mexical (40-50 families), Pescador (15families), Pozo Vicente (more than 100 families)."History.?Without question this tribe was first met by Hernando deAlarc6n in 1540. They are mentioned by Onate in 1604-5, by Kinoin 1701-2 under the name "Hogiopas," and by Francisco Garc6s in1776. Most of their territory was outside of the limits of the UnitedStates, but a small part of it passed under United States Governmentcontrol with the Gadsden Purchase. Those Cocopa who remained onthe northern side of the International Boundary were placed on theColorado River Reservation.Population.?Garc6s estimated 3,000 in 1776. In 1857 Heintzelmanplaced the former strength of the tribe at about 300 warriors. Thereare now said to be 800 in northern Baja California. There were 99in the United States in 1930, and 41 in 1937.Halchidhoma. Significance unknown.Connections.?The Halchidhoma belonged to the Yuman branch ofthe Hokan Unguistic stock and are said to have spoken the samelanguage as the Yuma tribe and to have been closely connected alsowith the Maricopa.Location.?At various points on the Colorado River near the mouthof the Gila. (See also California.) 350 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 VillagesAsumpci6n, a group of villages on or near the Colorado River, in California, morethan 50 miles below the mouth of Bill Williams Fork.Lagrimas de San Pedro, a group of villages in the neighborhood of Asumpci6n.San Antonio, in the same general location as Lagrimas but only 35 or 40 milesbelow the mouth of Bill Williams Fork.Santa Coleta, a group of villages in the same region as Asumpci6n and Lagrimasde San Pedro.History.?The Halchidhoma were probably encountered by Alarc6nin 1540, though he does not mention them. In 1604-5 Onate foundthem occupying eight villages on the Colorado below the mouth of theGUa; Father Eusebio Kino in 1701-2 came upon them above theGila, and by Garc6s' time (177B) their villages were scattered on bothsides of the Colorado, beginning about 38 miles below Bill WiUiams'Fork and extending the same distance downstream. Later theymoved farther north, along with the Kohuana, but were soon forceddownstream again by the Mohave and ultimately took refuge withthe Maricopa on Gila River, by whom they were ultimately absorbed.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates 3,000 in 1680, but this isevidently based on Garc6s' figure of 2,500 in 1776, which Kroeber(1920) believes much too high. Kroeber suggests about 1,000 as ofthe year 1770.Halyikwamai. Significance unknown. Also spelled Jallicumay,Quigyuma, Tlalliguamayas, Kikima (by Mason, 1940), and invarious other ways.Connections.?The Halyikwamai belonged to the Yuman linguisticstock, their dialect being reported as close to Cocopa and Kohuana.Location.? (See History.) VillagesPresentacion, probably Quigyuma, on the west side of the Colorado River, inBaja California,San Casimiro, probably on the east bank of the Colorado River, above tidewater,in northwest Sonora, Mexico.San Felix de Valois, apparently on the east bank of the Rio Colorado, between itsmouth and the junction of the Gila, probably about the present Arizona-Sonoraboundary line.San Rudesindo, probably on the east bank of the Colorado River, just above itsmouth, in northwestern Sonora, Mexico.Santa Rosa, a group of villages on the eastern side of the lower Rio Colorado,about latitude 32? 18' N., in northwestern Sonora, Mexico.History.?The Halyikwamai were discovered in 1540 by Alarc6n,who calls them Quicama. In 1604-5 Onate found them in villages onthe Colorado River below the mouth of the Gila River and above theCocopa Indians. In 1762 they dwelt in a fertile plain, 10 or 12 leaguesin length, on the eastern bank of the Colorado, and here they were SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 351found by Father Garc^s in 1771 in a group of villages which he namedSanta Rosa. By 1775, when he revisited the tribe, they had moved tothe west side of the river, their first villages on the north being in thevicinity of Ogden's Landing, about latitude 32?18' N., adjacent to theKohuana. It is probable that they were finally absorbed by theCocopa or some other Yuman people.Population.?-Mooney (1928) estimates a population for the Hal3^ik-wamai in 1680 of 2,000, which is Garces' estimate in 1775. Oiiate esti-mated 4,000-5,000 in 1605, but all of these figm'es are probably muchtoo high.Havasupai. Signifying "blue (or green) water people," abbreviatedinto Supai. Also called:Ak'-ba-su'-pai, Walapai form of name.Ka'nlna, Coconino, Cosnino, Kokonino, Zuni name said to have beenborrowed from the Hopi and to signify "pinon nut people."Nation of the Willows, so called by Gushing.Yabipai Jabesua, so called by Carets in 1776.Connections.?The Havasupai belong to the Yuman branch of theHokan linguistic stock, being most closely connected with the Walapai,and next with the Yavapai.Location.?They occupy Cataract Canyon of the Colorado River,northwestern Arizona.History.?The nucleus of the Havasupai Tribe is believed to havecome from the Walapai. The Cosnino caves on the upper Rio Verde,near the northern edge of Tonto Basin, central Arizona, were namedfor them, from a traditional former occupancy. Garces may have metsome of these Indians in 1776, but definite notices of them seem to belacking until about the middle of the last century. Leroux (1888)appears to have met one of this tribe in 1851, and since then theyhave come increasingly to the knowledge of the Whites.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates about 300 Havasupai in1680, but Spier (1928) believes this figure somewhat too high. In1869, 300 were reported; in 1902, 233; in 1905, 174; in 1910, 174; andin 1923, 184. In 1930, with the Walapai and Yavapai, they num-bered 646. In 1937 the number estimated was 208.Hopi. Contracted from their own name H6pitu, "peaceful ones,"or Hdpitu-shinumu, "peaceful all people." Also called:A-ar-ke, or E-ar'-ke, Apache name, signifying "live high up on top of themesas."Ah-mo-kdi, Zuni name.Ai-yah-kin-nee, Navaho name.A'-mu-kwi-kwe, Zuni name, signifying "smallpox people."Asay or Osay, by Bustamante and Gallegos (1582).Bokeaf, Sandia Tiwa name. 352 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bdll. 145Buhk'h6rk, Isleta Tiwa name for Tusayan.Bukfn, Isleta name for the people.Eyanini din6, Navaho name (Gatschet).Hapeka, a Zuni name, referring to excrement.Joso, Tewa name.Khoso, Santa Clara name.Kosho, Hano Tewa name.K'o-so-o, San Ildefonso Tewa name.Maastoetsjkwe, given by Ten Kate, signifying "the land of Mdsaw6," godof the earth, given as the name of their country.Mastutc'kwe, same as preceding.Moki, signifying "dead" in their own language, but probably from someother, perhaps a Keresan dialect.Topin-keua, said to be a Zuni name of which Tontonteac is a corruption.Tusayan, name of the province in which the Hopi lived, from Zufii Usaya-kue, "people of Usaya," Usaya referring to two of the largest Hopivillages.Whiwunai, Sandia Tiwa name.Connections.?The Hopi constitute a peculiar dialectic division ofthe Shoshonean branch of the Uto-Aztecan linguistic family, and theyare the only Shoshonean people, so far as known, who ever took on aPueblo culture, though the Tanoans are suspected of a remoteShoshonean relationship.Location.?On Three Mesas in northeastern Arizona.TownsAwatobi (destroyed), on a mesa about 9 miles southeast of Walpi.Hano, occupied by Tewa (see Tewa Pueblos under New Mexico).Homolobi, near Winslow, was formerly occupied by the ancestors of various Hopiclans.Kisakobi, at the northwest base of the East Mesa.Kuchaptuvela, on the terrace of the First or East Mesa below the present Walpivillage.Mishongnovi, on the Second or Middle Mesa.Moenkapi, about 40 miles northwest of Oraibi, a farming village of Oraibi.Oraibi, on the Third or West Mesa.Shipaulovi, on the Second or Middle Mesa.Shongopovi, on the Second or Middle Mesa.Sichomovi, on the First or East Mesa.Walpi, on the First or East Mesa.Kisatobi and Kuchaptuvela were successively occupied by the ancestors of theWalpi before the later Walpi was built.History.?According to tradition, the Hopi are made up of peopleswho came from the north, east, and south. Their first contact withEuropeans was in 1540, when Coronado, then at Zuni, sent Pedro deTobar and Fray Juan de Padilla to visit them. They were visitedby Antonio de Espejo in 1583, and in 1598 Juan de Onate, governorand colonizer of New Mexico, made them swear fealty and vassalageto the King of Spain. In 1629 a Franciscan mission was established SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 353 at Awatobi, followed by others at Walpi, Shongopovi, Mishongnovi,and Oraibi. These were destroyed in the general Pueblo outbreak of1680, and an attempt to reestablish a mission at Awatobi in 1700 ledto its destruction by the other pueblos. The pueblos of Walpi, Mish-ongnovi, and Shongopovi, then situated in the foothills, were prob-ably abandoned about the time of the rebellion, and new villages werebuilt on the adjacent mesas for defense against a possible Spanishattack which did not materialize. After the reconquest of the RioGrande pueblos by Vargas, some of the people who formerly occupiedthem fled to the Hopi and built a pueblo called Payupki on the MiddleMesa. About the middle of the eighteenth century, however, theywere taken back and settled in Sandia. About 1700 Hano wasestablished on the East Mesa, near Walpi, by Tewa from near Abi-quiu, N. Mex., on the invitation of the Walpians. About the timewhen the Payupki people returned to their old homes, Sichomovi wasbuilt on the First Mesa by clans from the Rio Grande, and Shipauloviwas founded by a colony from Shongopovi. The present HopiReservation was set aside by Executive order on December 16, 1882.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates a Hopi population of 2,800m 1680. In 1890 the population of Oraibi was 905, and in 1900 theother pueblos (exclusive of Hano) had 919. In 1904 the total Hopipopulation was officially given as 1,878. The Census of 1910 re-turned 2,009, apparently including Hano, and the Report of theUnited States Indian Office for 1923 gave 2,336. The United StatesCensus of 1930 returned 2,752. In 1937 there were 3,248, includingthe Tewan Hano.Connections in which they have become noted.?The Hopi are notedas a tribe Shoshonean in language but Puebloan in culture, and alsodeserve consideration as one of the Pueblo divisions to which particularattention has been paid by ethnologists, including Fewkes, the Steven-sons, Hough, Voth, Forde, Lowie, etc. Great popular attention hasbeen drawn to them on account of the spectacular character of theSnake Dance held every 2 years.Kohuana. Significance unknown. Also given as Cajuenche, Cawina,and Quokim.Connections.?The Kohuana belonged to the Yuman branch of theHokan linguistic stock, spoke the Cocopa dialect, and were also closelyconnected with the Halyikwamai.Location.?In 1775-76 the Kohuana lived on the east bank of theColorado River below the mouth of the Gila, next to the Halyik-wamai, theu' villages extending south to about latitude 32?33' N., andinto southern California, at about latitude 33?08' N., next to theeastern Diegueno. (See also Mexico.) 354 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 VillagesMerced, a group of rancherias in northeastern Baja California, west of theColorado and 4 leagues southwest of Santa Olalla, a Yuma village.San Jacome, probably Cajuenche, near the mountains, about latitude 33?8' N.,in southern California.San Sebastian, Cajuenche or Diegueiio, in southern California, latitude 33?8' N.,evidently at Salton Lake.History.?The Kohuana are the Coana mentioned by Hernando deAlarc6n, who ascended the Colorado River in 1540. Juan de Onatevisited them in 1604-5, and they are probably the Cutganas of Kino(1701-2), while Francisco Garc^s in 1776 reported that they werenumerous and at enmity with the Cocopa. From Mohave tradition,it appears that at a somewhat later period they lived along the rivernear Parker together with the Halchidhoma, whom they followed tothe fertile bottom lands higher up. Later the Mohave crowded themsouthward but still later compelled them to return to the Mohavecountry where they remained for 5 years. At the end of that periodthey determined to go downstream again to live with the Yuma; but,one of their number having been killed by the Yuma, they jomed theMaricopa, with whom they ultimately became merged.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that there were 3,000Kohuana in 1680, the figure given by Garc^s in 1775-76. Kroeber(1920) believes these estimates are too high. In 1851 Bartlett re-ported 10 of this tribe living with the Maricopa, and, according to aMohave informant of Kroeber's, there were 36 about 1883.Maricopa. Significance of the name unknown. Also called:Atchihwa', Yavapai name (Gatschet 1877-92).Cocomaricopa, an old form.Cohpdp, or Awo-pa-pa, Pima name.Pipatsje, own name, signifying "people."Si-ke-na, Apache name for Pima, Papago, and Maricopa, signifying "liv-ing in sand houses."Td'hba, Yavapai name (Gatschet, 1877-92).Tchihogdsat, Havasupai name.Widshi itfkapa, Tonto name, also applied to Pima and Papago.Connections.?The Maricopa belong to the Yuman linguistic stock,a part of the Hokan family, and are said to be related most closelyto the Yuma tribe proper and the Halchidhoma.Location.?On Gila River, with and below the Pima, to the mouthof the river. Anciently they are said to have had some rancherias ina valley west of the Colorado. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 355 VillagesThe following villages were all on theAicatum.Ainoque.Aopomue.Aqui.Aquimundurech.Aritutoc, on the north side at or nearthe present Oatman flat and theGreat Bend of the river.Atiahigui.Aycate.Baguiburisac, probably Maricopa, nearthe Gila River.Caborh.Caborica.Cant, probably Maricopa, not far belowthe mouth of Salt River.Choutikwuchik.Coat, probably Maricopa, location un-certain.Cocoigui.Cohate.Comarchdut.Cuaburidurch.Cudurimuitac.Dueztumac, about 120 miles above themouth of the Gila.Gohate.Guias.Hinama, its people now on the southbank of Salt River east of the Mor-mon settlement of Lehi, MaricopaCounty.Hiyayulge.Hueso Parado, with Pima, on the Pimaand Maricopa Reservation.Khauweshetawes.Kwatchampedau.Norchean.Noscario.Oitac.Ojiataibues.Pipiaca.Pitaya.Sacaton, mainly Pima, on the Gila Riverabout 22 miles east of Maricopa Sta-tion. Gila River unless otherwise specified:San Bernadino, at Agua Caliente, nearthe Gila River; another place on theriver was called by the same name.San Geronimo, 20 leagues from Mercedand 27 leagues from the Gila River.San Martin, on the Gila River west ofthe Great Bend.San Rafael, probably Maricopa, insouthern Arizona.Sasabac.Shobotarcham.Sibagoida, probably Maricopa, locationuncertain.Sibrepue.Sicoroidag, on the Gila River belowTucsani.Soenadut.Stucabitic.Sudac.Sudacsasaba.Tadeovaqui.Tahapit.Toa.Toaedut.Tota, probably Maricopa.Tuburch.Tuburh, location uncertain.Tubutavia.Tucavi, perhaps identical with Tucsani.Tucsani.Tucsasic.Tuesapit.Tumac, said to have been the western-most Maricopa village on the GilaRiver.Tuquisan.Tutomagoidag.Uitorrum, a group of rancherias on thesouth bank of the Gila River not farwest of the Great Bend.Uparch.Upasoitac, near the Great Bend of theGila River.Urchaoztac.Yayahaye. 356 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145History.?The Maricopa are thought to have separated from theYuma and to have moved slowly up the Colorado River to the lowerGila River; or, as later history would indicate, they may have beenforced into this region by hostile tribes. They were encountered byJuan de Onate in 1604-5, and by Kino in 1701-2. From 1775 untilrecent times they were at war with the Yuma, and in 1857, in alliancewith the Pima, they inflicted a severe defeat upon the Yuma nearMaricopa Wells. A reservation was set apart for the Maricopa andPima by Act of Congress February 28, 1859; it was enlarged by Execu-tive order of August 31, 1876, but was revoked and other lands wereset apart by Executive order of June 14, 1879. This was againenlarged by Executive orders May 5, 1882, and November 15, 1883.No treaty was ever made with them.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that there were 2,000 Mari-copa in 1680, Venegas (1758) says that in 1742 there were about6,000 Pima and "Cocomaricopa" on Gila River, and in 1775 Garcesestimates a population of 3,000 Maricopa. In 1905 there were 350under the Pima School Superintendent. The census of 1910 gives386, and the Report of the United States Indian Office for 1923, 394.The census of 1930 returned 310, and the Report of the United StatesIndian Office of 1937, 339.Connection in which they have become noted.?The name of theMaricopa is preserved in that of Maricopa County, Ariz., and in thename of a post village in Pinal County and another in Kern County,Calif.Mohave. From a native word "hamakhava," referring to the Needlesand signifying "three mountains." Also given as Amojave,Jamajabs. Synonyms are:Naks'-at, Pima and Papago name.Soyopas, given by Font (1775).Tzi-na-ma-a, given as their own name "before they came to the ColoradoRiver."Wamakava, Havasupai name.Wili idahapd, Tulkepaya name.Connections.?The Mohave belonged to the Yuman linguisticfamily.Location.?On both sides of the Colorado River?though chieflyon the east side?between the Needles and the entrance to BlackCanyon. VillagesPasion, a group of rancherias on the east bank of the Colorado, below the presentFort Mohave.San Pedro, on or near the west bank of the Colorado, about 8 miles northwest ofNeedles, Calif. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 357Santa Isabel, a group of rancherias situated at or in the vicinity of the presentNeedles.History.?Possibly Alarc6n may have reached the Mohave territoryin 1540. At any rate, Onate met them in 1604, and in 1775-76 Caretsfound them in the above-named villages. No treaty was made withthem by the United States Government, but by Act of March 3, 1865,supplemented by Executive orders in 1873, 1874, and 1876, the Colo-rado River Reservation was established and it was occupied by theMohave, Chemehuevi, and Kawia.Population.?Mooney (1928) gives 3,000 Mohave in 1680, andKroeber (1925) the same as of 1770, the estimate made by Garcesin 1775-76. About 1834 Leroux estimated 4,000. In 1905 theirnumber was officially given as 1,589, of whom 508 were under theColorado River School Superintendent, 856 under the Fort MohaveSchool Superintendent, 50 under the San Carlos Agency, and about175 at Camp McDowell, on the Verde River. The Indians at FortMohave and Camp McDowell, however, were apparently Yavapai,commonly known as Apache Mohave. The census of 1910 gives1,058 true Mohave. The United States Indian Office Report for1923 seems to give 1,840, including Mohave, Mohave Apache, andChemehuevi. The census of 1930 returned 854, and the Report ofthe United States Office of Indian Affairs for 1937, 856.Connection in which they have become noted.?The name Mohave hasbeen preserved in the designation of the Mohave Desert and MohaveRiver in California, and Mohave County, Ariz., and also in the nameof a post-village in Arizona. There is also a post village namedMojave in Kern County, Calif.Navaho. The Navaho occupied part of the northeastern section ofArizona. (See New Mexico.)Paiute. The southern or true Paiute occupied or hunted over someof the northernmost sections of Arizona. (See Nevada.)Papago. Signifying "bean people," from the native words papah, "beans," and 6otam, "people." Also called:Saikinn6, Si'-ke-na, Apache name for Pima, Papago, and Maricopa.Tdh'ba, Yavapai name.Texpamais, Maricopa name.T6no-oohtam, own name, signifying "people of the desert."Vidshi itikapa, Tonto name.Connections.?The Papago belong to the Piman branch of the Uto-Aztecan linguistic stock and stand very close to the Pima.Location.?In the territory south and southeast of the Gila River,especially south of Tucson; in the main and tributary valleys of the 358 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Santa Cruz River; and extending west and southwest across thedesert waste known as the Papagueria, into Sonora, Mexico.Subdivisions and VillagesAcachin, location uncertain.Alcalde, probably in Pima County.Ana, probably in Pima County.Anicam, probably in Pima County.Areitorae, south of Sonorita, Sonora, Mexico.Ati, on the west bank of Rio Altar, between Uquitoa and Tubutama, just southof the Arizona boundary.Babasaqui, probably Papago, 3 miles above Imuris, between Cocospera andMagdalena, Sonora, Mexico.Bacapa, in northwestern Sonora, Mexico, slightly southeast of Carrizal.Baipia, slightly northwest of Caborca, probably on the Rio Altar, northwesternSonora, Mexico.Bajfo, location uncertain.Batequi, east of the Rio Altar in northwestern Sonora, Mexico.Boca del Arroyo, probably in Pima County.Caborica, on the Gila River.Caca Chimir, probably in Pima County.Cahuabi, in Arizona near the Sonora border.Canoa, between Tubac and San Xavier del Bac, on Rio Santa Cruz.Casca, probably in Pima County.Charco, probably identical with Chioro.Chiora, probably in Pima County.Chuba, location uncertain.Coca, location uncertain.Comohuabi, in Arizona on the border of Sonora, M6xico.Cops, west of the Rio San Pedro, probably in the vicinity of the present Arivaca,southwest of Tubac.Cubac, in the neighborhood of San Francisco Atf, west from the present Tucson.Cuitoat, between San Xavier del Bac and the Gila River.Cujant, in northwest Sonora, between the mouth of the Rio Gila and Sonorita.Cumaro, southern Arizona near the Sonora border.Elogio, probably in Pima County.Fresnal, probably in Pima County.Guadalupe, about 10 leagues south of Areitorae.Gubo, probably Papago, 13 leagues east of Sonorita, just below the Arizonaboundary.Guitciabaqui, on the west bank of the Santa Cruz River, near the present Tucson.Juajona, near San Xavier del Bac, southern Arizona.Junostaca, near San Xavier del Bac.Macombo, probably in Pima County.Mata, probably Papago, north of Caborica.Mesquite, probably in Pima County.Milpais, location uncertain.Nariz, probably in Pima County.Oapars, in Arizona between San Xavier del Bac and the Gila River.Ocaboa, location uncertain.O'isur, on the Santa Cruz River, 5 or 6 leagues north of San Xavier del Bac, south-ern Arizona. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 359Onia, probably in Pima County.Ooltan, in northwest Sonora, Mexico, 3 leagues northwest of Busanic.Otean, location uncertain.Perigua, Arizona, south of the Gila River.Perinimo, probably in Pima County.Piato, probably the same as Soba, in the region of Tubutaraa and Caborica,Sonora, Mexico.Pitic, on the Rio Altar, northwest Sonora.Poso Blanco, in Arizona south of the Gila River.Poso Verde, south of the Arizona-Sonora boundary, opposite Oro Blanco, Ariz.Purificaci6n, probably Papago, near the Arizona-Sonora boundary, 12 leaguesfrom Agua Escondida, probably in a southeasterly direction.Quitovaquita, on the headwaters of Rio Salado of Sonora, near the Arizona-Sonora boundary line.Raton, location uncertain.San Bonifacio, probably Papago, south of the Gila River between San Angeloand San Francisco, in the present Arizona.San Cosme, probably Papago, directly north of San Xavier del Bac, on the SantaCruz River, Ariz.San Ignacio, with Pima, on the north bank of Rio San Ignacio, latitude 30? 45' N.,longitude 111? W., Sonora, Mexico.San Ildefonso, 4 leagues northwest of Caborica, Sonora, Mexico.San Lazaro, probably Papago, on the Rio Santa Cruz in longitude 110?30' W.,just below the Arizona-Sonora boundary.San Luis Babi, in northwest Sonora, Mexico, between Busanic and Cocospera.San Martin, probably Papago, on the Gila River, west of the Great Bend of theColorado.San Rafael, iu southern Arizona near the headwaters of the Rio Salado of Sonora.Santa Barbara, probably Papago, 4 miles southwest of Busanic, near the head-waters of the north branch of the Rio Altar, in Sonora, Mexico.Santa Rosa, south of the Gila River and west of Tucson.Saric, probably Papago, on the west bank of Rio Altar, in northern Sonora, Mexico.Saucita, in southern Arizona.Shuuk, or Pima, on the Gila River Reservation, southern Arizona.Sierra Blanca, probably in Pima County.Soba, a large body of Papago, including the villages of Carborica, Batequi, Mata,Pitic, and San Ildefonso.Sonoita, on the headwaters of the Rio Salado of Sonora, just below the Arizona-Sonora boundary.Tachilta, in southern Arizona or northern Sonora.Tacquison, on the Arizona-Sonora boundary.Tecolote, in southwestern Pima County, Ariz., near the Mexican border.Tubasa, probably on the Rio Santa Cruz River between San Xavier del Bacand the Gila River, southern Arizona.Tubutama, on the eastern bank of the northern branch of the Rio Altar, in north-west Sonora, Mexico.Valle, probably in Pima County.Zuniga, probably Papago, in northwest Sonora, Mexico.History.?Father Eusebio Kino was probably the first white manto visit the Papago, presumably on his first expedition in 1694. Theirsubsequent history has been nearly the same as that of the Pima, 360 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 except that they were not brought quite as much in contact with theWhites.Population.?Mooney (1928) places the number of Papago at 6,000in 1680. In 1906 they were reported as follows: Under the PimaSchool Superintendent, 2,233; under the farmer at San Xavier, 523allottees on the reservation and 2,225 in Pima County. In addition,859 Papago were officially reported in Sonora, Mexico, in 1900, prob-ably an underestimate. In 1910, 3,798 were reported in the UnitedStates, but the Report of the United States Indian Office for 1923gives 5,672; the 1930 census, 5,205; and the Indian Office Reportfor 1937, 6,305.Pima. Signifying "no" in the Nevome dialect and incorrectly appliedthrough misunderstanding by the early missionaries. Also called:A'-d'tam, own name, signifying "people," or, to distinguish them from thePapago, A'-d'tam fi'kimtilt, "river people."Nashtefse, Apache name, signifying "live in mud houses."Palnyd, probably name given by Havasupai.Saikine, Apache name, signifying "living in sand (adobe) houses," alsoapplied to Papago and Maricopa.Tex-p^s, Maricopa name.Tihokahana, Yavapai name.Widshi Iti'kapa, Tonto-Yuma name.Connections.?The Pima gave their name to the Piman linguisticstock of Powell, which is now recognized to be a subdivision of thegreat Uto-Aztecan stock, also including the Nahuatlan and Shoshoneanfamilies. The tribes connected most intimately with the Pima werethe Papago (see above) and the Quahatika (q. v.), and after themthe so-called Pima Bajo or Nevome of Mexico.Location.?In the valleys of the Gila and Salt Rivers. (See alsoMexico.) SubdivisionsFormerly the name Pima was applied to two tribes called respectively tnePima Bajo and Pima Alto, but the former, living chiefly in Sonora, Mexico, arenow known as Nevome, the term Pima being restricted to the Pima Alto.VillagesAgua Escondida, probably Pima or Papago, southwest of Tubac, southwesternArizona.Agua Fria, probably Pima, on Gila River Reservation.Aquitun, 5 miles west of Picacho, on the border of the sink of the Santa CruzRiver.Aranca, two villages, location unknown.Arenal, probably Pima, on the Pima and Maricopa Reservation, Gila River.Arivaca, west of Tubac.Arroyo Grande, southern Arizona. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 361Bacuancos, 7 leagues south of the mission of Guevavi, northwestern Sonora,Mexico.Bisani, 8 leagues southwest of Caborica, Sonora, Mexico.Blackwater.Bonostac, on the upper Santa Cruz River, below Tucson.Busanic, southwest of Guevavi, near the Arizona-Sonora boundary, latitude31?10' N. longitude 111?10' W.Cachanila, probably Pima, on the Pima and Maricopa Reservation, Ariz.Casa Blanca, on the Gila.Cerrito, probably Pima, on the Pima and Maricopa Reservation, Ariz.Cerro Chiquito, probably Pima, on the Pima and Maricopa Reservation, Ariz.Chemisez, on the Gila.Chupatak, in southern Arizona.Chutikwuchik.Chuwutukawutuk, in southern Arizona.Cocospera, on the headwaters of the Rio San Ignacio, latitude 31? N., Sonora,Mexico.Comae, on the Gila River, 3 leagues (miles?) below the mouth of Salt River, Ariz.Estaneia, 4 leagues south of the mission of Saric, which was just south of theArizona boundary.Gaibanipitea, probably Pima, on a hill on the west bank of the San Pedro River,probably identical with the ruins known as Santa Cruz, west of Tombstone, Ariz,Gutubur, locality unknown.Harsanykuk, at Sacaton Flats, southern Arizona.Hermho, on the north side of Salt iliver, 3 miles from Mesa, Maricopa County,Ariz.Hiatam, north of Maricopa Station on the Southern Pacific R. R., southernArizona.Hormiguero, probably Pima, on the Pima and Maricopa Reservation, Ariz.Huchiltchik, below Santa Ana, on the north bank of the Gila.Hueso Parado, with Maricopa, on the Pima and Maricopa Reservation, Ariz.Imuris, near the eastern bank of Rio San Ignacio, or Magdalena, latitude 30?50' N.longitude 110?50' W., in the present Sonora, Mexico.Judae, on the Gila.Kamatukwucha, at the Gila crossing.Kamit, in southern Arizona.Kawoltukwucha, west of the Maricopa and Phoenix R. R., in Maricopa County,Ariz.Kikimi, on the Gila River Reservation.Kookupvansik, in southern Arizona.Mange, on the Gila.Merced, northeast of San Rafael, in what is now southern Arizona.Nacameri, on the east bank of Rio Horcasitas, Sonora, Mexico.Napeut, on the north bank of the Gila.Ocuca, in Sonora, Mexico, near the Rio San Ignacio, northwest of Santa Ana.Oquitoa, on the Rio del Altar, northwestern Sonora, M6xico.Ormejea, in southern Arizona.Oskakumukchochikam, in southern Arizona.Oskuk, on the Gila.Peepchiltk, northeast of Casa Blanca, southern Arizona.Pescadero, in northern Sonora, Mexico.Petaikuk, in southern Arizona.Pitac, on the Gila. 362 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 Potlapigua, about Babispe, Baserac, and the frontier in Sonora, Mexico, but thiswas Opata territory.Remedios, a mission on the San Ignacio branch of the Rfo Asunci6n, in Sonora,Mexico.Rsanuk, about 1 mile east of Sacaton Station, on the Maricopa and Phoenix R. R.,southern Arizona.Rsotuk, northwest of Casa Blanca, southern Arizona.Sacaton, on the Gila, about 22 miles east of Maricopa Station and 16 miles northof Casa Grande Station on the Southern Pacific R. R., Ariz.San Andres Coata, near the junction of the Gila and Salado Rivers, Ariz.San Fernando, 9 leagues east of the ruins of Casa Grande, near the Gila.San Francisco Ati, west of the Santa Cruz River, Ariz.,San Francisco de Pima, 10 or 12 leagues above the Rfo Asunci6n from Pitic, aboutlatitude 31? N., Sonora, Mexico.San Serafin, northwest of San Xavier del Bac, southern Arizona.Santan, on the north bank of the Gila, opposite the Pima Agency.Santos Angeles, in Sonora, Mexico.Saopuk, at The Cottonwoods, on the Gila River.Sepori, south of the Gila River, Ariz.Shakaik, on the north side of the Gila, northwest of Casa Blanca.Statannyik, on the south bank of the Gila, between Vaaki (Casa Blanca) andHuchiltchik.Stukamasoosatick, on the Gila River Reservation.Sudacson, on the Gila River, Pinal County, Ariz., between Casa Grande and apoint 10 leagues below.Tatsituk, about Cruz's store in southern Arizona.Taumaturgo.Tubuscabors, on or near the Gila River, southern Arizona.Tucson, probably with Papago and Sobaipuri, on the site of modern Tucson.Tucubavia, on the headwaters of Rfo Altar, northern Sonora, Mexico.Tutuetac, about 16 miles northwest of Tucson and west of the Santa Cruz River,in southern Arizona.Uturituc, on the Gila and probably on the site of the present Sacaton.Wechurt, at North Blackwater, southern Arizona.History.?According to native tradition, the Pima originated in theSalt River Valley and spread later to the Gila River. They attributethe large adobe ruins in their country, including the Casa Grande, totheir ancestors, and tell stories of their occupancy of them, but the con-nection is still in doubt. The Nevome and Opata of the Altar, Mag-dalena, and Sonora Rivers are said to have sprung from Pima colonies.They claim that their old manner of life was ended by three bands offoreigners from the east, who destroyed their pueblos, devastated theirfields, and killed or enslaved many of their people. The rest fled tothe mountains, and when they returned they did not rebuild the sub-stantial adobe structures which they had formerly occupied, but livedin dome-shaped lodges of pliable poles covered with thatch and mud.Russell (1908) considers it unlikely that Coronado encountered thePima, but in 1694 Father Eusebio Francisco Kino reached the CasaGrande and undoubtedly met them. Under his inspiration, an ex- SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 363pedition was sent to the Gila in 1697 to ascertain the disposition of thetribe. In 1698 he again visited them and between that date and 1702entered their country four times more. In 1731 Fathers FelipeSegresser and Juan Bautista Grashoffer took charge of the missionsof San Xavier del Bac and San Miguel de Guevavi and became thefirst permanent Spanish residents of Arizona. Padre Ignacio JavierKeUer visited the Pima villages in 1736-37 and in 1743, and Sedelmayrreached the Gila in 1750. The first military force to be stationedamong the Pima was a garrison of 50 men at Tubac on the Santa Cruz.The presidio was moved to Tucson about 1776 and in 1780 it was in-creased to hold 75 men. Between 1768 and 1776 Father FranciscoGarc6s made five trips from Xavier del Bac to the Pimas and beyond.In 1851 parties of the Boundary Survey Commission passed down theGila River, and J. R. Bartlett, the American Commissioner, has leftan excellent description of the Pima Indians (Bartlett, 1854). Afterthe California gold rush began, the Pima frequently assisted partiesof explorers and travelers who were making the southern route, andthey often protected them from the Apache. In 1853 the GadsdenPurchase transferred the Pima to the jurisdiction of the United States.Surveys for a railroad through Pima territory were made in 1854 and1855, but it was not constructed until 1879. In the meantime thePima were subjected to contact with White outlaws and border rufl^ansof the worst description, and White settlers threatened to absorb theirsupplies of water. In 1857 the first United States Indian Agent forthe territory acquired by the Gadsden Purchase was appointed. In1871 the first school among them was opened.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that there were 4,000 Pimain 1680. In 1775 Carets placed the number of those on the Gila Riverat 2,500. In 1906 there were 3,936 in all; in 1910, according to theUnited States Census, 4,236; and in 1923, according to the Report ofthe United States Indian Office, 5,592. The 1930 census returned4,382. The Indian Ofiice reported 5,170 in 1937.Connections in which they have become noted.?Pima County, Ariz.,and a post town in Graham County, Ariz., preserve the name of thePima, which has also been made familiar to ethnographers and geog-raphers by the use to which it has been put in the Powell classificationto cover a supposed linguistic stock. There is little doubt, however,that this supposed stock is merely a part of a much larger stock, theUto-Aztecan.Quahatika. Significance unknown. Also spelled Kohatk.Connections.?The Quahatika belonged to the Piman division of theUto-Aztecan stock, and were most closely related to the Pima, of whichtribe they are said to have been a branch. 364 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Location.?In the desert of southern Arizona, 50 miles south of theGila River. VillagesThe chief Quahatika settlement is Quijotoa, in the western part of PimaCounty, southern Arizona. Early in the eighteenth century they are said to haveshared the village of Aquitun with the Pima. (See Pima.)History.?The history of the Quahatika has, in the main, been paral-lel with that of the Pima and Papago (q. v.). They are said to haveleft Aquitun about 1800, and to have introduced cattle among thePima from the Mexicans about 1820.Population.?The Quahatika seem to have been enumerated withthe Pima.Sobaipuri. Significance unknown. Also called:Rsdrsavinfi, Pima name, signifying "spotted."Connections.?The Sobaipuri were intimately connected with, if nota part of, the Papago, of the Piman division of the Uto-Aztecanlinguistic stock.Location.?In the main and tributary valleys of the San Pedro andSanta Cruz Rivers, between the mouth of the San Pedro River andthe ruins of Casa Grande, and possibly eastward of this area in southernArizona. VillagesAlamos, on Rio Santa Cruz, southern Arizona.Aribaiba, on the San Pedro River, not far from its junction with the Gila.Babisi, probably Sobaipuri, at the southern boundary near Suamca.Baicadeat, on the San Pedro River, Ariz.Busac, probably Sobaipuri, apparently on Arivaipa Creek, a tributary of the SanPedro, east of old Camp Grant, Ariz.Camani, probably Sobaipuri, on the Gila River, not far from Casa Grande, Ariz.Causae, on the San Pedro.Comarsuta, on the San Pedro, between its mouth and its junction with ArivaipaCreek.Esqugbaag, probably Sobaipuri, on or near the San Pedro, near the Arizona-Sonora boundary.Guevavi, on the west bank of the Santa Cruz, below Tubac, at or near the presentNogales.Jiaspi, on the western bank of San Pedro, probably near the present Prospect, Ariz.Juamalturgo, or Pima, in Arizona south of the ruins of Casa Grande.Muiva, on the San Pedro, probably near the mouth of Arivaipa Creek.Ojio, on the eastern bank of the San Pedro River, near its junction with the GilaRiver and not far from the present Dudleyville, Ariz.Optuabo, probably Sobaipuri, near the present Arizona-Sonora boundary andprobably in Arizona.Quiburi, on the western bank of the San Pedro, perhaps not far from the presentBenson, Ariz. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 365Quiquiborica, on the Santa Cruz, 6 leagues south of Guevavi, near the Arizona-Sonora boundary.Reyes, probably Sobaipuri, on the Santa Cruz, in the present southern Arizona.San Angelo, near the western bank of the Santa Cruz, below its mouth, in southernArizona.San Clemente, probably Sobaipuri, on the western bank of the Santa Cruz, northof the present Tucson, Ariz.San Felipe, at the junction of the Santa Cruz and Gila Rivers.San Salvador, on the San Pedro River, above Quiburi, southern Arizona.San Xavier del Bac, on Santa Cruz, 9 miles south of Tucson in the northeastcorner of what is now the Papago Reservation.Santa Eulalia, probably Sobaipuri, slightly northwest of Busanic, just south ofthe Arizona-Sonora boundary line.Sonoita, on the Santa Cruz, north of the present Nogales and 7 leagues east north-east of Guevavi.Suamca, on the headwaters of the Santa Cruz, in the vicinity of Terrenate, Sonora,Mexico, just below the Arizona-Sonora boundary line.Tubo, probably Sobaipuri, apparently on Arivaipa Creek, a tributary of the SanPedro River, east of old Camp Grant, Ariz.Tumacacori, probably Sobaipuri, on the Santa Cruz, south of Tubac and 8 leaguesnorth northwest of Guevavi.Turisai, probably Sobaipuri, probably on or near the Santa Cruz River, southernArizona.Tusonimon, about 4 leagues west of Casa Grande, near the Gila River.Tutoida, on the San Pedro, probably between Arivaipa Creek and the Gila.History.?The Sobaipuri were visited by Kino, 1694-1702, andmissions were established among them, but at a later period the tribewas broken up by the Apache and seems to have sought refuge amongthe Papago, with whom it became merged.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that there were 600 Sobai-puri in 1680. They are now extinct as an independent tribe.Tonto. This name has been applied to a number of distmct groupsof Apache and Yuman peoples. It is said to have been given to amixture of Yavapai, Yuma, and Maricopa, with some PinalenoApache, placed on the Verde River Reservation, Ariz., in 1873, andtransferred to the San Carlos Reservation in 1875; also to a bodyof Indians, descended mostly from Yavapai men and Pinalenowomen. (See New Mexico.)Walapai. From the native word Xawalap^iy', "pine-tree folk" (fideJ. P. Harrington). Also called:E-pa, by A. Hrdlifika (information, 1906), given as their own name.Gualiba, by Garc6s in 1776 (Diary, p. 404, 1900); Yavapai name.Hawdlapai, by Curtis (1907-9, vol. 2, p. 116).Jaguallapai, by Carets in 1776 (Diary, p. 308, 1900).Matd,v6k6-Paya, by Corbusier MS, p. 27. Meaning "people to thenorth"(?); Yavapai name.Oohp, by Ten Kate (1885, p. 160), Pima name. 366 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Buli^ 145Pdxuddo dm6ti, by Gatschet (1886, p. 86), meaning "people far down theriver," Yavapai name.Setd K6xnina.me, by Ten Kate (1884, p. 9), Hopi name,Tabk6pdya?Gatschet (1883, p. 124), Yavapai name; abbreviated fromMatd,v6k6-Paya.Tiqui-Llapais, by Domenech (1860, vol. 1, p. 444).Connections.?The Walapai belonged to the Yuman branch of theHokan Knguistic stock and were connected especially closely with theHavasupai, the Yavapai apparently standing next.Location.?On the middle course of the Colorado River, above theMohave Indians, between Sacramento Wash and National Canyonand inland, extending south almost to Bill Williams Fork.Subdivisions and VillagesKroeber and his collaborators give the following:A. Mata'va-kopai (north people) {the northwestern division). Villages: HadQ'-ba, Hai'ya, Hathekdva-ki6, Huwusk6t, Kahwdga, Kwa'thekithe'i'ta, Mati'bika,Tanyika";B. Soto'lve-kopai (west people) (the Cerbat Mountains and the country west tothe Colorado). Villages: Chimethi'ap, Ha-kamue", Hdka-tovahddja, Hamt6",Ha'thewell'-kio', Ivthl'ya-tanakwe, Kenyua'tci, Kwatehd, Nyi'i'ta, Quwi'-nye-h-i, Thawiniiya, Waika'i'la, Wa-nye-ha', Wi'ka-tavata'va, Wi-kawea'ta, Winya'-ke-tawasa, Wiyakana'mo;C. Ko'o'u-kopai (mesa people) (north central section).?Villages: Crozier (Amer-ican name), Djiwa'ldja, Hak-tala'kava, Haktutu'deva, He'l, Katha't-nye-ha',Muketega'de, Qwa'ga-we', Sewi", Taki'otha'wa, Wi-kanyo";D. Nyav-kopai (east people) (east of the point where Truxton Canyon beginsto cut its way down to Hualpai Valley).?Villages: Agwa'da, Ha'ke-takwl'va,Haksa", Ha'nya-djiluwa'ya, Tha've-nalnalwi'dje, Wiwakwa'ga, Yiga't;E. Hakia' tce-pai (?) or Talta'l-kuwa (cane'!) (about the Mohon Mountains). ? Villages: Hakeskia'l, Hakia' ch, Kr/nyu'tekwa', Tha'va-ka-lavala'va, Wi-ka-tava,Witevikivol, Witkitana'kwa;F. Kwe'va-kopai (south people).?Villages: Chivekaha', Djimwa'nsevio",Ha-djiluwa'ya, Ilapu'k, Kwakwa', Kwal-hwa'ta, Kwatha'wa, Tak-mi'nva;G. Hua'la-pai, Howa'la'^-pai (pine people) (at the northern end of the HualpaiMountains, extending in a rough half-circle from east to west.)?Villages:Hake-djeka'dja, Ilwi'-nya-ha', Kahwa't, Tak-tada'pa.History.?It is possible that some of the Walapai were encounteredby Hernando de Alarc6n in 1540, and at any rate Marcos Farfan delos Godos met them in 1598, and Francisco Garces in 1776. Theirhistory since that time has been httle different from that of the otherYuman tribes of the region.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that there were 700 Walapaiin 1680, but estimates of native informants regarded by Kroeber andhis associates as reliable would give a population of more than 1,000previous to 1880. There were 728 in 1889; 631 in 1897; 501 in 1910,according to the census of that year; 440 in 1923; and 449 in 1932;454 in 1937. (See Havasupai.) SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 367Yavapai. According to the Handbook of American Indians (Hodge,1907, 1910), from enya^va, "sun," and pai, "people," and thussignifying "people of the sun," but the southeastern Yavapaiinterpreted it to mean "crooked-mouth people," that is, a "sulky"people who do not agree with other peoples (fide Gifford, 1936).Also called:Apache Mohaves, in Rep. Office Ind. Aff., 1869, p. 92; 1870.Apdches, by Carets in 1775-76 (Diary, p. 446, 1900) ; also by Spaniards.Cruzados, by Oiiate in 1598 (Col. Doc. InM., vol. 16, p. 276, 1864-84).Dil-zha, by White (MS.); Apache name meaning "Indians living wherethere are red ants."E-nya6-va Pai, by Ewing (1892, p. 203), meaning "sun people" becausethey were sun worshipers.Gohun, by Ten Kate, (1884, p. 5), Apache name.Har-dil-zhays, by White (1875 MS.), Apache name.Inya'vap^, by Harrington (1908, p. 324), Walapai name.Jum-pys, by Heintzelman, (1857, p. 44)Kohenins, by Corbusier (1886, p. 276), Apache name.Ku-we-v6-ka pai-ya, by Corbusier (MS., p. 27); said to be own name,because they live in the south.Nyavapai, by Corbusier (1886, p. 276).Taros, by Carets in 1775-76 (Diary, p. 446, 1900), Pima name.Yampaos, by Whipple (1856, p. 103).Connections.?The Yavapai belonged to the Yuman branch of theHokan linguistic family, their closest cultural afiBliations being withthe Havasupai and Walapai.Location.?In western Arizona from the Pinal and MazatzalMountains to the country of the Halchidhoma and Chemehuevi in theneighborhood of Colorado River and from Williams and Santa MariaRivers, including the valleys of the smaller branches, to the neighbor-hood of the Gila River. SubdivisionsGifford gives the following:A. Kewevikopaya or Southeastern Yavapai, which included the WalkamepaBand (along the southerly highway from Miami to Phoenix via Superior), and theWikedjasapa Band (along the present Apache trail highway from Phoenix toMiami via Roosevelt Dam). These included the following exogamous bands:Limited to the Walkamepa Band: Ilihasitumapa (original home in the PinalMountains); limited to the Wikedjasapa Band: Amahiyukpa (claiming as theirhomeland the high mountains on the west side of the Verde River, just north ofLime Creek and directly opposite the territory of the Yelyuchopa Clan), Atachiopa(who originated in the mountains west of Cherry), Hakayopa (whose inlandhomeland was Sunflower Valley, south of Mazatzal Peak, high in the MazatzalMountains, and west of Fort Reno in the Tonto Basin), Hichapulvapa (whosecountry was the Mazatzal Mountains southward from the East Verde River andwestward from North Peak and Mazatzal Peak); represented in both bands:liwilkamepa (who considered the mountainous country between the Superstitionand Pinal Mountains as their homeland), Matkawatapa (said to have originated 368 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145from intermarriage between people of the Walkamepa Band and Apache from theSierra Ancha), Onalkeopa (whose original homeland was in the Mazatzal Moun-tains between the lands of the Hichapulvapa and Yelyuchopa clans but whomoved later south into the territory of the Walkamepa Band), Yelyuchopa (whoclaimed as their homeland the Mazatzal Mountains between the territories of theHakayopa and Hichapulvapa clans). Cuercomache (on one of the heads ofDiamond Creek, near the Grand Canyon of the Colorado) is given as a village.Amanyikd was the principal camp site of the Wikedjasapa south of the Salt River.B. Yavepe or Northeastern Yavapai, including:a. Yavepe proper (claiming upper Verde Valley and the mountains on eitherside, including the Montezuma National Monument), whose bands were: Wipu-kupa (occupying caves in Redrock country, probably in the region designated asRed Buttes on maps, and descending Oak Creek to plant maize in certain moistflats and to gather mesquite in Verde Valley), Matkitwawipa (people of upperVerde Valley, East Verde River, Fossil Creek, Clear Creek, ranging south to CaveCreek, and Walkey-anyanyepa (people of the massif to which Jerome clings).b. Mat-haupapaya (inhabiting the massif from Prescott to Crown King andBumble Bee), and including: Wikutepa (the Granite Peak Band) and Wikeni-chapa (the Black Mountains or Crown King Band).C. Tolkepaya or Western Yavapai, including: Hakupakapa or Inyokapa(inhabitants of mountains north of Congress) ; Hakehelapa Wiltaikapaya (peopleof Harquahala and Harcuvar Mountains on either side of Wiltaika (Salome) ; People's Valley, Kirkland Valley (upper drainage of Hassayampa Creek nearWickenburg and region around Hillside) ; Haka-whatapa or Matakwarapa (whoformerly lived at La Paz and Castle Dome).History.?Gifford (1936) states that "the earliest probable mention"of the Yavapai "is by Luxan of the Espejo expedition, who in 1582-1583 apparently visited only the country of the Northeastern Yava-pai." In 1598 Marcos Farfan de los Godos met them and called themCruzados because they wore small crosses on their heads, and in1604 Juan de Onate also visited them, as did Father Francisco Garcesin 1776, after which time contact with Europeans was pretty regular.They were removed to the Verde River Agency in May 1873. In1875 they were placed on the San Carlos Apache Agency, but by1900 most of the tribe had settled in part of their old home on theVerde River, including the abandoned Camp McDowell MilitaryReservation, which was assigned to their use, November 27, 1901,by the Secretary of the Interior, until Congress should take finalaction. By Executive Order of September 15, 1903, the old reserva-tion was set aside for their use, and the claims of the white settlerspurchased under Act of April 21, 1904.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates 600 Yavapai in 1680.Gifford's (1936) estimate would about double that, though he does notbelieve they ever exceeded 1500. In 1873 they were said to numberabout 1,000 and in 1903 between 500 and 600. In 1906, 520 werereported, 465 at Camp McDowell and Upper Verde Valley, and 55 atSan Carlos. In 1910, 289 were reported by the Census, but the sameyear the Indian Office reported 178 under the Camp McDowell School SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 369Superintendent, 282 under the Camp Verde School, and 89 under theSan Carlos School; total, 549. In 1823 the Indian Oflfice reported708 under the Camp Verde School and Salt River Superintendencies.In 1932 the Indian Office reported only 193, but the "Yuma Apache"would add 24. In 1937 there were 194.Connection in which they have become noted.?(See Havasupai.) Thename has been perpetuated in that of Yavapai County, Ariz.Yuma. Said to be an old Pima and Papago term for this tribe and insome cases the Kamia and Maricopa also (Forde, 1931). Also called:Cetguanes, by Venegas (1759).Chirumas, an alternative name given by Orozco y Berra (1864).Club Indians, by Emory (1848).Cuchan, or, strictly, Kwitc*'dn?, own name.Dil-zhay's, Apache name for this tribe and the Tonto and Mohave, signi-fying "red soil with red ants" (White, MS.).Garroteros, by Emory (1848).Guichyana, Chemehuevi name.Hatilshe', same as Dil-zhay's,Hiikwats, Paiute name, signifying "weavers."Klin, said to be Apache name for this tribe and the Tulkepaia.Wamakava, applied by Havasupai to Mohave and perhaps to this tribealso.Connections.?The Yuma were one of the chief tribes of the oldYuman linguistic stock, to which they have given their name, buttheir closest immediate relatives were the Maricopa and Halchidhoma,The Yuman stock is now considered a part of the larger Hokan family.Location.?On both sides of the Colorado River next above theCocopa, or about 50 or 60 miles from the mouth of the nver, at andbelow the junction of the Gila River, Fort Yuma being in about thecenter of their territory. (See also California.)VillagerForde (1931) gives the following:Ahakwedehor (axakweSexor), about 2 miles northeast of Fort Yuma.Avikwotapai, some distance south of Parker on the California side of the Colorado.Huksil (xuksi'l), along the Colorado River near Pilot Knob, a few miles south ofAlgodones and across the International Boundary.Kwerav (ava'io), about 2 miles south of the present Laguna Dam and on theCalifornia side of the Colorado.Unnamed town, a little east of the present site of Picacho, at the foot of theChocolate Mountains.History.?Neither Alarc6n, who ascended the Colorado River in1540, nor Onate, who visited it in 1604, mentions the Yuma, but inthe case of Onate this may be accounted for by the fact that theseIndians were then living exclusively on the west side of the river,which he did not reach. The first explorer to mention them by 370 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145name seems to have been Father Kino, 1701-2; and Garces, 1771, andAnza, 1774 and 1775, have a great deal to say about them. Garcesand Eixarch remained among them in 1775. (See Kino (1726), andGarces (1900).) Most of their territory passed under the control of theUnited States by the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848, andthe remainder in consequence of the Gadsden Purchase of 1853.After the founding of Fort Yuma, contacts between the Whites andthis tribe became intimate. Most of them were ultimately concen-trated on the Colorado River and Yuma Reservations.Population.?Garces (1776) estimated that there were 3,000 Yuma,but Anza (see Coues, 1900) raises this to 3,500. An estimate attributedto M. Leroux dating from "early in the 19th century," again gives3,000. According to the Report of the United States Indian Officefor 1910, there were then 655 individuals belonging to the tribe, butthe census of that year gives 834. The Indian Office figure for 1923is 826 and that for 1929, 826, but the United States Census for 1920increases it very materially, to 2,306. However, the Report of theIndian Office for 1937 gives only 848.Connections in which they have become noted.?Besides giving itsname to the Yuman stock, the name Yuma is preserved by counties inArizona and Colorado; localities in Yuma County, Ariz.; YumaCounty, Colo.; Cloud County, Kans.; Taylor County, Ky; WexfordCounty, Mich. ; and Carroll County, Tenn.COLORADOApache. A number of the Apache bands extended their raids fromtime to time over the territory of what is now Colorado, but onlyone of them, the Jicarilla, may be said to have been permanentoccupants of any part of the State within the historic period. Thistribe is considered under the name Jicarilla below; for an accountof the other Apache tribes except the Lipan, see New Mexico. TheLipan are treated under Texas.Arapaho. The Arapaho hunted and warred over parts of easternColorado. (See Wyoming.)Bannock. This tribe and the Shoshoni roamed over the extremenorthwestern corner of the State. (See Idaho.)Cheyenne. The same may be said of the Cheyenne as of the Arapaho.(See South Dakota.)Comanche. Like the Arapaho and Cheyenne, this tribe hunted andwarred in the eastern parts of the State. (See Texas.)Jicarilla. A Mexican Spanish word, meaning "httle basket," given SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 371to the tribe on account of the expertness of Jicarilla women inmaking baskets. Also called:Bfi'-xai, or Pex'-g6, Navaho name.Kinya-inde, Mescalero name.K^op-tagui, Kiowa name, signifying "mountain Apache."Pi'-ke-e-wai-i-ne, Picuris name.Tan-nah-shis-en, by Yarrow (1879) and signifying "men of the woodland."Tashi'ne, Mescalero name.Tinde, own name.Tu-sa-be', Tesuque name.Connections.?The Jicarilla were one of the so-called Apache tribes,all of which belonged to the gi"eat Athapascan linguistic stock, butwith the Lipan (see Texas) constituted a group distinct from theApache proper. (See New Mexico.)Location.?Within historic times the homes of the Jicarilla havebeen in southeastern Colorado and northern New Alexico, thoughthey have ranged into the adjacent parts of Kansas, Oklahoma, andTexas, SubdivisionsMooney (1928) gives the following:Apatsiltlizhihi, who claim the district of Mora, N. Mex.Dachizhozhin, original home around the present Jicarilla Reservation, N. Mex.Golkahin, claiming a former home south of Taos Pueblo, N. Mex.Ketsilind, claiming a former home south of Taos Pueblo, N. Mex.Saitinde, claiming the vicinity of present Espanola, N. Max., as their originalhome.History.?There is little doubt that the Jicarilla traveled south-ward at no very remote period from among the Athapascan tribesin northwestern Canada, very likely by way of the eastern flanks ofthe Rocky Mountains. They were probably among the Querechosmet by Coronado in 1540-42, the same people known to the laterSpanish explorers as Vaqueros. They first received mention undertheir own name early in the eighteenth century. In 1733 a Spanishmission was established for them near Taos, N. Mex., but it did notlast long, and their relations with the Spaniards were generally hostile.In 1853 the governor of New Mexico induced 250 of the tribe to settleon the Puerco River, but failure to ratify the treaty he had madewith them caused them to go on the warpath, and they continuedhostile until their defeat by United States troops in 1854. In 1870they resided on the Maxwell grant in northeastern New Mexico, butthe sale of it necessitated their removal. In 1872 and again in 1873attempts were made to move them to Fort Stanton, but most of themwere permitted to go to the Tierra Amarilla, on the northern confinesof the territory, on a reservation of 900 square miles set aside in 1874.Their annuities having been suspended in 1878 on account of their 372 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bdll. 145 refusal to move southward in accordance with an Act of Congress ofthat year, they resorted to thieving. In 1880 the Act of 1878 wasrepealed, and a new reservation was set aside on the Navajo River,to which they were removed. Here they remained until 1883, whenthey were transferred to Fort Stanton. On February 11, 1887, how-ever, a reservation was set aside for them in the Tierra Amarillaregion by Executive Order. They removed to this territory andthere they have now been allotted land in severalty.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated that there were about 800Jicarilla in 1845. In 1905 they numbered 795; according to theCensus of 1910, there were 694; the Report of the United StatesIndian Office for 1923 gave 608, and that for 1937, 714.Connection in which they have become noted.?The name Jicarilla isgiven to mountains and a post village in Lincoln County, N. Mex.Kiowa. Like the Arapaho, Cheyenne, and Comanche, the Kiowaformerly hunted and warred across parts of eastern Colorado.(See Oklahoma.)Kiowa Apache. This tribe always accompanied the Kiowa. (SeeOklahoma.)Navaho. The Navaho lived just south of the Colorado boundary,entering that State only occasionally. (See New Mexico.)Pueblos. Most of the Pueblo tribes trace their origin to some placein the north and there is no doubt that the ancestors of many ofthem lived in what are now the pueblo and cliff ruins of Colorado.In historic times the principal dealings of Colorado Indians with thePueblos have been with the Pueblo of Taos, which was once atrading point of importance. Many of its people intermarried withthe Ute. (See New Mexico.)Shoshoni. Together with the Bannock, the Shoshoni roamed overthe extreme northwestern part of Colorado. (See Idaho.)Ute. The Ute formerly occupied the entire central and western por-tions of Colorado. (See Utah.)UTAHBannock. This tribe and the Shoshoni roamed over the northernpart of Utah as far as the Uintah Mountains, and beyond GreatSalt Lake. (See Idaho.)Gosiute. The Gosiute were a smaU body of Indians inhabiting theregion about Great Salt Lake in northern Utah. They were longsupposed to be a mixture of Ute and Shoshoni but are now knownto have been connected only with the Shoshoni. They attractedparticular attention because of their wretched manner of life, which SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 373 reports frequently exaggerated unduly. (See Shoshoni, Western,under Idaho.)Navaho. This tribe occupied, at least at times, a small part of thesoutheastern section of Utah as far as the San Juan River. (SeeNew Mexico.)Paiute, Southern. The Southern Paiute occupied the southwesternpart of Utah. (See Nevada.)Shoshoni, Western. The Western Shoshoni extended into northernUtah; they included the Gosiute, as above stated. (See Idaho.)Ute. Significance unknown. Also called:Grasshopper Indians, Pattie (1833).liita-go, Kiowa name.letan, a form of their name used widely for Indians of the Shoshoneanstock.Mactcingeha wai", Omaha and Ponca name, signifying "rabbit skin robes.'Moh-tau-hai'-ta-ni-o, Cheyenne name, signifying "the black men."Ndsuia kwe, Zuni name, signifying "deer-hunting men."No-ochi or Notch, own name.Nota-^, Navaho name.Quazula, seems to be the Jemez name for them.Siipa wichasha, Dakota name, signifying "black people."T&'hana, Taos name.Tcingawdptuh, former Hopi name.Wdatenlhts, Atsina name, signifying "black."Connections.?The Ute belonged to the Shoshonean division of theUto-Aztecan linguistic stock and were related more closely to thetrue Paiute, Kawaiisu, and Chemehuevi.Location.?In central and western Colorado and all of easternUtah, including the eastern part of Salt Lake Valley and Utah Valleyand extending into the upper drainage area of the San Juan Riverin New Mexico. (See also Nevada and Wyoming.)SubdivisionsCapote, in the Tierra Amarilla and Chama River country, northwestern New-Mexico.Elk Mountain Ute (perhaps the Sabuaguanos of Escalante (1882) and Tah-bah-was-chi of Beckwith (1882), especially if the initial letter in one or the othercase has been misread, in the Elk Mountains of Colorado.Kosunats, on Uintah Reservation in 1873.Moache, in southwest Colorado and northwest New Mexico.Pahvant, around the lower portion of Sevier Lake and River, Utah.Pav6gowunsin, on the upper course of the Sevier River, south of the Salina River.Pikakwanarats, on the Uinta Reservation in 1873.Sampits or Sanpet, around Manti on San Pitch Creek but wintering on SevierRiver, Utah.Seuvarits or Sheberetch, in the Castle Valley country and on headwaters ofSan Rafael River, in east central Utah. 374 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Tabeguache, in southwest Colorado, chiefly about Los Pines.Tumpanogots or Timpaiavats, about Utah Lake, Utah.Uinta, in northeastern Utah.Wiminuche, in southwest Colorado, chiefly in the valley of the San Juan and itsnorthern tributaries.Yampa, on and about Green and Colorado Rivers in eastern Utah.The Sogup, in or near New Mexico, and Yubuincariri, west of Green River,Utah, are also given as former bands, and a few others of uncertain status alsoappear, such as the Kwiumpus, Nauwanatats, and Unkapanukints. In lateryears the recognized divisions were reduced to three: Tabeguache or Uncom-pahgre, Kaviawach or White River, and Yoovte or Uinta.History.?The Ute occupied the region above indicated when theycame to the knowledge of the Spaniards, who were the first Europeansto encounter them. Their warlike disposition was early accentuatedby the introduction of horses among them. Our first intimate knowl-edge of them is derived from the diary of Fray Silvestre Velez deEscalante, who penetrated their country in 1776. For a brief periodthey were organized into a confederacy under a chief named Tabb}^(Taiwi). The first treaty between the United States Government andthe Ute was concluded December 30, 1849. By Executive order ofOctober 3, 1861, Uintah Valley was set apart for the Uinta Band,while the remamder of the land claimed by them was taken withoutformal purchase. By a treaty of October 7, 1863, a reservation wasassigned to the Tabeguache, and the remainder of their land wastaken without formal purchase. On May 5, 1864, various reserves,established in 1856 and 1859 by Indian agents, were ordered vacatedand sold. By a treaty of March 2, 1868, a reservation was createdin Colorado for the Tabeguache, Moache, Capote, Wiminuche,Yampa, Grand River, Uinta, and other bands, who relinquished theremainder of their lands, but by an agreement of September 13, 1873,a part of the reservation was ceded to the United States. When itwas found that a portion of this last cession w^as included in the Un-compahgre Valley, the part so included was retroceded to the Uteby Executive order of August 17, 1876. By Executive order of No-vember 22, 1875, the Ute Reservation was enlarged, but this additionaltract was restored to the public domain by an order of August 4, 1882.By Act of June 18, 1878, a portion of the Act of May 5, 1864, wasrepealed, and several tracts included m the reservations thereunderestablished were restored to the public domain. Under an agreementof November 9, 1878, the Moache, Capote, and Wiminuche cededtheir right to the confederated Ute Reservation established by the1868 treaty, the United States agreeing to establish a reservation forthem on San Juan River, a promise which was finally fulfilled byExecutive order of February 7, 1879. On March 6, 1880, the South-ern Ute and the Uncompahgre acknowledged an agreement to settle SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OP NORTH AMERICA 376 respectively on La Plata River and on the Grand River near themouth of the Gunnison, while the White River Ute agreed to moveto the Uinta Reservation in Utah. Sufficient agricultural land notbeing found at the point designated as the future home of the Uncom-pahgre, the President, by Executive order of January 5, 1882, estab-lished a reserve for them in Utah, the boundaries of which were definedby Executive order of the same date. By Act of May 24, 1888, apart of the Uinta Reservation was restored to the public domain.The tribe has since been allotted land in severalty.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that there were 4,500 Utein 1845, including the Gosiute. In 1870 there were supposed to be4,000. The official reports give 3,391 in 1885 and 2,014 in 1909.The census of 1910 returned 2,244; the United States Indian Office in1923, 1,922, including some Paiute; and the Indian Office in 1937,2,163.Connections in which they have become noted.?The Ute shared withthe Shoshoni the reputation of being the strongest and most warlikeof the Plateau people. The State of Utah derives its name fromthe Ute. Utah is also the name of a county and a lake in this State,There is a place called Utahville in Clearfield County, Pa., and locali-ties called Ute in Montrose County, Colo., and Monona County,Iowa, and Ute Park in Colfax County, N. Mex.NEVADAEoso. This is properly a California tribe, though it sometimesranged into Nevada. (See California.)Painte, Northern. The significance of the word "Paiute" is uncer-tain, though it has been interpreted to mean "water Ute" or "true Ute." Also called:Monachi, Yokuts name.Monozi, Maidu name.Mono-Paviotso, name adopted in the Handbook of American Indians(Hodge, 1907, 1910), from an abbreviated form of the above and Paviotso.Nutaa, Chukchansi Yokuts name, signifying that they were east or up-stream.Paviotso, a native term applied by Powell (1891) to a part of theNevada Indians of this group.Snake, name commonly given to the Northern Paiute of Oregon.Connections.?With the Bannock, the Northern Paiute constitutedone dialectic group of the Shoshonean Branch of the Uto-Aztecanstock.Location.?The Northern Paiute were not properly a tribe, thename being used for a dialectic division as indicated above. They 376 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145 covered western Nevada, southeastern Oregon, and a strip of Cali-fornia east of the Sierra Nevada as far south as Owens Lake exceptfor territory occupied by the Washo. According to the students ofthe area, they were pushed out of Powder River Valley and theupper course of John Day River in the nineteenth century by Sha-haptian tribes and the Cayuse. (See also Idaho.)Subdivisions and VillagesThere were no true tribes or bands except in the extreme western and north-eastern parts of the area covered, but topography enforced concentration intocertain valleys. Aside from the detached Bannock, the Northern Paiute weredivided by the Sierra Nevada Mountains into a widely spread eastern divisionand a small division confined to California, the Eastern and Western Mono ofKroeber. Kroeber (1925) distinguishes six divisions of the latter as follows:Balwisha, on the Kaweah River, especially on its south side.Holkoma, on a series of confluent streams?of which Big Burr and SycamoreCreeks are the most important?entering Kings River above Mill Creek.Northfork Mono, for whom no native name has survived, on the North Fork ofSan Joaquin River.Posgisa or Poshgisha, of the San Joaquin, on Big Sandy Creek, and toward, ifnot on, the heads of Little and Big Dry Creeks.Waksachi, on Limekiln and Eshom Creeks and the North Fork of Kaweah River.Wobonuch, at the head of Mill Creek, a southern affluent of Kings River, and inthe pine ridges to the north.Away from Owens Valley and the immediate neighborhood the Paiute havebeen divided into a large number of bands with names which usually signify thatthey were "eaters" of some particular kind of food. Although the entire area hasbeen filled in with such names, they have been given largely by Indians from areasoutside those of the supposed bands; different names are given by different inform-ants, the same name occurs in a number of places, at times widely separated, andthere is lack of agreement among informants, including Steward (1933), Kelly(1937), Park (1938), and Blyth (1938), as to the numbers, names, and locations ofthe groups under consideration. Instead of attempting any sort of classification,therefore, I will simply insert a miscellaneous list of villages and local settlementsthough these were almost as fluctuating and impermanent as the larger groups.In most cases, however, it may be assumed that the location was determined byeconomic factors and mention of such a site has, therefore, some permanent valuehowever often the name may have changed or the composition of the villagefluctuated.Gifford (1932) gives the following hamlets belonging to Kroeber's NorthforkMono besides 83 fishing places and campsites, the exact locations of which areentered in his report and accompanying map:Apasoraropa. Homohomineu.Apayiwe. Howaka.Asiahanyu. Kodiva.Bakononohoi. Konahinau.Dipichugu. Kotuunu.Dipichyu. Kunugipii.Ebehiwe. Monolu.Homenadobema. Moyopaso. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 377Muchupiwe. Sihuguwe.Musawati. Sikinobi.Nabamayuwe. Sipineu.Napasiat. Siiigatu.Noboihawe. Soyakanim.Nosidop. Sukuunu.Ohinobi. Supanaminau.O'oneu. Takapiwe.Oyonagatii. Takatiu.Pahabitima. Tasineu.Pakasanina. Tiwokiiwe.Papavagohira. Topochinatii.Pasawapii. Tiibipakwina.Pasiaputka. Tiikweninewe.Pausoleu. Tumuyuyu.Payauta. Ttipipasaguwe.Pekeneu. Waapiiwee.Pimishineu. Wadakhanau.Poniaminau. Wegigoyo.Poniwinyu. Wiakwii.Ponowee. Wokoiinaha,Saganiu. Wokosolna.Saiipii. Yatsayau.Saksakadiu. Yauwatinyu.Sanita. Yauyau.Sigineu.Steward enumerates the following "districts" of Owens Valley and neighboringvalleys, each with communistic hunting and seed rights, political unity, and anumber of villages:Kwina patii, Round Valley.Panatii, the Black Rock territory, south to Taboose Creek.Pitana patii, extending from the volcanic tableland and Norton Creek in the Sierrato a line running out into Owens Valley from Waucodayavi, the largest creeksouth of Rawson Creek.Tovowahamatii, centering at Big Pine, south to Big Pine Creek in the mountains,but with fishing and seed rights along Owens River nearly to Fish Springs.Tunuhu witii, of uncertain limits.Utu'iitu witii, from the warm springs, now Keough's, south to Shannon Creek.The people of Deep Springs Valley called their valley Patosabaya and themselvesPatosabaya ntinemua; the Fish Lake Valley people to the north of these did notconstitute a unified band but were distributed into the following villages:Ozanwin, on the east or south slope of the Sylvania Mountains and near Tii'nava.Pau'uva, in the vicinity of McNett ranch.Sohodiihatii, at the present Oasis ranch.Suhuyoi, at the Patterson ranch.Tuna'va, the present Geroux ranch, marked McFee on the United States Geo-logical Survey.Tii'nava, at Pigeon Spring at the east end of Fish Lake Valley.Watiihad, MoHne ranch on Moline Creek.Yogamatii, several miles from the mountains at the present Chiatovich ranch. 378 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Steward (1933) gives the following village names in and near Owens Valley:An unnamed site west of Deep Springs Lake.Ahagwa, on Division Creek.Antelope Springs, native name not recorded.Hudu matu, on Cottonwood Creek.Hunadudugo, camp near Wyman Creek.Ka'nasi, camp at Dead Horse Meadow on Wyman Creek.Mogahu' pina, scattered along Hogback, Lone Pine, Tuttle, and Diez Creeks.Mogohopinan watu, on Richter Creek.Muhu witu, on Tinnemaha Creek.Nataka' matu, at Independence.Nuvahu' matu, near Thibaut Creek.Oza'n witu, southeast of Deep Springs Lake.Padohahu matu, on Goodale Creek.Pahago watu, on Tuttle Creek.Pakwazi' natu, at Olancha.Pa'natu, on Owens River, near mouth of Birch Creek.Pau'wahapu, at Hines Spring.Pawona witu, on Bishop Creek below Bishop.Pa'yapo'o'ha, south of Bishop.Pazi'wapi'nwuna, at Independence.Posi'da witu, on Baker Creek.Suhubadopa, at Fish Springs Creek, at least in prehistoric times.Suhu'budu mutu, on Carroll Creek.Suhuvakwazi natu, on Wyman Creek.Tanova witu, south of Independence.Ti'numaha witu, on Tinnemaha Creek.To'owiawatu, at Symmes Creek.Totsitupi, on Thibaut Creek.To'vowaha'matu, at Big Pine on Big Pine Creek.Tsagapu witu, at Shepherd Creek.Tsaki'shaduka, near Old Fort Independence.Tsaksha witu, at Fort Independence.Tsa'wawua'a, on Bishop Creek.Tsigoki, beyond Owens ranch, east of Bishop.Tuhunitogo, near upper course of Birch Creek.Tuinu'hu, on Sawmill Creek.Tunwa'pu, at the mouth of Taboose Creek.Tupico, on Birch Creek, west of Hunadudugo.Tupuzi witu, at George's Creek.Waushova witu, on Lone Pine Creek.Steward gives the following villages in Fish Lake Valley:Oza'nwin, on the east or south slope of the Sylvania Mountains and near Tu'nava.Pau'uva, in the vicinity of McNett ranch.Sohoduhatu, at the present Oasis ranch.Suhuyoi, at the Patterson ranch.Tuna' va, at the present Geroux ranch.Tu' nava, at Pigeon Springs at east end of Fish Lake Valley.Watuhad, at Moline ranch.Yogamatu, several miles from the mountains at the present Chiatovich ranch. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 379The following are miscellaneous local groups of Northern Paiute, the namesdrawn from various sources:Agaivanuna, at Summit Lake, western Nevada.Duhutcyatikadu, on Silver and Summer Lakes, Oreg.Genega's Band, at the mouth of Truckee RiverGidutikadu, in Surprise, Calif.; Coleman; Warner, Oreg.; and probably alsoLong Valleys, in California, Nevada, and Oregon.Goyatikendu, at Yainax and Beatty, Oreg., brought from Silver Lake.Hadsapoke's Band, at Gold Canyon, Carson River.Hoonebooey, east of the Cascades and south of the Blue Mountains of Oregon.Itsaatiaga, about Unionville, Nev.Kaivaningavidukw, in Surprise Valley, northeastern California.Koeats, in north central Nevada.Kosipatuwiwagaiyu, about Carson Sink.Koyuhow, about McDermitt, Nev.Kuhpattikutteh, on Quinn River, Nev.Kuyuidika, near the site of Wadsworth on Truckee River.Kuyuitikadu, at Pyramid Lake, Nixon, Nev.Kwinaduvaa, at McDermitt, Nev.Laidukatuwiwait, about the sink of the Humboldt.Lohim, an isolated Shoshonean band, probably of this connection, on WillowCreek, a southern affluent of the Columbia, Oreg.Loko, on or near Carson River, Nev.Nogaie (with 4 subbands), in the vicinity of Robinson District, Spring Valley,Duckwater, and White River Valley.Odukeo's Band, around Carson and Walker Lakes.Oualuck's Band, in Eureka Valley, Oreg.Pamitoy, in Mason Valley.Paxai-dika, in Bridgeport Valley, Calif.Petodseka, about Carson and Walker Lakes.Piattuiabbe (with 5 bands), near Belmont, Nev.Pitanakwat or Petenegowat, in Owens Valley, but formerly in Esmeralda County,Nev.Poatsituhtikuteh, on the north fork of Walker River,San Joaquin's Band, at the forks in Carson Valley.Sawagativa, about Winnemucca.Shobarboobeer, probably of this connection, in the interior of Oregon,Shuzavi-dika, in Mono Valley, Calif.Togwingani, about Malheur Lake, Oreg.Tohaktivi, about the White Mountains, near the head of Owens River, Calif.Toitikadu, at Fallon and Yerington, Nev.Toiwait, about the lower Sink of the Carson.Tonawitsowa (with 6 bands), in the vicinity of Battle Mountain and Unionville.Tonoyiet's Band, below Big Meadows, Truckee River.Torepe's Band, near the lower crossing of Truckee River.Tosarke's Band, near Carson and Walker Lakes.Tsapakah, in Smith Valley.Tubianwapu, about Virginia City.Tubuwitikadu, east of Steens Mountain, Oreg.Tupustikutteh, on Carson River.Tuziyammos, about Warner Lake, Oreg.Wahi's Band, at the big bend of Carson River. 380 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 146Wadatikadu, at Burns, Malheur District, Oregon, and Susanville, Calif.Wahtatkin, east of the Cascade Mountains and south of the Blue Mountains,Oreg.Walpapi, on the shores of Goose, Silver, Warner, and Harney Lakes, Oreg.Warartika, about Honey Lake, northeastern California.Watsequeorda's Band, on Pyramid Lake.Winemucca's Band, said to have had a specific location on Smoke Creek nearHoney Lake, northeastern California, but to have been extended to othernorthern Paiute living west of the Hot Springs Mountains in Nevada, who do notseem to have been united into one body until brought together to defendthemselves against the Whites.Wobonuch, at the head of Mill Creek, California, and in the pine ridges to thenorth.Yahuskin, about the shores of Goose, Silver, and Harney Lakes, Oreg.Yammostuwiwagaiya, in Paradise Valley, Nev.History.?Although the territory of the Northern Paiute has beenoccupied for a long period by human beings and has been modifiedfrom time to time along its margins by neighboring cultures, thereseem to have been few fundamental changes in the culture of theregion taken as a whole, the economic life having been based onhunting and gathering. Contacts with Europeans began at a com-paratively late period, probably with the entrance of trappers about1825. Jedediah Smith made journeys across Nevada in 1825 andOld Greenwood may have visited it still earlier. Peter Skene Ogdenvisited the Paiute of eastern Oregon between 1826 and 1828 andprobably reached Humboldt River in Nevada. These men werefollowed by Walker (1833), Russell (1834-43), and many others.During this period relations with the Indians seem to have beenuniformly friendly, but clashes became more numerous with thegreat stream of immigration which began about 1840 and swelled totidal proportions with the discovery of gold in California. ThePaiute in the remote valleys, however, remained for a long timelittle affected. Descriptions of Indian life in the numerous reportsof travelers are disappointing. A great crisis in the affairs of theIndians was brought about by the discovery of the Comstock lode atVirginia City, Nev., since in the next 10 years prospectors penetratedevery part of the territory, says Steward, "and boom towns sprang upin the midst of sheer desert." A greater menace to the lives of theIndians was the introduction of livestock and consequent destructionof native food plants. Pinyon trees were also cut down for fuel. Bythis time the natives had both guns and horses and were in con-sequence much more capable of inflicting damage in the clasheswhich began about 1860 and in consequence of which several militaryposts were established. With the completion of the first trans-continental railroad in 1869, the native period came practically toan end. On October 1, 1863, the United States Government extended SWANTONJ INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 381 its authority without formal purchase over the territory of the "West-ern Shoshoni" and included within it the northern part of the landsoccupied by the Northern Paiute under discussion. The Governmentassumed "the right of satisfying their claim by assigning them suchreservations as might seem essential for their occupancy, and sup-plying them in such degree as might seem proper with necessariesof life" (Royce, 1899). By virtue of the authority thus granted, amill and timber reserve was created on Truckee River by Executiveorder, April 24, 1864, for the Pyramid Lake Indians. In December1864 Eugene Monroe surveyed a reservation for the Paiute at WalkerRiver, and in January 1865 he surveyed another at Pyramid Lake.The former was set aside by Executive order March 19, 1874, andthe latter 4 days later. "The remainder of the Pai Ute country,"says Royce, "[was] taken possession of by the United States withoutformal relinquishment by the Indians." On the other hand, theIndians by no means confined themselves to these reservations.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated that this division, i. e., thetribes embraced under the name of Northern Paiute, and the true orSouthern Paiute numbered 7,500 in 1845. The figures given in theReport of the Indian Office for 1903 indicate a population of about5,400 for the group. The Census of 1910 reports 1,448 "Mono" and3,038 Paviotso, a total of 4,486, but the United States Indian OfficeReport of 1923 seems to give a total of more than 13,000. This isevidently erroneous since the United States Census of 1930 reported4,420. The figures of the United States Indian Office in 1937 seem toyield 4,108, after substracting 270, which plainly belonged to theSouthern Paiute.Paiute, Southern. Also called:Auolasus, Pima name.Chemegu6 Cuajdla, by Garc63 in 1776, the first name on account of theirassociation with the Chemehuevi (see under California; for Cuajdla, seeKohoaldje below).Da-da'-ze ni'-ka-ci?'-ga, Kansa name, signifying "grasshopper people."Diggers, a popular name sometimes used for them.Hogipa'goni, Shoshoni name, signifying "rush-arrow people."Kohoaldje, originally Mohave name of Virgin River Paiute.Niima, own name, signifying "people," "Indians."Pa'gonotch, Southern Ute.name.Pah-ru-sd-pdh, Chemehuevi name.Snake Diggers, or Ute Diggers, by Simpson (1859).Yabipai Cajuala, by Carets in 1776.Connections.?The Southern Paiute belonged to the Ute-Chemehuevigroup of the Shoshonean branch of the Uto-Aztecan stock.Location.?In western Utah, northwestern Arizona, southeasternNevada, and parts of southeastern California. 382 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145SubdivisionsPowell and Ingalls give the following "tribes" which, as Steward (1933) sug-gests, were more likely villages or restricted local groups:Ho-kwaits, in the vicinity of Ivanspaw ("Ivanpah Mountain").I'-chu-ar'-rum-pats, in Moapa Valley, "probably in Overton-St. Thomas vicinity"(Kelly, 1932).Kai'vav-wits, in the vicinity of Kanab ("Kaibab Plateau"?Kelly).Kau-yai'-chits, at Ash Meadows but actually in Shoshoni territory.Kwai-an'-tikwok-ets, east of Colorado, which is perhaps what the name means(Palmer, 1928).Kwi-en'-go-mats, at Indian Springs.Kwi-um'-pus, in the vicinity of Beaver.Mo-a-pa-ri'-ats, in Moapa Valley (on Moapa Creek).Mo-quats, in Kingston Mountains.Mo-vwi'-ats, at Cottonwood Island.Nau-wan'-a-tats, in Moapa Valley.No-gwats, in the vicinity of Potosi ("in Spring Mountains"?Kelly).Nu-a'gun-tits, in Las Vegas Valley.Pa-ga'-its, in the vicinity of Colville.Pa-gu'-its, at Pagu Lake.Pa-ran-i-guts, in Pa-ran-i-gut Valley.Pa-room'-pai-ats, in Moapa Valley "head of Moapa Creek, at Home ranch."Pa-room'-pats, at Pa-room Spring.Pa-ru'-guns, in the vicinity of Parawau "Paragonah Lakes" (Kelly, 1932).Pa-spi'-kai-vats, in the vicinity of Toquerville, "a district on lower Ash Creek"(Kelly).Pin'-ti-ats, in Moapa Valley.Sau-won'-ti-ats, in Moapa Valley.Shi'-vwits, on Shi'-vwits Plateau.Tim-pa-shau'-wa-got-sits, at Providence Mountains.Tsou-wa'-ra-its, in Meadow Valley.U'-ai-Nu-ints, in the vicinity of St. George.U-in-ka'-rets, in Mountains ("Mount Trumbull"?Kelly).Un-ka-ka'-ni-guts, in Long Valley.Un-ka'-pa-Nu-kuints', in the vicinity of Cedar (perhaps "second creek south ofKanarra . . . slightly southeast of New Harmony"?Kelly).U-tum'-pai-ats, in Moapa Valley ("site of Wiser Ranch, near Glendale, Nevada" ? Kelly).Ya'-gats, at Armagoza ("spring just north of Tecopa, in Armagosa Valley"Kelly).Kelly (1932) reduces the number of "tribes" or "bands" to 14, some of whichagree with those given by Powell, while others seem to contain the remnants of anumber of his "tribes." She also gives two not appearing in his list, viz: theKaiparowits and a band at Gunlock.History.?The Southern Paiute came in contact with the Spaniardsin the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries but were little disturbed bythem. The first attempt to describe them systematically seems tohave been made by Father Escalante, who traversed their territoryin 1776. After the annexation of California and New Mexico to the SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OP NORTH AMERICA 383United States, their country was slowly but steadily encroached upon,and they were in part removed to reservations though by far thegreater number remained scattered through the country. There hasbeen comparatively little friction between these Indians and theWhites.Population.?Mooney (1928) gives the population of the SouthernPaiute and Northern Paiute together as 7,500 in 1845. In 1906there were reported to be 129 Indians at Moapa Reservation, 267 atDuck Valley, and those not under an agent in Nevada were estimated6 years before to number 3,700, but this includes the Northern Paiute;in Utah there were 76 Kaibab, 154 Shivwits, and 370 not under anagency; and in Arizona there were 350 Paiute under the WesternNevada School Superintendent, altogether slightly more than 5,000.Even allowing for the Northern Paiute, this figure must be too high orthe enumerators of 1910 missed a great many Indians, for the census ofthat date reports only 780 Paiute altogether. The Indian OfficeReport for 1923 gives 226 in Nevada and southwestern Utah, butothers in Utah are enumerated with the Ute. The census of 1930enumerates 294 exclusive of the Chemehuevi. According to the Reportof the United States Indian Office for 1937, there seem to have been439 in that year.Connections in which they have become noted.?The name Paiutehas become identified with the name "Diggers." Both have beenused in a contemptuous sense. A county of south-central Utah isnamed Paiute.Panamint, see Paiute, Northern.Pueblo. In historic times none of the Pueblo Indians have occupiedany part of Nevada, but remains in the southern section of the Statetestify to former occupancy by these Indians. (See New Mexicoand Arizona.)Shoshoni. The Western Shoshoni occupied northeastern Nevada asfar as, and including, Reese River Valley. (See Idaho.)Ute. The Ute claimed a small part of eastern Nevada. (See Utah.)Washo. From the native term Washiu, signifying "person." Alsocalled:Tsaisuma, name given them by the northeastern Maidu.Connections.?Until recently the Washo were regarded as constitut-ing a distinct linguistic stock, but it is now believed that they wererelated to some of the tribes of California. J. P. Harrington hasannounced a linguistic connection between them and the Chumash, butother students place them in the Hokan linguistic family. 384 BT7REAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145SubdivisionsLowie gives the following:Ha'nale'lti, about Woodfords and in Antelope Valley.Pa'walu, near Minden and Gardnerville.We'lmelti, about Reno.Location.?On Truckee River as far down as the Meadows, thoughtheir right to the latter was disputed by the Northern Paiute tribes;Carson River down to the first large canyon below Carson City; theborders of Lake Tahoe; and Sierra and other valleys as far as the firstrange south of Honey Lake, Cafif.History.?There is some evidence that the Washo were once estab-lished in valleys farther east than the location above given and weredriven thence by Northern Paiute tribes. In 1860-62, according toMooney (1928), the Northern Paiute conquered them in a contestover the site of Carson and forbade them thenceforth to own horses.They had little contact with Whites until very recent years. Inlater times they lived between Reno and a point a short distancesouth of Carson City, where they adopted a parasitic mode of life,depending almost entirely on the towns and ranches. In 1865 it wasproposed to set aside two reservations for these Indians in Carsonand Washoe Valleys, but white settlers had already occupied theterritory and the plan was abandoned.Population.?Mooney (1928) made an estimate of 1,000 as of 1845.In 1859 they numbered about 900. In 1907, 300 were reported.The census of 1910 reported 819; that of 1930, 668. In 1937, 629were reported.Connections in which they have become noted.?The name W^asho ispreserved in the names of Washoe County, Washoe Lake, WashoeValley, and Washoe, a post hamlet, all in Nevada. Another localitycalled Washoe is in Carbon County, Mont.WYOMINGArapaho, possibly from the Pawnee tirapihu or larapihu, signifiying "trader." Also called:Xhya'to, Kiowa name.Ano's-anyotskano, Kichai name.Betides, Kiowa Apache name.Detseka'yaa, Caddo name, signifying "dog eaters."Dog Eaters.E-tah-leh, Hidatsa name, signifying "bison path Indians."Hitiinwo'Iv, Cheyenne name, signifying "cloud men" or "sky men."Intina-ina, own name, signifying "our people."Ita-Iddi, Hidatsa name (Maximilian).Kaninahoish, Chippewa name.Koms^ka-Ki'nahyup, former Kiowa name, signifying "men of the worn-outleggings." SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 385Kun na-nar-wesh or Gens des Vachles], by Lewis and Clark (1804).Mahplyato, Dakota name, signifying "blue cloud."Nii'rharl's-kGrikiwa'ahdski, Wichita name.Sargtika, Comanche and Shoshoni name, signifying "dog eaters"; thePawnee, Wichita, and Ute names were forms of this.Connections.?Together with their near relatives, the Atsina, theArapaho constitute the most aberrant group of the Algonquianhnguistic stock.Location.?The Arapaho have occupied a number of differentregions in the historic period, but after they crossed the Missourithey became most closely identified with northeastern Wyoming,where the main or northern part of the tribe resided for a long periodand where they were finally given a reservation. (See also Colorado,Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, SouthDakota, and Canada.) SubdivisionsThe Arapaho recognized five main divisions, which were evidently originallydistinct tribes. Mooney (1928) calls these: (1) NdkasinS'na, Bdachingna, orNorthern Arapaho; (2) NdwunSna, or Southern Arapaho; (3) Aa'ninCna, Hitiingna,Atsina, or Gros Ventres of the Prairie, today usually reckoned as a distinct tribe(see Montana) ; (4) Basawun?na, principally with the Northern Arapaho ; and (5)H^nahawungna, or Aanfi'nhawS, later incorporated with the Northern Arapaho.The corresponding names given by Kroeber (1902 b) are: Hinanae'ina" (Arapahoproper), Na^waginaha'ana" (evidently Southern Arapaho), Hitoune'na? (GrosVentres), Ba,asa?wuune'na?, and Ha?anaxawuune'na?. Kroeber also states thatfour more divisions recognized in the tribe were evidently in reality divisions ofthe Hinanae'ina". These are: Wa^xue'i^i ("ugly people"), about Cantonment,Okla.; Haxaa?9ine'na? ("ridiculous men"), on the South Canadian, Okla.;Baa?tcline'na? ("red-willow men"), in Wyoming; and a fourth whose name hasbeen forgotten. The following are relatively modern local bands of the .\rapaho:Forks-of-t he-River Men, Bad Pipes, Greasy Faces, Wdquithi, Aqdthing'na, Gawun-6na, Hdqihana, Sasdbaithi, of which the first three were among the NorthernArapaho.History.?According to tradition, the Arapaho were once sedentaryand seem to have lived in the Red River Valley, whence they movedsouthwest across the Missouri at some time prior to the passage ofthat stream by the Cheyenne. Sometime afterward the Atsinaseparated from the rest, possibly cut off from the main body by theCrow, and moved off to the north; and within the last centur}'' therest of the tribe have slowly divided into a northern and a vSouthernbranch, the Northern Arapaho living along the edges of the mountainsat the headwaters of the Platte, while the Southern Arapaho continuedon toward the Arkansas. About 1840 they made peace with the Da-kota, Kiowa, and Comanche but were at war with the Shoshoni, Ute,and Pawnee until they were confined to reservations. By the treatyof Medicine Lodge in 1867 the Southern Arapaho were placed upona reservation in Oklahoma along with the Southern Cheyenne; this was 386 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145thrown open to white settlement and the Indian lands were allottedin severalty in 1892. The Northern Arapaho were assigned to areservation on Wind River, Wyo., after having made peace with theShoshoni who occupied the same reserve. The Atsina were associatedwith the Assiniboin on Fort Belknap Reservation, Mont.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated that there were 3,000Arapaho in 1780 and the same number of Atsina. In 1894 therewere 2,638 of the two tribes together; in 1904 there were 889 NorthernArapaho and 859 Southern Arapaho, a total of 1,748. The census of1910 reported 1,419 Arapaho, while the United States Indian OfficeReport for 1923 gives 921 Arapaho in Wyoming and 833 in Oklahoma,a total of 1,754. The 1930 census reported 1,241, of whom 867belonged to the northern division. In 1937 there were 1,164 NorthernArapaho and 2,836 Southern Arapaho and Cheyenne together.Connections in which they have become noted.?The Arapaho were oneof the famous raiding tribes of the Plains; their name appears fre-quently coupled with that of the Cheyenne. The name Arapahoehas been given to a county and a mountain in Colorado and to localitiesin Furnas County, Nebr.; Pamlico County, N. C; Cheyenne County,Colo.; and Fremont County, Wyo.; and the name Arapaho to thecounty seat of Custer County, Okla.Bannock. Some Bannock ranged into western Wyoming. (SeeIdaho.)Cheyenne. The Cheyemie hunted and warred to some extent in theeastern part of Wyoming; were long allied with the Arapaho. (SeeSouth Dakota.)Comanche. Before separating from the Shoshoni the Comancheprobably occupied territory in Wyoming, afterward moving south-ward. (See Texas.)Crows. The Crows occupied in Wyoming the valleys of Powder,Wind, and Big Horn Rivers and ranged as far south as Laramie.(See Montana.)Dakota. Dakota hunting and war parties frequently reached theterritory of Wyoming, but the tribe had no permanent settlementsthere. In 1876 they participated with the Northern Arapaho andNorthern Cheyenne in the cession of the northeastern territory ofWyoming. (See South Dakota.)Kiowa. According to tradition, a tradition reinforced by other evi-dence, the Kiowa lived for a time in or near the Black Hills beforemoving south. (See Oklahoma.) SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 387Kiowa Apache. This tribe lived in close conjunction with the Kiowa.(See Oklahoma.)Pawnee. The Pawnee were known to Wyoming only as hunters andwarriors, (See Nebraska.)Shoshoni. The Northern Shoshoni formerly occupied the westernpart of Wyoming. (See Idaho.)Ute. The Ute were just south of the present Wyoming and enteredits territory at times to hunt or fight. (See Utah.)MONTANAArapaho. The Arapaho proper occupied, or camped in, parts ofsoutheastern Montana at various periods of their history. (SeeWyoming.)Arikara. Some Arikara hunted in eastern Montana. In 1869 and1880, together with the Hidatsa and Mandan, they relinquishedrights to land in the southeastern part of the State. (See NorthDakota.)Assiniboin. From a Chippewa term signifying "one who cooks bythe use of stones."E-tans-ke-pa-se-qua, Hidatsa name, from a word signifying "long arrows"(Long, 1823).Guerriers de pierre, French name.Hohe, Dakota name, signifying "rebels."Sioux of the Rocks, English name.Stonies, or Stone Indians, English name translated from the Indian.TlQ'tlama'eka, Kutenai name, signifying "cutthroats," the usual termfor Dakota derived from the sign language.Weepers, given by Henry (1809).Connections.?The Assiniboin belonged to the Siouan hnguisticfamily, and were a branch of the Dakota (see South Dakota), havingsprung traditionally from the Yanktonai whose dialect they spoke.Location.?The Assiniboin were most prominently associated his-torically with the valleys of the Saskatchewan and Assiniboin Rivers,Canada. In the United States they occupied the territory north ofthe Milk and Missouri Rivers as far east as the White Earth. (Seealso North Dakota.) SubdivisionsThe latest list is that given by Professor Lowie (1939). He states that, an-ciently, there were three principal tribal divisions, viz: Ho'ke (Like-Big-Fish),Tu-wa?'huda? (Looking-like-Ghosts), and Sitco?'-ski (Tricksters, lit. "Wrinkled-Ankles"). Lowie obtained the names of the following smaller bands: Tca?xta'da?,U?ska'ha (Roamers), Wazl'a wintca'ct*, (Northern People), Wat5'paxna-o?wa? or Wato'paxnatu", Tca?'xe wintca'cta (People of the Woods), Tani?'ta'bin(Buffalo-Hip), Hu'deca'bin* (Red-Butt), WacI'azI hyabin (Fat-Smokers), Witcl'- 388 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 abin, I'''ya?to?Va?bin (Rock People), Wato'pabin (Paddlers), Cuntcg'bi (CanumMentulae), Cahi'a iye'skabin (Speakers of Cree (Half-Crees)), Xe'nato?wan(Mountain People), Xe'bina (Mountain People), Icna'umbis', (Those-who-stay-alone), and Ini'na u'mbi. Hayden (1862) mentions a band called Min'-i-shi-nak'-a-to, or Lake People, which does not seem to be identifiable with any ofthe above. This last may be the band called by Henry (1809) Those-who-have-water-for-themselves-only. The following bands cited by Henry are whollyunidentifiable: Red River, Rabbit, Eagle Hills, Saskatchewan, Foot, and SwampyGround Assiniboin.History.?According to tradition, this tribe separated from theWazikute band of Yanktonai. The separation evidently took placebefore contact with the Whites, but there is evidence that whenEuropeans first heard of the tribe they were south of their later habitat,probably in the vicinity of the Lake of the Woods and Lake Nipigon.Thence they moved northwest toward Lake Winnipeg and later tothe banks of the Assiniboin and Saskatchewan Rivers. In the mean-time they had allied themselves with the Cree and had become enemiesof their own southern relatives with whom they were afterward almostconstantly at war. This northward movement and alliance with theCree was due in large measure to the establishment of British postson Hudson Bay and the desire of the Assiniboin Indians to have accessto them and thus supply themselves with firearms and other Europeanarticles. The Assiniboin in the United States were gathered underthe Fort Belknap and Fort Peck agencies ; those in Canada under theBattleford, Edmonton, and Assiniboin agencies, at Moose Mountain,and on Stoney Reservation.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated that there were 10,000Assiniboin in 1780. In 1829 Porter gave 8,000, and Drake {in Church,1825) thought that there were 10,000 before the smallpox epidemicof 1836, when 4,000 died. The United States Indian Office Reportof 1843 gave 7,000; in 1890 they numbered 3,008; and in 1904, 1,234in the United States, and 1,371 in Canada, a total of 2,605. Thecensus of 1910 gave 1,235 in the United States, and the United StatesIndian Office Report for 1923 gave 1,400, while there was an approxi-mately equal number in Canada. The United States Census of1930 gave 1,581. In 1937, 2,232 were returned in the United States.Connections in which they have become noted.?The Assiniboinattained prominence during the dealings of explorers and traders withthe Indians along the upper Missouri. As Assiniboin or Assiniboine,the name has been adopted for an important affluent of the RedRiver of the North in Manitoba and Saskatchewan Provinces. MountAssiniboin is in the Rocky Mountains near the boundary betweenBritish Columbia and Alberta, about 20 miles south of Banff. SWANTONJ INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 389Atsina. Probably from Blackfoot fit-se'-na, supposed to mean "^tpeople." Also called:Acapatos, by Duflot de Mofras (1844).A-re-tear-o-pan-ga, Hidataa name.Bahwetego-weninnewug, Chippewa name, signifying "fall people."Bot-k'in'ago, signifying "belly men."Fall Indians, common early name.Gros Ventres des Plaines, derived from an incorrect interpretation of thetribal sign and the qualifying phrase "des Plaines" to distinguish themfrom the Hidatsa, the Gros Ventres de la Riviere.Haaninin or Aa'nin^na, own name, said to signify "white-clay people," "lime-men," or "chalk-men."His-tu-i'-ta-ni-o, Cheyenne name.Hitiingna, Arapaho name, signifying "beggars" or "spongers."Minnetarees of the Plains, Minnetarees of the Prairies, so called to avoidconfusion with the Hidatsa (q. v. under North Dakota).Rapid Indians, from Harmon (1820).Sa'pani, Shoshoni name, signifying "bellies."Sku'tani, Dakota name.Connections.?The Atsina were a part of the Arapaho, of whichtribe they are sometimes reckoned a division, and both belong to theAlgonquian linguistic family.Location.?On Milk River and adjacent parts of the Missouri,in what is now Montana, ranging northward to the Saskatchewan.(See also Canada.) SubdivisionsKroeber (1908 b) has recorded the following names of bands or clans, some ofwhich may, however, be duplications:Names of clans whose position in the camp circle is known, beginning at thesouth side of the opening at the east: Frozen or Plumes, "Those-who-water-their-horses-once-a-day"; Tendons, "Those-who-do-not-give-away," or "Buffalo-humps"; Opposite (or Middle) Assiniboin, "Ugly-ones or Tent-poles worn smooth[from travel]"; Bloods, "Fighting-alone."Other clan names: Berry-eaters. Breech-cloths, CofTee, Dusty-ones, Gray-onesor Ash-colored, Ka?hutyi (the name of a chief). Night-hawks, Poor-ones, Torn-trousers, Weasel-skin headdress.History.?If the Arapaho once lived in the Red River country, theAtsina were probably with them. At least, the languages of bothpoint to the region of the Algonquian tribes northeast of the Plainsfor their origin. At the same time Kroeber (1900 b) thinks thatthey must have been separated for at least 200 years. According toHayden (1860), they were south of the Saskatchewan about 1800.In 1818 they joined the Arapaho and remained with them until 1823when they returned to the location given above in the neighborhoodof Milk River. For a long time they maintained an alliance with theBlackfeet but later joined the Crow against them and in the course 390 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 of the ensuing war, in 1867, suffered a severe defeat. Later they wereplaced on Fort Belknap Reservation, Mont., with the Assiniboin.Popvlation.?Mooney (1928) estimates that the Atsina numbered3,000 in 1780. In 1904 there were 535. The census of 1910 reported510, and the United States Office of Indian Affairs in 1923 reported586; 631 were reported by the census of 1930, and 809 in 1937.Bannock. The Bannock ranged into the western part of the State.(See Idaho.)Cheyenne. The Cheyenne frequently entered the eastern part ofMontana and the Northern Cheyenne were ultimately assigned a re-servation within the State. (See South Dakota.)Chippewa. The Chippewa had little contact with the region nowincluded in Montana until very recent times when a considerablenumber came to live there, 486 according to the census of 1910.(See Minnesota.)Cree. The original homes of the Cree were north of the presentUnited States, though their war parties frequently came into theterritory now occupied by this country to iBght the Dakota, Black-foot, and other tribes. In comparatively late times a number, givenby the census of 1910 as 309, settled in Montana, and others werereported from Washington (91), Michigan, Oregon, North Dakota,Idaho, Kansas, and Minnesota. (See also Canada.)Crow. A translation, through the French gens des corbeaux, of theirown name Abs4roke, "crow-, sparrowhawk-, or bird-people." AlsocaUed:Hahderuka, Mandan name.Haideroka, Hidatsa name.Hounena, Arapaho name, signifying "crow men."Issa.ppo', Siksika name.Kangitoka, Yankton Dakota name.Ka'-xi, Winnebago name.Kihnatsa, Hidatsa name, signifying "they who refused the paunch," andreferring to the tradition regarding the separation of these two tribes.Kokokiwak, Fox name.Long-haired Indians, by Sanford (1819).O-e'-tun'-i-o, Cheyenne name, signifying "crow people."Par-is-ca-oh-pan-ga, Hidatsa name, signifying "crow people" (Long,1823).St6mchi, Kalispel name.St6mtchi, Salish name.Stimk, Okinagan name.Yaxka'-a, Wyandot name, signifying "crow."Connections.?The Crow belonged to the Siouan linguistic stock andwere most closely related to the Hidatsa, from whom they claim tohave separated. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 391Location.?On the Yellowstone River and its branches, extending asfar north as the Musselshell and as far south as Laramie Fork on thePlatte, but centering particularly on three southern tributaries ofYellowstone River, the Powder, Wind, and Big Horn Rivers. (Seealso Wyoming and Canada.) SubdivisionsThere were formerly three local divisions, known to the people themselves asMine'sepere, Dung-on-the-river-banks?, or Black Lodges; the A'^c'araho', Many-Lodges; and the Erarapl'o, Kicked-in-their-bellies. The first of these is calledRiver Crow by some writers and the last two collectively Mountain Crow. Theywere also divided into 12 clans arranged in pairs.History.?As stated above, the Crow tribe claims to have separatedfrom the Hidatsa, a tradition shared by the Hidatsa. It is at leastcertain that the two are more closely related linguistically than iseither to any other Siouan group. Their separation into bands musthave occurred in the first quarter of the nineteenth century at latest.In 1804 they were found in their historic seats and have been inapproximately the same region ever since, the reservation to whichthey were finally assigned being on the Big Horn River.Population.?Mooney's (1928) estimate for the year 1780 is 4,000Crow. In 1804 Lewis and Clark estimated 350 lodges and 3,500 souls.In 1833 there were said to be 1,200 warriors and a population of from3,250 to 3,560. In 1890 a total population of 2,287 was reported,and in 1904, 1,826. The census of 1910 gave 1,799, and the UnitedStates Indian Office Report for 1923, 1,777. The census of 1930,reported 1,674, and the Indian Office Report for 1937, 2,173.Connections in which they have become noted.?The Crow tribe wasprominent in the early history of the Northwest, though not to theextent of the Dakota and Blackfeet. The Indian form of the name,Absarokee, is borne by a post village of Stillwater County, Mont. ; inthe form Absaraka it appears as the name of a place in Cass County,N. Dak.; and as Absaroka, more prominently, as the name of a rangeof mountains and a National Forest in the Yellowstone National Park.Dakota. The Dakota entered Montana at times to hunt and fightthe Crow but were not permanent residents of the State. (SeeSouth Dakota.)Hidatsa. Together with the Arikara and Mandan, in 1869 and 1880the Hidatsa took part in treaties ceding territory in southeasternMontana to the United States Government. (See North Dakota.)Kalispel. This tribe probably visited the westernmost parts ofMontana at times and most of them finally settled upon the Flat-head Reservation in that State. Some of them, together with theSalish and Kutenai, ceded Montana lands in 1855. (See Idaho.) 392 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [B0ll. 145Kiowa. According to tradition, the Kiowa at one time lived in thesoutheastern part of this State. (See Oklahoma.)Kutenai. Said to be from a term applied to this tribe by the BlackfootIndians and believed by Turney-High (1937) to have come origi-nally from the name of a Kutenai tribe or division called Tunaha.Also called:Flatbows, the name given often to the Lower Kutenai, the origin of whichis unknown.Kuspglu, their Nez Perc6 name, signifying "water people."Sdn'ka or asdn'ka, own name, significance unknown.Shalsa'ulk?, by the Sinkiuse and said to be from a place name, but see below.Skelsd-ulk, Salish name, signifying "Water People."Slender Bows, name sometimes given as an interpretation of their ownname, but erroneously.Connections.?The Kutenai were placed by Powell in a distinctstock called Kitunahan, but some linguists regard them as remoterelatives of the Algonquians and Salishans.Location.?On Kootenay River, Kootenay Lake, Arrow Lake, andthe upper course of the Columbia River, except for the bend betweenDonald and Revelstoke; in southeastern British Columbia; north-western Montana; northeastern Washington; and the northern tip ofIdaho. In modern times they have settled as far southeast as Flat-head Lake. (See also Canada.)SubdivisionsThe Kutenai were separated into two general divisions, the line between ex-tending roughly from north to south through Libby, Mont. The Upper Kutenailay to the east on upper Kootenay River and depended more upon hunting, es-pecially of the bison, while the Lower Kutenai were largely fishermen. Turney-High (1937) gives the following bands: (1) Tundxa, whose original home was onthe Plains and who have now been destroyed and their descendants incorporatedwith the other bands; (2) Tobacco Plains or People-of-the-Place-of-the-Flying-Head, esteemed to be the mother band of the tribe (on Kootenay River at theInternational Boundary Line?the Fernie Band was a subdivision) ; (3) JenningsBand (about Jennings, Mont.) ; (4) Libby Band (at Libby, Mont.) ; (5) Bonner'sFerry Band (at Bonner's Ferry, Idaho) ; (6) Fort Steele Band (at Steele, B. C.) ; (7) Creston Band (at Creston, B. C.) ; (8) Windermere Band (a very modern bandat Windermere, B. C). To these may be added the very modern Dayton-ElmoBand on Flathead Lake drawn from the Jennings and Libby bands.History.?From information collected by Turney-High (1937),it would seem that the Kutenai formerly lived east of the RockyMountains, extending at least as far as MacLeod, Alberta. Theiroldest settlement in their present territories would seem to have beenat Tobacco Plains whence they gradually spread to the north, west,and south, and in recent times to the southeast. Their country wastraversed early in the nineteenth century by David Thompson (1916) 8WANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 393in the interest of the Northwest Company, and Kootenai House wasestablished in 1807. With the running of the International Boundary,their country was divided between the Dominion of Canada and theUnited States to the considerable inconvenience of the tribe. Mis-sionary work among them, particularly work among the Upper Ku-tenai, has been very successful.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated the Kutenai population tobe 1,200 in 1780. In 1890 those in the United States were estimatedat 400 to 500. In 1905 they numbered 554, and those in British terri-tory the year preceding were enumerated at 553. The census of 1910gave 538 in the United States. The Report of the Canadian Depart-ment of Indian Affairs for 1924 returned about 450, and that of theUnited States Indian Office only 129 under that name. The latterfigure is evidently defective, as the Census of 1930 returned 287 ofwhom 185 were in Montana and 101 in Idaho. In 1937 there were118 in Idaho.Conneciions in which they have become noted.?The Kutenai are notedfor their peculiar language, which differs from the speech of all theirneighbors and has been given an independent position as the Kitu-nahan stock. They have given their name to Kootenay or KootenaiRiver, also called the Flat Bow or MacGillivray, which flows throughBritish Columbia, Montana, and Idaho; to Kootenay Lake in BritishColumbia; to Kootenai Mountains, and Kootenai Falls, Mont.;Kootenai County, Idaho; and to a post village, Kootenai, in BonnerCounty, Idaho.Mandan. The Mandan were parties to treaties made in 1869 and 1880ceding their claims to land in southeastern Montana. (See NorthDakota.)Nez Perce. Individuals belonging to this tribe sometimes enteredthe southwestern part of Montana. (See Idaho.)Piegan. The Piegan were the southernmost subtribe of the Siksika(q. v.).Salish, Probably a place name, the last syllable, -ish, "people."Also called:A-shu'-e-ka-pe, Crow name, signifying, "flatheads."A-too-ha-pe, Hidatsa name.Flatheads, widely so called because, in contradistinction to the tribeswest of them, they left their heads in the natural condition, flat on top,instead of sloping backward to the crown.Ka-ka-i-thi, Arapaho name, signifying, "flathead people."Ka-ko'-is-tsi'-a-ta'-ni-o, Cheyenne name, signifying, "people who flattentheir heads."Ko-toh'-spi-tup'-i-o, Siksika name.Nebagindibe, Chippewa name, signifying, "flat head." 394 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Pa O-bde'-ca, Yankton Dakota name, signifying, "heads cornered oredged."Tfites-Piates, common French term.Connections.?The Salish belonged to the interior division of theSalishan linguistic family, to which they have given their name.Location.?In western Montana originally, extending from theRocky Mountains on the west; south to the Gallatin; east to CrazyMountain and Little Belt Ranges, north to some hilly country northof Helena. Later they were centered farther west around FlatheadLake. (See also Idaho.) SubdivisionsIt is said that there was a distinct band of Salish Indians on a river near Helena,another band near Butte, another somewhere east of Butte, and another some-where in the Big Hole Valley; and there are traditions of still others.History.?According to Teit (1930) the Salish once extended fartherto the east, and there were related tribes in that region which he callsSematuse and Tunahe. As Turney-High (1937) has pointed out,however, the Tunahe were evidently a Kutenai division; and theSematuse, if not mythical, seem to have been an alien people inpossession of this country before the Salish entered it. Teit statesthat these Salish were driven westward out of the Plains by theBlackfoot, particularly after that tribe obtained guns. Turney-High,on the other hand, regards the Salish as rather late intruders into thePlains from the west. However, the pressure of tribes westward bytheir neighbors to the east as soon as the latter obtained guns is sucha common story that it hardly seems probable that the Salish couldhave escaped its effects. Just how far the SaUsh retired westwardmay be a matter of argument, nor does it affect the theory of anearlier eastward migration if such a movement can be substantiatedon other grounds. Salish relations with the Whites were alwaysfriendly and they were successfully missionized by Roman Catholicsunder the lead of the famous Father De Smet. By the treaty ofJuly 16, 1855, they ceded all of their lands in Montana and Idahoexcept a reserve south of Flathead Lake and a second tract in BitterRoot Valley which was to be made into a reserve for them if it wereconsidered advisable. It was, however, not so considered, and actingupon an Act of Congress of June 5, 1872, the Salish were removed tothe former reservation, where they still live.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated that there were 600 Salishin 1780, evidently accepting the figure given by Lewis and Clark for1806. Teit (1930) considers this much too low, the data collectedby him indicating a SaHsh population of perhaps 3,000, but thiswould seem to err in the opposite direction. The Indian OflBicefigure for 1905 is 557 and that for 1909, 598. The census of 1910 SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 395 reported 486, of whom 400 were in Montana, 46 in Washington, 27in Oregon, 6 in Idaho, 6 in Nebraska, and 1 in Kansas. The censusof 1830 reported 2,036 Interior Salish from Montana, but did notgive separate figures for the tribe under discussion. The UnitedStates Office of Indian Affairs reported 3,085 in 1937,Connections in which they have become noted.?It was among theSalish Indians that the noted Father De Smet worked as a missionary.The large group of languages to which this tribe belongs is known toethnologists as the SaUshan linguistic family. Flathead or SelishLake, Flathead Pass, and Flathead County, all in Montana, alsoderive their names from the Salish or "Flathead" Indians.Sematuse (phonetically SEmte'use). Signifying "foolish" accordingto some, derived from an old place name according to others.Teit (1930) identified the Sematuse as a former tribe of the Salishanstock, closely related to the Salish tribe. According to his in-formants, one band of these people was on Big Blackfoot River,another at a place later known as "Big Camas," or "Camas Prairie,"and some thought that a smaller band had headquarters nearDeer Lodge, and there may have been one at Phillipsburg. Otherswere said to have been on the Little Blackfoot and Salmon-TroutRivers but may not have constituted a band. Turney-High(1937), however, thinks that this tribe was mythical or else thatit was the name of a non-Salishan people who preceded the Salishin western Montana.Shoshoni. Before European weapons reached the eastern tribes,bands of Shoshoni ranged over a considerable part of easternMontana as far north as Milk River. (See Idaho.)Siksika. A native word signifying "black feet," by which term thetribe is best known. By some they are said to be called Blackfeetfrom the discoloration of their moccasins by the ashes of prairiefires, but more probably their moccasins were dyed black. Alsocalled : Ah-hi'-ta-pe, former name for themselves, signifying "blood people."Ayatchinini, Chippewa name.Ayatchiyiniw, Cree name, signifying "stranger," or "enemy."Beaux Hommes, so given by Dobbs (1744).Carmeneh, Crow name.Choch-Katit, Arikara name.Ish-te-pit'-e, Crow name.I tsi sf pi sa, Hidatsa name, signifying "black feet."Katce, Sarsi name.Ka-wi-'na-han, Arapaho name, signifying "black people."Makadewana-ssidok, Chippewa name.M&makat&'wana-si'ta'-ak, Fox name. 396 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Mkatewetit^ta, Shawnee name.Mukkudda Ozitunnug, Ottawa name (Tanner, 1830).Netsepoy^, sometimes used by the Confederacy and signifying "peoplewho speak our language."Pah-kee, Shoshoni name.Po'-o-mas, Cheyenne name, signifying "blankets whitened with earth."Saha'ntla, Kutenai name, signifying "bad people."Sawketakix, name sometimes used by themselves, signifying "men of theplains."S'chko6, or S'chkoeishin, Kalispel name, from ko^i, "black."Sica'bfi, Kansa name.Si-ha'-sa-pa, Yankton Dakota name, signifying "black feet."Skuafshgni, Salish name, signifying "black feet."Stxuafxn, Okinagan name, signifying "black."Tofikofiko, Kiowa name, signifying "black legs."Tuhu'vti-6mokat, Comanche name.Wateni'hte, Arapaho name.Connections.?The Siksika belong to the Algonquian linguistic stock,forming the most aberrant of all the well-recognized tongues of thatfamily except Arapaho and Atsina.Location.?In the territory stretching from North SaskatchewanRiver, Canada, to the southern headstreams of the Missouri inMontana, and from about longitude 105* W. to the base of theRocky Mountains. SubdivisionsThe Siksika are divided into the following subtribes: The Siksika or Blackfeetproper, occupying the northern part of the above territory ; the Kainah or Bloodssouth of the preceding; and the Piegan, south of the Kainah, the one best repre-sented in the United States.Each of the above divisions was subdivided into bands as follows:Siksika bands: Istsikainah.Aisikstukiks. Mameoya.Apikaiyiks. Nitikskiks.Emitahpahksaiyiks. Saksinahmahyiks.Motahtosiks. Siksahpuniks.Puhksinahmahyiks. Siksinokaks.Saiyiks. Piegan bands:Siksinokaks. Ahahpitape.Tsiniktsistsoyiks. Ahkaiyikokakiniks.Kainah or Blood bands: Apikaiyiks.Ahkaiksumiks. Esksinaitupiks.Ahkaipokaks. Inuksikahkopwaiks.Ahkotashiks. Inuksiks.Ahkwonistsists. Ipoksimaiks.Anepo. Kahmitaiks.Apikaiyiks. Kiyis.Aputosikainah. Kutaiimiks.Inuhksoyistamiks. Kutaisotsiman.Isisokasimiks. Miahwahpitaiks. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 397Miawkinaiyiks. Nitotsiksisstaniks.Mokumiks. Sikokitsimiks.Motahtosiks. Sikopoksimaiks.Motwainaiks. Sikutsipumaiks.Nitakoskitsipupiks. Susksoyiks (Hayden, 1862).Nitawyiks. Tsiniksistsoyiks.Nitikskiks.History.?According to certain traditions, the Siksika movedinto their present territory from the northeast, and it is at least evi-dent that they had gravitated westward, their movement probablyaccelerated by the acquisition of horses. They were at war withnearly all of their neighbors except the Athapascan Sarsi and theAtsina; both of these tribes usually acted with them. They were onrelatively friendly terms with the English of the Hudson's Bay postsin Canada, upon whom they depended for guns and ammunition, butwere hostile to the Whites on the American side, in large measurebecause through them their enemies received the same kind of sup-plies. They were several times decimated by smallpox but sufferedless than many tribes not so far removed from White influences, andhave never been forced to undergo removal from their home country.They are now gathered under agencies on both sides of the Inter-national Boundary and are slowly adapting themselves to Whitemodes of life.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that in 1780 there were15,000 Blackfeet. Mackenzie (1801) gave 2,250 to 2,500 warriors for1790, which would reduce Mooney's (1928) figures by about one-half,but in the meantime the smallpox epidemic of 1780-81 had occurred.The oflBcial Indian Report for 1858 gave 7,300 and another estimateof about the same period, said by Hayden (1862) to have been made "under the most favorable circumstances," reported 6,720. In 1909the official enumeration of those in the United States was 2,195, andof those in Canada 2,440, a total of 4,635. The census of 1910 gave2,367 in the United States, all but 99 of whom were Piegan. TheUnited States Indian Office Report for 1923 gives 3,124 Blackfeetand the Report of the Canadian Department of Indian Affairs for1924, 2,236; total, 5,360. The United States census of 1930 reported3,145. In 1937 the Office of Indian Affairs reported 4,242.Connections in which they have become noted.?The Siksika werepeculiar (1) as one of the largest and most warlike tribes of the north-ern Plains, next to the Dakota alone in prominence; (2) as speakingone of three highly specialized languages of the Algonquian stock;(3) as among the bitterest opponents of explorers and traders on theAmerican side of the International Boundary; and (4) as having giventhe name Blackfoot to a considerable town in Idaho, capital of Bing- 398 BUKEAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY IBull. i46ham County, to a creek in the same county, to mountains in Idahoand Alberta, to a river in Montana, and to a village in GlacierCounty, in the same State.Spokan. Some Spokan probably entered western Montana at timesand, in 1910, 134 were reported as residents of the State. (See Wash-ington.)Tnnahe (Tuna'xe). Given by Teit (1930) as the name of an extinctSalishan tribe hving in west central Montana, but identified byTurney-High (1937) as a former eastern or plains band of theKutenai Indians, that band, in fact, from which the name Kutenaiis derived. IDAHOBannock. From their own name Bana'kwiit. Also called:Diggers, by many writers.Ogoize, by the Kalispel.Panai'ti, form of name given by Hoffman (1886).Pun-nush, by the Shoshoni.Robber Indians, by Ross (1855).Ush-ke-we-ah, by the Crow Indians.Connections.?The Bannock belonged to the Shoshonean branch ofthe Uto-Aztecan linguistic stock, being a detached branch of theNorthern Paiute.Location.?In historic times their main center was in southeasternIdaho, ranging into western Wyoming, between latitude 42? and 45?North and from longitude 113? West eastward to the main chain ofthe Rocky Mountains. At times they spread well down Snake River,and some were scattered as far north as Salmon River and even intosouthern Montana. (See also Colorado, Oregon, and Utah.)SubdivisionsA few local group names have been preserved, such as the Kutsshundika orBuffalo-eaters, Penointikara or Honey-eaters, and Shohopanaiti or CottonwoodBannock, but these are not well defined.History.?Bridger met the Bannock Indians in the country aboveindicated as early as 1829, but contacts between them and the Whitesbecame much more intimate with the establishment of Fort Hall in1834. In 1869 Fort Hall Reservation was set aside for them and theShoshoni, but they were in the habit of wandering widely and it wasa long time before they were gathered into it. They claimed theterritory in southwestern Montana in which are situated Virginia Cityand Bozeman, and it is probable that they were driven across themoimtains into the Salmon River Valley at a comparatively recentperiod. Before 1853 they were decimated by the smallpox and were SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 399finally gathered under the Lemhi and Fort Hall agencies. Loss oftheir lands, failure of the herds of buffalo, and lack of prompt reliefon the part of the Government occasioned an uprising of the tribe in1878, which was suppressed by General O. O. Howard.Population.?Bridger, in 1829, stated that the Bannock had 1,200lodges, or a population of about 8,000, but he evidently included theneighboring Shoshoni. Mooney (1928) estimated that in 1845 therewere about 1,000, but Forney, in 1858 (p. 213) gave only 400 to 500.In 1870 Jones estimated 600 and Mann 800 "Northern Bannocks."In 1901 they numbered 513 but were so intermixed with Shoshoni thatthe figure is uncertain. The census of 1910 reported 413, all but 50of whom were in Idaho, and the census of 1930 gave 415, including313 in Idaho. In 1937, 342 were reported.Connections in which they have become noted.?The only prominenceattained by the Bannock was for a brief period during the BannockWar. The name is perpetuated by a river, a range of mountains, anda county. There is also a place named Bannock in Belmont County,Ohio, and another in Butler County, Ky.,but these are probably notconnected with the tribe,Kalispel. From a native term said to mean "Camas"; they weregiven the name Pend d'Oreilles, because when they were first metby Europeans nearly all of them wore large shell earrings. Alsocalled:Ak-min'-e-shu'-me, by the Crow and meaning "the tribe that uses canoes".Camas People, a translation of Kalispel.Earring People, an English translation of Pend d'Oreilles.Hanging Ears, English translation of Pend d'Oreilles.Ni-he-ta-te-tup'i-o, Siksika name.PapshpAn'lgma, Yakima name, signifying "people of the great fir trees."Connections.?The Kalispel belonged to the interior division of thegreat Salishan family.Location.?On Pend Oreille River and Lake, Priest Lake, and thelower course of Clark's Fork. They were said to have extended east-ward to Thompson Lake and Horse Plains and to have hunted oversome of the Salmon River country, Canada, and were formerly saidto have extended to Flathead Lake and Missoula. (See also Montanaand Washington.) Subdivisions(1) Upper Kalispel or Upper Pend d'Oreilles (in Montana from Flathead Lakeand Flathead River to about Thompson Falls on Clark Fork of the Pend OreilleRiver, including the Little Bitterroot, southward about to Missoula and north-ward to the International Boundary), with bands at Flathead Lake, near Kalispel,at or near Dayton, near Poison at the foot of the lake, and possibly one at Colum-bia Falls; some wintered on the Bitterroot and a large band at St. Ignatius. 400 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull, 145(2) Lower Kalispel or Lower Pend d'Oreilles or Kalispel proper (from Thomp-son Falls down Clark Fork, Pend Oreille Lake, Priest Lake, and Pend OreilleRiver nearly to the International Boundary and hunting territories along SalmonRiver, British Columbia).(3) The Chewelah (in the country west of the Calispell or Chewelah Mountainsin the upper part of the Colville Valley).The Lower Kalispel also included several minor bands, the Chewelah apparentlytwo. The Chewelah subdivision spoke a slightly different dialect and waesometimes regarded as an independent tribe.History.?The Kalispel were visited by Lewis and Clark in 1805,and in 1809 a post was established on Pend Oreille Lake by theNorthwest Company and another on Clark Fork the same yearcalled Salish House. Emissaries of the American Fm- Companyreached them later, and in 1844 they were missionized by the RomanCatholic Church. July 16, 1855, the Upper Kalispel, Kutenai, andSalish surrendered all of their lands except an area about FlatheadLake which became the Jocko Reservation. The greater part of theKalispel settled here, but part of the Lower Kalispel were gatheredon Colville Reservation with the Okanagon, Colville, and a numberof other tribes.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated that the Kalispel numbered1,200 in 1780, but Teit (1930) considered that the prehistoric popu-lation must have been between 5,000 and 6,500, an estimate whichwould seem to be excessive. In 1805 Lewis and Clark estimated thatthere were 30 lodges of these people and a population of 1,600. In1905 there were 640 Upper and 197 Lower Pend d'Oreilles under theFlathead Agency (Jocko Reservation) and 98 under the ColvilleAgency. The census of 1910 reported 386 from Montana, 157 fromWashington, 15 from Idaho, and 6 from three other States. Theywere not separately enumerated in 1930, but the United States Officeof Indian Affairs reported 97 in 1937.Connections in which they have become noted.?The name Kalispelis preserved in that of the banking city of Kalispell, county seat ofFlathead County, Mont., by CalispeU Lake, and by the CalispellMountains. The name Pend d'Oreilles is preserved in Pend OreilleLake in northern Idaho and in Pend OreiUe River in Montana, Idaho,3,nd Washington.Kutenai. This tribe occupied the extreme northern part of Idaho.(See Montana.)Nez Perce. A French appellation signifying "pierced noses." Alsocalled:A'dal-k'ato'igo, Kiowa name, signifying "people with hair cut acrossthe forehead."Aniporspi, Calapooya name.A-pa-o-pa, Atsina name (Long, 1823). 8WANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 401 A-pu-pe', Crow name, signifying "to paddle," "paddles."Blue Muds, name applied by traders.Chopunnish, Lewis and Clark.Green Wood Indians, Henry-Thompson Journal.I'-na-cp6, Quapaw name.KamQ'inu, own name.Ko-mun'-i-tup'-i-o, Siksika name.Mikadeshitchfsi, Kiowa Apache name.Nimipu, own name, signifying "the people."Pa ka'-san-tse, Osage name, signifying "plaited hair over the forehead."Pe ga'-zan-de, Kansa name.Pierced Noses, English translation of name.Po'-ge-hdo-ke, Dakota name.Sa-6ptin, Okanagon name.Shi'wanlsh, Tenino name for this tribe and the Cayuse, signifying "strangersfrom up the river."Tchaxsukush, Caddo name.Thoig'a-rik-kah, Shoshoni name, signifying "louse eaters(?)."Tsuharukats, Pawnee name.Tsutpgli, own name.Connections.?The Nez Perc6 Indians were the best known tribe ofthe Shahaptian division of the Shapwailutan hnguistic stock, to whichthey gave the name commonly apphed to them by Sahsh tribes.Location.?The Nez Perc6 occupied a large part of central Idaho, andsections of southeastern Washington and northeastern Oregon. (Seealso Montana and Oklahoma.)SubdivisionsThe following bands are given by Spinden (1908):Alpowe'ma, on Alpaha (Alpowa) Creek.Atskaaiwawixpu, at the mouth of the northern fork of Clearwater River.Esnime, Slate Creek Band, the Upper Salmon River Indians.Hasotino, at Hasutin, opposite Asotin City, Wash.Hatweme, on Hatweh Creek.Hcswdiwewipu, at the month of Asotin Creek.Hinsepu, at Hansens Ferry on the Grande Ronde.Imndma, on Imnaha River.Inantoinu, at the mouth of Joseph Creek.Is&wisnemepu, near Zindels, on the Grande Ronde.Iwatoinu, at Kendrick on Potlatch Creek.Kamiaxpu, at Kamiah, at the mouth of Lawyer's Creek; this band also calledUyame.Lamtdma, on Salmon River.Lapweme, on Lapwai and Sweetwater Creeks.Makapu, on Cottonwood or Maka Creek.Painima, near Peck, on Clearwater River.Pipu'Inlmu, on Big Canon Creek.Saiksaikinpu, on the upper portion of the Southern Fork of Clearwater River.Sakdnma, between the mouth of Salmon River and the mouth of Grande Ronde.Sdlwepu, on the Middle Fork of Clearwater River, about 5 miles above Kooskia,Idaho. 402 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145Saxsano, about 4 miles above Asotin City, Wash., on the east side of Snake River.Simlnekempu, at Lewiston, Idaho.Taksehepu, at Agatha on Clearwater River.Tamanmu, at the mouth of Salmon River.Tewepu, at the mouth of Oro Fino Creek.Toiknimapu, above Joseph Creek on the north side of the Grande Ronde.Tsokolaikiinma, between Lewiston and Alpowa Creek.Tuke'llklikespu, at Big Eddy.Tukpame, on the lower portion of the South Fork of Clearwater River.Tunfehepu, at Juliaetta on Potlatch Creek.Walwdma, in Willowa Valley.WewI'me, at the mouth of the Grande Ronde.Witkispu, about 3 miles below Alpowa Creek, on the east side of Snake River.Yakt5'Inu, at the mouth of Potlatch Creek,Yat6lnu, on Pine Creek.The Nuksiwepu, Sahatpu, Wawawipu, Almotipu, Pinewewewixpu, Tokalatoinu,and other bands extended about 80 miles down Snake River from Lewiston.History.?In 1805 Lewis and Clark passed through the territory ofthe Nez Perc6 Indians. The first friction between this tribe andthe Whites followed upon the discovery of gold in the West and theconsequent influx of miners and settlers. By treaties concluded in1855 and 1863 they ceded all of their lands to the United StatesGovernment with the exception of one large reservation. The occu-pants of Wallowa Valley refused to agree to the final cessions, and theNez Perc^ war of 1877 resulted, distinguished by the masterly retreatof Chief Joseph toward the Canadian line, which was almost attainedby him before he was overtaken. Joseph and his followers to thenumber of 450 were sent to Oklahoma, but they lost so heavily fromdisease that in 1885 they were removed to the Colville Reservation,Wash., where a few still hve.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates a population of 4,000Nez Perce in 1780. In 1805 Lewis and Clark computed the totalnumber at 6,000, if we deduct the estimated population of the twotribes later reckoned as distinct. Wilkes (1849) gives 3,000 and Gibbs(1877) estimates more than 1,700 in 1853. In 1885 the official figurewas 1,437. In 1906 there were 1,534 on Lapwai Reservation and 83on Colville Reservation, Wash. The census of 1910 reported 1,259,of whom 1,035 were in Idaho. The Report of The United StatesIndian Office for 1923 gave 1,415 and the report for 1937, 1,426. In1930 the Shahaptian division of the Shapwailutan stock numbered4,119.Connections in which they have become noted.?The Nez Perc6 haveclaims to remembrance, (1) as the largest and most powerful tribeof the Shapwailutan stock, (2) as having given a name applied to themto the principal division of the formerly independent Shahaptian SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 403family. From this tribe Nez Perce County, Idaho, and the post villageof Nezperce in Lewis County derive their names.Paiute, Northern. Indians of this group entered the southwesternpart of Idaho at times. (See Nevada.)Palouse. This tribe extended up the Palouse River into Idaho. (SeeWashington.)Salish, or Flathead. The present State of Idaho was visited to someextent by Indians of this tribe. (See Montana.)Shoshoni, Northern. Significance of the word Shoshoni is unknown.Also called:Aliatan, a name taken originally from that of the Ute and subsequentlyapplied to many Shoshoni tribes, including the Shoshoni proper.Bik-ta'-she, Crow name, signifying "grass lodges."E-wu-h"a'-wu-si, Arapaho name, signifying "people that use grass or bark fortheir houses or huts."Gens du Serpent, by the French.Ginebigonini, Chippewa name, signifying "snake men."Kinebikowininiwak, Algonkin name, signifying "serpents."Ma-buc-sho-roch-pan-ga, Hidatsa name.Mikd-ati, Hidatsa name, signifying "grass lodges."Mi'kyashe, Crow name, signifying "grass lodges."Pezhi'-wokeyotila, Teton Dakota name, signifying "grass-thatch dwellers."Pi-ci'-kse-ni-tup'i-o, Siksika name.Sin-te'-hda wi-ca-sa, Yankton Dakota name, signifying "rattlesnake Indians."Sisfzhanin, Atsina name signifying "rattlesnake men."Snake Indians, common English name.Sn6a, Okanagon name.Wdkidohka-numak, Mandan name, signifying "snake man."W6s'anikaci?ga, Omaha and Ponca name, signifying "snake people."Zuz^ca widdsa, Teton Dakota name, signifying "snake people."Connections.?The Northern Shoshoni belonged to the Shoshoni-Comanche dialectic group of the Shoshonean division of the Uto-Aztecan linguistic family.Location.?The Northern Shoshoni occupied eastern Idaho, exceptthe territory held by the Bannock; western Wyoming; and north-eastern Utah. SubdivisionsTheir only subdivisions were a number of bands headed by popular chiefs, themake up of which was constantly shifting.VillagesLemhi and Central Idaho : Bohodai, near the junction of Middle Fork with the Salmon, and an unnamedsite on upper Salmon River where a few famihes from Sohodai sometimeswintered.Guembeduka, about 7 miles north of the town of Salmon.Padai, scattered along Lemhi River about Salmon. 404 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145Pagadut,. on Red Rock Creek, about Lima, Mont. ; possibly a few families livednear Dillon, Mont.Pasasigwana, at a warm spring in the mountains north of Clayton.Pasimadai, on Upper Salmon River.Sohodai, on the upper Middle Fork of Salmon River, near Three Rivers.Fort Hall Shoshoni:No band names given.Bannock Creek (Kamdiika) Shoshoni (Pocatello's Band) : Biagamugep, the principal village, near Kelton.Cache Valley (Pangwiduka) Kwagunogwai:Along the Logan River above its junction with the Little Bear River.Salt Lake Valley:There are said to have been bands in the Ogden, Weber, and Salt Lake Valleys,but their names have not been preserved; they are sometimes called Ute, butSteward is certain that they were affiliated with the Shoshoni.History.?At one time the Northern Shoshoni extended farthereastward into the Plains but there is no reason to suppose that theydid not at the same time retain the mountain territories later held bythem. They were affected only indirectly by the Spanish settlementsto the south and southwest. In 1805 they were met by Lewis andClark who were guided by a famous woman of their nation, Sacagawea,and from that time on contact with the Americans became fairlycommon. The Northern Shoshoni, particularly those under the famouschief Washakie, were unusually friendly to the Whites. They werefinally gathered upon the Lemhi and Fort Fall Reservations in Idahoand the Wind River Reservation in Wyoming. By the Treaty ofFort Bridger, July 3, 1868, the eastern bands of the Shoshoni andBannock ceded aU rights to their territories in Wyoming and Idahoexcept the Wind River Reservation in the former state for the Sho-shoni and a reservation to be set apart for the Bannock whenever theydesired it. On July 30, 1869, Fort Hall Reservation was set asidefor the Bannock but subsequently occupied in part by the Shoshoni.February 12, 1875, the Lemhi Reservation was established for thesetwo tribes and the Sheepeater band of Western Shoshoni.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated 4,500 in the year 1845,including the Western Shoshoni. The United States Census of 1910gave 3,840 '^Shoshoni," of which number about 2,000 appear to havebelonged to this division. The Report of the OfRce for Indian Affairsof 1917 indicated about 2,200. The census of 1930 reported 3,994for the Northern and Western Shoshoni combined, but in 1937 theUnited States Office of Indian Affairs reported 3,650 NorthernShoshoni alone.Connections in which they have become nendent status. Raygives the following villages and camps:Nespelim villages:Haimisahun, a summer settlement of the Suspiluk, on the north bank of Co-lumbia River about a half mile above the mouth of Nespelem River.Masmasalimk, home of the Smasmasalimkuwa, approximately a mile and ahalf above Skik.Nekuktshiptin, home of the Snekuktshiptimuk, at the site of the presentCondon's Ferry, on the north side of the river.Nspilem, home of the Snspiluk, on the lower Nespelem from the falls to themouth of the river.Salkuahuwithl, home of the Salkuahuwithlau, across the river from the presenttown of Barry.Skik, home of the Skik, about a mile above Salkuahuwithl on the same side ofthe river.Skthlamchin, fishing grounds of the Salkuahuwithlau, across the river from themouth of the Grand Coulee.Sanpoil villages:Enthlukaluk, about a mile and a half north of the mouth of the river.Hahsulauk, home of the Shahsulauhuwa, near Plum.Hulalst, home of the S-hulalstu, at Whitestone, about 8 miles above Npuiluk.Hwatsam, a winter camp, about 3 miles above Snukeilt.Kakarnkam, on the islands in the Sanpoil River a short distance above themouth.Kathlpuspusten, home of the Kathlpuspustenak, about a mile above Plum, onthe opposite side of the river.Ketapkunulak, on the banks of the Columbia just east of the Sanpoil River.Naak, home of the Snaakau, about a mile below Plum but on the north side ofthe river.Nhohogus, fishing grounds of the S-hulalstu.Npokstian, a winter camp, about 2 miles above Hwatsam.Npuiluk, home of the Snpuiluk, at the mouth of Sanpoil River, made up of thefollowing camps: Snkethlkukwiliskanan, near the present landing of theKeller ferry; a branch of the last called by the same name, several hundredyards north of the first between the clifif and the Sanpoil River, on the westside; Kethltselchin, on the first bench above the Columbia, west of theSanpoil River.Nthlahoitk, a winter camp of the Snpuiluk, about halfway between Skthlam-chin and Naak.Saamthlk, home of the Saamthlk, on the opposite side of the river from Kathl-puspusten.Skekwilk, on the west side of Sanpoil River about a mile above the mouth. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 439Snputlem, on the east bank of Sanpoil River, about an eighth of a mile abovethe mouth.Snukeilt, home of the Snukeiltk, on the west side of Columbia River about }^mile above the mouth of Spokane River.Tkukualkuhun, home of the Stkukualkuhunak, at Rodger's Bar just acrossthe river from Hunters.Tsaktsikskin, a winter camp of the Snpuiluk, about a half mile below Naak.Wathlwathlaskin, home of the Swathlwathlaskink, }i mile up the river fromNthlahoitk.Temporary camp sites of the Sanpoil on Sanpoil River; beginning with the firsttemporary camp beyond Npuiluk:Enluhulak, about 3 miles above the mouth of the river.Ksikest, on the west side of the river about halfway between the ColumbiaRiver and Keller.Aklaiyuk, H mile above Ksikest.Snkloapeten, a short distance below Keller.Pupesten, at the present site of Keller.Nmhoyam, about a quarter of a mile north of Keller.Nhwiipam, a mile above Alice Creek on the east side of the river.Seaachast, at Alice Creek.Achhulikipastem, about half a mile north of Alice Creek.Nloklokekuelikten, about 2 miles south of Cash Creek.Nhatlchinitk, on the west side of the river at Cash Creek.Snthulusten, on the east side of the river at the foot of a cliff, about }i mile aboveCash Creek.Nlupiam, 1^ miles above Snthulusten, on the same side of the river.Slakumulemk, directly across the river from Nlupiam.Nklakachin, on the east side of the river, at Thirty-mile Creek.Malt, J^ mile above Thirty-mile Creek.Lulukhum, at Devil's Elbow.The following possible camp sites are higher up:Akthlkapukwithlp, 8 miles below West Fork.Kthliipus, at the present site of Republic.Tkwiip, near the creek at West Fork.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates 800 Sanpoil in 1780 butRay (1932) raises this to 1,600-1,700, and considers that there wereabout 1,300 immediately following the middle of the nineteenthcentury. In 1905 the United States Indian Office returned 324Sanpoil and 41 Nespelim; in 1910 the census gave 240 and 46; in1913, as the result of a survey, the Office of Indian Affairs returned202 and 43.Connection in which they have become noted.?Sanpoil River, anorthern tributary of the Columbia, perpetuates the name of theSanpoil. Nespelem River is named for the subgroup, and a town.Satsop. Significance unknown.Connections.?The Satsop belonged to the coastal division of theSalishan linguistic family, and have usually been classed with theLower Chehalis. 440 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Location.?On Satsop River, a branch of the Chehalis.Population.?The population of the Satsop is usually given withthat of the Chehalis (q. v.), but in 1888 a census of the Satsop alone,obtained by Olson (1936), gave 12.Connections in which they have become noted.?Satsop River and avillage called Satsop in Grays Harbor County preserve the name ofthe Satsop.Semiahmoo. Significance unknown. Also called:Birch Bay Indians, from a place occupied by them.Connections.?The Semiahmoo belonged to the coastal division ofthe Salishan linguistic stock.Location.?About Semiahmoo Bay in northwest Washington andsouthwest British Columbia.Population.?In 1843 the Semiahmoo numbered 300; in 1909 therewere 38 in British Columbia; none were enumerated on the Americanside of the line.Connections in which they have become noted.?The name of theSemiahmoo is preserved in Semiahmoo Bay and a township in What-com County, Wash.Senijextee. Significance unknown. Also called:Lake Indians, a popular name for them because they lived on the ArrowLakes.Connections.?The Senijextee belonged to the inland division of theSalishan Hnguistic stock, and were most closely connected with theSanpoil.Location.?On both sides of the Columbia River from Kettle Fallsto the Canadian boundary, the valley of Kettle River, KootenayRiver from its mouth to the first falls, and the region of the ArrowLakes, B. C. The Lake Indians on the American side were placedon Colville Reservation.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates their numbers at 500 in1780. In 1909 the United States Office of Indian Affairs reported ^342on ColviUe Reservation. The census of 1910 identifies them withthe Colville and returns 785.Sinkaietk. Significance unknown; an Anghcized form of their ownname.Connections.?The Sinkaietk are sometimes classed with theOkanagon, and called Lower Okanagon, both constituting a dialecticgroup of interior SaHshan Indians.Location.?Okanagan River from its mouth nearly to the mouth ofthe Similkameen. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 441SubdivisionsKartar, from the foot of Lake Omak to the Columbia River.Konkonelp, winter sites, from about 3 miles above Malott to the turn of theOkanagan River at Omak.Tonasket, from Riverside upstream to Tonasket.Tukoratum, winter sites, from Condon's Ferry on the Columbia to the mouthof the Okanagan River and up the latter to about 4 miles above Mouse, Wash.Ray (1932) mentions four villages belonging to the Kartar and TukoratumBands.Population.?Included with the Okanagon (q. v.).Sinkakaius. Meaning "between people."Connections.?The Sinkakaius belonged to the interior division ofthe Salishan linguistic stock and were composed largely of peoplefrom the Tukoratum Band of Sinkaietk and the Moses Columbiapeople.Location.?Between Columbia River and the Grand Coulee in thelatitude of Waterville.Skagit. Significance imknown. Also called:Hum-a-luh, own name, meaning "the people."Connections.?The Skagit belonged to the coastal division of theSalishan linguistic stock.Location.?On Skagit and Stillaguamish Rivers except about theirmouths. Subdivisions and Villages(Smith, 1941)Base'lelotsed, on Skagit River from Van Horn to roughly 3 miles above Rock-port and Sauk River almost to the mouth of Suiattle, including the village ofTca'gwalk, at the mouth of Sauk River.Baska'dsadsiuk, on the south bank of Skagit River from Hamilton to Birdsview,including a village opposite Hamilton.Baske'kwiuk, on Skagit River above Rockport, including a village at MarbleMount at the mouth of the Cascade River.Baslo'halok, on the north bank of the Skagit from Hamilton to Birdsview, includ-ing a settlement at Hamilton.Duwa'ha, on the mainland drainages from South Bellingham to Bayview includ-ing part of Lake Whatcom, Lake Saniish and Samish River, including the villageof Batsla'thllaos, at Bayview on Padilla Bay.Nookachamps. on Skagit River from Mount Vernon to Sedro WooUey and Nooka-champs River drainage including Big Lake, including a village back of MountVernon just below the concrete bridge, and Tsla'tlabsh on Big Lake.Sauk, on Sauk River above the confluence of the Suiattle River, including a settle-ment on Sauk prairie above Darrington.Sba'leuk, on Skagit River from above Birdsview to above Concrete, including avillage at Concrete.Sikwigwi'lts, on Skagit River from Sedro Woolley to below Lyman, including avillage on the flats near Sedro Woolley. 442 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Stillaguamish, on Stillaguamish River from Arlington up, including villages atArlington and Trafton.Suiattle, on Suiattle River, including a village not far about the mouth ofSuiattle River.Tcubaa'bish, on Skagit River from Lyman to below Hamilton, including DayCreek drainage, and including a village at the mouth of Dry Creek.Population.?The Skagit population is given by Mooney (1928),with the Swinomish and some other tribes, as 1,200 in 1780. Gibbs(1877) estimated there were 300 Skagit proper in 1853. The censusof 1910 returned 56 under this name. In 1923 the Um'ted StatesIndian Office entered 221 "Swinomish" in their returns, includingevidently the Skagit and some other tribes; in 1937 it gave an estimateof 200 Skagit.Connection in which they have become noted.?Skagit River, whichflows into Puget Sound, Skagit County, and a post hamlet preservethe name of the Skagit Indians.Skilloot. Significance unknown.Connections.?The Skilloot belonged to the Clackamas dialecticdivision of the Chinookan linguistic family.Location.?On both sides of Columbia River above and below themouth of Cowlitz River. (See also Oregon.)Subdivisions and VillagesCooniac (at Oak Point on the south si4e of Columbia River, below the mouthof the Cowlitz, in the present Columbia County, Oregon) was their principal villagein later times. The HuUooetell, reported to Lewis and Clark as a numerousnation north of Columbia River on Cowlitz and Lewis Rivers, may have been asubdivision, although perhaps Salishan. The Seamystj', at the mouth of CowlitzRiver before 1835, were undoubtedly a Skilloot band, and the Thlakalama andTlakatlala of Boas (1901, and personal information 1905), at the mouth ofKalama River, about 3 miles above Oak Point, had best be added.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates the number of SkiUoot at3,250 in 1780 including 250 Tlakalama. In 1806 Lewis and Clarkgive 2,500 and in 1850 Lane places the Skilloot population at 200.They have now entirely disappeared as an independent group.Skin. Taken from a town name.Connections.?The Skin belonged to the Shahaptian division of theShapwailutan linguistic stock.Location.?On Columbia River from The Dalles to a point about 75miles above. VillagesKa'sawi, on the Columbia opposite the mouth of Umatilla River.Skin, opposite the mouth of Deschutes River.Uchi'chol, on the north bank of the Columbia in Klickitat County.Waiya'mpam, about Celilo. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 443Eneeshur is used by Lewis and Clark for part of the above people, perhaps allof them.Population.?Mooney (1928) includes the Skin in a group underthe general name Tapanash, which he estimates to have numbered2,200 in 1780.Snohomish. Meaning unknown but evidently the name of a place.Also called:Ashnuhumsh, Kalapuya name.Connections.?The Snohomish belonged to the Nisqually dialecticgroup of the coastal division of the Salishan linguistic stock.Location.?On the lower course of Snohomish River and on thesouthern end of Whidbey Island.Subdivisions and VillagesSdugwadskabsh, the south portion of Whidbey Island, including villages oppositeMukilteo on Whidbey (Neg"a'sx) Island and at Newell on Useless Bay.Skwilsi'diabsh, from Preston Point, above Everett, to the southern tip of CamanoIsland, including a village at Marysville and Tcatcthlks opposite Tulalip onTulalip Bay.Snohomish, Port Gardner Bay and Snohomish River as far up as Snohomish,including Tctlaks at Everett on the south side of the mouth of Snohomish Riverand Hibolb on the north side of its mouth.Tukwetlbabsh, on Snohomish River from Snohomish to Monroe, including vil-lages at Snohomish at the mouth of Pilchuck Creek and below Monroe 2 milesfrom the confluence of the Skykomish and the Snoqualmie.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated the population of theSnohomish, the Snoqualmie, the Tulalip, and some others at 1,200 in1780. In 1850 there were 350 Snohomish. The census of 1910 gives664, evidently including other bands, and the United States Office ofIndian Affairs, 667 in 1937.Connections in which they have become noted.?The name of theSnohomish is perpetuated in Snohomish River, Snohomish County,and a city in that county.Snoqualmie. From the native word sdo'kwalbiuq".Connections.?The Snoqualmie belonged to the Nisqually branchof the coastal division of the Salishan linguistic family.Location.?On Snoqualmie and Skykomish Rivers.Subdivisions and VillagesSkykomish, on Skykomish River above Sultan, and on the same below Goldbar.Snoqualmie, on Snoqualmie River, including villages at Cherry Valley, on Sno-qualmie River opposite the mouth of Tolt River; at Fall City; and below Sno-qualmie Falls.Stakta'ledjabsh, on Skykomish River as far up as Sultan, including Sultan Creek,including villages above Monroe at the mouth of Sultan Creek and on SultanCreek 4 miles above its mouth. 444 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Population.?(See Snohomish.) The population of the Snoqualmiealone was reported as 225 in 1857.Connections in which they have become noted.?The name of thtSnoqualmie is perpetuated by Snoqualmie River and a town upon itin King County.Spokan. Phonetically Spoke '.n or Spo.qe'in) ; said by some to signify"Sun (people)," though this origin is doubtful. Also called:LecLe'cuks, Wasco name probably intended for this tribe.Lar-ti-e-lo, by Lewis and Clerk in 1806.SEnoxami'naEx, by the Okanagon, from their principal division.SEntutu' or Ssnoyma'n, by the Upper Kutenai from the Salish names forthe Middle and Little Spokan respectively.Connections.?The Spokan belonged to the inland division of theSalishan linguistic stock, and were most closely connected with theKahspel, Fend d'Oreilles, Sematuse, and Salish.Location.?On the Spokane and Little Spokane Rivers, southwardto, and perhaps including, Cow Creek, and northward to include all ofthe northern feeders of the Spokane. (See also Idaho and Montana.)SubdivisionsThe Lower Spokan (about the mouth and on the lower part of Spokane River,including the present Spokane Indian reserve), the Upper Spokan or LittleSpokan (occupying the valley of the Little Spokane River and all the countryeast of the lower Spokane to within the borders of Idaho), the South or MiddleSpokan (occupying at least the lower part of Hangmans Creek, extending southalong the borders of the Skitswish) . History.?Like so many other tribes of the Columbia region, theSpokan enter the arena of history with the appearance of Lewis andClark in their territory in 1805. Teit (1930) thinks it possible thatthe several bands were once so many distinct tribes which have becomefused in course of time, but of this there is no certainty. The Lower andmost of the Middle Spokan, and part of the Upper Spokan, were finallyplaced under the Colville Agency ; the rest are on the Flathead Reser-vation in Montana.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated that about 1780 theremight have been 1,400 Spokan, but Teit's figures would raise this tosomething like 2,500. In 1806 Lewis and Clark thought there were600 but they may have included only one of the three divisions. In1905 the United States Indian Office gave 277 Lower Spokan and 177Middle and Upper Spokan under the Colville Agency and 135 on theFlathead Reservation; in 1909 it gave 509 all together under the Col-ville Agency and 138 on the Flathead Reservation. The United StatesCensus of 1910 returned 643 all told; the Indian Office Report for1923, 669; and the Indian Office Report for 1937, 847. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 445Connections in which they have become noted.?The fame of the Spokanwill rest in the future mainly upon the importance of the Washingtoncity of Spokane. Their name is also attached to a river in Idaho andWashington, and to the county of which Spokane is the metropolis.It has also been applied to post hamlets in Custer County, S. Dak.;in Christian County, Mo.; and in Trumbull County, Ohio; also toSpokane Bridge, Spokane County, Wash.Squaxon or Squakson. Their owti name.Connections.?The Squaxon belonged to the Nisqually branch of thecoast division of the Salishan linguistic family.Location.?On North Bay, Puget Sound,VillagesOn North Bay at the mouth of Coulter Creek and at Allyn at the mouth ofMason Creek.Population.?With the Skokomish and Toanho (Twana), Mooney(1928) estimated that there were 1,000 Squaxon in 1780. In 1909there were 98 under this name, and in 1937, 32.Suquamish. From a native place name.Connections.?They belonged to the Nisqually branch of the coastaldivision of the Sahshan linguistic stock, their closest connections beingwith the Duwamish. The famous Seattle was chief of both tribes.Location.?On the west side of Puget Sound, according to Paige(1857) claiming the territory from Applegate Cove to Gig Harbor.Subdivisions and VillagesSaktabah, on Sinclair Inlet, Dyes Inlet, and southern Blakely, Blakely Island,with villages at Bremerton and on Eagle Harbor.Suquamish, on Liberty Bay, at Port Madison, and on the northern part of BlakelyIsland, with villages at Suquamish, above Poulsbo, and at Point Monroe.Population.? (See Duwamish.) The Suquamish numbered 441 in1857, 180 in 1909, and 307 in 1910, according to the census of that year.The United States Indian OflGice returned 204 "Susquamish" Indiansin 1910, probably meaning this tribe. In 1937 it returned 168"Suquamish."Connection in which they have become noted.?The name Suquamishis applied to a iovm. in Kitsap County, Wash.Swallah. A name applied by Eells (1889). Also called:Swalash, by Mallet (in Ind. Aflf. Rep., 1877, p. 198).Connections.?The Swallah belonged to the coastal division of theSalishan linguistic family.Location.?On Orcas Island and San Juan Island and the group towhich they belong. 446 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 VillagesHutta'tchl, on the southeast end of Orcas Island.Klala'kamish, on the east side of San Juan Island.Lemaltcha, on Waldron Island.Stashum, on Waldron Island.Swinomish. A place name.Connections.?The Swinomish belonged to the coastal division of theSalishan linguistic family, and are sometimes called a subdivision ofthe Skagit.Location.?On the northern part of Whidbey Island and about themouth of Skagit River. Subdivisions and VillagesHo'baks, on the upper end of Penn's Cove, not far from San de Fuca, Batsa'dsaliat Coupeville, Ba'asats between Coupeville and Snaklem Point west of LongPoint, and Tcubaa'ltced on the north side of Snaklem Point about 4 miles fromCoupeville.Kikia'los, on Skagit Bay from the South Fork of Skagit River to the north tip ofCamano Island, with a village at the mouth of Carpenter Creek betweenConway and Fir, and another called Atsala'di at Utsalady on Camano Island.Kwa'dsakbiuk, on the lower reaches of Stillaguamish River and Port Susan, witha village at the mouth of the Stillaguamish.Skagit, on Whidbey Island, from Oak Harbor south to Snaklem Point, with avillage at Oak Harbor.Skwada'bsh, on the North Fork of the Skagit River and the eastern part of WhidbeyIsland lying north of Oak Harbor, with Skwi'kwikwab at the mouth of theNorth Fork of the Skagit, and Tcotab on a point across Skagit Bay.Swinomish (on southern Padilla Bay, Swinomish Slough which joins Padilla Bayand Skagit Bay, Skagit Bay from Sullivan Slough north, and the southeastportion of Fidalgo Island), with the following villages: Kale'kut (not far fromWhitney at the highway bridge), Sde'os (near Lone Tree Point, Shuptada'tci(on Swinomish Slough 3 miles from La Conner), and another village (on SullivanSlough just east of La Conner).Population.?The Swinomish are usually enumerated with theSkagit (q. v.). The Skagit and Swinomish together numbered 268in 1909. In 1937 there were 285 Swinomish reported.Taidnapam. Also called Upper CowUtz.Connections.?The Taidnapam belonged to the Shahaptian divisionof the Shapwailutan linguistic family.Location.?On the headwaters of Cowlitz River and perhaps ex-tending over into the headwaters of the Lewis River.Population.?Mooney estimates the population of the Taidnapamand the Klickitat together at 600 in 1780, but extinct as independenttribes by 1907. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 447Twana. Said to signify "a portage," referring to that between theupper end of Hoods Canal and the headwaters of Puget Sound.Also called:Tu-a'd-hu, own name.Skokomish, from the name of a principal division.Wi'lfa Ampa'fa ami'm, Luckiamute-Kalapuya name.Connections.?The Twana constituted one dialectic group of thecoastal division of the Salishan stock.Location.?On both sides of Hoods Canal. Later they were placedon Skokomish Reservation.Subdivisions and VillagesEels (1877) gave the following:Kolsid, on Quilcene and Dabop Bays.Skokomish, around Annas Bay and the drainage area of Skokomish River.Soatlkobsh, on both sides of the canal from Seabeck and Oak Head to PortGamble and Squamish Harbor opposite.Smith (1941) lists the following villages:Habha'b, at Eldon on the Canal at the mouth of the Hammerhammer River.Li'liwap, at Lilliwap on the Canal.Skoko'bsh, at the mouth of the Skokomish River.Tule'lalap, at the east branch of the Canal at the mouth of Mission Creek.Two towns at Duckabush and Brinnon.Population.?Mooney (1928) gives the Twana, Skokomish, andSquaxon together a population of 1,000 in 1780. In 1853 they wereestimated to total about 265. The census of 1910 gave 61 Twanaand 195 Skokomish, and the United States Office of Indian Afi'airsreturned 206 Skokomish in 1937.Wallawalla. Meaning "Httle river"; called Walula by Spier (1936).Connections.?The Wallawalla language belongs to the Shahaptiandivision of the Shapwailutan linguistic stock and is very closelyrelated to the Nez Perc6.Location.?On the lower Wallawalla River, except perhaps for anarea around Whitman occupied by Cayuse, and a short span alongthe Columbia and Snake Rivers near their junction, in Washingtonand Oregon. They are now on Umatilla Reservation, Oregon.Population.?Mooney (1928) gives 1,500 for the Wallawalla and theUmatilla together in 1780. In 1805 Lewis and Clark estimated 1,600but they included other bands now known to be independent. Thecensus of 1910 gave 397, the Report of the United States Office ofIndian Affairs for 1923, 628, and that for 1937, 631, the two lastevidently including some other peoples. 448 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Connections in which they have become noted.?The name Walla-walla is perpetuated in that of the city of Walla Walla, Wash.;Walla Walla County ; Walla Walla River, which flows through Oregonand Washington; and appears in the name of a small place in Illinois.Wanapam. Significance unknown.Connections.?The Wanapam belonged to the Shahaptian diyisionof the Shapwailutan linguistic stock and were connected closely withthe Palouse.Location.?In the bend of Columbia River between Priest Rapidsand a point some distance below the mouth of Umatilla River, andextending east of the Columbia north of Pasco.SubdivisionsThey seem to have included two branches, the Chamnapum and Wanapamproper.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates their population as 1,800 in1780.Watlala. The Watlala occupied the north side of Columbia Riverfrom the Cascades to Skamania and perhaps to Cape Horn, but alarger territory on the south side. (See under Oregon.)Wauyukma. Significance unknown.Connections.?They belonged to the Shahaptian division of theShapwailutan linguistic family and were very closely related to thePalouse.Location.?On Snake River below the mouth of the Palouse.Population.?Unknown but probably included with the Palouse,which Mooney (1928) estimates to have numbered 1,800 in 1780.Wenatchee (Wina't;ca). So called by the Wasco, and it has becomea popular name for them. Also called:Awena'tchela, by the Klickitat, meaning "people at the coming-out orsource," said to refer to the fact that they occupied the country at theheads of the rivers or above the Yakima.Pisquow, from .s.npeskwau'zux, their own name, variants of which appearin the appelations given them by other Salish tribes in the neighborhood.Tso'kwob.c, by the Snohomish.Connections.?The Wenatchee belonged to the inland division ofthe Salishan linguistic family, their nearest relations being the Sinkiuse-Columbia Indians. Subdivisions(From Curtis (1907-9) and Ray (1932))Sinia'lkumuk, on the Columbia between Entiat Creek and Wenatchee River.Sinkumchi'muk, at the mouth of the Wenatchee.Sinpusko'isok, at the forks of the Wenatchee, where the town of Leavenworthnow stands. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 449Sintia'tkumuk, along Entiat Creek.Stske'tamihu, 6 miles down river from the present town of Wenatchee.Minor divisions mentioned are the foliowing:Camiltpaw, on the east side of Columbia River.Shanwappom, on the headwaters of Cataract (Klickitat) and Tapteel Rivers.Siapkat, at a place of this name on the east bank of Columbia River, aboutBishop Rock and Milk Creek, below Wenatchee River.Skaddal, originally on Cataract (Klickitat) River, on the west bank of YakimaRiver and later opposite the entrance to Selah Creek.Location.?On Methow and Wenatchee Rivers and Chelan Lake.The Wenatchee are now under the Colville Agency.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated there were 1,400 Wenatcheein 1780, but Teit (1928) considers this considerably too low. Thefour bands of this tribe mentioned by Lewis and Clark in 1805 totaled820. The census of 1910 gave 52.Connection in which they have become noted.?Wenatchee River,Lake Wenatchee, and Wenatchee Mountain preserve the name, asalso the town of Wenatchee, county seat of Chelan County.Wishram. From Wu'cxam, the name given them by the Yakima andKlickitat Indians. Also cnlled:E-che-loot, by Lewis and Clark in 1806, from their own name.Ila'xluit, their own name and from this called Tlakluit.Connections.?They belonged to the Chinookan stock, and spokethe same dialect as the Wasco.Location.?On the north side of Columbia River in Klickitat County.VillagesAtatathlia itcagitkok, on a small island near Celilo Falls, or more likely Ten-MileRapids.Chalaitgelit, a short distance east of The Dalles.Gawilapchk, a winter village below The Dalles.Gawishila, a fishing station above The Dailes.Hladakhat, about 10 miles below The Dalles.Hliluseltshlikh, below Big Eddy.Kwalasints, opposite The Dalles.Nayakkhachikh, a winter village below Gawilapchk.Niukhtash, at Big Edd3\Shabanahksh, 1 mile below Wishram (?).Shgwaliksh, perhaps Klickitat, about 12 miles (?) below The Dalles.Shikeldaptikh, about a half mile below The Dalles.Shkagech, below Crate's Point.Shkonana, opposite Crate's Point.Shkukskhat, below The Dalles.Tsapkhadidlit, a wintering place below Nayakkhachikh.Waginkhak, below The Dalles and the lowest Tlakluit town on the river.Wakemap, above Wishram.Wasnaniks, below Skukskhat.Wayagwa, above The Dalles, the easternmost town.Wishram (properly called Nixliiidix'), about 5 miles above The Dalles. 450 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated that in 1780 there wereabout 1,500 Wishram, but Spier and Sapir (1930) suggest 1,000 about1800. The latter figure is the one given by Lewis and Clark in 1806.The census of 1910 returned 274, and in 1937, under the designation"Upper Chinook," the United States Office of Indian Affairs gave 124.Connection in which they have become noted.?A town in KlickitatCounty preserves the name of the Wishram.Wynoochee. Significance of word is unreported.Connections.?The Wynoochee were closely connected with theChehalis Indians and belonged to the coastal division of the Salishanlinguistic stock.Location.?On the Wynoochee, an affluent of Chehalis River.Yakima. Meaning "runaway." Also called:Cuts-sdh-nem, by Clark in 1805 in Lewis and Clark Journals (1904-5).Pa' kiut'lgma, own name, "people of the gap."Shanwappoms, from Lewis and Clark in 1805.Stobshaddat, by the Puget Sound tribes, meaning "robbers."Waptai'lmln, own name, "people of the narrow river." Both of theirnames for themselves refer to the narrows in Yakima River at UnionGap where their chief village was formerly situated.Connections.?The Yakima belonged to the Shahaptian division ofthe Shapwailutan linguistic family.Location.?On the lower course of Yakima River.Subdivisions(As given by Spier (1936), quoting Mooney and Curtis)Atanum-lema, on Atanum Creek.Nakchi'sh-hlama, on Naches River, and hence possibly Pshwa'nwapam.Pisko, about the mouth of Toppenish Creek.Se'tas-lema, on Satus Creek.Si'-hlama, on Yakima River above the mouth of Toppenish Creek.Si'la-hlama, on Yakima River between Wenas and Umtanum Creeks,Si'mkoe-hlama, on Simcoe Creek.Tkai'waichash-hlama, on Cowiche Creek.Topinish, on Toppenish Creek.Waptailmin, at or below Union Gap.It is quite possible that under the term Yakima several distinct tribes were in-cluded.History and location.?The Yakima are mentioned by Lewis andClark under the name of Cutsahnim, but it is not known how manyand what bands were included under that term. In 1855 the UnitedStates made a treaty with the Yakima and 13 other tribes of Shap-wailutan, Salishan, and Chinookan stocks, by which these Indiansceded the territory from the Cascade Mountains to Palouse andSnake Rivers and from Lake Chelan to the Columbia. The Yakima SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 451Reservation was established at the same time and upon it all theparticipating tribes and bands were to be confederated as the YakimaNation under the leadership of Kamaiakan, a distinguished Yakimachief. Before this treaty could be ratified, however, the YakimaWar broke out, and it was not until 1859 that its provisions werecarried into effect. The Palouse and certain other tribes have neverrecognized the treaty or come on the reservation. Since the estab-Ushment of the reservation, the term Yakima has been generallyused in a comprehensive sense to include all the tribes witliin itslimits, so that it is now impossible to estimate the number of trueYakima.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated the Yakima proper at3,000 in 1780. In 1806 Lewis and Clark give an estimated populationof 1,200 to their Cutsahnim (see above). The census of 1910 gives1,362 "Yakima," and the Report of the United States Indian Officefor 1923, 2,939, but as already stated, this name now covers manypeople beside the true Yakima tribe. In 1937 the population of thesame body of Indians was given as 2,933.Connections in which they have become noted.?The Yakima firstattained prominence on account of the extension of their name overa number of related, and some unrelated, peoples as above mentioned,and its use to designate the Yakima Reservation. It has attainedgreater permanence as the designation of a branch of ColumbiaRiver, a county in Washington, and a town in the same County andState. OREGONThe history of the Oregon Indians was similar to that of the Indiansof Washington. The coast tribes seem to have been affected little ornot at all by the settlements of the Spaniards in California, andthose of the interior were influenced only in slightly greater measureby them through the introduction of the horse. Nor were thesetribes reached so extensively by the employees of the great fur com-panies. Contact with such advance agents of civilization was prin-cipally along the valley of the Columbia River, and Astoria willalways be remembered as bearing witness to the transient attemptsof the American Fur Company to establish a permanent tradingorganization in this region under the American flag. As in the caseof Washington, Oregon and its tribes were first brought to the acquaint-ance of our Eastern States in an intimate way by the expeditionof Lewis and Clark in 1805-6. Here also settlement was delayed untilthe fixation of the International Boundary line and the rush westwardfollowing upon the discovery of gold in California. From the middleof the nineteenth century onward, however, the native tribes wererapidly dispossessed, placed upon reservations, and reduced in 452 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 numbers. At a later period the decrease became less marked, butit has continued nevertheless, partly as an actual extinction of theaboriginal population and partly as an absorption in the dominantrace. Most of the Chinookan tribes were finally placed upon "WarmSprings and Grande Ronde Reservations and on Yakima Reservationin Washington ; all of the Athapascan tribes upon the Siletz Reserva-tion, except the Umpqua, who went to Grande Ronde; the Kusan andYakonan tribes upon the Siletz Reservation; the Salishan peoplesof Oregon upon the Grande Ronde and Siletz Reserves; most of theKalapooian peoples upon the Grande Ronde, though a few on theSiletz; most of the Molala upon the Grande Ronde; the Klamathupon Klamath Reserve; the Modoc mostly on Klamath Reserve buta few upon the Quapaw Reservation in Oklahoma; the Shahaptiantribes of Oregon upon the Umatilla Reservation; and the NorthernPaiutes upon the Klamath Reservation.Ahantchuyuk. Own name, significance unloiown. Also called:French Prairie Indians, by early settlers.Pudding River Indians, by various authors, and adopted by Berreman(1937).Connections.?The Ahantchuyuk belonged to the Kalapooian lin-guistic stock.Location.?On and about Pudding River, which empties into theWillamette from the east about 10 miles south of Oregon City.Population.? (See Calapooya.) Not given separately.Alsea. A corruption of Als^, their own name, meaning unknown.Also called:K^), in the valley of the Bonaparte River to iioar Ash-croft on the main Thompson, Cache Creek, Loon Lake, thn lower part of HatCreek, through Marble Canyon to Pavilion, and on both sides of Fra.ser Rivernear that point. Bands and the Principal Village of EachFraser River Division: Soda Creek (Hatsu'thl or Ha'tsu'thl), Buckskin Creek(Tcukkehwank), Williams Lake or Sugar Cane (Pethltcoktcitcen), Alkali Lake(Skat), Dog Creek (Ratltem or Ratlt), Canoe Creek (Teawak), Empire Valley(Tcekweptem or Tcekiuptem), Big Bar (Stekauz), High Bar (Thlenthlenaiten),Clinton (Pethlteket).Canon Division: Riskie Crock (Pek), North Cafion (Snhahalaus), South Cafion(Snhahelaus), Chilcotin Mouth (Tekhoilups). 596 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Lake Division: Lake la Hache (Hatlinten or Hallinten), Canim Lake (Tskasken),Green Timber (Pelstsokomus).North Thompson Division: Upper Thompson (Pesskalalten), Lower NorthThompson (Tcoktcekwallk), Kinbaskets.Bonaparte Division: Pavilion (Skwailak), Bonaparte River (Nhohieilten), MainThompson.Kamloops Division: Savona or Deadman's Creek (Sketskitcesten or Stskitcesten),Kamloops (Stkamluleps).Shuswap Lake Division: South Thompson (Halaut), Adams Lake, Shuswap Lake(Kwaut), Spallumcheen (Spelemtcin), Arrow Lake.History.?This tribe was encountered by Alexander Mackenzie in1793 and Simon Fraser in 1808. Mackenzie is thought to have beenthe first white man to meet any of them and Fraser was the first toexplore the northern and western parts of their country. They werefollowed by fur traders of the Hudson's Bay Company, among thema band of Iroquois who came about the year 1816. The appearanceof miners in 1858 introduced much greater changes into their liveswhich have since undergone rapid alterations though they have not,as in the case of so many Indian tribes of the United States, beendriven out of their ancient territories.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated that in 1780 the populationof the Shuswap was 5,300. Teit (1909) obtained an estimate froman intelligent old Indian which would give a population in 1850 of7,200. The returns of the Canadian Indian Office for 1903 were2,185; for 1906, 2,236.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Shuswap havegiven their name to a lake and hamlet in British Columbia.Siksika (Blackfoot). In historic times this tribe was on the uppercourse of the Saskatchewan River and extended southward into thepresent State of Montana. Their eastern boundary was in theneighborhood of the 150th meridian, and they stretched westwardto the Rocky Mountains. At an earlier period all seem to havebeen some distance north of the International Boundary. (SeeMontana.)Songish. Name given to the principal band of the group by theWhites, who adopted it, in a corrupt form, from the name of asept, the Stsa'nges. Also called:Etzamish, by the tribes of the south part of Puget Sound.Lku'ngEn, own name.Connections.?The Songish constituted one of the dialectic groupsof the coastal division of the Salishan linguistic family.Location.?At the southern end of Vancouver Island and on thewest coast of San Juan Island, State of Washington. SwANTo.N] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 597SubdivisionsThere were three principal bands or tribes: the Sanetch, Songish, and Sooke.The Sanetch consisted of the following septs or bands: Mayne Island, Panque-chin, Tsartilp, Tsawout, Tsehump, to which the Saturna Island Indians shouldbe added.The following are Songish bands or septs: Chikauach (at McNeill Bay, Van-couver Island), Chkungen (at McNeill Bay, Vancouver Island), Kekayeken(between Esquimalt and Beecher Bay, Vancouver Island), Kltlasen (at McNeillBay), Ksapsem (at Esquimalt), Kukoak (at McNeill Bay), Kukulek (at CadboroBay, Vancouver Island), Lelek (at Cadboro Bay, Vancouver Bay), Sichanetl(at Oak Bay, Vancouver Island), Skingenes (on Discovery Island off VancouverIsland), Skuingkung (at Victoria), Stsanges (between Esquimalt and Beecher Bay) . History.?The Songish were probably iirst encountered by the Greekpilot Juan de Fuca in 1592, when he discovered the straits bearing hisname. Spanish, English, and American exploring and trading vesselsvisited their country in ever-increasing numbers but the greatestchange in their lives followed upon the settlement of Victoria, first asa Hudson's Bay Company post, in 1843. As this rose to be thecapital of the province of British Columbia, it became a rendezvousof Indian tribes from all quarters and for all classes of Whites. It wasat the same time a potent cause of the civilizing of the Songish andof their decline.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that there were 2,700 peopleof the Songish group in 1780; they had become reduced to 488 in 1906.Connection in which they have become noted.?The only claim of theSongish to special recognition is the fact that Victoria, the provincialcapital of British Columbia, was founded in their country. The nameof the Sanetch, a Songish band, is perpetuated in Saanich Peninsulaand that of another Songish band, the Sooke, in Sooke Inlet.Squawmish. Significance unknown. Phonetically spelled Sk'qo'mic.Connections.?Together with the Nooksak of Washington, theSquawmish constituted a subdialect of the coastal division of theSalishan linguistic stock.Location.?On Howe Sound and Burrard Inlet, north of the mouthof Fraser River. VillagesChakkai, on the east side of Howe Sound.Chalkunts, on Gambier Island.Chants, on Burrard Inlet.Chechelmen, on Burrard Inlet.Chechilkok, at Seyniour Creek, Burrard Inlet.Chekoalch, on Burrard Inlet.Chewas, on the west side of Howe Sound.Chiakamish, on Chiakamish Creek, a tributary of Squawinisht River.Chichilek, on Burrard Inlet.Chimai, on the left bank of Squawmisht River.Chukchukts, on the left bank of Squawmisht River. 59S bttrp:att of American ethnology rBnrx. 145Ekuks, on the right bank of Squawmisht River.Etleuk, on the right bank of Squawmisht River.Hastings Saw Mill Indians.Helshen, on Burrard Inlet.Homulschison, at Capilano Creek, Burrard Inlet.Huikuayaken, on Howe Sound.Humelsom, on Burrard Inlet.lalmuk, at Jericho, Burrard Inlet.Ikwopsum, on the left bank of Squawmisht River.Itliok, on the left bank of Squawmisht River.Kaayahunik, on the west bank of Squawmisht River.Kaksine, on Maraukum Creek, left bank of Squawmisht River.Kapkapetlp, at Point Grey, Burrard Inlet.Kauten, on the right bank of Squawmisht RiverKekelun, on the west side of Howe Sound.Kekios, on the right bank of Squawmisht River.Kekwaiakin, on the left bank of Squawmisht River.Kelketos, on the east coast of Howe Sound.Ketlalsm, on the east side of Howe Sound.Kiaken, on the left bank of Squawmisht River.Kiaken, on Burrard Inlet.Kicham, on Burrard Inlet.Koalcha, at Linn Creek, Burrard Inlet.Koekoi, on the west side of Howe Sound.Koikoi, on Burrard Inlet.Kolelakom, on Bowen Island, Howe Sound.Komps, on the right bank of Squawmisht River.Kotlskaim, on Burrard Inlet.Kuakumchen, on Howe Sound.Kukutwom, on the east side of Howe Sound.Kulatsen, on the east side of Howe Sound.Kulaten, on Burrard Inlet.Kwanaken, on Squawmisht River.Kwichtenem, on the west side of Howe Sound.Kwolan, on the right bank of Squawmisht River.Male, shared with the Musqueam, north of Sea Island in the delta of Fraser River.Mitlmetlelch, on Passage Island, Howe Sound.Nkukapenach, on the right bank of Squawmisht River.Nkuoosai, on Howe Sound.Nkuoukten, on Howe Sound.Npapuk, on the east side of Howe Sound.Npokwis, on the right bank of Squawmisht River.Nthaich, on the right bank of Squawmisht River.Papiak, on Burrard Inlet.Poiam, on the right bank of Squawmisht River.Pokaiosum, on the left bank of Squawmisht River.Sauktich, Hat Island, Howe Sound.Schilks, on the east side of Howe Sound.Schink, at Gibson's Lodge, on the west side of Howe Sound.Selelot, on Burrard Inlet.Shemps, on the left bank of Squawmisht River.Shishaiokoi, on the east coast of Howe Sound. Sw ANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 599Siechem, on the right bank of Squawmisht River.Skakaiek, on the right bank of Squawmisht River.Skauishan, on the right bank of Squawmisht River.Skeakunts, on Burrard Inlet.Skeawatsut, at Port Atkinson on the east side of Howe Sound.Skelsh, on Burrard Inlet.Sklau, on the left bank of Squawmisht River.Skoachais, on Burrard Inlet.Skumin, on the left bank of Squawmisht River.Skutuksen, on the east side of Howe Sound.Skwaius, on Burrard Inlet.Slokoi, on the right bank of Squawmisht River.Smelakoa, on Burrard Inlet.Smok, on the left bank of Squawmisht River.Snauk, at False Creek, Burrard Inlet.Spapak, on the right bank of Squawmisht River.Stamis, on the left bank of Squawmisht River.Stetuk, on Burrard Inlet.Stlaun, on Burrard Inlet.Stoktoks, on Howe Sound.Stotoii, on the right bank of Squawmisht River.Suntz, on Burrard Inlet.Sutkel, on Burrard Inlet.Swaiwi, on Burrard Inlet.Swiat, on the west side of Howe Sound.Thetsaken, on the east side of Howe Sound.Thetuksem, on the west side of Howe Sound.Thetusum, on the west side of Howe Sound.Thotais, on the right bank of Squawmisht River.Tktakai, on the right bank of Squawmisht River.Tlakom, on Anvil Island in Howe Sound.Tlastlemauk, in Burrard Inlet.Tleatlum, on Burrard Inlet.Toktakamai, on the right bank of Squawmisht River.Tseklten, on Howe Sound.Tumtls, on the east side of Howe Sound.Ulksin, on Burrard Inlet.Yukuts, on the right bank of Squawmisht River.There were a few more villages at the upper end of Burrard Inlet. Modernvillages are: Burrard Inlet, Xo. 3. Reserve; False Creek (same as Snauk,q. v.), Kapilano (see Homulchison), Seymour Creek (see Checkilkok), andSquamish (on Howe Sound).History.?The history of the Squawmish has been practicallyidentical with that of the other coast Salish tribes in their neighbor-hood.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates 1,800 Squa^vmish in 1780.In 1909, 174 were returned.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Squawmish havegiven their name to Squawmisht River, B. C. 600 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY rBnn, 145Stalo. Significance of name unknown. Also called:Cowichan of Fraser River, on account of their close linguistic connectionwith the Cowichan proper of Vancouver Island.Halkome'lem, said to be a name which they applied to themselves.Hue-la-muh or Hum-a-luh, said to be the name by which at least a part ofthem called themselves.Sa-chinco, Shuswap name for the upper Stalo, meaning "strangers."Te'it, name for those above Nicomen and Chilliwack Rivers, so-called bythe lower bands.Connections.?The Stalo belonged to the coastal division of theSalishan linguistic stock, their nearest relatives being the Cowichanof Vancouver Island with whom they are often classed.Location.?On the lower Fraser River from a point below Spuzzumto the mouth of the river.Subdivisions and VillagesChehalis, along the middle course of Harrison River.Chilliwack, on Chilliwack River; they formerly spoke Nooksak.Coquitlam, in Fraser River Valley just above the delta, but owning no landbecause practically slaves of the Kwantlen.Ewawoos, in a town called Skeltem, 2 miles above Hope, on Fraser River.Katsey, in villages called Seltsas and Shuwalethet, on Pitt Lake and River.Kelatl, in a town called Asilao, on Fraser River above Yale.Kwantlen, in villages called Kikait, Kwantlen, Skaiametl, Skaiets, and Wharnock,between Stave River and the mouth of the southern arm of Fraser River andSumass Lake.Musqueam, in the northern part of Fraser Delta.Nicomen, in villages called Skweahm and Lahuai, on Nicomen slough and at themouth of Wilson Creek.Ohamil, on the south side of Fraser River just below Hope.Pilalt, in villages called Chutil, Kwalewia, Skelautuk, Skwala, Schachuhil, andperhaps Cheam, on lower Chilliwack River and part of Fraser River.Popkum, in a town of the same name on lower Fraser River.Scowlits, in a town of the same name at the mouth of Harrison River.Sewathen, on the coast south of the mouth of Fraser River.Siyita, in a village called Skuhamen, at Agassiz on Fraser River.Skwawalooks, on Fraser River below Hope.Snonkweametl, in a village called Snakwametl, on Fraser River.Squawtits, on Fraser River between Agassiz and Hope.Sumass, on Sumass Lake and River.Tsakuam, in a town called Shilekuatl, at Yale.Tsenes, location uncertain.History.?The first visitors to the Stalo were probably Spaniards,possibly the companions of Juan de Fuca in 1592. In 1809 SimonFraser passed through their country, and his name is perpetuated inthat of the river upon which most of them lived. Afterward tradersconnected with the Northwest and Hudson's Bay Companies enteredtheir territory more and more frequently and posts were es-tablished. They were followed about the middle of the nineteenth SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 601 century by miners and the latter by more permanent settlers. Com-plete opening up of the country followed upon its penetration by theCanadian Pacific Railway and the consequent establishment of theport of Vancouver for trans-Pacific trade.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated that in 1780 there were7,100 Stalo and in 1907, 1,451.Stuwihamuk, So called by the Ntlakyapamuk Salish, significanceunknown. Also called:SEi'lEqamuo, another Ntlakyapamuk name, meaning "people of thehigh country."Smll6'kamuQ, a third Ntlakyapamuk name.Connections.?The Stuwihamuk belonged to the Athapascan stockbut to what particular branch of it is unknown.Location.?In Nicola Valley.History.?At some prehistoric period the Stuwihamuk forced theirway into the midst of the territory occupied by Salishan tribes andwere finally absorbed by the Ntlakyapamuk of Thompson River.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated that in 1780 there were 150Stuwihamuk, basing his conclusions on Boas' (1895) estimate of 120to 150 at a later period (1895).Tahltan. Properly, according to Morice (1904 b), "Thalhthan, acontraction of Tha-sselhthan," from tha or thu, "water," and saelh-than, a verb that refers to some heavy object lying thereon, whichseems to be confirmed by a myth reported to Emmons (1911),though some of the older people told the latter it was from a foreigntongue; some, however, derived it from "thaUa-a, point, the firstliving place on the rocky tongue of land between Stikine andTahltan Rivers; and still others claim that it originated from theexhibition or giving away of a piece of steel, thai, by a chief at agreat feast given at this point in early days, in celebration of thebringing out of his daughter."Connections.?The Tahltan belong to the Athapascan luiguisticfamily, and have usually been classed with the Nahane, but we followJeimess (1932) in treating them separately.Location.?In the drainage basin of Stikine River down to themouth of Iskut River, Dease Lake, and Dease River halfway toMcDane Creek (though anciently the head of Dease Lake was not intheir territory), the northern sources of the Nass and some of thesouthern branches of the Taku in Alaska and British Columbia.VillagesGikahnegah, a fishing village on the south bank of the Stikine opposite Nine Mileflat.Lakneip, a subdivision or village on the upper course of Nass River. 602 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Tahltan, called by themselves Goontdarshage, the modern village, 1^ milesnorthwest of the mouth of Tahltan River.Teetch-aranee, on the south bank of the Tahltan near its mouth.Thludlin, on Tahltan River some 12 miles above its mouth.Tratuckka, a fishing village at Nine Mile flat on the Stikine River.Tsaqudartsee, several miles beyond Teetch-aranee on the rock ledge separatingthe Stikine and Tahltan Rivers.There were some others of which the names have not survived.History.?The Tahltan claim descent from people from severaldifferent dii-ections?-the head of the Nass, Tagish Lake, the head-waters of the Taku, the Liard (or Peace) River, and also from thecoast. Intimate contact with the Whites was delayed until placer goldwas discovered in the river bottom below Glenora in 1861 when somedesultory prospecting began, but constant contact only followed on theCassiar gold excitement of 1874. They suffered in many ways from "White contact, particularly during the smallpox epidemics of 1864and 1868.Population.?Mooney (1928) placed the entire Nahane populationincludmg this tribe at 2,000 in 1780. In 1909 there were 229 Tahltan.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Tahltan are notedas a tribe whose organization has been made over by contact withcoastal people.Takkuth-kutchin. Significance uncertain but possibly "squinters."Also called:Dakaz, by Morice (1906, p. 261).DakkadhS, by Petitot (1876, p. 20).Deguthee Dennee, by Franklin (1828, p. 40).Gens de rats, by Whymper (1868, 255).Klov6n-Kuttchin, by Petitot (1876).Kukuth-kutchin; by Bancroft (1886-90, vol. 1, p. 147).Lapiene's House Indians, by Kirkby in Hind (1863, vol. 2, p. 254).Louchieux Proper, by Ross (MS., p. 474).Nattsae-Kouttchin, by Petitot (1891, p. 361), meaning "marmot people."Porcupine River Indians, by Whymper (1868, p. 255).Quarrelers, by Mackenzie (1801, p. 51).Rat Indians, by Hardisty (1867, p. 311).Rat River Indians, by Whymper (1868, p. 255).Squint-Eyes, by Franklin (1824, p. 261).Takadh6, by Petitot (MS.).Ta-Kuth-Kutchin, by Hind (1863, p. 254).Tykothee-dinneh, by Franklin (1824, p. 261).Upper Porcupine River Kutchin, by Osgood (1934, p. 176).Yukuth Kutchin, by Bancroft (1886-90, vol. 1, p. 115).Connections.?The Takkuth-kutchin were the central and mostcharacteristic tribe of the Kutchin group of the northern division ofthe Athapascan linguistic stock.Location.?On the upper course of Porcupine River. SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 603Population.?With the Vunta-kutchin and Tutcone, Mooney (1928)estimated that there were about 2,200 Takkuth-kutchin in 1670. In1866 they had been reduced to 15 hunters or 40 men in all. Dawson(1888) gave 337 of this tribe and the Tatlit-kutchin ; Morice (1906)estimated 150 in 1906. In 1910, 6 were livinj2: in Alaska. (SeeNakotcho-kutcbin, Tatlit-kutchin, and also Kutcha-kutchin underAlaska.)Tatlit-kutchin. Signifying "those who dwell at the source of theriver [i. e., the Peel KiverJ." Also called:Fon du Lac Loucheux, by Hooper (1853, p. 270).Gens du fond du lac, by Ross (MS)..Peel River Kutchin, by Osgood (1934, p. 174).Sa-to-tin, by Dawson (1888).Tpe-tliet-Kouttchin, by Petitot (1891, p. 361).Connections.?The Tatlit-kutchin belonged to the Kutchin groupof tribes of the northern division of the Athapascan linguistic family,being particularly closely connected with the Takkuth-kutchin.Location.?On Peel River and neighboring parts of the Mackenzie.Population.?Mooney (1928) gives 800 to the Tatlit-kutchin andthe Nakotcho-kutchin, together. In 1866, 30 hunters and 60 men inall were reported. (See Nakotcho-kutchin, Takkuth-kutchin, and alsoKatcha-kutchin under Alaska.)Tatsanottine. Signifying "people of the scum of water," "scum"being a figurative expression for copper. Also called:Copper Indians, from the fact that copper was obtained in their country.Couteaux Jaunes, French-Canadian name.Red-knife Indians, referring to copper.Yellow-knife Indians, referring to copper.Connections.?The Tatsanottine belonged to the Athapascan lin-guistic stock and were later classified with the Chipewyan, but theiroriginal position within the stock is unknown.Location.?On the northern shores and eastern bays of Great SlaveLake.History.?The Tatsanottine derived their name from the ore in alow mountain near Coppermine River which they formerly made intoknives, axes, and other cutting tools and traded at fabulous prices,until the introduction of articles of European manufacture broke themarket and they moved away from the mine toward trading posts inthe south.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that there were 430 in 1670.In 1859 a census, which may, however, have been only partial, returned219. A later estimate by Morice (1906) gave 500.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Tatsanottine 604 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145have become noteworthy merely on account of their association withthe copper deposit above mentioned.Thlingchadinne, signifying "dog-flank people." Also called:Atticmospicayes or Attimospiquaies, by La Potherie, and said to mean "dog-ribs."Dog Ribs, popular English name from their own designation.Flancs-de-Chien or Plats-C6tes-de-Chien, French name derived from theirown designation.Lintcanre, nickname applied by their congeners.Connections.?The Thlingchadinne belonged to the Athapascanlinguistic stock.Location.?Between Great Bear Lake and Great Slave Lake butnot extending to the Mackenzie River.SubdivisionsPetitot (1891) gives the following divisions:Lintchanre, north and east of the northern arm of Great Slave Lake.Takfwelottine, southeast of Great Bear Lake and at the source of CoppermineRiver.Tsantieottine, on La Martre Lake and River.Tseottine, along the south shore of Great Bear Lake.History.?The name of the Thlingchadinne appears as early as1744. It is said that they were gradually forced northwest by theCree but it is probable that this was true of only a part of them, thegreater portion having occupied approximately the same territories.Their later history is bound up with that of the Hudson's Bay Com-pany, the purveyors of European civilization to most of the Indiansof northwestern Canada.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated that in 1670 there were1,250 Indians of this tribe. In 1858 Ross (1858) gave their totalpopulation as 926. Morice (1906) estimated 1,150.Tionontati, Signifying according to Hewitt {in Hodge, 1910), "therethe mountain stands". Also called:Gens du Petun, French name, meaning "tobacco nation," first used byChamplain (1616), on account of their agricultural activities.Quieunontati, a slightly diflferent form of Tionontati, meaning "where themountain stands," used by some early writers.Tobacco Indians, Tobacco Nation, popular English name.Connections.?The Tionontati belonged to the Iroquoian linguisticstock, being most closely connected probably with the Huron whosedesignation was sometimes extended over theno.Location.?In the highland south of Nottawasaga Bay, in Grey andSimcoe Counties, Ontario. (See also Wisconsin.) SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 605 VillagesEhouae (mission of St. Pierre and St. Paul), Ekarenniondi (St. Matthieu),Etarita (St. Jean), St. Andre, St. Barthelemy, St. Jacques, St. Jacques et St.Philippe, St. Simon et St. Jude, St. Thomas.History.?The Tionontati were first visited by Europeans, theFrench, in 1616, and in 1640 the Jesuits estabhshed a mission amongthem. When the Huron villages were destroyed by the Iroquois in1648-49, many Hurons took refuge with this tribe, in consequence ofwhich the Iroquois turned against them, and attacked Etarita inDecember 1649, during the absence of the warriors, destroying themission and many of the inhabitants. In consequence the Tionontatiabandoned their country and followed the fortunes of the Huron,\\4th whom they subsequently became amalgamated. Hewittbelieved that they are represented to a greater extent in the Wyandotof Ohio than were the Huron proper. (See Wyandot under Ohio.)Population.?Mooney (1928) estimates that in 1600 the Tionontatihad a population of 8,000. They are no longer separable from theHuron.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Tionontati werenoted solely for the extent to which they cultivated tobacco.Tsattine. Signifying "dwellers among the beavers." Also called:Beaver Indians, English term derived from their own name.Connections.?The Tsattine belonged to the same branch of theAthapascan family as the Sekani and Sarcee.Location.?On the prairies south of Peace River and east of theRocky Mountains and on the upper part of Peace River.History.?The Tsattine and the Sekani were originally one people,the separation having come about by the gradual penetration of theSekani westward into the mountains. The Sarcee evidently branchedoff from the Beaver. The invasion of the Cree probably had some-thing to do with all this. Some of the Indians of this tribe resortedto the Hudson's Bay Company's posts before there was a post in theirown country. Mackenzie (1801) says that they first secured firearmsin 1782. This was perhaps a result of the establishment of a poston Athabaska River by Peter Pond for the Northwest Companyin 1778. It was abandoned a few years later and never rebuilt butother forts took its place, such as Athabaska Landing, Peace RiverLanding, Fort St. John, Fort Dunvegan, and a post on Little SlaveLake. Mackenzie spent the winter of 1792-93 with one band ofBeaver near Peace River Crossing before setting out for the Pacific.Goddard (1916) states that they are now divided into three groups,one trading at Fort St. John, a second living about Dunvegan, anda third near Vermilion. There is also a large band at Hudson Hope. 606 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Tsetsaut. Name given them by the Niska and signifying "peopleof the interior."Connections.?The Tsetsaut belonged to the Athapascan stock andwere usually considered as a Nahane tribe. Their dialect is said to besimilar to Tahltan, yet they are reported to have branched off fromthe Kaska.Location.?According to Teit, "their [the Tsetsaut's] country layin a strip from near Bradfield canal and the Iskut across the streamsflowing into Behm Canal perhaps to about the head of Boca deQuadra. They occupied all of the upper part of Portland Canal aroundStewart, and Salmon and Bear Rivers. They may have come downthe canal as far as Maple Bay. They occupied all the White Riverand Meziadin Lake basins and one of their original headquarters,especially for salmon fishing, was at Meziadin Lake. They stretchedacross the head of the Skeena River above Kuldo River over toBear and Sustut lakes" (Teit's Note in D. Jenness, 1932).History.?Once a large tribe they were almost exterminated bythe Lakweip and Tlingit about 1830. They once lived further downBehm Canal and were friendly with the Sanya Tlingit until theydiscovered that the latter had determined to kill them and enslavetheir women and children, when they emigrated to Portland Canaland, becoming reduced in numbers, fell under the control of the Niska,among whom the last of them found homes.Population.?About 1830 the Tsetsaut numbered 500; in ISQ^they were reduced to 12.Tsimshian. A native term meaning "people of Skeena River."Also called:Kilat, by the Masset Haida.Kilgat, by the Skidegate Haida.Kwe'tEla, Heiltsuk Kwakiutl name.Skeena Indians, an English translation of their own name.Ts'OtsqE'n, Tlingit name.Connections.?The Tsimshian are the largest of the three divisions ofthe Chimmesyan linguistic stock, to which they have given their name.Location.?On the lower course of Skeena River and the neighboringparts of the Pacific Coast. (See also Alaska.)Subdivisions and VillagesThe following are at the same time tribal or band, and town groups:Kilutsai, near Metlakatla.Kinagingeeg, near Metlakatla.Kinuhtoiah, near Metlakatla.Kishpachlaots, at Metlakatla.Kitlani, near Metlakatla.Kitsalthlal, between Nass and Skeena Rivera. SwANTo.Ni INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 607 Kitunto, near the mouth of Skeona River.Kitwilgioks, near the mouth of Skeena River.Kitwilksheba, near Metlakatla and the mouth of Skeena River.Kitzeesh, near Metlakatla.These were the Tsimshian proper, but in a more extended sense the nameapplies to the Kitzilas, who occupied two towns in succession?Old Kitzilas justabove the canyon of Skeena River, and New Kitzilas just below, and Kitzimgay-luui, on the nortli side of Skeona Ri\ or below the canyon. In a still more extendedsense it covered the Kitkahta, on f^ouglas Channel; Kitkatia, on Porcher Island;and the Kittizou, on the .south side uf Swindle island, northwest of Milbank Sound.Modern towns are:New Metlakatla, at Port Chester on Annette Island, Alaska.Old Metlakatla, 15 miles south of Port Simpson.Port Essington, at the mouth of Skeena River.Port Simpson, between Old Metlakatla and the mouth of Nass River.History.?Traditional and other evidence indicates that the Tsim-shian formerly lived inland and have pushed do\vTi to the Pacific inrelatively late times, probably displacing the Tlingit. Spanishnavigators reached the latitude of their coast in very early times butit is questionable whether any actually touched there. In the latterpart of the eighteenth century English and American explorers andtraders met them and this contact became more intimate as time wenton. Later the Hudson's Bay Company's posts were established atFort Simpson in 1831 and at Fort Essington in 1835, and still latertheir country was overrun by miners and prospectors, particularlyduring the great Klondike rush. In 1857 Rev. William Duncanestablished a mission of the Church of England at Metlakatla, but,on account of differences with liis superiors over the conduct of thiswork, he removed to Annette Island, Alaska, in 1887 with the greaterpart of the Indians under his charge and obtained the grant of thisisland for his colony. A still closer contact between them and theoutside world resulted from the establishment of the terminus of theGrand Trunk (now the Canadian National Railway) among them atPrince Rupert.Population.?Mooney (1928) estimated that in 1780 there were5,500 Indians belonging to the Chimmesyan linguistic stock of whichthe Tsimshian were a part. In 1908 there were 1,840 Tsimshian, in-cluding 465 in Alaska.Connection in which they have become noted.?The Indians of thisstock, including the Tsimshian, are noted for their beaut iful carvings,equaled if at all only by those of the neighboring Haida. They andthe Haida together occupy the very center of the remarkable culturalarea of the north Pacific coast, and their social and ceremonial institu-tions have attracted particular attention. Their language occupies aunique position among tlie tongues of the northwest. 608 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Tutchone. Usually called Tutchone-kutchin, but their connectionwith the true Kutchin seems to be denied by later investigators;meaning of name "Crow People." Also called:Caribou Indians, by Dall (1877, p. 32).Gens de bois, by Whymper (1869, p. 255).Gens des Foux, by Dall (1870, p. 429).Klo-a-tsul-tshik', by Dawson (1889, p. 202).Mountain Indians, by Hardisty (1867, p. 311).Nehaunee, by Dall (1877, p. 32). (So called by Hudson's Bay Co. men.)Tatanchaks, by Colyer (1870, p. 593).Wood Indians, by Dawson (1889, p. 202). (So called by fur traders.)Connections.?The Tutchone belonged to the Athapascan stock andwere probably most closely related to the Han Indians on the YukonRiver to the north and the Nabesna Indians to the west.Location.?Between the Han Indians and the Nahane country.Population.?Hodge (1910), gives 1,100, on what authority is notstated, and it is uncertain how many other tribes may be included inwhole or in part. THE WEST INDIESINDIAN TRIBES OF HAITIBainoa.Connections.?So far as known, the Bainoa belonged io the Arawa-kan linguistic family.Location.?The Bainoa tribe or "province" included all of thepresent Republic of Haiti south of the San Nicolas Mountains,except that portion west of the River Savane, and also southwesternSanto Domingo to the River Maguana or San Juan.Subdivisions(As given by Peter Martyr (1912))Amaquei. Diaguo.Anninici. Guahabba.Atiec. Guarricco.Attibuni, on the River Artibonite. Honorucco.Azzuei. lacchi.Bauruco. lagohaiucho.Buiaz. Maccazina.Camaie. Maiaguarite.Caunoa. Neibaimao.Dabaigua. Yaguana.Dahibonici. Xaragua.However, 1 have omitted from his list Marien and Maguana, which I believeshould be considered distinct.Cahibo or Cibao.Connections.?The Cahibo belonged, so far as known, to the Ara-wakan linguistic family, except that a different language is said to SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 609have been spoken in the provinces of Cubana and Baiohaigua, butthe difference may have been dialectic. Peter Martyr's words renderit impossible to suppose the language of this entire tribe was distinctfrom the speech of the remaining Haitians.Location.?The northwestern mountain section of Santo Domingo,about the Desert Mountains or Cordilleras del Cibao.SubdivisionsBaiohaigua, Cotoy, Cubana, Cybaho, Dahaboon, Manabaho, and mountaiuousdistricts called Hazue, Mahaitin and Neibaymao.Caizcimu.Connections.?So far as known, all the Indians in this provincebelonged to the Arawakan linguistic family.Location.?The eastern part of the present Dominican Republic, ox-tending on the south side of the Bay of Samana to a point near themouth of the Juna River and on the south coast of the whole island tothe neighborhood of the mouth of the San Juan or Maguana. PeterMartyr (1912) defines it as reaching only to the coast just west of thepresent Ciudad Trujillo (formerly Santo Domingo City), but the sub-divisions he names indicate the greater extension given above.SubdivisionsPeter Martyr (1912), gives the following "districts or cantons"; Arabo, Ara-mana, Baguanimabo, Caicoa, Guanama, Guiagua, Hazoa, Higuey, Macorix,Reyre, Xagua, and the rugged district of Haiti to the north.Guaccaiarima.Connections.?Cave dwellers were reputed to live here, from whichcircumstance at least the western part of the territory indicated issometimes supposed to have been occupied by a people who precededthe Arawak, the Guanacahibes, who were also represented in westernCuba. No language of this province is known, however, distinct fromArawak.Location.?All of the southwestern peninsula of the Republic ofHaiti west of the River Savane.Subdivision.'iPeter Martyr gives the following "cantons": Ayqueroa, Cahaymi, Guabaqua,Habacoa, lanaizi, Little Bainoa, Manabaxao, Navicarao, Nimaca, Taquenazabo,Zavana.Hubabo (or Ciguayo)Connections.?Peter Martyr (1912) seems to say that the inhabitantsof this province spoke a language distinct from other Haitians, butthe wording is obscure and may refer to the province or tribe ofCahibo. (310 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Location.?In the northern part of Santo Domingo between theYaqui del Norte and Juna Rivers and the Atlantic and from thePeninsula of Samana to about Point Blanco.SubdivisionsPeter Martyr knew only the following: Canabaco, Cubao, and Xamana. Ifmy interpretation of his words is correct, the people of this province were calledMacoryzes. Elsewhere they seem to be called Ciguana.MaguanaConnections.?The Maguana probably spoke an Arawakan dialectbut their position is uncertain. Peter Martyr gives this as a districtor canton of the Bainoa province, but his description of it extends itso far, and the importance of its chief was so great that I have thoughtit best to give it an independent status. It seems possible that thisis identical with the district of Magna assigned to the province ofCahibo.Location.?In the upper Artabonite Valley, and the valleys of SanTome and San Juan, and Constanza Valley, apparently as far as theBay of Samana. SubdivisionsNone are given.MarienConnections.?The Marien probably spoke an Arawak language andare attached to the province of Bainoa by Peter Martyr (1912), buttheir chief seems to have acted independently of all others, and Marienis sometimes called a "province."Location.?The northwestern coast districts of the present Domini-can Republic and the northern coast of Haiti from the site of Isabellato the Windward Passage. SubdivisionsNone are known. INDIAN TRIBES OF CUBA(After Lehmann, 1920)Baiii. Cubanacan.Baracoa. Cuciba.Barajagua. Guaimaro.Barbacoa. Guamahaya.Bayamo. Guanacahibe.Bayaquitiri. Guaniguanico.Boyaca. Havana.Camagiiey. flanamana.Cayaguayo. lagua. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 611 Macaca.Macorixe.Maguano.Maisi.Maiye.Manyrun. iXDiAN TRIBES OF CUBA?ContinuedManiabon.Marion.Ornofay.Sabaneque.Sagua.Lucayans in Bahamas.Caribs in Lesser Antilles. Agueynaba.Arecibo.Aymamon.Bayamo.Coanio.Guanica.Guarionex.Humacao. Aguacadiba.Ameyao.Anaya.Guaygata. INDIAN TUIBE.S OF PUKRTO KR'O(After Lehmann, 1920)Loaiza.XIabodamaca.Mayague.x.Urayoan.IJtuado.Yagueca.Yauco. INDIAN TRIBES OF JAMAICAHueieo.Maynoa.Oristan.Vaquabo.MEXICO AND CENTRAL AMERICAThe latest and most detailed attempt to classify the languages ofMexico and Central America is that of Dr. J. Alden Mason assistedby Mr. Frederick Johnson (1940). Aside from some unaffiliatedfamilies and some languages of uncertain affiliations, these writersclassify the known languages of this area into 4 great phyla embracing15 stocks and under these in turn 28 families. In his table Dr.Mason also makes use of su( h divisions as subphyla, substock, sub-family, and groups, and he continues his classification down to lan-guages, varieties, dialects, and variations. For our purposes, the minordistinctions are unnecessary, many of them being uncertain and subjectto constant revision, but the phyla, stocks, and families it is useful tokeep in mind, and they may be indicated in small compass by repro-ducing the essential parts of the legend on Mr. Johnson's map, as 612 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145follows, merely changing Mosumalpan to Misumalpan, as in Mason'stext: Phylum SWANTON J INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 613This classification also omits one phylum, stock, and family men-tioned in the text, the Athapascan, disregarded evidently because itintruded into Mexico only at a late period and in fact had no perma-nent settlements there.The words "tribe," "band," and "division" will be employedrather indiscriminately in what follows. One of the lessons resultingfrom any attempt to classify or "give the number of" Indian tribes ? a remark which might be made still more general?is the fact notedalready in the Introduction, that there is no specific definition of suchnames that will apply in all cases. Sometimes a tribe is a tribe becauseof its political unity, sometimes because of its dialectic unity, some-times from a mere "consciousness of kind" on the part of the indi-viduals composing it. A "band" is supposedly a subdivision of a "tribe" but, the definition of a tribe being such as it is, it is frequentlyimpossible to say whether we have a tribe or a band. The word "division" assumes, of course, a larger unit but there are divisionswhich would be tribes from one point of view and divisions or bandsfrom others. Still the application of a name to any group of Indianswhether by themselves or by outsiders means that they share some-thing in common whether that something be a common territory,a common language, a common or similar culture, or a common govern-ment. The common territory, language, culture, or government may,however, extend beyond the tribe. A common territory may beshared by two or more tribes, as for instance in the case of the Hidatsa,Mandan, and Arikara Indians of North Dakota. A common languageis shared by tribes bitterly hostile to each other, such as the Dakotaand Assiniboin and the Choctaw and Chickasaw. A common cultureis shared by numbers of Indians in California who differ in language,and a common government is shared by the five tribes of the IroquoisConfederacy and the several tribes of the Creek Confederation. Forall that, each tribal name means something and a knowledge of them,or at least directory to them, with some intimation as to their geo-graphical and linguistic position, as basal ordinarily to their culturalposition, is of distinct service to ethnologists and ethnographers.Only the names of the most important divisions have been placedupon the map.Abasopalme, a band of Concho Indians.Abra, a division ("province") of Guetare mentioned by Peralta(1895).Acasaquastlan, location of a division of Nahuatl in the Republic ofHonduras.Acaxee, a tribe belonging to the Taracahitian branch of the Uto-Aztecan linguistic stock, located on the headwaters of the ()14 BUREAll OF AMERICAN ETHNOI.OCiY IH. 1,1,14.1Culiacaii River and centering about the valleys of San Andresand Topia. Subdivisions: Acaxec, Sabaibo, and Tebaca; thePapudo and Tecaya are also mentioned.Accerri, a division ("province") of Guetarc mentioned by Peralta.Achire, a division of Guasave at the southern end of their territory,near the mouth of the Rio Lorenzo.Acolhua, one of the three Nahuatl tribes which formed the AztecConfederacy.Aguacatec I, a tribe belonging to the Quichoid division of the Mayanfamily, in the region of Aguacatan in the northeastern part ofthe Mam territory.Aguacatec II, in the Zoque subfamily of the Mizocuavean stock, locatedin the Quiche territory in southwestern Guatemala, in the regionof Aguacatan.Ahomama, a Lagunero band.Ahome, a division of the Guasave about the mouth of the Rio Fuerte.Ahuachapan, the location of a detached body of Pokomam in theeastern part of El Salvador.Aibine, a division of Xixime.Akwa'ala, or Paipai, a Yuman (Hokan) tribe which occupied an in-land territory at the northern end of the peninsula of Baja Cali-fornia.Alaguilac, a tribe whose language resembled Pipil and thereforebelonged to the Uto-Aztecan stock, located on the Rio Motaguain the eastern part of Guatemala.Alamama, a Lagunero band.Amusgo, or Amishgo, a tribe of the Miztecan family occupying awedge-shaped area between the states of Oaxaca and Guerrero,and extending to the Pacific Ocean.Anachiquaies (the Anacasiguais of Orozco y Berra, 1864), a Tamauli-pec tribe about Escand6n.Apache, name given to several Athapascan tribes which invadedMexico in post-Columbian times. (See New Mexico.)Apostata, a Tamaulipec tribe about Burgos.Ara, an unclassified tribe but supposed to be Chibchan.Aracanaes, the Anacana of Orozco y Berra (1864), a Tamaulipec tribeabout Altamira.Aretino, a Tamaulipec tribe mentioned by Orozco y Berra (1864).Aripa, a Waicuri division in the northwestern part of the Waicuriterritory.Atzinca, a division of the Matlatzinca at San Juan Acingo, Mexico.Aycalme, a band of the Concho.Aztec, the most prominent of all the Nahuatl tribes, located on thesite of the present City of Mexico. SWANTON] INDIAN TRTBESl OF NORTH AMERICA 615Bachilmi, a Concho band.Baciroa, a tribe probably cognate with the Conicari and Tepahue andtherefore in the Taracahitian family, located south of the Conicariand between the Mayo and Tehueco.Bagaces, an Aztecoidan (Uto-Aztecan) tribe in the interior of Cost aRica northward from the head of the Gulf of Nicoya.Baimena, a division of the Zoe, in the southern part of the Zoe terri-tory.Baldam, a division of the Mosquito Indians near the Tuapi Lagoon.Bambana, a mixed Mosquito-Sumo tribe on the Rio Bambana ineastern Nicaragua.Bamoa, a tribe of Cahita south of the Rio Sinaloa.Baopapa, a Concho band.Bawihka, a Sumo tribe in the northern interior of Nicaragua, east ofWanks River near its mouth.Bayano, a Cuna tribe (Chibchan stock).Baymunana, a tribe of possibly Sumo affiliations (Misumalpan stock)south of Cape Gracias a Dios.Boa, a Sumo tribe on the headwaters of the Rio Grande near theMatagalpa Indians, central Nicaragua,Borrado, a Tamaulipec tribe near Dolores.Boruca, a Chibchan tribe on the Pacific coast in southeastern CostaRica about Coronado Bay.Bribri, a Chibchan tribe speaking the Talamanca language, andlocated on the upper course of the Rio Tarire in the territory ofthe present Republic of Panamd and adjacent parts of CostaRica.Burica, a Chibchan tribe of the Dorasque division located in thesouthwestern coiner of the Republic of Panamd and neighboringparts of Costa Rica.Burucaca, a Chibchan tribe related to the Boruca and living in theeastern part of Costa Rica in the interior.Cabecar, a Chibchan tribe of the Talamanca division located ineastern Costa Rica inland. A synonym for Chiripo.Cabezas, a tribe or band mentioned by Orozco y Berra (1864) andpossibly connected with the Toboso, who weie sometimes re-garded as belonging to the Athapascan family.Cacalote, a Tamaulipec tribe about Mier.Cacalotito, a Concho band (Uto-Aztecan stock).Cacaopera, a tribe speaking a Matagalpa dialect and living in theextreme northeastern part of P]l Salvador in the villages ofCacaopera and Lislique.Cadimas (Orozco y Berra (1864) has Cadinias), a Tamaulipec tribeliving about Guemes. 616 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Cahita, a Uto-Aztecan tribe of the Taracahitian family living in south-western Sonora and northwestern Sinaloa, principally in themiddle and lower portions of the valleys of the Rio Yaqui, RioMayo, Rio Fuerte, and Rio Sinaloa, and extending from theGulf of California to the Sierra Madre except for the coastaltract south of the Esto de Agiabampo. They included the Samoa(south of Rio Sinaloa), Sinalog or Cinaloa (on upper Rio Fuerte),Mayo (on Rio Mayo), Tehueco (on Rio Oteros), Yaqui (on RioYaqui), and Zuaque (on the lower course of the Rfo Fuerte).Caimanes, a Cuna tribe.Cakchiquel, a tribe belonging to the Quichoid division of the Mayanlinguistic stock located in central Guatemala between LakeAtitldn and the site of Guatemala City and southward to thePacific Ocean.Camaleones, a Tamaulipec tribe about SantUlana.Canaynes, given by Orozco y Berra (1864) as the name of a Tamaulipectribe.Caramariguanes, given by Orozco y Berra as the name of a Tamauli-pec tribe.Caramiguaies, given by Orozco y Berra as the name of a Tamauli-pec tribe.Carib, a tribe not entered upon the map because they were post-Columbian arrivals from the Lesser Antilles upon the northerncoast of Honduras whence they spread to the west coast of theGulf of Honduras and as far north as Stann Creek, BritishHonduras.Caribayes, given by Orozco y Berra (1864) as the name of a Tamaulipectribe.Carrizos, a Tamaulipec tribe about Camargo.Catapa, a Chibchan tribe of the Rama-Corobici subfamily.Caviseras, a Lagunero tribe.Cazcan, a tribe of the Nahuatlan (Aztecoidan) division of the Uto-Aztecan linguistic stock, located in the southernmost part of theState of Zacatecas, northern Jalisco, and perhaps a small partof Aguas Calientes, extending south to Lake Chapala and beyondthe Rio Grande de Santiago. The Cazcan proper were in thenorthern part of this territory, the Tecuexe in the southern part,and the Coca west of Lake Chapala.Chacahuaztli, a division of the Totonacan family.Chalchuapa, site occupied by a detached body of Pokomam Indians(Mayan stock) in the Pipil territory.Chaliva, a Chibchan tribe the minor affiliations of which are unknown.Chameleon, a valley near Naco, Honduras, where a band of NahuatlIndians lived. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 617Chanabal, a tribe forming one group with the Tzeltal, Tzotzil, Quelene,and Chuj in the Mayoid division of the Mayan linguistic stock.They were located in the southeastern part of Chiapas near theMexican-Guatemalan boundary.Changuena, a Chibchan tribe of the Dorasque division, located inthe westernmost part of the Republic of Panamd, inland andsouthwest of Rfo Tilorio.Chapagua, the site of a Nahuatl colony, northern Honduras.Chatino, a tribe belonging to the Zapotecan family living in thesouthern part of the State of Oaxaca between Oaxaca City andthe Pacific Ocean, and on the Rfo Verde.Chato, a Matagalpa (or possibly Lenca) tribe, perhaps identical withthe Dule and occupying part of the Tegucigalpa area, Honduras.Chiapanec, a tribe belonging to a family called Chiapanecan orChorotegan and centering about Tuxtla Gutierrez in westernChiapas but formerly occupying a much larger territory.Chicomuceltec, a tribe belonging to the Mayoid division of theMayan linguistic stock, located in the extreme southeastern partof Chiapas close to the Guatemalan frontier.Chilanga, a division of Lenca Indians in the northeastern part of theRepublic of El Salvador.Chinantec, a tribe constituting an independent stock, the Chinan-tecan, located in the district of Tuxtepec in the northern part ofthe State of Oaxaca, Mexico. Mason and Johnson (1940) givethe following dialectic varieties: Hume, Ojitlan, Wahmi, andYolox.Chinarra, an important subdivision of the Concho living between theRio Santa Maria and the Rio Conchos, State of Chihuahua,Mexico, in the northern section.Chinipa, a tribe placed by Mason and Johnson in the Varohio groupof the Taracahitian linguistic family and located on a river of thesame name, a branch of the Rio Fuerte, State of Chihuahua.Chiripo, a synonym for Cabecar (q. v.).Chiru, an "unassigned" tribe on the Gulf of Panama west of PanamdCity.Chizo, an important subdivision of the Concho living about the bigbend of the Rio Grande.Chocho (of Oaxaca), a tribe placed by Mechling (1912) in his Mazatecstock but by Mason and Johnson in the Popolocan family andOtomanguean stock; located in the northern part of the Stateof Oaxaca.Chocho (of Puebla), see Popoloca. 618 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Choi, a Mayan tribe including two divisions, the Choi Lacandon ofeastern Chiapas along the Rio Usumacinta and a second aboutthe head of the same.Cholo, a tribe placed by Mason and Johnson in the "unassigned"group but by Lehmann (1920) connected with the Choco Indiansof Colombia, in the extreme southeastern part of the Republic,of Panamd, on the Pacific coast.Cholutec, a tribe which has been called Alangue to the exclusion ofthe Diria and Orotina but are properly independent of butrelated to the Mangue. They have been united into one stockwith the Chiapanec called by Thomas (1911) Chiapanecan butby Mason and Johnson Chorotegan; Lehmann (1920) connectedthem with the Otomi. They lived in southern Honduras alongthe Gulf of Fonseca.Chontal, signifying in Nahuatl "stranger," (1) a Mayan tribe connectedclosely with the Tzeltal, Choi, and Tzotzil and occupying theentire eastern part of the State of Tabasco.Chontal (2), see Tequistlatec.Chorti, a tribe of the Choloid branch of the Mayan stock living inthe easternmost part of Guatemala and the neighboring Copandistrict of Honduras.Chuchures, a tribe living in the neighborhood of Point Manzanilloon the north coast of the Republic of Panamd, by some placedin the Nahuatlan (Aztecoidah) division of the Uto-Aztecanlinguistic family and by others connected with the Suma of theChibchan family.Chucunaque, a Cuna tribe belonging to the Chibchan stock.Chuj, or Chuje, a Mayan tribe closely connected with the Jacaltecand belonging to the same group as Choi, located in north-western Guatemala between Nenton and San Sebastian.Chumulu, a Chibchan tribe.Cinaloa, a Cahita tribe on the upper course of the Rio Fuerte, Stateof Sinaloa.Coahuiltecan tribes, the name given a great number of small tribes orbands in the State of Coahuila, Mexico, and also in Neuvo Le6n,Tamaulipas, and southern Texas as far as the River San Antonio.(See Texas.)Coano, a division of Cora Indians on the Rio Santiago, Nayarit,Mexico.Coca, a division of Cazcan Indians west of the Lago de Chapala,State of Jalisco, M6xico.Cochimi, a Yuman tribe in Baja California between latitude 26? N.and latitude 31? N.; Laymon is a northern division.Coco, a Sumo division. SWANTON) INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 619Cocomacaque, a division of Pima Bajo north of the Rio de Sonora,State of Sonora, Mexico.Cocopa, an Arizona tribe which occasionally crossed into Sonora.(See Arizona.)Cocora, a tribe belonging to the Rama-Corobici subfamily of theChibchan stock, on the Rio Cocora in southeastern Nicaragua.Coiba, signifying "distant" (?), the western division of the Cunanbranch of the Chibchan linguistic stock located in the neighbor-hood of the present Panama Canal and westward.Colotlan, a tribe on the river of the same name, closely connectedwith the Teul and Tepecano Indians and therefore in the Pimandivision of the Uto-Aztecan linguistic stock.Comanito, a tribe placed by Mason and Johnson in the Tahue groupof their Cahitan linguistic subfamily and Taracahitian family ofthe Uto-Aztecan stock.Comecamotes, a Tamaulipec tribe about Soto la Marina.Comecrudo, a Coahuiltec or Tamaulipec tribe about San Fernando,Tamaulipas.Comopori, a division of the Guasave north of the Esto. de Agiabampo.Concho, a tribal division in the valley of the Rio Concho above itsmouth and extending westward to the neighborhood of the CasasGrandes. They are placed by Mason and Johnson in the Tara-cahitian division of the Uto-Aztecan linguistic stock. There weretwo major subdivisions, the Chinarra around the salt lakes andsand dunes of northern Chihuahua, and the Chizo cast of theConcho and near the big bend of the Rio Grande; and the follow-ing minor bands: Abasopalme, Aycalme, Bachilmi, Baopapa,Cacalotito, Concho, Conejo, Coyamit, Guamichicorama, Guelasi-guicme, Guiaquita, Julime, Mamite, Mesquite, Mosnala, Obone(or Oposine), Olobayaguame, Olojasme, Polacme, Posalme,Sucayi, Tatamaste, Tocone, Topacolme, Xiximole, Yacchicaua,Yaculsari, Yaochane (Ahuchan or Ochan), Yeguacat.Conguaco, or Popoluca, a tribe classed by Thomas (1911), followingJuarros (1824), with the Lenca but by Lehmann (1920), followeddoubtfully by Mason and Johnson, in the Xincan family. Theywere in the extreme southeastern part of Guatemala near thePacific coast.Conicari, a tribe connected by Sauer (1934) with the Cahita and there-fore assigned by Mason and Johnson to their Taracahitian familyof the Uto-Aztecan stock; they were located about the junction ofthe Mayo and Cedros Rivers.Cooc, given by Peralta (1895) as a "province" of the Guetare Indians. 620 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Cora, (1) calling themselves Nayarit or Nayariti, a tribe belongingto the Taracahitian division of the Uto-Aztecan linguistic family,located in the Sierra de Nayarit, on the middle course of theRio Grande de Santiago, State of Jalisco, and a section of the SanPedro, and including the coast of the present Nayarit. Sub-divisions: Coano (in the barrancas of Mochitiltic in the extremesouth), Huaynamota (on an east branch of the Rio Grande deSantiago), Zayahueco (south and southwest margins of Coracountry).Cora, (2) a subdivision of the Waicuri on the east coast of BajaCalifornia from about Dolores to the southeastern point of thepeninsula.Corobici, a Chibchan tribe closely related to the Guatuso and livingto the east of Lake Nicaragua in Costa Rica.Coto, or Cocto, a Chibchan tribe related to the Boruca and located inthe interior of Costa Rica north of the Gulf of Dulce.Coyamit, a band of Concho Indians.Cuahcomeca, a tribe of unknown affinities located in western Guerrero.Cuercos quemados, a Tamaulipec tribe about Revilla.Cuicatec, a major division of the Mixtecan linguistic family living inthe district of Cuicatlan on the northeastern border of the Mixtec,State of Oaxaca, Mexico.Cuitlatec, a people of unknown affiliations living in the present Statesof Guerrero and Michoacan between the country of the Tarascoand the Pacific Ocean.Cuna, the eastern branch of the Cunan family of the Chibchan stock,occupying all of the eastern part of the Republic of Panamaexcept some territory on the Pacific coast and a small enclave inthe interior.Cuyuteca, a tribe of unknown affiliations living in the State of Jalisco.Daparabopos, a band of Lagunero Indians.Desaguedero, a body of Indians believed to have belonged to theAztecoidan division of the Uto-Aztecan stock, located at themouth of the Rio San Juan between the present republics ofNicaragua and Costa Rice.Didd, a tribe in Baja California of uncertain location believed to havebelonged to the Waicurian family.Diegueno, a Yuman tribe occupying territory in southwestern Cali-fornia and the northwestern part of Baja California. (SeeCalifornia.)Diria, a division of the Mangue, belonging to the Chiapanecan orChorotegan linguistic stock, connected by Lehmann (1920) withthe Otomi. They were located between Lake Nicaragua and thePacific Ocean. SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 621Doleguas, a Guaymi tribe on Rio Chiriqui, Republic of Panam^,.Dorasque, a tribe of the Chibchan linguistic stock living in thenorthwestern part of the Republic of Panama on the Atlanticcoast about the Bahia del Almirante and extending across to thePacific.Dudu, a Sumo tribe placed by Mason and Johnson in the Misumalpanlinguistic stock.Dule, a tribe, possibly identical with the Chato, placed somewhatdoubtfully in the Matagalpan family, and located in the area ofTegucigalpa, Honduras.Duy, a Chibchan tribe related to the Dorasque.Edu, a Baja California tribe of uncertain location but probablybelonging to the Waicurian family.Escoria, an "unassigned" tribe inland from the Gulf of Parita in thewestern part of the Republic of Panama.Estrella, a Chibchan tribe of otherwise uncertain position.Eudeve, a division of the Opata of the Uto-Aztecan linguistic stock,in the southern part of the Opata territory near the Jova.Garabito, given by Peralta (1895) as a Guetare "province," and hencefalling in the Chibchan linguistic stock.Gocoyome, a band of Toboso Indians and perhaps belonging to theAthapascan stock.Gotane, a tribe of the Chibchan stock and Rama-Corobici subfamily.Guachichile, a tribe or group of tribes regarded as connected with theHuichol and classed with the Aztecoidan division of the Uto-Aztecan linguistic family. They occupied a long strip of terri-tory extending from the borders of Michoac^n northward toSaltillo and lying between longitude 100? and 103? W.Gualaca, a Chibchan tribe otherwise "unclassified" living near themouth of Rio Chiriqui in the Gulf of Chiriqui.Guamichicorama, a band of the Concho.Guanexico, a tribe believed to belong to the Ulva group of the Sumanfamily and Misumalpan stock.Guarco, a Guetare band or "province" mentioned by Peralta.Guasapar, a tribe belonging to the Varohio division of the Taraca-hitian family and Uto-Azetcan stock, in the present state ofChihuahua midway between the Rio Oteros or Chlnipa and theRio Urique.Guasave, a tribe of the Cahita group, Taracahitian family and Uto-Aztecan stock located on the Pacific coast of the State of Sinaloabetween the Esto. de Agiabampo and the Rio San Lorenzo.Sauer (1934) gives the following subdivisions: Achire (at thesouthern end of the Guasave territory), Ahome (about the mouthof Rio Fuerte), Comopori (north of the Esto. de Agiabampo), 622 BHREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bri.L. 145and Vacoregue (between the Ahome and the Esto. de Agiabampo).The following names of settlements are also given: Pohui,Sisinicari, Tamazula, and Ure.Guatijigua, a settlement of Lenca Indians in the northeastern partof El Salvador.Guatinicamame, a Mazatec tribe belonging to the Popolocan familyand Otomanguean stock.Guatuso, a tribe which formed one group of the Chibchan stock withthe Corobici Indians, and lived in the interior of the Republicof Costa Rica south of Lake Nicaragua.Guaxiquero, a body of Lenca Indians living in Honduras.Guayma, a band of Seri Indians living on the Gulf of California nearGuaymas.Guaymi, signifying "man," a Chibchan tribe or group of tribes(Guaymi-Dorasque subfamily), in the Republic of Panama fromDavid Bay on the Pacific coast and the Rio Guaymi on the Atlan-tic side eastward to about the present Chame and Salud. Thefollowing are given as subdivisions or tribes: Doleguas (on RioCliiriqui), Move (east of Rio Chiriqui), Muoi (south of ChiriquiLagoon), Murire (about the Gulf of Chiriqui), Muite, Pariza (?),Penomeno (on the Gulf of Parita).Guelasiguicme, a Concho band.Guetare, a tribe belonging to the Talamanca division of the Chibchanlinguistic stock. Subdivisions: Besides Voto, the name of anindependent tribe, Peralta (1895) gives the following as "prov-inces": Abra, Accerri, Catapa, Cooc, Garabito, Guarco, Pacaca,Tayopan, Tice, Turriarba.Guiaquita, a Concho band.Guixolotes, a Tamaulipec tribe according to Orozco y Berra (1864).Halyikwamai, or Kikima, a Yuman tribe on the frontier betweenSonora and Arizona. (See Arizona.)Himeri, a division of Pima Indians of the Piman family and Uto-Aztecan stock living on and near the upper Rio Altar, Sonora.Hine, a Xixime division on the headwaters of the Rio Piaxtla.Hoeras, a Lagunero band.Huastec, the northernmost representatives of the Mayan linguisticstock in the northern part of the present State of Veracruz,southern Tamaulipas, and part of San Luis Potosi; Mason andJohnson mention Potosino and Veracruzano as dialects.Huave, a tribe belonging to the Mizocuavean stock, formerly consid-ered independent, living in the coastal parts of the districts ofJuchitlan and Tehuantepec, State of Oaxaca, Mexico.Huaynamota, a division of the Cora of Nayarit living on an eastbranch of the Rio Grande de Santiago. SWANTO.N) INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 623Huichol, a tribe supposed to be closely related to the Guachichil andwith them forming a branch of the Aztecoidan (Nahuatlan) fam-ily and Uto-Aztecan stock, located in the mountains betweenthe State of Zacatecas and the territory of Nayarit. They aredivided into three principal districts with the villages of SantaCatarina, San Sebastian, and San Andres Coamiata as theirrespective seats of government.Huite, signifying "bowmen," a tribe placed by Mason and eJohnsonin one group with the Ocoroni and Nio and in the Taracahitianlinguistic family and Uto-Aztecan stock. They lived about thejunction of the Otero and Urique Rivers.Hume (1), a division of the Chinantec Indians, (liorotegan family.Hume (2), a division of the Xixime on the Presidio and BaluarteRivers.Icaiche, a Maya subdivision.Ika, a body of Indians in Baja California probably belonging to theWaicurian family.Inocoples, a Tamaulipec tribe about Hoyos.Intibucat, a body of Lenca Indians in the Republic of Honduras.Ipapana, given by Zembrano as a Totonac dialect spoken in themissions of the Augustines.Irritila, a Lagunero band; Orozco y Berra (1864) applied their nameto all of the Lagunero.Itza, a Maya tribe about Lake Pet^n, Guatemala.Itzuco, a tribe of unknown affiliations located in northern Guerrero.Ixcatec, a tribe of the Popolocan family and Otomanguean stockliving in the northern part of the Mixtec territory, State ofOaxaca, Mexico.Ixil, a Quichoid tribe of the Mayan linguistic stock living in an areaslightly west of the center of Guatemala, and including thepueblos of Nebaj, Cotzal, and Chajul as the chief towns.Izalco, a tribe belonging to the Aztecoidan branch of the Uto-Aztecanlinguistic stock, with a dialect regarded by Lehmann (1920) asthe oldest type of Pipil. They lived about Izalco, south of SanSalvador City, El Salvador.Iztepeque, a body of Pokomam Indians, Mayan linguistic family,living east of San Salvador City.Jacaltec, a Mayan tribe speaking a dialect allied to Motozintlec, andlocated around the pueblo of Jacaltenango, near the northwesternboundary of Guatemala.Janambre, on slight evidence Orozco y Berra (1864) was induced toseparate this tribe and the Pisone from the other tribes in Tama,u-lipas, and he has been followed by others without more reason.It is probable that these two tribes were Tamaulipecan or con- 624 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY f Bull. 145 nected with the Pame and Otorai. They Uved in the south-western part of the State of Tamaulipas.Jano, a predatory tribe on the northern frontier of Mexico constantlycomplained of in late seventeenth-century documents. Sauer(1934) believes that they were Apache and specifically possiblythe Mimbreno Apache. (See Apache under New Mexico.)Jicaque, signifying in Nahuatl "ancient person/' a tribe or group oftribes in northwestern Honduras retained for the present as anindependent linguistic stock though they have resemblances tothe languages of the Paya, Lenca, and Xinca. Mason andJohnson express uncertainty as to whether their language shouldbe classed with those to the south or those to the north. TheJicaque of Yoro and Jicaque of Palmar (or Sula) are mentionedas dialects by Lehmann (1920). Mason adds that of Leany Mulia.Jocome, a predatory tribe mentioned constantly in seventeenth-centurydocuments in conjunction with the Jano and said to have thesame speech. Sauer (1934) beheves they were Apache and seemsto suggest that they might have been the Chiricahua Apache.Jova, a tribe connected with the Opata and classed in the Taracahitianfamily and Uto-Aztecan stock. They occupied the upper partof the valley of the Rfo Yaqui, and the following Jova villagesare mentioned: Bacaniyagua, Baipoa or Baypon, Natora, Opar-rapa, Orasaqui, Sereba, and Setasura.Julime, a Concho band.Jumano, a tribe on the Rio Grande above the big bend, probably partof the Suma. (See Shuman under Texas.)Kabo, a division of the Mosquito Indians on the east coast of Nicara-gua, north of the mouth of the Rio Grande.Kamia, a Yuman tribe whose main seat was in the Imperial Valley,California, but which ranged across the international boundary.(See California.)Karawaka, a division of the Panameka.Kekchi, a tribe constituting with the Pokomam and Pokonchi onedivision of the Quichoid family of the Mayan stock, and livingon both sides of the upper Rio Cahab6n, extending westward tothe Rio Chixoy.Kikima. (See Halyikwamai.)Kiliwa, or Kiliwi, a Yuman tribe connected somewhat closely with theKamia and Diegueno and living in the Peninsula of Baja Cali-fornia on the west side of the Gulf of California near its head.Kiwahka, a mixed Mosquito-Sumo tribe.Kohuana, a tribe on the Rio Colorado, (See Arizona.)Ku, a Sumo tribe of the Misumalpan stock located on the middle courseof Wanks River, Nicaragua. SWANTONJ INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 625Kukalaya, a mixed Mosquito-Sumo tribe.Lacandon, a Mayan tribe in the south central part of the Peninsula ofYucatan.Lagunero, from the Spanish signifying "lake people," a tribe or groupof tribes assigned somewhat doubtfully to the Aztecoidan branchof the Uto-Aztecan stock and living about the lakes of the table-lands of Mapimi. The following bands or subtribes are named byAlegre: Ahomamas, Alamamas, Caviseras, Daparabopos, Hoeras,Irritila, Maiconeras, Meviras, Miopacoas, Ochoes, Paogas, Vas-sapalles, Yanabopos.Lakus, a Sumo tribe (Suman family) living, with the Pispis Indians onthe Rio Uani, in Usabane, on the upper course of the Rio Pispisand on the Rio Bambana.Lari, an unclassified tribe but probably Chibchan,Laymon, a northern section of the Cochimi of the Yuman family,sometimes treated as independent.Lenca, a tribe or group of tribes usually placed in a family (the Len-can) independent of all others though the language containsresemblances to Xincan. It occupied the Valley of Olancho andextended westward into the departments of Tegucigalpa, Comay-agua, Intibuca, and Gracias and into the eastern part of ElSalvador east of the Lempa River. The following dialects arementioned: Guaxiquero, Intibucat, Opatoro, and Similaton inHonduras, and Chilanga and Guatijigua in El Salvador. Con-guaco is sometimes placed in this stock but Lehmann (1920)classes it with Xinca.Loreto, a site in Baja California occupied by Indians who constituteda division of the Cochimi of the Yuman family.Macoyahui, a tribe regarded by Sauer (1934) as "pretty certainly"related to the Cahita and therefore classed by Mason and John-son in their Taracahitian family of the Uto-Aztecan stock.They lived on the Rio Mayo above the Conicari and in the hillssoutheastward from the Mayo.Maiconeras, a Lagunero band.Maiinchenos, given by Orozco y Berra (1864) as a Tamauhpec bandor tribe.Mam, (1) a Quichoid tribe said to have spoken one of the most archaicof the Mayan dialects. They lived in southeastern Guatemalaand part of the district of Soconusco, Mexico.Mam, (2) a Mosquito tribe living about the Caratasca Lagoon,Honduras.Mamite, a Concho band. 626 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Manche, a Mayan tribe thought to belong to the Choloid groupunder the Mayoid division of the stock, and located at the headof the Bay of Honduras.Mandinga, a Cuna tribe, Chibchan stock.Mangue, a tribe of the Chorotegan family or substock located inNicaragua between Lake Managua and the Pacific Ocean.Divisions: Diria and Nagrandan.Maribichicoa-Guatajigiala, a small branch of the Maribio or Subtiabaof Nicaragua which in turn is believed to belong to the Hokanlinguistic stock. They lived in the northeastern part of ElSalvador.Mariguanes, a Tamaulipec tribe living about Horcasitas.Matagalpa, a tribe or group of tribes originally placed in an independ-ent stock of the same name, by Lehmann (1920) connected withthe Suma and Tawahka, Ulua, and Mosquito Indians, but putin their Misumaipan stock by Mason and Johnson. Theyoccupied the central part of Nicaragua, extending almost tothe northern end of Lake Nicaragua and north through southernHonduras to the northeastern corner of El Salvador. Accordingto Conzemius (1932), they formerly inhabited the western por-tion of the Mosquito coast. The Cacaopera constituted a sepa-rate dialect.Matlamc, a subdivision of the Matlatzinca which belonged to theOtomian linguistic family and Otomanguean stock.Matlatzinca, or Pirinda, a tribe belonging to the Otomian linguisticfamily and Otomanguean stock, occupying a narrow strip ofterritory south of the Mazahua, extending southwest from Toluca.The recorded subdivisions are: Atzinca (at San Juan Acingo),Ocuiltec (at Ocuila), and Quata.Maya, the type division of the Mayan linguistic family occupying allof the Peninsula of Yucatdn including the present British Hon-duras, northern Guatemala, and neighboring parts of Tabasco.Subdivisions or tribes were the following: Icaiche (east of theRio Hondo in the east central part of the peninsula), Itza (aboutLake Pet6n in northern Guatemala and in adjoining parts ofYucatan and British Honduras), Lacandon (in the south centralpart of the peninsula), Maya proper (in the greater part of thepeninsula and part of Tabasco), Mopan or Moapan (in thesouthern part of British Honduras and adjoining sections ofGuatemala), Santa Cruz (in the northeastern part of Yucatdn).Mayo, a Cahita tribe belonging to the Taracahitian family of theUto-Aztecan stock, living on the Rio Mayo, Sonora. SwANTo.vJ INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 627Mazahua, a tribe of the Otomian linguistic family living in thewestern portion of the State of Mexico and probably occupyingsome adjoining territory in Michoacdn.Mazatec, a tribe in the northern part of the States of Oaxaca andGuerrero and extending into the State of Veracruz. Mechling(1912) made it the type tribe of a distinct stock but Lehmann(1920) afterward united it with Chinantec and Otomian whileMason and Johnson connect it primarily with Cuicatec and placeit in their Otomanguean stock, and they give the followingsubdivisions: Mazatec of Oaxaca, Guerrero, and Tabasco, andGuatinicamame.Melchora, a tribe of the Chibchan stock closely connected with theRama and located in the Republic of Nicaragua northeast ofLake Nicaragua.Mesquite, a band of Concho Indians.Meviras, a Lagunero band.Meztitlanec, a tribe of the Aztecoidan division of the Uto-Aztecanlinguistic stock located in the region north of Tezcuco betweenthe Sierra Madre and Huastec territory.Miopacoas, a Lagunero band.Mixe, one of the two main divisions of the former Zoquean linguisticfamily, now the Mizocuavean stock of Mason and Johnson, in thesierra northeast of the Zapotec in the States of Oaxaca, Veracruz,and Chiapas.Mixtec, a tribe or tribal group in the western part of the State ofOaxaca and neighboring parts of Guerrero and Puebla. Theywere formerly, but seemingly erroneously, placed in one stockwith the Zapotec. Mason and Johnson, who give them anindependent stock position, do, however, place them in one "philum" with the Zapotec, Chinantec and Otomi. Theydistinguish the Mixteca Alta and Mixteca Baja as two mainsubdivisions.Mocorito, a tribe on the Rio Mocorito in the State of Sinaloa placedby Mason and Johnson in the Tahue group of the Taracahitianfamily.Monqui, a Waicurian division on the east coast of the Peninsula ofBaja California between Dolores and Loreto.Mopan, or Moapan, a Mayan tribe in the southern part of BritishHonduras and in adjoining sections of Guatemala.Mosnala, a Concho band.Mosquito, or Miskito, a group of tribes regarded by Thomas (1911) asforming an independent stock, connected by Lehmann (1920)with the Matagalpa, Ulua, and Sumo Indians, and through themwith the C^hibchan stock. Mason and Johnson, however, assign 628 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145them to their Misumalpan stock. They lived on the Atlanticcoast of Nicaragua north of Bluefields and on the Honduran coastas far west as Rio Patuca. Mason and Johnson give the followingas dialects: Baldam, Kabo, Mam, Tawira, Wanki.Motozintlec, a Mayan tribe belonging to the same dialectic group asthe Jacaltec and located about Motozintla in the southeasterncorner of Chiapas close to the Tapachula and Mam.Move, a Chibchan tribe of the Guaymi division, living on the Golfode los Mosquitos on the northwest coast of Panam^.Muite, a tribe belonging to the Guaymi division of the Chibchanlinguistic stock.Muoi, a tribe of the Guaymi division of the Chibchan stork locatedin the western part of the Republic of Panama.Murire, a tribe of the Guaymi division of the Chibchan stock locatedin the southwestern part of the Republic of Panama.Musutepes, a Suman tribe of the Misumalpan linguistic stock.Naco, see Chameleon.Nagrandan, a division of Mangue of the Chorotegan family.Nahuatl or Mexicano, popularly known as Aztec from the dominanttribe at the period of the Spanish conquest, a group of tribesbelonging to the Aztecoidan family of the Uto-Aztecan linguisticstock. They were located from Mexico City eastward to thecoast of the Gulf of Mexico near Veracruz and southeast alongthat coast to the eastern part of Tabasco, southward from MexicoCity nearly, if not quite, to the Pacific Ocean and in the coastdistricts of Michoacan. There was a detached area on the sea-coast of Chiapas and another at the mouth of Usumacinta River;also a number of others as indicated below. There were manytribes including the three allied tribes of Aztec, Acolhua, andTlacopan, and the Tlascaltec, Meztitlanec, Tepanec, the Sigua inPanama, the Desaguadero at the mouth of the Rio San Juan,Nicaragua, and Costa Rica, and the following detached groups inHonduras: Acasaguastlan, in the highlands of Olancho, in theChameleon Valley, Chapagua and Papayeca near Trujillo, andothers near Comayagua and Naco.Nahuatlato, an Aztecoidan tribe connected with the Pipil belongingto the Uto-Aztecan linguistic stock, and living on the east sideof the entrance to the Bay of Fonseca in the Republic of Nicaragua.(See Olomeca on map.)Nata, a tribe of unknown affiliations located on the Gulf of Parita, inthe western part of the Republic of Panama.Nebome, a division of Pima Bajo Indians living on both sides of theRfo Yaqui in the State of Sonora. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 629Nicarao, an Aztecoidan tribe of the Uto-Aztecan linguistic stockaffiliated with the Pipil. They lived between Lake Nicaraguaand the Pacific Ocean in the present Republic of Nicaragua.(See Niquisan on map.)Nicoya, an Orotina tribe of the Chorotegan stock living on NicoyaPeninsula, Costa Rica.Nio, a tribe placed by Mason and Johnson in one linguistic group withthe Ocoroni and Huite in the Taracahitian family of the Uto-Aztecan stock. They lived on the Rio Sinaloa about the mouthof the Ocoroni.Niquisan, see Nicarao.Obone, or Oposine, a Concho tribe.Ochoes, a Lagunero band.Ocoroni, placed by Mason and Johnson in one group with the Nioand Huite tribes and hence in the Taracahitian family of the Uto-Aztecan linguistic stock. They lived on a river of the same name,a branch of the Rio Sinaloa.Ocuiltec, a division of the Matlatzinca Indians of the Otomianlinguistic family, occuping the eastern part of their territory.Ojitlan, a division of the Chinantec of the Chorotegan linguisticfamily.Olancho, location of a Nahuatl division in Honduras.Olive, a tribe said to have been brought from the country beyond theRio Grande by a returning Spanish expedition early in the six-teenth century, but to which of the Texas linguistic stocks theybelonged is unknown, though it was probably either the Coahuil-tecan or the Karankawan. They were settled by the Spaniardsin southern Tamaulipas.Olmec, an extinct people of uncertain affiliations but formerly ofgreat importance.Olobayaguame, a Concho band.Olojasme, a Concho band.Olomega, see Nahuatlato.Oluta, a division of the Popoloca of Veracruz belonging to the Mixebranch of the Mizocuavean linguistic stock.Opata, from Pima signifying "hostile people," "enemies," a tribe ortribal group belonging to the Taracahitian division of the Uto-Aztecan linguistic stock extending east and west from longitude109? to 111? W. and north and south from the InternationalBoundary of Mexico and the United States to the main forkof the Rio Yaqui, about latitude 28?30' N. The Eudeve, inthe southern part of Opata territory near the Jova were a sub-division. Villages were: Ac6nche, Aibin, Alamos, Arib^tzi,Arispe, Babiacora, Babispes, Bacad6vatzi, BacanAra, Bac6bitzi, 630 BUREAU OF AMERICAN KTHNOLOGY [Bi-M.. 14r.Banamitzi, Batsines, Batiico, Batzinei', Chinapa, Cuchuricac,Cucuripe, Cumupas, Cuquiaratzi, Debatzi, Matape, Nacori,Opp6sura, Oppotu, Saracatzi, Sauaripa, Setdsura, Teiiricatzi,Toapa, Tonitzi, Uasserac, U^paca, Vasdabas, Zenoquippe.Opatoro, a division of the Lenca living in the RepubHc of Honduras.Orosi, an Orotina division living south of Lake Nicaragua and belong-ing to the Chorotegan family.Orotina, u tribe living in the extreme western part of the presentRepublic of Costa Kica between Lake Nicaragua and the PacificCoast and connected with the Chorotegan family. Subdivisions:Nicoya (on Nicoya Peninsula) and Orosi (south of Lake Nica-ragua).Osa, a subdivision of Boruca Indians about the Gulf of Dulce on thePacific coast of Costa Rica.Otomi, the principal tribe of the Otomian linguistic family occupyingthe greater part of the States of Queretero and Guanajuato, thenorthwestern portion of Hidalgo and parts of the State of Mexico.A northern division of this tribe was known as Serrano, and adetached body is reported to have lived near the Pacific coastwest of Colima. The Mazahua (q. v.) are sometimes regardedas a subdivision.Pacaca, given by Peralta (1895) as a Guetare "province."Pachera, a subdivision of the Tarahumare at the extreme headwatersof the northern branch of the Rio Nonoava, under the munici-pality of Guerrero. They belonged to the Taracahitian family,Uto-Aztecan stock.Pame, a tribe constituting a very divergent branch of the Otomianlinguistic family. They were located mainly in the southeasternpart of San Luis Potosi but also in adjoining areas of Tamaulipasand Queretero and are said to have extended into Guanajuatoand to have included a mission (Cerro Prieto) in the State ofMexico. Pimentel gives three dialects, one spoken in San Luisde la Paz, one in the city of Maiz, and one in Purisima Concepci6nde Arnedo.Panamaka, a tribe of the Suman family, Misumalpan stock, locatedin the northern interior of Nicaragua. The following subdivisionsare mentioned: Karaw^ala, Panamaka, Tunki.Panguayes, mentioned by Orozco y Berra (1864) as a Tamauhpectribe.Pantasma, a tribe given a doubtful status in the Matagalpan family.Paogas, a Lagunero band.Papabuco, a division of the Chatino of the Zapotecan stock.Papago, a tribe in Sonora and Arizona. (See Arizona.) SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 63 JPapantla, a dialectic division of the Totonac, Totonacan stock.Paparos, a detached body of Indians classified by Lehmann (1920)in the Chocoan linguistic stock the main body of which lay alongthe Pacific coast of the Republic of Colombia. The territoryof this tribe lay on the eastern borders of the Republic of Panama-inland but nearer to the Atlantic than to the Pacific coast.Papayeca, a Nahuatl colony near Trujillo, Republic of Honduras.Papudo, a division of the Acaxee of the Taracahitian linguistic familyand Uto-Aztecan stock, not mentioned by Sauer (1934).Pasitas, according to Orozco y Berra (1864) a tribe of Tamaulipec.Patica, a Chibchan tribe belonging to the Rama-Corobici division.Paya, a tribe constituting an independent family and living betweenthe Rio Agu^n and the upper reaches of the Patuca, as alsoprobably on the Bay Islands. A modern division is called Seco.Penomeno, A Chibchan tribe of the Guaymi division located on thewest coast of the Gulf of Panama.Pericu, a tribe connected on circumstantial evidence with the Wai-curian family though only some proper names in their languageare known. They lived about Cape San Lucas and extendednorthward on the west coast of the Peninsula of Baja Californiato about latitude 23?30' N. No subdivisions are known, thoughthe Waicurian Cora have sometimes been connected with them.Piato, an Upper Pima (Pima Alto) tribe, Piman family and Uto-Aztecan stock, on the middle and lower Altar in Sonora. (SeePima under Arizona.)Pima Alto, see Pima under Arizona.Pima Bajo or Lower Pima, a tribe belonging to a linguistic familybearing their name, itself in turn a section of the Uto-Aztecanlinguistic stock and located in the Rio Yaqui region, Sonora, butextending eastward into Chihuahua and northward to aboutlatitude 30?. Sauer (1934) gives three main divisions: theYdcora, neighbors of the Varohio on the borders of Chihuahuaand Sonora; the Nebome, on both sides of the Rio Yaqui; andthe Ures, inhabiting the flood plain of the Rio Sonora below thegorge of Ures and downstream as far as water was available.He also enters on his map the Cocomacaque in the northernpart of Pima territory.Pipil, a tribe or group of tribes belonging to the Nahuatl branch ofthe Nahuatlan family, Uto-Aztecan stock. They occupied sev-eral separate areas, the largest chiefly along the Pacific coast inwestern Salvador and some adjacent parts of Guatemala; a seconda little farther west, east of Escuintla in Guatemala; a third alongthe upper Rio Motagua in eastern Guatemala between the Choi 632 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145and Pokomam, a small area in Honduras north of Comayagua,another on the Rio Chamelec6n, and a doubtful enclave betweenthe Jicaque and Paya.Pirinda, see Matlatzinca.Pisone, a tribe associated by Orozco y Berra (1864) with the Janam-bre. (See Janambre.)Pispis, a division of Sumo Indians.Pitas, a Tamaulipec tribe about Santander, perhaps identical withOrozco y Barra's Pintos.Pochutla, a tribe speaking one of the most aberrant dialects of theAztecoidan family, Uto-Aztecan stock, and located about PortoAngel on the Pacific coast of Oaxaca.Pocora, a tribe belonging to the Rama-Corobici branch of the Chib-chan linguistic stock.PocosI, a tribe connected with the Cabecar of the Talamanca divisionof the Chibchan stock, living in the neighborhood of the presentLim6n, Costa Rica.Pokomam, a Mayan tribe closely connected with the Pokonchi andbelonging to the Quichoid division. They occupied a consider-able region in southeastern Guatemala, including the capital, ex-tending northward to the Rfo Grande or Upper Motagua, andeastward to the boundary line between Guatemala and El Salva-dor. There were detached bodies in Pipil territory at Ahuacha-p^n, Chalchuapa, Iztepeque, and San Salvador.Pokonchi, a tribe forming with the Pokomam one linguistic group ofthe Quichoid division of the Mayan family. They extended overa fairly wide territory in the center of Guatemala about the head-waters of the Rfo Cahabon.Polacme, a Concho band.Popoloca (of Conguaco) , a body of Indians at the pueblo of Conguaconear the southeastern corner of the Republic of Guatemala.Juarros (1884), followed by Thomas (1911), places them in theLencan stock but Mason and Johnson incline to agree withLehmann (1920) that they should be classed as Xincan.Popoloca (of Oaxaca), see Chocho.Popoloca (of Puebla), a tribe which gives its name to the Popolocanfamily of the Otomanguean stock located in the southern partof the State of Puebla near Oaxaca.Popoloca (of Veracruz), a tribe assigned to the Mixe division of theMizocuavean stock of Mason and Johnson and located on thesouthern coast of the Bay of Campeche extending south to themountains in the Peninsula of Tehuantepec, Mexico.Posalme, a Concho band. SWANTONI INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 633Potlapiqua, a tribe said to have branched off from the Pima thoughin Opata territory.Potosino, a body of Indians speaking a dialect of Huastec, Mayanlinguistic family.Prinzo, a body of Indians of the Uluan division of the Chibchanstock, located in the Republic of Nicaragua north of the RfoGrande.Quata, a tribe doubtfully classed in the Matlatzinca division of theOtomian linguistic family.Quepo, a division or tribe of Boruca Indians belonging to the Tala-manca division of the Chibchan hnguistic family and located onthe Pacific coast of Costa Rica centering about Quepos Point.Quiche, an important Mayan tribe belonging to the Highland divi-sion of the family which is given the name Quichoid by Masonand Johnson. They occupied considerable territory in centralGuatemala about the headwaters of Rio Motagua, extendingthence around the western side of Lake Atitldn and southwardto the Pacific Ocean.Quinicuanes, according to Orozco y Berra (1864), a Tamaulipec tribe.Rama, a tribe belonging to the Rama-Corobici division of the Chibchanlinguistic family. They occupied the southeasternmost part ofthe present Republic of Nicaragua between the Rfo San Juanand the Atlantic but the greater part of them are now on RamaKey in Bluefields Lagoon.Sabaibo, a division of the Acaxee.Sainoscos, a Tamaulipec tribe about Padilla.Salineros, a division of the Seri on the mainland of the State of Sonoraopposite Tibur6n Island.San Bias, a Cuna tribe of the Chibchan stock at San Bias on the northcoast of the Republic of Panamd.San Salvador, name given to a detached body of Pokomam of theQuichoid division of the Mayan family located about the capitalof the Republic of El Salvador.Santa Cruz, a division of Maya Indians in northeastern Yucatdn.Sayula, a division of the Popoloca of Veracruz.Sayultec, a tribe of the Aztecoidan division of the Uto-Azecan stockoccupying two areas, one on the Pacific coast in the southern partof Jalisco, and the other inland, south and southwest of the Lagode Chapala.Seco, a division of the Paya Indians (Payan stock).Seri, a tribe formerly placed in au independent stock but now classedwith the Yuman family and Hokan stock. They lived on Ti-burdn Island in the Gulf of Cahfornia and on the eastern coastof the latter from the Rfo San Jos4 nearly to the Altar, State of 634 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Soiiora. The following subdivisions are mentioned; Guayma (inthe southern part of the Seri territory), Salineros (on the main-land opposite Tibur6n Island), Tepocas (in the northernmostpart of the Seri territory), Tibur6n (on Tiburdn Island), Upan-guayma (near the Guayma).Serrano, a Seri division. (See Seri.)Serrano, a northern division of Otomi near the Rio Aloctezuma.Sibayones (1), a Tamaulipcc tribe about Aguayo.Sibayones (2), a Tamaulipec tribe on the Rio de los Infantes.Sigua, a Nahuatlan (Uto-Aztecan) tribe classed in the same group asthe Pipil and located on the Rio Telorio in the Bahia de AlmLrante,on the Atlantic coast of Panamd.Silam, a Sumo division belonging to the Misumalpan linguistic stockliving on the lower course of Wanks River, in the territory ofNicaragua and Honduras.Similaton, a dialectic division of the Lenca Indians (Lencan stock)located in the territory of the present Republic of Honduras.Sinacantan, a division of the Xinca Indians in southeastern Guate-mala.Sobaibo, a division of the Acaxee Indians in the southern part oftheir territory on the Rio San Lorenzo, State of Sonora.Soltec, a division of the Chatino of the Zapotecan linguistic stock.Subinha, a tribe of the Mayan linguistic stock believed to have beenrelated to the Jacaltec. All that is known of their language iscontained in a vocabulary in the Lenguas Indigenas de Centro-America en el Siglo XVIIl (Ferndndez, 1892.).Subtiaba, a tribe forming with the Tlapanec and Maribichicoa ofGuerrero the Supanecan linguistic family which has been con-nected with the Hokan stock. They lived in the region of Leon,Republic of Nicaragua, on the Pacific slope.Sucayi, a Concho band.Suerre, a tribe of the Talamanca division of the Chibchan linguisticstock located on the Atlantic slope of Costa Rica south of themouth of the Rio San Juan Bajo.Suma, a tribe or group of tribes which extended along the Rio Grandesouth of the present El Paso and westward to the Rio CasasGrandes. If, as is probable, Jumano is only another form of thename, their boundary would be carried down the Rio Grandebeyond the mouth of the Concho. (See Shuman under Texas.)Probably related to the Uto-Aztecan stock.Sumo, a tribe or group of tribes of the Suman family and Misumalpanlinguistic stock in the northwestern interior of the Republic ofNicaragua and a fringe of territory adjoining in Honduras.Subdivisions: Bawihka (east of Wanks River towards its mouth), SwANToN] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 635Boa (near the head of the Rio Grande), Coco, Panamaka (onthe Rio Bokay and Rio Hamaca), and the Lakus and PispisIndians (on the Rio Uani, in Uasabane, on the upper course ofthe Rio Pispis, and on the Rio Bambana), and Wasabane. TheKu and Silam (on the middle course of Wanks River) shouldprobably be added.Sumo-Sirpe, a mixed Mosquito-Sumo tribe.Tagualilos, given by Orozco y Berra (1864) as the name of aTamauli-pec tribe.Tahue, a tribe of the Taracahitian family of the Uto-Aztecan linguisticstock on the Pacific coast northward of Mazatlan, extending tothe mouth of the Rio San Lorenzo and from that point in-land and northward to about latitude 25?30' N. The followingvillages are mentioned: Atamura, Ategualato, Culiacan, Diarea-cato, Guachimeto, Hiluruto, Naboloto, Teboloto, Teculimeto,Yebalito?all but the third situated below Culiacan.Talamanca, a tribe associated with the Bribri and located in centralCosta Rica. It gave its name to a division of the Chibchanlinguistic stock.Tamaulipec, a group of small tribes named from the State of Tamaul-ipas in the central and southeastern parts of which they lived.It is probable that they were related to the Coahuilteco andKarankawa (see Texas), but the merest fragment of any of theirlanguages survives. Tlu-ough the Coahuilteco they are con-jecturally connected with the Hokan stock. The Mexican Pub-licaciones del Archivo General de la Naci6n XV (Reyes, 1944)gives the following Tamaulipec tribes: Anachiguaies (aboutEscand6n), Apostatas (about Burgos), Aracanaes (about Alta-mira), Borrados (about Dolores), Cacalotes (about Mier),Cadimas (about Guemes), Camaleones (about Santillan), Carrizos(about Camargo), Comecamotes (about Soto la Marina), Co-mecrudo (about San Fernando), Cuercos quemados (about Revilla),Inocoples (about Hoyos), Mariguanes (about Horcasitas), Pitas(about Santander), Sainoscos (about Padilla), Serranos (aboutSanta Barbara), Sibayones (1) (about Aguayo), Sibayones (2)(about Rio de los Infantes), Tepemacas (about Laredo). Orozcoy Berra (1864) repeats some of these names, sometimes in analtered form, and adds: Aretines, Canaynes, Caramariguanes,Caramiguais, Caribayes, Guisolotes, Malinchenos, Panguayes,Pasitas, Pintos (= Pitas?), Quinicuanes, Tagualilos, Tamaulipecos.Tamazulteca, a tribe of unknown connections living in westernMichoac^n. 636 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Tapachultec (1), (or Tapachula) a detached branch of the Zoque andso, according to Mason and Johnson, in the Mizocuavean stock.They lived on the border between Mexico and Guatemala.Tapachultec (2), a tribe of unknown affiliations, but distinct from thepreceding, located on the Mexico-Guatemalan border.Tapixulapan, a division of the Zoque tribe of the Mizocuavean stock.Tarahumare, a hispanized form, according to Lumholtz (in Hodge,1910, p. 692) of the native name Ralamari which probably signi-fies "foot-runners," a large tribe belonging to the Taracahitianbranch of the Uto-Aztecan linguistic stock, living in the SierraMadre Mountains and on the headwaters of the San Pedro,Conchos, Urique, Otero, and Papigochic Rivers, southern Sonoraand Chihuahua. The Pachera (at the extreme headwaters ofthe northern branch of the Rio Nonoava, under the municipalityof Guerrero) are given as a subdivision.Tarasco, a tribe forming the Tarascan linguistic stock and occupyingalmost the whole of the State of Michoacan, except for the coastalsection, and some small areas outside.Tariaca, a division of Cabecar Indians of the Talamanca branch ofthe Chibchan linguistic stock living on the north coast of CostaRica southeast of Point Lim6n.Tatamaste, a Concho band.Tatimolo, a division of Totonac Indians (Totonacan stock).Tatiquilhati, a Totonac division of the Totonacan linguistic stock.Tawahka, a tribe of the Sumo group and Misumalpan linguistic stock,living on the upper course of Wanks River, Honduras andNicaragua. (See Tanaxka on map.)Tawira, a tribe of Mosquito Indians (Misumalpan stock) in north-eastern Nicaragua on the coast.Tayopan, given by Peralta (1895) as a Guetare "province."Tebaca, a division of the Acaxee of the Taracahitian family andUto-Aztecan stock, living in the southwestern part of the Acaxeeterritory on the Rio Culiacan.Tecaya, given as a division of the Acaxee.Teco-Tecoxquin, a tribe belonging to the Aztecoidan branch of theUto-Aztecan linguistic stock located inland in southern Nayaritand in two detached areas in western Michoacan.Tecual, a tribe placed by Sauer (1934) in one group with the Huicholand by Mason and Johnson in the Aztecoidan branch of theUto-Aztecan stock. There were two sections of this tribe, oneon the Rio Grande de Santiago and the other on the Rio SanPedro in Nayarit.Tecuexe, a division of the Cazcan Indians, Aztecoidan branch of the SwANTOJJi INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 637Uto-Aztecan stock, living north of Lago de Chapala, State ofJalisco.Tedexenos, given by Orozco y Berra (1864) as the name of a Tamaul-ipec tribe.Tehueco, a tribe of the Cahita Indians on the Rio Oteros, State ofChihuahua.Teluski, a tribe whose exact affiliations are unknown but they probablybelonged to the Chibchan stock.Temori, a tribe assigned by Mason and Johnson to the Varohlo groupin the Taracahitian family and Uto-Aztecan stock. They livedbetween the Rio Chinipa or Oteros and the Rio Urique, State ofChihuahua.Tepahue, a tribe belonging to the Taracahitian family and Uto-Aztecan stock closely connected with the Cahita. They lived onthe Rio Cedros, a northern branch of the Rio Mayo, Sonora.Tepanec, a Nahuatl tribe.Tepecano, derived by Hrdli^ka (1903; in Hodge, 1910) from Nahuatltepetl, "mountain," and aco, "on top of," a southern Tepehuanedivision of the Piman family and Uto-Aztecan stock, living in thesierras of northern Jalisco.Tepehua, a tribe belonging to the Totonacan linguistic stock occupyinga small territory where the Mexican States of Veracruz, Hidalgo,and Puebla come together.Tepehuan, according to Buelna (1891) from Nahuatl tepetl, "moun-tain," and huan, "at the junction of," a tribe belonging to thePiman division of the Uto-Aztecan linguistic stock, locatedmainly in Durango, on the eastern slope of the sierra betweenlatitude 21? and 27? N., extending also into the States of Chi-huahua, and Zacatecas and from the headwaters of the RioFuerte to the Rio Grande de Santiago in Jalisco.Tepemacas, a Tamaulipec tribe about Laredo.Tepocas, a division of the Seri in the northernmost part of their terri-tory on the coast of the Gulf of California about latitude 30? N.Tequistlatec, often called Chontal, an Aztec word meaning "stranger,"a tribe in the districts of Yautepec and Tehuantepec on the Pacificcoast of the State of Oaxaca. It was originally made into anindependent linguistic stock, the Tequistlatecan from the nameTequistlateca suggested by D. G. Brinton (1891, p. 113).Brinton, however, classed it as a dialect of Yuman and this hasrecently been confirmed by Kroeber (1915), who allies itthrough that family with the Hokan stock.Terraba, a tribe belonging to the Talamanca division of the Chibchanlinguistic stock located in the extreme northwestern part of theRepublic of Panama, between Rio Tarire and Rio Telorio. 638 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Teshbi, a Chibchan tribe related to the T6rraba.Tetiquilhati, a Totonac division.Teul, a tribe in southern Zacatacas on the Rio Juchipila connectedwith the Tepecano and Tepehuan and through them with thePiman family of the Uto-Aztecan stock.Texixtepec, a division of the Popoloca (of Veracruz) connectedwith the Mixe and through them with the Mizocuavean stock.Tice, a tribe of the Rama-Corobici branch of the Chibchan linguisticstock.TIacopan, one of the three Nahuatl tribes in the Valley of Mexico,which formed the Mexican confederation.Tlacotepehua-Tepuzteca, an unclassified tribe centering aroundChilpancingo, Guerrero.Tlapanec, or Tlapaneco-Yopi, given by Orozco y Berra (1864) as aname applied to the Chocho Indians by the Indians of Guerrero,but made independent by Lebmann (1920), who connects theTlapanec with the Maribio and Subtiaba which would place itin the Hokan stock.TIascala, a Nahuatl tribe in the present State of Tlaxcala, Mexico,Toboso, the name of a predatory tribe living in the seventeenthcentury in the Bolson de Mapimi and extending northward atleast to the Rio Grande, State of Coahuila, Mexico. On circum-stantial evidence they have been classed as Athapascan butthis is not beyond question. Orozco y Berra's Cocoyome andCabezas should perhaps be classed with them.Tocone, a Concho band.Tojar, a Chibchan tribe related to the Terraba (Chibchan stock)and located on an island of the same name on the north coast ofPanama.Tolimeca, a tribe of uncertain aflBliations in western Guerrero.Topacolme, a Concho band.Toquegua, a tribe belonging to the Choloid branch of the Mayanlinguistic family and located in northwestern Honduras on thecoast of the Gulf of Honduras.Totonac, the principal tribe of the Totonacan linguistic stock whichis now regarded as independent though formerly thought to haveaffinities with the Mayan people. They lived in the northernpart of the State of Puebla and that part of Veracruz betweenthe City of Veracruz and latitude 21? N. Subdivisions: Masonand Johnson give three, the Coast, Papantla, and Sierra, butZembrano (1752) states that there were four dialects: Chaca-huaxtli (in the Pueblos of Xalpan and Pentepec), Ipapana(in the missions of the Augustines), Tatimolo (in the Pueblo ofNoalingo), and Tetiquilhati (in the high sierras). SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 639Totorame, a tribe closely connected with the Cora Indians andthrough them with the Aztecoidan branch of the Uto-Aztecanstock. They occupied the coast of Sinaloa from Mazatlansouthward.Trique, a tribe entered by Mason and Johnson as a substock of theirOtomanguean stock. Mechling (1912) connected them withMazatec and Lehmann (1920) with the Chiapanec and Otomi.They were in the midst of the Mixtec country west of the Cityof Oaxaca. The dialect of the town of Copala was said to differconsiderably from the rest.Tubar, a tribe placed by Mason and Johnson in the Tahue group ofthe Taracahitian linguistic family, Uto-Aztecan stock, and locatedin the hot river gorge between the debouchure of the Chlnipasand Urique Rivers.Tucurrique, a tribe believed to have been Chibchan but otherwiseof uncertain affiliations.Tule, a Cuna tribe in eastern Panama.Tungla, a mixed Mosquito-Sumo tribe.Tunki, a subdivision of the Panamaka.Turriarba, a Guetare tribe in southwestern Costa Rica.Turrin, a Rama-Corobici tribe of the Chibchan stock.Turucaca, a Chibchan tribe related to the Boruca living north of theGolfo Dulce, on the Pacific coast of the Republic of Panama.Tzeltal or Tzental, a tribe belonging to the Tzeltaloid division of theMayan stock and located in eastern Chiapas northeast of theChiapanec and between the Rio San Pedro and the Rio Grande,Mexico.Tzotzil (Quelene and Chamula probably synonyms), a tribe belongingto the Tzeltaloid division of the Mayan stock and located onthe Rio Grande in central Chiapas east of the Chiapanec.Tzutuhil, a tribe belonging to the Quichoid division of the Mayanstock, living around the southern shore of Lake Atitlan, Guatemala.Uchita, or Utciti, a division of the Waicuri on the west coast of thepeninsula of Baja California between latitude 24? N. and thePericu.Ulua, originally a type tribe of the Uluan linguistic stock, they wereconnected by Lehmann (1920) with the Tawahka, Yosko,Mosquito, and Matagalpa and all ultimately with Chibchan,Mason and Johnson, however, treat the Suman family as adivision of their Misumalpan stock and more remotely connectedwith the Chibchan tribes. They occupied much of the interiorof the present Republic of Nicaragua from the Bay of Fonsecaeastward to Lake Nicaragua and from the latter northward tothe lower Rio Grande and the Mosquito territory. The follow- 640 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145ing subdivisions are given: Guanexico (location not given),Prinzo (north of the Rio Grande), Ulua (on the Rio Grande andRio Signa).Upanguayma, a body of Seri Indians near Guaymas, Sonora.Uren, a Chibchan tribe not otherwise fixed as to status.Ures, a body of Pima Bajo on the flood plain of the Rio Sonora belowthe gorge of Ures and beyond, Sonora.Urinama, a Chibchan tribe connected with the Bribri.Urraca, a tribe of unknown affiliations living on the south coast of theRepublic of Panama.Uspanteca, a tribe of the Quiche group, Quichoid division, of theMayan linguistic family, located at the point of meeting of theQuiche, Ixil, and Pokonchi and in the great bend of the Chixoy(Rio Negro), Guatemala.Vacoregue, a division of the Guasave Indians of the Taracahitianfamily, Uto-Aztecan stock, on the Pacific coast north of themouth of the Rio Fuerte, Sonora.Varohio, by Mason and Johnson made the type tribe of a group belong-ing to the Taracahitian linguistic family and Uto-Aztecan stock.They were on the headwaters of the Rio Mayo on the boundarybetween Chihuahua and Sonora, Mexico.Vassapalles, a Lagunero band.Veracruzano, a Huastec dialectic division, Mayan stock.Viceita, a Chibchan tribe connected with the Bribri.Vigitega, a detached body of Indians near Tepic in Nayarit believedto have belonged to the Piman family and Uto-Aztecan stock.Voto, a tribe forming, with the neighboring Rama and Guatuso, onedialectic group of the Chibchan stock located in the northwesternpart of the present Republic of Costa Rica just south of the RioSan Juan.Wahmi, a division of the Chinantec, Chorotegan stock.Waicuri, the largest body of Indians belonging to the Waicurianlinguistic stock which Mason and Johnson classify conjecturallyunder the Hokan. They covered all of Baja California south oflatitude 26? N. except a small area in the extreme southwest.Subdivisions: Aripa (located by Orozco y Berra (1864) in theextreme northwestern part of Waicuri territory), Cora (on theeast coast from near Dolores to the southeastern point of thepeninsula), Alonqui (on the east coast between Dolores andLoreto), Uchita or Utciti (on the west coast between latitude24? N. and the Pericu), Waicuri (on the west coast from latitude24? to 25? N.). The Edu, Didu, and Ika, given by others as SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 641Cochimi divisions, wore probably Waiciiri but tlioir locations areuncertain.Wanki, a Mosquito subdivision.Xilotlantzinca, an unclassified tribe in western Michoac^n.Xinca, a tribe placed in the Zoquean stock by Lelimann (1920) butpven independent status by Thomas (1911) and more recentlyby Mason and Johnson except that the last mentioned place itin their great Macro-Penutian phylum. They lived in theextreme southeastern part of Guatemala between two areas ofPipil Indians. There were three closely allied dialects spoken inthe pueblos of Sinacantan, Xupiltepec, and Xutiapa, to whichConguaco should probably be added, although Juarros (1824)and Thomas (1911) call it Lencan.Xixime, a tribe of the Taracahitian branch of the Uto-Aztecan stock,their nearest relatives apparently being the Acaxee. Theyoccupied the upper courses of the San Lorenzo, Piaxtla, Presidio,and Baluarte Rivers in the States of Durango and Sinaloa. Thefollowing subdivisions are reported: Aibinc, Iline (on the head-waters of the Rio Piaxtla), Hume (on the Presidio and BaluarteRivers).Xiximole, a Concho band.Xorrhue, an otherwise unidentified Chibchan tribe.Xupiltepec, a town whose inhabitants spoke a Xinca dialect. It islocated in Guatemala.Xurru, a tribe belonging to the Rama-Corobici branch of the Chibchanstock.Xutiapa, a town of Guatemala in which a dialect of the Xinca languagewas spoken.Yacchicaua, a Concho band.Yaculsari, a Concho band.Yanabopos, a Lagunero band.Yaochane (Ahuchan or Ochan), a Concho band.Yaqui, a tribe or tribal division of the Cahita living on the Rio YaquIin the State of Sonora, Mexico.Yasika, a Suman tribe belonging to the Misumalpan stock.Yecora, a division of Pima Bajo along the boundary line between thestates of Chihuahua and Sonora, Mexico.Yeguacat, a Concho band.Yolox, a division of the Chinantec, Chorotegan stock.Yosco, a tribe of the Misumalpan stock most closely connected withthe Sumo and Ulua people, in central Nicaragua on the RioLisauei and the Rio Ilamaka. 642 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bdll. 145Zacateco, a tribe related to the Cazcan of the Aztecoidan family andUto-Aztecan stock, occupying a large part of the State of Zaca-tecas and also part of Durango, Mexico.Zapotec, the type tribe of the Zapotecan family, occupying thegreater part of central Oaxaca and extending from the Chinanteccountry to the Pacific coast. Mason and Johnson give the fol-lowing major divisions: Zapotec of the Northern Mountains,Zapotec of the Southern Mountains, and Zapotec of the Valleys,and the following dialects: the Zapotec Cajono, Zapotec Etla,Zapotec Ixtepexi, Zapotec Nexitza, Zapotec Ocotlan, ZapotecZaachilla, and the Tehuantepec.Zayahueco, a division of the Cora Indians, Taracahitian family,Uto-Aztecan stock, living in the southern and southwesternmargins of the Cora country.Zegua, a Chibchan tribe, otherwise unclassified.Zhorquin, a Chibchan tribe, otherwise unclassified.Zoe, according to Buelna (1891), from tzoi, "wax," "pitch tree,"regarded by Sauer (1934) as belonging to the same group as theComanito Indians which were members of the Taracahitian familyand Uto-Aztecan stock. They lived in the rough hill countryof the Rio Fuerte above the Cahita and along the Sinaloa-Chihuahua boundary. Two related tribes are mentioned, theZoe proper and the Baimena.Zoque, the type tribe of the Zoquean linguistic family placed byMason and Johnson in their Mizocuavean stock. They livedin the extreme eastern part of Oaxaca, in northwestern Chiapas,and in the adjoining parts of Tabasco. Tapixulapan is givenas a dialect.Zuaque, a division of the Cahita Indians of the Uto-Aztecan stockliving on the lower course of the Rio del Fuerte, State of Sinaloa.Authorities.?Brinton, D. G., 1891; Buelna, 1891; Conzemius, 1932; Hrdlicka,1903; Johnson, 1940; Juarros, 1824; Kro&ber, 1925; Lehraann, 1920; Lumholtz,1894; Mason, 1940; Mechling, 1912; Mexico, Archive General de la Naci6n,Publicaciones, vol. XV (on Tamaulipas, 1944); Orozco y Berra, 1864; Peralta,1895; Peter Martyr, 1912; Sauer, 1934; Thomas, 1911; Zembrano, 1752; SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 643BIBLIOGRAPHYAdair, James.1775. The history of the American Indians. London. (Reprint ed. bySamuel Cole Williams under auspices of Nat. Soc. Colonial Dames,in Tenn. The Watauga Press, Johnson City, Tenn., 1930.)AXiARCON, Fernando.1810. Relation. 1540. In Hakluyt, Voyages, vol. 3, 1600, reprinted 1810.1838. Relation de la navigation et de la ddcouverte . . . 1540. In Ternaux-Compans, Voyages, vol. 9, Paris.AxXiEN, Henrt T.1887. Report on an expedition to the Copper, Tanana, and Koyukuk Rivers,in the Territory of Alaska, in the year 1885. Washington.Allis, Samuel. See Dunbar, John B.Alvord, Clarence Walworth, and Bidgood, Lee.1912. The first explorations of the Trans-Allegheny Regions by the Vir-ginians, 1650-1674. Cleveland.Amdrup, L, Bob6. See Vahl, G. C, et al.American State Papers.1832, 1834. Documents, legislative and executive, of the Congress of theUnited States. Class II, Indian Affairs, vols. 1-2.1832-1861. Documents of the Congress of the United States in relation tothe Public Lands. Class VIII, Public Lands, vols. 1-8.Anghiera, Pietro Martire d' (Peter Martyr).1912. De orbe novo decades: The Eight Decades of Peter Martyr d' Anghiera.Trans, from the Latin with notes and introd. by Francis AugustusMacNutt. 2 vols. New York, (First decade originally publishedin 1511.)Anza, Lieut. Col. Juan Bautista de.1774, 1775. See Carets Diary in Coues, 1900.Arber, Edward, Editor. See Smith, John, 1884.Armstrong, Maj. Francis W.1835. Correspondence on the subject of the emigration of Indians, &c., Sen-ate Document No. 512, 1833. Washington.Babcock, William H.1899. The Nanticoke Indians of Indian River, Delaware. Amer, Anthrop.,n. s., vol. 1, pp. 277-282.Back, George.1836. Narrative of the Arctic land expedition in the years 1833, 1834, and1835. Philadelphia and London.1838. Narrative of an expedition in H. M. S. Terror, on the Arctic shores,in the years 1836-37. London.Ballard, Edward.1871. Geographical names on the coast of Maine. U. S. Coast Survey Rep.for 1868.Bancroft, Hubert Howe.1886-90. The works of. 39 vols. San Francisco. (Vols. 1-5, Nativeraces.) 644 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Bandelier, Adolf F.1881. Historical introduction to studies among the sedentary Indians ofNew Mexico. Pap. Archaeol. Inst. Amer., Amer. Ser., vol. 1.Boston.1884. Reports on his investigations in New Mexico during the years 1883-84.Fifth Ann. Rep. Archaeol. Inst. Amer. Cambridge.1890-92. Final report of investigations among the Indians of the south-western United States, carried on mainly in the years from 1880to 1885. Pap. Archaeol. lust. Amer., Amer. Ser., vol. 3, 1890;vol. 4, 1892. Cambridge.1890. Contributions to the history of the southwestern portion of the UnitedStates. Pap. Archaeol. Inst. Amer., Amer. Ser. vol. 5. Cambridge.1892. Documentary history of the Zuni tribe. Journ. Amer. Ethnol. andArchaeol., vol. 3. Boston, New York.See also Nunez Cabeza de Vaca, Alvar.Bandelier, Fanny. See Nui^EZ Cabeza de Vaca, Alvar.Banks, Charles E.1911. History of Martha's Vineyard. 3 vols. Boston.Barbeau, C. Marius.1915. Huron and Wyandot mythology. With an appendix containingearlier published records. Canada Dept. Mines, Geol. Surv.,Anthrop. Ser., Mem. 80, No. 11. Ottawa.1929. Totem poles of the Gitksan, Upper Skeena River, British Columbia.Nat. Mus. Canada, Anthrop. Ser. No. 12, Bull. 61. Ottawa.Barcia Carballido y ZuNiga, Andres G.1723. Ensayo cronologico para la historia general de la Florida, 1512-1722,por Gabriel de Cardenas Z. Cano (pseud.) Madrid.Barnwell, Col. John.1908. The Tuscarora expedition. Letters of Colonel John Barnwell. SouthCarolina Hist, and Geneal. Mag., vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 28-58.Barrett, S. A.1908 a. The ethno-geography of the Pomo and neighboring Indians. Univ.Calif. Publ. Amer. Arch, and Ethnol., vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 1-332.1908 b. The geography and dialects of the Miwok Indians. Univ. Calif.Publ. Amer. Arch, and Ethnol., vol. 6, Nos. 2 and 3, pp. 333-380.1910. The material culture of the Klamath Lake and Modoc Indians. Univ.Calif. Publ. Amer. Arch, and Ethnol., vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 239-292.1917 a. Ceremonies of the Pomo Indians. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer. Arch.and Ethnol., vol. 12, No. 10, pp. 397-441.1917 b. The Washo Indians. Bull. Public Mus. Milwaukee, vol. 2, No. 1.1919. The Wintun Hesi Ceremony. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer. Arch, andEthnol., vol. 14, pp. 437-488.Barrows, David Prescott.1900. Ethno-botany of the Coahuilla Indians of southern California. Univ.Chicago, Dept. Anthrop. Chicago.Bartlett, J. R.1854. Personal narrative of explorations and incidents . . . connected withthe United States and Mexican Boundary Commission, 1850-53.Vols. 1-2. New York. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 645Bartram, William.1792. Travels through North and South Carolina, Georgia, East and WestFlorida, the Cherokee country, the extensive territories of theMuscogulges or Creek Confederacy, and the country of the Choc-taws. London.1909. Observations on the Creek and Cherokee Indians. 1879. Withprefatory and supplementary notes by E. G. Squier. Report.Complete. Trans. Amer. Ethnol. Soc, vol. 3, pt. 1, pp. 1-81.(Facsimile reprint of 1853 ed.)1943. Travels in Georgia and Florida, 1773-74. A report to Dr. John Fother-gill. Annotated by Francis Harper. Trans. Amer. Phil. Soc, n. s.,vol. 33, pt. 2.Batts, Thomas. 5ee Alvord, Clarence W., and Bidgood, Lee; and Bushnell,David L, Jr., 1907.Beals, Ralph L.1932. The comparative ethnology of Northern Mexico before 1750. Ibero-Americana: 2. Univ. Calif. Press.1933. Ethnology of the Nisenan. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer. Arch, andEthnol., vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 335-414. Univ. Calif. Press.Beauchamp, William M.1892. The Iroquois trail; or, footprints of the Six Nations. Fayetteville,N. Y.1897 a. Aboriginal chipped stone implements of New York. Bull. N. Y.State Mus., No. 16. Albany.1897 b. Polished stone articles used by the New York aborigines. Bull.N. Y. State Mus., No. 18. Albany.1900. Aboriginal occupation of New York. Bull. N. Y. State Mus., No.32. Albany.1901. Wampum and shell articles used by the New York Indians. Bull.N. Y. State Mus., No. 41. Albany.1902. Horn and bone implements of the New York Indians. Bull, N. Y.State Mus., No. 50. Albany.1903. Metallic ornaments of the New York Indians. Bull. N. Y. StateMus., No. 73. Albany.1905. A history of the New York Iroquois. Bull. N. Y. State Mus., No. 78.Albany.1907. Aboriginal place names of New York. Bull. N. Y. State Mus., No. 108.Albany.Beaurain, Le Sieur. See La Harpe, Bernard de, 1831.Beckwith, Hiram M.1883. Indian names of water courses in the State of Indiana. Ind. Dept.Geol. and Nat. Hist., 12th Ann. Rept., 1882.Benavides, Alonso de.1630. Memorial. Madrid. {Also translation in Land of Sunshine, vol. 13.Los Angeles, Calif., 1900.)Berreman, Joel V.1937. Tribal distribution in Oregon. Mem. Amer. Anthrop. Assoc. No. 47.Berry, Brewton; Chapman, Carl; and Mack, John.1944. Archaeological remains of the Osage. Amer. Antiquity, vol. 10,pp. 1-11. 646 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Berry, Brewton; Chapman, Carl; Wrench, J. E.; and Seitz, Wilbur.1938. Archaeological investigations in Boone County. Missouri Archae-ologist, Columbia, Mo., vol. 4, pp. 1-36.Beverley, Robert.1722. History of Virginia, by a native and inhabitant of the place. 2d ed.London.BiEDMA, Luis Hernandez de. See Bourne, Edward Gaylord, Editor.Bienville, Jean Baptiste le Moyne, Sieur de.1932. Journal du voyage de M. de Bienville des Taensas au village desYataches, par les terres. 22 mars-18 mai, 1700. Printed in Miss.Provincial Archives, French Dominions, ed. Rowland, Dunbar, andSanders, Albert Godfrey, vol. 3. {Also in Margry, Pierre, 1875-86,vol. 4, pp. 432-444; MS. memoir in Newberry Library, Chicago.)Blossom, L. See Lapham, L A.Blyth, Beatrice. See Ray, Verne F.Boas, Franz.1888. The Central Eskimo. 6th Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol, pp. 399-669.1897. The social organization and secret societies of the Kwakiutl Indians,based on personal observations and on notes made by Mr. GeorgeHunt. Rep. U. S. Nat. Mus. for 1895.1898. The mythology of the Bella Coola Indians. Mem. Amer. Mus. Nat.Hist., vol. 2, Anthropology 1. New York.1901, 1907. The Eskimo of Baffin Land and Hudson Bay. Bull. Amer.Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 15. New York. (Pt. 1, 1901; pt. 2,1907.)1916. Tsimshian mythology. 31st Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol., 1909-1910, pp. 29-1037.1921. The ethnology of the Kwakiutl, based on data collected by GeorgeHunt. 35th Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol., 1913-14, pp. 43-794.1927. Map showing the distribution of Salish tribes and their neighbors aboutthe end of the 18th century. (Accompanying a paper on "SoundShifts in Salishan Dialects," by Franz Boaz and Herman Haeberlin.Int. Journ. Amer. Ling., vol. 4, Nos. 2-4.) New York.See also Reports of the Committee appointed by the British Associationfor the Advancement of Science to report on the northwest tribesof Canada, in Reports Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci., 1885-1898. London.Report of 1895 referred to particularly. And Haeberlin, H. K.;Teit, James A; and Roberts, Helen H.Bogoras, Waldemar.1904. The Chuckchee. 1. Material culture. Mem. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist.,Publ. Jesup N. Pacific Exped., vol. 7. Leiden and New York.Bollaert, William.1850. Observations on the Indian tribes in Texas. Journ. Ethnol. See.London, vol. 2,Bolton, Herbert Eugene.1914. Athanase de M^zieres and the Louisiana-Texas Frontier, 1768-1780.2 vols. Cleveland.1916. Spanish explorations in the Southwest, 1542-1706. Ed. by HerbertEugene Bolton. In Original narratives of early American history.New York. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 647Bolton, Herbert Eugene?Continued1919. Kino's historical memoirs of Pimerla Alta, 1681-1711. 2 vols. Ed.by Herbert Eugene Bolton. Cleveland.1925. Arredondo's historical proof of Spain's title to Georgia. A contribu-tion to the history of one of the Spanish borderlands. Univ. Calif.Press.BOSCANA, GeRONIMO.1846. Chinigchinich: A historical account of the origin, customs, and tradi-tions of the Indians at the missionary establishment of St. JuanCapistrano, Alta California; called the Acagchemem Nation.(English trans, in Robinson, Alfred, "Life in California." NewYork. The Spanish original is probably lost. Alexander Taylorreprinted the English version in the California Farmer, vol. 13, 1860.The Robinson book has also been reprinted, but without the Chinig-chinich.)Bossu, N.1771. Travels through that part of North America formerly called Louisiana.Trans, by J. R. Forster. 2 vols. London.BouRKE, John G.1892. The medicine-men of the Apache. 9th Ann. Rep. Bur. Ethnol.,1887-88, pp. 443-603.Bourne, Edward Gaylord, Editor.1904. Narratives of the career of Hernando de Soto. 2 vols. New York.(Note: Reprints of op. cit. are in "Great American explorers," byDavid Nutt, London, 1905; and "American explorers," AUerton BookCo., New York, 1922.)Boyd, Mark F.1934. A topographical memoir on east and west Florida with itineraries ofGeneral Jackson's army, 1818. By Capt. Hugh Young, Corps ofTopographical Engineers, U. S. A. With an introduction andannotations by Mark F. Boyd and Gerald M. Ponton. FloridaHist. Soc. Quart., vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 16-50, and No. 2, pp. 82-104.Brackett, Col. Albert G.1880. The Shoshonis, or Snake Indians, their religion, superstitions, andmanners. Ann. Rep. Smithsonian Inst, for 1879, pp. 328-333.Brannon, Peter A.1909. Aboriginal remains in the middle Chattahoochee Valley of Alabamaand Georgia. Amer. Anthrop., n. s., vol. 11, pp. 186-198.Brinton, Daniel G.1859. Notes on the Floridian Peninsula, its literary history, Indian tribes*and antiquities. Philadelphia.1882-85. Library of aboriginal American literature, 6 vols. Philadelphia.(1. Chronicles of the Mayas. 2. The Iroquois book of rites.3. The Comedy-ballad of Giieguence. 4. A migration legendof the Creek Indians, vol. 1. 5. The Lenfip6 and their legends.6. The annals of the Cakchiquels.) Ed. by Daniel G. Brinton.1891. The American Race. New York.1893. Vocabulary of the Nanticoke dialect. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc, vol.31, pp. 325-333. Philadelphia. 648 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145BUELNA, EUSTAQUIO.1891. Arte de la Lengua Cahita. Vol. 1. Mexico.Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution. Annual Reports1-48, 1881-1933. Bulletins, 1-143, 1887-1949. Introductions, 1-4, 1877-1880.Miscellaneous Publications, 1-12, 1880-1944. Contributions to North Amer-ican Ethnology, vols. 1-9, 1877-1893.BuRK, John D.1804-5. History of Virginia. 3 vols. Petersburg.BUSCHMANN, JOHANN C. E.1859. Spuren der Aztek. Sprache.BusHNEix, David I., Jr.1907. Discoveries beyond the Appalachian Mountains in September 1671.Amer. Anthrop., n. s., vol. 9, pp. 45-56.1908. The account of Lamhatty. Amer. Anthrop., n. s., vol. 10, No. 4,Oct.-Dec.1909. The Choctaw of Bayou Lacomb, St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana.Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 48.1930. The five Monacan towns in Virginia, 1607. Smithsonian Misc. Coll.,vol. 82, No. 12.Bustamante and Gallegos.1582. Reprinted in Colecci6n de documentos in^ditos . . . Vol. 15. Madrid,1864-84.Btrd, William.1866. History of the dividing line and other tracts. 2 vols. Richmond.Cabeza de Vaca, Alvar NuSez. See NuSez Cabeza de Vaca, Alvar, 1851.Cabrillo, Juan Rodriguez. See Ferrel, Bartolom^.Cadzow, Donald A.1925. Habitat of Loucheux Bands. Mus. Amer. Indian, Indian Notes, vol.2, No. 3.Canada. Department op Citizenship and Immigration, Indian AffairsBranch.Report. Ottawa, 1876-19?.Cardenas Z. Cano, Gabriel de. See Barcia Carballido t Zuniga, Andres G.CaRMACK on THE BeOTHUK IN BeOTHUK INSTITUTE.1907. In Handbook of American Indians. Bull. 30, vol. 1., art. BeothukanFamily. {See Hodge, Frederick Webb, 1907, 1910.)Carroll, B. R.1836. Historical collections of South Carolina; embracing many rare andvaluable pamphlets, and other documents, relating to the historyof that State, from its first discovery to its independence, in the year1776. 2 vols. New York.Cartier, Jacques.1545. Brief recit, et succincte narration, de la nauigation faicte es ysles deCanada. Paris. (Reprinted, Paris, 1863.)Carver, Jonathan.1778. Travels through the interior parts of North America, in the years1766, 1767, and 1768. London. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 649Carver, Jonathan?Continued1796. Three years' travels through the interior parts of North America formore than five thousand miles. Philadelphia.1838. Carver's travels in Wisconsin. New York.CasaJ^as, de Jesus Maria, Fray Francisco. See Swanton, John R. 1942.Casas, Bartolom6 de las.1875-76. Historia de las Indias. 5 vols. Madrid.CastaJJeda, Carlos E.1936. The Mission Era: Vol. 1, The finding of Te.xas, 1519-1693.CastaNeda de Nagera, Pedro de.1838. Relation du voyage de Cibola, entrepris en 1540. [1596. Ternaux-Compans, Voyages, vol. 9. Paris.Catlin, George.1844. Letters and notes on the manners and customs and condition of theNorth American Indians. 2 vols. New York and London.Census. United States Bureau of the Census. See Porter.Chamberlain, Alexander F.1892. In 10th Report on Northwest tribes of Canada for the British Associ-ation for the Advancement of Science.MS. Manuscript on the Malesit, 1882, in archives of Bureau of AmericanEthnology.Champlain, Samuel de.1830. Voyages: ou journals es decouvertes de la Nouvelle France. 2 t.Paris.1870. Oeuvres de Champlain publi6es sous le patronage de I'Universit^ Laval.Par I'Abb^ C.-H. Laverdiere, M. A. 2" ed. 5 t. Quebec.1922-36. The works of Samuel de Champlain. 6 vols. Trans, and ed. byH. H. Laughlin and William F. Ganong. The Champlain Soc.Toronto.Chapman, Carl. See Berry, Brewton, et al.Charlevoix, Pierre F. S. de.1744. Histoire et description generale de la Nouvelle France. 3 t. Paris.1761. Journal of a voyage to North America. 2 vols. London.Chauvignerie, Writing in 1736.1853. In Schoolcraft, Henry R., 1851-57, vol. 3, pp. 554-555.Church, Thomas.1825. The history of King Philip's War, and also expeditions against theFrench and Indians in the eastern parts of New England. To whichis added copious notes and corrections by Samuel G. Drake. Boston.{Also in Library of New England History, vols. 2-3. Boston,1865-67.)Colden, Cadwallader.1747. The history of the Five Indian Nations of Canada, which are dependenton the province of New York in America. London. (Reprint,1755.)Colecci6n de documentos in^ditos, relativos al descubrimiento, con-QUISTA Y COLONIZACi6n DE LAS ANTIGUAS POSESIONES EsPAfJOLAS EN AMilRICAY OcEANfA. 41 vols. Madrid, 1864-84. 650 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Congr6s International des Am^ricanistes.1907. Corapte rendu. Quinzieme session, Quebec, 1906. Quebec.CONNELLEY, WiLLIAM ElSEY.1918. The Prairie Band of Pottawatomie Indians. Coll. Kansas State Hist.Soc, vol. 14, pp. 488-570.CONZEMIUS, EdUARD.1932. Ethnographical survey of the Miskito and Sumu Indians of Hondurasand Nicaragua. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 106.Cook, S. F.1940. Population trends among the California Mission Indians. Ibero-Americana, vol. 17. Univ. Calif. Press.Cooke, Ann M. See Park, Willard Z.CopwAY, George.1847. Life, history, and travels of Copway, a young Indian chief of theOjibwa nation; sketch of the present state of the nation. Albany.Corbusier, William Henry.1886. In American Antiquarian, vol. 8. p. 276.MS. Manuscript on Yavapai, 1873-75, in archives of Bureau of AmericanEthnology.CouEs, Elliott, Editor.1893. History of the expedition of Lewis and Clark to the sources of theMissouri River, and to the Pacific in 1804-5-6. A new edition.4 vols. New York.1900. On the trail of a Spanish pioneer. The diary and itinerary of FranciscoCarets, 1775-76. 2 vols. New York.Coville, Frederick V.1892. The Panamint Indians of California. Amer. Anthrop., o. s., pp.351-361.1897. Notes on the plants used by the Klamath Indians of Oregon. Contr.U. S. Nat. Herb., vol. 5, No. 2.Cox, Isaac Joslin, Editor.1905. The journeys of R6n6 Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle. 2 vols.Trail Makers (series). New York.Cox, Ross.1831. Adventures on the Columbia River. 2 vols. London.Coxe, Daniel.1741. A description of the English province of Carolana. By the Spaniardscalled Florida, and by the French, La Louisiane. London. (Also inFrench, B. F., Historical Collections of Louisiana. 2d ed., pt. 2.Philadelphia, 1750.)Crane, Verner W.1929. The Southern Frontier, 1670-1732. Duke Univ., Durham, N. C.Crantz, David.1767. History of Greenland. 2 vols. London. (Other eds., London, 1780,1820.)Crozier, Archibald.1938. Indian towns near Wilmington, Delaware. Bull. Archaeol. Soc.Delaware, vol. 2. No. 6. June. Frank Martine Heal, ed. SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 651Curtis, Edward S.1907-30. The North American Indian. 14 vols. (1, Apache, Jicarillas, Nav-aho; 2, Pima, Papago, Qahatika, Yuma, Maricopa, Walapai, Hava-supai, Apache-Mohave; 3, Teton Sioux, Yanktonai, Assiniboin;4, Apsaroke, Hidatsa; 5, Mandan, Ankara, Atsina: 6, Piegan,Cheyenne, Arapaho; 7, Yakima, Klickitat, Interior Salish,Kutenai; 8, Nez Percds, Wallawalla, Umatilla, Cayuse, Chinookantribes; 9, Salishan tribes of the Coast, Chimakum, Quilliute,Willapa; 10, the Kwakiutl; 11, Nootka, Haida; 12, the Hopi; 13,Hupa, Yurok, Wiyot, Tolowa, Tututni, Shasta, Achomawi,Klamath; 14, Kato, Wailaki, Yuki, Porno, Wintun, Maidu,Yokuts.) New York.CusHiNG, Frank Hamilton.1883. Zuni fetishes. 2d. Ann. Rep. Bur. Ethnol., pp. 3-45.1886. A study of Pueblo pottery as illustrative of Zuni culture-growth. 4thAnn. Rep. Bur. Ethnol., pp. 490-564.1896. Outlines of Zuni creation myths. 13th Ann. Rep. Bur. Ethnol., pp.321-447.1901. Zuni folk-tales. New York.CusicK, David.1828. Sketches of ancient history of the Six Nations. 2d ed. Tuscarora,N. Y.Dall, William H.1870 a. On the distribution of the native tribes of Alaska and the adjacentterritory. Proc. Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci. 1869. Cambridge.1870 b. Alaska and its resources. Boston.1877. Tribes of the extreme northwest. Contr. N. Amer. Ethnol., vol. 1,pp. 1-156.1886. The native tribes of Alaska. Proc. Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci. 1885,vol. 34. Salem.Dawson, George M.1880 a. Report on the Queen Charlotte Islands. Rep. Geol. Surv. Canadafor 1878-79. Montreal.1880 b. Report of progress of the [Canadian] Geological Survey. SOB.1881. Report on an exploration from Port Simpson on the Pacific coast toEdmonton on the Saskatchewan, embracing a portion of the northernpart of British Columbia and the Peace River country. 1879.Rep. Geol. Surv. Canada. Montreal.1888 a. Notes and observations on the Kwakiool people of the northern partof Vancouver Island and adjacent coasts made during the summerof 1885, with vocabulary of about 700 words. Proc. and Trans.Roy. Soc. Canada. 1887, vol. 5. Montreal.1888 b. Report on an exploration in the Yukon district, N. W. T. andadjacent northern portion of British Columbia. Ann. Rep. Geol.and Nat. Hist. Surv. Canada, n. s. vol. 3, pt. 1, Rep. B, 1887-88.Montreal.1922. Notes on the Shuswap people of British Columbia. Proc. and Trans.Roy. Soc. Canada 1891, vol. 9, sec. 2. Montreal. 652 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145De Crenay Map.1733. Copy in Bureau of American Ethnology. Sections of this are repro-duced in Hamilton, Peter J., Colonial Mobile, revised and enlargeded. Boston and New York, 1910.De Forest, John W.1851. History of the Indians of Connecticut from the earliest known periodto 1850. Hartford. (Reprinted 1852, 1853.)De Kerl^rec, Chevalier.1907. Rapport du Chevalier de Kerl^rec, Gouverneur de la Louisianafrangaise sur les peuplades des vallees du Mississippi et du Missouri(1758). C. R. Congress Int. Am6r., 15th sess., vol. 1, pp. 61-86. Quebec.Delanglez, Jean.1938. The journal of Jean Cavelier, the account of a survivor of La Salle'sTexas expedition, 1684-1688. Trans, and annot. by Jean Delanglez.Inst. Jesuit Hist. Publ. Chicago.Denig, Edwin Thompson.1930. Indian tribes of the Upper Missouri. Ed. by J. N. B. Hewitt. 46thAnn. Rep. Bur, Amer. Ethnol., 1928-29, pp. 375-628.Densmore, Frances.1929. Chippewa customs. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull 86.Dents, Nicolas.1908. The description and natural history of the coasts of North America.Trans, and ed. by William F. Ganong. Champlain Soc, Toronto.De Soto, Hernando. See Bourne, E. G.Dickenson, Jonathan.1803. Narrative of a shipwreck in the Gulph of Florida. 6th ed. Stanford, N. Y.DiRON d'Artaguiette. ? See Mereness, Newton D., Editor.Dixon, Roland B.1905. The Northern Maidu. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 17, pt. 3.New York.1907. The Shasta. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 17, pp. 381-498.1910. The Chimariko Indians and language. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer.Archeol. and Ethnol., vol. 5, pp. 293-380.Dixon, Roland B., and Kroeber, A. L.1919. Linguistic families in California. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer. Archaeol.and Ethnol., vol. 16, pp. 47-118.Domenech, Emmanuel.1860. Seven years' residence in the great deserts of North America. Vols.1-2. London.Dorset, George A.1904 a. Mythology of the Wichita. Carnegie Inst. Washington Publ. No. 21.1904 b. Folk-lore Soc, vol. 8. Boston and New York.1905. The Cheyenne. Pt. 1, Ceremonial organization. Pt. 2, The Sundance. Publ. Field Col. Mus. Anthrop. Ser., vol. 9, Nos. 1 and 2.Chicago.1906. The Pawnee?Mythology, pt. 1. Carnegie Inst. Washington Publ. No. 59.Dorset, George A., and Kroeber, A. L.1903. Traditions of the Arapaho. Publ. Field Col. Mus., Anthrop. Ser,,vol. 5. Chicago. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 653DoBSEY, J. Owen.1884, Omaha sociology. 3d Ann. Rep. Bur. Ethnol., pp. 205-370.1896. Omaha dwellings, furniture, and implements. 13th Rep. Bur. Eth-nol., pp. 263-288.1897. Siouan Sociology. 15th Ann. Rep. Bur. Ethnol., 1893-94, pp. 205-244.MS. Naltunnetuiine vocabulary. Oct. 1884. {In Archives Bur. Amer.Ethnol.)DoRSEY, J. Owen, and Swanton, John R.1912. A dictionary of the Biloxi and Ofo languages. Bur. Amer. Ethnol.Bull. 47.DouAY, Father Anastasius.1905. Narrative of La Salle's attempt to ascend the Mississippi in 1687 . . .In Journeys of La Salle, edited by Isaac Joslin Cox, vol. 1, pp.222-247.Dousman, G. D. See Lapham, I. A,Drake, Samuel G.1848. Book of the Indians of North America, xi. Boston.See also Church, Thomas.Driver, Harold Edson.1937, Southern Sierra Nevada. Anthrop. Rec, Univ. Calif., vol. 1, No. 2.Berkeley.1939, Northwest California. Anthrop. Rec. Univ. Calif., vol. 1, No. 6.Berkeley.Drucker, Philip.1937. The Tolowa and their Southwest Oregon kin. Univ. Calif. Publ.Amer. Archaeol. and Ethnol., vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 221-300.Du Bois, Cora.1935. Wintu ethnography. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer. Archaeol. and Ethnol.,vol, 36, No. 1, iv+148 pp.DUMONT DE MONTIGNY.1753. M6moires historiques sur La Louisiane. 2 vols. Ed. by Le Mascrier.Paris.Dunbar, John B.1880-82. The Pawnee Indians. Mag. Amer. Hist., vols. 4, 5, 8. Morrisiana,N. Y.Du RouLLET, Regis.1732. Journal of a visit made to the Choctaw nation in 1732. (In theArchives of the Naval Hydrographic Service, Paris. Copy in theLibrary of Congress, MS. Div.)Dyer, J. O.1916. The early history of Galveston, pt. 1. Galveston, Tex.1917. The Lake Charles Atakapas (cannibals), period of 1817-1820.EcKSTORM, Fannie Hardy.1941. Indian place-names of the Penobscot Valley and the Maine coast.Univ. Maine Studies, 2d ser., No. 55. Univ. Maine Press, Orono,Maine.Eells, Myron.1877, The Twana Indians of the Skokomish Reservation in WashingtonTerritory. Bull. U. S. Geol. and Geogr, Surv., vol. 3, No. 1.1889. The Twana, Chemakum, and Klallam Indians of Washington Terri-tory, Ann. Rep. Smithsonian Inst, for 1887, pp. 605-681, 654 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Egede, Hans.1745. Description of Greenland. Trans, from the Danish. London.EisELET, LoREN C. See Speck, Frank G., and Eiselet, Loren C.EixARCH, TomIs. See Coues, 1900.Elvas, Narrative of a Gentlemen of. See Robertson, James A., TranslatorAND Editor; also Bourne, Edward Gatlord.Emmons, George T.1910. Articles on Niska and Tahltan in Handbook of American Indians,Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 30. (See Hodge, 1907, 1910.)1911. The Tahltan Indians. Univ. Pennsylvania Mas. Anthrop. Publ. vol. 4,No. 1.Emory, W. H.1848. Notes of a military reconnaissance from Fort Leavenworth in Missourito San Diego in California, made in 1846-47. Washington.ESCALANTE, FrAT SiLVESTRE VeLEZ DE.1882. In Duro, Cesareo F., "Don Diego de Penalosa y su descubrimientodel reino de Quivira." Madrid.EspEJo, Antonio de.1600. Viaje en el ano de 1583. In Hakluyt, Voyages. Reprint 1810.1871. Relaci6n del viage. In Col. Doc. In6dit., t. 15, pp. 163-189.EwiNG, Henry P.1892. Great Divide. Dec, p. 203.Fairbanks, C. R.1871. History of Florida, 1512-1842. Philadelphia.Fernandez, Le6n.1892. Lenguas indigenas de Centro-America en el Siglo XVIII. segun copiadel Archivo de Indias. San Jos6 de Costa Rica.Ferrel, Bartolom6.1879. Relation, or diary, of the voyage which Rodriguez Cabrillo made withtwo ships, from the 27th of June, 1542, until the 14th of April of thefollowing year. Wheeler Surv. Rep., vol. 7, pt. 1, app., Washington.(English translation in Bolton, H. E., "Spanish exploration in theSouthwest," pp. 13-39, New York, 1916.)Fbwkes, Jesse Walter.1897 a. Tusayan katcinas. 15th Ann. Rep. Bur. Ethnol., 1893-94, pp.245-313.1897 b. Tusayan Snake ceremonies. 16th Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol.,1894-95, pp. 267-312.1900 a. Tusayan migration traditions. 19th Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol.,1897-98, pt. 1, pp. 573-633.1900 b. Tusayan Flute and Snake ceremonies. 19th Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer.Ethnol., 1897-98, pt. 2, pp. 957-1011.1903. Hopi katcinas, drawn by native artists. 21st Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer.Ethnol., 1899-1900, pp. 3-126.Fletcher, Alice C.1904. The Hako, a Pawnee ceremony. 22d Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol.,1900-1, pt. 2, pp. 5-368.Fletcher, Alice C, and La Flesche, Francis.1911. The Omaha tribe. 27th Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol., 1905-6, pp.17-654. SwANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 655FONTANEDA, HeBNANDO DE EsCALANTE.1866. Mernoria de las cosas y costa Indios de la Florida. Doc. In6d., t. 5,pp. 532-548. Madrid. {Also in Smith, B., Letter of Hernando deSoto, and Memoir of Hernando de Escalante Fontaneda, Washing-ton, 1854; and French Irans. in Ternaux-Compans, Voyages, t. 20,pp. 9-42, Paris.)FooTE, Henry S.1841. Texas and the Texans. 2 vols. Philadelphia.Forde, C. Daryll.1931. Ethnography of the Yuma Indians. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer. Archaeol.and Ethnol., vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 83-278.Foreman, Grant.1930. A traveler in Indian Territory. The Journal of Ethan Allen Hitchcock,late Major-General in the United States Army. Cedar Rapids,Iowa.1946. The last trek of the Indians. Univ. Chicago Press.Forney, Jacob.1858. United States Office of Indian Affairs, Report, p. 213.FoRSTER, J. R. See Bossu, N.Frachtenberg, Leo J.1911. Siuslawan (Lower Umpqua). Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 40, pt. 2, pp.431-629.1918. Comparative studies in Takelman, Kalapuyan, and Chinookan. Int.Journ. Amer. Ling., vol. 1, pp. 175-182.Franciscan Fathers, The.1910. An ethnologic dictionary of the Navaho language. 2 vols. St.Michaels, Arizona.Franklin, John.1823. Narrative of a journey to the shores of the Polar Sea, in the years 1819,20, 21, and 22. London. (Other eds., London, 1824; Philadelphia,1824.)1828. Narrative of a second expedition to the Polar Sea, 1825-27. London.Franquelin, Johannes Ludovicus.1688. Map in Library of Congress.French, B. F.1846-53. Historical collections of Louisiana, embracing many rare and valu-able documents relating to the natural, civil, and political historyof that state. Pts. 1-5. New York. (Other eds: New ser..New York, 1869; second ser., New York, 1875.)Gairdner, Dr.1841. Notes on the geography of Columbia River. Journ. Roy. Geogr. Soc.London, vol. 11.Gallatin, Albert.1836. A synopsis of the Indian tribes within the United States east of theRocky Mountains, and in the British and Russian possessions inNorth America. Trans, and Coll. Amer. Antiq. Soc, ArchaeologiaAmericana, vol. 2. Cambridge.Ganong, William F. See Champlain, Samuel de, 1922-36; Dennys, Nicolas;Leclerq, Chr^tian, 1910.Carols, Francisco. See Coues, Elliott, Editor, 656 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Boll. 145Garcilaso de la Vega.1723. La Florida del Inca. Historia del adalantado, Hernando de Soto.Madrid.Gatschet, Albert S,1877-80. The Timucua language. Proc. Amer. Philos. See, vols. 16-18,Philadelphia.1877-92. Der Yuma-Sprachstamm nach den neuesten handschriftlichenQuellen. Zeitschr. Ethnol., B. 9-24. Berlin.1883. The Shetimasha Indians of St. Mary's Parish, Southern Louisiana.Trans. Anthrop. Soc. Washington, vol. 2.1884, 1888. A migration legend of the Creek Indians. Vol. 1. Brinton'sLib. Aborig. Amer. Lit., No. 4. Philadelphia. Vol, 2,Trans. Acad. Sci. St. Louis, vol. 5, Nos. 1 and 2. St. Louis.1891 a. The Karankawa Indians, the coast people of Texas. Archaeol. andEthnol. Pap. Peabody Mus., vol. 1, No. 2, Cambridge.1891 b. The Klamath Indians of southwestern Oregon. Contr. N. Amer.Ethnol., vol. 2, pts. 1 and 2. Cambridge.MS. Wyandot MS., 1877, in archives of Bureau of American Ethnology.Gerard, Wm. R. See Hodge, F. W., 1907, 1910.GiBBs, George.1867. Notes on the Tinneh or Chepewyan Indians of British and RussianAmerica. 1. The eastern Tinneh, by Bernard Ross. 2. TheLoucheux Indians, by William Hardisty. 3. The Kutchin tribes,by Strachan Jones. Ann. Rep. Smithsonian Inst, for 1866.1877. Tribes of western Washington and northwestern Oregon. Contr. N.Amer. Ethnol., vol. 1.GiFFORD, E. W.1931. The Kamia of Imperial Valley. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 97.1933. The Cocopa. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer. Archaeol. and Ethnol., vol.31, No. 5, pp. 257-334.1936. Northeastern and Western Yavapai. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer.Archaeol. and Ethnol. vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 247-354.1932. The Southeastern Yavapai. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer. Archaeol. andEthnol., vol. 29, pp. 177-252.1932. The Northfork Mono. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer. Archaeol. andEthnol., vol. 31, pp. 15-65.Giles, John.1869. Memoirs of Odd Adventures, Strange Deliverences, etc., in the Cap-tivity of John Giles, Esq., Commander of the Garrison on SaintGeorge River, in the District of Maine. Written by Himself.Originally published at Boston, 1736. Cincinnati.GiLMORE, MeLVIN R.1927. Notes on Arikara tribal organization. Mus. Amer. Ind., Heye Foun-dation, Indian Notes, vol. 4, No. 4, Oct., pp. 333-350.GoDDARD, Pliny Earle.1903. Life and culture of the Hupa. Univ. Calif. Publ., Amer. Archaeol.and Ethnol., vol. 1, No. 1.1914 a. Dancing societies of the Sarsi Indians. Anthrop. Pap. Amer. Mus.Nat. Hist., vol. 11, pt. 5.1914 b. Notes on the Chilula Indians of northwestern California. Univ.Calif. Publ. Amer. Archaeol. and Ethnol., vol. 10, pp. 265-288. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 657GoDDARD, Pliny Earle?Continued1916. The Beaver Indians. Anthrop. Pap. Anier. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 10,pt. 4.Goodwin, Grenville.1935. The social divisions and economic life of the western Apache. Amer.Anthrop., n. s., vol. 37, pp. 55-64.Gookin, Daniel.1806. Historical collections of the Indians in New England, 1792. Coll.Mass. Hist. Soc, 1st ser., vol. 1. Boston.Gravier, J. See Shea, John Gilmary, 1852, pp. 115-163; and Thwaites,Reuben Gold, Jesuit relations, 1896-1901, vol. 65, pp. 100-179.Greenland. 3 vols. Edited by M. Vahl, G. C. Amdrup, L. Bob6, and A. S.Jensen. Published by the Commission for the Direction of the Geological andGeographical Investigations in Greenland. C. A. Reitzel, Copenhagen; OxfordUniversity Press, London, 1928 and 1929.Grinnell, George Bird.1889. Pawnee hero stories and folk tales. New York.1892. Blackfoot lodge tales. New York.1905. Social organization of the Cheyenne. Rep. Int. Congr. Amer., 13thsess., 1902. New York.1923. The Cheyenne Indians: Their history and ways of life. 2 vols. YaleUniv. Press. New Haven.1926. Cheyenne camp fires. London.GtJNTHER, Erna.1927. Klallam Ethnology. Univ. Washington Publ. Anthrop., vol. 1, No. 5,pp. 171-314. Seattle.See also Haeberlin, Hermann, and Giinther, Erna.Haebehlin, Hermann, and GDnther, Erna.1924. Ethnographische Notizen iiber bie Indianerstamme des Puget Sundes.Zeitschr. f. Ethnol., pp. 1-74. Berlin.1930. The Indians of Puget Sound. Univ. Washington Publ. Anthrop.,vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1-84. Seattle.Haeberlin, H. K. ; Teit, James A.; and Roberts, Helen H.1928. Coiled basketry in British Columbia and surrounding region, underdirection of Franz Boas. 41st Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol.,1919-24, pp. 119-484.Halbert, Henry Sale.1901. District divisions of the Choctaw nation. Publ. Ala. Hist. Soc, Misc.Coll., vol. 1, pp. 375-385. Montgomery, Ala.Hale, Horatio.1846. Ethnology and philology. U. S. Exploring Exped. 1836-1842, undercommand of Charles Wilkes, U. S. N., vol. 6. Philadelphia.1883 a. Iroquois book of rites. Philadelphia.1883 b. The Tutelo tribe and language. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc, vol. 21,No. 114. Philadelphia.Hall, C. F.1865. Arctic researches and life among the Esquimaux. New York.Harby, Mrs. Lee C.1895. The Tejas: Their habits, government, and superstitions. Ann. Rep.Amer. Hist. Assoc, for 1894. Washington. 658 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Hare, Lloyd C. M.1932. Thomas Mayhew, Patriarch to the Indians. New York and London.Hariot, Thomas.1893. Narrative of the first English plantation of Virginia. 1588 and 1590.Reprint. London.Harper, Francis. See Bartram, William, 1943.Harrington, John Peabodt.1908. A Yuma account of origins. Journ. Amer. Folk-lore, vol. 21, pp. 324-348.1910. On phonetic and lexic resemblances between Kiowan and Tanoan.Archaeol. Inst. Amer., School Amer. Archaeol., No. 12.Harrington, M. R.1913. A preliminary sketch of Lendpe culture. Amer. Anthrop., n. s., vol.15, pp. 208-235.Harris, Jack. See Ray, Verne F.Harris, John.1705. Naviganteum atque itinerantium bibliotheca, or a complete collectionof voyages and travels. 2 vols. London. (2d ed. London, 1764.)Harvey, Henry.1855. History of the Shawnee Indians, from the year 1681 to 1854, inclusive.Cincinnati.Hawkes, E. W.1916. The Labrador Eskimo. Canada Geol. Surv., Anthrop. Ser., Mem.91, No. 14.Hawkins, Benjamin.1848. A sketch of the Creek country, in 1798 and 99. Georgia Hist. Soc.Coll., vol. 3. Savannah.1916. Letters of Benjamin Hawkins 1796-1806. Georgia Hist. Soc. Coll.,vol. 9. Savannah.Hayden, Ferdinand V.1862. Contributions to the ethnography and philology of the Indian tribesof the Missouri Valley. Trans. Amer. Philos. Soc, n. s., vol. 12.Philadelphia.Haywood, John.1823. The natural and aboriginal history of Tennessee, up to the first settle-ments therein by the white people, in the year 1768. Nashville.Hearne, Samuel.1795. Journey from Prince of Wales' Fort in Hudson's Bay to the northernocean. London. (Reprint, Dublin, 1796.)Heckewelder, John G. E.1819. An account of the history, manners, and customs of the Indian nationswho once inhabited Pennsylvania and the neighboring states.Philadelphia. (Reprinted Mem. Hist. Soc. Pa., vol. 12. Phila-delphia, 1876.)1907. Narrative of the mission of the United Brethren among the Delawareand Mohegan Indians from its commencement in the year 1740 tothe close of the year 1808. W. E. Connelley, ed. Cleveland.Heinzelman, Maj. S. P.1857. In Indian afl'airs on the Pacific. Message from the President of theUnited States transmitting report in regard to Indian aflfairs. (Pp.34-53.) H. R. Ex. Doc. 76, 34th Congr., 3d sess., p. 44. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 659Heinzelman, Maj. S. P.?Continued1858. In Annual Report of the Commissioner of Indian Affairs for the year1857, p. 392.Henley, Thomas A.1857. California Indians. In Schoolcraft, H. S., 1851-57, vol. 6, table 35,pp. 715-718. Philadelphia.Henry, Alexander.1809. Travels and adventures in Canada, and the Indian territories, between1760 and 1776. New York.MS. Comparative vocabularies of the Ojeebois, Kinistineau, and Assiniboine.Copied from the Journal of Alexander Henry, 1799-1811, by CharlesN. Bell, F. R. G. S., 1887. (In archives Bur. Amer. Ethnol.)Hewett, Edgar L.1906, Antiquities of the Jemez Plateau, New Mexico. Bur. Amer. Ethnol.Bull. 32.Hewitt, J. N. B.1892. Legend of the founding of the Iroquois league. Amer. Anthrop,, o. s.,vol. 5, pp. 131-148.1903. Iroquoian cosmology. 21st Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol., 1899-1900,pp. 127-339.1928. Iroquoian cosmology. Second Part. 43d Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer.Ethnol., 1925-26, pp. 449-819.See also Denig, Edwin Thompson; and Hodge, F. W., 1907, 1910.HiLL-TouT, Charles.1900. Notes on the Sk'qo'mic of British Columbia, a branch of the greatSalishan stock. In Rep. Comm. on Ethnol. Surv. Canada for Brit.Assoc, for Advancement of Science, pp. 472-559. London.1902. Report on the ethnology of the Siciatl of British Columbia, a coastaldivision of the Salishan stock. In Rep. Comm. on Ethnol. Surv.Canada for Brit. Assoc, for Advancement of Science, pp. 472-549.London.Hind, Henry Y.1863. Explorations in the interior of the Labrador Peninsula, the country ofthe Montagnais and Nasquapee Indians. 2 vols. London.Hodge, Frederick Webb.1907, 1910. Handbook of American Indians north of Mexico. Bur. Amer.Ethnol. Bull. 30, pts. 1 and 2. Ed. Frederick Webb Hodge.1910. The Jumano Indians. Proc. Amer. Antiquarian Soc, vol. 20, pp.249-268.Hodgson, William B.1848. The Creek Confederacy. Georgia Hist. Soc. Coll., vol. 3, pt. 1.Savannah.Hoebel, E. Adamson. See Ray, Verne F.Hoffman, Walter James.1886. Remarks on Indian tribal names. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc, vol. 23,pp. 294-303.1891. The Mide'wiwin, or "grand Medicine Society" of the Ojibwa. 7thAnn. Rep. Bur. Ethnol., 1885-86, pp. 143-300. 660 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Hoffman-, Walter James?Continued1896. The Menomini Indians. 14th Ann. Rep. Bur. Ethnology, pt. 1, pp.3-328.MS. In archives of Bureau of American Ethnology.HoiJER, Harry.1938. The Southern Athapaskan languages. Amer. Anthrop., n. s., vol. 40,No. 1, pp. 75-87.Holmes, William H.1905. Notes on the antiquities of Jemez Valley, New Mexico. Amer.Anthrop., n. s., vol. 7, No. 2.Hooper, Lucile.1920. The Cahuilla Indians. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer. Archaeol. andEthnol., vol. 16, pp. 315-380.Hooper, William H.1853. Ten months among the tents of the Tuski. London.Hopkins, Sarah Winnemucca.1883. Life among the Piiites. Ed. by Mrs. Horace Mann. Boston.Hough, Walter.1915. The Hopi Indians. Cedar Rapids, Iowa.Howley, James P.1915. The Beothucks or Red Indians: The aboriginal inhabitants of New-foundland. Cambridge [Eng.].HrdliCka, Ales.1906. Notes on the Pima of Arizona. Amer. Anthrop., n. s., vol. 8, No. 1,pp. 39-46.1903. The region of the ancient "Chichimecs," with notes on the Tepecanosand the ruin of La Quemada, Mexico. Amer. Anthrop., n. s., vol. 5,pp. 385-440.Hunt, George. See Boas, Franz, 1897, 1921.Hunter, John D.1823. Memoirs of a captivity among the Indians of North America. London.Iapi Oaye.1871-87, The Word Carrier. Vols. 1-16. Greenwood, Dakota; SanteeAgency, Nebraska.Iberville, Pierre le Moyne d'. See Margry, Pierre, 1875-86, vol. 4, p. 514.Indian Affairs (United States).Office of Indian Affairs, War Department. Reports. 1825-1848. Reportof the Commissioner, Department of the Interior, 1849-1932. In Reportof the Department of the Interior, 1933? . Jacobs, Melville.1937. Historic perspectives in Indian languages of Oregon and Washington.Pacific Northwest Quarterly, Jan., pp. 55-74.James, Edwin.1823. Account of an expedition from Pittsburgh to the Rocky Mountains,performed in the years 1819 and '20, by order of the Hon. J. C.Calhoun, Sec'y of War: under the command of Major Stephen H.Long. 2 vols, and atlas. Philadelphia. {Same, London, 1823.)Jefferson, Thomas.1801. Notes on the State of Virginia; with a map of Virginia, Maryland,Delaware, and Pennsylvania. Philadelphia. (2d ed., Philadelphia, 182.5) I SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 661Jefferts, Thos.1761. The natural and civil history of the French dominions in North andSouth America. Parts 1-2. London.Jenks, Albert Ernest.1900. The wild-rice gatherers of the upper lakes: A study in American prim-itive economics. 19th Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol., 1897-98,pt. 2, pp. 1013-1137.Jenness, Diamond.1922 a. The life of the Copper Eskimos. Rep. Canadian Arctic Exped.,1913-18, vol. 12, pt. A. Ottawa.1922 b. The Copper Eskimos; physical characteristics of the Copper Eski-mos. Rep. Canadian Arctic Exped., 1913-18, vol. 2. pt. B.1923 a. Eskimo folk-lore. Myths and traditions from Northern Alaska, theMackenzie Delta, and Coronation Gulf. Rep. Canadian ArcticExped., 1913-18, vol. 13, pt. A.1923 b. Eskimo folk-lore. Eskimo string figures. Rep. Canadian ArcticExped., 1913-18, vol. 13, pt. B.1932. The Indians of Canada. Nat. Mas. Canada, Bull. 65, Anthrop. Ser.No. 15. Ottawa.1937. The Sekani Indians of British Columbia. Nat. Mus. Canada, Bull.No. 84, Anthrop. Ser., No. 20. Ottawa.1938. The Sarcee Indians of Alberta. Nat. Mus. Canada, Bull. 90, Anthrop.Ser. No. 23. Ottawa.Jensen, A. S. See Vahl, G. C, et al.Jesuit Relations and Allied Documents.1858. Relations des Jesuites contenant ce qui s'est passe de plus remarquabledans les missions des peres de la Compagnie de Jesus dans la Nou-velle-France. Embrassant les armies 1611-1672. T. 1-3. Quebec.1896-1901. Travels and explorations of the Jesuit missionaries in New France,1610-1791. Reuben Gold Thwaites, ed. 73 vols. Cleve-land.Jevvitt, John R.1815. A narrative of the adventures and sufferings of John R. Jewitt; onlysurvivor of the crew of the ship Boston, during a captivity of nearlythree years among the savages of Nootka Sound. Middletown,Conn. (2d ed., Ithaca, N. Y., 1849.)JOCHELSON, WaLDEMAR.1933. History, ethnology, and anthropology of the Aleut. Carnegie Inst.Washington, Publ. No. 4320.Johnson, Elias.1881. Legends, traditions, and laws of the Irbquois, or Six Nations. Lock-port, N. Y.Johnson, Frederick.1940. The linguistic map of Mexico and Central America. In The Mayaand their neighbors: (Tozzer volume), pp. 88-114. New York andLondon.Jones, Peter.1861. History of the Ojebway Indians; with especial reference to their con-version to Christianity. London. 662 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145 JotTTEL, Henri.1713. Journal historique du dernier voyage que M. de la Sale fit dans le golfede Mexique pour trouver 1' embouchure de la riviere de Mississippi.Paris. (Also in Margry, Pierre, 1875-86, vol. 3, pp. 89-534.)JuARROs, Domingo.1808-1818. Compendio de la Historia de la Ciudad de Guatemala, 1808-1818.1824. English edition of above entitled "A statistical and commercial historyof the Kingdom of Guatemala."Keating, William H.1824. Narrative of an expedition to the source of St. Peter's River, LakeWinnepeek, Lakes of the Woods, etc. Compiled from the notes ofMajor Long, Messrs. Say, Keating, and Calhoun. 2 vols. Phila-delphia. (Same, London, 1825.)Kelly, Isabel T.1932. Ethnography of the Surprise Valley Paiute. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer.Archaeol. and Ethnol., vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 67-210.1934. Southern Paiute bands. Amer. Anthrop., n. s., vol. 36, No. 4, pp.548-560.Also see Park, Willard Z.Kendall, Edward Augustus.1809. Travels through the northern parts of the United States in the years1807 and 1808. 3 vols. New York.Ker, Henry.1816. Travels through the western interior of the United States, from theyear 1808 up to the year 1816. Elizabethtown.KiNiETz, W. Vernon.1940. The Indians of the Western Great Lakes 1615-1760. OccasionalContr. Mus. Anthrop. Univ. Michigan, No. 10. Univ. MichiganPress, Ann Arbor.Kino, Eusebius.1726. Tabula Californiae, Anno 1702. In Stocklein, Der Neue Welt-Bott,pt. 2, facing p. 74. Augspurg und Gratz.Krause, Aurel.1885. Die Tlinkit Indianer. Ergebnisse einer Reise nach der Nordwestkustevon America und der Beringstrasse. Auftrage der Bremer geograph-ichen Gesellschaft, 1880-81. Jena.Kroeber, Alfred L.1900. The Eskimo of Smith Sound. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 12,Art. 21, pp. 265-327.1902 a. Preliminary sketch of the Mohave Indians. Amer. Anthrop., n. s.,vol. 4, pp. 276-285.1902 b. The Arapaho. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 18.1903. The coast Yuki of California. Amer. Anthrop., n. s., vol. 5, pp. 729-730.1904. Types of Indian culture in California. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer,Archaeol. and Ethnol., vol. 2, pp. 81-103.1907 a. Shoshonean dialects of California. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer.Archaeol. and Ethnol., vol. 4, No. 3.1907 b. The religion of the Indians of California. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer.Archaeol. and Ethnol., vol. 4, pp. 319-356. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 663Kroeber, Alfred L.?Continued1908 a. Ethnography of the Cahuilla Indians. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer.Archaeol. and Ethnol., vol. 8, pp. 29-68.1908 b. Ethnology of the Gros Ventre. Anthrop. Pap. Amer. Mus. Nat.Hist., vol. 1, pt. 4.1909. Notes on Shoshonean dialects of Southern California. Univ. Calif.Publ. Amer. Archaeol. and Ethnol., vol. 8, No. 5.1915. Serian, Tequistlatecan and Hokan. Univ. Calif. Publ. Archaeol. andEthnol., vol. 11, No. 4.1920 a. Yuman tribes of the Lower Colorado. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer.Archaeol. and Ethnol., vol. 16, No. 8.1920 b. Californian culture provinces. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer. Archaeol.and Ethnol., vol. 17, pp. 151-169.1922. Elements of culture in native California. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer.Archaeol. and Ethnol., vol. 13, pp. 259-328.1925. Handbook of the Indians of California. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 78.1931. The Seri. Southwest Mus. Pap., No. 6, April.1932. The Patwin and their neighbors. Univ. Calif. Publ. Archaeol. andEthnol., vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 253-323.1934. Uto-Aztecan languages of Mexico. Ibero-Americana, No. 8, Univ.Calif. Press.1935. Material collected by Fred Kniffen, Gordon MacGregor, RobertMcKennan, Scudder Mekeel, and Maurice Mook. Edited by A. L.Kroeber. Mem. Amer. Anthrop. Assoc, No. 42, Contr. Lab. Anthrop.No. 1.1939. Cultural and natural areas of native North America. Univ. Calif.Publ. Amer. Archaeol. and Ethnol., vol. 38.Krogman, Wilton Marion.1935. The physical anthropology of the Seminole Indians of Oklahoma.With an introduction by Corrado Gini. Comitato Italiano per loStudio dei Problemi della Popolazione. Seri 3, vol. 2. Rome, Italy.Krztwicki, Ludwik.1934. Primitive society and its vital statistics. App. 2, North AmericanIndian Tribes, pp. 318-509. App. 3, North American confederaciesand their equivalents, pp. 510-543.La Flesche, Francis.1921. The Osage tribe. Rite of the chiefs; sayings of the ancient men.36th Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol., 1914-15, pp. 37-597.1925. The Osage tribe. The rite of vigil. 39th Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer.Ethnol., 1917-18, pp. 31-630.1928. The Osage tribe. Two versions of the child-naming rite. 43d Ann.Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol., 1925-26, pp. 23-164.La Harpe, Bernard de.1831. Journal historique de I'^stablissement des Fran^ais a la Louisiane.Nouvelle Orleans. (Eng. trans, in French, B. F., Hist. Coll. La.,vol. 3. New York, 1851.)Lamhattt, Account of. See Bushnell, David I., Jr., 1908.Lane, Joseph.1850. In Report of United States Office of Indian Affairs for 1850, p. 161. 664 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Lapham, I. A., Blossom, L., and Dousman, G. D.1870. Number, locality, and times of removal of the Indians of Wisconsin.Milwaukee.La Salle, Nicolas de. See Margry, Pierre, vol. 1, pp. 547-570.La Salle, R6n6 Robert Cavelier, Sieur de.For account of La Salle's voyage, see Shea, John Gilmary, 1861, pp. 15-42.See also Cox, Isaac Joslin, Editor; and Delanglez, Jean.Las Casas. See Casas, BARTOLOMf Las.LaudonniIire, Ren?.1586. Histoire notable de la Florida situ4e fes Indes Occidentales, contenant,les trois voyages faits en icelle par certains capitaines et pilotesFrancois a laquelle a est6 adjouste un quatriesme voyage fait parle Captaine Gourgues, mise en lumiere par M. Basnier. Paris.(New ed., Paris, 1853.)Laughlin, H. H., and Ganong, William F., Translators and Editors. SeeChamplain, Samuel de, 1922-36.LaverdiJire, C. H. See Champlain, Samuel de, 1870.Lawson, John.1709. A new voyage to Carolina; containing the exact description andnatural history of that country; together with the present statethereof, and a journal of a thousand miles travel thro' severalnations of Indians. London.1714. History of Carolina, containing the exact description and naturalhistory of that country. London. (Reprint, Raleigh, 1860; Rich-mond, 1937.)Leclerq, Chretien.1691. Nouvelle relation de la Gasp^sie. Paris.1881. First establishment of the faith in New France; now first translatedwith notes by J. G. Shea. 2 vols. New York.1910. New relation of Gaspesia, with the customs and religion of the Gas-pesian Indians. Trans, by William F. Ganong. The ChamplainSociety. Toronto.Lederer, John.1912. The discoveries of John Lederer in three several marches from Virginiato the west of Carolina and other parts of this continent; begun inMarch 1669, and ended September 1670. Together with a generalmap of the whole territory which he traversed. Collected and trans-lated by Sir William Talbot, Baronet. In Alvord, Clarence W.,and Bidgood, Lee. (Note: Other eds. of op. cit. are London, 1672;in Harris, vol. 2, London, 1705; and Rochester, 1902.)Lehmann, Walter.1920. Die Sprachen Zentral-Amerikas. Zentral-Amerikas, pt. 1, 2 vols.Berlin.Le Motne, Jacques.1875. Narrative of Le Moyne, an artist who accompanied the French expedi-tion to Florida under LaudonniSre, 1564. Trans, from Latin of DeBry. Boston.Lenguas iNofGENAS DE Centro-America EN EL SiQLO XVIII segun copia delArchive de Indias hecha por Le6n Ferndndez y publicada por Ricardo Fernan-dez Guardia y Juan Fernandez Ferraz para el 9? Congreso de Americanistas.San Jos6 de Costa Rica. Tip. nacional, 1892. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 665Le Page du Phatz, Antoine S.1758. Histoire de la Louisiane. 3 t. Paris. (Eng. trans., London, 1763,1764.)Leroux, Joseph.1888. Le medaillier du Canada. Montreal.Lescarbot, Marc.1612. Histoire de la novvelle France. Paris.1907-14. History of New France. Trans, by W. L. Grant. The ChamplainSociety. 3 vols. Toronto. (Vol. 1, 1907; vol. 2, 1911; vol. 3, 1914.)Lesser, ALEX.'i.NDER, and Weltfish, Gene.1932. Composition of the Caddoan linguistic stock. Smithsonian Misc.Coll., vol. 87, No. 6.Le Sueur, Narrative of. See Margry, Beaurain, and P^nicaut.Lewis, Albert Buell.1906. Tribes of the Columbia Valley and the coast of Washington andOregon. Mem. Amer. Anthrop. Assoc, vol. 1, pt. 2.Lewis, Meriwether, and Clark, Wm.1840. The journal of Lewis and Clark, to the mouth of the Columbia Riverbeyond the Rocky Mountains. Dayton, Ohio.Lieber, Oscar M.1858. Vocabulary of the Catawba language with some remarks on its gram-mar, construction, and pronunciation. Coll. S. C. Hist. Soc, vol. 2,pp. 327-342. Charleston.Long, John.1791. Voyages and travels of an Indian interpreter and trader, describingthe manners and customs of the North American Indians. London.Long, Stephen H. See James, Edwin; Keating, William H.Loud, Llewellyn L.1918. Ethnogeography and archaeology of the Wiyot territory. Univ. Calif.Publ. Amer. Archaeol. and Ethnol., vol. 14, pp. 221-436.LowERY, Woodbury.1901. The Spanish settlements within the present limits of the United States.1513-1561 and 1564-1574, 2 vols. New York and London.LowiE, Robert H.1917. Notes on the social organization and customs of the Mandan, Hidatsa,and Crow. Anthrop. Pap., Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 21, pt. 1.1939. Ethnographic notes on the Washo. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer. Archaeol.and Ethnol., vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 301-352.(Also numerous writings on the Crow Indians.)LuMHOLTZ, Carl.1894. Proceedings International Congress of Anthropology.1898. Huichol Indians of Mexico. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 10.New York.Lyon, G. F.1824. Private journal during voyage of discovery under Captain Parry.Boston. (Reprint, London, 1825.)MacCauley, Clay.1887. The Seminole Indians of Florida. 5th Rep. Bur. Ethnol., 1883-84,pp. 469-531.McClintock, Walter.1910. The Old North Trail. London. 666 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145McIlwraith, Thomas F.1948. The Bella Coola Indians. Univ. Toronto Press, 2 vols.Mack, John. See Berry, Brewton, et al.McKennan, Robert.1935. Note "Anent the Kutchin Tribes." Amer. Anthrop., n. s., vol. 37,No. 2, p. 369.McKenney, Thomas L.1846. Vol. 1: Memoirs, official and personal; with sketches of travels amongthe northern and southern Indians; embracing a war excursion, anddescriptions of scenes along the western borders. Vol. 2: On theorigin, history, character, and the wrongs and rights of the Indians,with a plan for the preservation and happiness of the remnants ofthat persecuted race. (Two volumes in one.) New York.McKenny, Thomas L., and Hall, James.1933-34. The Indian tribes of North America. 3 vols. Edinburgh.Mackenzie, Alexander.1801. Voyages from Montreal, on the river St. Lawrence, through the conti-nent of North America, to the Frozen and Pacific Oceans; in theyears 1789 and 1793. London. (Reprint, Philadelphia, 1802.)MacNutt, Francis Augustus. See Anghiera, Pietro Martire d'.Maine Historical Society. Collections, vols. 1-6, Portland, 1831-59. Vol. 7,Bath, 1876. Vols. 8-10, Portland, 1881-91. 2d ser., vols. 1-10. Portland,1890-99.Marbury,1792. MS. A census taken by the State of Georgia.Margry, Pierre.1875-86. D^couvertes et 6tablissements des Frangais dans I'ouest et dans lesud de TAmfirique Septentrionale (1614-1754). M^moires et docu-ments originaux. Pts, 1-6. Paris.Marquette's map, 1673. See Jesuit Relations.Mason, J. Alden.1912. The ethnology of the Salinan Indians. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer.Archaeol. and Ethnol., vol. 10, pp. 97-240.1940. The native languages of Middle America. In The Maya and theirneighbors (Tozzer Volume), pp. 52-87. D. Appleton-Century Co.,New York and London.Massachusetts Historical Society, Collections, vols. 1-10, Boston, 1792-1809(vol. 1 reprinted in 1806 and 1859; vol. 5 in 1816 and 1835). 2d ser., vols.1-10, Boston, 1814-23 (reprinted 1838-43). 3d ser., vols. 1-10, Boston,1825-49 (vol. 1 reprinted, 1846). 4th ser., 1-10, Boston, 1852-71.Maurault, J. A.1866. Histoire des Abenakis depuis 1605 jusqu'a nos jours. Quebec.Maximilian, Alexander P.1843. Travels in the interior of North America. Trans, from German byH. Evans Lloyd. London.Mayhew, Thomas, Jr.1928. In Territorial subdivisions and boundaries of the Wampanoag, Massa-chusetts, and Nauset, by Frank G. Speck. Ind. Notes and Monogr.,Misc. Ser., No. 44, p. 110. Mus. Amer. Ind., Heye Found. NewYork. I 1 SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 667Mechling, William H.1912. The Indian linguistic stocks of Oaxaca, Mexico. Amer. Anthrop.n. s., vol. 14, pp. 643-682.Meigs, Peveril, 3d.1939. The Kiliwa Indians of Lower California. Ibero-Americana, No. 15.Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley, Calif.Mengarini, Gregory.1871-72. Indians of Oregon. Journ. Anthrop. Inst., N. Y., vol. 1. NewYork.Mereness, Newton D., Editor.1916. Travels in the American Colonies. New York.Merriam, C. Hart.1905. The Indian population of California. Amer. Anthrop., n. s., vol. 7,pp. 594-606.1907. Distribution and classification of the Mewan stock of California.Amer. Anthrop., n. s., vol. 9, pp. 338-357.1914. Distribution of Indian tribes in the southern Sierra and adjacent partsof the San Joaquin Valley, California. Science, n. s., vol. 19, pp.912-917.1926. The classification and distribution of the Pit River Indian tribes ofCalifornia. Smithsonian Misc. Coll., vol. 78, No. 3.1929. The Cop-6h of Gibbs. Amer. Anthrop., n. s., vol. 31, pp. 136-137.1930 a. The New River Indians T16-h5m-tah-hoi. Amer. Anthrop., n. s.,vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 280-293.1930 b. The Em'-tim'-bitch, a Shoshonean tribe. Amer. Anthrop., vol. 32,No. 3, pt. 1, pp. 496-499.Mexico. Archivo General de la Naci6n, vol. 15. On Tamaulipas.M^zifcREs, Athanase de. See Bolton, Herbert Eugene, 1914.Michel, Francis Louis.1916. Report of the journey of Francis Louis Michel from Berne, Switzerland,to Virginia, October 2, 1701-December 1, 1702. Va. Mag. Hist, andBiog., Va. Hist. Soc, vol. 24, pp. 1-43, 113-141, 275-303. Trans-lated and edited by Prof. William J. Hinke.MicHELsoN, Truman.1912. Preliminary report on the linguistic classification of Algonquian tribes.28th Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol., 1906-7, pp. 221-290b.1916. Ritualistic origin myths of the Fox Indians. Journ. Washington Acad.Sci., vol. 6, No. 8, pp. 209-211.1919. Some general notes on the Fox Indians. Journ. Washington Acad.Sci., vol. 9, No. 16, pp. 482-494; No. 17, pp. 521-528.1921. The Owl Sacred Pack of the Fox Indians. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 72.1925. The mythical origin of the White Buffalo Dance of the Fox Indians.The autobiography of a Fox Indian woman. Notes on Fox mortuarycustoms and beliefs. Notes on the Fox society known as "ThoseWho Worship the Little Spotted Buffalo." 40th Ann. Rep. Bur.Amer. Ethnol., 1918-19, pp. 23-658.1927. Contributions to Fox Ethnology. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 85.1928. Notes on the Buffalo-head Dance of the Thunder Gens of the FoxIndians. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 87. 668 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145MiLFORT, LE ClERC.1802. Memoire ou coup-d'oeil rapide sur mes differens voyages et mon sejourdans la nation Creek. Paris.MiULiNG, Chapman J.1940. Red Carolinians. Univ. N. C. Press, Chapel Hill, N. C.MiNDELEFF, CoSMOS.1900. Localization of Tusayan clans. 19th Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol.,1897-98, pt. 2, pp. 635-653'.Minnesota Historical Society. Collections. Vols. 1-11. St. Paul, 1872-1905.Mississippi Provincial Archives, French Dominions.Particularly vol. 3, ed. Rowland, Dunbar, and Sanders, Albert Godfrey,Jackson, Miss., 1932. See Bienville, Jean Baptiste le Moyne, Sieur de.Mooney, James.1895. The Siouan tribes of the east. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 22.1896. The Ghost-dance religion and the Sioux outbreak of 1890. 14th Ann.Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol., 1892-93, pt. 2, pp. 641-1110.1898. Calendar history of the Kiowa Indians. 17th Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer.Ethnol., 1895-96, pt. 1, pp. 129-445.1900. Myths of the Cherokee. 19th Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol., 1897-98,pt. 1, pp. 3-548.1907. -The Cheyenne Indians. Mem, Amer. Anthrop. Assoc, vol. 1, pt. 6.1928. The aboriginal population of America north of Mexico. SmithsonianMisc. Coll., vol. 80, No. 7.Morgan, Lewis H.1851. League of the Ho-de-no-sau-nee, or Iroquois. Rochester, New York,and Boston. (2d ed., New York, 1904.)Morice, a. G.1889. The Western D^n^s. Their manners and customs. Proc. Can. Inst.,3d ser., vol. 6, No. 2. Toronto.1895. Notes, archaeological, industrial and sociological, on the WesternD6nes. Trans. Can. Inst., vol. 4, 1892-93. Toronto.1904 a. History of the northern interior of British Columbia, formerly NewCaledonia. Toronto.1904 b. In Transactions of the Royal Canadian Institute, vol. 7, p. 518.1906. The Great Dene Race. Anthropos, vol. 1 and succeeding vols,Morse, Jedediah.1822. A report to the Secretary of War of the United States, on Indianaffairs, comprising a narrative of a tour performed in the summer of1820. New Haven, Conn.MoTT, Mildred.1938. The relation of historic Indian tribes to archaeological manifestationsin Iowa. Iowa Journ. Hist, and Politics, vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 227-327.(Published quarterly by the State Hist. Soc. of Iowa, Iowa City,Iowa.)MuLLAN, John.1855. Report on the Indian tribes in the eastern portion of Washingtonterritory, 1853. Pac. R.R. Rep., vol. 1, pp. 437-441. Washington.MuLLOY, William T. See Park, Willard Z. I SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 669Murdoch, John.1892. Ethnological results of the Point Barrow Expedition. 9th Ann. Rep.Bur. Ethnol., 1887-88, pp. 3-441.MuRDOCK, George Peter.1941. Ethnographic bibliography of North America. Published for theDepartment of Anthropology. Yale Univ. Press.See also Ray, Verne F., 1938.Murie, James R.1914. Pawnee Indian Societies. Anthrop. Pap., Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist.,vol. 11, pp. 543-644.Myers, Albert Cook.1912. Narratives of early Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. InOriginal narratives of early American history. New York.Nansen, F.1893. Eskimo life. Trans, by William Archer. London. (2d ed., London,1894.)Neighbors, Major Robert S.1857. Report of United States OfBce of Indian Aflfairs. (See also Swanton,1942, p. 20.)Nelson, E. W.1899. The Eskimo about Bering Strait. 18th Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol.,1896-97, pt. 1, pp. 3-518.Nelson, William.1894. Indians of New Jersey. Paterson, N. J.New York. Documents Relating to the Colonial History of the StateVols. 1-15, 1853-87. Albany.Niza, Marcos de.1810. Relation, 1539. In Hakluyt, Voy., vol. 3, pp. 438-446, 1600. (Re-print, 1810. There are several other editions of this work.)NoMLAND, Gladys Ayer.1935. Sinkyone Notes. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer. Archaeol. and Ethnol.,vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 149-178.1938. Bear River ethnography. Anthrop. Rec, vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 91-124.Univ. Calif. Press.North Carolina, The Colonial Records of. Vols. 1-9. Raleigh, 1886-90.North Dakota, State Historical Society. Collections. Vols. 1-2. Bismarck,N. D., 1906-08.Northwestern Tribes of Canada. Reports on the physical characters, lan-guages, industrial and social condition of the northwestern tribes of the Dominionof Canada. In Reports of the British Association for the Advancement ofScience, 1885 to 1898, London, 1886-99.NuSez Cabeza de Vaca, Alvab.1851. Relation. Trans, by Buckingham Smith. New York. (2d ed.. NewYork, 1871.)1905. The journey of Alvar Nufiez Cabeza de Vaca . . . translated from hisown narrative by Fanny Bandelier. Trail Makers (series). NewYork.Oldmixon, John.1708. British Empire in America. 2 vols. London. 670 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Olson, Ronald L.1936. The Quinault Indians. Univ. Washington Publ. Anthrop., vol. 6,No. 1, pp. 1-190. Seattle, Washington.OS ATE, Juan de.1871. Memorial sobre el descubrimiento del Nuevo Mexico y sus aconteci-mientos. Anos desde 1595 d 1602. Col. Doc. In6dit., t. 16, pp.188-227. Madrid.Opler, Marvin K. See Park, Willard Z.Orcutt, S.1882. Indians of the Housatonic and Naugatuck Valleys.Orozco y Berra, Manuel.1864. Geograffa de las lenguas y carta etnogrdfica de Mexico. Mexico.Osgood, Cornelius.1934. Kutchin tribal distribution and synonymy. Amer. Anthrop., n. s.,vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 168-179.1936. Contributions to the ethnography of the Kutchin. Yale Univ. Publ.Anthrop., No. 14.Owen, Mary Alicia.1904. Folk-lore of the Musquakie Indians of North America. Publ. Folk-lore Soc, vol. 51. London.Pacific Railroad Reports. Reports of explorations and surveys to ascertainthe most practicable route for a railroad from the Mississippi River to thePacific Ocean. Made under the direction of the Secretary of War. 1853-54.Vols. 1-12, in 13 vols. Washington, 1855-60.Paige, G. A.1858. In Annual Report of the Commissioner of Indian Affairs for the year1857, p. 329. Washington.Palmer, William R.1928. Utah Indians past and present: An etymological and historical studyof tribes and tribal names from original sources. Utah Hist. Quart.,vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 35-52.Pareja, Francisco de.1612. Cathecismo, en lengua Castellana y Timuquana. Mexico.1613. Confessionario, en lengua Castellana y Timuquana. M6xico.1886. Arte de la lengua Timuquana compuesta en 1614. Bibl. Ling. Am6r.,vol. 11. Paris.Park, Willard Z., and Others.1938. Tribal distribution of the Great Basin. Amer. Anthrop., n. s., vol. 40,No. 4, pt. 1, pp. 622-638. (Containing: The organization andhabitat of Paviotso Bands, by Willard Z. Parks, pp. 622-626; WashoTerritory, by Edgar E. Siskin, pp. 626-627; The Northern Ute, byAnne M. Cooke, pp. 627-630; Groups of central and southernNevada, by William T. Mulloy, pp. 630-632; The Southern Ute,by Marvin K. Opler, pp. 632-633; Band organization of the SouthernUte, by Isabel T. Kelly, pp. 633-634; Kawaiisu Territory, byMaurice L. Zigmond, pp. 634-638.)Parker, Samuel.1840. Journal of an exploring tour beyond the Rocky Mountains. Ithaca,1838, 1840, 1842, 1846. (iSee 1840 vol., p. 257.) SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 671Parsons, Elsie Clews.1929. The social organization of the Tewa of New Mexico. Mem. Amer.Anthrop. Assoc. No. 36.Penhallow, Samuel.1726. The history of the wars of New England with the eastern Indians.Boston. (Other eds: In Coll. N. H. Hist. Soc, vol. 1, Concord.1824; reprint, 1871.)P^NICAUT, M.1869. Annals of Louisiana from the establishment of the first colony underd'lberville, to 1722. In French, B. F., Hist. Coll. La. and Fla.,n. s., New York; also in Margry, Pierre, pt. 5 (q. v.).Peralta, Manuel M. de.1895. In the Ethnology of Costa Rica. In Brinton's "Report upon the col-lection exhibited at the Columbian Historical Exposition at Madrid."Washington.Perea, Estevan de.1632-33. Verdadera [y Segvnda] relaci6n, de la grandiosa conversi6n que haavido en el Nuevo Mexico. Sevilla.Perrin du Lac, F. M.1805. Voyages dans les deux Louisianes, et chez les nations sauvages duMissouri, par les Etats-Unis, en 1801-1803. Paris, 1805. (Same,Lyon, 1805.)Perrot, Nicolas.1864. M6moire sur les moeurs, coustumes et relligion des sauvages de I'Am^ri-que Septentrionale, public pour la premiere fois par le R. P. J.Tailhan. Leipzig et Paris.Peter Martyr of Anghiera. See Anghiera, Pietro Martire d'.Petitot, Emile.1875. G^ographie de I'Athabaskaw-Mackenzie et des grands lacs du bassinarctique. Bull. Soc. G6ogr. Paris, 6" ser., t. 10. Paris.1876 a. Monographie des Dene-Dinji6. In Dictionnaire de la langue Dfenl-Dindji^ dialectes Montagnais ou Chipp^wayan, Peaux de Li^vreet Loucheux, etc. Bibl. Ling, et Ethnogr. Am6r., t. 2. Paris.1876b. Vocabulaire Francais-Esquimau. .Bibl. Ling, et Ethnogr. Am6r.,t. 3. Paris.1883. On the Athabascan district of the Canadian North West Territory.Proc. Roy. Geogr. Soc. and Monthly Rec. of Geogr., vol. 5. London.1884. On the Athapasca district of the Canadian North-west Territory.Montreal Nat. Hist. Soc, Rec. Nat. Hist, and Geol. Montreal.(Reprinted in Canadian Rec. Sci., vol. 1, Montreal, 1884.)1887 a. Traditions indiennes du Canada nordouest. Alengon.1887 b. En route pour la mer glaciale. Paris.1891. Autour du grand lac des Esclaves. Paris.1893. Exploration de la region de grand lac des Ours. Paris.MS. Comparative vocabulary of the Montagnais-Tinne. Includes Chippe-wyananock des Crees, Esclaves-Tribu des Peaux de Li^vre (Hares).1865. (In archives of Bur. Amer. Ethnol.)Petroff, Ivan.1884. Report on the population, industries, and resources of Alaska. U. S.Dept. Int., Census Office, 10th Census, vol. 8.Pollard, J. G.1894. The Pamunkey Indians of Virginia. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull 17. 672 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Popple Map.1733. In Swanton, John R., 1922, pi. 4.PoRTEB, Robert T.1893. In Report on population and resources of Alaska at the eleventhcensus, 1890. United States Bureau of the Census. Washington.Porter, Gen. Peter B. See Schoolcraft, Henry B., 1851-57, vol. 3, p. 497.Powell, John Wesley.1881. Wyandot government: A short study of tribal society. 1st Ann. Rep*Araer. Ethol., 1879-80, pp. 57-69.1891. Indian linguistic families of America north of Mexico. 7th Ann. Rep.Bur. Ethnol., 1885-1886, pp. 1-142.Powell, John Wesley, and Ingalls, G. W.1874. Report of the special commissioners J. W. Powell and G. W. Ingallson the condition of the Ute Indians of Utah; the Pai-Utes of Utah,northern Arizona, southern Nevada, and southeastern California;the Go-si Utes of Utah and Nevada; the northwestern Shoshones ofIdaho and Utah; and the western Shoshones of Nevada. Wash-ington.Powers, Stephen.1877. Tribes of California. Contr. N. A. Ethnol., vol. 3. Washington.Prince, J. Dyneley.1897. The Passamaquoddy wampum records. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc,vol. 36, pp. 479-495. Philadelphia.PuRCELL Map. See Swanton, 1922, pi. 7.Radin, Paul.1923. The Winnebago tribe. 37th Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol., 1915-1916,pp. 35-550.Rand, Silas T.1894. Legends of the Micmacs. New York and London.Rasmussen, Knud.1908. People of the Polar north; a record compiled from the Danish originalsand edited by G. Herring. Philadelphia.1919. Scientific results of the second Thule expedition to northern Greenland,1916-1918.Ray, Verne F.1932. The Sanpoil and Nespelem: Salishan peoples of northeastern Washing-ton. Univ. Washington Publ. Anthrop., vol. 5, Dec. 1932. Seattle.1938. Lower Chinook ethnographic notes. Univ. Washington Publ. Anthrop.vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 29-165. Seattle.Ray, Verne F., and Others.1938. Tribal distribution in eastern Oregon and adjacent regions. Amer.Anthrop., n. s., vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 384-415. (Containing: Tribaldistribution in northeastern Oregon, by Verne F. Ray, pp. 384-395;Notes on the Tenino, Molala, and Paiute of Oregon, by George PeterMurdock, pp. 395-402; Northern Paiute bands in Oregon, byBeatrice Blyth, pp. 402-405; Northern Paiute, by Omer C. Stewart,pp. 405-407; Western Shoshoni, by Jack Harris, pp. 407-410; Bandsand distribution of the Eastern Shoshone, by E. Adamson Hoebel,pp. 410-413; Wind River Shoshone geography, by D. B. Shimkin,pp. 413-415. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 673Reichard, Gladys A.1928. Social life of the Navajo Indians. New York.Reid, Hugo.1852. The Indians of Los Angeles County. Los Angeles Star. (Repub-lished by Alexander S. Taylor in the California Farmer, vol. 14,Jan. 11-Feb. 8, 1861.)Reports of the Committee Appointed by the British Association for theAdvancement of Science to report on the Northwest tribes of Canada.1889-98. Rep. Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci. London.Reyes, Candelario.1944. Apuntes para la historia de Tamaulipas en los siglos XVI y XVII.Mexico (Talleres graficos Laguna).Richardson, John.1851. Arctic searching expedition: A journal of a boat-voyage throughRupert's land and the Arctic sea. 2 vols. London.Rider, Sidney S.1904. The lands of Rhode Island as they were known to Caunounicus andMiantunnomu. Providence.RxGGS, A. L. See Iapi Oaye.RiGGS, Stephen Return.1894. Dakota grammar, texts, and ethnography. Contr. N. A. Ethnol.,vol. 9.Rights, Douglas L.1947. The American Indian in North Carolina. Duke University Press,Durham, N. C.Rink, Henry.1875. Tales and traditions of the Eskimo. London.1887. The Eskimo tribes. Medelelser om Gr0nland, vol. 11. Copenhagenand London.Rivers, William J.1856. Sketch of the history of South Carolina. Charleston.Roberts, Helen H.; Haeberlin, H. K.; and Teit, James A.1928. Coiled basketry in British Columbia and surrounding region, underdirection of Franz Boas. 41st Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol.,1919-24, pp. 119-484.Robertson, James Alexander, Editor and Translator.1933. True relation of the hardships suflfered by Governor Fernando de Sotoand certain Portuguese gentlemen during the discovery of theProvince of Florida, now newly set forth by a Gentleman of Elvas.2 vols. Fla. State Hist. Soc. De Land.Romans, Bernard.1775. A concise natural history of East and West Florida. Vol. 1. (Vol. 2unpublished.) New York.Ross, Alexander.1849. Adventures of the first settlers on the Oregon or Columbia River.London.1855. The fur hunters of the far west; a narrative of adventures in theOregon and Rocky Mountains. 2 vols. London. 674 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Ross, Bernard.1867. The eastern Tinneh. Smithsonian Rep. 1866.MS. Manuscript 1858 in archives of Bureau American Ethnology.Rowland, Dunbar, and Sanders, Albert Godfrey. See Bienville, JeanBaptiste le Moyne, Sieur de.Royal Canadian Institute. Proceedings: Ser. 1: The Canadian Journal: ARepertory of Industry, Science and Art; and a Record of the Proceedingsof the Canadian Institute. Vols. 1-3, Toronto, 1852-55. Ser. 2: TheCanadian Journal of Science, Literature, and History. Vols. 1-15, Toronto,1856-78. Ser. 3: Proceedings of the Canadian Institute. Vols. 1-7,Toronto, 1879-90. Annual Reports: 1886-94. (App. Rep. Min. EducationOnt., Toronto, 1888-94). Transactions: Vols. 1?. Toronto, 1889-19?.Royal Society of Canada.Proceedings and Transactions. 1st ser., vols. 1-12. Montreal, 1883-95.2d ser., vols. 1-12, Montreal, 1895-1905. 3d ser., 1913?.ROYCE, C. C.1887. The Cherokee nation of Indians: A narrative of their official relationswith the Colonial and Federal governments. 5th Rep. Bur. Ethnol.,1883-84, pp. 121-378.1899. Indian land cessions in the United States. 18th Ann. Rep. Bur.Amer. Ethnol., 1896-97, pt. 2, pp. 521-964.Russell, Frank.1908. The Pima Indians. 26th Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol., 1904-5,pp. 3-389.Ruttenber, Edward M.1872. History of the Indian tribes of Hudson's River; their origin, manners,and customs; tribal and sub-tribal organizations; wars, treaties, etc.Albany.Sagard Theodat, Gabriel.1865. Le grand voyage du pays des Hurons situ6 en I'Am^rique vers la merdouce avec un dictionnaire de la langue Huronne. 2 t. Paris.Salley, Alexander S., Jr., Editor.1911. Narratives of early Carolina. In Original Narratives of Early Ameri-can History. New York.Sapir, Edward.1909. Wishram texts, together with Wasco tales and myths. Collected byJeremiah Curtin and ed. by Edward Sapir. Leyden. Publ. Amer.Ethnol. Soc, vol. 2.1913. Wiyot and Yurok, Algonkin Languages of California. Amer. Anthrop.,vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 617-646.1915 a. The Na-den6 Languages, a preliminary report. Amer. Anthrop.,n. s., vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 534-558.1915 b. A sketch of the social organization of the Nass River Indians.Canada Geol. Surv., Mus. Bull. No. 19. Ottawa.See also Spier, Leslie, and Sapir, Edward.Sauer, Carl O.1934. The distribution of aboriginal tribes and languages in NorthwesternMexico. Ibero-Americana: No. 5. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley,Calif.1935. Aboriginal population of Northwestern Mexico. Ibero-Americana:No. 10. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley, Calif. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 675ScAiFE, H. Lewis.1896. History and condition of the Catawba Indians of South Carolina.Publ. Ind. Rights Assoc. Philadelphia.Schoolcraft, Henry R.1851-57. Historical and statistical information, respecting the history, con-dition, and prospects of the Indian tribes of the United States.6 vols. Philadelphia.SCHRADER, F. C.1900. Reconnaissances in Prince William Sound. 20th Ann. Rep. U. S.Geol. Surv., pt. 7, pp. 341-423.SCHULTZ, J. W.1907. My life as an Indian. New York.Scott, Hugh Lenox.1907. The early history and the names of the Arapaho. Amer. Anthrop.,n. s., vol. 9, pp. 545-560.Seitz, Wilbur. See Berry, Brewton, et al.Semmes, Raphael.1929. Aboriginal Maryland, 1608-1689. Maryland Hist. Mag., vol. 24, pt. 1,pp. 157-171; pt. 2, pp. 195-209.Serrano y Sanz, Editor.1913. Documentos historicos de la Florida y la Luisiana siglos 16 al 18.Madrid.Shawnee, W. H.1903. Absentee Shawnee Indians. Gulf States Hist. Mag., vol. 1, p. 415.Montgomery.Shea, John Gilmary.1852. Discovery and exploration of the Mississippi Valley. New York.(2d ed. Albany, 1903.)1861. Early voyages up and down the Mississippi. Albany.See also Charlevoix, Pierre F. X. de, 1774; and Leclerq, Chretien, 1881.Shimkin, D. B. See Ray, Verne F., 1938.Sibley, John.1832. Historical sketches of the several Indian tribes in Louisiana, south ofthe Arkansas River, and between the Mississippi and River Grande.(Message from the President communicating discoveries made byCaptains Lewis and Clark, Washington, 1806.) In Amer. StatePap., Class II, Ind. Affairs, vol. 1. (Also in Ann. Congr., 9thCongr., 2d sess., cols. 1076-1088.)Simpson, John.1855. Observations on the western Esquimaux. In Further papers relativeto the recent Arctic Expeditions. London.Siskin, Edgar E. See Park, Willard Z.Skinner, Alanson.1914. Political organization, cults, and ceremonies of the Plains-Ojibway andPlains-Cree Indians. Anthrop. Pap. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 11,pt. 6. New York.1921. Material culture of the Menomini. Indian Notes and Monographs.Misc. No. 20, Mus. Amer. Ind., Heye Foundation. New York.1923, 1925. Observations on the ethnology of the Sauk Indians. Bull.Public Mus. City of Milwaukee, vol. 5, Nos. 1-3. Milwaukee. 676 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Skinneb, Alanson?Continued1924-27. The Mascoutens or Prairie Potawatomi. Bull. Public Mus. Cityof Milwaukee, vol. 6, pt. 1: Social life and ceremonies.1925. Notes on Mahican ethnology. Bull. Public Mus. City of Milwaukee,vol. 2, No. 3.1926. Ethnology of the loway Indians. Bull. Public Mus. City of Milwaukee,vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 181-354. Milwaukee.Smet, Pierre J. de.1847. Oregon missions and travels over the Rocky Mountains, in 1845-46.New York.Smith, Buckingham, See NuSez Cabeza de Vaca, Alvar. 1851.Smith, Erminnie A.1883. Myths of the Iroquois. 2d Ann. Rep. Bur. Ethnol., 1880-81, pp.47-116.Smith, Huron H.1923 a. Ethnobotany of the Menomini Indians. Bull. Public Mus. City ofMilwaukee, vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1-174.1923 b. Ethnobotany of the Meskwaki Indians. Bull. Public Mus. City ofMilwaukee, vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 177-326.1923 c. Ethnobotany of the Ojibwe Indians. Bull. Public Mus. City ofMilwaukee, vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 327-525.Smith, John.1819. The true travels, adventures, and observations of Captaine JohnSmith, in Europe, Asia, Africke, and America; beginning about theyeere 1593, and continued to this present 1620. 2 vols. Vol. 2.The generall historic of Virginia, New England, and the Summeriles. Richmond. (Reprint of London ed. of 1620.)1884. Works, 1608-1631. Ed. by Edward Arber. English Scholar's Library,No. 16. Birmingham,Smith, Marian W,1940. The Puyallup-Nisqually. Columbia Univ. Contr. Anthrop., vol. 32.New York.1941. The Coast Salish of Puget Sound. Amer. Anthrop., n. s., vol. 43,No. 2, pt. 1, pp. 197-211.South Carolina Historical and Genealogical Magazine, Vol. 9.South Carolina Historical Society.1857-97. Collections. Vols. 1-5. Charleston and Richmond.Sparkman, Philip Stbdman.1908. The culture of the Luiseno Indians. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer. Archaeol,and Ethnol., vol. 8, pp. 187-234.Speck, Frank G.1907, The Creek Indians of Taskigi town. Mem. Amer. Anthrop. Asso.,vol. 2, pt. 2.1909 a. Ethnology of the Yuchi Indians. Anthrop. Publ. Univ. Mus.,Univ. Pa., vol. 1, No. 1. Philadelphia.1909 b. Notes on the Mohegan and Niantic Indians. Anthrop. Pap. Amer.Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 3, pp. 181-210.1915 a. The Nanticoke Community of Delaware. Contr. Mus. Amer. Ind.,Heye Foundation, vol. 2, No. 4. New York.1915 b. The Eastern Algonkian Wabanaki Confederacy, Amer. Anthrop.,n. s., vol. 17, pp. 492-508. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OP NORTH AMERICA 677Speck, Frank G.?Continued1915 c. Family hunting territories and social life of various Algonkian Bandsof the Ottawa Valley. Canada Geol. Surv., Mem. 70. Ottawa.1915 d. Myths and folk-lore of the Timiskaming Algonquin and TimagamiOjibwa. Canada Geol. Surv., Mem. 71, Anthrop. Ser, No. 9.Ottawa.1917. Game totems among the Northwestern Algonkians. Amer. Anthrop.,n. s., vol. 19, pp. 9-18.1922. Beothuk and Micmac. Indian Notes and Monographs. Mus. Amer.Ind., Heye Foundation. New York.1925. The Rappahannock Indians of Virginia. Indian Notes and Mono-graphs, vol. 5, No. 3. Mus. Amer. Ind., Heye Foundation. NewYork.1928 a. Chapters on the ethnology of the Powhatan tribes of Virginia.Indian Notes and Monographs, vol. 1, No. 5. Mus. Amer. Ind.,Heye Foundation. New York.1928 b. Territorial subdivisions and boundaries of the Wampanoag, Massa-chusett, and Nauset Indians. Indian Notes and Monographs,No. 44, Mus. Amer. Ind., Heye Foundation. New York.1928 c. Native tribes and dialects of Connecticut. 43d Ann. Rep. Bur.Amer. EthnoL, 1925-26, pp. 199-267.1928 d. Wawenock myth texts from Maine. 43d Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer.Ethnol., 1925-26, pp. 165-197.1929. Boundaries and hunting groups of the River Desert Algonquin.Indian Notes, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 77-120, Mus. Amer. Ind., HeyeFoundation,1931. Montagnais-Naskapi Bands and early Eskimo distribution in theLabrador Peninsula. Amer. Anthrop., n. s., vol. 33, No. 4, pp.557-600.1935. Siouan tribes of the Carolinas as known from Catawba, Tutelo, anddocumentary sources. Amer. Anthrop., n. s., vol. 37, pt. 2, pp.201-225.Speck, Frank G., and Eiselet, Loren C.1942. Montagnais-Naskapi Bands and family hunting districts of the Centraland Southeastern Labrador Peninsula. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc,vol. 85, No. 2, pp. 215-242.Spier, Leslie.1927. Tribal distribution in southwestern Oregon. Oregon Hist. Quart.,vol. 28, No. 4.1928. Havasupai ethnography. Anthrop. Pap. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol.29, pt. 3. New York.1930 a. Klamath ethnography. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer. Archaeol. andEthnol., vol. 30, pp. x-|- 1-338. Univ. Calif. Press.1936. Tribal distribution in Washington. Amer. Anthrop. Assoc, Gen. Ser.Anthrop., No. 3.Spier, Leslie, and Sapir, Edward.1930 b. Wishram ethnography. Univ. Washington Publ. Anthrop., vol. 3,No. 3, pp. 151-300. Seattle.Spiess, Mathias, Compiler.1934. Connecticut circa 1625, its Indian trails, villages, and sachemdoms.Publ. by Connecticut Soc. Colonial Dames of America, Inc., fromdata collected by Mathias Spiess. Ed. by Elinor H. Bulkeley,Chairman Publ. Comm. BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Spinden, H. J.1908. The Nez Perc6 Indians. Mem. Amer. Anthrop. Assoc, vol. 2, pt. 3.Squier, E. G. See Bartram, William, 1909.Statistik Aarbog 1922, Copenhagen.StefXnsson, VilhjXlmur.1914 a. Prehistoric and present commerce among the Arctic Coast Eskimo.Canada Geol. Surv., Bull. No. 6. Ottawa.1914 b. The Stefdnsson-Anderson Arctic Expedition of the American Museum:Preliminary ethnological report. Anthrop. Pap. Amer. Mus. Nat.Hist., vol. 14, pp. 1-395. New York.Stem, Jesse.1851. In Report of United States OflRce of Indian Affairs, pp. 260-261.Stern, Bernhard J.1934. The Lummi Indians of northwest Washington. Columbia Univ. Publ.Anthrop., vol. 17. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.Stevenson, Matilda Coxe.1894. The Sia. 11th Ann. Rep. Bur. Ethnol., 1889-90, pp. 3-157.1904. The Zufii Indians: Their mythology, esoteric fraternities, and cere-monies. 23d Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol., 1901-2, pp. 3-608.Steward, Julian H.1933. Ethnography of the Owens Valley Paiute. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer.Archaeol. and Ethnol., vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 233-250.1937. Linguistic distributions and political groups of the Great Basin Sho-shoneans. Amer. Anthrop., n. s., vol. 39, No. 4 (pt. 1), pp. 625-634.1938. Basin-plateau aboriginal sociopolitical groups. Bur. Amer. Ethnol.Bull. 120.1941. Culture element distributions: 13, Nevada Shoshone. Anthrop. Rec,vol. 4, No. 2. Univ. California Press.Stewart, Omer C.1941. Culture element distributions: 14, Northern Paiute. Anthrop. Rec,vol. 4, No. 3. Univ. Calif. Press.See also Rat, Verne F.Stone, Doris.1941. Archaeology of the north coast of Honduras. Mem. Peabody Mus.Archaeol. and Ethnol., Harvard Univ., vol. 9, No. 1. Cambridge.Strachey, William.1849. The historie of travaile into Virginia Britannia, expressing the cosmog-raphie and comodities of the country, together with the mannersand customs of the people. Hakluyt Soc Publ., vol. 6. London.Strong, William Duncan.1935. Archaeological investigations in the Bay Islands, Spanish Honduras.Smithsonian Misc. Coll., vol. 92, No. 14, Feb. 12.Swan, James G.1857. The northwest coast, or three years residence in Washington Territory.New York.1870. Indians of Cape Flattery. Smithsonian Contr. to Knowledge, vol. 16.SwANTON, John R.1904-5. Social conditions, beliefs, and linguistic relationship of the TlingitIndians. 26th Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol., 1904-5, pp. 391-485.1905. Contributions to the ethnology of the Haida. Mem. Amer. Mus. Nat.Hist., Jesup N. Pac. Exped,, vol. 5, pt. 1. Leiden and New York. SWANTONI INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 679SwANTON, John R.?Continued1911. Indian tribes of the Lower Mississippi Valley and adjacent coast ofthe Gulf of Mexico. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 43.1918. An early account of the Choctaw Indians. Mem. Amer. Anthrop.Assoc, vol. 5, pt. 2.1922. Early history of the Creek Indians and their neighbors Bur. Amer.Ethnol. Bull. 73.1928 a. Social organization and social usages of the Indians of the CreekConfederacy. 42d Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol., 1924-25, pp.23-472. 1928.1928 b. Religious beliefs and medical practices of the Creek Indians. 42dAnn. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol., 1924-25, pp. 473-672.1931. Source material for the social and ceremonial life of the ChoctawIndians. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 103.1942. Source material on the history and ethnology of the Caddo Indians.Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 132.1946. The Indians of the Southeastern United States. Bur. Amer. EthnolBull. 137.See also Thomas, Cyrus, and Swanton, John R,Tanner, John.1830. Narrative of captivity and adventures during thirty years' residenceamong the Indians in North America. Prepared for the press byEdwin James. New York.Taylor, Alexander S.1860-63. Indianology of California. Calif. Farmer and Journ. Useful Sci.,vols. 13-20, Feb. 22, 1860, to Oct. 30, 1863. San Francisco.Text, James.1900. The Thompson Indians of British Columbia. Mem. Amer. Mug. Nat.Hist., vol. 2, Publ. Jesup N. Pac. Exped., vol. 1, No. 4, Anthrop.vol. 1, pt. 4. New York.1906 a. Notes on the Tahltan Indians of British Columbia. In Boas anni-versary volume. Anthropological papers written in honor ofFranz Boas, Professor of Anthropology in Columbia University,on the twenty-fifth anniversary of his doctorate. New York.1906 b. The Lillooet Indians. Mem. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 4, pt. 6,Publ. Jesup. N. Pac. Exped., vol. 2, No. 5.1909. The Shuswap. Mem. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 4, pt. 7. Publ.Jesup N. Pac. Exped., vol. 2, No. 7.1928. The Middle Columbia Salish. Univ. Washington Publ. Anthrop., vol.2, No. 4, pp. 83-128. Seattle.Teit, James, and Boas, Franz.1930. The Salishan tribes of the Western Plateaus. 45th Ann. Rep. Bur.Amer. Ethnol., 1927-38, pp. 23-396.Teit, James A.; Haeberlin, H. K.; and Roberts, Helen H.1928. Coiled basketry in British Columbia and surrounding region, underdirection of Franz Boas. 41st Ann. Rep. Bur. Amer. Ethnol.,1919-24, pp. 119-484.Ten Kate, H.1884. Materiaux pour servir k I'anthropologie de la presqu'ile californienne.Bull. Soc. d' Anthrop., pp. 551-569.1885. Reizen en Onderzoekingen in Noord-Amerika. Leiden. 680 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Thalbitzer, William.1950. A note on the derivation of the word "Eskimo" (Inuit). AmerAnthrop., n. s., vol. 52, No. 4, pt. 1, p. 564.Thomas, Cyrus, and Swanton, John R.1911. Indian languages of Mexico and Central America and their geographicaldistribution. Bur. Amer. Ethnol. Bull. 44.Thompson, David.1916. Narrative of his explorations in western America, 1784-1812. Ed. byJ. B. Tyrrell. Publ. Champlain Soc, No. 12. Toronto.Thwaites, Reuben Gold, Editor.1896-1901. Travels and explorations of the Jesuit missionaries in NewFrance, 1610-1791. 73 vols. Cleveland.1904-7. Early western travels, 1748-1846. 32 vols. Cleveland.TiMBERLAKE, HeNRT.1765. Memoirs of Lieut. Henry Timberlake (who accompanied the threeCherokee Indians to England in the year 1762) . . . containing anaccurate map of their Over-hill settlement. London.ToLMiE, W. F., and Dawson, George M.1884. Comparative vocabularies of the Indian tribes of British Columbia.With a map illustrating distribution. Geol. and Nat. Hist. Surv.of Canada. Montreal.ToNTi, Henri de. See Margry, Pierre, 1875-86, vol. 1, pp. 572-616; and Cox,Isaac Joslin, Editor, 1905, vol. 1, pp. 1-65.TOOKER, W. W.1895. Algonquian appellatives of the Siouan tribes of Virginia. Amer.Anthrop., o. s., vol. 8, pp. 376-392.TowNSHEND, Charles H.1900. The Quinnipiack Indians and their reservation. New Haven.Trumbull, Benjamin.1818. Complete history of Connecticut from 1630 to 1764. 2 vols. NewHaven.Turner, Lucien M.1894. Ethnology of the Ungava district. 11th Ann. Rep. Bur. Ethnol.,1889-90, pp. 159-350.Turney-Hiqh, Harry Holbert.1937. The Flathead Indians of Montana. Mem. Amer. Anthrop. Assoc,No. 48 (suppl. Amer. Anthrop., vol. 39, No. 4, pt. 2: Contr. MontanaState Univ.).1941. Ethnography of the Kutenai. Mem. Amer. Anthrop. Assoc, No. 56(suppl. Amer. Anthrop., vol. 43, No. 2, pt. 2 E).Uhde, Adolph.1861. Die Lander am untern Rio Bravo del Norte. Heidelberg.Umfreville, Edward.1790. The present state of Hudson's Bay, containing a full description ofthat settlement and the adjacent country; and likewise of the furtrade. London.1859. Idem. Maine Hist. Soc. Coll., vol. 6, p. 270.Vahl, G. C; Amdrup, L. Bob?; and Jensen, A. S., Editors.1928-29. Greenland. 3 vols. Published by the Commission for the Direc-tion of the Geological and Geographic Investigations in Green-land. C. A. Reitzel, Copenhaven; Oxford Univ. Press, London. SWANTON] INDIAN TRIBES OF NORTH AMERICA 681Vancouver, George.1801. Voyage of discovery to the North Pacific Ocean, and round the world.1790-95. 6 vols. London.Venegas, Miguel.1757. Noticia de la California, y de su conquista temporal y espiritual hastael tiempo presente. T. 3. Madrid.1758. A natural and civil history of California. Translated from the originalSpanish. Madrid. Vols. 1-2. London, 1759.1767. Histoire naturelle et civile de la California. T. 3. Paris.VENIAMfNOFF, IVAN.1840. Zaplski ob ostravdx Unaldshkinskago otdailo. 2 vols. St. Petersburg.[In Russian.]VfiRENDRYE, PlERRE GaULTIER DE VaRENNES (aND HIS SONs).1927. Journals and letters of. Ed. by Lawrence J. Burpee. ChamplainSoc, Toronto.Vetancurt, Agustin de.1870-71. Teatro Mexicano. T. 4. Mexico (Reprint). (Tomo 3 containsthe Cr6nica de la provincia del Santo Evangello de Mexico, andtomo 4 the Menologio Franciscano de los varones, etc.)Vetromile, Eugene.1866. The Abnakis and their history, or historical notices on the aboriginesof Acadia. New York.Victor, Francis F.1871. The Oregon Indians. Overland Monthly, vol. 7, October. SanFrancisco.Voegelin, Erminie W.1938. Tiibatulabal ethnography. Anthrop. Rec, vol. 2, No. 1. Univ.Calif. Press.Warren, William W.1885. History of the Ojibways based upon traditions and oral statements.Coll. Minn. Hist. Soc, vol. 5. St. Paul.Waterman, T. T.1918. The Yana Indians. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer. Archaeol. and Ethnol.,vol. 13, pp. 35-102.1920. Yurok Geography. Univ. Calif. Publ. Amer. Archaeol. and Ethnol.,vol. 16, pp. 177-314.Weeden, William B.1884. Indian money as a factor in New England civilization. Johns HopkinsUniv. Studies in Hist, and Polit. ScL, 2d. ser., vols. 8-9. Baltimore.Wellcome, Henry B.1887. The story of Metlakahtla. New York.Wheeler Survey Report.1875-78. Report upon United States Geographical Survey west of the onehundredth meridian. In charge of First Lieut. Geo. M. Wheeler.Ann. Rep.1879. Idem., vol. 7. Archaeology.Whipple, A. W.1656. Pacific Railroad Report, vol. 3, pt. 3, p. 103.White, Frances J.1903. Old-time haunts of the Norwottock and Pocumtuck Indians. Spring-field, Mass.Whitman, William.1937. The Oto. Columbia Contr. Anthrop., vol. 28. Columbia Univ. Press,New York. 682 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Whorf, Benjamin L.1935. The comparative linguistics of Uto-Aztecan. Amer. Anthrop., n. s.,vol. 37, pp. 600-608.Whymper, Frederick.1868. A journey from Norton Sound, Bering Sea, to Fort Youkon (junctionof Porcupine and Youkon Rivers.) Journ. Roy. Geogr. Soc, vol. 38.London.Wilkes, Charles.1849. Western America, including California and Oregon, with maps of thoseregions and of the Sacramento valley. Philadelphia.Will, G. F., and Spinden, Herbert J.1906. The Mandans. A study of their culture, archaeology, and language.Pap. Peabody Mus. Amer. Archaeol. and Ethnol., Harvard Univ.,vol. 3, No. 4. Cambridge, Mass.Williams, Roger.1643. A key into the language of America. London. (Repr. in RhodeIsland Hist. Soc. Coll., vol. 1, Providence, 1827; also in Mass.Hist. Soc. Coll., 1st ser., vol. 3, Boston, 1794; also in NarragansettClub Publ., 1st ser., vol. 1, Providence, 1866.)WiLLOUGHBY, C. C.1905. Dress and ornament of the New England Indians. Amer. Anthrop.,vol. 7, pp. 499-508.1905. Textile fabrics of the New England Indians. Amer. Anthrop., vol. 7,pp. 85-93.1906. Houses and gardens of the New England Indians. Amer. Anthrop.,vol. 8, pp. 115-132.1907. The adze and ungrooved axe of the New England Indians. Amer.Anthrop., vol. 9, pp. 296-306,1908. Wooden bowls of the Algonkian Indians. Amer. Anthrop., vol. 10,pp. 423-434.Wilson, Edward F.1890. Indian tribes. Paper No. 11. The Kootenay Indians. 7n Our ForestChildren, vol. 3, No. 13. Owen Sound, Ontario.Wissler, Clark.1910. Material culture of the Blackfoot Indians. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist.,Anthrop. Pap., vol. 5, pt. 1. New York.1938. The American Indian. 3d ed.Wrench, J. E. See Berry, Brewton, et al.Wright, Julia McNair.1883. Among the Alaskans. Philadelphia.Yarrow, H. C.1879. Report of the operations of a special party for making ethnologicalresearches in the vicinity of Santa Barbara. Rep. U. S. Geogr.Surv. west of the 100th Meridian [Wheeler Surv. Rep.], vol. 7,Archaeology, pp. 32-46. Washington.Yoakum, H.1855-56. History of Texas from its first settlement to its annexation to theUnited States in 1846. 2 vols. New York.Young, Capt. Hugh. See Boyd, Mark F., 1934.Zbmbrano Bonilla, Jose.1752. Arte de la lengua totonaca. Ortega, printer.Ziqmond, Maurice L. See Park, Willard Z. INDEX'Aa'ninCna, see Atsina.A-ar-ke, see Hopi.A'-fi'tam, see Pima.A'a'tam d'kimtllt, see Pima.Aays, see Eyeish.Abasopalme, 613, 619Ab-boin-ug, see Dakota.Abercrombie, Lt. [W. R.], explorer, 530Abihka, 153, 157, 222, 228Abnaki, 13-15*, 16, 17, 18, 28, 44, 579,580joined by Pennacook, 18removal to Canada, 14, 18See also Delaware.Abra, 613, 622Absaroka, see Crow.Absaroke, see Crow.Absentee Shawnee, see Shawnee.Acapatos, see Atsina.Acarred Arms, see Cheyenne.Acasaqiiastlan, 613, 628Acaxee, 613-614, 631, 634, 636, 641Accerri, 614, 622Accohanoc, see Powhatan.Accorainta, see Pennacook.Achire, 614, 621Achomawi, 479-480*, 481Achuachapan, 614Acolapissa, 168, 174, 175, 192, 195-196*,200, 207, 208, 210, 211joined by Natchitoches, 206massacre of Natchitoches by, 206merged with Houma, 196, 200Acolhua, 614, 628 _Acoste, see Koasati.Acuera, 120*, 130, 131Acuy^, see Pecos.Adai, 196-197*, 201, 206, 212, 309, 314,315, 316, 318, 320probably joined Caddo, 197A da ka' da ho, see Arikara.A'dal-k'ato'igo, see Nez Perc6.Addle-Heads, see Menominee.Adshusheer, town of, 79, 84Adwanuqdji, see Atsugewi.Afulakin, see Wasco.Aguacadiba, 611Aguacaleyquen, see Utina.Aguacatec I, 614Aguacatec II, 614Agueynaba, 611A-gutch-a-ninne-wug, see Hidatsa.Ah'alakat, see Chemehuevi.Ahdlpam, see Santiam.Ahantchuyuk, 452*Ah-hi'-ta-pe, see Siksika.Ahihinin, see Pawnee. 'Asterisk indicates main account of tribe. Ah-mo-kdi, see Hopi.Ahomama, 614, 625Ahome, 614, 621, 622Ah-pen-ope-say, see Arikara.Aht, see Nootka.Ahtena, 529-530*Ahuddjg, see Apache.Ahuchan, see Yaochane.Ahya'to, see Arapaho.Ai-a'-ta, see Apache.Aibine, 614, 641Afgspalo, see Klamath.Algspaluma, see Klamath, Modoc.Ais, 121-122*, 131, 133Afspalu, see Klamath.Aix, see Eyeish.Ai-yah-kin-nee, see Hopi.Ajoica mission, 135Akansa, see Quapaw.Ak'-ba-su'-pai, see Havasupai.Akenuq'la'lam, see Okanagon.Akhrakouaehronon, see Susquehanna.A'kimmash, see Clackamas.Ak-min'-e-shu'-me, see Kalispel.Akochakanen, see ^lahican.Akokisa, 198, 199, 307, 308, 324fate unknown, 199See also Atakapa.A-ko-t'as'-ki-ro're"', see Tuscarora.A-ko-tcil-ka'n6?, see Delaware.Alabama,' 122, 130, 134, 135, 139, 144,145, 153-156*, 157, 159, 167,168, 180, 197, 210, 224, 299, 304,307, 324joined by Muskogee, 204joined by Pawokti, 136, 154, 170joined by Tawasa, 154, 211member of Creek Confederacy, 299migrations, 155, 197, 299, 307relations with French, 154uniting of some with Seminole, 155Alabama language, 154, 160Alabama [State of] 153-174Abihka, 153Alabama, 153-156*Apalachee, 156Apalachicola, 156Atasi, 156Chatot, 156Cherokee, 156Chickasaw, 156Choctaw, 156Creek Confederacy, 156-157Eufaula, 157Fus-hatchee, 157Hilibi, 157Hitchiti, 157 683 684 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Alabama [State of]?ContinuedKan-hatki, 157Kealedji, 157Koasati, 157-159*Kolomi, 159Mobile, 159-160*Muklasa, 160*Muskogee, 160-168*Napochi, 168-169*Natchez, 169Okchai, 169Okmulgee, 169Osochi, 169Pakana, 170Pawokti, 170Pilthlako, 170Sawokli, 170-171*Shawnee, 171Taensa, 171Tohome, 171-172*Tukabahchee, 172*Tuskegee, 172-173*Wakokai, 173Wiwohka, 174Yamasee, 174Yuchi, 174Alachua, 140Ala'dshush, see Chinook.Alaguilac, 614Alah6, see Kansa.Alakgma'yuk, see Luckiamute.Alamama, 614, 625AMmmimakt fsh, see Klamath.Alarc6n, Hernando de, 349, 350, 354,357, 366, 369Alaska [Territory of], 529-544Ahtena, 529-530*Aleut, 530-533*Dihai-kutchin, 533*Eskimo, 533Haida, 533Han, 533*Ingalik, 533-534*Koyukon, 534-536*Kutcha-kutchin, 536-537*Nabesna, 537*Niska, 538Natsit-kutchin, 538*Tanaina, 538-539*Tanana, 539-540*Tennuth-kutchin, 540*Tlingit, 540-543*Tranjik-kutchin, 543*Tsimshian, 543Vunta-kutchin, 543-544* ?A'ldtskn6-i, see Clatskanie.Alcoholic liquors, effect on Indians, 99Aleut, 530-533*, 539, 557, 568Algonkin, 544-545*Algonquian tribes, 65, 66, 74, 77, 78, 80,82, 83, 246, 392, 545, 548Aliatan, see Shoshoni, Northern.Aliche, see Eyeish.Allebome, see Comanche.Alleghanys, see Cherokee.Allen, Lt. Henry T., explorer, 530, 540 Alligewi, see Cherokee.AUikUk, 480, 497Allouez, French priest, 242, 253Aln&nbal, see Abnaki.Als6, see Alsea.Alsea, 452-453*, 469Altamaha Yamasee, 113Al-ta-tin, see Sekani.A'lvayg'lUIt, see Eskimo.Amacano, 122, 128, 129Amacapiras, see Macapiras.Amadas and Barlowe, explorers, 82Amahami, 276Amayes, see Jemez.Ameias, see Jemez.Amejes, see Jemez.A-me-she', se? Hidatsa.Ameyao, 611Amgdtsuish, see Umpqua.Amishgo, see Amusgo.Amojave, see Mohave.Amol^lish, see Molala.Ampxankni, see Wasco.A'-mu-kwi-kwe, see Hopi.Amusgo, 614Ana, see Cree.Anacana, see Aracanaes.Anacasiguais, see Anachiquaies.Anachiquaies, 614, 635Anadarko, member of Hasinai Confed-eracy, 307, 316Anagonges, see Abnaki.Anahou, see Osage.Anakwanckl, see Delaware.Ananis, see Biloxi.Anaxis, see Biloxi.Anaya, 611Anda-kpoen, see Eskimo.Andaste, see Susquehanna.Andatahouats, see Ottawa.Ani'-Gu'sa, see Muskogee.Ani'-Kltu'hwagI, see Cherokee.Ani'-Na'tst, see Natchez.Aniporspi, see Nez Perc6.Ani'-SawS,nu'gI, see Shawnee.An-ish-in-aub-ag, see Chippewa.Ani'-Skala'll, see Tuscarora.Ani'-Suwa'li, see Cheraw.Ani'ta'gua, see Catawba.Ani'-Tsa'ta, see Choctaw.Ani'-Tsi'ksA, see Chickasaw.Ani'-Yancisco Vasquez de, 110,290, 294, 306, 329, 331, 333, 336,339, 343, 345, 347, 348, 352, 362.371Cosapuj-a, see Cusabo.Cosnino, see Havasupai. 692 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Costanoan, 487-488*Costanos, see Costanoan.Coste, see Koasati.Costehe, see Koasati.Goto, 620Coulapissas, see Acolapissa.Coupe-gorges, see Dakota.Coushatta, see Koasati.Couteaux Jaunes, see Tatsanottine.C6w-ang-a-chem, see Serrano.Coweta, 134 ftn., 166 'Cowichan, 553-554*, 585, 591, 600Cowichan of Fraser River, see Stalo.Cowlitz, 416, 422-423*, 426Cowlitz, Upper, 422See also Taidnapam.Coxe, Daniel, 173, 187, 232Coyamit, 619, 620Coyotes, see Oto.Craven, Governor [Charles], 115Cree, 254, 390, 551, 552, 554-556*, 569,570, 580, 581, 592, 593, 604Assiniboin allied with, 388, 555driven out by Chipewyan, 551Etchaottine driven out by, 551, 569migrations of, 390relations with fur traders, 655, 556Sekani raided by, 555, 594, 605wars with Dakota, 555Creek Confederacy, 104, 105, 106, 107,111, 113, 119, 142, 143, 156-157*,160, 165, 166, 170, 174, 299, 300,301, 307incorporated into State of Okla-homa, 167, 300Creek-American War, 122, 129, 131, 134,142, 143, 155, 160, 166, 168Creeks, 93, 96, 104, 105, 107-108*, 110,113, 114, 116, 118, 123, 129, 130,134, 136, 139, 145, 151, 157, 158,165, 166, 167, 169, 170, 179, 213,221, 227, 229, 300, 314joined by Natchez, 169, 190, 301joined by Osochi, 153, 169joined by Yamasee, 152, 174joined by Yuchi, 104, 118, 140, 152,307relations with colonists, 166See also Alabama, Chiaha, Hitchiti,Mikasukee, Muskogee, Oconee,Sawokli, Tawasa, and Yuchi.Creeks, Lower, 104, 105, 108, 111, 113,114, 115, 116, 118, 119, 124, 128,139, 156, 157, 166, 168, 169, 170See also Seminole.Creeks, Middle, 157Creeks, Upper, 116, 119, 142, 156, 157,158, 165, 166, 167, 174, 179, 227Croatan Indians, name erroneouslyapplied to Robeson County In-dians, 81possible indentification with theHatteras, 80remnants of Woccon united with, 90tribe so-called in North Carolina,101 Crow, 275, 295, 385, 386, 389, 390-391*,556, 573Grow River Kutchin, see Vunta-kutchin.Cruzados, see Yavapai.Gruzate, Spanish officer, 331Guabajd,i, see Serrano.Cuahcomeca, 620Cuba, 610-611Bani, 610Baracoa, 610Barajagua, 610Barbacoa, 610Bayamo, 610Bayaquitiri, 610Boyaca, 610Gamaguey, 610Gayaguayo, 610Cubanacan, 610Guciba, 610Guaimaro, 610Guamahaya, 610Guanacahibe, 610Guaniguanico, 610Hanamana, 610Havana, 610lagua, 610Macaca, 611Macorixe, 611Maguano, 611Maisi, 611Maiy6, 611Mangon, 611Maniabon, 611Marien, 611Ornofaj', 611Sabaneque, 611Sagua, 611Cubanacan, 610Guchan, see Yuma.Guciba, 610Cuercos quemados, 620, 635Guicatec, 620Cuitlatec, 620Cuming, Sir Alexander, 221Cuna, 615, 618, 620, 626, 633, 639Cupeiio, 488Gusabo, 94-96*, 98, 107, 108, 109, 110,111noted for relations with Whites, 96relations with English, 95Gushing, Frank Hamilton, 347, 348Gushook, see Clowwewalla.Custer [George A.], General, 283Custer massacre, 280, 283, 384Gutganas, see Kohuana.Guts-sdh-nem, see Yakima.Cut-throats, see Dakota.Guyuteca, 620Cwarennoc, see Coree.Dacdbimo, see Navaho.Da-da'-ze ni'-ka-ci?'-ga, see Paiute,Southern.Dakaz, see Takkuth-kutchin.Dakkadhfe, see Takkuth-kutchin. INDEX 693Dakota, 192, 232, 250, 251, 259, 263,264, 265, 269, 274, 275, 280-284*,285, 286, 290, 295, 385, 386, 387,390, 391, 397, 545, 556Assiniboin separated from, 545Eastern, 283.joined by Cheyenne in Custer mas-sacre, 280Ottawa attacked by, 245uprising, 291wars with Cree, 555Western, 264, 283Dak'-ts!a*m-al-a?, see Klamath.Dak'-tsla'w-an-a'", see Klamath.Dakubetede, 459*, 488Dall, WiUiam H., 532, 540, 573Daparabopos, 620, 625Darazhazh, see Pawnee.d'Artaguiette, Diron, see Artaguiette,Diron d'.Da'sha-i, see Kadohadacho.DatsS-a?, see Comanche.DatQmpa'ta, see Kiowa.Davaxo, see Navaho.Davion, Father, Canadian missionary,193Dawson, George M., 573, 603Deadose, 197, 308, 314, 324Atakapa tribe, 314De Bry's map, 135De Crenay map, 175, 176, 192De-d'd. ten6, see Mishikhwutmetunne.Deguthee Dennee, see Takkuth-kutchin.Dekanawida, Iroquois chief, 39Delaware, 33, 42, 47, 48-55*, 57, 58, 59,60, 74, 91, 227, 228, 230, 235,237, 240, 269, 292, 298, 300, 301,326adoption of Wappinger, 47contact with Dutch, 54, 55contact with Swedes, 54joined Cherokee Nation, 223, 292,300relations with French, 54relations with Spanish, 54removal to reservations, 54, 237,292treaty with, at Greenville, 54, 237treaty with William Penn, 55use as scouts by Whites, 55Delaware, Lord, Governor of Virginia,48Delaware [State of], 57Delaware, 57Nanticoke, 57del Bosque, Fernando, explorer, 312Demers, Father, missionary, 550Desaguedero, 620, 628De Soto, Hernando, 76, 77, 95, 106, 107,111, 113, 115, 118, 120, 123, 124,128, 134, 135, 137, 138, 145, 150,151, 153, 154, 156, 158, 159, 160,165, 172, 176, 178, 180, 183, 187,189, 193, 201, 205, 207, 209, 212,213, 215, 221, 224, 225, 229, 315,316, 318, 325 Detseka'yaa, see Arapaho.de Vaca, Alvar Nufiez Cabeza, see NuiiezCabeza de Vaca, Alvar.De-w&-ka-nh&', see Chippewa.Dickenson, Jonathan, Quaker, 110, 121,131, 132Didii, 620, 640Diegueno, 353, 488-490*, 494, 498, 620,624Diggers, see Bannock and Paiute, Southern.Dihai-kutchin, 533*now extinct, 533Dfhit, see Ponca.Dilwishne, see Wiyot.Dil-zha, see Yavapai.Dil-zhay's, see Yuma.Dln^', see Navaho.Dirid, 618, 620, 626Dixon, Captain [George], explorer, 539,573, 588Djen6, see Navaho.Dobbs, Governor, 77Doegs, see Nanticoke.Dog Eaters, see Arapaho.Dog Indians, see Cheyenne.Dog People, see Mosopelea.Dog-Ribs, see Thlingchadinne.Do'gu'at, see Wichita.Do'kana, see Wichita.Doleguas, 621, 622Domingo Augustin, Jesuit missionary,110, 111Don Juan, Tacatacuru chief, 144Domay, Father Anastasius, 318Dorasque, 617, 621Dorsey, James O., 175, 258Douglas, Captain James, explorer, 539,542, 573Doustioni, member of NatchitochesConfederacy, 204Drake, Sir Francis, 478Drinkers of the Dew, see KeresanPueblos.Druilleyyes, French Missionary, 253Dshipowe-hdga, see Chippewa.Duckworth, Sir Thomas, 548Dudu, 621Dule, 617, 621Duncan, Rev. William, missionary, 543,607Durieu, Bishop, missionary, 593Dutch, contact with Delaware, 54, 55discovered Mahican, 41encounter with Susquehanna, 57guns sold to Indians by, 33, 39trade with Honniasont, 55war with Indians, (1640-45), 47Duwamish, 423*Duy, 621Dwa,-ka-n6?, see Chippewa.Dzltsi'stas, see Cheyenne.E-ar'-ke, see Hopi.Earring People, see Kalispel.Eastern Dakota, see Dakota. 694 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Eastern Niantic, see Niantic.Eastern Shawnee, see Shawnee.E-che-loot, see Wishram.Egija, Captain [Francisco Fernandez de],98, 99Eden, Governor [Charles], 76Edisto, 96Edii, 621, 640Eells, Myron, 420Eixarch, Tomds, 370Ekpimi, see Shasta.Eliot, John, missionary, 20Elk'ba'suniH, see Bellabella.Emejes, see Jemez.E-nagh-magh, see Tiwa Pueblos.England, territory ceded by France to,158English, 66at treaty of Greenville, 54encounter with Susquehanna, 57massacre by Indians under Ope-chancanough, 70, 71relations with Apalachee, 104relations with Chickasaw, 178, 180,196relations with Choctaw, 183, 184relations with Cusabo, 95relations with Sewee, 99treaty with Chowanoc, 77treaty with Iroquois, 70, 72treaty with Tuscarora, 83, 88war with Powhatan Indians, 70En-na-k'e, see Eskimo.En-na-k'i6, see Eskimo.Ennas, see Cree.Eno, 79*, 80, 83, 84, 96joined by Shakori, 84, 99joined Catawba, 79, 96, 99Entari ronnon, see Cherokee.E-nyae-va Pai, see Yavapai.E-pa, see Walapai.Epidemics, suffered by Indians, 26, 27,28, 91, 92, 137, 151, 276, 277, 280,308, 319, 327, 337, 397, 402, 413,425, 459, 532, 540, 542, 552, 578,591, 592, 602Equinipichas, see Acolapissa.firawika, see Kadohadacho.Erie, 33, 40, 48, 55, 230-231*, 235, 237destroyed by Iroquois, 231Erie Nation, 300Esbataottine, 594, 595Escalante, Fray Silvestre Velez de, 374,382Escoria, 621Eshkibod, see Eskimo.Eskiaeronnon, see Chippewa.Eskimo, 533, 539, 556-559*, 583relations with Whites, 568Espejo, Antonio de, 325, 333, 336, 339,343, 345, 348, 352, 368Esselen, tribe extinct, 490*Essequeta, see Kiowa Apache.Estevanico, Negro guide, 347Estrella, 621Eta, see Cree. E-tah-leh, see Arapaho.E-tans-ke-pa-se-qua, see Assiniboin.Etchaottine, 551, 569-570*driven out by Cree, 551, 569Etechemin, possibly Passamaquoddy, 579See also Malecite.Etiwaw, see Cusabo.Etn6mitane, see Umpqua.Etocale, see Ocale.Etzamish, see Songish.Eucheeanna, 117Eudeve, 621, 629Eufaula, division of the Muskogee, 134,152, 157, 166fi-ukshik-ni milMaks, see Klamath.E-wu-ha'-wu-si, see Northern Shoshoni.Eyanini din6, see Hopi.Eyeish, 201, 212, 309, 314-315*, 316,318, 320joined Caddo Tribes, 315Fall Indians, see Atsina.Fall Indians, see Clowwewalla.Fallam and Batts, explorers, 73Fallatahs, see Atfalati.Farfan de los Godos, Marcos, 366, 368Fernandeno, 490*, 491, 507practically extinct, 490Fernando, Kamia chief, 494Finley, James, explorer, 594Fire Nation, see Potawatomi.Five Nations, see Iroquois.Flancs-de-Chien, see Thlingchadinne.Flatbows, see Lower Kutenai.Flathead Reservation, 391Flatheads, see Chinook, Choctaw, Salish,Waxhaw.Fletcher, Miss Alice, 286, 287Florencia, Spanish officer, 128Florida [State of], 120-153Acuera, 120*Aguacaleyquen, 120Ais, 121-122*Alabama, 122Amacano, 122Amacapiras, 122Apalachee, 122-125*Apalachicola, 125Calusa, 125-128*Caparaz, 128Chatot, 128-129*Chiaha, 129Chilucan, 129Chine, 129Creeks, 130Fresh Water Indians, 130-131*Guacata, 131*Guale, 131Hitchiti, 131-132Icafui, 132*Jeaga, 132-133*Koasati, 133Macapiras, or Amacapiras, 133Mikasuki, 133-134*M0C050 or Mucogo, 134*Muklasa, 134 INDEX 695Florida [State of]?ContinuedMuskogee, 134Ocale or Etocale, 134-135*Ocita, 135Oconee, 135Onatheaqua, 135Osochi, 135Pawokti, 135-136*Pensacola, 136-137*Pohoy, Pooy or Posoy, 137*Potano, 137-138*Saturiwa, 138-139*Sawokli, 139Seminole, 139-143*Surruque, 143*Tacatacuru, 144*Tawasa, 144-145*Tekesta or Tequesta, 145-146*Ucita, 146Utina, or Timucua, 146-151*Tocobaga, 146*, 150, 151Yamasee, 152Yuchi, 152Yufera, 152Yui, 152-153*Yustaga, 153*Fon du Lac Loucheux, see Tatlitkutchin.Fontaine, Huguenot explorer, 73Fontaneda, Hernando de Escalante.121, 125, 127, 131, 132, 135, 145Fort Indians, see Kutcha-kutchin.Foxes, 225, 240, 242, 243, 250-252*, 253,254, 256, 257, 264, 265, 269, 270,285, 291, 292, 298, 300, 302migrations of, 265origin of name, 250relations with French, 251France, territory ceded to England, 158Franciscan Friars, 95, 110, 132, 138,151, 196, 197, 478Franciscan Missions, 352Francisco of Chicora, Indian informant,84, 99, 100, 103, 115Franquelin, Johannes Ludovicus, 265Franklin, Sir John, 593Eraser, Simon, 550, 578, 590, 594, 596,600Freckled Panis, see Wichita.French, encounter with Susquehanna, 57relations with Chickasaw, 178relations with Choctaw, 176, 183,185, 189relations with Delaware, 54relations with Foxes, 251relations with Natchez, 189, 190,204-205relations with Quapaw, 214relations with Saturiwa, 139relations with Tacatacuru, 144relations with Taensa, 209relations with Tunica, 193, 194French and Indian War, 583French missionaries, 251French Prairie Indians, see Ahantchu-yuk. French-English Wars, 40, 227Fresh Water Indians, 130-131Frobisher, [Martin], explorer, 568Fuca, Juan de, Greek navigator, 413,553, 588, 597, 600Fuentes, explorer, 576, 588Fur trade, effect on Indians, 583relation to Cree, 555, 556Fus-hatchee, division of the Muskogee,157Gabrielino, 490-491*, 498, 507practically extinct, 491Gadsden Purchase, 349, 363, 370Gahe'wa, see Kiowa.Gaitchim, see Juaneflo.Galasq'6, see Wasco.Galice Creek Indians, see Taltushtun-tude.Galisteo, 337, 344Gallegos, Baltazar de, Spanish oflBcer,120Galvez, 198Ganawese, see Coney.Ganniataratich-rone, see Nanticoke.Ga-qua'-ga-o-no, see Erie.Garabito, 621, 622Garc6s, Francisco, missionary, 349, 350,351, 354, 356, 357, 363, 366, 368,370, 517Garcfa de San Francisco, Fray, mission-ary, 334Garcilaso de la Vega, De Soto chroni-cler, 154, 155Garroteros, see Yuma.Gdta'ka, see Kiowa Apache.Gatsalghi, see Cheyenne.Gatschet, Albert S., 160, 175, 194, 196,198, 202, 203, 308, 312, 321, 466Gattacka, see Kiowa Apache.Geghdageghroano, see Illinois.Gemes, see Jemez.Genigueches, see Serrano.Gens de bois, see Tutchone.Gens de Bouleaux, see Tennuth-kutchin.Gens de la Grande Riviere, see Na-kotcho-kutchin.Gens de Rats, see Takkuth-kutchin,Gens des Foux, see Tutchone.Gens des Rats, see Vunta-kutchin.Gens des Vaches, see Arapaho.Gens du fond du lac, see Tatlit-kutchin.Gens du Large, see Natsit-kutchin.Gens du Petun, see Tionontati.Gens du Serpent, see Shoshoni, Northern.Gentlemen Indians, see Waco.Georgia [State of], 104-120Apalachee, 104Apalachicola, 104-105*Chatot, 105Cherokee, 105Chiaha, 105-107*Chickasaw, 107Creeks, 107-108Guale, 108-111*Hitchiti, 111* 696 IBUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Georgia [State of]?ContinuedKasihta, 111Oconee, 112*Okmulgee, 112-113*Osochi, 113Sawokli, 113Shawnee, 113Tamathli, 113-114*Timucua, 114Yamasee, 114-116*Yuchi, 116-120*Ghecham, see Luiseno.Ghost Dance religion, cause of Dakotauprising, 283, 284, 319Gi-aucth-in-in-e-wug, see Hidatsa.Gibbs, George, 402, 419, 422, 426, 442,458Gikidanum, see Serrano.Gila'qlulawas, see Kwalhioqua.GiLa'wewalamt, see Clowwewalla.Gila'xicatck, see Watlala.Gillamooks, see Tillamook.GIna's, see Kiowa Apache.Ginebigonini, see Shoshoni, Northern.Gitanemuk, see Serrano.Gita'qiemas, see Clackamas.Gfts'ajl, see Kichai.Gocoyome, 621Goddard, Pliny Earle, 605Gohun, see Yavapai.Gold, discovery of, 478, 536, 537, 585,602Gonana, see Nahane.Gorretas, see Manso.Gosiute, 372-373, 375Gosnold, [Bartholomew], explorer, 26Gotane, 621Gourgues, [Dominique] de, French com-mander, 139, 144Grand River, Ute band, 374Grant, Col. James, 222Grashoffer, Father Juan Bautista, 363Grasshopper Indians, see Ute.Gravier, J., 186, 195, 200Great Osage, see Osage.Greek Church, effect on natives, 532Green Wood Indians, see Nez Ferc6.Greenville, treaty with Delaware, 54treaty with English, 54Greenwood, Old, 380Gregorief, explorer, 530Grigra, adopted by Natchez, 185*, 189Gros Ventres, see Atsina, Hidatsa.Gros Ventres de la Rivifere, see Hidatsa.Gros Ventres des Plaines, see Atsina.Gros Ventres of the Plains, see Atsina.Guacata, 121, 131*disappearance of, 131Guacaya, see Waccamaw.Guaccaiarima, 609*Guachichile, 621, 623Guaes, see Kansa.Guaimaro, 610Gualaca, 621 Guale, 94, 108-111*, 116, 123, 131, 144,150, 165joined Yamasee, 110, 115 jkrelations with Spaniards, 165 ^Gualiba, see Walapai.Guamahaya, 610Guamichicorama, 619, 621Guanacahibes, 609, 610Guanexico, 621, 640Guanica, 611Guaniguanico, 610Guapo, see Wappo.Guarco, 621, 622Guarionex, 611Guasdmas, see Cathlamet.Guasapar, 621Guasave, 614, 619, 621, 640Guasco, 315Guatari, see Wateree.Guatijigua, 622, 625Guatinicamame, 622Guatuso, 620, 622, 640Guaxiquero, 622, 625Guaygata, 611Guayma, 622 634Guaymi, 621, 622, 628, 631Guelasiguicme, 619, 622Guerriers de pierre, see Assiniboin.Guetare, 619, 621, 622, 630, 639Gueza, 102Guiaquita, 619, 622Guichita, see Wichita.Guichyana, see Yuma.Guisoletes, 635Guithla'kimas, see Clackamas.Guithlamethl, see Cathlamet.Guixolotes, 622GA'ta'k, see Kiowa Apache.Guyandot, see Wyandot.Gyai'-ko, see Comanche.Gyitkshan, see Kitksan.Haaninin, see Atsina.Hahatonwan, see Chippewa.Hahatonway, see Chippewa.Hahderuka, see Crow.Hai-ai'-nlma, see Sanpoil.Haida, 533, 540, 570-573*noted for their arts, 573, 607Haideroka, see Crow.Haf'luntchi, see Cayuse.Hainai, 315Hdish, see Eyeish.Haiti, 608-610Bainoa, 608Cahibo or Cibao, 608-609Caizcimu, 609Guaccaiarima, 609Hubabo (or Ciguayo), 609-610Maguana, 610Marien, 610Halchidhoma, 349-350*, 354, 369, 492absorbed by Maricopa, 350Hale, Horatio, 426Halk5me'lem, see Stalo. INDEX 697H^-lum-mi, see Lummi.Halyikwamai, 350-351*. 353, 622, 624Ha-ma-kaba-mitc kwa-dig, see Apache.Han, 533*, 608See also Atakapa.Hanakwiche, see Serrano.Hanamana, 610Hand Cutters, see Dakota.Hanging Ears, see Kalispel.Hanis, 459*, 463Hanna, Captain, 588Hano, member of Tewa Pueblos, 340,344, 353Hanyuveche, see Serrano.Hapeka, see Hopi.Harahey, see Pawnee.Har-dil-zhays, see Yavapai.Hare Indians, see Kawchottine.Harney, Colonel, 127.Harrington, John P., 493Harrison, Gen. W. H., 228, 240Hasinai, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 326Hasinai Confederacy, 201, 205, 206,212, 307, 309,"314, 315-317,* 323Hat Creek Indians, see Atsugewi.Hathawekela, see Shawnee.Hati'hshi'ru'nil, see Winnebago.Hatilsh^, see Yuma.HatindiaSointen, see Wyandot.Hatiwa?ta-runh, see Neutrals.Hatteras, 80, 81Havana, 610Havasupai, 351*, 366Hawdlapai, see Walapai.Hawkins, Benjamin, 114, 132, 169Haynokes, see Eno.'H'-doum-dei-kiH, see Kadohadacho.Head deformation, practiced by Indians,102, 185Hearne, Samuel, explorer, 568He'iltsuq, see Bellabella.Heintzelman, Major S. P., 349, 494Hencock, Tuscarora chief, 86, 87Henley, Thomas A., 517Henne'sh, see Choctaw.Henry, Alexander, 593Hewaktokto, see Hidatsa.Hewitt, J. N. B., 605Hiawatha, Iroquois chief, 39, 40Hiawatha, poem by Longfellow, 264Hich'hu, see Hupa.Hidatsa, 274, 275-276*, 277, 281, 387,390, 391, 573citizens of United States, 276Hfgabu, see Kickapoo.Higgahaldahu, see Tillamook.Hikanagi, see Mahican.Hilibi, division of the Muskogee, 157Hilton, Captain William, 75Himeri, 622Hindsso, see Wichita.Hine, 622, 641HiokQo'k, see Pecos.His-tu-i'-ta-ni-o, see Atsina.Hitanwo'Iv, see Arapaho.Hitasi'na, see Cheyenne. Hitchcock, General E. A., 143Hitchiti, 104, 106, 111*, 112, 117, 122,130, 131-132, 133, 142, 157, 300member of Creek Confederacy, 300,301migrations of, 131-132Hitchiti language, 104, 113, 114, 131,144, 154Hitchiti-speaking people, 131, 132, 133139, 165Hitiingna, see Atsina.H'iwana, see Apache.H'lilush, see Tututni.Hoctatas, see Oto.Hodge, F. W., 339Hoeras, 622, 625Hogftpa'goni, see Southern Paiute.Hogiopas, see Cocopa.Hogologe, see Yuchi.Hoh, 417, 424*, 435Hohe, see Assiniboin.Holt, trader, 530Ho'-ma?-ha.?, see Omaha.Ho-ni'-i-taiii-o, see Pawnee,Honniasont, 55*, 74, 231destroyed by Susquehanna, 55joined Iroquois, 231trade with Dutch, 55Hook, 103Hopi, 340, 344, 346, 348, 351-353*famous for Snake Dance, 353relations with Spaniards, 353H6pitu, see Hopi.H6pitu-shlnumu, see Hopi.Hopohithli-yahola, Muskogee chief, 168Hostaqua, 135, 151Hotanka, see Winnebago.Hotcangara, see Winnebago.Hotl'nestako"', see Sauk.Houechas, see W^aco.Houma, 176, 185-186*, 193, 196, 199,200, 204, 207joined by Acolapissa, 196, 200joined by Bayogoula, 200migrations of, 186, 204Hounena, see Crow.Housatonic, see Stockbridges.Houston, Gen. Sam, 223How-mox-tox-sow-es, see Mandan.Hoxsiiwitan, see Wichita.Hua'amu'u, see Navaho.Huanchan6, see Waco.Huastec, 622Huave, 622Huaynamota, 620, 622Hubabo, 609-610*Huchnom, 492*, 527Hudson, Henry, discovered Wappinger,47Hudson's Bay Company, relations withIndians, 537, 542, 546, 550, 551,553, 555, 556, 569, 573, 576, 584,685, 591, 596, 597, 600, 604, 605,607Hue-la-muh, see Stalo. 698 BUREAU OF AMERICAiSr ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 145Huereo, 611Hughchee, see Yuchi.Huguenot colony, 95, 109, 138, 153destruction of bj' Spaniards, 95Huichol, 621, 623, 636Huite, 623, 629Hukwats, see Yuma.Humacao, 611Hum-a-luh, see Skagit.Hum-a-luh, see Stalo.Humano, see Shuman.Humboldt Bay Indians, see WiyotHume (1), 617, 623Hume (2), 623, 641Humptulips, 415, 416, 422, 424*Hunt, George, 21, 577Hunter, George, map of Cherokeecountry, 97Hupa, 483, 492-493*Huron, 33, 40, 43, 44, 48, 54, 233, 235,236, 245, 573, 604, 605attacked by Iroquois, 235, 245, 605joined by Ottawa, 245joined by Tionontati, 605iSee also Wyandot.Hiisky, see Eskimo.Hu-ta'-ci, see Lipan.Hutanga, see Kansa.Hu-iimui, see Omaha.Hiixul, see Lipan.Hyscani, see Yscani.lagua, 610liita-go, see Ute.Ibaja, see Guale.Iberville, Pierre le Moyne d', 160, 168,171, 172, 175, 186, 187, 189, 191,192, 196, 199, 200, 203, 208, 209,210, 211, 232, 267, 290Ibitoupa, 177, 185, 186-187*Icafui, 132*Icaiche, 626Icasqui, see Kaskinampo.Idaho [State of], 398-412Bannock, 398-399*Kalispel, 399-400*Kutenai, 400Nez Perc6, 400-403*Paiute, Northern, 403Paloos, 403Salish or Flathead, 403Shoshoni, Northern, 403-405*Shoshoni, Western, 405-410*Skitswish, 411-412*Snakes, see Paiute, Northern.Spokan, 412letan, see Ute.Igihua'-a, see Apache.Iguaja, see Guale.I'hl-den6, see Navaho.Ika, 623, 640.I'-ka-dfi', see Kickapoo.Ikanafaskalgi, see Seminole.Ikaniuksalgi, see Seminole.Ik-kil-lin, see Kutcha-kutchin.Ila'xluit, see Wishram. Ilga't, see Chehalis.lUinois, 212, 213, 230, 231, 235, 237, 240,241-242*, 243, 252, 254, 258, 265,269, 292, 297, 300, 301destruction of, 243, 249, 253, 256Illinois [State of], 240-243Chippewa, 240Delaware, 240Foxes, 240Illinois, 241-242*Kickapoo, 242Miami, 243Ottawa, 243Potawatomi, 243Sauk, 243Shawnee, 243Winnebago, 243Wyandot, 243Ima, see Quapaw.Imaha, see Quapaw.Immorality, effects on Indians, 573I'-na-cpg, see Nez Perc6.Indd, see Comanche.Inde, see Apache.Indiana [State of], 236-240Chippewa, 236Delaware, 237Erie, 237lUinois, 237Iroquois, 237Kickapoo, 237Mesopelea, 240Miami, 237-240*Neutrals, 240Potawatomi, 240Seneca, 240Shawnee, 240Wyandot, 240Ingalik, 533-534*Ingraham, explorer, 573Ing-we-pi'-ra"-di-vi-he-ma?, see Kere-san Pueblos.Innuin, see Eskimo.Innuit, see Eskimo.Inocoples, 623, 635Interior Salish, see Salish.Intibucat, 623, 625Intsi Dindjich, see Ahtena.Inuna-ina, see Arapaho.In^aVape, see Yavapai.Iowa [State of], 265-269Chippewa, 265Dakota, 265Foxes, 265Illinois, 265Iowa, 265-268*Missouri, 268Moingwena, 268Omaha, 268Oto, 268Ottawa, 268Peoria, 268Ponca, 268Potawatomi, 268Sauk, 269Winnebago, 269 INDEX 699Iowa, 252, 258, 264, 265*, 269, 270,285, 287, 28S, 291, 292-293, 300migrations of, 267Ipapana, 623, 638Ipataragiiites, see Shuman.Ipoilq, see Sanpoil.Iroquois, 33-40*, 42, 43, 44, 47, 54, 56,57, 58, 60, 62, 66, 70, 72, 73, 76,87, 91, 168, 230, 231, 233, 237,240, 242, 252, 293, 300, 544, 545,574, 583, 596armed by Dutch, 33, 39attacked Huron, 235, 245, 605attacked Ottawa, 245, 256became citizens of United States,300conquest of Susquehanna by, 57Erie destroyed by, 231governmental organization of, 40joined by Honniasont, 231joined by Tuscarora, 44, 57, 87, 88,300migrations of, 40removal to reservations, 40treaty with Catawba, 91treaty with English, 70, 72Wvandot destroyed by, 236, 250,259Iroquois Confederacy, 78, 574, 586Iroquois Nation, 57Irritila, 623, 625Isashbahdtsg, see Sarcee.Ish-te-pit'-e, see Siksika.Isis, 307Isle-de-Pierre, see Sinkiuse-Columbia.Isleta del Sur, see Pueblos.Isonkuaili, see Okanagon.I-sonsh'-pu-she, see Cheyenne.Issa, see Catawba,Issippo', see Crow.Isti seminole, see Seminole.Iswa, see Catawba.Ita ha'tski, see Dakota.Ita-Iddi, see Arapaho.Italwa lako, see Apalachicola.Itasi'na, see Cheyenne.I-ta-su-pu-zi, see Cheyenne.Itchali, see Kutcha-kutchin.Ithal6 tQni, see Mishikhwutmetunne.It-ka-lya-ruin, see Kutcha-kutchin.Itkpe'lit, see Kutcha-kutchin.Itku'dliiS, see Kutcha-kutchin.I tsi sf pi 6a, see Siksika.Itza, 623, 626Itzuco, 623I'-um O'-otam, see Kamia.Ivap'i, see Karok.Ixcani, see Yscani.Ixcatec, 623Ixil, 623, 640lyich, see Tyigh.lyiniwok, see Cree.Izalco, 623Iztepeque, 623 Jacaltoc, 618, 623, 628, 634Jackson, Andrew, 133, 142, 166Jaguallapai, see Walapai.Jallicumay, see Halyikwamai.Jamaica, 611Aguacadiba, 611Arneyao, 611Anaya, 611Guaygata, 611Huereo, 611Maynoa, 611Oristan, 611Vaquabo, 611Jamajabs, see Mohave.Janambre, 623, 632Jano, 325, 624Jarosom.a, see Apache.Jeaga, 121, 132-133*Jece, see Ais.Jefferson, Thomas, report on Indians, 71Jefferys, Thomas, 80Jemez, 330-332*, 340, 344joined by Pecos, 332, 337relations with Spanish, 331Jenness, Diamond, 551, 555, 568, 592,593, 594, 601Jesuits, missions established by, 58, 70,110, 236, 605Jewett, John, 588Jicaque, 624Jicarilla, 293, 300, 307, 317, 322, 330,332, 370-372*relations with Spaniards, 371removed to reservation, 371-372See also Apache.Jocome, 325, 624Joliet [Louis], explorer, 224Joshua, see Tututni,Joso, see Hopi.Joutel, Henri, 318Jova, 024Juaneno, 494*, 498Julime, 619, 624Jumano, 624, 634See also Shuman.Jumpers, see Chippewa.Jum-pys, see Yavapai.Juni, see Zuni.Kabo, 624Kiidiko, see Tonkawan Tribes.Kadohadacho, 205, 206, 208, 317migrations of, 318-319Kadohadacho Confederacy, 201, 205.212, 309, 314, 315, 316, 317-320=*Kai Porno, see Kato.Kaibab, 383Kaigani, see Haida.Kaispa, see Dakota.Kait-ka, see Calatjooya,Kaiviat-am, see Serrano.Ka-ka-i-thi, see Salish.Ka-ko'-is-tsi'-a-ta'-ni-o, see Salish.Kak'-wits, see Wailaki.Kaladlit, see Eskimo.Kalapooian people, 452 700 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BuU. 145Kalispel, 391, 399-400* 411, 424Lower, 400Ka-16X-la'-tce, see K^dohadacho.Kalu-xnd,dshu, see Kadohadacho.Kamaiakan, Yakima chief, 451Kamia, 488, 490, 494-495*, 624Kamiyahi, see Kamia.Kamiyai, see Diegueno, Kamia.Kamti'inu, see Nez Perc6.Ka'-nan-in, see Arikara.Kanawha, see Conoy.Ka'neaheS,wastsIk, see Cheyenne.Kangitoka, see Crow.Kan-hatki, division of the Muskogee,157Ka'nfna, see Havasupai.Kaninahoish, see Arapaho.Kanit', see Mandan.Kan'ka", see Ponca.Kank.'utla'atlam, see Okanagon.Kansa, 213, 270, 271, 286, 291, 293-294*,300removed to reservation, 300.Kansas, 286, 288Kansas [State of], 292-298Apache, 292Arapaho, 292Cherokee, 292Cheyenne, 292Chippewa, 292Comanche, 292Delaware, 292Foxes, 292Illinois, 292Iowa, 292-293Iroquois, 293Jicarilla, 293Kansa, 293-294*Kickapoo, 294Kiowa, 294-296*Kiowa Apache, 296-297*Miami, 297Missouri, 297Munsee, 297Osage, 297Oto, 297Ottawa, 297Pawnee, 297Potawatomi, 297-298Quapaw, 298Sauk, 298Seneca, 298Shawnee, 298Wyandot, 298Kantcati, 155Kantsi, see Kiowa Apache.K'd-patop, see Kiowa Apache.Karankawa, 308, 635Karankawan Tribes, 308, 309, 320-321*Karawala, 630Kariko, see Tonkawan Tribes.Karok, 495-496*Kasahd un