Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ??TScienceDirect %gkal ELSEVIER Biological Control 46 (2008) 4-14 www.elsevier.com/locate/ybcon Endophytic fungi as biocontrol agents of Theobroma cacao pathogens Luis C. Mejiaa'b, Enith I. Rojasa, Zuleyka Maynarda, Sunshine Van Baela, A. Elizabeth Arnold0, Prakash Hebbard, Gary J. Samuels6, Nancy Robbinsa, Edward Allen Herrea* a Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado Postal 0843-03092, Balboa, Ancon, Panama Department of Plant Biology and Pathology, Rutgers University, 59 Dudley Road, Foran Hall, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA "Division of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Department of Plant Sciences, The University of Arizona, 1140 E. South Campus Drive, Fortes ##. Twcmn, JZ 8J7Z/, C/^ Mars Inc., United States Department of Agriculture-ARS, Sustainable Perennial Crops Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA e United States Department of Agriculture-ARS, Systematic Mycology and Microbiology Laboratory, 10300 Baltimore Ave., Beltsville, MD 20705, USA Received 26 June 2007; accepted 18 January 2008 Available online 31 January 2008 Abstract Fungal endophytes isolated from healthy Theobroma cacao tissues were screened in vitro for antagonism against major pathogens of cacao. Of tested endophytic morphospecies, 40% (21/52), 65% (28/43) and 27% percent (4/15) showed in vitro antagonism against Monil- iophthora roreri (frosty pod rot), Phytophthora palmivora (black pod rot) and Moniliophthora perniciosa (witches broom), respectively. The most common antagonistic mechanism was simple competition for substrate. Nonetheless, 13%, 21%, and 0% of tested morphospe- cies showed clear antibiosis against M. roreri, P. palmivora, and M. perniciosa, respectively. One isolate of Trichoderma was observed to be parasitic on M. roreri. Endophyte species that were common in the host plants under natural conditions often are good colonizers and grow fast in vitro whereas antibiosis producers usually appear to be relatively rare in nature, tend to grow slowly in vitro, and often are not good colonizers. We suggest that there is an inherent general trade-off between fast growth (high colonization) and production of chemicals that produce antibiosis reactions. Finally, field trials assessing the effects of three endophytic fungi {Colletotrichum gloeospo- rioides, Clonostachys rosea and Botryosphaeria ribis) on pod loss due to M. roreri and Phytophthora spp. were conducted at four farms in Panama. Although the overall incidence of black pod rot was very low during the tests, treatment with C. gloeosporioides significantly decreased pod loss due to that disease. We observed no decrease in pod loss due to frosty pod rot, but treatment with C. rosea reduced the incidence of cacao pods with sporulating lesions of M. roreri by 10%. The observed reduction in pod loss due to Phytophthora spp., and sporulation by M. roreri, supports the potential of fungal endophytes as biological control agents. Further, these studies suggest that combined information from field censuses of endophytic fungi, in vitro studies, and greenhouse experiments can provide useful a priori criteria for identifying desirable attributes for potential biocontrol agents. ? 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Biological control; Endophytic fungi; Theobroma cacao; Moniliophthora; Phytophthora; Crinipellis; Colletotrichum; Clonostachys; Botryosp- haeria 1. Introduction tion worldwide. These diseases (black pod disease, caused by Phytophthora spp.; frosty pod rot, caused by Monilioph- Three diseases of Theobroma cacao L., the source of thora roreri (Cif.) Evans et al.; and witches broom caused cocoa, are major biological factors that limit cocoa produc- by Crinipellis perniciosa (Stahel) Singer, Moniliophthora perniciosa sensu Aime and Phillips-Mora (2005)) cause an annual reduction in cocoa production estimated at more * Corresponding author. Fax: +1 507 212 8148. than 700,000 tons of beans, corresponding to more than E-mail address: herrea@si.edu (E.A. Herre). 700 million US dollars (Bowers et al., 2001). Traditional 1049-9644/$ - see front matter ? 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.01.012 Z.C Me/6z e( a/. /Ao/ogica/ Owfro/ -^ (200&J -f-/^ methods of chemically controlling these diseases can be expensive, ineffective, and have a negative impact on both environmental and human health. Biological control as part of integrated pest management has been suggested as the most sustainable long-term solution (Bateman, 2002). Specifically, promising results for the control of dis- eases of cacao have been obtained using epiphytic myco- parasitic fungi (Krauss and Soberanis, 2001; Ten Hoopen et al., 2003). Furthermore, recent evidence shows that in some cases endophytic fungi restrict cacao pathogen growth or damage in vitro and in vivo (Arnold et al., 2003; Evans et al., 2003; Mejia et al., 2003; Holmes et al., 2004, 2006; Rubini et al., 2005; Tondje et al., 2006) high- lighting their status as a new source of biological control agents for combating cacao pathogens. Endophytic fungi are taxonomically and biologically diverse but all share the character of colonizing internal plant tissues without causing apparent harm to their host (Wilson, 1995). The best understood of these are members of the Clavicipitaceae (Ascomycota), which are endophytes of some temperate grasses. In these systems, there is usually only one endophytic fungal species per host and these fungi appear to be highly coevolved with their host. Generally, these fungi are transmitted vertically (from mother to off- spring through seeds, as reviewed by Clay and Schardl (2002); see also Saikkonen et al. (2004)). This transmission pattern is thought to promote beneficial relationships with the host plant (Herre et al., 1999). Nonetheless, in grasses, the net effect of endophyte associations can range from par- asitic (e.g., choke disease) to strongly mutualistic (Clay and Schardl, 2002). Beneficial effects for hosts include increased drought tolerance (Arechavaleta et al., 1989), deterrence of insect herbivores (Breen, 1994; Rowan and Latch, 1994), protection against nematodes (Pedersen et al., 1988; West et al., 1988; Kimmons et al., 1990), and resistance against fungal pathogens (Gwinn and Gavin, 1992; Bonos et al., 2005; Clarke et al., 2006). The last is also true for endo- phytes found in some tropical grasses (Kelemu et al., 2001). Anti-pathogen protection mediated by endophytes has been observed also in nongramineous hosts. For exam- ple, endophytic fungi have been found to protect tomatoes (Hallman and Sikora, 1995) and bananas (Pocasangre et al., 2001; Sikora et al., 2008) from nematodes, and beans and barley (Boyle et al., 2001) from fungal pathogens. However, even with the accumulating evidence that endo- phytic fungi can reduce pathogen damage in grasses and other host plants, little is known about the generality of this role in natural systems and whether it can be exploited as a biocontrol strategy in crop protection. Studies of endophytic fungi in Theobroma cacao and other dicots reveal substantial differences with the grass endophyte systems (Arnold et al., 2000; Herre et al., 2005, 2007; Van Bael et al., 2005). Specifically compared to grass endophytes, the endophytes associated with cacao and other tropical woody plants are highly diverse, hori- zontally transmitted (acquired from the environment), and show only some degree of host affinity (Herre et al., 1999, 2005, 2007; Arnold et al., 2000; Van Bael et al., 2005). In cacao, leaves and fruits are endophyte-free at emergence and accumulate diverse endophytes from spore rain in the environment. Cacao tissues are heavily colo- nized in a short period of time (~2-3 weeks) by a group of endophyte species characterized by a few species that are consistently dominant members of the assemblage and a large number of exceedingly rare endophyte species (Arnold et al., 2003; Herre et al., 2005, 2007; Van Bael et al., 2005). In T. cacao and Theobroma gileri at least two distinctive assemblages of endophytes can be found, one assemblage in leaves (Herre et al., 2005; Van Bael et al., 2005) and a second assemblage in trunks (Evans et al., 2003; Samuels unpublished; see also Crozier et al., 2006). The endophytes found in leaves tend to be leaf- and twig-inhabiting fungi in genera such as Colletotrichum, Botryosphaeria, Xylaria, and Phomopsis, while the domi- nant endophytes of trunks tend to be in genera that are usually known as soil fungi (e.g., Clonostachys and Trichoderma). These observations, jointly with in vitro and in vivo stud- ies (Arnold et al., 2003; Evans et al., 2003; Holmes et al., 2004; Rubini et al., 2005; Tondje et al., 2006; Aneja et al., 2006; Bailey et al., 2006) suggest that different endo- phytic fungi associated with T. cacao reduce the damage associated with pathogens in a variety of different ways in planta. Specifically, endophytes can inhibit pathogen infec- tion and proliferation within the host directly (e.g., via antibiosis, competition, and mycoparasitism), or indirectly via inducing resistance responses intrinsic to the host (Ane- ja et al., 2006; Bailey et al., 2006; S. Maximova, M. J. Guiltinan and E. A. Herre, unpublished). Correctly under- standing patterns of host-endophyte ecology as well as identifying the mechanisms underlying the interactions among endophytes, pathogens, and hosts hold important implications for developing effective strategies of biocon- trol (Herre et al., 2007). This study represents a step toward understanding the ecology of endophytes as a means to develop effective bio- control agents in T. cacao, with broader implications for use in other crop systems. First, we compare the interac- tions of endophytic fungi against T. cacao pathogens in vitro. Next we outline greenhouse studies where we com- pare the competitive success of different endophytic fungi in colonizing T. cacao tissues in planta. Finally, we report results from a field study following an augmentative bio- logical control approach against Phytophthora spp. and M. roreri in farms of Bocas del Toro Province, Republic of Panama. 2. Materials and methods 2.1. Isolation of endophytes The endophytic fungi used in this study come from the collection of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Sustainable Cacao Group. This collection developed from f. C Me/ih e( a/. /.BWogiW Confro/ ^ ^00&j -f-/V a survey of cacao leaves and fruits from four different sites in the Republic of Panama: Barro Colorado Island, where T, cacao grows as a natural part of an intact tropical forest; Nombre de Dios and Soberania National Park, where T. cacao grows in abandoned fields that partially or com- pletely overgrown by tropical forest; and near Almirante, Bocas del Toro, where cacao is cultivated in commercial plantations and small farms. Fungi were isolated from healthy leaves following Arnold et al. (2000). Leaves were briefly washed in running tap water and processed as fol- lows: 32 square pieces of 4 mm2 were cut from the central part of each leaf, surface sterilized in 0.525% sodium hypo- chlorite for 3 min. and 70% ethanol for 2 min.; immersed in sterile water for 1 min.; and then placed on 2% malt extract agar (2% ME A). Fungi that emerged from leaf pieces were transferred to tubes containing 2% MEA for storage and classification by morphospecies. To isolate endophytes from cocoa pods, pods were washed with running tap water and then subdivided in 8 parts. Sixteen 2-mm cubes were taken from each part: eight from the exocarp and eight from the mesocarp. Surface sterilization, plating, and stor- age procedures were the same as for leaves. Endophytes were classified by morphospecies as described by Arnold et al. (2000). Representative isolates of the morphospecies that were used for field and green- house inoculations were further delimited using DNA sequencing data from the nrDNA internal transcribed spacer regions 1 and 2 and 5.8 s gene (ca. 600 base-pairs) using primers ITS4 and ITS5 (White et al., 1990) following PCR protocols described by Rehner and Uecker (1994). Sequences were submitted to GenBank BLAST searches, and genus names were assigned based on the score and consistent similarity with the five sequences most similar to the submitted sequence. For the purpose of this work, morphospecies are considered as putative species. A subset of isolates that sporulated in culture and were used for inoculation experiments were identified to species on the basis of cultural and reproductive characteristics. This set is deposited at the USDA, Systematic Mycology and Microbiology Laboratory, Beltsville (SBML), and work is continuing on their identification. 2.2. In vitro tests of anti-pathogen activity In a series of experiments, dual plate assays were con- ducted to evaluate the in vitro antagonistic activity of endo- phytes against three pathogens of cacao. Seventy-five endophytic fungi isolates representing 52 morphospecies were tested against M. roreri; 62 isolates representing 43 morphospecies were tested against P. palmivora (Butl.) But!.; and 23 isolates representing 15 morphospecies were tested against M. perniciosa. In many cases, multiple differ- ent isolates of the same morphospecies were tested. Because the endophyte collections were ongoing, not every endo- phyte morphospecies was tested against every pathogen. Pathogen isolates used in dual plate assays were isolated from cacao pods in Bocas del Toro (M. roreri), Soberania National Park (P. palmivora), and Nombre de Dios (M. perniciosa). Hyphal plugs of pathogens and endophytes were placed 4 cm apart in petri dishes containing 2% MEA. M. roreri and M. perniciosa were plated one week earlier than the endophytes, reflecting the slow growth of these pathogens in culture. P. palmivora was plated concur- rently with endophytes. Evaluation of interactions began 60 h after endophytes were placed into assay plates. Three types of activity were recorded: (1) Antibiosis: growth-inhi- bition determined by the presence of an inhibition zone; (2) competition for substrate: overgrowth of one organism by another; and (3) mycoparasitism: direct parasitism on the hyphae of the pathogen. In each case, we determined which "won" or "lost" the interaction and by which type of activ- ity. Endophytes were considered to win if they inhibited the growth of the pathogen, showed more radial growth than the pathogen, or parasitized the pathogen. Endophytes were considered to "lose" if the pathogen "won" (showed the reverse outcome mentioned above). If endophytes and pathogens inhibited each other or showed the same amount of radial growth, the interaction was considered neutral. If different isolates of the same morphospecies interacted dif- ferently against the same pathogen in separate trials, the interaction was classified as mixed. 2.3. Spore production for inoculation experiments A subset of endophytic fungi that won interaction trials against cacao pathogens was selected for inoculation exper- iments. Inocula for greenhouse experiments were produced by liquid fermentation; inocula for field experiments were produced by liquid fermentation followed by solid state fermentation. Cultures of endophytic fungi were grown for 10 days in 100-mm petri dishes with 2% MEA until they colonized the entire petri dish. Dishes were then flooded with 10 ml of sterile water and mycelia and propagules were scraped into sterile Erlenmeyer flasks containing 500 ml of 1.5% molasses yeast medium (1.5% MYM: 15 g molasses, 2.5 g yeast extract, 11 water). This medium is a modified version of the one used by Hebbar and Lumsden (1999). The flasks were shaken at 125 rpm and 23 ?C for 10 days. For inoculation experiments in the greenhouse, contents of flasks were filtered through a sterile net of nylon stock- ings to separate the mycelium from the spore suspension. Spore suspensions were concentrated by centrifugation at 6 g (IEC series 428, International Equipment Co., Nedham Heights, MA), the supernatants eliminated, and the spore pellets resuspended in 0.5% gelatin. Spore concentrations were adjusted to the rank of 106 107 spores per ml and sprayed onto leaves using garden sprayers. For inoculation experiments in the field we used two solid substrates for spore production: Biodac? (Cellulose complex mesh size 20-50 from Kadant Grantek, Inc., Green Bay, WI) and rice grains in polypropylene bags with air filters (Unicorn Imp. & Mfg. Corp., Garland TX). Bags were prepared either using 100 g of Biodac? mixed with Z.C Me/6z e( a/. /Ao/ogica/ Owfro/ -^ ("200&J -f-/^ 50 ml of 1.5% MYM or 500 g of rice grains mixed with 200 ml of 1.5% MYM. We used each substrate in two sep- arate experiments based on their availability. Biodac? for the first field trial and rice for the second trial. Presterilized 1.5% MYM was added to rice or Biodac? in bags, which were then sealed, autoclaved for 1 h, and 24 h later auto- claved again for 1 h. When bags cooled to ca. 25 ?C, we inoculated them with fungi that had grown for 7 days in 1.5% MYM (liquid fermentation). We used 25 ml per 100 g (Biodac) or 100 ml per 500 g (rice) of fungi to inocu- late the bags. Bags were then sealed and kept at 24 ?C with a natural daylight photoperiod. 2.4. Greenhouse inoculation of seedlings We first generated endophyte-free cacao seedlings fol- lowing Arnold and Herre (2003). Cacao seeds were germi- nated in sterilized soil in a plastic shade house that prevented leaves from being exposed to environmental spores and water contact. Seedlings were watered without wetting aerial tissues. We inoculated three different species of endophytes to cacao leaves: Clonostachys rosea (Link:Fr.) Schroers et al. isolate PI004, Botryosphaeria ribis Grossenb. & Duggar isolate PI006, and Colletotrichum glo- eosporioides (Penz.) Penz. & Sacc. isolate 6174. These iso- lates were selected because they showed strong competitive ability in vitro against P. palmivora and M. ror- eri, they sporulated easily, and in the case of C. gloeosporio- ides 6174 and B. ribis PI006, they were common endophytes of healthy T. cacao growing in the Bocas region. We maintained high relative humidity inside the shade house by keeping a bed of wet towels on the bench where seedlings were located. The shade house was closed and high humidity was maintained for 48 h after inoculations. To verify that the endophyte species could colonize leaf tissue, we treated twenty T. cacao seedlings with each fun- gus and 20 noninoculated seedlings were used as a control (total number of plants ? 80). On three separate dates after inoculation, thirty-two leaf pieces of 4 mm2 from three leaves per treatment were surface sterilized and plated to evaluate the percentage of fungal colonization (number of leaf pieces with mycelia growth over total leaf pieces pla- ted per single leaf). The percent of fungal colonization per leaf was arcsine transformed and treatments were com- pared using separate univariate ANOVA tests on each sampling date. Differences among treatments were ana- lyzed using Tukey's multiple comparison test. To compare the relative colonization potential of differ- ent endophytic species in planta, we sprayed a mix of seven different endophytic isolates (from six species) onto cacao leaves and isolated the fungi that had colonized the leaves through time. Each endophytic isolate was grown in sepa- rate media (1.5% MYM) and spore concentrations were adjusted to 105 spores per ml per species. The spore suspen- sion from each isolate was sprayed on a plate to confirm spore viability. Then the seven spore suspensions were combined, and the final spore concentration of the mix was 3 x 106 spores per ml. The estimated percentages of spores of each of the different isolates in the mix, were C. gloeosporioides 5101(16%), C. rosea PI004 (15%), Fusarium solani (Mart.) Sacc. PI016 (16%) and PI20 (19%), Fusarium decemcellulare C. Brick PI018 (13%), Acremonium sp. PI23 (16%), and Xylaria sp. 9140 (5%). (note: the Xylaria was not originally collected from T. cacao). For this experi- ment, endophyte-inoculated leaves and control (noninocu- lated) leaves were produced in the same individual plants. During inoculations, we prevented spores from arriving on control leaves by placing a cone-shaped paper bag around the target leaves. Paper bags were removed one day after inoculations. The percent colonization of each endophyte isolate was determined on two different dates after inoculation: 14 days after inoculation (sample size N?6 leaves and 192 leaf pieces of 4mm2; and N?l and 224 leaf pieces of 4 mm for control and inoculated leaves, respectively) and 29 days after inoculation (N ? 6 leaves and 384 leaf pieces of 4 mm2 and N?9 and 560 leaf pieces of 4 mm2 for control and inoculated leaves, respectively. A second goal of the greenhouse experiments was to test whether the endophytic isolates showed any signs of being pathogenic. We observed inoculated plants to evaluate whether or not endophytes induce disease symptoms or abnormalities in leaves. 2.5. Field trials We first conducted a preliminary trial in an abandoned cacao field in Nombre de Dios to evaluate the possibility of reintroducing C. gloeosporioides to cacao tissues under field conditions. Spores of C. gloeosporioides isolate 4467 were produced after 20 days of growth in polypropylene bags that contained Biodac?. Spores were isolated by squeezing the contents of bags through a sterile nylon stocking sub- merged in 10 1 of 2% Tween 20. The resulting spore suspen- sion was transferred to compression sprayers for aspersion onto target tissues. C. gloeosporioides isolate 4467 was applied to 9 pods (n = 8 trees) while 6 pods and were main- tained as noninoculated controls. After 6 weeks, inoculated and noninoculated pods were sampled to measure what percentage of each pod had been colonized by the inocu- lated fungus. Three species previously evaluated under greenhouse conditions were selected for the field trial in commercial plantations: C. gloeosporioides 6174, B. ribis PI006, and C. rosea PI004. This field trial was conducted in four farms in Bocas del Toro, Panama, following a randomized block design. In each farm a row of 20 trees per fungal endophyte treatment and a row of 20 control trees for a total of 80 experimental trees per farm were selected. Rows of trees between treatments were separated by two rows of untreated trees. Distance between trees in the farms was within 2-3 m. Target tissues for inoculation were flowers and pods. Treatments began at the peak of the flowering f. C Me/ih e( a/. /.BWogiW Confro/ ^ (200&J -f-/V season in the region (May). Before the first inoculation, we performed a phytosanitary cleaning in which all diseased pods were removed from the trees. Over 7 months, we per- formed monthly phytosanitary cleanings before spore applications. Each month we quantified the number of mature cacao pods that were healthy, had early stage symptoms of frosty pod (deformed fruit), late stage symp- toms of frosty pod (sporulation), and/or symptoms of black pod disease. 2.6. Statistical methods: field trials We calculated the proportions of healthy or damaged fruit by averaging the last 4 months of treatments and mea- surements (September-December). Because we removed all mature healthy (harvestable) and damaged fruit after each census, the fate of each fruit on each tree was counted only once in the study. Twenty-two trees did not produce any fruit (healthy or diseased) during the final 4 months of the study (September-December) and were removed from analyses. We used the logit transformation to normalize the data before proceeding with parametric tests. The four treatments were compared using a mixed model analysis of variance (PROC MIXED in SAS, 2001) where the fixed effects of treatment, farm, and their interaction were calcu- lated. Tree nested within farm was the random factor in the model. The tests were followed up with individual compar- isons of all the fixed effects, using Bonferroni adjustments to account for multiple comparisons. We present all means as original, nontransformed values with lines drawn to rep- resent one standard error. 3. Results 3.1. In vitro activity Of the endophytic fungi morphospecies tested against three cacao pathogens, 40% (21/52), 65% (28/43), and 27% (4/15) showed in vitro antagonism against M. roreri, P. palmivora, and M. perniciosa, respectively (Table 1). Competition was the most common mode of action against pathogens and occurred for 23% (12/52), 35% (15/43), and 27% (4/15) of endophyte morphospecies tested against M. roreri, P. palmivora, and M. perniciosa, respectively. Anti- biosis occurred for 13% (7/52) and 21% (9/43) of morpho- species challenged against M. roreri and P. palmivora, respectively. No antibiosis was observed against M. pernic- iosa. Moniliophthora roreri and M. perniciosa inhibited the growth of several endophytic morphospecies (Table 1). Only one case of mycoparasitism was observed: a Tricho- derma sp. isolate parasitized the mycelia of M. roreri. Not all the same morphospecies were tested against each of the three pathogens, but 33 morphospecies were tested against both P. palmivora and M. roreri. Of these, 33% (11/33) antagonized both pathogens: four by antibiosis and eight by competition. C. gloeosporioides (morphospe- cies 1), which was used in inoculation experiments, had mixed interactions with pathogen, whereby different iso- lates of the same morphospecies won or lost against the Table 1 Summary interactions of endophytic fungi and three cacao pathogens" Activity Outcome of the interaction against M. roreri Winb Lose Neutral Mixed interaction13 Competition Antibiosis Competition + antibiosis Mycoparasitism Summary of activity against M. roreri Competition Antibiosis Competition + antibiosis Summary of activity against P. palmivora Competition Antibiosis Competition + antibiosis Summary of activity against M. perniciosa 12 7 1 1 21 6 6 0 0 12 11 Outcome of the interaction against P. palmivora 15 9 4 28 10 Outcome of the interaction against M. perniciosa 1 a Values indicate the number of cases in which a given outcome ("win" etc.) was observed between a given endophyte morphospecies and each of the three pathogens. The outcomes were determined 10 days after having been grown together in dual plate assays on 2% MEA. Not all endophytes were tested against all pathogens. Seventy-five endophytic fungi strains representing 52 morphospecies were tested against M. roreri; 62 strains representing 43 morphospecies were tested against P. palmivora; and 23 strains representing 15 morphospecies were tested against M. perniciosa. b Endophytes were considered to win if they inhibited the growth of the pathogen, they overgrew the pathogen, or if they parasitized the pathogen. If endophytes and pathogens were inhibiting each other or showed the same amount of radial growth, the interaction was considered neutral. If different strains of the same morphospecies interacted differently against the same pathogen in separate trials, then the interaction was classified as mixed. Z.C Me/6z e( a/. /BWogica/ Owfro/ -^ ("200&J -f-/^ same pathogen. Nonetheless, this morphospecies contained some of the most competitive isolates in vitro and was the best colonizer in the in vivo trials. 3.2. Greenhouse inoculations for seedlings Reintroduction of endophytic B. ribis PI006, C. rosea PI004, and C. gloeosporioides 6174 into cacao leaves was confirmed by successful reisolations after inoculation. Sam- pling of inoculated leaves at 10, 25, and 33 days after inoc- ulation showed a progressive colonization by inoculated fungi in their respective treatments, with C. gloeosporioides 6174 showing the highest capacity for colonization (Fig. 1 A-C). Sampling at 10 days after inoculation showed 13.54, 14.58, and 26.04% of leaf pieces sampled colonized by endophytic fungi in treatments with B. ribis PI006, C. rosea PI004, and C. gloeosporioides 6174 compared to 4.17% col- onization in control leaves (Fig. 1A). At the same date, 10.42, 11.46, and 20.83% of leaf pieces sampled were colo- nized by their respective inoculum in treatments with B. ribis PI006, C. rosea PI004, and C. gloeosporioides 6174 (see Table 2). Thirty-three days after inoculation 62.5%, 38.54%, and 91.67% of leaf pieces sampled were colonized in treatments with B. ribis PI006, C. rosea PI004, and C. gloeosporioides 6174, respectively, compared to 12.5% in control leaves (Fig. 1C). In control (not-treated, noninoculated) plants there were very few endophytes reisolated and those were not the ones used for inoculation. In the treated plants, the overall density of endophytes was higher and more than 60% of the fungi reisolated per treatment corresponded to their respective inoculum, indicating successful infection and colonization. Fig. 1 shows percentage of colonization by endophytic fungi of leaf pieces sampled overall and per- cent colonization by particular endophytic fungal species inoculum in each treatment at different days post inoculation. Colonization of cacao leaves by multiple endophytes was observed when a mix of seven isolates representing six differ- ent species was used as the inoculum source. At 14 and 29 days after inoculation, 38.40% and 74.64% of leaf pieces sampled were colonized in inoculated leaves vs. 7.29% and 4.17% of leaf pieces in noninoculated leaves (Fig. 2A and B). Although the mix contained similar spore counts for the fungal isolates (with exception oiXylaria sp., which pro- duced few spores), the recovery of inoculated endophytes from inoculated leaves showed a dominance of C. gloeospo- rioides 5101 over the other species. Despite the dominance of C. gloeosporioides 5101, 6 of 7 isolates were reisolated at 14 and 29 days after inoculation. Xylaria sp., which was not originally isolated from T, cacao, was never reisolated during this experimental period (Fig. 2A and B). 3.3. Field trials The preliminary trial confirmed that the incidence of C. gloeosporioides could be increased by spraying pods in the 10 days after inoculation 100-1 90- o 80- ^?inoculated species 1 0 o o 70- 1 1 Other spp. 60- 50- 40- b % 30- 20- 10- 0- a a a ^ 1 ~T~ ' y ^ <5 / Cf Treatment 25 days after inoculation I Inoculated species ] Other spp. C 33 days after inoculation I Inoculated species ] Other spp. ' / / / o Treatment Fig. 1. Percentage of colonization of leaf segments sampled for endo- phytic fungi under greenhouse conditions over time. Thirty-two leaf pieces of 4 mm2 from three leaves from each treatment at each date were plated to evaluate the percentage of fungal colonization. Mean (SE) percentage of colonization by endophytic fungi was significantly different among treatments at each post inoculation date: 10 days, F3 8 = 6.9, P = 0.0128; 25 days ^3,8 = 17.0, P = 0.0008, 33 days ^ = 18.1,P = 0.0006. Letters indicate significant differences among treatments using Tukey's multiple comparison test. field. Six weeks after application of endophytes, endo- phytes were found in 68.8% and 50.8% of sampled fruit tis- sue from inoculated and noninoculated pods, respectively. Within this, 41.0% and 9.1% of reisolated fungi corre- sponded to the inoculated isolate of C. gloeosporioides in 10 f. C Me/ih e( a/. /.BWogiW Confro/ ^ ("200&J 4-/4 Table 2 Cacao endophytic fungi used for inoculations Strain Taxonomy Tissue of origin Location of origin Leaf Barro Colorado Island Pod Nombre de Dios Pod Bocas del Toro Leaf Bocas del Toro Pod Bocas delToro Pod Barro Colorado Island Pod Bocas del Toro Pod Bocas del Toro Pod Bocas del Toro Leaf Barro Colorado Island 5101 4467 6174 PI004 PI006 PI016 PI018 PI020 PI023 9148^ Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Penz.) Penz & Sacc. Ml" Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Penz.) Penz & Sacc. Ml Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Penz.) Penz & Sacc. Ml Clonostachys rosea (Link:Fr) Botryosphaeria ribis Grossenb. & Duggar Fusarium solani (Mart) Sacc. Fusarium decemcellulare C. Brick Fusarium solani (Mart) Sacc. Acremonium sp. Xylaria sp. a Morphotype 1. b This strain was isolated from Heisteria concinna (Olacaceae), a naturally co-occurring species with T. cacao at Barro Colorado Island. 70 S GO I 50 o 40 8 30 o 20 * 10- 0 14 days after inoculation l l Other spp. USB Acremonium sp. PI 23 ^M C. gloeosporioides 5101 r~?in rosea PI004 E8F. so/a? P116 iHF. decemcellulare P118 [TJJJF solani PI 20 B Treatment 29 days after inoculation 70 .2 60 I so- ? 40 8 30 "5 20 * 10 0 l I Other spp. UM1 Acremonium sp. PI 23 ^H C gloeosporioides 5101 E3C. rosea PI 004 ^8F solani P116 \WM F. decemcellulare P118 [TJJJF. so/ara'PI20 Treatment Fig. 2. In planta competitive ability of different endophytic fungal species measured as percentage of colonization of T. cacao leaf tissue. Percent colonization of leaf pieces sampled in control leaves and leaves inoculated with a mix of seven endophytic isolates. (A) 14 days after inoculation (TV = 6 leaves and 192 leaf pieces of 4 mm2; and N =1 and 224 leaf pieces of 4 mm2 for control and inoculated leaves, respectively). (B) 29 days after inoculation (N = 6 leaves and 384 leaf pieces of 4 mm2 and N = 9 and 560 leaf pieces of 4 mm2 for control and inoculated leaves, respectively. inoculated and noninoculated pods, respectively. Thus, the incidence of the inoculated isolate increased by four times in the 6 weeks following the single inoculation. Cacao flowers and pods treated with C. gloeosporioides 6174, B. ribis 4467 and C. rosea PI004 continued their nor- mal development without showing any evidence of being negatively affected by monthly treatments. When we exam- ined the treatment effects on the percentage of pods with symptoms of Phytophthora, we observed a significant treat- ment by farm interaction (Treatment effect: ^3,204 ? 0.273, P = 0.044, Farm effect: F3>78 = 3.11, P = 0.031, Treatment by farm effect: ^9,204 = 2.69, P = 0.005). Specifically, the percentage of fruits infected with Phytophthora was reduced by C. gloeosporioides at 3 out of 4 farms. The other treatments did not differ from the control. However, we note the very low overall incidence of Phytophthora infec- tions that we observed in all of the farms: only 20% (64/ 320) of the trees in the study had fruits symptomatic of Phytophthora infection. None of the tested endophytes reduced the pod loss due to M. roreri. However, we observed a significant reduction in the percentage of pods with sporulating lesions of M. roreri in pods treated with C. rosea PI004 during the last 4 months of study (Fig. 3A). Pods treated with C. rosea PI004 showed 10% reduction of sporulating lesions com- pared to control pods but this effect was mostly due to a reduction at one farm (Fig. 3B). 4. Discussion Recent findings have shown that endophytic fungi can help limit pathogen damage in T. cacao (Arnold et al., 2003; Evans et al., 2003; Meji'a et al., 2003; Holmes et al., 2004, 2006; Rubini et al., 2005; Tondje et al., 2006; Pierre Roger Tonje, IRAD, Cameroon; personal communica- tion). Our results support these findings by showing that endophytic fungi isolated from healthy leaves and pods of T. cacao restrict in vitro growth of the three most com- mon and economically important pathogens of cacao (P. palmivora, M. roreri, and M. perniciosa). These suggestive in vitro results are further corroborated both in the green- house (Arnold et al., 2003; Rubini et al., 2005) and in the field (present work). Overall, these results strongly suggests that the diverse assemblage of endophyte species associated with T. cacao play an integral role in the resistance of their hosts to pathogen damage (Herre et al., 2007), and that endophytes can potentially be used as effective biocontrol agents. It is clear that in vitro results do not necessarily translate directly to what occurs in planta. Nonetheless, in vitro stud- ies and their results are particularly useful for identifying Z.C Me/6z e( a/. /Ao/ogica/ Owfro/ -^ (200&J -f-/^ 11 0-9 \& rf>v ( tf* f* & Treatment ^o^^>^ B ? 7 ? 0) o 60 CL