The Caridean Shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda) of the Albatross Philippine Expedition, 1907-1910, Part 5: Family Alpheidae Fenner A. Chace, Jr. SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY ? NUMBER 4 6 6 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Folklife Studies Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world of science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review. Press requirements for manuscript and art preparation are outlined on the inside back cover. Robert McC. Adams Secretary Smithsonian Institution S M I T H S O N I A N C O N T R I B U T I O N S T O Z O O L O G Y ? N U M B E R 4 6 6 The Caridean Shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda) of the Albatross Philippine Expedition, 1907-1910, Part 5: Family Alpheidae Fenner A. Chace, Jr. SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS Washington, D.C. 1988 A B S T R A C T Chace, Fenner A., Jr. The Caridean Shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda) of the Albatross Philippine Expedition, 1907-1910, Part 5: Family Alpheidae. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, number 466, 99 pages 25 figures, 1988. Keys are offered to the Philippine genera of the family, including the new monotypic genus Vexillipar, based on the new species V. repandum, the commonest alpheid in the collection and a possible inhabitant of Euplectella, the Venus's-flower-basket sponge, in depths of 296 to 875 meters. Also included are keys to all currently recognized species of Automate, Batella, Betaeopsis, and Nennalpheus, and to the known Philippine species of Alpheopsis, Alpheus.Athanas, and Synalpheus. The following new species are described, in addition to Vexillipar repandum: Alpheus davaoensis from 51 meters in Davao Gulf, Mindanao; A. hyphalus from 296 meters in Verde Island Passage south of western Luzon; A. macellarius from the Cebu Market; A. quasirapacida and A. suluensis from 18 and 38 meters, respectively, in the southwestern Sulu Archipelago; and Batella leptocarpus from 296 meters in the western Mindanao Sea. OFFICUAL PUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution's annual report, Smithsonian Year. SERIES COVER DESIGN: The coral Montastrea cavernosa (Linneaus). Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Chace, Fenner Albert The caridean shrimps (Crustacea?Decapoda) of the Albatross Philippine Expedition, 1907-1910. (Smithsonian contributions to zoology ; no. 381- ) Includes bibliographies. SupL of Docs, no.: SI 1.27:381 1. Shrimps?Philippines?Classification. 2. Crustacea?Classification?Collected works. 3. Crustacea?Philippines? Classification?Collected works. I. Title. II. Series: Smithsonian contributions to zoology ; no. 381 etc. QL1.S54 no. 381, etc 591s [595.3'843] 83-60000061 [QL444.M33] Contents Page Introduction 1 Acknowledgments 1 *ALPHEIDAE Rafinesque, 1815 3 Key to Philippine Genera of Alpheidae 3 *Alpheopsis Coutiere, 1896 4 Key to Previously Known Philippine Species of Alpheopsis 5 1. Alpheopsis aequalis Coutiere, 1896 5 2. Alpheopsis diabolus A.H. Banner, 1956 5 *Alpheus Fabricius, 1798 6 Key to Philippine Species of Alpheus 7 3. Alpheus acutocarinatus De Man, 1909 14 * 4. Alpheus acutofemoratus Dana, 1852 15 * 5. Alpheus alcyone De Man, 1902 15 6. Alpheus barbatus Coutiere, 1897 16 7. Alpheus batesi A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1964 16 8. Alpheus bicostatus De Man, 1908 16 * 9. Alpheus bidens (Olivier, 1811) 17 * 10. Alpheus bucephalus Coutiere, 1905 17 11. Alpheus canaliculatus A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1968 18 12. Alpheus chiragricus H. Milne Edwards, 1837 18 13. Alpheus collumianus Stimpson, 1860 19 14. Alpheus compressus A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1981 19 15. Alpheus coutierei De Man, 1909 20 16. Alpheus crinitus Dana, 1852 20 * 17. Alpheus crockeri (Armstrong, 1941) 20 * 18. Alpheus davaoensis, new species 21 * 19. Alpheus deuteropus Hilgendorf, 1879 22 * 20. Alpheus diadema Dana, 1852 23 * 21. Alpheus dispar Randall, 1840 23 22. Alpheus dolerus A.H. Banner, 1956 24 * 23. Alpheus edamensis De Man, 1888 24 * 24. Alpheus edwardsii (Audouin, 1826) 25 25. Alpheus ehlersii De Man, 1909 25 26. Alpheus euchirus Dana, 1852 26 * 27. Alpheus eulimene De Man, 1909 26 * 28. Alpheus euphrosyne euphrosyne De Man, 1897 27 29. Alpheus facetus De Man, 1908 27 30. Alpheus foresti A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1981 27 * 31. Alpheus frontalis H. Milne Edwards, 1837 28 * 32. Alpheus funafutensis Borradaile, 1898 28 * 33. Alpheus gracilipes Stimpson, 1860 29 34. Alpheus gracilis Heller, 1862 30 * 35. Alpheus hailstonei Coutiere, 1905 30 * 36. Alpheus hippothoe De Man, 1888 30 * 37. Alpheus hyphalus, new species 31 38. Alpheus ladronis A.H. Banner, 1956 31 iii IV SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY 39. Alpheus leptochirus Coutiere, 1905 33 40. Alpheus leviusculus leviusculus Dana, 1852 34 * 41. Alpheus lobidens De Haan, 1849 34 * 42. Alpheus lottini Guerin, 1829 35 * 43. Alpheus macellarius, new species 35 * 44. Alpheus macroskeles Alcock and Anderson, 1894 37 45. Alpheus maindroni, Coutiere, 1898 38 * 46. Alpheus malabaricus (Fabricius, 1775) 39 * 47. Alpheus malleodigitus (Bate, 1888) 40 * 48. Alpheus microstylus (Bate, 1888) 41 49. Alpheus miersi Coutiere, 1898 41 50. Alpheus mitis Dana, 1852 42 * 51. Alpheus nonalter Kensley, 1969 42 * 52. Alpheus obesomanus Dana, 1852 44 53. Alpheus ovaliceps Coutiere, 1905 44 54. Alpheus pachychirus Stimpson, 1860 45 * 55. Alpheus pacificus Dana, 1852 45 56. Alpheus paracrinitus Miers, 1881 45 57. Alpheus paradentipes Coutiere, 1905 46 * 58. Alpheus paralcyone Coutiere, 1905 46 * 59. Alpheus pareuchirus pareuchirus Coutiere, 1905 47 * 60. Alpheus parvirostris Dana, 1852 47 * 61. Alpheus parvus De Man, 1909 48 * 62. Alpheus polyxo De Man, 1909 48 63. Alpheus proseuchirus De Man, 1908 49 * 64. Alpheus pustulosus A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1968 49 * 65. Alpheus quasirapacida, new species 50 * 66. Alpheus serenei Tiwari, 1963 51 * 67. Alpheus soela D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1987 52 * 68. Alpheus spatulatus A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1968 52 69. Alpheus splendidus Coutiere, 1897 54 70. Alpheus spongiarum Coutiere, 1897 54 71. Alpheus stanleyi Coutiere, 1908 55 72. Alpheus staphylinus Coutiere, 1908 55 * 73. Alpheus strenuus strenuus Dana, 1852 56 74. Alpheus sulcatus Kingsley, 1878 56 * 75. Alpheus suluensis, new species 57 76. Alpheus villosus (Olivier, 1811) 59 Aretopsis De Man, 1910 59 77. Aretopsis amabilis De Man, 1910 60 *Athanas Leach, 1814 60 Key to Philippine Species of Athanas 61 78. Athanas areteformis Coutiere, 1903 61 79. Athanas borradailei (Coutiere, 1903) 61 80. Athanas dimorphus Ortmann, 1894 61 81. Athanas djiboutensis Coutiere, 1897 62 82. Athanas dorsalis (Stimpson, 1860) 62 83. Athanas indicus (Coutiere, 1903) 62 * 84. ?Athanas jedanensis De Man, 1910 62 85. Athanas marshallensis Chace, 1955 63 86. Athanas parvus De Man, 1910 63 NUMBER 466 Automate De Man, 1888 63 Key to Species of Automate 64 87. Automate dolichognatha De Man, 1888 64 *Batella Holthuis, 1955 65 Key to Species of Batella 65 * 88. Batella leptocarpus, new species 65 * 89. Batella parvimanus (Bate, 1888) 67 Betaeopsis Yaldwyn, 1971 67 Key to Species of Betaeopsis 69 90. Betaeopsis indica (De Man, 1910) 69 Metalpheus Coutiere, 1908 69 91. Metalpheus paragracilis (Coutiere, 1897) 69 Nennalpheus A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1981 69 Key to Species of Nennalpheus 70 92. Nennalpheus inarticulatus A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1981 70 Neoalpheopsis A.H. Banner, 1953 70 93. Neoalpheopsis euryone (De Man, 1910) 70 Prionalpheus A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1960 70 94. Prionalpheus sulu A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1971 70 Racilius Paulson, 1875 71 95. Racilius compressus Paulson, 1875 71 Salmoneus Holthuis, 1955 71 96. Salmoneus mauiensis (Edmondson, 1930) 71 97. Salmoneus serratidigitus (Coutiere, 1896) 71 *Synalpheus Bate, 1888 72 Key to Philippine Species of Synalpheus 72 98. Synalpheus albatrossi Coutiere, 1909 75 99. Synalpheus amabilis De Man, 1910 76 100. Synalpheus anterior De Man, 1910 76 *101. Synalpheus bituberculatus DeMan, 1910 76 102. Synalpheus charon (Heller, 1861) 77 103. Synalpheus coutierei A.H. Banner, 1953 77 *104. Synalpheus demani Borradaile, 1899 77 *105. Synalpheus fossor (Paulson, 1875) 78 106. Synalpheus gracilirostris De Man, 1910 78 ?107. Synalpheus hastilicrassus Coutiere, 1905 79 *108. Synalpheus iocasta De Man, 1909 80 109. Synalpheus laticeps Coutiere, 1905 81 *110. Synalpheus neomeris (DeMan, 1897) 81 ?111. Synalpheus neptunus (Dana, 1852) 82 *112. Synalpheus nilandensis Coutiere, 1905 82 *113. Synalpheus odontophorus De Man, 1909 83 114. Synalpheus paraneomeris Coutiere, 1905 83 *115. Synalpheus pescadorensis Coutiere, 1905 83 116. Synalpheus quadriarticulatus D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1975 84 *117. Synalpheus quadrispinosus De Man, 1910 84 ?118. Synalpheus sciro D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1975 85 119. Synalpheus septemspinosus De Man, 1910 85 *120. Synalpheus stimpsonii (De Man, 1888) 86 *121. Synalpheus streptodactylus Coutiere, 1905 87 122. Synalpheus thai A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1966 87 vi SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY *123. Synalpheus theano De Man, 1910 88 *124. Synalpheus triacanthus De Man, 1910 88 ?125. Synalpheus trispinosus De Man 1910 89 *126. Synalpheus tropidodactylus D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1975 89 127. Synalpheus tumidomanus (Paulson, 1875) 90 *Vexillipar, new genus 90 *128. Vexillipar repandum, new species 91 Literature Cited 94 The Caridean Shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda) of the Albatross Philippine Expedition, 1907-1910, Part 5: Family Alpheidae Fenner A. Chace, Jr. Introduction General considerations about the Albatross Philippine Expedition and its collections have been presented in Part 1 of this series (Chace, 1983). Repeated below are those particulars that are common to each of the parts. The taxa itemized are those known from the Philippines, whether or not they are represented in the Albatross collections; those taken by that Expedition are indicated by an asterisk (*). (This is a departure from earlier parts of the report, in which taxa recorded from either the Philippines or Indonesia were included.) The genera and species are arranged alphabetically, and the latter are numbered sequentially by order of appearance in the taxonomic portion of the report The generic entries comprise at least the original reference followed by designation of the type species and of the gender of the generic name, a diagnosis, and the geographic and bathymetric ranges of the genus. There has been no attempt to list all references or even all synonyms under the taxa headings in the text. Usually the species and subspecies entries are limited to: (1) the original reference and type locality of both senior and junior synonyms mentioned; (2) a reference to a published illustration, if possible; (3) a diagnosis; and (4) the range of the taxon. Under "Material" of species and subspecies represented in the Albatross collections are listed the following particulars when known: (1) general locality; (2) station number; (3) latitude and longitude; (4) depth in meters (in brackets when estimated); (5) character of bottom; (6) bottom temperature in degrees Celsius; (7) date and astronomical time intervals (hours between midnight and midnight, local time) that the gear operated at the indicated depth; (8) gear used; and (9) the number and sex of the specimens, with minimum and maximum carapace length to base of rostrum, in brackets (the Fenner A. Chace, Jr., Department of Invertebrate Zoology (NHB 163), National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560. numbers and size ranges of ovigerous females are included in the female totals, as well as separately). Additional station data may be available in Anonymous (1910). Acknowledgments This report compares quite unfavorably with the exemplary publications on Indo-Pacific alpheids by the late Albert H. and Dora May Banner (see "Literature Cited") but it is far better than it would have been without benefit of the solid foundation that they established. Perhaps partial reiteration of my remarks to Dora Banner following Hank's untimely death on August 18, 1985, will not only express publicly my indebtedness to them but may demonstrate to other novices the requirements for successful taxonomic research: "Only someone who has taken full advantage of the Banner legacy, as I have for the past eight months, knows the significance of the example they have set for anyone undertaking the revision of a group of organisms: (1) become sufficiently familiar with earlier students of the group and their publications to be able to interpret their descriptions to the utmost; (2) take advantage of every opportunity to examine type specimens; (3) visit as many collecting sites as possible, especially type localities, in an effort to correlate color and ecological factors with morphological ones; (4) develop an ample standard descriptive format that permits ready comparison of diagnostic characters and follow it consistently; and (5) when disaster strikes, don't cry over spilled milk?pitch into the cow and get more!" Thirty years of adherence to such doctrines provided the Banners with an alpheid species sense that seems to me to be nearly infallible. In addition to their published contributions, I have been privileged to profit in two other ways from the Banners' industry: (1) much of the material identified by A.H. Banner?especially unrecorded specimens from the Philip- pines collected subsequent to the Banner reports of 1978 and 1981?was available in the Smithsonian for direct comparison SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY ,12 0?E. ) 12 5? f TAIWAN FIGURE 1.?The Philippines and central Indonesia, showing the positions of the more than 330 Albatross offshore stations at which caridean shrimps were collected. NUMBER 466 during preparation of the keys, and (2) D.M. Banner, although retired from active systematic research and coping with grievous terminal illness, graciously reviewed the penultimate draft of this report and considerably enhanced its value, especially in regard to the reliability of the ranges of the species?a component of contributions of this kind that I am prone to treat with somewhat limited enthusiasm because of the often questionable reliability of identifications in the literature (a problem that is of minor importance in an area that has been so nearly monopolized for so long by a single research team). The report has also been materially improved by a characteristically detailed review by L.B. Holthuis of the Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie in Leiden and perusal by my Smithsonian colleague, B.F. Kensley, who devoted considerable effort to testing the keys to the genera and to the genus Alpheus. AJ. Bruce of the Northern Territory Museum, Darwin, Australia, also reported successful trials of some of the keys. R.W. Ingle of the British Museum (Natural History) voluntarily made the holotype of Batella parvimanus available for examination. As previously, my colleagues Horton H. Hobbs, Jr., Raymond B. Manning, and Austin B. Williams were continuing sources of professional assistance and encouragement. Finally, I am deeply indebted to Sandra L. Charles and Mary Ann MacLeod, who shared the task of transferring my typescript to a word processor, an exercise so remote from my sphere of competence as to distinguish clearly my helpless senior status from that of my colleagues, nearly all of whom have long since mastered such currently mandatory research procedures. *ALPHEIDAE Rafinesque, 1815 Alphidia Rafinesque, 1815:98. DIAGNOSIS.?Rostrum, if present, immovably attached to remainder of carapace, without single subterminal dorsal tooth; eyes short, often partially or completely concealed by carapace; antennule with dorsolateral flagellum usually more or less bifurcate; 2nd maxilliped with terminal segment applied as strip to mesial margin of flexed penultimate segment; 3rd maxilliped bearing well-developed exopod; pereopods without distinct exopods, both members of 2 anterior pairs distinctly chelate, 2nd pair with carpus subdivided into 2 or more segments, 3 posterior pairs not unusually long, carpus shorter than propodus. RANGE.?Commonly pantropical, especially numerous on coral reefs, to 45??unusually to 60??north and south latitude; littoral, rarely in fresh water, to 875 meters. REMARKS.?Of the slightly less than 30 alpheid genera generally recognized today, more than half are represented in the Philippines, alone. Partly because most of the alpheid genera are represented by small species that are commonly found in shallow water, whereas the emphasis of the Albatross Expedition was directed toward collecting the larger, offshore animals, only six of the 15 Philippine genera are represented in the resultant material. The most abundant species in the collections, however, belongs to a new genus that occurs only in depths greater than 296 meters. Key to Philippine Genera of Alpheidae 1. Strap-like epipods on at least 2 anterior pairs of pereopods 2 No strap-like epipods on any pereopods 13 2. Eyes concealed from view in dorsal aspect (except when artificially displaced anteriad) 3 Eyes at least partially exposed in dorsal aspect 11 3. Third maxilliped broad, flat, and longitudinally curved, partially covering enlarged anterior mouthparts; appendix masculina unusually elongate, overreaching exopod of 2nd pleopod of male Metalpheus Third maxilliped subtrigonal in cross-section, not suboperculate; appendix masculina not unusually elongate 4 4. Telson produced posteriorly into triangular point Neoalpheopsis Tfelson posteriorly truncate, convex, incised, not triangularly produced 5 5. Body much compressed from side to side; carapace with sharp, high carina over nearly entire length of dorsal midline Racilius Body not unusually compressed, carapace with, at most, partial low carina in dorsal midline 6 6. Rostrum absent Betaeopsis Rostrum usually distinct (if not, 1st pereopods asymmetrical, major chela carried with movable finger dorsolateral, not ventral, with molar-like tooth on movable finger, with adhesive plaques at base of movable finger and on distal end of palm, and with strap-like epipods on 4 anterior pairs of pereopods) 7 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY 7. Major cheliped carried in flexed position Salmoneus Major cheliped carried extended 8 8. Major cheliped carried with movable finger dorsolateral 9 Major cheliped carried with movable finger ventrolateral 10 9. Major chela without molar-like tooth on movable finger *Alpheopsis Major chela with molar-like tooth on movable finger *Alpheus 10. Mandible with palp; major chela with adhesive plaques at base of movable finger and on distal end of palm; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple, not biunguiculate Nennalpheus Mandible without palp; 1st pereopods without adhesive plaques at base of movable finger and on distal end of palm; 3rd pereopod with dactyl biunguiculate *Vexillipar 11. Both cornea and eyestalk exposed in dorsal aspect; rostrum vestigial or absent; 6th abdominal somite without articulated plate at posteroventral angle . Automate Little more than cornea of eye exposed in dorsal aspect; rostrum overreaching eyes; 6th abdominal somite with movable plate articulated at posteroventral angle. 12 12. Rostrum broadly rounded terminally in lateral aspect; mandible without palp; 1st pereopods carried with movable finger ventrolateral Aretopsis Rostrum acute in lateral aspect; mandible with palp; 1st pereopods carried with movable finger dorsolateral *Athanas 13. Sixth abdominal somite with movable plate articulated at posteroventral angle . . 14 Sixth abdominal somite without articulated plate at posteroventral angle . . . .15 14. Eyes exposed in dorsal aspect; mandible with palp and molar process *Athanas Eyes concealed from view in dorsal aspect; mandible without palp or molar process Prionclpheus 15. Eyes exposed in dorsal aspect; mandible without palp; 1st pereopods symmetrical; major chela without molar-like tooth on movable finger; appendix masculina on 2nd pleopod of male *Batella Eyes concealed in dorsal aspect; mandible with palp; 1st pereopods asymmetrical; major chela with molar-like tooth on movable finger; no appendix masculina on 2nd pleopod of male *Synalpheus *Alpheopsis Coutiere, 1896 Alpheopsis Coutiere, 1896:382 [type species, selected by Holthuis, 1955:84: Betaeus trispinosus Stimpson, 1860:32; gender: feminine]. DIAGNOSIS.?Body not unusually compressed from side to side; rostrum distinct, acute in lateral aspect; carapace without high carina throughout length of dorsal midline; abdomen usually with triangular flap articulated at posterolateral angle of 6th somite; telson terminating posteriorly in triangular tooth; eyes concealed from dorsal view, visible in anterior aspect; mandible with palp and molar process; 3rd maxilliped not unusually broadened to form partial operculum over other mouthparts; 1st pereopods similar but not necessarily equal, carried extended with movable finger dorsal or lateral, not ventral, major chela without molar-like tooth on movable finger; 2nd chela with fingers about as long as palm, carpus with 3 -5 , usually 5, articles; pereopods with strap-like epipods on at least 3 anterior pairs; appendix masculina not overreach- ing exopod of 2nd pleopod. RANGE.?Pantropical with temperate extensions; littoral to 786 meters. REMARKS.?The useful list of species of Alpheopsis pub- lished by Hobbs (1973:77) may be modified by adding the species A. harperi Wicksten, 1984, A. shearmii (Alcock and Anderson, 1899) A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1977a, A. undicola D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1973, and A. yaldwyni D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1973, and also A. equidactylus (Lockington, 1877) and A. garricki Yaldwyn, 1971, by those who consider those two forms to be distinct from A. trispinosa (Stimpson, 1860), and by deleting A. haugi Coutiere, 1906, and A. monodi Sollaud, 1932, both of which were transferred to the genus Potamalphe- ops by Powell (1979), and A. stygicola Hobbs, 1973, subsequently transferred to that genus by Hobbs (1983). Currently, Alpheopsis seems to be represented by 21 species, or 19 species in the opinion of those who believe that A. trispinosa is a single pantropical species. Wicksten (1984b:99) recorded A. trispinosa from the Gulf of Mexico and referred to it as "a pantropical species," but the same author in a paper NUMBER 466 issued a month earlier (1984a: 186) reported a range extension of A. equidactylus without referring to the remark in Schmitt (1921:77) that "According to Coutiere this [species] is Alpheopsis trispinosus of Stimpson (Rathbun)." A footnote in D.M. and A.H. Banner (1973:337) reads: "In personal correspondence Dr. J.C. Yaldwyn has indicated that he believes his species A. garrick [sic] (1971:87) may prove to be a synonym of this species [A. trispinosa] as redefined," but three pages later (1973:340), Banner and Banner remark that "On the basis of distributional pattern, we feel as we did in our 1966 paper that there may well be 3 species, one from the tropical Pacific, one from the south temperate Pacific, and another from the tropical and subtropical Atlantic," and "Until the true identity of De Man's, Coutiere's, Sollaud's, and our specimens are confirmed, we are loath to ascribe any non-Australian distribution to this species." The only specimen of Alpheopsis in the Albatross Philippine collections is a large female without either anterior cheliped with a postrostral carapace length of 10.2 mm (total length about 31 mm) from station 5188; Tafion Strait, east of Negros; 9?44X 123?14'20"E; 547 m; green mud; 17.0?C; 1 Apr 1908 (1044-1104); 12' Agassiz beam trawl, 3 mud bags. The frontal margin is devoid of ocular teeth, there are five articles in the carpus of the second pereopod, and the dactyls of the three posterior pairs of pereopods are simple. This combination of characters is shared by only five of the known species of the genus: A. aequalis Coutiere, 1897, A. consobrinus De Man, 1910, A. labis Chace, 1972, A. trigonus (Rathbun, 1901), and A. yaldwyni D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1973. The Albatross specimen seems to agree with most of the species of Alpheopsis examined in having strap-like epipods on the four anterior pairs of pereopods, but specimens available of the variable A. aequalis seem to have them on only the three anterior pairs. Even more distinctive is the dorsolateral antennular flagellum in the Albatross specimen, in which the fused portion, of six articles, is only one-half to three-fourths as long as the shorter of the free branches, which consists of as many as 12 articles. Of the five species that may be most like the Albatross specimen, only the Australian A. yaldwyni seems to be of similar size and to have even superficially similar antennular flagella, but that species has the proximal article in the carpus of the second pereopod proportionately longer and it is known only from shallow water, whereas the Philippine specimen came from a depth of nearly 550 meters, the deepest record for the genus, except for 786 meters at the type locality of A. shearmii. Key to Previously Known Philippine Species of Alpheopsis Ocular hoods convex, unarmed; 2nd pereopod with proximal article of carpus little if any longer than 2 succeeding articles combined; 3rd-5th pereopods with dactyl simple . . LA. aequalis Ocular hoods acutely produced, front tridentate; 2nd pereopod with proximal article of carpus longer than 4 succeeding articles combined; 3rd-5th pereopods with dactyl biunguiculate 2. A. diabolus 1. Alpheopsis aequalis Coutiere, 1896 Alpheopsis aequalis Coutiere, 1896:382 [type locality; the type specimens were recorded from two localities: Red Sea and Indian Ocean]. Alpheopsis equalis.?A.H. Banner, 1953:15, fig. 4.?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1973:342, fig. 16; 1978:218. DIAGNOSIS.?Ocular hoods variably convex, not dentate; dorsolateral antennular flagellum with fused portion very short, composed of 1 or 2 articles; 2nd pereopod with proximal article of carpus no longer than 2 succeeding articles combined; 3rd-5th pereopods with dactyl simple, not biunguiculate; epipods on 3 anterior pairs of pereopods; maximum carapace length about 5 mm. RANGE.?Red Sea and eastern Africa to Hawaii; intertidal to 80 meters. REMARKS.?There is no apparent justification for spelling the specific name of this shrimp in any but the correct Latin way originally proposed by Coutiere (1896). 2. Alpheopsis diabolus A.H. Banner, 1956 Alpheopsis diabilus [diabolus in figure legend] A.H. Banner, 1956:325, fig. 3 [type locality: Saipan, Mariana Islands]. Alpheopsis diabolus.?KM. and D.M. Banner, 1964:86; 1967:262.?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1978:218. DIAGNOSIS.?Ocular hoods dentate; dorsolateral antennular flagellum with fused portion swollen and composed of more than 5 articles; 2nd pereopod with proximal article of carpus considerably longer than 4 succeeding articles; 3rd-5th pereopods with dactyl biunguiculate; epipods on 4 anterior pairs of pereopods; maximum carapace length about 4 mm. RANGE.?Philippines and Mariana, Phoenix, and Society islands, littoral. REMARKS.?A.H. and D.M. Banner (1964) confirmed that the original spelling of the specific name of this species (1956) was a typographical error. Although that external evidence does not automatically invalidate the original spelling, according to Article 32c(ii) of the International Code of SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY Zoological Nomenclature, the alternate spelling was validated by the Banners' action under the first reviser principle, Article 24(c). *Alpheus Fabricius, 1798 Crangon Weber, 1795:94 [type species, by monotypy: Astacus Malabaricus Fabricius, 1775:415; gender feminine; name suppressed by plenary action of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, Opinion 334 (1955)]. Alpheus Fabricius, 1798:380, 404 [type species, selected by Latreille, 1810:422: Alpheus avarus Fabricius, 1798:404; gender, masculine]. Cryptophthalmus Rafinesque, 1814:23 [type species, by monotypy: Cryptoph- thalmus ruber Rafinesque, 1814:23 (= Cancer glater Olivi, 1792:51); gender masculine]. Autonomaea Risso, 1816:166 [type species, by monotypy: Autonomaea Olivii Risso, 1816:166 (= Cancer glaber Olivi, 1792:51); gender feminine]. Asphalius P. Roux, 1831:22 [type species, by monotypy: Palaemon brevirostris Olivier, 1811:664; gender masculine]. Dienecia Westwood in Hailstone, 1835:552 [type species, by monotypy: Hippolyte? rubra Hailstone, 1835:272 (= Hippolyte macrocheles Hailstone, 1835:395); gender feminine.]. Phleusa Nardo, 1847:6 [type species, by monotypy: Phleusa cynea Nardo, 1847:6 (= Cancer glaber, Olivi, 1792:51); gender feminine]. Halopsyche De Saussure, 1857:100 [type species, by monotypy: Halopsyche lularia De Saussure, 1857:100 (= Alpheus helerochaelis Say, 1818:243); gender feminine]. Alpheoides Paulson, 1875:105 [type species, selected by Holthuis, 1955:91: Alpheus insignis Heller, 1861:26; gender masculine]. Par alpheus Bate, 1888:567 [type species, by monotypy: Palaemon diversi- manus Olivier, 1811:663; gender, masculine]. DIAGNOSIS.?Rostrum variable, acute in lateral aspect; carapace without high carina throughout length of dorsal midline; abdomen without triangular flap articulated at posterolateral angle of 6th somite; telson not terminating posteriorly in triangular tooth; eyes concealed from dorsal view; mandible with palp and molar process; 3rd maxilliped not unusually broadened to form partial operculum over other mouthparts; 1st pereopods dissimilar and unequal, carried extended with movable finger dorsal or lateral, not ventral, major chela usually with molar-like tooth on movable finger; 2nd chela with fingers about as long as palm, carpus with S articles; pereopods with strap-like epipods on 4 anterior pairs; appendix masculina not overreaching exopod of 2nd pleopod. RANGE.?Virtually all tropical and subtropical and some temperate seas; intertidal to 640 meters. REMARKS.?Of the approximately 220 species and 10 subspecies of the genus Alpheus currently recognized (includ- ing the six species described herein and seven nominal species that must be regarded for the time being as nomina dubia), 74 have now been recorded from the Philippines, and 41 of them are represented in the Albatross collections. It is unfortunate that acceptable means of subdividing this cumbersome genus are not yet apparent. To be sure, the seven generally accepted species groups of Alpheus are probably characterized by valid phylogenetic differences, but there would be no practical gain in elevating them to even subgeneric status. The most important taxonomic features of each of the groups stems from the structure of the major cheliped, an appendage that is all too often missing from preserved material. It is hoped that recourse to these characters only as a last resort in the following key may facilitate the identification of collections comprising variably intact material. Each of the species diagnoses, however, is accompanied by an indication of the group with which it is associated, and the groups are characterized below in alphabetical order (characterizations adapted from D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1982). Brevirostris Group Orbital teeth lacking, orbital hoods often prominent; major chela with palm always compressed, more or less quadrangular in cross-section, often with surfaces delimited by distinct angles, with or without "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque; minor chela sometimes "balaeniceps" in male; 3rd pereopod with dactyl always simple, sometimes subspatulate, merus usually unarmed on flexor margin. Crinitus Group Rostrum often reduced, sometimes lacking; orbital teeth lacking; major chela with palm rounded in cross-section, without sculpture; minor chela often "balaeniceps" in male; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple or biunguiculate, merus usually armed with strong tooth on flexor margin. Diadema Group Rostrum with base sometimes flattened and abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; orbital teeth usually lacking; major chela with palm rounded to oval in cross-section, usually with "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque but lacking longitudinal grooves; minor chela sometimes "balaeniceps" in male; 3rd pereopod with dactyl almost always simple, sometimes variable intraspecifically, merus with or without tooth on flexor margin. Edwardsii Group Orbital teeth lacking except in A. euchirus; major chela with palm compressed, with "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque and usually with shoulder on opposite margin proximal to fixed finger, "saddle" usually extending onto both adjoining surfaces as triangular or quadrangular depressions; minor chela often "balaeniceps" in male; 3rd pereopod with dactyl usually simple, sometimes subspatulate, merus usually dentate on flexor margin. Macrocheles Group Orbital teeth always present; major chela with dactyl often deep and compressed into thin lamina, tip sometimes bulbous, palm compressed, somewhat twisted, with 3 longitudinal ridges and grooves, sometimes interrupted, terminating distally in NUMBER 466 adhesive plaque and strong tooth on each side of dactylar articulation; minor chela never "balaeniceps"; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple or biunguiculate, merus with or without teeth on flexor margin. Obesomanus Group Rostrum reduced, sometimes lacking; orbital teeth lacking; antennal peduncle often elongate, stylocerite with tooth weak or lacking; antennal peduncle and scale reduced; major chela with dactyl in form of single- or double-headed hammer, palm proximally rounded, distally tapering, with variably distinct longitudinal grooves; minor chela never "balaeniceps"; 2nd pereopods sometimes unusually long and asymmetrical; 3rd pereopod variable, not strongly dentate. Sulcatus Group Rostrum sometimes with base flattened and delimited from adrostral furrows; orbital teeth often present; major chela with palm never markedly compressed, usually with longitudinal but without transverse grooves; minor chela never "balaeniceps"; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple or biunguiculate, merus with or without tooth on flexor margin. Key to Philippine Species of Alpheus 1. Acute anterior tooth on each orbital hood or on margin between rostrum and orbital hood 2 Anterior margin of carapace without acute tooth either side of rostrum 18 2. Orbital spine arising from surface rather than margin of orbital hood 3 Frontal spine arising from margin of adrostral region or of orbital hood, which may be incised dorsad to base of spine 6 3. Third pereopod with merus armed with distal tooth on flexor margin 4 Third pereopod with merus unarmed on flexor margin 5 4. Body not densely setose; adrostral frontal margin unarmed; without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple, not biunguiculate *19. A. deuteropus Body denseley setose; both adrostral frontal margin and orbital hood armed with acute tooth; median tooth or tubercle on gastric region; 3rd pereopod with dactyl biunguiculate 76. A. villosus 5. Rostral base dorsally flattened and abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; 3rd pereopod with dactyl blunt distally *42. A. lottini Rostral base not flattened, sloping gradually into adrostral furrows; 3rd pereopod with dactyl sharp pointed 69. A. splendidus 6. Third pereopod with strong distal tooth on flexor margin of merus 7 Third pereopod without strong distal tooth on flexor margin of merus 10 7. Major chela without tooth either side of dactylar articulation 8 Major chela with sharp tooth either side of dactylar articulation 9 8. Rostrum barely overreaching distal margin of 1st antennular segment; carapace with median tubercle on anterior gastric region and paired flanges overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin armed with acute tooth slightly mesial to orbital hood, orbital hood unarmed; 2nd antennular segment twice as long as wide; major chela with narrow transverse "saddle" on palm proximal to adhesive plaque, minor chela with dactyl distinctly shorter than palm, palm without teeth at dactylar articulation; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article subequal to 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple, not biunguiculate 8. A. bicostatus Rostrum not reaching nearly as far as distal margin of 1st antennular segment; carapace without median tubercle on gastric region or paired flanges overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin unarmed mesial to orbital hood, latter armed with sharp marginal tooth; 2nd antennular segment 3 times as long as wide; major chela without "saddle" on palm proximal to adhesive plaque; minor chela with dactyl slightly longer than palm, sharp tooth on extensor margin of palm at articulation with dactyl; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article nearly twice as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl biunguiculate . . . 11. A. canaliculatus SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY 9. Rostrum overreaching orbital spines 13. A. collumianus Rostrum shorter than orbital spines 57. A. paradentipes 10. Major chela contorted and strongly sculptured, with at least 1 sharp carina terminating distally in acute tooth at dactylar articulation 11 Major chela relatively smooth, without sharp carina supporting acute tooth at dactylar articulation 14 11. Adrostral furrows distinct, extending posteriorly beyond eyes . 13. A. collumianus Adrostral furrows short and somewhat obscure or absent 12 12. Major chela with carina supporting mesial tooth at dactylar articulation entire, not interrupted *17. A. crockeri Major chela with carina supporting mesial tooth at dactylar articulation interrupted by transverse incision 13 13. Major chela with dactyl strongly compressed and curved in longitudinal plane; 3rd pereopod with dactyl usually at least obscurely biunguiculate; typically deepwater species (25-536 meters) *35. A. hailstonei Major chela with dactyl not strongly compressed or markedly curved in longitudinal plane; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple, not even obscurely biunguiculate; shallow-water species 72. A. staphylinus 14. Major chela twice as long as wide, with distinct "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque and marginal shoulder proximal to fixed finger 26. A. euchirus Major chela 2V2 to 4 times as long as wide, without distinct "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque or marginal shoulder proximal to fixed finger 15 15. Second antennular segment 3 or more times as long as wide 16 Second antennular segment less than twice as long as wide 17 16. Body strongly compressed, carapace twice as high as wide; minor chela with dactyl not "balaeniceps," at least in female; 3rd pereopod with dactyl subspatulate 14. A. compressus Body not unusually compressed; minor chela with dactyl "balaeniceps" in both sexes; 3rd pereopod with dactyl not subspatulate *67. A. soela 17. Margin between rostrum and orbital hood convex throughout; blunt rostral carina extending posteriorly to near midlength of carapace; major chela without depression on either margin proximal to fingers; 3rd pereopod with movable spine on ischium 29. A. facetus Margin between rostrum and orbital hood deeply incised at base of rostrum; rostrum dorsally rounded, not carinate; major chela with slight depressions on both margins proximal to fingers; 3rd pereopod without spine on ischium 34. A. gracilis 18. Rostrum abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows 19 Rostrum sloping gradually into adrostral furrows 24 19. Rostrum carinate in dorsal midline; margin between rostrum and orbital hood convex; median tubercle on gastric region; major chela subcylindrical; 3rd pereopod with acute subdistal tooth on flexor margin of merus *20. A. diadema Rostrum not carinate in dorsal midline; margin between rostrum and orbital hood not distinctly convex; without median tubercle on gastric region; major chela compressed; 3rd pereopod with merus unarmed on flexor margin 20 20. Third pereopod with dactyl subspatulate 21 Third pereopod with dactyl conical or biunguiculate, not subspatulate 23 21. Rostral margin not overhanging adrostral furrow; 2nd antennular segment 3 times as long as wide; major chela with proximal shoulder overhanging "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque *68. A. spatulatus Rostral margin overhanging adrostral furrow; 2nd antennular segment twice as long as wide; major chela with proximal shoulder overhanging very slightly, if at all, "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque 22 NUMBER 466 22. Antennal scale with lateral margin straight, distolateral spine overreaching distal margin of blade little, if at all; major chela with proximal shoulder sloping into "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, not abrupt, distinct shoulder on opposite margin proximal to fixed finger; minor chela with dactyl not "balaeniceps" in either sex 30. A. foresti Antennal scale with lateral margin concave, distolateral spine clearly overreaching distal margin of blade; major chela with abrupt shoulder proximal to "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, without distinct shoulder on opposite margin proximal to fixed finger; minor chela with dactyl "balaeniceps" in male . . . . 63. A. proseuchirus 23. First pereopods with flexor margin of merus armed with sharp distal tooth and 2 or more spines proximal thereto; major chela 372 times as long as wide, with distinct "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque; minor chela with dactyl "balaeniceps" in both sexes; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple, not biunguiculate *33. A. gracilipes First pereopods with merus unarmed on flexor margin; major chela less than 3 times as long as wide, without distinct "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque; minor chela with dactyl not "balaeniceps" in either sex; 3rd pereopod with dactyl often biunguiculate or with vestige of subdistal tooth on flexor margin 74. A. sulcatus 24. Median tooth or tubercle on gastric region 25 Without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region 28 25. Rostrum overreaching 1st antennular segment; large acute tooth arising each side of median gastric denticle and overhanging posterior end of adrostral furrow; 2nd antennular segment barely twice as long as wide; major chela less than 3 times as long as wide, with narrow transverse cleft or "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque; 3rd pereopod with dactyl not subspatulate, merus armed with sharp subterminal tooth on flexor margin *9. A. bidens Rostrum not reaching as far as distal margin of 1st antennular segment; carapace without tooth arising either side of median gastric tubercle; 2nd antennular segment more than 3 times as long as wide; major chela more than 4 times as long as wide, without "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque; 3rd pereopod with dactyl subspatulate, merus unarmed on flexor margin 26 26. Median postrostral carina extending posteriorly at least to midlength of carapace; antennal scale with distolateral spine barely overreaching distal margin of blade 3. A. acutocarinatus Median postrostral carina, if present, not extending posteriorly beyond anterior gastric region; antennal scale with distolateral spine distinctly overreaching distal margin of blade 27 27. First pereopods with strong subdistal tooth on extensor margin of merus; major chela oval in cross section, without longitudinal carinae or ridges on palm . . . *44. A. macroskeles First pereopods without subdistal tooth on extensor margin of merus; major chela with palm subrectangular in cross section and bearing strong longitudinal carina near margin proximal to fixed finger, obscure longitudinal ridge near midline of same surface, and 2 ridges defining flattened surface proximal to adhesive plaque *51. A. nonalter 28. Median postrostral carina extending posteriorly nearly or quite to midlength of carapace 29 Median rostral carina not extending posteriorly beyond anterior gastric region 35 29. Third pereopod with acute distal tooth on flexor margin of merus 30 Third pereopod with merus unarmed on flexor margin 34 30. Major chela without conspicuous sculpture; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article much shorter than 2nd 31 10 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY Major chela with "saddle" overhung by proximal shoulder proximal to adhesive plaque and shoulder on opposite margin proximal to fixed finger; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article much longer than 2nd 33 31. Rostrum prominent, sharply acute; frontal margin of carapace not extending anteriorly beyond margins of orbital hoods; antennal scale with well-developed blade reaching nearly or quite to distal end of antennular peduncle, basal antennal segment (basicerite) bearing strong lateral spine; 3rd pereopod with conspicuous movable spine on ischium *61. A. parvus Rostrum very short and broad; frontal margin of carapace extending anteriorly beyond margins of orbital hoods; antennal scale with reduced blade reaching about as far as midlength of 2nd antennular segment, basal antennal segment (basicerite) unarmed; 3rd pereopod with ischium unarmed 32 32. Rostrum minute, not extending anteriorly as far as lateral frontal margin; antennal scale strongly concave laterally, distolateral spine not unusually robust; major chela without distal sinus on palm proximal to adhesive plaque; minor chela with fingers shorter than palm *18. A. davaoensis Rostrum extending anteriorly beyond lateral frontal margin; antennal scale moderately concave laterally, distolateral spine unusually stout; major chela with distal sinus on palm immediately proximal to adhesive plaque; minor chela with fingers slightly longer than palm *27. A. eulimene 33. Margins of orbital hoods not extended anteriorly as flattened projections; minor chela without distinct lateral crest on dactyl *36. A. hippothoe Margins of orbital hoods extended anteriorly as flattened projections; minor chela with distinct lateral crest on dactyl, setiferous in male *66. A. serenei 34. Major chela with strong shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger; 3rd pereopod with dactyl not subspatulate, ischium unarmed IS. A. coutierei Major chela without distinct shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger; 3rd pereopod with dactyl subspatulate, ischium bearing movable spine *21. A dispar 35. Third pereopod with strong distal tooth on flexor margin of menis 36 Third pereopod without strong distal tooth on flexor margin of merus S3 36. Second pereopod with proximal article of carpus no more than xh as long as 2nd 37 Second pereopod with proximal article of carpus more than xli as long as to longer than 2nd 45 37. Third pereopod with dactyl biunguiculate 38 Third pereopod with dactyl simple, not biunguiculate 40 38. Antennal scale with blade much reduced, reaching little more than halfway to tip of distolateral spine; 3rd pereopod without spines on flexor margin of carpus or movable spine on ischium 70. A. spongiarum Antennal scale less reduced, reaching at least 2/3 of distance to tip of distolateral spine; 3rd pereopod with 1-4 spines on flexor margin of carpus and with movable spine on ischium 39 39. Minor chela not sexually dimorphic, fingers no more than 3/4 as long as palm; 3rd pereopod with series of spines on mesial flexor margin of merus *5. A. alcyone Minor chela sexually dimorphic, dactyl distinctly wider and slightly longer in male than in female, fingers at least as long as palm in both sexes; 3rd pereopod without series of spines on flexor margin of merus *58. A. paralcyone 40. Third pereopod with movable spine on ischium 41 Third pereopod without spine on ischium 44 41. Major chela with dactyl like double-headed hammer 42 Major chela with conventional dactyl, not double-headed 43 42. Antennal scale with blade well-developed, overreaching 2nd antennular segment *48. A. microstylus NUMBER 466 11 Antennal scale with blade reduced, not reaching beyond midlength of 2nd antennular segment *52. A. obesomanus 43. Basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with strong lateral tooth; major chela with transverse and longitudinal grooves; minor chela with fingers less than l/2 as long as palm, dactyl not "balaeniceps" in either sex . *4. A. acutofemoratus Basal antennal segment (basicerite) usually unarmed; major chela without apparent sculpture; minor chela with fingers at least 3A as long as palm, dactyl "balaeniceps" in male *10. A. bucephalus 44. Second antennular segment 3 times as long as wide; major chela with dactyl like double-headed hammer *47. A. malleodigitus Second antennular segment twice as long as wide; major chela with conventional dactyl, not double-ended 70. A. spongiarum 45. Major chela with strong tooth either side of dactylar articulation 13. A. collumianus Major chela without strong teeth flanking dactylar articulation 46 46. Major chela with palm distinctly constricted on both margins proximal to dactylar articulation 47 Major chela without distinct sinus in margin proximal to fixed finger 50 47. Major chela with sinus on margin proximal to fixed finger not delimited proximally by very strong shoulder 7. A. batesi Major chela with very strong shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger . . . 48 48. Basal antennal segment (basicerite) with unusually long ventrolateral tooth far overreaching stylocerite; major chela with "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque in form of narrow oblique groove; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article considerably longer than 2nd article *60. A. parvirostris Basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with spine-like ventrolateral tooth not overreaching stylocerite; major chela with "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque U-shaped and transverse; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article shorter than 2nd article 49 49. Major cheliped with sharp distal tooth on inferior flexor margin of merus; minor chela without sharp carina on extensor margin of dactyl and without sharp granules on extensor surface of palm *23. A. edamensis Major cheliped with flexor margin of merus unarmed; minor chela with sharp carina on extensor margin of dactyl and sharp granules on extensor surface of palm *32. A. funafutensis 50. Rostrum prominent, acute 51 Rostrum small, subrectangular 52 51. Major chela with palm devoid of grooves and ridges, fingers about lfa as long as palm 16. A. crinitus Major chela with subdistal, cleft-like "saddle" on palm, fingers about 2h as long as palm 49. A. miersi 52. Antennal scale with distolateral spine not especially stout, laterally convex, slightly overreaching well-developed blade; minor 1st chela with dactyl broadly "balaeniceps" in male only; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple 54. A. pachychirus Antennal scale with distolateral spine stout, laterally straight or slightly concave, considerably overreaching somewhat reduced blade; minor 1st chela with dactyl not "balaeniceps" in either sex; 3rd pereopod with dactyl variably biunguiculate 71. A. stanleyi 53. Third pereopod with dactyl biunguiculate or subspatulate 54 Third pereopod with dactyl neither biunguiculate nor subspatulate 63 54. Third pereopod with dactyl biunguiculate 55 Third pereopod with dactyl subspatulate 56 55. Major chela with prominent acute tooth either side of dactylar articulation, without "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, without distinct shoulder on margin 12 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY proximal to fixed finger, minor chela with dactyl no t "ba laen iceps" in either sex; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal art icle 13A t imes a s long as 2 n d . . . . 13. A. collumianus Major chela without prominent acute tooth either side of dactylar articulation, with distinct "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque overhung by proximal shoulder, with distinct shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger, minor chela with dactyl "balaeniceps" in male only; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article twice as long as 2nd *62. A. polyxo 56. Major chela without "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque 57 Major chela with "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque 61 57. Body strongly compressed, carapace twice as high as wide; 1st pair of pereopods with merus armed with 3 distal teeth on extensor margin . . 14. A. compressus Body not unusually compressed; 1st pair of pereopods with merus armed, at most, with single distal tooth on extensor margin 58 58. Second pereopod with proximal article of carpus shorter than 2nd 59 Second pereopod with proximal article of carpus longer than or subequal to 2nd. 60 59. Antennal peduncle (carpocerite) overreaching antennular peduncle; 1st pereopods with series of long, acicular spines on flexor margin of merus; minor chela nearly 8 times as long as wide, dactyl slightly shorter than palm, "balaeniceps" in male *64. A. pustulosus Antennal peduncle (carpocerite) not reaching as far as distal end of antennular peduncle; 1st pereopods with short, inconspicuous spines on flexor margin of merus; minor chela less than 5 times as long as wide, dactyl distinctly longer than palm, not "balaeniceps" in male *65. A. quasirapacida 60. First pereopods with strong subdistal tooth on extensor margin of merus; major chela oval in cross-section, without longitudinal carinae or ridges on palm . . . *A. macroskeles First pereopods without subdistal tooth on extensor margin of merus; major chela with palm subrectangular in cross section and bearing strong longitudinal carina near margin proximal to fixed finger, obscure longitudinal ridge near midheight of same surface, and 2 ridges defining flattened surface proximal to adhesive plaque *51. A. nonalter 61. Major chela without shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger *43. macellarius Major chela with shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger 62 62. Major chela less than 2!/2 times as long as wide; minor chela with fingers subequal to or slightly longer than palm, dactyl "balaeniceps" in male; maximum carapace length about 27 mm *28. A. euphrosyne euphrosyne Major chela 272 to 3*/2 times as long as wide; minor chela with fingers usually about 3 times as long as palm, dactyl not "balaeniceps" in either sex; maximum carapace length about 13 mm *46. A. malabaricus 63. Major chela with "saddle" or transverse cleft proximal to adhesive plaque . . . 64 Major chela without "saddle" or transverse cleft proximal to adhesive plaque . . . 80 64. Second pereopod with proximal carpal article 2 or more times as long as 2nd . . . 65 Second pereopod with proximal carpal article less than twice as long as 2nd . . . 67 65. Major chela with abrupt shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger, 3rd pereopod without spine on ischium 45. A. maindroni Major chela without marginal shoulder proximal to fixed finger; 3rd pereopod with movable spine on ischium 66 66. Margin of orbital hood curving regularly to base of rostrum, not produced anteromesially; major cheliped without distal tooth on inferior flexor margin of NUMBER 466 13 merus 6. A. barbatus Frontal margin between rostrum and orbital hood convexly produced; major cheliped with strong distal spine on inferior flexor margin of merus 25. A. ehlersii 67. Major chela with "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque at least partially overhung by shoulder proximal to "saddle" 68 Major chela with "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque not even partially overhung by shoulder proximal to "saddle" 74 68. Major chela with dactyl bearing very short, obliquely truncate plunger 69 Major chela with dactyl bearing well-developed plunger 71 69. Major chela with both proximal shoulder overhanging "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque and shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger sharply acute 12. A. chiragricus Major chela with both proximal shoulder overhanging "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque and shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger bluntly rounded 70 70. Major chela with margin proximal to fixed finger supporting low shoulder, forming shallow notch distally; minor chela of male with dactyl strongly "balaeniceps" and with distinct "saddle" on palm proximal to dactylar articulation *59. A. pareuchirus pareuchirus Major chela with margin proximal to fixed finger supporting strong shoulder forming rather deep notch distally; minor chela with dactyl not "balaeniceps" and palm without distinct "saddle" in either sex *75. A . suluensis 71. First pereopods with merus armed with acute distal tooth on inferior flexor margin 72 First pereopods with merus unarmed at distal end of inferior flexor margin . . . . ! 73 72. Minor chela with dactyl "balaeniceps" in male only; 2nd pereopod with proximal article of carpus PA to 2 times as long as 2nd *24. A. edwardsii Minor chela with dactyl "balaeniceps" in both sexes; 2nd pereopod with proximal subequal to 2nd article in length *73. A. strenuus strenuus 73. Rostrum nearly reaching level of distal margin of 1st antennular segment; antennal scale with distolateral spine distinctly overreaching distal margin of blade; major chela with sharp ridge on mesial surface of palm subparallel with "dorsal" margin of palm; minor chela of male with dactyl robust, displaying "balaeniceps" carina, especially on lateral surface *37. A hyphalus Rostrum not nearly reaching level of distal margin of 1st antennular segment; antennal scale with distolateral spine only moderately overreaching distal margin of blade; major chela with sharp ridge on mesial surface of palm diverging distally from "dorsal" margin of palm at angle of about 45?; minor chela of male with dactyl slender, without "balaeniceps" carina on either surface . . . . *55. A. pacificus 74. Major chela 3 or more times as long as wide 75 Major chela seldom more than 2!/2 times as long as wide 76 75. Frontal margin between rostrum and orbital hood convex l.A. batesi Frontal margin between rostrum and orbital hood incised . . . 39. A . leptochirus 76. Second pereopod with proximal article of carpus not appreciably longer than 2nd 77 Second pereopod with proximal article of carpus distinctly longer than 2nd . . 78 77. Antennal scale with lateral margin sinuous, distolateral spine laterally convex; 1st pereopods with 2-3 spines on flexor margin of merus proximal to distal tooth; minor chela with dactyl not distinctly "balaeniceps" in either sex 22. A. dolerus Antennal scale with lateral margin concave, distolateral spine nearly straight 14 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY laterally; 1st pereopods without spines on flexor margin proximal to distal tooth; minor chela with dactyl strongly "balaeniceps" in both sexes *73. A. strenuus strenuus 78. Major chela with "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque rather broad longitudinally and shallow, not abruptly delimited proximally; minor chela with dactyl not "balaeniceps" in either sex 38. A. ladronis Major chela with "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque in form of notch rather abruptly delimited proximally; minor chela with dactyl usually "balaeniceps" in male 79 79. Major cheliped without distal or subdistal tooth on inferior flexor margin of merus; 3rd pereopod usually without spine on ischium 40. A. leviusculus leviusculus Major cheliped usually with subdistal tooth on inferior flexor margin of merus; 3rd pereopod usually with movable spine on ischium *41. A . lobidens 80. Major cheliped without distal tooth on inferior flexor margin of merus 81 Major cheliped usually with acute tooth on inferior flexor margin of merus . . 82 81. Rostrum vestigial, frontal margin of carapace extending well beyond margins of orbital hoods; 2nd antennular segment nearly 3 times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with small, inconspicuous tooth; 2nd pereopod with proximal article of carpus more than twice as long as 2nd . . . . *31. A. frontalis Rostrum well-developed, frontal margin of carapace not extending beyond margins of orbital hoods; 2nd antennular segment about 172 times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with large, sharp tooth overreaching stylocerite; 2nd pereopod with proximal article of carpus less than IV2 times as long as 2nd 53. A. ovaliceps 82. Major chela with palm slightly less than twice as long as wide, fingers slightly more than V2 as long as palm; minor chela with fingers slightly shorter than palm 50. A. mitis Major chela with palm slightly more than twice as long as wide, fingers slightly less than V2 as long as palm; minor chela with fingers slightly longer than palm 56. A. paracrinitus 3. Alpheus acutocarinatus De Man, 1909 stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin moderately Alpheus acutocarinatus De Man. 1909a:104 [type locality: the type series COncave, dlStOlateral Spine not unusually StOUt, barely Over- came from 4 Indonesian localities: Selat Madura (56 m); west coast of reaching distal margin of blade; 1st pereopods with merus Lombok (18-27 m); noith coast of Celebes (72 m); and east coast of armed with acute distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; major Sumbawa (to 36 m)l; 1911:301, pi. 21: fig. 94-94/ pL 22: fig. chela oval in cross-section, 6 times as long as wide, dactyl w l i i s i ^ ^ DM" BaimCr* 1 9 8 1 : 2 2 5-D M- " * AH- Banner' nearly straight in longitudinal plane, not double-ended, bearing well-developed plunger, palm without teeth either side of DIAGNOSIS.?(Brevirostris Group). Body not unusually dactylar articulation or other obvious sculpture, without compressed or setose; rostrum prominent but not reaching as longitudinal carina near margin proximal to fixed finger, far as distal margin of 1st antennular segment, sharply carinate without "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque but with in midline, carina extending posteriorly beyond midlengh of indistinct distal sinus adjacent to plaque, without shoulder on carapace, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; margin proximal to fixed finger; minor chela 9 times as long carapace with median tooth interrupting postrostral carina on as wide, dactyl slender, slightly shorter than or subequal to gastric region, without flattened teeth overhanging posterior palm, "balaeniceps" in male only, without longitudinal crests ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin transverse and on opposable margin; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal unarmed mesial to orbital hoods, curving directly onto rostral article subequal to 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl pointed, margin, region not unusually flattened, orbital hoods unarmed, simple, subspatulate, propodus, carpus, and merus without adrostral furrows deep; 2nd antennular segment more than 4 spines on flexor margin, ischium bearing movable spine; times as long a wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 9.0 mm. with small lateral tooth not nearly reaching level of tip of RANGE.?Madagascar, Gulf of Thailand, Philippines (off NUMBER 466 15 Manila Bay), Indonesia, and southern Queensland, Australia; about 20-72 meters. In the Smithsonian collections, there are six specimens of A. acutocarinatus collected by the NAGA Expedition in the Bay of Nha Trang, Viet Nam in 1966. REMARKS.?The Albatross collected, at station 5397 in the Samar Sea east of Masbate in 245 meters, an ovigerous female (carapace length 8.3 mm to base of rostrum) of a shrimp without its three anterior pairs of pereopods that seems to be related to A. acutocarinatus. That it probably represents a distinct species is suggested not only by the greater depth at which it was taken but also by the remnant of what must have been a larger mesial gastric tooth, by a small spine on the frontal margin either side of the rostrum, and by a rather distinct branchiostegal spine. *4. Alpheus acutofemoratus Dana, 1852 Alpheus acutofemoratus Dana, 1852b:55O, pi. 35: fig. 2 [type locality: Balabac Strait].?Dc Man, 1902:888, pi. 27: fig. 63. Alpheus parabrevipes Coutiere, 1898a:151, fig. 2 [type locality: Samoa]. Alpheus acutofemoratus.?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1978:218; 1982:77, fig 29; 1985:11. DIAGNOSIS.?(Sulcatus Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum distinct but not reaching as far as distal margin of 1st antennular segment, bluntly carinate in midline, carina broadening posteriorly and disappearing on anterior gastric region, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle posterior to base of rostrum, without flattened teeth overhang- ing posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin between rostrum and orbital hood unarmed but angularly projecting anteriorly beyond orbital hood, submarginal region somewhat flattened, orbital hoods unarmed, adrostral furrows not very deep; 2nd antennular segment about twice as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with distinct lateral tooth that does not reach level of tip of stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin rather strongly concave, distolateral spine stout, distinctly overreaching distal margin of blade; 1st pereopods with merus armed with acute distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; major chela subconical, slightly more than twice as long as wide, dactyl little curved but directed somewhat laterad from longitudinal plane of palm, not double-ended, bearing well-developed plunger, palm without sharp teeth either side of dactylar articulation, without longitudinal carina near margin proximal to fixed finger, with narrow, V-shaped transverse "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, proximal shoulder not overhanging "saddle," without shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger, deep longitudinal sulcus but no sharp carina on mesial surface of palm subparallel with dorsal margin; minor chela about 3 times as long as wide, dactyl not especially slender, less than xli as long as palm, not carinate on extensor margin, not "balaeniceps" even in males, palm granulate and setose on mesial surface; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article xh as long as 2nd; 3rd and 4th pereopods with dactyl simple, propodus armed with 10-12 spines on flexor margin, carpus with acute tooth at distal end of flexor margin, merus armed with large acute distal tooth on flexor margin, ischium bearing movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 9 mm. MATERIAL.?PHILIPPINES. Port Gubat, southeastern Luzon [12?55'N, 124?09'E]; tide pool; 23 Jun 1909 (1300-1700): 1 ovig female [7.3]. RANGE.?Andaman Sea, Gulf of Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia, and Queensland, Australia, to the Marshall, Fiji, Samoa, and Tonga islands; intertidal to 3 meters. *5. Alpheus alcyone De Man, 1902 Alpheus crinitus.?Bate, 1888:548, pi. 98: fig. 2 [not A. crinitus Dana, 1852]. Alpheus alcyone De Man, 1902:870, pi. 27: fig. 61 [type locality: Temate].?D.M. and A.H. Banner. 1982:110. fig. 29. Alpheus aculeipes Coutiere, 1905:892, pL 79: fig. 31 [type locality: several localities in the Maldive Islands, as well as Djibouti and Mozambique]. DIAGNOSIS.?(Crinitus Group). Body neither unusually com- pressed nor densely setose; rostrum small, not reaching nearly as far as distal margin of 1st antennular segment, sharply carinate in extreme anterior part, carina becoming blunt posteriorly and disappearing on anterior gastric region, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle posterior to base of rostrum and without flattened teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin transverse and unarmed mesial to orbital hoods, region not flattened, orbital hoods unarmed, adrostral furrows rather deep; 2nd antennular segment less than twice as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) unarmed; antennal scale with lateral margin moderately concave, distolateral spine stout, far overreaching distal margin of rather narrow blade; major 1st cheliped with merus armed with acute distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; minor 1st cheliped with merus unarmed on flexor margin; major chela broadly oval in cross-section, about 272 times as long as wide, dactyl slightly curved in longitudinal plane, not double-ended, bearing short, truncated plunger, palm without obvious sculpture of any kind; minor chela 4 times as long as wide, dactyl not especially slender, nearly 73 as long as palm, not "balaeniceps" and without carinae on either extensor or opposable margin; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article about 73 as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl variably biunguiculate, sometimes obscurely so, propodus bearing 8 spines on flexor margin, carpus with 1-4 spines on flexor margin, merus with distal tooth and 3-12 spines on parallel carina of flexor margin; 4th pereopod with merus lacking teeth or spines on flexor margin; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 8 mm. M A T E R I A L ^ H D L I P P I N E S . Off Jolo Island, Sulu Archipel- ago: sta 5174; 6?03'45"N, 120?57/E; 37 m; coarse sand; 5 Mar 1908 (1551-1557); 9' Johnston oyster dredge: 1 male [5.5]. Near Siasi, Sulu Archipelago: sta 5147; 5o41'40"N, 120o47'10wE; 16 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY 38 m; coral sand, shells; 16 Feb 1908 (1127-1147); 12' Agassiz beam trawl, mud bag: 1 male [4.0]. RANGE.?Red Sea and eastern Africa to Japan, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, and Caroline, Marshall, Fiji, Samoa, and Tonga islands; intertidal to 71 meters, in coral and probably sponges. REMARKS.?Apparently a small and inconspicuous movable spine may be present or absent on the ischium of the third and fourth pereopods in this species. 6. Alpheus barbatus Coutiere, 1897 Alpheus barbatus Coutiere, 1897a:235 [type locality: Djibouti]; 1899:230, figs. 279, 280.?De Man, 1911:387, pi. 19: fig. 88.?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1982:163, fig. 49. DIAGNOSIS.?(Brevirostris Group). Body neither unusually compressed nor densely setose; rostrum short, subrectangular, not reaching nearly as far as distal margin of 1st antennular segment, slightly carinate in midline, carina not extending posteriorly beyond orbital hoods, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region, without flattened teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin transverse or concave and unarmed mesial to orbital hoods, region not especially flattened, orbital hoods unarmed, adrostral furrows shallow; 2nd antennular segment only slightly longer than wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) unarmed; antennal scale with lateral margin nearly straight, distolateral spine unusually stout, moderately overreaching distal margin of blade; 1st pereopods with merus unarmed on flexor margin; major chela compressed, about twice as long as wide, dactyl not double-ended, palm without teeth either side of dactylar articulation, without longitudinal carina on mesial surface parallel with "dorsal" margin, but with shallow longitudinal sulcus on lateral surface extending from base of fixed finger to midlength of palm; minor chela about 2!/2 times as long as wide, fingers gaping, about l2/3 times as long as palm, lateral surface of dactyl and mesial surface of both fingers bearing dense fringes of hair, filling gap, dactyl not "balaeniceps"; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article twice as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl pointed, simple, propodus bearing 7 spines on flexor margin, carpus and merus unarmed on flexor margin, ischium bearing movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum probably at least 10 mm. RANGE.?Red Sea and eastern Africa to Philippines, Indonesia, and Queensland, Australia; intertidal to 10 meters. 7. Alpheus batesi A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1964 Alpheus leviusculus, var. Bate, 1888:549, pi. 98: fig. 1. Alpheus batesi A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1964:94 [type locality: Viscayan Sea off Tagubanhan Island, Philippines; 11 "WN, 123?O9'E; 37 meters; mud]. DIAGNOSIS.?(Edwardsii Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum sharp, overreaching distal margin of 1st antennular segment, dorsally rounded, mesial ridge not extending posteriorly beyond orbital hoods, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region, without flattened teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin between rostrum and orbital hood unarmed but protruding anteriorly as convex lobe, region slightly flattened, orbital hoods unarmed, adrostral furrows not very deep; 2nd antennular segment about 3 times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) not armed with strong ventro- lateral tooth; antennal scale with lateral margin slightly concave, distolateral spine not unusually stout, slightly overreaching and separated from blade by moderate gap; major chela slightly compressed, about 3 times as long as wide, dactyl not doubled-ended, bearing short, truncate plunger, unarmed either side of dactylar articulation, without longitudinal carina near margin proximal to fixed finger, with shallow "saddle" on palm proximal to adhesive plaque, without distinct shoulder proximal to "saddle," with sinus on opposite margin proximal to fixed finger but without distinct shoulder proximal thereto, palm without sharp ridge on mesial surface subparallel with "dorsal" margin of palm; minor chela lost; 2nd pereopod with proximal article slightly longer than 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl elongate, simple, and sharp; carapace length about 11 mm. RANGE.?Apparently known only from the ovigerous female holotype from the Viscayan Sea, Philippines, in 37 meters. 8. Alpheus bicostatus De Man, 1908 Alpheus bicostatus De Man, 1908:102 [type locality: the type series came from 3 Philippine and Indonesian localities: Kepulauan Balabalagan, Makassar Strait (to 27 m); off North Ubian Island, Sulu Archipelago (surface to 23 m); and Selat Butung, southern Celebes (in floating seaweed)].?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1982:124, fig. 34. DIAGNOSIS.?(Diadema Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum slender, sharp, slightly overreaching distal margin of 1st antennular segment, bluntly carinate, carina interrupted on anterior gastric region, finally terminating on midgastric region; carapace with median tubercle on anterior gastric region, with paired convex or oblique flanges abruptly delimiting and overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin armed with acute tooth slightly mesial to orbital hood, meeting base of rostrum at right angle, region flattened, orbital hood unarmed but bearing nearly vertical carina; 2nd antennular segment twice as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with prominent ventral tooth reaching anteriorly nearly as far as tip of stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin concave, distolateral spine stout, overreaching distal margin of blade; major cheliped with chela subcylindrical, about 3 times as long as wide, dactyl nearly straight in longitudinal plane, not double-ended, bearing poorly developed concavely truncate plunger, palm without sculpture except for narrow and shallow "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, merus with subdistal tooth on inferior flexor NUMBER 466 17 margin; minor cheliped with chela about 4 times as long as wide, dactyl 2h as long as palm, without carina in midline of extensor surface, palm without sculpture, merus unarmed on inferior flexor margin; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article subequal to 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl pointed, simple, neither biunguiculate nor subspatulate, propodus with numerous spines on and near flexor margin, carpus with long distal tooth on flexor margin, merus with acute distal tooth on flexor margin, ischium bearing movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 10 mm. RANGE.?Kenya and Madagascar to the Philippines, Indone- sia, and Australia; intertidal to 27 meters, occasionally at surface. *9. Alpheus bidens (Olivier, 1811) Palaemon bidens Olivier, 1811:663 [type locality: Australia ("surles cotes de la Nouvelle-Hollande")]. Alpheus tridentatus Zehnter, 1894:204, pi. 8: fig. 24 [type locality: Ambon, Indonesia]. Alpheus praedator De Man, 1908:103 [type locality: Ambon, Indonesia]. Alpheus dissodonotus Stebbing, 1915:83, pi. 86 [type locality: off Port Elizabeth, South Africa; 33?5O'S, 25?46'E; 37 meters]. Alpheus bidens.?DM. and A.H. Banner. 1982:136, fig. 39. DIAGNOSIS.?(Diadema Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum prominent, reaching anteriorly as far as or beyond distal margin of 1st antennular segment, strongly and sharply carinate in dorsal midline, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace with median tubercle interrupting postrostral carina on gastric region and with paired large acute teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin unarmed but convex mesial to orbital hoods, meeting base of rostrum at almost right angle, region somewhat depressed, concave, orbital hoods unarmed but with strong vertical carina appearing almost toothlike in lateral aspect, adrostral furrows deep; 2nd antennular segment nearly IV2 times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) with strong ventrolateral tooth not reaching level of tip of stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin concave, stout, laterally convex distolateral spine overreaching blade; major cheliped with chela nearly cylindri- cal, fully 2V2 times as long as wide, dactyl nearly straight in longitudinal plane, not double-ended, bearing poorly devel- oped, somewhat concave plunger, palm virtually without sculpture except for narrow, deep "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, merus with inferior flexor margin armed with strong distal tooth; minor cheliped with chela 23A to 3J/2 times as long as wide, dactyl subequal to palm in length, balaeniceps and with suggestion of "saddle" on palm in male only, merus without distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl usually simple, neither subspatulate nor biunguiculate, propodus bearing 9-16 spines on flexor margin, carpus with 2 terminal spines on flexor margin, merus with acute subdistal tooth, ischium bearing movable spine; maximum carapace length about 23 mm. MATERIAL?PHILIPPINES. Off Jolo Island, Sulu Archipel- ago; 6?06'N, 120?58'5(TE; 35 m; sand, coral; 14 Feb 1908 (1055-1115); 12' Agassiz beam trawl, 2 mud bags: 1 female [6.3]. RANGE.?Madagascar and Hong Kong, Ryukyus, Philip- pines, Indonesia, Australia, Tasmania, Caroline, and Marshall islands; intertidal to 83 m. REMARKS.?Although D.M. and A.H. Banner (1982:139) considered "rather insignificant" the fact that all of the Australian specimens seen by them lacked elongate teeth on the distal margin of the first antennular segment, while all of De Man's Indonesian specimens bore two prominent teeth in this position, I attempted to couple this difference with an apparent difference in size between the Australian population and specimens available to me from off Hong Kong, the Philippines, and the Marshall Islands. The extra-Australian material examined was composed of small specimens, none exceeding a carapace length of 10 mm, ovigerous females yielding carapace lengths of 6.0 to 9.7 mm, whereas Australian material recorded in the literature seemed to be larger, corresponding to carapace lengths of 14 to 23 mm, and to occur in shallower water, 0 to 24 meters in contrast to 0 to 83 meters for the smaller form. Of 11 specimens of the extra-Australian shrimps examined, however, only two specimens displayed two teeth on the first segment of both antennular peduncles, two had two teeth on one side and one on the other, one had one tooth on each peduncle, two had one on one side and none on the other, and four specimens?all from the Marshall Islands?had no teeth on either peduncle. I am forced, therefore, to agree with the Banners about the variability of this character but I am still intrigued by the apparently larger size of the Australian examples and the possibility of eventually finding correlated morphological differences that might be of taxonomic significance. *10. Alpheus bucephalus Coutiere, 1905 Alpheus bucephalus Coutiere, 1905:890, pi. 78, fig. 29 [type locality: the material cited came from 2 Indian Ocean localities: Hulele, Male, Maldive Islands, and Minicoy, Laccadive Islands].?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1982:120, figs. 23d-f, 32. Alpeus consobrinus De Man, 1908:101 [type locality: the type series came from 7 Siboga stations in the Philippines and Indonesia: Pulau Lumulumu, Makassar Strait (reef); Pearl Bank (Lahangan Island), Sulu Archipelago (15 m); Pulau Pajunga, Kuandang Bay, northern Celebes (reef); Pulau Siau [Kepulauan Sangi] (reef); Pulau Selajar [south of Celebes] (to 36 m); Pulau Roti (to 36 m); and Kepulauan Balabalagan [Makassar Strait] (to 36 m)]. DIAGNOSIS.?(Crinitus Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum acute, short, not reaching nearly as far as distal margin of 1st antennular segment, sharply carinate in midline, carina not extending posteriorly beyond base of eyes, rostral base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region or acute teeth overhanging posterior end of adrostral 18 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY furrows, anterior margin partially convex and unarmed mesial to orbital hoods, region flattened, orbital hood unarmed but with projecting vertical carina, adrostral furrows distinct; 2nd antennular segment twice as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) usually unarmed; antennal scale with lateral margin quite concave, distolateral spine not unusually stout, reaching considerably beyond distal margin of blade; 1st pereopods with merus often armed with acute distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; major chela subcylindrical, 2!/2 times as long as wide, dactyl not curved in longitudinal plane but both fingers bent slightly toward flexor aspect of chela, not double-ended, bearing truncate plunger becoming acute proximally, palm without sculpture except for faint distal sinus adjacent to adhesive plaque; minor chela about 2V2 to 3!/2 times as long as wide, dactyl about equal to or somewhat longer than palm, "balaeniceps" in male only; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article 73 to V2 as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple, curved to sharp tip, not subspatulate or biunguiculate, propodus bearing 6 pairs of spines on flexor margin, carpus with acute distal tooth on flexor margin, merus armed with strong acute distal tooth on flexor margin, ischium bearing movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum, probably little more than 6 mm. MATERIAL?PHILIPPINES. Off Jolo Island, Sulu Archi- pelago: sta 5145 ; 6?04/3(TN, 120?59'3(TE; 42 m; coral sand, shells; 15 Feb 1908 (1344-1359); 12' Agassiz beam trawl, mud bag: 1 ovig female [5.3]. Marungas Island, Sulu Archipelago: [6?06*N, 120?58'E]; 19 Feb 1908; shore, coral head: 1 male [4.3]. RANGE.?Red Sea and eastern Africa to Japan, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, and Pacific Islands to Line and Society islands; intertidal to 80 meters. 11. Alpheus canalkulatus A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1968 Alpheus canalkulatus A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1968:141. fig. 1 [type locality: South China Sea southeast of Hong Kong; 20?05'N, 115?1 ITS; 250 meters; sand and mud]; 1981:225. DIAGNOSIS.?(Sulcatus Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum sharp, prominent, but not reaching nearly as far as distal margin of 1st antennular segment, rounded dorsally, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region or paired large acute teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin unarmed mesial to orbital hoods, joining rostral margin at less than right angle, orbital hood armed with sharp marginal tooth directed slightly mesiad, adrostral furrows moderately deep but narrow; 2nd antennular segment 3 times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with strong ventrolateral tooth nearly reaching level of Up of stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin concave in proximal xti, distolateral spine strong, laterally convex, considerably overreaching distal margin of blade; anterior pereopods with merus armed with acute distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; major chela compressed, fully 2V2 times as long as wide, dactyl not curved in longitudinal plane but directed slightly toward flexor side of chela, not double-ended, bearing truncated, very short plunger, palm without teeth either side of dactylar articulation, without longitudinal carina near margin proximal to fixed finger, without "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque but with 4 longitudinal furrows, furrow extending posteriorly from adhesive plaque bounded on each side by rather distinct carina; minor chela nearly 4 times as long as wide, dactyl slightly longer than palm, "sub-balaeniceps" even in female, with sharp tooth on extensor margin of palm at articulation with dactyl; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article nearly twice as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl biunguiculate, propodus with 14 spinules on flexor margin, carpus unarmed, merus bearing small, acute, distal tooth on flexor margin, ischium with distinct movable spine; carapace length to base of rostrum 5 mm. RANGE.?South China Sea off Hong Kong and northeast of Lubang Islands, Philippines; 186 to 250 meters. REMARKS.?The carapace length and the proportions of the carpal articles of the second pereopod were determined from examination of the female holotype in the Smithsonian collections. 12. Alpheus chiragricus H. Milne Edwards, 1837 Alpheus chiragricus H. Milne Edwards, 1837:354 [type locality: "les mers d'Asie"].?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1982:267, fig. 82. DIAGNOSIS.?(Edwardsii Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum prominent, 2 - 3 times as long as wide, reaching nearly as far as distal margin of 1st antennular segment, distinctly carinate in midline, carina extending posteriorly onto anterior gastric region, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region or strong paired acute teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin mesial to orbital hoods unarmed, meeting rostral margin at less than right angle, orbital hoods unarmed, adrostral furrows comparatively deep and narrow; 2nd antennular segment about twice as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with small, acute ventrolateral tooth not reaching level of tip of stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin slightly concave, distolateral spine strong but not unusually stout, distinctly but not greatly overreaching distal margin of blade; 1st pereopods with merus armed with acute distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; major chela somewhat compressed, about 2!/2 times as long as wide, dactyl straight in longitudinal plane, not double-ended, bearing short, truncated plunger, palm without longitudinal carina near margin proximal to fixed finger, with "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, both proximal shoulder overhanging "saddle" and shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger sharply acute; minor chela nearly 4 to nearly 4V2 times as long as wide, dactyl NUMBER 466 19 about as long as palm, "balaeniceps" in male; 2nd pereopod wih proximal carpal article nearly twice as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl pointed, simple, propodus bearing 8 spines on flexor margin, carpus unarmed except for distal tooth on extensor margin, merus unarmed, ischium with strong movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum perhaps exceeding 25 mm. RANGE.?Eastern Africa and Madagascar, Mergui Archipel- ago, Indonesia, and Australia; intertidal to 20 meters. REMARKS.?In their description of the neotype of A. edwardsii, A.H. and D.M. Banner (1972:1142) fail to mention the size of the plunger on the dactyl of the major chela either in their "Diagnosis" or under "Variation". In their Australian report, however (D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1982:271, fig. 83q), they illustrated the plunger on the dactyl of a small female of A. edwardsii dredged in Moreton Bay, Queensland. Compari- son of this drawing with two in the same work showing the dactyl of a male A. chiragricus trawled in the Gulf of Carpentaria, Queensland (1982:268, fig. 82c) and of a Madras specimen of the same species (fig. 82j) suggests that the development of the plunger may offer another character for distinguishing A. chiragricus from A. edwardsii. Unfortunately the material of the former species available to me is insufficient to confirm or deny that possibility. 13. Alpheus collumianus Stimpson, 1860 Alpheus collumianus Stimpson, 1860:30 [type locality: Bonin Islands; in coral in 2 meters].?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1982:45, fig. 9. Alpeus Malhaensis Coutiere, 1908:205 [type locality: the original pair of specimens came from 2 localities in the western Indian Ocean: Saya de Malha Bank (53 m) and Amirante Isles, Seychelles (53 m)]. Alpheus collumianus probabilis A.H. Banner, 1956:338, fig. 10 [type locality: off northwest coast of Saipan, Mariana Islands; about 3 meters]. Alpheus collumianus medius A.H. Banner, 1956:340, fig. 11 [type locality: Hawaii]. Alpheus collumianus inermis A.H. Banner, 1956:342, fig. 12 [type locality: off Saipan, Mariana Islands; about 6 meters]. DIAGNOSIS.?(Macrocheles Group). Body not unusually compressed or setose; rostrum acute, not nearly reaching as far as distal margin of 1st antennular segment, bluntly but strongly carinate in midline, carina not extending posteriorly far beyond eyes, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region, without paired large acute teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin somewhat convex and unarmed mesial to orbital hoods, typically notched adjacent to rostrum, and region often flattened, orbital hoods varying from armed with strong marginal tooth to unarmed, adrostral furrows deep; 2nd antennular segment 2 to Vli times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) varying from unarmed to armed with strong, acute tooth overreaching stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin concave, distolateral spine strong, far overreaching narrow blade, but not unusually stout; 1st pereopods with merus armed with few short spines and acute distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; major chela somewhat compressed, about 2xh times as long as wide, dactyl nearly straight in longitudinal plane but directed somewhat toward flexor side of chela, not double-ended, bearing short, truncated plunger, palm with strong, carinate tooth on mesial side of articulation interrupted by transverse incision, without longitudinal carina near margin proximal to fixed finger, without "saddle" or distal sinus on palm proximal to adhesive plaque, with indistinct shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger; minor chela about 3 times as long as wide, fingers about as long as palm, dactyl carinate on extensor margin but not "balaeniceps," palm with strong tooth on mesial aspect at dactylar articulation, with transverse incision in carina supporting tooth; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article distinctly longer than 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl variably biunguiculate, propodus bearing 6 pairs of spines on flexor margin, merus varying from being armed with series of spines and strong distal tooth on flexor margin to complete absence of spines and rounded distal angle, ischium bearing movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 9 mm. RANGE.?Red Sea, Madagascar, and South Africa to Japan and Australia and Pacific islands to Hawaii and Societies; intertidal reef flats to about 75 meters. REMARKS.?This species vies with some of those in the Brevirostris Group for extreme variability in characters that are otherwise believed to be relatively stable, like the presence or absence of spines on the orbital hoods and of a distal tooth on the flexor margin of the merus of the 3rd pereopod. 14. Alpheus compressus A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1981 Alpheus compressus A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1981:227, fig. 3 [type locality: southwest of Manila Bay, Philippines; 13?59.8'N, 120?18.6'E; 192 meters]. DIAGNOSIS.?(Brevirostris Group). Body strongly com- pressed, carapace twice as high as wide, not unusually setose; rostrum narrow, reaching nearly to distal margin of 1st antennular segment, base not abruptly delimited from orbital hoods; carapace without median tooth or tubercle or acute paired teeth on gastric region, anterior margin of orbital hood joining base of rostrum at slightly less than right angle, adrostral furrows minimal; 2nd antennular segment 3 times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with strong acute tooth reaching nearly to level of tip of stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin straight, distolateral spine not unusually stout, barely overreaching distal margin of blade; 1st pereopods with merus armed with acute subdistal tooth on inferior flexor margin; major chela somewhat compressed, 33A times as long as wide, dactyl nearly straight in longitudinal plane, not double-ended, bearing poorly developed plunger marked only by semicircular gap in proximal part of dactyl, palm without teeth either side of dactylar articulation or other obvious sculpture, without carina near margin proximal to fixed finger, without "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, 20 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY without shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger, minor chela about 5!/2 times as long as wide, dactyl not "balaeniceps" and without carina on extensor margin, about twice as long as palm; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article twice as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl subspatulate, propodus bearing 2 or 3 feeble spines on flexor margin, ischium with prominent movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum 16 mm. RANGE.?Reunion, Andaman Sea west of peninsular Thai- land, South China Sea southeast of Hong Kong, southwest of Manila Bay, Philippines, and Selat Sunda, Indonesia; 14 to 280+ meters. REMARKS.?The only specimen of this species that I have seen is the incomplete large female paratype from southeast of Hong Kong that has the orbital hoods dentate. Although the rostrum of this specimen conforms with the original description of the species, being "highly compressed and narrow, dorsally rounded, without carina," there is a rather prominent, though blunt, ridge in the midline of the carapace, reaching posteriorly slightly beyond the midlength of the latter. Inasmuch as this rather obvious ridge was not mentioned in the original description, it is not included among the characters attributed in the above key to those specimens in which the orbital hoods are unarmed. 15. Alpheus coutierei De Man, 1909 Alpheus Coutierei De Man, 1909a: 107 [type locality: the type series came from 2 Siboga stations: southeast side of Pearl Bank, Sulu Archipelago, Philippines (IS m) and off northeastern tip of Timor, Indonesia (27-54 m)]; 1911:409, pL 22: fig. 97. DIAGNOSIS.?(Edwardsii Group). Body not unusually com- pressed oi setose; rostrum acute, barely overreaching 1st antennular segment, sharply carinate in midline, carina extending posteriorly to posterior lh of carapace, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle or acute paired teeth on gastric region, anterior margin transverse and unarmed mesial to orbital hoods, curving directly onto rostral margin, orbital hoods unarmed; 2nd antennular segment 2xh times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) bearing extremely small ventrolateral spine; antennal scale with lateral margin deeply concave, distolateral spine rather stout, considerably overreach- ing narrow distal margin of blade; major cheliped with merus armed with small, acute, subdistal tooth on inferior flexor margin, chela compressed, 2'/2 times as long as wide, palm with "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, proximal shoulder obtuse, with shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger; minor cheliped with merus unarmed on inferior flexor margin, chela 4 times as long as wide, fingers slightly longer than palm; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article subequal to or somewhat longer than 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple, merus and ischium unarmed; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 6 mm. RANGE.?Sulu Archipelago, Philippines, southeastern Indo- nesia off eastern Timor, Fiji, Tonga, and Somoa islands; 15 to at least 27 meters. 16. Alpheus crinitus Dana, 1852 Alpheus crinitus Dana, 1852a:21 [type locality: Balabac Strait]; 1852b:548, pi. 34: fig. 8.?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1978:221. DIAGNOSIS.?(Crinitus Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum large, overreaching 1st antennular segment, carinate in midline, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; orbital hoods unarmed; 2nd antennular segment about 4 times as long as wide; major chela slightly compressed, 273 times as long as wide, without sculpture, smooth, slightly pubescent, dactyl not double-ended; minor chela 32/3 times as long as wide, lightly pubescent, fingers slightly shorter than palm; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article slightly shorter than 2nd; 3rd pereopod lightly pubescent, with dactyl pointed, simple, propodus with about 4 pairs of spinules on flexor margin, merus with acute distal tooth on flexor margin; carapace length to base of rostrum about 7 mm. RANGE.?Recorded from the Red Sea, in addition to the type locality in Balabac Strait, the southernmost passage between the Sulu Sea and the South China Sea. ?17. Alpheus crocked (Armstrong, 1941) Crangon crockeri Armstrong, 1941:8, figs. 2, 3 [type locality: Matautu Bay, Savai'i, Western Samoa; coral in shallow water]. Crangon tuthilli A.H. Banner, 1953:63, fig. 19 [type locality: off southwest Oahu, Hawaii; 12 to 107 meters]. Alpheus crockeri.?Crosnier and Forest, 1966:225, figs. 4,5.?A.H. and DM. Banner, 1966b:84, fig. 28. DIAGNOSIS.?(Macrocheles Group). Body not unusually compressed or setose; rostrum prominent but not nearly reaching as far as distal margin of elongate 1st antennular segment, rounded dorsally, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle or paired large acute teeth on gastric region, anterior margin concave and unarmed mesial to orbital hoods, meeting rostral margin at somewhat less than right angle, region not flattened, orbital hoods armed with acute marginal teeth, adrostral furrows shallow; 2nd antennular segment about twice as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with strong ventrolateral spine not overreaching stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin slightly concave, distolateral spine rather weak, distinctly but not far overreaching tapered blade; 1st pereopods with merus armed with acute distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; major chela compressed, about 3 times as long as maximum width, dactyl rather sharply angled toward flexor side of chela, not clearly double-ended, mesially laminate except near opposable margin, forming high, sharp dorsal crest, bulbous distally, plunger reduced to small blunt triangle, NUMBER 466 21 palm with acute tooth each side of dactylar articulation, blunt carina supporting tooth on mesial side of dactylar articulation entire, not interrupted by transverse notch, without "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, with very low, broadly rounded shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger; minor chela about 4!/2 times as long as maximum width, dactyl slender, slightly longer than palm, not "balaeniceps" or carinate on extensor margin; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article about 13A times as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple, sharp, propodus with 7 to 9 spiniform setae on flexor margin, merus unarmed, ischium with mobile spine; maximum carapace length probably about 8 mm. MATERIAL.?PHILIPPINES. South of Itbay Island, Batan Island; sta 5321; 20?18'30"N, 121?51'15"E; 48 m; white sand, coral, broken shells; 9 Nov 1908 (1125-1129); 9' Johnston oyster dredge: 1 female [5.3]. RANGE.?Reunion, Andaman Sea coast of peninsular Thai- land, Gulf of Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia, Mariana and Samoan islands and Hawaii in the Pacific Ocean and the islands of Sao Tome and Annobon in the eastern Atlantic; intertidal to 50 meters. ?18. Alpheus davaoensis, new species FIGURE 2 DIAGNOSIS.?(Crinitus Group). Body neither unusually com- pressed nor densely setose; rostrum minute, barely visible (Figure 2a), carinate in extreme anterior part, carina becoming indistinct on anterior gastric region but more apparent on posterior gastric region and extending posteriorly as barely visible line to about midlength of carapace, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle or paired acute teeth on gastric region, anterior margin unarmed, forming slightly flattened convex lobe either side of rostrum protruding anteriorly beyond margin of orbital hoods, orbital hoods unarmed, rostral furrows moderately deep anteriorly; 2nd antennular segment slightly less than twice as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) unarmed; antennal scale with lateral margin rather strongly and regularly concave, distolateral spine not very stout, far overreaching semicircular distal margin of greatly reduced blade; 1st pereopods (Figure 2e,h) with merus armed with acute subdistal tooth on inferior flexor margin; major chela (Figure If) subcylindrical, fully 272 times as long as maximum width, dactyl bent slightly toward flexor side of chela, not really double-ended, bearing very short, truncated, distally concave plunger, acutely prominent proximally (Figure 2g), palm without sculpture except for faint sulcus proximal to adhesive plaque; minor chela (Figure lij) 3 73 times as long as wide, dactyl slender, fingers A/s as long as palm, rather deeply excavate on opposable margins; both 2nd pereopods missing; 3rd pereopod (Figure 2k,l) with dactyl hooked, obscurely biunguiculate, propodus bearing about 9 spines on flexor margin, carpus not distinctly armed, merus armed with strong distal tooth on flexor margin, ischium without movable spine; carapace length 4 mm. MATERIAL.?PHILIPPINES. Davao Gulf, Mindanao: sta 5253; 7?04'48"N, 125?39'38"E; 51 m; coral; 18 May 1908 (1347-1358); 6' Johnston oyster dredge; 1 female [4.0], holotype (USNM 205661). TYPE LOCALITY.?Same as above. RANGE.?Known only from the unique female holotype from Davao Gulf, Mindanao, Philippines; 51 meters. REMARKS.?My opinion that the single specimen described above represents a previously undescribed species of a genus several members of which are quite variable may be unjustified, but I have been unable to relate the specimen to any of the approximately 22 known species of the Crinitus Group. The following six species apparently agree with A. davaoensis in lacking an ischial spine on the third pereopod: A. arethusa De Man, 1909a; A. bradypus Coutiere, 1905; A. cylindricus Kingsley, 1878; A. spongiarum, A. stanleyi, and A. styliceps Coutiere, 1905. The specimen from the Davao Gulf differs from A. arethusa from Indonesia and Australia in having the frontal margin recessed and the distolateral spine of the antennal scale less stout and the blade more reduced. It is distinguished from A. bradypus from the Laccadive and Mariana islands in having the rostrum less distinct, the distolateral spine of the antennal scale less stout and the blade more reduced, the major chela with a less pronounced depression proximal to the adhesive plaque, and the dactyl of third pereopod indistinctly biunguiculate rather than simple. From A. cylindricus from the eastern Pacific and western and eastern Atlantic it disagrees in having the front recessed, the distolateral spine of the antennal scale less stout and the blade more reduced, and a distal tooth on the inferior flexor margin of the merus of the third pereopod. It seems to be separated from A. spongiarum from the Red Sea to Japan, the Philippines, Indonesia, and Australia, with which it may be most similar, in the recessed front and minute rostrum, and the more concave lateral margin of the antennal scale and less stout distolateral spine. It deviates from A. stanleyi from the Indian Ocean, the Philippines, and Indonesia in the recessed front and minute rostrum, the absence of a tooth on the basal antennal segment (basicerite), and the much more reduced blade of the antennal scale. It differs from A. styliceps from the Indian Ocean in the very different front and rostrum, the more concave lateral margin of the antennal scale, and the shorter fingers of the minor chela. In two species of the Crinitus Group, A. crinitus and A. heurteli Coutiere, 1897c, the presence or absence of an ischial spine on the third pereopod is unknown. Alpheus davaoensis differs from the Philippine A. crinitus in the minute rather than unusually large rostrum, more robust antennular peduncle, and, possibly, the obscurely biunguiculate dactyl of the third pereopod, and from A. heurteli from the Bay of "Fernando-Velosa" in having the rostrum not overreaching the orbital hoods (the latter species has the two proximal carpal articles of the second pereopod subequal, a character that 22 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY FIGURE 2.?Alpheus davaoensis, new species, female holotype from Albatross sta 5253, carapace length 4.0 mm: a, anterior carapace and appendages, dorsal aspect; b, same, lateral aspect; c, t el son and uropods, dorsal aspect; d, right 3rd maxilliped; e, right (major) cheliped;/ right (major) chela, extensor surface; g, same, flexor surface; h, left (minor) cheliped; i, left (minor) chela, extensor surface; j , same, flexor surface; k, left 3rd pereopod; /, same, dactyl. cannot be compared with the missing second pereopods in A. davaoensis). ETYMOLOGY.?The proposed specific name obviously relates to the type locality of the species. ?19. Alpheus deuteropus Hilgendorf, 1879 Alpheus deuteropus Hilgendorf, 1879:834, pi. 4: figs. 8 - 1 0 [type locality: Zanzibar].?Coutiere, 1899:81 (fig. 45), 166 (fig. 184), 215 (figs. 254, 255).?D.M and A.H. Banner. 1982:42, fig. 8. DIAGNOSIS.?(Macrocheles Group). Body not unusually compressed or setose; rostrum acute, not nearly reaching as far as distal margin of 1st antennular segment, bluntly but strongly carinate in midline, carina not extending posteriorly far beyond eyes, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region, without paired large acute teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin variable, region shelf-like, flattened, orbital hoods armed with slender tooth, nearly as long as rostrum, adrostral furrows deep; 2nd antennular segment about 3 times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with strong acute tooth not overreaching stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin concave, distolateral spine strong, far overreaching distally narrow blade, but not unusually stout; 1st pereopods with merus armed with small acute distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; major chela compressed, about twice as long as wide, dactyl directed slightly toward flexor side of chela, not double-ended, bearing short, truncated, distally excavate plunger, palm with strong, acute tooth each side of dactylar articulation, ridge supporting tooth on mesial side of articulation with transverse notch terminating prominent channel on mesial side of palm, very shallow "saddle" or distal sinus proximal to adhesive plaque, with shoulder offset from margin proximal to fixed finger, minor chela nearly 23A times as long as wide, fingers more than !/2 as long as palm, dactyl neither carinate nor "balaeniceps," palm with unusually strong tooth on mesial aspect at dactylar articulation, with offset transverse incision at base of tooth; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article at least !/3 longer than 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple, not biunguiculate, propodus bearing 5 pairs of spines on flexor margin, merus armed with strong distal spine on flexor margin, ischium bearing movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 11 mm. MATERIAL.?PHILIPPINES. Grand Island, Subic Bay, Luzon [14?46'N, 120?14'E]; 2 - 6 m; scattered clumps of coral; 8 Jan 1908 (1300-1730); dynamite: 1 female [7.7]. RANGE.?Red Sea, eastern and South Africa through the Indian Ocean to Japan and Australia, and eastward across the NUMBER 466 23 Pacific to Hawaii. REMARKS.?The single specimen collected by the Albatross Expedition lacks the two anterior pairs of pereopods, but comparison with intact specimens identified by A.H. Banner leaves little doubt about the determination. Partial dissection of some of the material in the Smithsonian collections revealed a frontal region slightly different from the Coutiere illustration (1899, fig. 45). Although the supramargi- nal orbital spines are situated at the lateral extremities of the orbitorostral carinae, as indicated by Coutiere, there is no suggestion of what appears from his illustration to be a fused extension of the margin of the orbital hood extending dorsally to the base of each spine. In other words, the orbital spines seem to be completely isolated from the margin, except for their connection with the base of the rostrum by the orbitorostral carinae. ?20. Alpheus diadema Dana, 1852 Alpheus diadema Dana, 1852a:23 [type locality: Lahaina, Maui, Hawaii]; 1852b:555, pi. 35: fig. 7.?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1982:140. fig. 40. Alpheus insignis Heller, 1862a:269, pi. 3: figs. 17,18 [type locality: Red Sea]. DIAGNOSIS.?(Diadema Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum prominent but variable, not reaching level of distal margin of 1st antennular segment, feebly carinate in dorsal midline, base abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace with median tubercle on gastric region, anterior margin unarmed but convex mesial to orbital hoods and slightly incised lateral to rostral margin, orbital hoods unarmed, adrostral furrows deep and sharply defined laterally on orbital hoods as well as mesially at rostral margin; 2nd antennular segment nearly twice as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) with strong ventrolateral tooth not reaching level of tip of stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin concave proximally, stout, laterally convex distolateral spine overreaching diagonal distal margin of blade; major cheliped with chela nearly cylindrical, fully twice as long as wide, dactyl nearly straight in longitudinal plane, not double-ended, bearing well-developed plunger, palm without sculpture except for narrow transverse "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, merus with inferior flexor margin armed with strong distal tooth; minor cheliped with chela about 3 times as long as wide, dactyl about as long as palm and "balaeniceps" in male, shorter and not "balaeniceps" in female, merus without distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article about as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple or obscurely biunguiculate, propodus with at least a dozen spines on flexor margin, carpus with flexor margin terminating distally in strong tooth, merus with acute subdistal tooth, ischium with strong movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 9 mm. MATERIAL.?PHILIPPINES. Marungas Island, Sulu Archi- pelago [6?06Tsr, 120?58'E]; shore, coral head; 19 Feb 1908: 1 male [3.5]. RANGE.?Red Sea and eastern Africa, Indian Ocean, Japan, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, and tropical Pacific to Hawaii. REMARKS.?The single specimen from Marungas Island lacks the three anterior pairs of pereopods, but the carapace is so distinctive in this species that there is little danger of misidentification unless the concept of the species becomes modified. ?21. Alpheus dispar Randall, 1840 Alpheus dispar Randall, 1840:141 [type locality: Manila]. l?]Alpheus digitalis De Haan. 1844: pi. 45: fig. 4; 1849:178 [type locality: Japan].?Coutiere, 1898b:249, fig. 2.?Holthuis and Sakai, 1970:94. Alpheus distinguendus De Man, 1909b:155, pi. 7: figs. 9 - 1 4 [type locality: Japan].?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1982:157, fig. 47. DIAGNOSIS.?(Brevirostris Group). Body not unusually compressed or setose; rostrum reaching nearly as far as distal margin of 1st antennular segment, carinate in midline, carina becoming somewhat obscure posteriorly but extending nearly to midlength of carapace, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region or strong paired acute teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin transverse and unarmed mesial to orbital hoods, curving directly onto rostral margin, region not unusually flattened, orbital hoods unarmed, adrostral furrows deep; 2nd antennular segment 3 times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with small lateral tooth not nearly reaching level of tip of stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin very slightly concave, distolateral spine not unusually stout, barely over- reaching distal margin of blade; 1st pereopods with merus armed with acute distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; major chela compressed, 3 times as long as wide, dactyl nearly straight in longitudinal plane, not double-ended, bearing very short plunger defined only proximally, palm without teeth either side of dactylar articulation, sculpture limited to narrowly triangular flattened or slightly concave plane, widening distally, on margin proximal to dactylar articulation and to obscure longitudinal ridge on flexor surface, without "saddle," without shoulder on strongly compressed margin proximal to fixed finger, surface paved with flattened granules; minor chela about 4!/2 times as long as wide, dactyl broad in male, 23A times as long as palm, somewhat "balaeniceps" in male only; 2nd pereopod with 2 proximal carpal articles subequal; 3rd pereopod with dactyl pointed, simple, subspatu- late, propodus, carpus, and merus without spines, ischium bearing movable spine; maximum carapace length 27 mm. MATERIAL.?PHILIPPINES. Cotabate, Mindanao, below mouth of Mindanao River [7?13X 124?15'E]; 20 May 1908 (1430-1730); seine: 1 male [15.0]. Tilik, Lubang Island [13?49'N, 120? 12*E]; beach; sand, mud; 14 Jul 1908 (1430- 1700); 130' seine: 1 male [13.0]. RANGE.?Red Sea, Madagascar, Mergui Archipelago, Sing- 24 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY apore, Indonesia, Philippines, China, Japan, Australia; in depths shallower than 37 meters, especially off river mouths. REMARKS.?Both specimens collected during the Albatross Philippines Expedition lack the major cheliped, which may be diagnostic in this species, so the identification may be considered somewhat tentative. Randall (1840:141) referred his species to "A. breviros- tris? (Edw.) Mus. Acad.," followed by: "Dr. Burroughs has brought from Manilla a species of Alpheus agreeing with M. Edwards's description of A. brevirostris, with this exception, that it has a distinct tooth on the outer side of the basilar article of the external antennae; there is also a somewhat elevated ridge on the outer side of the arm. I have named it, provisionally, A. dispar." This name seems to be a senior synonym of A. distinguendus, a name proposed by De Man (1909b) for the Japanese specimen called A. rapax Fabricius by De Haan (1844,1849). According to D.M. and A.H. Banner (1982:173), the only possibly significant differences distin- guishing A. distinguendus from A. brevirostris are the absence of a transverse groove ("saddle") on the palm of the major chela and the granular, rather than smooth, surface of that appendage. Until such time as these two characters may prove to be unimportant, those authors "reluctantly" considered the two forms to be specifically distinct. In a report published a year earlier but actually prepared later, A.H. and D.M. Banner (1981:229) recorded the species that they called A. distinguen- dus from the Philippines (one specimen from 36 meters in Manila Bay and seven from the Manila market). There would seem to be little doubt that the species "brought from Manilla" by Dr. Burroughs is the same as the one from Japan called A. distinguendus by De Man and that A. dispar is the valid name for this species by all those who consider it to be distinct from A. brevirostris (Olivier, 1811). 22. Alpheus dolerus A.H. Banner, 1956 Alpheus dolerus A.H. Banner, 1936:362, fig. 21 [type locality: Saipan, Mariana Islands].?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1982:205, fig. 63. DIAGNOSIS.?(Edwardsii Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum acute, not overreaching distal margin of 1st antennular segment, dorsal carina rounded, not extending posteriorly beyond orbital hoods, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region, without flattened teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin between rostrum and orbital hood unarmed, narrowly concave, orbital hood unarmed but with stiff seta on anteromesial margin, adrostral furrows shallow; 2nd antennular segment twice as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with small acute tooth; antennal scale with lateral margin sinuous, distolateral spine not unusually stout, overreaching distally tapered blade; major chela somewhat compressed, 273 times as long as wide, dactyl not double-ended, bearing well- developed, distally convexly oblique plunger, unarmed either side of dactylar articulation, without distinct longitudinal carina near margin proximal to fixed finger, with "saddle" on palm proximal to adhesive plaque, with distinct shoulder proximal to but not overhanging "saddle," with heavy, rounded shoulder on opposite margin proximal to fixed finger, palm without sharp ridge on mesial surface subparallel with "dorsal" margin; minor chela about 3!/2 times as long as wide, dactyl subequal to palm in length, with proximal short row of setae in male but not truly "balaeniceps"; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article no longer than 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl pointed, simple, propodus bearing about 12 spines on flexor margin, carpus and merus unarmed, ischium with strong movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 7 mm. RANGE.?Somalia, Madagascar, Philippines and Australia eastward to the Society Islands [Hawaii, according to D.M. Banner, pers. comm.]: in coral heads to a depth of 4 meters. ?23. Alpheus edamensis De Man, 1888 Alpheus Hippothoe var. edamensis De Man, 1888a:518 [type locality: the type series was collected at 2 Indonesian localities: "Pulo Edam" (= Pulau Damar-Besar) off Djakarta, Java, and "Amboina" (= Ambon)]. Alpheus acanlhomerus Ortmann, 1890:474, pi. 36: fig. 12 [type locality: Tahiti]. Alpheus edamensis D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1982:188, fig. 57. DIAGNOSIS.?(Edwardsii Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum sharp, reaching level of distal margin of 1st antennular segment, dorsal carina rounded, not extending posteriorly beyond orbital hoods, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region, without flattened teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin between rostrum and orbital hood unarmed, slightly concave near rostrum, orbital hood unarmed, adrostral furrows moderately deep; 2nd antennular segment nearly twice as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with acute lateral tooth; antennal scale with lateral margin strongly concave, distolateral spine stout, overreaching narrow blade; 1st pereopods with merus armed with acute distal tooth on inferior flexor margin, major chela somewhat compressed, about 2xh times as long as broad, dactyl not noticeably curved in longitudinal plane, not double-ended, having well-developed plunger, palm without prominent longitudinal carina near margin proximal to fixed finger, with "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, proximal shoulder rounded, not overhanging "saddle," shoulder proximal to fixed finger strong, rounded, slightly projecting; minor chela about 3 times as long as wide, dactyl slightly longer than palm, not "balaeniceps" in either sex; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article slightly shorter than 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl pointed, simple, propodus bearing 16 spines on flexor margin, carpus with acute tooth each side of distal margin, merus with acute tooth at distal end of flexor margin, ischium with movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum 17 mm. NUMBER 466 25 MATERIAL.?PHILIPPINES. Port Palapag, Samar [12?38'N, 125?01'E] 3 Jun 1909: 1 male [11.0]. Batan Island [13?15TSf, 124WE] ; tide pool; 5 Jun 1909: 1 ovig female [12.5]. INDONESIA. Great Tobea, Selat Butung, Celebes [4?33'S, 122?42'E]; tide pools; 15 Dec 1909: 1 male [9.3]. RANGE.?Red Sea, Madagascar, Reunion, Seychelles, Mauri- tius, Malaya, Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, Ryukyus, Fiji, Samoa, Society Islands; intertidal to 50 meters. REMARKS.?The specimen from Port Palapag lacks the 2nd pair of pereopods, but the well-developed, rather than truncate, plunger on the dactyl of the major chela helped to distinguish it from related species of the Edwardsii Group. ?24. Alpheus edwardsii (Audouin, 1826) Nomen delinquum Savigny, 1817: pi. 10: fig. 1. Athanas Edwarsii Audouin, 1826:91. Alpheus Audouini Coutiere, 1905:911, pi. 87: fig. 52. Alpheus edwardsi.?A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1972:1141, fig. 1 [neotype locality: Suez]. Alpheus edwardsii.?DM. and A.H. Banner, 1982:270, fig. 83. DIAGNOSIS.?(Edwardsii Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum acute, reaching to about distal margin of 1st antennular segment, dorsal carina rounded, not extending posteriorly beyond orbital hoods, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region or flattened teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin between rostrum and orbital hood unarmed, nearly transverse, orbital hood unarmed, adrostral furrows moderately deep; 2nd antennular article about twice as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with small, acute lateral tooth; antennal scale with lateral margin distinctly concave near midlength, distolateral spine not unusually stout, over- reaching tapered blade; 1st pereopods with merus armed with sharp distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; major chela somewhat compressed, about 273 times as long as wide, dactyl not noticeably curved in longitudinal plane, not double-ended, having well-developed plunger, palm without prominent longitudinal carina near margin proximal to fixed finger, with "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, proximal shoulder blunt, but overhanging "saddle," shoulder proximal to fixed finger strong, slightly projecting but not acute; minor chela less than 4 to nearly 4!/2 times as long as wide, fingers from 2/3 as long as palm in male to subequal to palm in female, dactyl "balaeniceps" in male only; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article I1/-* to twice as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl pointed, simple, propodus with about 8 spines on flexor margin, carpus with distal extensor angle acute, merus unarmed, ischium with movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 14 mm. MATERIAL?PHILIPPINES. Upper reef, inside Dumurug Point, Port Cataingan, Masbate [ H ^ H 124?03'E]; 2 - 3 m; sand, scattered clumps of staghorn coral; 19 Apr 1908 (1500-1600); dynamite: 6 males [7.0-10.9] 1 ovig female [9.1]. Chase Head, Endeavor Strait, Palawan [lTOl'N, U9?l%fE]; 2V2 to 4 mm; coral, sand; 22 Dec 1908 (1400-1600); dynamite (3 shots): 1 ovig female [9.0]. Port Gubat, southeastern Luzon [12?55'N, 124WE]; tide pool; 23 Jun 1909 (1300-1700): 1 male [12.6]. RANGE.?Probably from Red Sea and eastern and South Africa to Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, and Caroline Islands (not yet known from Central Pacific islands east of Truk or New Zealand); intertidal under rocks to 25 meters. REMARKS.?In the largest male, from Port Gubat, southeast- ern Luzon, the dactyl of the minor chela is not fully "balaeniceps" in form; the margins of the dactyl display a low carina above a row of setae on each side, but the segment is rounded on the extensor surface, not noticeably flattened as is usual in males of this species. This specimen might be assigned to A. haanii Ortmann, 1890:472, if the minor chela of the male of that Japanese species should prove to be like that of the Port Gubat specimen (see D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1982:273). 25. Alpheus ehlersii De Man, 1909 Alpheus ehlersii De Man, 1909c:663, pL 70 [type locality: "island of Edam, Bay of Batavia" (= Pulau Damar-Besar, off Djakarta, Java, Indonesia)].? D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1982:132, fig. 37; 1985:16. DIAGNOSIS.?(Diadema Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum acute, not reaching level of distal margin of 1st antennular segment, carina rounded, not extending posteriorly beyond orbital hoods; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region or paired flanges overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin between rostrum and orbital hood unarmed but convexly produced at junction with orbital hood, latter unarmed, adrostral furrows rather shallow; 2nd antennular segment nearly twice as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) bearing strong tooth not reaching level of tip of stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin concave proximally, distinctly convex in distal xh, distolateral spine rather stout, overreaching distal margin of blade; 1st pair r?f pereopods with merus armed with acute or blunt distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; major chela slightly compressed, about 23A times as long as wide, dactyl nearly straight in longitudinal plane, not double-ended, with well-developed plunger, palm with shallow oblique groove or "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque; minor chela about 4 times as long as wide, fingers longer than palm, not "balaeniceps" in either sex; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article twice as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl pointed, simple, neither biunguiculate nor subspatulate, propodus bearing about 7 spines on flexor margin, carpus with blunt distal tooth on extensor margin, ischium bearing movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 6 mm. RANGE.?Red Sea, eastern Africa, Madagascar, Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, and Caroline, Marshall, 26 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY Phoenix, Samoa, and Tonga island groups; intertidal on dead coral heads. 26. Alpheus euchirus Dana, 1852 Alpheus euchirus Dana, 1852a:21 [type locality: Balabac Strait]; 1852b:545, pi. 34: fig. 6.?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1982:197. DIAGNOSIS.?(Edwardsii Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum acute, not overreaching distal margin of 1st antennular segment, dorsal carina not extending posteriorly beyond orbital hoods, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without flattened teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, orbital hood armed with small marginal spine; basal antennal segment (basicerite) with, at most, reduced lateral tooth; 1st pereopods with merus unarmed on inferior flexor margin; major chela somewhat compressed, about twice as long as wide, dactyl somewhat skewed from longitudinal plane of palm, not double-ended, palm with "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, proximal shoulder not overhanging "saddle," strong, rounded shoulder on opposite margin proximal to fixed finger, minor chela with stout fingers; 2nd pereopod with 1st carpal article about twice as long as second; 3rd pereopod with dactyl pointed, simple, propodus with 7 or 8 sets of spines on flexor margin, merus with very small, inconspicuous distal tooth on flexor margin; carapace length about 7 mm. RANGE.?Known only from the type locality in Balabac Strait, the southwestern passage between the Sulu Sea and the South China Sea. REMARKS.?In his preliminary report on the species of Alpheus collected by the United States Exploring Expedition, Dana (1852a) listed eight species under the heading "Orbitae margo inermis": A. strenuus, A. pacificus, A. obesomanus, A. crinitus, A. mitis, A. parvirostris, A. pugnax, and A. diadema; one species, A. euchirus, under "Orbitae margo spinula armatus"; and five species under "Orbitae margo spinula denteve armatus": A. acutofemoratus, A. tridentulatus, A. neptunus, A. laevis, and A. malleator. The form of the orbital hoods in the latter group is very variable. The Atlantic A. malleator has a sharp marginal spine, sometimes with a smaller spine mesial to it on each orbital hood. Alpheus laevis (= A. lottini) has an acute tooth arising from the surface of the hood, rather than from its margin. Alpheus tridentulatus (a nomen dubium applied to a species possibly from the western Atlantic) and A. neptunus have been transferred to the genus Synalpheus and have flattened, triangular orbital teeth characteristic of that genus. Alpheus acutofemoratus, if the current concept of that species is correct, has the orbital hoods completely unarmed; Dana (1852a:22) notes of this species, "Orbitae margo acutus sed spina non productus." It is difficult to understand why Dana placed this species in the category that he did and species like A. parvirostris and A. diadema in the first category, inasmuch as the frontal margin in those species is as produced as it is in A. acutofemoratus. Although Dana does not mention the orbital hoods in his description of A. euchirus, per se, it seems unlikely that he would have created a special category for this species and illustrated a distinct marginal spine on the orbital hood (clearly seen under a lens) in pi. 34: fig. 6a, if the hoods were unarmed. I am inclined to agree with D.M. and A.H. Banner (1982:199) that A. euchirus is the only known member of the Edwardsii Group with spinose orbital hoods and that it is one of several of Dana's species?like A. pugnax and perhaps A. tridentulatus?that have not yet been redis- covered. ?27. Alpheus eulimene De Man, 1909 Alpheus Eulimene De Man, 1909a:101 [type locality: off north coast of Pulau Waigeo; 0?7.2X 13O?25.5'E; 83 meters]; 1911:364. pi. 16: fig. 76. Alpheus eulimene.?DM. and A.H. Banner, 1982:105, fig. 27. DIAGNOSIS.?(Crinitus Group). Body neither unusually compressed nor densely setose; rostrum small, not reaching nearly as far as distal margin of 1st antennular segment, carina extending posteriorly as faint line nearly to midlength of carapace, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle posterior to base of rostrum and without flattened teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, frontal region projecting and unarmed except for rostrum between centers of orbital hoods, region not noticeably flattened, orbital hoods unarmed, adrostral furrows not especially deep; 2nd antennular segment fully IV2 times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) unarmed; antennal scale with lateral margin somewhat concave, distolateral spine unusually stout, far overreaching distal margin of reduced blade; 1st pereopods with merus armed with acute distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; major chela broadly oval in cross-section, about 2xli times as long as wide, dactyl rather sharply skewed from longitudinal plane, not double-ended, plunger truncate, projecting only proximally as bluntly acute angle, palm without sculpture except for variably distinct depression distally proximal to adhesive plaque; minor chela 3 times as long as wide, dactyl ll/s times as long as palm, curved in longitudinal plane, not "balaeniceps" in either sex; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article little more than l/2 as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl variably biunguiculate, sometimes simple, propodus bearing about 8 spines on flexor margin, carpus with both distal angles projecting, flexor surface with 1 or 2 spines, merus with strong, acute, distal tooth on flexor margin, ischium unarmed; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 5 mm. MATERIAL.?PHILIPPINES. Babuyan Channel, north of Luzon: sta 5325; 18?34'15"N, 121?51'15"E; 410 m; green mud; 11.8?C; 1 Nov 1908 (1113-1132); 12' Tanner beam trawl, mud bag: 2 males [2.5, 3.0] 2 females [2.6,4.1]. Grande Island, Subic Bay, Luzon [41?46'N, 120?14'E]; 2 - 6 m; scattered clumps of coral; 8 June 1908 (1300-1730); dynamite: 1 female [4.6] (identification tentative). Southwest of Manila Bay, Luzon: sta 5108; 14?05/05wN, 120?19'45TE; 24 m; coral; 15 Jan 1908 (0834-0835); 9' Albatross-Blake beam trawl, mud bag (dredging cable fouled on gin block; trawl NUMBER 466 27 not dragged on bottom): 1 female [4.0]; sta 5109; 120?16'30"E; 18 m; coral; 15 Jan 1908 (1026-1038); 9' Albatross-Blake beam trawl (trawl immediately torn on coral): 1 male [3.8]. Davao Gulf, Mindanao: sta 5249; 7?06/06wN, 125?40'08"E; 42 m; coral, sand; 18 May 1908 (1102-1109); 6' Johnston oyster dredge: 1 male [3.3]. RANGE.?Maldive Islands, Australia, Indonesia, Philippines, Japan, Mariana Islands; subtidal to 410 meters. *28. Alpheus euphrosyne euphrosyne De Man, 1897 Alpheus euphrosyne De Man, 1897:745, pi. 36: fig. 64 [type locality: Java Sea]. Alpheus eury dactyl us De Man, 1920:109 [type locality: Java]. Alpheus euphrosyne euphrosyne.?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1982:232, fig. 73. DIAGNOSIS.?(Edwardsii Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum acute, not nearly reaching level of distal margin of 1st antennular segment, dorsal carina low, rounded, not extending posteriorly far beyond orbital hoods, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region, without flattened teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin between rostrum and orbital hood unarmed, concave near rostrum, orbital hood unarmed, adrostral furrows shallow or obsolescent; 2nd antennular segment nearly twice as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) usually unarmed; antennal scale with lateral margin slightly convex, nearly straight, distolateral spine not prominent, usually reaching level of broadly rounded distal margin of blade but sometimes shorter; 1st pereopods with merus usually unarmed on inferior flexor margin; major chela somewhat compressed, about 2*/3 times as long as wide, dactyl lying in longitudinal plane of palm, not double-ended, having well-developed plunger, strong longitudinal ridge extending proximally from heavy, rounded shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger, "saddle" on opposite margin proximal to adhesive plaque, with proximal shoulder rounded, not overhanging "saddle"; minor chela 4!/2 times as long as wide in male, more than 5 times as long as wide in female, fingers subequal to length of palm in male, slightly longer in female, dactyl distinctly "balaeniceps" in male only; 2nd pereopod with proximal article from slightly longer to more than twice as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl pointed, subspatulate, propodus bearing about 9 spines on flexor margin, carpus with distal extensor angle projecting but bluntly rounded, merus unarmed, ischium with or without movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 27 mm. MATERIAL?PHILIPPINES. Manila market, Luzon; 4 Jan 1908: 1 male [21.8]. Inner Sound, Malampaya River, Palawan [10?50TSf, 119?24'E]; 1-2 m; soft mud; 26 Dec 1908 (0900-1500); dynamite or seine: 1 female [20.7]. RANGE.?Kenya, Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia, and Queensland, Australia; shallow, muddy, estuarine habitats. REMARKS.?There is little doubt that these two specimens belong to the same species even though the fine male from the Manila market has a prominent sharp tooth on the basal antennal segment (basicerite), whereas this segment is quite unarmed in the somewhat damaged female from Palawan. In both specimens, the blade of the antennal scale clearly overreaches the distolateral spine. The minor chela of the male has the palm only slightly constricted proximal to the adhesive plaque and the fixed finger. 29. Alpheus facetus De Man, 1908 Alpheus facet us De Man, 1908:100 [type locality: off Djedan, Kepulauan Aiu, Indonesia; 5?23'S, 134?41'E; 18 meters].?DM. and A.H. Banner, 1982:62, fig. 14; 1985:17. DIAGNOSIS.?(Sulcatus Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum acute, nearly reaching level of distal margin of 1st antennular segment, dorsal carina blunt, widening slightly posteriorly and extending to near midlength of carapace, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region or paired large acute teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin between rostrum and orbital hood forming flattened, convex prominences, orbital hood bearing marginal spine directed anteromesiad, adrostral fur- rows wide and shallow; 2nd antennular segment nearly Vfc times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with acute tooth reaching level of tip of rostrum but not quite as far as end of stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin nearly straight, distolateral tooth not unusually strong, but distinctly overreaching distal margin of tapered blade; anterior pereopods with merus armed with small acute distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; major chela slightly com- pressed, from less than 272 to more than 3V2 times as long as wide, dactyl lying in longitudinal plane of palm, not double-ended, bearing rather strong plunger directed proxi- mally, making virtually no angle with opposable margin of dactyl on distal side of plunger, palm without teeth either side of dactylar articulation, without "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque but often with paired oblique ridges on central part of palm; minor chela about 4!/2 times as long as wide, fingers about as long as palm, dactyl not "balaenicipes" in either sex; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article about twice as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple, propodus bearing about 11 spines on flexor margin, carpus with distal angles slightly projecting, merus unarmed, ischium bearing movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 10 mm. RANGE.?Western Indian Ocean, Thailand, Viet Nam, Philippines, Indonesia, Japan, Australia, and Caroline Islands; intertidal to 30 meters. 30. Alpheus foresti A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1981 Alpheus foresti A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1981:229, fig. 4 [type locality: southwest of Manila Bay, Philippines; 14?02.7'N, 120?20.3'E; 200 meters].?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1985:17. DIAGNOSIS.?(Edwardsii Group?). Body not unusually compressed or setose; rostrum reaching nearly as far as distal 28 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY margin of 1st antennular segment, flattened dorsally, margins abruptly delimited from and overhanging adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region or strong paired acute teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin mesial to orbital hoods unarmed, meeting rostral margin in concave curve, orbital hood unarmed, 2nd antennular segment twice as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) apparently armed with small, acute ventrolateral tooth not nearly reaching level of tip of stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin nearly straight, distolateral spine wide, overreaching or falling short of distal margin of blade; 1st pereopods with merus armed with acute distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; major chela considerably compressed, nearly 3 times as long as wide, dactyl lying in longitudinal plane of palm, not double-ended, plunger not separated from terminal tooth, palm with ill-defined notch representing "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, subrectan- gular shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger followed distally by 2nd prominence; minor chela 6V2 times as long as wide, dactyl subequal to palm in length, not "balaeniceps" in either sex; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article considerably longer than 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl subspatulate, propodus without spines on flexor margin, carpus without strong projection distally from either extensor or flexor margins, merus unarmed, ischium with movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 16 mm. RANGE.?Southwest of Manila Bay, Luzon, Philippines, and off southwestern Celebes, Indonesia; 134 to 200 meters. ? 3 1 . Alpheus frontalis H. Milne Edwards, 1837 Alpheus frontalis H. Milne Edwards, 1837:356 [type locality: Australia].? D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1982:99, figs. 231 ^ n, 25. Alpheus latifrons A. Milne-Edwards, 1873:87 [type locality: Upolu, Western Samoa]. Betaeus utricola Richters, 1880:164, pi. 17: figs. 34, 35 [type locality: Mauritius]. DIAGNOSIS.?(Crinitus Group). Body neither unusually compressed nor densely setose; rostrum obsolescent, rostral carina rounded, extending posteriorly to base of eyes, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region and without flattened teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin extending as vaulted shelf-like projection between orbits, adrostral furrows rather deep; 2nd antennular segment nearly 3 times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) bearing small acute ventral tooth; antennal scale with lateral margin sinuous, distolateral spine strong, over- reaching distal margin of blade; 1st pereopods with merus unarmed distally on flexor margin; major chela broadly oval in cross section, about 2!/3 times as long as wide, dactyl lying nearly in longitudinal plane of palm, not double-ended, bearing well-developed but distally truncate plunger, palm without obvious sculpture of any kind; minor chela slightly less than 2V2 times as long as wide in males, 33A as long as wide in females, dactyl broadly "balaeniceps" in male, about 3A as long as palm, unmodified in female, about l/2 as long as palm; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article fully twice as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple, propodus bearing about 9 spines on flexor margin, carpus terminating in acute tooth on flexor margin, blunt tooth on extensor margin, merus unarmed, ischium with movable spine; maximum overall carapace length about 16 mm. MATERIAL?PHILIPPINES. Port Matalvi, Luzon [15?29TSf, 119?56'E]; 23 Nov 1908; electric light: 1 female [5.3]. Varadero Bay, Mindoro [13?3O/N, 12?59'E]; surface; 22-23 Jul 1908 (2000-0200); dip net from gangplank with electric light: 2 males [5.2,5.3]. Sablayan Anchorage, western Mindoro [120?50H 120?46/E]; surface; 12 Dec 1908 (1900-2030); dip net, electric light 1 female [7.5]. RANGE.?Red Sea and eastern Africa to Japan, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, across Pacific to the Society Islands, but not Hawaii; low tide to 130 meters (all four of the Albatross specimens were found swimming at the surface under an electric light). REMARKS.?The statement by Miya (1974:136) that the major chela of A. frontalis is "entirely granulated on the inner surface, and densely covered with rather long soft hairs on the inner ventral surface, especially on the immovable finger" hardly reflects the relatively smooth and very sparsely hairy chelae of the specimens available to me. The larger of the Albatross females, however, displays a somewhat rougher and hairier major chela than do most of the other specimens examined. *32. Alpheus funafutensis Borradaile, 1898 FIGURE 3 Alpheus funafutensis Borradaile, 1898:1013, pL 15: fig. 10 [type locality: Funafuti, Ellice Islands].?De Man, 1911:436. Alpheus acanthomerus, var. inermis Lanchester, 1901:564 [type locality: Kelantan, Malaya]. DIAGNOSIS.?(Edwardsii Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum sharp, not reaching level of distal margin of 1st antennular segment, dorsal carina blunt, not extending posteriorly beyond orbital hood, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region, without flattened teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin between rostrum and orbital hood concave near rostrum, orbital hood unarmed, adrostral furrows moderately deep; 2nd antennular segment about 1V2 times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with acute ventro- lateral tooth reaching nearly to level of tip of stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin deeply concave, distolateral spine stout, far overreaching narrow blade; 1st pereopods with merus unarmed on inferior flexor margin; major chela somewhat compressed, about twice as long as wide, dactyl not noticeably curved in longitudinal plane, not double-ended, NUMBER 466 29 FIGURE 3.?Alpheusfunafutensis, ovigerous female from Grande Island, Subic Bay, Luzon, carapace length 5.0 mm: a, anterior carapace and appendages, dorsal aspect; b, minor cheliped, extensor aspect; c, same, flexor aspect; d, right 2nd pereopod; e, right 3rd pereopod. palm with "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, proximal shoulder rounded, not overhanging "saddle," shoulder proxi- mal to fixed finger strong, rounded, slightly projecting; minor chela nearly 2*/4 times as long as wide, dactyl shorter than palm, not "balaeniceps" in either sex; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article shorter than 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl pointed, simple, propodus bearing 9 spines on flexor margin, merus with acute tooth at distal end of flexor margin, ischium with movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 7 mm. MATERIAL?PHILIPPINES. Grande Island, Subic Bay, Luzon [14?46'N, 120?14'E]; 2 - 6 m; scattered clumps of coral; 8 Jan 1908 (1300-1730); dynamite: 1 ovig female [5.0]. RANGE.?Kenya, Malaya, Indonesia, Philippines, and central Pacific islands. REMARKS.?The specimen from Subic Bay lacks the major cheliped, but it agrees otherwise with the characters mentioned by De Man (1911:331, 436) based on his examination of an ovigerous female syntype of A. funafutensis, especially in having the movable finger of the minor chela (Figure 3c) "sharply carinate above." It seems to differ from the male from Thailand described by A.H. and D.M. Banner (1966b: 155, fig. 60) in having a shorter rostrum, the frontal margin lateral to the base of the rostrum concave rather than convexly produced, the antennal scales slightly shorter (Figure 3a), sharp granules, rather than "rounded papillae," on the palm of the minor chela (Figure 3b), and the proximal article of the second pereopod (Figure 3d) distinctly shorter than, rather than subequal, to the second. ?33- Alpheus gracitipes Stimpson, 1860 Alpheus gracilipes Stimpson, 1860:32 [type locality: Tahiti, among corals in depth of about 2 meters].?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1982:143, fig. 41. DIAGNOSIS.?(Diadema Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum acutely triangular, flattened dorsally, not carinate, nearly reaching level of distal margin of 1st antennular segment, base abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region, anterior margin unarmed and concave mesial to orbital hoods, latter unarmed but bluntly angulate and obscurely carinate, adrostral furrows sharply defined and overhung mesially by margin of rostral base, abruptly but less sharply delimited laterally; 2nd antennular segment twice as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with acute tooth nearly reaching level of tip of stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin concave, distolateral spine strong, laterally convex, overreaching narrow blade; 1st pereopods with merus armed with distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; major chela slightly compressed, 3xli times as long as wide, dactyl moving in plane angled slightly toward flexor side of palm, not double-ended, plunger not strong, clearly defined only proximally, palm with deep transverse groove or "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque; minor chela 5 times as long as wide, dactyl nearly as long as palm, "balaeniceps" in both sexes; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article slightly longer than 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl slender, simple, propodus bearing 10-16 spines on flexor margin, carpus with subacute distal tooth on extensor margin, merus unarmed, ischium with movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 13 mm. MATERIAL.?INDONESIA. Great Tobea, Selat Butung, Celebes [4?33'S, 122?42'E]; tidepool; 15 Dec 1909: 1 male [9.1]. RANGE.?Red Sea and eastern Africa to Hong Kong, Ryukyu Archipelago, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, and eastward through Pacific islands to Hawaii; intertidal to depth of 6 meters. 30 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY 34. Alpheus gracilis Heller, 1862 Aflpheus] gracilis UCOCT, 1862a:271,pl.3:figs. 19,20 [type locality: Red Sea]. Alpheus gracilis var. Alluaudi Coutiere, 1905:882 [type locality: Mahe Island, Seychelles]. Alpheus gracilis var. luciparensis De Man, 1911:338 [type locality: "5700 m. N. 279?E from South point of South-Lucipara-island. Reef."]. Crangon gracilis var. simplex A.H. Banner, 1953:75, fig. 25 [type locality: Waikiki Reef, Oahu, Hawaii]. Alpheus gracilis?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1982:60, fig. 13. DIAGNOSIS.?(Sulcatus Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum sharp, not reaching as far as distal margin of 1st antennular segment, rounded dorsally, not carinate, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region or paired large acute teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin unarmed mesial to orbital hoods but deeply incised lateral to base of rostrum, orbital hood armed with sharp marginal spine directed slightly mesiad, adrostral furrows shallowly rounded; 2nd antennular segment slightly longer than wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with strong and prominent tooth not reaching level of tip of unusually long stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin faintly concave, distolateral spine fairly strong and reaching beyond distal margin of blade; anterior pereopods with small acute distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; major chela compressed; 2x/2 times as long as wide, dactyl not curved much beyond longitudinal axis of palm, not double-ended, bearing moderately developed plunger, palm with 1 tooth beside dactylar articulation, without longitudinal carina near margin proximal to fixed finger, with shallow, rounded transverse depression or "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque and with slight constriction in margin proximal to fixed finger, minor chela 472 times as long as wide, not "balaeniceps" in either sex, tooth on margin of palm at articulation with dactyl; 2nd pereopod with proximal article more than twice as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl biunguiculate or not, propodus with 10 spines on flexor margin, carpus with rounded distal tooth on extensor margin, merus and ischium unarmed; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 7 mm. RANGE.?Red Sea, eastern and possibly South Africa to Thailand, Philippines, Japan, Indonesia, Queensland, Australia, and Pacific islands, including Hawaii and Society Islands. ?35. Alpheus hailstonei Coutiere, 1905 Alpheus Hailstonei Coutiere, 1905:879, pi. 74: fig. 18 [type locality: Maldive Islands (3 localities)]. Alpheus Hailstonei, var. laetabilis De Man, 1908:98 [type locality: 8 Indonesian localities; 27 to 120+ meters]. Alpheus Hailstonei. var. assimulans De Man, 1908:99 [type locality: 3 Indonesian localities; 54 to 113 meters]. Crangon hailstonei var. paucispinata A.H. Banner, 1953:51, fig. 16 [type locality: off Kauai Island. Hawaii; Hanamaulu warehouse, N. 44?30/, W. 2.6 miles; 125 to 165 meters]. Alpheus hailstonei.?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1982:38, fig. 6. compressed or setose; rostrum sharp, not nearly reaching as far as distal margin of 1st antennular segment, rounded dorsally, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle or paired large acute teeth on gastric region, anterior margin rather deeply sinuous mesial to orbital hoods, slanting gradually into rostral margin, region not flattened, orbital hood armed with acute marginal tooth, adrostral furrows short and shallow; 2nd antennular segment 3-4 times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) with well-developed ventrolateral tooth not overreaching stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin concave, distolateral spine not unusually strong but considerably overreaching narrowly tapered distal margin of blade; 1st pereopods with merus armed with acute distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; major chela nearly 2!/2 times as long as wide, dactyl strongly curved toward flexor side of chela, not double-ended, bearing high sharp crest on extensor margin, bulbous distally, without plunger, palm with acute tooth each side of dactylar articulation, carina supporting tooth on mesial side of dactylar articulation interrupted by transverse notch, without "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, with subrectan- gular shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger; minor chela 4!/2 times as long as wide, dactyl subequal to palm in length, not "balaeniceps" in either sex; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article about 13A times as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl usually somewhat biunguiculate, propodus with 11 pairs of spines on flexor margin, merus unarmed, ischium with movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 8 mm. MATERIAL.?PHILIPPINES. Off Jolo Island, Sulu Archipel- ago; sta 5138; 6?06/N, 120?58'50"E; 35 m; sand, coral; 14 Feb 1908 (1055-1115); 12' Agassiz beam trawl, 2 mud bags: 1 ovig female [4.9]. RANGE.?Kenya, Madagascar, Seychelles, Maldive Islands, Australia, Indonesia, Philippines, Japan, and Hawaii; 27 to 536 meters (the aberrant Philippine specimens reported by D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1978:223 were found in dead coral heads in no more than 5 meters). REMARKS.?The Albatross Philippine specimen has the second antennular segment slightly less than 3 times as long as wide (compared with the usual 3 - 4 times and 1.8-2.2 times in the three Philippine specimens reported by D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1978:223, from barely 5 meters deep). It also has the antennal peduncle (carpocerite) fully 5 times as long as wide (compared with the usual nearly 7 times and slightly more than 4 times in the Banner Philippine material). *36. Alpheus hippothoe De Man, 1888 Alpheus Hippothoe De Man, 1888b:268, pi. 17: figs. 1 - 5 [type locality: Sullivan Island (Lanbi Kyun) and King Island Bay (Padaw Aw), Mcrgui Archipelago, Burma]. Alpheus hippothoe.?DM. and A.H. Banner, 1982:195, fig. 59. DIAGNOSIS.?(Macrocheles Group). Body not unusually DIAGNOSIS.?(Edwardsii Group). Body not unusually com- NUMBER 466 31 pressed or setose; rostrum slender, reaching level of distal margin of 1st antennular segment, dorsal carina rounded, extending posteriorly to posterior gastric region, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region, without flattened teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin between rostrum and orbital hood unarmed, nearly transverse, not flattened, orbital hood unarmed, adrostral furrows moderately deep; 2nd antennular segment 22/3 times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) bearing acute lateral tooth not reaching level of tip of stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin deeply concave in proximal 1/2, distolateral spine strong, considerably overreaching narrow blade; 1st pereopods with merus armed with acute distal tooth on inferior flexor margin, somewhat reduced in minor cheliped; major chela compressed, 2!/3 times as long as wide, dactyl not noticeably curved in longitudinal plane, not double-ended, plunger rather poorly developed, truncate, palm without prominent longitudinal carina near margin proximal to fixed finger, with "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, proximal shoulder rounded but overhanging "saddle," shoulder proximal to fixed finger strong, rounded, at right angle to palm; minor chela about 22/3 times as long as wide, dactyl slightly shorter than palm, without setiferous longitudinal crest; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article about twice as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple, not biunguiculate, propodus bearing about 14 spines on flexor margin, carpus with both margins projecting distally, merus with strong acute tooth near distal end of flexor margin, ischium with strong movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 12 mm. MATERIAL.?PHILIPPINES. Visayan Sea north of Cebu: sta 5401; llo24'45'TSf, 124?06/E; 55 m; fine sand; 16 Mar 1909 (1005-1032); 6' McCormick trawl: 2 males [10.1,10.1]. Near Siasi, Sulu Archipelago: sta 5147; 5?41'40"N, 120?47'10"E; 38 m; coral sand, shells; 16 Feb 1908 (1127-1147); 12' Agassiz beam trawl, mud bag: 1 female [4.4]. RANGE.?Red Sea, Madagascar, Seychelles, South Africa, Indian Ocean, Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines, Japan, Fiji and Tonga islands; intertidal to 55 meters. REMARKS.?See "Remarks" under A. serenei. *37. Alpheus hyphalus, new species FIGURES 4, 5 DIAGNOSIS.?(Edwardsii Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum rather narrow, reaching level of distal margin of 1st antennular segment (Figure 4a), dorsal carina prominent but blunt, not extending posteriorly beyond midgastric region, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region, without flattened teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin between rostrum and orbital hood unarmed, concave near rostral margin, orbital hood unarmed, adrostral furrows moderately deep; 2nd antennular segment twice as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) with small, sharp ventrolateral spine not nearly reaching level of tip of stylocerite (Figure 4b); antennal scale with lateral margin rather deeply concave, distolateral spine stout, considerably overreaching narrow blade; 1st pereopods with merus unarmed (Figure Ag,hjc,t)\ major chela somewhat compressed, about 273 times as long as wide, dactyl only slightly skewed from longitudinal axis of palm but wih rather strong, blunt, sinuous carina on extensor margin, not double- ended, with well-developed plunger (Figure 4/), palm with strong longitudinal ridge near margin proximal to fixed finger (Figure 4e), with "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, proximal shoulder blunt but slightly overhanging "saddle," shoulder proximal to fixed finger strong, rounded, slightly projecting, mesial surface with sharp ridge subparallel with dorsal margin below distal end of depression associated with "saddle," similar ridge on opposite surface less sharp; minor chela (Figures 4iJ) about 3 times as long as wide, dactyl about as long as palm, weakly "balaeniceps" in male; 2nd pereopod (Figure 5d) with proximal carpal article nearly ll/2 times as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod (Figure 5b) with dactyl pointed, simple, propodus bearing about 9 spines on flexor margin, carpus only slightly produced on each side of distal margin, merus unarmed, ischium with movable spine; carapace length to base of rostrum 7.0 mm. MATERIAL.?PHILIPPINES. Verde Island Passage: sta 5292; 13?38'45"N, 121?01'irE; 296 m; fine black sand; 11.3?C; 23 Jul 1908 (1437-1457); 12' Agassiz beam trawl, mud bag: 1 male [7.0], holotype (USNM 205662). TYPE LOCALITY.?Same as above. RANGE.?Known only from the unique male holotype from Verde Island Passage, Philippines; 296 meters. REMARKS.?This species appears to be an offshore relative of A. pacificus; it differs from that species in the longer rostrum, more elongate distolateral spine of the antennal scale, somewhat different sculpture on the major chela, and the form of the minor chela of the male. ETYMOLOGY.?The name, derived from the Greek hyphalos ("under the sea"), alludes to the considerable depth at which the single representative of the species was found, compared with the usually intertidal habitat of the possibly related A. pacificus. 38. Alpheus ladronis A.H. Banner, 1956 Alpheus ladronis A.H. Banner, 1956:360, fig. 20 [type locality: Saipan. Mariana Islands].?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1978:223. DIAGNOSIS.?(Edwardsii Group). Body not unusually com- presed or setose; rostrum small, acute, not nearly reaching level of distal margin of 1st antennular segment, distinctly carinate in midline as far as posterior margins of eyes, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region or strong paired acute teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior 32 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY FIGURE 4.?Alpheus hyphalus, new species, male holotype from Albatross su 5292, carapace length 7.0 mm: a, anterior carapace and appendages, dorsal aspect; b, same, lateral aspect; c, telson and uropods, dorsal aspect; d, right 3rd maxilliped; e, left 1st (major) chela, mesial aspect; / same, lateral aspect; g, left 1st (major) cheliped, proximal segments, mesial aspect; h, same, lateral aspect; i, right 1st (minor) chela, mesial aspect;/ same, lateral aspect; k, right 1st (minor) cheliped, proximal segments, mesial aspect; /, same, lateral aspect NUMBER 466 33 FIGURE 5.?Alpheus hyphalus, new species, male holotype from Albatross sta 5292, carapace length 7.0 mm: a, right 2nd pereopod; b, right 3rd pereopod; c, right appendices masculina and intema. margin mesial to orbital hoods unarmed, nearly transverse, meeting rostral margin at obtuse angle, orbital hoods unarmed, adrostral furrows shallowly rounded; 2nd antennular segment fully V/2 times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with small acute lateral tooth not nearly reaching level of tip of stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin nearly straight, distolateral spine strong but not unusually stout, overreaching distal end of tapered blade; major cheliped with chela compressed, fully 2!/2 times as long as wide, fingers narrowly acute, dactyl not double-ended, palm without longitudinal carina near margin proximal to fixed finger, with shallow "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, proximal shoulder low, not overhanging "saddle," shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger much stronger, merus with conspicuous subterminal tooth on inferior flexor margin; minor cheliped with chela 4 times as long as wide, dactyl slightly longer than palm, not "balaeniceps"; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article nearly IV2 times as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl pointed, simple, propodus bearing 8 slender spines on flexor margin, carpus with extensor margin projecting distally, merus and ischium unarmed; maximum carapace length probably about 5 mm. RANGE.?Philippines, Marianas, and Samoa; shallow water. 39. Alpheus leptochirus Coutiere, 1905 Aflpheus] leptochirus Coutiere, 1905:914, pi. 87: fig. 54 [type locality: Maldive Islands (2 localities)]. Alpheus leptochirus.?DM. and A.H. Banner, 1978:223. DIAGNOSIS.?(Edwardsii Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum slender, reaching nearly to level of distal margin of 1st antennular segment, distinctly carinate in midline as far as posterior limits of orbital hoods, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region or strong paired acute teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin mesial to orbital hoods unarmed and rather deeply incised each side of rostrum, orbital hoods unarmed, adrostral furrows rather deep; 2nd antennular segment less than IV2 times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with lateral tooth; antennal scale with lateral margin not deeply concave, distolateral spine strong but not unusually stout, overreaching distal end of tapered blade; 1st pereopods with distal tooth on inferior flexor margin of merus; major chela compressed, 3 to 372 times as long as wide, dactyl not double-ended, with shallow "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, proximal shoulder low, not overhanging "saddle," shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger not very strong; minor chela 5 to SV2 times as long as wide, dactyl shorter than palm, "balaeniceps" in male only; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article as long as or slightly shorter than 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl very slender, simple, not biunguiculate, propodus bearing 7 slender spines on flexor margin, carpus with extensor margin projecting slightly distally, merus and ischium unarmed; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum perhaps about S mm. RANGE.?Maldive Islands, Seychelles, Reunion, and, per- haps, Philippines. The records from Hawaii by A.H. Banner (1953:133) and the Marianas by the same author (1956:362) need to be confirmed (see "Remarks" below). REMARKS.?A.H. Banner (1953:134) was fully aware that the three specimens dredged in 30 to 60 meters off Diamond Head, Oahu, Hawaii, might represent a distinct species. I have had the opportunity to examine one of these specimens?an ovigerous female with a carapace length of 4.2 mm?and I have found that it differs from Coutiere's description in the following particulars: the rostral carina is rounded, rather than "presque tranchante"; the margins of the ocular hoods are sinuously transverse and laterally angular, rather than regularly convex; the shoulder proximal to the "saddle" on the major chela arises almost vertically from and almost overhangs the "saddle"; and the third pereopod has the ischium armed with a long lateral spine. Only the availability of additional material will permit a determination as to whether these differences fall 34 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY within the range of variability of A. leptochirus, but one of the discrepancies listed by Banner (1953:134) is invalid. He noted that the second carpal article of the second pereopod is 1.1 times as long as the first, rather than 0.7 as long; in his description of this appendage, Coutiere (1905:915) stated: "Les 2 premiers segments du carpe sont egaux en longueur, parfois meme le 2me est le plus long." 40. Alpheus leviusculus leviusculus Dana, 1852 Alphtus Edwardsii var. leviusculus Dana, 1852b:543 [type locality: Wake Island, North Pacific]. Alpheus leviusculus.?Dana, 18SS, pi. 34: fig. 3a-f. Alpheus Bouvieri var. Baslardi Coutiere, 1898c:133, fig. la [type locality: the type series apparently included material from the Gulf of Aden, Madagascar (2 localities), and Panama]. Alpheus leviusculus leviusculus.?DM. and A.H. Banner, 1982:246, fig. 77. DIAGNOSIS.?(Edwardsii Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum triangular, short, not nearly reaching level of distal margin of 1st antennular segment, rounded in dorsal midline, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region or strong paired acute teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin mesial to orbital hoods unarmed, nearly transverse, concave near rostral margin, orbital hoods unarmed, adrostral furrows broad and shallow; 2nd antennular segment no more than I1 fa times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) with strong lateral tooth not quite reaching level of tip of stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin nearly straight, distolateral spine not especially stout, overreaching distal margin of fairly wide blade, sometimes considerably; 1st pereopod without distal tooth on inferior flexor margin of merus; major chela somewhat compressed, fully 272 times as long as wide, dactyl nearly straight in longitudinal plane, not double-ended, bearing well-developed plunger, palm without longitudinal carina near margin proximal to fixed finger, with "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, shoulder proximal to "saddle" rounded or forming right angle with surface of palm, shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger low and rounded; minor chela fully 3'/2 times as long as wide, dactyl slightly shorter than palm, usually clearly "balaeniceps" in male; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article not quite 1V2 times as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple, sometimes with slight swelling on flexor margin, propodus bearing about 9 spines on flexor margin, carpus with extensor margin projecting at articulation with propodus, merus unarmed, ischium usually without movable spine; maximum carapace length about 10 mm. RANGE.?Red Sea, eastern Africa, Indian Ocean, Indonesia, and Pacific islands at least as far eastward as Wake Island. REMARKS.?The presence or absence of an ischial spine on the third and fourth pereopods does not seem to be as diagnostic of this species as it is of most members of the genus. Specimens in the Smithsonian collections from Hong Kong show no trace of such a movable spine, but those from the Indian Ocean have small but distinct ones. *41. Alpheus lobidens De Haan, 1849 Alpheus lobidens De Haan, 1849:179 [type locality: Japan (probably near Nagasaki, according to Holthuis in A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1975:431)].? D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1981:29. Alpheus crassimanus Heller, 1862b:526 [type locality: Nicobar Islands]. Alpheus inopifuUus Holthuis and Gottlieb, 1958:42, figs. 8, 9 [type locality: Herzliya, Israel]. Alpheus lobidens polynesica A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1975:429, fig. 3A-H, J - L [type locality: Kaneohe Bay, Oahu, Hawaii]. Alpheus lobidens lobidens.?DM. and A.H. Banner, 1982:252, fig. 78s. DIAGNOSIS.?(Edwardsii Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum acute, triangular, reaching nearly to level of distal margin of 1st antennular segment, dorsal carina rather sharp, not extending posteriorly beyond orbital hoods, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region, without flattened teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin between rostrum and orbital hood unarmed, somewhat incised near rostral margin, adrostral furrows moderately deep; 2nd antennular segment about twice as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with small ventrolateral tooth not nearly reaching level of tip of stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin variably concave, distolateral spine stout, overreaching blade; 1st pereopods with or without distal tooth on inferior flexor margin of merus; major chela somewhat compressed, about 2'/2 times as long as wide, dactyl not noticeably curved in longitudinal plane, not double-ended, having well-developed plunger, palm with longitudinal groove but no carina near margin proximal to fixed finger, with "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, shoulder proximal thereto usually rounded, sometimes abrupt, but not overhanging "saddle," shoulder proximal to fixed finger always well developed but varying from rounded to angular; minor chela 3 to 43A times as long as wide, dactyl subequal to palm in length, strongly "balaeniceps" in male only; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article 174 to \2h times as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl pointed, simple, propodus usually bearing about 10 spines on flexor margin, carpus not produced distally at propodal articulation, merus unarmed, ischium usually bearing movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 19 mm. MATERIAL.?PHILIPPINES. Olongapo, Subic Bay, Luzon [14?50X 120?16'E]; shore; 7 Jan 1908 (1400-1515); 2 males [6.6, 8.3] 3 ovig females [8.0-10.7].?Tilik, Lubang Island [13?49X \2Sr\?E\\ beach; sand, mud; 14 Jul 1908 (1430- 1700): 1 ovig female [10.1]. RANGE.?Entire Indo-Pacific region from the Red Sea to Hawaii, as well as eastern and central Mediterranean; intertidal to 25 meters. REMARKS.?In regard to the determination by A.H. and D.M. Banner (1975:431) that A. crassimanus is a junior synonym of A lobidens, it may be of interest to recall the remarks of Coutiere (1899:14). He noted that the type specimen of A. lobidens in the Museum at Leiden was in such poor condition that it was impossible to determine the sex of the NUMBER 466 35 specimen satisfactorily and whether it represents the species called A. strenuus by Dana or A. crassimanus of Heller. He decided, however, that it was a female and therefore a senior synonym of Dana's species, in which the balaeniceps dactyl of the minor chela occurs in both sexes. Because of the delays often associated with the publication of major works, the detailed revision of this species and the relegation of A. inopinatus and the subspecies polynesica to its synonymy?which was to have appeared "in a check-list of the alpheids of the Red Sea at some time in the future" according to D.M. and A.H. Banner (1982:241, footnote)?were actually published during the preceding year (D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1981:29). *42. Alpheus lottini Guerin, 1829 Cancer sublucanus Forskil, 1775:94 [type locality: Juddah, Saudi Arabia; the name was suppressed under the plenary powers in Opinion 1367 of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1985:361)]. Alpheus Lottini Guerin, 1829, pi. 3: fig. 3. Alpheus Lottinii.?Cuhm, 1838:38 [type locality: New Ireland, Bismarck Archipelago]. A[lpheus]ventrosus H. Milne Edwards, 1837:352 [type locality: Mauritius]. A[lpheus] laevis Randall, 1840:141 [type locality: Hawaii]. Alpheus Thetis White, 1847:75 [Australia; nomen nudum]. Crangon latipes A.H. Banner, 1953:82, fig. 27 [type locality: off Waikiki Reef, Oahu, Hawaii; 6 meters]. Alpheus lottini.?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1982:65, fig. 15. DIAGNOSIS.?(Sulcatus Group). Body somewhat but not extraordinarily compressed, not twice as high as wide, not setose; rostrum reaching to about level of distal margin of 1st antennular segment, base flattened, abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region, without paired teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin between rostrum and orbital hood short, transverse, unarmed, submarginal area not flattened, orbital hood armed with sharp tooth directed anteromesiad from surface of hood, not marginal, adrostral furrows narrow and rather deep; second antennular segment usually about 13A times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) with strong, acute ventrolateral tooth nearly or quite overreaching stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin faintly sinuous, nearly straight, distolateral spine rather stout, overreaching distal margin of tapered blade; 1st pereopods with inferior flexor margin of merus terminating distally in strong but blunt projection; major chela compressed, about 272 times as long as wide, dactyl not strongly arched, veering only slightly from longitudinal plane of chela, not double-ended, bearing reasonably well-developed plunger, palm totally devoid of sculpture; minor chela 2l/z to 3 times as long as wide, dactyl subequal to palm in length, fairly slender, rather strongly hooked distally, not "balaeniceps" in either sex; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article nearly or fully twice as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl stout, laterally compressed, tip bluntly hoof-like, surrounded by ridge of soft chitin, propodus bearing 5 -7 rather stout spines on flexor margin, carpus with both extensor and flexor margins produced distally, merus and ischium unarmed; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 13 mm. MATERIAL.?PHILIPPINES. Southwest of Manila Bay, Luzon: sta 5109; 14?03'45"N, 120?16'3(rE; 18m; coral; 15 Jan 1908 (1026-1038); 9' Albatross-Blake beam trawl (trawl immediately torn on coral): 5 males [5.0-6.6] 2 ovig females [3.8-5.2]. Cagmanaba Bay, Burias Pass, southeastern Luzon [13?03TS[, 123?18'E]; coral heads; 11 Mar 1908: 1 male [7.5] 1 ovig female [8.7]. Palag Bay, Lagonoy Gulf, eastern Luzon [13?44'N, 123?56'E]; from coral; 16 Jun 1909: 1 male [6.8] 1 ovig female [7.8]. Marungas Island, Sulu Archipelago [6?06'N, 120?58'E]; shore, coral head; 19 Feb 1908: 1 male [5.5] 2 females [3.0,5.7], 1 ovig [5.7]. RANGE.?Red Sea to South Africa, eastward to the Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, to Hawaii, the Galapagos Islands, and the American mainland from the Gulf of California to Colombia; A. lottini is found only in association with living pocilloporid corals, which are commonly confined to sublit- toral depths to about 50 meters. *43. Alpheus macellarius, new species FIGURES 6,7 DIAGNOSIS.?(Brevirostris Group). Body not unusually compressed or setose; rostrum slender, not reaching anteriorly quite as far as distal margin of 1st antennular segment (Figure 6a), bluntly carinate in midline posteriorly to slightly beyond bases of orbital hoods, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region or paired acute teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin unarmed and transverse mesial to orbital hoods, curving gradually into rostral margin, region not noticeably depressed, orbital hoods unarmed and uncarinate, adrostral furrows comparatively shallow; 2nd antennular segment about 2]A times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with strong lateral tooth not reaching level of tip of stylocerite (Figure 4b); antennal scale with lateral margin concave near midlength, convex distally, distolateral spine strong, slightly overreaching distal margin of blade; major cheliped with chela (Figure Ad) oval in cross section, 3 times as long as wide, dactyl straight in longitudinal plane, not double-ended, plunger much reduced, defined only by proximal angle, palm without teeth either side of dactylar articulation, sculpture limited to narrow, transverse notch or "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque;, merus (Figure Ae) armed with distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; minor cheliped with chela (Figure 4/) 5 times as long as wide, dactyl not broadened or "balaeniceps" in either sex, nearly IV2 times as long as palm, merus (Figure Ag) without fixed distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; 2nd pereopod (Figure Ah) with proximal article of carpus \xh times as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod (Figure AC) with dactyl (Figure Aj) subspatulate, propodus bearing series of fine spines on flexor margin, merus unarmed, ischium bearing movable spine; maximum carapace length about 12 mm. 36 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY FIGURE 6.?Alpheus macellarius, new species, male holotype from Cebu Market, carapace length 11.2 mm: a, anterior carapace and appendages, dorsal aspect; b, same, lateral aspect; c, telson and uropods, dorsal aspect; d, right 1st (major) chela; e, right 1st (major) cheliped, proximal segments, lateral aspect;/, left 1st (minor) chela; g, left 1st (minor) cheliped, proximal segments, lateral aspect; h, right 2nd pereopod; i, right 3rd pereopod; j , same, dactyl; k, right 1st pleopod, posterior aspect; /, right appendices masculina and intern a, anterior aspect. MATERIAL.?PHILIPPINES. Dupon Bay, Leyte [10?55'N, 124?25TE]; 17 Mar 1909 (1900-2200); electric light: 1 female [6.8]. Cebu Market [ l O 0 ^ , 123?54'E]; 20 Mar 1909:2 males [10.9, 11.2], larger is holotype (USNM 205663). TYPE LOCALITY.?Vicinity of Cebu City, Cebu, Philippines. RANGE.?Known only from the three Albatross specimens cited above from the south central Philippines. REMARKS.?Of the approximately 33 members of the Brevirostris Group currently recognized, including the incom- pletely described A. miyakei Miya, 1974 (the sole species of the group with spinose orbital hoods), only 14 agree with A. macellarius in having a distinct transverse, distally delimited groove or "saddle" on the palm of the major chela proximal to the adhesive plaque at the dactylar articulation. Of these 14, the following five species may be eliminated from identifica- tion with A. macellarius by the styliform rather than spatulate or subspatulate dactyls of the third and fourth pereopods: A. barbatus, A. miersi, A. pubescens De Man, 1908, A. savuensis De Man, 1908, and A. talismani Coutiere, 1898d. Three species?A. brevicristatus De Haan, 1849, A. brevirostris (Olivier, 1811), and A. cythereus A.H. and D.M. Banner, 19661)?are distinguished by the presence of prominent NUMBER 466 37 FIGURE 7.?Alpheus macellarius, new species, a-g, male paratype from Cebu Market, carapace length 10.9 mm; h.i, female paratype from Dupon Bay, Leyte, carapace length 6.8 mm: a, right mandible; b, right 1st maxilla; c, right 2nd maxilla; d, right 1st maxilliped; e, right 2nd maxilliped; / right 3rd maxilliped; g, same, distal end; h, right 1st (major) chela; i, left 1st (minor) chela. longitudinal ridges or carinae on the major chela. Two more?A. bellulus Miya and Miyake, 1969, and A. moretensis D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1982 (together with A. cythereus, A. pubescens, and A. sauvensis)?have the dactyl of the minor chela "balaeniceps," at least in the male. Of the four remaining species, A. djeddensis Coutiere, 1897d, differs from A. macellarus chiefly in the form and proportions of the chelae of the first pereopods, both chelae being less than three times as long as wide, compared with fully three times as long as wide in the major chela and more than five times as long as wide in the minor chela of A. macellarius; A. homochirus (Yu, 1935) has the major chela four and one-half times as long as wide and the fingers twice as long as the palm, compared with about one and one-half times as long as the palm in the Philippine species; A. platyunguiculatus (A.H. Banner, 1953) has the minor chela less than four times as long as wide, compared with fully five times, and the proximal article of the carpus of the second pereopod no more than one-half, rather than longer than, the second article; finally, A. rapax Fabricius, 1798, which seems to be closely related to A. macellarius, apparently differs in the presence of flattened strips and accompanying delimiting longitudinal ridges or lines on the superior and inferior surfaces and the omission of any suggestion of the obtuse longitudinal ridge and accompanying depression sometimes present on the lateral surface of the major chela, compared with the complete absence of any such longitudinal sculpture in the new species, as well as in the more bowed and hairier fingers of the minor chela. The discussion of the extreme variability of A. rapax in D.M. and A.H. Banner (1982:176) indicates that A. macellarius may prove to be a variant of that species, but comparison of the Philippine specimens with one from the Andaman Sea identified by A.H. Banner as A. rapax has served to minimize the credibility of that possibility. ETYMOLOGY.?From the Latin word for "of the meat or provision market," in allusion to the source of the holotype of the species. ?44. Alpheus macroskeles Alcock and Anderson, 1894 FIGURE 8 Alpheus macroskeles Alcock and Anderson, 1894:153 [type locality (restricted by "type" selection by Alcock, 1901:141, documented by A.H. and D.M. Banner. 1981:232): Bay of Bengal. 490 meters].?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1978:224, fig. 1. DIAGNOSIS.?(Brevirostris Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum narrow, sharp, not nearly reaching as far as distal margin of 1st antennular segment, feebly carinate in midline, carina disappearing on anterior gastric region, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace with or without median tubercle on gastric region, without flattened teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin between rostrum and orbital hood variably incised, submarginal region not flattened, orbital hoods unarmed, adrostral furrows not very deep; 2nd antennular segment about 372 times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) with slender ventrolateral spine not reaching level of tip of stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin rather weakly concave, distolateral spine not especially strong, overreaching distal margin of blade by varying extent; 1st pereopods with merus armed with acute distal tooth on flexor margin and stronger tooth near distal end of extensor margin; major chela subcylindrical, about 7 times as long as wide, dactyl sometimes overreached by fixed finger, 38 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY FIGURE 8.?Alpheus macroskeles, a-f, male from Albatross sta S624, carapace length 8.3 mm; g,h, male from Albatross sta S62S, carapace length 8.1 mm: a, anterior carapace and appendages, dorsal aspect; b, 5th abdominal somite; c, telson, dorsal aspect; d, left 1st (minor) chela, flexor aspect; e, merus of left 1st (minor) cheliped, mesial aspect; / left 2nd pereopod; g, left 1st (major) chela, flexor aspect; h, merus of left 1st (major) cheliped. not double-ended, plunger little developed, palm without sharp tooth either side of dactylar articulation, without longitudinal carina or "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, without shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger; minor chela 10-14 times as long as wide, dactyl 2/3 to fully as long as palm, "balaeniceps" in male, palm somewhat granulate; 2nd pereo- pod with proximal carpal article l2/3 to twice as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl subspatulate, carpus with blunt distal lobe on extensor margin, merus unarmed, ischium bearing movable spine; maximum carapace length about 10 mm. MATERIAL.?PHILIPPINES. Babuyan Channel, north of Luzon: sta 5328; l ^ W m ^ ' E ; 274 m; blue mud; 12.2?C; 19 Nov 1908 (0944-1004); 12' Tanner beam trawl, mud bag: 1 female [8.2]. Balayan Bay, southern Luzon: sta 5117; 13?52'22"N, 120?46'22"E; 216 m; 21 Jan 1908 (0927-0947); 12' Tanner beam trawl, mud bag: 1 male [7.5] (identification ?). Northeast of Mindoro: sta5122; 13?21/3(TN, 120? [probably 121?] 30'33"E; 402 m; green mud; 2 Feb 1908 (1059-1119); 12' Tanner beam trawl, mud bag: 1 female [8.2]. Samar Sea, east of Masbate: sta 5396; 11?57X 124?12'24"E; 251 m; green mud; 15 Mar 1909 (0945-1005); 12' Agassiz beam trawl, mud bag: [8.1] (identification ?). West of Leyte: sta 5409; l O ^ X 124?13'08"E; 346 m; green mud; 18 Mar 1909 (0951-1020); 12' Agassiz beam trawl, mud bag: 1 ovig female [6.9]. Bohol Strait, east of Cebu: sta 5197; 9?52'30"N, 123o40'45"E; 318 m; green mud; 12.4?C; 9 Apr 1908 (0855-0915); 12' Agassiz beam trawl, 3 mud bags: 1 male [9.8] (identification ?); sta 5198; 9?40'50"N, 123?39'45^; 402 m; green mud; 12.2?C; 9 Apr 1908 (1125-1145); 12' Agassiz beam trawl, 3 mud bags: 1 ovig female [8.2]. INDONESIA. West of Halmahera: sta 5624; 0?12'15"N, 127?29'30"E; 527 m; fine sand, mud; 29 Nov 1909 (1058- 1118); 12' Agassiz beam trawl: 1 male [8.3]; sta 5625; 0?07'00*N, 127?28'00"E; 421 m; gray mud, fine sand; 29 Nov 1909 (1416-1437); 12' Agassiz beam trawl: 1 male [8.1]. RANGE.?Perhaps the only authentic records of A. mac- roskeles are those mentioned by Alcock and Anderson (1894) in the Bay of Bengal and the Andaman Sea in depths of 265 to 494 meters. The ovigerous female tentatively identified by De Man (1911:403) from the Bali Sea in 330 meters lacked both chelipeds and differed in minor respects from the descriptions of A. macroskeles; the present study indicates that specimens of this species cannot be distinguished from those of A nonalter without recourse to at least one of the first chelipeds (see "Remarks" under the latter species). The specimen recorded from the Red Sea by Balss (1915:23) came from a depth of only 58 meters, which might cast some doubt on the identification, yet D.M. and A.H. Banner (1978:224) found "excellent agreement" between paratypes of A mac- roskeles and specimens from only 77 meters in the South China Sea. At the other extreme, Caiman (1939:208) assigned to this species 18 specimens from depths of 528 to more than 1061 meters in the Gulf of Aden. REMARKS.?The two males from Albatross stations 5117 and 5197 (Balayan Bay and Bohol Strait, respectively) lack both first chelipeds and their identity with A. macroskeles is therefore questionable (see "Remarks" under A. nonalter.) 45. Alpheus maindroni Coutiere, 1898 A[lpheusJ Maindroni Coutiere, 1898c:133, figs. 2, 2' [type locality: the type series came from 2 localities: Masqat (Muscat), Gulf of Oman, and Djibouti, Gulf of Aden]. Alpheus maindroni.?DM. and A.H. Banner, 1982:203, fig. 62; 1985:19. DIAGNOSIS.?(Edwardsii Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum triangular, not nearly reaching distal margin of 1st antennular segment, bluntly carinate in midline, carina not extending posteriorly beyond bases of eyes, base of rostrum not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region or paired acute teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin mesial to orbital hoods unarmed but convexly produced anteriorly, meeting rostral margin at less than right angle, orbital hoods unarmed, adrostral furrows shallow; 2nd antennular segment IV2 times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with acute ventral tooth not nearly reaching level of tip of stylocerite; antennal NUMBER 466 39 scale with lateral margin slightly concave, distolateral spine stout, considerably overreaching distal margin of blade; 1st pereopods with merus armed with acute tooth on inferior flexor margin; major chela compressed 2!/2 times as long as wide, dactyl straight in longitudinal plane, not double-ended, bearing very well developed plunger, palm without longitudinal carina near margin proximal to fixed finger, with reduced "saddle" forming shallow, poorly delimited, oblique depression proxi- mal to adhesive plaque, shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger rounded; minor chela 3 times as long as wide, dactyl slightly longer than palm, not "balaeniceps" in either sex; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article more than twice as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl pointed, simple, propodus bearing 9 spines on flexor margin, carpus slightly projecting distally on both extensor and flexor margins, merus and ischium unarmed; maximum carapace length about 9 mm. RANGE.?Gulf of Aden, Gulf of Oman, Mozambique, Madagascar, Philippines, Indonesia, and Australia, Caroline and Marshall islands; shallow water. *46. Alpheus malabaricus (Fabricius, 1775) FIGURE 9 Astacus Malabaricus Fabricius, 1775:415 [type locality: Malabar Coast, southwestern India]. Alpheus macrodactylus Ortmann, 1890:473, pi. 36: fig. 10, lOe [type locality: Sydney]. Alpheus dolkhodactylus Ortmann, 1890:473, pL 36: fig. 11 [type locality: Tokyo Wan, Japan]. Alpheus dolkhodactylus, var. leptopus De Man, 1910:289 [type locality: the type series came from 4 Siboga stations in the vicinity of the Lesser Sunda Islands, Indonesia; 18-289 meters]. Alpheus malabaricus mackayi A.H. Banner, 1959:149, fig. 12 [type locality: Wailupe fish pond, Oahu, Hawaii]. Alpheus malabaricus malabaricus.?A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1966b: 145, fig. 55. Alpheus malabaricus songkla A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1966b: 147, fig. 56 [type locality: Lake Songkla, Songkla, Thailand]. Alpheus mackayi.?A.H. and DM. Banner, 1975:428, fig. 2A-H. Alpheus malabaricus trefzae D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1982:207, fig. 64 [type locality: Brammo Bay, Dunk Island, Queensland, Australia; low tide]. Alpheus mazatianicus Wicksten, 1983:46, figs. 7, 8 [type locality: Laguna del Caimanero, Sinaloa, Mexico]. DIAGNOSIS.?(Edwardsii Group). Body not unusually com- pressed or setose; rostrum variable in length and proportionate width, rarely if ever reaching as far as distal margin of 1st antennular segment, median carina moderately sharp to rounded, not reaching posteriorly beyond limits of orbital hoods, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without tooth or tubercle on gastric region or paired acute teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin mesial to orbital hoods variably incised to nearly transverse, orbital hoods unarmed, adrostral furrows, relatively shallow and short; 2nd antennular segment about twice as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with acute ventrolateral spine not nearly reaching level of tip of stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin moderately concave to nearly straight, distolateral spine strong but not unusually stout, distinctly overreaching distal margin of blade or not; 1st pereopods with merus armed with acute distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; major chela compressed, 2x/2 to 372 times as long as wide, dactyl straight in longitudinal plane, not double-ended, plunger moderately well-developed to barely distinguishable, palm with longitudinal furrow but no carina near margin proximal to fixed finger, with "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, shoulder proximal to "saddle" obtusely rounded to slightly projecting and overhanging "saddle"; minor chela 4!/2 to 7V2 times as long as wide, dactyl from less than IV2 to more than 3 times as long as palm, not "balaeniceps" in either sex, 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article from slightly longer than to twice as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl subspatulate, propodus with or without series of spinules on flexor margin, carpus with blunt distal projection on extensor margin, short acute distal tooth on flexor margin, merus unarmed, ischium with movable spine; maxi- mum carapace length to base of rostrum about 13 mm. MATERIAL.?PHILIPPINES. "Little Harbor at Luneta, Ma- nila Harbor," Luzon; 12 Dec 1907:4 males [5.2-9.2] 3 females [4.2-7.4], 1 ovig [7.4], Alimango River, Burias Island [13?06'N, 122?57'E]; sand, mud; 5 Mar 1909 (0900-1200); 130' seine (2 hauls), dynamite (5 shots): 1 female [7.0]. RANGE.?East Africa to Mexico; interudal to at least 289 meters. REMARKS.?Admittedly superficial study of the A. mala- baricus complex has suggested to me that the species?like the Atlantic A.floridanusKingsley, 1878 (seeChace, 1972:65)?is highly variable and widely ranging. A large number of taxa could be envisioned by recognizing the almost innumerable combinations of variable characters (see Wicksten, 1983:47, table E). For instance, the specimen from Burias Island illustrated in Figure 9 is nearly identical with the Australian specimen identified and illustrated by D.M. and A. H. Banner (1982:210, fig. 65) as A. macrodactylus, except for the more elongate first chelipeds. The character that seems most clearly to distinguish A. macrodactylus from a form like A. malabaricus trefzae (see D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1982:208, fig. 64f) is the much better developed plunger on the dactyl of the major chela, but a specimen from off Cochin, southwestern India, identified as A. malabaricus malabaricus by A.H. Banner has a plunger virtually identical with the one shown in Figure 9d, combined with a minor chela like the one illustrated from a specimen of A. malabaricus dolkhodactylus by De Man, 1911 (1915), pi. 23: fig. 105f. A.H. and D.M. Banner (1975:428) elevated A. malabaricus mackayi A.H. Banner, 1959, to species status because the rostrum is much smaller than it is in typical A. malabaricus and the fingers of the minor chela are only one and one-half, rather than two and one-half or more, times as long as the palm, but the rostrum is no smaller than it is in A. malabaricus trefzae and the fingers of the minor chela no shorter, in relation to the palm, than they are in A. malabaricus songkla. 40 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY FIGURE 9.?Alpheus malabaricus, female from Alimango River, Bunas Island, carapace length 7.0 mm: a, anterior carapace and appendages, dorsal aspect; b, same, lateral aspect; c, right 1st (major) cheliped, mesial aspect; d, same, chela, lateral aspect; e, left 1st (minor) cheliped, lateral aspect; / same, fingers, mesial aspect; g, left 3rd pereopod; h, same, dactyl, flexor aspect. It is quite possible that the evidence for the variability theory derived from the number of variations that are both sympatric and widespread geographically may eventually prove to be false, but such conclusions should be supported by the study of more material than is currently available. ?47. Alpheus malleodigitus (Bate, 1888) Betaeus malleodigitus Bate, 1888:565, pi. 101: fig. 5 [type locality: Levuka, Fiji Islands]. Allpheus] phrygianus Coutierc, 1905:886, pi. 77: fig. 25 [type locality: 2 sites in the Maldive Islands and 1 in Madagascar]. NUMBER 466 41 A[lpheus] Danae Coutiere, 1905:887, pi. 77: fig. 26 [type locality: Maldive Islands]. Alpheus persicus Nobili, 1905:238 [type locality: Persian Gulf]. Atpheus malleodigitus, var. gracilicarpus De Man, 19O9a:99 [type locality: 2 stations in the Sulu Archipelago, Philippines, and 2 in vicinity of Lesser Sunda Islands, Indonesia; 8 - 5 4 meters]. Alpheus malleodigitus.?AM. and D.M.Banner, 1966a: 162-175, figs. 8c,d, 9-18.?DAI. and A.H. Banner, 1982:92, fig. 22m-o.?A.H. and D.M.Ban- ner, 1983:44. DIAGNOSIS.?(Obesomanus Group). Body neither unusually compressed nor densely setose; rostrum very small, subrectan- gular, not reaching nearly as far as distal margin of 1st antennular segment, sharply carinate, carina disappearing rather abruptly into somewhat flattened triangular area somewhat sharply delimited from posterior ends of adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle posterior to base of rostrum and without paired acute teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin transverse and unarmed mesial to orbital hoods, submarginal region not flattened, adrostral furrows rather deep; 2nd antennular segment usually at least 3 times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) unarmed; antennal scale with lateral margin moderately concave, distolateral spine stout, far overreaching distal margin of blade; 1st pereopods with merus unarmed on mesial flexor margin; major chela subcircular in cross section, about 23/4 times as long as wide, dactyl straight in longitudinal plane, double-ended, bearing well-developed, truncated plunger, palm with rather extensive depression or broad furrow on lateral side of extensor surface immediately posterior to adhesive plaque and smaller lateral depression near base of fixed finger minor chela about 372 times as long as wide, dactyl about xli as long as palm, not "balaeniceps" in either sex; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article llz as long as to subequal with 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple, propodus bearing about 8 stout spines on flexor margin, carpus with short distal tooth on extensor margin, longer one on flexor margin, merus with subdistal tooth on flexor margin, ischium without movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 9 mm. MATERIAL.?PHILIPPINES. Marungas Island, Sulu Archi- pelago [6?06'N, 120?58'E]; lJ/4 to 272 m; scattered coral and sand; 10 Feb 1908 (1330-1500); diving, coral heads taken ashore; 2 females [7.4,7.7], 1 ovig [7.7]. RANGE.?Red Sea and eastern Africa to Hong Kong, Japan, Philippines, Indonesia, and Australia, eastward to the Society Islands but not Hawaii; on and in corals, usually in surf zone. REMARKS.?See "Remarks" under A. microstylus. *48. Alpheus microstylus (Bate, 1888) Betaeus microstylus Bate, 1888:566. pi. 101: fig. 6 [type locality: Albany Island, Cape York, Australia]. Alpheus microstylus.?A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1983:45, fig. 6a-f. DIAGNOSIS.?(Obesomanus Group). Body neither unusually compressed nor densely setose; rostrum very small, rarely absent, not reaching as far as distal margin of 1st antennular segment, sharply carinate, carina disappearing rather abruptly into somewhat flattened triangular area roughly delimited from posterior ends of adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle posterior to base of rostrum and without paired acute teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin transverse or concave and unarmed mesial to orbital hoods, submarginal region not flattened, adrostral furrows rather deep; 2nd antennular segment usually no more than 3 times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) unarmed; antennal scale with lateral margin somewhat concave, distolateral spine stout, usually overreach- ing distal margin of blade by moderate amount; 1st pereopods with merus usually unarmed on mesial flexor margin; major chela subcircular in cross section, about 2l/i times as long as wide, dactyl straight in longitudinal plane, double-ended, bearing well-developed, truncated plunger, palm with exten- sive depression immediately proximal to adhesive plaque and with sinuous furrow on fixed finger, minor chela about 2!/2 times as long as wide, dactyl less than lfr as long as palm, not "balaeniceps" in either sex; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article 73 to 72 as long as 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple, propodus bearing about 8 stout spines on flexor margin, carpus with short distal tooth on extensor margin, longer one on flexor margin, merus with subdistal tooth on flexor margin, ischium bearing inconspicuous small movable spine; maximum cara- pace length to base of rostrum about 9 mm. MATERIAL.?PHILIPPINES. Port Gubat, southeastern Luzon [12?55'N, 124?09'E]; tide pool; 23 Jun 1909 (1303-1700); 1 female [8.3]. RANGE.?Red Sea and eastern Africa to Indonesia, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, and Caroline, Mariana, and Samoan islands. REMARKS.?In their review of the alpheids of the western Indian Ocean, A.H. and D.M. Banner (1983) offered an analysis of the material available to them of A. malleodigitus, A. microstylus, and A. obesomanus. Although the species differed widely in geographic distribution, A. malleodigitus being most common in the western Indian Ocean, Thailand, and the Central Pacific, A. microstylus rare everywhere except the western Indian Ocean, and A. obesomanus common in Australia, the Philippines, and Thailand, they were "certain that further studies such as those we have made with preserved specimens, supplemented with crude field observations, will not resolve the question posed." They concluded: "Although we are inclined towards the concept of a single variable species [A. obesomanus], we have no proof and we therefore leave the three nominal species standing." 49. Alpheus miersi Coutiere, 1898 Alpheus gracilipes.?Miers, 1884:287 [not Alpheus gracilipes Stimpson, 1860:31]. Alpheus rapax var. Miersi Coutiere, 1898e:166, fig. 1 [type locality: the 2 specimens mentioned by Miers (1884:287) were found on the beach at Port 42 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY Molle and at Flinders Island, both on the Coral Sea coast of Queensland, Australia]. [?}A[lpheus] gracilipes var. serratus Coutiere, 1898e:167 [name erroneously credited to Mien for specimen from Flinders Island, see "Remarks"]. AllpheusJ Miersi?Coutiere, 1905:903, pL 83: fig. 42, pi. 84: fig. 42b-i . Alpheus mUrsL-D. M. and A.H. Banner. 1982:168, fig. SI. DIAGNOSIS.?(Brevirostris Group). Body neither unusually compressed nor densely setose; rostrum triangular, not reaching as far as distal margin of 1st antennular segment, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region, without paired teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin unarmed and slightly concave mesial to orbital hoods, latter unarmed; 2nd antennular segment little more than twice as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with rather prominent acute ventrolateral tooth not reaching level of apex of stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin slightly concave, distolateral spine overreaching distal margin of blade; 1st pereopods with merus armed with small distal tooth on inferior flexor margin; major chela subcylindrical, about 374 times as long as wide, dactyl not double-ended, palm without teeth either side of dactylar articulation, without longitudinal carina on mesial surface parallel with "dorsal" margin, with narrow transverse groove or "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque, without shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger, minor chela slightly or considerably more than 4 times as long as wide, dactyl subequal to palm in length, "balaeniceps" in male only; 2nd pereopod with 2 proximal articles subequal in length; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple, propodus bearing 7 spines on flexor margin; carpus projecting distally on extensor margin, merus with small tooth at distal end of flexor margin, ischium bearing prominent movable spine; maximum carapace length about 8 mm. RANGE.?Somalia, Madagascar, Seychelles, Maldive and Laccadive islands, Sri Lanka, Philippines, Japan, Indonesia, and Australia; intcrtidal. REMARKS.?Coutiere (I898e:166) noted the following "Les differences legeres qui s^parent cette vari6t6 [Miersi] de A. rapax sont encore att?nu?es chez un autre specimen nomme par Miers A. gracilipes var. serratus (Zool. de l'"Alert," 1884:287), ou le seul caractere distinctif consiste dans les dactylopodites non lanceoles." I can find no evidence that Miers ever used this name, which may have come to Coutiere's attention from a specimen label on the syntype from Binder's Island when he examined British Museum material. If deemed an available name, it should be credited to Coutiere, who apparently first published i t Inasmuch as Coutiere mentioned among the characters of A. rapax miersi, "Les dactylopodites des pattes 3, 4, 5 sont comprimgs lateralement en forme de griffe et ne montrent pas la forme aplatie et lanceolee caracteristique de A. rapax," it seems probable that he meant to indicate that A. gracilipes serratus agrees with A. rapax and perhaps disagrees with A. miersi in all characters mentioned except the nonlanceolate dactyls. This would seem to represent an acceptable description of a species-group animal at the time of publication. It is possible, therefore, that "serratus" is an available name for an Australian representative of the genus Alpheus, and homonyny does not seem to be involved, but I am unable to find a currently known shrimp to which the name is applicable. 50. Alpheus mitis Dana, 1852 Alpheus mitis Dana, 1852a:22 [type locality: Balabac Strait]; 1852b:549; 18SS, pi. 35: fig. 1. DIAGNOSIS.? (Diadema Group). Body not unusually compressed or setose; rostrum reaching nearly to level of distal margin of 1st antennular segment, carina low, rounded; carapace without median tooth or tubercle on gastric region, without paired teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin unarmed, transverse mesial to orbital hood, orbital hood unarmed, adrostral furrows shallow; 2nd antennular segment nearly twice as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) armed with acute ventrolateral tooth not reaching anteriorly as far as tip of stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin slightly concave, distolateral spine moderately strong, overreaching distal margin of blade; 1st pereopods with distal tooth on inferior flexor margin of merus; major chela oval in cross section, about 3 times as long as wide, dactyl little skewed, not double-ended, palm without sculpture, slightly less than twice as long as high, fingers slightly more than x/2 as long as palm; minor chela about 4 times as long as wide, fingers slightly shorter than palm; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article slightly longer than 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple, neither biunguiculate nor subspatulate, propodus with 6 - 7 spines on flexor margin, carpus produced distally on extensor margin, merus unarmed, ischium bearing movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 7 mm. RANGE.? If A. mitis is distinct from A. paracrinitus, it is apparently known with certainty only from the unique missing holotype from Balabac Straight. REMARKS.?See "Remarks" under A. paracrinitus. The final sentence in the original description?"An femina A. Lottinii?" (Dana, 1852a:22)?would suggest that the holotype of A. mitis was a female. *51. Alpheus nonalter Kensley, 1969 FIGURE 10 Alpheus nonalter Kensley, 1969:172, fig. 15 [type locality: northeast of Durban, South Africa; 118 meters].?A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1981:232. DIAGNOSIS.?(Brevirostris Group). Body not unusually compressed or setose; rostrum narrow, sharp, not nearly reaching as far as distal margin of 1st antennular segment, bluntly carinate in midline, carina disappearing on anterior gastric region, base not abruptly delimited from adrostral furrows; carapace with or without median tubercle on gastric NUMBER 466 43 h FIGURE 10.?Alpheus nonalter, male from Albatross sta 5397, carapace length 9.0 mm: a, lateral aspect; b anterior carapace and appendages, dorsal aspect; c, same, lateral aspect; d, telson and uropods, dorsal aspect; e, right 1st (major) chela, extensor aspect;/, same, flexor aspect; g, merus of right 1st (major) cheliped, mesial aspect; h, left 1st (minor) chela, flexor aspect; i, merus of left 1st (minor) cheliped, mesial aspect; j , right 2nd pereopod; k, right 3rd pereopod. region, without paired flattened teeth overhanging posterior ends of adrostral furrows, anterior margin between rostrum and orbital hood variably incised, submarginal region not flattened, orbital hoods unarmed, adrostral furrows not very deep; 2nd antennular segment about 3 times as long as wide; basal antennal segment (basicerite) with sharp ventral spine not reaching level of tip of stylocerite; antennal scale with lateral margin slightly sinuous, distolateral spine not especially strong, overreaching distal margin of blade to varying extent; 1st pereopods with merus armed with sharp distal spine on flexor margin; extensor margin unarmed; major chela about 6 times as long as wide, dactyl sometimes overreached by fixed finger, not double-ended, plunger little developed, palm without sharp tooth either side of dactylar articulation, without "saddle" proximal to adhesive plaque but with 5 rather obscure longitudinal carinae or ridges forming 4 facets on 3 of 4 surfaces, without shoulder on margin proximal to fixed finger, minor chela 10-14 times as long as wide, dactyl at least 2/a as long as palm, "balaeniceps" in male, palm granulate; 2nd pereopod with proximal carpal article distinctly longer than 44 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY 2nd; 3rd pereopod with dactyl subspatulate, carpus produced distally on extensor margin, merus unarmed, ischium bearing movable spine; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum at least 9 mm. MATERIAL.?PHILIPPINES. Samar Sea, east of Masbate: sta 5397; 11?57'27"N, 124?10/42>M. and A.H. Banner, 1973:306, fig. 3.?A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1983:77. DIAGNOSIS.?Rostrum variable in length; orbit with supracor- neal, extracorneal, and infracorneal teeth, latter overreaching extracorneal teeth; major cheliped with chela subcylindrical, merus deeply excavate on flexor surface, minor cheliped of mature female with carpus shorter than palm; 2nd pereopod with 5 carpal articles; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple, not biunguiculate, about xli as long as propodus; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 3 mm. RANGE.?Red Sea, eastern and South Africa, Maldive and Laccadive islands, Indonesia, Philippines, Japan, Coral Sea coast of Australia, and eastward through the Pacific islands to the Marquesas and Society groups; under rocks at low tide and in dead coral. More than 30 specimens of A. djiboutensis were collected at the Visayan Islands, northern Negros, and one specimen at the Cuyo Islands in the northern Sulu Sea in 1978. 82. Athanas dorsalis (Stimpson, 1860) Arete dorsalis Stimpson, 1860:32 [type locality: Lyemun Strait, Hong Kong; among sublittoral rocks]. Arete dorsalis var. Pacificus Coutiere, 1903:87, fig. 30 [type locality: Hong Kong(?), Samoa, New Caledonia, Central America ("sans indie, de versant")]. Arete Maruteensis Coutiere, 1905:864 [type locality: Marutea, Tuamotu Archipelago]. Arete maruteensis, var. salibabuensis De Man, 1910:313 [type locality: anchorage off lining, Palau Salebabu, Kepulauan Talaud, Indonesia; to 36 meters]. DIAGNOSIS.?Rostrum usually not overreaching 2nd antennu- lar segment; orbit without supracorneal tooth, with extracorneal tooth, and without infracorneal tooth; major cheliped with chela compressed, not subcylindrical, merus not deeply excavate on flexor surface, carpus shorter than palm in mature female; 2nd pereopod with 4 carpal articles; 3rd pereopod with dactyl biunguiculate, about xh as long as propodus; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 6 mm. RANGE.?There is little doubt that A. dorsalis occurs throughout the Indo-Pacific area from the Red Sea and Indian Ocean to Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, China, Japan, Australia, and eastward to the Tuamotu Archipelago. Coutiere (1899:544) mentioned a specimen from the West Indies and (1903:86-88) included Central America in the range, but both of these extensions need confirmation. The Smithsonian Philippine Expedition of 1978 collected two specimens of A. dorsalis at the Cayo Islands, northern Sulu Sea. This shrimp frequents reef flats and rather shallow sublittoral depths; it is commonly, perhaps obligatorily, associated with echinoderms, usually echinoids. 83. Athanas indie us (Coutiere, 1903) Arete dorsalis var. lndicus Coutiere, 1903:84, figs. 2 5 - 2 9 [type locality: Djibouti and Hulele Male Atoll, Maldive Islands]. Arete Iphianassa De Man, 1910:312 [type locality: off Sawan, Pulau Siau, Kepulauan Sangi, Indonesia; reef]. Arete intermedius Yu, 1931:513, fig. 1 [type locality: Amoy(?), China]. Athanas indicus.?Suzuki, 1970:5, figs. 4-7.?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1973:327, fig. 11; 1981:42. DIAGNOSIS.?Rostrum overreaching 2nd antennular seg- ment; orbit without supracorneal tooth, with extracorneal tooth, without infracorneal tooth; major cheliped with chela com- pressed, merus not deeply excavate on flexor surface, carpus shorter than palm in mature female; 2nd pereopod with 4 carpal articles; 3rd pereopod with dactyl biunguiculate, about 73 as long as propodus; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 7 mm. RANGE.?Red Sea, Mozambique, Madagascar, Persian Gulf, Indian Ocean, Indonesia, Philippines, China, Japan, and Australia, eastward to the Tuamotu Archipelago; possibly always associated with echinoids situated in the upper sublitorral zone. REMARKS.?Athanas kominatoensis Kubo, 1942, is prob- ably a synonym of this species, but Suzuki (1970:5) chose to regard it as distinct until the importance of the angulate versus rounded pterygostomian margin and the obtuse rather than acute distal part of the palm of the first cheliped can be evaluated more reliably. *84. ?Athanas jedanensis De Man, 1910 Athanas jedanensis De Man, 1910:313 [type locality: Djedan, Kepulauan Aru, Indonesia; 13 meters]; 1911:154, pi. 2: fig. 7. DIAGNOSIS.?Rostrum reaching about to level of distal margin of 2nd antennular segment; orbit without supracorneal tooth, with extracorneal tooth, and without infracorneal tooth; major cheliped with chela subcylindrical, merus deeply excavate on flexor surface, carpus longer than chela in mature female; 2nd pereopod with 5 carpal articles; 3rd pereopod with dactyl biunguiculate, about 73 as long as propodus; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 5 mm. MATERIAL.?PHILIPPINES. Off Tawitawi, Sulu Archi- pelago: sta 5157; 5?12'30"N, 119?55'50"E; 33 m; fine sand; 21 Feb 1908 (0904-0909); 9' Johnston oyster dredge: 1 male [1.9]. RANGE.?This questionable record is apparently the first for the species since the original male and three ovigerous females NUMBER 466 63 were described from Kepulauan Aru in the Arafura Sea south of West New Guinea, at a depth of 13 meters. REMARKS.?The single representative of the genus Athanas in the Albatross collections lacks both members of the first pair of chelipeds. It has been tentatively assigned to A. jedanensis only because it seems to agree reasonably well with De Man's description and illustrations in all other particulars. 85. Athanas marshallensis Chace, 1955 Athanas marshallensis Chace, 1955:17, fig. 8 [type locality: Bogombogo Island, Eniwetok Atoll, Marshall Islands; intertidal].?A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1983:151. DIAGNOSIS.?Rostrum not overreaching 2nd antennular segment; orbit without supracorneal tooth, with extracorneal tooth, with rounded infracorneal tooth; major cheliped with chela subcylindrical, merus deeply excavate on flexor surface, carpus more than l/2 as long to longer than palm in mature female; 2nd pereopod with 5 carpal articles; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple, not biunguiculate, about 7s as long as propodus; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum 5 mm. RANGE.?Until the limits of variation of this nominal species are better known, its range?as well as its appropriate name?must remain somewhat questionable. The most recent analysis (A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1983:151) suggests that A. marshallensis occurs in the Red Sea and western Indian Ocean, the Philippines, and Micronesia; shallow subtidal. REMARKS.?As alluded to above, it is still indeterminate whether A. rhothionastes A.H. and D.M. Banner, 1960a, is a synonym of A. marshallensis and even whether the latter species is distinct from A. esakii Kubo, 1940b, from the Caroline Islands, or even the Japanese A. lamellifer Kubo, 1940a, which is generally believed to be a synonym of A. japonicus Kubo, 1936. 86. Athanas parvus De Man, 1910 Athanas Sibogae De Man, 1910:314 [type locality: six different Indonesian Siboga stations; 13-36 meters]; 1911:151,pL 2: fig. 6.?MiyaandMiyake, 1968:134, fig. 2.?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1973:321, fig. 9. Athanas parvus De Man, 1910:315 [type locality: south coast of Timor, Indonesia; 8?39.1'S, YITAA'K. 34 meters]; 1911:148, pi. 1: fig. 4. DIAGNOSIS.?Rostrum usually overreaching 2nd antennular segment; orbit without supracorneal tooth, with extracorneal tooth and acute infracorneal tooth, extracorneal overreaching infracorneal tooth; major cheliped with chela subcylindrical, merus deeply excavate on flexor surface, carpus shorter than palm in mature female; 2nd pereopod with 5 carpal articles; 3rd pereopod with dactyl biunguiculate, about x/2 as long as propodus; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 6 mm. RANGE.?Red Sea, eastern Africa, Singapore, Indonesia, Philippines, Japan, Australia, and Tonga and Samoa islands; common intertidally under rocks and occurring at a maximum depth of 70 meters. REMARKS.?There is little doubt that A.H. and D.M. Banner (1960a: 141) acted as first reviser in citing A. sibogae as a junior synonym of A. parvus, and the latter name should take precedence over the former, even though the reverse relation- ship has been adopted by most authors since that date, perhaps in the mistaken belief that the selection is determined solely by page precedence. Automate De Man, 1888 Arethusa De Man, 1888a:216 [nomen nudum; no type species indicated]. Automate De Man, 1888a:529 [type species, by monotypy: Automate dolichognatha De Man, 1888a:529; gender feminine]. DIAGNOSIS.?Body not unusually compressed; rostrum, if present, inconspicuous, subtriangular or lobate, unarmed extension of frontal margin of carapace; carapace without high carina throughout length of dorsal midline; abdomen without articulated triangular flap at posterolateral angle of 6th somite; telson not terminating posteriorly in triangular tooth; both eyes and eyestalks visible in dorsal aspect; mandible with palp and molar process; 3rd maxilliped not unusually broadened to form partial operculum over other mouthparts; 1st pereopods dissimilar, carried extended with movable finger dorsal or lateral, not ventral, major chela without molar-like tooth on movable finger, 2nd pereopod with fingers about as long as palm, carpus with 5 articles; pereopods with strap-like epipods on 4 anterior pairs; appendix masculina absent. RANGE.?Pantropical with temperate extensions; intertidal to 250 meters. REMARKS.?A dozen species seem to have been described in this genus. Eight of them are here presumed to be valid, in line with the conclusions reached by D.M. and A.H. Banner (1973:302). The Banners omitted from their list of acceptable species A. branchialis from the eastern Mediterranean and included two names, A. kingsleyi and A. haightae, which, together with A. gardineri and A. johnsoni, are here relegated to the synonymy of the variable and wide-ranging A. dolichognatha, the only member of the genus thus far known from the Philippines. Inasmuch as Crosnier and Forest (1966:203) reported that they were unable to find the type specimens of A. talismani in the Paris Museum, the true identity of that species?which would logically represent an extension of A. dolichognatha into the eastern Atlantic and thereby establish the pantropical distribution of the species? may never be determined; it is here tentatively treated as a distinct species, as did the Banners, because the original description by Coutiere (1902) indicates that the rostrum is larger than its maximum development in A. dolichognatha. It is hoped that the following provisional key to the species recognized herein may help to clarify eventually the true membership of the genus. 64 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY Key to Species of Automate 1. Rostrum reaching nearly or quite to level of extreme anterior margin of carapace 2 Rostrum, if present, not reaching nearly as far as extreme anterior margin of carapace 3 2. Antennal scale overreaching 2nd antennular segment A. salomoni Coutiere, 1908:192 (Salomon Islands, Chagos Archipelago) Antennal scale reaching barely to level of midlength of 2nd antennular segment. . A. talismani Coutiere, 1902:340 ("Puerto-Grande (Acores), profondeur 20 metres"; probably Porto Grande, Sao Vicente, Cape Verde Islands, according to Holthuis, 1951:115) 3. Antennal scale with lateral margin somewhat sinuous 4 Antennal scale with lateral margin convex, concave, or nearly strait, not sinuous . . 5 4. Rostrum small but distinct; antennal scale with distolateral tooth slender and far overreaching distal margin of blade . . . . A. anacanthopus De Man, 1910:317 (Celebes and Ceram seas, Indonesia; 22-75 meters) Rostrum absent; antennal scale with distolateral tooth short, not overreaching distal margin of blade A. rectifrons Chace, 1972:75 (Quintana Roo, Mexico, and possibly Antigua Island, West Indies; shallow water) 5. Third pereopod with about 5 spinules on flexor margin of propodus 87. A. dolichognatha Third pereopod setose, without spinules on flexor margin of propodus, except for distal pair at base of dactyl 6 6. Basal segment of antennal peduncle (basicerite) armed with minute distal tooth at base of antennal scale A. branchialis Holthuis and Gottlieb, 1958:34 (Mediterranean coast of Israel; 18-73 meters) Basal segment of antennal peduncle (basicerite) unarmed 7 7. Major chela rugose on both margins of palm . . . . A. rugosa Coutiere, 1902:341 (Pacific coasts of Mexico and Panama; 27-70 meters) Major chela not rugose on margins of palm . . . A. evermanni Rathbun, 1901:112 (Western Atlantic from Virginia to Texas and Puerto Rico; eastern Atlantic from Cape Verde Islands and Liberia to Nigeria; 12-250 meters) 87. Automate dolichognatha De Man, 1888 Automate johnsoni Chace, 1955:13, fig. 7 [type locality: Bikini Atoll, Marshall Islands]. Automate dolichognatha De Man, 1888a:529, pi. 22: fig 5 [type locality: "Insel Noordwachter," presumably Djaga Utara in the southwestern Java Sea near DIAGNOSIS.?Rostrum acute, Subrectangular Or rounded, not Djakarta, Indonesia].?D.M. and A.H. Banner, 1973:299, fig. l. nearly reaching anteriorly to level of extreme anterior margin Aiutomaie] Gardineri Coutiere, 1902:337 [type locality: 4 Maidive atolls. o f carapace; stylocerite not reaching level of distal margin of Gilbert Islands, Masqat.and Djibouti]. , . . , . , , . n j A, , .. . . ? , n n J . . ,. ? , ? . ? , . , 1st antennular segment; antennal scale not overreaching 2ndAutomate kmgsleyt Hay, 1917:72 [type locality: Beaufort, North Carolina]. ? Automate haightaeBoonc, 1931:184, fig. 22 [type locality: north shore of isia antennular segment, with lateral margin nearly straight, Taboguiiia, Bahia de Panama]. distolateral tooth slightly overreaching distal margin of blade; NUMBER 466 65 basal segment of antennal peduncle (basicerite) armed with small distal tooth; major chela with margins smooth, not rugose; 3rd pereopod with dactyl simple, not subspatulate, with about 5 spinules on flexor margin of propodus; maximum carapace length to base of rostrum about 7 mm. RANGE.?Pantropical, except for eastern Atlantic; usually intertidal or shallow subtidal. *Batella Holthuis, 1955 Cheirothrix Bate, 1888:532 [type species, by monotypy: Cheirothrix parvimanus Bate, 1888:533; gender feminine. Invalid junior homonym of Cheirothrix Pictet and Humbert, 1866:51 (Pisces)]. Batella Holthuis, 1955:92 [substitute name for Cheirothrix Bate, 1888; type species: Cheirothrix parvimanus Bate, 1888; gender: feminine]. DIAGNOSIS.?Body not unusually compressed from side to side; rostrum distinct, acute in dorsal and lateral aspects; carapace without high carina throughout length of dorsal midline; abdomen without triangular flap articulated at posteroventral angle of 6th somite; telson not terminating posteriorly in triangular tooth; eyes largely concealed from dorsal aspect, visible in anterior aspect; mandible with molar process but without palp; 3rd maxilliped not unusually broadened to form partial operculum over other mouthparts; 1st pereopods similar, not necessarily equal, carried extended with movable finger dorsal or lateral, not ventral, major chela without molar-like tooth on movable finger; 2nd chela with fingers about 1/s as long as palm, carpus with 5 articles; pereopods without strap-like epipods; appendix masculina not overreaching exopod of 2nd pleopod. RANGE.?Northern East China Sea, Philippines, and Torres Strait; 15-296 meters. REMARKS.?To my knowledge, only two specimens of Batella, which were at first assigned to separate species, have been recorded heretofore. The Albatross obtained four specimens in the Philippines, three belonging to the type species and one to an undescribed species, as characterized in the following key. Key to Species of Batella Pterygostomial angle sharply produced; telson overreaching both branches of uropod, bearing single pair of small sublateral spines, posterior margin transverse; basal antennal segment (basicerite) with ventral lobe strongly produced; 1st pair of pereopods with movable finger very slightly, if at all, overreaching fixed finger; 2nd pair of pereopods with carpus nearly twice as long as chela, distal article about 4 times as long as wide *88. B. leptocarpus Pterygostomial angle less sharply produced; telson not overreaching mesial branch of uropod, bearing 2 pairs of dorsolateral spines, posterior margin mesially convex; basal antennal segment (basicerite) with ventral lobe not unusually produced; 1st pair of pereopods with movable finger far overreaching fixed finger, 2nd pair of pereopods with carpus less than \lli times as long as chela, distal article barely 3 times as long as wide *89. B. parvimanus *88. Batella leptocarpus, new species FIGURE 17 DIAGNOSIS.?See "Key to Species." DESCRIPTION.?Front damaged (Figure lib), apparently tridentate. Inconspicuous tubercle in midline of gastric region. Pterygostomian angle sharply produced (Figure 17a). Cardiac notch in posterior margin of carapace at base of branchiostegite deep. Abdomen broadly rounded dorsally, 3 anterior somites with pleura rounded subrectangular, 4th posteroventrally rectangu- lar, 5th posteroventrally bluntly acute, 6th with posteroventral angle obtuse and with broadly acute tooth either side of base of telson. Telson (Figure 17c) about twice as long as 6th somite, more than twice as long as anterior width, armed laterally with single pair of lateral spines in posterior !A of length, posterior margin nearly transverse. Eyes deeply recessed, completely concealed from dorsal and lateral view, quite exposed anteriorly. Antennules badly damaged, stylocerite sharply produced, distinctly overreaching basal segment. Antennal scale (Figure lid) 13A times as long as wide, distolateral tooth not reaching level of angularly convex distal margin of blade. Basal antennal segment with strong, acutely produced ventral lobe. Antennal peduncle reaching distal xh of antennal scale. Mouthparts as illustrated (Figure lle-i). Mandible with incisor process distally concave. First maxilliped with greatly expanded central lobe and 2nd maxilliped with obscure distal segment, both as in type species. Third maxilliped overreach- ing antennal scale by nearly 2h length of distal segment. First pair of pereopods slightly unequal (possibly due to 66 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY FIGURE 17.?Batella Uptocarpus, new species, male holotype from Albatross sta 5543, carapace length 5.8 mm: a, anterior end, lateral aspect; b, anterior end of carapace, dorsal aspect; c, telson and uropods, dorsal aspect; a\ right antennal scale; e, left mandible;/ left 1st maxilla; g, left 2nd maxilla; h, left 1st maxilliped; i, left 2nd maxilliped;/ right 1st chela; k, same, fingers; /, left 1st chela; m, left 1st cheliped, proximal segments; n, right 2nd pereopod; o, same, fingers, denuded; p, left 3rd pereopod; q, same, dactyl; r, left 1st pleopod, posterior aspect; s, endopod of left 2nd pleopod; /, same, appendices interna and masculina. NUMBER 466 67 regeneration), left larger, overreaching antennal scale by about 3A length of chela, movable finger slightly longer than fixed finger, right with fingers subequal in length (Figure 17/Jfc); carpus with at least 1 sharp marginal tooth; merus with staggered convex flanges on flexor margins (Figure 17m), most prominent on right side. Second pereopod overreaching antennal scale by fully length of chela; movable finger (Finger 17