s
a
e D
, Sm
S. L
and archaeology in documenting plant and animal
domestication, and highlight several promising areas
domesticates might initially have played only a small part
in the economies of societies that were still largely based
changes on both sides of the mutualistic relationship, as
Review TRENDS in Genetics Vol.xx No.xx Monthxxxx
DTD 5 ARTICLE IN PRESScompiled an edited volume of selected case studies thatturn, promoted specialization and a narrowing of research
focus in both disciplines. This trend towards an increas-
ingly tighter focus, however, has been accompanied by a
reduction in productive communication, both between and
within the fields of genetics and archaeology. Not only do
archaeologists and geneticists tend to share their results
and interpretations primarily within their own discipline,
but they also, increasingly, limit their interaction to the
community of researchers working on either the domes-
tication of plants or the domestication of animals.
In an effort to counter this trend, we have recently
both partner populations, over time, become increasingly
interdependent. In addition, the domestication process
does not invariably follow the same developmental
trajectory but is differentially shaped by the particular
biological and behavioral profiles of target species and by
the cultural context of the human societies involved. To
trace this process for different domesticate species and
different human societies, it is necessary to determine
which behavioral, genetic or morphological markers are
appropriate for distinguishing different points along a
particular mutualistic relationship as it develops. Recog-to documenting plant and animal domestication has, in
domestication. The growing sophistication of approaches domesticate. Rather it is a cumulative process marked bywhere the complementary perspectives of both dis-
ciplines provide reciprocal illumination.
Introduction
The past few decades have witnessed an increase in
research on domestication in genetics and archaeology.
New techniques for the identification of plant and animal
remains, the application of accelerator mass spectrometer
(AMS) radiocarbon dating and advances in microscopy
have enhanced the ability of archaeologists to detect and
date evidence for the initial domestication of plant and
animal species. Improvements for extracting, amplifying
and sequencing modern and ancient DNA (aDNA), and
new methods of phylogenetic analysis have encouraged an
expansion in genetic studies of crop and livestockDocumenting dome
section of genetics
Melinda A. Zeder1, Eve Emshwiller2, Bruc
1Archaeobiology Program, National Museum of Natural History
2Department of Botany, Field Museum of Natural History, 1400
3Smurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
Domestication, a process of increasing mutual depen-
dence between human societies and the plant and
animal populations they target, has long been an area
of interest in genetics and archaeology. Geneticists seek
out markers of domestication in the genomes of
domesticated species, both past and present day.
Archaeologists examine the archaeological record for
complementary markers ? evidence of the human
behavior patterns that cause the genetic changes
associated with domestication, and the morphological
changes in target species that result from them. In this
article, we summarize the recent advances in geneticson hunting and gathering, they did provide a buffer
against environmental uncertainties and thus a more
secure and predictable subsistence base, which, in turn,
enabled human societies to grow in size and to expand into
new, more-challenging environments.
Domestication is not an instantaneous event in which a
wild plant or animal is suddenly transformed into atication: the inter-
nd archaeology
. Smith1 and Daniel G. Bradley3
ithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560-0112, USA
ake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605-2496, USA
focus on central aspects of current research on plant and
animal domestication from the perspectives of archaeol-
ogy and genetics [1]. Here we highlight topical areas
where the two disciplines complement each other,
providing a more synthetic understanding of domesti-
cation as a general process of biological and
cultural evolution.
Domestication as a process
Domestication is a unique form of mutualism that
develops between a human population and a target plant
or animal population, and has strong selective advantages
for both partners. What sets it apart from other successful
mutualistic relationships is the role of sustained human
agency in the propagation and care of plants and animals
within the anthropogenic context of domestication.
Humans increase the genetic fitness of target populations
by intervening in their life cycles and enabling them to
increase in numbers and to expand their range and
habitat far beyond that of their wild progenitors. Althoughdomestication in different target species and how they
relate to the domestication process requires a range of
Corresponding author: Zeder, M.A. (zederm@si.edu).
www.sciencedirect.com 0168-9525/$ - see front matter Published by Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2006.01.007nizing markers that can be used in tracing the process of
Review TRENDS in Genetics Vol.xx No.xx Monthxxxx2
DTD 5 ARTICLE IN PRESSanalytical approaches and diverse disciplinary perspec-
tives in biology and archaeology.
Archaeological markers of domestication in plants and
animals
Behavioral and morphological markers in the archae-
ological record that indicate the existence of a relationship
of domestication between human societies and target
species take a range of different forms. Behavioral
markers of crop plant cultivation, for example, can include
preserved field systems; water management projects such
as canals or check dams; pollen and phytolith (opal silica
bodies) profiles and other indications of forest clearance
for field systems; an associated increased presence in
human settlements of crop plants and their weedy
companions; increased and improved plant food storage
facilities; and the appearance or improvement of technol-
ogy associated with field preparation (e.g. silica sheen on
hoes) or plant processing. However, such categories of
direct evidence for domestication often do not occur until
after reliance on crop plants has been established, limiting
their value as markers of either initial domestication or
the initial introduction of a domesticate into an economy.
Morphological changes in target plant populations, by
contrast, often can be strongly and directly linked to the
earliest stages of plant domestication. Several scholars [2?
9] identified a range of distinct morphological changes in
seed crops that could be expected to result not from
deliberate intentional selection for desirable traits by
humans, but as the result of unconscious selection:
?.selection resulting from human activities not involving
a deliberate attempt to change the organism? [9]. These
unintentional changes would result from a particular new
set of human activities involving target species of plants ?
specifically, the sustained harvesting and planting of
stored seed stock. When humans began to harvest, store
and plant seeds over a sustained period, they inadver-
tently created a new and distinctive selective environment
to which the target plant populations under management
adapted through genetic andmorphological change. Of the
adaptive responses by target populations of seed propa-
gated plants to the new human created environment, the
most important, and most likely to be visible in the
archaeological record are: (i) simultaneous ripening of
seeds; (ii) compaction of seeds in highly visible terminal
stalk-branch ?packages?; (iii) seed retention (loss of natural
seed dispersal mechanisms); (iv) increase in seed size; and
(v) simultaneous and rapid seed germination (loss of
germination dormancy, reduction in seed coat thickness).
Deliberate human selection for specific attributes in seed
plants (e.g. larger fruit size, color changes, plant habit)
also result in morphological changes that can often be
observed in the archaeological record, but these invariably
appear after evidence for automatic adaptive responses by
the target populations.
By contrast, no clear morphological markers have yet
been identified for unintentional selection during the
initial stages of human intervention in the life cycle and
management of root crops, often propagated by vegetative
cloning. Therefore, efforts to document domestication of
root crops in the archaeological record have focused on
www.sciencedirect.comevidence for deliberate human selection, particularly the
selection for larger subterranean organs and for starch
types that can be more easily processed and prepared. The
individual starch grains that form the underground
organs produced by extant domesticated crop plants not
only differ in terms of morphology, and often in size, from
starch grains produced by related wild taxa but also
frequently exhibit morphology that is diagnostic at the
species level. Given the right archaeological context,
careful field recovery and laboratory protocols, starch
grains that have been preserved intact on the surface and
in the cracks of grinding tools over long periods of time [10]
can provide clear documentation of the processing of
different wild and domesticated plant foods, including
domesticated root crops grown in previously poorly
documented low-latitude regions of the world.
Phytoliths can also provide direct micromorphological
indications of plant use in low-latitude zones of poor plant
preservation. These small pieces of ?glass? formed in the
living cells of plants during their life span, for structural
support and to deter predation, exhibit considerable
morphological variation, are resistant to decay and can
be recovered in substantial numbers from a range of
archaeological contexts. Distinctive phytolith morphology
can enable researchers not only to distinguish between
different species [11] but also to differentiate between
phytolith forms produced by domesticated crop plants and
their wild progenitors, identifying when domesticates first
appeared in the archaeological record.
In contrast to crop plants, selection on animals initially
brought under human management is most often directed
towards modification of behavior in the target species
rather than towards morphological change. For example,
both inadvertent and deliberate human efforts can select
for increased tolerance of penning, sexual precocity and,
above all, reduction of wariness and aggression [12,13].
Such selection for reduced aggression might be reflected
indirectly by several secondary morphological traits
commonly seen in domestic animals and sometimes
observable in the archaeological record (e.g. piebald
coats and lop ears, smaller brain size, a shortening of
facial bones and resultant crowding and size reduction in
teeth) [13?15]. Plastic or ecophenotypic (non-genetically
driven) responses by animals to the new, sometimes
impoverished, conditions associated with initial human
management can also be recognized in the archaeological
record, and can be used as early markers of herd
management (e.g. bone pathologies from penning, dietary
changes detectable by isotopic studies of animal bones and
evidence of mass ?die-offs? from disease) [16?19]. Archae-
ologists also look for sudden changes in the abundance of
animals or their appearance outside their presumed
geographical range [20,21]. They can consider changes in
human settlement patterns, the presence of corrals or
other traces of animals in settlements (manure or hoof
prints) or artifacts related to the exploitation of domestic
animals (bits or milk churns) as markers of different
stages of the process of animal domestication [22].
Deliberate human selection of breeding partners can
also result in morphological changes. The incremental
changes in the size and shape of horns in livestock animals
(e.g. sheep and goats) can be directly tied to a relaxation of
selection for larger horns, which might represent a
liability once they are no longer needed in competition
for mates [23]. Other morphological changes can result
from range expansion associated with domestication, as
managed herds are introduced into new environments
(either through a founder effect or through directed
adaptation to new habitats). Deliberate human selection
for desired traits (size, meat or milk yield and coat quality)
can also be recognized in the archaeological record.
One broadly applicable marker of domestication in
animals involves sex-specific demographic profiling of
prey populations. Faunal assemblages resulting from
human hunting differ from those resulting from managed
herds. In most managed herds of domesticated livestock,
young males are preferentially slaughtered, with only a
few allowed to survive and join the breeding population,
which comprises adult females of reproductive age.
Females are slaughtered when they pass peak reproduc-
tive age. The resultant age and sex profile of a managed
herd, characterized by an emphasis on young males and
older females, is distinctive and different from any
produced by human hunting, which reflects a strategy to
maximize the return from the hunt (i.e. focusing on older
and larger male animals). A new method for constructing
sex-specific harvest profiles from animal bone assem-
blages combines size analysis to determine sex with long
bone fusion to determine age [24,25]. When applied to
directly-dated archaeological-bone assemblages from Iraq
and Iran, this method has succeeded in detecting
unmistakable evidence of herd management of goats
(Capra aegagrus) O1000 years before the appearance of
any morphological markers of domestication for the
species [26?28].
Genetic markers of domestication in plants and animals
Geneticists interested in domestication focus on genetic
responses to the mutualistic relationship formed between
the domestic species and humans. The biological differ-
ences between plants and animals have a significant role
in the genetic study of domestication. Annual crops or
those with short generation times evolvemore rapidly, and
therefore respond faster to the changing selective press-
ures under domestication, than do most long-lived
animals and perennial or clonally-propagated crops (e.g.
fruit trees or tuber crops such as potatoes). Another
important difference in the biology of plants and animals
with special relevance to the genetic study of domesti-
cation is the prevalence of polyploidy in crop plants.
Moreover, the possibility of interspecific hybridization is
rarely an issue in animals, but represents another
complicating factor in the genetic study of
plant domesticates.
To trace the evolutionary ancestry of domesticates,
geneticists focus on neutrally evolving, noncoding loci and
organellar genomes. The rates of evolution among the
T2
93
me
ed
16
ox
he F
trilin
rom
t an
phis
Review TRENDS in Genetics Vol.xx No.xx Monthxxxx 3
DTD 5 ARTICLE IN PRESSY2Y1
42
T4
Figure 1. The complex ancestry of taurine cattle as shown bymtDNA and Y-chromoso
differences in diversity within domestic cattle (Bos taurus), illustrated by reduc
geographically distributed haplogroups distinguished by substitutions at positions (C
European cluster, T3 (red), is divergent from sequences derived from European wild
maternal lineages owe their ancestry to primary domestication centres proximal to t
populations display two additional clusters, T1 (yellow) and T4 (gray), suggestingma
reflects secondary migration across the Mediterranean. Polymorphisms on the Y ch
axis [102]. The modal southern variant, Y2 (green) is shared between the Near Eas
discontinuity. In addition, typing of one of the diagnostic single nucleotide polymor
wild oxen. This suggests that insemination of domestic cows of Near Eastern descent b
cattle, but that capture and incorporation of wild cows was not.
www.sciencedirect.comdata. Sequencing themost variable region of themtDNA D-loop shows the regional
median networks superimposed on regions of origin. Sequences fall into five
000) given in the skeleton network in the upper inset [29,121,122]. The predominant
archaeological samples. It is also found in the Near East, suggesting that European
ertile Crescent rather than to local input from the wild. Both African and Far Eastern
eal input from local wild oxen. The presence of the African variant in Iberia probably
osome delineate two B. taurus haplotypes, which are distributed on a north?south
d much of Europe, the northern haplotype, Y1 (red), seems not to be, suggesting
ms (SNPs) in archaeological samples indicates that Y1 is shared by most EuropeanTRENDS in Genetics 
T
Japan B. taurus
1
255 113 050
T1
057 (G?C)
185
TT3y local wild bulls might have been a major contributor to the ancestry of European
been demonstrated in cotton [54] and maize [55,56], and
can act over time to diminish the effects of the
domestication bottleneck [57]. However, gene flow in the
reverse direction, from crops to wild relatives, has been
shown in squash [58,59] and beans [60], and some would
argue is more frequent than generally thought [61].
Studies of gene flow from domesticates into wild or
weedy relatives are important with regard to the escape
of genes from genetically-modified organisms [55,61,62].
Continuing crop?wild gene flow subsequent to domesti-
cation can make it difficult to interpret patterns in the
genetic data, thus obscuring crop origins, and precluding
the localization of the area of domestication [35].
A particularly important focus in the genetic analysis of
domesticates centers on the study of genes and gene
complexes that are specifically selected for (or against) by
domestication (Box 1). Because many plant species
produce an abundance of seed, they are capable of
producing large data sets for mapping qualitative trait
loci (QTL) ? multiple genes that affect a particular
phenotypic feature [63]. Intensive work on corn genetics,
for example, has identified several key ?domestication
genes? that control features such as branching and glume
architecture [64?67] and these loci have been among the
first in which the reduction of nucleotide diversity near
the site of selection has been studied (Box 2). QTL studies
unknown diploid progenitors of the wild tuber-bearing taxa. Although this was the
simplest explanation of the ncpGS results, other data sources and additional wild
tuber-bearing Oxalis populations are now being studied and might lead to a
modification of this working hypothesis. Reproduced with permission from Ref.
[124] q2006 University of California Press.
Review TRENDS in Genetics Vol.xx No.xx Monthxxxx4
DTD 5 ARTICLE IN PRESSnuclear, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes are not
equal, and there are significant differences in the relative
rates of evolution in these genomes in plants and animals,
which affects their relative usefulness for ancestry
studies. In animals, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has a
rate of evolution that is five-to-ten times greater than in
the nuclear genome, making mtDNA ideal for studying
the divergence between wild and domestic populations
under the relatively short timescale of domestication (i.e.
!10 000 years). Although less variable than mtDNA,
nuclear DNA (nDNA) has proven useful in animal
domestication research [29]. The Y-chromosome,
especially, provides important information on patrilineal
inheritance, which can be markedly uncoupled from
matrilineal history (Figure 1) [30]. Moreover, noncoding
nuclear microsatellite DNA, contributed by both parents,
has also proven useful in the detection of shallow time-
depth variation seen in the divergence of domestic breeds
of animals [31?33].
Mitochondrial genomes in plants have a slower
mutation rate than chloroplast genomes (cpDNA) and
therefore evolve slowly, limiting their use in domestication
studies. Although cpDNA evolves somewhat faster than
plant mtDNA, it still lacks sufficient variation to address
most questions about variation and change on the 10 000
year span of domestication research. By contrast, nDNA in
plants evolves at a rate approximately four times faster
than cpDNA and 12 times faster than plant mtDNA [34].
Consequently, genetic studies of plant domestication
usually focus on nDNA, using DNA sequences and various
highly polymorphic markers that provide sufficient
intraspecific variation to document the domestication
process [35?39].
The nuclear genome is also key to teasing apart the
complicated genetic heritage of polyploid crops, because it
can potentially reveal the origins of all their ancestral
genomes [40,41]. Nuclear data have been used to
investigate the origins of kiwifruit, the tuber oca (Figure 2)
and sweet potato, and have been combined with chlor-
oplast genome data to study origins of polyploidy in cotton
and tef, an Ethiopian cereal [42?47]. Polyploids with well-
established histories, such as cotton, wheat and cole crops,
have been used as model systems in recent studies of the
complications of genome evolution under polyploidy [48?
50].
Plants not only have greater levels of interspecific
hybridization but also gene flow between crops and
conspecific, wild or weedy populations is frequent. For
testing hypotheses of crop?wild?weed gene flow and
hybridization, molecular data have the advantages of
providing many independent, highly variable markers
that are not affected by the environment, and most of
which are neutral or nearly neutral [51]. Morphological
data in hybrids are not necessarily intermediate between
the parental forms [52]. However, hypotheses based on
morphological data can be tested using molecular data,
and frequently confirm them; for example, most, but not
all, of the hypotheses proposed by Heiser of hybridization
between wild and domesticated sunflower taxa have been
confirmed in this way [53]. Such gene flow can introduce
alleles from wild populations into domesticates, as has
www.sciencedirect.comTRENDS in Genetics 
Oxalis tuberosa
2n = 8x = 64
Oxalis picchensis
wild tuber-bearing
4x
Bolivian
wild tuber-bearing
4x?
Oxalis sp.2x Oxalis sp.2x Oxalis sp.2x
Figure 2. A working hypothesis for the polyploid origins of Oxalis tuberosa. The
origin of the octoploid tuber crop oca, Oxalis tuberosa Molina, was studied using
DNA encoding glutamine synthetase (a single-copy nuclear locus that encodes the
form expressed in the chloroplast, or ncpGS [44]). As expected for an allopolyploid,
multiple copies of ncpGS were found in individual plants of oca, which were
separated by molecular cloning. Phylogenetic analysis of these oca cloned
sequences and those of wild Oxalis species revealed that the three sequence
types of oca joined with sequences from two wild tuber-bearing taxa on the ncpGS
gene tree. One of the possible scenarios that is congruent with the ncpGS
sequencing results is illustrated here. Octoploid oca might have originated by
hybridization between Oxalis picchensis and an as-yet-unnamed Bolivian wild
tuber-bearing taxon. O. picchensis of southern Peru is tetraploid [123] and is
probably autotetraploid, because it had a single sequence type for ncpGS. The
Bolivian taxon is of unknown ploidy level but is probably allopolyploid, because all
plants sampled had two sequence types for ncpGS. The lower row shows thein other crops have identified domestication genes
affecting starch composition in rice, fruit size in tomato,
and genetic documentation of domestication
Box 1. Identifying crop domestication genes
Recent studies of the genetic basis for the changes that occurred
during crop domestication focused on traits that were the targets of
selection and the genes that affect them ? ?domestication genes?. One
of the methods used in these studies is QTL mapping. This method
requires the use of numerous molecular markers scattered throughout
the genome and numerous descendents of a controlled cross between
parents that differ for the trait of interest. Statistical procedures can
identify chromosomal regions that might contain a gene affecting the
trait. In well-studied crops there could be a gene that is known to be
located in the same chromosomal region (usually because of a
mutation in that gene), and that candidate locus can be further tested
to determine whether it is the QTL.
One of the first domestication genes to be studied extensively was
teosinte branched1 (tb1), which affects apical dominance in maize,
such that the maize mutant has teosinte-like branching instead of a
single dominant stalk. QTL mapping found a strong effect on plant
architecture in the same chromosomal region in which tb1 was
located, and further genetic tests confirmed that tb1 was the locus that
had been identified [131]. Similar methods have been used for one of
the most important domestication genes in maize, teosinte glume
architecture1 (tga1), which controls the formation of the teosinte
cupulate fruitcase that encases the kernel [66,67] and was involved in
investigated in maize as possible domestication genes include
terminal ear1 (te1) [132], and several loci affecting kernel weight
[133]. Mapping and developmental studies found that suppressor of
sessile spikelets1 (sos1) was not involved in maize domestication,
although its mutant phenotype of single rather than paired spikelets
appears similar to teosinte [65].
Domestication often affects gene regulation. Selection can affect the
regulatory (promoter) regions of genes, for example, tb1 and tga1
(Box 2), or can target regulatory loci rather than protein-coding genes.
In an important domestication gene that affects fruit weight in tomato,
fw2.2, human selection seems to have targeted mutations in the
promoter region of the gene that cause it to activate earlier in fruit
development [69,134]. The tight edible inflorescence of cauliflower
and broccoli is affected by a regulatory gene, cauliflower (BoCAL) [70].
An exception is the mutation in the waxy gene of rice that affects the
gene splicing and hence starch composition, leading to the glutinous
rice favored in East and Southeast Asia [68].
The idea that domestication traits are controlled by few genes with
large effects has been confirmed in some cases [71,135,136], but it is
not universal. The classical domestication trait of the shattering rachis
is controlled by one locus in sorghum and three loci in rice but is
affected by ten loci in maize [137]. Sunflowers seems to differ from
Review TRENDS in Genetics Vol.xx No.xx Monthxxxx 5
DTD 5 ARTICLE IN PRESSthe modified inflorescence of cauliflower and broccoli, and
multiple traits in common bean [68?71].
Research focused on the identification of ?domestication
genes? in animals, despite some successes, lags signifi-
cantly behind that in plants. Causative mutations for
several monogenic traits, such as those for coat color in
several species, have been identified. Intensive research
on polygenic traits related to production has resulted in
the identification of loci such as insulin-like growth factor
2 (IGF2) in pigs, which is associated with differences
in muscularity, back fat and heart size in a wild boar?
domestic hybrid [72]. The completion of genome projects in
the crucial step that turned the stone-hard kernels of teosinte into the
much more usable kernels of maize. Other loci that have beenseveral species will greatly facilitate the search for the
genes that were the drivers in the journey from the wild
to domesticity.
Box 2. Domestication bottlenecks and footprints of selection
Reduced diversity of DNA polymorphisms in domesticates
compared with those in wild progenitors can take two forms.
There is often a genome-wide reduction in diversity ? the
?bottleneck? of domestication ? in which a subset of the genetic
diversity found in the wild progenitor is retained in the domesti-
cate, owing to the relatively small population that was initially
domesticated. The extent of the bottleneck depends on both the
number of individuals in the founding population and the duration
of the bottleneck. However, an even greater reduction of diversity
can occur in specific regions of the genome that are tightly linked
to the sites that were the targets of selection. When a strongly
selected allele is quickly brought to fixation in the population, other
tightly linked loci can also be brought to fixation, reducing diversity
in a ?selective sweep? that is known as the ?signature? or ?footprint?
of selection on domestication genes.
Domestication bottlenecks have been demonstrated in several
crops, including pearl millet [139], cotton [140], potato [141] common
bean and lima bean [60,92]. The extent of the domestication bottleneck
of maize in two neutral loci adh1 [142] and glb1 [143] was found to be
83% and 60%, respectively, of the diversity in teosinte; other neutral
loci in maize show similar proportions [131,144,145]. A secondary
bottleneck associated with the dispersal of the crop from its homeland
can be narrower than the domestication bottleneck itself if only a few
www.sciencedirect.comArchaeologists and geneticists use different tools to
illuminate different aspects of the process of domestication
in plant and animal species. Therefore, it is particularly
important for archaeologists and geneticists to combine
their disciplinary expertise to unravel the course of this
important process. There are several areas where the
possibility for cross-illumination between archaeology and
genetics are particularly promising.
Identification of wild progenitors of plant and animalAreas of cross-illumination in the archaeological
most other crops studied to date, in that its domestication traits are
influenced by numerous loci of moderate or slight effect [138].domesticates
Identifying the wild progenitors of domesticates is
important to understand domestication. The application
individuals and their descendents were disseminated around the
world, for example, potato and coffee [141,146].
A reduction in diversity of domestication genes has been studied in
several maize loci and in the BoCAL regulatory gene affecting the
inflorescence development of broccoli and cauliflower [70]. In maize,
studies of variation in domestication genes tb1 and tga1 have
uncovered strong evidence of the effects of selection, but the greatest
reduction indiversitywasnot in theprotein-codingpart of thegene, but
rather in the upstream regulatory region [66,147,148]. In contrast to the
evidence of selection found in tb1 and tga1, other loci, such as adh1,
glb1 and te1, seem to have evolved in a neutral fashion [131,145].
Elevated diversity might also point to domestic selection of a
different nature. Beja-Pereira et al. [149], for example, found that
Northern European cattle breeds showed significantly more alleles
than expected at several milk protein loci. This was in contrast to the
pattern in southern Europe and the Near East ? prompting a
suggestion that local selection pressures might have left a detectable
footprint. Interestingly, the north central European region also shows
a maximum for a human genetic trait that is unambiguously post-
domestic: the ability to drink raw milk into adulthood, lactose
tolerance. This leads to a tempting conclusion that parallel selection
processes have been at work in these two mammals brought about by
the development of intensive dairy economy.
domesticated should be tempered with the realization that
undiscovered or extinct populations might be yet closer to maize,
Review TRENDS in Genetics Vol.xx No.xx Monthxxxx6
DTD 5 ARTICLE IN PRESSBox 3. Identifying the progenitor of maize
Maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) looks so unlike any wild grass that
identifying its wild ancestor has been challenging. In the 1930s,
Mangelsdorf and Beadle proposed different alternative hypotheses
regarding the origin of maize, and it was not until the advent of
biochemical and molecular genetic techniques in the 1980s that a 40-
year-old debate was resolved, and Beadle was proven correct.
Mangelsdorf had suggested that maize was domesticated from a
wild maize (that is now extinct), and that the diversity in the extant
species is the result of substantial introgression with closely related
Tripsacum grasses. Beadle, by contrast, proposed a much more
straightforward origin: that maize had been domesticated from a still
extant annual grass ? teosinte.
In the 1980s, the first molecular studies targeting the wild ancestor
of maize involved isozyme variation and mapped restriction sites of
the chloroplast genome [150]. Phenetic analyses of isozyme data of
maize and several teosintes showed that the domesticate was most
similar to the teosinte populations of the subspecies Z. mays ssp.
parviglumis found in the central Balsas river valley of southwestern
Mexico. By identifying these extant central Balsas populations of Z.
mays ssp. parviglumis as the probablemodern descendants of ancient
progenitor populations, these initial studies not only tentatively
identified the wild ancestor of maize, but also suggested the region
where maize probably had been initially been domesticated.
The phylogenetic tree based on cpDNA was consistent with the idea
that the cultigen, Z. mays ssp. mays, belongs to the same species as
three wild teosinte subspecies (i.e. Z. mays sspp. parviglumis,
mexicana and huehuetenangensis) because their chloroplast haplo-
types were intermingled together in the same clade [150]. Although it
confirmed the close relationship of these taxa, this mixing of
haplotypes meant that the cpDNA data did not enable determination
of which subspecies was the progenitor of maize.of molecular information to the reconstruction of plant
and animal phylogenies has been key to charting the
ancestry of domesticates. Genetic studies have fre-
quently confirmed the earlier identifications of wild
progenitor species, such as sheep [73,74] and goats
[75], based on morphology, geography or cytology.
Genetic studies have also resolved long-standing con-
troversies about the ancestry of domesticates. For
example, Doebley?s definitive identification of the sub-
species of wild teosinte grass that gave rise to corn ruled
out alternative phylogenies that included complicated
hybridizations between wild grasses and mythical
ancestral species (Box 3) [55,76]. Similarly, Olsen and
Schaal?s research on cassava succeeded in identifying
the wild progenitor of this major tropical crop plant
[38,39]. Sometimes long-accepted progenitor species are
shown to be closely related sister species. For example,
recent genetic analysis has shown that the condiment
species Chinese chive (Allium tuberosum), originally
thought to be descended from the wild onion species
Allium ramosum, is now thought to have developed
through multiple domestications of a possibly extinct
sister species [36]. The list of potential progenitors can
be narrowed down in the complicated lineages of
polyploid crops, as Emshwiller and Doyle have done for
the South American tuber oca (Oxalis tuberosa)
(Figure 2) [43,44]. In some examples, where the wild
progenitor is either largely or entirely extinct, aDNA has
yielded crucial clues about the ancestry of important
domesticates (e.g. cattle [77] and horses [78]).
www.sciencedirect.comand species distributions might have changed since the time of
the domestication.
Similarly, although future excavation of sites in other areas of
southern Mexico could perhaps change the picture somewhat, the
earliest available archaeological evidence for domesticated maize
provides a separate line of evidence indicating that maize was derived
from teosinte within, or close to, the Balsas watershed, while also
providing a conservative, time-certain temporal framework for when
this major crop plant was domesticated. Direct accelerator mass
spectrometer radiocarbon dates obtained on twomaize cob fragments
recovered from Guila Naquitz in Oaxaca, w100 km northeast of the
Balsas watershed, have been dated to 6300 years before present (Bp)
[151?153], providing the earliest evidence for domesticated maize in
the archaeological record. Matsuoka et al. estimate maize was
domesticated as early as 8000 years Bp.A more recent distance analysis by Matsuoka et al. [56] of data
from 99 microsatellite loci comparing maize with the three teosinte
subspecies, however, confirmed earlier results, which indicated that
ssp. parviglumis accessions from the central Balsas river valley
were the teosinte populations closest to domesticated maize. The
study also provided additional support for a single domestication
event. Matsuoka et al. found that all the 193 domesticated maize
plants sampled from the pre-Colombian range in North and South
America clustered together and were separate from 71 teosinte
plants of three Z. mays subspecies. This single cluster is consistent
with a single origin of domestication and with earlier results based
on isozymes and chloroplast DNA, neither of which supported
multiple domestications of maize [150]. However, identifying the
Balsas watershed as the place where maize was probably initiallyThe correct identification of wild progenitor species, in
turn, contributes to the development of archaeological
markers capable of distinguishing between the archae-
ological remains of wild and domestic individuals. Bruno?s
matrix of morphological traits capable of distinguishing
domestic quinoa in the archaeological record, for example,
is based on early allozyme research that identified the wild
progenitor species of this important Andean crop plant
[79]. Wheeler and colleagues? genetic analysis sorted out
the complicated parentage of domestic camelids in South
America [32], and has been crucial to the development of
osteometric criteria for distinguishing between domestic
llamas and alpacas and their progenitors, guanaco and
vicun?a [80].
Documenting the number and location of domestication
events and the dispersal of domesticates
Another area of intersection between genetics and
archaeology is documenting the location(s) of initial
domestication and the trajectory of subsequent dispersal
of domesticates. Genetic analysis has supported a single
origin for certain domestic crops and livestock species. Not
only did Doebley and colleagues identify the progenitor
species of corn, for example, they also located the probable
geographic center of corn domestication in south central
Mexico [56] (Box 3). This research has, in turn, helped
guide archaeological efforts at documenting initial dom-
estication and diffusion of maize. For example, Piperno
and Ranere are seeking evidence of early landscape
modification, and macro- and micro-fossil evidence of
sti
Review TRENDS in Genetics Vol.xx No.xx Monthxxxx 7
DTD 5 ARTICLE IN PRESSBox 4. Ancient DNA documents the development of key dome
Archaeologists have long studied morphological changes in ancient
maize cobs, whereas geneticists studied domestication genes in
extant maize and teosinte. Jaenicke-Despre?s and colleagues [84]
demonstrated the strength of combining parallel research pathways.
Their analysis of archaeological maize cobs from Mexico (Figure Ia)
and the southwestern USA (Figure Ib) showed that aDNA can reveal
the effects of human selection on other traits that occurred in concert
with the selection on themorphological traits directly observable from
the cobs themselves. Direct AMS dating of archaeological cobs
provide a precise time table for the selection of these traits. Building
on previous studies of maize domestication genes, they show that the
DNA from ancient cobs can reveal information about the human
selection influencing parts of the plant that were not preserved in the
archaeological record, such as the stem and kernels. Mexican cobs
from the Ocampo Caves in Tamilaulipas that date from 4000 years ago,early maize in the Balsas River Valley of south central
Mexico* ? the genetic ?ground zero? for initial maize
domestication identified in Doebley?s work. Other archae-
ological efforts are using a variety of markers and
techniques to track and date the diffusion of corn out of
the centre of initial domestication southward through
Central and South America [81,82] and north into the
southwest USA and the rest of North America [83].
Combined analysis of morphology and aDNA of directly
dated archaeological corn cobs from sites in Mexico and
the southwestern USA by Jaenicke-Despre?s et al. [84] has
tracked the timing of selection of three maize domesti-
cation genes at various points of its dispersal from
(a)
(b) Years (c)
Genes 
tb1: teo
pbf: pro
su1: su
1000
2000
3000
4000
Tularo
Bp
Figure I. The analysis of archaeological maize cobs.
* D.R. Piperno, et al. (2004) Environmental and agricultural history in the Central
Balsas Watershed, Mexico: results of preliminary research, presented at the Society
for American Archaeology Meeting, Montreal, Canada.
www.sciencedirect.comcation genes in prehistoric maize
just before maize entered the southwestern United States, already
show the effects of human selection on three genes (tb1, pbf and su1)
that affect plant architecture and the protein and starch composition of
the kernels (Figure Ic). Whereas selection appears to be complete on
the alleles for an unbranched stem and protein composition (within
the limitations of a small sample size), the locus affecting starch
composition showed interesting differences in allelic frequency
between ancient cobs from Mexico and later cobs from Tularosa
Cave in southwestern USA, dating to 1000?2000 years Bp. All Mexican
cobs had the form of starch that now predominates in that region,
producing the softer kernels preferred for tortillas. Although still
retaining some starch diversity, more recent cobs from New Mexico
showed selection for the form of starch eventually found in hard-
kernelled North American cultivars, such as Northern Flint and its
modern hybrid derivatives.the initial center of maize domestication (Box 4). Genetic
studies focusing on the geographical center for the
domestication of various wheat species in the Old World
[37,85], also thought to have arisen from a single center of
origin [86], are consistent with archaeological evidence for
initial wheat domestication [87].
Recent archaeological and genetic research, however,
suggests that multiple domestication events are more
common in plants than originally thought. Rejecting
earlier ?out of Mexico? models for the diffusion of
domesticates into the eastern region of North America,
for example, Smith and colleagues proposed that squash
(Cucurbita pepo) was domesticated independently in the
USA, based on combined archaeobotanical and modern
biogeographic data [87] ? an argument consistent with
genetic evidence that indicates two independent
TRENDS in Genetics 
    
660
730
750
910
analyzed
sinte branched 1
lamin box-binding factor
gary 1
sa cave Ocampo caves
1860 Bp
1870 Bp
2350 Bp
2735 Bp
2750 Bp
4300 Bp
4405 Bp
Bp
Bp
Bp
Bp
domestication events for C. pepo [58,59]. New genetic
evidence for eastern and western Mediterranean centers
of olive domestication [88,89] supports a similar multi-
origins model, based on the morphological analysis of
modern and archaeological olive pits [90]. Genetic
analyses also identified two centers of domestication of
the common bean (Phaseolus) ? one in South America and
another in Mesoamerica [91,92]. Although a
comprehensive AMS radiocarbon analysis of pre-Colum-
bian beans determined when domesticated beans
appeared initially in South America and Mesoamerica
[93], there are no morphological markers (macro or micro)
that can be used to differentiate the beans domesticated in
these two areas.
Multiple domestication events are even more com-
mon in animals. Most domestic animals that have been
Box 5. Genetics and archaeology detect the first global economy
A vibrant ancient Indian Ocean trading network linking Africa, Arabia,
South Asi, and points east can be traced through the genetic and
archaeological study of traded plants and animals. Freeman et al. [154]
have reconstructed, from multiple microsatellite data sets, a gradient
of the genetic influence of zebu cattle (Bos indicus) extending from
India through the Horn of Africa into the interior of that continent
(Figure I), suggesting that zebu were introduced into Africa through an
Indian Ocean corridor rather than overland through Suez [155].
Pictorial representations of humped cattle in Egyptian tomb paintings
[156] indicate that zebu entered the African continent O4000
years ago.
The banana (Musa sp.) is another crop that moved across the ?great
lost corridor of mankind? [157] that linked the east coast of Africa, the
eastern coast of Arabia and the southern coast of Asia. Based on
present day geographical distribution of various banana complexes in
Africa, the banana, a Southeast Asian domesticate, is estimated to
have been introduced into East Africa by at least 3000 years Bp [158].
Direct evidence for the introduction and subsequent diffusion of
bananas in Africa is provided by opal phytoliths recovered from
archaeological sites. Phytoliths of Southeast Asian origin Musa have
been shown to be morphologically distinguishable from Ensete
phytoliths, a member of the Musaceae family indigenous to Africa
[159]. Musa phytoliths have been recovered from archaeological
contexts in Central Africa that are securely dated to w2500 years Bp.
The banana (along with other tropical Southeast Asian root crops such
as yams (Dioscorea sp.) and taro (Colocasia sp.) seems to have formed
an important crop complex that might be linked to major population
increase in humid regions of Central Africa [158].
Crops such as sorghum (Sorghum bicolor), finger millet (Eleusine
coracana) and pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum), which were
probably domesticated on the southern margin of the Sahara
w5000?3000 years ago [87], moved out of Africa in the opposite
direction. Imprints of these grains are found in mud-brick impressions
from sites on the Oman peninsula [160] dating tow4500 years Bp and
in carbonized plant remains at various sites on the Indian subcontinent
[157,161] beginning atw4600 years Bp. Unlike winter-growing wheat
and barley, introduced into the Indian sub-continent from the Near
East sometime earlier, these African crops were pre-adapted to the
Indian summer monsoon growing season and might have helped fuel
a rapid growth of Harappan village communities that supported the
first Indus civilization [161].
Another domesticate involved in this far-flung trading network was
the donkey (Equus asinus asinus). A phylogenetic tree based on
mtDNA control region sequences from donkeys and their relatives
(Figure II) [129,162] confirms an African origin for the domestic
donkey. The use of these animals in overland trade is attested by the
discovery of donkey remains at Tel Brak in northeastern Syria, which is
w4300 years old [163] and at Tal-e Malyan in highland Iran [164],
which isw4800 years old.
Other domesticates engaged in overland trade during this time
included the horse (Equus caballus) ? which combined genetic and
archaeological evidence suggests was domesticated (probably mul-
tiple times) and quickly spread across the Central Asian steppe
w5000?4000 years ago [78,162]. The recovery of bones, dung and
woven fiber from the Bactrian camel (Camelus bactrianus) at Shar-i
Sokhta in Iran suggests that this well-known caravan animal was
domesticated w4500 years ago [165]. Together these studies bear
witness to thriving sea-borne and overland global trading networks
spanning much of the ancient world, which had profound implications
for the course of human history across this broad region.
Review TRENDS in Genetics Vol.xx No.xx Monthxxxx8
DTD 5 ARTICLE IN PRESSFigure I. The origin of Bos indicus. The genetic influence of B. indicus is indicated by de
the Horn of Africa and in Madagascar, whereas a much less marked introgression is c
www.sciencedirect.comgrees of shading. Zebu admixture inmodern African cattle is particularly strong in
lear in the Near East. Reproduced, with permission, from Ref. [154].
inus
inus
s 
. afri
Review TRENDS in Genetics Vol.xx No.xx Monthxxxx 9
DTD 5 ARTICLE IN PRESS94
100
70
E. as
E. as
E. asinus
E. asinu
E. a
E. asinus 
90
98
100
78subjected to genetic analysis seem to have been
domesticated several times. Genetic data have sup-
ported archaeological arguments for multiple indepen-
dent domestication events in some studies but not in
others. Archaeological analysis promises to provide
important resolution on the timing and geographic
location of domesticated events. Analysis of bovine
mtDNA [77], for example, has provided evidence to
help bolster archaeological arguments for an indepen-
dent center of cattle domestication in North Africa [94],
while questioning archaeological arguments for an
independent center of cattle domestication in Europe
(Figure 1) [95]. Recently, a study of modern wild and
domestic pig mtDNA by Larsen et al. [96] found
evidence for at least six different domestication events
across the wide geographic distribution of wild boar.
E. a. africanu
91
58
94
E. kiang
E. kiang
E. kiang
E. kiang (AF 220933)
E. kiang (AF220932)
E. hemionus luteus
E. hemionus kulan (AF220934)
E. hemionus kulan (AF 220935
E. hemionus kulan (AF2209
E. hemionus onager (AF2
100
100
E. ca
0.1
Figure II. A phylogenetic tree based on mtDNA control regions sequences from donkey
two distinct domestication events. The average sequence divergence between these tw
of 27 substitutions (5.64G0.01%). One clade is most closely linked to the Nubian wild
shows affinities to the Somali wild ass (E. asinus somaliensis), currently found near the
University of California Press.
www.sciencedirect.com 
A
fri
ca
n 
w
ild
 a
ss
an
d
do
m
es
tic
 d
on
ke
y
N
ub
ia
n 
wi
ld
a
n
d
om
es
tic
 d
on
ke
y
(cl
ad
e I
)
D
om
es
tic
 d
on
ke
y
(cl
ad
e I
I)
E. a. somaliensis
E. a. somaliensis
E. a. somaliensis So
m
al
i w
ild
 a
ss
98
96
canusParallel archaeological analyses by the same team have
used several different markers to trace at least four
examples of pig domestication in Europe, the Near East
and the Far East [97]. Phylogenetic analyses of goat
and sheep have identified three distinct domestic
lineages in each, suggesting that these species were
domesticated at least three different times [75,98].
Moreover, in sheep and goats there is one major
geographically widespread lineage that probably rep-
resents the initial domestication event and two-to-three
smaller, more restricted lineages that probably rep-
resent later events. Ancient DNA extracted from goat
remains from Iran [99] place these specimens within
this larger lineage of domestic goats, implying a Fertile
Crescent origin for this main lineage, consistent with
long-standing archaeological evidence [100]. There is
d
A
si
at
ic
 w
ild
 a
ss
s
)
36)
20937)
E. caballus
E. caballus
ballus
H
or
se
s and their relatives. Two clades (I and II) of haplotypes are indicated, suggesting
o clades was 15.73G0.61 substitutions (3.29G0.01%) with amaximumdivergence
ass (E. asinus africanus), currently found in northeastern Sudan. The other clade
Red Sea or the Gulf of Aden. Reproduced, with permission, from Ref. [164]q2006
between the molecular clock estimate of wolf?dog diver-
gence and the first appearance of morphological change in
the form of tooth crowding in early dogs, which is felt to be
directly linked to selection for less aggressive behavior in
initial domesticates.
Molecular clocks are better scaled for species diver-
gences that occurred millions or tens of millions of years
ago, not for populations (e.g. domesticates) that diverged
!10 000 years ago. Evidence of unequal mutation rates
among different taxa and different genomes also challenge
the basic assumption of a molecular clock that has a
TRENDS in Genetics 
Horse
Lineage B
Lineage A
Lineage C
0.01
Figure 3. Three paradigms of domestic animal mtDNA diversity: phylogeographic
discontinuity, distribution and dispersal. Neighbor-joining networks of mtDNA
control region sequences from cattle, goat and horse are shown. Cattle haplotypes
fall into two clusters separated by a long internal branch. These clades correspond
alternatively to Bos taurus and Bos indicus origins, are the products of separate
domestications and show strong phylogeographical discontinuity when sampled
appropriately to avoid hybrids. Other large domesticates, such as water buffalo
(Bubalus bubalus) and pig (Sus scrofa), also show multiple origins and strong
geographical structure ? as with cattle primarily on an east?west axis. Goat (Capra
hircus) lineages also partition phylogenetically, into at least four clusters that show
phylogeographical distribution [125] ? with a geographic structure that is less
distinct than that of cattle. One of these goat clusters, lineage A is predominant
numerically, ubiquitous and undoubtedly reflects the primary caprine domesti-
cation process [75]. The other three lineages show some restriction in geographical
distribution, suggesting additional domestications. This pattern of multiple clades
with moderate geographical partitioning, which could alternatively reflect
substantial secondary mixing owing to the portability and tradeablity of small
livestock, is also exhibited in sheep (Ovis aries), dog (Canis familiaris) and chicken
(Gallus gallus) [126,107,127]. Llama (Lama glama), alpaca (Vicugna vicugna) and
asses (Equus asinus) also possess moderately distributed mtDNA clades [128,129].
By contrast, the phylogeography of the horse (Equus caballus) mtDNA is weak [78],
a pattern of dispersal that probably reflects a domestication process that was not
limited in time and space to the same extent as the other species discussed. This
pattern probably reflects the effects of extensive migration on the genetic structure
of this most mobile of animals [130].
Review TRENDS in Genetics Vol.xx No.xx Monthxxxx10
DTD 5 ARTICLE IN PRESSalso some archaeological evidence for an independent
domestication of goats in eastern Pakistan [101] that
might correspond to one of the smaller goat lineages
identified by genetic analysis. New demographic profil-
ing techniques for identifying initial attempts at human
management of sheep and goats are promising for
locating and dating the initial domestication of these
species, both within the Fertile Crescent and elsewhere
[26,27].
However, genetically independent domestication
events are not necessarily culturally, or even biologically,
independent. Perhaps many of the proposed genetically
recognized ?independent? domestication events in animals
represent the movement of a few domestic individuals into
an area, with the genetic signature of the introduced
founders subsequently submerged in the recruitment of
local wild animals. Transport of domestic males into new
regions would not be visible in the mtDNA of their
descendents, for example, nor would insemination from
the wild. As exemplified by the studies of Go?therstro?m et
al. [102], Y-chromosome data are crucial to resolving these
issues (Figure 1).
The application of molecular data to the study of
domesticates has also been helpful in distinguishing
primary domestication events from later or more-
restricted events, and in tracing the diffusion of domesti-
cates (Box 5). This is especially true for animal domesti-
cates, which vary in their degree of phylogenetic
discontinuity and phylogeographical patterning, which,
in turn, has bearing on the speed, direction and herding
strategies used in the diffusion of these domesticates
(Figure 3). Integrating and correlating genetically derived
scenarios with the archaeological record is essential.
Genetic data tracking the movement of domestic dogs
across Asia into the New World [103] and of pigs [96] and
rats [104] in Oceania, for example, offer insights into the
direction and pace of human migration into these regions.
But such genetic scenarios need to be reconciled with the
archaeological records of human dispersal into these areas
[105,106].
Documenting the temporal sequence of domestication
Defining the temporal framework of domestication is an
obvious area of mutual interest, and also an occasional
source of disagreement, between archaeologists and
geneticists. An initial estimate for the origin of domestic
dogs based on molecular data, for example, placed their
divergence from wolves at w135 000 years ago [107], O
100 000 years earlier than the first morphological
evidence for dog domestication based on fossil bones
from Europe and Asia, which were dated to w13 000?
17 000 years ago [108]. Although Wayne and colleagues
have recently qualified this early estimate, they defended
the molecular evidence for an early wolf?dog divergence
by arguing that genetic change, morphological change and
speciation in animals undergoing domestication will occur
at different points in the domestication process [109]. This
is an important point, particularly in animals where
domestication is likely to operate first on behavioral
attributes rather than on morphology. However, it is
difficult to reconcile the substantial gap that exists
www.sciencedirect.comCattle
Bos taurus
Bos indicus
Goat
Lineage Dregular mutation rate [110?114]. Therefore, many geneti-
cists, particularly those focusing on plant domestication,
Review TRENDS in Genetics Vol.xx No.xx Monthxxxx 11
DTD 5 ARTICLE IN PRESSBox 6. The origin and diffusion of cassava
Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz subsp. esculenta) also known as
manioc, tapioca, mandioca and yuca, is a primary calorie source in the
tropics and the sixth most important crop plant worldwide [166].
Recent genetic and archaeological research combined to locate the
origin of this important root crop and trace the direction and pace of its
diffusion out of its center of origin. Olsen and Shaal?s analysis of three
low-copy nuclear genes of populations of cultivated cassava and
possible progenitor species (M. esculenta ssp. flabellifolia (Pohl)
Ciferri and M. pruinosa Pohl) identified the former wild taxon as the
sole progenitor of cassava, which probably developed in a single
domestication event [38,39]. This result was supported by data from
microsatellites from the same populations (Figure I).
Analysis of starch grains from modern cassava and its wildrecommend against using the molecular clock to measure
the short timescales involved in domestication. Instead
they advocate using directly dated archaeological evidence
for domestication to anchor and ground-truth genetic
evidence for the origin and dispersal of domesticates with
the archaeological record (Box 6) [115,116]. Nonetheless,
genetic data can resolve questions of relative timing, for
example, by rejecting the idea that tetraploid cotton only
formed after humans brought A-genome cotton to the
Americas [46].
The promise of ancient DNA
The utility of genetic studies of modern domesticates in
tracing initial domestication and dispersal can be
progenitor by Piperno show clear morphological differences that can
300 6000
= M. pruinosa
=
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amazon riv
er
M. esculenta ssp. flabellifolia
Km
MT
ROAC
Figure I. The origin of cassava. Populations of Manihot esculenta ssp. flabellifolia that
haplotypes for G3pdh and at least one other of the three nuclear genes examined (bla
with vertical bars) [172]. These populations cluster along the southern border of the A
origin of cassava. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [172] q2006 University of C
www.sciencedirect.comidentify fossilized starch granules extracted from stone tools recov-
ered from archaeological sites [167]. Archaeological evidence for the
use of cassava from the poorly studied Amazon Basin is currently
lacking. Cassava starches, however, have recently been extracted from
grinding stones recovered from sites in the Porce and Cauca Valleys of
North Central Columbia that arew7500 years old and from Aguadulce
Shelter in Panama, which isw6900 years old [168]. In addition, pollen
grains likely to be from cultivated cassava have been found in
archaeological contexts on the Gulf Coast of Mexico and Belize dating
tow5800 years Bp and 4500 years Bp, respectively [169,170]. Cassava
starch granules have also recently been recovered from processing
tools in Puerto Rico dating from 3300?2900 years ago [171]. Together
these suggest an early origin for cassava and its rapid diffusion out ofconfounded by thousands of years of selective breeding,
hybridization and introgression that separate modern
domesticates from their progenitors. However, aDNA
holds promise for opening a direct window on these past
events. Because DNA encased in animal bone is likely to
be preserved and high-copy mtDNA in animals is suitable
for tracking divergence over shallow timescales, aDNA
has been more widely used in the study of animal
domestication than in plants. It has been useful in tracing
the dispersal of primary domestic species such as cattle
[77], horses [78], dogs [103], goats [99] and pigs [117] out of
the areas of their initial domestication. But it has proven
difficult to extract and replicate aDNA from the bones of
animals that date to the initial phases of domestication,
the Amazon Basin throughout the Neotropics and the Caribbean.
GO
TO
Atlantic ocean
contain either cassava G3pdh haplotypes (yellow with black outline), or cassava
ck), and populations that group with cassava in the microsatellite analysis (those
mazon Basin, strongly suggesting that this region is likely to be the center for the
alifornia Press.
particularly those from early archaeological contexts in
the arid Near East, which served as a hearth of
domestication for most of the major livestock species.
The application of aDNA to the study of archae-
ological plant remains is more challenging, owing to
preservation issues and because low-copy nuclear DNA
is more useful in the study of plant domestication.
Despite this, aDNA has been recovered from dried plant
remains from favorable archaeological contexts and has
been used to track genetic responses of plants at
various points along the pathway to domestication
[118,119]. The research of Jaenicke-Despre?s et al. [84]
on aDNA in maize is a model for the integration of
genetic and archaeological research in tracking the
direction and timing of the dispersal and evolution of a
major crop plant (Box 4). Another study of ancient
chloroplast DNA extracted from New World plant
remains, dating from O9000 years ago, has documented
the dispersal of morphologically domesticated bottle
gourd into the New World from Asia (Box 7) [120].
Such studies will be required to track the timing
and function of genetic change in plants and
animals undergoing domestication and to correlate
these changes with the appearance of associated
behavioral and morphological markers in the
archaeological record.
Concluding remarks ? the promise of increasing
collaboration
It is becoming increasingly clear that collaborative
research efforts that integrate genetics and archaeology
hold promise for advancing our understanding of both the
domestication of individual species and the origins of
agriculture. The need for collaboration between geneti-
cists and archaeologists reflects a shared recognition that
the process of domestication is complex and multifaceted.
It involves a long sequence of mutualistic interactions
between human societies and various target species and,
as a result, relevant information takes a variety of
different forms at different points along the trajectory
of domestication.
An initial hurdle for archaeologists and geneticists is to
recognize and acknowledge that not all data pertaining to
the domestication process resides within the boundaries of
their own discipline. Once they begin to consider the
complete spectrum of information that exists, the true
cross-illumination potential of genetic and archaeological
data will be clear and will result in more-comprehensive
and accurate characterizations of domestication. We have
discussed several recent and ongoing collaborative pro-
jects involving archaeologists and geneticists that address
multiple data sets in an effort to understand domesti-
cation. Such integrated efforts represent the leading edge
Box 7. Gourds and dogs enter the New World
The recent integration of archaeological and genetic research on both
the bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria) and the dog (Canis familiaris)
has substantially clarified our basic understanding of the initial
were identical to the modern Asian reference group, indicating that
domesticated bottle gourds were carried to the New World during the
late Pleistocene from Asia, not from Africa. Although it is possible that
Review TRENDS in Genetics Vol.xx No.xx Monthxxxx12
DTD 5 ARTICLE IN PRESSdomestication of these two early domesticates, their late Pleistocene
radiation from Asia across Beringia into the New World and their
subsequent diffusion throughout the Americas.
The bottle gourd has long represented an African enigma for
researchers interested in the domestication of New World plants.
Indigenous to Africa and long valued as a container crop rather than as
a food source, the bottle gourd has consistently been recovered in
archaeological association with the earliest evidence of New World
domesticated plants in many regions of the Americas. Given the
genetic similarity between modern African and New World land races
of domesticated bottle gourd and the absence, until recently, of any
well-documented wild bottle gourd populations that could be
employed to establish the wild versus domesticated status of
archaeologically recovered rind and seed specimens, the prevalent
default consensus has been that L. siceraria was carried by ocean
currents as a wild plant from Africa to South America.
A recent study combining genetic and archaeological lines of
evidence, however, has overturned this wild from Africa consensus.
Erickson et al. [120] analyzed modern Asian and African land races of
bottle gourd, along with 12 directly dated rind fragments recovered
from archaeological sites in northeast America, Mexico and South
America (Figure Ia). Comparative morphological analysis showed that
the archaeological rinds represented domesticated plants (the rinds
were significantly thicker than those of recently described wild L.
siceraria fruits from Zimbabwe), and direct AMS radiocarbon dates
indicated that bottle gourd was present as a domesticated plant in the
Americas by 10 000 years ago.
Ancient DNA analysis of the archaeological rind fragments yielded
even more surprising results. Three DNA sequence polymorphisms
that consistently distinguished between modern African and Asian
landraces of bottle gourd were identified within the chloroplast
genome: two separate 5-bp insertion deletions (InDel) and a G/A
transition SNP [120]. The nine archaeological rind fragments pre-
dating the arrival of Europeans from which DNA could be amplified
www.sciencedirect.comthe bottle gourd could have been carried from Asia to the Americas by
the north Pacific current, it is more probable that, along with the dog,
this early domesticate accompanied Paleoindian colonists as they
crossed Beringia into the New World.
In a parallel genetic study, Leonard et al. [103,109] resolved the long-
standing question of whether the dog was independently domesti-
cated from the gray wolf (Canis lupus) in both Eurasia and the
Americas. Analysis of a 425-bp portion of the mtDNA control region
obtained from a total of 24 pre-European contact dog skeletal
elements recovered from archaeological sites in Alaska, Mexico,
Peru and Bolivia, when compared with sequences from 259 modern
wolves (30 localities worldwide) and 140 modern dogs (67 diverse
breeds), indicated that all ancient and modern domesticated dogs
worldwide share a common origin from Old World gray wolves.
Further analysis (Figure Ib) shows that ancient dogs from the New
World are derived from four distinct haplotypes of modern dogs from
throughout the world, suggesting that at least five founding dog
lineages invaded North America with humans as they colonized the
New World.
This, in turn, suggests there was a substantial amount of divergence
in ancient Eurasian domestic dog lineages before this migration. The
earliest archaeological evidence for domesticated dogs in the Old
World, dating to 13 000?17 000 years Bp comes from several widely
dispersed sites extending from the Near East across eastern Europe,
and raises questions as to exactly when and in what location(s) the
gray wolf was first domesticated. Although the earliest domesticated
bottle gourd in the Old World dates to 8000?9000 years Bp in China
and Japan, it is reasonable to estimate that it was initially
domesticated in the same timeframe as the dog (w13 000 years Bp
or earlier), given its arrival in central Mexico by 10 000 years Bp.
Interestingly, both the dog and the bottle gourd, which stand out as
the earliest species to have been brought under domestication, are
similar in that they are both utilitarian in nature, valuedmostly for uses
other than as a source of food.
Review TRENDS in Genetics Vol.xx No.xx Monthxxxx 13
DTD 5 ARTICLE IN PRESS(a)
Mammoth cave
2700 Bp Cloudsplitter
2700 Bp
Windover
8100 Bp
El Coyote
Cave 1000 Bp
Coxcatl?n cave
7200 Bp, 200 Bp
Guil? Naquitz
10 000 ? 9000 Bpof research in this rapidly expanding area of
scientific inquiry.
References
1 Zeder, M.A. et al. (2006) Documenting Domestication: New Genetic
and Archaeological Paradigms, University of California Press
2 Darlington, C. (1956) Chromosome botany, Allen and Unwin
3 Darlington, C. (1969) The Evolution of Man and Society, Allen and
Unwin
4 Harlan, J. and de Wet, J. (1965) Some thoughts about weeds. Econ.
Bot. 19, 16?24
5 Zohary, D. (1969) The progenitors of wheat and barley in relation to
domestication and agricultural dispersal in the Old World. In The
Domestication and Exploitation of Plants and Animals (Ucko, P. and
Dimbleby, G., eds), pp. 47?66, Duckworth
6 Zohary, D. (1984) Modes of evolution in plants under domestication.
In Plant Biosystematics (Grant, W., ed.), pp. 579?596, Academic
Press
7 Harlan, J. et al. (1973) Comparative evolution of cereals. Evolution
Int. J. Org. Evolution 27, 311?325
8 de Wet, J. and Harlan, J. (1975) Weeds and domesticates. Evolution
in the man-made habitat. Econ. Bot. 29, 99?107
9 Heiser, C. (1988) Aspects of unconscious selection and the evolution of
domesticated plants. Euphytica 37, 77?85
10 Piperno, D.R. et al. (2004) Processing of wild cereal grains in the
Upper Paleolithic revealed by starch grain analysis. Nature 407,
894?897
N
Ancon
900 Bp
Quebrada Jagu?y
8400 Bp
Figure I. The domestication of gourds and dogs in the New World. (a) Archaeological s
minimum spanning network in which haplotypes occupy nodes, and each branch re
World (dark gray from Alaska, light gray from Latin America) are derived from four dis
D3, D9, D26), with an additional lineage (not shown) derived from haplotype D6. Repr
www.sciencedirect.comD2
D23
D3 D41
AF33 
8783
D5
AF33 
8786
D12
D15
D16
D17
AF33 
8784
D20
D26 
D14
 
D18 
 
D40
 
(b)
Clade a
D42
AF33
8777
D32
D22
D35
D25
D11
D9
D4
D37 D36 D31
D29
D33
D27D28
D30
D38
D111 Piperno, D.R. et al. (2002) Evidence for the control of phytolith
formation in Cucurbita fruits by the hard rind (Hr) genetic locus:
archaeological and ecological implications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.
S. A. 99, 10923?10928
12 Clutton-Brock, J. (1999) Domesticated Animals, 2nd edn, British
Museum of Natural History
13 Hemmer, H. (1990) Domestication: The Decline of Environmental
Appreciation, Cambridge University
14 Kruska, D. (1988) Mammalian domestication and its effect on
brain structure and behavior. In Intelligence and Evolutionary
Biology (Jerison, H.J. and Jerison, I., eds), pp. 211?250, Springer-
Verlag
15 Moray, D. (1992) Size, shape, and development in the evolution of the
domestic dog. J. Archaeol. Sci. 19, 181?204
16 Ko?hler-Rollefson, E. (1989) Changes in goat exploitation at ?Ain
Ghazal between the Early and Late Neolithic: a metrical analysis.
Pale?orient 15, 141?146
17 Ervynck, A. and Dobney, K. (1999) Lining up on the M1: a tooth
defect as a bio-indicator for environment and husbandry in ancient
pigs. Environmental Archaeology: The Journal of Human Palaeoe-
cology 4, 1?8
18 Wheeler Pires-Ferreira, J.C. et al. (1976) Preceramic animal
utilization in the Central Peruvian Andes. Science 194,
483?490
19 Mashkour, M. et al. (2005) Long distance movement of sheep and of
Bakhtiari nomads tracked with intra-tooth variations of stable
isotopes (13C and 18O). In Health and Diet in Past Animal
Populations: Current Research and Future Directions (Davies, J.
et al., eds), pp. 113?122, Oxbow Books
ites and the age of bottle gourd specimens analyzed by Erickson et al. [120]. (b) A
presents a single nucleotide substitution shows that ancient dogs from the New
tinct haplotypes of modern dogs from throughout the world (shown in white) (D2,
oduced, with permission, from Ref. [109] q2006 University of California Press.
Review TRENDS in Genetics Vol.xx No.xx Monthxxxx14
DTD 5 ARTICLE IN PRESS20 Wing, E.S. (1972) Utilization of animal resources in the Peruvian
Andes. In Andes 4: Excavations at Kotosh, Peru, 1963 and 1964
(Seiichi, I. and Terada, K., eds), pp. 327?351, University of Tokyo
Press
21 Bibikova, V.I. (1986) Appendix 3. On the history of horse domesti-
cation in south-east Europe. In Dereivka: A settlement and Cemetery
of Copper Age Horse Keepers on the Middle Dnieper (BAR
International Series, Vol. 287) (D. Telegin, ed.), pp. 163?182, BAR
22 Olsen, S.J. (2003) The exploitation of horses at Botai, Kazakhstan. In
Prehistoric Steppe Adaptation and the Horse (Levine, M., et al. eds),
pp. 83?104, McDonald Institute Monographs
23 Shaffer, V.M. and Reed, C.A. (1972) The co-evolution of social
behavior and cranial morphology in sheep and goats (Bovidae,
Caprini). Fieldiana Zoology, 61, Field Museum of Natural History
24 Zeder, M.A. (2001) A metrical analysis of a collection of modern goats
(Capra hircus aegargus and Capra hircus hircus) from Iran and Iraq:
implications for the study of caprine domestication. J. Archaeol. Sci.
28, 61?79
25 Zeder, M.A. Reconciling rates of long bone fusion and tooth eruption
and wear in sheep (Ovis) and goat (Capra). In Ageing and Sexing
Animals from Archaeological Sites, (Ruscillo, D., ed.) Oxbow Press
(in press)
26 Zeder, M.A. (2006) A critical assessment of initial domestication in
goats (Capra hircus). In Documenting Domestication: New Genetic
and Archaeological Paradigms (Zeder, M.A. et al., eds), pp. 181?208,
University of California Press
27 Zeder, M.A. (2005) A view from the Zagros: new perspectives on
livestock domestication in the Fertile Crescent. In New Methods and
the First Steps of Animal Domestications (Vigne, J.-D. et al., eds), pp.
125?147, Oxbow Press
28 Zeder, M.A. and Hesse, B. (2000) The initial domestication of goats
(Capra hircus) in the Zagros Mountains 10 000 years ago. Science
287, 2254?2257
29 Loftus, R.T. et al. (1994) Evidence for two independent domestica-
tions of cattle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 2757?2761
30 Verkaar, E.L. et al. (2004) Maternal and paternal lineages in cross-
breeding bovine species. Has wisent a hybrid origin? Mol. Biol. Evol.
21, 1165?1170
31 MacHugh, D.E. et al. (1997) Microsatellite DNA variation and the
evolution, domestication and phylogeography of taurine and zebu
cattle (Bos taurus and Bos indicus). Genetics 146, 1071?1086
32 Kadwell, M. et al. (2001) Genetic analysis reveals the wild ancestors
of the llama and alpaca. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 268,
2575?2584
33 Parker, H.G. et al. (2004) Genetic structure of the purebred domestic
dog. Science 304, 1160?1164
34 Wolfe, K.H. et al. (1987) Rates of nucleotide substitution vary greatly
among plant mitochondrial, chloroplast, and nuclear DNAs. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 9054?9058
35 Coulibaly, S. et al. (2002) AFLP analysis of the phenetic organization
and genetic diversity of Vigna unguiculata L.Walp. reveals extensive
gene flow between wild and domesticated types. Theor. Appl. Genet.
104, 358?366
36 Friesen, N. and Blattner, F.R. (2000) RAPD analysis reveals
geographic differentiations within Allium schoenoprasum L. (Allia-
ceae). Plant Biol. 2, 297?305
37 Ozkan, H. et al. (2002) AFLP analysis of a collection of tetraploid
wheats indicates the origin of emmer and hard wheat domestication
in southeast Turkey. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 1797?1801
38 Olsen, K.M. and Schaal, B.A. (1999) Evidence on the origin of
cassava: phylogeography of Manihot esculenta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U. S. A. 96, 5586?5591
39 Olsen, K.M. and Schaal, B.A. (2001) Microsatellite variation in
cassava and its wild relatives: further evidence for a southern
Amazonian origin of domestication. Am. J. Bot. 88, 131?142
40 Wendel, J.F. (2000) Genome evolution in polyploids. Plant Mol. Biol.
42, 225?249
41 Rieseberg, L.H. (2001) Polyploid evolution: keeping the peace at
genomic reunions. Curr. Biol. 11, R925?R92842 Atkinson, R.G. et al. (1997) The allopolyploid origin of kiwifruit,
Actinidia deliciosa (Actinidiaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 205, 111?124
www.sciencedirect.com43 Emshwiller, E. and Doyle, J.J. (1998) Origins of domestication and
polyploidy in oca (Oxalis tuberosa: Oxalidaceae): nrDNA ITS data.
Am. J. Bot. 85, 975?985
44 Emshwiller, E. and Doyle, J.J. (2002) Origins of domestication and
polyploidy in oca (Oxalis tuberosa: Oxalidaceae). 2. Chloroplast-
expressed glutamine synthetase data. Am. J. Bot. 89, 1042?1056
45 Buteler, M.I. et al. (1999) Sequence characterization of microsatel-
lites in diploid and polyploid Ipomoea. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99,
123?132
46 Wendel, J.F. and Cronn, R.C. (2003) Polyploidy and the evolutionary
history of cotton. Advances in Agronomy 78, 139?186
47 Ingram, A.L. and Doyle, J.J. (2003) The origin and evolution of
Eragrostis tef (Poaceae) and related polyploids: evidence from
nuclear waxy and plastid rps16. Am. J. Bot. 90, 116?122
48 Song, K. et al. (1995) Rapid genome change in synthetic polyploids of
Brassica and its implications for polyploid evolution. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 7719?7723
49 Adams, K.L. and Wendel, J.F. (2004) Exploring the genomic
mysteries of polyploidy in cotton. Biological Journal of the Linnaean
Society 82, 573?581
50 Feldman, M. and Millet, E. (2001) The contribution of the discovery
of wild emmer to an understanding of wheat evolution and
domestication and to wheat improvement. Isr. J. Plant Sci.
49(Suppl.), S25?S35
51 Rieseberg, L.H. and Wendel, J.F. (1993) Introgression and its
consequences in plants. In Hybrid Zones and The Evolutionary
Process (Harrison, R.G., ed.), pp. 70?109, Oxford
52 Rieseberg, L.H. and Ellstrand, N.C. (1993) What can molecular and
morphological markers tell us about plant hybridization? Crit. Rev.
Plant Sci. 12, 213?241
53 Seiler, G.J. and Rieseberg, L.H. (1997) Systematics, origin, and
germplasm resources of the wild and domesticated sunflower. In
Sunflower Technology and Production, Agronomy Monograph (n 35)
pp. 21?65, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of
America, Soil Science Society of America
54 Wendel, J.F. et al. (1989) Genetic diversity, introgression, and
independent domestication of old world cultivated cottons. Am.
J. Bot. 76, 1795?1806
55 Doebley, J. (1990) Molecular evidence for gene flow among Zea
species ? genes transformed into maize through genetic engineering
could be transferred to its wild relatives, the teosintes. Bioscience 40,
443?448
56 Matsuoka, Y. et al. (2002) A single domestication for maize shown by
multilocus microsatellite genotyping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
99, 6080?6084
57 Beebe, S. et al. (1997) Wild-weed-crop complexes of common bean
(Phaseolus vulgaris L, Fabaceae) in the Andes of Peru and Colombia,
and their implications for conservation and breeding. Genet. Resour.
Crop Evol. 44, 73?91
58 Decker-Walters, D.S. et al. (1993) Isozymic characterization of wild
populations of Cucurbita pepo. Journal of Ethnobiology 13, 55?72
59 Decker-Walters, D.S. et al. (2002) Diversity in free-living populations
of Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae) as assessed by random amplified
polymorphic DNA. Syst. Bot. 27, 19?28
60 Papa, R. and Gepts, P. (2003) Asymmetry of gene flow and differential
geographical structure of molecular diversity in wild and domesti-
cated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Mesoamerica.
Theor. Appl. Genet. 106, 239?250
61 Ellstrand, N.C. et al. (1999) Gene flow and introgression from
domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.
30, 539?563
62 Wilkinson, M.J. et al. (2000) A direct regional scale estimate of
transgene movement from genetically modified oilseed rape to its
wild progenitors. Mol. Ecol. 9, 983?991
63 Paterson, A.H. (2002) What has QTL mapping taught us about plant
domestication? New Phytol. 154, 591?608
64 Doebley, J. et al. (1995) Teosinte branched1 and the origin of maize:
Evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance. Genetics 141,
333?346
65 Doebley, J. et al. (1995) Suppressor of sessile spikelets1 (Sos1): a
dominant mutant affecting inflorescence development in maize. Am.
J. Bot. 82, 571?577
Review TRENDS in Genetics Vol.xx No.xx Monthxxxx 15
DTD 5 ARTICLE IN PRESS66 Wang, H. et al. (2005) The origin of the naked grains of maize. Nature
436, 714?719
67 Dorweiler, J.E. and Doebley, J. (1997) Developmental analysis of
teosinte glume architecture1: a key locus in the evolution of maize
(Poaceae). Am. J. Bot. 84, 1313?1322
68 Olsen, K. and Purugganan, M.D. (2002) Molecular evidence on the
origin and evolution of glutinous rice. Genetics 162, 941?950
69 Frary, A. et al. (2000) fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the
evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 289, 85?88
70 Purugganan, M.D. et al. (2000) Variation and Selection at the
CAULIFLOWER floral homeotic gene accompanying the evolution of
domesticated Brassica oleracea. Genetics 155, 855?862
71 Koinange, E.M.K. et al. (1996) Genetic control of the domestication
syndrome in common bean. Crop Sci. 36, 1037?1045
72 Andersson, L. and Georges, M. (2004) Domestic-animal genomics:
deciphering the genetics of complex traits. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5,
202?212
73 Hiendleder, S. et al. (2002) Molecular analysis of wild and domestic
sheep questions current nomenclature and provides evidence for
domestication from two different subspecies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B.
Biol. Sci. 269, 893?904
74 Pedrosa, S. et al. (2005) Evidence of three maternal lineages in Near
Eastern sheep supporting multiple domestication events. Proc Biol
Sci 272, 2211?2217
75 Luikart, G. et al. (2001) Multiple maternal origins and weak
phylogeographic structure in domestic goats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U. S. A. 98, 5927?5932
76 Doebley, J. (2001) George Beadle?s other hypothesis: one-gene, one-
trait. Genetics 158, 487?493
77 Troy, C.S. et al. (2001) Genetic evidence for Near-Eastern origins of
European cattle. Nature 410, 1088?1091
78 Vila`, C. et al. (2001) Widespread origins of domestic horse lineages.
Science 291, 474?477
79 Bruno, M. (2006) A morphological approach to documenting the
domestication of Chenopodium in the Andes. In Documenting
Domestication: New Genetic and Archaeological Paradigms
(Zeder, M.A. et al., eds), pp. 34?45, University of California Press
80 Mengoni-Gonalons, G. and Yaccobacio, H. (2006) The domestication
of South American camelids: A view from the South-Central Andes.
In Documenting Domestication: New Genetic and Archaeological
Paradigms (Zeder, M.A. et al. eds), pp. 228?224 University of
California Press
81 Pearsall, D. et al. (2003) Identifying maize in neotropical sediments
and soils using cob pytoliths. J. Archaeol. Sci. 30, 611?627
82 Thompson, R. (2006) Tracing the diffusion of maize into South
America through phytolith analysis of food residues. In Documenting
Domestication: New Genetic and Archaeological Paradigms
(Zeder, M.A. et al., eds), pp. 82?96, University of California Press
83 Vierra, B., ed. (2005) Current Perspectives on the Late Archaic across
the Borderlands, University of Texas Press
84 Jaenicke-Despre?s, V. et al. (2003) Early allelic selection in maize as
revealed by ancient DNA. Science 302, 1206?1208
85 Heun, M. et al. (1997) Site of einkorn wheat domestication identified
by DNA fingerprinting. Science 278, 1312?1314
86 Zohary, D. (1996) The mode of domestication of the founder crops of
Southwest Asian agriculture. In The Origins and Spread of
Agriculture and Pastoralism in Eurasia (Harris, D.R., ed.), pp.
142?158, Smithsonian Institution Press
87 Smith, B.D. (1998) The emergence of agriculture, W.H. Freeman
88 Besnard, G. et al. (2001a) Genetic relationships in the olive (Olea
europaea L.) reflects multilocal selection of cultivars. Theor. Appl.
Genet. 102, 251?258
89 Besnard, G. et al. (2001b) Olive domestication from structure of
oleasters and cultivars using RAPDs andmitochondrial RFLP. Genet.
Sel. Evol. 33 (Suppl. 1), S251?S268
90 Terral, J-F. et al. (2004) Historicical biogeography of olive domesti-
cation (Olea europaea L.) as revealed by geometrical morphometry
applied to biological and archaeological material. J. Biogeogr. 31,
63?77
91 Gepts, P. et al. (1986) Phaseolin protein variability in wild forms and
landraces of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) ? evidence for
multiple centers of domestication. Econ. Bot. 40, 451?468
www.sciencedirect.com92 Gepts, P. (1996) Origin and evolution of cultivated Phaseolus species.
In Advances in Legume Systematics, Part 8; Legumes of Economic
Importance (Pickersgill, B. and Lock, J.M., eds), pp. 65?74, Royal
Botanical Gardens
93 Kaplan, L. and Lynch, T.F. (1999) Phaseolus (Fabaceae) in
archaeology: AMS radiocarbon dates and their significance for pre-
Colombian agriculture. Econ. Bot. 53, 261?272
94 Gautier, A. (1984) Archaeozoology of the Bir Kiseiba region, Eastern
Sahara. In Cattle Keepers of the Eastern Sahara (Wendorf, F. et al.,
eds), pp. 49?72, Southern Methodist University
95 Bo?ko?nyi, S. (1994) The History of Domestic Animals in Central and
Eastern Europe, Akade?miai Kiado?
96 Larson, G. et al. (2005) World wide phylogeny of wild boar reveals
multiple centers of pig domestication. Science 307, 1618?1621
97 Albarella, U. et al. (2006) The domestication of the pig (Sus scrofa):
new challenges and approaches. In Documenting Domestication:
New Genetic and Archaeological Paradigms (Zeder, M.A. et al., eds),
pp. 209?227, University of California Press
98 Bruford, M. and Townsend, S.J. (2006) Mitochondrial DNA diversity
in modern sheep: implications for domestication. In Documenting
Domestication: New Genetic and Archaeological Paradigms
(Zeder, M.A. et al., eds), pp. 307?317, University of California Press
99 Ferna?ndez, H. et al. (2005) Assessing the origin and diffusion of
domestic goats using ancient DNA. In New Methods and the First
steps of Animal Domestications, (Vigne, J.D. et al., eds), pp. 50?54,
Oxbow Press
100 Hole, F. et al. (1969) Prehistory and human ecology on the Deh Luran
Plain. Memoirs of the Museum of Anthropology, The University of
Michigan Press
101 Meadow, R.H. (1993) Animal domestication in the Middle East: a
revised view from the Eastern Margin. In Harappan Civilization
(2nd edition) (Possehl, G., ed.), pp. 295?320, Oxford & IBH
102 Go?therstro?m, A. (2005) Cattle domestication in the Near East was
followed by hybridization with aurochs bulls in Europe. Proc Biol Sci
22, 2345?2350
103 Leonard, J.A. et al. (2002) Ancient DNA evidence for OldWorld origin
of New World dogs. Science 298, 1613?1616
104 Matisoo-Smith, E. and Reynolds, J.H. (2004) Origins and dispersal of
the Pacific peoples: evidence from mtDNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.
S. A. 101, 9167?9172
105 Bellwood, P. and White, P. (2005) Domesticated pigs in Eastern
Indonesia. Science 309, 381
106 Larson, G. et al. (2004) Response to Bellwood and White. Science 309,
381
107 Vila`, C. et al. (1997) Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog.
Science 276, 1687?1689
108 Sablin, M.V. and Khlopachev, G.A. (2002) The earliest ice age dogs:
evidence from Eliseevichi. Curr. Anthropol. 43, 795?799
109 Wayne, R. et al. (2006) Genetic analysis of dog domestication. In
Documenting Domestication: New Genetic and Archaeological
Paradigms (Zeder, M.A. et al., eds), pp. 279?293, University of
California Press
110 Dobney, K. and Larson, G. DNA and animal domestication: more
windows on an elusive process. J. Zool. (in press)
111 Graur, D. and Martin, W. (2004) Reading the entrails of chickens:
molecular timescales of evolution and the illusion of precision. Trends
Genet. 20, 80?86
112 Gaut, B.S. (1998) Molecular clocks and nucleotide substitution rates
in higher plants. In Evolutionary biology (Vol. 30) (Hecht, M.K. et al.,
eds), pp. 93?120, Plenum Press
113 Ho, S.Y. et al. (2005) Time dependency of molecular rate estimates
and systematic overestimation of recent divergence times. Mol. Biol.
Evol. 22, 1561?1568
114 Simon, Y.W. Ho and Larson, G. Molecular clocks: when times are
a-changin?. Trends Genet. (in press)
115 Emshwiller, E. (2006) Genetic data and plant domestication. In
Documenting Domestication: New Genetic and Archaeological
Paradigms (Zeder, M.A. et al., eds), pp. 99?122, University of
California Press
116 Bradley, D. (2006) Reading animal genetic texts. In Documenting
Domestication: New Genetic and Archaeological Paradigms
(Zeder, M.A. et al., eds), pp. 273?278, University of California Press
Review TRENDS in Genetics Vol.xx No.xx Monthxxxx16
DTD 5 ARTICLE IN PRESS117 Watanobe, T. et al. (2002) Prehistoric introduction of domestic pigs
onto the Okinawa islands: ancient mitochondrial DNA evidence.
J. Mol. Evol. 52, 281?289
118 Brown, T.A. (1999) How ancient DNA may help in understanding the
origin and spread of agriculture. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol.
Sci. 354, 89?97
119 Jones, M. and Brown, T. (2000) Agricultural origins: the evidence of
modern and ancient DNA. Holocene 10, 769?776
120 Erickson, D.L. et al. (2005) An Asian origin for a 10 000 year old
domesticated plant in the Americas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
102, 18315?18320
121 Cymbron, T. et al. (1999) Mitochondrial sequence variation suggests
an African influence in Portuguese cattle. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol.
Sci. 266, 597?604
122 Mannen, H. et al. (1998) Mitochondrial DNAvariation and evolution
of Japanese black cattle (Bos taurus). Genetics 150, 1169?1175
123 Emshwiller, E. (2002) Ploidy levels among species in the ?Oxalis
tuberosa alliance? as inferred by flow cytometry. Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 89,
741?753
124 Emshwiller, E. (2006) Origins of polyploid crops: the example of the
octoploid tuber crop Oxalis tuberosa. In Documenting Domestication:
New Genetic and Archaeological Paradigms (Zeder, M.A. et al., eds),
pp. 153?168, University of California Press
125 Chen, S-Y. et al. (2005) Mitochondrial diversity and phylogeographic
structure of Chinese domestic goats. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 37,
804?814
126 Pedrosa, S. et al. (2005) Evidence of three maternal lineages in Near
Eastern sheep supporting multiple domestication events. Proc Biol
Sci 272, 2211?2217
127 Liu, Y.P. et al. Multiple maternal origins of chickens: out of the Asian
jungles. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. (in press)
128 Wheeler, J. et al. (2006) Genetic analysis of the origins of domestic
South American camelids. In Documenting Domestication: New
Genetic and Archaeological Paradigms (Zeder, M.A. et al., eds), pp.
331?343, University of California Press
129 Beja-Pereira, A. et al. (2004) African origins of the domestic donkey.
Science 304, 1781
130 Jansen, T. et al. (2002) Mitochondrial DNA and the origins of the
domestic horse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 10905?10910
131 Doebley, J. (2004) The genetics of maize evolution. Annu. Rev. Genet.
38, 37?59
132 White, S.E. and Doebley, J. (1999) The molecular evolution of
terminal ear1, a regulatory gene in the genus Zea. Genetics 153,
1455?1462
133 Doebley, J. et al. (1994) Inheritance of kernel weight in two maize-
teosinte hybrid populations: Implications for crop evolution.
J. Hered. 85, 191?195
134 Cong, B. et al. (2002) Natural alleles at a tomato fruit size
quantitative trait locus differ by heterochronic regulatory mutations.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 13606?13611
135 Poncet, V. et al. (2002) Comparative analysis of QTLs affecting
domestication traits between two domesticated x wild pearl millet
(Pennisetum glaucum L., Poaceae) crosses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104,
965?975
136 Weeden, N.F. et al. (2002) Genetic analysis of pod dehiscence in pea
(Pisum sativum L.). Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 7, 657?663
137 Paterson, A.H. et al. (1995) Convergent domestication of cereal crops
by independent mutations at corresponding genetic loci. Science 269,
1714?1718
138 Burke, J.M. et al. (2002) The potential for gene flow between
cultivated and wild sunflower (Helianthus annuus) in the United
States. Am. J. Bot. 89, 1550?1552
139 Gaut, B.S. and Clegg, M.T. (1993) Nucleotide polymorphism in the
Adh1 locus of pearl-millet (Pennisetum glaucum) (Poaceae). Genetics
135, 1091?1097
140 Iqbal, M.J. et al. (2001) A genetic bottleneck in the ?evolution under
domestication? of upland cotton Gossypium hirsutum L. examined
using DNA fingerprinting. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103, 547?554
141 Ortiz, R. and Huaman, Z. (2001) Allozyme polymorphisms in
tetraploid potato gene pools and the effect on human selection.
Theor. Appl. Genet. 103, 792?796
www.sciencedirect.com142 Eyre-Walker, A. et al. (1998) Investigation of the bottleneck leading
to the domestication of maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95,
4441?4446
143 Hilton, H. and Gaut, B.S. (1998) Speciation and domestication in
maize and its wild relatives: evidence from the globulin-1 gene.
Genetics 150, 863?872
144 Tenaillon, M.I. et al. (2001) Patterns of DNA sequence polymorphism
along chromosome 1 of maize (Zea mays ssp mays L.). Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 9161?9166
145 Whitt, S.R. et al. (2002) Genetic diversity and selection in the maize
starch pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 12959?12962
146 Anthony, F. et al. (2002) The origin of cultivated Coffea arabica L.
varieties revealed by AFLP and SSR markers. Theor. Appl. Genet.
104, 894?900
147 Wang, R.L. et al. (1999) The limits of selection during maize
domestication. Nature 398, 236?239
148 Wang, R.L. et al. (2001) Correction: the limits of selection during
maize domestication. Nature 410, 718?718
149 Beja-Pereira, A. et al. (2003) Gene-culture coevolution between cattle
milk protein genes and human lactase genes. Nat. Genet. 35, 311?313
150 Doebley, J. (1990) Molecular evidence and the evolution of maize.
Econ. Bot. 44, 6?27
151 Piperno, D.R. and Flannery, K.V. (2001) The earliest archaeological
maize (Zea mays L.) from highland Mexico: new accelerator mass
spectrometry dates and their implications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.
S. A. 98, 2101?2103
152 Benz, B. (2001) Archaeological evidence of teosinte domestication
from Guila? Naquitz, Oaxaca. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98,
2104?2106
153 Smith, B.D. (2001) Documenting plant domestication: the consilience
of biological and archaeological approaches. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.
S. A. 98, 1324?1326
154 Freeman, A.R. Combination of multiple microsatellite data sets to
investigate genetic diversity and admixture of domestic cattle. Anim.
Genet. (in press)
155 Hanotte, O. et al. (2002) African pastoralism: genetic imprints of
origins and migrations. Science 296, 336?339
156 Marshall, F. (1989) Rethinking the role of Bos indicus in Sub-
Saharan Africa. Curr. Anthropol. 30, 235?240
157 Possehl, G.L. (1997) Sea faring merchants of Meuhha. In South
Asian Archaeology (Allchin, B., ed.), pp. 87?100, Oxford & IBH
Publishing Co.
158 De Langhe, E. et al. (1996) Plantain in the early Bantu world. In The
Growth of Farming Comunities in Africa from the Equator South-
wards (Sutton, J.E.G., ed.) Azania 29?30, pp. 147?160, The British
Institute in Eastern Africa
159 Mbida, C. et al. (2006) Documenting banana cultivation by phytolith
analysis: case study, prospects, and limits of the morphological
paradigm. In Documenting Domestication: New Genetic and Archae-
ological Paradigms (Zeder, M.A. et al., eds), pp. 68?81, University of
California Press
160 Cleuziou, S. and Costantini, L. (1980) Premiers e?le?ments sur
l?agriculture protohistorique de l?Arabe Orientale. Pale?orient 6,
245?251
161 Weber, S.A. (1991) Plants and Harappan Subsistence, American
Institute of Indian Studies
162 Vila`, C. et al. (2006) Genetic documentation of horse and donkey
domestication. In Documenting Domestication: New Genetic and
Archaeological Paradigms (Zeder, M.A. et al., eds), pp. 344?356,
University of California Press
163 Clutton-Brock, J. and Davis, S. (1993) More donkeys from Tell Brak.
Iraq 55, 209?221
164 Zeder, M.A. (1986) The equid remains from Tal-e Malyan. In Equids
of the Old World (Vol. 1) Beihefte zum Tubinger Atlas des Vorderern
Orients (Meadow, R. and Uerpmann, H.-P., eds), pp. 367?412,
University of Tubingen
165 Compagnoni, B. and Tosi, M. (1978) The camel: Its distribution and
state of domestication in the Middle East during the third
millennium B.C. in light of the finds from Shahr-i Sokhta. In
Approaches to Faunal Analysis in the Middle East (Meadow, R.H.
and Zeder, M.A., eds) (Peabody Museum Bulletin no 2), pp. 119?128,
Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology
166 Mann, C. (1997) Reseeding the green revolution. Science 277,
1038?1043
167 Piperno, D.R. (2006) Manioc (Manihot esculenta Crantz) and
other roots in Pre-Columbian tropical America through starch
grain analysis: a case study from Central America. In
Documenting Domestication: New Genetic and Archaeological
Paradigms (Zeder, M.A. et al. eds), pp. 46?67, University of
California Press
168 Aceituna, F.J. and Espitia, N.C. (2005) Mobility strategies in
Colombia?s middle mountain range between the Early and Middle
Holocene. Before Farming 2, 1?17
169 Pohl, M.D. et al. (1996) Early agriculture in the Maya lowlands.
Latin American Antiquity 7, 355?372
170 Pope, K.O. et al. (2001) Origin and environmental setting of ancient
agriculture in the lowlands of Mesoamerica. Science 292, 1370?1373
171 Paga?n, J.R. et al. (2005) La temprana introduccio?n y uso de algunas
plantas dome?sticas, silvestres y cultivos en Las Antillas precolombi-
nas. Dia?logo Antropolo?gico 3, 7?33
172 Olsen, K. and Schaal, B. (2006) DNA sequence data and inferences on
Cassava?s origin of domestication. In Documenting Domestication:
New Genetic and Archaeological Paradigms (Zeder, M.A. et al., eds),
pp. 123?132, University of California Press
Review TRENDS in Genetics Vol.xx No.xx Monthxxxx 17
DTD 5 ARTICLE IN PRESSwww.sciencedirect.com