HISTORY OF THE COCONUT PALM IN AMERICA. By O. F. Cook. INTRODUCTION. Many scientific text-books and works of reference support the popular idea that the coconut palm is specially adapted to tropical seacoasts and is confined to maritime regions. No other example of special adaptations of plants to their environments has had longer currency or more confident belief. Nevertheless, it seems that the botanical romance of the coconut, protected by its thick husk and floated from island to island in advance of human habitation, must go the way of many other pleasing traditions. What natural agencies have been supposed to do for the coconut is now to be recognized as the work of primitive man. The truth proves again to be stranger than the fiction. The coconut exists in the lowland tropics only as a product of cultivation. It does not plant or maintain or distribute itself on tropical seacoasts, and would entirely disappear from maritime local- ities if human care were withdrawn. The habits of the palm from the botanical standpoint, its significance in human history, and even its agricultural possibilities are misunderstood unless we are able to lay aside the maritime tradition. An outline of the evidence for the American origin of the coconut palm and of its distribution by human agencies has been published in a previous number of the Contributions.0 The present study car- ries the subject further in two principal directions. It brings addi- tional facts to show that the coconut palm was already widely dis- tributed in the New World before the arrival of the Europeans, and that it is not naturally a maritime or humid tropical species, but a native of drier and more temperate plateau regions in South America. A comparison of the habits of germination of the coconut with those of other related American palms shows other and very different uses «The Origin and Distribution of the Cocoa Palm, Contributions from the National Herbarium, vol. 7, pp. 257-293. (1901.) 271 272 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE NATIONAL HERBARIUM for the characters that have been looked upon as special adaptations for maritime dissemination. The huge seed with its immense store of food materials and its thick fibrous husk make it possible for the coconut to propagate itself in the relatively dry interior localities where it appears to have orig- inated. The inability of the palm to withstand shade explains why it has been unable to establish itself as a wild plant on any tropical seacoast. The application of these facts to cultural problems shows that the possibilities of an extratropical extension of the coconut palm are not to be realized on seacoasts, but in interior desert regions where larger amounts of heat and sunlight are to be obtained. Though the biological evidence of the American origin of the coco- nut palm appears complete and adequate, recent years have brought to light several additional facts which mav be of use to those whose training and habits of thought lead them to attach great weight to the historical arguments of De Candolle and other writers who believed in the Old World origin of this palm and its dissemination by the sea. The reader is impressed by De Cand olle's references to many old and rare books, anil will naturally remain loth to believe that so eminent an authority could have come to an erroneous con- clusion, unless all the foundations of his opinions are carefully reexamined. It is important to trace and clear away any mistakes or false deductions which obscure the early history of cultivated plants. Mis- conceptions regarding the origin and dissemination of any important economic species tend to distort human history as well as to mislead botanical and agricultural investigation. It is only when we view the past with the right perspective that we gain correct ideas of the factors which control our present interests and our future progress. Civilization itself is based on cultivated plants, and history may be written with as much propriety from the agricultural standpoint as from the military, political, or commercial. Many of the plants valued by primitive man have found no place in our civilization, but have gone more or less completely out of use, either because other species of better quality or more abundant yield have taken their places, or because their uses have been outgrown. The coconut does not belong among the plants of waning importance. Its cultivation is being extended in many parts of the Tropics, and its products are rapidly gaining places in the domestic economy of the most civilized nations of Europe and America. The probability is great that the coconut palm will be recognized eventually as a food plant of the first rank, not merelv bv the natives of the Mai a van and Polynesian islands, but by the whole civilized world. Coconuts are an important product in Porto Rico, Hawaii, and the Philippines. A coconut industry has been established in southern COOK—TIIE COCONUT PALM IN AMERICA 273 Florida, and is now beginning to attain considerable proportions. One of the Florida coconut planters is recently reported to have sold the crop of a single season for $15,000. There is also a possibility, still entirely untried, that hardy varieties of the coconut palm can be obtained in South America which can be cultivated in southern Cal- ifornia and Arizona, or even in a few spots in southern Texas where flowing artesian wells of warm water may make it possible to protect small areas from frost. ALLEGED INTBODTJCTION OF THE COCONUT PALM BY EURO- PEAN COLONISTS. De Candolle held the opinion that the coconut palm was intro- duced into South America and the West Indies by European set- tlers, and that it existed in pre-Spanish America only on the Pacific coast of the Panama region. The presence of even these coconuts in America was supposed to represent a recent arrival by sea from the Pacific islands. He says: The cocoa-nut abounds on the littoral of the warm regions of Asia, of the islands to the south of this continent, and in analogous regions of Africa and America; but it may be asserted that it dates in Brazil, the West. Indie?, and the west coast of Africa from an introduction which took place about three centuries ago. . . . The inhabitants of the islands of Apia were far bolder navigators than the American Indians. It is very possible that canoes from the Asiatic islands, containing a pro- vision of cocoa-nuts, were thrown by tempests or false manoeuvres on to the islands or the west coast of America. The converse is highly improbable. The area for three centuries has been much vaster in Asia than in America, and the difference was yet more considerable before that epoch, for we know that the cocoa-nut has not long existed in the cast of tropical America." This supposed limitation of the range of the coconut palm in ancient America, while not necessarily disproving its origin on this continent, might stand in the way of any full confidence in the American nativity of the species. But if it can be shown that there is adequate historical evidence of the existence and wide distribution of the coconut in tropical America at the time of the discovery, we gain a different idea of the status of the palm among the natives of America. De Candolle was able to entertain the opinion that the coconut did not exist on the eastern side of the American Continent before the Spanish dis- covery because he overlooked several important early references and because he relied upon the theory of an early Spanish intro- duction to explain the historical facts with which he was acquainted. No direct evidence of such an introduction has been produced, nor does a canvass of the references to the early accounts of America cited by De Candolle reveal any facts which support the assertion, even indirectly. There were no coconuts in the Mediterranean region a De Candolle, A., Origin of Cultivated Plants, ed. 2, pp. 430,433. (London, 1886.) 274 CONTRIBUTIONS FfiOM THE NATIONAL HERBARIUM. which the Spaniards could bring to America, and they had no facilities for securing coconuts from the East Indies. And even if they had been able to arrange such an importation through their jealous com- petitors, the Portuguese, the time required in those days for the necessary sea voyages would have been too long. A motive for such an introduction was lacking, as well as an oppor- tunity. It does not appear that any of the early discoverers or historians were familiar with the coconut before coming to America, and they evidently did not become acquainted with it here as an important article of food or as having any other value that would lead them to give it their active attention and care. The agricultural activities of the Spanish colonists took the direction of introducing European plants into America, in the hope of being able to supply themselves with their accustomed foods. The appreciation of the new foods and other products of the agricultural plants that were natives of America and the introduction of American plants into Europe went on only slowly and casually. There is nothing to show that tobacco or potatoes reached Europe until after the middle of the sixteenth century. Indian corn and capsicum pepper were known in Germany by 1543, as described by Fuchs, but in both these cases it is possible to doubt whether the plants were post-Columbian introductions from America or pre- Columbian arrivals from the Orient, as indicated bv the earlv histories 1 V and by their earliest European names.'1 Columbus himself began the introduction of European plants into America, but the only tropical types introduced during the period of the early discoveries appear to have been the varieties of bananas and sugar cane brought over from the Canary Islands. The Malayan and Polynesian islands, where the coconut is a plant of the first rank, were still undiscovered by Europeans, who had only vague rumors of the medicinal virtues of the Sax Indica, as it was termed in the medieval pharmacopoeia. Even in parts of the East Indies where the coconut palm undoubtedly existed some of the earlv writers make little or no mention of it. Thus in the extended "The history of the early introduction of American plants into Europe has been summarized by Dr. Seb. Killermann, in the Naturwisscnschaftliche Wochenschrift, vol. 24, p. 103. (March 28, 1909.) Doctor Killermann finds that four American plants were known in Europe before 1543, the Indian corn, the capsicum pepper, the squash (Cucurbitu maxima), and the French marigold (Tagetes patula). By about the middle of the sixteenth century five other American plants had been recorded, two species of tobacco (cot tana tabaciun and A'. rustiai), the prickly pear (Opuntia), the century plant (Agave), and the tomato. From the second half of the century there are accounts of the bean (Phaseohts vulgar is and P. coccineus), the peanut, the Jerusalem artichoke (Jlclian- thus tuberosus), the spiderwort (Tradescantia), the nasturtium (Tropaeolum), and the potato. The sweet potato does not appear in this list. The first reference to its existence in Europe given by De Candolle is that of Clusius in 1601. COOK—THE COCONUT PALM IK AMERICA. 275 account of Cochin China by an early Jesuit missionary, Borri, wliich follows the early discoveries of America in Churchill's Voyages, there is no mention of coconuts, though other plants ami their products are treated in detail. The first practical acquaintance of the Spanish with the coconut was gained in America, and we may believe that if they had under- taken to introduce the palm into the West Indies they would have brought the nuts from Panama instead of from the East Indies. But even this would have been quite outside of the objects and operations that are recorded in elaborate detail by the early historians. Any such undertaking on the part of any intelligent leader would almost certainly have become a matter of record. We find, however, no sign of interest in the plant which would render such an effort on the part of the Spaniards in any way probable. In thus alleging an early Spanish introduction of the coconut in America De Candolle seems to have depended entirely on an inference not really warranted by facts. lie argues that unless the palm were wild and indigenous it must have been introduced by Europeans, a deduction certainly unwarranted in view of the fact that numerous other species of native cultivated plants, such as Indian corn, sweet potato, cotton, capsicum, peanut, cassava, sour-sop, avocado, anatto, and cacao (chocolate) had been widely distributed through tropical America in pre-Columbian times. Like the coconut palm, most of these plants are still unknown in the wild state. They testify to the very great antiquity of agriculture in tropical America, and show the propriety of considering the coconut as one of many American plants that had been domesticated in America before the arrival of the Spaniards. EARLY ACCOUNTS OF THE COCONUT PAIM IN AMERICA. PETER MARTYR'S ALLUSIONS TO THE COCONTJT. The only suggestion of historical warrant that De Candolle gives us for the idea of the introduction of the coconut by Europeans is con- tained in this statement: Sloane pays it is an exotic in the West Indies. An old author of the sixteenth cen- tury, Martyr, "whom he quote?, ppeaks of its introduction. This probably took place a few yearn after the discovery of America, for Joseph Acoata saw the cocoa-nut palm at Porto Rico in the sixteenth century.0 In reality Sloane does not express any such opinion as his own; he gives a very casual mention of an idea which he ascribes to Peter Martyr, the representative of the Pope at the court of Spain, who wrote letters about the Spanish discoveries to his friends in Italy, ' De Candolle, A., Origin of Cultivated Plants, ed. 2, p. 430. (188(J.) 276 CONTRIBUTIONS PROM THE NATIONAL HERBARIUM based on information collected from the explorers and the reports they sent home. Sloane says: Martyr says this Fruit was brought to the American Isles, but, that many wore found naturally in Peru, it may be doubted whether they were not brought thither by the natural Currents of the Sea." Sloane does not tell us where such a statement is to be found in Martyr's writings, nor does De Candolle appear to have considered it necessary to verify the reference for himself. A search through the English version of Martyr's Decades used by Sloane might have lessened confidence in the idea that the palm was introduced by the Spaniards. The name "coco" was not mentioned by Martyr in his accounts of America, though there were many references to palms, which the early English translator turned into '4date trees," the date being the only palm well known in Europe at the time. Even in the last cen- tury we find English travelers referring to Brazilian species of Cocoa as "dates," aa in the following instance: Still we were skirting palm-trees, among which the gra^s grew to a great height. One of the things we had from the Indiana yesterday was the date-palm. I la fruit grown in cluster;*, looking like a colossal bunch of grape*; the outer shell is thin, and contains a sweet, yellowish substance, of which the Indians are very fond, covering a nut like a filbert., with the flavour of the coconut, containing the kernel from which the oil is extracted.^ In addition to the fact that both are fruits of palms, there is a notable external resemblance between dates and coconuts as they hang in large clusters among the bases of the leaves. The only strik- ing difference is that of size, which is commonly disregarded in popu- lar comparisons. Indeed, Martyr himself was familar with the idea that the products of America often exceeded those of Europe in size/ a Sloane, Hans, A Voyage to the Islands Madera, Barbados, etc., vol. 2, p. 9. (1725.) ft Mulhall, M. G., Between the Amazon and Andes, pp. 183, 184. (London, 1881.) e Martyr did not understand that the Indian corn of America was a different plant from the cereals of Europe, and hence found it difficult to credit the report that the wheat in Santo Domingo produced ears thicker than a man's arm. . . . The lyke encrease enmmeth of wheate if it be sowen vppon the inountaynes where the colde is of sumo strength: but not in the playnes, by reason of to much fatnes and rankenes of the grownde. It is in manor incredible to heare, that an earc of wheate whuld bee bygger then a mans arme in the brawne, and more then a spannc in length, bearynge also more then a thousandc graynes as they all confesse with one voyce, and ernestly aftirme the same with othes. Yet they say the bread of the Ilande (cauled) Cazabbi made of the roote of hwea, to bee more holsome, because it is of easyer digestion, and is cultured with lesse labour and greater increase. The residue of the tyme which they spende not in settynge and plantynge, they bestowe in gathering© of golde,—Martire, Fietro, The Decades of the Newe Worlde or West India (1510), trans, by Richard Eden (1553), in Arber, E., The First Three English Books on America, p. 168. (Birmingham, 1885.) COOK—THE COCONUT PALM IK AMERICA. 277 While most of Peter Martyr's allusions to dates give no details that afford a botanical identification of the palm, it must be remembered that there is no other palm in the West Indian region that is more similar to the date or any other that has economic importance enough to bring it to the attention of men like Martyr and his English translator, Eden, and lead them to reckon it among the economic products of the New World. Eden seems to have been more keenly interested in such matters than Martyr and occasionally adds infor- mation from other sources to his translation of Martvr, as in the fol- V ' lowing instance: ... In these Ilandes they founde no trees knowen vnto them, but pyne app[l]e trees, and date trees: And those of maruelous heyght. and exceding harde, by reason of the greate moystnesae and fatncHse of the growndc, with continuall and temperate heate of the eonne, whiche endureth so all the hole yere.° There is no corresponding statement in the complete Latin text of Martyr's "Decades" published at Paris in 1587, under the title "De Orbe Novo." The interest of the passage is not destroyed by the fact that it was an interpolation, for Eden was a contemporary of Martyr and published his translation of the first three of Martyr's "Decades" before the complete edition was issued. That Eden understood Martyr's passages about palms to refer to the coconut can hardly be doubted, and there is no reason to claim that he was mis- taken in such instances as the following: This fortresse, he cauled saynt Dominikcs towre. Into this kauen, runneth a ryuer of holsome water, replenyshed with eundrye kyndcs of good fysshes. They affyrme this ryuer to haue many benefytes of nature. For, where so euer it runneth all thynges are excedynge pleasaunte and fruitfull: hauynge on euerv eyde, groues of date trees, and dyucra other of the Ilande frutea bo plenty fully, that as they sayled alonge by the shore, often tymes the branches therof laden with flowres and fruites, hunge boo ouer theyr heades, that they mighte plucke them with theyr handes.b The phrase "groves of date trees" is justified by Martyr's Latin word palmeta, which also carries an implication that the groves were artificial, and not mere forests of wild palms. In another passage wild palms that grow "of themselves" arc mentioned in direct con- trast with those that bear "dates" larger than those of Europe, thus implying again that the latter were cultivated. . . . They haue alao abundance of nuttes of pynetreea, and great plentie of date tree.«, whiche beare frutea bygger then the dates that are knowen to vs: but they are not apte to bee eaten for theyr to much soweraes. Wylde and baren date trees, growe of them selues in sundry places, the branches wherof they use for biesommes, and eate also the buddes of the same, c * The words nueibus pineis of the Latin original indicate that Martyr, as well as his translator, confused pines and pineapples. It does not a Martire in Arber, op. cit., p. 67, & Martire in Arber, op, cit., p. 82. c Martire in Arber, op. cit., p. 131. 278 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE NATIONAL HERBARIUM. ~ appear that there arc any pine trees in the Veragua district of Panama, to which this statement pertains, or that there are any pines with edible nuts in the whole Central American region. There are many pine fofests in Mexico, Guatemala, and Honduras, but they are not known to extend farther south than the latitude of Matagalpa, Nicara- gua. The botanical explorations of Professor Pittier in Costa Rica and Panama afford conclusive evidence that there are no pines in those countries. Professor Pittier also states that ineffectual attempts hav been made to introduce pines into the central plateau of Costa R ica. The word translated by Eden as "date trees" simply means palms (palmarum), and might possibly refer to the fruits of one of the Attalea palms or to those of Elaeis melanococca, though neither of these could be expected to have received much consideration from the standpoint of utility as food, or to have been planted by the Indians. The coconut, though hardly distinguished for sourness (ob austeritaiem), would certainly be a disappointment as a food in com- parison with the sweet fruits of the true date. Coconuts are very seldom eaten in the Tropics in a raw state except by children; as an exclusive diet they were considered very unwholesome, especially by the weakened, half-starved men of the Spanish expeditions. OVIEDO'S ACCOUNT OF THE COCONUT. The source of Eden's information regarding the American "dates" need not be sought further than in the extensive accounts by Oviedo, also translated by Eden and published in the same book with Martyr's "Decades."0 There can be no possible doubt that Oviedo was acquainted with the coconut palm. lie described it at length in a two-page chapter of his quaint Spanish, which Eden rendered into contemporary English as follows: There is bothe in the firme lande and the Ilandes a certeyne tree cauled Cocus, beinge a kynd of date trees and hauynge theyr leaues of the self same greatnesse as haue the date trees which beare dates, but dyffer much in their growynge. For the leaues of this Cocus grow owte of the trunkes of the tree as doo the fyngera owt of the hande," wreathynge thein eeluea one within an other and so spreadynge abrode. These trees are hygh: and are founde in great plentie in the coaste of the sea of Sur, in the prouince of Cacique Chiman. These date trees brynge furth a frute after this aorte. Beinge altogyther vnite as it groweth on the tree, it is of greater circumference then the heade of a man. , . . Whyle this Cocus is yet freshe and newly taken from the tree, they vse not to eate of the sayde earnofitie and frute: But fyrate beatynge it • Oviedo's original publication was an abridgment entitled, Oviedodela natural hys- teria de las Indiaa. (Toledo, 1526.) This was translated by Richard Eden under the title, The natural history of the West Indies, and published in Arber, E., the first three English books on America. (Birmingham, 1885.) The complete work was first issued at Madrid in 1851. (See footnote, p. 295.) Books 1-19 and 10 chapters of book 50 were published in Seville, 1535, as La hietoria general delas Indiaa. COOK—THE COCONUT PALM IF AMERICA. 279 very much, and then stray nynge it, they drawe a my Ike thereof, much better and sweeter then is the my Ike of beastes, and of much substaunce: The which the Chris- tian men of those regions put in the tortes or cakes which they make of the grayne of Maizium wherof they make theyr breade, or in other breade as we put breade in porrage: So that by reason of the sayde mylke of Cocus, the tortes are more excellent to be eaten withowt offence to the stomake. They are so pleasaunte to the taste, and leaue it as well satisfy ed as thowghe it had byn dely ted wi th many delycate dysshes. . . . This frute was cauled Cocus for this cause, that when it is taken from the place where it cleaueth faste to the tree, there are scene two holes, and aboue them two other natural 1 holes, which altogyther, doo represente the gieature and fygure of the cattes cauled Mammone, that is, inunkeyn, when they crye: whiche crye the Indians caule Coca.a Eden's version of Ovieclo also affords a clue to the mystery of Sloane's statement regarding the introduction of the coconut into America, upon which De Candolle appears to have placed so much reliance. It was Oviedo, instead of Peter Martyr, who reported the planting of dates in Santo Domingo, but these were not coconuts, but true dates from Spain, as the context shows: Suche frutes as are brought owt of Spayne, into this Ilande, prosper maruelously and waxe rype all tymes of the yeare: as herbes of all sortes very good and pleasaunt to bee eaten. Also many pomegranates of the best kynde, and oranges bothe swecte and sower. Lykewyse many fay re Lymones and cedars: and a great quantitie of all such as are of sharpe, sowre, and bytter taste. There are also many fygge trees whiche brynge furth theyr frute all the hole yeare. Lykewyse those kynd of date trees that beare dates: and dyuers other trees and plantes which were brought owt of Spayne thyther.6 The substitution by Sloane of Peru for Panama, in the passage already quoted on page 276, may have been a mere slip of the pen, or a typographical error, for it does not appear that coconuts have ever thriven in Peru, in ancient times or modern, or that Sloane had any warrant of fact for his statement. Finally, we have the evidence of the passage just quoted, to show that Sloane confused the coconuts that were already in America with the true dates that were brought by the Spaniards from Spain. The only indication of historical warrant given by De Candolle for his theory of the Spanish intro- duction of the coconut into America proves to be entirely without foundation. REPORT BY COLUMBUS OF COCONUTS IN CUBA. Eden's version of Oviedo definitely asserts the existence of the coco- nut palm in the West Indies, as well as on the continent, and Oviedo's larger history includes the coconut in an account of the numerous native species found in the island of Santo Domingo, but De Candolle seems to have noticed only the mention of the special abundance of the coconut palms on the Pacific coast of Central America, which he a Oviedo in Arber, op. cit., p. 225. &Oviedoin Arber, op, cit., p. 239 51004°—vol 14, TT 2—10 2 280 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE NATIONAL HERBARIUM. contrasted with their supposed absence on the Atlantic coasts and islands. De Candolle alludes to Oviedo only in the following passage: Oviedo, writing in 1526, in the first years of the conquest of Mexico, says that the cocoa-nut palm was abundant on the coast of the Pacific in the province of the Cacique Chiman, and he clearly describes the species. This doea not prove the tree to be wild. Jn southern Asia, especially in the islands, the cocoa-nut is both wild and cul- tivated. The smaller the islands, and the lower and the more subject to the influence of the sea air, the more the cocoa-nut predominates and attracts the attention of travelers.0 Oviedo's statement is not the only one that has to be explained if we are to deny the existence of the coconut palm in the West Indies when the Spaniards arrived. Columbus himself recorded the finding of coconuts on the north coast of Cuba, near Puerto Principe, only a little over a month after his first landing in the Bahamas. The Admiral got into the boat, and went to visit the islands he had not yet seen to the S. W. He saw many more very fertile and pleasant inlands, with a great depth between them. Some of them had springs of fresh water, and he believed that the water of those streams came from some sources at the summits of the mountains*. He went on, and found a beach bordering on very sweet water, which was very cold. There was a beautiful meadow, and many very tall palms. They found a large nut of the kind belonging to India, great rats, and enormous crabs. He saw many birds, and there was a strong- smell of musk, which made him think it must be there. This day the two eldest of the nix youths brought from the Rio de Mares, who were on board the caravel Nina, made their escape.* The coconut was known to mediaeval Europe only as Nux Indica, or Indian Nut, the.name ''coconut," though stated in dictionaries to be derived from Latin and Greek words meaning nut or seed, seems not to have been applied to the coconut till after the discovery of America. Other lexicographers have undertaken to derive coco from Spanish or Portuguese words meaning ape or ogre, an applica- tion which is explained by allusion to the three pits or eyes of the coconut which afford a grotesque suggestion of the face of a man or a monkey. It is quite possible, however, that the Spaniards adopted the word coco from the natives of the West Indies as they did many other names of agricultural plants, such as "mais" (Indian corn), "aji" (capsicum), "achiote " (anatto), "platano" (banana), "mani" (peanut), etc. In the case of the banana it is evident that a native word, closely resembling platano led the early explorers to suppose that the banana was the actual platano or plane tree of which the Spaniards of that time knew only the name as it occurs in the Bible. The histories written by Oviedo and Acosta both contain chapters explaining that the plane tree of Scripture was not the same as the "platano" of the West Indies. f l)e Candolle, A., Origin of Cultivated Plants, ed. 2, p. 431. (1886.) & Journal of the first voyage of Columbus, trans, by C. R. Markham, p. 80. (Hakluyt Society, 1893.) COOK—THE COCONUT PALM IN AMERICA. 281 Markham's translation of the clause relating to the coconuts in Cuba is not altogether satisfactory. The Spanish version says that large nuts (nueces grandes) were found, rather than a single nut. The statement that the nuts were of the kind belonging to India (nueces grandes de las de India) is followed by a parenthetical idio- matic expression (creo que dice), as though to remind the reader that this was the opinion of Columbus, for which the editor of the journal, Las Casas, did not wish to be considered responsible. Las Casas added a footnote (Ilutias debian de ser, "They must have been agoutis") to indicate that the animals taken for rats by Columbus were agoutis, the large tailless rodents of Cuba. Having learned that the agoutis were not rats, the identity of the nuts might also be questioned, but no other nut has been found in Cuba large enough to be mistaken for a coconut. Knowing that Columbus had not in reality reached the East Indies, Las Casas was inclined to pass lightly over the evidences that had deceived the Admiral. We are left with no positive assurance that the large nuts came from the very tall palms, but botanical science affords us no ground for refusing to believe that the statement relates to the coconut, as Colmeiro has declared in opposition to a Spanish historian who con- sidered the large nuts as walnuts.a Markham's translation also omits a statement regarding the palms, that they were taller than any that Columbus had seen thus far, which may have reference to a previous mention of great numbers of palms (injinitas palmas) three days before at a location identified by Markham as Puerto de Taxamo, Cuba. If we include these emendations, the reference to the large nuts and its immediate con- text may be translated as follows: There was a very beautiful meadow, and many very tall palms, taller than those seen before; he found large Indian nuts, as he would say, and large rate, also like those of India, and very large crabs Though the presence of natives is not stated, the mention of the meadow indicates that the place had been cleared by human inhabi- tants. It appears unlikely that the native palms, even if they had a Vio Colon " muchas y altisimas palmas," asi como algunoe pinoa (Pinus ocdden- talis Sic, et. P. cubensis Griseb.), y despues deaqu£Ilas mencion6 las "nuecesgrandes de las de India," que no esadmisible perteneciesen 6 un nogal, como presumirt el historiador Munoz, siendo lo creible que fuesen cocos, porque no es improbable que el eocotero (Cocos nudfera L.) existiese en las regiones inlertropicales del Nuevo Mundo antes de su desoubriniiento, y asi parece demostrarlo tan significativa indi- caci6n.—Colmeiro, Miguel, Primeras Noticias acerca de la Vegetacion Americana, p. 13. (Madrid, 1892.) 6 The Spanish text of Navarrete is as follows: "... habia un prado muy lindo y palmas muchas y altisimas mas que las que habia visto: hallo micros grandes de las de India, creo que dice, y ratones grandee de los de India tambien, y cangrejos grandfaimos. (Navarrete, Coleccion de loa Viages y Dcscubrimientoe, etc., p. 60, Madrid, 1825.) 282 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE NATIONAL HERBARIUM. existed in the forest, would have attracted the attention of the explorer. Ferdinand Columbus states that his father found ''palm (roes of several sorts," and mentions on a previous occasion that soino had "the trunk green and smooth," which may refer to the Cuban royal palm (Roystonea regia).a This could have no connection with the large nuts, for the mature fruits are only about the size of a small cherry. One of Peter Martyr s passages relating to "dates" evidently lias reference to the same incident of exploration of the north coast of Cuba by Columbus: And when they had at the lengtho escaped these st-rayghtcs, and were limvc roome into a mayne and large sea, and had savled theron for the space of foure wore niylrs, they espyed an other excedinge hygh mount ay lie, whyther the Admiral I resorted to store his shyppes with freashe water and fuel, lleare amonge rerteyne wooddes of date trees, and pyneable trees of exeedvng height he fownd two naline eprynges of freeehe water. & The fantastic idea of tall 'pyneable trees" arose from the failure of Europeans not familiar with America to distinguish between pine trees and pineapples. True pine trees were found in abundance in Cuba and Santo Domingo, as well as in Central America. European readers who progressed far enough to learn that pineapples had no relation to pine trees often went to the other extreme of supposing that all the early references to pines related to pineapples. Pine trees are mentioned in the Journal of Columbus in the same district with the "very tall palms" and the large "nuts of India." If the statement of the Journal of Columbus stood alone we might well hesitate to base any general conclusion upon it, but there is certainly no reason to deny it a place among the many other statements that can be reasonably interpreted only by recognizing their relation to the coconut. As soon as we appreciate the fact that the Spaniards were not acquainted with the coconut, either in nature or in name, before their arrival in America, it becomes apparent that the state- ment of Columbus is as direct a piece of evidence as we could hope to get, under the existing circumstances. It is not unreasonable to believe that he knew something of the Indian nut, and of the palms that produced it, considering that he spent many years of his life in the active quest of geographical knowledge, with especial reference to the Indies, which he hoped to reach by sailing west. The most remarkable thing about this statement of Columbus is that it should have been so completely overlooked by De Cam 1 o I lie and other writers interested in the history of the coconut palm. Even Picker- ing failed to include it in liis immense collection of similar facts, aChurchill's Collection of Voyages and Travels, vol. 2, pp. 534, 635. (London, 1732.) Mar tire, in Arber, op. ci t., p. 77. (See footnote c, p. 276.) COOK—THE COCONUT PALM IN AMERICA, 283 though ho refers to the /hiding of coconuts by Columbus during the fourth voyage, when the coast of Central America was explored.a In this case an error appears to have been made, which has been copied into some of our works of reference. The only passage that it seems likely to have been interpreted in this way relates to the seeds of the cacao tree from which chocolate is made, not to the nuts of the coconut palm.6 ABUNDANCE OF COCONUT PALMS IN PORTO RICO. The earliest record of the coco palm in the West Indies given by De Candolle was that of Acosta, who visited America in the latter half of the sixteenth century and saw coco palms at San Juan, Porto Rico, from which De Candolle infers that the alleged introduction "probably took place a few years after the discovery of America/' The context of Ac-osta's allusion to the coconut at San Juan does not, however, support such a conjecture, since it is apparent that Acosta, who was a learned and careful historian, was describing the coconut as a notable product of the "Indies," after spending seventeen years in America. The coconuts at San Juan, if brought by the Spaniards, even from Panama, could not have been there for many decades, so that Acosta's mention of them is better evidence against a Spanish introduction than for it. Acosta does not say how many coco palms he saw at San Juan, but the chaplain of the Duke of Cumberland, who visited Porto Rico in 1598 gives us an account of the coconut palms of that island which would not be inapplicable at the present day, and which precludes alt reasonable doubt that at the end of the sixteenth century the coco palm existed in Porto Rico in such size and in such numbers as to render incredible any recent introduction, subsequent to the arrival of the Spaniards. The body of them i.s but slender, 110 when; bigge as a man's middle, and upwards growing proportionably le&se, till they are ri«dn xunc thirtic or fortie foot high without sprig or bough, then brcake out their boughs all at once, euery one whereof ia iust like a goodly Ostridge feather; their 1 canes are so cunningly get together, euery one whereof a ". . . Eastward from the Polynesian Islands, nuts were seen by Columbus on his fourth voyage, in Central America (Churchill Collections)."—Pickering, Charles, Chronological History of Plants, p. 428. & For their provision they had such roots and grain as they in Ihspaniola eat, and a sort of liquor made of Maiz, like the English beer; and abundance of Cacao nuts, which in Nev: Spain pass for money, which they seemed to value very much; for when they were brought aboard among their other goods, I observ'd that when any of these nuta fell, they all stoop*d to take it up, as if it had been a thing of great consequence: yet at that time they soem'tl to be in a manner besides themselves, being brought prisoners out of their canoe aboard the ship, among much strange and fierce people, as we are to them, but so prevalent is avarice in man, that we ought not to wonder that it would prevail upon the Indians above the apprehension of the danger they were in.—Church- ill's Collection of Voyages and Travels, vol. 2, p. fiOG. (London, 1732.) 284 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE NATIONAL HERBARIUM alone is something like a Sedge or the leafe of a wilde Lilly. Under this bush which is the head of the tree, doe the Coker-mits grow, some fortie on a tree round about (lie Hole, Bome yard downward from where the branches breake out. These trees are a very great grace to the Citie of Puerto Rico, [San Juan] and very many there were found in it." Samuel Champlain, the subsequent explorer of Canada, also visited Porto Rico in 1599, shortly after the English expedition had sailed away from the island. The Spanish expedition that Champlain accompanied also "remained at Porto Rico about a month/' and came to the same conclusions as the English chaplain regarding the island and its palms. The said Island of Porto-rico is pretty agreeable, although it is a little mountainous, as the following figure shows. It ia filled with quantities of fine trees, such as cedars, palms, firs, pal mottoes, and another kind of tree which is called sombrade. . . .b We might remain in doubt of what palms were intended if it were not for a later passage in which Champlain clearly distinguishes between the true palm or coconut and the cabbage or royal palms which he calls "palmiste," but not "palm." Ah I have spoken of the palm, although it is a tree sufficiently common, I will here represent it. It ia one of the highest and straightest trees that can be poeu; its fruit, which is called "Indian nut," grows quite on the top of the tree, and is as large as the head of a man; and there is a thick green bark on the said nut, which bark being removed, the nut is found, about the size of two fists; that which is inside is very good to eat, and has the taste of young walnuts; there comes from it a water, which serves as a cosmetic for the ladies.« FIRST ACCOUNT OF THE COCONUT IN BRAZIL, De Candolle knew from the writings of Piso and Marcgrave that the coconut existed in Brazil at an early date, but he did not admit that the palm was present before the European settlements were made. He treated his evidence regarding Brazil in the same way as that relating to Porto Rico, to support his assumption of an intro- duction by Europeans. But if we go back to the original of the earliest statement we find nothing of this implication that the coco- nuts had been imported by the colonists. We learn only that the palms were cultivated in Brazil, as everywhere else. De Candolle's inference from such statements is that Piso and Marcgrave "seem to admit that the species is foreign to Brazil, without saying so positively," but these authors certainly give no intimation of any idea that it was introduced into Brazil by the Portuguese. On the contrary, they both record the native Indian names, inaiaguacuiba for the tree and inaictguacu for the fruit, and state that the fruit of o Earl of Cumberland, Voyage to the West Indies, Pure has ITis Pilgrims, vol. 4, p. 1173. (London, 1025.) b Champlain, Samuel, West Indies and Mexico, trans, by Ali< o Wilmere, p, ]0. (Hakluyt Society, 1859.) c Op. cit., p. 31. COOK—THE COCONUT PALM IN AMEBICA 285 another species of Cocos native in Brazil is called inaia mira, or small coconut. N o suspicion is betrayed that coconuts were not one of the genuine products of the country, instead of a recent importation from abroad. The statements of later writers on Brazil and Guiana, such as Aublet, Martius, Spruce, Burton, and Wallace, are in entire accord with that of Piso and Marcgrave. They do not claim that the coconut is native in eastern South America, but find it widely distributed in cultivation. Piso's is not, however, the first reference to the coconut in Brazil, as De Candolle seems to have supposed. More direct and conclu- sive evidence was published nearly a quarter of a century before from a Portuguese friar who had resided in Brazil for the last three decades of the sixteenth century." This writing has also a direct bearing on the question of introduction by Europeans, since it contains a special enumeration of the plants brought to Brazil by the Portu- guese, The coconut does not occur in this list, but is included among the native cultivated plants. In this Brasill are many coco-nuts, excellent like those of India; these are ordi- narilly set, and growe not in the Woods, but in Gardens, and in their Farms. And there are more than twentie kindes of Palme trees, and almost all doe beare fruit, but not so good as the Cocos: with some of these Palme trees they couer their houses.& Exactly the same might have been written of the peach palm (Guilielma), the other indigenous palm widely cultivated in prehis- toric times by the Indians of South America. But since the peach palm did not attain a world-wide distribution no question of its South American nativity has ever been raised, though it has never been found in the wild state. The statements of the early historians that the coconut palms did not grow wild in the forest, but only where they had been planted, instead of supporting the idea of an introduction by the Portuguese colonists is better evidence to the contrary, for it becomes highly improbable that such a piece of history would have been omitted from the record. This consideration is even more conclusive in the case of Brazil than in that of Porto Rico, for in that island it might have been possible to raise the palms if the colonists had introduced them early and propagated them with care and diligence. But in Brazil there was actually no time for any multiplication and dissemi- nation of the palms to have taken place, for the colonization of Brazil by the Portuguese did not begin till after the middle of the sixteenth century, or less than twenty years before the arrival of the writer who states their abundance. a The manuscript of this unknown author was captured by an English sailor in 1601, and an English translation was published in 1625 in Purehas His Pilgrims, vol. 4, p. 1289. Piso's account of the coconut in Brazil was not issued until 1648. ^Purchas His Pilgrims, vol. 4, p. 1307. 286 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE NATIONAL HERBARIUM The Portuguese are also supposed by Martius and De Candolle to have planted the coconut in their West African settlements, but for this purpose they are more likely to have brought seed from Brazil than from the East Indies.0 The slave trade brought about early and frequent communication between Angola and Brazil, and several travelers visited and described both countries. Martius, though he does not give his authorities, states that the coco palm was planted in the Portuguese settlements in West Africa, This does not prove, of course, that the coconut was unknown in West Africa before Portuguese times; nor on the other hand does the record by Marcgrave of native Congo names afford sufficient proof that the natives knew the palm before the time of the Portuguese settlements. The coco palm continues to be planted at the European settle- ments and trading stations on the West Coast of Africa, but seems not to have extended itself spontaneously nor to have been adopted in cultivation, perhaps because very few of the agricultural natives live on the coast. The Kroo people of Liberia, who have maritime habits, were reported by Doctor Vogel to have superstitious fear of planting coconut palms.6 This belief seems still to prevail, for the very large Kroo town at Monrovia, though built along the beach, is shaded by no coco palms. EARLY NOTICES OF THE COCONUT PALM IN COLOMBIA. The presence of coconut palms in the interior of Colombia, as reported by Ilumboldt and more recent writers, was also recorded by Cieza de Leon, who accompanied the first overland expedition through Colombia. Cieza de Leon came to America in 15132 as a boy of 14, and after passing in military camps and marauding explora- tions the years that lads usually spend in school he began, at the, age of 22, the writing of a history, "because others of more learning were too much occupied in the wars to write." Nevertheless, the writings of Cieza give us a clearer picture of the condition of the country and the people than do those of any of the learned historians «Caseava and Indian corn, capsicum, peanuts, alligator pears, pineapples, and doubtless other American plants, including American types of cotton, appear to have been introduced into West Africa by the Portuguese at very early dates, and arc now widely distributed in that continent. The coconut has remained of little importance in Africa, not being utilized as a source of oil, that of the oil palm (Elaeii?) being of better quality and more easily obtainable. f>'' The inhabitants [of Cape Talmas] believe, that whoever plants a Cocoa-palm will die, before it produces fruit (i. e., in about seven years). The Chief of the fishermen yielded at last to the entreaties of the American Governor, and put pome Cocoa-nuts on the ground: he then drove cattle over the spot, that he might not incur the con- sequences of planting and covering them with earth!"—Hooker, W. J., Niger Flora, p. 37. (London, 1849.) COOK—THE COCONUT PALM IN AMERICA 287 like Oviedo, Acosta, ami Hernandez, and merit the high commen- dations bestowed by Clements R. Markham, who translated Cieza's writings.® The statement of Cieza de Leon regarding coconuts is as follows: . . . The site is twenty-three leagues from the city of Cartago, twelve from the town of Anzerma, and one from the great river, on a plain between two small rivers, and is sorrounded&y great palm trees, which are different from those I have already described, though more useful, for very savoury jxthnitos are taken from them, and their fruit is also savoury, for when it is broken with stones, milk flows out, and they even make a kind of cream and butter from it, which they use for lighting lamps. I have seen that which 1 now relate, and it all comes within my own experience. The site of this town is considered rather unhealthy, but the land is very fertile.b Velasco, in writing of the palms of the same region over two hundred years later, identifies Ciezu's reference and applies it to the variety of coconut called vira chorda or " butter palm." It may be doubted whether this is the true coconut palm or a distinct species which has been called Cocos butyracea. To treat butyracea as a distinct species docs not render it any less interesting, either from the botanical or the agricultural side. If the interior of Colombia affords other species of Cocos that are distinct from Cocos nucifera and yet closely related to it the question of origin will be still more definitely answered, and the diversity of types available for introduction to other parts of the world will appear still greater. It is evident, however, that Velasco con- sidered his mra chonta only as a variety of the coconut palm, since he includes it with three other varieties. Velasco's account of the coconut palms of Colombia, written about 1789, but not published till 1844, appears to contain more original information than any other statement on the subject. It is evident that he took special interest in the palms as a group, since he describes numerous spccit's in detail, with their native names and uses. The parts relating to the coconut palms may be translated as follows: There are more than fifty different species of palms, all with the generic name Chonta. . . . The fruit, in the language of Peru is called tutu and in that of Quito lulum, which means egg; accordingly the fruit of any sort of palm is called chontaruro. a "The work of Pedro de Cieza de Leon is, in many respects, one of the most remark- able literary productions of the age of Spanish conquest in America. Written by a man who had passed his life in the camp from early boyhood, it is conceived on a plan which would have done credit to the most thoughtful scholar, and is executed with care, judgment, and fidelity. ... In arrangement, in trustworthiness, in accuracy, and in the value of his observations, the work of Cieza de Leon stands higher than that of any contemporary chronicler: and these qualities in hi* book are enhanced by the romantic life and noble disposition of its author."—The Travels of Pedro de Cieza de Leon, trans, by C. R. Markham, pp. i, lvii of the introduction. (Hakluyt Society, 1864.) &Op. cit., p. 68. 288 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE NATIONAL HERBARIUM. Jlatuta chonta, that is, the largest of all pal ma. Its nut (coco) in commonly as large as the head of a man, covered with a tow which is the best kind for gun wads. The white marrow is very good, thick as a finger, and from it, by pressure, is extracted a very rich and sweet oil. The milky liquid is also sweet, refreshing, and good to drink, and from the nuts are made large vessels to hold liquors and for other purposes. Suni chonta is the palm with the long nut, slightly smaller than the preceding. It has the same properties and the tree is a little smaller, Vira chonta, the palm with buttery fruit, It is as high as the preceding, but much more slender and with narrow leaves. The fru it is somewhat small#r, almost spherical, with little or no firm marrow, and the milk so thick that after a little beating it coagu- lates into a very rich butter for eating or lighting. It is peculiar to the River Cauca, on the confines of the province of Popayan, where the Spaniards first discovered it in 1545, one of them, the historian Chieca de Leon, describing it. It is thus seen how lightly a thousand falsehoods are written by some, like Francisco Hernandez, native of Mexico, who in his Latin history asserts that cocos were brought by the Spaniards from the East Indies to the West. At their first entrance into South America they found very old palms full of fruit, which never occurs until after the age of 16-20 years with these large kinds of cocos. Yurac chorda, the palm which yields the white coco, not only the marrow but all the shell being white, and this, being very thick, is made into cups for chocolate with embossed work. The meat is not very good and the tree rather small. * * * Almost all of these palms are from the province of Maynas, and some of them from Guayaquil and Popayan.'1 Velasco does not give any definite citation of the books of Her- nandez, and may not have known them at first hand. In reality, Hernandez does not seem to have said that coconuts were brought from the East Indies. He states that coconuts were not found in New Spain (Mexico), but he reports at the same time that they were abundant in the West Indies as well as in the East, so that the idea of an introduction by the Spaniards is rather denied than affirmed. Velasco's reference to the use of the small shells of the yurac chonta for embossed work may have interest in connection with the photo- graph of the carved shell of a small coconut shown in plate 53, figure 1. The specimen from which this photograph was taken was presented to the writer, some years ago by Gen. E. A. Lever, of New Orleans, having been found by him in a grave in the Chiriqui district of Panama in digging for the gold ornaments and pottery that are often found in the prehistoric graves of that region. ECONOMIC STATUS OF THE COCONUT IN TROPICAL AMERICA. While the early records appear sufficient to establish the existence of the palm in the New World at the time of the early discoveries, they certainly do not indicate that it was a food plant of primary importance in any part of tropical America, unless it were along the Pacific coast of Panama and Costa Rica. If the coconut had had any such prominence among the Caribs and Arawacks of the West Indies as among the Polynesians and Malays of the East it is incredible « Velasco, J., llistoria del Reino de Quito, vol. 1, pp. 52-5*4. (Quito, 1844.) Corilr, Nat. Here, V..\ *4 Plate 53. Fig. 1.—Carved Coconut Shell. From a ftravt* in tlieChiriqiti ilisirii*i of I'muiim. ;Nuiurul size.) F*g, 2.^Dried Cotyledons of Coconuts. Brought by Dr. ftHviinl I'tUtuer from the n <»f At-n;nili ,i where they are railed 'nwoimt (mauzaiia* tie eueo} iNiituraC size.) COOK—THE COCONUT PALM IS AMERICA 289 that we should not have had much more numerous and extended reports of it during the period of discovery. The lack of more adequate accounts does not appear so surprising if we consider that even at the present day the coconut is not an economic plant of the first rank in tropical America; that is, it is nowhere of such cardinal importance as in the tropical islands of the Pacific. Outside of a few districts where commercial plantations of coco- nuts have been established, the status of the coconut among the natives of tropical America remains to-day much the same as it appears to have been at the time of the discovery of America by Europeans. Coconut palms are found on all the coasts and prin- cipal islands, planted more or less abundantly as the inhabitants of the different regions happen to be more or less civilized. People too backward in civilization to have settled abodes do not undertake the cultivation of long-lived tree crops like the coconut. The more primitive tribes of Indians either have no agriculture at all, or a merely nomadic form of agriculture that utilizes only annual or quick-growing crops, which are planted every year in new clear- ings instead of upon the same stationary farm as in the temperate regions. A reason for this nomadic system of agriculture that gen- erally prevails in forested tropical regions of low elevation is found in the fact that it is much easier to clear a new tract of land every year by cutting and burning than to pull up the weeds that invade cleared land or to maintain the fertility of the soil under continued clearing and cropping. It is only when people have reached the next stage of agricultural development and maintain permanent clearings and gardens, as among the Polynesian and Malayan inhab- itants of the islands of the Pacific and Indian oceans, that the coco- nut and other tree fruits become regular, staple products. Else- where, as among the tropical Indians of America and the natives of Africa, the coconut remains only secondary and exceptional, planted occasionally in the larger villages or towns that happen to be located near the coast, but nowhere attaining any serious or indispensable importance. At the present time the progress of the West Indian coconut industry, if not the actual existence of the palm in this region, appears to be threatened by a serious disease, which enters the terminal bud and kills the palm. Investigations of this disease indicate that it is due to a bacterial parasite, which appears to be spreading very rapidly.® « Home, W. T., La, Enfermedad do Ioh Cocoteroa, Bole (.in Oficial do la Secretaria de Agrieultura, Industria y Comercio, vol. 3, p. 1. (1907.) The ltud Rot and Some other Coconut Troubles in Cuba, Bull. 15, Estacion Central A^ronomica do Cuba. (1908.) Johnston, J. II., The bud rot of the coconut palm, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Plant Industry, Circular 36. (1909.) 290 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE NATIONAL HERBARIUM. The meat of the ripe nut, for which coconuts are imported into temperate countries, is not the part most valued, in the tropics, but the "milk" of the unripe nut. On many of the coral islands of the Pacific, where there are no springs or other supplies of water, the natives could not survive without the milk of the coconut. In Porto Rico and elsewhere in America the coconut is also valued chiefly as the source of a beverage, but where fresh water is as abundant as in the West Indies the milk of the coconut is a luxury rather than a necessity. The unripe nuts are carried to the towns and sold as a beverage, like lemonade or soda water in temperate regions. The meat of the coconut has little more importance in the American tropics than in the United States, being used mostly for pastry and confectionary, and not as a staple article of diet. Even the oil of the coconut which serves so many culinary and other domestic purposes in the East Indies is almost unknown in the American tropics. The extraction of the oil and its use in cooking are said to be practiced in British Honduras and in Trinidad, but by European residents rather than bv the natives of the country. There are no such multitudinous applications of the shells, husks, fibers, leaves, sap, and all other parts of the palm as in the East Indies. On the west coast of Mexico, according to Dr. Edward Palmer, use is made of the so-called "coconut apple" 0manzana de coco), in reality the swollen cotyledon of the germinating nut. The cotyledon gradu- ally absorbs the food materials stored in the meat of the nut, at the same time increasing in size till it fills the whole cavity of the shell. The fleshy part of the cotyledon is said to have a pleasant, sweetish taste, and to be much more delicate and more readily digestible than the meat itself. The coconut "apples" are also dried and are sold in the native markets in this condition. Plate 53, figure 2, shows a photograph of two dried cotyledons of the coconut. There is noth- ing to show whether the use of the cotyledon represents a native cus- tom in Mexico or was imported from the Pacific Islands, where it also exists. The making of fermented drink called "tuba" from the sap of the palm appears to have been introduced into the vicinity of Acapulco from the Philippines, as indicated by the presence of the Filipino names. An additional reason why the culture of the coconut palm was not flourishing in the West Indies at the time of the discovery is found in a fact of history. Columbus and other earlv explorers made repeated statements to the effect that the inhabitants of the islands were everywhere at war with the Caribs, the seafaring cannibals who preyed upon the more peaceable agricultural natives of the islands. The fear of the Caribs kept the natives from living near the coasts. COOK—THE COCONUT PALM IN AMERICA. 291 Even when the lands along the coast were extensively cultivated, as described by Columbus in Hayti, it was difficult to find people or houses.® One of Peter Martyr's letters to the Pope gives an account of the Caribs and reflects the impression of the early explorers regard- ing the havoc wrought by them in the West Indies. Theyr common meate, is Ages, Tucca, Maizhtm, Hniiatn, with miche other rootes and frutes of treea, and also suche fysshe as they vse in the Ilandes and other regions of these prouinces. They eate mans fle>hc but peldome, by cause they nice to not often tymes with ^trangiers, except they goo fnorth of theyr owne dominions with a mayne armye of purpose to hunt for men, when theyr rauenynge appetite pricketh them forwarde. For thev abstevne from them nelues, and eute none but suche as they take in the warres or otherwyse by chaunce. But suerly it is a miserable thynge to heare howe many myriadea of men these fylthy and vnnaturall deuourera of mans fles^he haue consumed, and lefte thou^andes of moste fayreand frutfull Ilandes and regions desolate wit how to menne: By reason wherof owre men founds so many llandea whiche for theyr fay renew and frutefuliies^e myght seemc to bee corteyne earthly Paradv^es, and yet were vtterly voyde of men. Hereby yowre holynesse may consider howe pernitious a kyndc of men this is.6 With such enemies to pounce upon them from the sea it is easy to understand that the coconut palm could not be popular among the coast-dwelling natives of the West Indies after the Carib invasions began. To plant coconut palms, or even to allow them to grow where they could be seen from the sea, would only invite the attacks of the cannibals by showing them where their human prey could be found, THE PALMS OF COCOS ISLAND. Another piece of definite evidence regarding the habits and history of the coco palm comes from a small island in the Pacific Ocean about 300 miles to the west of Panama. The name Cocoa Island was given by the early navigators because of the abundance of coconut palms found on it. Since the coming of the Spaniards, however, the island has not been inhabited and the coconut palms have almost completely disappeared. Prof. II. Pittier, who visited Cocos Island in May, 1898, and again in February, 1902, in the interest of the Costa Rican Government, reports that the palms that now abound on Cocos Island are not coconut palms, but belong to the genus Euterpe. Some of the American palms that have been referred to Euterpe have a superficial resemblance to coconut palms, a He believed that the villages must be at a distance from the sea, whither they went when the ehips arrived; for they all took to flight, taking everything with them, and they made smoke-Hignala, like a people at war.—The Journal of Columbus, trans, by 0. R. Markham, p. 104, HakluytSociety, 1893. b Martire in Arbor, op. cit., p. 159. (See footnote, p. 276, above.) 292 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE NATIONAL HERBARIUM but they belong in reality to a distinct group, much more related to the Cuban roval palm than to the coconut." Excepting a few planted very recently by a treasure seeker living on the island, the only coconut palms found by Professor Pittier were a small cluster near the southwestern end, on a bench so pro- tected by rocks and breakers that landing from the sea is quite impracticable. The mountains visible from the anchorages at the other end of the island are clothed with the Euterpe palms, not with coconut palms. The treasure seeker had brought coconuts from Punt-arenas, Costa Rica, and planted them at Wafer Bay, but these were found to be different from those already growing on the island. Some of the latter had also been planted recently at Chat- ham Ray. l)e Candolle refers to Dam pier as having found an abundance of coco palms on Cocos Island and looks on their presence on an unin- habited island so close to the American continent as an additional reason for believing that the shores of the New World might have been stocked by sea-borne nuts from t he archipelagoes of the Pacific. It has been shown in the previous paper that Dampier did not visit this Cocos Island, and that the "island of cocos" to which Dampier referred was near the coast of Colombia. It was not, as De Candolle supposed, the Cocos Island of modern maps.6 From the preceding facts it might be inferred that Cocos Island had been misnamed as a result of mistaking the Euterpe palms for coconuts, but there is historical evidence to justify the name. Although Dampier, as before stated, (lid not visit Cocos Island, we have an authentic account by Wafer of the existence of large num- bers of coconuts on this island in 1GS5. Wafer was at one time Dampier's first officer, and his "Travels" are often bound with Dampier's "Voyages." This may explain De Catidolle's citation of Dampier's statement as applying to the modern Cocos Island. Though Wafer was not a botanist, his account of the coconuts of Cocos Island is too circumstantial to permit us to doubt that coco- nuts existed in abundance in his day. Our men being tolerably well reeover'd, we stood away [from Ihe Gulph of Ama- pallaj to the Southward, and came to (lit; Island (,'ocos, in 5 De%. If> Min. N. Lat, 'Tis Mi called from its Coco-Nuts. wherewith 'Iin plentifully ator'd. 'Tis but a small Island, yet a very pleasant, one: For the Middle of I he Island is a steep Hill, Bur- rounded all about, with a Plain, declining to the Sea. This Plain, and particularly « The resemblance lies in the shape and position of the leaves when seen at a little distance. The crown of leaves of the royal palm does not resemble that of the coco- nut, because the leaflets are inserted at different angles along the midrib, but this is not the ease in the Porto Rico mountain palm {./lcm/a montimla) nor in the still more graceful tc/'tuTa or halaule (Plcchs aweniana) that adorns the summits of many limestone mountains in eastern Guatemala. ''Contribution* frurn the I . S. .National Herbarium, vol. 7, pp. 2{)), trans, by John Forster, p. 219. (London, 1772.) b Quirns (1'»!)">), in Pulrymple, Historical Collection of Voyages and Discoveries, vol. I, ]>. G9. (London, 1770.) COOK—TllJi COCONUT PALM IN AMERICA 297 personally communicated by Dr. W. E. Inksetter, of Alajuela, Costa Rica. A coconut, with (he husk intact, was found on the beach in the island of Ronsay, in the Orkney group, to the north of Scotland, in the winter of 1S92-93. Doctor Inksetter saw the nut and drank some of the milk, which was still in good condition. But of what advantage is such transportation if the nut encounters unfavorable conditions when it lands, and thus fails to germinate or to grow to maturity and establish its seedlings in turn? We should find on some tropical coast a place where the palms thrive and multiply, where we find old palms surrounded by flourishing young ones, growing spontaneously, without the aid of man, but no such instance has been reported, instances of floating nuts or of sup- posedly self-sown palms indicate th<' opposite of what they are some- times thought to prove, for the failure of the palms to persist is only emphasized by showing that opportun.il ies have been ample. There seems to be no authentic record of coco palms establishing and maintaining themselves on any tropical coast in a wild or truly spontaneous condition. A palm that is unable to maintain itself on the land has nothing to gain by having its nuts drifted about by the sea. The complete absence of coconuts from the extensive tropical coast line of Australia until planted by European colonists has already been cited as a gigantic experiment showing that the coconut did not establish itself without human, help, even in a place where it afterwards thrived in cultivation. It is known I fiat the shores of Australia were visited yearly by many Malay fishing boats carrying large (plant it ies of coconuts among their food supplies. Many nuts have also been found cast up on the tropical beach of Australia. The palms exist in large numbers on small islands in the Torres Straits, only ;>0 or 40 miles from the Australian coast. The contrast between these palm-covered islands and the palm less shores of Aus- tralia has made a strong impression upon eyewitnesses. Murray Island is about 700 feet high at its highest point, and consists of steep broken ground. Its whole aspect is singularly different from any part of Australia, since the whole of its lower portion, and a good part even of the lulls, is covered by a continuous grove of cocoa-nut trees. The cut-in? absence of these (rocs from every part of Australia is a most, striking; fact, since it its, I believe, the only country in the world so much oi which lies within the Tropics in which they have never been found. We had once or twice found cocoa-nuts on the beach, still more or less fresh; and here is an island, absolutely within the Great Barrier reef, completely covered by them, and yet neither by Flinders, King, Wickham, Stokes, or ourselves have any trees been discovered anywhere upon the mainland. We could perceive many natives oil the beach of Murray Island, as also a nearly continuous line of large dome-shaped 298 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE NATIONAL HERBARIUM huts, surrounded by fences of tall poles ornamented by large shells; everything shewing the natives to be a different race of beings from the Australians.'' The explanation of the absence of coconuts in Australia lias been found by all travelers in the fact that the Australian natives differ from those of all the Pacific islands in being nonagricultural. The same is true of another peculiar and very primitive people living on the Andaman Islands of the Indian Ocean. With them also the coconut palm was lacking, though their islands lie in the midst of the East Indies, where the coconut and its numerous varieties Jiave been supposed to originate and distribute themselves by sea.h No other inhabited tropical coasts and islands of the Pacific and Indian oceans appear to be without coco palms, but no other peoples failed to plant and care for them. Throughout this region there is no difference of popular opinion regarding the strict dependence of the coconut upon man. The idea of wild coconuts planting them- selves on tropical scacoasts is strictly the product of the imagination of authors who have written books about the Tropics without visiting such regions, or at least without taking into account the opinions of those who have first-hand familiarity with the habits of the palm. Throughout the South Sea islands coco-nut. palms abound, and oil may be obtained in various places, Some of the uninhabited islands are covered with dense groves, and the unfathered nuLs, which have fallen year after year, lie upon the ground in incred- ible quantities. Two or three men, provided with the necessary apparatus for pressing out the oil, will, in the course of a week or two, obtain enough to load one of the large sea canoes. . . . The coco-nut is essentially a maritime plant, and is always one of the first to make its appearance on coral and other new islands in tropical seas, the nut being floated to them, and rather benefiting than otherwise by it* immersion in the salt water/ The authority of Simmonds might seem to give weight to these statements, but no such ideas are found in the account of the coconut palm in that author's subsequent manual of Tropical Agriculture. The islands where the coconuts established themselves and accumu- lated in "incredible quantities'" were never specified.'1 ° Jukes, Voyage of the Fly to the Eastern Archipelago, 1S42, vol. 1, p. 132. (Lon- don, 1847.) & It is interesting to note that with the exception of a few spots, evidently planted by the early colonists, cocoa-nuts do not occur in the Andamans, and this is especially remarkable from the fact that the conditions are favorable for their propagation.— Safford, \V. E., The Abbott Collection from the Andaman Islands, Smithsonian Insti- tution, Ann. Ilep., 1001, pp. 477-4 T2, (1902.) c Simmonds, P. L., The Commercial Products of the Vegetable Kingdom, pp. 5(9, 550. (London, 1854.) d If anything further is needed to show that Simmonds had no direct knowledge of the coconut palm when the earlier work was written, his fanciful statement regard- ing the germination and growth of the palms will certainly suffice. Almost every line contains a fresh error. "The coco-nut is usually planted as follows: Selecting a suitable place, you drop into the ground a fully ripe nut, and leave it. In a few days a thin lance-like shoot Contr, Nit. Herb V.^1. 14 Plate 54. r Fig. 1. —Coconut Palms Overhanging the. Surf at High Tide, Puerto Barrios, Guatemala. Fig. 2.—Coconut Palms Overhanging the Sea, Livingston, Guatemala. T1ki irniiks Ir:iTi \ ri y m i'oill;Iy unwinl t hr fvil u rrMilt u: , i ,111 ;»i t it it ni with ui h*ir \ t >n COOK—THE COCONUT PALM TN AMERICA. 299 Tho conclusions of those who have considered the subject from the tropical standpoint and with the advantage of actual contact with tropical conditions, have been canvassed in the previous paper, but a few of their statements may bo repeated. Pickering testifies: . . . O. nucifera throughout the Pacific occurs only on those islands to which it has been carried by the natives, a fact well known to traders; was observed by myself only under cultivation throughout the islands of the Pacific and the Malayan Archipelago.^ ... So invariably in its presence attributable to human operations that it has become a guide to the traders in seeking for natives. Notwithstanding that the fruit is well adapted for floating uninjured over a wide expanse, I have never met with an instance of a cocoa palm having spontaneously extended itself from island to island.6 Other testimonies are the following: . . . It is to be emphasized that all coconuts are planted; the idea of a wild palm being as strange in Funafuti as that of a wild peach might be in England. ... I doubt whether, despite popular opinion to the contrary, a wild coconut palm is to be found throughout the breadth of the Pacific, c . . . From repeated observation, [in the Solomon group] I am convinced that the coco-nut palms will rarely grow, and certainly will not bear fruit, unless attended to and kept clear of overgrowing trees. . . . The Cingalese have a saying that Cocoa-nut trees do not thrive unless "you walk and talk among them," indicating that trees thrive the best when carefully attended to. f THE COCONUT PALM NOT TOLERANT OF SHADE. When tho traveler who lands for the first time on a tropical coast looks up along tho shore and sees the coconut palms leaning out toward the strand or actually overhanging the water, he is at once reminded of and confirmed in the idea of maritime distribution. (PI. 54, figs, 1 and 2.) But if he looks further into the facts he will learn forces itself through a minute hole in the shell, pierces the husk, and soon unfolds three pale-green loaves iti the air, while, originating in the same soft white sponge which now completely fills the nut, a pair of fibrous roots pushing away the stoppers which close two hole? in an opposite direction, penetrate the shell, and strike verti- cally into the ground. A day or two more, and the shell and husk, which in the last and germinating stag*' of the nut are so hard that a knife will scarcely make any impression, spontaneously burst by some force within; and, henceforth, the hardy young plant thrives apace, and needing no culture, pruning, or attention of any sort, rapidly arrives at maturity."—Simmonds, op. cit., p. 555. The rapidity of germination and growth are entirely misconceived; only one leaf is produced at a time, and the first leaves are simple, not three-parted; roots do not come out of the holes, but grow from the young plant; the shell does not burst; the young palms do not thrive without care, a Pickering, Charles, Chronological History of Plants, p. 428, (Boston, 1879.) bPickering, Charles, The Races of Men, pp. 54, 323. (London, 1851.) cHedley, Memoir 111, Australian Museum, Sydney, p. 22. (1896.) d Wood ford, A Naturalist Among the Head Ilunters, p. 194. (London, 1890.) e Seemann, B., Popular History of the Palms and their Allies, p. 158. (London, 1856.) 300 CONTRIBUTIONS FliOM T11K NATIONAL HERBARIUM that coconuts do not grow toward the sea in order to be able to drop their fruits into the waves, but because this wide is bare to the sun. The trunks of the palms reach out toward the sea for the same reason that house plants turn toward the window. Many writers overlook this fact, but there are exceptions, as the following statement will show: . , . Wo must also tiive up the poetic fancy thai, ihe coconut tree stretches out towards tin1 sea because it loves the briny breeze, The tnilli is, that the tree is a lover of li^ht. and will bend in anv direct ir>.) For a photograph of the tabonuco forest in which the seedling palms occur, we Cook, < >. F,, ami Colling C. N., Economic Plants of Porto Kico, Contributions IT. S, National Herbarium, vol. S, p, ];J2> pi. 34, (1903.) COOK—TIIE COCONUT PALM IN AMERICA 303 other plants, where special conditions enable the palms to persist. Some of the North American palms that require sunlight have taken refuge in deserts of Mexico, while others are confined to the fire-swept pine barrens of Florida. A third series, represented by Thrinax and allied genera, occupies the exposed, precipices and crags of the dry limestone hills and keys of the West Indies. A fourth series is limited to swamps or river banks (Augustinea), and a fifth to high mountain summits (Acrista). With the exceptions of the under- growth palms and the slender rattans and similar climbing types, there are very few true forest species able to secure a footing or even to hold their own in undisturbed tropical tree growth. These limitations are shared by the coconut and all of its nearer relatives, which inhabit relatively open interior districts, rocky mountain slopes, and barren or exposed situations where vegetation of other types is comparatively sparse. Some of the species frequent river banks, but these are distant and rather degenerate cousins of the coconut. Few members of the family, if any, are natives of truly maritime districts. Very few palms, even of other families, are to be reckoned as definitely maritime plants, for while several frequent the seashore, such as the palmettos of Florida and the West Indies, they are also able to grow away from the sea. A species of Phoenix (pos- sibly P. reclinata), native in Liberia, is confined to the sea beach, occurring: onlv in the outermost zone of shrubby vegetation stunted o *_ f o by the salt spray, but this apparent preference is likely to be due to the fact that the sea beach affords more of the necessary exposure to the sun than can be obtained in the adjacent forest. For the want of a more distinctive term, the larger palms are called "trees," but they might be described more correctly as overgrown herbs. Their trunks are always constructed on the same general plan as the cornstalk or the sugar cane, consisting of a central mass of pith with a hard external shell, but without the true bark which enables the trunks of other trees to increase gradually in thickness after beginning their growth as slender shoots. The young coconut palm is under the necessity of producing many leaves at the surface of the ground before the trunk can attain its full diameter and begin its upward columnar growth. The two or three years that are lost before the upward growth of the trunk can begin are a very serious handicap in the race for existence among the luxuriant and tangled growth of shrubs, trees, and vines which promptly overrun any abandoned land in the humid Tropics. Exogenous plants begin the elongation of the stem immediately after germination, and usually produce much longer in temodes in the shade than when exposed to the sunlight. Unless the human friends of the young coconut are at hand to keep down the other vegetation the period of infancy is not survived. 304 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE NATIONAL HERBARIUM. The rattans and other climbing palms that produce slender, long- jointed trunks sire able to outgrow other vegetation, but ail the palms that form thick, short-jointed trunks suffer the same disadvantage as the coconut. They are unable to compete with other quick- growing forms of vegetation that cover and smother young palms before they can escape by the building of trunks. The coconut must be reckoned among the palms that are unable to develop without full exposure to sunlight. The seedling plants attain a considerable size in locations that are partially shaded, but this apparent growth arises from the nourishment stored in the huge seed. Large amounts of sunlight appear to bo necessary to enable young coconut palms to make any independent growth. This intol- erance of shade is a fact of primary importance in the study of the coconut, either from the botanical or from the agricultural standpoint. It explains why coconuts are not able to establish themselves as wild plants in any of the wide tropical regions of low elevation in which they are cultivated. SOUTH AMERICAN ORIGIN OF THE COCONUT PAIM. As soon as we recognize that the coconut is unable to establish itself or even to maintain its existence on any tropical seacoast. we are no longer at liberty to believe that the species originated in maritime situations. It becomes evident that the home of the plant must be sought in interior localities where the young palms could escape competition with the more luxuriant types of tropical vege- tation. While we imagine that the coconut can be disseminated by ocean currents to any part of the Tropics, it seems hopeless to fix upon any particular coast line as the original home of the species, but when we understand that the species must have originated in an interior locality the problem of origin is immediately simplified and verv definite conclusions can be reached. 4' If the coconut could be submitted as a new natural object to a specialist familiar with all other known palms, he would without hesitation recognize it as a product of America, since ail of the score of related genera, including about three hundred species, are Amer- ican.0 With e<|ual confidence the specialist would assign the coconut "The only member of the family Coc/aceae that has an extra-American distribution is the African oil palm, Ekwis ffuiwotm, a species rather chicly related to the Amer- ican Ehmis rnelanocMxa. Even in this ease the idea of maritime distribution has become unnecessary. The African oil palm has been found in Brazil in un apparently wild state, and may have originated in that, country. Dr. F. II. Knowlton, of the I:. S. (ieological Survey, has showed me seeds of the African oil palm which wore taken from an albatross shot off the west coast of Africa by the United Stales iv-tipse Expedition of 1889-90. The powers of flight of the albatross arc such as to render it a much more effective a%ent of distribution than the ocean currents. Moreover, the oil palm does not behave an a littoral species, like the coconut. COOK—THE COCONUT PALM IN AMERICA. 305 to South America, because, all other species of the genus Cocoa are confined to that continent, and lie would further locate it in the northwestern portion of South America, because the wild species of Cocos of that region are much more similar to the coconut than are those of the Amazon Valley and eastern Brazil. Thus, from a purely biological standpoint, it is reasonable to suppose that the vigorous and productive coconut palms reported by Ilumboldt in the interior districts of Venezuela and Colombia may have been growing near the ancestral home of the species. In dealing with a plant like the coco palm we can be confident that it originated in a definite geographical region, along with the other similar and related species. To suppose that the same species has originated in two or more remote regions is quite as absurd an idea, from the standpoint of modern biology, as it would be in geometry to talk of a plane triangle including three right angles. It might be a matter of difficulty and debate to determine which of the other species of Cocos were most nearly related to the coconut, or which of the other American genera of Cocaceae were most nearly related to Cocos, but to insist that the coconut had sprung from the unrelated Malayan or Polynesian palms would be altogether fantastic. Bio- logical facts, though seldom appearing to be as exact and invariable as those of mathematics, are for some purposes equally definite. Geometry gave us the sciences of geography and navigation, and also made it possible to understand the motions of the planets. Biology, like geometry, is a system of bearings and measurements which may assist us in the solutions of many problems. The inability of the coconut to withstand the competition of ordi- nary tropical vegetation makes it unreasonable to suppose that the species originated in any region that had a natural forest covering. The fact that other related palms are much more tolerant of shade than the coconut makes it only the more probable that the coconut originally inhabited open places where it could have full exposure to the sun; that is, a place where the conditions were unfavorable for other types of vegetation, but favorable for the coconut. A con- dition that the coconut can tolerate and that excludes most other vegetation is the presence of salt in the soil. Many salt deposits are found along the eastern side of the Andes from Colombia to Peru. Cieza de Leon devotes a special chapter to the native salt industry of Colombia, mentioning many springs, streams, and lakes in the Cauca Valley, and especially in the district of Anzerma where the coconut palms were found. Before I treat, of the kingdom of Peru, or leave the government of Popayan, iI mems to me well to give some account of the notable fountains there are in this land, and of the rivers of water from which they make salt., for thua the people are sustained, having no salt pits in these parts, and the sea being far distant. . . . 306 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE NATIONAL HERBARIUM. In the province culled Cori, which is near ihe town of Anzerina, there is a river which flows with considerable force, and near it there are some ponds of salt water, whence the Indians obtain the quantity they require, and, matin# great fires, they place jars of this stilt, water on them, and net the water to boil until from an arroba there is not left half an azumbre. Then their experience enables them to convert the residue into as pure and excellent salt, as is made from the salt-pits of Spain. Throughout the districts of Antioquia there are many of these fountains, and they make so much salt that they take it inland, and exchange it for gold, cotton cloth, and other tiling which they may require. Beyond the great river which flows near the city of Call, and near that of Popayan, towards the north, we discovered a village called Mungia. . . . In this village of Mungia, and in another called Cenusara, we found some other fountains in mountains near a river, and from these fountains the natives made so much salt that their houses were full of it, molded into shapes exactly like loaves of sugar. They took this salt by the valley of Aburra to the provinces to the eastward, which have not been discovered or seen by the Spaniards to this day. This salt, has made the Indians exceedingly rich. . . . In the province of Anzerma, and in all its districts, there are fountains of the same sort, from which they make salt. In the city of C'artago every citizen has his apparatus for making salt, which is pre- pared in an Indian village called Consota. a league from the city, where a small river flows. Xear the river there is a mountain out of which comes a large spring of very black and thick water. The water is taken from this spring and boiled in cauldrons until it is nearly all evaporated, when a white-grained salt remains, as good as that of Spain. . . . In the city of Popayan there are some of these fountains, especially among the Coconucos, but not so many, nor of such good quality as those of Anzerma and Carl ago. At Pasto all the salt is obtained by trading, and it is better than that of Popayan. I have seen many springs, besides those which 1 have now described, with my own eyes, but it seems to me that I have said enough to make the reader understand the manner of procuring salt from these springs." Ilerndon, who explored the upper waters of the Amazon in eastern Peru near the middle of the last century, mentions deposits of salt in numerous localities in the eastern valleys of the Andes. . . . At a quarter past 10 we passed the Quebrada, or ravine of Iluinagua, on the right. A small stream comes down this ravine, the water of which is salt. The people of Uchiza ascend it—a day's journey—to a salt hill, where they supply themselves with this indispensable article. At twenty minutes past 11 we passed another; and at I p. m. another, where the people of Tocathe get their salt. It. is a day's journey from Tocache to the mouth of the Quebrada, and another to the salt hills.6 The hills of Piltuana, which we now soon passed, have their base immediately upon the river, on the right-hand side. They are about 300 feet, in height, and stretch along the banks of the river for a quarter of a mile. The salt shows like frost upon the red earth at a distance; but seen nearer the heavy rains seem to have washed away the loose earth and left nearly the pure salt standing in innumerable cone-shaped pinnacles, so that the broken sides of the hills look like what drawings represent of the crater of a volcano, or the bottom of a geyser. Where the hills have been excavated, beautiful stalactites of perfectly pure salt hang from the roof in many varieties of shapes. There « Cieza de Loon, pp. 124-127. (See footnote, above, p. 2R7.) b Ilerndon, W. L., and Gibbon, L., Exploration of the Valley of the Amazon, pt. 1, p. 154. (32d Cong. 2d sess., Executive No, 36, 1854.) COOK—THE COCONUT PALM IN AMERICA. 307 are much higher hills back of those, that appear also to contain salt; so that there seems a supply here for all people and for all time.« We passed the salt hills of Callana Yacu, where the people of Cha.suta and the Indians of Ucayali and Maranon get their salt. The hills are not so high as those of Filluana, and the salt seems more mixed with red earth. It" crops out" on the banks of the river, which are shelving, and rise into gentle hills as they recede, covered with bushes and small trees.6 Every year at this season the Indians of the Maranon and Ucayali make a voyage up the Huallaga for their supply of salt. They travel slowly, and support themselves by hunting, fishing, and robbing plantain patches on their wav.c Unfortunately, this traveler saw no coconut palms, or at least made no note of them, but a reference to coconuts in eastern Peru has boon pointed out to me by Professor Pittier in the surveys of the Intercontinental Railway Commission, near a place called Choros, on the Maranon River, at an elevation of 765 meters. Vegetation existed only in narrow strips along the immediate edges of the side streams entering the Maranon, and consisted mostly of coarse bushes and undergrowth. At this particular point, the natives had a small patch of sugar, and there were half a dozen cocoanut palms.(l No coconut palms are reported by the English botanist Spruce, who explored the region of Tarapoto in eastern Peru and ascended the humid valleys of the Pastasa and Bombonasa rivers on his way to Quito.c It would be reasonable to turn to these saline districts of South America if any attempts were to be made to definitely ascertain the original home of the coconut by finding it in a truly wild state. Such a discovery is hardly to be expected, because of the probability that localities suited to the spontaneous growth of coconuts would have attracted human inhabitants, even in very early times. We may hope, however, to find a series of local varieties or subspecies of the coconut palm in these interior localities, varieties that will be more hardy and vigorous than the maritime forms of the palm cultivated in the humid parts of the Tropics, and more likely to thrive under semitropical conditions. o Op. cit., pp. 154, 155. &Op. cit,, p. 16n, «Op. cit., p. 1(58. d Intercontinental Railway Commission Report, vol. 3, p. 1(5, On a previous page of the same series (vol. 2, p. 61) coconut palms are noted as cultivated " in a few places " in the Cauca Valley of Colombia. e Spruce, Richard, Notes of a Botanist on the Amazon and Andes, edited by A. R. Wallace, vol. 2, eh. 17. (London, 1908.) Also Kew Bulletin of Miscellaneous Infor- mation, ISM), p. 216. 308 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE NATIONAL HERBARIUM. DOMESTICATION OF PALMS IN ANCIENT AMERICA. The general acceptance of the idea that agriculture and other arts of civilization originated in the Old World has undoubtedly tended to complicate the question of the origin of the coconut palm, as studied by Seemann, De Candolle, and other writers on the subject. As the art of agriculture must have begun with the domestication of wild plants, it may be argued that the plants must have existed in the regions where domestication was practiced. The fact that the date, the betel nut (Areca), the Palmyra palm (Borassus), the toddy palm (Caryota), and the sugar palm (Arenga) were domesticated in the East Indies would naturally incline the ethnologist to include the coconut in the same list, especially if there appeared to be a differ- ence of botanical opinion on the question of origin. It is important, therefore, from the ethnological standpoint, to take into account the fact that several other palms were more or less completely domesti- cated in ancient America, some of them relatives of the coconut. The importance of the Old World series of domesticated palms appears greater because higher stages of civilization were reached in the Old World, but the relative importance of palms in the indigenous agri- culture o( America appears to be fully as great as in the Old World Tropics. DOMESTICATION OF THE PEACH PALM IN SOUTH AMERICA. The Indians of the northwestern part of South America—the same region that must be looked upon as the original home of the coconut— domesticated the so-called "peach palm'' (Guilielma), one of the numerous relatives of the coconut palm. (Pis. 55 and 50.) The peach palm is armed all over with long, slender, shining black spines, sharp as needles, but in spite of this unfriendly exterior the Indians have found it worthy of cultivation. Its handsome red or yellow fruits serve as an important article of diet among the natives of a vast region along the eastern slopes of the Andes, from Brazil and Peru through Ecuador, Venezuela, and Colombia, and even beyond the Isthmus of Panama in the Central American Kepublic of Costa Jtica. The peach palm appears to be as thoroughly domesticated among the Indians of South America as the date palm among the Arabs. Several botanical explorers of South America have described this palm and its importance among the Indians. The following extract from Alfred Kussel Wallace's "Palm Trees of the Amazon" shows its status in the interior districts of Brazil: The fruit is about the pizeof an apricot, of a triangular oval shape, and fine reddish- yellow colour. In most instances the seed is abortive, I he whole f mi ( hein^a farina- ceous mass. Occasionally, however, fruits are found containing Lin perfect stony seed, and they are then nearly double the usual size* This production of undeveloped Contr Nat rtr-l. Vol. 14, PLATE 55, A r ..-7" 1 k / 1 k ■ **- % ,■' ,f c > v1 i . >St . vV ./ \; i . vL % i \O "'' *v& : fL gb 1 ::N'L.i'v L:: _— - I " i, > vi ' : J i /: .ifc.Aiv %v v, hi - * « ■) .. < *■ x *. V" ti A ' Vv Peach Palms (Guilielma speciosa iw Costa Rica, A n lulivi-of tlit* clii'uiiuliluiiiosiicaii'il it] Sninli Alii'-; iru, Tin»t^^i luk^u u\ ilic n^iTt^ trf >vnui' t' ui It i ii t> Tilluf». Iu:lU \ ifl;rs, Cor.tr. Nat. Herb., Vol. 14. PLATE 56- *» \ ft i t Jzr'+f % *! f 1-1 # } u *1 i J£.' M it Peach Palm 'Guilielma speciosa' with Fruit and Seed. Spt'tMinons fmm tlu* cacuo cs[uic 1iI Mr, Limki 'i\ 1 ,:tpnult\ Kin Hr>nr bow strings, fishing-nets and other purposes where finencas, combined with strength, is required, . . . The Brazilians of the Rio Negro and l.'pper Amazon make very beautiful hammocks of fine "tuciim" thread, knitted by hand into a compact web of so fine a texture as lo occupy two persona three or four months in their completion. They then sell at about each, and when ornamented with the feather-work borders, at double that num. Most of them are writ, as presents* lo Rio de Janeiro." The method of stripping the epidermis and of twisting it into cords on the naked thigh, us described by Wallace, appears to be exactly the same as that used among the native negroes of West Africa in preparing the fiber known commercially as "raffia," which is derived from the epidermis of the young leaves of the African wine palm (Raphia). DOMESTICATION" OF THE PACAYA PALM IN GUATEMALA. Another domesticated palm, not hitherto recognized as such, exists in the Co ban district of eastern Guatemala. It is a species of Cha- maedorea, locally known as paeaya. Tt is jiot grown for the sake of its fruits or leaves, but for the ileshv inflorescences that are cooked and eaten as a salad. Only the male plants furnish the edible inflo- rescences, this palm being diavious, like all of the species of Chamae- tlorea. The whole of the spadix or flower-bearing part of the inflo- rescence is eaten and is of very delicate texture. It compares with other so-called "palm cabbages'' much as cauliflower does with other garden cabbages, the cauliflower representing the young tender inflorescence of the plant instead of the fleshy leaf bud. The taste of the cooked pacaya is slightly bitter, but the flavor is generally relished, not only by the native population, but also by resident Europeans. The difficulty of obtaining cabbages from other palms is that the whole palm has to be sacrificed in order to obtain the small mass of tender edible tissue in the terminal bud. With the pacaya no such sacrifice is necessary. The removal of the inflorescence does not injure the palms, and they continue to produce a succession of crops during a considerable period of years. The pacava is not planted as a field crop, but is grown in considerable numbers as a garden plant, not only about Coban, but in Purulha and other towns of east- ern Guatemala. In the wild state it seems to be confined to heavilv 4 shaded, humid valleys with other related species, but it also thrives when planted in the open. The palm grows to a height of 1o or 20 feet, and has a crown of very handsome, gracefullv drooping leaves. "Wallace, op. cit., pp. 105, 100. COOK THE COCO NUT PALM IN AMERICA. 311 The smooth given trunk has a diameter of 2 or 3 inches. The un- opened inflorescences are about the size of a large ear of com and are inclosed in green spathes somewhat similar to corn husks. DOMESTICATION OF PALMETTOS IN MEXICO. One of the native arts that flourishes in many localities in tropical America is the weaving of hats from the fibrous leaves of various n species of fan-leaved palms related to the Florida palmetto. Those are not the same as the so-called Panama hats made in South America from the leaves of Carludovica, which is not a true palm. Large numbers of the palmetto hats for local use are made in Guatemala and Mexico, though the most advanced state of the palmetto hat industry is found in Porto Rico, whence large quantities have been exported to the United States during the last decade. \ . The Porto Rican hat palmetto, (nodes causiarum, does not appear to be regularly cultivated, though it is valued and allowed to grow in many places for the sake of the leaves. The largest quantity of these palms is found along the seabeach at a place called Joyua, on the west end of the island between Mayaguez and Cabo Rojo. Palmettos grow wild in great abundance along the Pacific coast of Guatemala and the adjacent district of Soconusco in the Mexican State of Chiapas, and their leaves are gathered in large quantities for the thatching of houses and the weaving of hats. The hats them- selves and the straw, or "paja," prepared for weaving are important articles of domestic commerce, carried about on the backs of the Indians and sold in all the native markets. To secure additional supplies of the material the palms are also commonly planted about the native towns, sometimes in considerable numbers. Even on the east side of Guatemala in districts where there do not appear to be any native pal met. toes, the Indians have planted many of them in their villages, as at Cajabon and San August in, near TCI Rancho, and at other places. In southern Mexico the planting of palmettos is carried still further, thousands of these palms being found in the larger towns of the Soconusco district. Regular field plantings of palmettos were seen about Comitan in southwestern Chiapas and again near Merida in Yucatan. Palmettos are also grown exten- sively at San Bartolome, Chiapas, as reported by Mr. G, X. Collins, though no field plantings were noticed. PARTIALLY DOMESTICATED PALMS. In addition to the palms that may be said to have been definitely domesticated in the American tropics, there are several others that may bo described as partially domesticated. Though seldom actually planted or cared for, they are on a distinctly friendly looting with 51004°—vol 14f I*T 2—10 4 312 CONTRIBUTIONS FllOM T1IK NATIONAL HERBARIUM. mankind, and are much more abundant in inhabited regions than in the undisturbed forest. These partially domesticated palms take advantage of the clearings made for the planting of corn, cassava, and other crops, and repay this indirect assistance bv their fruits or other parts sufficiently useful M.' JL «H to cause them to be tolerated, if not actually prized. Some of these voluntary camp followers of primitive agriculture are of distinct importance, so much so that they would undoubtedly be cultivated if they did not grow spontaneously without the need of direct assist- ance. Some of them are worthy of much wider consideration in tropical agriculture than they now receive. The royal palm of Porto Kico (Jioffstonea borinquena) is a tree of much importance to the natives of the island, a large proportion of their houses being roofed with the tough sheaths of the leaves of this palm, known in the island as "yagua." While the leaves are alive the sheaths form complete cylinders 4 or 5 feet long, but when the leaves fall the sheaths split down one side and are then cut off and flattened out to form larcre leathery shingles. The side walls are CTr q, O often made of the same material or from the hard surface layer of the trunk of the same plain, split up into board-like strips. The fruits of the royal palm are small and arc not eaten by man, but they have an oily flesh much relished by the pigs, so that the palms are generally welcomed in the pastures, where they are vastly more abundant than on lands where the forest is allowed to grow. It is claimed that the fruits dropped by each adult palm will keep a pig in good condition without any other food than grass. There can be no doubt that the royal palm is a more important species in Porto Kico than the coconut itself and that it is worthy of much wider consideration in tropical agriculture. The American wine palm, Acrocomia, is found in all parts of the American tropics, from Paraguay on the south to Porto Kico, Cuba, and Mexico on the north. Whether this wide distribution is due to natural agencies or to human assistance is not known. Several species of Acrocomia have been described from different countries, but their characters are not very distinctive, and they may prove to be only local variations of a single species. In most places the Acrocomia palms are found only about human habitations or in lands that have been cleared for agricultural pur- poses, as indicated by Wallace for (he Para region of Brazil. The stem of thin Iree is about -10 fee) high, strong, smooth and ringed. The leaves are rather large, terminal and drooping. The leaflets are long and narrow, and spread irregularly from the midrib, every purl of which is very spiny. The sheathing bases of the leaf-stalks are persistent- on the upper part of the ntem, and in young trees clothe it down to the ground. The spadicea grow from among the leaves, erect or tomewhai drooping, and are pimply branched. The spathes arv woody, persistent and clothed with epines. The Contr. Nat. H*>rh . Vol. 14. j / < -m \ / V'i*"1 a ■, -x : *4 T! The Coyql Palm ^ ACROC^Mi A vinifera*, Costa Rica. A ivlul i w Hi i hij n n't uni I, p:irt \a 11 y < 1 in < Vi] I ral Amrrira J hr i >ln >t< \vn^ nuhV ar Lji * hh >1 < itk^ T >1 pi i in i hnrinim oshitc, nrur 1'in't Liuum, This slun k-* in*iKnmlly '"ir. N Jt. H»T. / 11. '4 Plate 58. » t N X 'ty /' ' ( ^ J* ; * h r ? j r * Vi.r.v t 1 A * , ■ "■ f L. -l T\ X*' , • ■» 4 * ^ * # r i - i\ ' ^ T -;!"V V'- ' '"7 f fV ' \ . V " # * J r- k, ^ \ ^ 'f +* .* H -' ■ V V Trunk and Fruit Clusters of the Corozo or Manaca Palm iAttalea cohune p Eastern Guatemala, A. relativo of tliv c ^nut. {wrtiiilly iIhtuj-^i ii-nt-1-! in \ h■:i crr11 AiiK-riut. Tlir ph■ pt- tn^ic in-ar I';! [i/u-L A [ I - l W m [my. COOK—THE COCONUT PALM TN AMERICA. 315 extensively cultivated in Porto Kico under the native name yautiaf are still commonly called cocos in Jamaica. Peter Martyr used the word coccos in his ninth Decade in describ- ing coconuts in the East Indies (Coccos appellant fructus iUos . . .), but no modern writer seems to have recorded the word as a native East Indian name of the coconut. None of the numerous names given in Watt's Dictionary of the Economic Products of India and in Wallace's vocabularies of thirty-three languages of the Malay Archipelago has any apparent resemblance to coco, unless it be copray the East Indian name of the dried meat. Some authorities note an ancient Egyptian word as the original of the Greek kouki of Theophrastus and the Latin cuci of Pliny. Seemann denies that the Egyptian kouki referred to the coconut, but applies it to a native African fan palm, Borassus. It is also possible to identify the cuciophoron of Theophrastus with the doum palm of Upper Egypt (Hyphaene).0 Indeed, the word "honk" is still to be heard in the bazaars of Cairo as the name of the homy endosperm of the doum palm, commonly used for making the beads of rosaries, and other small objects. Some etymologists would assimilate kouki with kokkos, a general Greek word for fruit, berry, or seed, the same as the Latin coccus. The word coccus seems to have come into Latin as the name of the Kermes insect {Coccus iliciti) that yielded the scarlet dye, rather than as the name of a seed or a berry. Nevertheless, we find among later post-Columbian writers of botanical Latin, such as Pi so, the expres- sion Coccus Jndica taking the place of Nux Indica as the name of the true coconut and Coccus Medica or Coccus Maldivica, instead of Nux Medica or Nux Mald'tvensium. Eden's English translation of Oviedo shows the word cocus; Oviedo himself adhered consistently to coco, except as ho wrote cocos in the plural number, as in the heading of his chapter. Li mucus, in his older works, such as the Ilortus Clif- fortianus and the Flora Zeylanica, also used the generic name Coccus. The change to Cocos seems to have been made in the first edition of the Species Plant-arum (1753) without any previous author being indicated as having used the name in this form. The fourth edition of Genera Plant arum (1752) uses the old spelling Coccus, but the fifth edition (1754) adopts the new form Cocos. The Latin and Greek derivations that have been invented for the word may have quite as little basis in fact as the fanciful theory given by Oviedo, and repeated by many later writers, that the name was suggested by the resemblance of the base of the shell to the face of a monkey. The Spanish language has a verb cocar, meaning to make faces like a monkey, and even a noun coco, meaning ogre or bugbear, « Greene, Edw. L , Landmarks of botanical history, pt. 1, Smiths. Misc. Coll., vol. 54, p. m. 316 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE NATIONAL HERBARIUM. connected by philologists with the Greek adjective kakos, the equiv- alent of the English word bad. Eden's translation0 elaborates Oviedo's original statement to the extent of definitely ascribing this etymology to the Indians, and associating it with the cry of the howling monkey. OTHER AMERICAN NAMES OF THE COCONUT. It now appears that names other than coco are applied to the coconut by aboriginal Indians. Such names have been found by Prof. II. Pittier among the inhabitants of the southern part of the Central American republic of Costa Rica, where several very primi- tive tribes have hidden themselves in the forest and avoided contact with the Spanish colonists. The name l-o-ko is used by the Cabecara, Dorasque, and Guaymi tribes; the Cunus say o-kob, also slightly sug- gestive of copra, while the Bribri and Brunka people have quite dis- tinct terms, sura uo and sia ud, respectively. According to Professor Pittier the Brunkas are good sailors, who make voyages of considerable length along the Pacific coast, though they are careful to keep their canoes wit bin sight of land. The Brunkas live not far from the Burica peninsula where Ovicdo found the coco palm In special abundance in the early part of the sixteenth century. The Burica district is also the nearest part of the main- land to Cocos Island. That this region possessed at one time a much more advanced civilization is shown by the graves of the adja- cent Chiriqui district of Panama, and other ancient remains dis- covered in the southern part of Costa Rica by Professor Pittier. It is to be expected that other native names will be found in the interior districts of South America where the coconut is known to exist, but these regions are still largely unexplored. The native names of the coconut in Brazil, inaiaguacu, recorded by Piso and Marcgrave in Brazil, have been noted in a previous chapter. Accord- ing to Martins the name inaja or inaia is also applied in Brazil to another related palm, Maximiliana. Martins associates the Tupi names for fruits, yba, iba, and ia with such words as aha or niat which relate more specifically to the large fruits of the Brazil-nut tree. BerthoUetia excelsa, and then points out the similarity to nia, the Hawaiian name of the coconut.1 fool.note p, & Marlins, (\ F. 1\ lieitriujo zur Ethnographic uiul iSpraehenkunde AmerikaV, vol. 2, p. 417. (Leipzig 1867.) In Muregrave's vocabulary of a native Brazilian language, published in 1658, the word nhia is said to signify heart (cor), COOK—TTTE COCONUT PALM IK AMERICA 317 DISSEMINATION OF THE COCONTJT PALM BY PRIMITIVE MAN. Without the recognition of human agency in its dissemination the history of the coconut would be likely to remain forever as mysterious as it was to the eminent botanist Seemann, who traversed the subject in several of his books in attempting to solve the problem by means of natural agencies alone: . . . And the great puzzle lias been, whence did it originally spring? Though having paid considerable attention to this subject, I am not acquainted with any theory, nor have been able to start one myself, which would be in unison with the part the Cocoanut plays in different countries. «■ Seemann was inclined to believe that the coconut palm must have been a native of Polynesia because of its extreme economic importance in that part of the world. In support of this view, and in opposition to the idea of Asiatic or Malayan origin which previous writers had advanced, Seemann argued that the coconut could not have been brought to the Pacific islands from (he west, because colonists from Asia would certainly have brought the Asiatic art of bleeding the sap from the palms by cutting the young flower stalksj to make toddy and sugar from the juice. Such facts tend to show that the original inhabitants of the Pacific islands did not derive their agricul- tural habits from Asiatic sources, and that the more modern contacts with Asia have also been very slight, since they have left the Poly- nesians in ignorance of the art of making toddy. . . . Had the Polynesian* therefore once known the process, they would probably never have forgotten so easy a way of obtaining sugar, vinegar, yeast, and a pleasant drink, the strength of which may be regulated by lime to any man's taste. So either the Polynesians could never have coine from eastern Asia, or else, after spreading over the Sou ill Sea, ages must have elapsed before the cocoa-nut made its appearance in these waters, so that the process of toddy-making (there being 110 other suitable Poly- nesian Palms to operate upon) had been entirely forgotten, and even disappeared from native traditions. I'nder such circumstances, it. behooves us to suspend our final judgment whether Polynesia be or be not the native country of the cocoa-nut. & If we admit Seem aim's argument, and there is no good reason for rejecting it, we can not suppose that the original settlers of the Pacific islands came from (he Malay region, for the coconut is the one thing that they w ould have taken with them, if all else had been left behind. It not only furnishes in that part of the world the chief ration for native voyages, but is the only source of fresh water on many of the smaller islands, and is thus indispensable for human existence. The fiber of the husk of the coconut is equally necessary to the Polynesians in the building and handling of boats. The mystery a Seemann, B., I)oltings on the Roadside, in Panama, Nicaragua, and Mosquito, p. 152. (London, 18G9.) & Seemann, op. cit., p. lo4; Flora Yitiensis, p. {London, 1868.) 318 COKTKIiiUTIOKS FROM THE NATIONAL MEHBAR1TTM. deal's only wlion wc arc prepared to admit that the original colonists in the Pacific islands were native of the same continent as the coconut palm, so that they could take with them the cultivated plants oil which their future existence depended. Bv keeping close to the practical agricultural facts we avoid the confusion to which De Candolle and Seemann were brought by conflicting theoretical methods of ascertaining the origins of plants. The uses of the coco- nut have been most highly developed in the Pacific islands because lack of other plants has compelled the inhabitants to depend more and more upon the coconut. Necessity has given rise to the multi- plicity of uses, but the palm itself had to be brought from the only part of the world where such palms grew -South America. The relatively slight economic importance of the coconut in America could be given as a reason for believing that the palm was not intro- duced into America bv the Polvnesians in the same wav that Seemann used the absence of toddy in Polynesia to prove that the palm was not brought to the Pacific islands by people from Asia. Jt is gratuitous to object to human agency as accounting for the spread of the coconut since there were other cult ivated tropical plants, such as the sweet potato and the banana which were also cultivated on both sides of the Pacific, and must have been carried across bv the men who knew and used them. They are propagated only from cuttings, would not survive soaking in salt water, and do not grow on sea beaches. The indications are that nearlv all the cultivated plants which Polynesia shared with America were natives of America, but whatever their source, they do not permit us to doubt that there was communication across the Pacific by primitive agricultural people. Ethnological evidence for such communication may also be found in the similarities now eommonlv recognized between the *_■ I1 natives of America and the present, inhabitants of eastern Asia and the Malay region. That the straight-haired peoples of the East Indies are not true aborigines of the countries they now occupy is shown by the presence among (hem of remnants of the former curl- haired populations, such as the Ainus in Japan, the Negritos in the Philippines, the Alfuros of (lilolo and ('cram, the Papuans, and the Andamanese. On the continent of Asia as well recent investiga- tions are showing that, primitive peoples related to the Negritos or to the Ainus preceded the Malayan and Mongolian occupations. That (lie present Polynesians do not more closely resemble the natives of America does not warrant an objection to the idea that the coconut palm was originally carried into the Pacific islands from America. Ethnologists are familiar with the fact that the prevail- ing direction of recent racial movements in the Pacific has been from west to east. Whatever may have been the conditions in the remote times when the islands were first occupied, the island people have COOK—THE COCONTJT PALM IN AMERICA 319 had more recent contacts with the Malayan and Mel artesian races. This eastward movement into the Pacific explains the presence, even in the most eastern archipelagoes, of many seedless varieties of the breadfruit, banana, and other Malayan plants, and of an infusion of Papuan or Melanesian blood. Yet these later influences have not destroyed the essential likeness of the Polynesian and Malayan culture to that of ancient America. The general unity of the Malavo- Polynesian language and the similarity of the people and their cus- toms to those of the American Indians are more obvious in the remote islands, such as New Zealand, Easter Island, and Hawaii, than in the equatorial archipelagoes, where the Melanesian influences are more apparent. The Polynesians have traditions and genealogies that refer to the introduction of the breadfruit as having taken place about eighty generations or two thousand years ago, but this eastward E_? A/ ( t 1 ' migration that carried the breadfruit need not have had any con- nection with the westward migration which carried the coconut into the Pacific from America, and which probably took place at a much more ancient period. Nor is it necessary to believe that contacts of the islanders with America entirely ceased during the modern period of eastward migra- tion. The presence of the banana in pre-Spanish America forbids such an assumption. In addition to numerous traditions of the arrival of people from the seas, in Peru and elsewhere, there was the definitely reported historical incident of the black, frizzle-haired people of the Isthmus of Panama, which can hardly be explained except by supposing that a tribe of Polynesians had established themselves on the Isthmus when Balboa crossed it and discovered the Pacific Ocean. The origin of the coconut in America and its dissemination by human agency to the tropics of the Old World do not stand alone as botanical theories, but are in full accord with more recent and well- established discoveries in the fields of ethnology and archeology. It is now generally admitted by ethnologists that the ancient civiliza- tions of tropical America were of native, indigenous origin and not imported from abroad. In Egypt and Assyria, on the contrary, it does not appear that the earliest civilizations were indigenous. Recent discoveries make it possible to trace them back to the shores of the Persian Gulf and to southern Arabia, and to a seafaring exotic race, skilled in agriculture and navigation. That the primitive agricultural people who distributed the coconut and other American plants over the islands and shores of the Pacific and Indian oceans came originally from America is a possibility that appears worthy of careful consideration by students of botany and ethnology. The tropical contact of the two hemispheres was so remote in time, and the subsequent changes have been so great on 320 CONTBIBUTIONS FROM THE NATIONAL HERBARIUM:. both sides of the Pacific, that the ethnological evidence a?one might riot be sufficient, but the addition of definite botanical data may yield conclusive proof. The earlier idea of an Asiatic origin of Amer- ican civilizations having been given up, the tendency has been to believe that agriculture and other arts of civilization have developed quite independently on the two sides of the Pacific. But even if we were willing to believe in closely parallel developments in customs and arts, this could not explain the prehistoric distribution of the same cultivated plants over the Tropics of both hemispheres. ORIGIN OF CULTIVATED VARIETIES OF THE COCONUT PALM. One of the most convincing arguments for the Malayan origin of the coco palm was the existence of many and very diverse varieties in the East Indies. It was a favorite line of reasoning with De Candolle that the native home of a species was the region in which it had been longest in domestication. The length of the period of domestication was inferred from the number of varieties as a meas- ure of the time that selection had been at work. Such calculations were applied to the sugar cane, the taro, and numerous other plants. In dealing with the coco palm this plan seemed to be particularly effective, for nearly all of the recorded varieties are in the East Indies. The coco palm in America is not as uniform as commonly supposed, though the varietal diversities do not approach those of the Malav region. Careful consideration of the evolutionary argument will lead, how- ever, to a conclusion directly opposite to that reached by De Candolle, for the greatest and most definite variations of a cultivated plant are much more likely to occur and he preserved outside its natural range, where intermixture with the wild type of the species is prevented. There are many reasons for believing that the abrupt and striking "sports" that appear among our cultivated plants are not, in reality, caused by selection, but are induced by new conditions and by the state of inbreeding that generally accompanies domestication. The normal or wild type of a species is generally prepotent over the varieties which have arisen in domestication, so that the "im- proved" breed rapidly "deteriorates" when allowed to become crossed with the wild stock. Darwin and many later experimenters have proved, also, that when diverse breeds are crossed the offspring are very often not intermediate between the breeds, but tend to revert to the ancestral form. The breeders of high-^rade varieties r> n look upon such mongrels as degenerate, but from the standpoint of the evolutionist they may be said to be recovering from the injurious results of inbreeding. It was noticed, for example, that in parts of Guatemala,-where the wild tropical papaw (Carica) is common, the cultivated trees also have very small fruit. The tendency to such COOK—THE COCONUT PALM IN AMEKICA, 321 reversion would ho particularly strong in plants like the palms, cross- fertilized by the wind. If economic importance and multiplicity of variations were to decide the question of origin, codec could be proved to be a native of the East Indies or of Central America, instead of Abyssinia. Many striking variations of the coffee plant have arisen in the American Tropics, and none, as far as known, in Abyssinia. The breadfruit could be shown by such reasoning to be a native of the eastern archipelagoes of Polynesia, where most of the specialized varieties are found and where the tree has an economic importance and an agri- cultural popularity far beyond that enjoyed in its original Malayan home. If the Malayan varieties of the coco palm are to be accepted as proof of anything, it is that the wild ancestral type of the species has not existed in that part of the world during the period in which the diverse mutations have arisen. The relatively unmodified coconuts of America, on the other hand, may indicate the compara- tively recent presence of the "unimproved" wild stock, and corrob- orate the evidence afforded by the geographical distribution of the related species of Cocos and the presence of the coco palm itself, in the salt-spring regions of the interior of Colombia. The history of the coco palm has been discussed recently at some length by Professor De Vries as affording evidence that the numerous cultivated forms of the species have originated during the period of domestication and do not represent separate domestications of wild species or varieties already diverse. There could seem to be no question that this is true of the coconut as of other cultivated plants.® The inference to be drawn from the fact that Cocos nucifera, as now cultivated in the Old World Tropics and made up of a large number of very distinct varieties, is not that wild species are so constituted, but that domestication conduces to the formation of the diverse varieties. The wild plants show individual diversity, the cultivated plants varietal diversity. The individual members of wild species are generally more diverse than individuals of domes- ticated varieties. On the other hand, wild species seldom present any such measure of diversity as exists among domesticated varieties. Trees of the larger varieties of the coco palm grow to a height of 50 to 100 feet, but a dwarf kind mentioned by Watt reaches a height of only 10 or 15 feet. The nuts differ correspondingly in abundance, size, and shape. In some varieties they are comparable in size to a man's head; in others to a turkey's egg. In shape they may be spherical or pointed at one or both ends, or with prominent angles. The outside of the husk may be green, yellow, red, bluish, brown, *De Vries, II., Species and Varieties, their Origin by Mutation, pp. 82-89. (Chi- cago, 1905.) 322 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE NATION AT. HERBARIUM or black. On the inside the husk may contain coarse or fine fibers or may consist of a reddish edible pulp. The meat may be thick or thin, hard or creamy, and rich or poor in oil. One sort has an outer layer of the meat red instead of white. Finally, the varieties differ in size, number, and color of the leaves, some being light green and some dark, or yellowish, grayish, or reddish. Most kinds have the pinna* separate, but in a few they remain united as in the young seedlings. No wild palms have been found with any such individual or varietal diversification as the coconut varieties; indeed, most of the species of palms are less easy to distinguish from their nearest relatives than arc these varieties. Professor De Vries has described many such variations of the evening primrose as new species, on the ground that they answer all the requirements of species as treated by sys- tematise, but if this be true it would seem to be better to modify our taxonomic criteria than to set ourselves the unnecessary task of naming as new species all the cultivated varieties of coconuts and other plants. The objection to the classification of these mutative variations as species is not that the amount of difference may not be as great as between some wild species, but that the evolutionary status of the mutation is not the same as among the wild species. The nat- ural species is a group of freely interbreeding diverse individuals, while mutative varieties generally represent the progeny of a single individual variation, induced and maintained by inbreeding. To give Latin names to fiftv or a hundred Malayan mutations of liint shows one tilurieli'ss loaf slieutli ami one simple, (iet'jily divided luii/, tltuilueiHl.) Fig, 2.—Cross Section of Coconut Germinating Inside the Husk. 1*roni f'nulliummv, l,i-1'twinicr. li^ Jit, I'- lift < lJaris. I'Jul'. (KvUk-uil.) COOK—T1IE COCONUT PALM IN AMERICA 327 case of the coconut the embryo lies inside the largest of the three thin spots or "eyes" at the base of the shell, and the soft spongy cotyledon grows out from this point to fill the whole interior cavity of the nut and then continues to digest and absorb until all of the surrounding food materials have been taken over and conveyed into the growing parts of the young plant. Palm seeds with thick hard shells like the coconut are provided with special channels or pores for the exit of the embryo, covered only by a thin scale of the shell material or a specially formed lid or plug easily pushed out of the way. When germination finally occurs the base of the cotyledon grows out of the seed, carrying with it the plumule or leaf bud of the young plant, which later emerges from the cotyledon by a split on one side. V,'ith the relatives of the coconut, which have not thick husks, the second phase of germination, the escape of the young pi ant let by the opening of the cotyledon, necessarily takes place outside the husk, but with the coconut the whole process of germination may be com- pleted inside the husk. Coconuts buried in the moist soil germinate without any special assistance from the husk, and even without wait- ing for the cotyledon to grow to full size, by absorbing the food mate- rials of the endosperm. It is said to be customary in some localities to remove the husk before planting. But if the husk is allowed to remain intact the coconut is able to germinate without even being placed in the ground. And not the germination alone, but the sub- sequent growth of the young plant may go on for months without any external contacts, the leaves often attaining considerable size, before the roots have made any external growth beyond the fibers of the husks. The young coconut seedling, with its ample provision of food and moisture and its fibrous husk for the accommodation of its roots, might be described as a self-potted plant. It is to a very large extent independent of external conditions during the early stages of growth, which are much more precarious for all other palms. The preference of gardeners for coconut fiber as a potting material may be accepted as a testimonial of the success of the palm in meeting the needs of the seedlings. (PI. 59, figs. 1,2.) For palms that arc natives of humid, densely forested regions such a provision would be superfluous and disadvantageous, for with them it is a question of increasing the number of seeds and seedlings and of thus multiplying the chances that some of the seedlings will find favorable situations, with light enough to permit them to grow. Natural selection in the form of competition of other vegetation would discriminate against the cvolulion of an excessively large seed in a species tolerant of shade. But for a palm that lives in an open country with long, dry seasons, the protection of the seed and the 51004°—TOT, 14, PT 2 10 -5 328 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE NATIONAL HERBARIUM. seedling against (Irving out would be- of the greatest possible advan- tage. An evolutionary tendency in this direction would be favored by natural selection and might be expected to make rapid progress. The natural result would be that we should have one species highly adapted in one respect, but remaining otherwise closely like its rela- tives, as in the case of the coconut. The adaptive value of the husk as an expedient for germination can also be estimated by comparing the habits of the coconut with those of related palms that encounter similar environmental problems. Excellent examples of adaptive germination devices are afforded bv Attalca and Acrocomia, two relatives of the coconut found in Guatemala. The seeds of Attalea cohune, which abounds in eastern Guatemala, are about the size of a turkey's egg, with a thin woody husk and an extremely hard, bony shell almost half an inch in thick- % ^ t ness, perforated at the base for the exit of the embryo. But instead of pushing out a young plant as in the coconut, the first organ to emerge from the seed is the long, slender, cord-like cotyledon, which grows down into the ground for a distance of from 3 to fi inches (pi. 60). The true germination takes place at the end of this burrow- ing organ, so that the young plant, though produced from a seed lying on the surface of the soil, is well and deeply planted, and at once sends its roots still farther down, to establish communication with the permanent moisture of the deeper layers of the soil. The cord-like cotyledon connecting the seed with the young plant remains alive for a long time, to carry down food materials from the store- house above. In Acrocomia the same difficulties have been solved in a very different way, though not less definitely adaptive. The nursing foot or cotyledon is very short and remains functional for a much briefer period than in Attalea. The young plant completes its germination and begins its development close to the surface of the soil. It par- tially supplies the deficiency of the length of the cotyledon by growing downward at first instead of upward, the bases of the leaves being abruptly bent (pi. 01). These first joints of the seedling very soon thicken into a fleshy bulb, formed, doubtless, by a prompt transfer of the nutrient material stored in the seed, thus avoiding the need of a long-lived cotyledon as in Attalea. The coconut follows neither of these policies. Being provided with its own water supply inside and outside the nut, it is able to grow a plant of considerable size before attempting to make any connection with the soil. And then being thoroughly prepared, and the proper season having arrived, it is able to send down a good supply of roots to the level of permanent moisture in the soil and establish itself on a self-supporting basis. Contr. Na* Herb.. V:r '4 Plate 60. Germination of the Corozo Palm (Attalea cohuneK Sliowiiifj the long Mim>wiii|r cut vision tluit carrit's thct'iiihryn iiitti thv ktouixI. Fi»r <-}mrison with tin- frorinit)Hti(»i of the coctuml :is sln»wn in jilatc 5'J. (Ntiturnl > Contr Nat. Herb. Vf>l 14. Plate 61. ( i 4. f Germination of the Coyol Palm (Acrocomia viniferaI. Showing the nuts with their foramina, the very short cotyledon. ntul llic downward growth of the utem of the young cotyledon to form a Jleshy subterranean bulb, producing the tirst leaves from its lower end, (Xntnrnl size.) COOK—THE COCONUT PALM IN AMERICA. 329 Even when actually hung up or kept in the house coconuts will often germinate and grow a plant 2 feet or more in height. In fact thev often do much better when treated this way than when buried k.' V in the ground too soon, and it is the regular custom in some tropical countries to germinate coconuts in sheds before planting them in the ground. Nevertheless it is difficult to believe that the moisture of the nut and its husk can sustain the plant for so long a period. The possi- bility that atmospheric moisture is drawn upon to replenish the sup- ply may be worthy of consideration, though it seems not to have been regarded in studies of the germination of the coconut. Thus Kirk- wood and Gies declare: Neither the husk nor the shell appears to serve any other than passive mechanical function, and only the constituents of the endosperm and milk, so far as the nut is concerned, nourish the young plant before it finds in the soil the elements provided there in abundance for its growth to maturity. . . . The lowest part of the stem contains almost as little solid matter and is nearly as watery as the cotyledon. The percentage of water in the stem diminishes as the distance away from the "root crown" increases. The watery condition of the lower part of the stem is increased, doubtless, by the fact that the surrounding husk is impregnated with water, thus favoring direct absorption by osmosis and at the same time preventing evaporation from the surface of the growing tissue.0 But on a previous page these writers have referred to chemical analyses which support in a striking manner the suggestion that the husk of the coconut may be able to collect moisture for the benefit of the young plant, and that it is the husk for which the plant makes demands of salt and potash. Bachofen's results indicate that sodium chloride and potassium phosphate are the chief inorganic matters drawn upon in the development of the cocoanut—chemical data in harmony with the fact that the cocoa palm does not thrive away from the coast or where salt is lacking in the soil.& A summary of Bachofen's analysis is also given, showing that of the important ingredients of the soil 1,000 nuts remove the following quantities: This means that each coconut husk contains about a tablespoonful of salt, to say nothing of the lime and potash, the presence of which a Kirk wood and Gies, Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, vol. 29, pp. 352, 357. (1902.) & Kirkwood and Gies, loc. cit., p. 334. Total in I Portion pounds. I in husk. Nitrogen Phosphor to acid Potash..,., Lime Sodium chloride X. f>5 2, 45 18, 75 2.30 21.42 3.70 .fc4 13- 52 1, H2 20.23 330 C'ONTttl MUTTONS FltOM THE NATIONAL HERliARTUM may well assist in increasing the power to attract and hold water for the young plant. The more wc appreciate the highly specialized adaptive character- istics of the coconut the more unwarranted appears the idea of maritime distribution. The huge size of the nuts and the necessary limitation of their number, would have no meaning from the stand- point of maritime distribution, the maximum production of flour- ishing trees under favorable conditions being reckoned at onlv 200 nuts. Related palms comparable in size to the coconut, such as Attalea and Acrocomia, produce seeds in vastly greater numbers. The number of pistillate /lowers is relatively very small in the coconut palm and many of these are abortive (pis. 6'.\ 63, G4). It would be impossible for any large number to develop. The chances of any sea-borne nut floating to a favorable destination are so infinitesimal that the natural perpetuation of the species by this method would be entirely impracticable. The specialization of the coconut toward greater size is in itself an evidence that natural selection has favored this tendency. If a few large seeds had not been more advantageous to the palms than many small seeds we may be sure that the large seeds would never have developed. How important the factor of human selection niav have been we do not know, but it does not appear that larger size has been a desideratum. The largest varie- ties do not seem to bespecially preferred in cultivation. BEHAVIOR OF THE COCONUT PALM IN INTERIOR LOCALITIES. The popular impression that the coconut will grow to normal maturity only in the immediate vicinity of the ocean has arisen from the fact that this palm, like the date, is a salt-loving plant and in continuously humid tropical countries finds no congenial soil except near the seashore. Many agricultural treatises and general works of reference continue to repeat the traditional theory of direct and necessary connection between the coconut and the sea. Even Nicholls asserts the limitation to the seacoast. The climate, however, must bo a maritime one, the palm delighting in the saline atmosphere of the seat-oust. When the tree is plant cd inland, in order to make up for the want of a saline atmosphere, it if usual to put: silt in l he hoks before the seedlings are set out, and as much as half a bushed of salt ia sometimes used in this way for each tree." But this view is no longer universal, and is very definitely denied bv a recent writer on coconut culture in British India. The old idea tliut it would not thrive f:ir from the influence of the sea breeze is ex- ploded, as it grows welhdl over the low country, where the jsoil mid r.iinfall are suitable, and even in sheltered vallevaat. an elevation of 2,000 feel, as in ihe I own uf Uadulhi.k "Nicholls, H. A. A., Tropical Agriculture, p. ]<)7. (London, 1H00.) fcJardme, W.t The Cultivation of the Coconut Palm, Tropical Agriculturist, vol. 24, p. 151. (11)05.) Cor-.tr. Nat. Hero.. Vo' '4 Plate 62 Flowers and Fruit of a Young Coconut Palm, Belize, British Honduras. Tin/ lit>n>UH UJAI shctuhs wild (uhulur >[mi lift Ihut iiirU^i1 thii iiitlniVM't-h*"! ^ u hrri yuunir iii:lIm> sliowti, at uKo (lit- st ars ul thti ^ nf itUlvEL l^uvs mm 11 if trunk. Cortr. NiT. Hr-rK> Vo . 1 4 Plate 63. Fruit Clusters of Mature Coconut Palm, Costa Rica. [n a tmiiHii;! (.liUUHlioll lit I.!i Ciiliiinliintiii. rinir I'nrl IJiriuii. Mure pnnliic-1 nc 1 n;.'»tn soi'U. tint Iiiivt". u lair tiiiiin-siuii of liic ilusU-r^- <>i ntit< ;i^ 111>• v Iniiih in tl ] insii ii >1 l. ii\ n1 *■* •] t\*"1 L r 1 [' 1111 w L n L i C-' n'r. Nal. H'.-rh. V^l. - 4 Plate 64. Inflorescence of the Coconut Palm, with Staminate and Pistillate Flowers. 1mmr sttuniiww llmvrrs; bnsrHnd tijHil" ii lirniH'h <0 n\\ i[itU>rvsrtMm\ witli ^imniutr iJiuvits: rt (mrl t»f n spnthi* inrlosiiitf \hv intlnivsi-t'Tiiv, with iniTntir«»u* biHlsol" shnimmtr llmvrrs mn) ■ tfir i^istillrt ti- hud: f/. ui (wobruin Ir-s. tnrh Ki'tiriii^ji very yuuiiirrorunut. ■ Nsitnrtil COOK THE COCONUT PALM IN AMERICA 331 The traditional partiality of the coconut for the scabeaeh is fully explained by two considerations, the salt and the relative absence of of her vegetation, which enables it to be grown with less care or to persist longer without cultivation. The limestone of coral islands may also afford sufficient alkaline mutter for the coconut, even out of reach of the sea water, as described by Wallace on the island of Matabello in the Malay Archipelago." Nor is the coconut confined to humid tropical climates or to low elevations. Coco palms have been reported as thriving away from the sea in relatively dry localities in several tropical countries. Pick- ering reported them in Arabia in the district behind Muscat. Coco- nuts are extensively grown in the southern part of the Hindustan peninsula, and even in Bangalore, in tne middle of the peninsula at an altitude of 900 meters. Field cultures of coconuts are recognized as acutely dependent upon part icular kinds of soils/" An old report of coconuts in the interior of Africa, in the region of Timbuctu, was probably a mistake, as Seemann has pointed out, though it does not appear improbable that they would grow there if planted. Landor refers to five kinds of palms as seen about Tim- buctu, but makes no mention of coconuts/ ""The natives uf Matabello are almost nil ircly occupied in making cocoa-nut oil, which they sell to the Iiugis and (lorsim traders, who carry it l<> Banda and Amboina. The rugged coral rock seems very favorable to the growth of the cocoa-nut palm, which abounds over the whole island lo tlx* very highest points, and produces fruit all the year round."—The Malay Archipelago, p. 281. (London, ISS!).) & A report "On the composition of Indian soils " contains the following statements: "No. 375-96. Black loam; lies on a gravelly substratum at a depth of 2 or 3 feel.; is therefore unfit for cocoa-nut. The ryots complain that the soil of ihi.s and the neigh- bouring fields is not retentive enough, and needs to he more frequently watered than the fields farther down the Cauvery Valley. Irrigated under the Kaling-arayan channel from (he Bhavani. "No. 377-Oii. Clay, black; more mellow and clayey than No. 375. At a depth of 3 to 5 feet there its a, bed of impalpable black sand; cocoa-nuts and plantains thrive on this remarkably, and nowhere in the Can very Valley are cocoa-nuts more exten- sivoly cultivated. The nuts are comparatively small. (The sample received could not be called either black or clayey; it consisted of a dark-brown loamy Koil.)"— Leather, J. \\\, The Agricultural Ledger, No. 2, p. 8. (1898.) c"A (cw date palms, the gorboij'mwukuru, tho (jorbotj-homo. with long green thorns and a bitter fruit much enjoyed by the children, and a number of dwarf palms arc to be found, as well as the forked palm, thcbdvdc—Landor, A, II, S,, Across Widest Africa, vol. 2, p. 451. (1907.) The palms with the long green thorns may be oil palms, Elaeis guineensis Jaeq., which have the lower pinme narrow, stiff, and spine-like. Many other palms have spines along the margins of the petioles, but usually short and brown or black in color. The fruits oi Elaeis are rather bitter when raw, but not after they have been roasted. 332 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE NATIONAL HERBARIUM. A recent publication on the German colonies contains a photo- graph of a group of apparently thriving coconut palms at Misa- hoclic, in the interior of the Togo colony in West Africa, but no statement is made regarding them." Coconut palms are grown in large numbers on limestone soils in interior districts of the Yucatan peninsula, especially about the city of Mcrida, and they are also said to thrive on the Pacific side of Mexico, around the volcano of Colima. They are also reported by Mr. G. X. Collins at Acala, a town in the State of Chiapas, in an arid interior district with a natural growth of cacti and other desert plants, Humboldt remarked particularly the vigorous condition of the coconut palms found by him in the interior of Venezuela and Colom- bia, which he considered as an anomalous fact in the distribution of a maritime species. Sir Richard Burton mentions the coconut palm as flourishing and very productive in interior districts of Brazil that have alkaline soils which he recognized as a practical substitute for " sea air." b More recent testimony to the existence of the coconut palm in interior localities of South America is that of Prof. II. Pit tier, a special agent of the Department of Agriculture, who makes the following statement: Until 189.1, 1 had no notion of that species bearing fruit at any great distance from the seashore or high above the sea level, but when, on behalf of the Intercontinental Railway Commission, I crossed the Azuero peninsula from Retnedios to Santiago de Yeragua, in the present Republic of Panama, I was surprised to see groves of coconut palmy surrounding the houses in the high savannas of Tole, more than meters above sea level. The sites of many houses in the valley of Tabasara were marked by isolated coconut trees. This, however, did not seem so very wonderful on account of the proximity of the sea, and at Tol<5 the inhabitants attributed (he fine condition of the palms to their being fully exposed lo the sea breeze. l>ul in 1905, when we entered through Buenaventura into the Dagua Valley of Colombia, we began to notice coconut trees as soon as we reached the drier region of the interior, at an alti- tude of over 2,000 feet. On the inner watershed of (he Western Cordillera, near a hostelry and on the brink of a precipitous slope, another beautiful specimen was found at about 4,800 feet above sea level. In the Cauca plain, in the interior of Colombia, at a mean level of over 900 meters, in a warm, temperate climate, wi(h extreme conditions of wet and dry seasons, groves of coconut palms were seen every- where. (1M. Gti, fig. 1.) The people of the Cauca Valley did not seem to distinguish their variety from the one growing on the seashore at Buenaventura, but Dr. Evaristo Garcia, a noted naturalist and physician of Calf, assured me that coconuts brought into the valley from the seabeaeh do not thrive. In the Cordillera do Santa Maria I have seen several coconut trees on the hills around San Andres at nearly 1,090 meters of elevation, and the palm seemed to be quite familiar to the Indians. All over Central America the coconut palm is also ° Wohltmann, I' ., Kultur-und-Vegelationa Dilder aus unseren IH'Ut.schcn Colonieti, pi. 52. & Burton, R., Highlands of Brazil, vol. 2, pp. 204, 2S0. (London, 1869.) Co ft' N it. H»iph vol. 14. Plate 65. Fig. 1Coconut Palm, near Palmira. Fig. 2.- Coconut Palm at Cajabon, Cauca Valley, Colombia. Alta Verapaz. Guatemala. Kxrtmpli's from interior localities. Kig. I, filtilmlc '."X) idcIit-: n1«n»t iiu'ivr*. Cor-Nil. HU-rti. ■■ ' 4 Plate 66, Coconut Palm at Belize* British Honduras. 'llMVXtll.Lf Will*- foi'tll * 11 It 41 \t ^ us I avsrl 11 < n ] Uml + T Mil |f\rl i'i pHi! i I h HW. I " In « i Mil |VU t 1 uilli < .'l!, fi\ w t ] n f | s[n *W pulltl> l^rnU LtlL3 tmrruMt r mi li i inii.ruT ion- m\*[ tiriwiiu -iUT»-r nrnl COOK—THE COCONUT PALM IN AMERICA. 333 frequently cultivated in the interior, especially in the drier districts, but the natives do not seem to be so well acquainted with it as is the case in South America, and they have no special names to designate it. The palms shown in plate 52 (frontispiece) are growing in the city of Salama near the geographical center of Guatemala. The broad valley or plateau in which Salama is situated has an altitude of 900 meters, and has a distinctly desert climate, but the coconut prospers apparently as well as on the seashore. The leaves are not as large as usual in coast-grown palms (compare with pi. 65), but this is in accordance with a very general principle of plant growth, that plants produce smaller leaves under the stronger light and more rapid transpiration afforded by desert conditions. The coconut is also planted with success in other drv vallevs in Guatemala, notably in that of Cajabon (pi. G6, fig. 2), It is a curious fact that in several of these places the prosperity of the palms is coincident with the prevalence of goiter, a disease commonly sup- posed to be associated with alkaline water, which might be an advan- tage to the palms. In eastern Guatemala, near Livingston, the coconut palm has given an apparent illustration of its requirement of salt by refusing to grow within a few rods of the ocean on slopes moistened only by fresh water. The nature of the soil and the water supply will prob- ably be found to constitute a very large factor in all such cases. The palms thrive much better in the town of Livingston, built on a part of the same slope where the agricultural production of coconuts appears to have failed (pi. 54, fig. 2, facing p. 290). Proximity to the sea is not enough without the right conditions of the soil. Other tropical tree crops, such as coffee and cacao, often thrive under dooryard cultiva- tion in districts where agricultural production is much less success- ful. Even at Panzos, 90 miles from the sea, coconuts are still able to grow in the yards about the houses." The dryness of the interior valleys of Guatemala, and the alkalinity of their scant water supplies, are to a large extent artificial conditions induced by the long-continued presence of agricultural populations and the consequent destruction of the forests and denudation of the a An instance where proximity to the sea enabled palms to thrive in otherwise unfavorable soil is given in Spons' Encyclopedia: "Coco-nuts growing in mangrove soil on the side of creeks, and more or less saturated with nalt, have their milk brackish, and the eap is saline also. These trees do not suffer from Ihe a Hacks of the rhinoceros beetle, and are found to bear much sooner than those planted on a sandy soil, As an illustration of this, while trees planted at Penang thirty years ago, on sandy soil, have not yet borne fruit—although they arc fine-looking trees—others in the same plantation, only 10 years old, but on low ground, where the sea title conies up daily, washed their roots, and runs off again, are in full bearing, giving 50—100 nuts annually, and the kernel is as thick aa that of nuts grown on sandy soil, and produces as much oil." 334 CONTlUnUTTO"X£ FltOM THE XATIONAT, HKHHAJiU'M soil. Under favorable conditinns upon the seabeaeh the coconut palm may require only one form of assistance front man -protection against the shade of other vegetation hut in other places it may become dependent upon mail for its water supply and for (he saline constituents of the soil. ABSENCE OF COCONUT PALMS ON THE COAST OF PERU. The failure of archaeologists to imd coconut shells in the ancient graves of Peru was used bv De Candollc as an argument against the n ■ t ™ American origin of the palm, but coconuts still refuse to ^row alon^ the Peruvian coast, in spite of efforts to introduce them. Other palms Iloiirish m the botanical gardens at Lima, bui numerous experiments have shown that the coconut is entirely unsuited to the local conditions. Although much of the coast belt of Peru lies inside the Tropics, the sky is overcast and the weather continuous!v cool for several months of the year, a result of the cold llumbohlt current that follows (he Peruvian coast. The unfavorable climate continues northward nearly to Guayaquil, where the cloud belt is passed and the coco palm thrives." The Kn^lish botanist Spruce, who made a special study of (he vegetation of this region, considers that the Peruvian desert extends alonS5? taken together with their almost complete disappearance at the present day, affords a striking illustration of the dependence of the coconut upon human assistance not only for its distribution, but for its continued existence on oceanic islands. The dissemination of the coco palm along the tropical coasts is to be ascribed to the agency of primitive man, as with the sweet potato, banana, and other tlomesi icated plants which were widely distributed in prehistoric times. The theory that it lias been dis- seminated by ocean currents is gratuitous, unproved, and improbable. The development of distinct varieties of the coconut has not been confined to the Polvnesian and .Malayan islands. Distinct varieties are also to be found in isolated localities in America, such as the Soconusco region of Mexico and the island of Porto Rico. The existence of manv and diverse varieties in the Malav region fc- n does not indicate that the species is native there, but the opposite, since the proximity of the wild stock of a species is likely to hinder the appearance and preservation of imitations among its cultivated representatives. The relative uniformity of the coconuts of America is in accord with the probability of an origin in this hemisphere. The discovery of distinct varieties in isolated localities in America accords with the probability that the Malayan varieties have arisen, like other cultivated varieties, through segregation and mutation rather than by gradual evolution and natural selection. HISTORICAL CONCLUSIONS. At the time of the discovery of America the coconut was not con- fined to the Pacific side of the Isthmus of Panama, as De Candollc believed, but was already widely distributed along the Atlantic side of the American tropics. Early records show its presence in Cuba, Porto "Rico, Brazil, and Colombia at dates so early as to pre- clude the idea of introduction by the Spaniards. The statement of Pickering, frequently quoted in works of refer- ence, to the effect that coconuts were reported by Columbus on the coast of Central America during his fourth voyage, proves to be erroneous. On the other hand, there appears to be a definite refer- ence to the coconut in Cuba in the journal of the first voyage of Columbus. 340 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE NATIONAL HERBARIUM. De Candolle's inference from Acosta's report of coconuts in Porto Rico at the end of the sixteenth century, that they had recently been introduced by the Spaniards, proves to have 110 warrant in history and is directly opposed by the more extended reference to the coconut in Porto Rico by the Duke of Cumberland's chaplain, who visited the island onlv a few years after A cost a. ])e Candolle's use of the testimony of Piso and Marcgrave to sup- port the idea of the introduction of the coconut into Brazil by Europeans is also unwarranted, since those writers only indicated that the plant was cultivated. An earlier and more explicit record, unknown to De Candolle, gives an account of the coconut as one of the native products of Brazil. The journal of Cieza de Leon, who accompanied the first Spanish expedition to the interior of Colombia, indicates the presence of the coconut palm in localities where it still continues to exist, as shown by the accounts of Velasco, Humboldt. and more recent travelers, down to the present decade. ETHNOLOGICAL CONCLUSIONS. The American origin of the coconut palm and the strict limita- tion of its status in maritime tropics to that of a cultivated plant are facts of ethnological significance. The wide distribution of the coconut in prehistoric times is evidence of the antiquity of agri- culture in America and of very early communication across the Pacific. The American origin of the coconut palm, along with its inability to maintain itself on tropical seacoasts without human assistance, compels us to believe that its trans-Pacific distribution was the work of primitive man. The dependency of the Pacific islanders upon the coconut inav he taken to show that these islands could not have l- been occupied without the previous domestication and dissemina- tion of the coconut. I11 view of the fact that several other palms of unquestioned American origin have been domesticated by aborigines of the Ameri- can tropics, no ethnological objection can be raised to the idea that the coconut palm was originally domesticated ill ancient America. The name "coco" does not appear to have been applied to the 'Indian nut" till after the discovery of America and is to be con- sidered as a word derived from the natives of the AVest Indies. Other native names for the coconut are found among primitive tribes of Costa Rica, as well as in Brazil. The presence of large numbers of coconuts on Cocos Island in the time of Wafer (1(>S5) and their subsequent disappearance should be considered as evidence that the island was formerly inhabited, or COOK—THE COCONUT PALM IN AMERICA. 341 at least regularly visited, by the maritime natives of the adjacent mainland. The fact that the coconut is largely restricted to islands and tropical countries of low elevation explains its importance among the pre- eminently maritime people of the Old World tropics and its relatively slight importance among tlie non maritime natives of the lowland tropics of America. The evidence of the prehistoric dissemination of the coconut and other American cultivated plants across the Pacific Ocean is such as to warrant a careful consideration of other indications that agricul- tural civilization developed originally in America and was distributed to the shores of the Pacific and Indian oceans by a primitive people with agricultural and maritime habits, like those of the Polynesians and Mala vs. The existence of a distinct tribe of frizzle-haired people near the Isthmus of Panama at the time of the discovery does not rest alone on Peter Martyr's casual mention of the finding of negroes, but is supported by Oviedo's contemporary history written directly from the testimony of Balboa and other members of his expedition, just after their return to Darien. The facts are not to be explained rea- sonably by assuming a chance arrival of African negroes, but indi- cate that prehistoric communication across the Pacific continued after the frizzle-haired Melanesian race had spread eastward in the Pacific. Such communication would account for the existence of the banana plant in America previous to the arrival of the Spaniards, as well as for the Old World distribution of the coconut palm and other culti- vated plants of American origin. The banana plant is as evidently a native of the eastern continent as the coconut palm of the western. Evidence of these facts appears very definite and concrete from the biological standpoint, and is worthy of careful consideration by ethnologists. AGRICULTURAL CONCLUSIONS. The coconut is confined to seacoasts only in the humid lowlands of the Tropics; in dry regions it is not restricted to coasts, but thrives in many districts remote from the sea. The fact that it received scientific study only as a maritime plant should not longer obscure the fact that it is also adapted to interior localities with saline soils. The cultural problems of the coconut palm should be investigated quite apart from the idea of maritime habits and distribution. The possibility of raising coconuts in frost-free localities outside the Tropics is not to be tested along the seacoast, but in interior districts where larger amounts of sunlight and heat arc available, as in the valleys of southern California and Arizona. The coconut, like J 342 CONTH MUTTONS FROM THE NATIONAL 11 KUI5ARII'JI. many oilier (minis, is not tolerant of shade nor of long continued cool and cloudy weather. Other species of Cocoa that arc less exacting in their requirements of sunlight and heat have been found to do well along the California coast. n The possibility of introducing coconut palms into southern Cali- fornia is not disproved hy the absence of these palms from Egypt and Palestine. Though the climatic conditions are probably favor- able, it, does not appear that any adequate effort has been made to introduce the palms in those countries. The ability of the coconut to thrive on seaeoasts shows that its requirements of heat are not as great as those of the date palm. Though probably less hardy than the dale palm, it is not impossible that the coconut may be able to exist in frost-free localities that have not enough heat for the ripening of dates. The possibility of introducing the. coconut palm into southern California and Arizona can not be fairly tested by the planting of the maritime varieties. The chances of success will be verv much I greater with the varieties that are adapted to the dry interior locali- ties of the temperate plateaus of the Andes. c ■ r.v. h.t:. , v.,1. :4. Plate 67.