S M I T H S O N I A N C O N T R I B U T I O N S T O B O T A N Y N U M B E R 2 6 A Monograph of the Lichen Genus Relicina (Parmeliaceae) Mason E. Hale, Jr . SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS City of Washington 1975 A B S T R A C T Hale, Mason E., J r . A Monograph of the Lichen Genus Relicina (Parmelia- ceae). Smithsonian Contribut ions to Botany , number 26, 32 pages, 16 figures, 1975.-A revision on the world level is made for Relicina, a generic segregate of Parmelia characterized by having bulbate cilia on the lobe margins and by pro- ducing usnic acid in the cortex. Of the 24 species presently known, 19 occur in the Old World tropics, with the greatest concentration in the lowland dipterocarp forests, 3 are endemic to the New World tropics, and 2 occur in both the New and Old World outside of Africa. The most important taxonomic characters are type of rhizine (simple or branched), presence of coronate apothecia, isidia, and chemistry. The major chemical constituents are echinocarpic acid, fumarproto- cetraric acid, and protocetraric acid. The genus is considered to be of fairly recent origin but rather conservative in terms of morphological and chemical evolution. Four new species, R. amphi thr ix , R . incongrua, R. precircumnodata, and R. subconnivens, are described and one new combination, R. relicinula (Muller Argau) Hale, is made. OFFICIAL PUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution?s annual report, Smithsonian Year. SI PRESS NUMBER 5356. SERIF^ COVER DESIGN: Leaf clearing from the Katsura tree Cercidiphyllum japonicum Siebold and Zuccarini. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Hale, Mason E. A monograph of the lichen genus Relicina (Parmeliaceae). (Smithsonian contributions to botany, no. 26) Supt. of Docs. no.: SI 1.29.26 1. Relicina. I. Title. 11. Series: Smithsonian Institution. Smithsonian contributions to botany, QKl.S2747 no. 26 [QK585.P2] 581?.08s [589?.1] 75-6191 19 no. 26. Contents Page Introduction 1 Morphological Characters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Ecology and Habitats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Phytogeography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Evolution and Speciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Position of Relicina in the Parmeliaceae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Key to Species of Relicina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Literature Cited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chemistry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 16 Species Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 iii A Monograph of the Lichen Genus Relicina (Parmeliaceae) Mason E. Hale, Jr . Introduction Relicina is a generic segregate of the collective genus Parmelia. I t is characterized by marginal bul- bate cilia and the constant occurrence of usnic acid, a yellow pigment, in the cortex. The genus includes 24 species, almost all of them occurring in tropical Southeast Asia. This paper is a monographic treat- ment of the genus based on herbarium and field studies. T h e first species of Relicina was described by E. Fries as Parmelia relicina on the basis of a speci- men from ?Rawak? in 1825. Neither Linnaeus nor Acharius had seen any material belonging to this genus. Laurer described the second species, P. lim- bata, an Australian endemic, in 1827. This species is well known because i t was issued in several widely distributed exsiccati. I n the remainder of the 19th century only five more taxa were discovered: Parmelia abstrusa Vainio, P. circzrmnodata Nylander, P. relicinella Nylander, P. relicinula Muller Argau, and P. lim- bata f . isidiosa Muller Argau (=Relicinu sydney- ensis). Between 1900 and 1964 an additional four taxa were described: P. abstrzisa f . laevigata Lynge (= Relicina subabstrusa), P. nigrociliata Hillmann, P. samoensis Zahlbruckner, and P. samoensis var. eximbvicata Gyelnik (=Relicina eximbricata). Hillmann (1940) recognized a natural relationship between six species described from the Old World and constructed a key to them. In I964 Hale and Kurokawa (1964) examined a Mason E . Hale, Jr., Department of Botany, h?ational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560. series of collections from the Bogor herbarium and described seven more species, mainly from Java and Borneo (Kalimantan and Sabah). Most of these, as with previous species, were known only from type collections. It became obvious during the course of their work, however, that these mar- ginally bulbate species formed a natural group, quite distinct from section Xanthoparmelia where they had previously been classified. They recog- nized the 18 species then known as a series in subgenus Paymelia section Imbricaria subsection B icorn u tae. M7hile this publication (Hale and Kurokawa, 1964) was actually in press, I had an opportunity to collect lichens in Malaysia, the Philippines, and Japan. What I discovered explained why this peculiar assemblage of species had been so poorly collected in the past and represented by so few herbarium specimens. Relicina inhabits canopy branches in the vast lowland dipterocarp forests from Burma to the Solomon Islands. I collected at logging heads where these giant trees, 60 m or more high, were being felled commercially. Most earlier collectors had obviously not been able to find (or did not try to find) felled trees. For ex- ample, many lichens were collected by botanists in the Philippines and studied by Vainio for his extensive Philippine lichen flora, yet he did not report a single species of Relicina, in reality the commonest foliose lichens in the Philippines! An- other habitat where Relicinn has proved abundant is the oak forests found at high elevation through- out southeastern Asia. These areas have not been visited by lichenologists either. The most reassuring aspect of my field work was 1 2 ShiITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS T O BOTANY that all of the species described by Hale and Kurokawa were rediscovered, often in great abun- dance and comprising the major foliose element in lowland rain forest. As one might expect, more undescribed species were found. I described two species, Parmelia puorescens and P. malesiana (Hale, 1965), and Kurokawa (1965) described other species from Japan (P. echinocarpa and P. sub- turgida). In the final revision of this monograph four more new species are being described to bring the total for the genus to 24 species. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS-I wish to thank the follow- ing curators of museums who kindly sent specimens on loan: Dr. S. Ahlner, Dr. T. Ahti, Dr. R. Alava, Dr. 0. Almborn, Dr. C. E. Bonner, Mme. Jovet- Ast, Dr. R. A. Maas Geesteranus, Dr. H. Merx- muller, Dr. H. Riedl, and Dr. R. Santesson. Dr. S. Kurokawa assisted with species descrip- tions, identification, and chemical studies both in 1960 in Washington and in 1964-1965 when I studied at the Tokyo National Science Museum. The field studies were supported by the National Science Foundation under the Japan-US. Coopera- tive Science Program and by the Smithsonian Re- search Foundation. In this connection I wish to express sincerest thanks to Dr. G. Velasquez and Dr. Flora Uyenco of the University of the Philip- pines, who arranged for trips to lumbering areas in the Philippines. I am also indebted to Mrs. Sheila Collonette for arranging a trip to Mt. Kina- balu, to Dr. W. Meijer for trips to eastern Sabah, and to Mr. J . Anderson for assistance in Sarawak. Dr. Manuel Lopez Figueiras kindly provided sup- port and transportation in Venezuela. T h e project would never have been completed without the generous logistic support of lumber companies and forestry departments in the Philippines, Malaya, Sarawak, and Sabah. The scanning-electron microphotographs were taken by Mr. Walter Brown of the Smithsonian Scanning-electron Microscope Laboratory. Herba- rium specimens were photopaplied by the Smith- sonian PhotolITHSOZJIAN CONTRIBUTIOTS T O BOTANY Qzie)ciis at high elevations. A few species grow in secondary forests on trees such as coconut or even on rocks. T h e typical lowland dipterocarp forests occur in dense stands from sea level to less than 1000 m elevation. T h e highest locality at which I collected on tlipterocarp was 850 m in Negros Occidental, Philippines. Those species which occur in this ele- vational range (and often only up to 400 m) include R. circiimnodata, R. conniven y, R. male- tiana, R. precircnmnodntn, R. rarnosissimn, R . re- licitiiila, R. wbabstrtisa, R. subconnivens, antl R. tiiblanea. In the New T\'orld one finds R. incon- grrra in a similar range of elevation. In almost all case5 I collected these species in areas where trees were being felled commercially, and since the dip- terocarp forests do not usually regenerate, Relicinn could become extinct as the forests are timbered throughout southeast Asia. Oak and , on Luzon, Philippines, P i n i i ~ make up the typical vegetation above about 1400 m eleva- tion on mountains in Southeast Asia. T h e charac- acteristic species here are R. acrobotyrs, R. fliiores- f e n $ , R . liitroviridis, R. planiuscziln, and R. tchizo7t)atho. These oak forests are being cut over for vegetable farms and as with the dipterocarp forests many of the Relicinn species will eventually hecome extinct. Several temperate species occur on trees and rocks at relatively low elevation. These include R . echinocnrpa, R. l imbata, and R. sydneyensis. Also occurring a t low elevation but in disturbed forest5 in tropical regions are R. samoensis antl R. cxim bi icatn. Rel ic inn w b l i m batn seems to occur in drier subtropical areas of Burma and Thailand a t mid elevations. Two species, one restricted to Asia (R. a m p k i - thrix) and the other pantropical outside of Africa (R . nbrtriiro), have very great elevational ranges, from 150 m to over 1600 m. Phyto geo gr aph y T h e most distinctive feature of Relicinn is the high degree of endemism in Southeast Asia. Out- side of R. abstrzim and R. wbabstrzisn, which occur in the Neotropics a5 well as in Asia, and three neo- tropical endemics (R. eximbl-icntn, R. incongrua, R. relicinella), all remaining 19 species occur only in the Old TVorld. At the same time the genus is as yet unknown in Europe, India and central Asia, and Africa, except for a single isolated collection of R. szibnbstrzisa on the Comoro Islands near Madagascar. T h e genus obviously evolved in the ancient dipterocarp forests of Southeast Asia. T h e endemic neotropical species may be remnants of older more widespread species, although they are unrelated to any species now found in the Old World. Alter- natively they may have evolved separately in the New 12rorltl where conditions have obviously not been favorable for rapid evolution and expansion of the genus. T h e number of species known in various geo- graphic areas is summarized in Figure 10. T h e actual species by region are tabulated as follows: Japan: R. nbstrusn, R . echinocnrpa, R . planiusculn, and R. sydn eyensis. Taiwan: R. nbstrirsn, R . nanlesiann, R . plnniuscula, R. sub- nbstrirsn, and R . sydneyensis. Philippines: R. nhstrusn, R. ninphi thrix , R . circumnodntn, R. conniz~ens, R . mnlesinnn, R. plnnizisciiln, R. precircumno- dntn, R . roniosissinzn, R . reliciniiln, R . snmoensis, R . schizo- spothn, R. sitbnbstritso, and R. sublnnen. hfalaya: R . nbstrusn, R . ninphi thrix , R . circumnodntn, R. p lan i i t sc~i ln , R . rninosissiinn, R. relicin i i ln, R. schi:ospathn, R . s~cbconnivenr, and R. srihlnnen. Indonesia: R. nbstritsn, R . acrobotrys, R. connivens, R . plani- usculo, R . minosissinin, R. relicinuln, R . samoensis, R . schizospnthn, R . sciblnnen, and R. sydneyensis. Sarawak: R . nbstrzisn, R . circiimnodntn, and R. subnbstrusn. Sabah: R. nrrobotrys, R . nmph i thr i x , R . f luorexens, R. luteo- ?tiridis, R . ~nnlrs innn, R . plirniirscitln, R . rnmosissimn, and R. schizospnthn. New Guinea: R. connivens, R . fluorescens, and R. malesinnn. Australia: R . l imbntn, R. subnbstrnsn. and R. sydneyensis. Pacific Islands: R . connizxws and R. snmoensis. Thailand-Burma: R. siiblimbnto. Comoro Islands: R. sit bn bstrusn. U.S..A,: R. n b s t r t m and R. eximbricntn. hlexico: R. nbstrusa. IVest Indie?: R. nbstrusn and R. eximbricntn. Panama: R. nhstrtisn and R. incongrira. Colombia: R. nbsfrusn, R. relicinella. Venezuela: R. nbstrusn. Brazil: R . nbstriisn, R . incongrzln, R . relicinello, and R. sub- Paraguay: R. nbstritsn and R. sribnbstrusn. Argentina: R. nbstrusn. nbst rusn. T h e commonest species of Relicina are as fol- lows lvith number of collections examined: R. sub- ob.ttrii,ro (52), R . omphi thr ix (43), R. circiimnodnta (40), R. plnrii?i.tcziln (37), R. reliciniila (31), R. nbstrir.tn (26), and R. schizospnthn (20). Rarities N U M B E R 26 13 ? include R. luteoviridis (3), R. precircumnodata (3), and R. siibconniveizs (1). The localities where especially large numbers of specimens were collected include logging areas in Negros Occidental, Philippines (44 collections), Selangor, Malaya (40), and Mountain Province, Philippines (36). The richest localities had six or seven species each with considerable differences in species composition. Evolution and Speciation Very little is known or even hypothesized about evolution and speciation in lichens. Lacking any fossil record, lichenologists are left with few clues that can be used to trace evolution of species and genera. Chemistry has proven to be a valuable independent check in some groups, especially the Parmeliaceae. I have already discussed in some detail the evolution of species in Hypotmchyna (Hale, 1975), where hybrid chemistries and rich development of vegetative morphs permit one to draw a fairly complete picture of speciation. By comparison, Rrlicintl has fewer vegetative morphs and the chemistry is less varied. T h e structure of the most characteristic acid, echinocarpic acid, is as yet unknown. T h e following discussions, there- fore, will cover only the more obvious lines of evolution. MORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION F o m r A T I o N OF MORPHS.-A vegetative morph is defined as an isidiate or sorediate population which is absolutely identical in chemistry and morphology (excepting the diaspores) to a fertile, nonisidiate or nonsorediate parent population. A discussion of the development of the theory of morps in lichens is presented by Hale (1975). In Hypot??aclzyna, for example, more than half of the speciation can be attributed to the formation of morphs. A similar situation is known in Paimotl-emn (Hale, 1965a; Cullierson, 1973). Relirintl is exceptional in that soredia are not formed b y any of the species. Isidia do occur, how- ever, in five species, and four of these can be paired witli nonisidiate sexual morphs: R. 0 bsf YlLsn-R. S l i 110 b s t r u ~ n R. r i m i i n ii odatn-R . precircu i n i iodnto R. ~~la?r iz~scz i ln-R. fliiorcsrciis (echinocarpic acid population) R. sydiieyensis-R. limbata 14 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOTANY The acid deficient population of R. amphi thr ix is closely related to nonisidiate R. relicinula and may represent a vegetative morph, but variation in isidia and lobule development is so great that the evidence for a direct derivation is poor. RHIZINES.-The type of rhizine, simple or branched, appears to be an important character. The five species with branched agglutinated, pale rhizines seem to form a close group that originated in and has not migrated out of the dipterocarp forests. One, R. acrobotrys, occurs only in high elevation forests and, perhaps significantly, is chem- ically completely distinct from the other four species in containing salazinic and barbatic acids. The other species contain protocetraric acid or fumarprotocetraric acid and occur only at low elevations. One series, including R. 1-amosissima antl R. rziblanea, is ecoronate and has small ovoid spores; the other series, including R. precircumno- data antl its isidiate morpli R. circzimnodata, is coronate and has cornute spores. The main lines of evolution here seem to be ecological isolation and differentiation in apothecial and spore charac- ters (Figure 11). CORONATE APOTHECIA.-I am assuming that ecor- onate species are more primitive than coronate species and gave rise by mutation to coronate species. T h i s seems fairly evident in the R. sub- lanea-R. c i m i m n o d n t a group discussed above where the coronate condition is paralleled by spore evolution and where chemistry is not significantly changed. A somewhat different pattern can be Progeniror Ecoronate progenitor Coronate progenitor R. acrobotrys / \ 4 I R. sublanea R. prerirci~mnodata J R. raniosissima R. rirriimnodata FIGURE 11.-Hypothetical evolution of species with branched, pale rhizines. seen in R. connivens (ecoronate) and R. subconni- vens (coronate) where the spores have not changed but the chemistry is altered (protolichesternic acid versus caperatic acid). In most other species of ReZicina, however, parallel ecoronate-coronate populations are not closely matched, or as in the R. eximbricata group in the New World no ecoro- nate parent populations are extant. Conversely no coronate species have evolved from the R. l imbata group. CHEMICAL EVOLUTION Chemical evolution is presumed to involve genetic processes that lead to differentiation of a parent species into two or more chemical popula- tions. The patterns may be extremely clear-cut and easy to follow, as in Hypotrachyna (Hale, 1975), or too complex to interpret. Relicina has a less varied chemistry but several examples can be given. One is the difference between the two main populations of R. abstnisa and R. subnbstrzisa. All specimens of these two related species contain approximately equal amounts of norstictic acid and salazinic acid in the New World. Most speci- mens in the Old IVorld, however, even though externally indistinguishable from those in the New T.Vorlc1, usually lack salazinic acid or have at most trace amounts. The constancy of the difference suggests that the two major populations have been isolated for a long period and that no genetic interchange has occurred during this period of isolation. The New World populations have in fact begun to evolve in another direction, if we correctly interpret the evidence from a single Bra- zilian collection, which contains diffractaic and barbatic acids, indicating a backcross with a parent morpli containing diffractaic acid, similar for example to R. incongrua. If true, we can expect other chemical evolution in the New World, espe- cially since apothecia are common in both the isidiate anti noni5idiate populations, whereas the more conservative Old World isidiate population usually lacks apotliecia and gives no evidence of continuing chemical evolution. Another example of possible backcrossing can be cited for the R. fEuoYescens group. The two species here, R. piiol-escens and R. planiurciila, are morphologically very close because of the strongly developed columnar cortex and similar habitats at NUMBER 26 15 higher elevations. The presumptive parent, R. Puorescens, has a complex chemical population structure, alectoronic acid alone, echinocarpic acid alone, and the two acids occurring jointly (Figure 12). T h e three populations occur together in sig- nificant numbers in Sabah. T h e vegetative morph, R . planiuscula, contains only echinocarpic acid. If we are correct in assuming that R. planiuscula evolved from R. fluorescens or a sexual morph similar to it, as shown in Figure 12, then the morph must have developed before R. fiuorescens underwent chemical evolution. A corallary of this assumption is that the progenitor population con- tained echinocarpic acid. Perhaps the alectoronic acid-containing populations of R. fiuorescens have not had time to develop isidiate morphs, or if they have evolved they cannot, for reasons we cannot even guess at this time, compete with the now widespread echinocarpic acid-containing morph R. planiuscula. Another example of how species have diverged slightly in chemistry and apparently become repro- ductively isolated is R. eximbricata and R. relici- nella in the New World. While these externally similar species share the production of fumarproto- cetraric acid, R. eximbricata also produces succin- protocetraric acid, while R. relicinella contains an unidentified P + compound, also apparently re- lated to protocetraric acid. More significantly, R. relicinella has multispored asci. T h e species containing echinocarpic acid form the niicleiis of the genus in Southeast Asia. We cannot speculate on the chemical evolution of this group until the molecular structure of echinocarpic acid is determined. P r o g e n i t o r R. fruoresrens R. frtdoresrens [echinocarpic acid] [alectoronic acid] R. planiiisrrda R. fruorescens [echinocarpic & alectoronic acids] FIGURE 12.-Hypothetical e v o l u t i o n of c h e m i c a l p o p u l a t i o n s in R . fluorexens and R . planiuscula. A common situation in Relicina is the differen- tiation of species into parallel chemical groups with various combinations of fumarprotocetraric acid and other substances. For example R. subl im- bata and R. nzalesiana are essentially identical but R. subl imbata produces succinprotocetraric acid along with fumarprotocetraric acid, while R. male- siana produces only fumarprotocetraric acid. In this instance the species have a different geographic range, R. subl imbata occurring in Burma and Thailand, R . malesiana from Taiwan south to New Guinea apart from the Asian mainland. Position of Relicina in the Parmeliaceae Relicina has an isolated position in the Parme- liaceae because of its morphology and phytogeog- raphy. First, i t has nothing to do with X a n t h o - parmelia, with which it shares only the yellow cortical pigment usnic acid. The only closely related genus is B u l b o t h r i x (Hale, 1974), which also has marginal bulbate cilia and coronate apo- thecia but which produces only atranorin in the cortex. Bulbothr ix , however, is rare in the range of Relicina. Only B . subdissecta (Nylander) Hale and B . pigmentarea (Hale) Hale occur in the low- land rain forests of Southeast Asia and B . Jubin- flata (Hale) Hale in oak forests where one finds Relicina. Bulbothr ix is largely a genus of the drier subtropical zones, being especially common in southeastern United States and Africa. I t generally has larger spores, 12-19 pm long, twice the average size of those in Relicina, although a few species do have spores only 2-4 pm long. The chemistry of B u l b o t h r i x is different in many respects and there is little evidence of any significant chromosomal exchange with Relicina that might appear in the chemistry. Many species of Bulbothr ix , for exam- ple, have gyrophoric or salazinic acid, both of these very rare in Relicina. No barbatic, difiactaic, echi- nocarpic, furmaprotocetraric, or stictic acids are produced. On the other hand, Bulbothr ix produces lecanoric, lobaric, and colensoic acids, all unknown in Relicina. I would argue then that Bulbothr ix and Relicina as they presently stand are not closely related biologically. This does not rule out the possibility that they have a distant common origin which may have centered on the usnic acid- atranorin split. 16 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOTANY Key to Species of Relicina 1. Thallus isidiate, isidiate-lobulate, or lobulate. 2. Isidia distinct, cylindrical. 3. Lower surface pale brown. 4. Rhizines densely branched. 4. R. circumriodata 4. Rhizines simple. 24. R. sydwyensis 3. Lower surface black. 5 . Lobes very narrow and appressed, 0.5-1.0 mm wide 3. R. amphithrix 5 . Lobes broader, adnate, 1-3 mm wide. 6. Medulla K + red. 1. R . abstrusa 6 Medulla K-. 13. R. p lan iusda 3. R. amphithrix 7. Lobes narrow and appressed, 0.5-1.0 mm wide. 7. Lobes broader and adnate, 1-3 mm wide. 8. Medulla C + red; lobules densely developed. 11. R. luteoviridis 8 Medulla C- or dull )ellowish red (and P f red); lobules not dense. 9. Thallus coriaceous; upper cortex columnar. 13 R. planiuscula 9. Thallus thinner; upper cortex not columnar. 19. R. schizospatha 2. Isidia becoming dorsiventral and lobulate or only lobules present. 1. Thallus lacking isidia and lobules (some adventitious marginal lobules may be present). 10. Lower surface tan to pale brown. 11. Rhizines simple. 11. Rhizines densely branched. 10. R. lirnbata 2. R. acrobotrys 14. R. precircumnodata 22. R. sublanea 15. R. ramodssima 12. Medulla K + red. 12. Medulla K - . 13. Apothecia present, coronate. 13. Apothecia ecoronate or lacking. 14. Protocetraric acid present. 14. Fumarprotocetraric acid present. 10. Lower surface black. 15. Apothecia present, coronate. 16. Medulla K + red. 16. Medulla K - . 20. R. subabstrusa 17 Medulla P-. 18. Diffractaic acid present; New World species. 18. Diffractaic acid absent; Old World species 9. R. incongrua 17. R. relicinula 2 1. R. subconnivens 18. R. sanioensis 7. R. eximbricata 16. R. relicinella 19. Lobes narrow and appressed, 0.5-1 0 mm Tside. 19. Lobes broader and adnate, 1-3 mm wide. 17 Medulla P + orange red. 20. Echinocarpic acid present; Old World species. 20. Fumarprotocetraric acid present; New World species. 21. Spores 8/ascus. 21. Spores 16-32/ascus. 15. Apothecia ecoronate or lacking. 22. Medulla K + red. 23. Salazinic acid only present. 23. Norstictic and salazinic acids present. 24. Medulla P -. 6. R. echinocmpa 20. R. subabstrusa 22. Medulla K - . 25, Lobes narrow and appressed, 0.5-1 mm wide. 25. Lobes broader and adnate, 1-3 mm wide. 17. R. relicinula 8. R . Puorescens 5. R. connivens 26 Upper cortex columnar; alectoronic acid present. 26. Upper cortex not columnar; protolichesterinic acid present. 24. Medulla P f orange red. 27. Echinocarpic acid present 28. Upper cortex columnar. 28. Upper cortex not columnar. 8. R. puorescem 6. R. echinocarpa NUMBER 26 17 Relicina (Hale and Pnrmelia subgenus Bicornutae series Type-species: 27. Fumarprotocetraric acid present. 29. Succinprotocetraric acid present. 29. Succinprotocetraric acid lacking. 23. R. sublimbata 12. R . rnalesiana Species Treatment Relicina Kurokawa) Hale, 1974:484. Purmelia section lmbricaria subsection Relicinae Hale and Kurokawa, 1964: 135. Parmelia relicinn Fries, 1825:283. My typification of the genus (Hale, 1974) was not completely accurate since Parmelia relicinn must be designated as the type-species even though it becomes a tautonym when transferred to Reli- cinn. Furthermore, my typification of Pnrmelia eumorphn Hepp, based on an incorrectly deter- mined specimen in the Rijksherbarium (L), which I considered to be a valid type, is in error. As Muller Argau (1882) had pointed out, Hepp?s species is a Coccocnrpia and the specimen which Muller Argau examined (in G) is indeed a Cocco- cnl-pin, although the same number in L is a Relicinn species. Finally, Hepp?s protologue ob- viouslj refers to a nonparmelioid genus. T h e species are listed alphabetically in the list- ing below. All collections by Hale are deposited in the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, and the herbarium acro- nym (US) is not given. 1. Relicina abstrusa FIGURE 13a Relicinn nbstrusu (Vainio) Hale, 1974:484. Parnzelin nbsti m a Vainio, 1890:G4 [ripe-collection: Caraca, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 1/ni?iio 1347 (not 1346) ( T U R , lecto- type; UPS, isolectotype)]. Thallus closely adnate on bark or rocks, 6-10 cm in diameter, pale chartreuse yellow; lobes sub- linear, 1-2 mm wide; upper surface plane to con- vex, continuous or faintly maculate, moderately isidiate, isidia short, mostly simple: bulbate cilia moderately inflated; lower surface black and rliizi- nate, the rhi7ines simple, shiny (Figure 80). Apo- thecia adnate, 1-4 mm in diameter, coronate, basally retrorsely rhizinate, the amphithecium isidiate, the disc carob brown; spores 8, 4-5 X 5-6 pm. CHEhiIsTRY.-I1/Iedulla K f yellow turning red, C--, KC-, Pi- orange, norstictic and usnic acids with or without salazinic acid and very rarely with diffractaic acid and a trace of barbatic acid and 4-0-denietliylbarbatic acid. A ?quintaria? unknown, the reddish pink spot just below norstictic acid in both solvent systems, occurs in about one-quarter of the specimens. Rmr.mKS.-This is a very common species in both the New 1170rld and the Old World. As with R. szibabstmsn, the presumptive nonisidiate par- ent, the S e w World specimens produce norstictic and salazinic acids in nearly equal concentration, but salazinic acid is either absent or present in trace amounts in Old 1170rld specimens. The two populations also differ in elevational range. In Southeast Asia R. n b s t i x ~ n occ~irs commonly from 100 m to 1400 m elevation. The same species in South America ranges from 700-2150 m. Xpothecia are much more common in the New Tl?orld popu- lations (5Sm, frequency) than in the Old Ii?orld (7yo frequency). One specimen from Brazil (Lichenes nirsfro- nmeiicnni 95) contained diffractaic acid and a trace of barbatic acid in addition to the main compo- nents listed above. This unusual combination of acids could have originated as a backcross with a species such as R. incongrirn, which contains only diffractaic and barbatic acids. Vainio (1 890) considered Parmelin lim bntn f . i,sidio.cn hfuller Argau to be a synonym of P. nb- .rfriisa, but Muller?s taxon is now recognized as Relicinn ,xydney~?i,si,r. A\saliina (1951) identified nor- stictic and stictic acids in Japanese specimens, whicli lie identified as P. nb.r t~ i r . rn and these too represent Rclirinn ,sydneyei?sis. S F E C I S I ~ ~ S Exh\rIxrD.--Florida: Baker Coniltv. HI!/