oo to U 3 a? 13 G oi u x a X> Sx> s -s O U 3 B 0 <3 ifi O. -a 43 s g O 01 13 s o> I 5 CL 6 J2 1 E 6 IS *<3 o> N "Z 3i J5 o o. ,2 Ji a, 1 'SL OH a 01 X (B % i u 5 ? bO 60 s 1 3k T3 o OH c HI 01 tu Is s 3 s o o- w i| S OH $ * T3" S = > O $ 1 8 I c o 'Eb Si to 1 N ai 2 u oo ?S 3 0 8 3k OH 8 2 ?S c 01 G 60 33 "3 OH 0) 0) S , (3 3 ra u 0) 3 3 -^ E X 3 oi OH 3 ? c Ol o OH o ? tD 0) 1^ 00 ? ? u u Q. OH ?J3 (8 ? nj 3 3 C o O 13 XI o O 3 OH OH tn X, X. u e ns 01 X 0- x 8 o> c o o g (3 f? 3 ?u OH Si 8 , U) ,3 'So 0 Q ? O 8 .? CX vi ?a c ns tfl 0) N (5 S 5 -C 01 o (2 > 3 m ? "o u vj ? Is (0 ?g a ai IS 'u '2 P "8 01 00 (0 00 0) B oi 2 a 3 c (U I o e &^ JX, I 0> a% O u HJ .5 e ? g K a os a. I s. (0 u 01 S 00 SB p 0 "3 oi 11 "3 13 c is c o o E s II u CH u ? U ex, g 3 o 0 ^ O to ? 00 'C ?8 2_ ? u ^3 &. a 3 5 o I % E bo ex p 2 y. 01 bo 01 .3 0 a o 23 P x> ? s Y m -* l< " II a ?, ?S 3 <0 o is CJ 7 > ? o\ ii x I CM O CO II X 3 II X 3 in X o- 3 00.? E _0J > (0 >\ a 73 JS e ? tO t. 0? % a?? ss tg p o DfS C CL T3 &> .a > || U T3 & 8 T3 (0 u 'C T3 a c o> ^ -> 01 U eL a. M g- ? o E J d) T3 bo T3 o 4 X o u 0) II X % tu u c a Li S D_ 3, Ifi p {NJ 3 0! ?c 1 &, a) 1 "#3 "S, g 15 u > J3Z c 3 m 3 B C m 01 | Hi c s JS c p 01 o E p JJ ?X s o C u 4-: c m oi P "3 ?8=3 'S p I 6 ex ^ o S Us p P ? o 6 P a> 3- k g ffl o c U a m oi C bo o "p x -? " M | oi ex, ex ? p g ?> " ^ j= q .- X. CX tn oi EX X O) g oi " I ? oi ? x X O) 15 6 Oi ? c ?> '" 5 ? "? 01 .5 iP 3 * 1 S.3 s ? a o fx o _i oi rx p 01 01 I4 tx S to o IS u B ,01 a P-, l E 6 Lf) T3 ^ e oo ts oo x; o ^? "55 Jj 01 o n. a ?= u tu J CO e o u be C ?c % o a, o bO II u bo U a, c c ? 3 u U Q. C ? 3 s u U Sii E9 b "O U 52- (0 U C 2 3 CL, 2 nj 3 3 (0 o Sis 2 ^? bO 15-3 S u &.? 3 "?- 2 &^ ? m ? 5 3 ai *a xT ?a?-a s ? ? u S G if ? ? c a giSg oi" rt *j ? 3 ?3 _ 3 14= OI in _, ?a 3 s o JO j" 2 2 "5 T3 ? ? ai o ex -0,2 c ai a OH u S c 01 6 E o 01 .3 ? 3 ? (0 o> "H .5 '5 j a. IS o 3 C es o> 1 B ? 2 g s OI "5 S (0 ai ? I 3 g u -a CQ CL. ^3 0 f= e a, (8 c oi 1 3 c 1 01 2 5 o -a S 3 r^ r bb 0 c o D to D 3 (0 3 B 3 15 3 6 [ft *1 15 3 ^ s u -I -a bp e ?X S R 3 s a o ^ bo u m *s. > k a >-. OJu E bo id CD (S'S ^ .s K a; ^j .3 m ai 2 3 .5 f| &. a, 3 bO % o TI B ?3$ 1 I U in T 01 SI (3 C Y ? 3 ^ "8 I B~ (SI i! a o a. in <0 6 cu "S >, o _ * <* _2 D ? w; g-s: ?ri c M T id lA tJ ^ x m 7! 5 a 2 in [X 3 a. oi 0) 15 ?X a, ? 15 o a. ?? 01 01 g 01 s 2 ? <\> c JJ 01 y a. o a a. 0 a- Ol 0 J3 s (8 bo 01 o s 2 a, oi 5 ? a,^ 01 O .. i g 13 S Q ? ? 3 a, ? B.2 oi 3 15P UH 01 C ? ?H XI 15 ? ?? ? O 3 79 Incertae Sedis "Conopora" anthohelia n. sp. (Plates 65, e-g, 66, a, b) MATERIAL EXAMINED: Types, q.v. DISTRIBUTION: Colville Ridge and Three Kings Ridge; 547-1170 m. DESCRIPTION OF HOLOTYPE: Colony uniplanar, 203 mm tall and 18.6 mm broad, with a basal branch diameter of 3.4 x 4.2 mm. Branching dichotomous and equal, only two generations of branching present, resulting in 3 axils and 4 branch tips. Branches flattened in plane of colony; distal branches blunt, 2.9-35 mm in diameter. Coenosteum white, with a linear-granular, porcellanous texture. Strips 0.12-0.32 mm wide, but coenosteal slits obscure. Mid-line of coenosteal strips often carinate, each ridge as high as 60 urn; if strip not carinate, there is often a series of pointed granules of equivalent height along mid-line. Nematopores absent. Cyclosystems primarily unifacial, the holotype having 11 cyclosystems on its anterior face (Plate 65, f) and 3 (1 near the ends of 3 of the 4 branches) on the posterior face. Anterior-facing cyclosystems closely spaced, often directly adjacent to one another, and occur from colony base to near branch tips; however, cyclosystems do not occur at branch tips, but always slightly subdistally. Cyclosystems circular to slightly elliptical and nonexsert, up to 2.6 mm in greater cyclosystem diameter. Based on 14 cyclosystems (all available for analysis) the range of dactylopores per cyclosystem was 17-20, average 18.42 (a = 0.77), and mode 18. Cyclosystems lack lids and lips but most have a short proximal diastema occupying 20?-30? of its circumference. Gastropore tubes unique in structure. Upper chamber broad and extremely shallow, the pseudo- septal inner edges extending far below dactylo- tomes. Nonetheless, a smooth, nonseptate portion of upper chamber exists just above gastropore ring constriction. Gastropore ring constriction circular and quite large: 0.7-0.8 mm in diameter. Short (up to 75 um), lamellar septa (Plate 66, b) project from the edge of the gastropore ring constriction and continue along the lateral and lower, outer edges of lower gastropore chamber. These lamellae occur in equal numbers to pseudosepta and are interpreted as disrupted continuations of the pseudosepta within the lower gastropore chamber. Lower chamber also relatively shallow (only 0.10-0.11 mm deep) and bears a large, low mound (Plate 66, a, b) centrally. The mound is analogous in position to a gastrostyle but is only about 0.05 mm high and 0.45 mm in basal diameter (H: W ratio = 0.11), appearing as little more than a slight, but distinct convexity in lower chamber. Mound sparsely covered with pointed granules up to 40 urn tall. No ampullae were apparent; however, it appeared as though large subcoenosteal cavities exist on much of the posterior face, similar to the internal ampullar masses of Conopora unifacialis. TYPES: Holotype: NZOI Stn P947, 1 col., NZOI H- 584. Paratype: NZOI Stn U581,1 col., NZOI P-933. TYPE LOCALITY: NZOI Stn P947,25T3.7S, 179*04.1'W, Colville Ridge; 547-646 m. ETYMOLOGY: The species name anthohelia (from the Greek anthos, flower + helios, sun) the latter being a common suffix used in stylasterid names, in this case pertaining to the cyclosystems), alludes to the sunflower-like nature of the cyclosystems of this species. REMARKS: Among the stylasterid genera, "Conopora " anthohelia is most similar to Conopora, specifically C, unifacialis. Points of similarity include unifacial, nonexsert cyclosystems; broad, shallow gastropore upper chambers; an almost identical average number of dactylopores per cyclosystem; dichoto- mous, equal branching; and co-occurrence at the same station. However, there are striking differences that distinguish "Conopora" anthohelia from C. unifacialis as well as the other species in the genus ? "C." anthohelia has a rudimentary gastrostyle; larger, subterminal, diastema te cyclosystems; thick, flattened branches; an enormous gastropore ring constriction with pseudosepta occurring in and below it; and a carinate, porcellanous coenosteal texture. "Conopora" anthohelia also resembles the genus Pseudocrypthelia in having double-chambered gastropore tubes, unifacial cyclosystems, and a rudimentary gastrostyle. It differs in lacking a cyclo- system lid, having linear-granular coenosteum (not linear-imbricate), lacking nematopores, and in having very shallow gastropore tubes with pseudoseptal ridges extending into the lower chamber. Because of the limited material available, a new genus is not suggested for this species. Astya Stechow, 1921 Castro- and dactylopores arranged in cyclosystems, which occur exclusively on anterior branch faces; 80