1532 American Journal of Botany 97(9): 1532?1554. 2010. American Journal of Botany 97(9): 1532?1554, 2010; http://www.amjbot.org/ ? 2010 Botanical Society of America Grassland ecosystems are one of the most easily recognized biomes in the world, covering about 40% of the earth ? s sur- face ( World Resources, 2000 ; Gibson, 2009 ), and they are also threatened and highly endangered. Humans evolved with grass- lands, and we depend on grasses and grasslands for our suste- nance directly as crops (rice, corn, and wheat) and indirectly as forage for herbivores. However, only a small fraction of grass- land ecosystems remains intact today, and we need to study the biodiversity of this important biome from an evolutionary per- spective before it is destroyed. The Muhlenbergiinae Pilg. is a diverse assemblage of C 4 grasses containing 176 species that dominate grasslands in the western hemisphere. Species such as Muhlenbergia montana (Nutt.) Hitchc. (mountain muhly) and M. rigida (Kunth) Kunth (purple muhly) are the most common grass species of high- plateau grasslands in north central Mexico, the southwestern United States, and, to a lesser extent, along the Andean Cordil- lera of South America. Yet evolutionary relationships and a modern classifi cation of the Muhlenbergiinae based on the study of molecular characters have not been completed. To un- derstand the origins and rise of C 4 grasslands, a better interpre- tation of plant traits via phylogenetic reconstruction is essential ( Edwards et al., 2010 ). The placement of Muhlenbergia Schreb. within the grasses has been the subject of many papers since the genus was in- cluded in the subfamily Festucoideae, tribe Agrostideae by Hitchcock (1935) [see Table 1 for a summary of taxonomic treatments in the Muhlenbergiinae]. The subtribe Muhlenber- giinae was fi rst circumscribed by Pilger (1956) where he recog- nized a single genus, Muhlenbergia with the following eight sections: Acroxis (Trin.) Bush, Bealia (Scribn.) Pilg., Cinnastrum (E. Fourn.) Pilg., Clomena (P. Beauv.) Pilg., Muhlenbergia , Podosemum (Desv.) Pilg., Pseudosporobolus Parodi, and Sten- ocladium (Trin.) Bush. In this same treatment, Pilger recog- nized the genus Epicampes J. Presl (included in subtribe Sporobolinae Ohwi by Pilger), a name now placed in synonymy within Muhlenbergia . Subsequent authors have agreed that Pilger ? s infrageneric treatment of Muhlenbergia was not phylo- genetically informative ( Soderstrom, 1967 ; Pohl, 1969 ; Morden, 1985 ; Peterson and Annable, 1991 ). With the accumulation of 1 Manuscript received 19 November 2009: revision accepted 7 July 2010. The authors thank the National Geographic Society Committee for Research and Exploration, grant number 8087-06 for fi eld support, the Smithsonian Institution ? s Restricted Endowments Fund, National Museum of Natural History Small Grants Fund, the Scholarly Studies Program, Research Opportunities, Atherton Seidell Foundation, and Biodiversity Surveys and Inventories Program for fi nancial support, J. H. Kirkbride, Jr. for translating German, A. Touwaide for correcting the Latin, and two anonymous reviewers for suggesting improvements. 5 Author for correspondence (e-mail: peterson@si.edu) doi:10.3732/ajb.0900359 A PHYLOGENY AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE MUHLENBERGIINAE (POACEAE: CHLORIDOIDEAE: CYNODONTEAE) BASED ON PLASTID AND NUCLEAR DNA SEQUENCES 1 Paul M. Peterson 2,5 , Konstantin Romaschenko 2,3 , and Gabriel Johnson 4 2 Smithsonian Institution, Department of Botany MRC-166, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 USA; 3 Laboratory of Molecular Systematics, Botanic Institute of Barcelona (CSIC ? ICUB), Passeig del Migdia, s.n. 08038 Barcelona, Spain; and 4 Department of Botany and Laboratories of Analytical Biology, Smithsonian Institution, Suitland, Maryland 20746 USA ? Premise of the study : To understand the origins of C 4 grasslands, we must have a better interpretation of plant traits via phylo- genetic reconstruction. Muhlenbergiinae, the largest subtribe of C 4 grasses in Mexico and the southwestern United States (with 176 species), is taxonomically poorly understood. ? Methods : We conducted a phylogenetic analysis of 47 genera and 174 species using six plastid regions ( ndhA intron, ndhF, rps16-trnK, rps16 intron, rps3 , and rpl32-trnL ) and the nuclear ITS 1 and 2 (ribosomal internal transcribed spacer) regions to infer evolutionary relationships and revise the classifi cation. ? Key results : In our analyses, Muhlenbergia (ca. 153 species) is paraphyletic, with nine genera ( Aegopogon , Bealia , Blepharon- euron , Chaboissaea , Lycurus , Muhlenbergia , Pereilema , Redfi eldia , Schaffnerella , and Schedonnardus ) found nested within. We recognized the following fi ve well-supported monophyletic lineages within Muhlenbergia : subg. Muhlenbergia , with spe- cies that have phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase-like leaf anatomy and long, scaly rhizomes; subg. Trichochloa with long- lived species that are relatively tall (up to 3 m); subg. Clomena with 3-nerved upper glumes; sect. Pseudosporobolus species with narrow panicles and plumbeous spikelets; and sect. Bealia species with lemmas with hairy margins and midveins. ? Conclusions: We propose expanding the circumscription of Muhlenbergia to include the other nine genera in this subtribe and make the following new combinations: Muhlenbergia subg. Bealia , M. diandra , M. geminifl ora , M. paniculata , M. phleoides , M . subg . Pseudosporobolus (also lectotipifi ed), M. solisii , M. tricholepis . We also propose several new names: M. ammophila , M. columbi , M. plumosa . Our phylograms suggest that Muhlenbergia originated in North America because the sister ( Sohnsia fi lifolia and Scleropogoninae) is composed of predominantly North American species. Key words: biogeography; Chloridoideae; classifi cation; ITS; Muhlenbergia ; Muhlenbergiinae; phylogeny; plastid DNA sequences; Poaceae. 1533September 2010] Peterson et al. ? Phylogeny of Muhlenberginiinae The Muhlenbergiinae currently consists of 10 genera: Ae- gopogon (four spp. in North and South America; T ? rpe, 1973 ; Levin and Moran, 1989 ), Bealia (one sp., B. mexicana Scribn. in northern Mexico; Peterson, 1989b ; Peterson et al., 1993 ), Blepharoneuron [two spp. in North America, B. shepherdii (Vasey) P. M. Peterson & Annable and B. tricholepis (Torr.) Nash, the latter an important range grass in the southwestern USA and northern Mexico; Peterson and Annable, 1990, 2003], Chaboissaea [four spp., three in central Mexico and C. atacamensis (Parodi) P. M. Peterson & Annable in Argentina and Bolivia; Peterson and Annable, 1992; Peterson and Herrera Arrieta, 1995; Sykes et al., 1997], Lycurus [three spp., including the amphitropical disjunct L. setosus (Nutt.) C. Reeder; Peterson and Morrone, 1998], Muhlenbergia [147 spp. centered in north- ern Mexico and the southwestern USA, containing the impor- tant range grass M. montana and the amphitropical disjuncts M. arenicola Buckley and M. torreyi (Kunth) Hitchc. ex Bush; Peterson and Ort ? z Diaz, 1998; Peterson, 2003; Herrera Arrieta and Peterson, 2007; Peterson et al., 2007b; but also with seven species located in southeast Asia; Wu and Peterson, 2006]; Pereilema (four spp. in North, Central, and South America), Redfi eldia [one sp., R. fl exuosa (Thurb. ex A. Gray) Vasey in the southwestern USA, of probable hybrid origin; Reeder, 1976; Duvall et al., 1994], Schaffnerella [one sp., S. gracilis (Benth.) Nash in San Luis Potos ? , Mexico; Columbus et al., 2002], and Schedonnardus [one sp., S. paniculatus (Nutt.) Trel., an amphi- tropical disjunct with spicate primary infl orescence branches]. Ninety-six percent of the species within the Muhlenbergiinae are native to the western hemisphere, and more than 80% of these are native to North America ( Peterson et al., 2007a ). Am- phitropical disjuncts within the Muhlenbergiinae thus far tested have been shown to have North American origins ( Peterson and Herrera Arrieta, 1995 ; Sykes et al., 1997 ; Peterson and Morrone, 1998 ; Peterson and Ort ? z Diaz, 1998 ; Peterson et al., 2007a ). Within Muhlenbergia , there are 127 species indigenous to North America (86%); 125 of these occur in Mexico (center of species diversity) and, of these, 56 are endemic ( Peterson et al., 2007a ). In preliminary molecular analyses, Muhlenbergia has appeared paraphyletic, with all nine remaining genera of Muhlenbergii- nae nested within ( Duvall et al., 1994 ; Hilu and Alice, 2001 ; Columbus et al., 2007 , 2010 ; Peterson et al., 2010 ). Plastid restriction site markers supported the inclusion of Bealia Scribn., Blepharoneuron Nash, Chaboissaea E. Fourn., Lycurus , Pereilema J. Presl, and Redfi eldia Vasey in the same subtribe as Muhlenbergia ( Duvall et al., 1994 ). Columbus et al. (1998) found that Aegopogon Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd. and Schaffnerella Nash, traditionally placed near Bouteloua Lag., actually were closely aligned with the large genus Muhlenbergia . What is quite unusual about these two genera is that they do not at fi rst appear morphologically similar to Muhlenbergia . Aegopogon has spikelets in triads with the central sessile fl oret perfect and the two lateral pedicelled fl orets staminate or sterile. Muhlen- bergia has only solitary spikelets. Hilu and Alice (2001) in their phylogeny of the Chloridoideae based on matK sequences in- cluded Schedonnardus Steud. in a well-supported clade with Aegopogon and Muhlenbergia . On the basis of anatomical characters, Muhlenbergia appears to be divisible into three ma- jor groups corresponding to two subgenera, Muhlenbergia subg. Muhlenbergia and M . subg. Trichochloa, the latter subgenus with two sections, Muhlenbergia sect. Epicampes and M . sect. Podosemum ( Peterson 2000 ; Peterson and Herrera Arrieta, 2001 ). Analyzing ITS and trnL-trnF sequences of 52 species of other types of data, i.e., leaf and embryo anatomy, Muhlenbergia became fi rmly placed in the Chloridoideae, although it has been aligned in a variety of tribes/subtribes, including Eragrostideae and Sporobolinae ( Reeder, 1957 ; Stebbins and Crampton, 1961 ; Clayton and Renvoize, 1986 ; Peterson et al., 1995 , 1997 ). Species within the Muhlenbergiinae are morphologically highly variable and can be characterized as having membranous ligules (rarely a line of hairs); paniculate infl orescences that are rebranched or composed only of primary branches; spikelets that are usually solitary but sometimes in pairs or triads, with cleistogenes (self-pollinated fl owers that do not open at matu- rity) occasionally present in the leaf sheaths; one fl oret (rarely more) per spikelet that is perfect, staminate, or sterile; glumes that are awned or unawned; lemmas 3-nerved, awned or un- awned; and a base chromosome number of x = 8 ? 10 ( Peterson et al., 1995 , 1997 , 2007a , b ; Peterson, 2000 ). Two subtypes of C 4 photosynthesis based on nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide cofactor malic enzyme (NAD-ME) and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PCK) have been found in the Muhlenbergiinae with a few verifi ed by biochemical assay ( Gutierrez et al., 1974 ; Brown, 1977 ; Hattersley and Watson, 1992 ). On the basis of anatomy, morphology, and cytology, Soder- strom (1967) distinguished two subgenera within Muhlenber- gia and divided M . subg. Podosemum (Desv.) Soderstr. (= M . subg. Trichochloa A. Gray, an older name) into two sections, sect. Podosemum (Desv.) Pilg. and sect. Epicampes (J. Presl) Soderstr. Two years later, Pohl (1969) completed a revision of 12 closely related species that he believed represented the entire M . subg. Muhlenbergia in North America. Based on anatomy, morphology, cytology, and fl avonoid chemistry, 29 annual spe- cies of Muhlenbergia have been investigated and placed in ten- tative natural groups ( Peterson and Rieseberg, 1987 ; Peterson, 1988a , b , 1989a ; Peterson et al., 1989 ; Peterson and Annable, 1991 ). Morden and Hatch (1987 , 1996 ) investigated the ana- tomical and morphological variation of six species they referred to as the M. repens complex. A biosystematics study investigat- ing the M. montana complex (consisting of 15 species) has been completed ( Herrera and Grant, 1993 , 1994 ; Herrera Arrieta, 1998 ). Molecular genetic data of intersimple sequence repeats (ISSRs) were investigated for M. capillaris (Lam.) Trin., M. expansa (Poir.) Trin., and M. sericea (Michx.) P. M. Peterson ( Gustafson and Peterson, 2007 ). Table 1. Primary taxonomic treatments found in the Muhlenbergiinae and the number of species in each taxon. Author Taxa treated No. of species Hitchcock, 1935 Muhlenbergia , USA and Mexico 110 Pilger, 1956 Muhlenbergiinae with 8 sections ? Soderstrom, 1967 Muhlenbergia subg. Podosemum (= Trichochloa ) sect. Epicampes 26 Pohl, 1969 Muhlenbergia subg. Muhlenbergia 12 T ? rpe 1973 Aegopogon 3 J. Reeder, 1976 Redfi eldia 1 C. Reeder, 1985 Lycurus 3 Peterson, 1989b Bealia 1 Peterson and Annable, 1990 Blepharoneuron 2 Peterson and Annable, 1991 ? annual ? species of Muhlenbergia 29 Peterson and Annable, 1992 Chaboissaea 4 Morden and Hatch, 1996 Muhlenbergia repens complex 6 Herrera Arrieta, 1998 Muhlenbergia montana complex 15 Peterson, 2000 Muhlenbergiinae with 6 genera 165 Columbus et al., 2002 Schaffnerella 1 1534 American Journal of Botany [Vol. 97 sample from a different location for the same species. All vouchers are deposited in the Smithsonian Institution, United States National Herbarium (US). The ma- jority of samples (89%) used in this study were collected by P. M. Peterson from 1984 to 2008. In addition, where feasible, we sampled older herbarium specimens to maximize the number of outgroup genera in the Chloridoideae. Molecular methods ? All procedures where performed in the Laboratory of Analytical Biology (LAB) at the Smithsonian Institution. DNA was isolated using the BioSprint 96 DNA Plant Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, California, USA) following the protocol of the manufacturer. PCR amplifi cations were performed in MJ Research or PE 9700 thermal cyclers. Genomic DNA was combined with 1 ? reaction buffer (200 mM Tris-HCl, 500 mM NH 4 ) [Bioline Biolase Taunton, Madison, Wisconsin, USA] without Mg 2+ , 2 mM MgCl 2 , 200 mM dNTPs, 1.5 ? L of Taq polymerase (Bioline Biolase Taunton), 40 pmol/ ? L each of forward and reverse primers. We targeted seven regions for sequencing: three from the plastid large single copy (LSC) region: rps3 (coding), rps16 intron, and 3 ? rps16- 5 ? trnK (spacer); three from the small single copy (SSC) region: ndhF (coding), ndhA intron, and rpl32- trnL (spacer); and nrDNA ITS. Intergenic spacers rpl32-trnL (SSC) and rps16- trnK (LSC) are two of the top ranked, most variable noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in the angiosperms ( Shaw et al., 2007 ). We chose the widely used ndhF gene (SSC) to recover phylogenetic relationships because it proved useful in other groups of grasses ( Giussani et al., 2001 ; Soreng et al., 2007 ; Rom- aschenko et al., 2010 ). The sequences, melting temperature, quality, and refer- ences for the primers used are given in Peterson et al. (2010) . The amplifi cation parameters for all plastid and the nuclear ribosome ITS regions follow Peterson et al. (2010) . All PCR products were cleaned with Exo- SAP-IT (USB, Cleveland, Ohio, USA). DNA sequencing was performed with BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing v.3.1 (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) according to the following parameters: 80 ? C, 5 min; 25 or 30 cycles of 95 ? C for 10 s, 50 ? C for 5 s and 60 ? C for 4 min. Sequenced products were analyzed on an ABI PRISM 3730 DNA Analyzer 7900HT. The regions rpl32-trnL , rps3 , rps16 intron, 3 ? rps16- 5 ? trnK , ndhF (coding region), and ITS were sequenced in one direction. Relatively short regions (500 ? 750 bp) covered by our primers were easily interpreted allowing us to accumulate sequences from different parts of the genome for phylogenetic inference ( Shaw et al., 2005 , 2007 ). The ndhA intron (933 bp) was sequenced in both directions and the program Se- quencher 4.8 (Gene Code Corp., Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 1991 ? 2007) was employed to produce the contig sequence for the entire region. Phylogenetic analyses ? Sequence alignment was done manually using the program BioEdit v.7.0.5.3 ( Hall, 1999 ). Several ambiguously aligned regions were excluded from analyses. The length of sequences and amount of excluded data for each region is presented in Table 2 . We used the maximum parsimony analysis implemented in PAUP* to calculate the tree length (TL), consistency index (CI), homoplasy index (HI), retention index (RI), and rescaled consistency index (RC) for separate and combined regions ( Table 2 ). No data were excluded from rps3, rps16 intron, and ndhA intron. All gaps were treated as missing data. We used maximum likelihood and Bayesian analysis to infer phylogeny. The maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was conducted with the program GARLI 0.951 ( Zwickl, 2006 ). Bayesian and maximum likelihood analyses yielded trees Muhlenbergia , Columbus et al. (2010) also found support for two clades containing species of Muhlenbergia subg. Muhlenbergia and M . subg. Trichochloa . In a large molecular study of the entire Chloridoideae, Peterson et al. (2010) found strong support for the fi ve clades within 33 sampled species of Muhlenbergiinae: Muhlenbergia subg. Muhlenbergia , M . subg. Trichochloa , M . sect. Bealia , M . subg. Clomena , and an un- named clade that includes three species of Chaboissaea , two species of Lycurus , Redfi eldia , Schaffnerella , Schedonnardus , M. arenacea (Buckley) Hitchc., M. richardsonis (Trin.) Rydb., and M. unifl ora (Muhl.) Fernald. Using an analysis of plastid and nuclear DNA sequences, we provide a clear phylogeny for 124 of the 176 (70%) species that occur in the Muhlenbergiinae. We estimate the phylogeny of the Muhlenbergiinae based on the analysis of seven molecular markers (nuclear ITS and plastid ndhA intron, ndhF, rps16-trnK, rps16 intron, rps3 , and rpl32-trnL DNA sequences). Previously, Columbus et al. (2010) considered 52 species of Muhlenbergia (plus 14 additional species from the other nine Muhlenbergii- nae genera) for two molecular markers (nuclear ITS and plastid trnL-F DNA sequences). We include an expanded survey of the Muhlenbergiinae by sampling an additional 105 species for seven markers (687 new sequences), which is a signifi cant ad- vance over Peterson et al. (2010) and Columbus et al. (2010) . Our study includes 109 species of Muhlenbergia, 15 additional species from the other nine Muhlenbergiinae genera and se- quences for six plastid and ITS markers. We compare the ITS and plastid based phylogenies with the classifi cations in Columbus et al. (2010) and Peterson et al. (2001 , 2007a , 2010 ). In addition, we seek morphological and anatomical characters supporting relationships in the molecular phylogenies and pro- pose changes to the classifi cation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Taxon sampling ? Representatives of 37 genera were chosen as outgroups from the Chloridoideae clade in Peterson et al. (2010) : Aeluropus , Allolepis , Astrebla , Austrochloris , Blepharidachne , Bouteloua , Chloris , Crypsis , Cyn- odon , Dasyochloa , Distichlis , Eleusine , Erioneuron , Gouinia , Gymnopogon , Hilaria , Jouvea , Lepturus , Microchloa , Monanthochloe , Monelytrum , Mosde- nia , Munroa , Orinus , Perotis , Pogonarthria , Scleropogon , Sohnsia , Sporobo- lus , Swallenia , Tragus , Trichoneura , Tridens , Trioidia , Vaseyochloa , Willkommia , and Zoysia (for a complete list of species see Appendix 1). Voucher information and GenBank numbers for 178 accessions representing 162 species are given in Appendix 1. Fifteen of the accessions included a second Table 2. Summary data for six plastid regions and nrDNA ITS used in this study. Characteristic ndhF rpl32-trnL rps16-trnK rps3 rps16 intron ndhA intron Plastid ITS Combined plastid+ITS Aligned sequence length 796 1389 1222 590 1368 1424 6789 814 7603 Average sequence length 734 695 723 579 745 933 4409 669 5078 No. of taxa 163 175 174 174 165 161 177 172 179 No. of excluded characters 2 364 213 0 0 0 579 89 743 Proportion of excluded characters (%) 0.3 26.2 17.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.5 10.9 9.8 No. of PIC 169 258 221 85 159 256 1148 312 1460 PIC/SL 0.230 0.371 0.306 0.147 0.213 0.274 0.260 0.466 0.288 Tree length 569 761 575 254 400 708 3369 2373 5859 Consistency index 0.4271 0.5361 0.5513 0.4764 0.5800 0.5508 0.508 0.284 0.407 Homoplasy index 0.5729 0.4639 0.4487 0.5236 0.4200 0.4492 0.492 0.716 0.593 Retention index 0.8344 0.8450 0.8428 0.8679 0.8768 0.8674 0.844 0.689 0.784 Rescaled consistency index 0.3564 0.4530 0.4646 0.4135 0.5086 0.4778 0.429 0.196 0.319 Akaike information criterion GTR+G TVM+G TVMef+G TVM+G K81uf+G K81uf GTR+G GTR+G GTR+G Notes: PIC, parsimony informative characters; SL = sequence length 1535September 2010] Peterson et al. ? Phylogeny of Muhlenberginiinae with visually similar topology, i.e., the trees are visually the same, but some branch lengths could differ minutely. A test run of Bayesian analysis for the com- bined data sets under the single GTR+G model yielded the same topology and posterior probability (PP) values as the Bayesian analysis for a partitioned data set performed under models suggested by MODELTEST for separate regions. The Akaike information criterion (AIC) scores are indicated in Table 2 ( Kimura, 1981 ; Tavar ? , 1986 ; Posada and Crandall, 1998 ). Very little confl ict was observed among maximum likelihood trees in the individual plastid analyses. The incongruence length difference (ILD) test ( Farris et al., 1994 ) was implemented in the program WinClada ver. 1.00.08 ( Nixon, 2002 ) to test for incongruence between the ITS and plastid data sets. Default parameters for 1000 replicates were executed. Bootstrap analyses ( Felsenstein, 1985 ) were performed for the ML analysis using GARLI with the default parameters for 1000 replicates, with the program PAUP* ver. 4.0b10 ( Swofford, 2000 ) used to compute the bootstrap consensus tree. Bootstrap (BS) values of 90 ? 100% were interpreted as strong support, 70 ? 89% as moderate, and 50 ? 69% as weak. Bayesian posterior probabilities were estimated using the program MRBAYES ver. 3.01 ( Huelsenbeck and Ronquist, 2001 ; Ronquist et al., 2005 ) with DNA substitution models selected using the program MrModeltest ver. 1.1b ( Nylander, 2002 ). The plastid data set and combined plastid+ITS data set for Bayesian analy- sis were then partitioned into two subsets that were processed implementing dif- ferent parameters suggested by MrModeltest concerning the model for among site rate variation, number of substitution types, substitution rates, and gamma shape parameter. All other parameters were left at default settings. Each Bayesian analy- sis was initiated with random starting trees and was initially run for 2 million generations, sampling once per 100 generations. The analysis was continued until the value of standard deviation of split sequences dropped below 0.01 as the con- vergence diagnostic value ( Huelsenbeck and Ronquist, 2001 ). The fraction of the sampled values discarded as burn in was set at 0.25. RESULTS Phylogenetic analyses ? A total of 687 sequences represent- ing 105 species are newly reported in GenBank (Appendix 1). Lengths sequenced for individual regions are noted in Table 2 . Plastid rpl32-trnL had the highest rate of amplifi cation and suc- cessful sequencing with 99% of taxa recovered across the entire data set. Recovery in other plastid regions ranged from 91 ? 98%, and the effectiveness of sequencing the ITS region was 97% ( Table 2 ). An average of 4.5% of data was missing across the entire data set. As expected, ITS provided the most information per aligned nucleotide ( Table 2 ; the ratio of the number of par- simony informative characters (PIC) per sequence length (SL) was 0.466, compared with 0.147 ? 0.371 for plastid regions). Analysis of ITS sequences ? There are fi ve major clades within a monophyletic Muhlenbergiinae (moderate support), labeled in Fig. 1 as Muhlenbergia sect. Bealia (strong support), M . subg. Trichochloa (strong support), M . subg. Clomena (moderate support), M . sect. Pseudosporobolus (weak support), and M . subg. Muhlenbergia (moderate support). Muhlenbergia sect. Bealia and subg. Trichochloa share a common ancestor (strong support), and M . subg. Clomena and sect. Pseu- dosporobolus form a clade (moderate support) that is sister to M . subg. Muhlenbergia (strong support). Muhlenbergia ramu- losa is sister to the rest of the Muhlenbergiinae. Muhlenbergia sect. Bealia consists of 20 taxa and contains strongly supported clades of M. caxamarcensis and M. fi liformis ; two accessions of Blepharoneuron shepherdii ; M. argentea , M. eludens , and M. fl avida ; M. arenicola and M. torreyi , which are sister to eight annual species; and M. minutissima and M. sinu- osa . There are 42 taxa included within M . subg. Trichochloa clade (six of these have two samples per species) and these show very little sequence divergence because all branches are very short. A single clade exhibits strong support for two acces- sions of M. lucida . Muhlenbergia subg. Clomena contains 11 taxa (two of these have two samples per species) divided into two well-supported clades: M. durangensis - M. fl aviseta sister to the remaining species. Muhlenbergia sect. Pseudosporobo- lus consists of 22 taxa (three of these have two samples per species) and contains strongly supported clades comprising M. implicata and M. jaime-hintoni ; two different accessions of M. unifl ora ; M. fastigiata sister to two accessions of M. rich- ardsonis ; two different accessions of Lycurus setosus ; and Chaboissaea subbifl ora , C. atacamensis , and C. ligulata . There are 38 taxa within M . subg. Muhlenbergia (two of these have two samples per species) with seven well-supported clades: M. spiciformis and M. tenuifolia ; M. appressa, M. brandegei , and M. microsperma ; Pereilema beyrichianum and P. crinitum ; M. ciliata , M. pectinata , and M. tenella ; Aegopogon cenchroi- des and A. tenellus ; M. andina , M. curtifolia , and M. thurberi ; and M. sobolifera and M. tenuifl ora . Analysis of plastid sequences ? As in the ITS tree, fi ve ma- jor clades appear to be within a monophyletic Muhlenbergiinae (strongly supported), and these are labeled in Fig. 2 as Muhlen- bergia sect. Bealia (weakly supported), M . subg. Trichochloa (moderately supported), M . subg. Clomena (moderately sup- ported), M . sect. Pseudosporobolus (weakly supported), and M . subg. Muhlenbergia (strongly supported). Species composition in each of these fi ve clades is identical with the ITS-derived phylogram, except for the fi ve additional taxa included in the data set. As in the ITS-derived phylogram, Muhlenbergia sect. Bealia and subg. Trichochloa share a common ancestor (strongly supported), and M . subg. Clomena and sect. Pseudosporobolus form a clade (moderately supported) that is sister to M . subg. Muhlenbergia (moderately supported. Muhlenbergia ramulosa is sister to M . sect. Bealia and M . subg. Trichochloa (strongly supported). There is considerably higher backbone support among clades within Muhlenbergia sect. Bealia , and there is one additional taxon not included in the ITS data set, M. vaginata , that forms a clade with M. fi liformis (strongly supported); sister to this is M. caxamarcenis (strongly supported). Other strongly supported clades in M . sect. Bealia include M. arizonica - M. argentea - M. eludens - M. fl avida , two species of Blepharoneuron with two accessions of B. shepherdii , and two clades that are sister: (( M. minutissima, M. texana )( M. sinuosa ( M. brevis, M. depau- perata ))) and (( M. arenicola , M. torreyi )( M. fragilis ( M. annua, M. majalcensis ))). Muhlenbergia subg. Trichochloa contains more internal sup- port as compared to the ITS-derived phylogeny with strong support for separate clades containing M. elongata , M. emersleyi , and M. lucida ; and M. involuta , M. reverchonii , and M. sericea. The two accessions each of M. dubia , M. lucida , M. pubescens , and M. rigida do not form sister groups. In the M . subg. Clom- ena clade, Muhlenbergia fi liculmis , M. jonesii , two accessions of M. montana and M. virescens , M. quadridentata and M. straminea form a well-supported clade; sister to this are M. crispiseta - M. peruviana pair (strongly supported). As in the ITS-derived phylogeny, M. durangensis - M. fl avida pair (strongly supported) is sister to the remaining species in M . subg. Clomena . Backbone support for M . sect. Pseudosporobolus is much higher in the plastid-derived phylogram, and the topology is somewhat different than in the ITS tree. Strongly supported clades include two accessions of Lycurus setosus , M. palmi- rensis - M. villifl ora var. villosa , Chaboissaea subbifl ora sister 1536 American Journal of Botany [Vol. 97 Fig. 1. Phylogram of best maximum likelihood tree from analysis of nuclear ITS data. Numbers above branches represent bootstrap values; numbers below branches are posterior probability values. (A) Detail of upper portion and (B) lower portion of phylogram. Abbreviations for subtribes: A = Aeluropodinae, B = Boutelouinae, E = Eleusininae, H = Hilariinae, Mo = Monanthochloinae, Sc = Scleropogoninae, Td = Triodinae, Tg = Traginae, Tt = Tridentinae. Taxon color indicates native distribution: green = North America, blue = South America, purple = North and South America, red = southeast Asia. 1537September 2010] Peterson et al. ? Phylogeny of Muhlenberginiinae 1538 American Journal of Botany [Vol. 97 and M. mexicana var. fi liformis . However, these relationships were depicted in the ITS-derived phylogram. Therefore, in the following sections we will refer to the combined plastid ITS- derived phylogram when discussing evolutionary scenarios. In the discussion section, we make all necessary combinations and new names within Muhlenbergia. Analysis of outgroups ? Determination of the sister to the Muhlenbergiinae allows us to test the monophyly of the sub- tribe and to polarize morphological and anatomical characters. The ITS and plastid trees differed in relative branch length, sup- port values that occur on these branches, and topology among the 38 taxa used as outgroups. In the ITS phylogram ( Fig. 1 ) the sister to the Muhlenbergiinae was a clade (PP = 0.75) contain- ing Sohnsis fi lifolia as sister to the Scleropogoninae. In the plas- tid and combined ITS/plastid tree ( Figs. 2, 3 ), Sohnsia fi lifolia was sister to the Muhlenbergiinae, and the Scleropogoninae was the sister group to both of these. Relative positions of Swal- lenia , Tragus , and Jouvea differ among the ITS, plastid, and combined ITS/plastid phylograms. Relationships among these three taxa in the tribe Cynodonteae have been thoroughly inves- tigated by Peterson et al. (2010) using a much broader sample. DISCUSSION Monophyly of the Muhlenbergiinae is moderately to strongly supported by our data in all trees and Muhlenbergia , as tradi- tionally treated by agrostologists, is depicted as paraphyletic with Aegopogon , Bealia , Blepharoneuron , Chaboissaea , Lycu- rus , Pereilema , Redfi eldia , Schaffnerella , and Schedonnardus embedded within this clade ( Duvall et al., 1994 ; Hilu and Alice, 2001 ; Columbus et al., 2007 , 2010 ; Peterson et al., 2010 ). Be- cause the monophyly of Muhlenbergia s.s. or s.l. is not sup- ported by phylogenetic analysis of ITS, matK , ndhA intron, ndhF, rps16-trnK, rps16 intron, rps3 , and rpl32-trnL, trnL-trnF sequences, and RFLP studies ( Duvall et al., 1994 ; Hilu and Alice, 2001 ; Columbus et al., 2007 , 2010 ; Peterson et al., 2010 ), we are incorporating all nine genera within Muhlenbergia . Within the Muhlenbergia clade (=Muhlenbergiinae) there are fi ve large, well-supported clades: Muhlenbergia sect. Bealia , M . subg. Trichochloa , M . subg. Clomena , M . sect. Pseudosporobo- lus , and M . subg. Muhlenbergia . The M . subg. Muhlenbergia clade includes only species that exhibit PCK-like leaf anatomical characteristics, where the chlorenchyma is composed of tabular cells that are indistinctly radiate and continuous between bundles [PCK type, defi ned as centrifugal/evenly distributed photosynthetic carbon reduction (PCRD) cell chloroplasts (with grana), the major veins (which, at maturity have a protoxylem lacuna and large metaxylem ele- ments) are surrounded by two bundle sheaths, an inner mes- tome sheath of elongate nonchlorenchymatous cells and an outer chlorenchymatous sheath of shorter PCRD cells (desig- nated XyMS+structural type; Hattersley and Watson, 1976 , 1992 ; Dengler et al., 1986 ) with suberized lamella, fan- to shield-shaped bulliform cells without formation of a complete column of colorless cells from the adaxial to the abaxial sur- face, and species that have four or more secondary and/or ter- tiary vascular bundles between consecutive primary vascular bundles ( Peterson and Herrera Arrieta, 2001 ). Morphologically, members of the M . subg. Muhlenbergia clade have broad, fl at leaf blades, most have well-developed, scaly, and creeping rhizomes, and panicles that are usually narrow at maturity to C. atacamensis - C. ligulata , Redfi eldia fl exuosa sister to two accessions of M. unifl ora , M. fastigiata sister to M. repens - M. utilis with these three sister to two accessions of M. richardso- nis . One other large clade with strong support includes Schedo- nnardus paniculatus as sister to a clade of (in phylogenetic order) three species of Chaboissaea , M. cuspidata , M. palmi- rensis - M. villifl ora var. villosa , M. wrightii , Schaffnerella gra- cilis , and two accessions of Lycurus setosus . Muhlenbergia jaime-hintoni is sister to Redfi eldia fl exuosa - M. unifl ora (Fig. 2B) rather than to M. implicata in the ITS tree (Fig. 1B). The topology of the plastid-derived phylogram for M . subg. Muhlenbergia is similar to that portrayed by the ITS-derived phylogram, although many branches have higher support val- ues and the topology of a few clades is different. A derived, moderately supported clade with all species occurring in south- east Asia includes M. ramosa sister (strongly supported) to two accessions of M. japonica (moderately supported) and M. hi- malayensis - M. huegelii (strongly supported). Other strongly supported clades include M. racemosa - M. tenuifl ora (in the ITS tree, M. tenuifl ora forms a strongly supported clade with M. sobolifera ), M. andina sister to M. curtifolia - M. thurberi , M. paucifl ora and M. glauca 21023 (there are two different acces- sions for this species, see Appendix 1) - M. polycaulis , Pereilema beyrichianum - P. crinitum , M. breviseta - M. dumosa , M. alamo- sae sister to M. tarahumara that is sister to Aegopogon cenchroi- des - A. tenellus , M. arsenei (in the ITS tree, M. arsenei is sister to Pereilema crinitum - P. beyrichianum ) sister to M. tenella - M. ciliata - M. pectinata , M. spiciformis - M. tenuifolia sister to M. porteri that is sister to M. appressa - M. brandegei - M. mi- crosperma . Muhlenbergia mexicana var. fi liformis is a moder- ately supported sister to clade ( M. sobolifera ( M. californica ( M. racemosa , M. tenuifl ora ))), whereas in the ITS tree it is sister to M. californica in a larger clade, (( M. sobolifera , M. tenuifl ora )( M. racemosa ( M. californica , M. mexicana var. fi liformis ))). Analysis of combined plastid and ITS sequences ? The ILD test ( P = 0.1667; 99% confi dence level) failed to reject the null hypothesis of congruence between the ITS and plastid data sets; therefore, we combined them. As in the ITS and combined plas- tid trees, fi ve major clades seem to be within a monophyletic Muhlenbergiinae (strongly supported), and these are labeled in Fig. 3 as Muhlenbergia sect. Bealia (strongly supported), M . subg. Trichochloa (strongly supported), M . subg. Clomena (moderately supported), M . sect. Pseudosporobolus (moder- ately supported), and M . subg. Muhlenbergia (strongly sup- ported). Species composition in each of these fi ve clades is again identical with the ITS and plastid-derived phylograms. As in the other analyses, Muhlenbergia sect. Bealia and subg. Trichochloa share a common ancestor (strongly supported), and M . subg. Clomena and sect. Pseudosporobolus form a clade (strongly supported) that is sister to M . subg. Muhlenbergia (strongly supported). Muhlenbergia ramulosa is sister to M . sect. Bealia and M . subg. Trichochloa as in the ITS-derived phylogram. The overall topology of the combined phylogram is remark- ably similar to that of the plastid-derived tree, even in the termi- nal branches. There are only some minor differences with the plastid phylogeny, most notably in M . sect. Pseudosporobolus where M. fastigiata is sister (strongly supported) to two acces- sions of M. richardsonis and in M . subg. Muhlenbergia where M. sobolifera - M. tenuifl ora form a clade (strongly supported) that is sister (strongly supported) to M. racemosa , M. californica , 1539September 2010] Peterson et al. ? Phylogeny of Muhlenberginiinae ( M. porteri is an exception with open, 6 ? 15 cm wide panicles) ( Peterson, 2003 ). Our study supports a previous hypothesis of Peterson and Herrera Arrieta (2001) that within Muhlenbergia the evolution of the PCK subtype of photosynthesis was a sin- gle evolutionary event. Early in the evolution of Muhlenbergia , the PCK-like condition appears to have arisen once, because all species that have been chemically assayed as PCK occur in this clade ( Gutierrez et al., 1974 ; Brown, 1977 ). Ecologically, Muhlenbergia PCK-like species are able to fl ourish in shaded sites and forest margins with low-light intensities and moist- humid microhabitats that are not normally occupied by their NAD-ME relatives. In our ITS phylogram within the M . subg. Muhlenbergia clade, species of Pereilema do not appear monophyletic be- cause they form a poorly supported grade (BS = 67, PP = 0.97), and P. ciliatum is paired with M. fl exuosa (unsupported). In our plastid and combined phylogram, all species of Pereilema form a weak to moderately supported clade. Because it would require quite a few parallel evolutionary events to select for the mor- phological features expressed in this genus, our plastid markers may be a better estimate of phylogeny in this lineage. All four species of Pereilema have two unique characters: sterile, bris- tle-like spikelets that subtend the fertile spikelets and prominent blade auricles that are usually ciliate ( Peterson, 2000 ). Embedded with M . subg. Muhlenbergia is a strongly sup- ported clade containing Aegopogon cenchroides and A. tenellus . The four species of Aegopogon have a false spike with each branch usually bearing three spikelets with one larger spikelet perfect and the other two smaller and often staminate or rudi- mentary (two spikelets in A. bryophilus D ? ll with one spikelet often not developed) ( Peterson, 2000 ). The recently described species M . tarahumara ( Peterson and Columbus, 2009 ) was found in our study to be sister to Aegopogon in all trees. Muhlen- bergia tarahumara differs from other species of Aegopogon by having panicle branches with only two terminal, perfect spike- lets ( Peterson and Columbus, 2009 ). Anatomically, M. tarahu- mara also differs from other species in M . subg. Muhlenbergia by having noncontiguous chlorenchyma separated by columns of colorless cells between adjacent vascular bundles. Other spe- cies in this clade ( M. paucifl ora and M. polycaulis ) exhibit this leaf anatomical characteristic, at least near the middle of the blades. However, near the leaf margins, the tertiary vascular bundles of these latter two species have chlorenchyma tissue that is continuous between each adjacent vascular bundle. All other characteristics, i.e., presence of two bundle sheaths, un- even outline of the outer sheath, round shape of chloroplasts in the outer sheath, and centrifugal/peripheral position of the chlo- roplasts in each cell, are predictive of PCK for M. paucifl ora , M. polycaulis , and M. tarahumara . Because the habitat where M. tarahumara is found is rather xeric (slopes, ridge tops, rock outcrops), the columns of colorless cells between adjacent vas- cular bundles, like most NAD-ME species, facilitate involution of the leaf blades, an adaption to periods of drought. PCK-like leaf anatomy appears to have arisen once in the evolution of the Muhlenbergiinae, and this morphology is linked to species that oc- cupy slightly more mesic habitats ( Peterson and Herrera Arrieta, 2001 ). The anatomical structure found in M. tarahumara, and to some extent in M. paucifl ora and M. polycaulis, might be in direct response to the environment where reversion to NAD-ME- like leaf structure is likely an adaptive feature. The Chinese species M. himalayensis , M. hueglii , M. japon- ica , and M. ramosa form a clade within M . subg. Muhlenbergia with moderate bootstrap support in the plastid and combined plastid/ITS phylograms, suggesting a single colonization event, most likely from North American origins. Only seven native species of Muhlenbergia occur in southeast Asia, and all seven are reported in the fl ora of China ( Wu and Peterson, 2006 ). The Asian species of Muhlenbergia are predominately rhizomatous (only M. duthieana Hack. is loosely caespitose without rhi- zomes) and occur in similar habitats to most species in M . subg. Muhlenbergia , such as mountain slopes, forests, and along moist roadsides. Muhlenbergia californica , M. mexicana var. fi liformis , M. racemosa , M. schreberi , M. sobolifera , and M. tenuifl ora are sister to these Chinese species, and together they are sister to the remaining species within M . subg. Muhlenbergia , suggesting that colonization from North America to southeastern Asia occurred relatively recently in the evolution of this subgenus ( Figs. 1 ? 3). Three sections of Muhlenbergia recognized by Pilger (1956) : sect. Acroxis ( M . dumosa , M . mexicana , M . polycaulis , and M . racemosa ), sect. Muhlenbergia ( M . schreberi ), and sect. Steno- cladium ( M . bushii R. W. Pohl, M . hueglii , M . japonica , M . ramosa , M . sobolifera , and M . tenuifl ora ) included species in our subg. Muhlenbergia clade. In our phylograms, there are no clades that correspond with Pilger ? s sections; therefore, we agree with earlier authors that his treatment was not phyloge- netically informative ( Soderstrom, 1967 ; Pohl, 1969 ; Morden, 1985 ; Peterson and Annable, 1991 ). Although the clade of species representing the M . subg. Trichochloa is strongly supported in our analyses ( Figs. 1, 3 ), there is little resolution among members, likely refl ecting very low levels of divergence within our plastid and nrDNA ITS se- quences. The low level of divergence may be a consequence of rapid speciation events. It is possible that some species delimi- tations of subg. Trichochloa are not tenable because of recent diversifi cation although it may also be the case that suitable molecular markers have yet to be applied. Within Muhlenber- gia , this group is by far the most diffi cult to determine because there are very few morphological differences among the taxa and discrete (nonplastic) characteristics are few. Anatomically, most species in this clade have sclerosed phloem, a crown of infl ated cells located adaxially to the primary vascular bundles, unequal secondary and tertiary vascular bundles, and primary vascular bundles that are either rectangular or obovate/elliptic in shape ( Peterson and Herrera Arrieta, 2001 ). Species in M. subg. Trichochloa are erect, relatively tall (0.8 ? 3 m), robust and stout, caespitose perennials that have unnerved or 1-nerved glumes ( Soderstrom, 1967 ; Peterson, 2000 ). Pilger (1956) rec- ognized M. sect. Cinnastrum with narrowly contracted, spicate panicles ( M. angustata, M. macroura , and M. rigens ) and M . sect. Podosemum with open panicles, lemmas long aristate, new shoots inside the sheaths (intravaginal), and ligule extended ( M. articulata , M. capillaris , M . distichophylla , M. longiglu- mis , M. rigida , and M. stricta ). Pilger ? s two sections do not in- clude the same species as M . subg. Trichochloa sects. Epicampes and Podosemum as described in Peterson and Herrera Arrieta (2001), but the species treated by Soderstrom (1967) in his subg. Podosemum (= M . subg. Trichochloa ) are the same. The clade of M . subg. Clomena (= M. montana complex sensu Herrera Arrieta, 1998 ) is moderately supported in our analysis, and morphologically, this complex includes species that have 3-nerved upper glumes that are often 3-toothed and densely caespitose individuals with lower leaf sheaths that become fl at and somewhat papery at maturity ( Reeder and Reeder, 1995 ; Herrera Arrieta, 1998 ). Muhlenbergia argentea , a species with 1-nerved upper glumes, slightly compressed-keeled sheaths, 1540 American Journal of Botany [Vol. 97 Fig. 2. Phylogram of best maximum likelihood tree from analysis of plastid data. Numbers above branches represent bootstrap values; numbers below branches are posterior probability values. (A) Detail of upper portion and (B) lower portion of phylogram. Abbreviations for subtribes: A = Aeluropodinae, B = Boutelouinae, E = Eleusininae, H = Hilariinae, Mo = Monanthochloinae, Sc = Scleropogoninae, Td = Triodinae, Tg = Traginae, Tt = Tridentinae. Taxon color indicates native distribution: green = North America, blue = South America, purple = North and South America, red = southeast Asia. 1541September 2010] Peterson et al. ? Phylogeny of Muhlenberginiinae 1542 American Journal of Botany [Vol. 97 and subg. Clomena . Of the 20 species in M . sect Bealia , 14 are annual, with only Blepharoneuron tricholepis, M. arenicola , M. argentea , M. arizonica , M. caxamarcensis , and M. torreyi being perennial. Blepharoneuron was originally erected by Nash (1898) to emphasize the densely pilose margins and mid- vein of the lemma found in B. tricholepis . Blepharoneuron shepherdii also has densely pilose margins and midvein of the lemma and a base chromosome number of x = 8, prompting Peterson and Annable (1990) to place Muhlenbergia shepherdii (Vasey) Swallen in Blepharoneuron . The overall morphology of B. shepherdii with species in the M. fragilis - M. annua - M. majalcensis clade ( Fig. 3 , moderately supported) and the M. minutissima - M. sinuosa pair ( Fig. 3 , moderately supported) is striking because all are slender annuals with unawned lem- mas, with capillary, fl exuous pedicels that are often nodding ( Peterson and Annable, 1990 , 1991 ). Sister to the Blepharoneuron pair is a strongly supported clade comprising M. caxamarcensis, M. fi liformis , and M. vaginata ( Fig. 3 ). With the inclusion of M. ligularis ( Columbus et al., 2010 ), these latter four taxa form a tight assemblage of short-lived perennial to annual, mat-forming species with short culms not exceeding 35 cm in height, narrow to loosely contracted panicles, and unawned, mucronate or short- awned lemmas ( Laegaard and S ? nchez Vega, 1990 ; Peterson and Annable, 1991 ). Morphologically, these four species closely resemble the M. repens complex ( M . sect. Pseudosporobolus ) as previously discussed, but differ primarily by lacking well- developed rhizomes, a characteristic common in M . subg. Muhlenbergia and M. arenacea , M. asperifolia , M. jaime-hin- tonii , M. palmirensis , M. villifl ora var. villosa , and Redfi eldia fl exuosa , all members of M . sect. Pseudosporobolus . In our study, M. ramulosa does not align within any subgenus or section but is sister to all Muhlenbergiinae in the ITS phylo- gram (not well supported in Fig. 1 ) or sister to M . sect. Bealia and M . subg. Trichochloa in the plastid and combined phylo- grams (strongly supported in Figs. 2 and 3 ). Earlier molecular studies of the Muhlenbergiinae (ITS and trnL-F ) are also unable to confi rm the affi nity of M. ramulosa ( Columbus et al., 2010 ), clearly a distinctive taxon, phylogenetically, wherever it belongs. Morphologically, M . ramulosa is very similar to many of the small delicate annuals that reside in M . sect. Bealia . At this time, we are not prepared to erect a subgeneric ranking to accommodate only M. ramulosa . Cleistogamous spikelets appear to have evolved twice within the Muhlenbergiinae, once in the M . subg. Muhlenbergia where M. appressa , M. brandegei , and M. microsperma (all annuals) form a strongly supported clade ( Fig. 3 ) and in M . sect. Pseu- dosporobolus known only from a few collections of M. cuspi- data ( Morden and Hatch, 1984 ). The formation of cleistogamous spikelets could actually be more common among the Muhlen- bergiinae, but is undocumented to date. Sclerosed phloem appears to have evolved a minimum of four times within the Muhlenbergiinae because it is found in M. arenicola - M. torreyi clade in sect. Bealia , the subg. Trichochloa clade, the subg. Clomena clade, and in M. jaime-hintonii (sect. Pseudosporobolus ). In a cladogram derived entirely on the analysis of 16 anatomical characters within Muhlenbergia , Peterson and Herrera-Arrieta (2001) indicated that sclerosed phloem originated twice. Biogeography ? All three phylograms suggest that the Muhlenbergiinae originated in North America; for example, the sister group (Scleropogoninae in Fig. 1 ; or Sohnsia fi lifolia and Scleropogoninae in Figs. 2 and 3 ) are predominantly North and fl attened caryopses ( Reeder and Reeder, 1995 ) was in- cluded by Herrera Arrieta (1998) in her study of the M. montana complex; however, this taxon occurs in our clade of M . subg. Bealia . We provide evidence for the exclusion of M. argentea and the addition of two annual species, M. crispiseta and M. peruviana ( Peterson and Annable, 1991 ) to be included in M . subg. Clomena . Within our clade of M. subg. Clomena , there are three strongly supported subclades, one that includes the two annual species, a second that includes M. durangensis and M. fl aviseta , and a third that includes those species with mor- phologies very similar to M. montana . Some individuals of M. montana and M. virescens have sclerosed phloem. This charac- teristic apparently has arisen four times within Muhlenbergia because it also is found in subg. Trichochloa , in M. arenicola and M. torreyi (subg. Bealia ), and in M. jaime-hintoni (sect. Pseudosporobolus ) ( Peterson and Herrera Arrieta, 2001 ). The moderately supported clade of M. sect. Pseudosporobo- lus ( Fig. 3 ) includes a diverse assemblage of species, such as Schedonnardus paniculatus , that has panicles with long pri- mary branches that do not rebranch, hence containing nearly sessile spikelets; Redfi eldia fl exuosa with 2 ? 6-fl owered spike- lets, a line of hairs for a ligule, and open and diffuse panicles with capillary branches very similar to M. asperifolia , also oc- casionally with 2- or 3-fl owered spikelets; Schaffnerella gracilis , a little known endemic of San Luis Potos ? , Mexico ( Columbus et al., 2002 ) that has panicles composed of short primary branches, each bearing a triad of 1-fl owered spikelets, 7 ? 9-nerved lemmas that have 3 ? 5 awns, all enclosed in a spathiform sheath; Lycurus setosus with spikelets that are grouped in pairs, one sessile and one pedicellate; and Chaboissaea with one or two (occasionally three) fl orets per spikelet, the lower fl oret perfect and the upper fl orets staminate or sterile ( Reeder, 1985 ; S ? nchez and R ? golo de Agrasar, 1986 ; Peterson and Annable, 1992 ; Peterson 2000 ; Peterson et al., 2007b ). Embedded in M . sect. Pseudosporobolus is a strongly supported clade ( Fig. 3 ) consisting of M. fastigiata , M. repens , M. richardsonis , and M. utilis , all earlier treated as the M. repens complex ( Morden, 1985 ; Morden and Hatch, 1987 , 1996 ). These four species are characterized by having short culms seldom exceeding 40 cm in height; a rhizomatous perennial habit, short involute leaf blades; short, narrow, contracted panicles; plumbeous spikelets; and unawned or mucronate lemmas ( Morden, 1985 ; Morden and Hatch, 1987 , 1996 ). Muhlenbergia villifl ora var. villosa was in- cluded in Morden ? s M . repens complex, but in our analyses, it is sister to the Ecuadorian endemic M. palmirensis ( Fig. 3 , moderately supported; Fig. 2 , strongly supported). Most spe- cies in M . sect. Pseudosporobolus have well-developed abaxial and adaxial sclerenchyma in their primary vascular bundles, narrow panicles, usually plumbeous spikelets, and unawned to mucronate lemmas ( Peterson and Herrera Arrieta, 2001 ). Ex- ceptions to these general trends include the short-awned Lycu- rus setosus and long-awned M. implicata, and the broad and open-panicled M. asperifolia, M. implicata , and Redfi eldia fl ex- uosa . The characteristic of having 2 ? 3( ? 6)-fl owered spikelets is also quite common in M . sect. Pseudosporobolus because it is found in Chaboissaea atacamensis , C. ligulata , C. subbifl ora , M. arenacea , M. asperifolia , M. cuspidata , M. fastigiata , M. richardsonis , M. unifl ora , and Redfi eldia fl exuosa . The strongly supported clade of M . sect. Bealia contains few unique morphological characteristics shared among its mem- bers. However, all species in this clade have lemmas with hairy margins and midveins and caespitose or tufted culms, charac- ters that are shared by many species in the M . subg. Trichochloa 1543September 2010] Peterson et al. ? Phylogeny of Muhlenberginiinae American species. The phylogenetic arrangement of the various tribes, subtribes, and genera in our analysis is similar to that found in Peterson et al. (2010) in which the Zoysieae is sister to the Cynodonteae, and within the Cynodonteae nested clades of the Aeluropodinae and Triodiinae are fi rst, followed by the Or- cuttiinae (not included), Tridentinae, Eleusininae, Tripogoninae (not included), Pappophorinae (not included), Traginae, an almost entirely New World clade with the Allolepis - Jouvea - Hilariinae sister to the Monanthochloinae-Scleropogoninae, Sohnsia fi lifolia , Lepturidium insulare Hitchc. & Ekman (not included), and the remaining Muhlenbergiinae. Within the Muhlenbergiinae, multiple independent radiations to South America have occurred one or more times in each of the three subgenera and two sections (blue and purple taxa in Figs. 1 ? 3), and 15 species occur in both North and South America. The study of amphitropical disjunctions within the Muhlenbergiinae has indi- cated a North American origin and recent introduction into South America for at least three species ( Peterson and Herrera Arrieta, 1995 ; Sykes et al., 1997 ; Peterson and Morrone, 1998 ; Peterson and Ort ? z Diaz, 1998 ; Peterson et al., 2007a ). Other plant groups with similar desert, amphitropical disjunct distributions have all been postulated to be of recent origin, i.e., late Pliocene to Pleistocene ( Raven, 1963 ; Wen and Ickert-Bond, 2009 ). Within M . subg. Muhlenbergia , there is evidence for a single colonization event in southeastern Asia (red taxa in Figs. 1 ? 3). Intercontinental disjunctions between eastern North America and eastern Asia have been investigated in insects ( von Dohlen et al., 2002 ) and plants ( Wen, 1999 , 2001 ; Wen et al., 2002 ). This fl oristic disjunction has resulted from fragmentation and range restriction of a widespread mesophytic forest during the past that attained its intercontinental distribution via the Bering and North Atlantic land bridges (e.g., Manchester, 1999 ; re- viewed in Wen, 1999 , 2001 ). Because the Asian Muhlenbergia clade is deeply nested, it seems likely that these species attained their current distribution recently, at least post Pleistocene. Estimates of introduction dates will be the topic of a forthcom- ing biogeographic study with the use of additional markers and a more complete sample of the species in the subtribe. Taxonomy ? Because our molecular analysis renders Muhlenbergia paraphyletic, we propose incorporating Aegopo- gon , Bealia , Blepharoneuron , Chaboissaea , Lycurus , Pereilema , Redfi eldia , Schaffnerella , and Schedonnardus within Muhlen- bergia . Muhlenbergia is the oldest name. Expansion of the cir- cumscription to include these nine genera within Muhlenbergia requires the least amount of nomenclatural changes and still allows us to recognize a strongly supported monophyletic and morphologically cohesive unit. A complete classifi cation for the Chloridoideae of the New World can be found in Soreng et al. (2009), and an attempt to place most genera within the sub- family into the four recognized tribes is found in Peterson et al. (2010) . Below, we list all species in these nine genera and pro- vide their name in Muhlenbergia . Our analysis also supports the recognition of fi ve major clades within Muhlenbergia , and for consistency in rank, we propose two new subgeneric combi- nations below. Muhlenbergia alopecuroides (Griseb.) P. M. Peterson & Columbus, Madro ? o 55(2): 159. 2008. Basionym: Lycurus alopecuroides Griseb., Abh. K ? nigl. Ges. Wiss. G ? ttingen 19: 255 ? 256. 1874. Heterotypic synonym: Pleopogon setosum Nutt., Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 4: 25. 1848. Lycurus setosus (Nutt.) C. Reeder, Phytologia 57: 287. 1985. non Muhlenbergia setosa (Kunth) Trin. Muhlenbergia ammophila P. M. Peterson, nom. nov. Replaced name: Graphephorum fl exuosum Thurb. ex A. Gray, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 1863: 78. 1864. Redfi eldia fl exuosa (Thurb. ex A. Gray) Vasey, Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 14: 133. 1887. non Muhlenbergia fl exuosa Hitchc. Notes: The species is usually found growing on sand hills and dunes; therefore, it seems appropriate to emphasize its habitat requirement by using the epithet ? ammophila ? or sand loving. Muhlenbergia atacamensis Parodi, Revista Argent. Agron. 15: 248. 1948. Chaboissaea atacamensis (Parodi) P. M. Peterson & Annable, Madro ? o 39(1): 19. 1992. Muhlenbergia subg. Bealia (Scribn.) P. M. Peterson, comb. stat. nov. Basionym: Bealia Scribn., The True Grasses 104, f. 45a. 1890. Muhlenbergia sect. Bealia (Scribn.) Pilg., Die Nat ? lichen Planzenfamilien, Zweite Aufl age 14d: 71. 1956. Muhlenbergia beyrichianum Kunth, Enum. Pl. 1: 200. 1833. Pereilema beyrichianum (Kunth) Hitchc., Contr. U. S. Natl. Herb. 24(8): 385. 1927. Muhlenbergia biloba Hitchc., Contr. U. S. Natl. Herb. 17(3): 294. 1913. Replaced name: Bealia mexicana Scribn., The True Grasses 103, f. 45a. 1890. non Muhlenbergia mexicana (L.) Trin., Gram. Unifl . Sesquifl . 189, 190, 297, t. 5, f. 8. 1824. Muhlenbergia bryophilus (D ? ll) P. M. Peterson, Caldasia 31(2): 279. 2009. Basionym: Aegopogon bryophilus D ? ll, Fl. Bras. 2(3): 239. 1880. Muhlenbergia cenchroides (Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd.) P. M. Peterson, Caldasia 31(2): 280. 2009. Basionym: Aegopogon cenchroides Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd., Sp. Pl. 4(2): 899. 1806. Muhlenbergia columbi P. M. Peterson, nom. nov. Replaced name: Schaffnera gracilis Benth., Hooker ? s Icon. Pl. 14: 59. T. 1378. 1882. later near hom., non Schaffneria Moore (1857). non Muhlenbergia gracilis (Kunth) Trin. Schaffnerella gracilis (Benth.) Nash, N. Amer. Fl. 17(2): 141. 1912. Notes: The spe- cifi c epithet commemorates J. Travis Columbus who led a trip to San Luis Potos ? , Mexico and was the fi rst to collect this enigmatic species again more than 120 yr after the original collections by J. G. Schaffner between 1876 and 1880 ( Columbus et al., 2002 ). Muhlenbergia decumbens Swallen, Bol. Soc. Bot. Mexico 23: 30 ? 32. F. 4. 1959. Chaboissaea decumbens (Swallen) Reeder & C. Reeder, Phytologia 65(2): 156. 1988. Muhlenbergia diandra (R. W. Pohl) P. M. Peterson, comb. nov. Basionym: Pereilema diandrum R. W. Pohl, Novon 2(2): 102. 1992. Muhlenbergia geminifl ora (Kunth) P. M. Peterson, comb. nov. Basionym: Aegopogon geminifl orus Kunth, Nov. Gen. Sp. (quarto ed.) 1: 133, t. 43. 1816. Heterotypic synonyms: Lamarkia tenella DC., Cat. Pl. Hort. Monsp. 120. 1813. Aegopogon tenellus (DC.) Trin., Gram. Unifl . Sesquifl . 164. 1824. non Muhlenbergia tenella (Kunth) Trin. Muhlenbergia ligulata (E. Fourn.) Scribn. & Merr., Bull. Div. Agrostol. USDA 24. 19. 1901. Basionym: Chaboissaea ligulata E. Fourn., Mexic. Pl. 2: 112t. 1. 1886. Muhlenbergia paniculata (Nutt.) P. M. Peterson, comb. nov. Basionym: Lepturus paniculatus Nutt., Gen. N. Amer. Pl. 1: 81. 1818. Schedonnardus paniculatus (Nutt.) Trel., Annual Rep. Geol. Surv. Arkansas 1888(4): 236. 1891. Muhlenbergia pereilema P. M. Peterson, Caldasia 31(2): 293. 2009. Replaced name: Pereilema crinitum J. Presl, Reliq. Haenk. 1(4 ? 5): 233, t. 37, f. a ? f. 1830. non Muhlenbergia crinita (L. f.) Trin. Muhlenbergia phalaroides (Kunth) P. M. Peterson, Caldasia 31(2): 294. 2009. Basionym: Lycurus phalaroides Kunth, Nov. Gen. Sp. (quarto ed.) 1: 142. 1816. 1544 American Journal of Botany [Vol. 97 Fig. 3. Phylogram of best maximum likelihood tree from analysis of combined plastid and ITS data. Numbers above branches represent bootstrap values; numbers below branches are posterior probability values. (A) Detail of upper portion and (B) lower portion of phylogram. Abbreviations for sub- tribes: A = Aeluropodinae, B = Boutelouinae, E = Eleusininae, H = Hilariinae, Mo = Monanthochloinae, Sc = Scleropogoninae, Td = Triodiinae, Tg = Traginae, Tt = Tridentinae. Taxon color indicates native distribution: green = North America, blue = South America, purple = North and South America, red = southeast Asia. 1545September 2010] Peterson et al. ? Phylogeny of Muhlenberginiinae 1546 American Journal of Botany [Vol. 97 Muhlenbergia phleoides (Kunth) P. M. Peterson, comb. nov. Basionym: Lycurus phleoides Kunth, Nov. Gen. Sp. (quarto ed.) 1: 142, t. 45. 1816. Muhlenbergia plumosa P. M. Peterson, nom. nov. Replaced name: Pereilema ciliatum E. Fourn, Mexic. Pl. 2: 93. 1886 non Muhlenbergia ciliata (Kunth) Trin. Notes: The new name empha- sizes the small feathery hairs on the surface of the fascicled spike- lets and the sterile bristles that surround the fertile spikelets. Muhlenbergia subg. Pseudosporobolus (Parodi) P. M. Peter- son, comb. stat. nov. Basionym: Muhlenbergia unranked Pseu- dosporobolus Parodi, Physis. Revista de la Sociedad Argentina de Ciencias Naturales 9: 207. 1928. M . sect. Pseu- dosporobolus (Parodi) Pilg., Die Nat ? lichen Planzenfamilien, Zweite Aufl age 14d: 71. 1956. Lectotype: Muhlenbergia fastigi- ata (J. Presl) Henrard, designated here. Parodi (1928) and Pilger (1956) did not explicitly indicate the type species for this taxon. Muhlenbergia shepherdii (Vasey) Swallen, Contr. U. S. Natl. Herb. 29(4): 204. 1947. Basionym: Sporobolus shepherdii Vasey, Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 14: 8. 1887. Blepharoneuron shepherdii (Vasey) P. M. Peterson & Annable, Syst. Bot. 15: 519. 1990. Muhlenbergia solisii (G. A. Levin) P. M. Peterson, comb. nov. Basionym: Aegopogon solisii G. A. Levin, Mem. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 16: 61. 1989. Muhlenbergia subbifl ora Hitchc., N. Amer. Fl. 17(6): 437. 1935. Chaboissaea subbifl ora (Hitchc.) Reeder & C. Reeder, Phytologia 65(2): 156. 1988. Muhlenbergia tricholepis (Torr.) P. M. Peterson, comb.nov. Basionym: Vilfa tricholepis Torr., Pacif. Railr. Rep. 4(5): 155. 1857. Blepharoneuron tricholepis (Torr.) Nash, Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 25(2): 88. 1898. LITERATURE CITED Brown , W. V. 1977 . The Kranz syndrome and its subtypes in grass systematics. Memoirs of the Torrey Botanical Club 23 : 1 ? 97 . Clayton , W. D. , and S. A. Renvoize . 1986 . Genera graminum, grasses of the world. Her Majesty ? s Stationery Offi ce, London, UK. Columbus , J. T. , H. L. Bell , R. Cerros Tlatilpa , M. P. Griffith , and J. M. Porter . 2002 . Schaffnerella rediscovered! (Gramineae, Chloridoideae). Aliso 20 : 45 ? 50 . Columbus , J. T. , R. Cerros Tlatilpa , M. S. Kinney , M. E. Siqueiros- Delgado , H. L. Bell , M. P. Griffith , and N. F. Refulio Rodr ? guez . 2007 . Phylogenetics of Chloridoideae (Gramineae): A preliminary study based on nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer and chloroplast trnL-F sequences. Aliso 23 : 565 ? 579 . Columbus , J. T. , M. S. Kinney , R. Pant , and M. E. Siqueiros D . 1998 . Cladistic parsimony analysis of internal transcribed spacer region (nrDNA) sequences of Bouteloua and relatives (Gramineae: Chloridoideae). Aliso 17 : 99 ? 130 . Columbus , J. T. , P. M. Peterson , N. F. Refulio Rodr ? guez , R. Cerros Tlatilpa , and M. S. Kinney . 2010 . Phylogenetics of Muhlenbergiinae (Poaceae, Chloridoideae, Cynodonteae) based on ITS and trnL-F DNA sequences. In O. Seberg, G. Petersen, A. S. Barfod, and J. I. Davis [eds.], Diversity, phylogeny, and evolution in the monocotyle- dons, 477 ? 495. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark. Dengler , N. G. , R. E. Dengler , and P. W. Hattersley . 1986 . Comparative bundle sheath and mesophyll differentiation in the leaves of the C 4 grasses Panicum effusum and P. bulbosum. American Journal of Botany 73 : 1431 ? 1442 . Duvall , M. R. , P. M. Peterson , and A. H. Christensen . 1994 . Alliances of Muhlenbergia (Poaceae) within New World Eragrostideae are iden- tifi ed by phylogenetic analysis of mapped restriction sites from plastid DNAs. American Journal of Botany 81 : 622 ? 629 . Edwards , E. J. , C. P. Osborne , C. A. E. Str ? mberg , S. A. Smith and C 4 Grasses Consortium [E. J. Edwards , C. P. Osborne , C. A. E. Str ? mberg , S. A. Smith W. J. Bond, P. A. Christin, A. B. Cousins, et al.]. 2010 . The origins of C 4 grasslands: Integrating evolutionary and ecosystem science. Science 328: 587 ? 591. Farris , J. S. , M. K ? llersj ? , A. G. Kluge , and C. Bult . 1994 . Testing signifi cance of incongruence. Cladistics 10 : 315 ? 319 . Felsenstein , J. 1985 . Confi dence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39 : 783 ? 791 . Gibson , D. J. 2009 . Grasses and grassland ecology. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA. Giussani , L. M. , J. H. Cota-S ? nchez , F. O. Zuloaga , and E. A. Kellogg . 2001 . A molecular phylogeny of the grass subfamily Panicoideae (Poaceae) shows multiple origins of C 4 photosynthesis. American Journal of Botany 88 : 1993 ? 2012 . Gustafson , D. J. , and P. M. Peterson . 2007 . Re-examination of the Muhlenbergia capillaries , M. expansa , and M. sericea (Poaceae: Muhlenbergiinae). Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas 1 : 85 ? 89 . Gutierrez , M. , V. E. Gracen , and G. E. Edwards . 1974 . Biochemical and cytological relationships in C 4 plants. Planta 119 : 279 ? 300 . Hall , T. A. 1999 . BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41 : 95 ? 98 . Hattersley , P. W. , and L. Watson . 1976 . C 4 grasses: An anatomical criterion for distinguishing between NADP-malic enzyme species and PCK or NAD-malic enzyme species. Australian Journal of Botany 24 : 297 ? 308 . Hattersley , P. W. , and L. Watson . 1992 . Diversifi cation of photosyn- thesis. In G. P. Chapman [ed.], Grass evolution and domestication, 38 ? 116. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Herrera Arrieta , Y. 1998 . A revision of the Muhlenbergia montana (Nutt.) Hitchc. complex (Poaceae: Chloridoideae). Brittonia 50 : 23 ? 50 . Herrera Arrieta , Y. , and W. F. Grant . 1993 . Correlation between generated morphological character data and fl avonoid content of spe- cies in the Muhlenbergia montana complex. Canadian Journal of Botany 71 : 816 ? 826 . Herrera Arrieta , Y. , and W. F. Grant . 1994 . Anatomy of the Muhlenbergia montana (Poaceae) complex. American Journal of Botany 81 : 1038 ? 1044 . Herrera Arrieta , Y. , and P. M. Peterson . 2007 . Muhlenbergia (Poaceae) de Chihuahua, Mexico. Sida . Botanical Miscellany 29 : 1 ? 109 . Hilu , K. W. , and L. A. Alice . 2001 . A phylogeny of Chloridoideae (Poaceae) based on matK sequences. Systematic Botany 26 : 386 ? 405 . Hitchcock , A. S. 1935 . Manual of grasses of the United States. Miscellaneous Publication 200. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., USA. Huelsenbeck , J. P. , and F. R. Ronquist . 2001 . MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17 : 754 ? 755 . Kimura , M. 1981 . Estimation of evolutionary distances between homol- ogous nucleotide sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 78 : 454 ? 458 . Laegaard , S. , and I. S ? nchez Vega . 1990 . Three new species of Muhlenbergia and Uniola (Poaceae) from northern Peru. Nordic Journal of Botany 10 : 437 ? 441 . Levin , G. A. , and R. Moran . 1989 . The vascular fl ora of Isla Socorro, Mexico. San Diego Society of Natural History Memoir 16 : 1 ? 66 . Manchester , S. R. 1999 . Biogeographical relationships of North American Tertiary fl oras. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86 : 472 ? 522 . Morden , C. W. 1985 . A biosystematic study of the Muhlenbergia repens complex (Poaceae). Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, USA. Morden , C. W. , and S. L. Hatch . 1984 . Cleistogamy in Muhlenbergia cuspidata (Poaceae). Sida 10 : 254 ? 255 . Morden , C. W. , and S. L. Hatch . 1987 . Anatomical study of the Muhlenbergia repens complex (Poaceae: Chloridoideae: Eragrostideae). Sida 12 : 347 ? 359 . Morden , C. W. , and S. L. Hatch . 1996 . Morphological variation and synopsis of the Muhlenbergia repens complex (Poaceae). Sida 17 : 349 ? 365 . Nash , G. V. 1898 . New or noteworthy American grasses VIII. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 25 : 83 ? 89 . 1547September 2010] Peterson et al. ? Phylogeny of Muhlenberginiinae Nixon , K. C. 2002 . WinClada ver. 1.00.08. Computer program published by the author. Ithaca, New York, USA. Nylander , J. A. 2002 . MrModeltest v.1.1b. Computer program distributed by the author. Department of Systematic Zoology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. Parodi , L. R. 1928 . Sinopsis de las gram ? neas Argentinas del g ? nero Muhlenbergia. Physis Revista de la Sociedad Argentina de Ciencias Naturales 9 : 205 ? 222 . Peterson , P. M. 1988a . Systematics of the annual Muhlenbergia (Poaceae). PhD. dissertation, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA. Peterson , P. M. 1988b . Chromosome numbers in the annual Muhlenbergia (Poaceae). Madro ? o 35 : 320 ? 324 . Peterson , P. M. 1989a . Lemma micromorphology in the annual Muhlenbergia (Poaceae). Southwestern Naturalist 34 : 61 ? 71 . Peterson , P. M. 1989b . A re-evaluation of Bealia mexicana (Poaceae: Eragrostideae). Madro ? o 36 : 260 ? 265 . Peterson , P. M. 2000 . Systematics of the Muhlenbergiinae (Chloridoideae: Eragrostideae). In S. W. L. Jacobs and J. Everett [eds.]. Grasses: Systematics and evolution, 195 ? ? 212. Commonwealth Scientifi c and Research Organization [CSIRO] Publishing, Melbourne, Australia. Peterson , P. M. 2003 . Muhlenbergia. In M. E. Barkworth, K. M. Capels, S. Long, and M. B. Piep [eds.], Magnoliophyta: Commelinidae (in part): Poaceae, part 2, Flora of North America north of Mexico, vol. 25, 145 ? 201. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA. Peterson , P. M. , and C. R. Annable . 1990 . A revision of Blepharoneuron (Poaceae: Eragrostideae ). Systematic Botany 15 : 515 ? 525 . Peterson , P. M. , and C. R. Annable . 1991 . Systematics of the annual species of Muhlenbergia (Poaceae: Eragrostideae). Systematic Botany Monographs 31 : 1 ? 109 . Peterson , P. M. , and C. R. Annable . 1992 . A revision of Chaboissaea (Poaceae: Eragrostideae). Madro ? o 39 : 8 ? 30 . Peterson , P. M. , and C. R. Annable . 2003 . Blepharoneuron. In M. E. Barkworth, K. M. Capels, S. Long, and M. B. Piep [eds.], Magnoliophyta: Commelinidae (in part): Poaceae, part 2, Flora of North America north of Mexico, vol. 25, 47, 48, 50. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA. Peterson , P. M. , C. R. Annable , and V. R. Franceschi . 1989 . Comparative leaf anatomy of the annual Muhlenbergia (Poaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 8 : 575 ? 583 . Peterson , P. M. , and J. T. Columbus . 2009 . Muhlenbergia tarahumara (Poaceae: Chloridoideae: Cynodonteae: Muhlenbergiinae), a new species from Chihuahua, Mexico. Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas 3 : 527 ? 534 . Peterson , P. M. , J. T. Columbus , and S. J. Pennington . 2007a . Classifi cation and biogeography of New World grasses: Chloridoideae. Aliso 23 : 580 ? 594 . Peterson , P. M. , M. R. Duvall , and A. H. Christensen . 1993 . Allozyme differentiation among Bealia mexicana, Muhlenbergia argentea , and M. lucida. Madro ? o 40 : 148 ? 160 . Peterson , P. M. , and Y. Herrera Arrieta . 1995 . Allozyme variation in the amphitropical disjunct Chaboissaea (Poaceae: Eragrostideae). Madro ? o 42 : 427 ? 449 . Peterson , P. M. , and Y. Herrera Arrieta . 2001 . A leaf blade ana- tomical survey of Muhlenbergia (Poaceae: Muhlenbergiinae). Sida 19 : 469 ? 506 . Peterson , P. M. , and O. Morrone . 1998 . Allelic variation in the am- phitropical disjunct Lycurus setosus (Poaceae: Muhlenbergiinae). Madro ? o 44 : 334 ? 346 . Peterson , P. M. , and J. J. Ort ? z Diaz . 1998 . Allelic variation in the am- phitropical disjunct Muhlenbergia torreyi (Poaceae: Muhlenbergiinae). Brittonia 50 : 381 ? 391 . Peterson , P. M. , and L. H. Rieseberg . 1987 . Flavonoids of the annual Muhlenbergia. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 15 : 647 ? 652 . Peterson , P. M. , K. Romaschenko , and G. Johnson . 2010 . A clas- sifi cation of the Chloridoideae (Poaceae) based on multi-gene phylogenetics trees. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 55 : 580 ? 598. Peterson , P. M. , R. J. Soreng , G. Davidse , T. S. Filgueiras , F. O. Zuloaga , and E. J. Judziewicz . 2001 . Catalogue of New World grasses (Poaceae): II. Subfamily Chloridoideae. Contributions from the United States National Herbarium 41 : 1 ? 255 . Peterson , P. M. , J. Vald ? s Reyna , and Y. Herrera Arrieta . 2007b . Muhlenbergiinae (Poaceae: Chloridoideae: Cynodonteae): From northeastern Mexico. Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas 1 : 933 ? 1000 . Peterson , P. M. , R. D. Webster , and J. Vald ? s Reyna . 1995 . Subtribal clas- sifi cation of the New World Eragrostideae (Poaceae: Chloridoideae). Sida 16 : 529 ? 544 . Peterson , P. M. , R. D. Webster , and J. Vald ? s Reyna . 1997 . Genera of New World Eragrostideae (Poaceae: Chloridoideae). Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 87 : 1 ? 50 . Pilger , R. 1956 . Gramineae II. Unterfamilien: Micrairoideae, Eragrostideae, Oryzoideae, Olyroideae. In A. Engler and J. Prantl [eds.], Die nat ? rlichen Pfl anzenfamilien, 2nd ed., vol. 14, 1 ? 168 . Duncker and Humblot, Berlin, Germany. Pohl , R. W. 1969 . Muhlenbergia subgenus Muhlenbergia (Gramineae) in North America. American Midland Naturalist 82 : 512 ? 542 . Posada , D. , and K. A. Crandall . 1998 . MODELTEST: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14 : 817 ? 818 . Raven , P. H. 1963 . Amphitropical relationships in the fl oras of North and South America. Quarterly Review of Biology 38 : 151 ? 177 . Reeder , C. G. 1985 . The genus Lycurus in North America. Phytologia 57 : 283 ? 291 . Reeder , C. G. , and J. R. Reeder . 1995 . The resurrection of a species: Muhlenbergia straminea (Gramineae). Phytologia 78 : 417 ? 427 . Reeder , J. R. 1957 . The embryo in grass systematics. American Journal of Botany 44 : 756 ? 768 . Reeder , J. R. 1976 . Systematic position of Redfi eldia (Gramineae). Madro ? o 23 : 434 ? 438 . Romaschenko , K. , P. M. Peterson , R. J. Soreng , N. Garcia-Jacas , O. Futorna , and A. Susanna . 2010 . Phylogenetics of Stipeae (Poaceae: Pooideae) based on plastid and nuclear DNA sequences. In O. Seberg, G. Petersen, A. S. Barfod, and J. I. Davis [eds.], Diversity, phylogeny, and evolution in the monocotyledons, 513 ? 539. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark. Ronquist , F. , J. P. Huelsenbeck , and P. van der Mark . 2005 . MrBayes 3.1 manual, draft 5/26/2005. Website http://mrbayes.csit. fsu.edu/mb3.1_manual.pdf. S ? nchez , E. , and Z. E. R ? golo de Agrasar . 1986 . Estudio taxon ? mica sobre g ? nero Lycurus (Gramineae). Parodiana 4 : 267 ? 310 . Shaw , J. , E. B. Lickey , J. T. Beck , S. B. Farmer , W. Liu , J. Miller , K. C. Siripun , C. T. Winder , E. E. Schilling , and R. L. Small . 2005 . The tortoise and the hare II: Relative utility of 21 noncoding chloro- plast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. American Journal of Botany 92 : 142 ? 166 . Shaw , J. , E. B. Lickey , E. E. Schilling , and R. L. Small . 2007 . Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in Angiosperms: The tortoise and the hare III. American Journal of Botany 94 : 275 ? 288 . Soderstrom , T. R. 1967 . Taxonomic study of subgenus Podosemum and section Epicampes of Muhlenbergia (Gramineae). Contributions from the United States National Herbarium 34 : 75 ? 189 . Soreng , R. J. , G. Davidse , P. M. Peterson , F. O. Zuloaga , E. J. Judziewicz , T. S. Filgueiras , and O. Morrone . 2009 . Classifi cation of New World grasses [updated 2 September 2009]. Website http://www.tropicos. org/docs/meso/grassclassifi cationstrippedgd1Apr2010.htm. Soreng , R. J. , J. I. Davis , and M. A. Voionmaa . 2007 . A phyloge- netic analysis of Poaceae tribe Poeae sensu lato based on morphologi- cal characters and sequence data from three plastid-encoded genes: Evidence for reticulation, and a new classifi cation for the tribe. Kew Bulletin 62 : 425 ? 454 . Stebbins , G. L. , and B. Crampton . 1961 . A suggested revision of the grass genera of temperate North America. In Recent advances in botany, from lectures & symposia presented to the IX International Botanical Congress, Montreal, 1959, vol. 1: 133 ? 145. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada. Swofford , D. L. 2000 . PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachuesetts, USA. 1548 American Journal of Botany [Vol. 97 Wen , J. , and S. M. Ickert-Bond . 2009 . Evolution of the Madrean ? Tethyan disjunctions and the North and South American amphitropical disjunc- tions in plants. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 47 : 331 ? 348 . Wen , J. , P. P. Lowry II , J. L. Walck , and K. O. Yoo . 2002 . Phylogenetic and biogeographic diversifi cation in Osmorhiza (Apiaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 89 : 414 ? 428 . World Resources . 2000 . People and ecosystems: The fraying web of life. World Resources Institute in collaboration with the United Nations Development Program, United Nations Environment Program, and the World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA. Wu , Z. L. , and P. M. Peterson . 2006 . Muhlenbergia. In Z. Y. Wu, P. H. Raven, and D. Y. Hong [eds.], Flora of China: Poaceae, vol. 22, 486 ? 487. Science Press, Beijing, China and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Zwickl , D. J. 2006 . Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA. Sykes , G. R. , A. H. Christensen , and P. M. Peterson . 1997 . A chlo- roplast DNA analysis of Chaboissaea (Poaceae: Eragrostideae). Systematic Botany 22 : 291 ? 302 . Tavar ? , S. 1986 . Some probabilistic and statistical problems in anal- ysis of DNA sequences. In R. M. Miura [ed.], Some mathematical questions in biology: DNA sequence analysis, vol. 17. American Mathematical Society, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. T ? rpe , A. M. 1973 . Anatom ? a foliar en Aegopogon. Lilloa 33 : 261 ? 280 . von Dohlen , C. D. , U. Kurosu , and S. Aoki . 2002 . Phylogenetics and evolution of the eastern Asian ? eastern North American disjunct aphid tribe, Hormaphidini (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 23 : 257 ? 267 . Wen , J. 1999 . Evolution of eastern Asian and eastern North American disjunct distributions in fl owering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30 : 421 ? 455 . Wen , J. 2001 . Evolution of eastern Asian ? eastern North American biogeographic disjunctions: A few additional issues. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162 : S117 ? S122 . 1549September 2010] Peterson et al. ? Phylogeny of Muhlenberginiinae A pp en di x 1. S pe ci m en s s am pl ed , v ou ch er s ( all ho us ed at th e U nit ed St ate s N ati on al He rba riu m, U S) , c ou ntr y, an d G en Ba nk ac ce ssi on s f or D N A se qu en ce s. Se qu en ce s g en er at ed b y th is stu dy ar e in b ol df ac ed ty pe ; a ll ot he r s eq ue nc es a re fr om P et er so n et a l. (20 10 ). Ta x o n Vo u ch er Co un try n dh F rp l3 2- trn L rp s1 6- trn K rp s3 IT S rp s1 6 in tro n n dh A in tro n Ae go po go n ce nc hr o id es H um b. & B on pl . e x W ill d. Pe te rs o n 2 20 45 & S aa re la M ex ic o G U 35 96 13 G U 36 00 11 G U 36 05 78 G U 36 01 43 G U 35 92 59 G U 36 02 74 G U 35 94 03 Ae go po go n te ne llu s ( DC .) T rin . Pe te rs o n 2 20 44 & S aa re la M ex ic o G U 35 95 92 G U 36 00 12 G U 36 05 77 G U 36 01 28 G U 35 92 60 G U 36 02 78 G U 35 93 92 Ae lu ro pu s l ag op oi de s ( L. ) Tr in . e x Th w ai te s W ei ne rt s. n. & M os aw i Ir aq G U 35 95 91 G U 36 00 13 G U 36 05 76 G U 36 00 85 G U 35 92 61 G U 36 02 84 G U 35 93 91 Al lo le pi s t ex a n a (V as ey ) S od ers tr. & H . F . D ec ke r H itc hc oc k 7 54 1 M ex ic o G U 35 95 77 G U 36 00 15 G U 36 05 73 G U 36 00 88 G U 35 92 64 G U 36 03 18 G U 35 93 88 As tre bl a pe ct in at a (L ind l.) F. M ue ll. ex B en th . Ch al m er s 5 A us tra lia G U 35 95 85 G U 35 98 61 G U 36 05 67 G U 36 00 95 G U 35 92 86 G U 36 03 11 G U 35 94 21 Au st ro ch lo ris d ic ha nt hi oi de s (E ve ris t) La za rid es An so n s.n . A us tra lia G U 35 95 84 G U 35 98 60 G U 36 05 66 G U 36 01 13 G U 35 92 72 G U 36 03 10 G U 35 94 20 Be al ia m ex ic an a Sc rib n. Pe te rs o n 7 94 6, A nn ab le & H er re ra M ex ic o ? G U 35 98 59 G U 36 05 50 G U 36 00 98 G U 35 92 58 G U 36 03 09 ? Bl ep ha rid ac hn e be nt ha m ia na (H ac k.) H itc hc . M el ix 5 70 & C he ro bi ni A rg en tin a G U 35 95 82 G U 35 98 57 G U 36 05 79 G U 36 01 00 G U 35 92 75 ? ? Bl ep ha ro n eu ro n s he ph er di i (V as ey ) P . M . P et er so n & A nn ab le Pe te rs o n 2 00 13 & S an ch ez Al va ra do M ex ic o ? H M 14 31 39 H M 14 36 25 H M 14 32 42 H M 14 30 38 H M 14 35 29 H M 14 33 46 Bl ep ha ro n eu ro n s he ph er di i (V as ey ) P . M . P et er so n & A nn ab le Pe te rs o n 2 24 52 & S aa re la M ex ic o G U 35 95 80 G U 35 98 54 G U 36 05 60 G U 36 01 02 G U 35 92 77 G U 36 03 20 G U 35 94 19 Bl ep ha ro n eu ro n tr ic ho le pi s (T o rr . ) N as h Pe te rs o n 2 20 99 & S aa re la M ex ic o G U 35 95 76 G U 35 98 53 G U 36 05 59 G U 36 01 03 G U 35 92 78 G U 36 03 05 G U 35 94 18 Bo ut el ou a ar ist id oi de s (K u n th ) G ris eb . Pe te rs o n 2 19 94 & S aa re la M ex ic o G U 35 95 70 G U 35 98 52 G U 36 05 58 G U 36 01 04 G U 35 92 79 G U 36 03 04 G U 35 94 17 Bo ut el ou a un ifl o ra Va se y Pe te rs o n 2 14 23 , S aa re la & St an ? ik M ex ic o G U 35 95 67 G U 35 98 48 G U 36 06 06 G U 36 01 33 G U 35 92 32 G U 36 02 96 G U 35 93 83 Ch ab oi ss ae a at ac am en sis (P ar o di ) P . M . P et er so n & A nn ab le Pe te rs o n 1 96 26 , S or en g, Sa la ria to , & P a n iz za , A rg en tin a G U 35 97 29 G U 35 98 79 G U 36 05 95 G U 36 01 15 G U 35 93 44 G U 36 04 89 G U 35 93 82 Ch ab oi ss ae a lig ul at a E. F o u rn . Pe te rs o n 2 24 16 & S aa re la M ex ic o G U 35 97 18 G U 35 98 63 G U 36 05 51 G U 36 00 69 G U 35 92 73 G U 36 04 40 G U 35 93 81 Ch ab oi ss ae a su bb ifl o ra (H itc hc .) R ee de r & C . R ee de r Pe te rs o n 2 11 58 , S aa re la , Ro se n & R ei d M ex ic o G U 35 97 07 G U 35 98 77 G U 36 05 18 G U 36 00 36 G U 35 93 18 G U 36 04 39 G U 35 94 28 Ch lo ris ra di at a (L .) S w. Pe te rs o n 2 22 78 & S aa re la M ex ic o G U 35 97 24 G U 35 98 72 G U 36 05 13 G U 36 00 48 G U 35 93 21 G U 36 04 34 G U 35 93 66 Cr yp sis a cu le at a (L .) A ito n So re n g 54 69 & P et er so n Ch in a G U 35 95 73 G U 35 98 41 G U 36 05 99 G U 36 01 40 G U 35 92 38 G U 36 04 02 G U 35 93 62 Cy no do n hi rs u tu s St en t Sm oo k 6 61 6 So ut h A fri ca G U 35 97 51 G U 35 98 76 G U 36 05 94 G U 36 01 35 G U 35 92 29 G U 36 04 52 G U 35 93 58 D as yo ch lo a pu lc he lla (K u n th ) W ill d. ex R yd b. Pe te rs o n 2 19 92 & S aa re la M ex ic o G U 35 96 89 G U 35 98 64 G U 36 05 05 G U 36 00 39 G U 35 93 30 G U 36 04 82 G U 35 93 69 D is tic hl is sp ic at a (L .) G ree ne Pe te rs o n 1 93 09 , S or en g, Sa la ria to & P a n iz za A rg en tin a G U 35 96 95 G U 35 98 01 G U 36 04 99 G U 36 00 32 G U 35 93 46 G U 36 04 75 G U 35 94 78 El eu sin e i nd ic a (L .) G ae trn . Pe te rs o n 2 13 62 , S aa re la & F lo re s Vi lle ga s M ex ic o G U 35 96 98 G U 35 97 97 G U 36 04 96 G U 36 00 31 G U 35 93 38 G U 36 04 72 G U 35 94 73 Er io ne ur o n a ve n a ce u m (K u n th ) T at eo ka Pe te rs o n 1 93 29 , S or en g, Sa la ria to & P a n iz za A rg en tin a G U 35 97 73 G U 35 98 22 G U 36 05 25 G U 36 00 63 G U 35 93 10 G U 36 04 03 G U 35 94 41 G ou in ia p ar a gu ay en si s ( Ku n tz e) Pa ro di Pe te rs o n 1 15 26 & A nn ab le A rg en tin a G U 35 97 32 G U 35 98 17 G U 36 05 04 G U 36 00 58 G U 35 93 14 G U 36 03 84 G U 35 94 37 G ym no po go n gr a n di fl o ru s R os en g. , B . R . A ril l. & Iz ag . Pe te rs o n 1 66 42 & Re ful io- Ro dr igu ez Pe ru G U 35 97 33 G U 35 98 16 G U 36 05 81 G U 36 00 57 G U 35 92 00 G U 36 03 83 G U 35 94 36 H ila ria ce nc hr o id es K u n th Pe te rs o n 2 23 39 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o G U 35 97 36 G U 35 98 13 G U 36 06 97 G U 36 00 55 G U 35 91 43 G U 36 03 80 G U 35 94 24 Jo u ve a p ilo sa (J. Pr esl ) S cri bn . Pe te rs o n 1 10 17 & An na bl e M ex ic o G U 35 97 37 G U 35 98 12 G U 36 06 96 G U 36 01 73 G U 35 91 44 G U 36 03 79 G U 35 94 33 Le pt ur us re pe ns R . B r. W hi stl er 9 85 3 D ie go G ar ci a Is la nd G U 35 97 30 G U 35 98 93 G U 36 06 91 G U 36 02 28 G U 35 91 50 G U 36 04 28 G U 35 94 27 Ly cu ru s s et os us (N utt .) C. R ee de r Pe te rs o n 2 09 60 , S aa re la , L ar a Co nt re ra s & Re yn a Al va re z M ex ic o G U 35 97 44 G U 35 99 76 G U 36 06 88 G U 36 02 24 G U 35 91 52 G U 36 04 26 G U 35 94 25 Ly cu ru s s et os us (N utt .) C . R ee de r Pe te rs o n 2 20 08 M ex ic o G U 35 97 45 G U 35 99 75 G U 36 06 87 G U 36 02 23 G U 35 91 53 G U 36 04 25 G U 35 94 51 M ic ro ch lo a ca ffr a N ee s Sm oo k 1 04 41 So ut h A fri ca G U 35 97 46 G U 35 99 72 G U 36 06 70 G U 36 02 06 G U 35 91 55 G U 36 04 24 G U 35 94 53 1550 American Journal of Botany [Vol. 97 Ta x o n Vo u ch er Co un try n dh F rp l3 2- trn L rp s1 6- trn K rp s3 IT S rp s1 6 in tro n n dh A in tro n M on an th oc hl oe li tto ra lis En ge lm . M or a n 1 05 70 M ex ic o G U 35 97 48 G U 35 99 70 G U 36 06 99 G U 36 02 35 G U 35 91 57 G U 36 04 22 G U 35 94 60 M on el yt ru m lu ed er itz ia nu m H ac k. Sm oo k 1 00 31 So ut h A fri ca G U 35 97 49 G U 35 99 69 G U 36 06 82 G U 36 02 18 G U 35 91 58 G U 36 04 21 G U 35 94 59 M os de ni a ph le oi de s ( Ha ck .) S ten t Sc hw ei ck er dt 1 54 2 So ut h A fri ca G U 35 97 50 G U 35 99 67 G U 36 06 81 G U 36 02 16 G U 35 91 59 G U 36 04 20 G U 35 94 58 M uh le nb er gi a al am os ae Va se y Pe te rs o n 2 21 04 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 34 36 H M 14 31 40 H M 14 36 26 H M 14 32 43 H M 14 30 39 H M 14 35 30 H M 14 33 47 M uh le nb er gi a an di na (N utt .) H itc hc . Pe te rs o n 1 04 32 , A nn ab le & W ei np ah l U SA H M 14 34 37 H M 14 31 41 ? H M 14 32 44 H M 14 30 40 H M 14 35 31 H M 14 33 48 M uh le nb er gi a an gu st at a (J. Pr esl ) K u n th Pe te rs o n 2 17 03 , S or en g, La To rr e & Ro jas Fo x Pe ru H M 14 34 38 H M 14 31 42 H M 14 36 27 H M 14 32 45 H M 14 30 41 H M 14 35 32 H M 14 33 49 M uh le nb er gi a an gu st at a (J. Pr esl ) K u n th Pe te rs o n 2 19 58 , S or en g & M on to ya Q uin o Pe ru H M 14 34 39 H M 14 31 43 H M 14 36 28 H M 14 32 46 H M 14 30 42 H M 14 35 33 H M 14 33 50 M uh le nb er gi a an nu a (V as ey ) S wa lle n Pe te rs o n 2 20 22 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 34 40 H M 14 31 44 H M 14 36 29 H M 14 32 47 H M 14 30 43 H M 14 35 34 H M 14 33 51 M uh le nb er gi a ap pr es sa C. O . G oo dd . Pe te rs o n 4 18 3 & An na bl e U SA G U 35 96 18 G U 35 99 62 G U 36 06 76 G U 36 02 11 G U 35 91 64 G U 36 04 15 G U 35 94 43 M uh le nb er gi a ar en a ce a (B uc kle y) H itc hc . Pe te rs o n 1 06 24 & An na bl e M ex ic o G U 35 96 19 G U 35 99 61 G U 36 06 75 G U 36 02 10 G U 35 91 65 G U 36 04 14 G U 35 94 52 M uh le nb er gi a ar en ic ol a B uc kl ey Pe te rs o n 1 99 47 & La ra -C on tre ra s M ex ic o G U 35 96 20 G U 35 99 60 G U 36 06 74 G U 36 02 09 G U 35 91 66 G U 36 04 13 G U 35 94 62 M uh le nb er gi a ar ge n te a Va se y Pe te rs o n 2 20 95 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 34 41 H M 14 31 45 H M 14 36 30 H M 14 32 48 H M 14 30 44 H M 14 35 35 H M 14 33 52 M uh le nb er gi a ar iz on ic a Sc rib n. Pe te rs o n 2 21 73 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 34 42 H M 14 31 46 H M 14 36 31 H M 14 32 49 H M 14 30 45 H M 14 35 36 H M 14 33 53 M uh le nb er gi a ar se ne i H itc hc . Pe te rs o n 1 52 08 & Ca yo ue tte M ex ic o H M 14 34 43 H M 14 31 47 H M 14 36 32 H M 14 32 50 H M 14 30 46 H M 14 35 37 H M 14 33 54 M uh le nb er gi a ar tic ul at a Sc rib n. Pe te rs o n 1 33 86 & K no w le s M ex ic o ? H M 14 31 48 H M 14 36 33 H M 14 32 51 H M 14 30 47 H M 14 35 38 H M 14 33 55 M uh le nb er gi a as pe ri fol ia (N ee s & M ey en e x Tr in .) P ar o di Pe te rs o n 1 54 52 , S or en g, Fi no t & Ju dz ie w ic z Ch ile H M 14 34 44 H M 14 31 49 H M 14 36 34 H M 14 32 52 H M 14 30 48 H M 14 35 39 H M 14 33 56 M uh le nb er gi a br a n de ge ei C. R ee de r Pe te rs o n 4 76 0 & An na bl e M ex ic o G U 35 96 21 G U 35 99 59 G U 36 07 11 G U 36 02 08 G U 35 91 67 G U 36 04 12 G U 35 94 50 M uh le nb er gi a br ev is C. O . G oo dd . Pe te rs o n 2 20 23 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 34 45 H M 14 31 50 H M 14 36 35 H M 14 32 53 H M 14 30 49 H M 14 35 40 H M 14 33 57 M uh le nb er gi a br ev is et a G ris eb . ex E. F o u rn . M cV a u gh 2 29 30 M ex ic o ? ? H M 14 36 36 ? ? ? ? M uh le nb er gi a ca lifo rn ica Va se y Pe te rs o n 5 01 3 & Ba rr o n U SA H M 14 34 46 H M 14 31 51 H M 14 36 37 H M 14 32 54 H M 14 30 50 H M 14 35 41 H M 14 33 58 M uh le nb er gi a ca pi lla ris (L am .) T rin . Pe te rs o n 1 42 36 , W ea kl ey & Le Bl on d U SA H M 14 34 47 H M 14 31 52 H M 14 36 38 H M 14 32 55 H M 14 30 51 H M 14 35 42 H M 14 33 59 M uh le nb er gi a ca xa m ar ce n si s L ? ga ar d & S ? n ch ez V eg a Pe te rs o n 2 19 65 , S or en g & M on to ya Q uin o Pe ru H M 14 34 48 H M 14 31 53 H M 14 36 39 H M 14 32 56 H M 14 30 52 H M 14 35 43 H M 14 33 60 M uh le nb er gi a ci lia ta (K u n th ) T rin . Pe te rs o n 2 21 93 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 34 49 H M 14 31 54 H M 14 36 40 H M 14 32 57 H M 14 30 53 H M 14 35 44 H M 14 33 61 M uh le nb er gi a cr is pi se ta H itc hc . Pe te rs o n 1 07 68 , A nn ab le & Va ld es R ey na M ex ic o ? ? ? H M 14 32 58 ? ? ? M uh le nb er gi a cu rt ifo lia Sc rib n. Pe te rs o n 5 63 1 & An na bl e U SA H M 14 34 50 H M 14 31 55 H M 14 36 41 H M 14 32 59 H M 14 30 54 H M 14 35 45 H M 14 33 62 M uh le nb er gi a cu sp id at a (T o rr . ex H oo k. ) R yd b. H ill 3 53 31 U SA ? H M 14 31 56 ? H M 14 32 60 H M 14 30 55 H M 14 35 46 ? M uh le nb er gi a de pa up er a ta Sc rib n. Pe te rs o n 2 12 93 , S aa re la & Fl or es V ill eg as M ex ic o H M 14 34 51 H M 14 31 57 H M 14 36 42 H M 14 32 61 H M 14 30 56 H M 14 35 47 H M 14 33 63 M uh le nb er gi a di sti ch op hy lla (J. Pr esl ) K u n th Pe te rs o n 1 59 13 & Va ld es R ey na M ex ic o H M 14 34 52 H M 14 31 58 H M 14 36 43 H M 14 32 62 ? H M 14 35 48 H M 14 33 64 M uh le nb er gi a du bi a E. F o u rn . Pe te rs o n 1 58 85 & Va ld es R ey na M ex ic o H M 14 34 54 H M 14 31 59 H M 14 36 45 H M 14 32 64 H M 14 30 58 H M 14 35 49 H M 14 33 66 M uh le nb er gi a du bi a E. F o u rn . Pe te rs o n 2 11 05 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 34 53 H M 14 31 60 H M 14 36 44 H M 14 32 63 H M 14 30 57 H M 14 35 50 H M 14 33 65 M uh le nb er gi a du m os a Sc rib n. ex Va se y Pe te rs o n 1 34 38 , K no wl es , D ie tr ic h & Br a xt on M ex ic o H M 14 34 55 H M 14 31 61 H M 14 36 46 H M 14 32 65 H M 14 30 59 H M 14 35 51 H M 14 33 67 M uh le nb er gi a du ra n ge n si s Y. H er re ra Pe te rs o n 1 36 44 , K no wl es , D ie tr ic h, B ra xt on & G on za le z E liz on do M ex ic o H M 14 34 56 H M 14 31 62 H M 14 36 47 H M 14 32 66 H M 14 30 60 H M 14 35 52 H M 14 33 68 M uh le nb er gi a el on ga ta Sc rib n. ex B ea l Pe te rs o n 2 21 64 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 34 57 H M 14 31 63 H M 14 36 48 H M 14 32 67 H M 14 30 61 H M 14 35 53 H M 14 33 69 M uh le nb er gi a el ud en s C . R ee de r Pe te rs o n 2 21 88 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 34 58 H M 14 31 64 H M 14 36 49 H M 14 32 68 H M 14 30 62 H M 14 35 54 H M 14 33 70 M uh le nb er gi a em er sle yi Va se y Pe te rs o n 2 20 96 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o G U 35 96 22 G U 35 99 58 G U 36 06 72 G U 36 02 07 G U 35 91 68 G U 36 04 11 G U 35 94 49 A pp en di x 1. C on tin ue d 1551September 2010] Peterson et al. ? Phylogeny of Muhlenberginiinae Ta x o n Vo u ch er Co un try n dh F rp l3 2- trn L rp s1 6- trn K rp s3 IT S rp s1 6 in tro n n dh A in tro n M uh le nb er gi a ex pa ns a (P oir . ) T rin . Pe te rs o n 1 42 34 , W ea kl ey & Le Bl on d U SA H M 14 34 59 H M 14 31 65 H M 14 36 50 H M 14 32 69 H M 14 30 63 H M 14 35 55 H M 14 33 71 M uh le nb er gi a fas tig iat a ( J. Pr esl ) H en ra rd Pe te rs o n 2 15 12 , S or en g, La To rr e & Ro jas Fo x Pe ru H M 14 34 60 H M 14 31 66 H M 14 36 51 H M 14 32 70 H M 14 30 64 H M 14 35 56 H M 14 33 72 M uh le nb er gi a fi li cu lm is Va se y Pe te rs o n 1 19 54 & An na bl e U SA H M 14 34 61 H M 14 31 67 H M 14 36 52 H M 14 32 71 H M 14 30 65 H M 14 35 57 H M 14 33 73 M uh le nb er gi a fi li for mi s (T hu rb. ex S. W at so n) Ry db . Pe te rs o n 1 04 33 , A nn ab le & W ei np ah l U SA ? H M 14 31 68 H M 14 36 53 H M 14 32 72 H M 14 30 66 H M 14 35 58 H M 14 33 74 M uh le nb er gi a fl a vi da Va se y Pe te rs o n 2 22 37 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 34 62 H M 14 31 69 H M 14 36 54 H M 14 32 73 H M 14 30 67 H M 14 35 59 H M 14 33 75 M uh le nb er gi a fl a vi se ta Sc rib n. Pe te rs o n 2 24 09 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o G U 35 96 23 G U 35 99 57 G U 36 06 85 G U 36 02 50 G U 35 91 27 G U 36 04 10 G U 35 94 48 M uh le nb er gi a fl e xu o sa H itc hc . Pe te rs o n 2 03 73 , S or en g & Ro m as ch en ko Pe ru H M 14 34 63 H M 14 31 70 H M 14 36 55 H M 14 32 74 H M 14 30 68 H M 14 35 60 H M 14 33 76 M uh le nb er gi a fra gi lis Sw al le n Pe te rs o n 2 21 94 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 34 64 H M 14 31 71 H M 14 36 56 H M 14 32 75 H M 14 30 69 H M 14 35 61 H M 14 33 77 M uh le nb er gi a gi ga nt ea (E . F o u rn .) H itc hc . Pe te rs o n 2 22 60 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o G U 35 96 63 G U 35 99 66 G U 36 06 80 G U 36 02 15 G U 35 91 60 G U 36 04 19 G U 35 94 57 M uh le nb er gi a gi ga nt ea (E . F o u rn .) H itc hc . Pe te rs o n 2 23 46 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 34 65 H M 14 31 72 H M 14 36 57 H M 14 32 76 H M 14 30 70 H M 14 35 62 H M 14 33 78 M uh le nb er gi a gl au ca (N ee s) B. D . J ac ks . Pe te rs o n 2 10 23 , S aa re la , L ar a Co nt re ra s & Re yn a Al va re z M ex ic o H M 14 34 67 H M 14 31 73 H M 14 36 58 H M 14 32 78 H M 14 30 72 H M 14 35 63 H M 14 33 79 M uh le nb er gi a gl au ca (N ee s) B. D . J ac ks . Pe te rs o n 2 11 80 , S aa re la , G on za le z E liz on do , Ro se n & Re id M ex ic o H M 14 34 66 H M 14 31 74 H M 14 36 59 H M 14 32 77 H M 14 30 71 H M 14 35 64 H M 14 33 80 M uh le nb er gi a gl om er a ta (W ill d. ) T rin . Pe te rs o n 2 09 24 , S aa re la & H ow ar d U SA G U 35 96 38 G U 35 99 54 G U 36 07 16 G U 36 02 53 G U 35 91 14 G U 36 04 07 G U 35 94 45 M uh le nb er gi a gr a n di s V as ey Pe te rs o n 1 34 13 , K no wl es , D ie tr ic h & Br a xt on M ex ic o H M 14 34 68 H M 14 31 75 H M 14 36 60 H M 14 32 79 H M 14 30 73 H M 14 35 65 H M 14 33 81 M uh le nb er gi a gy ps op hi la R ee de r & C . R ee de r Pe te rs o n 1 58 40 & Va ld es R ey na M ex ic o H M 14 34 69 H M 14 31 76 H M 14 36 61 H M 14 32 80 H M 14 30 74 ? H M 14 33 82 M uh le nb er gi a hi m al ay en sis H ac k. ex H oo k. f. So re n g 56 66 , P et er so n & Su n H an g Ch in a H M 14 34 70 H M 14 31 77 H M 14 36 61 H M 14 36 62 H M 14 32 81 H M 14 30 75 H M 14 35 66 H M 14 33 83 M uh le nb er gi a hu eg el ii Tr in . So re n g 53 44 , P et er so n & Su n H an g Ch in a H M 14 34 71 H M 14 31 78 H M 14 36 63 H M 14 32 82 H M 14 30 76 H M 14 35 67 H M 14 33 84 M uh le nb er gi a im pl ic at a (K u n th ) T rin . Pe te rs o n 2 22 66 , S aa re la M ex ic o H M 14 34 72 H M 14 31 79 H M 14 36 64 H M 14 32 83 H M 14 30 77 H M 14 35 68 H M 14 33 85 M uh le nb er gi a ir id ifo lia So de rs tr. Pe te rs o n 6 13 3 & An na bl e M ex ic o H M 14 34 73 H M 14 31 80 ? H M 14 32 84 H M 14 30 78 ? ? M uh le nb er gi a jai me -hi nto nii P. M . Pe te rs on & V al d ? s- Re yn a Pe te rs o n 1 58 41 & Va ld es R ey na M ex ic o H M 14 34 74 H M 14 31 81 H M 14 36 65 H M 14 32 85 H M 14 30 79 H M 14 35 69 H M 14 33 86 M uh le nb er gi a jal isc an a S w al le n Pe te rs o n 6 14 9 & An na bl e M ex ic o H M 14 34 75 H M 14 31 82 H M 14 36 66 H M 14 32 86 H M 14 30 80 H M 14 35 70 H M 14 33 87 M uh le nb er gi a jap on ica St eu d. So re n g 52 40 , P et er so n & Su n H an g Ch in a H M 14 34 77 H M 14 31 83 H M 14 36 67 H M 14 32 87 H M 14 30 81 H M 14 35 71 H M 14 33 88 M uh le nb er gi a jap on ica St eu d. So re n g 53 01 , P et er so n & Su n H an g Ch in a H M 14 34 76 H M 14 31 84 H M 14 36 68 H M 14 32 88 H M 14 30 82 H M 14 35 72 H M 14 33 89 M uh le nb er gi a jon esi i (V as ey ) H itc hc . Pe te rs o n 4 86 1 & An na bl e U SA H M 14 34 78 H M 14 31 85 H M 14 36 69 H M 14 32 89 H M 14 30 83 ? H M 14 33 90 M uh le nb er gi a lin dh ei m er i H itc hc . Pe te rs o n 6 28 0 & An na bl e U SA H M 14 34 79 H M 14 31 86 H M 14 36 70 H M 14 32 90 H M 14 30 84 H M 14 35 73 H M 14 33 91 M uh le nb er gi a lo ng ig lu m is Va se y Pe te rs o n 1 36 66 , K no wl es , D ie tr ic h, B ra xt on & G on za le z E liz on do M ex ic o ? ? H M 14 36 71 H M 14 32 91 ? ? ? M uh le nb er gi a lo ng ili gu la H itc hc . Pe te rs o n 1 52 24 & Ca yo ue tte U SA H M 14 34 80 H M 14 31 87 H M 14 36 72 H M 14 32 92 H M 14 30 85 H M 14 35 74 ? M uh le nb er gi a lu ci da Sw al le n Pe te rs o n 2 20 47 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 34 82 H M 14 31 89 H M 14 36 73 H M 14 32 93 H M 14 30 87 H M 14 35 76 H M 14 33 93 M uh le nb er gi a lu ci da Sw al le n Pe te rs o n 2 21 34 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 34 81 H M 14 31 88 H M 14 36 74 H M 14 32 94 H M 14 30 86 H M 14 35 75 H M 14 33 92 M uh le nb er gi a m ac ro u ra (K u n th ) H itc hc . Pe te rs o n 2 20 62 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o G U 35 96 24 G U 35 99 56 G U 36 06 83 G U 36 02 65 G U 35 91 25 G U 36 04 09 G U 35 94 47 M uh le nb er gi a m aja lce ns is P. M . P et er so n Pe te rs o n 4 51 9 & An na bl e M ex ic o H M 14 34 83 H M 14 31 90 H M 14 36 75 H M 14 32 95 H M 14 30 88 H M 14 35 77 H M 14 33 94 M uh le nb er gi a m ax im a L ? ga ar d & S ? n ch ez V eg a Pe te rs o n 2 18 84 , S or en g & Sa nc he z V eg a Pe ru H M 14 34 84 H M 14 31 91 H M 14 36 76 H M 14 32 96 H M 14 30 89 H M 14 35 78 ? A pp en di x 1. C on tin ue d 1552 American Journal of Botany [Vol. 97 Ta x o n Vo u ch er Co un try n dh F rp l3 2- trn L rp s1 6- trn K rp s3 IT S rp s1 6 in tro n n dh A in tro n M uh le nb er gi a m ex ic an a v ar . fi li for mi s ( To rr . ) S cri bn . Pe te rs o n 2 08 61 & Sa ar el a U SA H M 14 34 85 H M 14 31 92 H M 14 36 78 H M 14 32 98 H M 14 30 91 H M 14 35 79 H M 14 33 95 M uh le nb er gi a m ex ic an a (L .) T rin . Pe te rs o n 5 56 2 & An na bl e U SA H M 14 34 86 H M 14 31 93 H M 14 36 77 H M 14 32 97 H M 14 30 90 H M 14 35 80 H M 14 33 96 M uh le nb er gi a m ic ro sp er m a (D C. ) K u n th Pe te rs o n 2 18 55 & So re n g Pe ru H M 14 34 87 H M 14 31 94 H M 14 36 79 H M 14 32 99 H M 14 30 92 H M 14 35 81 H M 14 33 97 M uh le nb er gi a m in ut is si m a (S teu d.) Sw al le n Pe te rs o n 2 20 12 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o ? H M 14 31 95 H M 14 36 80 H M 14 33 00 H M 14 30 93 ? ? M uh len be rg ia m on ta na (N utt .) H itc hc . Pe te rs o n 2 20 46 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 34 88 H M 14 31 96 H M 14 36 81 H M 14 33 01 H M 14 30 94 H M 14 35 82 H M 14 33 98 M uh len be rg ia m on ta na (N utt .) H itc hc . Pe te rs o n 2 22 34 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o G U 35 97 05 G U 35 99 64 G U 36 06 78 G U 36 02 13 G U 35 91 62 G U 36 04 17 G U 35 94 55 M uh len be rg ia m uc ro n a ta (K u n th ) T rin . Pe te rs o n 2 20 38 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 34 89 H M 14 31 97 H M 14 36 82 H M 14 33 02 H M 14 30 95 H M 14 35 83 H M 14 33 99 M uh le nb er gi a ni gr a H itc hc . Pe te rs o n 1 60 97 & Ro sa le s M ex ic o H M 14 34 90 H M 14 31 98 H M 14 36 83 H M 14 33 03 H M 14 30 96 H M 14 35 84 H M 14 34 00 M uh le nb er gi a pa lm er i V as ey Pe te rs o n 5 47 8 & An na bl e U SA H M 14 34 91 H M 14 31 99 H M 14 36 84 H M 14 33 04 H M 14 30 97 H M 14 35 85 H M 14 34 01 M uh le nb er gi a pa lm ire n si s G rig no n & L ? ga ar d Pe te rs o n 9 31 7 & Ju dz ie w ic z Ec ua do r ? H M 14 32 00 H M 14 36 85 H M 14 33 05 H M 14 30 98 H M 14 35 86 H M 14 34 02 M uh le nb er gi a pa uc ifl o ra B uc kl ey Pe te rs o n 2 20 48 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 34 92 H M 14 32 01 H M 14 36 86 ? H M 14 30 99 H M 14 35 87 H M 14 34 03 M uh le nb er gi a pe ct in at a C. O . G oo dd . Pe te rs o n 2 21 08 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 34 93 H M 14 32 02 H M 14 36 87 H M 14 33 06 H M 14 31 00 H M 14 35 88 H M 14 34 04 M uh le nb er gi a pe ru vi an a (P. B ea uv . ) St eu d. Pe te rs o n 2 24 40 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o G U 35 96 25 G U 35 99 55 G U 36 07 13 G U 36 02 21 G U 35 91 54 G U 36 04 08 G U 35 94 46 M uh le nb er gi a po ly ca ul is Sc rib n. Pe te rs o n 2 20 92 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 34 94 H M 14 32 03 H M 14 36 88 H M 14 33 07 H M 14 31 01 H M 14 35 89 ? M uh le nb er gi a po rt er i Sc rib n. ex B ea l Pe te rs o n 1 98 46 & La ra Co nt re ra s M ex ic o H M 14 34 95 H M 14 32 04 H M 14 36 89 H M 14 33 08 H M 14 31 02 H M 14 35 90 H M 14 34 05 M uh le nb er gi a pu be sc en s (K u n th ) H itc hc . Pe te rs o n 2 12 50 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 34 96 H M 14 32 05 H M 14 36 91 H M 14 33 10 H M 14 31 03 H M 14 35 92 H M 14 34 06 M uh le nb er gi a pu be sc en s (K u n th ) H itc hc . Pe te rs o n 2 21 01 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 34 97 H M 14 32 06 H M 14 36 90 H M 14 33 09 H M 14 31 04 H M 14 35 91 H M 14 34 07 M uh le nb er gi a pu bi gl um a Sw al le n Pe te rs o n 1 58 38 & Va ld es R ey na M ex ic o H M 14 34 98 H M 14 32 07 H M 14 36 92 H M 14 33 11 H M 14 31 05 H M 14 35 93 H M 14 34 08 M uh le nb er gi a pu rp us ii M ez Pe te rs o n 6 22 7 & An na bl e M ex ic o H M 14 34 99 H M 14 32 08 H M 14 36 93 H M 14 33 12 H M 14 31 06 H M 14 35 94 H M 14 34 09 M uh le nb er gi a qu ad rid en ta ta (K u n th ) T rin . Pe te rs o n 1 61 03 & Ro sa le s M ex ic o H M 14 35 00 H M 14 32 09 H M 14 36 94 H M 14 33 13 H M 14 31 07 ? H M 14 34 10 M uh le nb er gi a ra m o sa (H ac k. ex M at su m .) M ak ino So re n g 53 02 , P et er so n & Su n H an g Ch in a H M 14 35 01 H M 14 32 10 H M 14 36 95 H M 14 33 14 H M 14 31 08 H M 14 35 95 H M 14 34 11 M uh le nb er gi a ra m u lo sa (K u n th ) Sw al le n Pe te rs o n 2 24 47 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o G U 35 96 27 G U 35 99 53 G U 36 07 17 G U 36 02 54 G U 35 91 15 G U 36 04 06 G U 35 94 44 M uh le nb er gi a re ed er o ru m So de rs tr. Pe te rs o n 2 12 62 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 35 02 H M 14 32 11 H M 14 36 96 H M 14 33 15 H M 14 31 09 ? H M 14 34 12 M uh le nb er gi a re pe ns (J. Pr esl ) H itc hc . Pe te rs o n 7 90 0 & An na bl e U SA H M 14 35 03 H M 14 32 12 H M 14 36 97 H M 14 33 16 H M 14 31 10 H M 14 35 96 H M 14 34 13 M uh le nb er gi a re ve rc ho ni i Va se y & S cr ib n. Pe te rs o n 6 28 5 & An na bl e U SA H M 14 35 04 H M 14 32 13 H M 14 36 98 H M 14 33 17 H M 14 31 11 H M 14 35 97 H M 14 34 14 M uh le nb er gi a ri ch ar ds on is (T rin .) R yd b. Pe te rs o n 1 98 17 , S aa re la & Se ar s U SA G U 35 96 17 G U 35 99 78 G U 36 06 77 G U 36 02 12 G U 35 91 63 G U 36 04 31 G U 35 94 54 M uh le nb er gi a ri ch ar ds on is (T rin .) R yd b. Pe te rs o n 7 83 2 & An na bl e U SA H M 14 35 05 H M 14 32 14 H M 14 36 99 H M 14 33 18 H M 14 31 12 H M 14 35 98 H M 14 34 15 M uh le nb er gi a ri ge n s (B en th. ) H itc hc . Pe te rs o n 2 21 29 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o G U 35 96 29 G U 35 99 51 G U 36 07 29 G U 36 02 56 G U 35 91 17 G U 36 03 57 G U 35 94 81 M uh le nb er gi a ri gi da (K u n th ) K u n th Pe te rs o n 2 16 37 , S or en g, La To rr e & Ro jas Fo x Pe ru G U 35 96 16 G U 35 99 52 G U 36 07 18 G U 36 02 55 G U 35 91 16 G U 36 04 05 G U 35 93 80 M uh le nb er gi a ri gi da (K u n th ) K u n th Pe te rs o n 2 20 61 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 35 06 H M 14 32 15 H M 14 37 00 H M 14 33 19 H M 14 31 13 H M 14 35 99 H M 14 34 16 M uh le nb er gi a ro bu st a (E . F o u rn .) H itc hc . Pe te rs o n 1 59 28 & Va ld es R ey na M ex ic o H M 14 35 07 H M 14 32 16 H M 14 37 01 H M 14 33 20 H M 14 31 14 H M 14 36 00 ? M uh le nb er gi a sc hr eb er i J . F . G m el . Pe te rs o n 1 94 43 , S or en g, Sa la ria to & Pa n iz za A rg en tin a G U 35 97 65 G U 35 99 50 G U 36 06 79 G U 36 02 14 G U 35 91 61 G U 36 04 04 G U 35 94 56 M uh le nb er gi a se ri ce a (M ich x.) P. M . P et er so n Pe te rs o n 1 48 43 , B la ck bu rn & Pe te rs o n U SA H M 14 35 08 H M 14 32 17 H M 14 37 02 H M 14 33 21 H M 14 31 15 H M 14 36 01 H M 14 34 17 A pp en di x 1. C on tin ue d 1553September 2010] Peterson et al. ? Phylogeny of Muhlenberginiinae Ta x o n Vo u ch er Co un try n dh F rp l3 2- trn L rp s1 6- trn K rp s3 IT S rp s1 6 in tro n n dh A in tro n M uh le nb er gi a se tifo lia Va se y Pe te rs o n 2 09 42 , S aa re la , L ar a Co nt re ra s & Re yn a Al va re z M ex ic o H M 14 35 09 H M 14 32 18 H M 14 37 03 H M 14 33 22 H M 14 31 16 H M 14 36 02 H M 14 34 18 M uh le nb er gi a si nu os a Sw al le n Pe te rs o n 7 97 6, A nn ab le & H er re ra M ex ic o ? H M 14 32 19 H M 14 37 04 H M 14 33 23 H M 14 31 17 H M 14 36 03 H M 14 34 19 M uh le nb er gi a so bo life ra (M uh l. ex W ill d. ) T rin . Pe te rs o n 2 08 34 & Sa ar el a U SA H M 14 35 10 H M 14 32 20 ? H M 14 33 24 H M 14 31 18 H M 14 36 04 H M 14 34 20 M uh le nb er gi a sp ec io sa Va se y Pe te rs o n 1 36 16 , D ie tri ch , Br a xt on , & G on za lez E liz on do M ex ic o H M 14 35 11 H M 14 32 21 H M 14 37 05 H M 14 33 25 H M 14 31 19 H M 14 36 05 H M 14 34 21 M uh le nb er gi a sp ic ifo rm is Tr in . Pe te rs o n 2 23 62 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 35 12 H M 14 32 22 H M 14 37 06 H M 14 33 26 H M 14 31 20 H M 14 36 06 H M 14 34 22 M uh le nb er gi a st ra m in ea H itc hc . Pe te rs o n 1 52 38 & Ca yo ue tte U SA H M 14 35 13 H M 14 32 23 H M 14 37 07 H M 14 33 27 H M 14 31 21 H M 14 36 07 ? M uh le nb er gi a st ri ct a (J. Pr es l) Ku n th Pe te rs o n 1 37 09 M ex ic o H M 14 35 14 H M 14 32 24 H M 14 37 08 H M 14 33 28 H M 14 31 22 H M 14 36 08 H M 14 34 23 M uh le nb er gi a su ba ris ta ta Sw al le n Pe te rs o n 2 12 43 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 35 15 H M 14 32 25 H M 14 37 09 H M 14 33 29 H M 14 31 23 H M 14 36 09 H M 14 34 24 M uh le nb er gi a ta ra hu m ar a P. M . P et er so n & C ol um bu s Pe te rs o n 2 20 53 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 35 16 H M 14 32 26 H M 14 37 10 H M 14 33 30 H M 14 31 24 H M 14 36 10 H M 14 34 25 M uh le nb er gi a te ne lla (K u n th ) T rin . Pe te rs o n 2 21 41 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 35 17 H M 14 32 27 H M 14 37 11 H M 14 33 31 H M 14 31 25 H M 14 36 11 ? M uh le nb er gi a te nu ifl o ra (W ill d. ) B rit ton , S ter ns & P og ge nb . Pe te rs o n 1 57 78 & Sa ar el a U SA H M 14 35 18 H M 14 32 28 H M 14 37 12 H M 14 33 32 H M 14 31 26 H M 14 36 12 H M 14 34 26 M uh le nb er gi a te nu ifo lia (K u n th ) K u n th Pe te rs o n 2 23 44 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 35 19 H M 14 32 29 H M 14 37 13 H M 14 33 33 H M 14 31 27 H M 14 36 13 H M 14 34 27 M uh le nb er gi a te xa n a B uc kl ey Pe te rs o n 2 20 16 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o ? H M 14 32 30 H M 14 37 14 H M 14 33 34 H M 14 31 28 H M 14 36 14 ? M uh le nb er gi a th ur be ri (S cri bn .) R yd b. Pe te rs o n 5 61 9 & An na bl e U SA H M 14 35 20 H M 14 32 31 H M 14 37 15 H M 14 33 35 H M 14 31 29 H M 14 36 15 H M 14 34 28 M uh le nb er gi a to rr ey i ( Ku n th ) H itc hc . e x B us h Pe te rs o n 1 94 29 , S or en g, Sa la ria to & Pa n iz za A rg en tin a G U 35 96 30 G U 35 99 92 G U 36 07 20 G U 36 02 66 G U 35 91 18 G U 36 02 67 ? M uh le nb er gi a un ifl o ra (M uh l.) Fe rn al d Pe te rs o n 1 32 12 , A nn ab le , Pi zz ol at o, G or do n, F re tt, Fr ic k, M or ro n e & G rin er U SA H M 14 35 21 H M 14 32 32 H M 14 37 16 H M 14 33 37 H M 14 31 30 H M 14 36 16 H M 14 34 29 M uh le nb er gi a un ifl o ra (M uh l.) Fe rn al d Pe te rs o n 2 08 62 & Sa ar el a U SA G U 35 96 31 G U 35 99 94 G U 36 07 15 G U 36 02 58 G U 35 91 19 G U 36 02 75 G U 35 94 63 M uh le nb er gi a ut ili s ( To rr . ) H itc hc . Pe te rs o n 5 73 5 & An na bl e U SA H M 14 35 22 H M 14 32 33 H M 14 37 17 H M 14 33 38 H M 14 31 31 H M 14 36 17 H M 14 34 30 M uh le nb er gi a va gi na ta Sw al le n Pe te rs o n 2 24 17 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o ? H M 14 32 34 H M 14 37 18 ? ? H M 14 36 18 ? M uh le nb er gi a ve rs ic ol or Sw al le n Pe te rs o n 9 91 3 & An na bl e M ex ic o ? H M 14 32 35 H M 14 37 19 H M 14 33 39 H M 14 31 32 H M 14 36 19 ? M uh le nb er gi a vi lli fl o ra v ar . vi llo sa (S wa lle n) M ord en Pe te rs o n 1 58 11 & Va ld es Re yn a M ex ic o H M 14 35 23 H M 14 32 36 H M 14 37 20 H M 14 33 40 H M 14 31 33 H M 14 36 20 H M 14 34 31 M uh le nb er gi a vi re sc en s (K u n th ) T rin . Pe te rs o n 2 12 59 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 35 24 H M 14 32 37 H M 14 37 21 H M 14 33 41 H M 14 31 35 H M 14 36 22 H M 14 34 33 M uh le nb er gi a vi re sc en s (K u n th ) T rin . Pe te rs o n 2 24 12 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o H M 14 35 25 H M 14 32 38 H M 14 37 22 H M 14 33 42 H M 14 31 34 H M 14 36 21 H M 14 34 32 M uh le nb er gi a vi rle tii (E . F o u rn .) So de rs tr. Pe te rs o n 9 72 4 & Ca m po s Vi lla nu ev a M ex ic o H M 14 35 26 H M 14 32 39 ? H M 14 33 43 H M 14 31 36 ? ? M uh le nb er gi a w ri gh tii Va se y ex J. M . C ou lt. Pe te rs o n 2 09 64 , S aa re la , L ar a Co nt re ra s & Re yn a Al va re z M ex ic o H M 14 35 27 H M 14 32 40 H M 14 37 23 H M 14 33 44 H M 14 31 37 H M 14 36 23 H M 14 34 34 M uh le nb er gi a x in vo lu ta Sw al le n Pe te rs o n 6 28 4 & An na bl e U SA H M 14 35 28 H M 14 32 41 H M 14 37 24 H M 14 33 45 H M 14 31 38 H M 14 36 24 H M 14 34 35 M un ro a a rg en tin a G ris eb . Pe te rs o n 1 55 05 , S or en g & Ju dz ie w ic z Ch ile G U 35 96 33 G U 36 00 06 G U 36 07 23 G U 36 02 60 G U 35 91 21 ? G U 35 93 85 O rin us ko ko n o ri ca (K . S . H ao ) K en g ex X . L . Y an g So re n g 54 47 , P et er so n & Su n H an g Ch in a G U 35 96 28 G U 35 99 99 G U 36 07 28 G U 36 02 59 G U 35 91 40 G U 36 02 70 G U 35 93 99 Pe re ile m a be yr ic hi an um (K u n th ) H itc hc . Pe te rs o n 2 03 66 , S or en g & Ro m as ch en ko Pe ru G U 35 95 97 G U 35 99 95 G U 36 07 12 G U 36 02 47 G U 35 91 29 G U 36 02 80 G U 35 94 93 Pe re ile m a ci lia tu m E. F o u rn . Pe te rs o n 2 01 06 , H al l, Al va re z M ar va n & Al va re z Ji m en ez M ex ic o G U 35 95 98 G U 35 99 79 G U 36 07 19 G U 36 02 46 G U 35 91 30 G U 36 02 81 G U 35 95 16 Pe re ile m a cr in itu m J. Pr es l Pe te rs o n 2 21 91 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o G U 35 95 99 G U 35 99 93 G U 36 07 10 G U 36 02 45 G U 35 91 31 G U 36 02 82 G U 35 95 19 Pe ro tis h or de ifo rm is N ee s So re n g 57 17 , P et er so n & Su n H an g Ch in a G U 35 96 00 G U 35 99 91 G U 36 07 08 G U 36 02 43 G U 35 91 32 G U 36 02 83 G U 35 95 20 A pp en di x 1. C on tin ue d 1554 American Journal of Botany Ta x o n Vo u ch er Co un try n dh F rp l3 2- trn L rp s1 6- trn K rp s3 IT S rp s1 6 in tro n n dh A in tro n Re dfi el di a fl e xu o sa (T hu rb. ex A . G ra y) Va se y Pe te rs o n 7 84 5 & An na bl e U SA G U 35 96 04 G U 35 99 85 G U 36 07 02 G U 36 01 91 G U 35 91 38 G U 36 02 89 G U 35 95 25 Sc ha ffn ere lla g ra ci lis (B en th. ) N ash Sc ha ffn er 13 4 M ex ic o ? G U 35 99 81 ? ? ? ? ? Sc he do nn ar du s p an ic ul at us (N utt .) T re l. Pe te rs o n 1 20 70 & An na bl e U SA G U 35 96 09 G U 35 99 36 G U 36 06 73 G U 36 01 70 G U 35 92 01 G U 36 03 75 G U 35 95 29 Sc le ro po go n br ev ifo liu s P hi l. Pe te rs o n 1 92 80 , S or en g, Sa la ria do & Pa n iz za A rg en tin a G U 35 96 11 G U 35 99 19 G U 36 06 35 G U 36 01 67 G U 35 92 03 ? G U 35 95 30 So hn sia fi l ifo lia (E . F o u rn .) A iry S ha w Pe te rs o n 1 11 29 & An na bl e M ex ic o G U 35 96 12 G U 35 99 18 G U 36 06 34 G U 36 01 66 G U 35 92 04 G U 36 03 50 G U 35 95 31 Sp or o bo lu s c ry pt an dr us (T o rr . ) A . G ra y Pe te rs o n 2 20 03 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o G U 35 96 74 G U 35 99 14 G U 36 06 31 G U 36 01 62 G U 35 92 08 G U 36 03 54 G U 35 95 24 Sw al le ni a al ex a n dr a e (S wa lle n) So de rs tr. & H . F . D ec ke r Ca rte r 2 78 4 U SA G U 35 96 69 G U 35 99 20 G U 36 06 39 G U 36 01 54 G U 35 92 17 G U 36 03 64 G U 35 95 12 Tr a gu s b er te ro n ia nu s S ch ul t. FL SP 4 57 Pe ru G U 35 96 75 G U 35 98 98 G U 36 06 16 G U 36 01 48 G U 35 92 24 G U 36 03 70 G U 35 95 03 Tr ic ho ne ur a e le us in oi de s (R en dle ) E km an Se yd el 4 48 So ut h A fri ca G U 35 96 01 G U 35 99 88 G U 36 07 05 G U 36 02 40 G U 35 91 35 G U 36 02 77 G U 35 95 22 Tr ic ho ne ur a w eb er ba ue ri Pi lg . Pe te rs o n 1 56 86 & So re n g Ch ile G U 35 96 81 G U 35 99 48 G U 36 06 68 G U 36 01 94 G U 35 91 72 G U 36 03 61 G U 35 95 65 Tr id en s m ut ic us (T o rr . ) N ash Pe te rs o n 2 19 97 & Sa ar el a M ex ic o G U 35 96 82 G U 35 99 47 G U 36 06 67 G U 36 01 95 G U 35 91 73 G U 36 03 21 G U 35 95 57 Tr io di a ba se do wi i P rit z. Pe te rs o n 1 44 37 , S or en g & Ro se nb er g A us tra lia G U 35 96 83 G U 35 99 46 G U 36 06 66 G U 36 02 05 G U 35 91 74 G U 36 03 22 G U 35 95 50 Va se yo ch lo a m ul tin er vo sa (V as ey ) H itc hc . Sw al le n 10 04 1 U SA G U 35 96 56 G U 35 99 25 G U 36 06 46 G U 36 01 77 G U 35 91 93 G U 36 03 42 G U 35 95 44 W ill ko m m ia sa rm en to sa H ac k. Sc hw ei ck er dt 2 18 1 So ut h A fri ca G U 35 96 57 G U 35 99 24 G U 36 06 45 G U 36 02 52 G U 35 91 94 G U 36 03 43 G U 35 95 45 Zo ys ia m ac ra n th a D es v. So re n g 59 13 & Pe te rs o n A us tra lia G U 35 96 60 G U 36 00 17 G U 36 06 41 G U 36 00 20 G U 35 91 42 G U 36 03 46 G U 35 95 58 A pp en di x 1. C on tin ue d