SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTIONBUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGYBULLETIN 194 HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIALORGANIZATION By ALFRED W. BOWERS U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICEWASHINGTON : 1965 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing OflSceWashington, D.C., 20402 - Price $3.25 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Smithsonian Institution,BuEEAU OP American Ethnology,Washington, D.O., September 30, 1963.Sir: I have the honor to transmit herewith a manuscript entitled "Hidatsa Social and Ceremonial Organization," by Alfred W. Bowers,and to recommend that it be published as a bulletin of the Bureau ofAmerican Ethnology.Very respectfully yours, Frank H. H. Roberts, Jr.,Director.Dr. Leonard Carmichael,Secretary, Smithsonian Institution.TL PREFACEDuring the spring of 1932, the late Dr. Fay-Cooper Cole invited meinto his office at the University of Chicago to examine a projectwhich the late Dr. George L. Collie, curator of the Logan Museum ofBeloit College, had formulated to investigate the archeology of thehistoric Hidatsa sites near the Knife River in North Dakota; theinvestigation was planned to include interviews with the older Hidatsamen and women concerning an interpretation of their ancient way ofUfe. When the depression deepened, the Logan Museum was unableto finance these researches. Since our preliminary investigations hadindicated that there were only a few well-informed old Hidatsas livingwho were famihar with their aboriginal culture. Dr. Cole suggestedthat I work with them for at least 1 year and investigate every as-pect of their former culture before they passed away. Hidatsa arche-ology could be done later. In the meantime, under the influence ofDr. A. R. Radcliffe-Brown and Dr. Robert Redfield, my own prin-cipal interests had shifted away from archeology.Dr. Cole secured a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation for 1year's investigation of Hidatsa culture. During the depression, ex-penses were less than we had calculated and after 9 months in thefield I was able to handle the Hidatsa language without the servicesof an interpreter; therefore it was possible for me to remain at FortBerthold Reservation for 15 months. It was our understanding thata request would be made for additional funds to report the findings,but since funds were not available in 1933 I obtained employmentwith the U.S. Department of Agriculture, where I worked for severalyears. However, as time passed, it became evident that I was losingmy understanding of the Hidatsa language; in the period 1939-46Dr. Cole sent me additional funds to engage interpreters to translatepassages that were no longer intelligible to me and to recheck some ofmy field data.From July 1932 to September 1933 I lived at Elbowoods, N. Dak.,where Mr. and Mrs. Hal O. Simons, who were employees of the Gov-ernment as Farm Agent and Postmistress respectively, provided mewith living quarters. Off-reservation I made my home with Mr. andMrs. George A. Boomer, of Oakdale, whom I had known for manyyears. I look back with warm memories to the time I spent in theirhomes, ni IV PREFACEHowever competent informants may be, it takes good interpretersto bring out the information one seeks. Tom Smith, my first andoldest interpreter, had worked with me in assembling the data I usedfor my Mandan study. He had attended school at Hampton, Va., asa young man, but had returned home to hunt buffaloes and participatein the ancient ways. He had done much of the preliminary work inacquainting the older Hidatsas with the nature of the study to be madeand had assisted me in preparing a preliminary census of lodgegroups as of 1870-72, even before the Hidatsa study was undertaken.Without his help I could not have secured the data I received from afew of the more conservative non-Christian Indians. When I came toElbowoods in 1932 he had already written me that his health was notgood. I found him too ill to work for me, but he did give me muchassistance in selecting good informants and he talked to them of mywork when he saw them. He died about 2 months after this studywas begun. He had told me that Sam Newman would be an excellentinterpreter if I could get along with him. Mr. Newman was withoutquestion the most competent interpreter I ever used. He had hadextensive experience interpreting for various Government officials.Although he was with me most of the time for 9 months, I cannot saythat I came to know him well. He never discussed his family orneighborhood matters with me. He always came on time, eventhough the winter of 1932-33 was a severe one, with deep snow. Hewould come to my informant's home, take off his heavy wraps, sit athis place at the table, and, without commenting on any of the eventsof the day, say, "Will you read me the last paragraph, please, so I cancollect my wits?"I used James Baker as interpreter during the late winter while Iworked in the Independence district of the Fort Berthold Reservationand lived in his home. Jim, as he was known by everyone, made noclaim of competence as an interpreter, his only experience beingwith White stockmen of the district who came to call on non-English-speaking Indians about ranching problems. He was warm and friend-ly, and we became close friends and kept track of each other as longas he lived. Whereas Sam Newman's facial expression never changedthroughout the day and one would have never been able to anticipatehumorous or serious matters coming up in translation, Jim was con-tinually responding to the informant. One moment he would say tome on the side, "Get ready to shed tears" or "You are going to get alaugh out of this" or "Hold onto your hat." Sam Newman's precisemanners and lack of response to emotional scenes was always bringinginformants up short of tears. This was not so with either TomSmith or James Baker. Informants freely expressed their emotionsto them, laughing at the obviously humorous events of theu- lives and PREFACE V weeping on recalling the death of their loved ones in war or epidemics.These were my interpreters, all of whom have long since died.My informants, too, have long since passed away, Crows Heartbeing the last to die, about 13 years ago. Joe Ward, the younger sonof Hauy Coat (see pi. 2) who had come from Awatixa village on theKnife River, was the first to die. In fact, the data he supplied I re-corded while making the Mandan study during odd periods when noMandan informant was immediately available. He would have beenan easier informant than his brother, Bird-Lying-Down, as he was anelder in one of the Christian churches at the time of his death. Hisdeath made my work much more difficult, for, even at that late time,some informants were reluctant to discuss the details of their variousceremonial bundles and lore.Bears Arm (frontispiece) was a brilliant man with a tremendousmemory for detail, but, more important to me, he had given muchprior thought to the interrelationships of the various aspects of Hidatsaculture. His home was near the Elbowoods Agency, and people fromthe most distant ends of the Fort Berthold Reservation found a heartyinvitation to come in and spend the night with him. Sometimes theseold people would stay up all night telling of past events. He toldme, when I first discussed with him the matter of serving as an in-formant, that he had long recognized how the younger people werelosing interest in the old ways and that the old people visiting at hisplace were glad to find one who wanted to know everything aboutthe Hidatsa ways and history. I was very fortunate to find a manof Bears Arm's understanding with whom to shape the design of thisstudy. His father, Old-Woman-Crawling, was born at Awaxawi vil-lage and his mother. Many Growths, was from Awatixa village. Iaddressed Bears Arm as "father" and he addressed me as "son.''Wolf Chief was an old hand at dealing with anthropologists, forhe had been an informant for Dr. Gilbert L. Wilson, Dr. Robert H.Lowie, and Edward S. Curtis. He lived at Independence and I hadcome to know him beforehand as he claimed me as a fellow clansmanof the Prairie Chickens. Unlike Bears Arm, who was a man of greatdignity. Wolf Chief was easygoing and inclined to laughter. Hehad a tremendous memory for details, but he was not the great syn-thesizer Bears Arm was. He died during the spring of 1933 whilethis field study was being made but after I had completed my workwith him. Thinking he would not live much longer, he had askedme, if I were around when he died, to come to his funeral and sheda tear on his grave, which I did.My experience with Four Dancers, of the Speckled Eagle clan, whomI addressed as "older brother," was somewhat different from myrelationships with the others. He was the only male descendant of VI PREFACEthe Earthnaming bundle owners from whom I could secure dataconcerning the Earthnaming ceremony for Poor Wolf, having no sons,had not given his daughter, Mrs. White Duck, a coherent picture ofthis important ceremony. When I drove up to Four Dancers' homehe was quite surprised when I addressed him in the Hidatsa languageand told him why I was there. We talked a while and then hesaid, laughing, "You talk just like an Awaxawi." All my associationswith him were without the aid of an interpreter. Even at this latedate, after nearly a century of living together, the older people stUlhad slight dialectic differences which they associated with the variousoriginal community groups. I took down everything he said inHidatsa text and we got along very well together. He gave me muchvaluable data on the Earthnaming and related ceremonies that theother informants were unable to provide. I learned from him muchabout the internal stresses that so often got out of hand and led tothe disruption of communities, such as had occurred when the Crow-Flies-High group, with Four Dancers' father as ceremonial leader,had moved out of Fishhook Village to Fort Buford when he was asmall boy.The weakness of this study is in part due to the few convenientand outstanding female informants near my headquarters. I reliedentirely on Mrs. Good Bear?she addressed me as "gi*andfather"?forinformation on those ceremonies in which she had participated withher husband. Most of the information on the Sun Dance came fromher. She also contributed much material on lodge groups withwhich she was familiar, both Mandan and Hidatsa. I relied on Mrs.White Duck?I called her "father's sister" and she called me "son" ? for an understanding of the woman's role in Hidatsa communitylife. She told me very early in my study with her that she thoughtthe woman's role in warfare was as important for the success of theexpedition as those who were away to war, and that the success orfailure of a war party depended as much on what women at home didwhile the warriors were out as on what their male relatives lookingfor their enemies did. I learned much from her, and what I havewritten of the woman's role is largely her contribution.I did not use Crows Heart very much during the initial studyexcept for those ceremonies that were clearly of Hidatsa origin, sincehe came from a mixed Mandan-Hidatsa household. However, duringthe summer of 1947 I spent several weeks with him recording hisautobiography, and I did draw heavily from these notes for an inter-pretation of many aspects of Hidatsa culture. He was the first ofmy informants to apply their kinship terminology to me, callingme "younger brother." PREFACE VnWithout the help of these older Hidatsa informants, this studycould not have been made. All of them were born about 1850-60and were adults at the time of the Custer massacre. They hadbeen participants in their ancient ceremonies. They were thelast survivors sufficiently informed to provide an accurate picture oftheir former culture. Other weaknesses in this study are due to myown shortcomings; I never observed the culture I was studying.When such a wealth of information is at hand, it is not always easyto extract the most pertinent patterns of a culture for analysis or tosee life as the informants did without actually living it.I have had much assistance from many people. I am deeplyindebted to the late Dr. George L. Collie of the Logan Museum, Be-loit College, for starting me off into the field of Plains researches.The late Dr. Fay-Cooper Cole followed my progress in the field andguided me skillfully toward the attainment of my objectives in theHidatsa studies. Dr. A. R. Radcliffe-Brown guided me toward anunderstanding of the synchronic approach to the study of society asa system, which was essentially the image of the Hidatsa that BearsArm was always describing for me. Dr. Radcliffe-Brown would havebeen greatly impressed with Bears Arm. Nor had I gone far inmy field investigations before I discovered that theoretically, underthe Hidatsa kinship system, an individual might stand in severaldifferent relationships to another. At first I was inclined to believethat there were errors in my recording or that informants were con-fused. I drew these matters to the attention of the late Dr. RobertRedfield. He called for examples and was able to demonstrate tome that, in fact, individuals could stand in a number of differentrelationships, each social situation determining the relationship thatwould prevail.In January 1947, I went to Chicago to prepare manuscripts frommy field notes on the social and ceremonial organization of the Man-dan and Hidatsa and Great Plains archeology under the directionof Dr. Cole. When he retired from the faculty of the Universityof Chicago, the supervision of these researches went to Dr. FredEggan with whom I worked until July 1, 1949, when I joined thefaculty of the University of Idaho. I am deeply grateful to Dr. Egganfor his assistance. During my first years on the University of Idahofaculty, it was difficult, because of my heavy teaching load and largeclasses, to devote much time to this report. Three years ago myteaching load was reduced by one-fourth so that I could devote timeto the preparation of this report and other researches in the Plainswhich the University of Idaho had sponsored.Dr. Robert L. Stephenson, chief of the Missouri Basin Project,River Basin Surveys, Smithsonian Institution, suggested the incorpo- VIII PREFACE ration of various old maps of the Hidatsa sites near the Knife Riverthat had been made by personnel of the North Dakota HistoricalSociety many years ago, and Russell Reid, superintendent of theSociety, furnished me with these maps. Dr. Stephenson provided areconstruction of Rock Village of the Awatixa (pi. 1), made by DonHartle for the River Basin Surveys. James Macduff, of the GeologyDepartment, University of Idaho, processed the village maps of theKjiife River sites for publication. All the other maps and drawingswere prepared by Dale Ludick, of the Geography Department of theUniversity of Idaho. Leo D. Harris made the photographic studiesof Bears Arm (frontispiece) and of Drags Wolf and Foolish Bear(pi. 12). The turtle effigy (pi. 6) was photographed by Russell Reidfor Logan Museum of Beloit CoUege. All other original photographswere taken by the author. It is a privilege to express my thanks toaU these people and many others who have helped me in one way oranother in the preparation of this book.Finally, I must express to my wife, Gladys Monson Bowers, mydeep appreciation for her great help in typing rough and revised copiesof my extensive field notes on Hidatsa mythology and traditions aswell as the final manuscript. We have worked together as a teamduring the entire period this report was in preparation.Alfred W. Bowers,February 1962 University oj Idaho NOTEThe variation in the spelling of "AwaxEna^\ita" and "Itisuku" inthe text and in the charts arises from dialectic or individual differencesin pronunciation. The final vowel "u," "a," or even "e" comes outshort and unaccented en the ends of compound words and to theHstener may sound like u as in "up," a as in "anon," or e as in "met." CONTENTS PAGEPreface iiiIntroduction 1Historical and cultural background 10Hidatsa social organization 26Village and tribal organization and activities 26Councils 27Leaders 40War 40Summer camp 45Intertribal visits 47Summer hunt 50Winter camp 56Summary 63The clan and moiety system 64Origins 64Clan membership and affiliations 67Clan duties and responsibilities 71Hidatsa moiety concept 78The kinship system 80Kinship extension 90Kinship behavior 103Life cycle 126Birth and naming 126Training and ceremonial participation 129Marriage and the household 138Maturity and old age 163Last illness and death 168The age-grade system 174Men's societies 175Stone Hammer society ISOKit Fox society 181Lumpwood society 183Half-Shaved Head society 183Black Mouth society 184Dog societies 194Bull society 198Women's societies 199Skunk society 200Enemy society 200Goose society 200White Buffalo Cow society 204Characteristics of the Hidatsa age-grade structure 207Warfare 212Intertribal relations 212 X CONTENTSHidatsa social organization?ContinuedWarfare?Continued pageTraining 219Offensive warfare 223Defensive warfare 275Cannibalism 277Military honors 278Hidatsa ceremonial organization 282The individual and the supernatural 282The legendary period 297First Creator myth 297Sacred Arrows myth 303Hidebeating ceremony 308Woman Above and Holy Women ceremonies 323Old-Woman-Who-Never-Dies and related ceremonies 333Grizzly Bear ceremony 348Thimder ceremonies 358Big Bird 363Missouri River 371Creek 380Tying-the-Pots 389Wolf ceremonies 392Sunrise Wolf 394Sunset Wolf 410Wolf Woman 430Buffalo Calling ceremonies 433Earthnaming 433Imitating Buffalo 438Buffalo Corral 446Painted Red Stick 451Buffalo Neckbone 463Clan bundle ceremonies 467Waterbuster clan bundle 467Knife clan bundle 473Summary 474Hidatsa cultural position in the Northern Plains 476Bibliography 490Index 495 ILLUSTRATIONSPLATES(All plates follow p. 494)Frontispiece. Bears Arm.1. Reconstruction of Rock Village.2. Hairy Coat's earth lodge near Shell Creek,3. Pehriska-Ruhpa (Two Crows) in the costume of the Dog Band.4. Buffalo (Bull) Dance of the Mandan.5. Wolf Chief and wife.6. Turtle effigy near Price, N. Dak.7. Roadmaker, of Awaxawi village.8. Scalp Dance of the Manitaries (Hidatsa).9. The seven enemy warriors.10. Buffalo skulls of a bundle owner.11. Winter village of the Manitaries (Hidatsa).12. Drags Wolf and Foolish Bear with Waterbuster clan bundle.TEXT FIGURES PAGE1. The 13 parts of the sacred arrow 2922. Plan of the NaxpikE lodge (Sun Dance) and offerings to the NaxpikEbundle 3133. Ceremony to the Sun, Moon, and Woman Above 3244. Ceremonial appointments for Woman Above ceremony 3255. Diagram of Bear ceremonial lodge 3546. Lodge arrangements for Sunset Wolf ceremony 4207. Plan of the last dance of the Sunset Wolf ceremony 4288. Floor plan of the Imitating Buffalo ceremony 4449. Plan of the buffalo corral 45010. Painted Red Stick ceremony, plan one 45811. Painted Red Stick ceremony, plan two 45912. Plan of eagle villages in the sky 468MAPS 1. Limits of Hidatsa lands 122. Map of Rock Village 133. Hidatsa village site 35 on north bank of the Knife River 184. Old Awatixa village at the mouth of the Knife River 195. New Awatixa village at the mouth of the Knife River 20zi XII ILLUSTRATIONSCHARTS PAGE1. Hidatsa kinship system; ego= male 822. Hidatsa kinship system; ego= femaIe 833. Hidatsa affinal relatives; ego= male 844. Hidatsa affinal relatives; ego=female 855. Father's lineage; ego==male 866. Mother's lineage; ego? male 877. Mother's lineage; ego= female 888. Father's lineage; ego= female 899. Mother's father's lineage ; ego= male or female 8910. Relationships between Bears Arm and Walks 9611. Relationships between Bears Arm and Yellow Coat 9812. Relationships between Old-Woman-Crawling and Bear Woman 10013. Relationships between Old-White-Man and Lead Woman 10214. Wolf ceremonies in Four Bears line 416 HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIALORGANIZATIONBy Alfred W. BowersINTRODUCTIONAnthropologists are usually silent with respect to their field methodsand their manner of handling research data in the final preparationof reports. When the researcher lives with the people he is investi-gating and writes about a way of life that he is able to observe, onemay presume that most of what he records is the result of personalobservations supplemented by direct inquiry. When I studied theHidatsa Indians in 1932 and 1933, and for short periods thereafter,little of their ancient way of life remained, and a description of whatI saw then would have told me little of the ancient culture that Iwas endeavoring to reconstruct.The Hidatsa of the Fort Berthold Reservation provided an excel-lent laboratory for the employment of the "creatively historicalmethod" so commonly used by those of us who have directed re-searches in the Great Plains area. At the time I undertook thisstudy, the older Hidatsa men and women had lived much as theirgrandparents had when the first fur traders and explorers visitedthem at their ancient villages downstream on both banks of theKnife River. This was the last chance anthropologists would everhave to get first-hand information from those who had lived by theancient culture.Much had already been written about the Hidatsa. Some of thisinformation was very good; much of it omitted material we shouldhave about these important agricultm-al communities. They hadbeen variously known as Big Bellies, Gros Ventres, Ehart-sah, Min-netarees, Minnetarees of the Willows, Wandering Minnetarees,Minataries, Minitaries, Mahaha, Maxaxa, Awatixa, Amahami, Awax-awi, Ahnahaway, Gens-di-foulers, Mirokac (collectively with theRiver Crow), and by other names. This array of proper names forvarious segments of the total population told us little of their originalcommunity social organization. The first extensive study to employthe name "Hidatsa" as a tribal designation was written by Wash-1 2 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194ington Matthews (1877), assistant surgeon of the United States Army,while stationed at Fort Stevenson near Fishhook Village. Sincethat time, all students of the culture have identified them as Hidatsa,and other proper names have tended to drop out of the literatureexcept in Government reports.All the informants for this study were born within 10 years afterthe abandonment of their old villages near the mouth of Knife Kiver.Their parents all were adults before Fishhook Village was built in1845, and they had referred to three contemporary settlements whichthey identified as Hidatsa, Awatixa, and Awaxawi, these three andno more. The three ancient villages were remembered by my in-formants, for it was the custom of many families to return to thesesites and to point out to the younger people the depressions of lodgeswhere certain relatives had lived, their graves, or earth rings on theprairies where various ceremonies such as the NaxpikE or Wolf cere-monies were held. Wolf Chief, Crows Heart, and Bears Arm pointedout many of these features to me, identified even earlier sites in theSanger vicinity, and explained many things that might have other-wise gone unrecognized.As this study progressed, it was evident that some cultural dif-ferences existed between villages and that there should be someconsistent way of identifying these former separate and independentcommunities. The tribal name "Hidatsa" was generally in use bythis time, although it had been employed by the people themselvesonly to identify the inhabitants of the largest village communitysituated on the north bank of Knife River. I decided to continuethe use of the term "Hidatsa" when speaking of the entire populationor when referring to customs and practices that appeared to be commonto all three communities. I have identified the people of the middlevillage as "Awatixa," the name by which they were designated bythe others. The small group, somewhat more diverse in dialect andculture, I have designated as "Awaxawi." Unlike their near neigh-bors, the Mandan, they had no tribal name until given one by earlytraders. Since many situations arose during the preparation of thismanuscript when it was necessary to distinguish the communitygroup known as "Hidatsa" from the other communities, I haveemployed the term "Hidatsa-proper" when referring to them.This study of the Hidatsa actually began several years prior tothe field studies of 1932 and 1933 when, as a graduate student inanthropology at the University of Chicago and graduate assistantfor the Logan Museum of Beloit College, I collected much archeo-logical data from ancient earth-lodge sites along the Missouri. Al-though the ancient sites of the Hidatsa at, and downstream from,the mouth of the Knife River have never been extensively studied Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 3by archeologists, surface features of these sites are still clearly dis-tinguishable, and river cutting frequently exposes large sections ofsome of these sites and their associated artifacts. Extensive diggingby local artifact hunters at the old village of the Awatixa north ofStanton, N. Dak., has opened up deep cross sections of stratifiedrefuse with the lower levels, producing many pottery types identicalto those found at the oldest traditional sites of the Hidatsa in theSanger area but not characteristic of the contemporaneous modernsites. Perhaps the strongest evidence in the archeology of the regionindicative that the Hidatsa groups when first reaching the Missouriwere culturally more unlike the Mandan than in later years, as men-tioned in both Mandan and Hidatsa traditions, is the fact that thelate prehistoric and historic archeological inventories of the two tribesare essentially identical. Researches in Hidatsa social organizationand ceremonialism point to similar intertribal cultural borrowing evenwithin the memory of informants or of their parents.Rarely does the researcher in an Indian tribe have available sorich a source of archeological, historical, and anthropological infor-mation when undertaking a detailed analysis of a small segment ofthe total culture of a people as was the case with the Hidatsa. Wecan trace their group movements through the earliest historic accountsand the statements of qualified informants from data they securedfrom grandparents who saw the first White traders to reach theirvillages. We can compare their prehistoric culture, as revealed bytheir traditional village sites, with that of their immediate neighbors,the Mandan, and even with their more remote neighbors, the Arikara.The literature on the Hidatsa is extensive, even though the earlyfur traders, explorers, and others tended to view them as the "poorrelatives" of the Mandan, giving us rather extensive accounts ofthe life of the latter and sketchy accounts of the former. Amongthe first contributors to our knowledge of the Hidatsa were Boiler,Kurz, Lewis and Clark, Charles Mackenzie, Maximilian, Palliser,Thompson, and others (see Bibliography). In the middle of thepast century, studies by Hayden, Matthews, Morgan, and School-craft appeared. During the first quarter of this century, variousaspects of Hidatsa culture were studied by a generation of trainedresearchers, among whom were Beclrwith, Curtis, Densmore, Hyde,Lowie, Pepper, Will, and Wilson, All of them contributed importantinformation on some aspect of Hidatsa culture and provided back-ground data for this study.The primary purpose of the present study was to reconstruct theaboriginal culture of the Hidatsa as it would have been observedabout 1836, prior to the last major smallpox epidemic. It wouldhave employed the synchronic approach to the understanding of the 4 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194Hidatsa at a moment in time. However, as the study progressedand as I became aware that my informants all recognized markedchanges in their way of life from that of their grandparents, I decidedto deviate from that plan wherever there was pertinent and authenticknowledge of historic cultural changes. My employment of thediachronic approach was especially applicable to particular aspectsof their culture such as the age-grade system. In other areas of theirculture, such as their kinship system, there was little evidence ofcultural change.Extensive use has been made of the voluminous source material onthe Hidatsa. I have tried to combine all that has been written aboutthem with my personal observations of their ancient sites and cultureand what information I was able to glean from native informants.My aim has been to produce a study of the personal and intimaterelationships of individuals and organized groups living togetherwithin a complexly integrated social-ceremonial system that wasundergoing significant cultural enrichment under the influence oftheir agricultural neighbors until terminated by the heavy lossessuffered during the smallpox epidemic of 1837 and the destructiveinfluences of subsequent White encroachments upon their communityand ancient wildlife resources.The Hidatsa were not a homogeneous people. The knowledgeof one was not that of another, save as exists between individualsas to sex and age, so characteristic of very primitive hunters andgatherers. The Hidatsa had a firm economy based on hunting andprimitive hoe gardening. There was much specialization; one couldhave learned this from the literature.My first problem was to select informants who possessed specialknowledge. I had become acquainted with most of them beforehandwhile making the Mandan study with the help of Tom Smith, whowas in their age-group and knew each of them well. We had antic-ipated difficulty in getting informants to reveal certain religious lore,and it was necessary, in some instances, to assure the informantthat what he told us would not be revealed in his lifetime so thatwe would not be interfering in the orderly transfer of this knowledgeto Indian purchasers. This rule was never broken. When what werecorded of a religious nature was not repeated by us, or informantslearned that we never talked about what they told us should be treatedsecretly, confidence between us grew. When resistance was met insecuring sacred lore and the informant was otherwise well informed,we would work with him on routine social patterns and try again.Usually, after getting acquainted with each other, the informantwould slowly edge into the sacred area of his experiences and submitto detailed inquiry. Eventually there was not an informant that Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 5I could not have inter\dewed on any aspect of their culture; anygaps in our knowledge of Hidatsa social and ceremonial life are ofmy own oversight.From my experiences with the Mandan, I decided to investigatehousehold and kinship ties first and then relate sacred bundles andrites to households and lineages. The Government census and tribalroles for 1870 and 1880 were obtained in advance, studied, and par-tially memorized. Without revealing this fact to my informants,I then made up my own census as of about 1872, using Bears Arm,Mrs. White Duck, and Mrs. Good Bear as informants. This was theonly instance in which I used several informants simultaneously.This census by households was taken by securing, first of all, thenames and relationships of the occupants of the three informants'own households and then moving to those households to which theyhad been related or where they visited most. These three inform-ants finally came to a number of households about which little wasknown, and information on them was secured from other informants.On the basis of the principal occupants of these household groups,extensive genealogies were then made extending family lines backto the three contemporary villages at the mouth of Knife River,Rock Village, and a fifth community area near Square Buttes ofwhich my informants knew little. Residence at Scattered Village(Awatixa) on the north bank of the Heart River at Mandan, N. Dak.,was not borne out by these genealogies. However, the data onhousehold groupings is in essential agreement with the Governmentrecords when one takes into account the fact that the small log cabinwas introduced at this time?what the Government counted as twoor more households (lodges set side by side, perhaps joined by ahallway) my Indian informants counted as a single household.The next step was to establish the clan membership of all indi-viduals reported, the approximate age of each person, village ofbirth, and all known tribal and personal sacred bundles and rites inwhich the individual had held ownership and special roles. Mostof this was known in a general way, at least, through ritual obser-vations or by word of mouth. Nevertheless, inquiries with otherinformants brought out further information about certain lesserknown bundles, especially those of a personal nature.Understanding the social position of mixed families, where thehusband and wife were of different tribes (primarily Crow, Mandan,Arikara, and Assiniboin) was more difficult. In one instance, thehusband would be a Mandan and in another, a Hidatsa, but norule of residence seemed to apply. It was finally eptabhshed that mixedhouseholds should be classified as Hidatsa only in those instancesin which they participated primarily in Hidatsa activities. I had710-1?5?65 2 6 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194had some misgivings as to whether it would be possible to relatelineages and household groups to the three former villages at KnifeRiver, but I found that informants were more certain of the oldvillage ties than of actual clan membership. I had to rely on moietymembership for some individuals whose precise clan membershipwas not known.The genealogies were further extended as the study progressedand additional informants were used. Constant reference was madeto them throughout the field study period. They provided me withprecise information on the inheritance of sacred bundles, bundlecomplexes, and rights?often at variance with the ideal patterns ? and indicated that certain ceremonies or age-grade societies werefound only at certain villages. Differences in village clan systemswere also determined by these genealogical records. They wereespecially valuable in ascertaining changing trends in intervillagemarriage between clans while living iu the old villages and ultra-village marriages after the survivors united at Fishhook Village.It was further established that intervillage marriage and marriagewith the Mandan or other tribes was virtually nonexistent priorto the building of Fishhook Village in 1845 and common with theMandan, but rarely with the Arikara, after that date. With thisinformation at hand it was possible to view in brief outline most ofthe important sacred bundle systems even before investigating thedetails of the associated rituals.At the time this study was made, there were many more old Hidatsamen and women than were interviewed. Some, whose parents had notbeen important leaders and who were not from households owningimportant bundle rites, were not used in the investigation. Access-ability in the reservation was also an important factor. Whereseveral shared unique information, I tended to go into great detailwith one informant and merely recheck with another. Informantswere both Christian and non-Christian, the latter tending to be moreconservative in divulging sacred lore but equally cooperative inroutine matters. Even the Christian Indians were not entirelyunrestrained in divulging knowledge of their parents' sacred rites.They would speak freely of general matters concerning these bundles;but would sometimes wait for a while before relating the sacred mythsand usually did not like to have pictures taken of the sacred bundles.There was a common reluctance to sing any of the sacred songs.Mrs. Good Bear, for instance, was a devout Roman Catholic whoattended Mass regularly and who spoke freely with me concerningher deceased husband's and her role in the NaxpikE (Sun Dance)ceremony. She knew all the songs used, but could not be prevailedupon to sing them or repeat the words of the songs. Wolf Chief, Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 7 a Congregationalist, told how he had been in several close brusheswith lightning after he allowed Gilbert L. Wilson to take the Water-buster (Thunder) clan bundle to New York City, and had been afraidof lightning ever since.I discovered that all informants were unwilling to talk in thepresence of visitors, regardless of the subjects being studied. Informer times it was considered bad taste to enter uninvited whenone was telling stories or giving certain information to another andthe only trouble encountered was with young men not familiar withthis custom.The kinship charts were prepared primarily from the combinedgenealogical data of all my informants. At this time (1932) therewere no important variations in the terminology and categorieswith the exception of those of the father's father's sister and daughter-in-law. Some claimed the former was a "grandmother" whUe othersthought she would be a closer relative by some other extension ofthe kinship system. Daughter-in-law terminology also differedbetween villages. It was found that many factors of social partic-ipation affected the relationships between individuals and extendedthe system to include nonrelatives, age-grade associates, ceremonialparticipation, adoption of children and ceremonial adoptions by bothmen and women, and equation of Hidatsa with Mandan clans. Allthese produced systems of interaction between individuals in whichtwo people often stood in several relationships to each other. Thiswas not mentioned specifically by informants and came out in thestudy of various customs.All of my informants had had previous experience with anthro-pologists and claimed that no two of us worked the same way. Iheard several criticisms of us, chiefly that we either tried to answerom* own questions or that informants were cut off by saying thatwhat was being told was not important. I tried to avoid doingeither, for I had a year to make this study and I was as interestedin what my informants thought about their cultural values as inwhat they did. Each informant was encom-aged to digress whenone social pattern reminded him of something else, or when hisexcursions into another area seemed to produce noteworthy culturaldata. Since the Hidatsa explain much in their culture by meansof formal myths, they were encouraged to relate the myths as theyhad learned them. Lest continuity be broken, I usually avoidedinterrupting informants and held back my questions until a narrativehad been completed.I followed few fixed rules in getting at the data, and these weresubject to change whenever the situation warranted. I frequentlyrequestioned an informant months later on obscure points. The old 8 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194people generally knew who would be the best informed in certain areasof their culture. Wherever possible, I relied heavily on direct infor-mation from the informant's parents or a relative who had lived in thesame household. One who had bought ceremonial rights or had paida person for specific information was considered to be a better in-formant than one who had not done these things. Information froman individual who had served as understudy to a ceremonial leader inperforming a ceremony was highly rated as was that from one who hadbeen a ceremonial "father" when another was buying ceremonialrights and bundles. I discovered that mere participation in a cere-mony as a young man added little information that one could not haveacquired as an eyewitness to the event. At all times I have hadbefore me notes on the source and the conditions under which theinformants gained their information and have tried to weigh this inmy analyses.From the beginning of the field study, I recognized that the Hidatsalearned much by means of sacred and secular myths and that thesymbols and ritual acts performed could best be understood in termsof the instructions in these myths. So I always took them down inessentially the form in which they were related to me, making allow-ance for some alteration both in form and meaning inevitable in trans-lations. After I acquired some understanding of the Hidatsa language,they were recorded in native text without an interpreter and translatedlater. These myths often revealed interrelationships, native attitudes,and values not otherwise apparent.Their mythology and traditions as recorded provide an importantbody of original source material on Hidatsa literary style and form,but in too great detail to be used unedited in this study. They appearin this report in summary form, expressing what I thought were theimportant points the speaker was trying to communicate.The various sections dealing with Hidatsa ceremonial organizationwere arranged, in part, chronologically according to native traditionsat the time of their adoption in mythological times. This chrono-logical order was broken, however, beginning with "The ThunderCeremonies," in order to treat groups of related rites as complexes.Some of the rites of the complex?the Thunder ceremonies, the Wolfceremonies, or the Buffalo Calling ceremonies?^are beheved to goback nearly to the beginning of time. Other related rites were adoptedfrom time to time thereafter. Because the informed Hidatsa believedthese rites were interrelated, I arranged them in this way.Finally, I have tried to present a detailed account of the social andceremonial life of the Hidatsa in the image they had of their way oflife. To do this, I have frequently resorted to the same sources ofinformation a young Hidatsa man or woman would have?sacred and Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 9traditional myths?and have presented them herein as a summary ofthe myth. In other sections of this study I have presented briefsegments of personal histories, believing that a correct presentationof the social and ceremonial organization of these people should bemeaningful to those who worked so long with me when it was beingrecorded. HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL BACKGROUNDThe first reference in the literature to the Hidatsa as an independenttribal group was made by Thompson (1916, pp. 209-242), who visitedthe villages of this tribe and of the Mandan in 1797. Prior to thattime, owing to the similarities between the cultures, tribal differencesapparently were not recognized by the early White traders; all theseearth lodge village groups living upstream from the Heart River wereknown as Mandan, from the name given by the Assiniboin to themore numerous and sedentary tribe. The Mandan, prior to the 1782smaUpox epidemic, must have greatly outnumbered the populationof the three Hidatsa villages. The latter, however, were not recog-ni2;ed as separate tribal and linguistic groups xmtil White traders hadcome to live in the villages and had actually learned the native lan-guages. When Thompson visited the five village groups of Hidatsasand Mandans, his information was obtained from traders who hadmarried into the tribes and were living in the villages.In 1738, La V6rendrye (1927, pp. 290-360) visited earth lodgevillage groups on the Missouri downstream from the traditional villagesites of this tribe believed, on the basis of archeological findings, tohave been occupied at this time. Although there is no reference inLa Verendrye's account to visiting groups other than the "Man-tanees," he may have seen the Awaxawi group of Hidatsa who werethen more closely associated with the upstream Mandan villagegroups.Mackintosh, in 1773, reported that the Mandan were living onboth banks of the Missom-i with from 9 to 13 villages and manythousands of warriors (Schoolcraft, 1851, vol. 3, p. 253). However,no reference is made to other tribal earth lodge groups. His estima-tion of the Mandan population is obviously excessive and it is to bepresumed, on the basis of traditional and archeological evidence, thatsome Hidatsa village groups, particularly the Awatixa and Awaxawi,were also included in these figures.Although the M. Bellen map of 1755 was the first to show thelocation of the Mandan villages, indicating that the Mandan andArikara were separated by a stretch of about 300 miles on the MissouriRiver, no reference is made to the Hidatsa in relation to these otherearth-lodge groups (WincheU, 1911, p. 47). The Laurie and Whittlemap (1782) enumerates and locates a number of tribes heretofore not10 Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION H reported (ibid., p. 56) . It resembles Bellen's map in that the MantonsRiver still was not recognized to be a section of the Missom-i. TheMandan lived along the Mantons River, which flowed to the southeast.Their nearest neighbors were the Nadouasis who had left the head-waters of the Mississippi, crossed the Red River, and were livingbelow the Mandan villages. Immediately to the west of the Mandanvillages were the Snake Indians; the Assiniboin were to the north.The Arikara were to the southeast along the Missouri River, and theTetons occupied the prairie region between Lake Traverse and theMissouri River. ^During the entire period of recorded history, beginning with Thomp-son in 1797 and continuing to 1845, the Hidatsa recognized threeindependent but closely related village groups whose relative sizeremained unchanged. Of these groups, the Hidatsa were the mostnumerous and exceeded the other two in total numbers. TheAwatixa were intermediate in size, while the Awaxawi have neverexceeded 20 earth lodge household groups in historic times. Thomp-son (1916, pp. 235-236) visited these groups when they were in theirwinter villages and gave the following figures for households byvillage groups: (1) Awatixa, 31 earth lodges and 7 tipis; (2) Hidatsa,82 earth lodges; (3) Awaxawi and Mandan, 52 earth lodges (15Awaxawi and 37 Mandan); (4) Mandan, 40 earth lodges; and (5)Mandan, 113 earth lodges. For 190 Mandan lodges he estimatedthe population to be 1,520 and for the Hidatsa (FaU Indians) 128lodges and 7 tipis he gave a population of 1,330.^Even as early as 1797 two contradictory accounts of the history ofthe Hidatsa were recognized by Thompson; that they were formerlyagriculturalists living at the headwaters of the Red River, and thatthey were nomadic and came from the north to settle near the Mandan,where they adopted agriculture and fixed villages. The same con-tradictions appear regularly in subsequent accounts, and similarinformation was given to me by Hidatsa informants when this studywas made.LeRaye, in 1802, identified two village groups of Hidatsa; theHidatsa-proper occupying the large village (site 35) on the northbank of the Knife River and the Hidatsa group, better known by thenatives as the Awatixa, immediately opposite on the south bank(site 33). The Awaxawi, whom he called Gens-di-foulers, had anindependent village (site 32) 3 miles below the Awatixa (LeRaye,1908, p. 169). He estimated the population of the two Hidatsa ' Bellen probably errs in placing the Arikara so far downstream. There is much archeological evidencethat several Arikara village groups were at this time upstream from Pierre, S. Dak., in a region not wellknown to explorers.> Identification of these village groups was by my native informants. 12 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194 oc as ?5 s .s00 bo5 ?J ffi Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 13 ^v' VILLAGE SITENW /'4 SECT. 27 T. 147 R.86SCALE I INCH: 100 FT.CONTOUR INTE.'^VAL 5 FT. SURVEYED 7-10-08BY STOUTFISHSTEINBREUCKMap 2.?Map of Rock Village. (Courtesy North Dakota Historical Society.) villages to be 600 warriors and 2,500 inhabitants. It is of significancefor a reconstruction of Crow-Hidatsa group relations to note that,on the basis of information obtained from the various Crow bands,the Ehart-sah (Hidatsa) were still considered to be a Crow bandalthough the two other Hidatsa village groups, the Awatixa andAwaxawi, were not so considered. 14 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194Lewis and Clark (1804-05) wintered near the Mandan and Hidatsavillages. They also grouped together two Hidatsa village groups,the Hidatsa and the Awatixa (sites 35 and 33) as a separate tribe todistinguish them from the Awaxawi. Concerning the earth lodgevillages at this point they wrote:The villages near which we are established are five in number, and are theresidence of three distinct nations: the Mandans, the Ahnahaways [Awaxawi],'and the Minnetarees [Hidatsa and Awatixa].On the same side of the river, and at a distance of 4 miles from the lower Mandanvillage, is another called Mahaha [The Mandan name for the Awaxawi]. It issituated on a high plain at the mouth of Knife river, and is the residence of theAhnahaways . . . [They] formerly resided on the Missouri, about 30 miles belowwhere they now live. The Assiniboins and Sioux forced them to a spot 5 mileshigher, where the greatest part of them were put to death, and the rest emigratedto their present situation, in order to obtain an asylum near the Minnetarees . . . their whole force is about 50 men.On the south side of the same Knife river, half a mile above the Mahaha andin the same open plain with it, is a village of Minnetarees surnamed Metaharta *who are about 150 men in number. On the opposite side of Knife river, and oneand a half miles above this village, is a second of Minnetarees, who may beconsidered as the proper Minnetaree nation [Hidatsa]. It is situated in a beauti-ful low plain, and contains 450 warriors. . . . The Mandans say that this people came out of the water to the eastand settled near them in their former establishment in nine villages; . . . TheMinnetarees proper assert, on the contrary, that they grew where they now live . . . They also say that the . . . Minnetarees of the Willows,^ whose languagewith very little variation is their own, came many years ago from the plains andsettled near them. Perhaps the two traditions may be reconciled by the naturalpresumption that these Minnetarees [Hidatsa] were the tribes known to theMandans below, and that they ascended the river for the purpose of rejoiningthe Minnetaree proper.The inhabitants of these five villages, all of which are within the distance of6 miles, live in harmony with one another. The Ahnahaways understand inpart the language of the Minnetarees. The dialect of the Mandans differs widelyfrom both; but their long residence together has insensibly blended their manners,and occasioned some approximation in language, particularly as to objects ofdaily occurrence and obvious to the senses. [Lewis, 1893, pp. 196-200.]Although Lewis and Clark's analysis of the history of Hidatsa villagegroups is somewhat confusing, many of these conflicting traditions canbe resolved by examining the Hidatsa not as a tribe but as independentvillage groups. Both the LeRaye and Lewis and Clark accounts agreein designating the Awaxawi, although dialectically related to theothers, as somewhat removed culturally. Lewis and Clark further ' Village group names in brackets are my interpretations. * The Mandan name for Awatixa meaning "Scattered Village." Another Mandan equivalent is "mitoxtE" which is the name by which the Mandan also speak of the village on the present site of the cityof Mandan, N. Dak. ? So far as we know this name was applied only to the Hidatsa, never to the Awatixa or Awaxawi. Notethat the Awatixa at this time recognized dialectic differences with the Hidatsa and that the Mandan traditionof a Hidatsa migration to the Missouri as nonagriculturalists is denied by the Awatixa as applying to them. Bowers] EQDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 15indicate that the Hidatsa (Minnetarees of the Willows) and Awatixa(Minnetarees-proper of Metaharta) have had independent histories.The former, as a nomadic group, came recently to the Missouri fromthe northern plains to Heart River where they became known to theMandan before taking up residence north of Knife River. The Awa-tixa claimed long residence on the Missouri as an agricultural group.This distinction between nomadic (Hidatsa) and sedentary (Awatixa)Hidatsa groups must have loomed prominently in theu* minds, forthey distinguished these two groups when they wrote: ... As Captain Clark was about leaving the village, two of their chiefs returnedfrom a mission to the Grosventres [Hidatsa] or wandering Minnetarees. Thesepeople were camped about ten miles above, and while there one of the Ahnahaways[Awaxawi] had stolen a Minnetaree girl. [Ibid., pp. 219-220.]It appears that Lewis and Clark were aware of differences betweenthe two principal Hidatsa village groups, the Hidatsa-proper and theAwatixa, since they refer to the group living on the north bank of theMissouri as the Minnetarees (Hidatsa), and those on the south bank(Awatixa) as the Minnetarees, surnamed Metaharta. Inasmuch asthe names employed to designate these village groups are of Mandanorigin, it would be well to examine Mandan interpretations of them.According to my Mandan informants, the word "Minnetaree" referredonly to the nomadic ethnic group which arrived at the Mandan villagesnear Heart River from the northeast in late prehistoric times. Havingtasted the Mandan corn, which they learned to cultivate during ashort residence there, they were advised by the Mandan leaders inthese words:It would be better if you went upstream and built your own village, for our cus-toms are somewhat different from yours. Not knowing each other's ways theyoung men might have differences and there would be wars. Do not go too faraway for people who live far apart are like strangers and wars break out betweenthem. Travel north only until you cannot see the smoke from our lodges and therebuild your village. Then we will be close enough to be friends and not far enoughaway to be enemies. [Crows Heart.]Once this group became established on the Missouri near the mouthof Knife River, a separation occurred to produce the Hidatsa whoadopted agriculture and built Hidatsa village 35 on the north bank ofthe Knife River. The remainder removed farther upstream and be-came the Kixa'ica' or 'Those Who Quarreled Over the Paunch,' thepresent Hidatsa name for the River Crow. According to Mandaninterpretations, neither the Awatixa nor the Awaxawi was in-volved in this more recent migration, both being older agriculturalgroups on the Missouri. The Mandan relate the Awatixa to the west-ern Crow from whom they are said to have separated by mutual con-sent while living on the Missomi between the mouths of the Knifeand Heart Rivers. They viewed this early separation as a gradual one 16 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194due to their long western migrations out onto the Plains. Eventuallythe western ones moved permanently into the upper Little MissouriRiver region to take up hunting. The smaller group remained onfriendly terms with the Mandan living in the Painted Woods regionintermediate to the Knife and Heart Rivers where they practicedagriculture. This seems to be a reasonable interpretation, for theMandans who supplied much of the data recorded by Lewis and Clarkin 1804 were aware of the different cultural histories of the threeHidatsa village groups and the Crow.Concerning the Awaxawi, if we are to rely on traditions andinterpretations of Mandan and Awaxawi informants, we must concludethat they represent an independent village group who arrived on theMissouri after the Awatixa and Mountain Crow and prior to theHidatsa-River Crow; that they were agriculturalists prior to theirarrival on the Missouri as indicated by the Thompson account; andthat they were, owing to their small numbers, closely associated fordefense with either the Mandan or the more sedentary Awatixa duringthe 18th and first half of the 19th centuries. The archeological recordof their traditional villages on the Missouri River further strengthensnative beliefs of the relative periods of the occupation along the Mis-souri by these three village groups and the Mandan.In 1806, Alexander Henry recognized the Saultier (Awaxawi) to bean independent tribe, writing:These people are an entirely different tribe from the Big Bellies and Mandanes;'their language resembles that of the latter more than that of the former, but isnot the same.^ Their long intercourse with those people has tended to thissimilarity of language, and from proximity they have acquired the manners andcustoms of the other nations, though they continue to live by themselves. Theyhave the reputation of a brave and warlike people. They formerly sustained athree-years' war with the Big Bellies notwithstanding the latter were then tentimes their number.^ They held out with the greatest resolution and disdainedto submit till the others, finding it impossible to reduce them, unless by extermina-tion, proposed to make peace. Since then they have lived in amity. They arestationary, like their neighbors, the Mandanes, with whom they have alwaysbeen at peace, and have acquired more of their customs and manners than thoseof the Big Bellies, who continue to view them with an envious eye. [Henry,1897, pp. 343-344.]Henry estimated the size of the villages to be: Awaxawi, 40 lodges;Awatixa, 60 lodges; Hidatsa, 130 lodges. These are unquestionablyoverestimations, since lodge outlines at these villages show Hidatsasite 35 to have 83 earth lodges, Awatixa site 33 to have 49 earth ' Hidatsa and Awatixa village groups at this time lived In the same two villages as reported by Lewis andClark previously. ' Henry errs. It was a Hidatsa-Crow dialect. ' Traditionally this was with the Hidatsa, not the Awatixa, and was brought about by the unwillingnessof the Hidatsa to permit settlement on the Missouri upstream from the mouth of the Knife River in tradi-tional Hidatsa hunting territory. Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 17lodges, and Awaxawi site 32 to have approximately 20 lodges. Theexact number at the latter site is not definitely known, since the sitehas been partially destroyed.Bradbury (1904, vol. 5, p. 162) also distinguished the Awaxawi asa separate tribe from the other two Hidatsa village groups of whichhe said "It is stated by Mr. Lewis that the two villages or bands canraise six hundred warriors but the number at this time is probablymuch less." It was at this time, according to traditions largely sub-stantiated by recent tree ring studies, that one group under StrongJaw moved out of the Hidatsa village to buUd on the Little Missourinear the mouth of Cherry Creek (WUl, 1946). Concerning theAwaxawi, Bradbury (1904, p. 163) wrote that? ? In our way to the Mandans we passed through the small village belonging tothe Ahwahhaways, consisting of not more than eighteen or twenty lodges. Thisnation can scarcely muster fifty warriors, and yet they carry on an offensive waragainst the Snake and Flathead Indians.Catlin in 1832 did not recognize the Awaxawi as a separate tribe,writing:The Minitarees (people of the willows) are a small tribe of about 1,500 souls,residing in three villages of earth-covered lodges, on the banks of Knife river; asmall stream, so called, meandering through a beautiful and extensive prairie,and uniting its water with the Missouri. [Catlin, 1841, vol. 1, p. 185.]Catlin identified Awatixa village on the south bank as the principalvillage; it consisted of 40 to 50 earth-covered lodges (see map 5).Maximilian (1906, pp. 230-231) in 1833 reported that the Hidatsagroups were in the same villages as when Charboneau came to theMissouri in 1797. These were sites 35, 33, and 32. However, 6 or 7years prior to 1797 it would appear that the Awatixa and Awaxawiwere not living at the mouth of Knife River, for Maximilian describesan attack by the Sioux on Hidatsa village (site 35). These twoincidents provide a minimum date for the final union of the threeHidatsa village groups at the mouth of Knife River where theyremained in close associations until 1837 when they scattered toescape a second smallpox epidemic. The Maximilian account wouldindicate that immediately after the smallpox epidemic of 1782, theAwatixa were in Rock Village (site 53) upstream from the mouth ofKnife River, the Hidatsa were at the mouth of Knife River in villagesite 35, and the Awaxawi were downstream near the Mandan of theHensler-Sanger region where ruins of their villages were described byLewis and Clark in 1804. This date for the occupation of RockVillage would agree with Curtis' (1907 a, p. 131) account.Bears Arm, one of the principal informants for this study, statedthat his mother. Many Growths, was born at Awatixa site 33. Imme-diately after the smallpox epidemic of 1782, the Awatixa abandoned 18 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194Ni >o ^ O Hidatsa VillageKnife RiverSW \ OF SEC. 21, TOWN. 145RANGE 84SCALE I INCH- 105.6 FT.Map 3.?Hidatsa village site 35 on the north bank of the Knife River. (Courtesy NorthDakota Historical Society.) their old village 34 and removed to Rock Village, where Bears Arm'smaternal grandmother was born. According to Bears Arm, the villagegroup which we know as Hidatsa comprised both an agricultural andnomadic population prior to 1782. The ratio of nomads to agricul-turalists varied from season to season, Theu' principal headquarterswas on the north bank of Knife River (site 35) from which they ranged Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 19upstream along the Missouri, the tributary regions to the west, andthe Mouse River and Devils Lake regions to the northeast.The Awatixa at this time, he stated, were agricultural and livedmuch like the Mandan who placed great emphasis on agriculture.They had lived at site 34 for a long time, at first with the Mandanand Awaxawi living downstream to the Heart River and beyond, theCrow to the west, and the other Hidatsa-River Crow group to thenortheast and upstream as nomads. The Awatixa were then the mosto -OoFENCE Old Awatixa VillageSE % SECT. 33 TOWN. 145 RANGE 84SCALE I INCH TO 115.75 FEET Map 4.?Old Awatixa village at the mouth of the Knife River. (Courtesy North DakotaHistorical Society.) 20 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194 New Awotixa VillageNe!'40F sect. 33 TOWN. 145 RANGE 84SCALE I INCH TO 90.66 FEET Map S.?New Awatixa village at the mouth of the Knife River. (Courtesy North DakotaHistorical Society.) northern agriculturalists along the Missouri River. Concerning theAwaxawi, where his father was born, Bears Arm stated that this groupwas once more numerous and lived to the east as agriculturalists onthe streams of that region and later at Devils Lake. There theHidatsa-River Crow (called Miro'kac prior to the separation) foundthem and concluded that they were related since their languages weremutually intelligible. Reaching the Missouri, the Awaxawi lived inthe Painted Woods region around the Square Buttes where theyremained on friendly terms with the Mandan of that and the HeartRiver region, and the Awatixa of site 34 on Knife River. Prior tothe epidemic of 1782, the enemies of the earth-lodge groups, particu-larly the Sioux, were not numerous. The Arikara were more niunerousand aggressive at that time and carried on constant warfare against Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 21their upstream neighbors. There were fewer Assiniboin and theyrarely wintered on the Missouri River upstream from the earth lodgevillages at and below Knife River. The Hidatsa and River Crowhunted on that stretch of the Missouri between the Knife and Yellow-stone Rivers and were numerous enough to withstand the Assiniboin.It was during this time that the Awaxawi moved upstream and at-tempted to build a permanent village above Knife River only to bedriven out by the Hidatsa. War broke out between them and wascontinued for 3 years during which time the Awaxawi moved down-stream near Fort Yates and built a village near the friendlier Cheyenne.This conflict with the Hidatsa and temporary residence below theMandan traditionally is prior to 1782, according to Bears Arm, as theAwaxawi were in the Painted Woods region during the first smallpoxepidemic.Awatixa traditions provide little information on their early historyand migrations, for they claim to have always occupied positions onthe Missouri, priQcipally around and upstream from Painted Woods(Washburn, N. Dak.). They have no traditions of permanent resi-dence elsewhere. It was in this area that they believe the clans andall of the rites relating to the Sacred Arrows originated. From allinformation provided by traveler accounts, Mandan informants, andAwatixa traditions, it appears that this group lived in that area forat least three centuries. They claimdd to be the descendants of an orig-inal population which came down from the sky to Charred Body Creeksituated a few miles below the present town of Washburn. Theirtraditional history is chiefly an account of the cultural developmentof tribal ceremonies pertaining to this vUlage site, the sites of theHensler-Sanger region, and site 34 at the mouth of the Knife River.References to legendary incidents occurring elsewhere are exceedinglyrare. They speak of moving downstream to the north bank of theHeart River while still a part of the Crow (Mountain or Western Crow)where certain incidents occurred prior to the removal of the latter tothe western Plains in company with a few Mandan families. Theyclaim Rock Viflage above the Knife River was built after the epidemicof 1782 when the Hidatsa consisted of both nomadic and agriculturalgroups. They also mention in the Waterbuster bundle myth, a tem-porary village built farther upstream and below Shell Creek. Thissite is said to have been built prior to the arrival of the Hidatsa-Crow.Nor are the Awatixa unique in claiming exclusive cultural developmentin one area along the Missouri River, having first been created thereby culture heroes who brought the original "parents" of the tribe downfrom the sky; some Mandans have a similar legend to account for theoriginal creation of the earth and the human population of the regionat the mouth of the Heart River.710-195?65 3 22 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194According to both Awatixa and Mandan traditions, once the originalpopulations were established, other related groups moved to the regionand joined them. There is much archeological evidence in the earthlodge sites of the area to support the general outlines of tribal historiesas given by native informants. Will (1946) has dated certain sites ofthe Heart Kiver region as representing an early agricultural popula-tion at the Huff site. On the basis of changes of frequencies of pot-tery types, I have shown that a continuous cultural developmentoccurred in that region even predating the Huff site (dated as 1485-1543) and continuing to the historic period (Bowers, MS.). Typo-logical differences exist between these earlier traditional Mandan sitesand those believed by both tribes to have been occupied by the variousHidatsa village groups. On the oldest identified horizons, the Mandansites show many middle Mississippi cultural traits. The Hidatsashow stronger Woodland influences. Mandan pottery had a highfrequency of plain or polished (body) wares while Hidatsa pottery hada high frequency of check-stamping and cord-roughening. Thesedifferences were less pronounced in the historical period sites. Man-dan village sites show fixed lodge arrangements with an open circle orceremonial area within the village, a specialized ceremonial lodge withstructural features of the older rectangular lodges, and the commonuse of bastions. The Hidatsa never preserved a fixed ceremonial areawithin the village, nor is there reference to lodge orientation withinthe camp area. Even in historic times, the Hidatsa had no cere-monial or tribal lodge for their ceremonies. Nor do those Hidatsasites known to have been occupied prior to the smallpox epidemic of1782 show well-defined fortifications, although the Mandan werebuilding strongly fortified villages before A.D. 1500.Trade sherds appearing in Mandan sites after 1550 indicate thatthe first Hidatsa groups, probably the Awatixa and their closestMountain Crow relatives, reached the Missouri about that time or alittle later. Awatixa pottery and culture in general were influencedby the Mandan far more than were Mandan cultural traits influencedby the AwatLxa, indicating that the first contacts were made by anAwatixa invading group fewer in number than the contemporaryMandan. That contacts were not entirely broken between the variousHidatsa-Crow groups is indicated by the close similarity in theirlanguages. If we assume a distribution of Hidatsa-Crow groups inaccord with their traditions (from the Red River and its western tri-butaries westward in the headwaters region of the Sheyenne and JamesRivers, the Turtle Mountains, the southern loop of the Mouse Riverand onto the Missouri upstream from Washburn, N. Dak., thencewestward onto the Little Missouri to its headwaters and the Yellow-stone River to the Powder River), we have an area which reveals ma- Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 23 terials of unusual uniformity. Temporary campsites found along therivers reveal pottery complexes characteristic of this older Hidatsaearth lodge culture on the Missouri. Temporary nonagriculturalsites are found east and west of the Missouri; permanent sites arefound on the lower section of the Sheyenne River where it emptiesinto the Red River and again in the Devils Lake region where evi-dences of agriculture are indicated. It appears that only in the cen-tral portion along the Missouri, around Devils Lake, and in the lowerSheyenne River region, was agriculture regularly practiced by theAwatLxa and Awaxawi. Evidences of occasional agriculture upstreamfrom the mouth of the Knife River is indicated by numerous smallstorage pits, scapula hoes, and charred corncobs. The corncobscould have been brought in by trade, but it is unlikely that scapulahoes and storage pits would have been used unless some agriculturewas practiced. The archeological evidence indicates that agriculturewas not important upstream from the Knife River until historic times,but earlier attempts at farming are indicated by numerous temporarysites in that region.The late prehistoric and protohistoric locations of the villagegroups comprising the Hidatsa tribe are pretty well defined bytraders and native accounts which can be authenticated by arche-ological record. The Awaxawi were intermediate in position on theMissouri to the Mandan and Awatixa, living in the Painted Woodsregion as agriculturalists. The Awatixa, though formerly mostintimately associated with the other agricultural groups, the Man-dan and Awaxawi, rather than with the nomadic Hidatsa-Crowgroups, were by this time in closer associations with the Hidatsa whooccupied the north bank of the Knife River and the area upstreamfrom that point. The final separation of the Hidatsa and the RiverCrow traditionally occurred during this period after a quarrel overthe disposal of a buffalo's paunch. The archeological record up-stream along the Missouri and Yellowstone Rivers, however, wouldindicate that this Hidatsa-Crow population was composed of numer-ous bands which gradually moved apart as some members took overagriculture while others remained on the Plains permanently ashunters.It would appear that even the Hidatsa-proper did not make thedecision to settle in earth lodge villages quickly but, rather, wereindifferent to agriculture for quite a while. The smallpox epidemicof 1782 and the westward movement of the Assiniboin and Siouxchanged the picture on the Missom"i; it was the sedentary peopleswho suffered most from smallpox. The more nomadic Hidatsa werecompelled to make a decision between reuniting with the River Crowor moving in with their linguistically closer relatives living near the 24 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194Knife River. It was during this period, 1782-1800, and as a resultof some serious losses at the hands of the Sioux, that the three Hidatsaand the nine or more Mandan village groups reorganized for mutualdefense. In 1790 a large force of Sioux attacked the Hidatsa; be-cause of the distance between the villages, the Awatixa at RockVillage and the Awaxawi, who had survived an attack on them and theNuptadi Mandan, were unable to provide assistance. Nevertheless,by 1796 the Mandan groups had aU moved out of the Heart Riverregion and had consolidated their position in a limited area immedi-ately below the Knife River Hidatsa villages.Close intervillage and intertribal cooperation developed. Onegroup of Arikara, who previously had had close ties with the AwigaxaMandan near the Grand River, moved north at this time and settlednearby at the Greenshield site opposite Washburn. They did notget along well with the other Mandan and Hidatsa groups and weresoon driven out. The Awaxawi had abandoned their village nearSquare Buttes after the epidemic of 1782 to live in one of the Mandanvillages. However, once the earth lodge population was concentratednear the Knife River, they moved into a village of their own (site 32)situated between the Mandan and Hidatsa. There they continuedto live as an independent village group until after the epidemic of 1837.They then abandoned their own village organization and united withthe Awatixa.The Hidatsa, Awatixa, and Awaxawi occupied the same village sitesbetween 1795 and 1837 although the Hidatsa-proper had some diffi-culty in integrating their population. Quarrels occasionally brokeout, one resulting in the building of Cherry Creek Village on the LittleMissouri River. These close contacts, between slightly different cul-tural groups of Hidatsas and Mandans endeavoring to preserve theirindependent village systems, resulted in the breakdown of culturaldifferences through intergroup borrowing and intermarriage. Never-theless, something of the cultural differences between these groups isstill preserved in native interpretations and traditions. The assimila-tion process of the Hidatsa groups was rapid after 1782.With the heavy losses suffered from smallpox in 1837, a secondperiod of reorganization followed. Many living at Hidatsa villageconsidered rejoining the River Crow. In fact, many did move therepermanently. Other Hidatsas from this village moved upstream whenthe epidemic broke out and built an earth lodge village near the mouthof the upper Knife River which they occupied until 1845. TheAwaxawi and Awatixa remained on the Knife near the Mandan until1845, when, in company with the Nuitadi Mandan, they undertookthe building of Fishhook Village where they were rejoined by manyHidatsa households. The problem of resolving several traditions was Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 25 not an easy one. None of the groups composing the population ofFishhook was sufficiently numerous to survive in an independentvillage. Were it not for the pressures of nomadic enemies, the rem-nants of each village would have lived alone. Those Hidatsa whowere unwilling to continue as agriculturalists at Fishhook moved westand united permanently with the River Crow.In the chapters that follow, through field investigations and inter-views with many Hidatsa informants, I have examined the cultures ofthe three original village groups, recorded cultural differences whereit was possible to do so, indicated something of the cultural elementscommon to the three groups, and have traced out in some detailthose cultural processes and native concepts of the history or "road"by which the Hidatsa groups achieved the cultiu*al status they knewwhen Fishhook Village was abandoned for the move onto the reserva-tion. The Hidatsa still (1932) think strongly in terms of these orig-inal village groups. HIDATSA SOCIAL ORGANIZATIONVillage and Tribal Organization and ActivitiesThe Hidatsa employed the term "chief" to designate anyone who,by virtue of his authority at any particular moment was recognizedas leader of a group of people, whether a segment of the village group,a village group, or the entire population of the three villages and suchother organized groups as might be residing with the Hidatsa at thatparticular time. Leadership was graded in much the same manneras was the male and female population comprising the age-gradesystem. The Hidatsa had, in 1932, a rather clear understanding ofthe character of the tribal leadership prior to the epidemic of 1837when the population lived in three independent villages. Accordingto my informants, these villages had had no tribal council until afterthe epidemic of the 1780's, as the villages were widely scattered alongthe Missouri and its tributaries and contacts were not numerous.At that time, the Awaxawi were below the Knife River near SquareButtes, and the Awatixa were in their old vUlage on the south bankof the Knife River where they had lived for a very long time. TheHidatsa-proper comprised a loose association of closely related bandsthat ranged northward along the Missouri and Lower Yellowstone,the Little Missouri, Mouse River, Turtle Mountains, and even theDevils Lake region. Occasionally the wandering Hidatsa groupswould all move back to the north bank of the Knife River to plantcorn but, just as often, they remained on the prairies during thesummer, hunting buffaloes. These northern Hidatsa bands collec-tively greatly exceeded the Awatixa and Awaxawi in numbers andconsistently resisted their efforts to move above the Knife River.Each Hidatsa band was under the leadership of a strong chief whohad considerable prestige with his group. The Awatixa, who hada traditional history of long residence in earth lodge villages on theMissouri, had a more complex vUlage system of chieftainships basedon hereditary bundles and offices, "ward" leadership to supplementand reinforce tribal chiefs, and clan inheritance of rights and privileges.The ceremonial aspects of their village life were organized around a26 Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 27 village or peace chief and the war activities around an outstandingwar leader. The Awaxawi, although sedentary like the Awatixa,lacked clan inheritance rights and privileges. The ceremonial andpeace functions at Awaxawi were vested in the Earthnaming bundleowner while the war activities were organized around the strongestwar leader.The smallpox epidemic of the 1780's greatly reduced the tribalpopulation, and the subsequent westward movement of the Assiniboincaused the Hidatsa and Awatixa village groups to attempt a union.At this time the Awatixa built Rock Village upstream from the KnifeRiver. The effort was unsuccessful because of conflicting bundlerights and the jealousy of the chiefs. After a few years, those whodesired to remain agriculturalists returned to the Knife River, TheAwaxawi left Painted Woods and built 2 miles below the mouth ofKnife River, the Awatixa were situated on the south bank of the Knife,and those Hidatsa who chose to ally with the other two village groupssettled on the north bank. A few Hidatsa families joined the Crow,and others followed them, a few families at a time, until after 1845.Except for the short residence at Rock Village, this was traditionallythe first time that the Hidatsa village groups had lived within a fewmiles of one another. This was done to offer better opportunities formutual defense and still retain the original village groups. The Hid-atsa lived in about 130 lodge or household groups, the Awatixa inapproximately 50 household groups, and the Awaxawi in about 20household groups. COUNCILSFor mutual defense against common enemies, around 1797 or 1798,the three villages established a tribal council composed of the mostdistinguished war leaders of each village. Council membership hasbeen reported by my informants as totaling 10, with the head chiefs ofHidatsa and Awatixa as additional members, and as 12 in number byCurtis (1907 a, vol. 4, p. 182) . Their duties were concerned only withgeneral matters concerning warfare and the mutual assistance of thevillages. They made peace with neighboring villages and discouragedefforts of the enemy to make alliances with one village to the exclusionof the others. This tribal council was first established before 1800and continued until the three village groups united to build FishhookVillage in 1845.When the smallpox epidemic broke out in 1837, the council wascomposed of the following men (according to Bears Arm who secured 28 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull, 194 this information from his father, Old-Woman-Crawling, who camefrom Awaxawi) : Hidatsa Village Clan membershipWolf Chief Three-clan moietyTwo Nights WaterbusterGives-Away-his-Arrows Prairie ChickenBloody AwaxenawitaRuns WaterbusterAwatixa VillageBlackens-his-Moccasins WaterbusterYoung-White-Bear MaxoxatiStirrup KnifeTwo Tails MaxoxatiAwaxawi VillageCrow Bull AwaxenawitaRoadmaker WaterbusterThis tribal council was composed of persons whose names commonlyappear in the journals of travelers and traders of that period. Thevillage representatives of the tribal council were outstanding individ-uals, respected primarily for their good judgment and mihtary ac-complishments, who were members of their respective village councilsfrom which they received their authority. When a member died orlost prestige, as in the instance of One-eyed Antelope who stole awoman and killed her husband when he returned from warfare toclaim her, the position was not filled until the next year at the time ofthe summer buffalo hunt and the NaxpikE ceremony. There were noregular meetings of the council. If one of the members had somethingto discuss with the others, he would have a feast prepared and thematter was discussed at that time. On other occasions, as when apipe bearer arrived for the purpose of arranging a peace treaty or thepeaceful admission of his band for trading, the council met to deter-mine the attitude of the people. The council frequently would refuseto discuss matters with young men of an enemy tribe, knowing thatsuch an arrangement did not carry the authority of the band leaders.It appears that the council also had an earlier understanding with theMandan, for in his journals of 1806, Alexander Henry wrote of aparty of Arikara that had arrived at the nearby Mandan villages toarrange a treaty:About 30 Big Bellies soon arrived on horseback, at full speed; they brought aninterpreter with them. This party consisted of some of the principal war chiefs,and other great men, who did not appear well pleased, but looked on the Pawneeswith disdain. After some private consultation they desired the Pawnees toreturn immediately to their own villages and to inform their great war chief,Red Tail, that if he sincerely wished for peace he must come in person, and thenthey would settle matters, as they were determined to have nothing to do with aprivate party of young men. [Henry, 1897, p. 335.] Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 29When it was not possible to arrive at a unanimous decision, thecouncil would endeavor to influence the minority group or a decisionwas postponed for a later date. Because of the numerical superiorityof the Hidatsa-proper the other two villages frequently gave in,particularly in matters concerned with the protection of the villages.This led early travelers to refer to the domination of the other twovillages by the Hidatsa-proper. This was probably only partly truefor either village group could have moved away and settled at any timeprovided they did not establish a permanent earth lodge village up-stream from the Hidatsa-proper. In matters for the common good,the council was an eft'ective organization. There was no tendency toinclude Mandan representatives in the council even though the twoMandan village groups lived only a few miles below the Awaxawi.Instead, the two tribes maintained independent councils which metjointly from time to time to discuss common problems. Each tribedefended the villages of the other tribe from attack and peace treatieswere not entered into by one tribe unless the other was included.With one exception, that of the Nuptadi who did not go upstreamwhen the other Mandan accompanied the Hidatsa groups in 1845 tobuild Fishhook, preferring an alliance with the nearby Arikara, thisrule was followed until the people went onto the Fort BertholdReservation.This federation of Hidatsa villages served a useful function inbreaking down the borders between village territorial grounds, thuseliminating one longstanding cause of intratribal friction. In 1750,the Awaxawi controlled the river region opposite the present town ofWashburn and hunted on the flats and along the small streams in thatregion, the Awatixa controlled the Knife River valley westward to-ward the Killdeer Mountains, and the Hidatsa claimed the regionalong the Missouri upstream from the mouth of the Knife River.When the three village groups settled on the Knife, however, separatevillage hunting grounds were no longer recognized. Each grouphunted on the others' territories or hunting parties were comprised ofhousehold groups from each of the villages. Nevertheless, theHidatsa-proper felt a prior claim to the region upstream from theKnife and consistently refused to permit the AwatLxa, the Awaxawi,or the Mandan to build earth lodge summer villages above them onthe Missouri. In 1845, because the wood had been largely consumedat the Knife River, the Hidatsa-proper contemplated moving up-stream to the Lower Yellowstone to join the River Crow. TheAwatixa, under Four Bears and Missouri, preferred to move to Fish-hook Bend and there build a permanent village. The former raisedno objection to a village at that point since they contemplated movingstill farther upstream. In the spring, however, when a trading post 30 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BuU. 194was established at that point, the Hidatsa-proper also decided tosettle there. The upstream position in relation to the other groupsof the Hidatsa was never relinquished. An attempt at this time toestablish a separate Hidatsa-proper village near the present town ofSanish, N. Dak., failed due to the greater strength of the Assiniboin.For a number of years after the three Hidatsa village groups imited atFishhook, each former village group continued to occupy a separatewinter village; in each instance we find the Hidatsa-proper occupyingthe upstream position. The Hidatsa-proper did not contribute to theorganization of the original "building" ceremonies at the time Fish-hook Village was built in 1845, these rites being largely performed bythe leaders of Awatixa, Awaxawi, and the Nuitadi Mandan, but theirstrength was not great enough to survive alone as an independentvillage group. Cultural differences between villages caused endlessfriction; the Awatixa and Awaxawi were more conservative than theHidatsa-proper in the preservation of longstanding organized rites,and the latter placed greater emphasis on individual vision experi-ences. When an opportunity arose to settle near a Government fortat Fort Buford shortly after 1870, many Hidatsa who had earlierfailed in maintaining a summer village near Sanish, again movedupstream to live. It is this group that now occupies the upstreamend of the Fort Berthold Reservation around Shell Creek.The stability of the original three Hidatsa groups is indicated bythe traditions and mythologies identified with these groups, thearcheological evidence of long residence in recognized village sites,and the persistence of the original groups in maintaining and pre-serving their identity in the face of forced union for mutual defenseagainst common enemies. One cannot say that they were primarilyeconomic groups, for if that were so, after the epidemic of the 1780*sthe Awatixa and Awaxawi collectively were not as numerous as eithervillage group had been before the epidemic. It appears to me fromnative accounts, that the reluctance to unite was due to differentcultural histories, differences in ceremonial and social organization,a strong sense of village solidarity, and the imwillingness of recognizedleaders to share their hard-earned positions with others of comparablestatus.Some of the cultural differences can still be identified from ananalysis of bundle rites and the traditional knowledge of the olderHidatsas. Since the Awatixa have contributed much to the cere-monial rites at the building of the last important vUlage, the FishhookVillage, some of the basic cultural characteristics of that group willbe indicated first. This Hidatsa group had traditions of long resi-dence on the Missouri; in fact, this group claims to have settled theearth from a village in the sky which distinguishes them from the Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 31 other two groups which claim a common kinship by virtue of a com-mon origin from the underworld. In spite of their traditional originfrom the sky, the oldest culture-bearing levels in the Awatixa sitesshow features which are characteristic of the other Hidatsa sites onthe Missouri as well as to the east and southeast of the region. TheAwatixa culturally occupied a position intermediate to the other twoHidatsa groups on one hand and the Mandan on the other. Thebasic Hidatsa-Awaxawi inheritance pattern of sacred rites and objectswas from father to son; the Mandan practiced clan inheritance ofbundles, particularly ancient tribal bundles. The Awatixa had adual system; that is, most bundles were inherited through a "father-to-son" relationship but a number of other important bundles were ownedby the clan and transmitted to another member when one holding thebundle died. The Waterbuster and Knife clan bundles were ownedcollectively by the clan members of Awatixa village. While living atthe Knife River, and after the other two bands had built villagesnearby, those of the same clan in the other villages at first claimed norights in the clan bundles; it was not until the three Hidatsa groupsunited at Fishhook in 1845 that clan rights extended to the othergroups. The Shell Robe belonging to the Prairie Chicken clan ofAwatixa was actually kept by the Mandan during the last century.Nevertheless, rights in the bundle were claimed by all Mandans ofthe Prairie Chicken clan regardless of the village they lived in, and bythe Awatixa. More recently, after imiting at the mouth of theKnife River, rights were extended to include persons of the PrairieChicken clan at Awaxawi and Hidatsa. The Awatixa, according totraditions, brought the Sun Dance (NaxpikE) down from the skyand taught the rites to the other Hidatsa groups. They shared withthe Mandan the custom of arranging skull circles near the scaffoldsfor the dead as shrines to the Sun Doing bundles and transportingback to the villages skulls of those who had died or had been killedwhen away from home. This custom was not generally practiced bythe other Hidatsa groups. They did not establish "mourners' camps"as did the Hidatsa and Awaxawi, rationalizing this practice by theother two groups on the basis of a quarrel?not a part of their culturalhistory?which occurred prior to the separation of the Hidatsa-properand River Crow.Awatixa village organization differed slightly from that of the otherHidatsa groups in the absence of an Earthnaming bundle with ritesdefining village hunting territory. It was claimed that the highestranking leadership was vested in the holders of the Knife clan bundle(Three-clan moiety) and the Waterbuster clan bundle (Four-clanmoiety): Stirrup and Blackens-his-Moccasins, respectively, just priorto 1837. The village had no open circle or lodge arrangement other 32 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194than the close grouping of lodges according to nearness of kin. Thevillage was, however, divided into four "wards," each under the super-natural protection of a prominent man selected for his part in theceremonies conducted for the gods of the direction which he repre-sented. These four men, known as "protectors of the people," wereesteemed ceremonial leaders and occupied a status position equal withthat of the two village chiefs and other select members of the villagecouncil distinguished either for their knowledge of sacred lore or fordistinction in warfare. Although the dual chieftainship of the Man-dan and the other Hidatsa groups prevailed, the distinction betweenwar and village chiefs was less evident due to the greater prestige ofthe Waterbuster and Knife clan bundles. The entire population wasorganized by the age-grading of both men and women. The BlackMouths served as police and enforced the regulations of the councilcomposed of older men.The Hidatsa-proper and Awaxawi village organizations differed fromthat of the Awatixa in many ways. Both groups traditionally arrivedrather recently on the Missouri. Since that time the Awaxawi werein intimate and continuous contacts with the Mandan, particularlythose at Painted Woods. According to traditions, the Awaxawi cameto the Missouri as a small agricultural group and settled in the PaintedWoods region. They represent the most diverse dialectic group andwere believed by Lewis and Clark to be a distinct tribe (Lewis, 1893,p. 196). During their short residence on the Missouri, they have beenon friendly terms Avith the Mandan with whom they cooperated in theperformance of tribal rites and, before reaching the Missouri, withvillage groups of agricultural Cheyennes near the headwaters of theRed River. In spite of dialectic differences and their greater emphasison agriculture, they more closely resemble the Hidatsa-proper cul-turally than either the Mandan or Awatixa. Hidatsa and Awaxawiclans apparently did not own ceremonial bundles; ^ all inheritance wasfrom "father" to "son." Authority was vested in a council of headmen who had attained eminence by the performance of rites or suc-cesses in warfare. The top leadership of the council was representedby the owner of the Earthnaming bundle, who organized the ritesrelating to the various buffalo-calling ceremonies which defined villagehunting territorial rights, and the principal war leader. Thus thesocioceremonial and the war-making activities of the village weresymbolically separate as represented by two head men. Tradition-ally, the top leaders of the ceremonial activities are said to have heldprecedence over the war leaders. In recent years, due to the increasedwar activities of the tribe in its struggle for survival, the war leader ? One exception?the notched sticks for the Tylng-the-Pots ceremony. Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 33took precedence and the owner of the Earthnaming bundle was hisrepresentative in the village. As at Awatixa, special leaders wereselected when the occasion arose: directing the summer hunt, manag-ing the winter camp, or traveling beyond the summer vUlage. Villageswere divided into four "wards" with a bundle owner, whose gods wereof the direction selected, serving as "protector of the people." TheBlack Mouths were subordinate to the council of older men and policedthe village.The village council was of indefinite size, since elevation to mem-bership was based on personal achievements and public acclaim.Although it was composed chiefly of those who had passed the BlackMouths in age, it was essentially a group of mature men. Since theBlack Mouths must be kept informed of council decisions, theyusually met together whenever any matters of great importance werebeing discussed. It was the privilege of each person to speak, butone's prestige was based chiefly on age and accomplishments; thosewith mediocre records carried little influence. If a young man witha good record presumed to influence the older men, they wouldusually say to him:You are young; you have a good record. Do not assume responsibilities ofthis kind too soon. If you seek to influence us, it may be that you are not ready.Then you might "kick the stone." There is plenty of time. When you areolder and have demonstrated your abiUty in other things, the people will wantyou to be their leader. In the meanwhile, be kind to the old and the very young;be industrious and generous. Do not ask to be our leader. If you do all thethings that a chief must do, the people will ask you to help when they think youare ready.The high respect for age indicated by the attitude of individualstoward their older brothers and fathers, an organized age-group to thenext higher one, and the buying of sacred bundles from older people,is expressed in the attitude of the people toward the councU. Nor-mally, one's position and prestige in the council was slowly attained.One who had distinguished himself in a chiefly way frequently did notattend meetings until he was called in to render an opinion or toassist in solving some difficult problem. Since to act as a group, allsub-groups and households should have a voice in decisions, importantmatters were frequently discussed for quite a time in order that allhouseholds might have an opportunity to express an opinion. In theorganization of the council the "crier" or announcer held an honoredrole comparable to that of "First Creator" in the ceremonies. Heannounced meeting dates and the purpose of the meeting so that eachhousehold could be adequately informed of the matters for discussion.It was the privilege of each household to send an older person toexpress opinions. In the event that a number of related householdsopposed the proposition, measures were taken to win their approval 34 JBUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194 or the matter was dropped. We find, for example, instances of peaceemissaries being received by the council but acceptance being delayeduntil those households which had recently lost members in warfareagainst the tribe had indicated their willingness to accept the peaceofferings. The council could not accept the peace plans if a householdrefused to approve. Usually, families were given horses and othergoods in considerable quantities as symbols of respect to the deadmembers of the households, at which time objections were withdrawn.Although on the surface these gifts may appear to outsiders as bribes,to these people the offering of gifts was a symbol of respect. If thereturned leader of an unsuccessful war expedition did not fast longenough or inflict personal torture sufScient to console the families ofthose killed, the council frequently was thwarted in its efforts to wintheir approval of the matters under discussion. In the face ofcontinued resistance by the households, the council was unable tofunction. Even as peace negotiations could not be completed exceptwith the approval of the interested households, neither could thevillage function as a unit in other matters. Thus, at best, the councilwas only as strong as the bond which held households together. Thecouncil could not prevent households from withdrawing from thevillage whenever they wished to establish independent villages.Through the police, however, it could enforce rules of behavior aslong as the household groups remained in the village.The attitude of a dissatisfied group obviously took a different formwhen enemies pressed them from all sides. On the other hand, agroup could lose prestige by making unreasonable demands. In-formants will say that decisions were always unanimous and that de-cisions were not made until a solution was reached that was acceptableto all. Nevertheless, we have a number of council decisions whichwere not unanimous and can observe the reactions that followed.Since conditions of warfare were difficult during the winter due todeep snows and the ease of tracking the enemy, pressures of enemygroups were not as great. Under these conditions, the village groupwas frequently unable to agree on a common winter camping area andsmall segments of the population would break away against the betterjudgment of the older and more experienced leaders. The councilcould not exert physical force to drive them back into the group butthey could throw the weight of tradition against them by publiclyinvoking the gods sending the winter buffalo to send them no buffaloes.Cherry Necklace was selected by a majority of the combined Hidatsa,Awatixa, and Awaxawi during the autumn of 1862 as "leader of thewinter camp" but was opposed by some households because he hadalready served in that capacity a few years earlier during which timemembers of these households died. These deaths were blamed on Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 35their leader since he was held accountable for any deaths or accidentsoccurring during the winter. Cherry Necklace could have reinstatedhimself in their esteem by "sacrificing" for the dead, that is, makingofferings of goods and fasting a short time away from the village, buthe chose instead to disregard the matter. Now he was chosen againby the other households because there had actually beenmany buffaloesin the vicinity of his camp aU winter but some families chose to opposehim on the grounds that he had brought them bad luck intentionallyas proved by his disregard for their deceased relatives. Thus a stale-mate developed and no compromise could be reached. They wentinto two winter camps: one under Cherry Necklace and the majorityof the population together with the police organization, and the othera few miles nearer the summer village. Rumor reached the un-organized camp that their relatives were concerned for the safety ofthis small group and that Cherry Necklace had pointed his pipe tothe north and invoked the gods of that direction to send the peopleback by sending the buffaloes only to his camp where the long estab-lished buffalo calling rites were being performed. Soon rumors alsoreached the little camp that Cherry Necklace had also pointed hispipe to the south and directed the Sioux to attack the undefendedcamp to bring them back. When the buffaloes came south to CherryNecklace's camp but did not continue southward to the other campand scouts discovered strange human tracks in the woods near thelittle camp, relatives went to the little camp and begged them to jointhem for mutual defense and offered them goods to show their respect,treating them as mourners.From the foregoing accounts, we have seen that prior to 1837,each village group had its own council and police force and operatedpretty much as an independent group with prescribed territory onthe Missouri for permanent summer villages and separate huntingterritory. The traditions indicate that the territory controlled wassharply reduced during the latter part of the 18th century due toepidemics and an intensification of warfare when neighboring groupsreceived firearms and moved westward into territory formerly con-trolled by these and the Mandan village groups. With the reductionof controlled territory, and the resettlement of the three village groupsnear the mouth of Knife River, a tribal council was estabhshed foreffective cooperation between village groups, its membership con-sisting of some 12 members of high status. This system was notof long existence, beginning shortly after the 1782 smallpox epidemicand ending with the union of the three village groups to build FishhookVillage in 1845.Various writers have written of the first building of FishhookVillage but the particular rites employed on this occasion have signifi- 36 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194 cance only when analyzed in the light of the former village systemsof the three Hidatsa and one Mandan group that comprised theoriginal population at the time of its founding. Each of thesevillage groups had suffered severe smallpox losses 8 years beforeand the intervening period was one of general disorganization. Nodoubt the original village groups would have remained independentand separate villages had the pressure of enemy groups slackened,for we have seen that although the Awaxawi numbered only 18 or20 households prior to the epidemic, they had shown no inclinationto assimilate with any of the other village groups. During thisperiod of social disorganization, the Hidatsa and Mandan villagegroups accepted the Arikara ^? as equal partners because of commonenemies, the Sioux. The three Hidatsa groups and the NuitadiMandan chose to move out of the Knife River region because woodwas getting scarce. One Mandan village group, the Nuptadi, pre-ferred to maintain an independent village near the Arikara ratherthan join with the Hidatsa. The Nuptadi Mandan group had manykinship bonds with the principal Yankton bands under MedicineBear, a Sioux chief, whose mother was a Nuptadi Mandan takenprisoner when the Sioux sacked and burned the village near PaintedWoods during the 1780's. She was a small girl at the time and wasreared by the Sioux, later marrying a Sioux. Her son distinguishedhimself and became head chief of one large band of Yankton. Itwas said that he always had a compassion for the Nuptadi Mandanand liked to visit them because he had so many relatives in thatvillage. Other Mandans taken prisoner at the same time and adoptedby the Sioux likewise claimed kinship with this Mandan group whichremained back at the Knife River when the Fishhook Village wasbuilt.The smallpox epidemic of 1837 had cut deeply into the earth lodgepopulation on the Upper Missouri; even a majority of the originaltribal council died at that time. Of the three Hidatsa village groups,the Awaxawi and Awatixa suffered the heaviest losses; this was dueto the nearness of their villages to the Mandan where the epidemicfirst broke out. At this time, the Hidatsa-proper were on one oftheir periodic upstream migrations and were dispersed into severalbands. The period 1837-45 was one of indecision; the Awatixaand Awaxawi were so few in numbers that they were obhged to seekassistance of the Mandan and Arikara for protection from the Sioux.The Hidatsa-proper, in part, lived in a strongly-fortified village northof the present town of Sanish while others moved westward and joinedwith the River Crow from whom they had separated when they 1" The Arikara were themselves the remnants of a large number of independent village groups. Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 37 adopted agriculture and settled at the Knife River. The Awatixa,with a long history of life in earth lodge villages, chose to remainagriculturalists as did the Awaxawi who were few in number andunable to maintain an independent village organization. TheNuitadi Mandan, finding conditions intolerable with the Arikara,who had moved in on them after the smallpox epidemic, indicated apreference for the Awatixa and Awaxawi near whom they had livedfor a long time and with whom some households were related throughmarriage.The Awatixa, Awaxawi, and Nuitadi Mandan then organized acouncil headed by Four Bears, son of Two Tails of the original council,who was at that time the most distinguished war leader. He wasentrusted with the physical defense of the people, and Missouriwas selected to organize the ceremonies of establishing the new vil-lage which was to be built upstream from the mouth of Knife Riverbut below the Hidatsa-proper. Although the selection of the siteis clothed in traditions, the Like-a-Fishhook Bend was an ideal sitefor defense. The role of the supernatural in determining where tobuild is indicated by the complete absence of references to the manyadvantages of the site for the summer village. It was on a low bendoverlooking the Missouri with the river at the edge of the village,steep banks on three sides, an abundance of timber growing in thevalley and reaching up to the edges of the village on two sides, suitablesoil for gardens in the timber, and a broad, flat, grassed prairie withan unimpaired view which extended back from the unprotected sideof the village where horses could be better protected while grazing.During the period 1837 to 1845 the Hidatsa were unable to operateas a tribal unit. The more sedentary Awatixa and Awaxawi pre-ferred to continue the old cultural pattern based on agriculture.The Hidatsa-proper, with a short traditional history of agricultureon the Missouri after separating from the River Crow with whomthey had still maintained close contacts on the Missouri above KnifeRiver, preferred to accept an invitation to rejoin the Crow. Whenthe final decision was made and the site of the new village had beenselected, the Hidatsa-proper were ready to move upstream in thespring and separate permanently from their more agricultural rela-tives. Some Awatixa and Awaxawi families, however, decided toabandon agriculture and move upstream, while several Hidatsa-proper famihes moved downstream to continue agriculture.BoUer (1868, p. 242) gives essentially the same account of theevents leading up to the building of Fishhook Village. He wrote: ... At last they determined to seek the Crows and unite with them again.They deserted their village, abandoned their corn-fields, left the bones of those710-195?65 1 38 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194 once loved and lost, and severing all old ties, crossed to the east shore of theMissouri, and started on their pilgrimage.It was in the fall when they arrived at the site of the present village. TheFour-Bears thought it would be a good place to winter in, ... . When springcame, the Fur Company's steamboat arrived, and at the urgent solicitation ofthe Indians, a trader was left with a few goods.The squaws cut and dragged timber for a fort; the Gros Ventres gave up theiridea of rejoining the Crows, ....Although the original Hidatsa village group broke up at this timethey took little part in the village-building ceremonies. The topchieftainship was patterned after the former Awatixa village systemin which the Waterbuster clan owner was village chief and Missouriwas selected to manage the ceremonies of laying out the vUlage anddesignating the ward leaders or "protectors of the people." The warchief was likewise selected from this village group, Four Bears beingselected for that position.The top leadership in 1845 when the village was built was asfollows:Head Chiefs.?Missouri River from Awatixa, village chief andkeeper of the Waterbuster clan bundle; Four Bears from Awatixa,war chief and owner of rights in Daybreak and Sunset Wolf ceremonialbundles; and Big Hand from Awaxawi, First Creator impersonatorand announcer for the chiefs.Protectors of the People.?Big Cloud (Fat Fox) from Awaxawi,Thunder bundle and protector of the east direction; Bear-Looks-Outfrom Awaxawi, Old-Woman-Who-Never-Dies bundle and protectorof the south direction; Bobtail Bull from Awatixa, Thunder bundleand protector of the west direction; Bad Horn from Hidatsa, Bearbundle and protector of the north direction; and Big Hand fromAwaxawi, vUlage announcer.This group was entrusted with the supernatural protection of thevillage. Four Bears, the war chief, took no part in the ritual organiza-tion of the village other than outlining the limits of the area on whichlodges were to be built. In deference to the wishes of the Mandanfamilies, they laid out an open-circle area within the village near theriverbank on the southwest section of the village which was reservedfor their ceremonies, sacred cedar, and ceremonial lodge. TheMandan were organized independently by the Okipa members underthe direction of Big Turtle and Flying Eagle. The Mandan did nothave enough households to complete the open circle and others alsoselected lodge sites there.From the time of its first construction, the village life was a com-promise of several village systems. A distinct ceremonial center withlodge orientation had never before been reserved in Hidatsa villagesfarther downstream, according to native traditions. This is borne Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 39 out by archeological evidence in the three villages at the Knife, FortClark Station, Bagnall, Gaines, Mile Post 128, Upper Sanger, andother traditional sites, although the surface evidence at UpperHidatsa site 35 suggests a small area not occupied by lodges. Thestill distinguishable large open circle described by Kurz (1937),Boiler (1868), and Matthews (1877) at Fishhook Village, suggests thevillage arrangement of a dozen or more Mandan sites found betweenthe mouth of the Knife and Cannonball Rivers, some of which wereoccupied as early as the 15th century. The open-circle area hadnever been considered a sacred phenomenon by the Hidatsa as it wasby the Mandan; even today there is no religious taboo againstdescribing it although the writer sometimes encountered this in hiswork with the Mandan. Nevertheless, it was a convenient place toassemble on social and ceremonial occasions. Although the Hidatsanever performed tribal rites at the sacred cedar, as did the Mandanon all ceremonial occasions, the Mandan ceremonial lodge situatedadjacent to the open circle to the north and facing the sacred cedarbecame increasingly popular with the Hidatsa. Because of its greatsize, the performance of ritualistic feasts formerly held in any largeearth lodge were often held in this lodge.The council continued to be the principal policy-making body.Any chief could call a council meeting merely by preparing a feastfor its members. The village was occupied only during the summerperiod while the gardens were being cared for; the population wouldleave in late fall for the eagle-trapping camps and winter villageswhen the danger of massed attacks against them lessened. At firstthe population tended to retain its identity according to the fouroriginal village groups from which it was derived. The council wasselected from the population at large without regard to originalvillage origin, the only qualifications being that one was in the age-group above that of Black Mouths and had distinguished himselfin warfare or had participated in recognized ceremonial and socialactivities. Until the Nuptadi Mandan joined the earlier populationat Fishhook, one large Black Mouth society functioned to preserveorder until the population went into winter camps. The societythen broke up into separate camp segments based on their originalvillage ties.Unless enemies were numerous, it was customary even as late asthe 1860's for the Hidatsa to go into three separate winter campsand the Mandan into a fourth some distance away. In some in-stances the camps were many miles apart, at other times only a fewhundred yards apart; nevertheless this breaking up into separatecamps, however close they were, was a device for expressing eachgroup's feeling of "separateness." There were intergroup gambling 40 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194 contests for adults and games of skill for the children, but in the sum-mer village the population was intermixed so that an outsider wouldscarcely have been able to detect the existence of different socialgroupings.Under the direction of the council, the village was fortified. Alarge bell was obtained and rung each day by a Black Mouth toannounce that the gates were open for the horses to go to pasture.The bell was again rung in the evening to announce that the gateswere soon to be closed and that the people should come in from theirwork. Once the gate was closed, all sections of the village wereguarded to keep out intruders, and only those who could be identifiedwere admitted. Unauthorized war parties were forbidden to goout and the rewards of their successful expeditions were depreciated.LEADERSWarIt was in this atmosphere that Fishhook was first built and ad-ministered until the last Mandan village group and the Arikarasettled at the village after 1860. Prior to that time, the people atFishhook were largely at the mercy of the Assiniboin and Siouxwhose war parties against the Arikara and Nuptadi Mandan livingbelow the Knife were harbored and fed both going and coming andthe group felt obliged to tolerate them?even though it was commonfor a young man to be sent out on the sly to warn the people down-stream. During this time several large-scale attacks were made onthe village, each of which was driven off under the skillful leadershipof Four Bears who is today still considered one of their most dis-tinguished v/ar chiefs. The role of the village or religious leadershas been largely obscured by the numerous exploits and the braveryof this military leader. His prestige was so great that all respectedhim as the savior of the village. Before his death in 1861, he hadconvinced the Nuptadi Mandan and the Arikara that their positionwould be more secure if they came to Fishhook to make their per-manent home away from the Yanktons who greatly outnumberedthem and were determined to extend their range northward from theHeart River to include the large Painted Woods bottoms admirablysuited for winter camps.The role of the council has been largely obscured by the socialstature of this Hidatsa leader, but numerous incidents reflect theinfluence of the bundle owners expressed in the objective acts of thewar chief. At the time the Arikara were invited to move north andjoin the other earth lodge people at Fishhook, they chose to buildinstead on the opposite bank in two separate villages and with thatend in view "planted" their medicines there. That is, they had Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 41 covered certain tribal bundles, indicating that the villages shouldbe erected at that spot. The Hidatsa-Mandan council sent wordacross with Four Bears that the Arikara should move across andbuild with the others but they told this delegation that they hadput their medicines in the ground at that place and planned to buildthere. Then the bundle owners entrusted with the rites of the "protection of the people" selected Wooden Bowl to take the pipeto the Arikara and ask them to come but they still refused to acceptthe pipe. Standing before them, Wooden Bowl raised his pipe soall could see, saying, "My medicine is the bear who lives above.These people have refused to take the pipe so I ask you, my god, tosend them across in four days."Wooden Bowl returned and told the people how he had invokedhis god, the bear, to compel the Arikara to comply with the orderssent across by Four Bears and his council. In a few days a largeparty of Sioux came and camped beside the Arikara. They gotalong very well for a few days and then a quarrel broke out betweenan Arikara and a Sioux in which both tribes became involved. TheMandan and Hidatsa crossed to the aid of the Arikara even thoughthey had "called down the gods" on them with the result that theSioux were driven off. Then the Arikara crossed and joined theHidatsa and Mandan where they remained until the reservation wasestablished.On another occasion, the Hidatsa were informed in 1851 that theyshould send representatives to Fort Laramie for the purpose of enteringinto a treaty with the Government concerning tribal territory.Again we find the real authority asserting itself in the persons ofthose bundle owners possessing supernatural powers. Among thesewere the two Earthnaming bundle owners whose rites were concernedwith certain hills and other landmarks believed to be the homes ofvarious supernatural beings, foremost of which were those believedto be connected with the increase of the buffalo herds. When thedelegation was selected with Four Bears as leader. Guts and PoorWolf instructed him relative to tribal territorial claims based onthe area traditionally associated with their bundle rites. It was onthe basis of this information that the delegation entered into a treatywith the Government.A chief was considered great if he could command the respectof the village for a long time. The principal war chief's positionand reputation varied according to residence. He was essentiallya summer chief and connected with the summer village life duringwhich time warfare was actively conducted. Although he wouldstiU be an important person during the winter period, when warfarewas usually discontinued, the winter chief or leader of the winter 42 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194camp took precedence over all other males. Unlike the winter chief,who was appointed annually and rarely succeeded himself, the prin-cipal war chief continued as long as he retained the good will andrespect of the entire community. When dissatisfaction developed,the tactful chief invited in those who expressed opposition to himin an effort to dissipate conflict, showed other evidences of generosityand good will, or suggested that others take over his work. He wasstill an important member of the council. In any event, when theprincipal war chief grew old he tactfully relinquished his position toa younger man who had passed Black Mouth age.When Missouri River grew old and his Waterbuster clan or Skullbundle was relinquished to Small Ankles, the latter never attainedthe eminence of the former owner. The top ceremonial leadershipreverted to the system formerly in practice at Hidatsa and Awaxawiwhere the principal role was delegated to the owner of the Earth-naming bundle. Since, with the union of the Hidatsa-proper andAwaxawi, two bundles were in existence, complications developed.Guts, who came from Hidatsa village, was a much older man thanPoor Wolf, the bundle owner from Awaxawi, and should have heldseniority, but he had the reputation of bringing bad luck to all warparties he accompanied. None would follow him as war leaderand the warriors tried to keep him from accompanying them. Intime, people thought that he had committed some errors when buyingthe bundle and his prestige was very low indeed, however hard hetried to win successes in warfare. Poor Wolf, the other bundle owner,although a younger man, had some military successes. He wasalways kind to the old and the poor, and had bought rights in this andseveral other bundles. He was active in many additional ceremoniesand showed great interest in the people's welfare. He was selectedas principal village chief after he had shown good judgment whileserving as one of the leaders of the BlackMouth or police society. Withthe death of Four Bears and the selection of Crows Paunch as warchief. Poor Wolf became the village chief over the objections of theyounger men still in the Black Mouth society. Guts then relinquishedhis rights in the Earthnaming bundle to his son, Bobtail Bull, of theyounger set who had a good reputation in every way and none of thebad luck that had plagued his father. Bobtail Bull was very popularwith his own age-grade group and was a recognized leader of theyounger "set" as Poor Wolf was of the next older age-group. Asholder of the Earthnaming bundle of the former Hidatsa village on theKnife, he was held in high respect by those formerly belonging to thatvillage. By tribal custom when all other things were equal, prece-dence was given to age. Poor Wolf rightfully occupied a positionsuperior to Bobtail BuU, who was some 10 years younger, but each Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION" 43had an Earthnaming bundle although from two different villages onthe Knife River. This was a new situation, for in the old villagesthere was only one bundle to a village and it could not be subdivided.Opposition to Poor Wolf and Crows Paunch came largely from theformer Hidatsa village group with short traditional permanentvillages, for this group was traditionally more hke the Crow withfewer formal ceremonies. The Awatixa and Awaxawi had placedgreat emphasis on the formal ceremonies of long traditional existenceas the basis for societal welfare and indicated that, with the exceptionof Bobtail Bull, the others had not made outstanding contributionsto the ceremonial life of the village. The younger men replied thatthis was true but that they had done individual fasting and had morescalps, war honors, and stolen horses than those who were alwayshanging around the village begging goods of their relatives to pay forthe ceremonies. It was in this atmosphere that the people livedduring the latter part of the 1860's. Under other circumstances,one group would have broken away until the differences had beenreconciled but this was impossible at the time because of the pressurefrom the Sioux.During this time the conservative element centered its attack onCrow-Flies-High whose relations with Bobtail Bull were essentiallythat of a war chief to the village chief except that this relationshipdid not have universal approval. Crow-Flies-High's parents had diedduring the smallpox epidemic of 1837 and he was reared by womenof his clan. His father was the owner of an Old-Woman-Who-Never-Dies bundle which was "put away" when he died. While fasting as ayoung man, Crow-Flies-High dreamed of the bundle which wasinterpreted as a supernatural instruction to perform the rites andtake up his father's ceremonial rights with the tribe. Instead, hemade up a personal bundle of those articles seen in his dream andotherwise disregarded tribal practices of "taking up the father'sgods." Thus, the old "holy" men got neither a big feast nor fine goodsand Crow-Fhes-High received neither promises of success in warfareand everything that he undertook nor the promise that he wouldsome day become a chief. Still, he was very successful whenever hewent out to war whether under someone else or as his own leader.The older men said that his luck would surely give out, but it neverdid. Fearing that he would lead the young men to their deaths, theold men would advise the young warriors not to go out with Crow-Flies-High; but they would sneak out and return with war honors.All this was very disturbing, for Crow-Flies-High and his friendBobtail Bull were both members and leaders of the Black Mouth societyas well. 44 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194To reinforce their positions, Crows Paunch and Poor Wolf selectedfrom the council four men older than themselves to serve as "pro-tectors of the people" according to ancient custom, but many ofthe younger group ridiculed these four men, calling them, "protectorsof our chiefs who are no good." About this time, the Governmentestabhshed Fort Buford near the mouth of the Yellowstone andyounger men from the village served as scouts. Trouble broke outat the village when the Government rations were being distributed;some younger men accused Crows Paunch and Poor Wolf of showingfavorites and retaining too large a share for their own famihes. Fightsbroke out, but Bobtail Bull quickly asserted himself as leader of theopposition and urged moderation. He promised that if his supporterswould take no drastic steps or resort to j&ghting, he would serve astheir peace chief, take them upstream, and ask the Government forpermission to build a village near the fort. Since there were manybuffaloes farther west and the young men could get positions as scouts,he felt that the people would be happier there. The next day hisfollowers commenced packing and left the village shortly thereafter.Some Mandans discovered that they too had not been treated fairlyby their chiefs in the distribution of goods and decided to go alongalso. At this time, the Mandan had two sets of head men: thoserepresenting the Nuitadi Mandan who came to Fishhook in 1845when the village was first built, and those of the Nuptadi Mandanwho arrived in the early 1860's. Flying Eagle, the chief of theNuitadi Mandan, also decided to go upstream, for the people nolonger recognized his authority and talked about him when he wasnot present, saying that he was selfish. A few Mandan famihes wentwith him.The character of this conflict expresses numerous situations whichwould have taken a different form in former times. In the firstplace, it was wrong for younger men to question the authority of theolder men, irrespective of their relative ceremonial and militaryachievements. This questioning of authority led to the fast break-down of the age-grade structure. A drift away from the organizedand formal public rites was indicated by the willingness of young mento go to war with one who had not obtained his full military authorityin the customary way. Although the practice of seeking personalsupernatural guidance was characteristic of the Crow and numerousother adjacent tribes, the Hidatsa had gone one step further and hadmade supernatural quests a prerequisite for entrance into the formalbundle rites having group recognition and participation. A finalpoint was the length of the feud and the unwilhngness of either groupto take the customary steps to separation into a separate camp, eitherpermanently or until the differences had been corrected, knowing that Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 45 should the smaller group move away and suffer severely from enemyattacks, their leaders would lose face and those who followed themwould be ridiculed by their relatives who had wisely taken no partin the separation.In this instance, the separation "worked." The group had theprotection of the U.S. Government. Buffaloes were numerous, so thepeople lived well. In fact, there was an upstream migration ofindividual families to join the group, which was an affront to theleadership at Fishhook. More than that, the four "protectors of thepeople" named did not prove to be wise selections; Sitting Elk murderedEdge-of-Rock in a drunken brawl. This disposed of two members ofthe group: Edge-of-Rock, who was dead, and Sitting Elk, who wasbanished and taken in by the U.S. Army stationed at Fort Stevenson.Of the other two members, Knife, the Long Arm impersonator of theNaxpikE ceremony, moved to Fort Buford and joined the BobtailBull group; Cherries-in-Mouth had family troubles and with no wivesto provide big feasts for his friends was no longer able to entertainand people no longer sought his advice.This was the situation at the time that the Government was takingover the social and economic life of the Hidatsa. The two groupsvisited back and forth and assisted each other in the performance ofceremonies. There was no thought of intergroup warfare and neithergroup defended those who got into trouble at home. The relationshipbetween villages was essentially the same as existed a century earlierwhile living in the three villages on the Knife River. There was ageneral drift away from the formal public ceremonies at Fort Bufordwhile the other group continued about as before. In time, Crow-Flies-High as military leader assumed the principal role as had FourBears a number of years earlier; Bobtail Bull, as village or peacechief was not so frequently mentioned. At the present time, thedescendants of this group live largely in the Shell Creek section of thereservation and are spoken of as the Crow-Flies-High band. Theystill consider themselves to be a separate group which had its originseveral centuries earlier when they separated from the River Crow tooccupy the river section north of the mouth of the Knife River.Summer CampThe accounts given above have been devoted to the three originalvillage groups, the Hidatsa, the Awatixa, and the Awaxawi. Thesewere the summer village groups which were formerly further sub-divided into winter groups until the pressure of enemies and reducednumbers caused further integration so that the summer and villagepopulations were composed of the same households. The social,ceremonial, and economic life of the summer village was more complex 46 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194than that of the winter camps, even in later years when the populationof each summer village occupied the same winter camp. Summer wasa period of intensive activity for the women and many of the oldermen in the gardens, planting and caring for the growing crops of corn,beans, squash, and sunflowers. There were corn scaffolds to buildor repair, former seasons' crops to be restored, cache pits to be built,and many other duties relating to the production, curing, and storingof the crops. This was the period of small hunting expeditions intothe adjacent areas and one large communal summer hunting expedi-tion organized so as not to interfere with the caring for the gardens.Summer was also the period of greatest war activity. When thelast snows were thawing, the rivers were clear of ice, the horses hadregained their strength, and the men talked of warfare ; even those tooold or too young to participate actively talked about it. Thoseintending to go out cried and fasted on the prairie, offered feasts tothe older men for assurances of successes and advice, and looked totheir riding equipment and ceremonial bundles as plans were formu-lated to leave the villages in search of their enemies. Simultaneously,enemy groups moved from their wintering grounds to the summerranges while their young men made similar plans to raid the Hidatsaand other earth lodge villages. Although the Hidatsa emphasizedwarfare and encouraged the young men to carry on continuous warfareagainst their enemies, and all males hoped to show pubhcly symbolsof their military accomplishments, it was necessary for the village attimes to restrict military activities so that enough able-bodied menwere always at hand to defend the aged, the women, and the childrenfrom attacks on the village. In these situations the role of the topleadership, the council, and the dual chiefs armed with the authorityof public opinion, becomes evident; a war leader asked to remain inthe village when many parties were out was acclaimed as highly asthose who had returned with military honors. Since the protectionof the village was primarily the duty of the Black Mouth society, thestatus of that group which effectively protected the village fromattacks was greatly enhanced; its members automatically becamemembers of the council when rehnquishing their society to the pre-ceding age-group. Not only must the village be defended fromattack but the women must be protected while working in theirgardens or getting wood. All these activities required close integra-tion of the entire population.This was the period of greatest ceremonial activities. All of thecorn, snake, and rain rites were performed at that time; likewise theNaxpikE (Sun Dance) and Wolf rites were held during the hottestpart of the summer. The Hidatsa liked a well-performed ceremonybut, by virtue of the inheritance pattern, there were frequently more Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGAlSriZATION 47ceremonies promised than it was possible to perform adequately.In these situations, the older men could postpone the performance ofa particular rite until the succeeding year simply by informing thepledger that "since you have pledged the ceremony, it is the same asthough you had gone through with it." The postponement had thesanction of the group and the authority of the council was neverquestioned. Informants say that to question the authority of thecouncil would have brought bad luck which was just what the pledgerwas endeavoring to avoid by pledging the ceremony. Village esti-mations of young men's bravery and fortitude were made largely onthe basis of observations of the older men at the important summerceremonies. When the population occupied the three villages at theKnife River, there was a large measure of competition betweenyouths of different villages to outdo each other in the endurance ofpain and the old people would encourage this competition by tellingtheir young men that they should be brave and not show any signsof fear in the presence of their people from the other villages or ofenemy groups who might be present.The summer camps were situated on grassed terraces above woodedbottoms and out of the reach of floods. The construction and mainte-nance of these villages was a greater task than was necessitated bythe winter villages. The large summer earth lodges, large dryingscaffolds, and the storage pits all demanded a great deal of labor.During later years there were fortifications to build and maintain.In time, fuel became a problem and it was necessary to rely more ondriftwood or trees and branches cut from timber farther upstreamand floated down to the villages. Nevertheless, the stability of,and the long residence in, these summer villages is indicated by nativetraditions substantiated by travelers' accounts, the depth of refuseaccumulation, and the concentration of lodges on their village sitesat the Knife River and downstream along the Missouri to the vicinityof Square Buttes. Intertribal VisitsBoth intratribal and intertribal contacts were most numerous duringthe period of summer village occupation. Visits were both economic(alien groups came to trade for garden products) and social in char-acter. At this time it was necessary to watch the hotheads to preventquarrels, and to protect the village should trouble threaten. TheBlack Mouths met continuously during the visiting period, forbadeyoung men to leave on war expeditions lest the village be left defense-less, and frequently recalled parties outside the village when wordwas received that an ahen group was approaching. There werealso continuous contacts with other Hidatsa village groups and the 48 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194Mandan. In later years such visits were deemed a necessity in thewinter camps also, occasioned by the proximity of enemy wintercamps attracted by nearby trading posts.The Hidatsa visited alien groups a great deal, even those groupsagainst whom they conducted intermittent warfare. There werenumerous friendships between individual Hidatsas and members ofalien bands who customarily came to the villages to trade for corn.In return, a prominent Hidatsa would pledge a return visit at somefuture date at a rendezvous out on the prairies. As far as I know,these smaU group visiting trips were only to those bands whichcame regularly to the villages to trade. A Hidatsa would selectas a "son" a prominent member of the visiting band, usually theleader of the band, and announce that he would come to visit some-time during the summer. In the interim both "father" and "son"would prepare the goods and paraphernalia necessary for the adoptionceremonies. The father would first prepare, or have prepared bysome member of the Adoption Pipe fraternity, the principal ceremonialobject; a wooden pipestem decorated with redheaded woodpeckerscalps, eagle feathers, and horsetail hair hanging as a scalp. Hewould also secure a good buffalo horse, complete sets of clothingfor the son and family, and other fine presents such as robes, guns,and bows and arrows. In the accumulation of the necessary things,he received assistance from his own and related households, andfrom the members of his own clan and age-grade groups.When the time came for the adoption rites to be given, frequentlya large part of the village indicated a desire to go along for the purposeof trading corn for robes, horses, and other things. The father inthe adoption rites became the leader of the party since it was hisceremony. If a large number of families were involved, includingsmall children, and the trip would take them through enemy territory,the party was organized in essentially the same manner as the summerbuffalo hunt. Since the party was burdened with sacks of corn andother garden products, they traveled slowly. The leader was re-sponsible for the safety of his party and invariably employed thoseBlack Mouths in the party to assist in the policing of the group.If the leader was especially popular and the group represented mostof the village population, the Black Mouths accompanied themas the recognized police force while the defense of the village wasleft to those left behind and the men of an adjacent village.One adopting a son of an alien group endeavored to make a gooddisplay of wealth, and his relatives would feel obliged to go alongand assist him in his efforts lest the enemy groups think little ofthe Hidatsa. If a man had little following and the others thoughtthat his trip was unwise, it was usually canceled on the advice of Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 49the older men and the rites were held when the alien group cameto the village. Nevertheless, trips, sometimes involving a largepercentage of the village population, went far out onto the prairieseven as far as the Black Hills and Powder River, traveling as anorganized group and through territory occupied by unfriendly groupsto reach the band where the adoption was to be made. To commandthe confidence of a large party, the leader must have distinguishedhimself on former occasions. To lead a party far from home on oneof these combined adoption and trading expeditions added greatlyto one's reputation. Frequently, the top leadership of the summervillage and other adjacent Hidatsa or Mandan villages went alongon these trips but their social position at the moment was inferiorto the one who had organized the party and they were subject tothe same rules as the others. The leader surrounded himself duringthe trip with the other distinguished men of the tribe; they met athis lodge to eat, smoke, and discuss the affairs of the day. In allmatters of procedure, however, he was the final authority, for hewas responsible for the safety of the most distinguished chiefs aswell as the women and children.Arriving at the enemy camp, he set up a separate camp in a circle,policed the camp lest the young men get into quarrels, and directedthe negotiations with the alien group. The people looked to himfor instructions through his announcer as on the summer hunt. Eigiddiscipline was necessary to avoid quarrels or, if quarrels broke out,immediate steps had to be taken to settle them before they got outof control. Although the rules of hospitality prescribed that onewho had entered the camp or village and had been fed and shelteredwas to be protected, young men sometimes did not observe theserules. For that reason, the police authority was important in keepingone's own group from committing an unfriendly act which wouldinvolve the safety of the entire party. One who had wide "relation-ships" with alien groups and could bring them to the villages totrade for corn enjoyed a high prestige. Leadership of trading partiesprovided one of the avenues by which Hidatsa chieftainship wasdeveloped.Sometimes, however, smaller groups of related households traveledout from the villages for the purpose of visiting "friends" in neigh-boring tribes. Although small groups did not go far from the villages,care had to be taken against attack by an enemy war party. In-stances of the attack and extinction of these small parties must havebeen rare indeed, for informants could recall few traditional examples.These small visiting groups were never as elaborately organized asthe summer camp. The character of the organization was determinedby the size of the party and the likelihood of being attacked. If the 50 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194party was merely a group of individuals accepting invitations tocome visiting, usually the most distinguished war leader was selectedor the people accepted his leadership without the formality of aselection. More often, however, these visits were for a specific pur-pose ; to invite the alien group to come to trade, to observe ceremonies,to partake in the winter hunts, or to instruct the Hidatsa in someceremony or dance which appealed to them. Although the grouplacked the formal organization and specialization of duties so charac-teristic of the summer camp, the essential features were there: aleader was appointed or one assumed that position by virtue of hispersonality and prior experiences; the older men were consulted whencrises arose; and younger men served as scouts. The principaldifference was the absence of an organized police group. Beingbetter able to travel unobserved, the party avoided battle by seekingcover, and prohibiting noises and fires whenever, in the opinion ofthe leader and the older men, the situation warranted. One wonderswhy, in view of the teachings of the older men when the youth of thevillage were seeking supernatural guardians, these measures weretaken. Evidently, the Hidatsa were practical about these religiousmatters. SuMMEE HuntOne of the most important activities of the summer camp was thesummer buffalo hunt which, invariably, affected the entire tribe.These hunts were not tribal activities in the manner of the Plainsnomadic groups, who assembled as a unit during the summer for thelarge buffalo hunts and tribal Sun Dance activities, but rather avillage activity in which all except the old participated. It was arecognized unit of the total social and economic activities of thevillage and seems to have been a custom of long standing. Afterthe corn had reached knee-height, and the fixed summer rites suchas the NaxpikE and Wolf Ceremonies had been performed, there wasa slack period of about a month before the time came to harvest thecrops. The summer hunt was designed to come at this time. Informer times, it was often customary to go out 100-200 miles fromthe village to cure meat and hides, leaving behind an older womanof each household, the small children, and enough older men to defendthe village from burning. In later years, with reduced numbers andvillages closely built for mutual defense, groups cooperated for thedefense of the villages and older people. Either the older peoplewould move to one village, or they would keep in close touch witheach other, or one village would not go out until the others hadreturned.The older men planned the summer hunt several months in advancefrom reports of war parties and others who had been out from the Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 51 villages to learn the disposition of enemy camps as well as the locationof the herds. From this information they determined the regionwhere the hunt would be held. The principal problem was that oftransporting the cured meat and hides.The summer herds generally were largest to the southwest of KnifeRiver between the KjUdeer Mountains and the Black Hills, but theproblem of transportation overland was greater than when the huntwas held upstream from the summer villages, for then the hidescould be used for boats and the cured meat could be floated down tothe villages. If the reports indicated an abundance of buffaloesadjacent to the Missouri or its larger tributaries, the Hidatsa preferredto go in that direction. However, the buffaloes usually?especiallyafter a severe winter?left the river valleys, which had been strippedof all grass, to summer on the higher lands away from the principalstreams.Some time before the village group was to leave on the hunt, thecouncil of older men selected a hunt leader. Although all men aspiredto be selected as leader once, many never received that distinctionchiefly because there were too many eligible for the honor. Theselection was made on the basis of one's personal record; he shouldfirst of all be one who had been a successful "leader of the hunters" ona former summer hunt, have the buffalo represented in his sacredbundle, and have the confidence of the group. This leadership wasan outlet for those who had not been previously afforded the distinc-tion of serving as leader of the whole group. As a rule, former wintercamp leaders were not selected or, if they were considered, they usuallydeclined in favor of one who had not as yet been so recognized. Theprincipal war leader was rarely selected and his role was a subordinateone during the period of the hunt.The council considered different men until one could be selectedwith unanimous agreement of the group. Rarely did a minoritygroup hold out, for it was believed that when the people quarreledover the selection of the leader, bad luck would surely follow. Thefear of responsibility for prolonged debate was sufficient to quicklybreak down most opposition. As soon as the leader was selected, thecouncil's announcer called the name of the leader and the time ofdeparture. Although the council delegated authority to direct thegroup, the wise leader solicited the assistance of the council as repre-sentatives of the various households in order that he could keep inclose contact with his group, learn their difficulties of travel, andknow of their wishes. Once the leader was selected, and before theparty left for the hunt, his lodge became headquarters for the council.The old men would drop in through the day to eat and discuss detailsof the contemplated hunt. Some would tell of a household with no 52 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194horses or riding gear, of others whose men had all been killed in arecent battle, and of the little problems of preparation for the trip.A good leader was one who could organize the group to travel withoutlaggards. So he would send word by his announcer to those with asurplus of horses to lend assistance here and there or a word of criti-cism to another household that was not providing adequately forsome of its members. But many of these details were more tactfullyhandled by dropping a hint to the council member most closelyrelated to the distressed household.Since the gardens were so important to the Hidatsa, the summerhunt was not scheduled to leave until the corn was knee high. Whenthe date for the hunt was announced, the women looked to theirgardens, completing the hilling of the plants and pulling the lastweeds; the men repaired their riding equipment and checked theirweapons. But the sharp dichotomy of work was not as apparentas during normal times. Men did many duties otherwise reservedfor the women. They would assist in the gardens, spread out thetipis for inspection and last-minute repairs, and attend to last-minute matters so that the household would be ready to move outof the village when the signal was given. Everyone worked hardto get ready, for the summer hunt was a happy event in Hidatsalife. It was an opportunity for the younger boys and girls to traveland see new things. Riding horseback together in groups, boyswere often mounted three or four to a horse. They ran races, sangsongs, and galloped back and forth from the front to the back of theline.The older boys and young men would dress up and watch for op-portunities to talk to their girls whose mothers were otherwise en-gaged in caring for the household's equipment. But this fhrting wasoften a front to conceal their inner feelings about the torture ordealsthat would be expected of them once the group was out in the buffalocountry. Many had already pledged to draw buffalo heads or to besuspended from some cliff while on the summer hunt; others knewthat their "older brothers" would bring up the matter once theyhad reached the hunting grounds.The welfare of the whole group was the leader's responsibility, butthe council was always invited to assist him. The leader's positionwas at the head of the line with his announcer who rode back andforth informing the people from time to time of matters affecting thewhole group. The Black Mouths policed the party, driving stragglersback, assisting the laggards or those encountering difficulties of traveland looking after the general welfare of the group. The leader calledupon men younger than the Black Mouths to serve as scouts, ridingahead and watching from the hills for evidences of enemies or of Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 53buffalo herds. Each group of scouts under a leader selected by thesummer hunt leader was assigned an area to cover; these groups werechanged from time to time so that their horses were not tired ex-cessively. Often these scouts were 40 miles or more in advance ofthe main party. As the group moved along, the leader designatedthe evening camping places for several days in advance. Thesesites were selected because of water, fuel, and ease of defense ; a levelflat adjacent to a stream usually was selected because it providedprotection from the creek bank on one side and water for themselvesand their animals in case of attack. Since they frequently went tothe same general area to hunt each year, certain named camps wereused.The camp circle was always used. The leader's household set uptwo tipis, one for the leader and his council and the other for hishousehold, at the head of the line. Those at the back end swungin a circle so that the household at the rear of the line placed its tipito the left of the leader's council lodge. The Black Mouths movedback and forth to see that the tipis were spaced properly to completethe circle and yet leave sufficient room to bring in the horses. Whenthe tipis were set up, rawhide ropes were strung between each tipiforming a corral into which the horses were driven for the night.While the tipis were being set up, the horses were freed of their burdensand taken to pastm'e by the younger men below the status of BlackMouths. While some young men kept the horses together so theywould not stray, others rode out to serve as scouts in guarding thegroup against surprise by enemy horse-raiding parties. Before dark,the horses were brought into the enclosure and guarded during thenight. Special attention was given to the horse guard while theBlack Mouths kept scouts out in all directions near the camp to fore-stall sudden attacks on the party. Young men were permitted ? in fact, they were encouraged?to go out to hunt small game such asantelope, deer, and elk or even to surround a small herd of buffaloes.Except for small quantities of dried corn and corn balls, no otherfood was taken on the summer hunt; the party rehed on the gamebrought to camp each day by the scouts and small hunting partiessent out whenever animals were discovered at hand. They movedalong leisurely from one camping spot to the next, stopping to permitthe women to dig wild turnips or to pick Juneberries and choke-cherries whenever the quantity of these foods warranted the delay.As the party approached the customary hunting grounds, theystopped from time to time to permit those having sacred bundle ritesrelating to certain buttes and sacred spots to make appropriateofferings for the replenishment of the herds or for a distinguishedindividual to pray at some traditional fasting spot where he had710-195?65 5 54 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194formerly received supernatural experiences. When the buffalo ap-peared in great numbers, the leader, with the advice of the counciland the information supplied him by the scouts, selected the camp-ing place where the hunt would be held. The camp was alwaysplaced near good water, either a large spring or a creek, and a supplyof wood from which to construct the drying frames.The final organization of the hunt was not completed until the camphad been set up. Then the leader of the summer hunt selected the "leader of the hunters" whose duty it was to organize the surroundand direct the rites of taking the buffaloes. In the selection of thisman, the camp leader always named a person of a younger age-gradegroup, one who had formerly shown skill in hunting buffaloes and hadthe right to pray to them. Generally, the one selected had justrecently obtained or had made the pledge to obtain his sacred bundle.Thus he was given an opportunity to test the bundle's supernaturalpowers. Except for the camp leader, who always remained in camp,and those Black Mouths who were selected to protect the party, allother males were given definite assignments. The younger boysherded the horses while the old men assisted by hauling poles intocamp and setting up the drying frames. Young men acted as scoutswatching from the hills to prevent attack. All men not otherwiseassigned were expected to assist in the surround.The surround was a group activity and anyone hunting alonewas severely punished by the Black Mouths. The "leader of thehunters" planned the attack and arranged the riders. Before thehunters made the attack, all dismounted and stood around theirleader while he prayed to his bundle for good luck and to the buffaloes,who were given a small offering placed on a buffalo skull or a stick,asking them not to send him bad luck or to gore the hunters. Inreturn for good luck, a feast was promised the buffaloes at a later date.Without the rites, it was believed that the buffaloes would break upinto small groups and run out between the hunters. All manners ofmisfortunes are said to have befallen those who did not fast properlyor who, in other ways, violated the rules relating to the buffalo rites.When the hunters had good luck and everything went well, the "leaderof the hunters" was acclaimed as a future leader of the village. Onother occasions, when their horses stepped into badger or gopherholes, or the buffaloes were difficult to handle, people talked of his badluck and sought to explain it in terms of improper fasting or ritualperformances. The leader would then ask to be reheved of his re-sponsibility to his hunters, and would ask the camp leader to selectanother to complete the surround.As soon as the surround was completed, word went back to thecamp for the people to come out and help with the butchering. At Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 55 first the women would come out to assist, but, in time, as the supplyof meat reaching the camp grew, the women would stay in campcuring the meat and hides while men with packhorses would butcherand transport the meat and hides to camp. Meat and hides weretaken to a number of convenient parts of the camp and piled in heaps.There was no particular attempt at supplying one's own household;coming in with meat, one would look across the camp circle and selecta collecting point where the pile was low and there unload his meat.Old men and women alike assisted as their strength permitted, ifdoing no more than standing nearby to keep the dogs away. Oldmen who never assisted in getting wood or poles for the summervillage would work enthusiastically hauling poles for additional dryingframes. From time to time, if the meat was not taken from thepiles for curing fast enough, the camp leader would go around thecircle and urge the people to work faster. Until the meat was takenfrom the communal piles for curing on household scaffolds, it remainedgroup property and could be taken by anyone able to cure it. Dueto the division of male labor at this time, many households wouldhave no hunters and butchers out, but in the manner of distributionof the meat and hides, all shared according to their ability to dry andstore the meat. Nor was the capacity of the households to care forthe meat and hides equal. Some households would have four or moremiddle-aged women of good health and wide experience in caring formeat, while others might have only one woman who was in ill healthor was burdened with several small children. Under normal condi-tions, the women of a household would often fill all drying spacequicldy. While their meat dried, they would assist their less fortunateclanswomen or brothers' wives. The tribal rule that "the clan looksafter its own" certainly applied to these situations. There was agreat deal of mutual assistance between related households on theseoccasions.Evenings were spent in dancing and feasting. For many youngmen, however, once the first large kill was made, it was a period offasting for supernatural instructions. In these camps, self-torturetook two forms: (1) dragging of buffalo heads through the camp bymeans of thongs in the skin and flesh; and (2) suspension from cliffsor trees. The Hidatsa, like the Mandan, thought of the varioussupernatural beings as having homes near the summer villages or inhills and other places on the prairies. Believing that it was easy toget supernatural guidance from the buffaloes, many sought visionsduring the summer hunt. Generally, a number of young men werefasting on hills or dragging skulls through the camp at the same time.These personal vision quests and brief stops for an individual to makea personal offering when passing a butte or other spot were the prin- 56 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194 cipal religious expressions while on these summer hunts. In noinstances were any of the important village ceremonies performed.By contrast with the nomadic tribes, this period was not one forreorganizing the tribal structure, selecting new chiefs, joining militarysocieties, or any of the other group activities. For the Hidatsa, thesummer hunt was primarily an economic activity. Even the leader-ship of the summer hunt was in hands other than either the summervillage or winter camps. Its internal organization and economicaspects show close similarity to the nomadic groups in that the campwas organized around a recognized leader and a poUce authority andthat the camp circle was employed. But the top leadership differedfrom that of the nomads. The leader was selected for a specific time,that is, from the time the group left the summer earth lodge villageuntil it returned about a month later; the nomadic leadership was,except in a few cases, for no specific period. The summer war chiefand village or peace chief seemingly had no greater authority thanany other distinguished person and was restricted by the same rulesas were other people. For the nomadic groups, there was a leisureli-ness that the Hidatsa could not enjoy since the hunt must be com-pleted in time to harvest the crop.As soon as the party returned to the village, the summer campleader's duties terminated and the established village leaders tookover. The summer buffalo hunt thus was one of the outlets for leader-ship to which all aspired as a mark of public esteem.Winter CampAfter the retm^n from the summer hunt, and the completion of theharvest, the group disbanded to form winter camps. These werein sharp contrast to the few but permanent summer villages to whichthey returned each spring. According to traditions, prior to theappearance of the strong Siouan bands and the Assiniboin, thesummer villages were unfortified and the population was widelyscattered over a broad site situated to exploit adjacent corn grounds.This is certainly true, for only in the ruins of the later sites do wefind evidences of fortifications and ditches. In traditional sites suchas Fort Clark Station and the settlements at Sanger, lodges werewidely scattered over broad river terraces. The pressure of enemygroups also produced changes in the winter village structure. Incontrast to the smnmer village sites, which are still easily identifiedby deep refuse and lodge pits, winter camp sites are exceedinglydifficult to find even when taken to the actual locations by olderinformants who lived there. These were temporary sites locatedin the heavy timber for protection from the storms. The woodwas used for lodges, fuel, and feed for the horses. The site was Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 57 selected solely on the basis of the wood supply and observations thatthe buffalo sought shelter there during the colder months. Thelodges were neither large nor carefully constructed, and the eagle-trapping lodge was of common use. In the fall, after the gardenproducts had been stored away, the population of any of the summervillages would disperse into several groups to seek shelter on theMissouri or one of its tributaries. There, under the leadership of aneagle-trapping bundle owner, eagles and other large birds werecaught until ice began to form along the edges of the streams. Ifthe crops were poor, they usually remained in the eagle-trappingcamp until spring, depending on the hunt, and returning in the springby bullboat, floating down their lodge goods, dried meat, and hides.Not uncommonly, while the Crow were on the Little Missouri andLower Yellowstone and before enemies became too numerous, thesewinter hunting parties would go overland to the Little Missourinearly to its source to trap eagles and hunt until spring and returnto the summer villages by water, using the larger hides for boat coversto float the party and the goods. There was a revival of this practiceafter the railroads went through and the Sioux were put on reserva-tions, but the distances traveled were not as great as formerly.The winter camp organization was much simpler than that of thesummer village. The top leadership was vested in a "winter campchief" selected by the council, and his authority was only for theperiod out of the summer village. According to tradition, the wintercamp system was based on that of the eagle-trapping camps; oneleader functioned with full authority and responsibility for the wel-fare of the group. His duties were to supervise and organize thecamp for the duration of the winter until they returned in the spring.He selected the winter campsite with the advice of the council, deter-mined the time for moving, and generally supervised the group veryclosely. He set the time for the winter ceremonies, regulated campactivities during sanctioned rites and fasting for the winter buffalo-calling ceremonies, and placed restrictions on family movements be-yond the camp whenever the enemy was about or when the herdswere observed to be moving toward the river bottoms. The wintercamp leader was held responsible for any misfortunes that befell mem-bers of the party, even such trivial matters as accidental broken limbs.Once having suffered misfortune, a household preferred to avoid goingout with the same leader unless he compensated the unfortunate oneswith gifts of one sort or another. The same responsibility rested withone leading the winter camp in later years even when the total villagepopulation was in a single camp. Every ambitious male aspired tobe winter chief at least once in his lifetime although men usuallyrefused to serve more than twice. His authority and responsibility 58 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [BuU. 194 were great. He received credit for all enemies killed during thewinter, but he was likewise held responsible for any killed by theenemy even though it was not customary for the winter camp chiefto engage in active warfare except when the village was attacked.About the year 1863, Cherries-in-Mouth was winter camp leader.He had fasted much and had been given credit, as war leader, for fiveSioux kUled a few years earlier in a winter battle at Saddle Buttes.During this battle Red Leaf had been shot through the lungs but hadrecovered. In 1863, however, Red Leaf overexerted himself whilehunting, and the old wound opened causing him to bleed to death.This was considered equivalent to losing a man in warfare and thedeath went against Cherries-in-Mouth's record.The winter camp leader was selected by the council on the basis ofhis military record, interest in public matters, participation in villageand tribal rites, generosity and kindness to the old, good judgment,and personality. Ownership of winter buffalo-calling rites and goodstanding with the various households were of importance, for theleader must have the confidence of the people. He could direct thebuffalo-calling rites personally, or he might cooperate with othershaving a good reputation in "bringing the buffaloes." Likewise, hemust have the good will of the households or the population wouldbe likely to break up into smaller camps. Since much good will wasobtained by generosity, selfish persons or those with an unhappyhome were disregarded. Humility when selected was a prime virtueas the leader was expected, by custom, to express his own incompe-tence without the assistance of his sacred bundles and the advice andassistance of the older men. The leader's lodge became a meetingplace for the village dignitaries to eat and sleep while discussingmatters for the good of the group. The leader selected his own an-nouncer, a clansman, usually an older and distinguished individualwho had acted as assistant in many ceremonies. There were fewrules, but those that were made were enforced by the Black Mouths.It was customary for the sinnmer village leaders to rest from theirsummer duties and to relinquish their responsibilities to the newlyselected leaders.Nowhere in the Hidatsa cultm-e do we find clear-cut distinctionsbetween military aspects and village or peace functions?war chiefsperformed numerous rites and village chiefs often went on militaryexpeditions?but winter camp leadership was more clearly indicatedas an extension of the role of peace or village chief to the winter camp,for this was a period of Httle mihtary activity.The Hidatsa relied heavily on the winter buffalo migrations onto Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 59the river bottoms both for their primary som'ce of food during thewinter months, and for a surplus to carry them through the springmonths when they were engaged in agricultural pursuits. Frequentlythe winter herds did not come onto the river bottoms, especiallywhen the season was mild. Then the winter camp suffered. Whetherthe winter was mild or not, the rites to the winter herds began withthe winter solstice and continued until either the herds appeared orthe population divided into smaller hunting groups to seek othergame such as deer and elk in the undisturbed wooded areas. Theydid not normally rely heavily on the garden products for wintersubsistence. Some corn and other garden products were taken to thewinter camp to vary the diet, and periodic trips were made to thesummer village to open caches for additional garden products, but theHidatsa endeavored to save their produce for use while at the summervillage.The winter leader never rehed solely on the supernatural powersof his own sacred bundles. He would pray frequently to his gods tosend good luck and the herds, but his principal duty was to organizeand regulate the winter rites. Ambitious younger men who hadrecently received visions would go to the winter leader for interpreta-tions of their dreams. A good leader was one who could stimulateinterest in winter fasting, for it was to his credit to have many youngmen out in the forests or on the hills fasting during cold stormyweather when the "calUng the buffaloes" rites were being celebrated.If the fasters succeeded in bringing the buffaloes, that is, if the buffaloherds began arriving while one was fasting or shortly thereafter,particularly if the herds appeared on the day indicated in the dream,fasters were praised by the people without in any way detracting fromthe reputation of the winter camp's leader. From native accountsrecorded when making this study, we find numerous instances ofyoung men first coming to the attention of the people as potentialtribal leaders as a result of their successful fasts during the wintercamp period.Winter fasting followed two distinct patterns; fasting for personalvision instructions, and fasting for the specific purpose of bringingthe winter herds. The former affected but few people, chiefly thehousehold of the faster, and generally went unobserved by thepopulation at large unless the personal torture was so severe that hisclan relatives or age-grade society members were obliged to intervene.In the latter instances, the entire population was affected. It hadthe sanction of the winter camp leader and those working with himin the management of the camp, and restrictions of one sort or another 60 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194 were invariably imposed on the whole population while the fast wason. Commonly, when one with recognized supernatural powersvolunteered to fast at a distance from the camp, fires were extinguished,all loud noises were prohibited, and hunters were forbidden to leavecamp. The entire population fasted while men and women alikeaddressed prayers to their sacred objects. When the sun set, thefaster returned to the camp and the fires were rekindled. Fastingcontinued daily for 4 days, after which, if no buffaloes appeared, thefaster terminated his fast by either promising the herds in a statedtime or offering some excuse for his failure. The women's White-Buffalo-Cow society also fasted daily during the coldest days, withthe camp organized in the manner described above.The first approach of the winter herds toward the river bottoms wasthe signal for increased ritualistic action to "keep them coming."The camp was strictly policed to prevent premature hunting. Woodcutting was prohibited, and fires were extinguished if they were up-wind of the approaching herds. Scouts kept watch of the progress ofthe herds and reported regularly to the camp leader. The individualhouseholds which had sacred bundles including buft'alo skulls madeofferings of food and calicoes to each bundle, while households havingno such bundles made similar offerings to those of closely relatedhouseholds. During the approach of the herds, the Black Mouthswere on constant guard to see that no person hunted prematurely;there are traditions that on some occasions the police killed individualsdisobeying their orders. In the memory of the oldest Hidatsa,however, there were few intentional violations of the orders ; hence thepunishment was less severe. In any event, the Black Mouths hadthe authority, fortified by public opinion, to take such measures asthey deemed necessary to enforce the "no hunting" orders of the winterchief. According to informants, the buffalo herds were easily startledwhen they fii'st reached the wooded bottoms from the prairies?infact, whenever a herd first moved to a new pasture?and it wasnecessary to leave them undisturbed for a few days to graze and getsettled in their new environment, or'^they were likely to move on.During this time, Wolf Chief said that it was very hard indeed torestrain one's self, particularly when the children were crying fromhunger and cold. The people stayed within doors and could often seethe buffaloes walking between the lodges or hooking at dogs that hadnot been securely tied. When the time came to kill, even in lateryears, restrictions on the use of firearms were enforced. Theserestrictions placed the young men unskilled with bows and arrowsat a disadvantage. After two or three large surrounds had been Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 61 completed and enough meat had been secm-ed for the winter needs(and the meat-cm-ing capacity of the women had been reached),all restrictions were removed and those who desired additional meatwent out in small parties and hunted whenever they wished. Withthe arrival of the winter herds, the ritualistic activities diminished.Those who had pledged summer ceremonies used the period forexceptional efforts to obtain large quantities of meat and robes. Thepledgers hunted continuously and the women cured meat and tannedrobes with the assistance of their female relatives. The people wouldsay that the pledger's prayers for a good Uving for his people werebeing answered when, diu"ing his period of preparation, the winterherds were unusually large. "The gods he was buying had sent thebuffaloes," they would say.The winter camp leader's responsibilities ended with the return tothe summer village. When enemies were far away, the familiesleisurely returned to the summer camp in small groups of relatedhouseholds, assisting each other with the loads and the care of thechildren. If, however, signs of enemy war parties had been reportedor there were other reasons for believing that an attack might be made,the group moved as an organized party with the leader to the frontand the Black Mouths in charge to see that none dropped out of line.Should a household encounter difficulty in traveling at the pace setby the leader or the loads fell from the horses, others gave immediateassistance so that all were adequately protected. Each individualkilled or wounded represented a mark against the leader's record.Therefore, the good leader was careful to maintain discipline and toprohibit individual and disorganized breaking of camp unless dangerof attack was very remote. He lacked authority to prevent segmentsof the group from leaving the main party, establishing temporaryhunting camps out in the hills, and following the buffaloes moving outfrom the river valleys with the first general thaws. He was not,however, responsible for the safety of these small hunting partiesonce they had fallen out of line.These spring hunting camps were not without leadership. Theprincipal purpose of these side trips was to obtain an additionalsupply of fresh meat. The older men met and selected from theirnumber one who had formerly enjoyed good luck while making the "surround" and who had bundle rights which included the sacredbuffalo skull. The organization of the camp was essentially the sameas for the larger summer buffalo hunt. These hunts were known as "in-between" hunts as they were conducted after the winter camphad broken up and before the summer village was reoccupied. Guards 62 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194 were placed around the camp but the Black Mouths no longer func-tioned as an organized group except when the entire winter encamp-ment moved out onto the hills as a group. Instead, the leader selectedvarious younger men who served without regard to age-grade afl&lia-tions. The old people today identify the thousands of boulder outlineson the prairies adjacent to the river valleys as former tipi outlines ofthese ''in-between" camps occupied in the late winter and early springas precaut ons against sudden flooding of the river bottoms. Fromall available evidence it appears that with the arrival of the Siouxand Assiniboin, the "in-between" hunting camps were less commonand that when brief expeditions were made onto the adjacent prairies,greater emphasis was placed on organization for defense.As the groups moved back into the summer village, the summerchieftains assumed command, and the winter camp leader becamemerely a distinguished member of the council of older men. If thepopulation at large was well cared for, had no suffering or deaths, thewinter camp leader was highly acclaimed. If there had been anunusually large number of buffaloes nearby, the people would say thatnot in years had there been so many buffaloes, and would recount thefine winter they spent. They would show their esteem after returnmgto the summer camp by preparing feasts from the garden productswhich had been sparingly used during the winter, and invite thewinter camp leader and his family. Other households perhaps, werenot so successful: one member of the household had died or had hadan accident; their horses had been taken sick and died or had strayedaway to be captured by raiding parties; their best buffalo horse mayhave broken a leg or been gored by a buffalo. All these and othermisfortunes went agauast the winter leader's record. They would telltheir friends of their misfortunes and criticize the leader behind hisback even though he had been their best friend before going into thewinter camp.Custom provided numerous measures for restoring good will andthe wise leader was certain to take quick action. If the discontentarose from the killing of a member of the household by a known enemy,the leader would often organize a retaliatory war party or designateone to go out and take the scalp of the particular enemy or one ofhis near relatives. This type of war honor, going out for a specificperson, particularly if unaccompanied far from the village, was of thevery highest. In recent years, the Hidatsa had a wide acquaintancewith enemy groups and frequently the person killing a Hidatsa wasknown in the viUage. When the individual or war party returnedsuccessfully, the scalp was taken to a sister of the one mourned. Shecarried the scalp during the war dances and sang the praises of theone who had returned victorious. No longer did the household Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 63 criticize their winter leader; in fact, they would be the first to nominatehim as winter leader for the succeeding year.Frequently, however, one did not take such positive action. Hear-ing that a war party was going out, the former winter leader mightmake offerings of gifts and recite a prayer for the success of the party.If the expedition was successful, out of gratitude to the former wintercamp leader who had assisted them ritualistically, he received thescalp which was taken to the mourners, especially the sister or mother,and carried in the dances. Then the matter was forgotten. Forminor misfortunes such as the natural death of a relative, feasts andpresents were sufficient to establish a feeling of good will betweenthem. Then the people would say, "Think nothing of it; one can'tlive forever." Wolf Chief tells of a little boy who told the winterchief that their winter chief was no good because his bow string keptbreaking, and the winter chief had a new bow made with a strongerstring; after that the boy had no trouble with his bow. When theparents heard of the incident they scolded the boy, for they con-sidered it impudent for a child to speak of an elder in that manner.SUMMARYThe Hidatsa used the term "chief" very broadly to designateanyone who was at the time in a position of leadership and authority.Every important situation required leadership. We have shown abovethat there was a feeling of clan leadership in matters concerning theclan; that each age-grade as an organized group had its complementof officers; and finally that responsible leaders were recognized in thegeneral administration of the summer and winter villages. These byno means exhaust the list of organized groups recognized by thesepeople. These units varied in size from the community to smalleconomic groups, such as fish trapping, and from permanent groupsto those of short and temporary existence.The wide selection of leaders and the numerous opportunities to "lead" are consistent with their concepts of supernatural powers andthe promises of the tribal ceremonial leaders when young men orga-nized and planned their lives. On every important occasion, when ayoung man distinguished himself in warfare, personal torture, orritualistic purchases, the leaders assured him that his ultimate goalshould be that of "leader of the people."Because "supernatural power was measurable," it increased bythe performance of certain rites and other practices and, in likemeasure, was exhausted in combating the daily risks. As the in-dividual assumed greater responsibilities within the group, thesepowers were exhausted at a greater rate. An individual, therefore,should not remain in authority too long and no man aspired to 64 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194 continuous leadership. In applying this concept to group leader-ship, we find constant changing of top leadership as the situations oflife changed.The opportunities to lead enumerated above indicate only a fewgroup situations, but they represent the largest groups for whichleadership was provided. In this category should be included theorganization of the village for the purpose of corralling buffaloes nearthe village. Since this activity had important ceremonial aspectsand was a part of a group of related rites, it is analyzed under "HidatsaCeremonial Organization" (pp. 282-476).The Clan and Moiety SystemThe clan?a named matrUineal group?was an important featureof Hidatsa social, economic, and ceremonial life. At birth, thechild became a member of his mother's clan or, if the mother wasclanless because she had belonged to a different tribe, the child assumedthe clan of the other children of the household. In spite of thetraditional late arrival of the Hidatsa-proper and the Awaxawi onthe Missouri River, the clan names as now employed are concernedwith incidents or events occurring along the Missouri River and inno instance reflect incidents or events relating to their former resi-dences to the east or northeast. The traditions and mythologyindicate that two different clan systems were once in vogue: (1) the13-clan system of the Awatixa; and (2) the 7-clan system of theAwaxawi and Hidatsa-proper. ORIGINSReference to the Awatixa system of 13 clans is found in the mythsof the Sacred Arrows which relate that when this group came downfrom above to inhabit the earth, their culture hero. Charred Body,selected 13 household groups to represent the 13 parts of the sacredarrow. Each household group established a matrilineal lineage;marriage within the household was prohibited. Since the populationof this mythological village was small, people were able to remembertheir relatives. Because of the rich land Charred Body had foundbelow at Painted Woods, with its extensive wooded bottoms foragriculture and the large herds of buffaloes on the adjacent prairies,the population increased rapidly and broke up into 13 small localgroups of related kin. At that time the groups were exogamous andlived near each other for protection from certain local evil spirits whoresented the occupation of the area by Charred Body's people. Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 65During mythological times, these groups were named for incidentsinvolving them. Of the 13 original groups, 8 received names whichstill designate existing clans. Of the other five lineages, nothingis remembered, and it is assumed by the Hidatsa that these groupsdied out or united with other named groups.The Hidatsa-proper and the Awaxawi informants claim never tohave had more than seven clans. Genealogies of the three Hidatsagroups indicate that the eighth clan, the Xura, was found only atAwatixa. They also claim short residence on the Missouri, coming tothis river as large village groups without clans. It is to be presumedthat they had matrilineal lineages, in view of the method wherebyclans were introduced into the village population; when a clan namewas adopted from some incident involving a group of males, the namewas extended to include the mothers, sisters, and sisters' children. Inthis manner, according to mythology, every person in the tribe in timebecame a member of a named clan. This system of extending clanmembership obviously is acceptable to the Hidatsa, for they show thatwhenever a considerable number of female prisoners were taken, in afew years all were incorporated into the clan system by the samemethods as nonclan Hidatsa were integrated when the clan systemwas adopted.Native concepts of clan origin are of two kinds: (1) the origin of theclan from a single female of a household group coming down from thesky with Charred Body; and (2) a local group accustomed to livingtogether. We shall see that numerous bundles were inherited byclans of the former group but less characteristically by those of the latter.The clan names with two exceptions are nontotemic and referto incidents involving a few people. The Maxoxati clan receivesits name from maxoxi, which refers to the dry dust that formedfrom the decaying of the earth lodge rafters and dropped downcontinuously, and ati meaning "lodge." The MEtsiroku clan meansliterally "knife people" and refers to an instance of wife-purchasewith a stone knife. The Apukawiku clan receives its name fromapuka meaning cap or article of clothing worn above the eyes to shadethem from the sun and wiku meaning "low." The clan name wasderived from the supernatural experiences of Packs Antelope withthe Thunderbirds and the Grandfather snake of the Missouri whokilled by means of hghtning which flashed from his eyes. When hereturned from his exploits with the supernatural, he shaded his eyesto protect the people. The three clans listed above are groupedtogether and are known today as the Three-clan Moiety. 66 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194The Prairie Chicken clan was believed to have once been a separatevillage group. The name was derived from the fact that membersof this group were noisy like the prairie chickens. In another myth,the Prairie Chicken clan began from the custom of a war partyto camp at night in the bushes, the berries of which were eaten by theprairie chickens. The AwaxEnawita clan derives its name from thechildhood custom of building tiny villages with wet clay. Laterthe people saw hills upstream and nearly opposite the present cityof Williston, N. Dak., that reminded them of the work of smallchildren. The people camped there three times; hence the nameAwaxEnawita taken from awaxE meaning 'hill sliding down' andnawi meaning 'three.' The Miripdti clan derives its name from aquarrel that occurred in the village. The Miripdti separated andbuilt near the village of the Xura, who, at that time, had a separatevillage. Water was brought from the river and stored in bladdersfor use in case of a prolonged attack. One man became angeredbecause of the cowardice of his people and cut up the waterbaghanging in his lodge; after this the group was known as Miripatihsfrom miri meaning 'water' and pati meaning 'to break open.' TheXura clan, which in recent years has functioned as a named lineagein the Waterbuster or Miripdti clan, is believed to have been aseparate village at one time. The name is derived from the noiseof the cicada. The village, except for one woman and her baby daughter,disappeared mysteriously during the night. The survivors moved tothe village of the Waterbusters of Awatixa and formed a friendshipwith that group.The Itisuku clan received its name from the custom of being outto the front of the war party along the edges of the hills overlookingthe Missouri. Once a group of young men called on Old-Woman-Who-Never-Dies at her lodge near the Red Buttes and she promised themsuccess in warfare. When they returned to their homes, they calledthemselves Itisuku.In addition to the eight clans listed above, there were a few membersof the Speckled Eagle clan in the tribe. According to tradition, thisclan was of Mandan origin although many members can no longertrace their lineages back to any particular Mandan village group.They lived principally at Awaxawi village. According to the Mandan,however, the Awaxawi Speckled Eagles were people who moved toAwaxawi at the time of the destruction of Nuptadi shortly after1780. Like the Mandan Speclded Eagle clan, they have been assimi-lating with the Prairie Chicken clan in recent years and marriage withthe Prairie Chicken clan is now generally disapproved. Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 67CLAN MEMBERSHIP AND AFFILIATIONSA census by mformants of the Mandan and Hidatsa living at Fish-hook Village in 1872?subsequent to the removal of the Crow-Flies-High band?showed the following population by clans: *^Hidatsa clans:MaxoxatiKnife (. MEtsiroku)Low cap (Apukawiku)Prairie chickenAwaxEnawitaWaterbusters ( Miripati)XuraItisukuMandan clans:WaxikenaTamisikPrairie chickenSpeckled eagleOther tribes:ArikaraBlackfootCrowWhile the Mandan and Hidatsa seemed in general agreement as towhether a mixed household was Mandan or Hidatsa, no definite rulecould be made. Although children generally claimed to belong tothe mother's tribe, there were numerous exceptions to the rule asin the case of Bad Gun, one of the Mandan chiefs, whose motherwas a Hidatsa and whose wife was also. Tribal aflEiliation seemedto be based even more on the individual's participation in social andceremonial functions. In other similar situations a man and thehousehold would have been classified by the informants as Hidatsa.The extent of Hidatsa-Mandan intermarriage prior to 1872 is indicatedby the figures for households. These figures do not include onefaction of the Hidatsa who moved away about this time and wereaccompanied by a few Mandans. We see that there were 296Hidatsas living in recognized Hidatsa households while an additional63 belonging to Mandan clans lived in the same households as did3 Arikaras, and 4 Crows who were brought there by marriage. Inaddition, there were 81 persons belonging to Hidatsa clans who wereliving in recognized Mandan households housing 192 persons ofMandan clans. More than 80 percent of this intermixture of Mandansand Hidatsas occurred after 1850. In Hidatsa In Mandanhouseholds households 68 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194The Three-clan moiety was composed of the Maxoxati, Knife, andLow Cap clans. Although differing greatly in relative size, each wasof equal status in the moiety. In recent years it has become commonpractice to identify oneself as "three clan," and in some instancesthe actual clan membership is not now known. The other moietyis spoken of as the "Four-clan moiety" although it actually comprisesfive clans, excluding the Speckled Eagle which is of Mandan origin.The clans of this moiety are grouped into phratries of linked clans.One phratry is composed of the Prairie Chicken-AwaxEnawita clans. Inmythological times, so the people say, the Prairie Chickens would killand scalp people of the other clans. They lived in a separate villagenear Expansion and above the mouth of the Knife River. The peopleof the AwaxEnawita clan went to the people of Prairie Chickenvillage and said, "It is not right for us to fight, for we speak the samelanguage." Then the Prairie Chicken people "united" into a friend-ship band with the AwaxEnawita people. When no other relationshipwas known, persons of the two clans treated each other as distantclansmen. Nevertheless, marriages between the two clans werecommon. The close ties of the Waterbuster, Xura, and Itisuku clansare indicated by the mythologies. When the Xura village groupmoved away and disappeared, one household joined the Waterbustersof Awatixa village and is now largely incorporated into that clanas a named lineage. The union of the Waterbusters into related clansis of long standing, according to the mythology, and stems from thebelief that at one time a minor group of Waterbusters, who later wereidentified as Itisuku, went on the warpath together. The tablesshow that this phratry was largely exogomous. This is consistentwith native beliefs that the Prairie Chicken and AwaxEnawita inter-married more frequently than the Waterbuster-Itisuku.Table 1 was prepared from genealogies of the Hidatsa and Mandanliving at Fishhook Village in 1872 and was compiled from the informa-tion supplied me by about 15 informants. Table 1 enumeratesmarriages which were of some permanence and does not include briefelopements. These marriages were, in general, those that occurredbetween 1825 and 1885. Approximately 80 percent of the marriagesoccurred after 1855 while the Mandan and Hidatsa were living atFishhook Village. Figures for the Mandan are included in the tableto indicate the extent of intertribal marriage.Table 1 shows that of 128 marriages within the Hidatsa tribe, 7were within the clan. According to custom, it was considered im-proper for one to marry a person of the same clan, but the instancesof marriage with one of the father's clan are equally rare. This is insharp contrast with data from the Mandan genealogies which showa frequency of nearly 25 percent. Table 1 shows 59 marriages with Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 69 70 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194to Awaxawi village after the first smallpox epidemic. According totraditions, the equivalence of the Mandan Prairie Chicken clan wasoriginally with the Prairie Chickens of Awatixa village, who owned aSacred Robe bundle in common. It was customary for these peopleto meet whenever the ceremony was being performed. Inclusion ofthe Prairie Chicken members of Hidatsa and Awaxawi villages inthese rites did not occur until after the three Hidatsa villages unitedfor mutual defense after 1837, at which time all Prairie Chicken mem-bers, irrespective of village origin, met when the rites were being per-formed and were entitled to receive goods and honors. Marriagewithin the clan was then no longer considered proper. The equatingof the other clans occurred within the memory of the older peopleliving in 1932 when this study was made. When they were young,opinion was divided; some thought that it was proper for persons ofthe Knife clan to marry Mandans of the Tamisik, since the couplewas of different tribes, but others disapproved. The same viewsprevailed for the WaxikEna and Maxoxati clans. By 1880, whensuch marriages occurred, disapproval was general.Equating of clans was extended to include the moieties as well.Except for the Awatixa, who claim to have once had a 13-clan systemwhich at this time seems forgotten, there was a marked difference inthe number of Mandan and Hidatsa clans. The Hidatsa Three-clanmoiety was equated with the Mandan WaxikEua-Tamisik moietyfounded by Lone Man and comprised the survivors of the Six-clanmoiety; the Hidatsa Four-clan moiety became equated with theMandan Seven-clan moiety founded by Clay-on-Face of which onlytwo clans, the Prairie Chicken and Speclded Eagle, survive.The Hidatsa clan names have remained unchanged during the entireperiod of recorded history. This is in sharp contrast with the Crowamong whom names were changing during the memory of old in-formants. With the exception of the Prairie Chicken and Xuraclans, Hidatsa names were nontotemic and more closely resemble theCrow than the Mandan who had, in one moiety, Prairie Chicken,Speckled Eagle, Bear, Badger, Red-Hill-People (snake), Crow, andBunch-of-Wood People. In spite of their traditional late separationfrom the Crow, none of the names of Crow clans show similarity tothose of the Hidatsa nor do the Hidatsa have traditions of clan re-lationships to specific Crow clans. Those Hidatsa who have hadintimate contacts with the Crow during the period of readjustmentsubsequent to the smallpox epidemic of 1837, when many Hidatsalived temporarily with the Crow, are aware of the presence of clansamong the Crow but in no instance do they equate the clans of thetwo tribes. Those Crow who settled with the Hidatsa soon affiliated Bowersl HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 71 with a Hidatsa clan group. Such has also been the case with personsof other tribes settling at the villages.The role of the Hidatsa clan, with a few exceptions, is essentially thesame as that of the Mandan. It is composed of a named group ofrelatives tracing their origin back to separate households of CharredBody's village and to names subsequently given to the group duringtheir residence on the Missouri River. The clan is an outstandingfeature of Hidatsa social organization but it has its economic andritualistic aspects as well. It extended kinship relationships to thelimit of the village and the tribe, not to discount a more recent ex-tension by means of "clan equating" to include the Mandan as well.Based on a "sibling" relationship between clan members, one classifiedas "brothers" and "sisters" those of one's clan. By the same prin-ciple, the persons of the father's clan were "fathers" or "father'ssisters." These were the most important kinship extensions, sincethey comprised an individual's important relatives.CLAN DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIESThe clan was responsible for the care of its own members. Theseobligations were expressed in many ways. Old people and orphanswere cared for and often taken into the households of clan members.When the wife died, the man generally left the household to live inone where the females were of his clan. One would go preferably tothe sister's or sister's daughter's household; otherwise he would takeup residence with any member of his clan with whom he was wellacquainted. From the number of instances of change in residence ofold men whose wives had died and the attitude of those providingcare for them, I feel that they were welcomed through a sense of obliga-tion. These old men were respected and welcomed members of thehousehold and played an important role in informing the youngerpeople of tribal lore and traditions. Since those attaining prominencein the tribe were required to display considerable knowledge of tribaltraditions and mythology, particularly those defining proper conduct,these old men sold their stories and received goods, horses, and honors,in proportion to their knowledge in these matters.It was the duty of the clan to assume responsibility for the care oforphans. The Hidatsa interpret an orphan to be one whose fatherand his brothers, mother and her sisters, married sisters, and able-bodied maternal grandmothers were dead. Then the clan took overand provided a home. The number of such cases was quite largeafter 1800 owing to epidemics and enemy attacks on small huntingparties of both sexes. It is interesting to observe that some of themost distinguished Hidatsa of the 19th century were left orphans in1837 by the inroads of smallpox. Occasionally a childless couple 72 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194 received permission of the clan to adopt one of a different clan. Thesechildren invariably joined the clan of the female caring for them.The clan was responsible for the behavior of its members. It wasthe duty of older persons of the clan to instruct and supervise thechildren as they grew up. At first this responsibility was assumed bythe "older brothers" of the household: one's own older brothers; themother's brothers and the mother's sisters' older sons; the maternalgrandmother's brothers; or any other males residing in the lodge andclassified as "older brother." Also included were the females of thelineage residing in the same lodge. As a child grew up and movedmore freely about the village, it was the right as well as the duty ofan older person of the clan to step in and correct any child who violatedvillage rules and customs, and to lend assistance on various occasions.Discipline usually took the form of a mild reminder of misdeeds. Inmore extreme offenses?^hitting smaller children or girls, playing inlodges containing certain sacred bundles, destroying property, at-tempting rape, or stealing?^any older clan member conveniently athand could step in and inflict punishment by beating or ducking theoffender in the river.It was the duty of the clan not only to discipline its own membersbut also to protect them from the attacks of others. When a matureperson violated tribal custom and caused people to talk of his mis-deeds, the whole clan was shamed. People would say that the clanhad been negligent in its duties or he would have behaved properly.Often some woman would neglect her gardens and steal from others'gardens. People in the village would talk of strange tracks seen inthen' gardens and of stalks from which corn had been stripped.Watching late at night, someone v/ould see a woman or sometimesseveral women leave a certain lodge and go toward the gardens.Knowing that the women of that household had been neglectingtheir garden or had failed to plant a crop that year, the observerwould conclude that these women were out stealing. A thief's clanwould usually attempt to break up the stealing without the assistanceof the injured parties, lest the Black Mouths be called upon to investi-gate the affair. Each sex tended to discipline clan members of itsown sex. Women of the clan would lie in wait to catch her. Seizingher they would throw her down and beat her with sticks, straps, andeven hoe handles until she confessed her errors and promised neverto steal even so much as the smallest and most worthless thing again.If she fought back, the punishment was likely to be extremely severe.When she promised to forego stealing in the future, she was taken tothe lodges of her clan members and given food, clothing, and sometimeseven horses. Once the stealing was stopped, it was considered im-proper for people of other clans to discuss the matter lest the same Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 73misdeeds be committed by members of their own clan. Had thestealing continued, it would have been the right of others to demandpayment of any member of the thief's clan. Probably more importantfor the peace of the village, this practice of punishing a clan memberkept conflicts localized and confined within a segment of the totalvillage group and limited the duties of the organized village policeto matters involving the population at large.One's clansmen played an important role in directing and super-vising the fasting of its younger members. When a number of youngclansmen had reached the age of 12 to 14, older people of the clan wouldsay that it was now time for them to take fasting seriously. Severalrelated households would discuss the matter and decide to send theboys to some secluded spot under the direction of an older clansmanwhere they would be supervised and instructed in fasting. A fastingshelter would be erected where the director could eat and smoke andthose who wished to could sleep. Each faster would select a spot onthe side of a clay bank, beside a pile of rocks, or near a bush too smallto offer shade or protection from the hot sun, where he would standduring the day and far into the night. He was taught how to cry tothe gods for successful dreams; afterward he would be recommendedfor a chance to join some war leader to secure from the enemy thatwhich the holy ones had promised him in the dream. During thetime the boys fasted, the leader observed their behavior and watchedto see that food or water was not being taken on the sly. Those whopursued extreme measures to induce good dreams were publicly praisedin the village and were told that they would surely live good lives.The clan further assisted its young men by encouraging fasting andparticipation in all ceremonies providing opportunities for publicfasting. The most popular rites in this class were the NaxpikE(Sun Dance) and the Wolf ceremonies which emphasized warfare.The clan furnished goods and horses for a younger member to giveduring the ceremony to certain "fathers" and others in exchange forcustomary services relating to the acquisition of supernatural powers.When the young clansman endured unusual suffering during theceremony, the clan would voice its approval and bring goods to theceremony in such quantities as to embarrass the other clans whosemembers had endured less suffering or had shown fear during thetorture featiu-e.The clan protected its members from outside attack, whether by amember of the village or by an outsider, and resented infringement byanother in the disciplining of a member. Because of these importantfunctions of the clan, the father's role as a disciplinary officer wasexceedingly unimportant. Had the father scolded his son or hit him,he would have been severely criticized by both his son's and his own 74 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194 clan. When a clansman's wife was stolen, the whole clan felt injuredand would assist the one whose wife had been stolen by demandingpayment collectively from the aggressor's relatives and clans. Sincesome of the aggressor's relatives usually had advance information thatan elopement was contemplated, it was customary for them to takegoods and horses to the injured man even before he discovered hisloss and had enlisted the assistance of his clan; otherwise they werepermitted to kill the aggressor's horse and cut up his property.The clan revenged the murder of a member by killing the offenderand demanding goods of his clansmen as indemnity. There is norecorded instance of murder by one of a different clan in recent yearsso it was not possible to study a case history of manslaughter. Whena person killed another of the same clan, restitution was betweenhouseholds. Since the clan as an organized group could not extractindemnity from itself, the matter was allowed to drop if the murdererescaped from the village. During the last century there have beenat least three murders committed within the clan by males whileintoxicated. In two cases the murderer was aided by his householdin making his escape while his household and closer clan relativesmade restitution to the dead man's household. The third case wascommitted during a drunken brawl after the Agency was estabUshedand was handled by the North Dakota courts. In former times, mur-der was of such great importance that the Black Mouths took chargeimmediately to see that matters did not get out of hand, otherwisea portion of the population was likely to break away and establishan independent village. In former times when the Hidatsa occupiedthree villages, since each village had essentially the same clan repre-sentation, murderers escaping from one village were not secure inanother one because of the presence there of the murdered one'sclansmen. Generally they would escape to the Crow but frequentlythe Mandan or Arikara would harbor them. At first those of Hidatsavillage who had committed crimes against persons of the PrairieChicken and Speckled Eagle clans were prohibited refuge with theMandan, where these clans were also represented. Because of thenumerous marriages between the Mandan and the Hidatsa villages ofAwaxawi and Awatixa, it was never considered safe for men of thesevillages to seek refuge with the Mandan. After the Mandan movednorth to the region of the Hidatsa villages near Knife River, refugewith the Mandan was less common due to the equating of the Mandanand Hidatsa clans and intermarriage between these village groups.One-eyed, a chief of the Hidatsa, is said to be the last from Hidatsavillage to seek temporary refuge with the Mandan with whom helived for a short time after killing a clansman whose wife he coveted. Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 75Clan cooperation was expressed in many ways. In addition toassisting and caring for the old and the orphans, women who were illand could not do their work were assisted in caring for their householdsand gardens. One might even be brought into the lodge of clanswomenand nursed back to health; Goods and horses were contributed whena clansman performed a ceremony. Men of the same clan gave uptheir wives for an unmarried clansman or one whose wife was inadvanced pregnancy when a ceremony was being performed, in orderto enhance the prestige of the clan. When a clansman was killed inwarfare and his clan brothers did nothing about it, people of the otherclans would accuse them of being cowards. The highest honor wasshown one who had organized his fasting so as afterward to avengethe death of a clan brother. In every instance, the clansmen broughtout goods and property for the victory dances when one of its numberhad returned successfully from war.At death, both the person's own and the father's clan had importantduties. Generally, the members of the father's clan who officiatedwere selected in advance, sometimes years beforehand. It was theduty of the clan to provide goods, horses, and food for the funeral ritesas payment for the official mourners who comprised the adults of thefather's clan. Not uncommonly one who was believed dying wouldcall in the close relatives of the father's clan, either men or women,who would paint and dress the dying person even before death oc-curred. The clan members would begin bringing in the property anddisplaying it on lines within the lodge where those caring for the sickperson and friends coming in for a last visit could observe them. Itwas believed that a lavish display of goods expressed the generosityand solidarity of the clan. The sick person was happy in the beliefthat in the spirit world he could boast of the goods that had beendisposed of when he was sent away. The clan had no other role whendeath of a member occmred. Individuals of the father's clan were incharge of the last rites. A dying person called in those who were to bepresent to perform the funeral rites, otherwise the family would makethe selection. They would say to the people selected, "We want youto bring the robe; your son (or daughter) is ill and about to leave you."Those selected talked to the "son" or "daughter," telling him notto be afraid; that all people must die sometime; that they would seetheir people in the spirit village and to greet them. Some dyingpersons had many messages to carry to relatives in the spirit world.The Hidatsa preferred to be dressed and painted when death occurred,so, not uncommonly, a person would be painted and dressed severaltimes before death occurred. Brave men wounded in battle, knowingthey were dying, often asked to be painted so that they could dancebefore the people to show their bravery. The people of the father's 76 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194 clan would sing the victory songs and praise their "son" while hisown clansmen wept at the thought of losing one of their members.In such circumstances the "blood father" occupied an intermediatesituation. He would weep with his son's clansmen, cut his hair, andinflict physical pain on himself as did the females of the son's familyand clan. The degree of self-torture was usually in direct proportionto the son's bravery and whether the father would be left sonless.A man grieved loudest and longest for an only son.The final rites were held at the grave or scaftold where the body wastaken by persons of the father's clan and either placed on a scaffoldor interred, according to the wishes of the deceased or his nearestclansmen. Those officiating, people of the father's clan, and visitors,were given the goods collected by the clan for its deceased member.According to tradition, the Hidatsa more frequently buried theirdead outside of the village than did the Awaxawi or Awatixa. Inthis respect, the latter groups more closely followed the later Mandanpractice of placing the dead on scaffolds. The archeology of the threeKjiife River villages supports this native belief; individual burial pitsand mounds are exceedingly numerous adjacent to Hidatsa villagealthough exceedingly rare at the other villages.The father's clan had other important duties in addition to officiatingduring the death and funeral of a son. They generally named their "sons" and "daughters" and frequently, in the case of children dyingyoung, the same person giving the name was selected to "bring therobe" when the child died. Informal feasts were also given to thepeople of the father's clan from time to time. Everyone was expectedto give feasts. Those who had a surplus of food and property wereexpected to share it from time to time with the elderly, but moreparticularly with the people of the father's clan. One looked tothe people of the father's clan for formal instruction in fasting andrituals and paid for that service. With few exceptions, organizedceremonies likewise passed from one man to another standing in therelationship of "son." The father and the people of the father's clanwere respected relatives; they took little part in the routine training oftheir "sons" and "daughters." In ritualistic training, however,they assumed a dominant role, for, at birth, a "son" or "daughter"received a name taken from these ritualistic possessions believed toafford supernatural protection. All through life the people of thefather's clan offered prayers and sold sacred objects and rites to the "sons" and "daughters"; and in death they disposed of the body withappropriate rites to send the spirit away. On some occasions, specialrites were performed years after the death of a "son" or "daughter"who had died away from the village, at the time when the skull wasbrought back and placed at a skull shrine. Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 77The clan, particularly a large one, played an important role inuniting households and integrating the village population, and itbrought together many households for common efforts. Thus we findthat the amount of goods required for the purchase or performance ofa ceremony was far in excess of one person's ability to acquire. Cere-monial demands, in general, were not difficult burdens for one belong-ing to a large clan since all people of the clan were obliged to assist toavoid censure from the other clans and to save face. Only in the caseof small clans v/as the burden heavy; this may explain the tendency ofthe small clans, such as the Xura and Itisuku, to affiliate with largerones. The obligations of the clan in elevating a person to chieftain-ship were so numerous that a small clan was at a distinct disadvantage . Not only did the clan play an important role in the integration ofhousehold groups comprising the villages but it united households withthose of other villages. The degree of cooperation between personsof the same clan but of different villages was largely a matter of dis-tance. According to the opinion of informants, well supported byarcheological evidence, the villages were quite widely separated whenthe population was large and their enemies were not so numerous.The villages were largely endogamous due to matrilocal residencewhich kept the women tied to the households of their mothers.Males were reluctant to move from their mothers' villages where theyhad all of their closest social and ceremonial ties. We can assumethat, because of the similarity of clan names and groupings, the clansystem as we know it today was established long before 1796 when thethree village groups occupying sites within 3 or 4 miles of each otherat the mouth of Knife River were visited by early travelers. In rela-tions between villages, the clan was the principal integrating force.Visitors from adjacent villages were housed with clansmen and fre-quently assisted and participated in the ceremonial activities of fellowclansmen. Although there were minor dialectic and other culturaldifferences which distinguished villages, a common clan system playedan important role in holding the tribal population together and avoid-ing intervillage warfare.By 1825, and after a quarter of a century of intimate contacts withthe Mandan, refuge there was no longer offered to those who hadmurdered a tribesman. This is undoubtedly due to the equating ofMandan and Hidatsa clans prior to that period. At this point it isinteresting to note that even though the Crow-Flies-High band ofHidatsa separated from the Fishhook Village about 1872 under condi-tions approaching civil war and established a separate village of theirown, those who got into trouble at either village were not accepted bythe other because of the strength of the clan ties. Neither Big Wind,who committed manslaughter at Fort Buford, nor Sitting Elk, who 78 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194committed the same offense at Fishhook and under similar circum-stances?killing a clansman while intoxicated^?-dared flee to a Hidatsavillage. Big Wind fled to the Crows and Sitting Elk fled to FortStevenson and asked protection of the U.S. Army. It is interesting toobserve, and it is important for this study to note, that the custom ofvillage groups to break up whenever irreconcilable internal conflictsarose did not weaken authority of the clan.HIDATSA MOIETY CONCEPTIn contrast with the Mandan, the Hidatsa moiety concept was ofless social and economic importance. In this respect the Hidatsaseem to have occupied a position intermediate between the Mandan,who had a highly developed moiety concept, and the Crow where themoiety was unknown. Nowhere in the Hidatsa ceremonialism doesone find moiety seating of fasters or participants as practiced by theMandan in their important summer Okipa ceremony. We find theHidatsa fasters in their important summer NaxpikE and the SunsetWolf ceremonies sitting around the periphery of the sacred lodgewithout regard to moiety. Hidatsa fasters, when participating inthe Okipa ceremony, would sit by moieties and, so far as possible, byequated clans. Although the Hidatsa relate the myth of the creationof the earth by two heroes working on different sides of the MissouriRiver, they obviously borrowed the myth from the Mandan in veryrecent times. Their ceremonies in no way celebrate the event norare the culture heroes represented in the rites identified with clan ormoiety as did the Mandan ; nor does one find culture heroes responsiblefor the establishment and naming of moieties as with the Mandan.The concept of the moiety is highly developed and permeates theentire Mandan ceremonial structure and one would conclude fromtheir traditions that the clans came later than the moiety. Eefer-ences to Hidatsa symbolic representation of the moiety is limited tothe Eagle Trapping and related ceremonies which, in every respect,show greater similarities to the comparable Mandan rites than anyother common ceremonies. In fact, the similarities in the rites andmythological interpretations were so great that in a former paper(Bowers, 1950, pp. 206-254) I treated this aspect of their culturestogether, the differences between the two tribes being no greater thanbetween different bundle lines of the same tribe. I interpret thissimilarity of Eagle Trapping rites, techniques, and beliefs as pointingto recent diffusion from the Mandan. This similarity seems also tosubstantiate Hidatsa traditions of an eastern origin from a woodedregion not suited for eagle trapping by the techniques in vogue on thePlains. If we eliminate those moiety concepts associated with eagletrapping and related economic activities, little or nothing of the moiety Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 79concept remains. We find the Hidatsa dividing the buffaloes takenfrom corrals by moieties but the rituals of corralling buffaloes areassociated with the eagle trapping bundles and, more particularly, thesacred snares of that bundle.One finds reference to moiety division of eagle trapping sites withthe Missouri River serving as the dividing line between moieties, buta survey of site locations recalled by the older people shows no suchdivision (ibid., p. 213). I found that informants unacquainted withthe eagle trapping rites had no knowledge of territorial moieties.Lowie (1917, p. 21) speaks of moiety eagle trapping grounds on whichother trappers could not trespass. Case histories show that theseare basically clan grounds?linked-clans and moiety ties applied onlywhen no clansman used the site?at least so far as ownership and usewere concerned in the 19th century. A new trapping site was theproperty of the man who erected the lodge and supervised the selec-tion and excavation of the trapping pits. So long as he lived, thesite was his own to use or to lend. When he died, the site became thepreferential property of the clan and not of his son who inherited thebundle rites. Here we have two rules of inheritance in conflict witheach other, namely, clan inheritance of trapping sites and father-soninheritance of bundles. The Mandan, with a highly developed systemof clan inheritance of property and bundles, provided for simultaneoustransfer of both the site and the sacred bundle to a younger clansman.Lowie (ibid.) refers to moiety division in council and mentions thegreater number of chiefs in the Four-clan moiety. Chieftainshipseems to have been unaffected by moiety aflBliation; instead, it was amark of individual stature based on personal accomplishments.Moreover, there were more people in the Four-clan moiety, my countshowing 237 individuals in the Four-clan moiety and 185 in theThree-clan moiety. In addition to sitting and debating issues bymoiety in early treaty discussions and other business dealings withthe U.S. Government, each moiety had a spokesman; one who washeld in high regard by the tribe. In the division of Governmentallotments, goods were divided into two equal parts and the membersof each moiety took from their pile. The same rules applied whendividing corralled game.Ttie moiety defined relationships when clan relationships did notapply. When parents were of different clans of the same moiety, oneoccasionally hears reference to honors shown the opposite moiety,honors usually limited to those of the father's clan. Case historiesshow a greater tendency of the Mandan, in the same situation, tooffer presents to all clans except that of the mother. My case his-tories show that rarely did an Hidatsa ask one of the opposite moiety 80 BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY [Bull. 194to cut the flesh and insert the thongs for fasting; this was the specialduty of one's father's clansmen, irrespective of his moiety affiliation.In the light of recent data obtained from the Mandan, I believethat the Hidatsa moiety concept developed recently from a clansystem similar to that of the Crow after their settlement on theMissouri. It was not exogamous nor were there traditions of formermarriage exogamy. The Mandan, on the other hand, had traditionsof moiety exogamy and the table shown indicated even during thelast century a greater tendency toward moiety exogamy than for theHidatsa. The Kinship SystemNot only the daily social and economic life but much of Hidatsaceremonial life as well was patterned by the kinship system. Kinshipwas based on socially recognized genealogical relationships whichextended to the limits of the tribal group. For many individuals, theculture heroes were also included in the kinship structm-e. Alien popu-lations likewise were included in the kinship groups in instances whereTable 3. ? Hidatsa kinship terms ^Number 2 Bowers] HIDATSA SOCIAL AND CEREMONIAL ORGANIZATION 81 contacts were numerous and continuous. The accompanying chartssummarize the important features of the Hidatsa kinship system.Charts 1 and 2 illustrate by means of conventional diagrams the kin-ship terms used by a male ego and by a female ego.^^ The systemcan be conveniently described by an analysis of its terminologicalstructure, the behavior of reciprocals, and the life cycle of the indi-vidual. For convenience in analysis, English terms will frequentlybe employed, but these terms should be understood in reference tonative meanings which are determined by the applications and thesocial behavior involved.The Hidatsa kinship system is of the "classificatory" type in thatcollateral and lineal relatives are classed together. The father'sbrothers are classed with the father, and the mother's sisters with themother, while separate terms are employed for the mother's brotherand the father's sister. Grandparents are distinguished according tosex, and grandparent terms are extended to their siblings of the samesex. The maternal grandmother's brother is an "older" or "youngerbrother" {iuku or isuku, m.s.); the maternal grandfather's sister is a "grandmother" except in those instances where the maternal grand-father and the father are of the same clan when she is classed as "father's sister"; the paternal grandmother's brother is a "father"and the paternal grandfather's sister is sometimes a "grandmother."In the parent's generation there is a separate term for the "father'ssister," and her husband is classified as a "grandfather." There is noseparate term for the "mother's brother." Instead, he is classifiedwith ego's brothers, being either "older brother" or "younger brother"depending on whether he is older or younger than ego. The mother'sbrother's wife, woman speaking, is classified with her brother's wifeand her husband's sister as "sister-in-law" (itu'). A man classifiesthe "mother's brother's wife" (uuku) with his brothers' wives and hiswife's sisters.In ego's generation, siblings are distinguished according to ageand sex, while parallel cousins are treated as siblings. A femaleuses the term itdru and a male the term iuku for an older brother;both employ isuku to designate a younger brother. A female employsthe term iru for an older sister and itdku for a younger sister; thechildren of sisters are designated as sons and daughters. A maledesignates "older sisters" as itawiu and "younger sisters" as itakisu,their female lineal descendants likewise being classified as "oldersisters" and "younger sisters" depending on their age. 12 The kinship system is still in operation (1933) among the older people so that it is possible to get a ratherdetailed account of the terminology and most of the social usages. 82 '-<]|0'trOl i-<]cvj OZ ?- o -o U^J II r O ooo> '- rO!2 -Oi2 - OcvjII?Oi2 . -o2 ~ i- L<,cviO o> r02 '-05 ^ E oo ?? I r--< c o ^'7 I .EC ? a> ^ c ?- .Ac Co o o oo