A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE CONODONTS WITH DE-SCRIPTIONS OF EARLY MISSISSIPPIAN SPECIESBy Grace B. HolmesOf the Eastern High School, Washington, D. C.INTRODUCTIONThe present contributions to the study of the conodonts was pre-pared at the suggestion of Dr. R. S. Bassler and under his direction inthe paleontological laboratory of the United States National Museumwhere extensive collections of these toothlike structures were avail-able. As Doctors Ulrich and Bassler had just completed their paperon the classification of the conodonts and had applied their newclassification in the description of an Upper Devonian fauna ofwestern New York and an early Mississippian one from Tennessee,it was thought best that my work should carry these studies to theMississippian rocks of Alabama and also include for the ready refer-ence by students illustrations of previously described species, withexception of three publications, and a bibliography of the group.The exceptions mentioned refer to the work of Bryant in 1921,Ulrich and Bassler in 1926, and Roundy in 1926, copies of whichare still available to the student.ZOOLOGICAL AFFINITIES OF THE CONODONTSThe affinities of the conodonts have been a subject of controversyalmost since their discovery by Pander in 1856. That there was nodoubt in Pander's mind as to their relationship may be ascertainedfrom the title of his monograph. He studied the internal as wellas the external structure of the fossils and saw in their formationfishlike characters somewhat of the Selachian type.The question concerning the affinities of these fossils seems tohave had its birth in the mind of Dr. J. S. Newberry, of Ohio, whoafter studying specimens found in the Cleveland shales remainedundecided for some years whether they were Marsipobranchii(Cyclostomata) or Annelids.Hinde, who made the m.ost comprehensive study of conodonts ofany paleontologist up to Bryant's work of 1921, classified them asprimitive vertebrates, probably Myxinoids. He based his conclu-sions upon two facts: First, no gastropods which possessed suchNo. 2701.?Proceedings U. S. Natjonal Museum, Vol. 72. Art. 5.55414?28 -1 1
2 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vou72rteeth were found in the same formations nor did any crustaceanshave such spines; and, secondly, the annelid jaws which he foundin the same beds are composed of chitin, while the conodont teethcontain both calcium carbonate and calcium phosphate. He was ofthe same opinion in 1900, namely, that the teeth belonged to fishrather than to some invertebrate.In 1886 Rohon and Zittel decided that "the conodonts havestructurally nothing in common either with the dentine of Selachiaand other fishes, the horny teeth of Cyclostomi, the lingual teethof the MoUusca, the booklets of the Cephalopoda, or the brokensegment spines of the Crustacea ; on the other hand, both in form andin structure, they agree remarkably with the masticatory apparatusof the Annelida and Gephyrea." They came to the conclusion thatsince there is this agreement, all these microscopic teeth, those ac-knowledged by Hinde to be annelids and those which he calledconodonts, are the oral or oesophageal teeth of worms.In reviewing the literature on conodonts it will be found that themost thorough students of these fossils believe they are the remainsof primitive vertebrates, probably some simple fish. In neither ofJohn Smith's papers on conodonts of Scotland can one find a sug-gestion that these are not fish teeth, but an exception is found whenAsser Hadding places them in the phylum Annelida.In Grabau's Text-Book of Geology, conodonts are described ashorny, jawlike, or toothed structures developed within the body?theoesophageal jaws of worms.Bryant in 1921 remarks : " On the whole, the longer I have studiedthese organisms the more have I become convinced that the trueconodonts have hardly anything really diagnostic in common withannelid jaws. If, as I shall hereinafter try to demonstrate, certainof the leaflike forms are of the nature of pavement teeth, then theconclusion seems almost unavoidable that the conodonts must be con-sidered as the dentition of some primitive type of fishes."In the recent publication on the subject of conodonts by Ulrichand Bassler they are regarded as teeth and plates of primitive fish.Their classification is as follows
:
Class PISCESTYPICAL CONODONTS (teeth of primitive fishes)Family DISTACODIDAE Ulrich and BasslerDistacodus Hinde, 1879 {Machairodus Pander, 1856, preoccupied jMachairodia Smith, 1907); Acodus Pander, 1856; Acontiodus Pan-der, 1856; Drepanodus Pander, 1856; Scolopodus Pander, 1856;Oistodtis Pander, 1856 ; Paltodus Pander, 1856.
AET.5 BIBLIOGEAPHY OF THE CONODONTS?HOLMES 3Family PRIONIODIDAE Ulrich and BasslerPrioniodus Pander, 1856; Suhpriordodiis Smith, 1907; CordylodusPander, 1856; Belodus Pander, 1856; Ligonodma^ Ulrich andBassler. Family PRIONIODINIDAE Ulrich and BasslerComuramia Smith, 1907; Hindeodella^ Ulrich and Bassler;Pachysotnia Smith, 1907; Lonchodina^ Ulrich and Bassler; Pnonio-dina, Ulrich and Bassler ; Prioniodella, Ulrich and Bassler ; Bryan-todus^ Ulrich and Bassler ; Ewprioniodina^ Ulrich and Bassler ; Hib-l)ardella, Ulrich and Bassler; Lonchodus Pander, 1856; ValentiaSmith, 1907; Prionognathvs Pander, 1856; Pdlmatodella^ Ulrichand Bassler; Diplododella^ Ulrich and Bassler; Synprioniodin^yUlrich and Bassler. FISH PLATES (dermal plates)Family POLYGNATHIDAE Ulrich and BasslerPolygnathus (Hinde) Bryant, 1921; Ancyrodella Ulrich andBassler; Palniatole'pis Ulrich and Bassler; Panderodella Ulrich andBassler; Polygnathellus Ulrich and Bassler; Gnathod^s Pander,1856; Gtenognathus Pander, 1856.BIBLIOGRAPHY OF CONODONT LITERATURE1856. Pandee, C. H., Monographie der Fossilen Pische des Sllurischen Systemsder Russich-Baltischen Gouvernements, St. Petersburg, 91 pages, 9plates. (Contains original definition of conodonts with descriptionof numerous genera and species.)1861. EEabley, J., Geological Society, London, Quarterly Journal, volume IT,pages 543-552, plate 17. (Discusses zoological position. Probablyseveral of his specimens described are not conodonts.)1861. Owen, Richaed, Paleontology, Second Edition, Edinburgh, page 117.(Brief discussion of position.)1863. Von Eichwald, O. E., Bulletin de la Societe Imperiale des Naturalistesde Moscou, volume 36, page 375. (Brief discussion of systematic,position.)1870. Moore, Charles, British Association for the Advancement of Science.Report of the 39th Meeting, 1869, pages 375-377. (Conodonts discussedbut no specific description or figures.)1875. Newberry, J. S., Geological Survey, Ohio, Report, volume 2, part 2;Paleontology, pages 41-44, plate 57. (Illustrates various specimenswithout generic or specific names and discusses systematic posiition.>1878. Ulrich, E. O., Journal Cincinnati Society of Natural History, voliume1, pages 87-91, plate 4. (Briefly discusses conodonts.)1879. Hinde, G. J. Quarterly Journal, Geological Society, London, volume 35^.pages 351-369, plates 15-17. (A general review of conodonts, with,discussion of zoological relations and description of new forms.).
4 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vou 721880. Young, John, Glasgow Natural History Society, Proceedings, volume 4,pages 5 and 74. (Notice of occurrence of conodonts in Silurian andDevonian strata in England.)1881. Mason, Robert, Glasgow Natural History Society, Proceedings, volume ;4,page 190. (Records discovery of conodonts at a new locality inScotland.
)
J 882. RoLLE, Fr., Handworterbuch der Mineralogie, Geologie, und Paleontologie,volume 1, page 408. (Short discussion.)1884. Jamks, U. p., Cincinnati Society Natural History Journal, volume 7, pages143-149, plate 7. (Describes two conodonts.)1886. RoHON J. v., and Zittel, V., Sitzungsberichte der mathematische-physi-kaliscben Classe der k. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Miinchen,volume 16, pages 108-138, plates 1, 2. (Discussion of zoological posi-tion from a chemical and physical standpoint.)1887. Clarke, J. M., New York State Geologist, Sixth Annual Report for 1886,pages 30-33, plate Al. (Description and figures of conodonts andannelid jaws from the Devonian of New York.)1898. GiRTY, George H., American Journal of Science, series 4, volume 6, pages384-395. (Describes and illustrates a species from the Upper Devonianof Kentucky.)1899. Grabaxj, a. W., Bulletin Buffalo Society Natural Sciences, volume 6,pages 150-158. (Reproduces Hinde's figures with condensed descrip-tions. )1900. Smith, John, Natural History Society, Glasgow, Transactions, new series,volume 5, pages 336-338. (Discusses occurrence of Scotch Carbonif-erous conodonts.)1900. HiNDE, G. J., Natural History Society, Glasgow, Transactions, new series,volume 5, pages 338-346, plates 9, 10. (Describes and figures 13 speciesof Scotch Carboniferous conodonts.)1907. Smith, John, Natural History Society, Glasgow, Transactions, new series,volume 7, part 3, pages 235-252, plates 5-9. (Discusses occurrence ofconodonts in Silurian rocks of Scotland and describes about 40 speciesand 4 uevv^ genera.)1910. Grabau, a. W., and Shimer, H. W., North American Index Fossils, In-vertebrates, volume 2, pages 243-245. (Conodonts of Genesee, Waverly,Chazy, and Lorraine listed. Figures copied from Hinde.)1913. Hadding, Assar, Lunds University Arsskrift, new series, volume 9, No. 15.Kongl. Fysiografiske SiiHskapets Handlingar, new series, volume 24,No. 15, pages 30-32. (Describes eight new species of conodonts.)1921. Bryant, William L., Buffalo Society Natural Science Bulletin, volume 13,No. 2, pages 1-58, plates 1-16. (Reviews the literature and dis-cusses zoological position of conodonts. (Describes fauna of Genundewalimestone of western New York.)1921. Grabau, Amadeus W., A Textbook of Geology, Part 2, Historical Geology,pages 140 and 584. (Notes occurrence of conodonts in Upper Ordo-vician and Upper Devonian. Mentions probable zoological position.)1923. Parks, W. A., assisted by Madeline Fritz, The Stratigraphy andPaleontology of Toronto and vicinity, part 3, Gastropods, Cephalopods,and Vermes. Thirty-first Annual Report, Ontario, Department ofMines, volume 31, part 9, pages 1-45, plates 1-6. (Hinde's work onannelids and conodonts of Toronto region copied.)1923. Dean, Bashfoed A., B.bliography of Fishes, volume 3, American Museumon Natural History. (Mentions that the zoological position of cono-donts is disputed.)
AKT. 5 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE CONODONTS HOLMES 51924. Clabk, Thomas H., Bulletin American Paleontology, volume 10, No. 41,pages 67-70, plate 6. (Describes seven supposed species of conodonts,)1925. RouNDY, P. v., Bibliography of Conodont and Paleozoic annelid jawliterature, 4 pages. (Mimeographed; distributed by the Division ofGeology and Geography, National Research Council, Washington,D, C.)1926. Ulmch E. O. and Basslek R. S., A classification of the tooth-like fossilsconodonts. with descriptions of American Devonian and Mississippianspecies. Proceedings U. S. National Museum, volume 68, pages 1-63.plates 1-11. (Digest of classification in Bulletin Geological Society ofAmerica, 1925, vol. 36, pp. 218-220.)1926. RouNDY, P. V. The microfauna in Mississippian Formations of SanSaba County, Texas. Professional Paper 146, U. S. Geological Siirvey,pages 5-17 plates 1?i. (Describes 10 species and varieties of cono-donts, seven of which are new.)1926. Butts, Charles. Geology of Alabama. Geological Survey of Alabama,Special Rept. No. 14, plate 48. (Gives illustrations of sixteen speciesfigured in the present article.)BIBLIOGRAPHIC LIST OF CONODONTSIn this condensed bibliographic list of conodonts only the pageand plate citations are given since the title of the work can be deter-mined from the foregoing bibliography of literature. For theproper generic references, I have followed the work of Ulrich andBassler.Acodiis Pandek, 1856 (p. 21). Genotype (first species) : Aeodus erectusPander, 1856.Acodus acutus Pander, 1856 (p. 21, pi. 1, fig. 12). Lower Ordovician, BalticProvinces.AGodus crassus Pander, 1856 (p. 22, pi. 1, fig. 10; pi. 2, fig. 13). Lower Ordo-vician, Baltic Provinces.Acodus erectus Pander, 1856 (p. 21, pi. 1, fig. 1). Lower Ordovician, BalticProvinces.Acodus planus Pandek, 1856 (p. 22, pi. 1. fig. 9). Lower Ordovician, BalticProvinces.Acodus sigmoideus Pander, 1856 (p. 21, pi. 1, fig. 11). Lower Ordovician,Baltic Provinces.Acontiod'us Pander, 1856 (p. 28). Genotype (first species) : AcmHodus lafusPander, 1856.Acontiodus gracilis Pander, 1856 (p. 28. pi. 2, figs. 2a-c). Lower Ordovician,Baltic Provinces.Acontiodus latus Pander, 1856 (p. 28. pi. 2. figs. la-c). Lower Ordovician,Baltic Provinces.Acontiodus triangularis Pander, 1856 (p. 28, pi. 2. figs. 35rt-</). {Acontiodustriangulosis on plate). Lower Ordovician, Baltic Provinces.Ancyrodella Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 48). Genotype: Anciirodclla nodosaUlrich and Bassler, 1926.Ancyrodella hamata Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 48, pi. 7, fig. 7). Mis.sissip-pian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount Pleasant, Tenn.Ancyrodella malleus Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 49, pi. 7, figs. 1, 2). Mis-sissippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleasant,Tenn.
6 PKOCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM VOL.72,,Ancyrodella nodosa Uleich and Babbler, 1926 (p. 48, pi. 1, figs. 10-13). De-vonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County, N. Y.Ancyrodella symmetrica Uleich and Bassleb, 1926 (p. 49, pi. 8, fig. 1). Mis-sissippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Belodus Pandeib, 1856 (p. 30). Genotype and only species; Belodus gracilis,Pander, 1856.Belodus gracilis Pandeb, 1856 (p. 30, pi. 2, fig. 21). Lower Ordovician, BalticProvinces.Bryantodus Ulkich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 21). Genotype; Bryantodns It/picnsUlkich and Bassler, 1926.Bryantodus coalescens Ulbich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 25, pi. 4, fig. 28). UpperDevonian, Hhinestreet shale of Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County, N. Y.Bryantodus conjunctus Uleich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 24, pi. 4, figs. 8, 9).Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County,N. Y.Bryantodus crassidens Uleich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 23, pi. 6, figs. 17, 18).Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County,N. Y.Bryantodus crassus Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 27, pi. 10, fig. 14). Mississip-piau, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount Pleasant, Tenn.Bryantodus cristatus Bryant, 1921. PHoniodus cristatus Bryant, 1921 (p. 20,pi. 3, fig. 9; pi. 6, fig. 7). Upper Devonian, Genundewa limestone at base ofGenesee, North Evans, Eighteen Mile Creek, N. Y.Bryantodus curvatulus Uleich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 28, pi. 9, fig. 13). Mis-sissippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Bryantodus curvatus Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 26, pi. 4, figs. 19, 20).Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County,N. Y.Bryantodus dudius Smith, 1900. Polygnathus duMus Smith, 1900. (NotHinde, 1879), (p. 341, pi. 9, fig. 1). Carboniferous, Lower limestone, Birk-head, etc., west Scotland.Bryantodus duplicattis Hinde, 1879. Polyg^nathus duplicatus Hinde, 1879 (p.364, pi. 16, fig. 19). " Genesee, Bear Creek, Ontario."Bryantodus germanu s \Ji.B.icn and Bassler, 1926 (p. 25, pi. 10, fig. 18). Mississippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount PleasantTenn.Bryantodus gracilis Uleich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 27, pi. 10, fig. 10). Mississippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Bryantodus immersus Hinde, 1879, Polygnathus immersus Hinde, 1879 (p. 364,pi. 16, fig. 21). Prioniodus immersus Bryant, 1921 (p. 19, pi. 6, fig. 2)"Genesee, Kettle Point, Ontario." Reported by Bryant from the Genun-dewa limestone.Bryantodus incertus Uleich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 27, pi. 10, fig. 8). Missis-sippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Bryantodus inequalis Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 22, pi. 6, fig. 14). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, Erie -County,N. Y.Bryantodus insolens Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 25, pi. 10, fig. 17). Missis-sippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleasant,Tenn.
AET,5 BIBLIOGRAPHY OP THE CONODONTS HOLMES 7Bryantodus macrodentatus Bbyant, 1921, Prioniodus macrodentatus Bryant,1921 (p. 18, pi. 8, fig. 10). Upper Devonian, Genundewa limestone at baseof Genesee, North Evans, Eighteen Mile Creek, N. Y.Bryantodus minutus Uleich and Babbler, 1926 (p. 27, pi. 10, fig. 6). Missis-sippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Bryantodus muUidens Uleich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 22, pi. 6, figs. 15, 16).Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, ErieCounty, N. Y.Bryantodus muricatus Bryant, 1921, Prioniodus muricatus Bryant, 1921 (p. 18,pi. 5, fig. 7). Upper Devonian, Genundewa limestone at base of Genesee,North Evans, Eighteen Mile Creek, N. Y.Bryantodus nelsoni Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 28, pi. 10, fig. 9). Missis-sippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Bryantodus niiidus Uleich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 24, pi. 4, figs. 12-14). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County, N. Y.Bryantodus normalis Uleich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 24, pi. 4, figs. 25-27). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County,N. Y.Bryantodus oUiquus Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 23, pi. 6, figs. 19, 21). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County,N. Y.Bryantodus ottusus Bryant, 1921, Prioniodus ottusus Bryant, 1921 (p. 20, pi. 3,fig. 6, pi. 6, fig. 1). Upper Devonian, Genundewa limestone at base ofGenesee, North Evans, Eighteen Mile Creek, N. Y.Bryantodus parvulus Bryant, 1921, Prioniodus parvulus Bryant, 1921 (p. 20,pi. 9). Upper Devonian, Genundewa limestone at base of Genesee, NorthEvans, Eighteen Mile Creek, N. Y.Bryantodus pergracilis Uleich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 27, pi. 10, fig. 11). Missis-sippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Bryantodus politus Hinde, 1879, Prioniodus politus Hinde, 1879 (p. 858, pi. 15,figs. 11, 12) ; Parks, 1922 (p. 37, pi. 6, figs. 26, 27). Upper Cincinnatian,Lorraine-Dundas, Garrison Common, Ontario.Bryantodus pravus Bryant, 1921, Prioniodus pravus Bryant, 1921 (p. 18, pi. 8,fig. 5). Upper Devonian, Genundewa limestone at base of Genesee, NorthEvans, Eighteen Mile Creek, N. Y.Bryantodus radiatus Hinde, 1879, Polygnathus radiatus Hinde, 1879, (p. 364,pi. 16, fig. 20). Prioniodus radiatus Bryant, 1921 (p. 16, pi. 4, figs. 10-12;pi. 5, figs. 1-5, 8; pi. 6, fig. 5; pi. 7, figs. 1, 2, 4, 6, 8; pi. 14, fig. 1). " Genesee,Kettle Point, Ontario ". Identified by Bryant from Genundewa limestone ofwestern New York.Bryantodus retusus Bryant, 1921, Prioniodus retusus Bryant, 1921 (p. 17),pi. 4, figs. 8, 9; pi. 5, figs. 9, 11; pi. 8, fig. 3). Upper Devonian, Genundewalimestone at base of Genesee, North Evans, Eighteen Mile Creek, N. Y.Bryantodus semiseparatus Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 24, pi. 4, fig;. 16).Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, ErieCounty, N. Y.Bryantodus sinuatus, Uleich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 23, pi. 6, figs. 22-34).Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, ErieCounty, N. Y.Bryantodus spatulatus Bryant, 1921, Prioniodus spatulatus Bryant, 1921 (p.18, pi. 8, fig. 9). Upper Devonian, Genundewa limestone at base of Genesee,North Evans, Eighteen Mile Creek, N. Y.
8 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vol.72Bryantodus subbrevis Ulbioh and Bassler, 1926 (p. 28, pi, 10, figs. 15, 16).Mississippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Cliattanooga shale, MountPleasant, Tenu.Bryantodus subradiatus Uuuch and Bassler, 1926 (p. 26, pi. 10, figs. 12,13). Mississippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattiinooga shale. MountPleasant, Tenn.Bryantodus tenuis Ulbich and Bassi^ek, 1926 (p. 26, pi. 10, fig. 7). Missis-sippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Bryantodus transitans Ulkich and Bassles, 1926 (p. 20, pi. 4, figs. 10, 11).Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, ErieCounty, N. Y.Bryantodus tridentatus Ulbich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 22, pi. 6, fig. 13).Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County,N. Y.Bryantodus typious Ulrich and Bassi-eb, 1926 (p. 21, figs. 11, 12). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County, N. Y.Centrodus Pander, 1856. See Lonchodus Pander, 1856.Centrodus convexus Pander., 1858. See Lonchodus convexus.Centrodus distans Smith, 1907. See LoiicJwdus distans.Centrodus duplicatus Hindb, 190O. See Hindeodslla duplicata.Centrodus ereclus Smith, 1907. See Lonchodus ereotus.Centrodus invaUdus Bryant, 1921. See Prioniodella invaUda.Centrodus Uneatus Hinde, 1900. See Hmdeodella lineata.Centrodus oUiquus Smith, 1907. See Lonchodus ohliquus.Centrodus princeps Bryant, 1921. See Lonchodus princeps.Centrodus simplex Pander, 1856. See Lmtchodus simplex.Cordylod'us Pander, 1856 (p. 33). Genotype (first species) : Cordylodus angu-latus Pander, 1856.Cordylodus angulatus Pander, 1856 (p. 33, pi. 2, figs. 26-31, 34). Lower Ordovvician, Baltic Provinces.Cordylodus ramosus Hadding, 1913 (p. 31, pi. 1, fig. 6). Ordovician Dicello-graptus zone, southern Norway.Cordylodus rotundatus Pandeh, 1856 (p. 33, pi. 2, figs. 32, 33). Lower Ordo-vician, Baltic Provinces.Cornuramia Smith, 1907 (p. 246) ; Ulbich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 41). Geno-type : Cornuramia monodonta Smith, 1907.Cornuramia Mcornua Smith, 1907 (p. 251, pi. 9, fig. 49). Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Cornuramia diplodonta Smith, 1907 (p. 246, pi. 5, fig. 25). Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, Ravengill, Scotland.Co7'nuramia monodonta Smith, 1907 (p. 246, pi. 6, fig. 20). Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, Ravengill, etc., Scotland.Ctenognathus Pander., (1856, p. 32) ; Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 54) Roundy,1926 (p. 16). Genotype: Ctenognathus murchisom Pander, 1856.Ctenognathus kayserUngii Pander, 1856 (p. 32, pi. 2A, fig. 15). Carboniferouslimestone, Tula, Russia.Ctenognathus murchisoni Pandeoj, 1856 (p. 32, pi. 4, fig. 17; pi. 6, figs. ISff, h).Silurian, Rootsikiille, Russia.Ctenognathus ohliquus Pander, 1856. See Eindeodella oMiqua.Ctenognathus ve>-neuilU Pander, 1856 (p. 32, pi. 4, fig. 18; pi. 2A, figs. 13, 14,16, 17). Devonian, Wells on the Wolchow, Russia. Species of Valeyitia,Prioniodina, and Eindeodella are represented by these illustrations.
AiiT.5 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE COIsTODONTS HOLMES 9Diplododella Ulrich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 41). Genotype: Diplododella hi-lateralis Ulbich and Bassleb, 1926.Diplododella MJaterall'i Uibich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 41, text fig. 21, p. 16).Mississippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, MountPleasant, Tenn.Distacodidae Ulrich and Bassleb, 1926 (p. 6).Distacod'us Hinde, 1879 (p. 357). Proposed for Machairodus Pander, 1856(p. 22) preoccupied. Machairodia Smith, 1907 (p. 246), also proposed inplace of Machairodus Pander:. Genotype: Distacodus {Maohairodlis) in-Gurvus Pandeb, 1856.Distacodus angustus Pander, 1856. Machairodus angustus Pander, 1856 (p.2.S, pi. 1, fig. 35). Lower Ordovlcian, Baltic Provinces.Distacodus canalictilatus Pandeb, 1856. Machairodus canalienlatus Pandeib,1856 (p. 24, pi. 1, fig. 23). Lower Ordovician, Baltic Provinces.Distacodus d'latatus Pandeb, 1856. Machairodus dilatatus Pandeb, 1856 (p22, pi. 1, fig. 14; pi. 2, fig. 14). Lower Ordovician, Baltic Provinces.Distacodus ensiformis Pander, 1856. Machairodns ensiformis Pandeb, 1856(p. 28, pi. 1, figs. 25-28: pi. 2, fig. 36). Lower Ordovician, Baltic Provinces.Distacodus InaequaUs Pander, 1856. Machairodus maequaUs Pander, 1856 (p.23, pi. 2, fig. 38). Lower Ordovician, Baltic Provinces.Distacodus incuriHis Pandeb, 1856. Machairodus incurmis Pandeb, 1856 (p. 23,pi. 1, fig. 22). Lower Ordovician, Baltic Provinces; Hinde, 1879 (p. 357,pi. 15, fig. 9), and Paeks, 1922 (p. 36, pi. 6, fig. 23). Upper Ordovician,Lorraine-Dundas, Garrison Common near Toronto, Ontario.Distacodus planus Pandeb, 1856. Machairodus pJamis Pander, 1856 (p. 24,pi. 2, fig. 39). Lower Ordovician, Baltic Provinces.Distacodus rectus Ulrich and Bassleb, 1926 (p. 6, pi. 9, fig. 22). Missis-sippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Distacodus 7-homheus Smith, 1907. Machairodia rhomheus (Pander ?) Smith,1907 (p. 246, pi. 6, fig. 19). Ordovician. Arenig-Llandeilo, Ravengill, etc.,stfuthern uplands of Scotland.Bista<;odus rhomhoideus Pander, 1856. Machairodus rhomVoideus Pander, 1856(p. 22, pi. 2, fig.s. 10-12). Lower Ordovician, Baltic Provinces.Distacodus solidtis Pander, 1856. Machairodus solidus Pander, 1856 (p. 23,pi. 2, fig. 15). Lower Ordovician, Baltic Provinces.Distacodus sulcatus Smith, 1907. Machairodus sulcata Smith, 1907 (p. 246,pi. 6, fig. 17). Ordovician, Ai-enig-Llandeilo, Ravengill, southern uplands ofScotland.Drepanodus Pander, 1856 (p. 20). Genotype (first species) : Drepanodus in-flexus Pander, 1856.Drepanodus acutus Pander, 1856 (p. 21, pi. 2, fig. 9). Lower Ordovician,Baltic Provinces.Drepanodus arcuatus Pander, 1856 (p. 20, pi. 1, figs. 2, 4, 5, 17, 30, 31). LowerOrdovician, Baltic Provinces; Hinde, 1879 (p. 357, pi. 15, figs. 7, 8) ; Grabadand Shimeb, 1910 (p. 245, figs. 1537 d, e) ; Parks, 1922 (p. 36, pi. 6, figs. 21,22). Ordovician, Lorraine-Dundas, Toronto, Canada.Drepanodus falcatus Hadding, 1913 (p. 30, pi. 1, fig. 3). Ordovician, Dicello-graptus zone, southern Norway.Drepanodus flexuosns Pander, 1856 (p. 20, pi. 1, figs. 6-8). Lower Ordovician,Baltic Provinces; Smith, 1907 (p. 246, pi. 6, fig. 18). Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.55414?28 2
10 PEOCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vol, 72Drepanodus infiexus Pander, 1856 (p. 20, pi. 1, fig. 3; pi. 2, fig. 16). LowerOrdovician, Baltic Provinces.Drepanodus oMusus Pandee, 1856 (p. 21, pi. 2, fig. 11). Lower Ordovician,Baltic Provinces.Drepanodus roiustiis Haddino, 1913 (p. 31, pi. 1, fig. 5). Ordovician, Dicello-graptus zone, southern Norway.Drepanodus verutus Hadding, 1913 (p. 31, pi. 1, fig. 4). Ordovician, Dicello-graptus zone, southern Norway.Euprioniodina Ulbich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 29). Genotype: Euprioniodmadeflecta Ulrich and Bassi.ee, 1926.Euprioniodina acicularis Hinde, 1879, Prioniodus acictilaris Hinde, 1879 (p. 360,pi. 15, figs. IS, 19). Devonian, Genesee, Kettle Point, Ontario; Grabau, 1899(p. 151, fig. 33E).Euprioniodina ? alata Hadding, 1913, Prioniodus alatus Hadding, 1913 (p. 32,pi. 1, figs. 9, 10). Ordovician, Diceilograptus zone, southern Norway.Euprioniodina l)ryanU Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 29, pi. 3, figs. 13, 14;pi. 1, fig. 21). Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage groupShaleton, Erie County, N. Y.Euprioniodina conferta Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 29, pi. 3, fig. 13, 14;pi. 1, fig. 21). Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group,Shaleton, Erie County, N. Y.Euprioniodina conferta Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 29, pi. 3, fig. 17). UpperDevonian, Rhinesti'eet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County, N. Y.Euprioniodina curvata Smith, 1907, Prioniodus curvatus Smith, 1907 (p. 249,pi. 8, fig. 40). Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Euprioniodina deflecta Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 29, pi. 3, figs. 11, 12).Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, ErieCounty, N. Y.Euprioniodina ? discedens Hadding, 1913, Prioniodus discedens Hadding, 1913p. 32, pi. 1, fig. 11). Ordovician, Diceilograptus zone, southern Norway.Euprioniodina ? furcata Hinde, 1879, Prioniodus furcaius Hinde, 1879 (p. 358,pi. 15, fig. 13) ; Parks, 1923 (p. 37, pi. 6, fig. 27). Upper Ordovician, Lorraine-Dundas, Garrison Common near Toronto, Ontario.Euprioniodina ? lanceolata Smith, 1907, Polygnathus lanceolatus Smith,1907 (p. 245, pi. 5, fig. 16). Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplandsof Scotland.Euprioniodina peculiaris Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 30, pi. 10, fig. 3)iMississippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. MountPleasant, Tenn.Euprioniodina perangulata Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 30, pi. 3, fig. 10).Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, ErieCounty, N. Y.Euprioniodina ? radicans Hinde, 1879, Prioniodus radicans Hinde, 1879(p. 356, pi. 15, figs. 1-6; Grabau and Shimee, 1910 (p. 244, figs. 1538 a-c).Lower Ordovician (Chazy) Grenville, Quebec.Onathodus Pander, 1856 (p. 33). Genotype (first species) : Gnathodus mos-guensis Pander, 1856. See also Hinde, 1879 (p. 365) ; Brtant, 1921 (p. 22) ;Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 54), and Roundy, 1926 (p. 12).Gnathodus americanus Bryant, 1921 (p. 22, pi. 7, fig. 5). Upper Devonian,Genundewa limestone at base of Genesee, North Evans, Eighteen Mile Creek,N. Y. ; Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 54, pi. 1, fig. 5). Upper Devonian,Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Chaleton, Erie County, N. Y.
ABT..5 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE CONODONTS HOLMES 11G-nathodus ? crassus Hinde, 1879, Polygnathus crassus Hindb, 1879 (p. 365,pi. 17, fig. 3) ; Grabau, 1899 (p. 155, fig. 38) ; Gbabau and Shimer, 1910 (p.243, fig. 1535c). Genesee, Genundewa limestone, North Evans, EighteenMile Creek, N. Y. Possibly a side view of a Polygnathus.Gnathodus ? curvatus Hinde, 1879, Polygnathus ? curvatus Hinde, 1879 (p.366, pi. 17, fig. 7). "Genesee shale, Bear Creek, Ontario."Qnathodus ? eriensis Hinde, 1879, Polygnathus ? eriensis Hinde, 1879 (p. 366,pi, 17, fig. 6). "Erratic boulder of black Genesee shale, north shore of LakeErie, Ontario."Qnathodus mosquensis Pandeb, 1856 (p. 34, pi. 2A, fig. 10a, &, c). Carbon-iferous, Moscow^, Russia, Polygnathus (Gnathodus) mosquensis Hinde, 1879(p. 342, pi. 9, figs. 2-4). Carboniferous limestone. Dairy, etc., West Scotland.Qnathodus texanus Roundy, 1926 (p. 12, pi. 2, figs. 7, 8). Barnett shale ofMississippian, San Saba County, Tex.Qnathodus texanus, var. bicuspidus Roundy, 1926 (p. 12, pi. 12, fig. 9). Barnettshale of Mississippian, San Saba County, Tex.EiMardella Uleich and Basslek, 1926 (p. 37). Genotype: Prioniodus angu-latns Hinde, 1879.Eibiardella angulata Hinde, 1879, Prioniodus angulatus Hinde, 1879 (p. 360,pi. 15, fig. 17) ; Grabau, 1899 (p. 151 fig. 33D) ; Grabau and Shimer, 1910(p. 244, fig. 1537/1) ; Bryant, 1921 (p. 17). Upper Devonian, Rhinestreetshale of the Portage group, vpestern New York. ? Prioniodus angulatusHinde, 1900 (p. 343, pi. 10, figs. 18, 19). Carboniferous lower limestone.Dairy, etc.. West Scotland; Hihhardella angulata (Hinde) Uleich andBassler, 1926 (p. 37, pi. 3, figs. 1-4). Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shaleof the Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County, N. Y.HiiMrdella ? confertissima Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 38, pi. 3, fig. 5).Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, ErieCounty, N. Y.Eibbardella multidens Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 38, pi. 3, figs. 8, 9).Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, ErieCounty, N. Y.Eibbardella subaequalis Uleich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 38, pi. 3, figs. 6, 7).Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, ErieCounty, N. Y.Eindeodella Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 38). Genotype: Eindeodella sub-tilis Ulrich and Bassler, 1926.Eindeodella alternata Uleich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 40, pi. 1, figs. 14, 15).Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, ErieCounty, N. Y.Eindeodella decurrens Uleich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 40, pi. 8, fig. 13). Missis-sippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Eindeodella dubia Smith, 1907. Polygnathus duMus Smith, 1907, not Hinde,1879 (p. 245, pi. 5, fig. 15). Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplandsof Scotland.Eindeodella duplicata Pander, 1856, Lonchodus (Centrodus) dupllcatus Pander,1856 (p. 31, pi. 2A, figs. 7, 8). Carboniferous limestone, Tula, Russia. Cen-trodus dupUcatus (Pander) Hinde, 1900 (p. 341, pi. 9, fig. 12). Carbon-iferous, upper limestone, Monkcastle, Kilwinning, west Scotland.Eindeodella lineata Pander, 1856, Lonchodus (Centrodus) lineatus Pander,1856 (p. 31, pi. 2A, fig. 9). Carboniferous limestone, Tula, Russia. Cen-trodus lineatus (Pander) Hinde, 1900 (p. 341, pi. 9, figs. 13, 14). Carbon-iferous, upper limestone, Monkcastle, Kilwinning, west Scotland. Lonchodus ?lineatus Roundy, 1926 (p. 15, pi. 3, figs. 6-8). Barnett shale of Mississippian,San Saba County, Tex.
12 PEOCBEDINGS OP THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vol.72Hindeodella longidens Ulbich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 40, pi. 8, figs. 14, 15).Missis-sippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Hindeodella ohUqua Pander, 1856, Centrodus obliguus Pander, 1856 (p. 33, pi.2A, figs. 11, 12). Devonian, Gostinopolskoi, Prislan on the Wokhow River;HiNDE, 1900 (p. 344, pi. 10, figs. 27-29). Carboniferous, lower limestone.Birkhead, Dairy, west Scotland.Hindeodella recta Ulbich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 40, pi. 8, fig. 16). Mtssiis-sippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount I'l>asan(,Tenn.Hindeodella simiUs Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 39, pi. S, fig. 20). Mi.s-sissippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga .^bale. Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Hindeodella sulequalis Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 41, pi. 4, fig. 21). UpjperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County, N. Y.Hindeodella suMilis Ulrich rnd Bassler, 1926 (p. 39, pi. 8, figs. 37-19). Mis-sissippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Ligonodina Ulbich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 12), Genotype; Ligonodin-a pecti-nata Ulbich and Bassler, 1926.Ligonodina deflecta Ulbich and Bassler, 1926 (13 pi. 2, figs. 3, 4). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County, N. Y.Ligonodina falclformis Ulbich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 14, pi. 2, fig.^!. 11-13).Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, ErieCounty, N. Y.Ligonodina li'iblardi Ulrich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 14, pi. 2, figs. 7, 8). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, Brie County,N. Y.Ligonodina hindei Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 14, pi. 2, figs. 14-16). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County,N. Y.Ligono'liiia niagnidens Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 14, pi. 2, figs. 5, 6). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County,N. Y.lAgonodina panderi PIinde, 1879, PriOJiodu,'t panderi Hinde, 1879 (p. 361, pi. 16,fig. 4) ; Grabau, 1899 (p. 152, fig. 33H) ; Grabau and Shimeb., 1910 (p. 244,fig. 1533a). Upper Devonian, Genesee or Portage. Eltditeen Mile Creek. N. Y.Ligonodina panderi (Hinde) Ulrich and Basslei;. 1926 (p. 13, pi. 2, figs. 1.2). Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, BrieCounty, N. Y.Ligonodina pectinata Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 13, pi. 2, figs. 9, 10). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group. Shaleton, Erie County,N. Y.JJgonodina simplex Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 15, pi. 9, fig. 2S). Missis-sippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chitttanooga shale. Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Ligonodina tridentata Ulbich and Bassijir, 1926 (p. 15, pi. 9, fig. 5). Misbis-sippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount Pleasjmt,Tenn.Lonchoditia Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. -30). Genotype; Lonchodlna typicalisUlrich and Bassler, 1926.
AKT.5 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE COTnTODONTS HOLMES 13Lonchodina abnomiis Uleich and Bassleb, 1926 (p. 34, pi. 6, figs. 8-10). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County,N. Y.Lonchodina alteiiiata Uleich and Basslkk. 1926 (p. 35, pi. 6, fig. 4). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County,N. Y.Lonchodina arcuata Uleich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 32, pi. 5, fig. 15). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County,N. Y.Lonchodin-a bUateraUs Uleich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 32, pi. 5, fig. IS.) UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County,N. Y.Lonchodina clavata Hinde, 1879, Prioniodus clavatus Hinde, 1879, (p. 360.pi. 15, fig. 16) ; Grabau, 1899 (p. 151, fig. 33c) ; Gr-vbau and Siiimeu, 1910 (p.244, fig. 15376) ; Beyant, 1921 (p. 16, pi. 6, figs. 3, 6). Upper Devonian.Genundewa limestone at base of Genesee, North Evans, Eighteen Mile Creek.N. Y.Lonchodina deUcatula Uleich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 33, pi. 5, fig. 11). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County,N. Y.Lonchodina discreta Ulkich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 36, pi. 10, figs. 1, 2).Mississippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount Pleas-ant, Tenn.Lonchodina erratica Hinde, 1879, Prioniodus erraticus Hinde, 1S79 (p. 359,pi. 15, fig. 14) ; Grabaxj, 1899 (p. 150, fig. 33A) ; Grabau and Shimer, 1910,p. 244, fig. 1537c) ; Bbyakt, 1921 (p. 17, pi. 2, fig. 10; pi. 7, fig. 1). UpperDevonian, Genundewa limestone at base of Genesee, North Evans, EighteenMile Creek, N. Y.Lonchodina geniculata Uleich and Basslek, 1926 (p. 36, pi. 4, fig. 15). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County.N. Y.Lonchodina ? increMscens Ulrtch and Bassler, 1926 (p. 35, pi. 5, fig. 20;pi. 3, figs. 15, 16). Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group,Shaleton, Erie County, N. Y.Lonchodina paucidens Uleich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 34, pi. 6, fig. 1). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County,N. Y.Lonchodina peracuta Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 33, pi. 5, fig. 19). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County,N. Y.Lonchodina perlonya Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 32, pi. 5, figs. 6, 7). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shade of the Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County,N. Y.Lonchodina ? projecta Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 35, pi. 5, figs. 9, 10).Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, ErieCounty, N. Y.Lonchodina f prona Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 36, pi. 5, figs. 16, 17). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County,N. Y.Lonchodina rectangulata Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 37, pi. 10, fig. 4).Mississippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleas-ant, Tenn.
14 PEOOEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vou 72Lonchodma rectidens Ulkich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 31, pi. 5, figs. 13, 14).Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, ErieCounty, N. Y.Lonchodinfi separata Ulkich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 31, pi. 5, fig. 12). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County,N. Y.Lonchodina f spinata Hadding, 1913, Polygnathus spinatua BLadding, 1913,(p. 32, pi. 1, fig. 8). Ordovician, Dicellograptus zone. Southern Norv^ay.Lonchodina suhangulata Ulkich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 32, pi. 5, fig. 3). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County,N. Y.Lonchodina subrecta Ulrioh and Bassler, 1926 (p. 33, pi. 5, figs. 4, 5). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County,N. Y.Lonchodina subsymmetrica Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 34, pi, 6, figs. 5-7;pi. 5, fig. 8; pi. 1, fig. 24). Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portagegroup, Shaleton, Erie County, N. Y.Lonchodina transversa Uleich and BasoLee, 1926 (p. 34, pi. 6, figs. 2, 3).Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, ErieCounty, N. Y,Lonchodina typicalis Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 31, pi. 5, figs. 1, 2). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet .shale of the Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County,N. Y.Lonchodus Pander, 1856 (p. 80) (Gentrodus Pander, 1856, p. 31, preoccupied)
;
uleich and Basslee,^ 1926 (p. 42) ; Roundy, 1926 (p. 15) Genotype (firstspecies) : Lonchodus {Centi'odus) simplex Pandee, 1856.Lonchodus convexus Pandee, 1856. Gentrodus convexus Pandee, 1856 (p. 31,pi. 2A, fig. 4). Carboniferous limestone, Tula, Russia. Polygnathus {Gentro-dus) convexus (Pander) Hinde, 1900 (p. 342, pi. 9, figs. 6-8). Carboniferous,Upper limestone, Monkcastle, Dairy, etc., west Scotland.Lonchodus coronatus Hinde, 1879, Polygnathus coronatus Hinde, 1879 (p. 365,pi. 17. fig. 1). Devonian, Genesee, Kettle Point, Ontario; Grabau andShimee, 1910 (p. 243, fig. 1535a); Beyant, 1921 (p. 21). Bryant recordsthis species from Portage shale at Sturgeon Point, N. Y. Possibly a speciesof Lonchodina but Hinde's restoration does not match any of the speciesso far noted.Lonchodus curvatus Smith, 1907. Polygnathus curvatus Smith, 1907 (p. 245,pi. 5, fig. 11). Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Lonchodus distans Smith, 1907. Gentrodus distans Smith, 1907 (p. 244, pi.5, fig. 7). Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Lonchodus dupUcatus Pandee, 1856. See Hindeodella duplicata.Lonchodus erectus Smith, 1907. Gentrodus erectus Smith, 1907 (p. 244, pi. 5,figs. 1, 2, 4, 5). Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Lonchodus lineatus Pander, 1856. See Hindeodella lineata.Lonchodus minus Smith, 1907. Polygnathus minus Smith, 1907 (p. 245, pi. 5,fig. 8). Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Lonchodus oUiquus Smith, 1907. Gentrodus oUiquus Smith, 1907 (p. 244,pi. 5, fig. 3). Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Lonchodus parvus Smith, 1907. Polygnathus parvus Smith, 1907 (p. 245, pi.5, fig, 6) . Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.
AHT,5 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE CONODOIirTS?HOLMES 15Lonchodus princeps Hindb, 1870. Polygnathus princeps Hinde, 1879 (p. 365,pi. 16, fig. 23) ; Grabatj, 1899 (p. 155, fig. 36) ; Centrodus princeps (Hinde)Bbtant, 1921 (p. 22, text fig. 6). Upper Devonian, Genundewa limestoneat base of Genesee, North Evans, Eighteen Mile Creek, New York. Polyg-nathus princeps (Hinde) Smith, 1907 (p. 245, pi. 5, figs. 9, 10, 12, 13).Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Lonchodus sitnplex Pandee, 1856. Centrodus simplex Pandeb, 1856 (p. 31,pi. 2A, figs. 2, 3, 5, 6). Carboniferous limestone, Tula, Russia; Rotjndy,1926 (p. 15, pi. 3, figs. 1-5). Barnett shale of Mississippian, San SabaCounty, Texas.Machairodia Smith, 1907. See Distacodus Hinde, 1879.Machairodus Pandeb, 1856. See Distacodus Hinde, 1879.Oistodus Pander, 1856 (p. 27). Genotype (first species) : Oistodus lanceolatusPandeb, 1856.Oistodus acuminatus Pandeb, 1856 (p. 27, pi, 2, fig. 20). Lower Ordovician,Baltic Provinces.Oistodus inaequalis Pandeb, 1856 (p. 27, pi. 2, fig. 37). Lower Ordovician,Baltic Provinces.Oistodus lanceolatus Pandee, 1856 (p. 27, pi. 2, figs. 17-19) . Lower Ordovician,Baltic Provinces.Oistodus parallelus Pandeb, 1856 (p. 27, pi. 2, fig. 40). Lower Ordovician,Baltic Provinces.Pachysomia Smith, 1907, (p. 246) ; Uleich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 43). Geno-type : Pachysomia wanlocJcensis Smith, 1907.Pachysomia wanlockensis Smith, 1907 (p. 246, pi. 6, fig. 23). Ordovician,Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Palmatodella Ulbich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 41). Genotype: Palmatodelladelicatula Uleich and Basslee, 1926.Palmatodella delicatula Uleich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 41, pi. 10, fig. 5; textfig. 20). Mississippian, Chattanooga shale, north of Huntsville, Alabamaand Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleasant, Tenn.Palmatolepis Uleich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 49). Genotype: Palmatolepis per-lobata Uleich and Basslee, 1926.Palmatolepis asymmctrica Ulbich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 50, pi. 7, fig. 18).Mississippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount Pleas-ant, Tenn.Palmatolepis Mfurcata Uleich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 50, pi. 7, figs. 16, 17).Mississippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount Pleas-ant, Tenn.Palmatolepis ewtraloMta Uleich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 50, pi. 8, fig. 3). Mis-sissippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Palmatolepis glaler Uleich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 51, pL 9, figs. 18-20). Mis-sissippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Palmatolepis lohatula Ulbich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 50, pi. 7, figs. 3, 4).Mississippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount Pleas-ant, Tenn.Palmatolepis peculiaris Uleich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 51, pi. 8, figs. 11, 12).Mississippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleas*ant, Tenn.
16 PROCEEDINGS OP THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vol. 72Palmatolepis perlobata Ulrich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 49, pi. 7, figs. 19-23).Mississippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleas-ant, Tenn.Palmatolepis putvciata Hinde, 1879. Polygnathus pnnctatus Hinde, 1S79 (p. 367,pi. 17, fig. 14) ; Grabau, 1899 (p. 157, fig. 43) ; Grabatj and Shimer, 1910(p. 244, fig. 1536<Z) ; Bryant, 1921 (p. 25). Devonian, Genundewa limestone,at base of Genesee, North Evans, Eighteen Mile Creek, New York ; Ulrichand Bassler, 1926 (p. 51, pi. 1, figs. 6, 7). Rhinestreet shale of Portagegroup, Shaleton, Erie County, New York.Paltodus Pander, 1856 (p. 24). Genotype (first species) : Paltodus suhaequaUsPander, 1856.Paltodus Mcostatus Pander, 1856 (p. 25, pi. 1, fig. 21). Lower Ordovician,Baltic Provinces.Paltodus canaliculatus Pander (p. 25, pi. 1, fig. 36). Lower Ordovician, BalticProvinces.Paltodu-f obtusus Pander, 1856 (p. 24, pi. 1, figs. 13, 16, 29, 32). LowerOrdovician, Baltic Provinces.Paltodus rotundatus Pander, 1856 (p. 25, pi. 1, figs. 33, 34). Lower Ordovician,Baltic Provinces.Paltodus subaequalis PANDsat, 1856 (p. 24, pi. 1, fig. 24). Lower Ordovician,Baltic Provinces.Paltodus tnmcatus Pander., 1856 (p. 25, pi. 1, figs. 18-20). Lower Ordovician,Baltic Provinces.Panderodella Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 52). Genotype: Panderodellatruncata Ulrich and Bassler, 1926.Panderodella maxillaris Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 53, pi. 9, fig. 21).Mississippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. MountPleasant, Tenn.Panderodella scitula Hinde, 1900, Polygnathus scUtdus Hinde, 1900 (p. 343,pi. 9, figs. 9-11). Carboniferous, upper limestone. Dairy, etc., west Scotland.Panderodella serrata Hinde, 1879, Polygnathus serratus Hinde, 1879 (p. 365,pi. 17, figs. 4, 5 ) . Devonian, Genesee, Kettle Point, Ontario.Panderodella solida Hinde, 1879, Polygnathus solidus^ Hinde, 1879 (p. 365,pi. 17, fig. 2) ; Grabau, 1899 (p. 155, fig. 37) ; Grabau and Shimer, 1910(p. 213, fig. 1535&) ; Beyanti,; 1921 (p. 27, pi. 7, figs. 7-10, 12). UpperDevonian, Genundewa limestone at base of Genesee, North Evans, EighteenMile Creek, N. Y.Panderodella sulerassa Ulrich and Bassler., 1926 (p. 53, pi. 9, fig. 14). Missis-sippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Panderodella truncata Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 52, pi. 9, figs. 15-17),Mississipian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Polygnathellus Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 53). Genotype: Polygnathellustypicalis Ulrich and Bassler, 1926.Polygnathellus coUigatus Bryant, 1921, Prioniodus colUgatus Bryant, 1921,(p. 17, pi. 3, figs. 1, 2, 4; pi. 5, figs. 6, 10; pi. 6, fig. 8; pi. 7, figs. 2, 6).Upper Devonian, Genundewa limestone at base of Genesee, North Evans,Eighteen Mile Creek, N. Y.Polygnathellus curvatus Ulrich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 54, pi. 1, fig. 4). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County, N. Y.Polygnathellus typicalis Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 53, pi. 1, figs. 1-3),Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of Portage group, Shaleton, ErieCounty, N. Y.
ART, 5 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE CONODONTS HOLMES 17Polygnathidae Uleich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 43).Polygnathus Hinde, 1879 (p. 361) ; Bryant, 1921 (p. 23) ; TJlrich and Bass-ler, 1926 (p. 43) ; Roundy, 1926 (p. 13). Genotype: Polygnathus pennatusHinde, 1879 {Polygnathus dubius Hinde, 1879, part).Polygnathus ? acaulis Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 47, pi. 8, figs. 4, 5). Mis-sissippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Polygnathus alternans Hadding, 1913. See Prioniodus ? alternans.Polygnathus argos T. H. Clark, 1924 (p. 70, pi. 6, fig. 7). Not a conodont.probably fringe of appendage of merostome or trilobite. Canadian, PointLevis, Canada.Polygnathus 'bilineatus Roundi"-, 1926 (p. 13, pi. 3, fig. 10). Barnett shale ofMississippian, San Saba County, Tex.Polygnathus caelatus Bryant, 1921 (p. 27, pi. 13, &^s. 1-13). Upper Devonian,Genundewa limestone at base of Genesee, North Evans, Eighteen Mile Creek,N. Y.Polygnathus ? claviger Roundy, 1926 (p. 14, pi. 4, figs. 1, 2). Barnett shale ofMississippian, San Saba County, Tex.Polygnathus concentricus Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 47, pi. 8, figs. 6, 7).Mississippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount Pleas-ant, Tenn.Polygnathus confiuetis Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 46, pi. 7, figs. 14, 15).Mississippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount Pleas-ant, Tenn.Polygnathus convexus Hinde, 1900. See Lonchodus convexus.Polygnathus crassulus Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 48, pi. 8, figs. 8-10).Mississippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount Pleas-ant, Tenn.Polygnathus crassus Hinde, 1879. See Gnathodus ? crassus.Polygnathus cristatus Hinde, 1879 (p. 366. pi. 17, fig. 11) ; J. M. Clarke, 1886(pi. A-1, fig. 20) ; Bryant, 1921 (p. 24) ; Polygnathus duUus Hinde, 1879(p. 363, pi. 16, figs. 16, 18) : J. W. Clarke, 1886 (pi. A-1, fig. 20). De-scribed from Genundewa limestone at North Evans, but probably fromPortage beds of same locality, according to Bryant.Polygnathus ? curvatus Hinde, 1879. See Gnathodus curvatus.Polygnathus curvattis Smith, 1907. See Lonchodus curvatus.Polygnathus delicatulus Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 45, pi. 7, figs. 9. 10).Mississippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. MountPleasant, Tenn.Polygnathus duUus Hinde, 1879 (p. 362, pi. 16, figs. 6-18) ; Grabau, 1899(p. 153, fig. 34) ; Grabau and Shimer, 1910 (p. 243. figs. 1533c-i; 1534a-c).Described from an assemblage of species of different genera on a slabprobably of Portage age, western New York; J. M. Clarke, 1886, pi. A-1.Naples shale, Naples, N. Y. See Polygnathus pennatus.Polygnathus duMiis Smith, 1900. See Bryantodus dubius.Polygnathus dubius Smith, 1907. See H ndeodeila <^ubia.Polygnathus duplicatus Hinde, 1879. See Bryantodus duplicatus.Polygnathus 1 eriensis Hinde, 1879. See Gnathodus eriensis.Polygnathus foliatus Bryant, 1921 (p. 24, pi. 10, figs. 13-16). Upper Devonian,Genundewa limestone at base of Genesee, North Evans, Eighteen Mile Creek,N. Y.Polygnathus folium Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 46, pi. 7, fig. 5). Mississip-pian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleasant, Tenn.55414?28?3
18 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vol.72Polygnathus germanus Ulrich and Bassleb, 1926 (p. 46, pi, 7, figs. 11, 12).Mississippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. MountPleasant, Tenn.Polygnathus glaber Ulrich and Bassleb, 1926 (p. 46, pi. 7, fig. 13). Missis-sippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Polygnathus immersus Hinde, 1879. See Bryantodus immersus.Polygnathus lanceolatus Smith, 1907. See Euprioniodina ? lanceolata.Polygnathus linguiformis Hinde, 1879 (p. 3G7, pi. 17, fig. 15) ; Gbabau, 1899(p. 157, pi. 44) ; Bryant, 1921 (p. 25, pi. 11, figs. 1-9; pi. 14, fig, 2). Polyg-nathus simplex Hinde, 1879 (p. 367, pi. 17, fig. 18) ; Gbabau, 1899 (p. 157,fig. 46). Upper Devonian, Genundewa limestone at base of Genesee, NorthEvans, Eighteen Mile Creek, N. Y. North Shore of Lake Brie, Ontario.Polygnathtis minus Smith, 1907, See Lonchodus minus.Polygnathus mosquensis Hinde, 1879. See Gnathodus tnosquensis.Polygnathus nasutus Hinde, 1879, See Synpriomodina nasuta.Polygnathus navicula Hinde, 1900 (p. 342, pi. 9, fig, 5). Carboniferous. Upperlimestone near Douglass, West Scotland.Polygnathus ordinatus Bryant, 1921 (p, 24, pi, 10, figs. 10, 11). Upper De-vonian, Genundevpa limestone at base of Genesee, North Evans, Eighteen MileCreek, N. Y.Polygnathus palmatus Hinde, 1879 (p. 367, pi. 17, figs. 16, 17) ; Grabau, 1899(p. 157) ; Grabau and Shimer, 1910 (p. 244, fig. 1536/i). Genesee (?Portage)Kettle Paint, Ontario.Polygnathus parvus Smith, 1907, See Lonchodus parvus.Polygnathus pauperortus Smith, 1907, See Prionvodus pauperatus.Polygnathus pennatus Hinde, 1879 (p, 366, pi. 17, fig. 8) ; J. M. Clarke, 1866(pi, A-1, fig. 9) ; Grabau, 1899 (p, 156, fig. 39) ; Grabau and Shimek, 1910(p. 243, fig, 1536a) ; Bryant, 1921 (p. 23, pi, 10, figs, 1-9), Polygnathus OmUusHinde, 1879 (part), (p. 363, pi, 16, fig, 17) ; J. M. Clarke, 1886 (pi. A-1, figs.2, 3, 13), Upper Devonian, Genundewa limestone at base of Genesee, NorthEvans, Eighteen Mile Creek, N, Y.Polygnathus pennatulus Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p, 45, pi, 7, fig 8, pi. 9,figs. 24, 25), Mississippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale.Mount Pleasant, Tenn,Polygnathus peracutus Bryant, 1921 (p. 25, pi. 10, fig. 12). Upper Devonian,Genundewa limestone at base of Genesee, North Evans, Eighteen Mile Creek,N. Y.Polygnathus princeps Hinde, 1879. See Lonchodus princeps.Polygnathus punctatus Hinde, 1879. See Palmatolcpis punctata.Polygnathus radiatus Hinde, 1879. See Bryantodus radiatus.Polygnathus rhoniboideus Ulrich and Bassleb, 1926 (p. 46, pi, 7, fig. 6), Mis-sissippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Polygnathus rimulatus Ulbich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 45, pi, 1, figs, 8, 9). De-vonian, Khinestreet shale, Shaleton, N. Y,Polygnathus rotundilohns Bryant, 1921 (p. 26, pi. 12, figs. 1-6; text fig. 7),Polygnathus tuberculatus Hinde, 1879 (part) (p. 366, pi, 17, fig. 10), UpperDevonian, Genundewa limestone at base of Genesee, North Evans, EighteenMile Creek, N, Y,Polygnathus scitulus Hinde, 1900, See Pmiderodella scitula.Polygnathus serratus Hinde, 1879, See Panderodella serrata.
ABT,5 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE CONODOITTS HOLMES 19
Polyffttathus simplex Hinde, 1879. Synonym for Polygnathus linguiforniisHiNDE, 1879.Polygnathus solidus Hinde, 1879. See Panderodella soUda.Polygnathus spinatus Hadding, 1913. See Lonchodina ? spinata.Polygnathus sublatus Ulrich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 47, pi. 8, fig. 2). Missis-sippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Polygnathus taffi, Roundy, 1926 (p. 13, pi. 3, fig. 11). Barnett shale of Missis-sippian, San Saba County, Tex.Polygnathus texmius Roundy, 1926 (p. 14, pi. 3, fig. 13). Barnett shale of Mis-sissippian, San Saba County, Tex.Polygnathus truncatus Hinde, 1879 (p. 366, pi. 17, figs. 12, 13) ; Geabau, 1899(p. 156, fig. 42) ; Geabau and Shimer, 1910 (p. 243, figs. 1536&, c). "Genesee,Bear Creek, Ontario."Polygnathus tuherculatus Hinde, 1879 (p. 386, pi. 17, figs. 9, 10) ; Geabau,1899 (p. 156, fig. 40) ; Geabau and Shimee, 1910 (p. 244, figs. 1536e, f) ;Beyant, 1921 (p. 25, pi. 12, figs. 7-9). Upper Devonian, Genundewa lime-stone at base of Genesee, North Evans, Eighteen Mile Creek, N. Y.Polygnathus wilsoni U. P. James, 1884 (p. 148, pi. 7, fig. C). Ordovician (Mays-ville) Warren County, Ohio. Fossil of uncertain afl3nities.Prioniodella Ulrich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 18). Genotype: Prioniodclla nor-malis Ulrich and Bassler, 1926.Prioniodella aequidens Uleich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 19, pi. 4, figs. 6, 7). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County, N. Y.Prioniodella hrevispina Uleich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 20, pi, 10, fig. 21). Mis-sippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Prioniodella conferta Uleich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 21, pi. 10, fig. 25.) Mis-sissippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Prioniodella gracilis Uleich and Basslee, 1026 (p. 20, pi. 10, figs. 22, 23). Mis-sissippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Prioniodella inaequalis Uleich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 19, pi. 4, figs. 2, 3). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County, N. Y.Prioniodella informata Uleich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 20, pi. 10, figs. 19, 20).Mississippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount Pleas-ant, Tenn.Prioniodella invalida Bryant, 1921. Centrodtis invalidus Bryant, 1921 (p. 21,pi. 3, figs. 3, 5). Upper Devonian, Genundewa limestone at base of Genesee,North Evans, Eighteen Mile Creek, N. Y.Prioniodella miiltidens Ulrich and Bassle21, 1926 (p. 19, pi. 4, figs. 4, 5). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County, N. Y.Prioniodella normalis Ulrich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 19, pi. 4, figs. 1, 1'). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County, N. Y.Prioniodella rolusta Uleich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 20, pi. 10, fig. 24). Mis-sissippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, ISiount Pleasant,Tenn.Prioniodidae Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 7).Prioniodina Uleich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 18) . Genotype : Prioniodina siib-curvata Ulrich and Bassler, 1926.Prioniodina? gemina Hinde, 1900. Prioniodus geminus Hinde, 1900 (p. 344,pi. 10, fig. 25). Carboniferous, Upper limestone, Glencart, etc., west Scotland.
20 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vol.72Prioniodina recedens Bryant, 1921, Prioniodus recedens Bryant, 1921 (p. 13,text fig. 3; pi. 1, figs. 1, 2, 6-14; pi. 2, figs. 1^, 7, 9). Upper Devonian,Genundewa limestone at base of Genesee, North Evans, Eighteen Mile Creek,N. Y.Prioniodina separata Uleich and Bassler, 1926 (p. IS, pi. 4, figs. 17, 18) . UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet s.hale of Portage group, Shaieton, Erie County, N. Y.Prioniodina subcurvata Ulbich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 18, pi. 4, figs. 22-24).Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of Portage group, Shaieton, Brie County,N. Y,Prioniodinal voWorthii Pander, 1856. Prioniodus voliorthii Pander, 1856(p. 30, fig. A on p. 20). Carboniferous? of Russia.Prloniodinidae Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 15).Prioniodus Pander, 1856 (p. 29) ; Roundt, 1926 (p. 10) ; Ulrich and Bassler,1926 (p. 8). Genot.ype (first species) ; Prioniodus eiegans Pander, 1856.Prioniodus aMreviatus Hinde, 1879 (p. 359, pi. 15, fig. 15) : Grabau, 1899 (p. 150,fig. 33B) ; Grabau and Shimer, 1910 (p. 244, fig. 1537?) ; Bryant, 1921 (p. 14,pi. 1, figs. 3-5; pi. 3, fig. 7). Upper Devonian, Genundewa limestone at baseof Genesee, North Evans, Eighteen Mile Creek, N. Y.Prioniodus acicularis Hinde, 1879. See Euprioniodina acicularis.Prioniodus alatus Hinde, 1879 (p. 361, pi. 16, fig 5) ; Grabatt, 1899 (p. 153,fig. 331) ; Grabau and Shimer, 1910 (p. 244, fig. 1533&) ; Bryant, 1921 (p. 15,pi. 3, fig. 10; pi. 4, figs. 1-7). Upper Devonian, Genundewa limestone at baseof Genesee, North Evans, Eighteen Mile Creek, N. Y. ; Ulrich and Bassler,1926 (p. 11, pi. 1, figs. 25, 26). Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of Portagegroup, Shaieton, Erie County, N. Y.Prioniodus alatus Hadding, 1913. See Euprioniodina f alata.Prioniodus ? alternans Hadding, 1913. Polijgnathus alternans Hadding, 1913(p. 32, pi. 1, fig. 7). Ordovician, Dicellograptus zone), southern Norway,Prioniodus angulatus Hinde, 1879, 1900. See Hihhardella angulata.Prioniodus armatus Hinde, 1879 (p. 360, pi. 15, figs. 20, 21) ; Grabau, 1899(p. 152, fig. 33F) ; Grabau and Shimer, 1910 (p. 244, figs. 1537if,.<7) ; Bryant,1921 (p. 18) ; Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 12). "Genesee, North Evans,N. Y." Apparently from Rhinestreet shale of Portage, western New York.Prioniodus ? carinatus Pander, 1856 (p. 30, pi. 2, fig. 25). Lower Ordovician,Baltic Provinces.Prioniodus clavatus Hinde, 1879. See Loncliodina clavata.Prioniodus colligatus Bryant, 1921. See Polygnafhellus colligatus.Prioniodus complex Hinde, 1900 (p. 344, pi. 10, fig. 24). Carboniferous, Upperlimestone, Glencart, etc., west Scotland.Prioniodus concavus Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 10, pi. 9, fig. 11). Missis-sippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Prioniodus cristatus Bryant, 1921. See Bryantodus cristatus.Prioniodus cultratus Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 9, pi. 9, fig. 7). Mississip-pian Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Prioniodus curvatus Smith, 1907. See Euprioniodina curvata.Pnoniodus curvidens UtRicH and Bassler, 1926 (p. 11, pi. 1, figs. 16, 17).Upper Devonian, Rhinestreet shale of Portage group, Shaieton, Erie, County,N. Y.Prioniodus dilata Bryant, 1921, Prioniodus dilatus Bryant, 1921 (p. 20, pi. 7,figs. 3, 4, 11). Upper Devonian, Genundewa limestone at base of Genesee,North Evans, Eighteen Mile Creek, N. Y.Prioniodus discedens Hadding, 1913. See Euprioniodina ? discedens.
AET.5 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE CONODONTS HOLMES 21Prioniodus disparilis Ulbich and Bassleb, 1926 (p. 10, pi. 9, fig. 12). Missis-sippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Prioniodus dorcms T. H. Clark, 1924 (p. 68, pi. 6, fig. 3). Not a conodont, buta spiny terminal fragment of triiobite. Canadian, Point Levis, Canada.Prioniodus dychei U. P. James, 1884 (p. 148, pi. 7, figs. A, C). Ordovician(Maysvilie), Warren County, Ohio. Probably an annelid jaw.Prioniodus elegans Pandek, 1856 (p. 29, pi. 2, figs. 22, 23). Lower Ordovician,Baltic Provinces. Hiwde, 1879 (p. 358, pi. 15, fig. 10) ; Grabau and Shimeb,1910 (p. 244, fig. 1538d) ; Parks, 1922 (p. 36, pi. 6, fig. 24). Upper Ordo-vician, Lorraine-Dundas, Toronto, Ontario.Prioniodus equalis Smith, 1907 (p. 249, pi. 8, figs. 38, 39). Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Prioniodus erraticus Hinde, 1879. See Lonchodina en'atica.Prioniodus furcatus Hinde, 1879. See Euprioniodina, ? furcata.Prioniodus geminus Hinde. See Prioniodinal gemina.PrioniGdus hamatus Bryant, 1921 (p. 15, text fig. 5; pi. 2, figs. 5, 6, 8, 11). Up-per Devonian, Genundewa limestone at base of Genesee, North Evans, Eigh-teen Mile Creek, N. Y.PrioniGdus healdi Roundt, 1926 (p. 10, pi. 4, fig. 5). Barnett shale of Missis-sippian, San Saba County, Tex.Prioniodus immersus Bryant, 1921. See Bryantodus immersus.Prioniodus inequalis Ulkich and Eassler, 1926 (p. 10, pi. 9, fig. 6). Missis-sippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale. Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Pi'ioniodus inflatus Smith, 1907 (p. 249, pi. 8, fig. 36). Ordovician, ArenigLlandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Prioniodus inutiJis Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 11, pi. 1, fig. 23). UpperDevonion, Khinestreet shale of Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County, N. Y.Prioniodus lelaps T. H. Clark, 1924 (p. 69, pi. 6, fig. 4). Not a conodont, butan annelid jaw, Canadian, Point Levis, Canada.Prioniodus macconochii Smith, 1907 (p. 249, pi. 8, figs. 41, 42). Ordovician,Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Prioniodus macrodentatus Bryant, 1921. See Bryantodus maerodentatus.Prioniodus melampus T. H. Clarke, 1924 (p. 68, pi. 6, fig. 2). Not a conodont.but the spiny terminal fragment of a triiobite, Canadian, Point Levis, Canada.Prioniodus muricatus Bryant, 1921. See Bryantodus muricatus.Prioniodus nasutus Bryant, 1921. See Synprioniodina nasuta.Prioniodus o'btusus Bryant, 1921. See Bryantodus oMusus.Prioniodus pamphagus T. H. Clark, 1924 (p. 70, pi. 6, fig. 6). Not a conodont,but an annelid jaw and the same as Prioniodus Maps T. PI. Clark, 1924Canadian, Point Levis, Canada.Prioniodus panderi Hinde, 1879. See Ligonodina panderi.Prioniodus parvidentatus Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 9, pi. 9, fig. 1). Mis-sissippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount PleasantTenn.Prioniodus parvulus Bryant, 1921. See Bryantodus parvulus.Prioniodus pauperatus Smith, 1907. Polygnathus pauperatus Smith, 1907,(p. 245, pi. 5, fig. 14). Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands ofScotland.Prioniodus peracutus Hinde, 1900 (p. 343, pi. 10, figs. 21-23). Carboniferous,lower and upper limestone, Monkcastle, Dali"y, etc., west Scotland ; Roundy,1926 (p. 10, pi. 4, figs. 6-8) Barnett shale of Mississippian, San Saba County,Tex.
22 PEOCEEDINGS OF THE NATION'AL MUSEUM vol. 72Prioniodus politus Hinde, 1879, See Bryantodus politus.Prioniodus porcatus Hinde, 1900 (p. 344, pi. 10, fig. 26). Carboniferous, upperlimestone, Monkcastle, etc., west Scotland.Prioniodus pravus Bryant, 1921. See Bryantodus pravus.Prioniodus proclinatus Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 10, pi. 1, fig. 22), UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of Portage group, Shaletou, Erie County, N. Y,Prioniodus proclinis Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 9, pi, 9, figs, 8-10), Mis-sissippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Prioniodus radiatus Bryant, 1921. See Bryantodus radiatus.Prioniodus radicans Hinde, 1879. See Euprioniodina radicans.Prioniodus recedens Bryant, 1921. See Prioniodina recedens.Prioniodus retusus Bryant, 1921. See Bryantodus retusus.Prioniodus reversus Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 10, pi. 9, fig. 4). Missis-sippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Prioniodus spatulatus Bryant, 1921. See Bryantodus spatulatus.Prioniodus spicatulus Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 9, pi, 9, figs. 2, 3), Mis-sissippian, Hardin sandstone at base of Chattanooga shale, Mount Pleasant,Tenn.Prioniodus spicatus Hinde, 1879 (p. 361, pi. 16, figs. 1-3) ; Clarke, 1886, {pi,A-1, fig. 22) ; Grabau, 1899 (p. 152, fig. 33G) ; Bryant, 1921 (p. 19), UpperDevonian, Portage-Naples and Rhinestreet shales, vpestern New York ; Hinde,1900 (p. 343, pi. 10, fig. 20). Carboniferous, lower limestone, Birkhead, Dairy,etc., west Scotland.Prioniodus suhcompactus Smith, 1907 (p. 249, pi. 8, fig. 37). Ordovician,Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Prioniodus sulcatus Pander, 1856 (p. 29, pi. 2, fig. 24). Lower Ordovician,Baltic Provinces.Prioniodus tigris T. H. Cu'iEk, 1924 (p. 69, pi. 6, fig. 5). Not a cono'^.out, butprobably fringe appendage of merostome or trilobite. Canadian, Point Levis,Canada.Pi'ioniodus- tlieron T. H. Clark, 1924 (p. 67, pi. 6, fig. 1). Not a eonodont
;
probably fringe appendage of merostome or trilobite. Canadian, Point Levis,Canada.Prioniodus tuJcnsis Pander, 1856 (p. 30, pi. 2A, figs. 1, 18-20). Carboniferouslimestone. Tula, Russia; Hinde, 1900 (p. 343, pi. 9, figs. 15-20). Carbonif-erous, upper and lower limestone, Glencart, Dairy, etc., west Scotland.Prioniodus undosus Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 12, pi. 1, figs. 18-20). UpperDevonian, Rhinestreet shale of Portage group, Shaleton, Erie County, N". Y.Prioniodus vonortMi Pander, 1856. See Prioniodina volborthii.Prionoffnathus Pander, 1856 (p, 34) ; Ulrich and Bassler, 1926 (p. 43),Genotype (only species) : Prionoffnathus irandtii, Pander, 1856.Prionognathus drandtii Pander, 1856 (p. 34, pi. 4, fig. 19). Silurian, Root-sikiille. Island of Oesel. Probably not a eonodont.Scolopodiis Pander, 1856 (p. 25). Genotype (first species) : Scolopodus sub-laevis Pander, 1856.ScoJopodus aequilateralis Pander, 1856 (p. 26, pi. 2, fig. 5). Lower Ordovician,Baltic Provinces.Scolopodtis costatus Pander, 1856 (p. 26, pi. 2, fig. 7). Lower Ordovician,Baltic Provinces.Scolopodus quadratus Pander, 1856 (p. 26, pi. 2, fig. 6). Lower Ordovician,Baltic Provinces.Scolopodus semicostatus Pander, 1856 (p. 26, pi. 2, fig. 4). Lower Ordovician,Baltic Provinces.
ART. 5 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE OONODONTS HOLMES 23Scolopodus striatus Pandee, 1856 (p. 26, pi. 2, fig. S). Lower Ordoviciau,Baltic Provinces.Scolopodus suUaevds Pandeb, 1856 (p. 25, pi. 2, fig. 3), Lower Ordovician,Baltic Province.Sulprioniodus Smith, 1907 (p. 247). Genotype: Subprioniodus paticidentatusSmith, 1907. Genus retained provisionally for Ordovician species of Prionio-dus referred here by Smith.Sulprioniodus acutus Smith, 1907 (p. 250, pi. 9, fig. 45; pi. 7, fig. S3). Ordo-vician, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Suiprioniodus calcarus Smith, 1907 (p. 250, pi. 9, fig. 46). Ordoviciau, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Sulprioniodus orassus Smith, 1907 (p. 250, pi. 9, fig. 48). Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Sulprioniodus cringcrampensis Smith, 1907 (p. 248, pi. 7, fig. 35). Ordovician,Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Suhprimiiodus distans Smith, 1907 (p. 250, pi. 9, fig. 44). Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Subprioniodus equalis Smith, 1907 (p. 248, pi. 7, fig. 31). Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Sulprioniodus falcatus Smith, 1907 (p. 250, pi. 9, fig. 51). Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Sulprioniodus fardingensis Smith, 1907 (p. 250, pi. 9, fig. 47). Ordovician,Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Sulprioniodus lurcatus Smith, 1907 (p. 247, pi. 6, fig. 22). Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Sulprioniodus gillosus Smite, 1907 (p. 247, pi. 7, fig. 27). Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Sulprionidus huntlatvensis Smith, 1907 (p. 248, pi. 7, fig. 34 a, b). Ordovician,Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Sulprioniodus lanceolaius Smith, 1907 (p. 247, pi. 7, fig. 29). Ordovician,Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of -Scotland.Sulprio-niodus olUqiio-lanceoJatus Smith, 1907 (p. 248, pi. 7, fig. 30). Ordo-vician, Areaig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Sulprioniodus parims Smith, 1907 (p. 247, pi. 7, figs. 26, 28). Ordovician,Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands, of Scotland.Sulprioniodus paucidentatus Smith, 1907 (p. 247, pi. 8, fig. 21). Ordovician,Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands, of Scotland.Sulprioniodus pei'acutus Smith, 1907 (p. 248, pi. 7, fig. 32). Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.Sulprioniodus sulserratus Smith, 1907 (p. 250, pi. 9, fig. 43). Ordovician,Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands, of Scotland.Synprioniodina TJlrich and Basslee, 1928 (p. 42). Genotype: Synprioniodinaalternata Ulrieh and Bassler, 1926.Synprioniodina alternata Ulrich and Bassleb, 1926 (p. 42, text fig. 22). Mis-sissippian, Chattanooga shale, 13 miles east of north of Huntsville, Ala.Synprioniodina nasuta Hikde, 1879. Polygnathus nasutus Hinde, 1879 ,(p. 364,pi. 16, fig. 22) ; Grabau, 1899 (p. 155, fig. 35). Prioniodus nasutus (Hinde)Bryant, 1921 (p. 19). Devonian, Genesee shales, North Evans, EighteenMile Creek, N. Y.Valentia Smith. 1907 (p. 251) ; Ulkich and Basslee, 1926 (p. 43). Genotype{only species) : Valentia mot^ocJiensls Smith, 1907.Valentia morrochensis Smith, 1907 (p. 257, pi. 9, fig, 50). Ordovician, Arenig-Llandeilo, southern uplands of Scotland.
24 PEOCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vol, 72DESCRIPTION OF EARLY MISSISSIPPIAN SPECIESAll of the species herein described were obtained in the Chatta-nooga black shale of Early Mississippian age at a locality 13 mileseast of north of Huntsville, Ala.Family PRIONIODIDAE Ulrich and Bassler, 1926Genus PRIONIODUS (Hinde) Bryant, 1921PRIONIODUS ALABAMENSIS, new speciesPlate 9, figs. 1, 2Tooth consisting of a long, thin, tapering, recurved cusp risingfrom a flat, thick bar. This central cusp is not produced below thebase. A series of short, sharp pointed denticles which are wellseparated, rises at an acute angle from the bar.Gotypes.?C2it No. 11431, U.S.N.M.PRIONIODUS ALATOIDES, new speciesPlate 9, fig. 3This is a more delicate species than Hinde's Prioniodus alatus.The bar is straight, flat, and thin. The cusp is very wide at the basebut tapers to a sharp point, extends below and forms an obtuse anglewith the bar. The denticles and the cusp rise from the bar at obtuseangles.Holotype.?C^t. No. 11432, U.S.N.M.PRIONIODUS CULTRATUS Ulrich and Bassler, 1926Plate 9, fig. 41926. Prioniodus cultratus Uleich and Bassler, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 68^art. 12, p. 9, pi. 9, fig. 7.Tooth composed of a broad, flat, tapering cusp rising from theslightly deflected end of a moderately flat bar at a right angle.Four long, sharp pointed, slightly recurved denticles are placed onthe bar at obtuse angles with the base of the cusp. These are suc-ceeded by several short, smaller denticles.Plesiotype.?Cat No. 11433, U.S.N.M.Genus LIGONODINA Ulrich and Bassler, 1926LIGONODINA PARVULA, new spccicBPlate 9, fig. 5The pointed, recurved cusp extends below a slightly curved bar onwhich are several denticles, well rounded and set at obtuse angles to
ART. 5 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE CONODONTS HOLMES 25the bar. A wide space separates the cusp and the denticles, whichin turn are removed from one another by means of a space aboutequal to the width of a denticle. The characteristic suckerlike mark-ings are present on the downward extension of the main cusp.Holotype.?C2it. No. 11434, U.S.N.M.Family PRIONIODINIDAE Ulrich and Bassler, 1926Genus HINDEODELLA Ulrich and Bassler, 1926HINDEODELLA TENERRIMA, new speciesPlate 9, figs. 6, 7A long, thin, sharp pointed cusp rises from a very slender bar.Two broken denticles are on one side of the cusp and nine or tenare on the other side, all widel}' spaced. Due to the concavity of thebar immediately below the cusp, it may be inferred that this is theinner side of the jaw.Cotypes.?Csit. No. 11435, U.S.N.M.HINDEODELLA MINUXroENS, new speciesPlate 9, fig. 8The upright denticles in this specimen are so minute and regularly,though closely, spaced and the bar is so long and flat that thisconodont resembles a fine-toothed saw.Eolotype.?Csit. No. 11436, U.S.N.M.HINDEODELLA GERMANA, new speciesPlate 9, fig. 9The anterior side of the bar is very thick and bears several needle-like, irregular denticles. On the posterior side the denticles, whichslant backward, are alternately long and short. In one or two placestwo small denticles are found between the longer ones. The pos-terior end of the bar terminates in a spinelike point.Holotype.?C^i. No. 11437, U.S.N.M.HINDEODELLA SUBTILIS Ulrich and BasslerPlate 9, figs. 10, 111926. Hindeodella suMilis Ulrich and Bassler, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 68,art, 12, p. 39, pi. 8, figs. 17-19.This species, described from the Hardin sandstone, is well repre-sented in the succeeding Chattanooga black shale, where entire speci-mens, such as those in Figure 10, are not uncommon. The character-istic basketlike expansion at the anterior end and the minuteness anddecided alternation of the denticles along the bar are features easily
26 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATION^AIi MUSEUM VOL.72
recognized. Figure 11 represents a variety in which the alternationof the denticles is not so evident and the denticles are shorter.PUsiotypes.?Q2^t. No. 11438, U.S.N.M.Genus LONCHODINA Ulrich and Bassler. 1926LONCHODINA IRREGULARIS, new BpecicsPlate 9, flg. 12Bar slightly outwardly bowed, irregularly curved, with the anteriorend shorter and bent abruptly downward. Main cusp located at thepoint of downward bending, followed posteriorly by two equallylarge denticles separated by a minute one. Rest of bar occupied bynarrow, more delicate denticles decreasing in size to the extremities.The irregularity of curvature and the three larger central denticlescharacterize this species.Eolotyj>e.?C2it. No. 11439, U.S.N.M.LONCHODINA DISCRETA Ulrich and BasslerPlate 9, fig. 131926. LoHchodina disci-eta Uleich and Basslee, Proc. U. S. Nat Mus., vol. 18,p. 36, pi. 10, figs. 1, 2.A pointed, short, robust cusp rises from an irregularly curved,narrow bar. The cusp is separated from the denticles on each sideby spaces several times its diameter. The two denticles on one sideof the bar are short and robust; on the other side there are threewhich are thin.Plesiotype.?Cut No. 11440, U.S.N.M.Genus PRIONIODELLA Ulrich and Bassler, 1926PRIONIODELLA ARCUATA, new speciesPlate 9, fig. 14Tooth minute, broadly arched, the bar of which is very narrow,but well rounded. Denticles all similar, being delicate and needle-like, but the long ones are grouped on the anterior part of the bar andthe short ones on the posterior. The decided curvature of the bar,the absence of a main cusp, and the two sets of delicate denticlescharacterize this species.Holotype.?Cat. No. 11441, U.S.N.M.PRIONIODELLA INUTILIS. new speciesPlate 9, fig. 15Bar broad, very slightly curved, bearing closely arranged, butdistinctly separated denticles rather equal in size.Eolotype.?C&t No. 11442, U.S.N.M.
ART, 5 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE CON'ODONTS HOLMES 27Genus PRIONIODINA Ulrich and Bassler, 1926PRIONIOOmA SEPAKANS, new speciesPlate 9, figs. 16, 17Tooth consisting of a slender curved bar bearing fourteen or morerather short, flattened denticles, separated from each other by morethan their own diameter and with a main cusp about twice the sizeof a denticle, developed at the angle of curvature. The cusp isslightly extended below the bar into a protuberance. The denticlesare very similar to each other and to the cusp in shape.Cotypes.?Cdit. No. 11443, U.S.N.M.PRIONIODINA UNDULATA, new speciesPlate 9, fig. 18This bar is slightly arched along the posterior extension, but issharply deflected at the cusp, forming a right angle. The main cuspis very long, stout, well rounded, and bluntly pointed. The denticleson both sides are similar to the cusp but they are about one-third thesize and they vary somewhat as to length. The denticles farthestfrom the cusp are upright but the nearer they approach the cusp,the more they bend toward this great central tooth. A space a littleless than the width of the denticles separates them.Bolotype.?Q^X. No. 11444, U.S.N.M.Genus BRYANTODUS Uhick and Bassler, 1926BRYANTODUS INEQUALIS, new speciesPlate 10, figs. 1, 2The bar is traversed for half its length by a median ridge. Theother half is very flat, curling slightly at the end. A broad, short,sharply pointed, and slightly recurved cusp rises at an obtuse anglefrom the center of the bar. The cusp is about four times as broad asthe denticles at its base. Posterior to the main cusp the denticles areshort and slightly separated. On the anterior side the denticles areabout twice this length, although they gradually become shorter asthey approach the end of the bar. As the denticles become shorterthey are at right angles with the bar, whereas the long ones near thecusp are noticeably curved toward that tooth.The unequal size of the two sets of denticles marks this species.Gotypes.?C&t. No. 11445, U.S.N.M.BRYANTODUS INCLINATUS, new epeciesPlate 10, fig. 3Tooth triangular in outline, consisting of a broad flat sharp pointedmain cusp, inclined to the bar, followed posteriorly by at least 10
28 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vol. 72
slender denticles diminishing in size toward the extremity and ante-riorly by three or four similar denticles. All of the denticles are alsoblunt and are very much alike except in length. All are inclinedwith the main cusp.The strong inclination of both main cusp and denticles characterizethis species.Holotype.?C^it No. 11446, U.S.N.M.BRYANTODUS GERMANUS. new speciesPlate 10, fig. 5The wide, almost fiat bar is traversed for its entire length by amedian line The upper and lower portions of the bar thus lie in twodifferent planes. From the center of the upper half a broad angledand strongly recurved tooth rises. On the concave side of this cuspthere is a broad, blunt denticle about as long as the cusp. The otherdenticles vary in length but are of the same general shape. On theother side of the cusp the denticles are longer, flatter, and very sharppointed. Narrow but equal spaces separate all of the denticles.Holotyfe.?QdA. No. 1144T, U.S.N.M.BRYANTODUS SUBANGULATUS, new speciesPlate 10, tig-. GThis narrow bar is very strongly arched or angulated. On oneside of the cusp the denticles are much shorter than those on the otherside. All of the denticles become gradually shorter toward the endsof the bar.Holotype.?C&t. No. 11448, U.S.N.M.Genus EUPRIONIODINA Ulrich and Bassler, 1926EUPRIONIODINA GEKMANA, new species-Plate 10, fig. 7The moderately arched bar is broad and angulated on one side ofthe cusp. On the other side it is stout but somewhat flat. Broad,heavy denticles rise from the long side of the bar. The terminaldenticle is about as broad as any two of the others. All of the den-ticles are separated by very narrow spaces. There is a wide space oneach side of the cusp which is round, very thick, and slightly ex-tended below the bar. On the short side of the bar the denticles arethinner than the others but they are quite substantial looking. Theyare short and widely spaced.Hoiotype.?C^ii. No. 11449, U.S.N.M.
ART. 5 BIBLIOGHAPHY OF THE COlSrODOISrTS HOLMES 29Genus DIPLODODELLA Ulrich and Bassler, 1926DIPLODODELLA BILATERALIS Ulrich and Bassler. 1926Plate 10, fig. 81926. Diplododella hilateralis Ulrich aud Bassleb, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol.68, p. 41, text, fig. 21.The short, narrow, blunt cusp rises from the center of a stronglyarched bar, both sides of which are about equal in length. Themedian ridge, extending the whole length of the bar, divides the barinto two parts which lie in different planes. Beneath the cusp thereis a small concave depression. The denticles, which are alike on bothsides of the cusp, seem to rise from the median ridge rather thanfrom the edge of the bar. Spaces ^vider than the denticles separatethem. The denticles themselves vary in size ; the nearer the endsof the bar, the smaller and thinner tliey become.no7oti/pe.?Csit No. 11306, U.S.N.M.Genus HIBBARDELLA Ulrich and Bassler, 1926HI3BARDELLA CURVATA, new species
I'late 10, tig.
. This is a tiaralike tooth. There are five short, thick denticleswith blunt points on each side of a narrow but very robust bar.Very wide spaces separate the denticles. The crownlike appearanceis helped by the curved contour of the strongly arched bar. Theblunt-pointed cusp is very wide, thick, and long.Holotype.?Cat No. 11450, U.S.N.M.Genus PALMATODELLA Ulrich and Bassler, 1926PALMATODELLA DELICATULA Ulrich and Bassler, 1926Plate 10, tig. 101926. PalmatodeUa delicatala Ui.kich and Passlek. Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol.68, p. 4, pi. 10, fig. o, text tig. 20.This sharply arched bar is distinctlj^ divided into two parts. Onone side of the long, angular cusp which has its origin in the peakof the bar, the round, thick bar bears a number of short, sharp-pointed and well-separated denticles. The other side has the appear-ance of a flat, finely serrated palm leaf. Here the denticles gradu-ally diminish in length from the very long one next to the cusp tothe one at the end of the bar which is so minute as to be hardlydistinguished from the bar itself. Spaces about the width of veryfine hairs separate these denticles.HoIotype.?CsLt. No. 11307, U.S.N.M.
30 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL. MUSEUM VOi^ 72:Genus SYNPRIONIODINA Ulrich and Bassler, 1926SYNPRIONIODINA ALTERNATA Ulrich and Bassler, 1926Plate 10, figs. 11, 121926. Synpriomodma alternata Ulkich and Bassler, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus^.vol. 68, p. 42, text, fig. 22.Both of these specimens exhibit the interior sides of two oppositeplates. The long, stout cusp, tapering to a very blunt point, dividesthe bar into two unequal parts. The denticles are merely indicatedon the short side of the sharply arched bar. The long side bears anumber of long, needlelike denticles. In some places the relativelywide spaces between the denticles are filled with very fine denticles..In Figure 11 the denticles are much longer than those in Figure 12.Holotype and plesiotype.?Cat. No. 11308, U.S.N.M.SYNPRIONIODINA PLANA, new speciesPlate 10, fig. 13The bar is very broad, flat, and strongly arched. A median ridgedivides the bar into two parts. The cusp is flat, very wide, andtapers a little toward a rather wide, blunt point. It is about twicethe length of the other denticles, which are similar in shape. Thespaces become wider as both ends of the bar are approached. All ofthe denticles are set at right angles to the bar, which is very long onthe steeper side of the arch. This specimen, as well as several othersthe bars of which are divided by the median ridge, gives one theimpression of being one of a series, set in a jaw, as the shark'steeth are.Holotype.?Q2.t, No. 11461, U.S.N.M.Family POLYGNATHIDAE Ulrich and Bassler, 1926Genus PANDERODELLA Ulrich and Bassler, 1926PANDERODELLA RECTA, new speciesPlate 10, fig. 14Our figure shows the convex side of the plate or tooth, the bar ofwhich is very flat and broad. The cusp, which is scarcely differentfrom the other short, blunt pointed denticles, is moderately producedas a flange below the bar. These denticles are all widely separated.The terminal tooth of the long side helps to form a convex endto the bar.Holotype.?C&i. No. 11452, U.S.N.M.
ABT,5 BIBLIOGEAPHY OF THE CONODONTS HOLMES 31PANDERODELLA SUBRECTA, new speciesPlate 10, fig. 15This specimen is a modification of Panderodella recta. The de-flection of the bar is more noticeable. The denticles on the long sideof the bar are short, spear-shaped, and evenly spaced. Those on-the deflected side are needlelike.Bolotype.?QdX, No. 11463, U.S.N.M.Genus POLYGNATHUS (Hinde) Bryant, 1921POLYGNATHUS GYRATILESTEATUS, new speciesPlate 11, figs, 1, 2Plate an irregular polygon with the tubercules united so as toform parallel ridges extending in concentric lines from one side ofthe median ridge to a place on the other side directly opposite thepoint of origin. The median ridge, which is slightly flexed to theright and to the left, is produced beyond the plate into a carinabearing denticles.Cotypes.?C^i. No. 11454, U.S.N.M.POLYGNATHUS PERGYRATUS. new speciesPlate 11, fig. 3This species is very similar to Polygnathus gyratilineaius but thelines are much closer together. The posterior end of the plate isproduced into a carina as usual in this type of species.Eolotype.?Cnt. No. 11455, U.S.N.M.POLYGNATHUS TRILOBATUS, new speciesPlate 11, fig. 4As its name indicates this is a distinctly three-lobed plate. Theanterior lobe is long and narrow, while the lateral lobes sweep inbroad lines from the anterior lobe to the carina. A low medianridge rises in the middle of the anterior lobe becoming flattenedtowards the top but gradually narrowing posteriorly until it isproduced beyond the plate into a broad carina, bearing denticles.The tubercules of the basal portion are stronger and more concen-trically arranged than in Polygnathus concentricus. The tuberculesof the anterior lobe extend from side to side across the top of themedian ridge.Eolotype.?C2it. No. 11456, U.S.N.M. .
32 PROCEEDINGS OE THE NATIONAIj MUSEUM vou 72POLYGNATHUS CONCENTRICUS Ulrich and Sassier. 1926Plate 11, figs. 5-71926. Polygnathus concctitricns Ulrtch and Basslek, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus.,vol 68, p. 47, pi. 8, figs. 6, 7.The plate is roughly triangular, having three Avell-defined lobes.The rounded lateral lobes gradually disappear into the sides of thesharp-pointed anterior lobe by means of a shallow, curving indenta-tion. The plate is slightly depressed toward the posterior end butelevated in the anterior lobe. The median ridge, which is low butsharp in the posterior end, extends the entire length of the plate andin the anterior lobe becomes broad, being produced be3^ond the platehj a carina bearing several round, compressed denticles. Both themedian ridge and the carina are somewhat sinuous in their courses.Short tubercules are concentrically arranged in the lobes. In theanterior lobe, where they cross the median ridge, they are so closelyspaced as to appear as continuous lines. Compared with PolygnathustrilohahiSy this species differs in its more finely marked basal portionand in the extension of the median ridge to the anterior extremity.Ples7atypes.-?Cat. No. 11457, U.S.N.M.POLYGNATHUS RHOMBOIDEUS Ulrich and BasslerPlate 11, figs. 11, 121926. Polyfrnuthus rhombotdcus Ulrich and Bassler, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus.,vol. 68, p. 46, pi. 7, fig. 6.Plate rhomboidal in shape. Posterior lobe long and narrow.Lateral lobes slightly broader and somewhat rounded. The medianridge which extends the length of the plate is extended beyond theplate by a short, narrow carina, bearing several denticles, varying inshape and size. These denticles are extensions of those borne on themedian ridge. In the anterior end of the plate the ridge is traversedby tubercules concentrically arranged but terminating abruptly atthe ill-defined base of the ridge. Parallel rows of denticles extendfrom the anterior lobe to the origin of the carina, where they turnat a sharp angle and terminate in the margin of the lateral lobes.The rhomboidal shape, less conspicuous transverse ribs, fewerrows of tubercules, and their more longitudinal arrangement, dis-tinguish this species from its allies such as Polygnathus concentlicus.Plesiotypes.?Cat. No. 11456, U.S.N.M.POLYGNATHUS PENNATULOIDEA, new speciesPlate 11, fig. 14This species is somewhat similar to Polygtudhus penmitulusUlrich and Bassler. The high median ridge is surmounted by
ART, 5 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE CONODONTS?HOLMES 33numerous tubercules. It extends the whole length of the plate,beyond which it is produced by means of a long, robust carina, bear-ing several large denticles. The tubercules on the plate are arrangedin less definite order than in P. fennatulus.Holotype.?Cdit. No. 11, 461, U.S.N.M.POLYGNATHUS PENNATULUS Ulrich and BassJcrPlate 11, fig. 151926. Polygnathus pemiatulus Uoiich and Bassijer, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol.68, p. 45, pi. 7, fig. 8 ; pi. 9, figs. 24, 25.The narrow median ridge which bears denticles throughout itslength extends from the anterior end of the plate to the carina, whichis slightij^ deflected. Several stout denticles are borne on the carina.The tubercules on both sides of the plate occur in short parallel linesextending from the margin to a depression at the base of the ridge.Plesiotype.?^o. 11, 462, U.S.N.M.Genus PALMATOLEPIS Ulrich and Bassler, 1926PALMATOLEPIS INEQUALIS. new speciesPlate 11, figs. 8-10This plate is divided into three parts by the unequal bifurcationsof the median ridge. The main part of the ridge which is producedbeyond the plate by a short, blunt carina, is broad and stout. Thebranches which are thin and high bear six or seven denticles. Theshort, blunt tuberc'ules on each section of the plate are generallyarranged at right angles to the main ridge or its branches. Figure10 is the under surface of plate with the same bifurcated ridges butwithout ornament.Gotypes.?Q^i. No. 11, 458, U.S.N.M.PALMATOLEPIS ELONGATA, new speciesPlate 11, fig. 13This is a long, narrow, minute plate with the finely denticulatedmedian ridge extending its whole length. The ridge is very lowat the anterior end but rises toward the posterior end where it be-comes high and broad. On one side of the plate there is a short,pointed lobe. The relative smoothness of the surface serves to dis-tinguish this species from Palmatolefis verlohata Ulrich and Basslerto which it is related.Eolotyfe.?Q^i. No. 11, 460, U.S.N.M.
34 PKOCEEDINGS OP THE NATIONAL MUSEUM TOu 72PALMATOLEPIS PERLOBATUS Ulrich and SassierPlate 11, figs. 16-191926. Palmatolepis perloMtus Ulbich and Basslee, Proc. U. S. Nat Mus.,vol. 68, p. 49, pi. 7, figs. 19-23.Plate irregularly diamond shaped, flexed either to the right or tothe left in the posterior portion. The ridge extends the whole lengthof the plate and is slightly produced beyond by a short, thick carina.The anterior portion of the ridge is indicated by a low, narrow line.From a central prominence the ridge thickens toward the carina.One side, which is rounded, extends slightly beyond the center. Theother side which is produced in the central region by an angular lobeextends almost the entire length of the median ridge but becomesgradually narrower as it approaches the carina. In the anteriorlobe the short, blunt tubercules converge toward the central prom-inence. This in the posterior half of the plate are at right anglesto the central ridge.Plesiotype.?Cat. No. 11, 463, U.S.N.M.EXPLANATION OF PLATESPlates 1All of the figures on this and the following seven plates are copied from theauthors cited. The magnification was often not stated but it lies usuallyIbetween 10 and 20 diameters.Fig. 1. Distacodus (Machairodus) angustus Pander, 1856.2. Distacodus {Machairodus) canaliculatus Pander, 1856.3, 4. Distacodus (Machairodus) dilatatus Pander, 1856.5-9. Distacodus (Machairodus) etisiformis Pander, 1856.10. Distacodus (Machairodus) inaequalis Pander, 1856,11. Distacodus (Machairodus) incurvus Pander, 1856.12. Distacodus incurvus (Pander) Hinde, 1879.13. Distacodus (Machairodus) planus Pander, 1856.14. Distacodus (Machairodia) rhombeus (Pander) Smith, 1907.15. Distacodus (Machairodia) sulcata Smith, 1907.16. Belodus gracilis Pander, 1856.17. Distacodus (Machairodus) rhomboideus Pander, 1856.18. Distacodus (Machairodus) rhomboideus Pander, 1856, var.19. Distacodus (Machairodus) solidus Pander, 1856.20. Acodus acutus Pander, 1856.21. 22, Acodus crassus Pander, 1856.23. Acodus erectus Pander, 1856.24. Acodus planus Pander, 1856.25. Acodus sigmoideus Pander, 1856.26. Acontiodus gracilis Pander, 1856.27. Acontiodus latus Pander, 1956.28. Acontiodus triangularis Pander, 1856.29. Drepanodus acutus Pander, 1856.30-35. Drepanodus arcuatus Pander, 1856.36,37. Drepanodus arcuatus (Pander) Hinde, 1879.38. Drepanodus falcatus Hadding, 1913.39-41. Drepanodus fiexuosus Pander, 1856.42, Drepanodus i/nflexus Pander, 1856,
ART. 5 BIBLIOGEAPHY OF THE GONODOUTS?HOLMES 35Pultb2
FiQ. 1. Drepanodus flexuosus (Pander) Smith, 1907.2. Drepanodus inflexus Pander, 1856.3. Drepanodus oitusus Pander, 1856.4. Drepanodus robustus Hadding, 1913.5. Drepanodus verutus Hadding, 1913.6. Scolopodus aequilateralis Pander, 1856.7. Scolopodus Gostatus Pander, 1856.8. Scolopodus guadratus Pander, 1856.9. Scolopodus semicostatus Pander, 1856.10. Scolopodus striatus Pander, 1856.11. Scolopodus suMaevis Pander, 1856.12. Oistodus parallelus Pander, 1856.13. Oistodus inaequalis Pander, 1856.14. Oistodus acuminatus Pander, 1856.15-17. Oistodus lanceolatus Pander, 1856.18. Paltodus Mcostatus Pander, 1856.19. Paltodus canaliculatus Pander, 1856.20. 21. Paltodus rotundatus Pander, 1856.22-25. Paltodus odtusus Pander, 1856.26. Paltodus suMequalis Pander, 1856.27-29. Paltodus truncatus Pander, 1856.Plate 3Fig. 1. Prioniodus sulcatus Pander, 1856.2. Prioniodus carinatus Pander, 1856.3. Prioniodus alternans Hadding, 1913.4-6. Prioniodus elegans Pander, 1856.7. Prioniodus elegans (Pander) Hinde, 1879.8. Prioniodus ahdreviatus Hinde, 1879.9, 10. Prioniodus armatus Hinde, 1879.11-13. Prioniodus spicatus Hinde, 1879.14. Prioniodus spicatus Hinde, 1900.15. Prioniodus spicatus (Hinde) Clarke, 1886.16-19. Prioniodus tulensis Pander, 1856.20-22. Prioniodus tulensis (Pander) Hinde, 1900.23, 24. Prioniodus equalls Smitb, 1907.25. Prioniodus infiatus Smith, 1907.26. Prioniodus porcatus Hinde, 1900.27. Prioniodus lelaps T. H. Clark, 1924.28,29. Prioniodus macconocMi Smith, 1907.30. Prioniodus tigris T. H. Clark, 1924.31. Prioniodus pamphagus T. H. Clark, 1924.32. Prioniodus complex Hinde, 1900.33. Prioniodus dorcens T. H. Clark, 1924.34. Prioniodus {Polygnathus) ^auperatus Smith, 1907.35. Prioniodus subcompacttis Smith, 1907.36. Prioniodus melampus T. H. Clark, 1924.87-39. Prioniodus peracutus Hinde, 1900.40. Prioniodus alatus Hinde, 1879.
36 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vol.. 72:Plate 4Fig. 1. Suhprioniodus suhscrratus Smith, 1907.2. Subprioniodtis calcarus Smith, 1907.3-5. Suhprioniodus acutus Smith, 1907.6. Suhprioniodus cra.'isus Smith, 1907.7. Subprioniodus distans Smitli, 1907.8 Subprioniodus vringcampeiiwU Smith, 1907.9. Subprioniodus equal is Smitli, 1907.10. Subprioniodus falcatiis Smith, 1907.11. Subprioniodus fureaius Smith, 1907.12. Subprioniodus fardvngetms Smith, 1907.13. Subprioniodus gibbosus Smith, 1907.14, 15. Subprioniodus lumtlan-en-ns Smitli, 1907.16. Subpriomodus lanceolotus Smith, 1907.17. Subprioniodus obllquo-lanceolatus Smith, 1907.18, 19. Subprioniodus parvus Smith, 1907.20, 21. Subprioniodus paucidentatus Smith, 1907.22. Subprioniodus peracutus Smith, 1907.23-29. Cordylodus angulatus Pandev, 1856.30. Cordylodus ramosus Hadding, 1913.31, 32. Cordylodus rotiindatus Pander, 1856.33. Cornuramia bicornua Smith, 1907.34. Co-rnuramia diplodonta Smith, 1907.35. Cornuramia monodontu Smith, 1907.36. nindeodella (Polygnathus) dubius (Hinde) Smitli. 1907.87,38. Hlndeodella {Centrodus) dupUcatus Pander, 1856.39. Hindeodella (Centrodus) dupUcatus (Pander) Hinde, 1879.40, 41. Hindeodella (Centrodus) lineatus (Pander) Hind(\ 1879.42. Hindeodella (Centrodus) lineatus Pander, 1856.43. Ligonodina (Prioniodus) panderi Hinde, 1879.44. Prioniodus theron T. H. Clark, ]924.Plate 5Figs. 1, 2. Hindeodella (Ctenognathus) obliquus Pander, 1856.3-5. Hindeodella (Ctenognathus) ol)liquus (Pander) Hinde, 1879.6. Pachysomia wanlockensis Smith, 1907.7. Lonchodina (Polygnathus) spinata Hadding, 1913.8. Lonchodina (Prioniodus) erraticus Hinde, 1879.9. Lonchodina (Prioniodus) clavatus Hinde, 1879.10. Prioniodina (Prioniodus) geminus Hinde, 1879.11. Pt*ioniadina (Prioniodus) volborthii Pander, 1856.12. BryantodMS (Polygnathus) radiatus Hinde, 1879.13. Bryantodus (Polygnathus) dupUcatus Hinde, 1S79.14. Bryantodus (Polygnathus) immersus Hinde, 1879.15,16. Bryantodus (Prioniodus) politus Hinde, 1879.17,18. Eupriomodina (Prioniodus) alata Hadding, 1913.19. Euprioniodina (Prioniodus) dlscedens Hadding, 1913.20,21. Euprioniodina (Prioniodus) acicularis Hinde, 1879.22. Euprioniodina (Polygnathus) lanceolata Smith, 1907.23. Euprioniodina (Prioniodus) furcata Hinde, 1879.24-29. Eivpriomodina (Prioniodus) radica)is Hindo. 1879.30. Euprioniodina (Prioniodus) curt-ata Smith, 1907.31. Hibba/rdella (Prioniodus) angulatus Hinde, 1879.32. 33. Hibbardella (Prioniodus) angulatus Hinde, 1900.
AKT.5 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE COXODONTS HOLMES 37Plate 6Fig. 1. Lonchodus (Polygnathus) parvus Smith, 1907.2-5. LoncJiodus (Centrodus) simplex Pander, 1856.6. Lonchodus (Centrodus) ohUquus Smith, 1907.7-10. Lonchodus (Cewtrodus) erectus Smitli, 1907.11. LonchodiUS (Centrodus) cotwexus Pander, 1856.12-14. LoncJiodus (Polygnatlius) convexus (Pander) Hinde, 1900.15. Lonchodus (Centrodus) distans Smith, 1907.16. Lonchodus (Polygnathus) prmceps Hinde, 1879.17-20. Lonehodus (Polygnathus) prmceps (Hinde) Smith, 1907.21. Lonehodus (Polygnathus) curvatns Smith, 1907.22. Lonchodus (Polygnathus) coron<itus Hinde, 1879.23. Lonehodus (Polygnathus) mmus Smith, 1907.24. Valentia morrochensls Smitli, 1907.25. Pa/nderodella (Polygnathus) solidus Hinde, 1879.26-28. Panderodella (PolygnatJms) scitulus Hinde, 1900.29,30. Panderodella (Polygnathus) serratus Hinde, 1879.31. Gnathodus mosquensis Pander, 1856.32. Cfnathodus (Polygnathus) orassus Hinde, 1879.33. Gnathodus (Polygnathus) curxratus Hinde, 1879.34,35. Prion ogn a thus iramdtU, Pander, 1856.Plate 7Fig. 1. Gnathodus (Polygnathus) eriensis Hinde, 1879. (Side view.)2-4. Polygnathus (Gnathodus) mosquensis (Pander) Hinde, 1900.5. Polygnathus ? simplex Hinde, 1879.6. Polygnathus cristatus (Hinde) Clai'ke, 1885.7. Polygnathus cristatus Hinde, 1879.8,9. Polygnathus cristatus Hinde (Polygnathus dul)'his, part), 1879.10, 11. Polygnathus pennatus Hinde, 1879.12. Polygnathus pennatus (Hinde) Clarice, 1885.13. Polygnathus argos T. H. Clark, 1924.14. Polygnathus naricula Hinde, 1900.15, 16. Polygnathus palmatus Hinde, 1879.17. Palmatalepis (Polygnathus) punctatus Hinde, 1879.18, 19. Polygnathus tuberculatus Hinde, 1879.20,21. Polygnathus truncatus Hinde, 1879.22. Polygnathus linguiformis Hinde, 1879.23. Ctenognathus murchisoni Pander, 1856.24. Ctenognathus keyserlingii Pander, 1856.25-29. Ctenognathus verneuUli Pander, 1956.30. Synprioniodina (Polygnatlius) tiasutus Hinde, 1879.Plate 8 _Fig. 1. PHoniodina (Polygnathus) duhius (Hinde) Smith, 1900. A species ofBryantodus.2-13. Polygnathus duMus Hinde, 1879. Devoniau (probably Portage) west-em New York. Specimens of different genera as follows, referredto this species : 2, 4, Bryantodus ; 3, PHoniodina ; 5, 8, Hindeodella;7, Gnathodus or Polygnatlius ; 6, 9, 11, 12, Lonchodus or undeter-mined ; 13, Loncliodina;14-32. Polygnathus d\uMus (Hinde) Clarke, 1885. Specimens from theNaitles shale at Naples, Ontario County, N. Y., referred by Clarkin 1885 to this species. Genera represented as follows : 14-16, 19,21, 22, side views of Polygnathus ; 17, 25, Bryantodus; IS, Prioni-odus; 20, 23, 24, Lonchodus; 26-28, 31, Hindeodella; 30, Polygna-thellus; 29, 32, Eupriomodina.
38 PKOOEEDIIvrGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vol. 72Pl^TB 9All the specimens illustrated here and on plates 9 and 10 are from theChattanooga black shale of Lower Mississippian age at a locality 13 miles eastof north of Huntsville, Ala. All are magnified 12 diameters.Figs. 1, 2. Prioniodus alaJyamensis, new species.3. Prioniodus alatoides, new species.4. Prioniodus cultratus Ulrich and Bassler.5. Ligonodina parvula, new species.6, 7. Hindeodella tenerrima, new species.8. Hindeodella tninutidens, new species.9. Hindeodella germana, new species.10. 11. Hindeodella suMilis Ulrich and Bassler.12. Lonchodina irregularis, new species.13. Lonchodina discrete Ulrich and Bassler.14. Prioniodella arcuata, new species.15. Prioniodella inutilis, new species.16, 17. Prioniodina separans, new species.18. Prioniodvna undulata, new species.Plate 10Chattanooga black shale 13 miles east of north of Huntsville, Ala. Magnified12 diameters.J'iGS. 1, 2. Bryantodus inequalis, new species.3. Bryantodus inclinatus, new species.4. Bryantodus, species.5. Bryantodus germanus, new species.6. Bryantodus suhangulatus, new species.7. Euprioniodima germana, new species.8. Diplododella Mlateralis Ulrich and Bassler.9. HiMardella curvata, new species.10. Palmatodella delicatula Ulrich and Bassler.11. 12. Synprioniodina alternata Ulrich and Bassler.13. Synprioniodina plana, new si)ecies.14. Panderodella recta, new si)ecies.15. Panderodella sudrecta, new species.Plate 11Chattanooga black shale, 13 miles east of north of Huntsville, Ala. Magnifledi12 diameters.Figs. 1, 2. Polygnathus gyratilineatus, new species.3. Polygnathus pergyratus, new species.4. Polygnathus trilobatus, new species.5-7. Polygnathus concentricus Ulrich and Bassler.8-10. Palmatolepis inequalis, new species.11, 12. Polygnathus rhomboideus Ulrich and Bassler.13. Palmatolepis elongatus, new species.14. Polygnathus pennatuloideus, new species.15. Polygnathus pennatvlus Ulrich and Bassler.16-19. Palmatolepis perlobatus Ulrich and Bassler.o
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM PROCEEDINGS, VOL. 72, ART. 5 PL. 1
41 4-2Illustrations of conodontsFor explanation of plate see page 34
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM PROCEEDINGS, VOL. 72, ART. 5 PL. 2
Illustrations of conodontsFor explanation of plate see page 35
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM PROCEEDINGS, VOL. 72, ART. 5 PL. 3
Illustrations of conodontsFor explanation of plate see page 35
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM PROCEEDINGS, VOL. 72, ART. 5 PL. 4
Illustrations of conodontsFor explanatjon of plate see page 36
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM PROCEEDINGS, VOL. 72, ART. 5 PL. 5
Illustrations of conodontsFor explanation of plate see page 36
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM PROCEEDINGS, VOL. 72, ART. 5 PL. 6
Illustrations of conodontsFor explanation of plate see page 37
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM PROCEEDINGS, VOL. 72, ART. 5 PL. 7
Illustrations of conodontsFor explanation of plate see page 37
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM PROCEEDINGS, VOL. 72, ART. 5 PL. 8
Illustrations of conodontsFor explanation of plate see page 37
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM PROCEEDINGS, VOL. 72, ART. 5 PL. 9
Early Mississippian conodontsFor explanation of plate see page 38
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM PROCEEDINGS, VOL. 72, ART. 5 PL. 10
f-^^ a.r
'f-jm - . 1?;?
P^^^^^?
?ii .it,? Ip??'
: '!i*'..iP
AmOA^J.
Early Mississippian conodontsFor explanation of plate see page 38
U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM PROCEEDINGS, VOL. 72, ART. 5 PL. 11
Early Mississippian conodontsFor explanation of plate see page 38