DSpace Repository

The weight of fossil leporids and ochotonids: body mass estimation models for the order Lagomorpha

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Moncunill-Solé, B. en
dc.contributor.author Quintana, J. en
dc.contributor.author Jordana, X. en
dc.contributor.author Engelbrektsson, P. en
dc.contributor.author Köhler, M. en
dc.date.accessioned 2015-04-20T15:16:01Z
dc.date.available 2015-04-20T15:16:01Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.citation Moncunill-Solé, B., Quintana, J., Jordana, X., Engelbrektsson, P., and Köhler, M. 2015. "The weight of fossil leporids and ochotonids: body mass estimation models for the order Lagomorpha." <em>Journal of zoology</em>. 295 (4):269&ndash;278. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12209">https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12209</a> en
dc.identifier.issn 0952-8369
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10088/25734
dc.description.abstract Lagomorphs are widespread around the world, but little is known about the biology and ecology of their fossil ancestors. In this case, knowing the body mass of these extinct species is of principal interest because it is correlated with physiological, morphological and life history attributes. Moreover, insular fossil rabbits, hares and pikas, which became spectacular giants with huge weights and dramatic shifts in their life histories, encourage curiosity in the research world. Our principal aim is to create allometric models between skeletal parameters and body weights with extant species of the order Lagomorpha (both ochotonids and leporids). These regressions can then be applied to the fossil register to estimate the body mass of the extinct lagomorphs. The models are satisfactory in all cases, although weaker relationships were obtained when we analyzed dental parameters. Multiple models have slightly better results than bivariate ones, but their use is limited to complete bones or skeletons. These body mass estimation models were tested in three different fossil lagomorphs: Prolagus apricenicus, Prolagus cf. calpensis and Nuralagus rex. In all three cases, the results from dental variables were discarded due to the fact that these species may not follow the allometric relationship between teeth and body mass of standard lagomorphs. Other variables, such as the proximal anteroposterior diameter of the humerus in N. rex, were also removed for their implications in fossorial lifestyle. We ultimately estimated a weight of around 600 g for P. apricenicus, 300 g for P. cf. calpensis and 8000 g for N. rex. Differences in extrinsic mortality explain the important differences in body masses between the two Prolagus species. The results of N. rex cannot be compared with the giant Prolagus due to phylogenetic differences. en
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of zoology en
dc.title The weight of fossil leporids and ochotonids: body mass estimation models for the order Lagomorpha en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.srbnumber 134036
dc.identifier.doi 10.1111/jzo.12209
rft.jtitle Journal of zoology
rft.volume 295
rft.issue 4
rft.spage 269
rft.epage 278
dc.description.SIUnit NH-Vertebrate Zoology en
dc.description.SIUnit NMNH en
dc.description.SIUnit Peer-reviewed en
dc.citation.spage 269
dc.citation.epage 278


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account