ICARUS 25, 495-537 (1975) The Moon after Apollo PAROUK EL-BAZ National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.G- 20560 Received September 17, 1974 The Apollo missions have gradually increased our knowledge of the Moon's chemistry, age, and mode of formation of its surface features and materials. Apollo 11 and 12 landings proved that mare materials are volcanic rocks that were derived from deep-seated basaltic melts about 3.7 and 3.2 billion years ago, respec- tively. Later missions provided additional information on lunar mare basalts as well as the older, anorthositic, highland rocks. Data on the chemical make-up of returned samples were extended to larger areas of the Moon by orbiting geo- chemical experiments. These have also mapped inhomogeneities in lunar surface chemistry, including radioactive anomalies on both the near and far sides. Lunar samples and photographs indicate that the moon is a well-preserved museum of ancient impact scars. The crust of the Moon, which was formed about 4.6 billion years ago, was subjected to intensive metamorphism by large impacts. Although bombardment continues to the present day, the rate and size of impact- ing bodies were much greater in the first 0.7 billion years of the Moon's history. The last of the large, circular, multiringed basins occurred about 3.9 billion years ago. These basins, many of which show positive gravity anomalies (mascons), were flooded by volcanic basalts during a period of at least 600 million years. In addition to filling the circular basins, more so on the near side than on the far side, the basalts also covered lowlands and circum-basin troughs. Profiles of the outer lunar skin were constructed from the mapping camera system, including the laser altimeter, and the radar sounder data. Materials of the crust, according to the lunar seismic data, extend to the depth of about 65 km on the nearside, probably more on the far side. The mantle which underlies the crust probably extends to about 1100 km depth. It is also probable that a molten or par- tially molten zone or core underlies the mantle, where interactions between both may cause the deep-seated moonquakes. The three basic theories of lunar origin?capture, fission, and binary accretion ?are still competing for first place. The last seems to be the most popular of the three at this time; it requires the least number of assumptions in placing the Moon in Earth orbit, and simply accounts for the chemical differences between the two bodies. Although the question of origin has not yet been resolved, we are beginning to see the value of interdisciplinary synthesis of Apollo scientific returns. During the next few years we should begin to reap the fruits of attempts at this synthesis. Then, we may be fortunate enough to take another look at the Moon from the proposed Lunar Polar Orbit (LPO) mission in about 1979. I. INTRODUCTION ledge for better understanding of the scientific data now being collected from Exploration of the Moon has yielded a other planets. There are indications that plethora of information regarding the the forces of nature that created the mater- chemistry, age, and evolution of the surface ial of the Earth were also operative on the materials. A complete and thorough under- Moon and probably the terrestrial planets, standing of these data is important for two Mars, Venus, and Mercury, reasons: first, to decipher the thermal To a lesser degree, a study of the Moon is history and origin of Earth's closest also important in studying the Sun's past, neighbor, and, second, to apply that know- At present, there are numerous new tools Copyright ? 1975 by Academic Press, Inc. 495 All rights of reproduction in any form reserved. Printed in Great Britain 496 FAROUK EL-BAZ ~^^- ii ^ iff + ^ ; i ) J r^ I l (/I I j I. ' I 1 * ' ' A ? i ? - /*" f -? fr i* c3 ^'if 3 o o A oj X --- Tiri ? s 00 ?-! ? ,? cc P y" a .3 ? o ? 9 ?3 a 2 32 3 S-i O 73 k .2 H 3 ?i o SP a ?5 05 2 ' /= s += o 1 s "o 0 C j: ?- -P 05 -3 ? g 1 -G d m H ~ ^ a ? o 43 O c3 g s 05 ? : -4 a ^ a fl OQ ? c3 8 J ? a % s &.S [C 05 T "2 ^ C a -7 cS w .2 ^ > 73 0 c CO 0 0 gn -S c 0 C "^ cS cS C ?-^ < MOON AFTER APOLLO 497 to study with increasing degrees of sophis- tication the processes that are acting on the Sun. Before the return of lunar samples, however, it was not feasible to study the past history of the Sun. The lunar materials have collected and kept a record of the solar particles reaching them from the Sun. More than fifty spacecraft have flown near or landed on the Moon since 1958. Twelve American astronauts have walked on and sampled its surface, traversing nearly one hundred kilometers. Two un- manned Soviet vehicles have returned samples from two different sites on the Moon, and two others have roamed the lunar surface telemetering their intelligence to the Earth. Five scientific observatories left by the astronauts on the Moon continue today to transmit information about the lunar environment. The two Soviet passive stations and similar laser retrorefiectors at three Apollo landing sites are being used to measure the Earth-Moon distance, and also the rate of continental drift on Earth. About twenty thousand photographs taken from lunar orbit have captured the Moon in great detail, permitting better interpretations of its features. The majority of the hard facts, however, were provided by the soft-landed spacecraft (Fig. 1). Most prominent among these are some 400 kilograms of rock and soil samples that were returned, mostly by the Apollo mis- sions. These samples are being studied by more than a thousand scientists of diverse specialities in nearly twenty countries. As is customary in scientific research, the findings from lunar studies generated questions that remain unanswered. How- ever, many questions have been satis- factorily answered and several conclusions can be drawn. It is my intention to sum- marize in this paper the state of the art of lunar science, with emphasis on what I think is important among the results of the six Apollo lunar surface exploration missions. For the past eight years I have been a member of the so-called "lunar science team." Between team members of this "mutual admiration society," intimate verbal contact is the rule rather than the exception. For this reason, it is sometimes hard to acknowledge all contributors to a given result, theory or manner of present- ation. However, and at the expense of brevity, it is attempted here to give proper credit to authors for the sake of readers who may wish to consult original papers dealing with the various subjects or areas of discussion. Other summary reports of lunar science include those by Hinners (1971), EL-Baz (1974), Schmitt (1974), Runcorn (1974), and Taylor (1975). II. THE APOLLO MISSIONS A. Mare Tranquillitatis It was a giant leap for Neil Armstrong to take the first step on the Moon. The Apollo 11 mission was also a giant leap for science because it provided the first returned samples from another body in the solar system. Before Apollo, no matter how sophisticated the instruments were of remote sensing, whether from Earth or from lunar orbit, no undisputable conclu- sions could be drawn as to the nature of the lunar surface materials. The exact chem- istry of a rock, the mineral species that form its fabric, as well as the absolute age of that rock are among the fundamental parameters necessary for a full understand- ing of its origins and its history. These parameters are nearly impossible to define without having the rock samples to study in the laboratory. The Apollo 11 landing site is in a relative- ly smooth and level part of Mare Tran- quillitatis (Fig. 2a). This part of Tran- quillitatis is characterized by a low albedo (reflecting only about 9% of incident sun- light; Pohn and Wildey, 1970) and a high density of craters (Grolier, 1970; Trask, 1970) ranging in diameter from less than one meter to several tens and hundreds of meters. Materials of the regolith, the upper- most fragmental surface layer, range in size from very fine particles to blocks more than a meter across. The landing was made about 6 km west-southwest of the center of the landing ellipse. The astronauts avoided a blocky-rimmed crater named West, which is about 180 meters in diameter and 30 meters deep. Its hummocky eject a extends about 250 meters out from the rim 498 FAROTJK EL-BAZ MOON AFTER APOLLO 499 crest. Ejected blocks, radially arranged around that crater were photographed by the astronauts, and samples of its finer ray materials were probably returned by Apollo 11. Samples from this site consist of (a) coarse-to-fine grained ophitic basalts of igneous origin, (b) microbreccias, which are believed to be a mechanical mixture of soil and small rock fragments compacted into a coherent rock and (c) fine-grained soil (LSPET, 1969). The soil is a diverse mixture of crystalline fragments and glassy fragments (Fig. 2c). It contains a small number of crystalline fragments which are totally different from any of the sampled igneous rocks. These fragments were interpreted to have been derived from the nearby highlands by Wood et al. (1970). This interpretation was found to hold true on later Apollo flights. The soil was also found to contain small fragments of iron meteorites (LSPET, 1969). Evidence of shock effects due to meteor- oid impacts are well preserved in soil sam- ples and the fabric of returned rocks. The shock features in rock fragments are equivalent to those produced in the lab at 40 kilobars (Quade et al., 1970), or higher, and in the fine dust to those approaching the megabar region (von Engelhart et al., 1970). Evidence that the regolith is the product of meteoroid impacts include the following. 1. Observation of glass coatings on blocks (Fig. 2b) as well as rock and soil samples (McKay et al., 1970); some of the coatings contain extra amounts of elements attributed to the impacting meteorites (Anders et al., 1971, and Laul et al., 1971). 2. Presence of minute impact pits, also known as "zap craters," on surfaces of rocks and soil samples (e.g. Horz et al., 1971). 3. Occurrence of fragments, mostly angular, of basaltic rocks and glass or glass-coated rocks (Fig. 2c). 4. Aggregation of fragments and par- ticles back into a coherent rock, breccia (LSPET, 1969). 5. Deformation of the structure of individual minerals (plagioclase and pyrox- ene) and the production of fractures, planar structures, and multiple twinning (Short, 1970). 6. Further deformation causing com- plete disruption of the mineral lattice, shock-induced thermal melting, and re- crystallization of the materials (von Engel- hardteW., 1970). 7. Smallness of the median particle size, in the soil, which may represent the average mineral grain size in the crystalline rocks (Duke et al., 1970). Sizes below a few microns dominate (Gold et al., 1971). 8. Presence of small particles of meteoritic debris (composed mostly of iron-nickel) in the soil or aggregated with lunar particles (Chao et al., 1970). Studies of trace elements in the Apollo 11 basalts have shown that the samples are remarkably similar in a wide range of chemical characteristics. These character- istics distinguish the Apollo 11 rocks from basaltic meteorites and terrestrial basalts. As reported by Oast and Hubbard (1970) they show (1) a high concentration of ti- tanium, zirconium, and rare earth elements, (2) a two- to fourfold depletion of europium relative to samarium and gadolinium, and (3) a low abundance of sodium relative to the other major elements. Oast and Hubbard (1970) conclude that these basalts must have formed by the eruption of lavas from beneath the surface of the Moon, after segregation of molten rock and its fraction- ation to produce this particular composi- tion. FIG. 2. Apollo 11: (a) Oblique view looking west of the landing site (arrow) in southwestern Mare Tranquillitatis. There are numerous craters, several hundred meters across, in the site area, like the one shown in Fig. 2b. Note the proximity of highland masses to the mare surface in which the LM landed (Apollo 11 frame 6092); (b) A cluster of blocks in the center of the floor of a crater 200m in diameter. Presence of the blocks suggests exposure of bedrock that underlies the regolith (uppermost fragmental layer) by the impact that created the crater (Apollo 11 frame 5954); (c) Fragments of Apollo 11 soil composed mainly of basaltic rock, but including a dark-colored glass fragment (1), the product of impact metamorphism and a light-colored anorthositic fragment (2), probably derived from the nearby highlands (Photograph courtesy of Carl Zeiss Company). 500 FAROUK EL-BAZ Ages of rock fragments from the Apollo 11 basalts were investigated by various radiometric age-dating techniques. The rubidium-strontium analyses on total rocks and minerals appear to produce the most consistent internal isochrons. Albee et al. (1970a) reported precise internal isochrons of rubidium 87-strontium 87 in five rocks giving the same age of 3.65 ? 0.05 billions years. They considered this to be the crystallization time of the Marc Tranquillitatis basalts sampled on Apollo 11. Argon 40-argon 39 age-dating tech- niques of seven crystalline rocks also indicated a similar age of 3.7 billion vears (Turner, 1970). Age-dating of the fine dust from Apollo 11 produced other significant results. Concentrations of uranium, thorium, and lead in the soil samples are very low: from less than one to a few ppm. However, the extremely radiogenic lead allows radio- metric dating of the fine soil. Based on the ratios of lead 207: lead 206, lead 206: uranium 238, lead 207: uranium 235, and lead 206: thorium 232, Tatsumoto and Rosholt (1970) obtained a concordant age of 4.66 billion years. Silver (1970) also reported that uranium-thorium-lead isotope relations in dust samples yield apparent model ages of about 4.6 billion years. He emphasized that the discrepency between rock ages and dust ages poses a problem of rock genesis on the Moon. In summary, the Apollo 11 rock and soil samples provided significant new informa- tion from which the following are empha- sized . 1. The majority of Mare Tranquilli- tatis samples are volcanic rocks of basaltic composition. This is a confirmation of pre-Apollo photogeologic interpretations, as well as interpretations of data trans- mitted by the Surveyor missions. 2. The rocks are remarkably similar in composition except for the concentra- tions of a few minor and trace elements. By terrestrial standards, they are rich in iron and titanium, and poor in sodium, carbon and water. They also do not contain any evidence that life once existed on the Moon. 3. The volcanic rocks are derivatives of differentiation in a melt at depth (rather than being impact-produced, near-surface melts). There is also ample chemical evidence that the original magmas had low oxidation levels. 4. Samples of fine dust and soil are in most part derived from the basaltic rocks. The soil is chemically similar to the rock samples except for minor components which are probably derived from the nearby (anorthositic) highlands. 5. Rocks, rock fragments, and fine dust are most likely the product of repeated impacts on solid bed rock surfaces. There is ample evidence of modifications of the original rock structures by shock meta- morphism, including the formation of glass and breccias. 6. The lunar volcanic rocks at the Apollo 11 site are extremely old; they crystallized from melts 3.7 billion years ago. (This particular fact contradicts some earlier suggestions that the Moon has been volcanically active in the recent past.) The model age of the soil, 4.6 billion years, probably represents the age of the Moon. B. Oceanus Procellarum Since the Apollo 11 mission landed too far west of the planned landing point, one of the main objectives of the Apollo 12 mission was to develop and exercise the capability of pinpoint landing. The general area of the Surveyor III landing site was selected as the target of this mission. The site is located in the extreme south- eastern part of Oceanus Procellarum (Fig. 1) and it is covered by a broad ray which is believed to have originated by ejection of material from the crater Copernicus some 370 km to the north (Fig. 3a). The mare material in this site is characterized by a relatively smooth surface and a smaller number of craters per unit area than the Apollo 11 site (Trask, 1970; Pohn, 1971). The Apollo 12 site is characterized by a distinctive cluster of 50-400 m craters that was named the "Snowman" (Fig. 3b). The lunar module landed on the northwest rim of the 200 meter Surveyor crater, within which Surveyor III had landed two years earlier. The regolith at the site is made up of microscopic particles to blocks several meters across. In addition to samples of MOON AFTER APOLLO 501 ? msaMftm */" ' ( ;A ^ ^^ FIG. 3. Apollo 12: (a) The landing site area (arrow) in southeastern Oceamis Procellarum. Kote that the area is covered by a bright ray from the crater Copernicus near the top of the photograph (Lunar Orbiter IV frame M-126); (b) Close-up view of the landing site showing a cluster of craters named "Snowman" with the Surveyor crater in the middle. The position of the Surveyor III space- craft is shown by a cross and the Apollo 12 LM by an arrow (Lunar Orbiter III, frame H-137); (c) Exposures of white soil in the Apollo 12 site that may be part of the Copernicus ray material (Apollo 12 frame 7052). 502 FAROIXK EL-BAZ rock and soil, the Apollo 12 astronauts brought back parts of the Surveyor space- craft to be studied for effects of the lunar environment. Basaltic igneous rocks, breccias, and soil were collected from a variety of the geologic features in the Oceanus Pro eel - larum site. The igneous rocks show many differences from the Tranquillitatis basalts. The rocks of Apollo 12 are predominantly crystalline, whereas the Apollo 11 rocks are half crystalline and half microbreccias (LSPET, 1970). The Procellarum basalts show greater variation in grain size; some are very coarse grained. This was explained to be the result of segregation during crystallization in relatively thick lava flows or shallow intrusive dikes or sills (LSPET, 1970). Later, geologic evidence was developed indicating that these rocks were samples from several distinct basalt units, perhaps at least three (Button and Schaber, 1971). This is supported by petrographic evidence of various types of sampled basalts, including a porphyritic basalt that is made up of large crystals of olivine and pyrozene in a fine-grained matrix. Prom the chemical-mineralogical point of view, according to Melson and Mason (1971), the Tranquillitatis basalts show a greater abundance of titanium, lower anorthite content of the plagioclase, lower hyperstene: diopside ratio, and a predominantly quartz-normative miner- alogy when compared with the Procellarum basalts. Some of the fine-grained material col- lected at the 12 site is of much higher albedo than the surroundings (Fig. 3c). Soil and breccia samples from this high albedo unit contain fragments of unusual composition. According to Mayer et al. (1971), these occur as ropy and sculptured glasses, glassy matrix breccias, and an- nealed fragments with a predominance of orthopyroxene. The composition of these materials is essentially basaltic, but with greatly enriched trace element contents of potassium (K), rare earth elements (REE), and phosphorus (P). This resulted in coining of the acronym KREEP by Hubbard ef aZ. (1971). This chemistry makes the KREEP component a foreign one to the basalts of Oceanus Procellarum. For this reason, and because of the association with the light- colored soil, it is interpreted as part of the ejecta from the crater Copernicus, i.e., the result of penetration of the mare fill and ejection of the underlying pre-mare high- lands by the crater Copernicus (Fig. 3a). One Apollo 12 rock, number 13, proved to be the most unusual lunar sample yet obtained. It is a very heterogenous mixture of light and dark components with various degrees of mixing between them. The light component is granitic in composition, con- sisting predominantly of potassium-rich feldspar and quartz with plagioclase and pyroxene. The dark component is similar to the basaltic microbreccias of the Apollo 11 site consisting of angular fragments of plagioclase and pyroxene in a fine mixture of plagioclase, pyroxene, and ilmenite. One simple model of rock 13 (Albee et al., 1970b) suggests that the dark basaltic component was permeated and assimilated to varying degrees by the light, granitic component. The age of this rock, 4.0 billion years, was ascribed to the time when the light material intruded and reacted with the dark component (Albee etal., 1970b). Both the chemistry and the age indicate that "rock 13" is foreign to the Procellarum basalts. The crystallization ages of these basalts as obtained by rubidium-strontium method varied between 3.1 and 3.3 billion years (Papanastassiou and Wasserburg, 1971). Among the most important conclusions that could be drawn from the findings of Apollo 12 are the following. 1. The chemistry of the two mare landing sites, Apollo 11 and 12, resembles the findings of Surveyor V and VI (see Fig. 1 for locations). This chemistry distinguishes lunar basalts from basaltic meteorites and terrestrial basalts. 2. At least two, probably three or more, mare units were sampled on Apollo 12 based on petrologic and petrographic evidence. This confirms photogeologic interpretations that suggest the presence of more than one lava flow in the landing site area. MOON AFTER APOLLO 503 3. The age of the Apollo 12 basalts, which is approximately 3.2 billion years, attests to the fact that the lunar maria are geologically very old. The wide difference between the ages of Mare Tranquillitatis and Oceanus Procellarum basalts (600 million years) indicates a prolonged episode of mare filling on the Moon. 4. The high albedo material collected in the fine samples as well as rock 13 appear to be foreign to the Procellarum basalts. These light-colored materials seem to be part of the Copernicus ray. KREEP components in the Apollo 12 site may, therefore, be part of buried Era Mauro Formation materials. If so, KREEP basalts should be an important component in the Apollo 14 rocks, which they are. G. Fra Mauro Formation The site selected for Apollo 13 and later Apollo 14 after the former was aborted is in the Era Mauro Formation. This unit covers a substantial part of the near side of the Moon as a broad belt that surrounds the Imbrium basin; the Formation is inter- preted to be an ejecta deposit from the impact that created the basin (Eggleton, 1964). It is characterized by broad ridges that form a characteristically hummocky terrain (Fig. 4a), with the major orienta- tion being radial to the Imbrium basin. The thickness of this ejecta blanket is judged to be several kilometers by the calculated depth of the craters which are almost completely obscured by it (Eggle- ton, 1964; Eggleton and Offield, 1960). The Apollo 14 LEM landed about 1100 meters west of Cone crater which is a sharp- rimmed crater, 350 meters in diameter, that apparently penetrated one of the characteristic ridges of the Fra Mauro Formation (Fig. 4b). The sampling traverse was planned with the ejecta of Cone crater in mind, i.e. to collect fresh exposures of the ridgy material excavated by this relatively recent event. Study of the photographs taken on the lunar surface indicates that large blocks in the area are composed of breccias in which dark and light clasts are set in a light-colored matrix (Fig. 4c). The returned rocks show that brecciation and presence of clasts in the large boulders are also exhibited in collected samples. Inspection of the returned samples and study of thin sections (LSPET, 1971; LSAPT, 1972, 1973) confirmed the brec- ciated nature of almost all the returned samples. Many generations of brecciation were observed, that is breccias within breccias within breccias. This suggests that, before excavation of the Imbrium basin, the host rock had been subjected to earlier impacts. The effects of the Imbrium impact on the rock appears to be re crystal- lization, mineral reactions, and incipient fusion, characteristics that are to be associated with shock metamorphism due to a large impact. This shock meta- morphism may be in part due to a base- surge like environment described in vol- canic eruptions on Earth (Moore, 1967). A recent study of the Orientale basin and the surrounding ejecta by Moore et al. (1974) shows that there are six facies of ejecta around its outer rim, the Cordillera Mountains: concentric, radial, smooth- plained, grooved, secondary impact crat- ered, and fissured. The transport of these ejecta (based on photogeologic mapping, terrestrial crater analogs, and experimental data) occurred by the following processes: block-riding, landsliding, debris flow (possibly by base-surge), viscous flow, and ballistic ejection. In their view of the dynamic transport mechanisms, therefore, mixing of ejecta and substratum materials must have occurred. Extrapolation of this model to Imbrium suggests a wide distri- bution of ejecta from this basin. Moore et al. (1974) point out that the locations of Apollo 14, 15, 16, and 17 permit the presence of Imbrium ejecta of considerable thicknesses at all these sites. Chemically, the Apollo 14 samples have consistently lower contents of iron oxide and higher contents of aluminum oxide than mare basalts. The iron content is more like most terrestrial basalts. The concentration of minor or trace elements, such as potassium, rubidium, uranium, thorium, barium, yttrium, and europium are much higher than those found in mare basalts. The closest compositions are those of the Apollo 12 KREEP basalts and 504 FABOUK EL-EAZ Fio. 4. Apollo 14: (a) Oblique view showing the ridgy Fra Mauro Formation (middle part of the frame) within which the Apollo 14 LM landed (arrow) (Apollo 16 metric frame 2507); (b) Close-up view of the landing site (arrow) southwest of Gone crater (upper right part of photograph). Gone crater, which is about 350 meters in diameter, apparently penetrated one of the Fra Mauro Form- ation ridges (right half of photograph) (Lunar Orbiter III frame H-133); (c) Large blocks, several meters across, near the rim of Cone crater showing dark and light clasts of breccia set in a light- colored matrix. The brecciation appears to be the result of impact metamorphism (Apollo 14 frame 9449). MOON AFTER APOLLO 505 the dark portion of' 'rock 13." The chemical composition of the soil closely resembles that of the fragmental rocks, except for the fact that some trace elements are somewhat depleted in the soil (LSPET, 1971). The Apollo 14 rocks are dated at 3.95 billion years (Tera etal., 1973). These rocks (samples of the Fra Mauro Formation) most probably represent ejecta from the Imbrium basin, where the impact event must have reset the radioactive clocks. Therefore, the 3.95 billion years age repre- sents the last stage of recrystallization of the Imbrium basin ejecta. In summary, important results of the study of the Apollo 14 samples are: 1. The complex history of shock metamorphism of all the rocks, for which there are three probable causes: (a) excava- tion by the Imbrium impact of preexisting brecciated materials; (b) formation of breccia within breccia during the Imbrium event, and the base-surge that resulted from it; and (c) local cratering events superposed on the Imbrium event. 2. The composition of the Fra Mauro Formation rocks is different from the mare rocks of Apollo 11 and 12. The high- land or KREEP basalts of Apollo 14 are characterized by a lower iron oxide content and higher aluminium oxide and trace element concentrations than those of mare basalts. 3. Since the recrystallization age of the Apollo 14 rocks is about 3.95 billion years, and if the Fra Mauro Formation is indeed ejecta of the Imbrium basin, then we have established the absolute age of the Imbrium event which shaped much of the near side of the Moon. D. Apenni?ie-Hadley The Apollo 15 lunar module landed on the mare surface of Palus Putredinis on the eastern part of Mare Imbrium, which is rimmed by the Montes Apenninus. The landing site is strategically situated such that the astronauts were able to sample the mare material, the highland massif Hadley 8 or its regolith, and the sinuous Rima Hadley (Fig. 5a). The mare material of Palus Putredinis is very similar in texture, appearance, and number of craters per unit area to the mare of Oceanus Procel- larum in which Apollo 12 landed, and, therefore, it was believed to be of the same relative age (Carr et al., 1971). Hadley ?, which is part of the Apennine Mountains was believed to include material that was uplifted from the subsurface at the time of the formation of the Imbrium basin (Shoemaker, 1962, among many others). First to be studied were the large numbers of photographs returned by the Apollo 15 crew. Both surface and orbital photographs were used to decipher local stratigraphic relationships. For example, high resolution panoramic camera photo- graphy showed meters thick layers on the walls of Rima Hadley (Fig. 5b). These layers, which confirm the theory of filling of mare basins by successive lava flows, were also depicted on high resolution surface photographs (LSAPT, 1972). Also, a highland prominence, informally called Silver Spur, within the Apennine chain of mountains and hills showed several strata (Fig. 5c). Each layer is about 100 meters thick, and the layers may be ejecta from the Imbrium basin (Swann et al., 1970). The mare material returned by Apollo 15 was found to be basalts similar to that returned from Oceanus Procellarum. Material of Hadley S was found to be chemically different from both the mare basalts and the KREEP basalts of Apollo 14. It is mostly anorthositic rock; some of the returned samples are crystalline rocks which indicates that brecciation was not as extensive as at the Apollo 14 site. The anorthositic rocks are held by most lunar investigators to represent a large part of the lunar crust. The chemistry of this material is similar to that of the light- colored fine particles collected in the soil from several sites [for example, Apollo 11 (Wood et al., 1970) and Luna 16 (Vino- gradov, 1971)]. Unlike the Fra Mauro KREEP this material does not show high concentration in radioactive elements. One anorthositic crystalline rock from the highland regolith samples on Apollo 15 and named "Genesis Rock" gives an age of 4.1 billion years (LSAPT, 1972). This is the oldest rock sampled on that mission. Study of the samples collected from the FAROUK EL-BAZ FIG. 5. Apollo 15: (a) Photograph of the landing site (arrow) in Palus Putredinis. The site is west of the Apennine Mountain chain and east of the sinuous Hadley Rille (Apollo 15 frame 12811); (b) High resolution photograph of part of Hadley Rille that is marked by a square in Fig. 5a. Note the ledge of bedrock near the top and the numerous blocks that accumulated at the bottom of the V-shaped rille (AprHo 15 panoramic camera frame 9342); (c) Photograph of the layered Silver Spur (near center of horizon) at Hadley S as viewed from the LM (Apollo 15 photography 11371). MOON AFTER APOLLO 507 rim of Bima Hadley failed to add any significant insight into the origin of the structure. The morphological character- istics of this sinuous depression may best be explained as the result of drainage of lava into a conduit whose top part may have congealed and later collapsed to form the rille (Greeley, 1971; Carr et al, 1971; Howard et al., 1972). However, the data are not conclusive, and the origin of this and other sinuous rilles remain somewhat enigmatic. Among the most significant results of the Apollo 15 mission are the following. 1. The basalts of the Apollo 15 site are similar chemically and texturally to the Apollo 12 basalts. Both mare basalts are also about 3.2 billion years old. They constitute the youngest group of sampled basalts. The luna 16 and Apollo basalts are 3.5 and 3.7 billion years old, respectively. The oldest basalt is one of the Apollo 14 rocks, number 53, which is 3.95 billion years old (LSAPT, 1972). 2. Rocks and soil samples of Hadley ? are in general terms anorthositic gabbros and gabbroic anorthosites. Some of these are crystalline rocks, which indicates that brecciation was not as extensive at the rim of the Imbrium scar as it was farther out on the ejecta blanket (Apollo 14 breccias). 3. The lunar highlands are indeed older than the maria, which is in agreement with photogeologic interpretations. The fact that "Genesis Rock" is 4.1 billion years old is very significant, in that the rock is older than the Imbrian basin, and was not metamorphosed by that event. 4. Although samples and close up photographs were taken of Rima Hadley, no new information was gathered on the origin of that sinuous rille. All existing theories of sinuous rille formation are still competing, and there may be many modes of origin for these rilles. E. Descartes Highlands Apollo mission 16 was dedicated to sampling and exploration of part of the central lunar highlands north of the crater Descartes (Fig. 1). Two distinctive units were recognized and mapped before the mission (Fig. 6). The first is a relatively flat unit which resembles in gross appear- ance old mare units but displays a much higher albedo and a denser population of craters, the plains-forming Cayley Form- ation. The second is a topographically higher unit which is characterized by hilly, grooved, and furrowed terrain. The latter ("Descartes") unit is morphologically simi- lar to some terrestrial volcanic deposits. Hence, it was interpreted as a representa- tive of volcanism in the lunar highlands; relatively viscous volcanic materials could be responsible for the formation of the hilly topography (Milton, 1968; Wilhelms and McCauley, 1971; El-Baz and Roosa, 1972; Milton and Hodges, 1972; and others). If this interpretation is correct, one would expect an abundance of crystalline high- land rocks at the Apollo 16 site. During the mission, however, the astro- nauts observed that most of the rocks they encountered were breccias rather than crystalline or igneous rocks. Examination of the returned samples confirmed that the vast majority of the samples are breccias and only a few are unmetamorphosed igneous rocks (LSPET, 1973a). There is an abundance of high aluminum and calcium rocks: many are monomict breccias ap- proaching pure calcic plagioclase com- position. These crushed anorthosite breccias are unlike other lunar breccias, displaying no evidence that they are mechanically produced mixtures of pre- existing rocks. The Apollo 16 breccias probably formed from coarse-grained anorthosites by impact metamorphism (LSPET, 1973a). Ray materials and ejecta derived from two bright rayed craters in the area, North Ray and South Ray (Fig. 6), appear to mantle much of the traversed surfaces, and, therefore, dominate the sampling locations. Because of this there is some uncertainty whether the material of the hilly terrain was sampled. It was clear, however, that premission theories of a volcanic origin were probably incorrect. After the mission, several theories were advanced relating the majority of Apollo 16 rocks to Imbrium basin ejecta (Hodges et al., 1973), Orientale basin ejecta (Chao et al., 1973), material generated by secon- 508 FAROUK EL-BAZ FK:. 0. High resolution photograph of the Apollo 16 landing site area. The landing point (arrow) is approximately midway between two bright craters, 800 meters in diameter, North Ray (N) and South Ray (S). The latter is the younger and therefore the brighter of the two. Ejecta from both was collected on the mission in addition to materials of the light plains (Cayley Formation) in which the LM had landed (Apollo 16 panoramic camera frame 4623). MOON AFTEK APOLLO 509 dary craters of Imbrium (Oberbeck et al., 1974), and Nectaris ejecta and locally generated deposits (Head, 1974). None of these theories fully explains all the observations, although all the con- sidered impacts may have contributed to the terra deposits in the Descartes site. However, the study of the Orientale basin ejecta by Moore et al. (1974) may provide additional support for this theory of Imbrium basin ejecta origin for the Apollo 16 materials. Moore et al. (1974) state that Imbrium-related debris more than 500 meters thick at the Apollo 16 site is quite possible, and is consistent with the photo- geologic evidence in the Orientale case. This, however, does not preclude the presence of some Orientale and other basin ejecta at the site. Moore et al. (1974) expect a thinner deposit of Orientale materials in the Descartes region. Locally generated debris must also be present, e.g., ejecta blankets and rays of North and South Ray and older craters. If we are to accept the theory of Imbrium basin ejecta for the Descartes site, two fundamental questions will remain un- answered : First, why are the rocks of the Apollo 16 site so different morphologically, petrologically, and from the metamorphic history point of view than the Apollo 14 breccias (which are also believed to be ejecta from Imbrium)? Second, why are the concentrations in KREEP basalts so much higher in the Era Mauro Formation rocks than in the Descartes highlands, if both are mostly Imbrium ejecta deposits? Some of the samples of North Ray crater ejecta appear to have a rustlike coating. Studies of the opaque mineral assemblage in these rocks revealed the presence of an iron hydroxide, goethite, in that coating. According to El Goresy et al. (1973), goethite occurs as a thin film around metallic Fe/Ni and infiltrates the silicate grain boundaries in the vicinity of the Fe/Ni metals. These observations lead to the conclusion that goethite was formed on the lunar surface by hydro- thermal or similar reactions between troilite and water vapor, perhaps during a cometary impact, the water being a component of the cometary tail. Therefore, a cometary impact may have formed North Ray crater. From studies of the Apollo 16 samples, the following results are most significant. 1. Photogeologic interpretations by many investigators, including myself, of landforms in the Descartes region were proved incorrect. The hilly and grooved topography in that area is probably unrelated to terra volcanism and most likely to the accumulation of basin ejecta. 2. Although the Imbrium basin appears to be the most likely source of the Descartes area deposits, differences be- tween the Apollo 16 and 14 rocks are still not fully understood. 3. The ages of Apollo 16 rocks (about 3.9 billion years, Tera et al., 1973) are consistent with an Imbrium origin, al- though some samples dated by argon 40-argon 39 give crystallization ages of approximately 4.1 to 4.2 billion years (Husain and Schaeffer, 1973). 4. The high aluminum and calcium rocks of the Apollo 16 site are crushed anorthosite breccias, probably derived from cataclysmic metamorphism of an anorthositic complex containing 70 to 90 percent plagioclase. 5. Although the lunar environment is completely void of water and is char- acterized by exceedingly low oxygen pressure, goethite was formed in the Apollo 16 rocks as a mineral reaction rim. The water vapor may have been part of the impacting (cometary) projectile that formed North Ray crater. F. Taurus-Littrow The Apollo 17 site is located on a dark unit that fills a valley between two large massifs on the southeast rim of Mare Serenitatis (Figs. 1 and 7). This flat unit is among the darkest of all lunar surface materials (albedo value about 6-7%; Pohn and Wildey, 1970). As mapped by Carr (1966) this unit was believed to be younger than the inner mare fill of the Serenitatis basin. Also, according to Greeley and Gault (1973) this unit is so moderately cratered that it was considered among the youngest marelike units on the near side of the Moon. It displays a very 510 FAROTTK BL-BAZ FIG. 7. Area of the Apollo 17 exploration site. The LM (arrow) landed in the dark plain between two highland massifs, North Massif (N) and South Massif (S). Samples were collected from the plains, the two massifs, the landslide near South Massif, the scarp between the two massifs, and Shorty crater (circle) (Apollo 17 panoramic camera frame 2314). MOON AFTER APOLLO 511 smooth surface which was interpreted to be the result of a thin pyroclastic mantle (El-Baz, 1972a). This interpretation was endorsed by the sighting in this vicinity, from the Apollo 15 orbit, of small smooth- rimmed craters which were interpreted as cinder cones (El-Baz et al., 1972). Part of this unit is covered with a relatively thin layer of light-colored material which is believed to be a landslide from the South Massif (El-Baz, 1972b; Scott et al., 1972). The massif units measure up to two kilometers in height and display relatively fresh surfaces with numerous blocks. A large population of blocks could also be seen at the base of the massifs, indicating unstable slopes and much downslope movement of material. Crossing the site in a north-southerly trend is a scarp with mare ridgelike segments. This scarp is inter- preted as a fault scarp with en-echelon segments producing the ridgelike appear- ance. Muehlberger (1974) interprets it to be an asymmetric compressed fault, part of postmare structural adjustments in southeastern Serenitatis. Observations made at the site indicate that the dark unit is composed of igneous rock which is similar to the mare basalts; a thick pyroclastic mantle was not obvious. The observations were confirmed in the laboratory where the basalts showed a high titanium content in the form of the mineral ilmenite much like the Apollo 11 basalts (LSPET, 1973b). This tends to support the studies by Adams and McCord (1971) which suggest that the albedo of the mare unit depends partly on chemical composition. In this case the darker the unit, the higher the titanium content. At Shorty crater (Fig. 7), the astronauts encountered an orange-colored layer of fine grained material which appeared during the mission to be the result of fumarolic activity, i.e., alteration by oxidation of the host rock. This observation, however, did not hold in the laboratory and the orange material was found to be made of very fine grained glass spheres, yellow, orange, brown to black in colour with high lead, copper, zinc and chlorine content (LSAPT, 1973). Although some investigators believe that the glass spheres may be impact produced (Roedder and Weiblen, 1973), most agree that they represent a product of volcanic eruption (Reid et al., 1973, among others). Orange-colored deposits and ejecta blankets are apparently not restricted to the Apollo 17 landing site area; orbital observations on Apollo 17 indicate that they abound in the Sulpicius Gallus region on the western Serenitatis rim (Evans and El-Baz, 1973; Lucchitta and Schmitt, 1974). The highland materials collected at the Apollo 17 site show several suites of anorthositic rocks. Although petrologically complex, massif rocks may be divided into two chemical suites: (a) noritic breccias which include the petrologic varieties of green-gray, blue-gray, and light gray breccias; and (b) anorthositic gabbros, which petrologically are brecciated gabbroic rocks. The second group occurs both as clasts in noritic rocks and as isolated samples. Although the noritic breccias are broadly similar to KREEP rocks, they contain only one-half the minor and trace element content (LSPET, 1973b). The ages of Apollo 17 basalts were found to be close to those of the Apollo 11 site, about 3.7 billion years old (Tera et al., 1974). The highland rocks gave crystalliza- tion ages of approximately 4.0 billion years (Tera et al., 1974). However, age dating of highly crushed dunite fragments of a clast in a South Massif boulder sample (72435) gave a model age of 4.48 billion years (Albee et al., 1974). From its composition and old age, these authors tentatively conclude that the rock must represent a very early differentiate derived from the upper lunar mantle, and that it represents a cumulus formed during early lunar differentiation and associated differential gravitational settling. Particle-track measurements on target materials carried to the lunar surface on Apollo 17 have provided new data on heavy ions from solar and galactic cosmic rays in the low energy range (LSAPT, 1973). Previously unknown "quiet time" fluxes of ions from carbon to iron in the energy range of .05 to 1 million electron volts per nucleon were observed. Also, the large 512 FARO UK EL-BAZ >. GO'S ? t FIG. 8a. Distribution of mare material on the near side of the- Moon. The mare material is concen- trated in multiringed circular basins (Hartman and Kuiper, 1962) and in their peripheral troughs. Kaula et al. (1973) have determined a 2 to 3 km offset toward the Earth of the Moon's center of mass from its center of figure. They ascribe this to a variable thickness of low-density highland crust, thinner on the near side than on the far side. The maria are therefore concentrated on the near side MOON AFTER APOLLO 513 v. / 'f< 4V *?z st?y%:? because the mare basalts could more easily penetrate the thinner crust. Numbered are Oceanus Procellarum (1) and the maria of Imbrium (2), Cognitum (3), Humorum (4), Nubium (5), Frigoris (6), Serenitatis (7), Vaporum (8), Tranquillitatis (9), Nectaris (10), Humboldtianum (11), Crisium (12), Fecunditatis (13), Marginis (14), Smythii (15), and Australe (16). (Drawing from Masursky et al., 1975; base map by the National Geographic Society). 514 FAROTJK EL-BAZ /V / HP = , i "?? r.{ ^Pfkl* , ujfe? ? '?> W h c8 o Ul bO H ?*? ^ n o I fl 3 ^ o fl M o 2 & 3 2 e 3% co bo nf CD fl E::a ? fl -S +3 w S^ a fl ? ^0) s^ a. o CD o- ft CD jfl o ? fl fe H ?V.V CD fl fl _, o ,_l M - fl W fl -t3 -fl o ft n & ? CO 1 - 6.5 o > fO ?s ^3 c8 08 * fl O CD CD mm g- fl Hii ~ k, oS v' ea fl ^ .3 ?:g o3 ?Q ?? ? 03 co O S fl tz; .2 g on 43 a; 6 n !* ?" o k ^ 520 FAROUK EL-BAZ Therefore, the plagioclase of lunar basalts contains lesser amounts of the albite component. As discussed above, lunar mare basalts are not compositionally or texturally uniform within a given site or between sites. Variations are common in grain size, crystallinity, and vesicularity, as well as in detailed composition. These variations are most probably due to minor differences in the source materials beneath the surface, as well as to variations in thickness and cooling rates of individual lava flows. Mare basalts contain greater amounts of iron and titanium than do the anortho- sitic and feldspathic highland materials, which are enriched in aluminum and calcium. These iron-rich basalts are also depleted in radioactive elements. The presence of some iron-rich intermediate rocks, particularly in the Apollo 14 site (samples 14053 and 14072) prompted Gast (1973) to suggest that the typical mare basalts may be derived from iron-rich source regions that have been subjected to previous partial melting. Highland materials, which make up about four-fifths of the lunar surface are chemically and petrologically more com- plex than the mare materials. In general, the sampled highlands are feldspathic breccias. The common brecciation, re- crystallization, and apparent partial melt- ing is consistent with patterns of over- lapping ejecta from numerous impacts. The major rock types are: feldspar-rich rocks, especially the type called anorthosite; KREEP basalts with a relatively high concentration of radioactive elements; "Very High Aluminum" (VHA) basalts (Hubbard et al., 1973) which are common in the Apollo 16 samples; and the anortho- sitic gabbros of Apollo 17. There are several variations in rock types, where petro- graphers recognize at least a half dozen categories of highland breccia rocks (LSAPT, 1973). A number of truly igneous rocks have also been collected in the high- lands, but only a few of these may have crystallized from internal lunar melts; most are undoubtedly the product of impact melting. All the lunar rock and soil returned by Apollo and Luna missions originated from differentiates; they have the specialized chemical compositions that are character- istically produced by magmatic differ- entiation. This indicates that the part of the Moon that was sampled had been molten at one time or another. The basic pattern of primary differentiation may have been relatively simple, but the picture has been greatly complicated by the tendency of large cratering events and lava eruptions to transport and mix chemical entities during and after the original differentiation (LSAPT, 1973). The chemical pattern that was developed by studying the returned samples was confirmed by the orbiting geochemical sensors on Apollo missions 15 and 16, which carried X-ray and y-ray spectrometers. The X-ray sensor measured the character- istic fluorescence signatures of aluminum, silicon, magnesium, and iron that were excited by impinging solar radiation (Adler et al, 1973). The Al/Si intensity profiles clearly show low Al/Si values over the lunar maria, and higher values over terra materials, especially on the lunar farside (Fig. 10). Intermediate Al/Si values usually correspond with boundaries between the basaltic mare units and the anorthositic highlands. A reverse correla- tion generally exists in Mg/Si ratios, where mare units show a higher value than the highlands (Adler et al., 1973). The y-ray spectrometer measured con- centrations of natural radioactive emis- sions from the lunar surface (Fig. 11). The highest counts, which correspond roughly to about 10 ppm thorium, are confined to the western near side of the Moon, namely two regions in Mare Imbrium and Oceanus Procellarum (Metzger et al., 1973). Based on the aforementioned discussion of sample compositions at Apollo 12 and 14 sites, this high radioactivity probably is due to the presence of KREEP basalts. This leads to the conclusion that the areas of high radioactivity must contain exposures of ejecta from the Imbrium basin. The hitter is the largest of the impact basins on the lunar near side, and, therefore, may have penetrated through originally radioactive parts of the crust. A high radioactive spot MOON AFTER APOLLO 521 in the vicinity of the crater Van de Graaff on the far side is also within a very old and large basin, even larger than Imbrium (Stuart-Alexander, 1975). The localization of the highly radioactive rocks supports the deduction that they cannot represent average lunar surface materials. Groundtruth derived from the study of returned samples from six Apollo missions and two Luna missions are, therefore, extrapolated, by "orbital truth" data, to larger areas of the Moon. IV. EVOLUTION OP THE SURFACE Before the return of lunar samples, geologists were limited to establishment of a relative time scale to describe events and major provinces on the Moon. This relative age time scale can effectively be applied to the entire Moon, most of which will not be sampled. The absolute time scale, which is based on age dating measure- ments of the lunar rocks, can now be used to calibrate the relative time scale, as will be discussed below. A. Relative Ages Global morphology of the Moon is controlled by the large features of impact origin known as multiring circular basins (Fig. 12). From the time of its formation, the crust of the Moon has probably been repeatedly shaped by basin and crater formation (Baldwin, 1969; El-Baz, 1973; Howard et al., 1974). Materials of those basins and smaller craters compose most of the lunar highlands. As discussed above, mare materials, of later volcanic origin, are concentrated in the basins and their peripheral troughs, and the nearby lowlands. Thus, the main surface sculpting mechan- isms on the Moon appear to be meteorite bombardment and the downslope move- ment of fine-grained debris from higher to lower levels, aided by tectonic and/or seismic shaking. Study of fresh-appearing and young-looking features can, therefore, help in understanding relatively older ones. As discussed in detail by Wilhelms and McCauley (1971), subtly expressed forms can be recognized and often con- fidently identified as older equivalents of more clearly expressed features. Several attempts have been made to classify features by relative age according to topographic and morphologic char- acteristics. A stratigraphic sequence was first developed by Shoemaker (1962) and Shoemaker and Hackman (1962) of an area around the crater Copernicus. This sequence was later modified and applied to most of the near side of the Moon by U.S. Geological Survey mappers as summarized by McCauley (1967), Wilhelms (1970), Wilhelms and McCauley, (1971), and Mutch (1972). Also, it was recently realized that an extension of the nearside lunar strati- graphy could be employed on the far side as well (e.g., EL-Baz, 1974; Wilhelms and El-Baz, 1975). At the present time, a Moon-wide time- stratigraphic sequence exists, where sur- face units belong to one of the following, in the order of decreasing relative age. 1. Pre-Nectarian. All materials form- ed before the Nectaris basin and as far back as the formation of the Moon are classed as pre-Nectarian. The majority of pre-Nectarian units are distinguished on the lunar far side. These include mater- ials of very old and subdued basins such as Al-Khwarizmi (El-Baz, 1973), and mantled and subdued craters cuch as Pasteur (Wilhelms and El-Baz, 1975). 2. Sectarian System. This system in- cludes all materials stratigraphically above and including Nectaris basin materials, up to and not including Imbrium basin strata (Stuart-Alexander and Wilhelms, 1974). Ejecta of the Nectaris basin that can be traced near the east limb region allows recognition of these materials as a strati- graphic datum for the farside highlands. Younger than Nectaris ejecta, hence grouped under the Nectarian system, are materials of such basins as Humbold- tianum, Moscoviense, and Mendeleev. Some plains units, particularly on the far side, are believed to be Nectarian in age (Wilhelms and El-Baz, 1975). 3. Imbrian System. A large part of the lunar surface is occupied by ejecta sur- rounding both the Imbrium and Orientale basins. These form the lower and middle 522 FABOUK EL-BAZ MOON AFTER APOLLO 523 parts of the Imbrian System, including units such as the Fra Mauro Formation, Hevelius Formation, and Cayley Forma- tion, the latter being light-plains material of Imbrian age. Two-thirds of the mare materials belong to the Imbrian System, particularly in the eastern maria of Crisium, Fecunditatis, Tranquillitatis, Nectaris, the dark annulus of Serenitatis, as well as most mare occurrances on the lunar far side. This system also includes materials of numerous large craters such as Plato, Arzachel, Petavius, and Tsiol- kovskij. 4. Eratosthenian System. This system includes materials of ray less craters such as Eratosthenes. Most of these are believed to have once displayed rays that are no longer visible because of mixing due to prolonged micrometeorite bombardment as well as solar radiation. The system also includes about one-third of the mare surface materials on the lunar nearside. These are generally concentrated in Oceanus Procellarum, in western Mare Ibrium, and possibly the central region of Mare Serenitatis. 5. Copernican System. This is strati- graphically the highest and, hence, the youngest lunar time-scale unit. It includes materials of fresh-appearing, intermediate to high albedo, bright-rayed craters. The system also includes exposures of very high albedo material on innerwallsof Coper- nican and older craters, as well as other scarps. Brightness in these cases is inter- preted as the result of fresh exposure by mass wasting and downslope movement along relatively steep slopes. The Coper- nican System also includes isolated occur- rences of relatively small dark-halo craters. Many of these are probably impact craters, however, the possibility that some may be volcanic in origin cannot be discounted. B. Absolute Ages As previously discussed, many tech- niques have been employed in absolute dating of lunar rock and soil, sometime yielding different results. However, some generalizations could be made particularly from the strontium-rubidium and uran- ium-lead data. One age about which most investigators agree is the model age of the lunar soil, 4.6 billion years. As pointed out by Tatsu- moto and Bosholt (1970), this age is comparable with the age of meteorites and with the age generally accepted for the Earth. The same figure presumably represents the age of the Moon; however, the "Lunatic Asylum" of the California Institute of Technology files a complaint that the age of the Earth and the Moon are lower than the accepted age of meteorites by 0.1 billion years (Tera et al., 1974). It was shown above that there are chemical-petrological indications of an early differentiation resulting in the form- ation of the Moon's crust. Age-dating results of highland rocks give indirect indications of the same thing. Studies by Nyquist et al. (1973) suggest differentation ages of 4.3-4.4 billion years. Tera et al. (1974) conclude from all the available absolute age data that planetary differ- entiation processes took place between 4.6 and 4.3 billion years, and that the crust is 4.43 billion years old. The solid crust must have continued to receive impacting projectiles. Reshaping of the lunar physiography, accompanied by resetting of the radioactive clocks, continued with each major impact erasing most of the earlier history within its sphere of influence. From the uranium-lead evolution data on highland rocks from the four Apollo sites, 14, 15, 16 and 17, Tera et al. (1974) confirm that a major lunar cataclysm occurred at 3.9 to 4.0 billion years on the near side of the Moon. In addition to other materials, ejecta of the Imbrium basin has most likely been sampled at all four Apollo sites. The ages of rocks from the Fra Mauro Formation (Apollo 14), a distinct ejecta unit of the Imbrium basin, cluster at 3.95 billion years (Tera et al., 1973). It is, therefore, probable that the 3.9-4.0 billion year old cataclysm is either: (1) the formation of the Imbrium basin itself, or (2) the forma- tion in quick succession (within 0.1 billion years) of the large nearside basins, i.e., Serenitatis Nectaris, Imbrium and possibly Orientale. The majority of sampled mare basalts 524 FAROUK EL-BAZ show ages between 3.2 and 3.7 billion years. The distinction is very clear between at least two ages of mare basalts. One group clusters around 3.2 billion years, repre- senting samples of Apollo 12 and 15 basalts. The second group gives ages around 3.7 billion years, representing basalts of Apollo 11 and 17. The Luna 16 basalts of Mare Fecunditatis are closer to the latter group, being about 3.5 billion years old. This quite convincingly correlates with the two major mare episodes discussed earlier that belonged to the Eratosthenian and the Imbrian systems. The Apollo 12 and 15 basalts are Eratosthenian in age (3.1 to 3.3 billion years old) and the Apollo 11 and 17 and Luna 16 basalts are Imbrian in age (3.5 to 3.7 billion years old). In addition to rock ages, the times of formations of lunar craters have also been determined radiometrically (LSAPT, 1972). For example, the crater Copernicus on the south rim of Imbrium was formed about one billion years ago, if the noritic glass component of the Apollo 12 soil is correctly interpreted as Copernicus ray material. Cosmic-ray exposure ages of rocky debris from Cone crater, the domin- ant landmark at the 14 site, show that it was excavated about 25 million years ago. Similarly, in the four billion year old highland units, cosmic-ray exposure ages of rocks and boulders ejected from the craters in the Apollo 16 site (Fig. 6) show that North Ray crater was excavated 50 million years ago while South Ray crater occurred onlv 2 million years ago (LSAPT, 1973). The time of formation of Shorty crater in the Apollo 17 site, based on the exposure age of orange and black soil samples, was determined to be 20 to 30 million years ago (Eberhardt et al., 1974). Age sequences like these could be used to calibrate the relative age time scale already established among time-stratigraphic and TIME IN BILLIONS OF YEARS 0- COPERNICAN SYSTEM ERATOSTHENIAN SYSTEM IMBRIAN SYSTEM 3.5- NECTARIAN ij - SYSTEM PRE-NECTARIAN 4.5 i ornatior. cf" smaller ::rat orth Ray, Cons , Shorty , '.pact craters id marie. Ycunr, basalts (Apollo ] " ^:,(J -5; Old basalts (Luna If) Older basalts (Apollo i: ?.na 17) \ ? Oldest rock (Ape Fie;. 13. Schematic illustration of the evolution of the lunar surface. The absolute time scale in billions of years as deduced from age and exposure date techniques is shown along the median line. On the right, major events and episodes of material emplacement are shown; on the left is the lunar- wide relative age scheme based mainly on superposition relationships of geologic units. MOON AFTER APOLLO 525 rock-stratigraphic units. An attempt is made here (Fig. 13) to correlate the relative age scheme derived mainly from strati- graphic relations and photogeologic inter- pretations with the absolute ages of returned rock and soil samples. In a nutshell, the Moon is assumed to have formed 4.6 billion years ago; global planetary differentiation processes took place between 4.6 and 4.3 billion years ago. As the solid anorthositic crust was formed it kept a record of moonlets that struck it leaving numerous scars (pre-Nectarian time). The last of the impact basins were formed on the near side about 4.0 to 3.9 billion years ago (Imbrian System, starting about 3.95). Volcanic eruptions filled the basins and low lands with basalts from 3.7 to 3.2 billion years ago (Imbrian and Eratosthenian time). Postbasalt history included transport and mixing of the lunar materials, mostly by impact craters, that continues to the present day (Copernican System). V. LAYERS OF THE MOON A. The Outer Skin Details of the broad-scale topographic relief of the lunar surface were provided by laser altimeter measurements made on Apollo missions 15 through 17. The alti- meter measured precise altitudes of the orbiting Command Service Module above the lunar surface (Wollenhaupt and Sjo- gren, 1972). Measurements were made at points spaced every one to one-and-a-half lunar degrees, or every 30 to 45 km on the surface. The agreement between measure- ments on the three missions emphasizes the accuracy of the profiles. Figure 14 is one example of an Apollo 15 profile where the measurements were made in a plane inclined at approximately 26? with respect to the lunar equator. Lunar elevations were computed relative to an assumed mean lunar radius of 1738 km. It is clear from Fig. 14 that the far side is over 4 km higher than the near side on the Apennines 1738-km mean lunar radius Longitude, deg Gagarin Longitude, deg FIG. 14. Apollo 15 laser latimeter profiles of the lunar near side (top) and far side (bottom). Eleva- tion data are computed relative to a sphere of 1738 km radius with respect to the lunar center of mass. (After Robertson and Kaula, 1972.) 19 526 FAEOUK EL-BAZ ID 3 ' CO g a g s g s s SO'8 9 t- p ft O.SB q,a . < * S ID _J" 3 J3 ?~ CO * ^ "H ^ "H ^H c8 g S 3 cS ' i?I fT\ !fi TO ?2 g o 5 El M 4-, o _fl CD 3 be c3 c3 4-, TS O n ^ ? ?? TJ S -? 3 ? c ? ^ % -p 3 CO cr g ? '3 a ? 3 ?SP.S S 3 ^ <3 n 5 5 > o ia u O i ? CD h a 3 X, " o += ? s IO CD 1-1 r3 h O U 3 ~ & 3 CD .2 3 ? ? S * average. Figure 14 (top) also shows the greatly depressed mare basins, on the near side, e.g., Smythii, Crisium, and Seren- itatis. Another method of generating elevation profiles of the lunar surface was provided by the lunar sounder (Phillips et al., 1973). The sounder which was carried on Apollo 17 consists of a three-frequency coherent radar (5, 15 and 150 MHz). Continuous surface profiles were optically recorded and show excellent details of the outer skin of the Moon, e.g., Fig. 15. Brown et al. (1974) have recently used the 5 MHz radar data to generate profiles with an estimated absolute accuracy of 130 m, and an estimated relative accuracy of 5 m over mare surfaces. The same authors compared the radar profiles with the Apollo 17 laser altimeter measure- ments. Although these two sets of data were not acquired simultaneously, they agree within 150 meters over mare sur- faces. Brown et al. (1974) used a 1738 km sphere about the lunar center of mass and the center of figure, as well as a 1734 km sphere about what they termed "center of maria" (Fig. 16). To generate the latter, they used the mare surfaces of western Procellarum, Serenitatis and Crisium; they found that Mare Smythii falls within 40 meters of that circle. This suggestion of a center of maria gives credence to the idea that lunar lavas rose only to a certain level, at least in large quantities. Examination of Fig. 16c shows that the northern floor of the large basin on the far side at about 180? is near the same mare level. This basin encloses the largest concentration of mare patches on the far side (Gornitz, 1974, and Stuart-Alex- ander, 1975). As mentioned previously, it also contains the highest y-ray activity on the far side (Metzger et al., 1973), and the strongest intrinsic magnetic field as mea- sured by the subsatellite magnetometer of Apollo 15 (Russell et al., 1973). Lunar magnetism, its cause and probable origins are discussed by Fuller (1974), and its relationship to the interior of the Moon by DyaleW., (1974). From both the laser altimeter and radar sounder profiles, it is clear that the impacts that formed the multiringed circular basins resulted in an enormous loss of mass from MOON AFTER APOLLO 527 FIG. 16. Radial plots of lunar sounding radar profiles about: (A) the center of mass, where the radius of the sphere is 1738 km; (B) the center of figure, where the radius of the sphere is also 1738 km; and (C) the center of maria, where the radius of the sphere is 1734 km. The radial scale in all three cases is 8 km/cm. (After Brown et al., 1974.) the impact sites. These same basins, as discussed earlier, display large mascons. Some older basins were probably formed early enough to be essentially obliterated by intense cratering and volcanism (Stuart- Alexander and Howard, 1970). Others were formed by the impact of very large objects in a solid lunar crust which was underlain by an upper, partially plastic mantle. The partially plastic mantle may have allowed for an upward movement to isostatically compensate for the lost mass and its redistribution by the impact. At a later time, upward moving volcanic lavas used as channelways the fractures that were created by the impacts. The lavas erupted to the surface to fill the circular depressions, and also topographically low plains. The additional weight of tens-of - kilometers thick, dense basalts would, therefore, contribute to the positive gravity anomaly within the isostatically com- pensated circular impact basins (Wise and Yates, 1970; and Wood, 1970). B. The Lunar Interior With respect to the shallow lunar inter- ior, it was realized from the first seismo- meter measurements of impacts on the lunar surface that the travel times are relatively low (Latham et al., 1970). The observed travel times, and the relatively low seismic velocity in lunar near-surface rocks, are interpreted by Watkins (1971) 528 FAROTJK EL-BAZ to mean either, (1) that lunar near-surface rock consists of cold, participate, unfused material accreted from space; or (2) that lunar near-surface rock has fused at some time during the evolution of the Moon, but subsequently has been brecciated and fractured to considerable depth by meteor- ite impact. Although Watkins favors the cold accretion model, the second model is favored by most investigators: first, there is ample photogeologic and petrographic evidence of an early melting, and second, there is evidence of repeated fracturing and brecciation of the lunar rock to a depth from a few km to 25 km by meteoroid bombardment (Latham et al., 1972). Our knowledge of the deep lunar interior consists of inferences based on (1) the geophysical data provided by the network of geophysical stations or observatories at the Apollo sites 12, 14, 15 and 16 (Fig. 1); and (2) the chemistry and mineralogy of the surface samples. Of special importance are the recordings of natural moonquakes by the seismometer network which allowed the determination of their origin time, epicenter, and focal depth. Also, seismic data, mainly from man-made impacts, revealed a major discontinuity at a depth of between 55 and 70 km in eastern Oceanus Procellarum (Latham etal., 1971). Additional data were obtained from a large meteoroid impact that occurred on the far side of the Moon on 17 July 1972, where direct shear-wave arrivals were not observed at some of the Apollo seismic stations. This led to the conclusion by Nakamura et al. (1973) that the material in the lunar interior at a depth of 1000 to 1100 km may be in a partially molten state. From these data and an analogy with the Earth's interior, I previously sum- marized a model of the lunar interior (El-Baz, 1974) where the successive layers from top downward are as follows (Fig. 17). 1. Crust: a layer enriched in alumin- um and calcium (anorthositic gabbros), approximately 60 km thick in the region of the Apollo seismic network, as compared to the 5 to 35 km thick crust on Earth. In this layer there are local mass concentra- tions of iron-rich rocks, and a rapid increase 0" Serenitatis ?Center of mass FIG. 17. Inferred cross-section of the lunar interior. It shows a crust 65 km thick, with a highly fractured upper 25 km; a mantle 1100 km thick; and a core that is either partially molten or includes a molten zone. This cross section represents a segment of the Moon drawn to scale from a sphere 1738 km in radius from the center of mass. Surface features correspond roughly to part of the near side topography shown in Fig. 14 (top). of velocity down from the surface due to pressure effects on dry rocks. There is also a minor discontinuity at a depth of about 25 km which may be related to intensive fracturing of the upper crust and/or to petrological differences. The seismic velo- city is nearly constant (6.8 km sec l) between 25 and 65 km (Toksoz et al., 1972). 2. Mantle: at the major dicontinuity at about 65 km depth, there is a large in- crease in the velocity to about 9.0 km sec '. This interface is comparable to the rise of velocity at the Mohorovicic discon- tinuity on Earth (Toksoz et al., 1972). This layer appears to continue to the depth of 1100 km. Compositions of the surface rocks, the measured seismic velocities, and constraints imposed by the Moon's mean density and moments of inertia support a pyroxene-rich composition for the lunar mantle. MOON AFTER APOLLO 529 3. Core: the moment of inertia and the overall density of the Moon place an upper limit of about 500 km on the radius of the lunar core, if a core exists (Toksoz et al., 1974). A molten or partially molten silicate zone or core below about 1100 km from the surface (Nakamura et al., 1973) may be responsible for deep-seated moon- quakes, which are focused between 800 and 1100 km deep. The data however, do not rule out the possibility of a small, 400 km radius, iron-rich (Fe-FeS?) core (Solomon and Toksoz, 1973). VI. QUESTIONS OF ORIGIN There are three basic theories of origin of the Moon. She is either Earth's wife, captured from some other orbit; daughter, fissioned directly from "proto" Earth; or sister, accreted from the same binary system. Before Apollo, it was widely believed that the lunar exploration missions would provide the necessary information for a final answer to the question of origin. This did not happen. As discussed above, the primitive lunar crustal materials have been subjected to much metamorphism, due to large impacts. Thus, the three basic theories of lunar origin (Fig. 18) are still competing, espe- cially since all three have been modified to accommodate the new findings. Each theory has its share of positive points as well as shortcomings, and these vary depending on whose paper one reads. However, as discussed by Wood (1974b), one of the most important constraints on the theories of origin is the chemical makeup of the Moon. Any theory will have to account for the lower metal and volatile content, and the higher refractory element content in the lunar rocks, as compared to the compositions of terrestrial rocks and meteorites. A. Capture The basic attractiveness of the capture theory is the assumption that the Moon was formed somewhere else in the solar svstem, therefore, one does not have to explain chemical differences between the Earth and Moon. In this theory the Moon is envisioned as a body that was captured from an orbit about the Sun to one around the Earth. As discussed by Wood (1974b) some authors believe that the Moon was captured intact; others suggest that in the capturing process, disruption and reaccumulation occurred. Proponents of this theory have looked for ways to decelerate the approach- ing Moon to allow capture by the Earth. This may be staged by tidal interaction between the two bodies, or by collisions between the approaching Moon with smaller objects circling the Earth (Kaula and Harris, 1973). Other ways were sought for selective capture of small bodies into geocentric orbits without resorting to tidal or colli- sional deceleration (Opik, 1972; Wood and Mitler, 1974). According to the latter, silicate-rich material can be captured and metal-rich bodies rejected into the helio- centric orbits. However, Wood (1974b) states that the process, being inefficient, would not result in complete rejection of metal-rich fragments. B. Fission The idea that the Moon came directly from the Earth was first proposed by Sir George Darwin in 1880. The theory is still viable and in recent years has been supported by Wise (1963 and 1969) and O'Keefe (1970). The present concept of the fission theory starts with a fluid body rotating around the Sun. As heavier components settle at the core and lighter ones float on top, the spin is increased to cause rotational instability. The latter causes elongation of the body perpendicular to the spin axis, until creation of two separate bodies is achieved. This theory accounts for the chemical differences between the two bodies. Fission would have occurred after the formation of a core in the part of the body that formed the Earth. The Moon-forming part of the body would then be depleted in metals. Binder (1974) believes that sampled lunar rock types could be made of materials that 530 FAROUK EL-BAZ hyperbolic orbits CAPTURE FISSI 'BINARY ACCRETION FIG. 18. Schematic illustrations of the three theories of lunar origin: (a) capture : selective capture by the Earth of bodies that accreted to form the Moon; fragments in orbits 1 to 5 are lost in hyper- bolic orbits; those in orbits 6 to 10 are captured in elliptical orbits (from Wood and Mitler, 1974); (b) fission of the Moon from "mother" Earth as it was spun to instability during core formation (after Wise, 1963); and (c) binary accretion of both the Earth and Moon from the solar nebula. The Earth was formed first, and heavy metals settled to form a core. Lighter fragments in geocentric orbits accreted by collision to form the Moon (adapted from Ringwood, 1972). are chemically equivalent to those of Earth's mantle. Ringwood (1970) added a new dimension to the fission theory by proposing that the temperature of the accreting Earth could have been high enough to form a thick, hot atmosphere of metal and oxide vapors. These vapors could have been spun out of the equator to form the Moon as accretion proceeds in Earth orbit. Whether fission occurred from a solid body or by escape of hot gases, it appears that the major objection to the theory is the excessive amount of angular momen- tum required for the process (Wood, 1974b). C. Binary Accretion This theory envisages both the Earth and Moon accreting together from the solar nebula along with the terrestrial planets. In this context, WTood (1974b) discussed the differences between what he termed the American and Russian schools of thought. The first (championed by Cameron, 1973) pictures a massive solar system nebula in which rapid accretion of the terrestrial planets causes extensive heating and melting. On the other hand, the Russian school (established by Schmidt, 1958) views the planets as accretionary products of slowly accumulating planetismals from a small solar nebula (Wood, 1974b). The global chemistry of the Moon indicates probable melting of at least the outer 100 km. Therefore, it seems logical to consider a rapid accretionary process to have caused such melting as the Moon formed. In simple terms, one can envision a rapidly rotating accretionary system with MOON AFTER APOLLO 531 a dense proto-Earth and a swarm of planetismals, dust and gases in geocentric orbits. Mutual collisions among the mem- bers of the swarm tended to round up their orbits and bring them into a common plane. From these colliding planetismals, a moonlet was formed. The moonlet swept the circum-terrestrial orbit by attracting more and more planetismals. The accre- tionary energy would have resulted in melting of the uppermost layers. Also, in the process much of the volatile elements would have been lost from the growing moonlet. This view of the binary accretion theory shares some aspects with the precipitation theory of Ringwood (1970 and 1972). This theory requires the least number of assumptions. It also accounts for all the chemical differences between the Earth and Moon. For these reasons, it has been the most widely accepted theory among lunar scientists in recent years. VII. FUTURE OUTLOOK In the past decade, our knowledge of the Moon has evolved through the findings of Ranger, Surveyor, Lunar Orbiter, Luna and Apollo missions. However, six manned Apollo lunar exploration missions provided the most tangible of data. Our understand- ing of the Moon grew systematically and chronologically from the rich harvest of rocks and soil as well as remotely sensed information gathered by Apollo. To me, the most important findings from Apollo lunar exploration are the following. 1. The lunar samples indicate that the Moon does not now, nor did it ever, host any water or life forms of any kind. 2. The Moon is made up of the same chemical elements as is the Earth, but in varying proportions. The lunar rocks are enriched in refractory elements and de- pleted in volatile elements. 3. The Moon is a differentiated body: extensive melting may have occurred in the upper layers of the Moon, to about 100 km depth, at the time of accretion. As the hot magma cooled, light plagioclase cry- stals floated to form the low-density crust leaving denser materials below. 4. The low-density highland rocks are exposed everywhere on the lunar crust except where covered by denser basalts. These are the products of internally generated volcanic melts which spread on the surface during a period of 600 million years (between 3.7 and 3.2 billion years ago)- 5. There are many indications of the shaping of the Moon by large impacts, basin and crater formation being the major sculpting mechanism on the Moon. Shock effects on the rocks attest to the violent impact history. Although the bombard- ment is now continuing, the size and frequency of impacting projectiles were much larger in the early history of the Moon. 6. As confirmed by the orbiting geochemical experiments, samples col- lected at the landing sites most probably represent the whole Moon. 7. The figure of the Moon shows pro- nounced asymmetry; the far side is higher, and the near side is lower, relative to a mean lunar radius of 1738 km. Also, the center of mass is shifted about 2 km towards the Earth relative to the center of the figure. 8. There is lateral asymmetry in natural y-ray radiation on the Moon. Pockets of radioactive materials are con- centrated in the western near side; only a small anomaly in the vicinity of the crater Van de Graaff exists on the lunar far side. 9. The moon is probably layered into a crust, about 65 km on the near side and probably thicker on the far side; a solid mantle, about 1100 km thick; and a silicate core, about 500 km thick, that is in part molten or contains a partially molten zone. 10. The data so far collected do not provide enough proof for final conclusions regarding the origin of the Moon. Only two years have passed since the last Apollo mission, and only about 10% of the lunar rocks and soil have been studied and analyzed in great detail. Much of the data obtained by sensors from lunar orbit is yet to be processed to fully extract all its meanings. It will perhaps take two years to process all of these data adequately, and 532 EAROTJK EL-BAZ two additional years for thorough inter- pretations and correlations. Geophysical data from five ALSEP stations on the Moon continue to yield new results about the lunar interior and the lunar environ- ment. All of these stations are operating well and could continue to do so for several more years. Only then could concrete conclusions be drawn concerning the ultimate results of Apollo lunar explor- ation. After four more years have passed, we may be fortunate enough to take another look at the Moon. The National Aero- nautics and Space Administration (NASA) is now considering the possibility of a mission to the Moon. This would be an unmanned Lunar Polar Orbit mission, or LPO. This indeed appears to be perfect timing; by then, much of the Apollo information would have been assimilated and synthesized, at least to a first order synthesis. To voice my opinion, some of the things that need yet to be done relate to three general fields: photogeology, geochemistry, and geophysics. Contrary to widespread belief, the sur- face of the Moon has not yet been adequate- ly photographed. Although Lunar Orbiter IV covered nearly all the near side of the Moon, this photography can neither be used for measurements nor is it stereo photography. We only have stereometric coverage of about 20% of an equatorial area of the Moon at 30 m resolution. Much is yet to be known and learned about the lunar surface features and their mode of formation. One of the most important localities to our understanding of large impact processes and the transport of materials on the lunar surface is that of the Orientale basin. The Orientale basin is not covered by stereographic photographs. Models of the Moon and of the transport of ejecta on the surface have all referred to Orientale because of its freshness as the type of locality to be studied. However, we lack the proper tools for the necessary studies. Stereographic photographs aided by laser altimetry are essential in measure- ments of the multiple rings of the Orientale basin and its ejecta blanket. From the geochemical point of view, there is still much information to be gained about the Moon. Most important among these are the lunarwide natural gamma radiation fields. The y-ray experiment has already shown that there is asymmetry in natural gamma radiation. The source and the distribution of this radiation will not be fully understood unless we have data covering almost the entire Moon. In addition to this, we also need to know more about the global chemistry of the Moon, both concerning the distribution of elements like aluminum, calcium, iron and magnesium in the highlands and in the maria, and also concerning the distri- bution of titanium in the maria. Chemical mapping of the maria should extend to the lunar far side, perhaps utilizing both X-ray and multispectral equipment. From the geophysical point of view, two types of information appear to be most required. First is the definition of an equipotential gravitational surface on the Moon. For this, one needs to understand and measure gravitational anomalies or mascons on the lunar far side. Second is the measurements of the figure of the Moon including details of the figure at higher latitudes, including the polar regions. It is hoped that the LPO mission will provide such information so that a com- prehensive view of the Moon could be gained. If we are to apply the knowledge gained from lunar exploration to planetary exploration, that knowledge should be complete or near complete, so that when correlations are made they would be drawn from clear positions of strength. This is especially relevant since we know from the Mariner 9 data of Mars and the Mariner 10 data of Mercury, that the processes that acted on the Moon have also been responsible for many features of both planets. REFERENCES ADAMS, J. B., AND MCCOBD, T. B. (1971). Optical properties of mineral separates, glass, and anorthositic fragments from Apollo mare samples. Proc. Second Lunar Sci. C'onf. 3, 2183-2195. MOON AFTER APOLLO 533 ADLER, I., TEOMBKA, J. I., SOHMADEBBCK, R., LOWMAN, P., BLODGET, H., YIN, L., AND ELLEB, E. (1973). Results of the Apollo 15 and 16 X-ray experiment. Proc. Fourth Lunar Sci.Conf. 3, 2783-2791. ALBEE, A. L., BURNETT, D. S., CHODOS, A. A., ETTGSTER, O. J., HUNEKE, J. C, PAPAN- ASTASSIOU, D. A., PODOSEK, F. A., Russ, G. P., SANZ, H. G., TEBA, F., AND WASSEEBUBG, G. J. (1970a). Ages, irradiation history, and chemical composition of lunar rocks from the Sea of Tranquillity. Science 167, 463-466. ALBEE, A. L., BUBNETT, D. S., CHODOS, A. A., HAINES, E. L., HUNEKE, J. C, PAPANASTAS- SIOU, D. A., PODOSEK, F. A., Russ, G. P., AND WASSEEBUBG, G. J. (1970b). Mineralogic and isotopic investigations on lunar rock 12013. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 9, 137-163. ALBEE, A. L., CHODOS, A. A., DYMEK, R. F., CANCABZ, J. A., GOLDMAN, D. S., PAPA- NASTASSIOU, D. A., and WASSEEBUBG, G. J, (1974). Dunite from the lunar highlands: petrography, deformation history, Rb-Sr age. In Lunar Science V, pp. 3-5. Lunar Science Institute, Houston, Texas. ANDERS, E., GANAPATHY, R., KEAYS, R. R., LAUL, J. C, AND MOEGAN, J. W. (1971). Volatile and siderophile elements in lunar rocks: comparison with terrestrial and meteor- itic basalts. Proc. Second Lunar Sci. C'onf. 2, 1021-1036. BALDWIN, R. B. (1963). The Measure of the Moon. Univ. of Chicago Press, 488 pp. BINDER, A. B. (1974). On the origin of the Moon by rotational fission. In Lunar Science V, p. 63. Lunar Science Institute, Houston, Texas. BROWN, W. E., JB., ADAMS, H. F., EGGLETON, R. E., JACKSON, P., JORDAN, R., KOBBICK, M., PEEPLES, W. J., PHILLIPS, R. J., POB- CELLO, L. J., SCHABEB, G., SILL, W. R., THOMSON, T. W., WABD, S. H., AND ZELENKA, J. S. (1974). Elevation profiles of the Moon. Proc. Fifth Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 3037-3048. CAMEBON, A. G. W. (1973). Accumulation pro- cesses in the primitive solar nebula. Icarus 18, 407-450. CABB, M. H. (1966). Geologic map of the Mare Serenitatis region of the Moon. U.S. Geol. Survey, Map 1-489. CABB, M. H., HOWARD, K. A., AND EL-BAZ, F. (1971). Geologic Maps of the Apennine-Hadley region of the Moon: Apollo 15premission maps. U.S. Geol. Survey, Map 1-723. CHAO, E. C. T., JAMES, O. B., MINKIN, J. A., BOEEMAN, J. A., JACKSON, E. D., AND RALEIGH, C. B. (1970). Petrology of unshocked crystalline rocks and evidence of impact metamorphism in Apollo 11 returned lunar sample. Proc. Apollo 11 Lunar Sci. Conf. 1, 287-314. CHAO, E. C. T., SODEEBLOM, L. A., BOYCE, J. M., WILHELMS, D. E., AND HODGES, C. A. (1973). Lunar light plains deposits (Cayley For- mation) : reinterpretation of origin. In Lunar Science IV, pp. 127-128. Lunar Science Institute, Houston, Texas. DARWIN, G. H. (1880). On the secular change in elements of the orbit of a satellite revolving about a tidally distorted planet. Phil. Trans. Roy.Soc. (London) 171, 713-891. DUKE, M. B., Woo, C. C, SELLEBS, G. A., BIBD, M. L., AND FINKELMAN, R. B. (1970). Genesis of lunar soil at Tranquillity Base. Proc. of Apollo 11 Lunar Sci. Conf. 1, 347-361. DYAL, P., PARKIN, C. W., AND DAILY, W. D. (1974). Magnetism and the interior of the Moon. Rev. Oeophys. Space Phys. 12, 568- 591. EBEBHABDT, P., EUGSTEE, O., GEISS, J., GRAF, H., GROGLER, N., GUGGISBEBG, S., JUNGOK, M., MAUBER, P., MORGELI, M., AND STETTLER, A. (1974). Solar wind and cosmic radiation history of Taurus Littrow regolith. In Lunar Science V, pp. 197-199. Lunar Science Insti- tute, Houston, Texas. EGGLETON, R. E. (1964). Preliminary geology of the Riphaeus quadrangle of the Moon and definition of the Fra Mauro Formation. In Astrogeol. Stud. Ann. Prog. Rept. (1962-63), Pt. A, pp. 46-63. EGGLETON, R. E., AND OFPIELD, T. W. (1970). Geologic maps of the Fra Mauro region of the Moon: Apollo 14 pre-mission maps. U.S. Ceol. Survey, Map 1-708. EL BAZ, F. (1972a). The cinder field of the Taurus Mountains. In Apollo 15 Prelim. Sci. Rep., Part 25, 66-71. EL-BAZ, F. (1972b). New geological findings in Apollo 15 lunar orbital photography. Proc. Third Lunar Sci. Conf. 1, 39-61. EL-BAZ, F. (1973). Al-Khwarizmi: a new-found basin on the lunar far side. Science 180. 1173-1176. EL-BAZ, F. (1974). Surface geology of the Moon. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 12, 135-165. EL-BAZ, F., AND ROOSA, S. A. (1972). Significant results from Apollo 14 lunar orbital photo- graphy. Proc. Third Lunar Sci. Conf. 1, 63-83. EL-BAZ, F., WORDEN, A. M., AND BRAND, V. D. (1972). Astronaut observations from lunar orbit and their geologic significance. Proc. Third Lunar Sci. Conf. 1, 85-104. EL GOEESY, A., RAMDOHE, P., AND MEDENBACH, O. (1973). Lunar samples from the Descartes site: mineralogy and geochemistry of the 534 FAEOUK BL-BAZ opaques. In Lunar Science IV, pp. 222-224. Lunar Science Institute, Houston, Texas. VON ENGBLHAEDT, W., AKNDT, J., MULLEB, W. F., AND STOFFLEB, D. (1970). Shook metamorphism in lunar samples. Science 167, 669-670. EVANS, R. E., AND EL-BAZ, F. (1973). Geological observations from lunar orbit. Apollo 17 fWwn. 6W. .Rep., Part 28, 1-32. FULLEB, M. (1974). Lunar magnetism. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 1, 23-70. CAST, P. W. (1973). Lunar magnetism in time and space. In Lunar Science IV, pp. 275-277. Lunar Science Institute, Houston, Texas. OAST, P. W., AND HXIBBABD, N. J. (1970). Rare earth abundances in soil and rocks from the Ocean of Storms. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 10, 94-100. GBEELEY, R. (1971). Lunar Hadloy Rille: consideration of its origin. Science 172, 722-725. GREELEY, R., AND GATJLT, D. E. (1973). Crater frequency age determinations for the proposed Apollo 17 site at Taurus-Littrow. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 18, 102-103. GOLD, T., O'LEABY, B. T., AND CAMPBELL, M. J. (1971). Some physical properties of Apollo 12 lunar samples. Proc. Sec. Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 2173-2181. GOBNITZ, V. (1974). Correlations between region of enhanced mare flooding on the lunar far side and Apollo orbital results. The Moon 9, 323-325. GROLIEB, M. J. (1970). Geologic map of the Apollo landing site 2 (Apollo 11). U.S. Geol. Survey, Map 1-619. HARTMANN, W. K., AND KTTIPEB, J. P. (1962). Concentric structures surrounding lunar basins. Commun. Lunar Planet. Lab. 1, 51 66. HEAD, J. W. (1974). Stratigraphy of the Des- cartes region (Apollo 16): implications for the origin of samples. The Moon, in press. HINNERS, N. W. (1971). The new Moon: a review. Reviews Geophys. Space Phys. 9, 447-522. HODGES, C. A., MUEHLBERGEB, W. R., EGGLE- TON, R. E., AND SCHABEB, G. G. (1973). Geologic setting of Apollo 16. In Lunar Science IV, pp. 368-370. Lunar Science Institute, Houston, Texas. HORZ, V., HARTUNG, J. B., AND GAULT, D. E. (1971). Micrometeorite craters and lunar rock surfaces. J. Geophys. Res. 76, 5770-5798. HOWARD, K. A., HEAD, J. W., AND SWANN, G. A. (1972). Geology of Hadley Rille. Proc. Third Lunar Sci. Conf., 1, 1-14. HOWARD, K. A., WILHELMS, D. E., AND SCOTT, D. H. (1974). Lunar basin formation and high- land stratigraphy. Reviews Geophys. Space Phys. 12, 309-327. HDBBABD, N. J., MEYER, C, GAST, P. W., AND WIESMANN, H. (1971). The composition and derivation of Apollo 12 soils. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 10, 341-350. HUBBARD, N. J., RHODES, J. M ., AND GAST, P. W. (1973). Chemistry of very high A1203 lunar basalts. Science 181, 339-342. HUSSEIN, L., AND SHAEFPER, O. A. (1973). Ar40-Ar39 crystallization ages and Ar38-Ar37 cosmic ray exposure ages of samples from the vicinity of the Apollo 16 landing site. In Lunar Science IV, pp. 406-408. Lunar Science Institute, Houston, Texas. JACKSON, E. D., AND WILSHIBE, H. G. (1968). Chemical composition of the lunar surface at the Surveyor landing sites. J. Geophys. Res. 73, 7621-7629. KAULA, W. M., AND HABRIS, A. W. (1973). Dynamically plausible hypotheses of lunar origin. Nature, 245, 367-369. KAULA, W. M., SCHUBEBT, G., LINGENGELTER, R. E., SJOGBEN, W. L., AND WOLLENHAUPT, W. R. (1973). Lunar topography from Apollo 15 and 16 laser altimetry. Proc. Fourth Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 2811-2819.' LATHAM, G. V., EVVING, M., PBESS, F., SUTTON, G., DOBMAN, J., NAKAMURA, Y.. TOKSOZ, N., WIGGTNS, R., DEER, J., AND DUENNEBIER, F. (1970). Passive seismic experiment. Science 167, 455-457. LATHAM, G., EWING, M., DOBMAN, J., LAMMLEIN, D., PBESS, F. TOKSOZ, N\, SUTTON, G., DUENNEBIEB, F., AND NAKAMURA, Y. (1971). Moonquakes. Science,\li, 687-692. LATHAM, G., EWING, M., DOBMAN, J., LAMMLEIN, D., PRESS, F., TOKSOZ, N., SUTTON, G., DUENNEBIER, F., AND NAKAMUBA, Y. (1972). Moonquakes and lunar tectonism. The Moon 4, 373-382. LAUL, J. C, MORGAN, J. W., GANAPATHY, R., AND ANDEBS, E. (1971). Meteoritic material in lunar samples: characterization from trace elements. Proc. Second Lunar Sci. Conf. 2, 1139-1158. LSAPT: Lunar Sample Analysis Planning Team (1972). Third Lunar Science Conference. Science 176, 975-981. LSAPT: Lunar Sample Analysis Planning Team (1973). Fourth Lunar Science Conference. Science 181, 615-622. LSPET: Lunar Sample Preliminary Examin- at i on Team (1969). Preliminary examination of lunar samples from Apollo 11. Science 165, 1211-1227. LSPET: Lunar Sample Preliminary Examin- ation Team (1970). Preliminary examination MOON AFTER APOLLO 535 of lunar samples from Apollo 12. Science 167, 1325-1339. LSPET: Lunar Sample Preliminary Examin- ation Team (1971). Preliminary examination of lunar samples from Apollo 14. Science 173, 681-693. LSPET: Lunar Sample (Apollo 16) Preliminary Examination Team (1973a). The Apollo 16 lunar samples: petrographic and chemical description. Science 179, 23-34. LSPET: Lunar Sample Preliminary Examin- ation Team (1973b). Preliminary examination of lunar samples. In Apollo 17 Prelim. Sci. Sep., Part 7, 1-46. LUCCHITTA, B. K., AND SCHMITT, H. H. (1974). Orange material in the Sulpicius Gallus Formation at the southwestern edge of Mare Serenitatis. Proc. Fifth Lunar Sci. C'onf. 1, 223-234. MASURSKY, H., EL-BAZ, F., AND COLTON, G. W. (1975). Apollo orbital views of the Moon. NASA Spec. Pub., in preparation. MCCAULEY, J. F. (1967). The nature of the lunar surface as determined by systematic geologic mapping. In Mantles of the Earth and Terres- trial Planets (S. K. Runcorn, Ed.), pp. 431-460. Wiley, New York. MCKAY, D. S., GREENWOOD, W. R., AND MORRISON, D. A. (1970). Origin of small lunar particles and breccia from the Apollo 11 site. Proc. Apollo 11 Sci. Conf. 1, 673-694. METZGER, A. E., TROMBKA, J. I., PETERSON, L. E., REEDY, R. C, AND ARNOLD, J. R. (1973). Lunar surface radioactivity: prelim- inary results of the Apollo 15 and Apollo 16 gamma-ray spectrometer experiments. Science 179, 800-803. MELSON, W. G., AND MASON, B. (1971). Lunar "basalts": some comparisons with terrestrial and meteoritic analogs, and a proposed classification and nomenclature. Proc. Second Lunar Sci. Conf. 1. 459-467. MEYER, C, BRETT, R., HUBBARD, N. J., MORRI- SON, D. Q., MCKAY, D. S., AITTEN, F. K., TAKEDA, H., AND SCHONFELD, E. (1971). Mineralogy, chemistry, and origin of the KREEP component in soil samples from the Ocean of Storms. Proc. Second Lunar Sci. Conf. 1, 393-411. MILTON, D. J. (1968). Geologic map of the Theophilus quadrangle of the Moon. U.S. Ceol. Survey. Map 1-546. MILTON, D. J., AND HODGES, C. A. (1972). Geologic maps of the Descartes region of the Moon (Apollo 6 premission maps). U.S. Qeol. Survey. Map 1-748. MOORE, H. J., HODGES, C. A., AND SCOTT, D. H. (1974). Multiringed basins?illustrated by Orientale and associated features. Proc. Fifth Lunar Sci. Conf. 1, 71-100. MOORE, J. G. (1967). Base surge in recent volcanic eruption. Bull. Volcanologique 30, 337-363. MUEHLBERGER, W. R. (1974). Structural history of southeastern Mare Serenitatis and adjacent highlands. Proc. Fifth Lunar Sci. Conf. 1, 101-110. MULLER, P. M., AND SjOGREN, W. L. (1968). Mascons: lunar mass concentrations. Science 161, 680-684. MUTCH, T. A. (1972). Geology of the Moon: a Stratigraphic View. Revised ed., Princeton Univ. Press. NAKAMURA, Y., LAMMLEIN, D., LATHAM, G., EWING, M., DORMAN, J., PRESS, F., AND TOKSOZ, N. (1973). New seismic data on the state of the lunar interior. Science 181, 49-51. NYQTJIST, L. E., HUBBARD, N. J., AND GAST, P.W.(1973).Rb-Sr systematics for chemically defined Apollo 15 and 16 materials. Proc. Fourth Lunar Sci. Conf. 2, 1823-1846. OBERBECK, V. R., HORZ, F., MORRISON, R. H., QUAIDE, W. L., AND GAULT, D. E. (1974). Effects of formation of large craters and basins on emplacement of smooth plains materials. In Lunar Science V, pp. 568-570. Lunar Science Institute, Houston, Texas. O'KEEFE, J. A. (1970). The origin of the Moon. J. Geophys. Res. 75, 6565-6574. OPIK, E. J. (1972). Comments on lunar origin. Irish Astron.J. 10, 190-238. PAPANASTASSIOU, D. A., AND WASSERBURG, G. J. (1971). Lunar chronology and evolution from Rb-Sr studies of Apollo 11 and 12 sam- ples. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 11, 37-62. PHILLIPS, R. J., ADAMS, G. F., BROWN, W. E., EGGLETON, R. E., JACKSON, P., JORDAN, R., PEEBLES, W. J., PORCELLO, L. J., RYU, J., SCHABER, G., SILL, W. R., THOMPSON, T. W., WARD, S. H., AND SELENKA, J. S. (1973). The Apollo 17 lunar sounder. Proc. Fourth Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 2821-2831. POHN, H. A. (1971). Geologic map of the Lans- berg P region of the Moon (Apollo 12). U.S. Geol. Survey. Map 1-627. POHN, H. A., AND WILDEY, R. L. (1970). A photoelectric-photographic study of the normal albedo of the Moon. U.S. Geol. Survey. Prof. Pap. 599-E. QUAIDE, W., BUNCH, T., AND WRIGLEY, R. (1970). Impact metamorphism of lunar surface materials. Science 167, 671-672. REID, A. M., LOFGREN, G. E., HEIKEN, G. H., BROWN, R. W., AND MORELAND, G. (1973). Apollo 17 orange glass, Apollo 15 green glass and Hawaiian lava fountains glass. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union. 54, 606-607. 536 FAROUK EL-BAZ RINGWOOD, A. E. (1970). Origin of the Moon: the precipitation hypothesis. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 8, 131-140. RINGWOOD, A. E. (1972). Some comparative aspects of lunar origin. Phys. Earth Planet. Int. 6, 366-376. ROBERSON, F. I., AND KAULA, W. M. (1972). The Apollo 15 laser altimeter. In Apollo 15 Prelim. Sci. Rep., Part 25, 48-50. ROEDDER, E., AND WEIBLEN, P. W. (1973). Apollo 17 "orange soil," a result of meteorite impact on liquid lava? Nature 244, 210-212. RUNCOBN, S. K. (1974). Some aspects of the physics of the Moon. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser.A 336, 11-33. RUSSELL, C. T., COLEMAN, P. J., LICHTENSTEIN, B. R., SCHUBEBT, G., AND SHARP, L. R. (1973). Subsatellite measurements of the lunar magnetic field. Proc. Fourth Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 2833-2845. SCHMIDT, O. Y. (1958). A Theory of Earth's Origin. Foreign Language Publishing House, Moscow, 139 pp. SCHMITT, H. H. (1974). Evolution of the Moon: the 1974 model. In Proc. Soviet-Amer. Conf. Cosmochem. Moon and Planets. In press. SCOTT, D. H., LUCCHITTA, B. K., AND CABB, M. H. (1972). Geologic maps of the Taurus - Littrow region of the Moon (Apollo 17 pre- mission maps). U.S. Geol. Survey. Map 1-800. SHOEMAKER, E. M. (1962). Interpretation of lunar craters. In Physics and Astronomy of the Moon (Z. Kopal, Ed.), pp. 283-359. Academic Press, New York. SHOEMAKBE, E. M., AND HACKMAN, R. J. (1962). Stratigraphic basis for a lunar time scale. In The Moon?Symposium 14?IA U (Z. Kopal and Z. K. Mikehilov, Eds.), pp. 289-300. Academic Press, New York. SHOBT, M. M. (1970). Evidence and implications of shock metamorphism in lunar samples. Science 167, 673-675. SILVER, L. T. (1970). Uranium-thorium-lead isotope relations in lunar materials. Science 167, 468-471. SJOGBEN, W. L., WOLLENHAUPT, W. R., AND WIMBEBLY, R. N. (1974). Lunar gravity via the Apollo 15 and 16 subsatellite. The Moon 9, 115-128. SOLOMON, S. C, AND TOKSOZ, M. N. (1973). Internal constitution and evolution of the Moon. Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors 7, 15-38. STUABT-ALEXANDER, D. E. (1975). Geologic map of the central far side of the Moon. U.S. Oeol. Survey, in preparation. STUABT-ALEXANDEB, D. E., AND HOWARD, K. A. (1970). Lunar maria and circular basins?a review. Icarus 12, 440-456. STUABT-ALEXANDEB, D. E., AND WILHELMS, D. E. (1974). Nectarian System, a new lunar stratigraphic name. U.S. Oeol. Surv. Jour. Res., in press. SUTTON, R. L., AND SCHABEE, G. G. (1971). Lunar locations and orientations of rock samples from Apollo missions 11 and 12. Proc. Second Lunar Sci. Conf. 1, 17-26. SWANN, G. A., BAILEY, H. G., BATSON, R. M., FREEMAN, V. L., HAIT, M. H., HEAD, J. W., HOLT, H. E., HOWAED, K. A., IBWIN, J. B., LARSON, K. B., MUEHLBEBGEE, W. R., REED, V. S., RENNILSON, J. J., SCHABEB, G. G., SCOTT, D. R., SILVEB, L. T., SUTTON, R. L., ULEICH, G. E., WILSHIBE, H. G., AND WOLFE, E. W. (1972). Preliminary geologic investiga- tion of the Apollo 15 landing site. In Apollo 15 Prelim. Sci. Rep., Part 5, 1-112. TATSUMOTO, M., AND ROSHOLT, J. N. (1970). Age of the Moon: an isotopic study of uranium- thorium-lead systematics of lunar samples. Science, 167, 461-463. TAYLOR, S. R. (1975). Lunar Science: A Post- Apollo View. Pergamon, New York. In press. TEBA, F., PAPANASTASSIOU, D. A., AND WASSER- BURG, G. J. (1973). A lunar cataclysm at ~ 3.95 AE and the structure of the lunar crust. In Lunar Science IV, pp. 723-725. Lunar Science Institute, Houston, Texas. TEBA, b\, PAPANASTASSIOU, D. A., AND WASSER- BUBG, G. J. (1974). The lunar time scale and a summary of isotopic evidence for a terminal lunar cataclysm. In Lunar Science IV, pp. 792-794. Lunar Science Institute, Houston, Texas. TOKSOZ, M. N., PBESS, F., ANDEBSON, K., DAINTY, A., LATHAM, G., EWING, M., DORMAN, J., LAMMLEIN, D., NAKAMURA, Y., SUTTON, G., AND DUENNEBIEB, F. (1972). Velocity struc- ture and properties of the lunar crust. The Moon 4, 490-504. TOKSOZ, M. N., DAINTY, A. M., SOLOMON, S. G, AND ANDERSON, K. R. (1974). Structure of the Moon. Rev. Qeophys. Space Phys. 12, 539-567. TRASK, N. J. (1970). Geologic maps of early Apollo landing sites. U.S. Geol. Survey. Maps 1-616-627. TURKEVICH, A. L., ANDERSON, W. A., ECONO- MOU, T. E., FBANZGBOTE, E. J., GRIFFIN, H. E., GROTCH, S. L., PATTERSON, J. H., AND SOWINSKI, K. P. (1969). The alpha-scattering chemical analysis experiment on the Surveyor lunar missions. In Surveyor Program Results, pp. 271-348. NASA SP-184. TURNER, G. (1970). Argon - 40/argon - 3 9 dating of lunar rock samples. Science 167,466-468. VINOGRADOV, A. P. (1971). Preliminary data on lunar ground brought to Earth by automatic MOON AFTER APOLLO 537 probe "Luna 16." Proc. Second Lunar Sci. Conf. 1, 1-16. WATKINS, J. S. (1971). Seismic velocity models of the lunar near surface and their implications. J. Geophys. Res. 76, 6246-6252. WILHELMS, D. E. (1970). Summary of lunar stratigraphy-telescopic observations. U.S. Oeol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 599-F. WILHELMS, D. E., AND EL-BAZ, F. (1975). Geologic map of the east side of the Moon. U.S. Geol. Survey, in preparation. WILHELMS, D. E., AND MCCATTLEY, J. F. (1971). Geologic map of the near side of the Moon. U.S. Geol. Survey. Map 1-703. WISE, D. U. (1963). An origin of the Moon by rotational fission during formation of the Earth's core. J. Geophys. Res. 68, 1547-1554. WISE, D. TJ. (1969). Origin of the Moon from the Earth: some new mechanisms and compari- sons. J. Geophys. Res. 74, 6034-6046. WISE, D. U., AND YATES, M. T. (1970). Mascons as structural relief on a lunar mantle. J. Geophys. Res. 75, 261-268. WoLLENHAUPT, W. R., AND SjOGBEN, W. L. (1972). Comments on the figure of the Moon based on preliminary results from laser alti- metry. The Moon 4, 337-347. WOOD, J. A. (1970). Petrology of the lunar soil and geophysical implications. J. Geophys. Res. 75, 6497-6513. WOOD, J. A. (1974a). A survey of lunar rock types and comparison of the crusts of the Earth and Moon. In Proc. Soviet-Amer. Conf. Cosmochem. Moon and Planets, in press. WOOD, J. A. (1974b). Origin of Earth's Moon. Proc. Inter. Astron. Union, Coll. No. 28, in press. WOOD, J. A., AND MITLEB, H. E. (1974). Origin of the Moon by a modified capture mechanism, or half a loaf is better than a whole one. In Lunar Science V, pp. 851-853. Lunar Science Institute, Houston, Texas. WOOD, J. A., DICKEY, J. S., MARVIN, J. S., AND POWELL, B. N. (1970). Lunar anorthosites. Science, 167, 602-604.