SERIAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION

The emphasis upon publications as a means of diffusing knowledge was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry articulated a program that included the following statement: “It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge.” This keynote of basic research has been adhered to over the years in the issuance of thousands of titles in serial publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series:

Smithsonian Annals of Flight

Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology

Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics

Smithsonian Contributions to Botany

Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences

Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology

Smithsonian Contributiotis to Zoology

Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology

In these series, the Institution publishes original articles and monographs dealing with the research and collections of its several museums and offices and of professional colleagues at other institutions of learning. These papers report newly acquired facts, synoptic interpretations of data, or original theory in specialized fields. These publications are distributed by subscription to libraries, laboratories, and other interested institutions and specialists throughout the world. Individual copies may be obtained from the Smithsonian Institution Press as long as stocks are available.

S. DILLON RIPLEY
Secretary
Smithsonian Institution

SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 230

Contribution to the Polychaete Family Trochochaetidae Pettibone

Marian H. Pettibone

SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS

City of Washington

1976

A B S T R A C T

Pettibone, Marian H. Contribution to the Polychaete Family Trochochaetidae Pettibone.Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, number 230, 21 pages, 10 figures, 1976.—The polychaete family Trochochaetidae Pettibone (=Disomidae Mesnil) is reviewed, and a key to the species of Trochochaeata Levinsen (=Disoma Oersted) is included. Based on new material and examination of types, the descriptions of three species are supplemented: T. carica (Birula), new combination; T. watsoni (Fauvel); and T. diverapoda (Hoagland). A new species from West Africa, T. kirkegaardi, is described.

OFFICIAL PUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution’s annual report, Smithsonian Year. SERIES COGER DESIGN: The Coral Montastrea cavernosa (Linnaeus).

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data

Pettibone, Marian H.

Contribution to the Polychaete Family Trochochaetidae Pettibone.

(Smithsonian contributions to zoology; 230)

Bibliography: p.

Supt. of Docs, no.: SI 1.27:230

1. Trochochaetidae. 2. Annelida―Classification. I: Title.

QL1.S54 no. 230 [QL391.A6] 591'.08s [595'.147] 76–3464

Contents

Introduction

Family TROCHOCHAETIDAE Pettibone, 1963

Trochochaeta Levinson, 1883

Key to the Species of Trochochaeta

T. carica (Birula), new combination

T. watsoni (Fauvel)

T. diverapoda (Hoagland)

T. orissae (Fauvel)

T. kirkegaardi, new species

Literature Cited

Publication in Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology

Contribution to the Polychaete Family Trochochaetidae Pettibone

Marian H. Pettibone

____________

Marian H. Pettibone, Curator, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560.

Introduction

The present study is based primarily on new material from eastern Canada: that from the Saint John River Estuary, New Brunswick, was obtained in 1972 and 1973 by M. L. H. Thomas and Patricia Steer of the University of New Brunswick, and that from the deeper parts of the Gulf of Maine was collected in 1967 on Verrill Cruise 67–53 by R. R. Hessler of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. In addition, two trochochaetid species, collected in 1883 and 1885 in deep water off New England by the Albatross, were found among the unidentified material in the United States National Museum. This material, including some well preserved and complete specimens, allows me to supplement descriptions of previously described species that, for the most part, were based on incomplete fragments and to describe a new one based on specimens erroneously assigned to another species.

In addition to the material deposited in the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution (using the acronym “USNM” for the old United States National Museum), specimens were received on loan from the following Museums: British Museum (Natural History), London (BMNH), through J. D. George; Universitetets Zoologiske Museum, Copenhagen (UZMC), through J. B. Kirkegaard; and Zoological Institute Academy of Science, Leningrad (ZIASL), through P. V. Uschakov. The manuscript benefited from the suggestions of H. H. Hobbs, Jr. and M. L. Jones, both of the Smithsonian Institution.

The polychaete species, which are referable to the Trochochaetidae, are listed below, along with indications of the families to which they were assigned originally, type-localities, locations of the type specimens (if known), and their subsequent and present designations:

1. Disoma multisetosum Oersted, 1843, under “Ariciae Naidinae” (=Spionidae); Denmark; types (?); referred to Trochochaeta multisetosa by Pettibone (1963b:310).

2. Trochochaeta sarsi Levinsen, 1883, under Amphinomidae; Kattegat; holotype (UZMC, = posterior fragment, examined); referred to Disoma multisetosum by Michaelsen (1897:41), to Trochochaeta multisetosa by Pettibone (1963b:310).

3. Thaumastoma singulare Webster and Benedict, 1884, under “Incertae Sedis”; Massachusetts, in 37 m; holotype (USNM 29028, =anterior fragment, on 20 slides, examined); referred to Disoma multisetosum by Mesnil (1897:95), to indeterminable genus and species by Hartman (1947:161), to Trochochaeta multisetosa by Pettibone (1963b:310).

4. Disoma carica Birula, 1897; no family named but placed between species of Orbiniidae and Spionidae; Kara Sea, in 19 m; holotype (ZIASL 2/25892, =anterior fragment, examined); description supplemented and referred herein to Trochochaeta carica.

5. Nevaya whiteavesi McIntosh, 1911, under Scalibregmidae; Gulf of St. Lawrence, dredged; holotype (BMNH 1921: 5: 1: 4567, =anterior fragment, in poor condition, examined); referred to Disoma carica by Fauvel (1916:3), to Trochochaeta multisetosa by Pettibone (1963b:309).

6. Disoma watsoni Fauvel, 1916, under Disomidae; off Nova Scotia, eastern Canada, in 1332 meters; holotype (anterior fragment) in Musée Océanographique de Monaco, according to Belloc (1953:6); referred to Trochochaeta watsoni by Achari (1969:100), description supplemented herein.

7. Aonides diverapoda Hoagland, 1920, under Spionidae; Philippine Islands, in 37 m; 2 syntypes (USNM 18961, poor condition, examined); referred to Trochochaeta by Pettibone (1963a:91), description supplemented herein.

8. Disoma orissae Fauvel, 1932, under Disomidae; east coast of India, in 8 m; holotype (anterior fragment) in Indian Museum, Calcutta?; referred to Trochochaeta orissae by Achari (1969:99).

9. Disoma franciscanum Hartman, 1947, under Disomidae; central California, in 2–29 m; 10 syntypes (USNM 20912, anterior, middle and posterior fragments, examined); referred to Trochochaeta multisetosa by Pettibone (1963b:310).

10. Disoma orissae.–Kirkegaard, 1959, under Disomidae; West Africa, in 44–175 m; specimens examined and referred to Trochochaeta kirkegaard, new species; holotype and 2 paratypes (UZMC).

As indicated in the above summary, the nine previously described species belonging to the Trochochaetidae were originally distributed among five genera and several families, including the Spionidae, Amphinomidae, Scalibregmidae, and Disomidae, and treated as incertae sedis on one occasion. Most of these species were described from anterior fragments, and one, Trochochaeta sarsi Levinsen, from a posterior fragment. Additional material available for this study enables me to supplement the descriptions of two of the species, T. carica (Birula) and T. watsoni (Fauvel), and to include notes on the abdominal region and posterior end of T. carica.

Aonides diverapoda Hoagland, 1920, from the Philippine Islands, was originally placed in the Spionidae. Previously, in connection with a study of the species of Aonides, the syntypes of Hoagland’s species were examined (USNM) and found to belong rather to the Trochochaetidae (Pettibone, 1963a:91); the species was referred to Trochochaeta but without additions or corrections to the original description. As far as the material permits, the description of the species has been amplified herein.

Unfortunately, no specimens of T. orissae (Fauvel) were available for study. The species is discussed briefly and included in the key to the species of the genus. Kirkegaard (1959:26) referred three specimens from West Africa to Disoma orissae Fauvel—originally described from the east coast of India, and commented on its strange distribution. Kirkegaard’s specimens have been examined and are referred herein to a new species, Trochochaeta kirkegaardi.

Four of the nine previously proposed names listed above are now considered to be synonyms of Trochochaeta multisetosa (Oersted). The types of Thaumastoma singulare Webster and Benedict (USNM 29028) and Disoma franciscanum Hartman (USNM 29912) were examined previously and commented on by me (1963b:310). The holotype of Trochochaeta sarsi Levinsen (UZMC) was recently examined and I am able to confirm the statement of Michaelsen (1897) that it was described only from a posterior end. Nevaya whiteavesi McIntosh was referred to Disoma carica Birula by Fauvel (1916:3), Uschakov (1955:284), and Hartman (1959:394), and to Trochochaeta multisetosa (Oersted) by Pettibone (1963b:310). In order to assess these differences of opinion, the holotype of N. whiteavesi was recently examined (BMNH 1921: 5: 1: 4567). Although in poor condition, it was found not to differ from T. multisetosa.

Trochochaeta multisetosa has been adequately described and figured previously and is not dealt with further herein, except to include it in the key to the species of Trochochaeta. For synonymies, descriptions, and references, see Pettibone (1963b:310, figs. 82a–f, 83a–g); Uschakov (1955:284, figs. 101A–D, 102A–H, as Disoma multisetosum); Banse and Hobson (1968:30, fig. 6g); Hartman (1969: 201, figs. 1–7, as Disoma franciscanum); and Hartmann-Schröder (1971:292, figs. 97c–e, 98a–p). The species is widely distributed in west Greenland, Iceland, North Atlantic (North Sea, western Baltic, Gulf of St. Lawrence to New England), and North Pacific (north Japan Sea, Japan, Washington to Central California).

Family TROCHOCHAETIDAE Pettibone, 1963

DISOMIDAE Mesnil, 1897 [part].

DISOMIDIDAE Chamberlin, 1919 [part].

The family, as defined by Mesnil (1897) and Chamberlin (1919), included Disoma Oersted, or Disomides Chamberlin, and Poecilochaetus Claparède. The latter genus was placed in a separate family Poecilochaetidae, by Hannerz (1956). Both families show relationships to the Spionidae, in which some of the species were grouped earlier, and to the Chaetopteridae. Following Hannerz, the family includes the single genus, Trochochaeta.

Trochochaeta Levinsen, 1883

Disoma Oersted, 1843. [Type-species: Disoma multisetosum Oersted, 1843, by monotypy; preoccupied by Ehrenberg, 1831, in Protozoa (see Neave, 1939), =Trochochaeta multisetosa (Oersted, 1843).]

Trochochaeta Levinsen, 1883. [Type-species: Trochochaeta sarsi Levinsen, 1883, by monotypy, =Trochochaeta multisetosa (Oersted, 1843).]

Thaumastoma Webster and Benedict, 1884. [Type-species: Thaumastoma singulare Webster and Benedict, 1884, by monotypy, =Trochochaeta multisetosa (Oersted, 1843).]

Nevaya McIntosh, 1911. [Type-species: Nevaya whiteavesi McIntosh, 1911, by monotypy, =Trochochaeta multisetosa (Oersted, 1843).]

Disomides Chamberlin, 1919. [New name for Disoma Oersted, preoccupied.]

DIAGNOSIS.—Sedentary, tubicolous, spioniform polychaetes. Body long, slender, subcylindrical, with numerous segments, divided into more or less distinct regions: short anterior thoracic, and long abdominal, changing gradually with some transitional segments. Prostomium small, fusiform, with median crest and caruncle extending posteriorly on first segment or beyond, with or without small median antenna, with or without 2–4 small eyes. Pair of long spioniform palps (readily deciduous) with longitudinal groove, lateral to prostomium. Parapodia of anterior two segments closely apposed, directed anteriorly and somewhat enclosing prostomium, tentacular palps and ventral mouth; with or without notosetae on segment 2. Proboscis eversible as thin-walled lobulated sac. Parapodia of thoracic region biramous, with simple capillary notosetae and neurosetae and well developed postsetal lobes, subtriangular to lamelliform, with margins entire or serrated; fan-shaped group of heavy acicular neurosetae on segment 3 and sometimes also on segment 2. Beginning on segment 5, some neurosetae stouter, of various types—straight, lanceolate, acicular, smooth, spiny or hairy, curved subdistally with hairy limbate borders and fine tips. Abdominal region more slender, thin-walled, with notopodia lacking more anteriorly; neuropodia with few capillary and acicular neurosetae and subconical to digitiform postsetal lobes, extending posteriorly as thin flanges. Posterior abdominal region with notopodia in form of low mounds and few dark acicular spines, sometimes forming stellate structures. Pygidium thick, collar-like, slightly lobulate or with circle of anal cirri, and with terminal anus. Tube long cylindrical, formed of fine mud particles cemented together by secreted fibers.

GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FAMILY AND GENUS.—The trochochaetids are sedentary, tubicolous polychaetes, living in fine sandy and muddy bottoms, where they form long, cylindrical-to-somewhat-flattened tubes of their own making by combining fibrous secretions with fine muddy particles. They evidently add to their tubes more or less continuously (see Thulin, 1921). The tubes and worms break easily and complete specimens are rather rare in collections. They are bottom-deposit feeders, making use of their long, paired, food-collecting tentacular palps. Early development appears to be entirely pelagic and the larvae are predominantly planktotrophic (see Hannerz, 1956).

Body Form: The body is long, slender subcylindrical, with numerous segments (up to 200), somewhat flattened dorsoventrally more anteriorly, and divided into more or less distinct regions: short anterior thoracic and long abdominal segments, separated by some transitional segments (Oersted, 1844, pl. 2: fig. 1). The prostomium is comparatively small and wedged between the anterior two segments, which are so closely allied that they have been interpreted by some authors as consisting of a single one. The long, paired, spioniform tentacular palps and ventral mouth are also enclosed by the two anterior segments (Figure 1a–d). The two following segments are somewhat modified relative to the more posterior thoracic ones. The anterior abdominal segments differ slightly from the posterior ones, and the pygidium bears a terminal anus.

Prostomium and Anterior Four Segments: The prostomium (Figures 1a–d, 4a,b, 8a) is elongate-oval or fusiform, truncate, rounded, or slightly bilobed anteriorly, with 2–4 small eyes or eyes lacking, with a more or less well developed mediun crest, which extends posteriorly as a narrow caruncle on the first segment or beyond; a median antenna may be small (Figures 4a, 8a), filiform, or absent (Figure 1a). The long, paired, spioniform tentacular palps (readily deciduous and may be in varying stages of regeneration) are situated laterally between the prostomium and the parapodia of the first segment; the palps are large, cylindrical, with a longitudinal ciliated groove along the inner sides leading to the mouth region (Figure 1c,d). The parapodia of the first tentacular or buccal segment are lateral to the prostomium; they are biramous, projecting anteriorly and dorsally, with bundles of long capillary notosetae and neurosetae, and subconical postsetal lobes (sometimes referred to as tentacular cirri; Figure 2a,b); the segment is enlarged ventrally enclosing the large triangular mouth (Figures 1b,d, 4b). The pharynx or proboscis is eversible as an unarmed, lobulated, densely ciliated soft sac (Figure 1b,d). The second segment is closely apposed to the first, the ventral part contributing to the lower lip of the mouth; the biramous parapodia are shifted ventrally, enclosing the mouth region (Figure 1d); the postsetal lobes are similar to those of the first segment; notosetae are usually absent (Figures 2c,d, 6c, 9c,d) but are present in T. watsoni (Figure 4e,f); the neuropodia have fan-shaped bundles of usually smooth capillary neurosetae (Figure 4g) but there are bipinnate capillaries in T. birula (Figure 2e) and sometimes additional heavy acicular spines (Figures 6c,d, 9c–e). The third segment has postsetal lobes that are short, broad, oval, or flattened, with borders entire or serrated, with capillary notosetae; neuropodia are provided with dark, stout, acicular spines and few capillary neurosetae in vertical series (Figures 2f–h, 4h,i, 6e-h, 9f-j). Thus, segment 3 and sometimes segment 2 have specialized heavy projecting acicular spines. The fourth segment has postsetal lobes that are similar to those of the following segments, with capillary notosetae and neurosetae (Figures 2i,j, 4j,k, 6i–k, 9k–m).

Remaining Thoracic Region (Figures 3a–h, 5a–h, 7a–i., 10a–i): The notopodia have fan-shaped bundles of capillary notosetae. The neuropodial setal lobes are subcylindrical, with capillary limbate neurosetae, and stouter neurosetae toward the central part of the bundle, of various types: straight, lanceolate, acicular, or curved, with striated border and erect fine tips; they may be variously provided with more or less frayed sheaths, which appear spiny or hairy. The postsetal lobes (sometimes referred to as dorsal and ventral cirri) are oval or platelike, with borders entire or serrated. The notopodial lobes become gradually smaller posteriorly and the notosetae decrease in number and may be absent on a few transitional segments.

Abdominal Region and Pygidium: The body wall becomes markedly thinner, delicate and more fragile, thus accounting for the difficulty of obtaining complete specimens. In the anterior abdominal region, the notopodial lobes and notosetae disappear, sometimes represented by small papillae on a few segments (Figures 5g,h, 10g,i). The neuropodial lobes become smaller, with only a few heavy acicular and a few capillary neurosetae (Figures 1g, 5i–k, 10j,k). The digitiform to subcorneal postsetal lobes continue posteriorly on each segment as thin, slightly undulate flanges or membranes (Figures 1e, 7k, 10j). Although not observed on all species (since most specimens are incomplete posteriorly), notopodia reappear in the more posterior abdominal segments in the form of low mounds armed with a bundle of few, dark, pointed acicular spines (Figures 1e,f, 7k,l; Hartman, 1947: fig. 1c). When withdrawn, only the tips of the notopodial spines project but they are visible through the thin body wall. When extended, they may appear as stellate or wheel-like organs, the structure to which the generic name Trochochaeta refers; these were described and figured by Levinsen (1883, pl. 2: fig. 6) for a specimen, named T. sarsi, which later turned out to be the posterior end of Disoma multisetosum Oersted. The posterior end is cylindrical, with a collar-like pygidium, more or less lobulated (Hartman, 1947, fig. 1c) or encircled by a variable number of anal cirri (Figure 1h). Ventrally, on the body segments on either side of the median line, there may be a few short retractile papillae (sometimes referred to as branchiae; Figure 8d; Levinsen, 1883, pl. 2: fig. 7; Hartman, 1947, fig. 1d).

Trochochaeta carica (Birula), new combination

FIGURES 1–3

Disoma carica Birula, 1897:87, 99, pl. 10: fig. 1a–d.—Fauvel, 1916:3; 1932a:2, figs. 1,2; 1932b:24, pl. 1: figs. 12–18.— Uschakov, 1955:284, fig. 100A–G.—Hartman, 1947:162; 1959:394.

Key to the Species of Trochochaeta

MATERIAL EXAMINED.—Kara Sea: East coast of Ob Bay, 26.6 km NE of Cape Droviya, 19 m, sandy mud, 11 August 1896, A. Birula, collector, holotype (ZIASL. 2/25892).

New Brunswick: Kennebecasis River, Saint John River Estuary, about 12 m, mud, 18 June 1972, M. L. H. Thomas, collector, 2 specimens (USNM 51933). Forrester Cove, Kennebecasis River, 23 m, June to August 1973, P. Steer, collector, 10 specimens (USNM 51934; ZIASL).

Gulf of Maine: Verrill Cruise 67–53, 31 July/1 August 1967, R. Hessler, collector: Murray Basin, 42°25.5′ to 42°29.5′ N, 69°45.2′ to 69°48.9′W, 239–276 m, sta. 1,2,5—78 specimens, including many small ones (USNM 51937–9). Wilkinson Basin, 42°32′ to 42°33.8′N, 69°31.3′ to 69°32.1′W, 278–280 m, sta. 6,7—85 specimens, including mostly small ones (USNM 51940/1). Platts Basin, 43°24′N, 69°31.4′W, 163 m, sta. 9—3 small specimens (USNM 51942). NW Wilkinson Basin, 43°10.7′N, 69°48.9′W, 172 m, sta. 11—6 small specimens (USNM 51943).

New England: 41°11′N, 66°12′W, 913 m, Albatross sta. 2078, 4 September 1883, 1 specimen (USNM 51935). 40°42′N, 66°33′W, 1558 m, Albatross sta. 2531, 14 July 1885, 1 specimen (USNM 51936).

DESCRIPTION.—Body long, slender, divided into short, flattened, wider thoracic region and long, more slender abdominal region, with few transitional segments. Length of incomplete holotype of 27 segments 10 mm, greatest width 2.5 mm, including setae. Length of complete specimen from New Brunswick (USNM 51934) 40 mm, greatest width in thoracic region 2 mm, including setae, segments 130. Length of incomplete specimen of 24 segments from off New England (USNM 51936) 8 mm and 3 mm wide, including setae.

FIGURE 1.—Trochochaeta carica (a,b, USNM 51936; c–h, USNM 51934): a, anterior end, dorsal view, tentacular palps missing; b, same, ventral view, pharynx partially extended; c, anterior end, dorsal view; base of right tentacular palp shown, left one missing; d, frontal view of anterior end, showing prostomium, partially extended pharynx, right tentacular palp (left one missing), and parapodia of first two segments; e, three right parapodia from posterior abdominal region, dorsal view; f, two groups of notosetae from same; g, three neurosetae from same, with detail of tip; h, posterior end, lateral view.

Prostomium (Figure 1a–d) small, oval to fusiform, narrowing anteriorly to more or less distinct shield-shaped, truncate part, with nuchal crest on posterior half, projecting on first segment (referred to as median antenna by Fauvel); without eyes. Pair of tentacular palps wedged between prostomium and parapodia of first segment; palps long, thick, cylindrical, with longitudinal ciliated groove along inner side; one or both palps usually missing on preserved specimens. Mouth on ventral side of first or peristomial segment. Pharynx eversible as ciliated lobulated sac (Figure 1b,d).

FIGURE 2.—Trochochaeta carica (USNM 51934): a, right first parapodium, anterior view; b, two neurosetae from same; c, left parapodium 2, posterior view; d, right parapodium 2, anterior view; e, neuroseta from same, with detail of small portion; f, left parapodium 3, posterior view; g, right parapodium 3, anterior view; two replacement neurosetae dotted; h, four neurosetae from same; i, right parapodium 4, anterior view; j, two neurosetae from same.

Anterior four segments of thoracic region with considerably modified biramous parapodia, differing from one another (Figures 1a–d, 2a–j).

First or peristomial segment (Figure 1a–d, 2a,b) with parapodia shifted dorsally, directed anteriorly and enclosing prostomium; notopodial and neuropodial lobes indistinct, with short and long, slender, smooth capillary setae; notosetae relatively few (about 8); neurosetae numerous, forming fan-shaped spreading bundles; notopodial and neuropodial postsetal lobes elongate, subulate, wider basally.

Second segment (Figures 1 a–d, 2c–e) with parapodia shifted ventrally, lateral to mouth; notosetae lacking; neuropodial setal lobe low, wide, with fan-shaped bundle of numerous, slender, capillary neurosetae of 2 kinds—row of smooth shorter ones and row of longer, curved, bispinous ones with dotted stems (Figure 2e); postsetal lobes subconical, notopodial somewhat larger than neuropodial.

Third segment (Figures 1a,b, 2f–h) with parapodia lateral; notopodial lobe low, with fan-shaped bundle of smooth capillary notosetae, short anterior row and longer posterior row, with subconical postsetal lobe; neuropodial lobe wide, low, with fan-shaped bundle of 6 stout, curved, smooth acicular neurosetae, alternating with 5 short, slender, dotted capillary neurosetae (Figure 2h); replacement acicular neurosetae in process of formation visible in upper part of bundle (Figure 2g); postsetal neuropodial lobe low, bilobed, rounded.

Fourth segment (Figures 1a,b, 2i,j) with parapodia lateral, with similar notopodial and neuropodial lobes; setal lobes low, rounded, with smooth capillary setae, anterior row of short ones and posterior row of longer ones (Figure 2j); postsetal lobes subrectangular, with outer margins slightly undulate.

Following 9 (holotype) to 11 thoracic segments (segments 5 to 13 or 15) similar, with lateral biramous parapodia (Figures 1a,b, 3a–f). Notopodial setal lobes low, rounded, with smooth, limbate capillary notosetae, anterior row of shorter ones and posterior row of longer ones. Notopodial postsetal lobes wide, subcorneal more anteriorly, to small, digitiform (on segment 15; Figure 3f). Neuropodial setal lobes short, subcylindrical, with compact bundles of neurosetae, of 2 kinds: shorter, stout, acicular, smooth or dotted, with blunt tips, found in central part of bundle; and longer, limbate capillaries, sometimes frayed and appearing hairy or spinous (Figure 3b). Neuropodial postsetal lobes short, subrectangular, extending only slightly beyond setal lobes.

FIGURE 3.—Trochochaeia carica (USNM 51934): a, right parapodium 5, anterior view; b, four neurosetae from same, with detail of tips; c, right parapodium 7, anterior view; d, right parapodium 8, posterior view; e, right parapodium 12, anterior view; f, right parapodium 15, anterior view; g, transitional right parapodium 16, anterior view; h, transitional right parapodium 17, anterior view.

Segments 14 and 15 (holotype) or 15 and 16 transitional, with notopodia absent, except for small papillae; neuropodia smaller than preceding ones, with fewer neurosetae and subconical postsetal lobes (Figure 3g, h).

Abdominal region, beginning about segment 18, long, flattened, thin-walled. Notopodia and notosetae absent on anterior abdominal segments. Neuropodial lobes small, rounded, with few (2–3), slender, nonlimbate, capillary neurosetae and few (1–3), stouter acicular neurosetae, with or without terminal sheath projecting as fine thread (Figure 1g); some acicular neurosetae mostly buried, with only terminal sheaths projecting; postsetal neuropodial lobes digitiform, continuing posteriorly as delicate, flattened, longitudinal flanges (Figure 1e). Beginning about segment 26, notopodia with 2–5, stout pointed spines, arranged in arc, projecting from slightly raised mounds on dorsum and directed posteriorly (Figure 1e,f); notopodial spines sometimes withdrawn, except for tips, but visible through transparent body wall. Small papillae (or branchiae), one pair per segment, present on each side of midventral line in posterior abdominal region. Posterior end cylindrical, with terminal anus encircled by filiform anal cirri (4–8; Figure 1h). Tubes cylindrical, rather thick-walled, soft, compact, muddy.

BIOLOGY.—According to the information given by M. L. H. Thomas and Patricia Steer, the specimens of T. carica in the Saint John River Estuary have their maximum density in 23 meters, with temperature of 9°C and salinity of approximately 18‰. They are the dominant form and number several thousand per square meter in some low salinity locations.

REMARKS.—Trochochaeta carica was described by Birula and Fauvel from anterior fragments only. The posterior abdominal region and pygidium are described herein for the first time. Trochochaeta carica agrees with T. multisetosa in having stout notopodial spines and ventral papillae or branchiae in the abdominal region; however, the notopodial spines are arranged in an arc in the former, rather than emerging, as in the latter, from a central place and appearing stellate. The ventral papillae appear to be fewer in number in T. carica than in T. multisetosa—a single pair per segment, instead of up to three or four pairs.

Fauvel (1916, 1932a,b) treated Nevaya whiteavesi McIntosh, 1911, from the Gulf of St. Lawrence, as a synonym of Disoma carica, and was followed by Uschakov (1955) and Hartman (1959). Based on the original description, however, McIntosh’s species was referred to Trochochaeta multisetosa (Oersted) by Pettibone (1963b:310). A recent examination of the type (consisting of an anterior fragment in poor condition) of Nevaya whiteavesi (BMNH 1921: 5: 1: 4567) revealed that the thoracic postsetal lobes are serrated, as in T. multisetosa, and not entire, as in T. carica.

DISTRIBUTION.—Bering Sea, Kara Sea, New Brunswick to New England, in 12 to 1558 m.

Trochochaeta watsoni (Fauvel)

FIGURES 4, 5

Disoma watsoni Fauvel, 1916:1, fig. 1a–i; 1932b:28, pl. 1: figs. 8–11.—Belloc, 1953:6.—Hartman, 1965:159, pl. 32: figs, c–f.—Hartman and Fauchald, 1971:107.

Trochochaeta watsoni.—Pettibone, 1963b:315, fig. 83h–k.

MATERIAL EXAMINED.—New England: 41°13′N, 66°W, 1657 m, blue mud, Albatross sta. 2076, 4 September 1883, 2 anterior fragments (USNM 28953). 40°16′N, 67°05′W, 2359 m, Albatross sta. 2084, 5 September 1883, 12 anterior fragments (USNM 51929).

DESCRIPTION.—Length of incomplete specimen of 25 segments (USNM 51929) 5 mm, width 2 mm, including setae. Prostomium (Figure 4a,b) elongate, fusiform, wide and rounded or slightly bilobed anteriorly, with longitudinal crest and small conical median antenna on posterior part (keeled, according to Fauvel), with nuchal crest extending posteriorly on first segment; without eyes. Tentacular palps missing but oval bases visible between prostomium and parapodia of first segment.

Biramous parapodia of anterior four segments of thoracic region considerably modified, differing from one another (Figure 4a–k). Parapodia of first segment shifted dorsally and directed anteriorly, partly enclosing prostomium; notopodial and neuropodial lobes with short and longer, slender, smooth, capillary setae forming spreading bundles, notosetae fewer and shorter than neurosetae; notopodial postsetal lobes elongate, lanceolate (Figure 4a–d). Parapodia of second segment shifted ventrally, lateral to mouth; notosetae slender, capillary, smooth, forming spreading bundles (Figure 4f); neurosetae stouter than notosetae, forming fan-shaped bundles, anterior row of stouter and posterior row of slightly more slender ones, both types slightly limbate, dotted and ending in curved fine tips (Figure 4g; stouter ones referred to as subacicular by Fauvel); notopodial and neuropodial postsetal lobes subcorneal, latter shorter than former (Figure 4a,b,e). Third segment with notopodia similar to those of second segment; neuropodial setal lobes low, wide, with fan-shaped bundles of neurosetae, anterior row of 4–6 stout acicular spines with blunt tips and posterior row of slender, curved neurosetae with fine tips (Figure 4i); postsetal lobes subglobular, shorter than notopodial (Figure 4a,b,h). Fourth segment with similar low, rounded notopodial and neuropodial lobes; notosetae slender, smooth capillary, forming spreading bundles; postsetal notopodial lobes thick, fleshy, and subconical; neurosetae shorter and slightly stouter than notosetae, slightly limbate, tapering rather abruptly to capillary tips (Figure 4k); postsetal neuropodial lobes thick, fleshy, and subrectangular (Figure 4a,b,j).

FIGURE 4.—Trochochaeta watsoni (USNM 51929): a, dorsal view of anterior end, tentacular palps missing; b, same, ventral view, pharynx partially extended; c, left first parapodium, anterior view; d, two neurosetac from same; e, left parapodium 2, anterior view; f, two notosetae from same; g, two neurosetac from same; h, left parapodium 3, anterior view; replacement neuroseta dotted; i, three neurosetac from same; j, left parapodium 4, anterior view; k, two neurosetac from same.

FIGURE 5.—Trochochaeta watsoni (USNM 51929): a, left parapodium 5, anterior view; b, left parapodium 6, posterior view; c, seven neurosetae from same; d, left parapodium 8, anterior view; e, left parapodium 9, posterior view; f, left parapodium 10, anterior view; g, neuroseta from same; h, left parapodium 11, anterior view; i, two left parapodia from anterior abdominal region (segments 12–15), anterior view; j, two left parapodia from anterior abdominal region (segments 24, 25), anterior and posterior views; k, two neurosetae from same.

Following 7 thoracic segments (segments 5–11) similar, with lateral biramous parapodia (Figures 4a,b, 5a–h). Notopodial setal lobes low, rounded, with slender, slightly limbate, delicately frayed, capillary notosetae; postsetal lobes thick, fleshy, subconical, becoming more slender on segments 8–10 and lacking on segment 11, associated with smaller bundles of notosetae (Figure 5h). Neuropodial setal lobes low, rounded, with neurosetae of 2 kinds: central group of stout, curved, broadly limbate, more or less frayed, with erect fine tips; upper, posterior and lower ones longer, slender, slightly limbate, delicately frayed, capillary (Figure 5c); postsetal lobes thick, fleshy, and subconical to oval.

Abdominal region (Figure 5i–k) beginning on segment 12, with notopodia lacking; neurosetae of 2 kinds: slightly stouter, tapering rather abruptly to capillary tips, and more slender, slightly limbate, frayed, capillary (Figure 5k); postsetal lobes subconical, continuing posteriorly as delicate, slightly undulate flanges. Posterior abdominal region missing.

REMARKS.—The specimens from the southwest coast of India, identified by Achari (1969) as T. watsoni, appear to differ from the North Atlantic specimens: on segment 2, notosetae were lacking and stout acicular neurosetae were present; the prostomium lacked a median antenna and 4 small eyes were present. They appear to resemble more closely T. orissae (Fauvel), described from the east coast of India.

DISTRIBUTION.—North Atlantic, off Nova Scotia to off New England, in 530 to 3753 m.

Trochochaeta diverapoda (Hoagland)

FIGURES 6, 7

Aonides diverapoda Hoagland, 1920:620, pl. 51: figs. 9–12.

Trochochaeta diverapoda.—Pettibone, 1963a:91.

MATERIAL EXAMINED.—Philippine Islands: Taratara Island, off western Samar, 37 m, green mud, Albatross sta. D5209, 14 April 1908, 2 symypes (USNM 18961).

As indicated by Pettibone (1963a:91) when the types of Aonides diverapoda (USNM 18961) were examined, the two syntypes were found to be in poor condition but nevertheless clearly referable to the genus Trochochaeta. A note in the vial reads: “These annelids were not in this dried condition when the description was made,” indicating that they were allowed to dry sometime before being deposited in the collections of the USNM. The prostomium and abdominal region are in particularly poor condition; fortunately, the former was figured by Hoagland. The parapodia of the thoracic region are in fair condition and are figured and described below. Hoagland confused the second segment with the first.

DESCRIPTION.—Width up to 3 mm, according to Hoagland. Prostomium (Hoagland, 1920, pl. 51: fig. 9) oval, truncate anteriorly, with filiform medial antenna and nuchal ridge extending posteriorly as sinuous filament to anterior border of segment 4; without eyes. Tentacular palps long and slender.

Biramous parapodia of anterior four segments of thoracic region considerably modified, differing from one another (Figure 6a–k). Parapodia of first segment shifted dorsally and directed anteriorly, partly enclosing prostomium; notopodial and neuropodial lobes with shorter and longer, slender, smooth and hairy, capillary setae; notosetae fewer and shorter than neurosetae; notopodial and neuropodial postsetal lobes elongate, lanceolate (Figure 6a,b). Parapodia of segment 2 shifted ventrally, lateral to mouth (overlooked as distinct segment by Hoagland); notosetae lacking; neuropodial setal lobes low, wide, with fan-shaped bundles of neurosetae, anterior row of 13 stout, acicular, with blunt tips and posterior one of 10 slightly more slender, tapering distally to fine tips; notopodial and neuropodial postsetal lobes subconical (Figure 6c,d). Parapodia of segment 3 (segment 2, according to Hoagland) with shorter and longer, slender, smooth and hairy, capillary notosetae, with elongate, subulate postsetal notopodial lobes; neuropodial setal lobes wide, rounded, with fan-shaped bundles of neurosetae, anterior row of 9 stout, dark reddish, acicular spines and posterior one of 7 more slender neurosetae, stouter basally, curved dorsally, limbate and hairy, tapering distally to fine tips; neuropodial postsetal lobes wide, low, rounded (Figure 6e–h). Parapodia of segment 4 (segment 3, according to Hoagland) with similar low, wide, rounded notopodial and neuropodial setal lobes, with wide bundles of numerous, slender, hairy, capillary notosetae and neurosetae, latter shorter and stouter than former, with longer hairs; postsetal lobes wide, subrectangular (Figure 6i–k).

FIGURE 6.—Trochochaeta diverapoda (syntype of Aonides diverapoda, USNM 18961): a, right first parapodium, anterior view; b, two neurosetae from same, with detail of small portion; c, left parapodium 2, anterior view; d, three neurosetae from same; e, left parapodium 3, anterior view; f, same, posterior view; g, notoseta from same; h, three neurosetae from same, with detail of small portion; i, left parapodium 4, anterior view; j, notoseta from same; k, neuroseta from same.

FIGURE 7.—Trochochaeta diverapoda (syntype of Aonides diverapoda, USNM 18961): a, left parapodium 5, posterior view; b, notoseta from same; c, longer neuroseta from outer row of same; d, two shorter neurosetae from inner row of same; e, left parapodium 6, anterior view; f, left parapodium 7, posterior view; g, left parapodium 9, anterior view; h, neuroseta from same; i, left parapodium 10, posterior view; j, left anterior abdominal parapodium (segment 11), anterior view; k, two right parapodia from posterior abdominal region, dorsal view; l, notosetae from same; m, two neurosetae from same.

Following 6 thoracic segments (segments 5–10) similar, with lateral biramous parapodia (Figure 7a–i). Notopodial setal lobes short, cylindrical, with cylindrical bundles of numerous, slender, limbate and hairy, capillary notosetae (Figure 7b; small bundles on segments 9 and 10); notopodial postsetal lobes wide, subrectangular on segment 5 (Figure 7a), narrower, subrectangular on segment 6 (Figure 7e), narrower and subconical on following thoracic segments (Figure 7f,g,i). Neuropodial setal lobes low, wide, with fan-shaped bundles of stout neurosetae, several rows thick. Neurosetae stout, wider basally, with hairy distal tips, those of inner rows slightly stouter, and more strongly curved (Figure 7d) than those of outer rows (Figure 7c); heavy curved type lacking on segments 9 and 10 (Figure 7h). Neuropodial postsetal lobes low, subrectangular.

Segments 11 and 12 transitional (Figure 7j), with notopodia lacking; neurosetae slender, limbate, hairy. Anterior abdominal segments lacking notopodia; more posteriorly, segments provided with few (3 or more?), dark, pointed, acicular notosetae (Figure 7k,l). Neuropodia with about 5 stout, acicular neurosetae with whiplike hairy appendages (Figure 7m) and about 8 slender, limbate, hairy, capillary ones. Neuropodial postsetal lobes digitiform to subconical, with delicate flanges extending posteriorly (Figure 7k).

DISTRIBUTION.—Philippine Islands, in 37 m.

Trochochaeta orissae (Fauvel)

Disoma orissae Fauvel, 1932c:174, fig. 29a–m; 1953:327, fig. 172a–m.—Hartman, 1947:162; 1959:174.—Dampdaram, 1973:36, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55.

Trochochaeta orissae.—Achari, 1969:99.

?Trochochaeta watsoni.—Achari, 1969:100, fig. 1,A–L [not Fauvel, 1916].

REMARKS.—No specimens of this species were available for study. Disoma orissae was described by Fauvel (1932c) from a single anterior fragment from off Puri, Orissa, on the east coast of India, in 8 meters. The description is lacking in some significant details and needs to be supplemented by examination of additional material from the Indian Ocean, as well as the holotype, if available.

Dampdaram (1973) reported D. orissae as abundant on the Kerala coast on southwest India, in 4 to 21 meters, but without description.

Achari (1969) described two specimens from north of Ernakulam, along the southwest coast of India, in 27 to 44 meters, and referred them to the North Atlantic Trochochaeta watsoni (Fauvel). Except for the absence of a median antenna on the prostomium, the description and figures appear to agree more closely with T. orissae, than with T. watsoni.

The specimens from West Africa, recorded by Kirkegaard (1959:26) as Disoma orissae, were examined and are referred herein to a new species, Trochochaeta kirkegaardi.

DISTRIBUTION.—East and southwest coasts of India, in 4 to 55 m.

Trochochaeta kirkegaardi, new species

FIGURES 8–10

Disoma orissae.—Kirkegaard, 1959:26 [not Fauvel, 1932].

MATERIAL EXAMINED.—West Africa, Atlantide Expedition (as Disoma orissae by Kirkegaard, 1959): off Liberia, 06°03′N, 10°25′W, 44 m, sta. 55, 8 January 1946, paratype (UZMC); off Gold Coast, 05°37′N, 0°35′E, 150–175 m, sta. 84, 30 January 1946, holotype (UZMC); off Nigeria, 04°01′N, 07°56′E, 66 m, sta. 116, 23 February 1946, paratype (UZMC).

DESCRIPTION.—Body long, slender, divided into short, flattened, wider thoracic region and long, cylindrical, more slender abdominal region (Figures 8a–d). Length of incomplete holotype of 60 segments (anterior and two middle fragments) 24 mm, greatest width in thoracic region 2 mm, including setae. Length of incomplete paratype (sta. 55, off Liberia) of 43 segments 15 mm, width 1 mm. Length of incomplete paratype (sta. 116, off Nigeria) of 25 segments 12 mm, width 3 mm.

Prostomium (Figure 8a) small, fusiform, narrowing and truncate anteriorly, with nuchal crest beginning anteriorly as small subtriangular median antenna and continuing posteriorly on segment 3; without eyes. Pair of tentacular palps wedged between prostomium and parapodia of first segment; palps ribbon-like, long (about 16 mm in length on holotype, free in vial; missing on paratypes).

Anterior four segments of thoracic region with modified biramous parapodia, differing from one another (Figures 8a,b, 9a–m).

FIGURE 8.—Trochochaeta kirkegaardi, new species (holotype, UZMC): a, dorsal view of anterior end, tentacular palps not shown, shaded parts on segment 6 indicating reddish glandular areas; b, ventral view of right side of segments 10–17, shaded parts indicating reddish-brown glandular areas; c, dorsal view of segments 22–24 (anterior abdominal), shaded parts indicating brownish gladular areas; d, ventral view of three segments in abdominal region, showing ventral papillae.

First or peristomial segment (Figures 8a, 9a,b) with parapodia shifted dorsally, directed anteriorly and enclosing prostomium; notopodial and neuropodial lobes indistinct, with short and longer, slender, smooth capillary setae (Figure 9b); notosetae relatively few (about 10); neurosetae numerous, forming fan-shaped spreading bundles; notopodial and neuropodial postsetal lobes elongate, subulate, wider basally.

Second segment (Figures 8a, 9c–e) with parapodia shifted ventrally, lateral to mouth; notosetae lacking but with subconical notopodial lobe; neuropodial setal lobe low, wide, with fan-shaped group of acicular neurosetae (about 8), alternating with equal number of more slender capillary neurosetae, both types curving dorsally (Figure 9e); postsetal neuropodial lobe oval, much smaller than notopodial.

Third segment (Figures 8a, 9f–j) with parapodia lateral; notopodial lobe low, with fan-shaped bundle of smooth capillary notosetae (Figure 9h), shorter anterior row and longer posterior row, and with suboval postsetal lobe; neuropodial lobe wide, low, with fan-shaped bundle of stout, reddish amber-colored acicular neurosetae (about 5), alternating with equal number of slender, curved capillary neurosetae, both types curving dorsally (Figure 9i); postsetal neuropodial lobe suboval, similar to notopodial. Right third parapodium of holotype (Figure 9j) differing from that on left side (Figure 9f,g), with more numerous neurosetae (9 acicular, light amber-colored, and 9 capillary, resembling those of segment 2) and smaller bundle of notosetae. Parapodia of third segment on two paratypes symmetrical and not asymmetrical, as on holotype.

FIGURE 9.—Trochochaeta kirkegaardi, new species (holotype, UZMC): a, left first parapodium, anterior view; b, two neurosetae from same; c, left parapodium 2, posterior view; d, same, anterior view; e, two neurosetae from same; f, left parapodium 3, anterior view; replacement neuroseta dotted; g, same, posterior view; h, two notosetae from same; i, two neurosetae from same; j, right parapodium 3, anterior view; k, left parapodium 4, anterior view; l, two notosetae from same; m, two neurosetae from same.

FIGURE 10.—Trochochaeta kirkegaardi, new species (holotype, UZMC): a, left parapodium 5, anterior view; b, three neurosetae from same; c, left parapodium 6, anterior view; d, two neurosetae from same; e, left parapodium 8, posterior view; f, left parapodium 10, anterior view; g, left parapodium 11, anterior view; h, two neurosetae from same; i, left parapodium 15, anterior view; j, dorsal view of left side of three abdominal segments; k, four neurosetae from same.

Fourth segment (Figure 8a, 9k–m) with parapodia lateral, with similar notopodial and neuropodial lobes; setal lobes low, wide, with capillary setae, anterior row of shorter ones and posterior row of longer ones; setae limbate and somewhat frayed (Figure 9l,m); postsetal lobes wide, subrectangular.

Following 11 thoracic segments (segments 5 to 15) with prominent lateral parapodia, with reddish-brown glandular areas ventral to neuropodia (Figures 8a,b, 10a–i). Parapodia of segments 5 to 10 similar, with lateral biramous parapodia (Figures 8a, 10a–f). Notopodial setal lobes low, wide, with limbate, frayed capillary notosetae—anterior row of shorter ones and posterior row of longer ones. Notopodial postsetal lobes wide, subrectangular. Neuropodial setal lobes short, wide, subcylindrical, with compact bundles of neurosetae of two slightly different types—shorter, slightly stouter, reddish amber-colored, frayed or spinous, tapered rather abruptly to short slender tips and longer, frayed, tapered gradually to capillary tips (Figure 10b,d). Neuropodial postsetal lobes wide, subrectangular, subequal to notopodial (segment 5, Figure 10a) or larger than notopodial (segments 6–10, Figure 10c,e,f). Parapodia of segments 11 to 15 with notopodia represented only by small subconical lobes, lacking notosetae (Figure 10g,i); neurosetae similar to those of preceding thoracic segments but becoming fewer in number, especially stouter, shorter type (Figure 10h); neuropodial postsetal lobes smaller than those of preceding segments (Figures 8b, 10g,i).

Abdominal region beginning on segment 16 (Figure 8b), long, narrower than thoracic region, thin-walled, with paired round to oval structures visible dorsally (Figure 8c) and paired delicate papillae ventrally (Figure 8d). Parapodia inconspicuous, lacking notopodial lobes and notosetae (Figure 10j). Neuropodial lobes small, rounded, with few (2–3), slender, non-limbate capillary neurosetae and few (3–4), stouter, acicular neurosetae with subterminally attached aristae (Figure 10k). Postsetal neuropodial lobes digitiform, continuing posteriorly as delicate, flat, longitudinal flanges (Figure 10j). Posterior abdominal region and pygidium unknown.

REMARKS.—Trochochaeta kirkegaardi agrees with T. orissae (Fauvel) and T. diverapoda (Hoagland) in having the postsetal thoracic lobes entire instead of serrated or fimbriated, in possessing stout acicular neurosetae on segments 2 and 3, and in lacking notosetae on segment 2. The three species may be separated as indicated in the key.

DISTRIBUTION.—West Africa, in 44 to 175 m.

Literature Cited

Achari, G. P. K.

1969. Studies on New or Little Known Polychaetes from Indian Seas, 1: Trochochaeta watsoni (Fauvel) and Poecilochaetus serpens Allen, journal of the Marine Biological Association of India, 10(1):99–106, 2 figures.

Banse, K., and K. D. Hobson.

1968. Benthic Polychaetes from Puget Sound, Washington, with Remarks on Four Other Species. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 125(3667):l–53, 8 figures.

Belloc, G.

1953. Catalogue des Types de polychètes du Musée Océanographique de Monaco. Bulletin de l’Institut Océanographique, 1027:1–12.

Birula, A.

1897. [Researches on Biology and Zoogeography, Chiefly in Russian Seas. Collected by Dr. A. L. Botkine in 1895 in the Gulfs of Yenesei and Obi.] Annuaire du Musée Zoologique de l’Academie Impériale des Sciences de St. Pétersbourg, 2 (1896):78–116, plates 9, 10. [In Russian.]

Chamberlin, R. V.

1919. The Annelida Polychaeta. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, 48: 514 pages, 80 plates.

Dampdaram, R.

1973. Studies on the Benthos of the Mud Banks of the Kerala Coast. Bulletin of the Department of Marine Sciences University of Cochin, 6:1–126, 16 figures.

Fauvel, P.

1916. Deux Polychètes nouvelles (Disoma watsoni n. sp. et Hyalinoecia Brementi n. sp.). Bulletin de l’Institut Oceanographique, 316:1–10, 3 figures.

1932a. Note préliminaire sur les Polychètes provenant des Campagnes de l’Hirondelle II. Bulletin de l’Institut Océanographique, 594:1–8, 3 figures.

1932b. Annélides Polychètes provenant des campagnes de l’Hirondelle II (1911–1915). Part 85 in Résultats des Campagnes Scientifiques Monaco, 50 pages, 1 plate. Monaco.

1932c. Annelida Polychaeta of the Indian Museum, Calcutta. Memoirs of the Indian Museum, Calcutta, 12(1): 262 pages, 9 plates, 40 text-figures.

1953. Annelida Polychaeta. In The Fauna of India Including Pakistan, Ceylon, Burma and Malaya. 507 pages, 250 figures. Allahabad: The Indian Press.

Hannerz, L.

1956. Larval Development of the Polychaete Families Spionidae Sars, Disomidae Mesnil, and Poecilo-chaetidae n. fam. in the Gullmar Fjord (Sweden). Zoologiska Bidrag från Uppsala, 31:1–204, 57 figures.

Hartman, O.

1947. Disoma franciscanum, a New Marine Annelid from California. Journal of the Washington Academy of Science, 37(5):160–169, 3 figures.

1959. Catalogue of the Polychaetous Annelids of the World, Part II. Allan Hancock Foundation Publications Occasional Paper, 23:355–628.

1965. Deep-Water Benthic Polychaetous Annelids off New England to Bermuda and Other North Atlantic Areas. Allan Hancock Foundation Publications Occasional Paper, 28: 378 pages, 52 plates.

1969. Atlas of the Sedentariate Polychaetous Annelids from California. 812 pages, 343 figures. Los Angeles: Allan Hancock Foundation, University of Southern California Press.

Hartman, O., and K. Fauchald.

1971. Deep-Water Benthic Polychaetous Annelids off New England to Bermuda and Other North Atlantic Areas, Part II. Allan Hancock Monographs in Marine Biology, 6: 327 pages, 34 plates.

Hartmann-Schröder, G.

1971. Annelida, Borstenwürmer, Polychaeta. In Die Tierwelt Deutschlands und der Angrezenden Meeresteile. 594 pages, 191 figures. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag. Hoagland, R. A.

1920. Polychaetous Annelids Collected by the United States Fisheries Steamer “Albatross” during the Philippine Expedition of 1907–1909. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 100(9):603–635, plates 46–52.

Kirkegaard, J. B.

1959. The Polychaeta of West Africa, Part I: Sedentary Species. In Scientific Results of the Danish Expedition to the Coasts of Tropical West Africa 1945–1946. Atlantide Report, 5:7–117, 25 figures.

Levinsen, G. M. R.

1883. Systematisk-geografisk Oversigt over de nordiske Annulata, Gephyrea, Chaetognathi og Balanoglossi, Part II. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra den Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening i Kjøbenhavn, 1883:92–350, plates 2, 3.

McIntosh, W. C.

1911. Notes from the Gatty Marine Laboratory, St. Andrews, 2: On Nevaya whiteavesi, a Form with Certain Relationships to Sclerocheilus Grube, from Canada. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, (8)7:149–151, plate 5.

Mesnil, F.

1897. Études de morphologie externe chez les Annélides; Remarques complémentaires sur les Spionidiens; La famille nouvelle des Disomidiens; La place des Aonides (sensu Tauber, Levinsen). Bulletin Scientifique de la France et de la Belgique, 30:83–100, plate 3.

Michaelsen, W.

1897. Die Polychaetenfauna der Deutschen Meer, Einschliesslich der Benachbarten und Verbindenden Gebiete. Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen (Kiel and Leipzig), new series, 2:(1): 216 pages, plate I.

Neave, S. A.

1939. Nomenclator Zoologicus. Volume 2, 1025 pages. London: Zoological Society.

Oersted, A. S.

1843. Maxicolae. Part 1 of Annulatorum Danicorum Conspectus. 52 pages, 7 plates. Copenhagen.

1844. Zur Classification der Annulaten, mit Beschreibung einiger neuer oder unzulänglich bekannter Gattungen und Arten. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 10(1):99–112, plates 2, 3.

Pettibone, M. H.

1963a. Revision of Some Genera of Polychaete Worms of the Family Spionidae, Including the Description of a New Species of Scolelepis. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 76:89–104, 2 figures.

1963b. Marine Polychaete Worms of the New England Region, Part I: Aphroditidae through Trochochaetidae. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 227:1–356, 83 figures.

Thulin, G.

1921. Biologisch-faunistische Untersuchungen aus dem öresund. Über Cossura longocirrata Webster und Benedict und über die Röhren von Disoma multisetosum. Acta Universitatis Lundensis, new series, 17(10):1–14, 17 figures.

Uschakov, P. V.

1955. [Polychaeta of the Far Eastern Seas of the U.S.S.R.] Akademia Nauk SSSR, Opredeliteli po Faune SSSR, 56: 445 pages, 164 figures. [In Russian; translated in 1965 by Jerusalem Israel Program for Scientific Translations, for the National Science Foundation. 419 pages, 164 figures.]

Webster, H. E., and J. Benedict.

1884. The Annelida Chaetopoda from Provincetown and Wellfleet, Massachusetts. Annual Report of the Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries for 1881, pages 699–747, plates 1–8.

Publication in Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology

Manuscripts for serial publications are accepted by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to substantive review, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums. Non-Smithsonian authors should address inquiries to the appropriate department. If submission is invited, the following format requirements of the Press will govern the preparation of copy.

Copy must be typewritten, double-spaced, on one side of standard white bond paper, with 1½? top and left margins, submitted in ribbon copy with a carbon or duplicate, and accompanied by the original artwork. Duplicate copies of all material, including illustrations, should be retained by the author. There may be several paragraphs to a page, but each page should begin with a new paragraph. Number consecutively all pages, including title page, abstract, text, literature cited, legends, and tables. The minimum length is 30 pages, including typescript and illustrations.

The title should be complete and clear for easy indexing by abstracting services. Taxonomic titles will carry a final line indicating the higher categories to which the taxon is referable: “(Hymenoptera: Sphecidae).” Include an abstract as an introductory part of the text. Identify the author on the first page of text with an unnumbered footnote that includes his professional mailing address. A table of contents is optional. An index, if required, may be supplied by the author when he returns page proof.

Two headings are used: (1) text heads (boldface in print) for major sections and chapters and (2) paragraph sideheads (caps and small caps in print) for subdivisions. Further headings may be worked out with the editor.

In taxonomic keys, number only the first item of each couplet; if there is only one couplet, omit the number. For easy reference, number also the taxa and their corresponding headings throughout the text; do not incorporate page references in the key.

In synonymy, use the short form (taxon, author, date:page) with a full reference at the end of the paper under “Literature Cited.” Begin each taxon at the left margin with subsequent lines indented about three spaces. Within an entry, use a period-dash (.—) to separate each reference. Enclose with square brackets any annotation in, or at the end of, the entry. For references within the text, use the author-date system: “(Jones, 1910)” and “Jones (1910).” If the reference is expanded, abbreviate the data: “Jones (1910:122, pl. 20: fig. 1).”

Simple tabulations in the text (e.g., columns of data) may carry headings or not, but they should not contain rules. Formal tables must be submitted as pages separate from the text, and each table, no matter how large, should be pasted up as a single sheet of copy.

Use the metric system instead of, or in addition to, the English system.

Illustrations (line drawings, maps, photographs, shaded drawings) can be intermixed throughout the printed text. They will be termed Figures and should be numbered consecutively; however, if a group of figures is treated as a single figure, the components should be indicated by lowercase italic letters on the illustration, in the legend, and in text references: “Figure 9b.” If illustrations (usually tone photographs) are printed separately from the text as full pages on a different stock of paper, they will be termed Plates, and individual components should be lettered (Plate 9b) but may be numbered (Plate 9: figure 2). Never combine the numbering system of text illustrations with that of plate illustrations. Submit all legends on pages separate from the text and not attached to the artwork. An instruction booklet for the preparation of illustrations is available from the Press on request.

In the bibliography (usually called “Literature Cited”), spell out book, journal, and article titles, using initial caps with all words except minor terms such as “and, of, the.” For capitalization of titles in foreign languages, follow the national practice of each language. Underscore (for italics) book and journal titles. Use the colon-parentheses system for volume, number, and page citations: “10(2):5–9.” Spell out such words as “figures,” “plates,” “pages.”

For free copies of his own paper, a Smithsonian author should indicate his requirements on “Form 36” (submitted to the Press with the manuscript). A non-Smithsonian author will receive 50 free copies; order forms for quantities above this amount with instructions for payment will be supplied when page proof is forwarded.