SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION

Emphasis upon publication as a means of “diffusing knowledge” was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: “It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge.” This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series:

Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology

Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics

Smithsonian Contributions to Botany

Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences

Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences

Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology

Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology

Smithsonian Folklife Studies

Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space

Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology

In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world of science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world.

Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review. Press requirements for manuscript and art preparation are outlined on the inside back cover.

Robert McC. Adams

Secretary

Smithsonian Institution

SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 416

Pyralidae and Microlepidoptera of the Marquesas Archipelago

J.F. Gates Clarke

SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS

City of Washington

1986

ABSTRACT

Clarke, J.F. Gates. Pyralidae and Microlepidoptera of the Marquesas Archipelago. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, number 416, 485 pages, 319 figures, 1 table, 1986.—In this publication 82 genera and 260 species and subspecies are treated. The following genera, species and subspecies are described as new (each new genus is noted with its type species): Neoxychirota (type-species: N. isolata); Stangeia distantia; Ernopthora iospila, lechriogramma, aphanoptera, palassoptera; Zamagiria exedra; Cateremna decipula; Delcina (type-species: D. diaspora); Psara orphnopeza; Tessema (type-species: T. sensilis); Bradina fidelia, stricta, emphasis, eremica; Cangetta eschatia; Idioblasta transversata, stenogramma, amydrosoma, acrogramma, linearis; Eudonia clavula, achlya, ara, aplysia, dupla, munroei; Dichelopa amorpha, flexura, hadrotes, chionogramma; platyxantha, dorsata, phalaranthes aporrhegma, ochroma, gnoma, paragnoma, meligma, zona, canitia, argema; Duessa marquesana; Cydia peudomalesana; Orneodes pterochroma, xanthozona; Autosticha leucoptera; Chelophoba melaina; Pitycona attenuata; Ephesteris longicornis; Asymphorodes macrogramma, didyma, plemmelia, trigrapha, diamphidius, aporia, hypostema, brevimacula, hemileucus, cuneatus, seminiger, albicoma, semiluteus, nigricornis, cicatricula, amblysoma, chalcoptera, lenticula, chrysophanes, mesoxanthus, adynatus, melanosoma, chalcocoma, homosoma, bipunctatus, remigiata, emphereia, regina, poliopterus, canicoma, lucidus, diffidentia, culminis, fractura, lucerna, phalarogramma, leucoloma, paraporia, chalcosoma, aenigma, montomeryi, nuciferae, favilla, trichogramma, sericeus, acritopterus, spodogramma, honoria, phaeodelta, leptotes, mediostriatus, nebrias, ochrogramma; Herlinda (type-species: H. phaeoxantha), fasciola, iota, oligoria; Adeana (type-species: Labdia leucoxantha Meyrick); Iressa microsema; Melnea (type-species: Ascalenia armigera Meyrick); Cosmopterix nonna, diandra; Acanthophlebia (type-species: A. argentea); Imma philomena, gloriana, feaniensis, rotia, assita, impariseta, heppneri; Choreutis chelaspis euthenia; Prays ignota; Eftichia (type-species: E. chrysoleuca); Terthroptera astochia; Epicephala spinula; Caloptilia insidia; Decadarchis celestra, incongrua, aspera, tritogramma; Wyoma (type-species: W. dysgnoia); Comodica signata; Opogona discordia. Many new combinations are made. Male and female genitalia are figured where possible and wings of all species are illustrated.

OFFICIAL PUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution's annual report, Smithsonian Year. SERIES COVER DESIGN: The coral Montastrea cavernosa (Linnaeus).

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data

Clarke, J.F. Gates (John Frederick Gates), 1905–

Pyralidae and Microlepidoptera of the Marquesas Archipelago

(Smithsonian contributions to zoology ; no. 416)

Bibliography: p.

Includes index.

Supt. of Docs. no.: SI 1.27:416

1. Moths—Marquesas Islands—Classification. 2. Pyralidae—Classification. 3. Insects—Classification. 4. Insects—Marquesas Islands—Classification. I. Title. II. Series.

QL1.S54 no. 416 [QL559.M37] 591 s 85-600124 [595.78′1]

Contents

Introduction

The Islands

The Fauna

Endemism

Disposition of Specimens

Acknowledgments

Family Oxychirotidae

Family Pterophoridae

Family Pyralidae

Family Tortricidae

Family Olethreutidae

Family Orneodidae

Family Gelechiidae

Family Cosmopterigidae

Family Blastobasidae

Family Heliodinidae

Family Immidae

Family Choreutidae

Family Yponomeutidae

Family Gracillariidae

Family Tineidae

Literature Cited

Figures 274–319

Index to Animal Names

Host Index

Requirements for Smithsonian Series Publication

Pyralidae and Microlepidoptera of the Marquesas Archipelago

J.F. Gates Clarke

____________

J.F. Gates Clarke, Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560.

Introduction

As far as I have been able to ascertain, the earliest descriptions of Pyralidae from the Marquesas Islands were those of Idioblasta lacteata Warren and I. straminata Warren (1891:62) followed by Bradina perlucidalis Hampson (1897:201). It was not until 1929 and 1934 that more pyralids and some of the true microlepidoptera were recorded from the Marquesas Islands by Meyrick. During the Pacific Entomological Survey, conducted by the Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, 1929–1932, Mr. G. Le Bronnec collected a considerable quantity of pyralids and microlepidoptera. These were described by Meyrick (1934c). The preponderance of pyralids and microlepidoptera, up to the present, was described by Meyrick (1929a,b) from specimens collected during the British “St. George” Expedition, 1924–1925. Of these Meyrick states (1929a:489):

Over 1000 specimens were included in the present consignment, of which about two-thirds are from Pacific Islands, the remaining third being from small islands closely adjacent to the American coast; these two sections are entirely unrelated, and are treated separately. The majority of the specimens were collected by Mr. C.L. Collenette and Miss C.E. Longfield, including all these where no captor is specially mentioned; but a proportion was taken by Miss L.E. Cheesman, and in the case of these her name is always recorded.

In 1968, from 13 January to 14 April, my wife and I made extensive collections on the islands of Nuku Hiva, Hiva Oa, and Fatu Hiva, facilitated by Smithsonian Research Foundation Grant SG 0636056. The results of this expedition are recorded in the following pages. Following our expedition, S.L. Montgomery of Honolulu visited the Marquesas Islands in 1977 and collected 347 specimens. These are recorded here also. Altogether, this report is based on well over 7300 specimens, exclusive of types.

Comparatively few of the species of microlepidoptera and pyralids occurring in the Marquesas Islands have been figured previously (Walsingham, 1907; Shibuya, 1928a; Clarke, 1958 [in 1955–1970], 1971). In most cases no illustrations or only the adult or the genitalia of one sex have been figured. In this work adult wings are figured, but even here sometimes the genitalia of only one sex is illustrated because of the absence of the opposite sex in the collections at hand.

As usual, my color descriptions are based on Ridgway, 1912, Color Standards and Color Nomenclature. Some colors and hues I have used are not in Ridgway. In situations where I considered some term more appropriate than one found in Ridgway, I have used it.

A map showing the relative positions of the various Marquesas Islands is given (Figure 1). As additional background material on these islands, I recommend Adamson, 1939. Also, I have presented maps of Nuku Hiva, Hiva Oa, and Fatu Hiva showing the locations of our collecting sites (Figures 2, 3). In addition, maps showing the known distribution of some of the genera and species are included.

FIGURE 1.—The Marquesas Islands (after Adamson, 1936).

FIGURE 2.—Clarke collecting localities (elevations in feet): a, Nuku Hiva; b, Hiva Oa.

FIGURE 3.—Clarke collecting localities on Fatu Hiva (shaded area indicates cliffs).

The distribution maps are based on specimens in the British Museum (Natural History), the Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii, and USNM collections of the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution.

I have already discussed (Clarke, 1971:2–5) Meyrick's explanation for the peculiarities of the fauna of Rapa and some of the neighboring islands. In the work cited above, I stated (1971:5): “The evidence of zoological and botanical relationships between the Australian, southern South American, and South African regions is already well established. These relationships are carried to some of the Southern Hemisphere oceanic islands, but as far as I am able to ascertain, from a study of the material at hand, there is no connection between the fauna of Rapa and that of the Americas…” In the case of the Marquesas Islands there is some evidence of a relationship between the Marquesas and the Americas by the presence of the genus Zamagiria (Z. exedra, new species) an American genus found in Central America, Cuba, and Florida. Also, the presence of Tinea oxymora Meyrick, with the type-locality of Chosica, Peru, is further evidence of a connection. It is possible, however, that the presence of the latter species in the Marquesas is the result of an accidental introduction. The suggestion of a Marquesan-American connection probably is not unreasonable in view of botanical findings in Sachet (1975:1–2).

The climate of the region is tropical oceanic, constantly warm, with high atmospheric humidity, local sporadic rain showers, and heavy orographic rainfall where the mountainous islands interfere with the prevailing easterly trade winds. However, the simple pattern of windward-leeward trade-wind effect in the Marquesas is very much complicated by the dissected topography and other factors. The “backbones” of the islands are usually bathed in mists and crowned with very mossy “cloudforest.” But on low lying areas, the trade winds exert a dessicating effect. The lower uninhabited islands, the “desert” islands, appear quite arid and there are years of prolonged drought. On the western “plateaus” of Nukuhiva and Hivaoa stretch arid areas, with a vegetation of grasses and scattered woody plants, including very interesting species, such as sandalwood and Cordia lutea, a shrub otherwise known from dry Ecuador, Chile, and the Galapagos Islands. The deep valleys contain streams, many of which are frequently dry; and the high waterfalls tumbling down the cliffs of the higher cirques often disappear.

The Marquesas are closely related to Tahiti and Rapa by the presence of the genus Dichelopa, especially through D. argosphena (Marquesas), D. fulvistrigata (Tahiti), and D. iochorda (Rapa), all with a divided uncus, and the presence of Cryptoblabes ardescens (Meyrick).

Several groups, or species, of microlepidoptera that one might expect to find in the Marquesas are absent. At present there are not records of the occurrence of the Chlidanotidae in these islands, although the family is frequently found in the Pacific region. The Carposinidae appear to be absent, but the family is common in the Pacific area. The Oecophoridae, an uncommon family in the Pacific islands, are also absent. (Some workers will dispute this based on the presence of Stoeberhinus testaceus Butler and Autosticha pelodes (Meyrick); I consider these two to be Gelechiidae). Another common, widely distributed migrant, Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller) is also absent. The widely distributed genus Monopis (Tineidae) is apparently absent. The genus Bactra is commonly represented in the Pacific islands by a considerable number of species, ranging from Japan and the Bonin Islands in the north (Kawabe and Kusui, 1978) through the Caroline and Society Islands all the way south and east to Rapa (Clarke, 1971:13, 131). Although Cyperaceae, the food plants of Bactra species, are abundant in the Marquesas, a diligent search failed to disclose the presence of any Bactra species. The genus Choropleca is found in South America, Hawaii, Fiji, and Rapa but, apparently, has failed to reach the Marquesas. Despite the obvious relationship between Rapa and the Marquesas, and the presence of Coprosma, the food plant of Tanaoctena, the genus does not appear to be present in the Marquesas.

THE ISLANDS

The Marquesas Islands (Figure 1; Table 1) lie between latitudes 7°50′ and 10°35'S, and longitudes 138°25′ and 140°50′W. The Hawaiian Islands lie approximately 3220 kilometers (2000 miles) north-northwest, the Society Islands 1368 kilometers (850 miles) southwest and the nearest land, the Tuomotu Islands, is 483 kilometers (300 miles) distant. When we visited the islands, a survey was being conducted, and we were informed that the actual elevation of Mt. Temetiu (Figure 8), the highest point on Hiva Oa, was not known. The islands are remnants of ancient volcanoes, with steep slopes and deep valleys.

TABLE 1.—Approximate areas and maximum elevations of the 12 islands of the Marquesas (from northwest to southeast) (measurements in square miles and feet are from Adamson, 1936:10).

The Marquesas Islands consist of a Southern group and a Northern group. Former, or synonymous, names are given in parentheses. The Southern group consist of: Fatuuku, Hiva Oa (Dominica), Tahuata (Santa Cristana), Mohotani (Motane, San Pedro), Fatu Hiva (Magdelena, Fatuiva), and was discovered in 1595 by the navigator Alvaro Mendana. He named the group Islas Marquesas de Mendoza in honor of the wife of his patron, Don Garcia Hurtad de Mendoza, Viceroy of Peru. The Northern group consists of Sand Island, Hatutu (Hatutaa), Eiao, Fatu Iti (Motu Iti), Nuku Hiva, Uahuka, and Uapou. This group was discovered in 1791 by Captain Joseph Ingraham of the American brig Hope of Boston, when he visited Nuku Hiva.

Of all the islands in the group, we have numerous records of microlepidoptera from only three, Nuku Hiva, Hiva Oa, and Fatu Hiva. From Tahuata, Eiao, and Uapou we have a few records, but from the other islands we have nothing. Therefore, we can only conclude that we know little of the fauna of the Marquesas.

As is the case with many Pacific islands, much devastation has occurred because of deforestation, slashing, burning (Figure 10) and the introduction of horses (Figure 7), cattle, and pigs. Rats also occur, having been introduced by the ancient colonizers and through modern commerce. There are no endemic mammals.

In spite of the damage that has been done, there are many pockets of original vegetation, and at the higher elevations (Figures 6–8) much of the natural flora remains. At the lower elevations (Figures 4, 5), however, mostly introduced plants replace the native flora. Here are such plants as Mangifera indica L. (mango), Thespesia populnea (L.), Tamarindus indica L., Pandanus tectorius Solander, Cocos nucifera L. (coconut), Musa sp., banana, Carica papaya L. (papaya), Artocarpus sp. (bread-fruit), Hibiscus tiliaceus L., Psidium guajava L., the grass Paspalum paniculatum L. (Figure 5, lower right), Cyperaceae, lichens, and mosses. At the higher elevations one enounters a rich flora of Pandanus sp., numerous shrubs, ferns, mosses and lichens (Figure 6), Cheirodendron marquesense F. Brown, Vaccinium cereum (L.f.) Forster f. and Bidens henryi Scherff.

On the high plateau area of Nuku Hiva, at Tapuaooa, 762 m (Figure 7) there are abundant grasses, scattered trees of Metrosideros collina (Forster) A. Gray var., and mixed shrubs including Glochidion ramiflorum (Forster f.) Mueller-Argovensis I have mentioned only a tiny fraction of the flora and suggest that those who are interested consult Sachet, 1975, and subsequent papers by this author.

THE FAUNA

Fifteen (15) families of pyraloids and microlepidoptera are recorded in the following pages. In these families I have recognized 81 genera as follows: Oxychirotidae (1), Pterophoridae (2), Pyralidae (28), Tortricidae (1), Olethreutidae (8), Orneodidae (1), Gelechiidae (5), Cosmopterigidae (11), Blastobasidae (1), Heliodinidae (1), Immidae (1), Choreutidae (1), Yponomeutidae (5), Gracillariidae (2), and Tineidae (13). (Phthorimaea (Gelechiidae) is treated in the text as a possible component of the Marquesan fauna but is not included in the above tabulation).

As indicated above, the Marquesas are distant from any land masses and their diverse and peculiar fauna has multiple origins. As in the case of Rapa Island, the fauna demonstrates again the facility with which lepidoptera and other organisms become distributed to oceanic islands.

The Oxychirotidae are represented in Australia by two species: Oxychirota paradoxa Meyrick and Cenoloba obliteralis (Walker), one species on Christmas Island and one on Ceylon (Sri Lanka) (Figure 12). Yet, many thousands of miles east of Australia, a new genus and species (Neoxychirota isolata) appears and indicates an ancient origin. So far, no other species of this family has appeared in the area between Australia and the Marquesas, but the family Lathrotelidae from Rapa (Clarke, 1971:58) may be synonymous; additional material of this latter family may settle this problem. Oxychirota paradoxa was recorded at low elevation at Sydney, and presumably C. obliteralis was also taken at low elevation; N. isolata occurs at high altitudes in the Marquesas.

The Pterophoridae are represented by only two species, but Stangeia distantia, new species, provides a great extension of the range of this genus. Geographically and structurally, the nearest species to distantia is S. rapae Clarke from Rapa, but distantia is a smaller species. We did not discover the food plant of distantia, but rapae feeds on Siegesbeckia orientalis L., so we can expect to find distantia on some other composite.

The Pyralidae are one of the dominant families in the Marquesas with 28 genera and 63 species. Of these genera only three (Delcina and Tessema, new genera, and Chrysophyllis Meyrick) appear to be endemic. All the others are wide ranging. Achroia, Cadra, Spoladea, Maruca, and Diaphania are especially common and widely distributed. Achroia grisella (Fabricius) and Cadra cautella (Walker) are stored-products pests and are generally distributed throughout most of the world. The larva of Maruca testulalis (Geyer) feeds on a multitude of hosts and is a serious pest of legumes in some areas. Diaphania indica (Saunders), the notorious “cucumber moth” also attacks other curcubits. Chrysophyllis lucivaga Meyrick is of special interest because of the extraordinary male aedeagus (Figure 52b).

FIGURES 4, 5.—Nuku Hiva: 4, Taiohae, ancient house platform and unidentified leguminous trees; 5, Pakiu Valley.

FIGURES 6, 7.—Nuku Hiva: 6, Pandanus grove, ∼548 m (1800 ft); 7, Tapuaooa, 762 m (2500 ft), tree in right foreground is of Metrosideros sp.

FIGURE 8.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Temetiu, ∼1219 m (4000 ft), highest point in the Marquesas; right rear, Mt. Feani, 1158 m (3800 ft).

There is only a single genus of Tortricidae currently known from the Marquesas Islands: Dichelopa. In this genus I recognize 26 species and one new subspecies. Undoubtedly, when more is known about the islands, other species will be discovered. The presence of this genus in the Marquesas indicates a close relationship to Rapa (15 species), Tahiti (2), and Australia (6). Previously only 13 species of Dichelopa were known from the Marquesas. From Tahiti only two species are currently known, but only incidental collecting has been done there, and that only below 1500 feet. Careful and thorough collecting will, unquestionably, reveal more species in this genus and perhaps, the same can be said for neighboring Morea, Huahini, and other islands in the vicinity.

FIGURE 9.—Hiva Oa, webs of Microzestis inelegans Meyrick in association with webs of a species of Embioptera (probably Oligotoma (Aposthonia) oceana Ross, 1955:3).

Eight genera with 10 species of Olethreutidae are currently known from the Marquesas Islands. The genus Cryptophlebia, with three species, is found all the way from Argentina to Japan and is common in the Pacific region. C. pallifimbriana is endemic; C. chaomorpha, described from the Marquesas, has been recorded from the distant Seychelles and Maké Island by Diakonoff (1969), and C. rhynchias is widely distributed. Dudua eumenica is endemic and is closely related to the common D. aprobola. Another endemic species, Duessa marquesana, is strikingly similar and closely related to D. pleurogramma Clarke from Kosrae (Kusaie) in Micronesia, and suggests an ancient zoological connection between the Marquesas and Micronesia. Cydia pseudomalesana has its counterpart in the Indian Cydia malesana (Meyrick), new combination, and probably had its origin in India. With Tritopterna eocnephaea we have another example indicating an entomological connection between the island of Rapa and the Marquesas. For a discussion of Crocidosema plebejana, see Clarke, 1971.

FIGURE 10.—Fatu Hiva, lower slope badly cut-over, containing many weed species of plants.

FIGURE 11.—Fatu Hiva, lower Omoa Valley (Omoa village hidden by trees).

The Orneodidae are represented by two species, both previously unknown.

The Gelechiidae are represented by only five genera, although I have included a sixth, Phthorimaea, in the key as a possible component of the fauna. Stoeberhinus with its single species, S. testaceus, is strictly a Pacific taxon. The genus Autosticha is encountered frequently in the Pacific and presents no problems. The genus Ephysteris, however, raises some interesting zoogeographical questions. So far, North America has not produced a species of this genus, but Europe has no less than three, and the genus is recorded from Africa. In 1965 I recorded Echinoglossa trinota from the Juan Fernandez Islands which, currently, is referred to Ephysteris; and in this report I describe Ephysteris longicornis, new species, from the Marquesas. Moreover, in the British Museum (Natural History), there is an additional species of Pacific Ephysteris from the Gilbert Islands. Chelophoba melaina, new species, shows distinct affinities to Asiatic species of Gelechiidae as discussed under the species. Also, Pitycona attenuata, new species, appears to be derived from the Asiatic fauna.

There is no question in my mind that the center of development of the Cosmopterigidae is in the Pacific region. One has to consider only the enormous radiation that has occurred in the Hawaiian Islands in the genus Hyposmocoma and that of the genus Asymphorodes in the Marquesas Islands. The latter genus has two species in the Hawaiian Islands (Zimmerman, 1978:1061). In the Marquesas there are 75 species currently known in the genus Asymphorodes, 53 of which are described as new; one of these, A. trichogramma, new species, also occurs on Easter Island. In this study I have included at least 10 other genera, some far ranging, such as Cosmopterix and Labdia, and others apparently confined to the Pacific region. Trissodoris is widespread in the Pacific (Figure 213) and probably will be found wherever its food plant, Pandanus, grows. Other genera of this family, recorded here, undoubtedly will be found ultimately in other Pacific islands.

In the case of Herlinda, new genus, and Asymphorodes we have an example of convergence in that the structure of the genitalia of the two genera are identical. Herlinda differs from Asymphorodes, however, by the absence of the thornlike projections from the metasuctum and the lack of modification of the 6th and 7th abdominal segments of the males.

The Blastobasidae are poorly represented in the Pacific. It is, therefore, surprising that a species in this family has reached the Marquesas. Blastobasis inana (Butler) was formerly known from such widely separated places as India and Hawaii, and its presence in the Marquesas suggests distribution through commerce.

Only one species of Heliodinidae, Lissocnemitis argolyca Meyrick, originally was found in these islands; it also occurs on Rapa (Clarke, 1971:182).

The Immidae are widespread in the warmer regions of the world, Indo-Australia, South America, and Oceania. It is not surprising, therefore, that the Marquesas support a fauna of at least 11 species. When the faunas of more of the islands are known, undoubtedly additional species will appear. The closely related Choreutidae, with a worldwide distribution, are represented by only a single species.

The Yponomeutidae do not present any real surprises. The ubiquitous Plutella xylostella (L.) is established as expected, and other species indicate a relationship to more western taxa.

Two genera of Gracillariidae are present: Epicephala and Caloptilia. The former genus was previously known only from Australia and New Guinea, but Caloptilia is widespread.

Twenty-nine species in 13 genera of Tineidae are recorded in these pages. Of the 14 species of Decadarchis, D. simulans (Butler), D. flavistriata (Walsingham), and D. minuscula (Walsingham) are widespread, and D. penicillata (Swezey) occurs in Hawaii, suggesting a relationship with the Marquesas as in the case of the two species of Asymphorodes (A. dimorpha (Busck) and A. triaula (Meyrick)).

Robinson (1983:306) synonymized 13 genera with Erechthias, including Nesoxena and Caryolestis, as well as Decadarchis. Of these, only Erechthias has a simple harpe (valve) but the others all have a cluster of stout setae on the costa of harpe (Clarke, 1971, figs. 153, 155; Robinson, 1983, fig. 3). The female genitalia of all are similar, but the venation of Erechthias is quite different from the others. In this work I am retaining Decadarchis, and temporarily including Nesoxena and Caryolestis as synonyms. In the Nesoxena-Caroylestis complex there are four described “species” which I consider synonyms: Decadarchis strangulata (Meyrick, 1929a), new combination; Decadarchis praedatrix (Meyrick, 1934a), new combination, new synonym; Decadarchis semifusca Bradley, 1961, new synonym; and Decadarchis pandani (Clarke, 1971), new combination, new synonym. In addition to the above, I have specimens from two populations of this species from the Caroline Islands: Kosrae (Kusaie) and Kapingamarangi. This species group is not recognized from the Marquesas; but since the larvae feed on dead tissue of coconut and Pandanus, and the species occurs in the nearby Tuomotu Islands, it can be expected.

In the genus Opogona there are four species. O. aurisquamosa is widespread; regressa and discordia have limited distribution outside the Marquesas, and trissostacta appears to be endemic.

The remaining genera in the family each have one species and only Wyoma, new genus and species, appears to be endemic.

In my Rapa study (Clarke, 1971:21) I indicated a peculiar feature of some of the species: the black or gray-tipped hindwing. No such feature is detectable in any of the Marquesan species.

ENDEMISM

Endemism, like distribution, is often an artifact of collecting. Actually, we know so little about the faunas of the Pacific islands, that reported endemism gives us only a suggestion of what the real situation is.

In my paper on the Juan Fernandez Islands (Clarke, 1965) I reported 75 percent endemicity for the 71 species of microlepidoptera known to exist on those islands. Rapa Island (Clarke, 1971), which is remote from other land areas, exhibited comparatively low endemicity. The entire known lepidopterous fauna was considered. Of the macrolepidoptera only 25 percent are endemic but 60 percent of the microlepidoptera appear to be endemic. In my paper on the Tortricoidea of Micronesia (Clarke, 1976) I treated only a fraction of the fauna that must occur in those islands. Only 67 forms were recorded and of these 55.2 percent appear to be endemic. In this report I have recorded 279 species and subspecies of which 208 currently appear to be confined to the Marquesas Islands or, 74.4 percent. Of the genera Asymphorodes (except one species on Easter Island) and Dichelopa, 100 percent of each are endemic, but of the 29 species of Tineidae recorded only 8 species, or 23 percent, are endemic.

DISPOSITION OF SPECIMENS

The holotypes of the species described as new are in the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., unless indicated otherwise. Where possible, paratypes will be placed in the United States National Museum collections of the National Museum of Natural History, the Museum d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, the British Museum (Natural History), London, and the Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii. Specimens of previously described species, where series are sufficiently large, will also be placed in the museums listed above.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

In any undertaking of this size many individuals contribute to its completion. Dr. S. Dillon Ripley made the entire project possible through a grant from the Smithsonian Research Foundation. Dr. Ripley also authorized several grants from the Smithsonian Fluid Research Fund to support contracts with illustrators for the production of many of the line drawings.

I am also indebted to many of the Marquesans who helped my wife and me on the three islands we visited; but especially to Mr. Francis Herault who was of great assistance on Fatu Hiva.

I wish to express my appreciation to the authorities of the British Museum (Natural History) for permission to examine and study pertinent types, and for the photographs of Eucosma agriochlora Meyrick (Figure 291b) and Cryptophlebia rhynchias (Meyrick) (Figure 293a). I am especially grateful to Dr. Klaus Sattler and Michael Shaffer for the loan of specimens and the answers to many questions that arose during this study; and to Dr. D.S. Fletcher for the use of his manuscript catalog of genera and type citations.

Dr. Frank J. Radovsky, chairman, and Mr. Gordon Nishida, Department of Entomology, Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii, have been particularly helpful. Through them I have been able to study all of the types of Marquesan microlepidoptera in their possession.

I wish, also, to thank Dr. Eugene Munroe who segregated all of the Eudonia species and helped me with other pyralids. Dr. Alex Diakonoff of Leiden, Netherlands, provided translations of some of the references in Dutch, and Dr. Hiroshi Inoue of Iruma City, Japan, aided with articles in Japanese. To both I am greatly indebted.

As usual, my colleagues at the Smithsonian Institution always support me in many ways. I wish to thank Donald R. Davis and Ronald W. Hodges, especially, for reviewing the manuscript, and for other matters in connection with this study. Also, I wish to thank George C. Steyskal, research associate, Systematic Entomology Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, for checking many of the names.

For botanical names I am indebted to Dan H. Nicholson, Raymond Fosberg, and Marie-Hélène Sachet. This work has required much library work, and without the help of Jack F. Marquardt, Carolyn Sue Hahn, Ruth F. Schallert, and Karen Drescher, many of the required references would not have been forthcoming. They are exceptional librarians.

A considerable number of able illustrators have produced the drawings. The late André del Campo Pizzini, and Jung Lea Smith produced some of the figures, previously published, which are repeated here. Elaine R.S. Hodges has produced the bulk of the figures and has done all of the Cosmopterigidae. Molly K. Ryan and Vishai Malikul have worked primarily with the pyraloids; Ann R.P. Richardson did the Immidae, Choreutidae, and Tineidae; and three volunteers, Catherine A. Baer, Eva Dorfman, and Sally Parker have contributed miscellaneous figures. To all of the above I am deeply grateful. To Mrs. Nancy McIntyre I am deeply indebted for carefully helping with reading the galley and page proofs.

I thank Victor Kranz, Smithsonian staff photographer, for the care he has taken in making the photographs of the moth wings. The illustrations of scenes on the islands are reproduced from photographs by my wife and me.

In conclusion, I wish to express my sincere appreciation to my wife, Thelma. As on several other expeditions, she accompanied me to the Marquesas Islands as a volunteer aid. As usual, she cared for the livestock and undertook all the household tasks, freeing me for more extended fieldwork. I owe her a lasting debt of gratitude.

Family OXYCHIROTIDAE

Neoxychirota, new genus

FIGURE 12

TYPE-SPECIES.—Neoxychirota isolata, new species, by monotypy and present designation.

The gender of this generic name is feminine.

Labial palpus nearly twice as long as head, strongly compressed; third segment greatly reduced, obscured by long scales of second. Maxillary palpus well developed, about length of labial palpus, clothed with loose scales. Head flattened dorsally with closely appressed scales; side tufts posteriorly spreading; ocellus absent. Antenna with short projecting scales at end of each segment; finely ciliated; scape without pecten. Forewing pointed, costa straight, termen very oblique, 11 veins; 1b simple, obsolete; 1c absent; 2 and 3 very short, well before angle of cell; 4 from angle; 5 distant from 4; 5, 6, 7 about equidistant, well separated; 8 and 9 coincident to costa; 10 out of the stalk of 8 and 9; 11 from near end of cell. Hindwing linear, pointed, with 9 veins; 2, 3, and 4 very short, well separated, 4 from angle of cell; 4, 5, 6 equidistant and well separated, parallel; 7 and 8 stalked, 7 to termen slightly below apex; 9 free. Hindleg tibia slender, smooth. Abdomen smooth.

FIGURE 12.—Distribution of the family Oxychirotidae.

Male genitalia with ganthos and uncus present.

Female genitalia without signum; accessary bursa present.

Neoxychirota is very near Oxychirota but lacks the short cone of scales of forehead. Neoxychirota also differs in forewing by vein 5 distant from 4, and 7 separate from stalk of 8 + 9: also in hindwing vein 5 is separate from 4, not connate, 6 is separate from the stalk of 7 and 8.

Neoxychirota isolata, new species

FIGURES 13, 274a

Alar expanse 10–13 mm.

Labial palpus ochraceous on inner surface, grayish fuscous on outer side. Antenna grayish with darker annulations toward base; scape fuscous. Head pale grayish; on vertex a large patch of metallic scales. Thorax grayish overlaid with metallic scales; collar, tegula and posterior tuft mostly metallic scales. Forewing ground color grayish fuscous to fuscous, the scales with buff bases giving an irrorate effect; base of dorsum, a streak in fold, a blotch on tornus and a subapical spot metallic; on costa and at apical fourth, buff spots; on dorsum, at basal third, a buff spot and across end of cell a transverse buff streak followed by fuscous scales; in middle of cell an ill-defined fuscous spot; cilia ochraecous buff, mixed with grayish fuscous. Hindwing fuscous; cilia ochraeous buff, mixed with grayish fuscous. Foreleg light buff; tibia and tarsal segments fuscous on outer side; midleg light buff; tibia suffused grayish; hindleg light buff. Abdomen fuscous dorsally, ventrally pale buff, each segment with a small tuft posterodorsally; first segment buff posterodorsally.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24021. Harpe broadest toward cucullus; cucullus rounded; at basal third a small papillalike point. Gnathos a slender semicircle with a membranous area ventrad and covered densely with filament-like setae. Uncus bluntly rounded. Vinculum a narrow sclerotized band. Tegumen about twice as long as wide. Anellus V-shaped, the arms dilated posteriorly. Aedeagus short, stubby, pointed.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24015, 24545, 24547, 24605, 24608, 25066, 25067, 25068, 25099. Ostium U-shaped, small. Inception of ductus seminalis well before ostium. Ductus bursae very slender, membranous. Bursa copulatrix rather small, oval, membranous; appendix bursae from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Signum absent.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100751.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Mt Teoaiua, 610 m (2000 ft).

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (27 Mar 1968) and 37 paratypes as follows. 12 paratypes with same data as holotype. Fatu Hiva: Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 16 paratypes; Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (167 m), 3 Apr 1968, 5 paratypes; Teavapuhiau, Ouia, 750 m, 1–3 Aug 1977, 2 paratypes (Montgomery). Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m), 1 Mar 1968, 1 paratype. Nuku Hiva: Tovii, Ooumu, 900 m, 16–19 July 1977, 1 paratype (Montgomery).

In appearance isolata is similar to Oxychirota paradoxa Meyrick but broader winged and generically distinct.

The occurrence of this species in the Marquesas Islands provides a very great extension of the range of this family.

Family PTEROPHORIDAE

Genus Stangeia Tutt

Stangeia Tutt, 1906:492.—Chapman, 1908:53.—Adamczewski, 1951:309, 382, pl. 12: fig. 62.—Bigot, 1966:284, 285 [figs.], 286.—Clarke, 1971:96.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Pterophorus siceliota Zeller, 1847:907, by monotypy.

Stangeia distantia, new species

FIGURES 14, 274b

Alar expanse 11–12 mm.

FIGURE 13.—Neoxycntrota isotata, new species; a, wing venation; b, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; c, aedeagus; d, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 14.—Stangeira distantia, new species; a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalis.

Labial palpus white; outer side of second segment olive buff; apical tuft half white, half black; third segment with longitudinal black line on each side ventrolaterally. Antenna black, spotted white; scape olive buff, ventrally black, with a white spot dorsally. Head olive buff. Thorax olive buff; posteriorly buff; tegula olive buff basally, sordid white distally. Forewing ground color olive buff, somewhat darker costad; outer half of costa very narrowly edged white; from second feather of forewing a conspicuous group of white cilia. Hindwing fuscous; cilia grayish. Legs ocherous white longitudinally streaked with fine black lines. Abdomen dorsally and narrowly olive buff, bordered on each side with a buff longitudinal line; laterally fuscous; ventrally olive buff with a median longitudinal buff line; on each side of buff median line a series of small black spots.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24064, 24548, 24549. Harpe long, slender, crescentic, base irregular, dilated; both harpes considerably narrowed beyond middle. Gnathos and socii absent. Uncus consisting of a pair of slender digitate processes. Vinculum long, narrow, with a broad flat flange around periphery. Tegumen short, broad. Anellus a narrow, transverse, sclerotized plate with a long slender arm posteriorly attached to aedeagus. Aedeagus moderately stout, terminating in a ventral beaklike process and a dorsolateral, short, digitate process.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24065. Ostium oval. Antrum conical, sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis dorsolateral from bursa copulatrix slightly before junction with ductus bursae. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous, short. Signum absent. Lamella antevaginalis triangular, transverse; lamella postvaginalis triangular, rounded posteriorly.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100752.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Omoa.

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype, 2 and 5 paratypes, all from Omoa, collected 11–16 Mar to 8 Apr 1968.

This species is closely related to S. rapae Clarke (1971), (13–16 mm), but is a smaller species (11–12 mm) and is generally lighter in color. The genitalia of distantia are strikingly similar to those of other species of this genus, and are, in themselves, not reliable for specific separation.

As far as I am able to ascertain, this is the easternmost record for this genus.

Genus Marasmarcha Meyrick

Marasmarcha Meyrick, 1886a:11.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Alucita phaeodactyla Hübner [1805] 20 June 1813 [1796–1838], pl. 3: figs. 14, 15 (only named included species, Article 69(a)i).

Marasmarcha pumilio (Zeller)

FIGURES 15, 274c

Mimeseoptilus pumilio Zeller, 1873:324.

Marasmarcha pumilio (Zeller).—Barnes and Lindsey, 1921:348, pl. 42: fig. 7, pl. 49: fig. 13.—Forbes, 1923:646.—Meyrick, 1927a:69; 1929a:491.—Forbes, 1931:345.—Hori, 1933:394.—Wolcott, 1936:480.—McDunnough, 1939:38 [No. 6504].—Viette, 1949a:325.

Marasmarcha liophanes Meyrick, 1886a:19; 1906:136; 1910:18, fig. 15; 1913:27; 1914:47.—Nohira, 1916:38.

Stenoptilia pumilio (Zeller).—Fernald, 1891:87 [No. 4566]; 1898:58.—Smith, 1903:100 [No. 5382].—Fernald in Dyar, 1903:447 [No. 4991].—Meyrick, 1910:18; 1913b:28.—Barnes and McDunnough, 1917:151 [No. 5945].

Stenopitlia (?) pumilio (Zeller).—Walsingham, 1892:495, 542; 1897:58.

Mimaeseoptilus gilvidorsis.—Hedemann, 1896:8 [not Mimaeseoptilus gilvidorsis Zeller].

Leioptilus (?) griseodactylus Pagenstecher, 1900:240.

Exelestis liophanes (Meyrick).—Fletcher, 1909:33, pl. A12; 1910a:313 [No. 149], 321; 1910b:403; 1919:81; 1921a:26; 1926:610.

Exelastis pumilio (Zeller).—Fletcher. 1921a:46, pl. 5A–C; 1931:38.—Viette, 1957:171.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24062, 25161. Harpe very narrow basally; broadened distad, from slightly beyond middle a prominent ridge is armed with long, curved, deciduous setae. Uncus divided. Vinculum V-shaped, with ventral plate. Tegumen slender, lightly sclerotized. Anellus membranous. Aedeagus slender, slightly enlarged beyond middle.

FIGURE 15.—Marasmarcha pumilio (Zeller): a, ventral view of male genitalia with aedeagus in situ; b, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24063. Ostium funnel-shaped. Antrum not differentiated. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae very slender, threadlike. Bursa copulatrix membranous, finely granular. Signum absent.

HOLOTYPES.—In the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge (pumilio); in the British Museum (Natural History) (liophanes); (?) (griseodactylus).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Texas (USA) (pumilio); Reunion (liophanes); Bismarck Archipelago (?) (griseodactylus).

DISTRIBUTION.—Barbadoas, Grenada, St. Vincent, St. Croix, Jamaica, North America (New Jersey south to Florida west to Missouri and Texas), Sri Lanka (Ceylon), Borneo, Bismarck Archipelago, Japan (Ryukyu Islands), Taiwan (Formosa), Tahiti, China, India, Reunion, Fiji, Seychelles, Africa, Marquesas Islands.

From the Marquesas I have the following 21 specimens. Nuku Hiva: Pakiu Valley, 1800 ft (548 m), 17–28 Jan 1968, 8 , 1 . Fatu Hiva: Omoa Valley, 16 Mar to 5 Apr 1968, 9 , 3 .

FOOD PLANTS.—Oxalis sp., Alyce clover (Alysicarpus vaginalis (L.) de Candolle.

I have dissected the types of pumilio and liophanes and there is no doubt about the identity of the Marquesas specimens.

Family PYRALIDAE

Key to the Subfamilies of Pyralidae of the Marquesas Only

Subfamily GALLERIINAE

Genus Achroia Hübner

Achroia Hübner, 1819 [1816–1826]:163.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Galleria alvearia Fabricius, 1798:463; subsequent designation by Westwood, 1840:113 (= Achroia cinercola Hübner, 1819[1816–1826]:163).

Achroia grisella (Fabricius)

FIGURES 16, 274d

Tinea grisella Fabricius, 1794, 3(2):289 [No. 10].

Achroea [sic] grisella (Fabricius).—Zeller, 1848:583.—Stainton, 1849a:3; 1849b:1.—Heinemann, 1865 [1863–1870]: 204 [No. 296].—Wocke, 1871:231 [No. 647].—Meyrick, 1879a:216.—Snellen 1882:120.—Ragonot, 1885:22.—Leech, 1886:110, pl. 13: fig. 6.—Bethune-Baker, 1894:586.—Spuler, 1910:189.

Achroia grisella (Fabricius).—Stephens, 1852:24.—Westwood, 1854:207 [No. 1435].—Stainton, 1859:169 [No. 859].—Hampson, 1896 [1894–1896], 4:6.—Rebel, 1901, 2:1 [No. 3].—Ragonot, 1901:497.—Dyar, 1903:413 [No. 4636].—Maxwell-Lefroy and Howlett, 1909:509.—Duport, 1913:35 [No. 215].—Shiraki, 1913:377.—Hampson, 1917:44.—Barnes and McDunnough, 1917:141 [No. 5454].—Britton, 1920:108.—Fletcher, 1920:81, 84, pl. 7a–e.—Ghosh, 1923:14.—Forbes, 1923:535.—Meyrick, 1934c:333, 343.—Lhomme, 1935:161 [No. 2111].—Le Marchand, 1935:311.—Pierce and Metcalf, 1938:12, pl. 7.—Rebel, 1939:6.—McDunnough, 1939:25 [No. 5995].—Adamson, 1943:45.—Corbet and Tams, 1943a:29, fig. 7, pl. 1, fig. 10; 1943c:72, 92, figs. 26, 81, 82, 127, 163, p;. 2: figs. 9, 10.—Kloet and Hincks, 1945:114.—Lamont and Callan: 1950:205.—Hartig and Amsel, 1951:45.—Inoue, 1955:122 [No. 675].—Bollmann, 1955:610, fig. 1.—Elton, 1956:12–14.—Hartig, 1956:93.—Peterson, 1956:200, figs. L45, D-H.—Zimmerman, 1958b:27, figs. 11–13.—MacNay, 1959c:141.—Razowski and Śliwínski, 1961:31, 33, 49.—Whalley, 1964:566.—Gentry, 1965:175.—Kloet and Hincks, 1972:44.—Balachowsky, 1972:1230.—Emmet, 1979:213 [No. 1390].—Leraut, 1980:109 [No. 2620].—Inoue et al., 1982:374, pl. 44: figs. 62, 63.—Hodges et al., 1983:79 [No. 5623].—Brower, 1983:14 [No. 5995].—Shin et al., 1983:394.

FIGURE 16.—Achroia grisella (Fabricius): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Bombyx cinereola Hübner, 1803 [1796–1838] (Bombyces), pl. 23; fig. 91.

Galleria alvearia (Stephens.)—Latreille, 1809:231.—Stephens, 1829:213 [No. 7410].—Curtis, 1831 [1824–1839]:176.—Duponchel in Godart and Duponchel, 1842(4):127, pl. 60: fig. 10; 1844:326.—Westwood, 1854:207 [No. 1433].

Achroia alvearia (Stephens).—Stephens, 1834:294.—Curtis, 1837:205 [No. 981].—Herrich-Shäffer, 1849, 4:112, pl. 21: figs. 149, 150.

Meliphora alveariella Guenée, 1845:308; [1846]:70.

Tinea anticella Walker, 1863 [1856–1866], 483.

Achroia griseella.—Ragonot, 1885:18 [misspelled].

Meliphora grisella (Fabricius).—Meyrick, 1895:384; 1899:197; 1928:400; 1929b: 160.—Philpott, 1929:474, fig. 6.

Achroia obscurevitella Ragonot.—Leech, 1901:388.

Achroia obscurovittella.—Matsumura, 1908:190 [No. 1585] [misspelled.].

Achroria [sic] grisella (Fabricius).—Wolcott, 1936:475.

Meliphora (Achroia)grisella (Fabricius).—Ford, 1949:17 [No. 55].

Achroia grisella infranella Lucas, 1955:251.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25274. Harpe broad basally, tapered to a bluntly pointed cucullus; inside sacculus, near middle, a triangular prominence. Socius a fleshy lobe. Uncus bilobed. Vinculum bluntly pointed. Tegumen arched. Anellus a broadly U-shaped plate. Aedeagus stout, longer than harpe; vesica armed with a single long, curved cornutus.

Female genitalia slides USNM 25272, 25273. Ostium broad, transverse, emerging from a broad, granulated posterior portion of ductus bursae. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior part of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae slender, membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signum absent.

TYPES.—In the British Museum (Natural History) (anticella); in the Carnegie Museum, Pittsburgh (obscurevittella); location unknown (grisella, aluearia, cinercola); in the Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle (infranella).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Australia (anticella); Japan (obscurevittella); unknown (grisella, aluearia, cinercola); Morocco (infranella).

DISTRIBUTION.—Africa, Australia, Crotia, Sicily, Germany, France, Madagascar, Trinidad, Jamaica, Japan, Colombia, Porto Rico, North America, Marquesas Islands, Tahiti, Sikkim, Bengal, Ceylon.

FOODS.—Comb of honeybee, dried fruits (apples, raisins).

Subfamily PHYCITINAE

Key to the Genera of Phycitinae

Genus Cryptoblabes Zeller

Cryptoblabes Zeller, 1848:644.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Cryptoblabes rutilella Zeller, 1848:645, by monotypy.

Cryptoblabes ardescens (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURES 17, 18, 274e

Eurhodope ardescens Meyrick, 1929b:160.—Viette, 1949a:321.—Clarke, 1971:91, fig. 81, pl. 12c,d.

TYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Society Islands, Raiatea.

DISTRIBUTION.—Society Islands (Tahiti, Raiatea); Austral Islands (Rurutu, Rapa): Marquesas Islands:Nuku Hiva: Pakiu Valley, 1000–1700 ft (304.8–518 m), 30 Jan to 14 Feb 1968, 12, 4; Taiohae, 17 Jan to 2 Feb 1968, 6, 5; Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 1, 3. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 12 Feb to 14 Mar 1968, 6, 44; Tahauku, 2–12 Mar 1968, 2, 4. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11–20 Mar 1968, 21, 36; Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 3; Teavapuhiau, Ouia, 750 m, 1–3 Aug 1977, 1, 3 (Montgomery).

FIGURE 17.—Cryptoblabes ardescens (Meyrick): a, ventral view of male genitalia with aedeagus removed, and showing expanded right corema; b, aedeagus.

FIGURE 18.—Cryptoblabes ardescens (Meyrick): a, venation of right wings; b, ventral view of female genitalia.

Eiao: Northern highlands, 400 m, 7 Aug 1977, 1 (Montgomery).

FOOD PLANTS.—Mangifera indica L. (inflorescence); Pandanus tectorius Parkinson (fruit stalk); Oparanthus rapensis (F. Brown) Sherff; Psidium guajava L. (fruit); Tamarindus indica L. (dead and living leaflets); Eugenia uniflora L. (fruit).

This species is probably widely distributed throughout the Pacific islands since the larvae seem to have a great tolerance for a variety of foods.

Although figured in Clarke (1971, figs. 81, 82) the figures are repeated here for completeness.

Genus Ernophthora Meyrick

Ernophthora Meyrick, 1887:263.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Ernophthora phoenicias Meyrick, 1887:263, by monotypy.

Ernophthora denticornis (Meyrick)

FIGURES 19, 274f,g

Aspithra denticornis Meyrick, 1929b:156.

Ernophthora denticornis (Meyrick).—Meyrick, 1934:335.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24774. Harpe costa concave, narrowly sclerotized, cucullus rounded. Transtilla three branched, the posterior arm indented distally. Uncus elongate, triangular, pointed; on each side, near base, a slender hooked process. Vinculum broadly rounded. Tegumen much broader than long. Anellus a subquadrate plate with a digitate process from each side posteriorly. Aedeagus stout, simple; vesica apparently unarmed.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24775, 24810, 24862. Ostium broad, transverse, funnel-shaped. Much heavy scaling around ostium. Inception of ductus seminalis at posterior third of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae ornamented with numerous, very fine longitudinal ridges. Bursa copulatrix mostly granular. Signum an oval dentate plate.

LECTOTYPE.—Male, 21 mm, “Hiva Oa, Marquesas, at light, 3500 ft. 28.1.25. St. George Expedn. C.L. Collenette.” The specimen bears the usual British Museum “Type” label. In addition, a white rectangular label reads “Aspithra denticornis, Meyrick, Holotype.” There is also a label in Meyrick's hand “Aspithra denticornis Meyr.” Slide JFGC No. 11948. Lectotype hereby designated.

Lectotype is in the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, 3500 ft (1067 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

We have 33 specimens from two islands as follows. Nuku Hiva: Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 1. Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m), 1 Mar 1968, 9, and 3800 ft (1158 m), 20 Feb 1968, 11 , 12.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Meyrick (1934C:335) lists this species also from the islands of Tahuata and Uapou and from Fatu Hiva (1929b:157).

Ernophthora iospila, new species

FIGURES 20, 274h

Alar expanse 22–28 mm.

Labial palpus sorghum brown mixed with fuscous scales. Antenna sorghum brown with buff spots dorsally. Head, thorax, and forewing ground color sorghum brown, the forewing slightly paler toward dorsum, and with very fine fuscous irroration; from near base, along cell, a faint buff stripe extends nearly to termen; near apical third, inside costa, a small but well-defined blackish spot; cilia sorghum brown. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia with reddish tinge. Fore-, mid-, and hindlegs sorghum brown with fine fuscous irrorations; hindleg tibia mostly ochraceous buff. Abdomen ochraceous buff dorsally, sorghum brown ventrally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24776. Ostium broad, transverse, funnel-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis lateral, from ductus bursae slightly posterior to bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix very finely granular. Signum a curved, sclerotized rod with a triangular, dentate plate anteriorly.

FIGURE 19.—Ernophthora denticornis (Meyrick): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 20.—Ernophthora iospila, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100729.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (20 Feb 1968) and 7 paratypes with the same data.

This species has an almost unicolorous forewing. The only contrasting feature is the small black dot inside costa at about apical third. One specimen, the largest of the series, has a somewhat darker hindwing than the other examples.

Ernophthora dryinandra (Meyrick)

FIGURES 21, 275a–d

Aspithra dryinandra Meyrick, 1929b:157.

Ernophthora dryinandra (Meyrick).—Meyrick, 1934c:335.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24780, 24817. Harpe slightly broader at middle, evenly curved; costa sclerotized; cucullus rounded. Transtillar arms converging to form a long, sclerotized, median rod. Uncus narrowed distally, with basal lateral arms. Vinculum a broad band. Tegumen broader than long. Anellus a quadrate plate with posterior pointed processes laterally. Aedeagus smooth, curved; vesica armed with an irregular patch of spiculate cornuti.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24777, 24778, 24779, 24784. Ostium very broad, funnel-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis lateral, from anterior third of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae membranous except finely granular before ostium. Bursa copulatrix mostly membranous but partly finely granular. Signum an oval, sclerotized plate armed with dentate processes.

LECTOTYPE.—Male, 18 mm., “Hiva Oa, Marquesas. At light, 3500 ft 28.1.25 St. George Expedn. C.L. Collenette.” The specimen is marked “Allotype” on a yellow-bordered, round label. A rectangular label reads, “Aspithra dryinandra Meyrick. Allotype.” A third, small rectangular label bears the inscription “Brit. Mus. 1925–488.” Slide JFGC No. 11951. Lectotype hereby designated.

FIGURE 21.—Ernophthora dryinandra (Meyrick): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Lectotype is in the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, 3500 ft (1067 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

I have 50 specimens from the following localities. Nuku Hiva: Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 1. Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3700–3800 ft (1028–1158 m), 20 Feb to 20 Mar 1958, 9, 28 (11–20 Mar dates for reared specimens). Ootua, 800 m, 27–30 July 1977, 1 (Montgomery). Fatu Hiva: Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 6; Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 1. Teavapuhiau, Ouia, 750 m, 1–3 Aug 1977, 1 (Montgomery). Uapou: above Hakahetau, 800 m, 23–24 July 1977, 2 1 (Montgomery).

FOOD PLANT.—Vaccinium cereum (L.f.) Forster f. (HO8).

The Vaccinium was growing alongside the trail at 3700 ft (1028 m), in the cloud forest, among thick moss, fern, and other plants, and was recumbent and vinelike. The larvae of dryinandra feed in the leaves, tying them together, skeletonizing large areas.

Ernophthora lechriogramma, new species

FIGURES 22, 275e–g

Alar expanse 16–24 mm.

Male: Labial palpus prout's brown mixed with very fine fuscous irrorations. Antenna light grayish brown with prout's brown spots dorsally. Head, thorax, and forewing ground color prout's brown, the whole finely speckled with fuscous; center of thorax with a warm buff patch; tegula fuscous posteriorly; from near base of costa to middorsum a slender buff line with a parallel fuscous shade inwardly; in outer third of forewing a perceptible, outwardly oblique, fuscous shade; termen with a slender blackish fuscous line; cilia reddish. Hindwing gray with modified scales centrally, some toward costa metallic; an elongate light buff patch subcostally; margins light buff; terminal line, narrow, blackish fuscous; cilia light buff to ochraceous buff. Fore- and midlegs prout's brown, suffused fuscous; hindleg mostly ochraceous buff; femur shaded prout's brown. Abdomen gray dorsally shading to buff posteriorly; buff ventrally suffused brownish.

Female: Essentially the same as male except hindwing pale buff, slightly darker toward apex; cilia buff except darker around apical portion of termen. Abdomen ochraceous buff dorsally; ventrally shaded prout's brown.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24809, 24816. Harpe simple, broadest at middle; costa narrowly sclerotized; cucullus rounded. Transtilla with a slender, sclerotized median process indented distally. Uncus narrowly triangular with a knobbed process basally on each side. Vinculum broadly rounded. Tegumen broader than long. Anellus a subquadrate plate with digitate process posteriorly on each side. Aedeagus stout, simple, curved; vesica armed with a few weak spiculate cornuti.

Female genitalia slides USNM 25182, 25183, 25184. Ostium transverse, broad, funnel-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis lateral, about middle of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous, with some weak granulation. Signum a small oval plate with an anterior extention on one side, the whole comblike on inner edge.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100727.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

Described from the holotype (20 Feb 1968), 30 and 69 paratypes from the following localities. Nuku Hiva: Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 1; Tunoa Ridge 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 12, 17.

Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m), 20 Feb 1968, 9, 13, and 3400 ft (1036 m), 1 Mar 1968, 22; Ootua, 800 m, 27–30 Jul 1977, 4; Toovii, Ooumu, 900 m, 16–19 July 1977, 1 (Montgomery). Fatu Hiva: Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 6; Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 5; Mt Upe, 2025 ft (617 m), 3 Apr 1968, 1. Teavapuhiau, Ouia, 150 m, 1–3 Aug 1977, 1 (Montgomery). Uapou: above Hakahetau, 800 m, 23–24 Jul 1977, 8, 4 (Montgomery).

FIGURE 22.—Ernophthora lechriogramma, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Ernophthora lechriogramma is similar, and closely related to denticornis, but lacks the pale transverse fascia well before termen and also lacks the light outwardly oblique dash slightly beyond middle.

The females collected in March and April are lighter colored (considerably more reddish) than those collected in January and February.

Ernophthora aphanoptera, new species

FIGURES 23, 276a,b

Alar expanse 15–20 mm.

Labial palpus deep olive buff; second and third segments each with a patch of mixed fuscous and reddish scales on outer side. Antenna deep olive buff spotted fuscous dorsally. Head and thorax a mixture of deep olive buff, fuscous and reddish scales. Forewing ground color blackish fuscous but largely obscured by olive buff, white, and reddish scales; usually from basal fourth of costa a poorly defined, transverse fascia indicated by mixed white and reddish scales; on middle of costa a more-or-less well-defined, large triangle of ground color; much of dorsum broadly marked by white and reddish scales; along termen a series of 6 or 7 blackish fuscous spots; cilia mixed deep olive buff, fuscous, and reddish. Hindwing of silvery gray; cilia deep olive buff with a grayish subbasal line; deep olive buff, cilia a shade lighter. Fore- and midleg a mixture of blackish fuscous, reddish, and deep olive buff; hindleg deep olive buff with some grayish suffusion. Abdomen of gray, mixed olive buff dorsally, deep olive buff ventrally; deep olive buff, ventrally with some grayish fuscous scaling.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24781, 24782. Harpe simple, curved, costa broadly sclerotized; cucullus rounded. Median arm of transtilla reaching end of uncus, distal end indented. Uncus long, slender, bluntly pointed. Vinculum broadly rounded. Tegumen broader than long. Anellus a subquadrate plate with a slender, digitate process from each side posteriorly. Aedeagus stout, curved; vesica armed with a cluster of very fine cornuti.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24783. Ostium transverse, funnel-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis from anterior end of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix finely spiculate to granular. Signum an oval, sclerotized plate with serrate edge.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100730.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

FOOD PLANT.—Bidens heneyi Scherff. (HO9).

Described from the holotype (30 Jan 1968), 9 and 6 paratypes as follows. Nuku Hiva: Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 3, 4; Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 2, 1. Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m), 1 Mar and Em 15 Mar 1968, 2; and 3800 ft (1158 m), 20 Feb 1968, 2. Fatu Hiva: Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 1.

The genitalia of E. aphanoptera are, for all practical purposes, identical to those E. dryinandra, but the coloring of both males and females of the former is different from that of the latter.

The larvae were feeding on the leaves of the yellow flowered composite shrub Bidens heneyi growing alongside trail (cloud forest). The larvae fed mainly in the terminals. Webbing between the leaves was conspicuous. Some feeding takes place among dead leaves attached to the plant. One pupa was found in a rolled dead leaf.

Ernophthora palassoptera, new species

FIGURES 24, 275h

Alar expanse 16 mm.

Labial palpus clay color speckled fuscous. Antenna clay color with grayish fuscous annulations. Head and thorax clay color mixed with fuscous scales. Forewing ground color clay color abundantly speckled fuscous; from basal third of costa, an outwardly oblique pale clay color transverse line extends to middorsum; a very faint pale clay color transverse line extends subapically from costa to tornus; slightly beyond middle, inside costa, a blackish fuscous spot; subterminally, a series of four blackish fuscous spots; cilia clay color with grayish fuscous subbasal line. Hindwing buff, slightly infuscated toward margins; cilia pale clay color with darker subbasal line. Legs buff variously marked with fuscous. Abdomen light ochraceous buff dorsally with a sprinkling of fuscous scales; ventrally profusely irrorate fuscous.

FIGURE 23.—Ernophthora aphanoptera, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 24.—Ernophthora palassoptera, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25245. Ostium rather small, transverse. Inception of ductus seminalis lateral, from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous, finely grandular. Signum a small, sclerotized plate, irregularly dentate anteriorly.

HOLOTYPE.-USNM 100728.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (27 Mar 1968).

Of all the Ernophthora species recorded from the Marquesas, palassoptera is the only one that has a uniform ground color speckled with blackish fuscous. The signum places palassoptera near dryinandra.

Ernophthora maculicostella (Ragonot), new combination

FIGURES 25, 276c

Aspithra maculicostella Ragonot, 1888: 37.—Meyrick, 1929b: 157.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24867. Harpe simple, costa strongly sclerotized. Transtilla 3-branched, the median branch very long, slightly indented distally. Uncus very long, bluntly pointed. Vinculum broadly rounded. Tegumen broader than long. Anellus a subquadrate plate with digitate process on each side posteriorly. Aedeagus stout, slightly bent; vesica armed with a large, dense cluster of small cornuti.

FIGURE 25.—Ernophthora maculicostella (Ragonot): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24868. Ostium broad, transverse. Inception of ductus seminalis from anterior third of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix mostly membranous, with some fine to coarse granulations. Signum a subtriangular sclerotized plate with a large toothlike projection from one end, the latter with dentate inner edge.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Museum d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—“Iles Marquises.”

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

I did not find this species on our expedition, and it is known to me only from the type and the series in the British Museum (Natural History).

Ernophthora chrysura (Meyrick)

FIGURES 26, 276d, h

Aspithra chrysura Meyrick, 1929b:158.

Ernophthora chrysura (Meyrick).—Meyrick, 1934c:336.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25219. Harpe simple, widest at middle, weak; cucullus rounded. Median arm of transtilla slender, pointed. Uncus twice as long as wide at base; narrowly rounded at apex. Vinculum V-shaped with strong scaletuft from each side. Tegumen broader than long. Anellus a quadrate plate with long, fleshy, digitate lobe from each side posteriorly. Aedeagus moderately stout; vesica apparently unarmed.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25216. Ostium moderately broad, funnel-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis lateral, from anterior part of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae membranous, with some granulation posteriorly. Bursa copulatrix membranous with some small granulations. Signum an oval plate with a large serrate tooth from one end.

ORIGINAL MATERIAL.—“. 15–18 mm…Marquesas, Nuku Hiva, Hiva Oa, to 300 feet, January, February; 3 ex.” (Meyrick, 1929b:158).

LECTOTYPE.—A large white data label contains the following: “Nuku Hiva, Marquesas, at light, 300 ft., 24.1.25, St. George Expedn. C. L. Collenette.” A small white label reads “Brit. Mus. 1925–488.” A third white label bears “Aspithra chrysura, Meyrick. Holotype.” A long, narrow white label, in Meyrick's hand, reads “Aspithra chrysura Meyr.” Above all these labels is the British Museum, red-bordered, circular “type” label. Lectotype hereby designated.

Lectotype is in the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, 300 ft (91 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

Our four specimens are all from low elevation and are as follows. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 16 Feb 1968, 2, and 24 Feb 1968, 1. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 15 Mar 1968, 1.

This species is unlike most species of Ernophthora, resembling more closely such species as Cadra cautella (Walker).

The large anal tufts of the male immediately identify it.

Genus Zamagiria Dyar

Zamagiria Dyar, 1914:329.”

TYPE-SPECIES.—Zamagiria dixolophella Dyar, 1914:329, by monotypy and original designation.

Zamagiria exedra, new species

FIGURES 27, 276e

Alar expanse 17 mm.

Labial palpus cinereous; second segment dark gray anteriorly; third segment almost wholly dark gray. Antenna dark gray. Head cinereous. Thorax cinereous with scattered darker scales. Forewing ground color cinereous, largely overlaid with dark gray scales; from basal third of costa to middorsum an outwardly oblique dark gray fascia; from apical fifth of costa to tornus an irregular dark gray fascia edged outwardly by an irregular line of ground color; between the two transverse lines a pair of dark gray spots; along termen a series of 7 small dark spots; cilia gray, with whitish tips. Hindwing light gray, darker along margin; cilia gray with darker subbasal line. Fore- and midleg gray; hindleg cinereous marked dark gray. Abdomen gray.

FIGURE 26.—Ernophthora chrysura (Meyrick): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 27.—Zamagiria exedra, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia USNM 24818. Ostium very broad, transverse. Inception of ductus seminalis dorsolateral from posterior end of bursa copulatrix, opposite posterior end of signum. Ductus bursae very short, membranous posteriorly, with a coarsely granular section at junction with bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous anteriorly, sclerotized posteriorly. Signum a long, spinous, sclerotized rod.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100726.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Taiohae.

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (18 Jan 1968).

In placing this species in the Neotropical genus Zamagiria I do so with considerable misgiving. All of the previously described species of this genus are Neotropical, and one, Z. laidion (Zeller), reaches Florida in the United States. Nevertheless, the signum, venation, and labial palpi match those of the genus and exedra has a signum almost identical to that of Z. dixolophella, the type of that genus. Superficially, exedra is nearest dixolophella. Of the Marquesan species of Phycitinae, exedra superficially resembles most closely Ernophthora chrysura (Meyrick).

I suggest that exedra represents an unknown Neotropical species introduced into Nuku Hiva.

Genus Cateremna Meyrick

Cateremna Meyrick 1882:156.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Euzophera microdoxa Meyrick, 1879b:231, subsequent designation by Hampson, 1912a:1252.

Cateremna halmophila Meyrick

FIGURES 28, 276f

Cateremna halmophila Meyrick, 1929b:159.

FIGURE 28.—Cateremna halmophila Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24793, 25173, 25176. Harpe broadest beyond middle; costa narrowly, but strongly sclerotized; cucullus rounded. Gnathos terminating in a sharply pointed hook. Uncus rounded and densely clothed with setae distally. Transtillar elements fused forming a Y-shaped distal end. Vinculum U-shaped. Tegumen shorter than broad. Anellus a rectangular plate with a digitate process on each side posteriorly. Aedeagus short and stout; vesica armed with a swirl of spiculate cornuti.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24792, 25174, JFGC 11953. Ostium transverse, funnel—shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis from bursa copulatrix, near signum. Ductus bursae rather broad, membranous. Bursa copulatrix finely granular over most of its inner surface. Signum a narrow, curved, folded rod with dentate edges.

ORIGINAL MATERIAL.—“. 18–22 mm…Marquesas, Hiva Oa, Tahuata, Fatu Hiva, to 850 feet. December, January; Society Is., Raiatea, May (Miss Cheesman); 26 ex.”

LECTOTYPE.—Female, 19 mm. “Tahuata, Marquesas, at light, 850 ft., 12.1.25. St. George Espedn. C.L. Collenette.” There is a white rectangular label with “Cateremna halmophila Meyrick. Allotype.” A yellow bordered round label bears the words “Paratype” and “Allotype.” In addition a small white label bears “Brit. Mus. 1925–488.” Slide JFGC. No. 11953.

I have selected the female because the male, marked “Type,” is in poor condition. The female is clearly marked and matches perfectly the fresh material in hand. Lectotype hereby designated.

Lectotype is in the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Tahuata.

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands, Society Islands.

I have before me the following 30 specimens. Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 16–28 Jan 1968, 1, 4. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 22 Feb to 7 Mar 1968, 5. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 14–29 Mar 1968, 7, 11, and 6–8 Apr 1968, 1 1.

FOOD.—Unknown.

The 8th tergum and sternum of the male are modified. Apparently this species is associated with human habitation since all of the specimens were collected at low elevations in the above-named villages.

Meyrick's specimen of Cateremna albicostalis in the British Museum is halmophila.

Cateremna decipula, new species

FIGURES 29, 276g

Alar expanse 13–16 mm.

Labial palpus white; second segment shaded grayish fuscous distally on outer side; third segment grayish fuscous. Antenna grayish fuscous. Head grayish fuscous; face whitish. Thorax grayish fuscous. Forewing ground color grayish fuscous; costa white from near base to apex; at inner edge of white costal streak, at apical third, a small fuscous spot; subterminally, a suggestion of a grayish transverse line; extreme termen narrowly fuscous; cilia grayish fuscous. Hindwing light gray, darker around margin; cilia grayish. Legs sordid white suffused and marked grayish fuscous. Abdomen grayish dorsally, sordid white ventrally.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24787, 25178. Harpe simple, broadest distad; cucullus narrowly rounded. Gnathos terminating in a slender, curved process. Transtilla Y-shaped, distally deeply incised. Uncus triangular; posterior half clothed with setae. Vinculum broadly rounded. Tegumen short and broad. Anellus a lightly sclerotized curved plate with a digitate process posteriorly on each side. Aedeagus short, stout, thickest about middle; vesica armed with a large group of spicules.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24789, 24799. Ostium oval, small. Inception of ductus seminalis from anterior half of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae short, gradually widening and merging with bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix granular posteriorly, membranous anteriorly. Signum a slender, curved, sclerotized plate with median ridge.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100732.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Omoa.

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa, Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

FIGURE 29.—Cateremna decipula, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Described from the holotype (11 Mar 1968), 1, 2 paratypes from Omoa, 13–18 Mar 1968; 19, Hiva Oa, Atuona, 27 Feb 1968. In addition to the above there are 2 small (9 and 11 mm) from Atuona, 15 and 18 Feb 1968, which may be conspecific but which are not included in the type series. The male genitalia are indistinguishable from those of the holotype.

This species is closely related to C. halmophila Meyrick but lacks the transverse fascia at basal third and the oblique apical shade of forewing.

Genus Ctenomeristis Meyrick

Ctenomeristis Meyrick, 1929b:159.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Ceroprepes almella Meyrick, 1879a: 210, original designation by Meyrick, 1929b:159.

Ctenomeristis ochrodepta Meyrick

FIGURES 30, 277a,b

Ctenomeristis ochrodepta Meyrick, 1929b:159; 1934c:336.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25214. Harpe of about equal width throughout; from base, near middle, a sclerotized bar extends diagonally to fuse with sacculus and terminates in one or two sharp spines; costa strongly curved; cucullus rounded. Gnathos short, terminating in a point. Uncus very broad, rounded. Vinculum rounded. Tegumen broader than long. Anellus a broadly oval plate. Aedeagus short and stout; vesica armed with several long, strong cornuti and a cluster of shorter ones.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25215. Ostium broad, transverse. Inception of ductus seminalis lateral from near posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae short, about half the length of bursa copulatrix; membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signa two large, sclerotized, irregular plates.

ORIGINAL MATERIAL.—“. 18–22 mm…Marquesas, Hiva Oa, Tahuata, Fatu Hiva, to 850 feet, December, January; 144 ex.”

LECTOTYPE.—Male, “Marquesas, Hiva Oa, at light, 26.12.24. St. George Expedition. C.L. Collenette.” A large white label is inscribed, “Ctenomeristis ochrodepta Meyrick. Holotype.” A small label reads “Brit. Mus. 1925-488.” An elongate label, in Meyrick's hand, reads “Ctenomeristis ochrodepta Meyr.” Below this is a black-bordered orange label with “Original specimen for color slide no. photogr. 1959. U. Roesler/ Holotypus.” Below these labels is the British Museum circular “lectotype” label and at the top of all the labels is the usual British Museum circular, red-bordered “type” label. Lectotype hereby designated.

Lectotype is in the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa.

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

I have 27 specimens from the following localities. Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 17 Jan 1968, 1; Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 3, 7; Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 1, 1. Toovii, Ooumu, 900 m, 16–19 Jul 1977, 1, 2 (Montgomery). Hiva Oa: Atuona, 12 Feb to 7 Mar 1968, 1, 9. Ootua, 800 m, 27–30 Jul 1977, 1 (Montgomery).

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

The genitalia immediately distinguish ochrodepta from other phycitid species and it does not appear to have any close relatives in these islands.

Delcina, new genus

TYPE-SPECIES.—Delcina diaspora, new species, by monotypy and present designation.

The gender of the generic name is feminine.

Antenna of male pectinate, nearly as long as forewing; basal segment notched (female unknown). Labial palpus obliquely upturned, scarcely reaching middle of frons; maxillary palpus minute. Head slightly roughened. Tongue well developed, scaled. Thorax with posterior tuft. Hind tibia loosely scaled above. Forewing smooth, costa straight, apex rounded, termen oblique, 11 veins, 1b simple; 2 from before angle of cell; 3 well separated from 2; 4 and 5 stalked; 6 connate with 8 + 9; 8 and 9 coincident; 10 approximate to 8 + 9; 11 from well before 10; 12 from near base. Hindwing with 7 veins; 2 from cell, well before 3; 4 and 5 coincident; 3 approximate to 4 + 5; 6 anastomosed with stalk of 7 and 8; 7 and 8 very longstalked.

FIGURE 30.—Ctenomeristis ochrodepta Meyrick: a, venation of right wings; b, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; c, aedeagus; d, ventral view of female genitalia.

Male genitalia symmetrical. Uncus and gnathos present; socius absent.

Female genitalia unknown.

Delcina is reminiscent of Monoptilota Hulst (1900:13), both having a pectinate antenna in the male, but in the forewing of Delcina veins 8 and 9 are coincident, in Monoptilota 8 and 9 are stalked. In the hindwing veins 4 and 5 are coincident in Delcina, stalked in Monoptilota.

Delcina diaspora, new species

FIGURES 31, 277c

Alar expanse 30 mm.

Labial palpus fuscous, with whitish scales at the distal ends of the second and third segments. Antenna fuscous. Head fuscous between antennae, grayish posteriorly; frons grayish. Thorax grayish, but many scales suffused grayish fuscous. Forewing ground color grayish; basal third fuscous, followed by an irregular band of ground color, this preceding a broad transverse, dentate, blackish fuscous fascia; at end of cell a blackish fuscous, bilobed spot; from apical fourth of costa to tornus an ill-defined transverse fascia; around termen a series of 6 blackish fuscous spots; cilia grayish with a darker basal line. Hindwing grayish fuscous, darker toward margins. Legs mixed grayish and fuscous. Abdomen grayish fuscous above, grayish ventrally.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24898. Harpe simple, widest before middle; costa strongly sclerotized; sacculus very short, sclerotized, terminating in a sharp point. Gnathos terminating in a point. Uncus broad, hood-shaped, profusely clothed with setae. Vinculum wide, broadly rounded. Tegumen lightly sclerotized, narrowed posteriorly. Anellus a narrow, sclerotized, transverse plate with a narrow, curved process on each side posteriorly. Aedeagus stout, straight; vesica apparently unarmed.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100731.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (20 Feb 1968).

As in Ctenomeristis ochrodepta Meyrick (1929b:159) the antennae of the male of diaspora are pectinated, but the latter species has a narrower, longer forewing than the former. Moreover the basal fourth of the forewing of diaspora is wholly fuscous, not so in ochrodepta.

Genus Phycita Curtis

Phycita Curtis, 1828 [1824–1839], part 2, 5(68) [No. 233].

TYPE-SPECIES.—Tinea spiciella Fabricius, 1798:420, by original designation.

Phycita orthoclina Meyrick

FIGURES 32, 277d

Phycita orthoclina Meyrick, 1929b:158; 1934c:336.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24891.Harpe very slender; from ventral edge, at base, a cluster of modified scales. Gnathos an elongate oval plate with ventral keel. Uncus subtriangular; distally bluntly pointed. Vinculum broad basally, narrowed and rounded distally. Tegumen broad basally, narrowed posteriorly. Anellus a subquadrate, sclerotized plate. Aedeagus stout, straight, about as long as harpe; vesica armed with a cluster of strong cornuti.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24892. Ostium very broad, transverse. Inception of ductus seminalis dorsal, from bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae very short, membranous. Bursa copulatrix with a granular band posteriorly, preceded by a broad, strongly sclerotized section from which dorsoanteriorly is emitted an elongate, sclerotized, curved plate armed with stout spines; anterior half of bursa membranous.

ORIGINAL MATERIAL.—“. 17–20 mm…Marquesas, Hiva Oa, Nuka Hiva, Tahuata, to 1200 feet, December, January; 15 ex.”

FIGURE 31.—Delcina diaspora, new species: a, venation of right wings; b, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; c, aedeagus.

LECTOTYPE.—Male; a white label reads “Hiva Oa, Marquesas, at light, 800 ft. 2.1.25. St. George Expedn. C.L. Collenette.” A second white label bears the inscription, “Phycita orthoclina Meyrick. Holotype.” A narrow white label, in Meyrick's hand reads “Phycita orthoclina Meyr.” A small white label has printed “Brit. Mus. 1925–488.” The usual British Museum red-bordered “Type” label appears immediately below specimen. Lectotype hereby designated.

Lectotype is in the British Museum (Natural History).

FIGURE 32.—Phycita orthoclina Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed: b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, 800 ft (244 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

Our specimens are from the following localities. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 12 Feb 1968, 2. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 14 Mar 1968, 1 Mt Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 1. Teavapuhiau, Ouia, 250m, 23–24 Jul 1977, and 1; 750 m, 1–3 Aug 1977, 1 (Montgomery).

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

In addition to the localities listed above, Meyrick (1929b:158) recorded the species from Nuku Hiva and Tahuata. The species is probably well established throughout the Marquesas.

Genus Cadra Walker

Cadra Walker, 1864 [1856–1866]:961.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Cadra defectella Walker, 1864 [1856–1866]:962; by monotypy.

Cadra cautella (Walker)

FIGURES 33, 277e,f

Pempelia cautella Walker, 1863 [1856–1866]:73.—Moore 1886 [1884–1887]:369.

Cadra cautella (Walker).—Whalley, 1960:183.—Sweeney, 1963:164.—Aitken, 1963:179, fig. 6.—Hannemann, 1964:219, fig. 145.—Takahashi and Mutuura, 1964:129, figs. 1–3.—Okumura, 1966:183.—Boles and Marzke, 1966:260.—Issiki et al., 1969:66, pl. 32: fig. 128.—Clarke, 1971:93, fig. 84, pl. 12h.—Press and Flaherty, 1973:147–148.—Cogburn, 1973a:401; 1973b:427.—Hagstrum and Tomblin, 1973:809–812; 1975:358–363.—Brower, 1976:1011–1015.—Leraut, 1980:113 [No. 2798].—Inoue et al., 1982:388, pl. 46: fig. 73.—Shin et al., 1983:422, pl. 29: fig. 469.

Cadra defectella Walker, 1864 [1856–1866]:962.

Nephopteryx desuetella Walker, 1866 [1856–1866]:1719.

Ephestia cahiritella Zeller, 1867:384.—Ragonot, 1885:24, 25.—South, 1890:304.—Pearce, 1891:18.—Meyrick, 1895:373.—Chittenden, 1897:7, 39, fig. 1.—Van Deventer, 1904:80.—Maxwell-Lefroy, 1906:256, fig. [312].—Maxwell-Lefroy and Howlett, 1909:512, fig. 340.

Ephestia passulella Barrett, 1875:271.—Porritt, 1882: 142.—Buckler, 1882:104.—Porritt, 1883:41.—Atmore, 1884:258.

Salebria cautella (Walker).—Swinhoe and Cotes, 1889 [1887–1889]:675 [No. 4586].—Hampson, 1891:41.

Ephestia cautella (Walker).—Hampson, 1896 [1894–1896], 4:66.—Ragonot, 1901:292, pl. 34: fig. 23.—Leech, 1901:406.—Rebel, 1901:16 [No. 271].—Dyar, 1903:435 [No. 4875].—Holland, 1903:414, figs. 234, 235.—Hulst, 1903:434.—Matsumura, 1908:195 [No. 1631].—Maxwell-Lefroy and Howlett, 1909:512.—Fletcher, 1910a:298 [No. 98], 321.—Spuler, 1910:202.—Chittenden, 1911:1–40.—de Joannis, 1913:317.—Duport, 1913:35 [No. 224].—Dyar, 1914:345.—Zacher, 1916:199.—Fletcher, 1917:107.—Rebel and Zerny, 1917:437 [No. 85].—Barnes and McDunnough, 1917:149.—Janse, 1917:151 [No. 2389].—Essig, 1920:121.—d'Emmerez de Charmoy and Gebert, 1921:186.—Forbes, 1923:635.—Essig, 1926:711.—Curran, 1926:386.—Meyrick, 1928:388.—Shibuya, 1928b:77.—Auctorum, 1928:6.—de Joannis, 1930 [1929–1930]:[379] 617.—Richards and Herford, 1930:380.—Noyes, 1930:80.—Simmons, Reed, and McGregor, 1931:36.—Keifer, 1931:619.—Richards and Thompson, 1932:197.—Pemberton, 1932:126.—Bovingdon, 1933:1–88.—Norris, 1934:333–360.—Tams, 1935:274.—Lhomme, 1935:8 [No. 1686].—Zerny, 1935:112.—Dickins, 1936:342.—Swezey, 1936:196.—Lehmensick and Liebers, 1937:443.—Pierce and Metcalfe, 1938:7, pl. 4.—Yatomi and Yamashita, 1938:133.—McDunnough, 1939:35.—Fukaya, 1939:96.—Bondar, 1940:125.—Ghosh, 1940C: 196.—Hinton, 1942:21–25, fig. 4, 12, pl. 1: fig. 2; 1943:193.—Corbet and Tams, 1943C:64, figs. 56, 62, 110, 147, pl. 3: figs. 8–9.—Hinton and Corbet, 1943:31, figs. 53, 74, 78.—Swezey, 1944:143.—Essig and Hoskins, 1944:65.—Kloet and Hincks, 1945:113.—Fraenkel and Blewett, 1946a:162–171; 1946b:172–190.—Ford, 1949:13.—DeLucca, 1949:148.—Cotton, 1950:733.—Hartig and Amsel, 1951:51.—Beirne, 1952:82, figs. 62, 70; pl. 6: fig. 5.—van Deurs, 1952:280.—Rungs, 1953:68.—Auctorum, 1953:9.—Kalshoven, 1954:6.—Paulian and Viette, 1955:188.—Wise, 1955:527, 528.—Burges, 1956:813.—Fujimoto, 1956:20, pl. 6: fig. 5.—Hartig, 1956:95.—Takahashi, 1956:179.—Heinrich, 1956:298, 302–304, figs. 125, 629, 1121.—Wiltshire, 1957:115 [No. 594].—Janjua and Haque, 1958:144 [No. 108].—Zimmerman, 1958b: 20, 379, figs. 317, 318, 323.—Abraham, 1958:540.—Sømme, 1959:20, fig. 1.—Jensen, 1959:64, figs. 1(3, 4), 2(3, 4).—Wolff, 1959:124, figs. 5, 8.—Inoue et al., 1959:236, pl. 166: fig. 22.—Wattal and Kalra, 1960:79.—Whalley, 1960:183–184.—Thomas et al., 1960:114.—Beardsley, 1961:354.—Mathlein, 1961:36.—Butler, 1961:384.—Takahashi: 1963:117.—Takahashi and Mutuura, 1964:129, figs. 1–3.—Tuli and Mookherjee, 1963:379.—Knocke, 1963:7, fig. 3(2–6); pl. 1A–E.—Patel et al., 1964:366.—Zaguliaev, 1965:32.—Comstock, 1966:52.—Tello, 1968:228—Steele, 1970:229–245.—Balachowsky, 1972:1237.—Chiu and Chien, 1974:50, 57, fig. 4.—Mullen and Arbogast, 1977:641.—Shaffer, 1978:23.—Brower, 1983:21 [No. 6403]

FIGURE 33.—Cadra cautella (Walker): a, venation of right wings; b, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; c, aedeagus; d, ventral view of female genitalia.

Cryptoblabes formosella Wileman and South, 1918:219.—Shibuya, 1928b:17, 88.

Xenephestia cautella (Walker).—Gozmány, 1958:223, fig. 1E. Ephestia (Cadra) cautella (Walker).—Hannemann, 1964:222 [No. 145].

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Ceylon.

DISTRIBUTION.—Cosmopolitan.

Our series from the Marquesas consists of 26 specimens as follows. Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 27 Jan 1968, 1. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 10–29 Feb 1968, 8, 17.

FOODS.—Dried and stored vegetable products. This common, cosmopolitan species is carried in commerce throughout the world and is seen commonly flying around the copra boats that ply between the islands of the Pacific. in American economic literature it is known as the “almond moth,” but in economic literature generally it is referred to as the “fig moth” or “dried currant moth.”

I have figured the genitalia for completeness; but for a comprehensive treatment of this species and allies, see Heinrich 1956.

Subfamily PYRAUSTINAE

Key to the Genera of Pyraustinae

Genus Spoladea Guenée

Spoladea Guenée, 1854:224.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Phalaena recurvalis Fabricius, 1775:644; subsequent designation by Shibuya, 1928b:178.

Spoladea recurvalis (Fabricius)

FIGURES 34, 35, 277g

Phalaena recurvalis Fabricius, 1775:644; 1781:274; 1787:22; 1794 [1793–1794] 2:237.—Aurivillius, 1898:169.

Spoladea recurvalis (Fabricius).—Guenée, 1854:225, pl. 8: fig. 5; 1862:62.—Hering, 1901:324.—Clarke, 1971:69, figs. 66, 67.—Auctorum, 1975:8.

Phalaena Pyralis fascialis Cramer, 1782 [1777–1782]:1 and 236, pl. 398, fig. 0.

Phalaena angustalis Fabricius, 1787:22 [No. 309].

Pyralis fascialis Cramer.—Stoll, 1791:163, pl. 36: fig. [13][text fig. 12 in error].

Piralis recurvalis Anonymous, 1802:28.

Phycis recurvella Zincken, 1818:143.

Hymenia diffascialis Hübner, 1825 [1816–1826]: 361 [No. 2453].

Hydrocampa albifascialis Boisduval, 1833b:119, pl. 16: fig 7.

Zinckenia recurvalis (Fabricius).—Zeller, 1852 [1854]:55.—Lederer, 1863:437.—Walker, 1866 [1856–1866]:1321.—Wocke, 1871:214 [No. 273].—Snellen, 1872:95.—Meyrick, 1884:308.—Pagenstecher, 1884: 280.—Snellen, 1884:43.—Meyrick, 1885:105; 1886b:252.—Pagenstecher, 1888:198 [No. 661].—Meyrick, 1888b:217.—Möschler, 1891:312.—Gundlach, 1891:362.—Snellen, 1891:629.—Rebel, 1892:247.—Snellen, 1892:75.—von Hedemann, 1894:294.—Pagenstecher, 1894:43.—Rebel, 1896:112; 1898:380.—Fletcher, 1910a:301 [No. 112].—Holland, 1920:327.—Marumo, 1923:189, 203.

Spoladea animalis Guenée, 1854:226.

Hymenia recurvalis (Fabricius).—Walker, 1859 [1856–1866]:396.—Wallace and Moore, 1866:364.—Wollaston, 1879:332.—Moore, 1885 [1884–1887]:293.—Swinhoe and Cotes, 1888 [1887–1889], 5:627 [No. 4262].—Druce, 1888a:229.—Warren, 1888:333.—Swinhoe, 1890:277; 1900:455.—Stebbing, 1903:83.—Swezey, 1910:136.—Fullaway, 1914:20.—Swezey, 1915a:107; 1919:13.—Auctorum, 1919:4.—Bridwell, 1919a:22; 1919b:115.—Auctorum, 1922:11.—Swezey, 1926a: 296.—Ogilvie, 1926:44.—Auctorum, 1927:348.—Williams, 1927:460.—Shibuya, 1928b:179, pl. 7: fig. 12.—Illingworth, 1928:44; 1929:251.—Swezey, 1929a:276; 1929b: 281; 1929c:283.—Shibuya, 1929:161.—deJoannis. 1930 [1929–1930]:[421] 659.—Matsumura, 1931:1037.—Esaki, 1932:1395.—Tams, 1935:274.—Klima, 1939a:31.—Ghesquiére, 1940:119, pl. 4: fig. 7.—Vesey-Fitzgerald, 1941:157.—Swezey, 1942b:208; 1946:178.—Auctorum, 1947:6, 19; 1948:209.—Viette, 1949a:322.—Cockayne, 1952:71, pl. 3: figs. 12–14.—Mere, 1952:57.—Auctorum, 1952:355; 1953:5.—Pemberton 1954:49.—Marion, 1954:44; 1955:76.—Paulian and Viette, 1955:174, fig. 33.—Inoue, 1955:163 [No. 909].—Batra, 1956:22.—Rungs, 1957:297.—Viette, 1957:178; 1958:8.—Zimmermann, 1958a:8; 1958b:52, figs. 37–40.—Mathur, 1959:190, figs. 22–29.—Singh, 1960:35, unnumbered figs.—Batra and Bhattacherjee, 1961:128.—Butler, 1961:383.—Martin, 1961:6, pl. C4.—Bhattacherjee and Menon, 1963:252, pl. 1: figs. 1–14.—Nazmi, 1963:205, 216, fig. 7A–D.—Patel et al. 1964:366.—Pak, 1964:58.—Azuma, 1965:55.—Gentry, 1965:137.—Kimball, 1965:200, pl. 24; fig. 25.—Beardsley, 1966:174, 181.—Comstock, 1966:55.—Inoue and Maenami, 1968:532.—Issiki et al., 1969:76 [No. 148], pl. 37: fig. 148.—Balachowsky, 1972:1173, 1174.—Sugerman, 1972:279.—Fox, 1978:368, 374.—Gressitt and Nadkarni, 1978:87.—Inoue et al., 1982, 1:331; pl. 38: figs. 60, 61.—Shin, et al., 1983:358, pl. 22: fig. 350.

Hymenia fascialis (Cramer).—Butler, 1880:683;1883:117; 1884b:500; 1886a:384.—Swinhoe, 1884:524; 1885:867; 1886:457.—Moore, 1889:59.—Hampson, 1891:39.—Dyar, 1903:373.—Marsh, 1911:1–15; figs. 1, 2, pl. 1.—Chittenden, 1913:2, pl. 4: fig. 2.—Meyrick, 1913b:39.—Fletcher, 1914:431, fig. 307.—Zacher, 1916:198, fig. 61.—Watson, 1917:59.—Fletcher, 1917:296.—Barnes and McDunnough, 1917:129.—Pillai, 1921:46.—Forbes, 1923:545.—Simmonds, 1924:8.—Tams and Hampson, 1924:285.—Hutson, 1926:D15–D17—Swezey, 1926b:720.—Poos, 1926:491, fig. 90.—Hudson, 1928:179, pl. 20: fig. 41.—Simmonds, 1932:10 [facialis, sic!].—Miller, 1932:11, 39.—Ghosh, 1932:4.—Russell, 1934:31.—McDunnough, 1939:9.—Ghosh, 1940c:151.—Krauss, 1944:89.—Roonwal and Bhasin, 1954:32.—Amsel, 1956 [1954–1957]:201, pl. 26: fig. 2, pl. 83: fig. 6.—Wiltshire, 1957:129 [No. 742].—Thomas, 1958:223.—Butani, 1958:182.—Agenjo, 1963b:24, fig. 1.—Tello, 1968:228.—Brower, 1983:3 [No. 5354].

Zinkenia [sic] recurvalis (Fabricius).—Gundlach, 1881:420, 434.—Hering, 1901:324.

Zinckenia fascialis (Cramer).—Butler, 1883:117.—Swinhoe, 1884:524; 1886:437.—Hampson, 1896 [1894–1896], 4:262, fig. 158[]; 1898:623, fig. 21 [].—Pagenstecher, 1900:188.—Snellen, 1901:259.—Leech, 1901:449.—Holland, 1903:392, pl. 47: fig. 28.—Rebel, 1906:43.—Maxwell-Lefroy, and Howlett, 1909:516.—de Joannis, 1930:640.—Zimmermann, 1958a:8; 1958b:52, figs. 37–40.—Mathur, 1959:190, figs. 22–29.—Singh, 1960:35, unnumbered figs.—Batra and Bhattacherjee, 1961:128.—Butler, 1961:383.—Martin, 1961:6, pl. C4.—Bhattacherjee and Menon, 1963:252, pl. 1:figs. 1–14.—Nazmi, 1963:205,216, fig. 7A–D.—Patel et al. 1964:366.—Pak, 1964:58.—Azuma, 1965:55.—Gentry, 1965:137.—Kimball, 1965:200, pl. 24; fig. 25.—Beardsley, 1966:174, 181.—Comstock, 1966:55.—Inoue and Maenami, 1968:532.—Issiki et al., 1969:76 [No. 148], pl. 37: fig. 148.—Balachowsky, 1972:1173, 1174.—Sugerman, 1972:279.—Fox, 1978:368. 374.—Gressitt and Nadkarni, 1978:87.—Inoue et al., 1982, 1:331; pl. 38: figs. 60, 61.—Shin et al., 1983:358, pl. 22: fig. 350.

Hymenea [sic] recurvalis (Fabricius).—Schaus and Clements, 1893:45.

Hymenia exodias Meyrick, 1904:130.

Zinckenia (Pyralis) fascialis (Cramer).—Matsumura, 1908:207 [No. 1728].

Odezia hecate var. formosana Shiraki, 1910:146, pl. 35: fig. 5.

Zinchenia fascialis (Cramer).—Shiraki, 1913:365 [misspelled].

Hymeria [sic!] fascialis (Cramer).—Fullaway, 1913:49.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25157. Harpe elongate oval, fleshy, with small tuft of scales near middle and one from base of costa. Gnathos absent. Transtilla a sclerotized band. Uncus short, clothed with stout setae. Vinculum rounded. Tegumen broader than long. Anellus a sclerotized plate, forked posteriorly. Aedeagus moderately long, curved, with a strong sclerotized bar ventrally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25158. Ostium round, membranous. Inception of ductus seminalis dorsal from posterior end of bursa copulatrix at base of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae membranous posteriorly with a sclerotized collar anteriorly. Bursa copulatrix lightly rugose anteriorly; posteriorly armed with strong spines on inner surface. Signum a diamond-shaped plate with a median ridge.

TYPES.—Lost (recurvalis); lost? (fascialis); Vienna? (angustalis); Museum d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris? (albifascialis); British Museum (Natural History) (exodias, animalis); Entomological Institute, Taipeh (formosana).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—East Indies (recurvalis); Japan (fascialis); Tranquebar, Southeast India (angustalis); Madagascar (albifascialis); Molokai, Hawaii (exodias); Pernambuco, Brazil (animalis); Formosa (formosana).

FIGURE 34.—Spoladea recurvalis (Fabricius): a, ventral view of male genitalia, showing corema, with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus.

FIGURE 35.—Spoladea recurvalis (Fabricius), ventral view of female genitalia.

DISTRIBUTION.—Cosmopolitan except in very cold climates.

From the Marquesas we have specimens from three islands. Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 17 Jan to 6 Feb 1968, 4, 56. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 12–16 Feb 1968, 10. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 13–21 Mar 1968, 4; 9 Apr 1968, 1; Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m), 3 Apr 1968, 1.

FOOD PLANTS.—Numerous. Among the most important are: beets, cotton, tomato, carrot, spinach, eggplant, purslane, cucumber, corn, sugarbeets, chenopodiaceous weeds, Amaranthus, Helianthus, and Celosia cristata L.

This species is known as the “Hawaiian beet webworm.” In some areas, particularly India and Ceylon, it is a serious pest of leafy vegetables.

The Marquesan specimens of recurvalis show none of the extraordinary variation such as that found in Hawaiian examples of this species.

Genus Marasmia Lederer

Marasmia Lederer, 1863:385.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Marasmia cicatricosa Lederer, 1863:386, by monotypy.

Marasmia trapezalis (Guenée)

FIGURES 36, 277h

Salbia trapezalis Guenée, 1854:200.—Lederer, 1863:381.

Marasma [sic!] trapezalis (Guenée).—Green, 1903:141, pl. 14: fig. 3.

Botys creonalis Walker, 1859[1856–1866]:579.—Moore, 1885 [1884–1887]:284, pl. 180: fig. 10.—Meyrick, 1887:217.

Botys neoclesalis Walker, 1859 [1856–1866]:635.—Meyrick, 1887:217.

Botys suspicalis Walker, 1859[1856–1866]:667.

Botys convectalis Walker, 1866[1856–1866]:1411.

Cnaphalocrocis bifurcalis Snellen, 1880:219; 1883:136, pl. 8: figs. 5, 5a.—Meyrick, 1886b:237.

Rovanoa creonalis (Walker).—Moore, 1885[1884–1887]: 284, pl. 180: fig. 10.

Dolichosticha perinephes Meyrick, 1886b:236; 1887:217.

FIGURE 36.—Marasmia trapezalis (Gueneée): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Dolichosticha trapezalis (Guenée).—Meyrick, 1887:217.—Hampson, 1891:40.—Schaus and Clements, 1893:46.

Marasmia trapezalis (Guenée).—Hampson, 1898:639.—Maxwell—Lefroy and Howlett, 1909:516.—Fletcher, 1910a:303 [No. 118], 316.—Duport, 1913:36 [No. 242], 50, 51.—Fletcher, 1914:432, pl. 33: figs. 1–5.—Janse, 1917:158 [No. 2197].—Fletcher, 1917:149, 180, 187, 190, 199.—Ghosh, 1925:6.—Shibuya, 1928b: 192.—Meyrick, 1929b: 163.—de Joannis, 1930 [1929–1930]: [427]665.—Ghosh, 1932:3, 4.—Meyrick, 1934c:337.—vanderGoot, 1934:22—Sevastopulo, 1935:205.—Tarns, 1935:276.—Wolcott, 1936:458.—Harris. 1937: 483.—Klima, 1939a:65–67.—Schaus, 1940:337.—Ghosh, 1940b:74, pl. 25.—Ghesquiére, 1942:125.—Swezey, 1942b:209; 1943:280; 1946:179.—Vielte, 1949a:322; 1951:15.—Dick, 1951:390—Pemberton, 1954:50.—Paulian and Vielte, 1955:175.—Venkatra—man and Chacko, 1961:73, fig. 1.—Comstock, 1966:56.—Clarke, 1971:65, figs. 63, 64, pl. 10h.—Inoue et al., 1982, 1:335.—Hodges et al., 1983:75[No. 5288].

Epimima trapezalis (Guenée).—Swinhoe, 1900:464.

Marasmia traplzalis Guérin [sic!].—Sharma, 1964:30.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24873, 24874. Harpe elongate oval, three times as long as wide; small projection from sacculus at basal third; sacculus narrowly rolled inwardly at middle. Uncus triangular with elongate, setose, lateral elements. Vinculum shield—shaped. Tegumen greatly reduced, wider than long; laterally swollen forming a nodule emitting hairlike scales. Anellus membranous. Aedeagus long, straight; vesica armed with two strong, large cornuti.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24875. Ostium transverse, membranous. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior edge of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae short, flattened, sclerotized except for very narrow section where it joins bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous, posterior third studded with small spines. Signum a very small, scobinate plate.

TYPES.-British Museum (Natural History) (creonalis, neoclesalis, susplcalis, convectalis, perinephes, trapezalis), Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke, Leiden (bifurcalis).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Santo Domingo (creonalis); Cape of Good Hope (noeclesalis); Ceylon (susplcalis). South Hindostán (convectalis), Fiji (perinephes); Sierra Leone (trapezalis); Celebes (bifurcalis).

DISTRIBUTION.—Pantroplcal: West Indies, Africa, Ceylon, South India, Fiji, Celebes, Marquesas Islands, Society Islands, Tuamotus, Austral Islands (Rapa), Java, Ellice Islands.

In this present collection there are 50 specimens as follows. Nuku Hiva: Pakiu Valley, 1000 (304.8 m), 17 and 19 Jan 1968, 2, 5; Taiohae, 1 Jan 1968, 2; Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 2; Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 5d. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 12 Feb to Mar 1968, 1, 15; Puamau, 8 Feb 1968, 1. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11–25 Mar 1968, 10, 7.

FOOD PLANTS.—Paspalum paniculatum L., P. conjugatum Bergius, P. scrobiculatum L., Miscanthus floridulus (Labillardière) Warburg, Indian corn, millet, sorghum, sugarcane.

Meyrick recorded this widespread species also, from Uapou and Tahuata Islands. Unquestionably it will be found on most, if not all, the Marquesan Islands.

Genus Maruca Walker

Maruca Walker, 1859 [1856–1866]:540.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Hydrocampe aquatilis Boisduval, in Guérin-Méneville, 1844[1829–1844]:524, pl. 90: fig. 9, by monotypy.

Maruca testulalis (Geyer)

FIGURES 37, 280d

Crochiphora testulalis Geyer in Hübner, 1832[1818–1837], 4:12[No. 315], figs. 629, 630.—Gundlach, 1891:359.—Möschler, 1891:307.—Hampson, 1891:40.—Schaus and Clements, 1893:46.—Swinhoe, 1900:522[No. 3552].—Schaus, 1940:365.—Paulian and Vielte, 1955:184, fig. 41.—Vielte, 1957:182; 1958:10.

FIGURE 37.—Maruca testulalis (Geyer): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Maruca testulalis (Geyer).—Moore, 1885[1884–1887]:298.—Swinhoe and Cotes, 1888(1887–1889], 5:622[No. 4229].—Swinhoe, 1890:284.—Hampson, 1896[1894–1896]:393, fig. 211; 1899:194, fig. 104.—Swinhoe, 1900:523.—Pagenstecher, 1900:219.—Leech, 1901:482.—Hering, 1901:309—Matsumura, 1901:22 [No. 116]; 1908:214[No. 1787].—Maxwell—Lefroy and Howlett, 1909:519, fig. 342—Rebel, 1910b:431; 1910c:431.—Shiraki, 1910, 1:123, pl. 32: fig. 11; 1913:363.—Duport 1913:37(No. 262], 52, 53, 55.—Fletcher, 1914, figs. 1–6, pl. 36.—Rebel, 1915:146.— de Bussy, 1916:112–121.—Andrews, 1916:19.—Fletcher, 1917:44, 52, 56, 60, 65.—Janse, 1917:162[No. 2546].—Cotton, 1918:279.—Holland, 1920:331.—Hutson, 1920:C8–C10.—Pillai, 1921:40.—Wolcott, 1923:186.—Ghosh, 1924a:12; 1924b:2.—McKerral, 1924:14.—Tams and Hampson, 1924:288.—Gater, 1925a:222; 1925b:327.—Light, 1927:20.—Hopkins, 1928a:29: 1928b:47.—Shibuya, 1929:153, 203.—Bruner et al., 1930:31–36.—de Joannis, 1930[1929–1930]:694[456], pl. 4: fig. 16.—Leonard and Mills, 1931:467.—Mills and Leonard, 1931:763.—Mackie, 1931:234–235.—Bruner, 1931:13, fig. 4.—Esaki, 1932:1370.—Miller, 1932:11, 29, 30.—Fleury, 1932:796.—Moutia, 1932:10.—Ghosh, 1932:4.—Wolcott, 1933:242, 254.—Hargreaves, 1933:53.—Bruner, 1935:1–52.—Corbett, 1935:52.—Tams, 1935:286.—Sevastopulo, 1935:205.—Wolcott, 1936:457.—Krishnamurth, 1936:25, 29, 33.—Issac, 1936:170.—Swezey, 1936:197.—Klima, 1939b:367.—Scott, 1940:35–47.—Ghosh, 1940c: 100, pl. 39.—Ghesquiére, 1942:175.—Holdaway, 1942:254.—Swezey, 1943:281; 1944:143; 1946:183.—Williams, 1951:64.—Mutuura, 1953:3, pl. 1: fig. 2, pl. 3: fig. 6 [in Japanese].—Amsel, 1954–1957:204, pl. 31: fig. 5, pl. 82: fig. 3.—Gressitt, 1954:172, 185.—Swaine, 1954:54.—Pemberton, 1954:50.—Marion, 1954:47.—Weber, 1955:635.—Inoue, 1955:181[No. 1000].—Davis, 1958:358.—Thomas, 1958:227.—Zimmerman, 1958b:56, figs. 41–43.—Dale and Herring, 1959:12, 13.—Thevasagayam and Canagasingham, 1960:288, 289.—Rainwater, 1963:305.—Appert, 1964:790, 791, 797, 799.—Gentry, 1965:158.—Comstock, 1966:61.—Tello, 1968:229.—Schmid and Endicott, 1968:41.—Balachowski, 1972:1171, 1172.—Gressitt and Nadkarni, 1978:87.—Inoue et al., 1982, 1:352; 2: pl. 41: fig. 44.—Mohanty and Nayak, 1982:87, 91, figs. 37–39.—Shin et al., 1983: p. 332,pl. 19: fig. 291.

Hydrocampe aquatilis Boisduval in Guérin-Méneville, 1832[1829–1844], pl. 90: fig. 9; 1844[1829–1844]:524.

Stenia testulalis Guenée, 1854:247[No. 230].—Walker, 1859[1856–1866]:420.—Guenée, 1862:63.

Maruca aquatilis (Boisduval).—Walker, 1859 [1856–1866]:540.—Moore, 1867:93.—Butler, 1880:685.—Swinhoe, 1885:870.—Druce, 1888b:579.

Siriocauta testulalis (Geyer).—Lederer, 1863:424.—Snellen, 1872:94.—Gundlach, 1881:419, 432.—Snellen, 1884:39, pl. 3: figs. 9, 9a,b.—Meyrick, 1884:299; 1886b:225.—Pagenstecher, 1888:195[No. 642].—Snellen, 1891:623.—Meyrick, 1894a:10; 1894b:468.

Botys bifenestralis Mabille, 1880:25.—Marion, 1954:47; 1955:78.—Paulian and Viette, 1955:184.

Manica [sic] testulalis (Geyer).—Swinhoe and Cotes, 1888[1887–1889]. 5:622[No. 4229].

Siriocauta simialalis Snellen, 1892:73.

Maruca testulatis [sic] Ghosh, 1924a:12[unjustified emendation].

Maruca nigroapicalis de Joannis, 1930[1929–1930]:695[457], pl. 4: fig. 17.

Maruca testularis [sic] Matsumura, 1931:1040[unjustified emendation].

Maruca telulalis [sic] Viette, 1951:15[unjustified emendation].

Male genitalia slide USNM 25162. Harpe scarcely sclerotized; cucullus rounded; on sacculus a small sclerotized hook. Uncus slender, strongly curved; distodorsally a cluster of short, stout setae; at extreme distal end a cluster of fine setae. Vinculum rounded. Tegumen very slightly sclerotized. Anellus a very small, elongate plate. Aedeagus nearly straight, strongly sclerotized on one side; cornuti two, weak. Corema very strong, thick.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25163. Ostium transverse, short. Antrum sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis dorsal, slightly before antrum. Ductus bursae slender, granular, nearly twice as long as bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix oval, granular. Accessory bursa present. Signa a pair of lateral rods.

HOLOTYPE.—Location unknown.

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Buenos Aires (testulalis); Tonkin (nigroapicalis); Madagascar (bifenestralis); Sumatra (simialalis); Java (aquatilis).

DISTRIBUTION.—Indo-Australian Region, Oriental Region, Neotropical and Ethiopian Regions, Oceania (Caroline and Marquesas Islands).

Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 16 Jan to 6 Feb 1968, 36, 20; Pakiu Valley, 1800 ft (548 m), 19 and 28 Jan 1968, 5, 7; Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 2. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 12 and 19 Feb. 1968, 15, 24. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11 and 13 Mar 1968, 17, 8; Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 1.

FOOD PLANTS.—Arachis hypogaea L. (peanut), Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh, Cannabis sativa L. (hemp), Delonix regia (Bojer) Rafēnesque, Derris elliptica (Roxburgh) Bentham, Gliricidia sepium (Jacquin) Walpers, Hibiscus rostellatus Guillemin and Perrottet, Mucuna urens (L.) de Candolle, Oryza sativa L. (rice), Phaseolus vulgaris L. (beans), Phaseolus multiflorus Willdenow, Pisum sativum L. (peas), Nicotiana tabacum L. (tobacco), Sesbania grandiflora (L.) Persoon, S. aculeata (Willdenow) Persoon, S. tomentosa Hooker and Arnott, Stizolobium pruriens (L.) Medicus, Tephrosia vogelii Hooker f., T. candida de Candolle, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walpers (cowpea).

Genus Psara Snellen

Psara Snellen, 1875:239.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Psara pallicaudalis Snellen, 1875:240, pl. 13: figs. 13, 14, by monotypy.

Psara jasiusalis (Walker), new combination

FIGURES 38, 278a,b

Botys jasiusalis Walker, 1859[1856–1866]:708.—Hampson, 1899:204.

Botys basistrigalis Walker, 1866[1856–1866]:1443.—Hampson, 1899:204.

Pachyzancla stultalis.—Meyrick, 1929b: 164 [not Botys stultalis Walker]; 1934c:340.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24835. Harpe costa strongly arched and narrowly, but strongly sclerotized; cucullus rounded. Transtilla two elongate triangular elements. Uncus narrow, pointed, distally clothed with setae. Vinculum a moderately broad band; saccus short, pointed. Tegumen longer than broad. Anellus a narrow, lightly sclerotized plate. Aedeagus straight, slightly swollen distad; vesica armed with a series of densely packed dentate cornuti.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25836. Ostium funnel-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior edge of ridged portion of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae posterior third membranous; anterior two-thirds much broader than posterior third and ornamented with a series of slender longitudinal ridges. Bursa copulatrix mostly membranous, finely granular posteriorly. Signum a small diamond-shaped plate.

TYPES.—In the British Museum (Natural History) (basistrigalis); in the Hope Museum, Oxford (jasiusalis).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Java (basistrigalis); Sarawak (jasiusalis).

DISTRIBUTION.—Australia (Queensland), Andamans, Burma, China, Fergusson Island, Malaya, Marquesas Islands, New Guinea, Philippines, Samoa, Sarawak.

Our Marquesas examples are from the following localities. Nuku Hiva: Pakiu Valley, 1800 ft (548 m), 19 Jan 1968, 1; Taiohae, 1, 2, Jan 1978, 1, 3. Hiva Oa: Ootua, 800 m, 27–30 Jul 1977, 1 (Montgomery). Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 7 Mar 1968, 1.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Meyrick (1929b: 164) recorded Pachyzancla stultalis (Walker) from the Marquesas (Hiva Oa), but his specimens, based on a comparison of the genitalia with those of the type, are Psara jasuisalis, as is our series. Walker's stultalis is very different from the males of jasiusalis having flaring lateral fans of modified scales from the 8th abdominal segment. Another species, Psara maledicta (Warren), described as Acharana maledicta Warren (1892:435) from Pitcairn Island, is very closely related to jasiusalis, if it is not conspecific, but more material from that island is needed before this matter can be settled.

Psara orphnopeza, new species

FIGURES 39, 278c

Alar expanse 25 mm.

Labial palpus second segment light buff below, dresden brown above; third segment dresden brown. Antenna light ochraceous buff; scape shaded dresden brown. Head light ochraceous buff. Thorax light ochraceous buff suffused brownish. Forewing ground color pale ochraceous buff suffused brownish, especially toward margins; at basal fifth of costa a fuscous spot continued faintly to dorsum as an irregular antemedian line; slightly beyond the costal spot, a small fuscous spot in cell, followed by a larger one of the same color at end of cell; from slightly beyond middle of dorsum, a faint, irregular, fuscous transverse line extends to vein 2; postmedian line fuscous, broadest on costa, extending irregularly to tornus; at base of dorsum a small fuscous spot; cilia light ochraceous buff mixed with grayish fuscous. Hindwing pale ochraceous buff, suffused brownish toward margins; at basal third a fuscous spot in cell; a postmedian fuscous line extends to vein 5, then outwardly to form three “teeth” between veins 2 to 5, then inwardly and transversely to margin of wing; cilia light ochraceous buff mixed with grayish fuscous. Foreleg pale ochraceous buff suffused brownish; tarsal segments marked fuscous; midleg pale ochraceous buff suffused brownish; tarsal segments marked fuscous; hindleg pale ochraceous buff. Abdomen pale ochraceous buff, suffused brownish.

FIGURE 38.—Psara jasiusalis (Walker): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 39.—Psara orphnopeza new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25246. Ostium very broad, funnel-shaped. Antrum narrowly sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis dorsal, from near posterior end of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae narrow before ostium, broadening anteriorly, ribbed, and strongly sclerotized before bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix very finely granular. Signum a diamond-shaped plate with central ridge.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100734.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (27 Mar 1968).

This species is similar to Psara jasiusalis but is larger, the tegulae are shorter and the transverse lines are not as well defined. In pattern it is almost identical to what Ghesquiére (1940, pl. 3: fig. 8; 1942:141) treated as the African Lamprosema indicata (F.) (Fabricius, 1775:640).

Genus Herpetogramma Lederer

Herpetogramma Lederer, 1863:430.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Herpetogramma servalis Lederer, 1863:430, by monotypy.

Herpetogramma phthorosticta (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURE 40, 278d

Pyrausta phthorosticta Meyrick, 1929b:166.

Oeobia phthorosticta (Meyrick).—Meyrick, 1934:340.

FIGURE 40.—Herpetogramma phthorosticta (Meyrick): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24881. Harpe narrow basally; cucullus broadly rounded; from base of costa a strongly sclerotized bar crosses harpe and terminates in a pointed process; sacculus strongly sclerotized. Uncus short, broad basally; apex armed with a dense patch of strong setae. Vinculum triangular. Tegumen broader than long. Anellus a rectangular plate; posterior edge concave. Aedeagus slender, slightly curved; ventral side stronly sclerotized; vesica armed with a cluster of moderately short cornuti.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24882. Ostium funnel-shaped. Antrum narrowly sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis well before antrum. Ductus bursae membranous and swollen posteriorly, narrowed anteriorly and ornamented with longitudinal, slender, sclerotized ridges. Bursa copulatrix very finely granular. Signum a short, narrow, sclerotized ridge.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, 3500 ft (1067 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

Our specimens are from Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m), 1 Mar 1968, 2, 1; 3800 ft (1158 m), 20 Feb 1968, 2.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Apparently the species is confined to the island of Hiva Oa.

Herpetogramma cleoropa (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURES 41, 278e

Oeobia cleoropa Meyrick, 1934c:340.—Klima, 1939b:312.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25221. Harpe broadest about middle; from base of costa, across harpe to ventral edge, a sclerotized rod terminating in a point; cucullus rounded. Transtilla a sclerotized band. Uncus long, narrow; terminal half clothed with strong setae. Vinculum pointed. Tegumen broader than long. Anellus a rectangular plate. Aedeagus as long as harpe, moderately slender; vesica armed with a long, very weak cornutus.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25241. Ostium broad, transverse, funnel-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis at junction of ductus bursae and bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae sclerotized in posterior half, granular anteriorly. Bursa copulatrix very long, constricted at middle, granular in posterior three-fifths. Signum a diamond-shaped concentration of fine granules.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Kaava Ridge, 2460 ft (750 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa, Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

In addition to the holotype we have a series from Nuku Hiva: Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 7.

I do not hesitate to associate the seven males from Nuku Hiva with the holotype female from Hiva Oa. As can be seen from a comparison of the figures of the genitalia with those of the males of cleoropa and phthorosticta, the species are very closely related. In the female holotype, the spermatophore was so large that the bursa copulatrix was ruptured.

Genus Tatobotys Butler

Tatobotys Butler, 1880:686.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Tatobotys argillacea Butler, 1880:686, by monotypy.

Tatobotys vibrata Meyrick

FIGURES 42, 278f

Tatobotys vibrata Meyrick, 1929b:161; 1934c:337.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25166. Harpe broadly oval; cucullus bluntly pointed; inside costa an elongate sclerotized rib; near base, ventrad, a triangular projection. Uncus stout, sharply curved, armed with thick setae distally. Vinculum very lightly sclerotized. Tegumen longer than broad. Anellus a U-shaped plate. Aedeagus slender, pointed distally, bulbous proximally.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

FIGURE 41.—Herpetogramma cleoropa (Meyrick): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 42.—Tatobotys vibrata Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, 3500 ft (1067 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

I have before me specimens from Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m), 1; 3400 ft (1036 m), 1 Mar 1968, 1.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Meyrick described vibrata from two specimens and recorded a third from Hiva Oa (1934c:337) but did not indicate the sex. Our two males bring to five the total number of specimens known.

No female was available for study.

Tessema, new genus

TYPE-SPECIES.—Tessema sensilis, new species, by monotypy and present designation. The gender of the generic name is feminine.

Antenna of male pubescent (female unknown), as long as forewing. Labial palpus squamiform; maxillary palpus minute, simple, porrect. Head slightly roughened. Tongue well developed, scaled. Thorax smooth. Legs very long; hind tibia smooth. Forewing smooth, costa straight, apex bluntly pointed, termen oblique, 12 veins; 1 b simple; 2 distant from 3; 3, 4, and 5 approximate at bases; 6 parallel to 5 and approximate to 7; 8 and 9 long-stalked, 8 to apex, 9 to costa; 10 anastomosing with stalk of 8 and 9; 11 from about outer fourth of cell; 12 from base. Hindwing with 8 veins; 2 distant from 3; 3, 4, and 5 approximate at their bases; 7 and 8 anastomosed for some distance beyond cell; 6 out of the base of 7.

Male genitalia symmetrical. Uncus present. Gnathos and socius absent.

Female genitalia unknown.

Tessema is similar to Pilocrosis Lederer (1863:431) but in the latter genus the labial palpus is upturned, and veins 7 and 8 of the hindwing are stalked, not anastomosed as in Tessema. Moreover, the legs and antennae of Tessema are much longer than those in Pilocrosis.

Tessema sensilis, new species

FIGURES 43, 278g

Alar expanse 36 mm.

Labial palpus dresden brown, white ventrally. Antenna grayish with dresden brown spots basally; between base of scape and upper edge of eye a small crescentic group of white scales. Head and thorax dresden brown; underside of thorax white; tegula with paler scaling posteriorly. Forewing ground color dresden brown; at the outer end of cell a short, fuscous, transverse dash; cilia dresden brown. Hindwing dresden brown; cilia concolorus. Foreleg coxa white; femur white on innerside, brownish on outerside; tibia shaded brownish; tarsal segments buff; midleg femur white; tibia shaded brownish; tarsal segments buff; hindleg femur white; tibia shaded brownish, tarsal segments buff, basal segment suffused brownish. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally except 8th segment white anteriorly, fuscous posteriorly; ventrally whitish; posterior anal tuft fuscous-tipped buff scales, but fuscous ventrally.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25220. Harpe very lightly sclerotized; cucullus broadly rounded; costa with a narrow sclerotized ridge; sacculus narrowly sclerotized; from center of harpe a curved sclerotized process. Uncus slender, curved, dilated and clothed with setae distally. Vinculum broad, truncate, with a median protuberance. Tegumen arched. Anellus a small sub- triangular plate with lightly sclerotized posterolateral extensions. Aedeagus stout, with a heavily sclerotized rod ventrally.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100735.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (23 Jan 1968).

This species resembles superficially what Hampson (1896 [1894–1896], 4:351) described as Glyphodes cypripennalis (Perak, Burma) and Glyphodes argyritis (1912c:570) from British and Dutch New Guinea.

The Marquesan species has a less contrastingly colored costa than cypripennalis and has a more strongly marked subcostal mark on the forewing than that of argyritis. In addition sensilis is also similar to the Peruvian Pilocrosis fimbrialis (Dognin) (1904:130) but the latter has a pure white anal tuft.

As can be seen from the photograph of the wings, the type specimen is somewhat rubbed. If more material in good condition is obtained, a revised description is in order.

Genus Glyphodes Guenée

Glyphodes Guenée, 1854:292.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Glyphodes stolalis Guenée, 1854:354; subsequent designation by Hampson, 1896 [1894–1896], 4:345.

Glyphodes phormingopa (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURES 44, 278h

Margaronia phormingopa Meyrick, 1934c:339.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24821, 25165. Harpe rather short; cucullus broadly rounded. Gnathos anchor-shaped. Uncus slender, sharply bent basely, terminally armed with setae. Vinculum a truncated V with a bulbous process anterodorsally. Tegumen weak, elongate. Anellus a small triangular plate. Aedeagus long, slender, with sclerotized bar on one side; vesica armed with a single, very long, slender cornutus.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24822. Ostium funnel-shaped. Antrum constricted, heavily sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis dorsal, from ductus bursae and anterior to antrum. Ductus bursae sclerotized, with one loop anterior to middle at junction with bursa. Bursa copulatrix granular. Signum a slightly curved line of coarse granules.

FIGURE 43.—Tessema sensilis, new species: a, venation of right wings; b, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; and showing right corema; c, aedeagus.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Feani Ridge, 3970 ft (1210 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva, Hiva Oa. Nuku Hiva: Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 1, 1 Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 1. Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m), 1 Mar 1968, 1 3800 ft (1158 m), 20 Feb 1968, 2, 4. Fatu Hiva: Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 1.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

FIGURE 44.—Glyphodes phormingopa (Meyrick): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed and showing base of right corema; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Meyrick described phormingopa from Hiva Oa and placed it in the genus Margaronia, but it is clearly referable to the genus Glyphodes.

Although currently recognized from only three islands, phormingopa will probably be found elsewhere in the Marquesas.

Genus Bradina Lederer

Bradina Lederer, 1863:424.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Bradina impressalis Lederer, 1863, pl. 15: fig. 16; designated by Hampson, 1896 [1894–1896], 4:226.

Key to the Species of Bradina

Bradina tormentifera Meyrick

FIGURES 45, 279a

Bradina tormentifera Meyrick, 1929b: 161; 1934c:336.—Klima, 1937:156.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24863. Harpe broadest at middle; costa strongly arched. Uncus short, stubby; apical half densely clothed with setae. Vinculum rounded, with two anterior protuberances. Tegumen slightly longer than broad. Anellus a subquadrate plate. Aedeagus long, slender, terminating in two bladelike structures.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24864. Ostium broadly crescentic. Antrum narrowly sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis dorsal and slightly anterior to antrum. Ductus bursae membranous with a row of teeth anterior to antrum. Bursa copulatrix spiculate. Signum triangular with opposite points produced and anterior edge dentate.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, 3500 ft (1067 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

The following 46 specimens are before me. Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3400–3800 ft (1036–1158 m), 20 Feb and 1 Mar 1968, 6, 40.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Apparently this high elevation taxon is confined to Hiva Oa, all of our series and those described by Meyrick being from that island.

Bradina fidelia, new species

FIGURES 46, 279b

Alar expanse 23–26 mm.

Labial palpus buff; second segment fuscous dorsally; third segment wholly fuscous. Antenna light ochraceous buff. Head light ochraceous buff; face fuscous. Thorax light ochraceous buff laterally, grayish fuscous dorsally; tegula fuscous anteriorly. Forewing ground color light ochraceous buff; costa fuscous; at basal fourth a fuscous blotch confluent with costal shade; from middle of costa an outwardly oblique fuscous bar extends half way across wing; from costa at apical fourth, an outwardly curved grayish-fuscous fascia reaches tornus; termen narrowly fuscous; a few scattered grayish scales in dorsal part of wing; cilia fuscous. Hindwing light ochraceous buff; slightly before middle of wing, toward costa, a grayish-fuscous triangular spot; from outer third of costa a transverse grayish-fuscous fascia extends to anal angle; termen and cilia fuscous. Foreleg pale ochraceous buff; tibia and tarsal segments suffused grayish fuscous; midleg and hindleg pale ochraceous buff. Abdomen light ochraceous buff dorsally with fuscous, median longitudinal line; ventrally pale ochraceous buff.

FIGURE 45.—Bradina tormentifera Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 46.—Bradina fidelia, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24865. Harpe narrow basally, widening toward the broadly rounded cucullus; costa arched. Uncus short, stout, dorsoposteriorly densely clothed with stout setae. Vinculum U-shape with two protuberances posteriorly. Tegumen longer than broad. Anellus a small sclerotized plate deeply cleft posteriorly. Aedeagus long, slender, terminating in a pair of bladelike structures.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24866. Ostium transverse, funnel-shaped. Antrum narrowly sclerotized, slightly swollen. Inception of ductus seminalis dorsoanterior to antrum. Ductus bursae slender, membranous, with cluster of teeth posteriorly. Bursa copulatrix spiculate. Signum subtriangular with comb of teeth anteriorly.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100737.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (23 Jan 1968), 2 and 3 paratypes as follows. Nuku Hiva: Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 2 2 Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 1.

In size this species is similar to tormentifera but is easily distinguished from it by the light ochraceous buff ground color of the forewing.

Bradina perlucidalis Hampson

FIGURES 47, 279c

Bradina perlucidalis Hampson, 1897:201.—Meyrick, 1929b:161; 1934c:336.—Klima, 1937:155.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24849, 24851, 24853. Harpe simple, broadest at cucullus. Uncus stout, narrowest at middle, clothed with stout setae distally. Vinculum approximately U-shaped with two protuberances medianly. Tegumen slightly longer than broad. Anellus a subquadrate plate. Aedeagus slender; apical third broader than basal two-thirds; distal end with two bladelike structures.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24850, 24852. Ostium broadly crescentic. Antrum sclerotized, constricted. Inception of ductus seminalis, dorsal, from anterior end of antrum. Ductus bursae membranous, Bursa copulatrix membranous, clothed with fine spicules. Signum a triangular plate with comblike teeth on anterior edge.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Taou-ata (Tahuata) Island, Marquesas.

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

We have the following 83 specimens from the Marquesas. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 12–29 Feb 1968, 2, 7 trail to Mt. Feani, 1200–2500 ft (365762 m), 20 Feb and 6 Mar 1968, 5, 1 Tahauku, 26 Feb 1968, 2. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11 Mar to 8 Apr 1968, 20, 18; Omoa Valley, 1625 Mar 1968, 19, 7; Mt. Upe, 1025 ft (617 m), 3 Apr 1968, 1, 1.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Meyrick also recorded this species from Uapou (1934c:336).

This is the smallest of the Bradina species found in the Marquesas Islands.

Bradina stricta, new species

FIGURES 48, 279d

Alar expanse 18 mm.

Labial palpus white; second segment with grayish fuscous spot on outer side distally. Antenna grayish buff; scape white. Head white. Thorax white laterally, grayish fuscous dorsally; tegula white, grayish fuscous at extreme base. Forewing ground color white; costa narrowly pale grayish fuscous; at base of cell a small fuscous spot; beyond this spot a short transverse fuscous bar; from apical third of costa to termen a slender transverse fuscous fascia; from near base, anal vein marked grayish fuscous to anal angle; cilia sordid white. Hindwing white; at basal third a short grayish fuscous bar and from costa a straight grayish fuscous bar reaches anal angle. Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg white; tarsal segments with very pale grayish suffusion. Abdomen sordid white, segments marked grayish fuscous dorsally.

FIGURE 47.—Bradina perlucidalis Hampson: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 48.—Bradina stricta, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24884. Ostium transverse, crescentic. Antrum swollen, partly sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis dorsal, well before antrum. Ductus bursae membranous with cluster of teeth posteriorly. Bursa copulatrix spiculate. Signum crescentic with long outer points and comb of teeth anteriorly.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100738.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, trial to Mt. Feani, 1200 ft (365 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (6 Mar 1968).

This taxon is similar in size to emphasis, new species, but is easily distinguished from it by the much narrower and lighter markings than those found in that species.

Bradina emphasis, new species

FIGURES 49, 279e

Alar expanse 18–19 mm.

Labial palpus white; second segment pale ochraceous buff posterolaterally. Antenna grayish fuscous. Head white. Thorax white laterally, fuscous dorsally; tegula white except narrowly fuscous anteriorly. Forewing ground color white with slight yellowish tinge toward costa and termen; costa broadly fuscous; at basal fourth a fuscous bar extends to base of vein 2; veins 2, 3, 4 basally streaked fuscous; from outer third of costa a moderately broad transverse fuscous bar reaches tornus; dorsum fuscous from slightly beyond base; termen fuscous; cilia white with fuscous basal band. Hindwing white; at basal third an irregular fuscous blotch; from outer third of costa a curve fuscous line extends to anal angle; termen fuscous; cilia white with fuscous basal line. Foreleg white suffused grayish fuscous; midleg and hindleg sordid white. Abdomen white; anteriorly segments broadly fuscous.

FIGURE 49.—Bradina emphasis, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25169. Ostium transverse, funnel-shaped. Antrum narrowly sclerotized, with a lobe on right side. Inception of ductus seminalis anterior to antrum. Ductus bursae membranous with a small ring of teeth posteriorly. Bursa copulatrix spiculate. Signum triangular, strongly dentate anteriorly.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100739.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (3 Apr 1968).

In size, this species is similar to eremica, new species, and stricta, new species, but is distinguished from both by the strongly marked wings.

Bradina eremica, new species

FIGURES 50, 279f

Alar expanse 19 mm.

Labial palpus white, second segment fuscous dorsolaterally. Antenna light ochraceous buff with slightly darker annulations; scape whitish on inner side. Head white with yellowish tinge. Thorax white, suffused yellowish; tegula fuscous anteriorly. Forewing ground color white with faint yellowish suffusion; costa grayish fuscous; at basal fourth a small fuscous spot fused with grayish fuscous of costa; from costa, a fuscous, outwardly oblique bar extends to bases of veins 2 and 3; from outer third of costa a slightly outwardly curved transverse fascia extends to tornus; dorsum light ochraceous buff with scattering of grayish fuscous scales; termen fuscous, the color suffused inwardly between veins; cilia grayish with darker subbasal line. Hindwing white with faint yellowish suffusion toward termen; at basal third a short fuscous dash; from costa a curved fuscous fascia reaching anal angle; cilia grayish with darker subbasal line. Foreleg light ochraceous buff suffused grayish fuscous; midleg and hindleg white. Abdomen white strongly overlaid grayish fuscous on each segment dorsally.

FIGURE 50.—Bradina eremica, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedagus removed; b, aedeagus.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24883. Harpe broadest beyond middle, simple; cucullus broadly rounded. Uncus short, stout; distally densely clothed with long setae. Vinculum rounded, with two protuberances inwardly. Tegumen longer than broad. Anellus a subquadrate plate, posterior edge indented. Aedeagus slender proximally, broader distally and armed distally with two bladelike structures.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100740.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (23 Jan 1968).

Very similar in size to emphasis, new species, eremica is distinguished from it by the distinctly differently marked labial palpus, the more slender markings and differently colored cilia of both fore- and hindwings. Unfortunately the female of eremica is unknown and cannot be compared with that of emphasis.

Genus Stemorrhages Lederer

Stemorrhages Lederer, 1863:397.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Phalaena sericea Drury, 1770 [1773], 2:9, pl. 6: fig. 1; by monotypy.

Stemorrhages euthalassa (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURES 51, 279g

Margaronia euthalassa Meyrick, 1934c:338.

Diaphania euthalassa (Meyrick).—Klima, 1939b:272.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25247. Harpe very wide, lightly sclerotized; cucullus broadly rounded; from inner face of harpe, near ventral edge, a small, thornlike process. Uncus basal half slender, curved; outer half tubular, clothed with fine setae. Vinculum rounded. Tegumen three times as long as broad. Anellus rodlike. Aedeagus slightly longer than harpe; narrowly, but strongly, sclerotized dorsally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25248. Ostium transverse, broad. Antrum strongly sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis lateral from ductus bursae, slightly before antrum. Ductus bursae granular for most of its length. Bursa copulatrix finely granular. Signa two cones.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Feani Ridge, Tenatinaei.

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa, Fatu Hiva.

I have before me specimens from the following localities. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 25 Feb 1968, 1; Mt. Feani, 3400–3800 ft (1036–1158 m), 20 Feb to 1 Mar 1968, 7. Fatu Hiva: Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 5, 3; Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 3, 1.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

This is the largest and most attractive pyralid so far recorded from the Marquesas Islands, and probably occurs on islands other than Hiva Oa and Fatu Hiva.

Genus Chrysophyllis Meyrick

Chrysophyllis Meyrick, 1934c:337.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Chrysophyllis lucivaga Meyrick, 1934c:338, by monotypy.

Chrysophyllis lucivaga Meyrick

FIGURES 52, 279h

Chrysophyllis lucivaga Meyrick, 1934c:338.—Klima, 1939b:287.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25242. Harpe very broad and short; cucullus rounded; inside base of costa a dense cluster of setae; about middle of harpe a sclerotized, curved process; sacculus lightly sclerotized, terminating in a curved, sclerotized process. Uncus very long, slender, curved. Vinculum rounded. Tegumen longer than wide, truncate posteriorly. Anellus a slender, curved sclerotized plate. Aedeagus extremely long, coiled, slender.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Kaava Ridge, 2460 ft (750 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Unfortunately, the holotype of lucivaga is the only specimen known. The aedeagus of the male is extraordinary (Figure 52b). Dr. Eugene Munroe, world authority on the Pyralidae, always generous with his information, referred me to Janse (1935), who illustrated East Indian species of the genus Talanga. The species of this genus have the same extraordinary development of the aedeagus as that found in Chrysophyllis, and are obviously related. Pygospila tyres Guenée, from Darjiling, India, is also closely related according to Munroe. In the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History there is a specimen labeled imitalis Guenée (no generic name) from Cuba with the same type of genitalia, and there are other related American species. The ductus bursae of the female is likewise lengthened to accommodate the aedeagus.

FIGURE 51.—Stemorrhages euthalassa (Meyrick): a, ventral view of male genitalia with right harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 52.—Chrysophyllis lucivaga Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, right corema.

As far as I know, such a development of the aedeagus is found outside the pyraustinae, elsewhere in the lepidoptera, only in the Arrenophanidae (see Bradley, 1951).

Genus Diaphania Hübner

Diaphania Hübner, 1818 [1818–1837], 1:20, pl. [18]: figs. 101, 102.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Diaphania vitralis Hübner, 1818 [1818–1837], 1:20; by subsequent designation by Klima, 1939b:237.

Diaphania indica (Saunders)

FIGURES 53, 280a

Eudioptes indica Saunders, 1851a:163, pl. 12: figs. 5–7; 1851b:71.—Cotes, 1894:136.

Eudioptis indica (Saunders).—Moore, 1886 [1884–1887]:324.—Hampson, 1891:37 [No. 1031].—Schaus and Clements, 1893:44.—Hampson, 1893:47 [No. 1228].—Cotes, 1894:136.—Hampson, 1896 [1894–1896]:360; 1898:738.—Swinhoe, 1900:511 [No. 3515].—Pagenstecher, 1900:211.—Hering, 1901:260; 1906:132, 133.—Pillai, 1921:33.—Buxton and Hopkins, 1927, p. 29.

Margaronia indica (Saunders).—Fletcher, 1917:307.—Simmonds, 1922:23.—Tarns and Hampson, 1924:287.—Hutson, 1924:289.—Shibuya, 1928b:236; 1929:191.—de Joannis. 1930 [1929–1930]:680 [442].—Ghosh, 1932:3—Miller, 1932:11, 33, 34.—Esaki, 1932:1376.—Tams, 1935:282.—Ghosh, 1940c:146, pl. 71.—Swezey, 1946:181.—Pemberton, 1954:48, 50.—Patel and Kulkarny, 1956:118–127.—Janjua and Haque, 1958:140 [No. 90].—Whalley, 1962:114 [No. 53].—Nazmi, 1963 [1964]:218, fig. 8 A—C.—Comstock, 1966:59.—Balachowsky, 1972:1131, 1134, 1135.

Margarania [sic] indica (Saunders).—Dale and Herring, 1959:13.

Margorina [sic] indica (Saunders).—Mohanty and Nayak, 1982:87, 89, figs. 34–36.

Margarodes indica (Saunders).—Ghosh, 1925:7.

Margaronia (Glyphodes) indica (Saunders).—Fletcher, 1917:303. figs. 1–5.—Ramchandra and Cherian 1926:48.

Margaronia (Diaphania) indica (Saunders).—Wilkinson, 1931:397.

Diaphania indica (Saunders).—Hutson, 1931:70.—Klima, 1939b:239, 252.—Ghesquière, 1942:157, pl. 6: fig. 2.—Inoue, 1955:177 [No. 977].—Thomas, 1958:224.—Mathur and Singh, 1963:117, 118, 131, figs. 32–37.—Wang, 1963:361, pl. 1: fig. 6.—Gentry, 1965:148.—Inoue et. al, 1982, 1:346, 2: pl. 40, fig. 42.—Hodges et al. 1983:74 [No. 5207].

Diaphania (Margaronia) indica (Saunders).—Ferrière, 1929:415.

Diaphana indica (Saunders).—Paulian and Viette, 1955:180.—Viette, 1957:180; 1958:9.

Diaphana (Phacellura) indica (Saunders).—Marion, 1954:46.

Glyphodes indica (Saunders).—Meyrick, 1895:509.—Hampson, 1896 [1894–1896], 4:360; 1898:738.—Pagenstecher, 1900:211 [No. 399].—Matsumura, 1901:22 [No. 115].—Rebel, 1901:54 [No. 997].—Leech, 1901:471.—Maxwell-Lefroy and Howlett, 1909:518.—Rebel, 1910c:431.—Duport, 1913:36 [No. 252], 59, 86.—Rebel, 1915:146.—Janse, 1917:160 [No. 2525].—Senior-White, 1917:121.—Strand, 1918:59.—Pillai, 1921:33.—d'Emmerez de Charmoy and Gebert, 1921:181–190.—Swezey, 1924:219.—Vayssière and Mimeur, 1925:255–268.—Buxton and Hopkins, 1927, p. 29.—Monteil, 1934:14.—Sevastopulo, 1935:205.—Meyrick, 1935a:38.

Glyphodes (Phakellura) indica (Saunders).—Rebel, 1906:43.—Matsumura, 1908:213 [No. 1773].

Glyphodes (Phakellula) [sic] indica Sound [sic].—Okada, 1915:497.

Glyphodes (Phacellura) indica (Saunders).—Hill, 1915:3.

Phacellura indica (Saunders).—Meyrick, 1884:297; 1886b:223.—Ribbe, 1886:89.—Meyrick, 1934c:333, 338.—May, 1946:144, pl. 43.

Phakellura indica (Saunders).—Walker, 1859 [1856–1866]:514.—Snellen, 1875:228.—Wollaston, 1879: 332.—Butler, 1880:685.—Snellen, 1883:141.—Butler, 1884b:501.—Swinhoe, 1884:525; 1885:870; 1886:459.—Pagenstecher, 1886:171 [No. 153]; 1888:191 [No. 612].—Swinhoe and Cotes, 1888 [1887–1889]:5:616 [No. 4197].—Swinhoe, 1890:279.—Snellen, 1891:611.—Pagenstecher, 1894:42.—Rebel, 1896:112; 1898:380.

Palpita indica (Saunders).—Shin et al., 1983:379, pl. 25: fig. 399.

Phakellura indicalis Moore, 1867:93 [unjustified emendation by Moore].

Phakellura gazorialis Guenée, 1854:297 [No. 304].—Semper, 1867:702.

Phacellura gazorialis (Guenée).—Lederer, 1863:400.

Phakellura zygaenalis Guenée, 1854:297 [No. 305],—Walker, 1859 [1856–1866]:515.—Snellen, 1875:229.

Endioptis [sic] hyalinata.—Shiraki, 1913:362 [not Phalaena Geometra hyalinata Linnaeus].

Margaronia hyalinata.—Wolcott, 1936:462 [not Phalaena Geometra hyalinata.—Linnaeus].

FIGURE 53.—Diaphania indica (Saunders): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed, and part of corema showing; b, aedeagus; c, ventral review of female genitalia.

Botys hyalinalis Boisduval, 1833a:265; 1833b:117.

Eudioptis capensis Zeller, 1852 [1854]:52.

Phacellura capensis (Zeller).—Lederer, 1863:400.

Phakellura cepensis (Zeller).—Snellen, 1875:228.

Phakellura cucurbitalis Guenée, 1862:64.

Male genitalia slide 24872. Harpe half as broad as long; costa and sacculus nearly parallel, each strongly sclerotized; from middle a lightly sclerotized, narrow plate terminating in a weak spine; cucullus rounded. Uncus slightly longer than tegumen, tubular terminally and clothed with setae. Vinculum subquadrate. Tegumen about as long as broad. Anellus a small, sclerotized triangular plate. Aedeagus nearly straight, strongly sclerotized ventrally and with a distal, flattened curved process.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25517. Ostium transverse, oval. Antrum broadly sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis dorsal, from slightly before anterior edge of antrum. Ductus bursae very short, scarcely differentiated from posterior part of bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix long, slender, constricted at anterior third; wall of bursa profusely armed with short spines. From posterior edge of 7th segment, laterally, an eversible sac clothed with long scales.

LECTOTYPE.—In the Hope Museum, Oxford, England (indica).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Java (indica, gazorialis), Judea? (zygaenalis), South Africa (capensis); Reunion (cucurbitalis).

DISTRIBUTION.—Java, India, Ceylon (Sri Lanka), China, Fiji, Mauritius, Sula, Siam (Thailand), Ceram, Caroline Islands (Ponape), Marquesas Islands, Formosa (Taiwan), Africa.

Through the courtesy of Mr. Michael Shaffer of the British Museum (Natural History), I quote the following from his letter of 31 May, 1984 concerning indica and its synonyms.

With reference to your letter concerning Diaphania indica (Saunders), 1851. I am afraid there is very little information available concerning the type material of the many synonyms. No one has made a serious study of this species as yet and I have not seriously examined the available BM material for research/curation purposes. What little information I can provide concerns mostly indica, though I have no doubt that detailed study of available material, which is very considerable, may reveal some syntypic material of at least the three Guenée taxa.

For indica I was fortunate some years ago to discover two specimens in the University Museum of Oxford which I am satisfied are Saunders syntypes. I labelled them lectotype and paralectotype respectively. This lectotype designation still awaits publication. If you would like to undertake this designation and somehow add it to your forthcoming Marquesas paper, please feel free to do so. Here are the label details: Lectotype ; Eudiotes indica Java, E. Ind. Aust. reg. Dr. Horsfield ; Lectotype Eudioptes indica Saunders det. M. Shaffer, 1979 [lectotype hereby designated].

Paralectotype ; Eudioptes Hb. Phakellura L. Gueld. E. indica Saunders Trans. Ent. Soc. NS. 1. p. 163 pl. 12 f. 7 Java; Paralectotype Eudioptes indica Saunders det. M. Shaffer, 1979. Both specimens are set, the lectotype is mounted upside down and neither specimen has been dissected. Full reference for this name is Saunders, 1851. Trans. Ent. Soc. London new series 1850–51 1:163 pl. 12 figs. 5, 6, 7 Eudioptes, type locality Java.

Phakellura indicalis Moore would appear to be an emendation of indica.

Phakellura gazorialis Guenée, 1854. Lepid. Het. 8 Delt.&Pyr. :297 Java 1 male coll. Lefebvre. Type could be in Paris or even Leiden.

Phakellura zygaenalis Guenée, 1854. ditto :297 Judea ? 1 male coll. Roux (doubtful locality) 1 male from unknown locality. Type possibly in Paris.

Eudioptis capensis Zeller, 1852. Lepid. Caffr. :52 South Africa, Limpopo and Gariep rivers. Syntypes not yet traced but could very well turn up in the BM accessions.

Phakellura curcubitalis Guenée, 1862. Annexe G de L'ouvrage intitulé: Notes sur l'Ile de la Réunion. Lépidoptéres: 64 ex number from Réunion. 1 specimen possibly male labelled as type in MNHN, Paris.

FOOD PLANTS.—Gossypium herbaceum L., Erythrina corallodendron L., Luffa aegyptiaca Miller, Luffa acutangula (L.) Roxburgh, Trichosanthes anguina L., Trichosanthes palmata Roxburgh, Cucurbita lagenaria (L.) L. (= Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standby), “pumpkin and mellon leaves.”

This is the common “cucumber moth” of the Indo-Australian region, but the species probably attacks other cucurbits more than it does cucumber.

With regard to “pumpkin,” Dr. Raymond Fosberg, Department of Botany, Smithsonian Institution, provided the following note.

Bailey, Hortus Third gives the common name “pumpkin” to four species of Cucurbita—C. maxima, C. mixta, C. moschata, and C. pepo. The typical “jack-o-lantern” pumpkin is a cultivar of Cucurbita pepo L. This is the sense in which I have used C. pepo, but it also includes a number of other cultivars. If you can describe the one you are calling pumpkin, perhaps I can give you a more precise or reliable determination. Most cultivars may be hybrids of two or more of the above species.

Genus Aulacodes Guenée

Aulacodes Guenée, 1854:258.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Aulacodes aechmialis Guenée, 1854:258, by monotypy.

Aulacodes eupselias Meyrick

FIGURES 54, 280b

Aulacodes eupselias Meyrick, 1929b:161; 1934c:336.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24819. Harpe simple, heavily clothed with long fine setae; cucullus slightly wider than the remainder of harpe. Uncus two digitate processes armed with short stout setae. Vinculum triangular. Tegumen subquadrate with two groups of long, strong setae posterodorsally. Anellus a small, sclerotized plate. Aedeagus stout, nearly straight; vesica armed with two strong cornuti.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24820. Ostium V-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis dorsolateral from anterior end of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae sclerotized, enlarged anteriorly and with two conspicuous digitate processes ventrally. Bursa copulatrix finely granular. Signum a small sclerotized cone.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Tahuata.

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

I have before me the following specimens. Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m), 2. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11 Mar to 25 Mar 1968, 1, 2; Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 1; Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 3, 1; Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m), 3 Apr 1968, 2, 1. Teavapuhiau, Ouia, 1–3 Aug 1977. 1 (Montgomery).

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Although present records indicate that distribution is confined to three islands, further search will undoubtedly reveal the presence of eupselias elsewhere in the Marquesas.

Genus Cangetta Moore

Cangetta Moore, 1886:314.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Cangetta rectilinea Moore, 1886:314, pl. 182: fig. 8, by monotypy.

Cangetta eschatia, new species

FIGURES 55, 280c

Alar expanse 11–12 mm.

Labial palpus white with two grayish fuscous spots on outer side of second segment. Antenna pale grayish with darker annulations. Head, thorax, and forewing ground color wood brown; antemedian and postmedian transverse lines fuscous, the postmedian line irregular; between the two transverse lines, near costa, a fuscous blotch; from costa, just before apex, a fuscous line curves outwardly along termen, thence to tornus; beyond this subterminal line, apex and termen pale ochraceous buff; cilia buff to brownish with fuscous subbasal line. Hindwing wood brown; transverse lines fuscous; subterminal line fuscous; cilia wood brown, basal line fuscous. Legs pale ochraceous buff, suffused grayish. Abdomen brown dorsally, ventrally pale ochraceous buff suffused grayish.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25172. Ostium slitlike, transverse, entering an elongate, sclerotized lateral sac. Inception of ductus seminalis dorsal, from posterior end of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae membranous, slender. Bursa copulatrix elongate, oval, membranous, with suggestion of granulations. Signum a small, lightly sclerotized plate with a slender hooklike process from posterior edge.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100736.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

FIGURE 54.—Aulacodes eupselias Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed, and showing corema; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 55.—Cangetta eschatia, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

Described from the holotype (27 Mar 1968) and one paratype Fatu Hiva, Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m), 3 Apr 1968.

This species is similar to C. rectilinea Moore, but is smaller, with the forewing more uniformly colored and lacks the white legs of rectilinea.

Genus Piletocera Lederer

Piletocera Lederer, 1863:431.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Piletocera violalis Lederer, 1863:431, pl. 16: fig. 15, by monotypy.

Piletocera signiferalis (Wallengren)

FIGURES 56, 57, 280e–h

Isopteryx signiferalis Wallengren, 1860:175.

Piletocera signiferalis (Wallengren).—Hampson, 1897:210.—Rebel, 1910b:430; 1915:146.—Meyrick, 1929b:162; 1934c:337.—Tams, 1935:269.—Klima, 1937:175,—Swezey, 1946:178.—Viette, 1949a:322.—Kraus, 1953b:219.—Comstock, 1966:55.—Clarke, 1971:83, figs. 76, 77.

Ceratoclasis barbicornis Felder and Rogenhofer, 1874 [1864–1875]:6, pl. 136: fig. 1.

Rinecera mirabilis Butler, 1884a:95; 1886b:424.

Strepsimela signiferalis (Wallengren).—Meyrick, 1886b:250; 1887:222.—Druce, 1888a:230.

Rinecera nigrescens Butler, 1886b:424.

Types.—Depository unknown (signiferalis); in the British Museum (Natural History) (barbicornis, mirabilis, nigrescens).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Tahiti (signiferalis); Caroline Islands (mirabilis); Viti Islands (nigrescens); Fiji (barbicornis).

DISTRIBUTION.—Loyalty Islands, Cook Islands, New Hebrides, Fiji, Elice Islands, Tonga, Society Islands, Austral Islands, Marquesas Islands, Micronesia; Southeast Asia? also recorded from Natal.

Our records from the Marquesas Islands are as follows. Nuku Hiva: Pakiu Valley, 1000–1800 ft (305–549 m), 17–28 Jan 1968, 9; Taiohae, 15 Jan to 3 Feb 1968, 8, 15; Tapuaooa, 2000 ft (610 m), 1; Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 2. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 11 Feb to 8 Mar 1968, 11; Puamau, 8 Feb 1968, 3; Tahauku, 26 Feb 1968, 1. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11–21 Mar 1968, 4, 15; Omoa Valley, 16 Mar 1968, 1; Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 1. Uapou: above Hakahetau, 800 m, 23–24 Jul 1977, 1 (Montgomery). Eiao: N. highlands, 400 m, 7 Aug 1977, 1 (Montgomery).

FIGURE 56.—Piletocera signiferalis (Wallengren): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia; d, venation of right wings, .

FIGURE 57.—Piletocera signiferalis (Wallengren), male corema.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

I have compared our series of signiferalis with a series from Tahiti, the type-locality, and the two appear to be identical. Undoubtedly, some populations from other localities throughout the range of this species will vary from the typical as does the population from Rapa (Clarke, 1971:83).

Although widely distributed in the Pacific, signiferalis apparently has not reached the Hawaiian Islands.

Genus Aethaloessa Lederer

Aethaloëssa Lederer, 1863:435.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Stenia floridalis Zeller, 1852 [1854]:60; subsequent designation by Shibuya, 1928b: 192.

Aethaloessa calidalis tiphalis (Walker)

FIGURES 58, 281a

Syngamia tiphalis Walker, 1859 [1856–1866]:335.

Aethaloēssa calidalis tiphalis (Walker).—Whalley, 1961:106, fig. 3a,b, pl. 4: fig. 3.

Syngamia octavialis Walker, 1859 [1856–1866]:334.

Hyalea fulvidalis Wallengren, 1860:174.

Chnaura octavialis (Walker).—Lederer, 1863:435.

Syngamia secutalis Walker, 1866 [1856–1866]: 1291.

Botys witalis Felder in Felder et al., 1875 [1864–1875], pl. 135: fig. 8.

Syngamia floridalis.—Hampson 1898:644 [not Syngamia floridalis Zeller].

Syngamia aurantiaca Hampson, 1912b:254.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24834. Harpe very lightly sclerotized; near base of costa a cluster of fine setae and another near outer end; a slender sclerotized longitudinal rod well inside costa extends nearly to cucullus; slightly beyond middle of sacculus a small papilla followed by a strong single seta. Uncus two spined lobes. Vinculum subquadrate; saccus elongate. Tegumen very narrow. Anellus a very lightly sclerotized plate. Aedeagus moderately stout, nearly straight; vesica armed with one strong cornutus, a series of thornlike cornuti and an elongate patch of granules.

FIGURE 58.—Aethaloessa calidalis tiphalis (Walker): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed, and showing corema; b, aedeagus.

TYPES.—In the British Museum (Natural History) (tiphalis, secutalis, octavialis, aurantiaca); depositories unknown (fulvidalis, witalis).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Celebes (tiphalis); Siam (secutalis); Tahiti (fulvidalis); Sumatra (octavialis); “Insulae vitiani” (witalis); Singapore (aurantiaca).

DISTRIBUTION.—Malaya, Burma, Formosa, Java, Sumatra, Borneo, Celebes, New Guinea, Solomon Islands, New Ireland, Bali, New Britain, Ceram, Sudest Island, Rook Island, Tambora, Philippines, Samoa, Tahiti, Tenimber, Warri, Australia (Queensland and New South Wales) according to Whalley, 1961. Marquesas Islands.

We have one specimen from Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 15 Mar 1968, 1.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Unfortunately I do not have a female available for study.

Subfamily PYRALINAE

Genus Pyralis Linnaeus

Pyralis Linnaeus, 1758:1–533.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Phlaena Pyralis farinalis Linnaeus, 1758:533; by subsequent designation by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 1957, Opinions, Declarations, International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 15 (Opinion 450):254.

Pyralis pictalis (Curtis)

FIGURES 59, 281b

Asopia pictalis Curtis, 1834 [1824–1839], pl. 503; 1837:205 [No. 981].—Herrich-Schäffer, 1849 [1843–1856], 4:123 [No. 9].—Lederer, 1863:343.—Snellen, 1883:122.

Pyralis pictalis (Curtis).—Stephens, 1834:395.—Guenée, 1854, 8:120, No. 9.—Walker, 1859, 17: 267,—Snellen, 1883:122—Swinhoe and Cotes, 1888 [1887–1889], 5:657 [No. 4458].—Swinhoe, 1890:291.—Ragonot, 1891:38.—Meyrick, 1894a:12; 1895:428.—Hampson, 1896 [1894–1896], 4:150; 1896:508.—Swinhoe, 1900:431.—Rebel, 1901:45 [No. 839].—Leech, 1901:423.—Matsumura, 1908:202 [No. 1685].—Duport, 1913:36 [No. 237], 46.—Strand, 1919:58.—Shibuya, 1928a:150; 1928b:120.—Meyrick, 1928:445.—de Joannis, 1930 [1929–1930]: [400] 638.—Matsumura, 1931:1048.—Meyrick, 1935a:30.—Sevastopulo, 1935: 205.—Pierce and Metcalf, 1938:39, pl. 22.—Ghosh, 1940c:196.—Ghesquiére, 1942:209.—Corbet and Tams, 1943c:64, 80, figs. 46, 104, 141.—Kloet and Hincks, 1945:116.—Amsel, 1954b:310.—Inoue, 1955:150 [No. 843].—Wattal and Kalra, 1960:77–79, pl. la,b.—Kloet and Hincks, 1972:44.—Auctorum, 1979:212 [No. 1383].—Inoue et al., 1982, 1:381, 2: pl. 43: fig. 3.

Pyralis pronoealis Walker, 1859 [1856–1866]:906.

Asopia pronoealis (Walker).—Lederer, 1863:343, 458.

Myelois bractiatella Walker, 1863 [1856–1866]:36.

Pyralis suggeralis Walker, 1866 [1856–1866]: 1237.

Pyralis elachia Butler, 1879:70, pl. 58: fig. 3.

Pyralis bractiatella (Walker).—Moore, 1885 [1884–1887]:262, pl. 178: fig. 5.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24880. Ostium rather small, funnel-shaped. Antrum sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis at anterior margin of antrum. Ductus bursae mostly membranous, with a coarsely granular area at about posterior third. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signum absent.

TYPES.—In the British Museum (Natural History) (pronoealis bractiatella, suggeralis, elachia); Australia? (pictalis).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Great Britain? (pictalis); Sarawak (pronoealis); Ceylon (bractiatella); Sarawak (suggeralis); Japan (elachia).

FIGURE 59.—Pyralis pictalis (Curtis), ventral view of female genitalia.

DISTRIBUTION.—Southern India, Ceylon (Sri Lanka), Philippine Islands, New Guinea, Java, Khasi Hills, Formosa, Japan, Accra, England, Marquesas Islands, Europe, Burma, Sumatra, Gilbert Islands, Belgian Congo, South Africa, Fiji, Siam (Thailand), West Africa, Northwest Himalaya, Central and Western China.

We have only a single record from the Marquesas Islands. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 15 Feb 1968, 1.

FOOD.—Grains; eggs of bedbug.

This widely distributed species is undoubtedly spread through commerce.

Subfamily CRAMBINAE

Genus Idioblasta Warren

Idioblasta Warren, 1891:62.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Idioblasta lacteata Warren, 1891:62, by original designation.

Following is a quote from Zimmerman (1958b:296) in which he discusses the separation of Idioblasta from the Hawaiian Mestolobes.

There have been several species of Mestolobes described from the Marquesas, but this has been done in error. The Marquesan species belong to Idioblasta Warren (1891:62, type Idioblasta lacteata Warren). Hampson (1899:239) sank Idioblasta as a synonym of Pionea in the Pyraustinae. He ignored the fact that Idioblasta bears the typical Crambinae pecten in the hind wing. Hampson's latest arrangement in the British Museum has the species in Hapalia, also in the Pyraustinae. Meyrick (1929[b]:165) noted Hampson's sinking Idioblasta under Pionea, and he pointed out that it is very distinct and redescribed it. Meyrick later (1934[c]:340) sank Idioblasta as a synonym of Mestolobes. In his personal collection, now in the British Museum, Meyrick put Idioblasta in front of Mestolobes under the title “Idioblasta Meyr.” [sic!]. It would be most helpful if Meyrick's conclusion that the two genera were the same could be substantiated, because we would then know extra-Hawaiian Mestolobes and might be able to say whence the genus came, but Idioblasta is not a synonym of Mestolobes. A careful examination will reveal quickly obvious differences between the genera. Idioblasta has a developed pecten on the hind wing, and the genitalia of both sexes are very different from Mestolobes. On Idioblasta lacteata, the type of Idioblasta, the male genital valves are of a basically distinct form from Mestolobes, and the uncus resembles an arm and hand with five long, outstretched fingers; the gnathos is a broad, apically truncated, subspatulate organ. The female genitalia show no resemblance to Mestolobes. Instead of the short, broad ovipositor of Mestolobes, Idioblasta has a narrow, greatly elongated ovipositor which exceeds the length of the remainder of the genitalia combined, there is no trace of the peculiar paired accessory sacs, and the female genitalia somewhat resemble those of Orthomecyna.

Key to the Species of Idioblasta

Idioblasta straminata Warren

Idioblasta straminata Warren, 1891:62.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—“Marquesas Islands.”

DISTRIBUTION.—Tahuata.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Unfortunately, the abdomen of the type is missing and no comparison of the genitalia with those of other species can be made. The weakly indicated lines of the forewing are similar to those of procellaris, but the latter species has an almost completely black hindwing, is from a different island, and most certainly is distinct.

The type-locality was given as “Marquesas Islands” in the original description, but the label data indicate that the type is actually from the island of Tahuata.

Idioblasta lacteata Warren

FIGURES 60, 281d,e

Idioblasta lacteata Warren, 1891:62—Zimmerman, 1958b: 296.

Mestolobes lacteata (Warren).—Meyrick, 1929b: 165; 1934c: 341.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24876. Harpe very thick and strongly sclerotized, this area produced as a sharp point at outer part of costa; near base of costa a C-shaped process followed by a dentate spur; from ventral edge of sclerotized part a series of hooked setae; sacculus narrow, membranous; cucullus bluntly pointed. Gnathos spoon-shaped. Uncus distally divided into five-pointed, curved processes. Vinculum broadly M-shaped. Tegumen about as long as uncus. Anellus a fleshy pad. Aedeagus slender, curved; vesica armed with a series of spiculate cornuti.

ORIGINAL MATERIAL.—“One female, two males, Marquesas Islands.”

LECTOTYPE.—Male, “Nuku Hiva I. Marquesas I. BM. slide No. 1012,” hereby designated. The usual red-circled type label is attached to the pin.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—“Nukahiva I. Marquesas Islands.”

Lectotype is in the British Museum (Natural History).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva, Uapou.

Before me are six specimens as follows. Nuku Hiva: Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 1; Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 5.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Originally described from Nuku Hiva, this species was recorded from Uapou by Meyrick (1934c:341), and probably occurs elsewhere in the Marquesas.

Idioblasta procellaris (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURES 61, 282a

Mestolobes procellaris Meyrick, 1934c:341.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24890. Harpe base broad, rather strongly sclerotized, this part produced on costa as a sharply pointed, curved process; at base of costa a deep excavation forming a curved process proximally, and a toothlike point distally; cucullus slender, fleshy. Gnathos spoon-shped. Uncus elongate, terminating in five sharply pointed, curved processes. Vinculum M-shaped. Tegumen longer than broad. Anellus a small sclerotized plate produced posteriorly on each side. Aedeagus slender, curved; vesica armed with a series of strong cornuti.

FIGURE 60.—Idioblasta lacteata Warren: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25177. Ostium oval, transverse, ventral edge produced. Inception of ductus seminalis about middle of membranous portion of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae posterior half flattened, strongly sclerotized, curved; from anterior end of sclerotized part a membranous section is directed dorsad, turns laterally then folds and is directed anteriorly to bursa. Bursa copulatrix granular. Signum absent.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Omoa Valley, 1500 ft (457 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

Fatu Hiva: Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 1.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

When Meyrick described this species he stated (1934c:341): “The forewings in this insect are also partially rubbed, but apparently the absence of lines is natural….” The transverse lines of the forewing are obvious in our specimen, which is in excellent condition (Figure 282a). These lines have the same conformation as those of straminata. The hindwings are characteristic. The male is smaller (18 mm) than the female type (20 mm).

FIGURE 61.—Idioblasta procellaris (Meyrick): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Idioblasta transversata, new species

FIGURES 62, 282b

Idioblasta straminata.—Meyrick, 1929b:165 [not Idioblasta straminata Warren.]

Alar expanse 20–22 mm.

Labial palpus pale ochraceous buff interspersed with blackish fuscous scales, especially dorsally. Antenna ochraceous buff dorsally, fuscous ventrally; scape ochraceous buff. Head ochraceous buff. Thorax ochraceous buff with scattered blackish fuscous scales anteriorly; tegula ochraceous buff with scattered blackish fuscous scales. Forewing ground color ochraceous buff; in basal angle a blackish fuscous dash; in basal third a roughly S-shaped transverse line of loosely arranged blackish fuscous scales; across middle of wing a pair of highly contrasting blackish fuscous lines; between these lines blackish fuscous irroration; terminal line slender, blackish fuscous; cilia pale ochraceous buff marked with groups of fuscous scales. Hindwing ochraceous buff to orange buff; apex with a large subtriangular blackish fuscous spot; anal angle marked with blackish fuscous dash. Foreleg pale ochraceous buff; tibia and tarsal segments marked fuscous; midleg similar but only tarsal segments marked fuscous; hindleg pale ochraceous buff. Abdomen ochraceous buff dorsally, light ochraceous buff ventrally.

Male genitalia USNM slide 24833. Harpe broad basally and strongly sclerotized, this area narrowed distad and costa terminating in a sharply pointed, curved process; on ventral edge of sclerotized part a series of strong, curved setae; cucullus narrow, fleshy, weak; at base of costa a fleshy process. Gnathos spoon-shaped, broadened distally. Uncus terminating in a five-pointed claw. Vinculum M-shaped. Tegumen about as long as broad. Anellus a sclerotized plate. Aedeagus slender, slightly curved; vesica armed with numerous spiculate cornuti.

Female genitalia USNM slide 25240. Ostium oval, transverse. Inception of ductus seminalis near junction of ductus bursae and bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae posterior three-fourths sclerotized, flattened, curved, broadened anteriorly; anterior quarter at right angles to posterior part, ridged. Bursa copulatrix finely granular, long, slender. Signum absent.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100741.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

Described from the holotype (20 Feb 1968), 1 and 1 paratypes with same data as holotype, and 14 and 4 paratypes as follows. Hiva Oa: 7, 2, 27 Jan 1925, 3000–3500 ft (914–1067 m), beaten from herbage; 3, 2, 31 Dec 1924, 3000 ft (914 m), sheltering in Pandanus; 2, Jan 1925, 3500 ft (1067 m) at light; 1. Dec 1924, 3000 ft (914 m), all collected by C.L. Collenette. Ootua, 800 m, 27–30 Jul, 1977, 1 (Montgomery).

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Meyrick misidentified this species as straminata Warren and redescribed but did not name it. It is much larger and more contrastingly marked than straminata, even though the abdomen of straminata is missing, and the genitalia cannot be compared, I am certain that transversata is distinct.

Idioblasta isoterma (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURE 63, 281c

Mestolobes isoterma Meyrick, 1934c:340.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25189. Ostium irregular, transverse. Inception of ductus seminalis from anterior part of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae strongly sclerotized posteriorly, then a granular section at right angles to the sclerotized part, followed anteriorly by a short membranous section. Bursa copulatrix mostly membranous, finely granular anteriorly. Signum absent.

FIGURE 62.—Idioblasta transversata, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 63.—Idioblasta isoterma (Meyrick), ventral view of female genitalia.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatuuku, 860 ft (262 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatuuku.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

The entire series of this species is in deplorable condition, as indicated by Meyrick, but one thing is certain, there is a grayish or fuscous terminal area on the forewing bordered on the inner edge by a whitish or yellowish transverse line. The entire margin of the hindwing is blackish fuscous as in lacteata and linearis, new species.

Idioblasta acleropa (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURES 64, 281f

Mestolobes acleropa Meyrick, 1934c:340.

Male genitalia USNM 25190. Harpe broadly sclerotized and thickened, this part terminating in a curved, pointed process; costa arched before middle, with a dentate process before middle and a finger-like process near base; ventral edge with strongly curved setae. Gnathos subspatulate, broadened and granular distally. Uncus terminating in a five-fingered claw, the fingers short. Vinculum M-shaped. Tegumen long and narrow. Anellus a subquadrate plate with a thick, short process on each side posteriorly. Aedeagus slender, curved; vesica armed with a cluster of spinulate cornuti.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Eiao, above Vaituha, 1200 ft (366 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Eiao.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

The holotype is the only specimen of this species that I have seen, and it is quite distinct from any others we encountered.

Idioblasta stenogramma, new species

FIGURES 65, 282c

Alar expanse 18 mm.

FIGURE 64.—Idioblasta acleropa (Meyrick): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus.

Labial palpus light ochraceous buff; second segment with some gray scales apically on outer side; third segment almost wholly gray on outer side. Antenna grayish fuscous; scape light orange yellow. Head, thorax, and forewing ground color light orange yellow; at basal fifth, inside costa, an ill-defined fuscous spot; at two-fifths of costa a short, outwardly oblique, slender, transverse line; from apical third of costa to tornus a prominent, blackish fuscous transverse line; extreme edge of termen narrowly fuscous; cilia light ochraceous buff. Hindwing light orange yellow, slightly paler basally; apex a blackish fuscous triangle; cilia mixed light orange yellow and light ochraceous buff. Fore-, mid-, and hindlegs light buff; hindleg suffused yellowish. Abdomen light orange yellow dorsally; ventrally light buff suffused yellowish.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24877. Harpe swollen and strongly sclerotized, costa terminating in a curved, sharp point; saccular edge clothed with strong, recurved setae; cucullus fleshy, pointed; at base of harpe a fleshy finger-like process with a sharp tooth beyond. Gnathos spoon-shaped, distally broadened. Uncus broad basally, constricted at middle, terminating in five-pointed claw. Vinculum M-shaped. Tegumen long and narrow. Anellus a fleshy plate with two dentate processes basally. Aedeagus slender, curved; vesica armed with numerous small, dentate cornuti.

HOLOTYPE—USNM 100742.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (30 Jan 1968).

FIGURE 65.—Idioblasta stenogramma, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus.

Idioblasta stenogramma is similar to transversata but has only a single prominent transverse line on the forewing, the latter has two prominent lines. Also transversata measures 20–22 mm; but stenogramma measures only 18 mm. The female is unknown.

Idioblasta amydrosoma, new species

FIGURES 66, 282d

Alar expanse 14 mm.

Labial palpus cream white; second segment dorsolaterally fuscous; third segment fuscous. Antenna grayish fuscous; basal segments of flagellum pale orange yellow dorsally; scape pale orange yellow. Head, thorax, and forewing ground color pale orange yellow; forewing without any distinguishing markings; cilia concolorous. Hindwing pale orange yellow; most of apical half of wing fuscous; a fuscous dash in anal angle; cilia mixed fuscous and pale orange yellow apically, others pale orange yellow. Foreleg cream white suffused yellowish; tarsal segments marked fuscous; midleg missing; hindleg cream white suffused yellowish. Abdomen pale orange yellow dorsally; cream white ventrally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24879. Ostium transverse, oval. Inception of ductus seminalis from anterior part of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae posteriorly heavily sclerotized for nearly half its length; anterior section granular. Signum absent.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100743.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuka Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (30 Jan 1968).

Although similar to acrogramma, new species, amydrosoma has a paler forewing without any trace of transverse lines, and a greater area of the hindwing is marked by blackish fuscous. Furthermore, there is a blackish fuscous dash in the anal angle of hindwing of amydrosoma that is absent in acrogramma.

FIGURE 66.—Idioblasta amydrosoma, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

Idioblasta acrogramma, new species

FIGURES 67, 282e

Alar expanse 15 mm.

Labial palpus light ochraceous buff; second segment with grayish fuscous scaling on outer side apically; third segment almost wholly grayish fuscous. Antenna grayish fuscous; scape light orange yellow. Head, thorax, and forewing ground color light orange yellow; from apical third of costa to tornus a somewhat darker shade indicating an ill-defined transverse line; terminal line very slender, grayish fuscous; cilia light orange yellow, slightly darker distad. Hindwing light orange yellow, slightly paler basally; apex a small blackish fuscous triangle; cilia light orange yellow; apical cilia with fuscous basal line. Fore-, mid-, and hindlegs light buff, suffused yellowish; foretarsi spotted fuscous. Abdomen light orange yellow dorsally; ventrally light buff suffused yellowish.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24878. Harpe thick, broadly sclerotized; base of costa with finger-like, fleshy lobe, tooth beyond very small; costa terminating in a curved, pointed process; cucullus small, fleshy; ventral edge of harpe armed with a series of long, strong, curved setae. Gnathos subspatulate, curved; dorsodistally armed with spiculate setae. Uncus terminating in a five-pointed claw. Vinculum M-shaped. Tegumen long and narrow. Anellus subsquadrate with a fleshy lobe on each side. Aedeagus slender, curved; vesica armed with a series of spiculate cornuti.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100744.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (30 Jan 1968).

This is similar to, but smaller than stenogramma, and lacks the prominent transverse line of forewing found in that species.

FIGURE 67.—Idioblasta acrogramma, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus.

Idioblasta linearis, new species

FIGURES 68, 282f

Alar expanse 16 mm.

Labial palpus white; second segment light clay color dorsolaterally; third segment grayish fuscous. Antenna grayish fuscous. Head sordid white with median grayish suffusion. Thorax sordid white; tegula grayish fuscous anteriorly. Forewing ground color sordid white with scattered light clay color scales over entire surface; from slightly before middle of costa an ill-defined, broken grayish fuscous line extends to middorsum; from apical third of costa an irregular, narrow, grayish fuscous, transverse line extends to tornus; between the two lines, at end of cell, a short grayish fuscous dash; around termen 8 grayish fuscous spots; extreme termen narrowly grayish fuscous; cilia white with grayish fuscous basal band. Hindwing shining white; margin entirely fuscous; cilia white. Foreleg sordid white; tarsal segments marked grayish fuscous. Mid- and hindlegs sordid white with very pale grayish suffusion. Abdomen smoke gray dorsally; ventrally sordid white.

FIGURE 68.—Idioblasta linearis, new species, ventral view of female genitalis.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25213. Ostium irregular. Inception of ductus seminalis from near junction of ductus bursae and bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae posterior two-thirds strongly sclerotized, curved; anterior third granular, at right angles to sclerotized section, then directed anteriorly. Bursa copulatrix finely granular. Signum absent.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100745.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (23 Jan 1968).

This species has the same kind of hindwing that is found in lacteata, but none of the dark, strongly contrasting transverse lines of the forewing of that species.

Subfamily SCOPARIINAE

Genus Eudonia Billberg

Eudonia Billberg, 1820:93.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Phalaena Tinea mercurella Linnaeus, 1758:538, [No. 269]; by monotypy.

Munroe (1972:47–72) presents an excellent description of the genus and treats the North American species. Regarding the Marquesan species, Munroe states the following (in litt. 8 Sept. 1982):

All the species belong to the genus Eudonia. They appear close to the Hawaiian and Rapa species, also the Tahitian, but this genus is very uniform around the world, and the genitalia are just like those of Holarctic, Neotropical, Indo- Malayan, Papuan, Australian, Afrotropical and some New Zealand species. As you noted, there are representative forms, usually not identical, in the different islands….

The genitalia of the species of Eudonia are monotonously similar and are of little help in distinguishing most species. The males have simple harpes, strikingly similar aedeagi, and the vesica in all species is armed with what appears to be a small disc of concentrated granules. In the females there is always a kink in the ductus bursae where the anterior membranous portion joins the posterior sclerotized half. Where the two parts join there is a heavily sclerotized triangular area armed with small teeth. Usually the number of teeth is obscured and is useless for diagnosis.

Concerning the Rapa species (Clarke, 1971:86–89), which I placed in the genus Scoparia, they become: Eudonia exterminata (Meyrick), new combination, Eudonia psednopa (Meyrick), new combination, and Eudonia tivira (Clarke), new combination.

Key to the Species of Eudonia

Eudonia citrocosma (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURES 69, 283a

Scoparia citrocosma Meyrick, 1929b: 166.

Male genitalia slides USNM 25369, 25385. Harpe simple, cucullus broadly rounded. Gnathos curved, bladelike. Uncus narrow, densely clothed with setae on each side. Vinculum rounded. Tegumen broad basally, narrowed posteriorly. Anellus pyriform. Aedeagus about as long as harpe, gently curved; vesica armed with a very finely dentate round disc.

Female genitalia slides USNM 25368, 25386. Ostium broad, funnel-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis at junction of sclerotized and membranous parts of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae posterior half sclerotized; anterior half coiled, membranous; at junction of the two parts a series of about 10 teeth. Bursa copulatrix finely granular. Appendix bursae membraneous. Signum an oval, sclerotized, finely dentate plate.

FIGURE 69.—Eudonia citrocosma (Meyrick): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

ORIGINAL MATERIAL.—”. 18–20 mm….Marquesas, Hiva Oa, 3500 feet, January; 21 ex.”

LECTOTYPE.—Label data are as follows: A large white label with “Hiva Oa, Marquesas, at light. 3500 ft. 28.1.25. St. George Expedn. C.L. Collenette.” A small white label with “Brit. Mus. 1925-488.” A narrow white label with “Scoparia citrocosma Meyr.” A large white label reads “Scoparia citrocosma Meyrick.” BM Slide No. 9694. At the top above all the other labels is a circular purple-bordered “type” label. Lectotype hereby designated.

Lectotype is in the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, 3500 ft (1067 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

Our series of 18 specimens is as follows. Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3400 and 3800 ft (1036 and 1158 m), 20 Feb and 1 Mar 1968, 9, 9.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

The yellow ground color of the forewing distinguishes citrocosma from any other known Marquesan Eudonia.

Eudonia clavula, new species

FIGURES 70, 283b

Alar expanse 16–18 mm.

Labial palpus grayish fuscous; ventrally, at base, very pale buff. Antenna fuscous. Head grayish fuscous and buff mixed. Thorax fuscous; tegula fuscous mixed with buff. Forewing ground color buff, strongly marked by blackish fuscous blotches and scattered light ochraceous-buff scales; from basal fourth of costa an irregular transverse line of ground color extends to basal third of dorsum; beyond this line an irregular blackish fuscous blotch; on tornus a blackish fuscous blotch; before apex a fuscous shade; on terminal edge a series of small blackish fuscous spots; subterminally, an ill-defined, irregular, transverse buff line; cilia mixed grayish and buff. Hindwing grayish fuscous, paler toward base; cilia grayish. Legs buff suffused grayish fuscous and marked with fuscous. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally; buff ventrally.

Male genitalia slides USNM 25370, 25371, 25403. Harpe broadest before cucullus; cucullus broadly rounded. Gnathos claviform. Uncus profusely clothed with setae. Vinculum U-shaped. Tegumen narrowed posteriorly. Anellus pyriform. Aedeagus nearly as long as harpe, stout, curved; vesica armed with a small granular disc.

Female genitalia slides USNM 25372, 25373. Ostium funnel-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis near junction of sclerotized posterior and membranous sections of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae lightly sclerotized in posterior half, membranous and coiled in anterior half. Bursa copulatrix finely granular; appendix bursae membranous. Signum an oval patch of granules.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100733.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Mt. Teoaiua 2000 ft (610 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fata Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype, 4 and 7 paratypes as follows. Fatu Hiva: Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 2, 2; Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 1. Teavapuhiau, Ouia, 23–24 Jul and 1–3 Aug 1977, 1, 5 (Montgomery).

Eudonia clavula is similar to citrocosma but lacks the yellow markings of that species. The males of clavula are easily distinguished from those of citrocosma by the claviform gnathos.

Eudonia spectacularis (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURES 71, 283c

Scoparia spectacularis Meyrick, 1929b:167, 1934c:342.

Male genitalia slides USNM 25374, 25395. Harpe simple, rather narrow; cucullus rounded. Gnathos with distal third abruptly narrowed. Uncus subtriangular, laterally densely clothed with setae. Vinculum rounded. Tegumen narrowed posteriorly. Anellus pyriform. Aedeagus about as long as harpe, curved, stout; vesica armed with a very small, granular disc.

FIGURE 70.—Eudonia clavula, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 71.—Eudonia spectacularis (Meyrick): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slides USNM 25377, 25396. Ostium broad, transverse, funnel-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis at junction of sclerotized and membranous parts of ductus bursae. At the point of inception of ductus seminalis two clusters of small teeth. Ductus bursae posterior half sclerotized, anterior half membranous, coiled. Bursa copulatrix oval, granular. Appendix bursae membranous. Signum an oval granular plate.

ORIGINAL MATERIAL.—”. 13–15 mm Marquesas, Hiva Oa (3500 feet), Fatu Hiva (2000 feet), January; 30 ex.”

LECTOTYPE.—A large white label reads “Hiva Oa, Marquesas, at light. 3500 ft. 28.1.25. St. George Expedn. C.L. Collenette.” Then, a small white label “Brit. Mus. 1925–488.” Another small white label reads “Original body. teste WHTT.” A large white label has the inscription “Scoparia spectacularis Meyrick. Holotype.” Then, a narrow label in Meyrick's hand “Scoparia spectacularis Meyr.” BM slide No. 9696. Lectotype hereby designated.

LECTOTYPE is in the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, 3500 ft (1067 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

Our series of 25 specimens is from the following localities. Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3400 and 3800 ft (1036 & 1158 m), 20 Feb and 1 Mar 1968, 9, 15; Atuona, 12 Feb 1968, 1.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Currently, this species is known only from the island of Hiva Oa. Generally, this species must be considered a high elevation taxon, but I cannot place the Atuona specimen (low elevation) with any other species.

Eudonia opostactis (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURES 72, 283d

Scoparia opostactis Meyrick, 1929b:168.

Scoparia apostactis [sic].—Meyrick, 1934c:342 [misspelled].

Male genitalia slides USNM 25349, 25393. Harpe simple, gradually widened toward cucullus; cucullus broadly rounded. Gnathos very slender, long. Uncus narrowly triangular, densely clothed with setae laterally. Vinculum broadly rounded. Tegumen rather abruptly constricted posteriorly. Anellus pyriform. Aedeagus about as long as harpe, stout, curved; vesica armed with a small dentate disc.

Female genitalia slides USNM 25338, 25394. Ostium funnel-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis from near junction of sclerotized and membranous parts of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae posterior half sclerotized, constricted anteriorly; anterior half membranous, coiled. Bursa copulatrix small, granular; appendix bursae membranous. Signum an oval dentate plate.

ORIGINAL MATERIAL.—”. 13–16 mm…. Marquesas, Fatu Hiva, 2000 feet, January; 7 ex.”

LECTOTYPE: Male; the label data are as follows: A large white label with “Fatu Hiva, Marquesas. At light, 2000 ft. 31.1.25. St. George Expedn. C.L. Collenette.” A small white label with “Brit. Mus. 1925–488.” A large label with “Scoparia opostactis Meyrick. Holotype.” A long, slender white label with “Scoparia opostactis Meyr.” and British Museum slide label 9700. At the top is a circular purple-bordered “type” label. Lectotype hereby designated.

Lectotype is in the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, 2000 ft (610 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

Our series consists of the following. Fatu Hiva: Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 2, 13; Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 5, 5; Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m), 3 Apr 1968, 3. Teavapuhiau, Ouia, 750 m, 1–3 Aug 1977, 1 (Montgomery).

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

This species is similar to officialis but is larger, has a longer, more slender gnathos, and a larger signum. Also, opostactis appears to be confined to Fatu Hiva.

Eudonia officialis (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURES 73, 283e

Scoparia officialis Meyrick, 1929b: 168; 1934c:342.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25389. Harpe simple, narrowest at middle; cucullus rounded. Gnathos very slender. Uncus narrowly triangular, clothed densely with setae laterally. Vinculum narrowly rounded. Tegumen narrowed posteriorly. Anellus pyriform. Aedeagus as long as harpe, curved, stout; vesica armed with a small granular disc.

FIGURE 72.—Eudonia opostactis (Meyrick): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 73.—Eudonia officialis (Meyrick): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25390. Ostium transverse, funnel-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis at junction of sclerotized and membranous parts of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae posterior half sclerotized, anterior half membranous, coiled. Bursa copulatrix small, round, granular; appendix bursae membranous. Signum a small, oval, dentate plate.

ORIGINAL MATERIAL.—”. 13–15 mm. Marquesas, Hiva Oa, 3500 feet. January; 25 ex.”

LECTOTYPE. Male; label data are as follows: A large white label with “Hiva Oa, Marquesas at light. 3500 ft. 28.1.25. St. George Expedn. C.L. Collenette.” Below this a small white label with “Brit. Mus. 1925-488.” Then a large white label with “Scoparia officialis Meyrick. Holotype”, followed by a narrow white label with “Scoparia officialis Meyr.” BM slide label No. 9697. Above all the foregoing is a circular, purple-bordered “type” label. Lectotype hereby designated.

Lectotype is in the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, 3500 ft (1067 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

We have 38 specimens as follows. Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3400 and 3800 ft (1036 and 1158 m), 20 Feb and 1 Mar 1968, 6, 31. Uapou: above Hakahetau, 800m, 23–24 Jul 1977, 1 (Montgomery).

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

This is very similar to opostactis but averages a little smaller. Meyrick (1934c:342) records officialis from Uapou, and we have an additional specimen from that island.

Eudonia achlya, new species

FIGURES 74, 283f

Alar expanse 12–14 mm.

Labial palpus blackish fuscous, but white ventrally toward base. Antenna fuscous. Head fuscous with a few paler scales laterally. Thorax blackish fuscous; tegula blackish fuscous with some grayish fuscous scales mixed. Forewing ground color blackish fuscous with scattered white scales; from basal fourth of costa an almost straight white transverse line extends to dorsum; from near apical fourth of costa a fine, irregular, white transverse line extends to dorsum just inside tornus; terminal line, white, dentate, preceded by a series of black spots; between these two lines a group of white scales; cilia grayish with blackish fuscous subbasal line. Hindwing fuscous, slightly paler basally; cilia grayish with fuscous subbasal line. Legs white variously marked with blackish fuscous. Abdomen fuscous above, ventrally pure white.

Male genitalia slides USNM 25346, 25399, Harpe simple, broadest before cucullus; cucullus rounded. Gnathos short and blunt. Uncus rounded posteriorly, densely clothed with setae. Vinculum U-shaped. Tegumen arched. Anellus pyriform. Aedeagus, stout, curved, about as long as harpe; vesica armed with a small disc of granules.

Female genitalia slides USNM 25347, 25400. Ostium transverse, deeply U-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis from a point near the juncture of the sclerotized posterior half of the ductus bursae and the anterior, membranous, spiraled part. Bursa copulatrix granular; signum an oval granular disc; appendix bursae membranous.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100749.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (23 Jan 1968), 3 and 14 paratypes with same data as holotype.

In superficial coloration achlya is similar to officialis but is immediately distinguished from it by the snow white underparts. The basal transverse line of the forewing of achlya is straight and well defined but that of officialis is obscure.

Eudonia clerica (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURES 75, 283g,h

Scoparia clerica Meyrick, 1929b: 167; 1934c:342.

Male genitalia slides USNM 25350, 25359, 25379. Harpe simple, broadest beyond middle; cucullus rounded. Gnathos curved, terminating in a small knob. Uncus oval, heavily clothed with setae. Vinculum narrowly rounded. Tegumen narrowed posteriorly. Anellus pyriform, with a small, fleshy lobe posteriorly. Aedeagus as long as harpe, stout, curved; vesica with a small anterior granular patch.

FIGURE 74.—Eudonia achlya, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 75.—Eudonia clerica (Meyrick); a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slides USNM 25351, 25360, 25380. Ostium funnel-shaped, granular. Inception of ductus seminalis from about middle of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae posterior half sclerotized, anterior half coiled, membranous; at junction of the two parts a bend with 5 or 6 small teeth. Bursa copulatrix finely granular; appendix bursae membranous. Signum a small, oval, dentate patch.

ORIGINAL MATERIAL.—”. 14–17 mm….Marquesas, Hiva Oa (3500 feet), Fatu Hiva (2000 feet), January, 13 ex.”

LECTOTYPE.—Male; following are the label data: A white label with “Hiva Oa, Marquesas, at light, 3500 ft. 28.1.25. St. George Expedn. C.L. Collenette.” Next, a small white label “Brit. Mus. 1925–488.” A large white label bears “Scoparia clerica Meyrick. Holotype.” Then, a narrow label with “Scoparia clerica Meyr.” At the top of all labels there is a circular, purple-bordered “type” label. Lectotype hereby designated.

Lectotype is in the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa.

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa, Fatu Hiva.

I have before me the following specimens. Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3400 and 3800 ft (1036 and 1158 m), 20 Feb to 1 Mar 1968, 3, 10. Ootua, 800m, 27–30 July 1977, 6, 3 (Montgomery). Fatu Hiva: Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 3, 8; Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 4.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

The ground color of the forewing of clerica is white, but this color is usually obscured by blackish dusting. In the male genitalia the terminal knob of the gnathos distinguishes clerica from other species.

Eudonia ara, new species

FIGURES 76, 284a

Alar expanse 12–15 mm.

Labial palpus blackish fuscous except white ventrally and a white spot dorsally on second segment near base. Antenna fuscous. Head gray mixed with whitish scales. Thorax blackish fuscous; tegula white mixed with a few fuscous scales. Forewing ground color white strongly marked and irrorate with blackish fuscous; from basal fourth of costa a well-defined transverse line of the white ground color extends to dorsum at basal third; in cell a blackish fuscous spot; at end of cell a white dash; from apical fourth of costa a wavy, white transverse line extends to dorsum before tornus; on tornus a blackish fuscous spot and a similar spot before apex; terminal area blackish fuscous with two large white spots, and a series of white spots along termen; cilia grayish fuscous with a blackish fuscous basal line. Hindwing grayish basally shading to fuscous toward margins; cilia grayish with darker basal line. Fore- and midleg white strongly marked blackish fuscous; hindleg white; tarsal segments marked fuscous. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally, white ventrally.

Male genitalia slides USNM 25332, 25333, 25334, 25335, 25422. Harpe simple, narrowest toward base; cucullus rounded. Gnathos rather stout basally, sharply pointed. Uncus densely clothed with setae. Vinculum rounded. Tegumen narrowed posteriorly. Anellus pyriform. Aedeagus moderately stout, curved, about as long as harpe; vesica armed with a granular disc.

Female genitalia slides USNM 25356, 25357, 25358, 25423. Ostium funnel-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis ventral, from near junction of sclerotized and membranous portions of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae sclerotized in posterior half, membranous and coiled in anterior half. Bursa copulatrix partly spiculate and partly granular; appendix bursae membranous. Signum a concentration of granules.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100746.

FIGURE 76.—Eudonia ara, new species; a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (23 Jan 1968), 7, 9 paratypes with same data as holotype; and 3 paratypes from Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), (2 23 Jan 1968 and 1, 30 Jan 1968).

Eudonia ara is closely related to clerica but has a paler hindwing and the forewing is not so heavily marked with blackish fuscous.

Eudonia aplysia, new species

FIGURES 77, 284b

Alar expanse 13–15 mm.

Labial palpus fuscous on outer surface, buff on inner surface and ventrally. Antenna fuscous. Head fuscous mixed with a few buff scales. Thorax fuscous with slight mixture of buff scales. Forewing ground color fuscous with scattered buff and yellowish scales; from basal fourth of costa a buff, irregular, transverse line extends to dorsum; subapically on costa a small, triangular buff spot; subterminal line, slender, yellowish; terminal line slender, blackish fuscous; cilia grayish fuscous. Hindwing grayish basally shading to fuscous at margins; cilia grayish with darker basal line. Fore- and midleg buff marked with blackish fuscous; hindleg buff; tibia shaded with fuscous; tarsal segments marked fuscous. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally, buff ventrally.

Male genitalia slides USNM 25339, 25340, 25341, 25420. Harpe simple; cucullus rounded. Gnathos about as long as uncus; sharply pointed. Uncus densely clothed with setae. Vinculum rounded. Tegumen narrowed posteriorly. Anellus pyriform. Aedeagus about as long as harpe, moderately stout, slightly curved; vesica armed with a small group of granules.

Female genitalia slides USNM 25342, 25344, 25345, 25421. Ostium funnel-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis ventral, near junction of sclerotized and membranous portions of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae posterior half sclerotized, anterior half membranous, coiled. Bursa copulatrix very finely granular; appendix bursae membranous. Signum a small granular area.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100750.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (23 Jan 1968), 6, 14 paratypes with same data as holotype; and 1, 2 paratypes Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968.

This species is similar to clerica but lacks the distinct irregular transverse line at apical fifth of forewing; also, the subterminal line of clerica is whitish, that of aplysia is yellowish.

Eudonia dupla, new species

FIGURES 78, 284d,e

Alar expanse 13–14 mm.

Labial palpus basal segment white; second and third segments fuscous, inner side streaked with whitish scales. Antenna fuscous. Head fuscous, mixed with whitish scales. Thorax fuscous, streaked with whitish to buff scales. Forewing ground color fuscous variously marked with buff to whitish; at basal third, from costa to dorsum, a whitish transverse line; at apical third of costa a conspicuous, whitish triangular spot; on dorsum, just before tornus a short transverse dash; in cell some whitish scaling; before apex two small whitish or buff spots and a similarly colored spot just beyond tornus; terminal line slender, buff to whitish; cilia whitish to buff with a fuscous basal line. Hindwing of male grayish fuscous; female fuscous; cilia buff to whitish with grayish fuscous () or fuscous () basal line. Legs buff to whitish variously marked with fuscous or grayish fuscous. Abdomen fuscous dorsally, whitish ventrally.

Male genitalia slides USNM 25345, 25378, 25397, 25398, 25407. Harpe narrowest at base, gradually broadening to a rounded cucullus. Gnathos slender, slightly dilated distally. Uncus narrowly triangular, truncated; densely clothed with setae distally. Vinculum rounded. Tegumen narrow posteriorly. Anellus pyriform. Aedeagus as long as harpe, stout, curved; vesica armed with a small granulated disc.

FIGURE 77.—Eudonia aplysia, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 78.—Eudonia dupla, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25348, 25408. Ostium broad, transverse, funnel-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis at junction of sclerotized and membranous parts of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae posterior half sclerotized; anterior half membranous, coiled. Bursa copulatrix membranous, finely granular; appendix bursae membranous. Signum an oval, finely dentate plate.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100747.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva, Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype, 28 and 28 paratypes as follows. Fatu Hiva: Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 23, 10 Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 3, 9 Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m), 3 Apr 1968, 2, 2 Omoa, 11–16 Mar 1968, 3. Teavapuhiau, Ouia, 750m, 1–3 Aug 1977, 2 (Montgomery). Hiva Oa, Ootua, 800m, 27–30 Jul 1977, 2 (Montgomery).

The males of dupla are similar to clerica but the females of dupla are darker and more like spectacularis. Both clerica and spectacularis lack the prominent whitish subapical spot on costa. The anellus of officialis is much narrower than that of dupla.

Eudonia munroei, new species

FIGURES 79, 284g

Alar expanse 18 mm.

Labial palpus fuscous mixed with grayish scales on outer side distally; white ventrally toward base. Antenna fuscous. Head fuscous mixed with yellow ochre scales. Thorax blackish fuscous; tegula mixed fuscous, golden ochre and buff. Forewing ground color blackish fuscous profusely covered with yellow ochre scales, obscuring most of ground color; from basal fourth of costa an outwardly oblique, jagged, buff transverse line extends to basal third of dorsum; beyond this line, in cell, a spot of the blackish fuscous ground color; at about apical fourth of costa a pair of buff marks, which join to form an ill-defined buff, irregular, transverse line; on tornus a large blackish fuscous spot with streaks of yellow ochre; along termen a series of six small blackish fuscous spots; cilia mixed grayish fuscous and buff, with a grayish fuscous basal line. Hindwing fuscous, but paler basally; cilia grayish with fuscous basal line. Foreleg buff; tibia blackish fuscous on outer side; tibia and tarsal segments blackish fuscous marked with buff; midleg similar but femur almost wholly buff; hindleg buff; tibia suffused fuscous; tarsal segments blackish fuscous marked buff. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally, each segment edged buff posteriorly; ventrally buff.

FIGURE 79.—Eudonia munroei, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slides USNM 25362, 25417. Ostium funnel-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis at junction of sclerotized and membranous portions of the ductus bursae. Ductus bursae posterior two-fifths sclerotized; anterior three-fifths membranous, coiled. Bursa copulatrix granular; appendix bursae membranous. Signum an oval granular plate.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100784.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (20 Feb 1968), and 1 paratype from Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m), 1 Mar 1968.

Probably munroei is most closely related to chrysomicta but the forewing of munroei is profusely covered with yellow ochre scales, a character lacking in chrysomicta. Moreover, the basal transverse line of munroei is jagged, not so in chrysomicta.

It gives me much pleasure to name this species for Dr. Eugene Munroe, the world's leading authority on the Pyralidae, who is always willing to help those less knowledgeable in this group.

Eudonia chrysomicta (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURES 80, 284c,f

Scoparia chrysomicta Meyrick, 1929b:166; 1934c:341.

Scoparia commercialis Meyrick, 1929b:167.

Male genitalia slides USNM 25366, 25381. Harpe simple; narrowest before middle; cucullus rounded. Gnathos curved, compressed distally. Uncus elongate, strongly clothed with setae laterally. Vinculum rounded. Tegumen broad basally, narrowed posteriorly. Anellus pyriform, small lobes lateroposteriorly. Aedeagus as long as harpe, stout, curved; vesica with a small granular disc.

Female genitalia slides USNM 25367, 25382. Ostium broad, funnel-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis at junction of sclerotized and membranous parts of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae posterior half sclerotized, granular before ostium; anterior portion membranous, coiled; at junction of the two parts a series of 5 or 6 teeth. Bursa copulatrix granular; appendix bursae membranous. Signum a small, dentate oval plate.

ORIGINAL MATERIAL OF Eudonia chrysomicta.—”. 16–18 mm….Marquesas, Hiva Oa, 3500 feet, January; 29 ex.”

LECTOTYPE.—Male; following are the label data: A white label bearing “Hiva Oa, Marquesas, at light. 3500 ft. 28.1.25 St. George Expedn. C.L. Collenette.” Then, a small white label bears “Brit. Mus. 1925-488.” A large white label has the inscription “Scoparia chrysomicta Meyrick. Holotype.” A narrow white label in Meyrick's hand reads “Scoparia chrysomicta Meyr.” Brit. Mus. slide No. 9695. Above all of the labels indicated is a circular, purple bordered “type” label. Lectotype hereby designated.

ORIGINAL MATERIAL OF Eudonia commercialis.—”. 15–17 mm….Marquesas, Hiva Oa, 3500 feet, January; 12 ex.”

LECTOTYPE.—Male; label data are as follows: A white label with “Hiva Oa, Marquesas, at light, 3500 ft. 25.1.25. St. George Expdn. C.L. Collenette.” A small white label reads “Brit. Mus. 1925-488.” A third label is inscribed, “Scoparia commercialis Meyrick. Holotype.” Then, a narrow white label in Meyrick's hand, “Scoparia commercialis Meyr.” Brit. Mus. slide No. 9698. At the top of all the labels is a circular, purple-bordered “type” label. Lectotype hereby designated.

Lectotypes are in the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Hiva Oa, 3500 ft (1067 m).

FIGURE 80.—Eudonia chrysomicta (Meyrick): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa. Our series consists of 26 specimens as follows: Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3400–3800 ft (1036–1158 m), 20 Feb and 1 Mar 1968, 10, 14. Ootua, 800m, 27–30 Jul 1977, 2 (Montgomery).

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Under S. chrysomicta, Meyrick (1934c:341) stated “I am satisfied that S. commercialis Meyrick is not specifically distinct from this.”

In addition to the specimens listed above, we have 10 specimens (1, 9) from the same locality, which average a little larger and are more contrastingly marked than typical chrysomicta, but are indistinguishable on genitalia.

Family TORTRICIDAE

Genus Dichelopa Lower

FIGURE 81

Dichelopa Lower, 1901:76.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Dichelopa dichroa Lower, 1901:76; by monotypy.

Key to the Species of Dichelopa

FIGURE 81.—Dichelopa distribution map.

Dichelopa castanopis Meyrick

FIGURES 82, 285a

Dichelopa castanopis Meyrick, 1934c:345.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]: 75.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24314, 24325. Harpe of about equal width to just before cucullus; costa slightly arched; cucullus spatulate, bluntly pointed. Gnathos narrow, constricted about middle, curved, pointed. Socius slender, digitate, clothed with fine setae. Uncus clavate, curved, armed with stout setae distally. Transtillar lobe strongly developed, armed posteriorly with antler-like spines. Vinculum rounded. Tegumen about as broad as long. Anellus a reniform, sclerotized plate. Aedeagus stout, curved and dilated distally; vesica unarmed.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24326. Ostium transverse, oval. Sterigma a narrow sclerotized band. Antrum sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis well before antrum. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signum absent. Papillae anales rather broad, flat pads.

FIGURE 82.—Dichelopa castanopis Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Uapou, Tekohepu Summit, 3200 ft (975 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Uapou.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Meyrick's type series is mixed and most of the specimens are in very poor condition. With the specimen labeled “type” by Meyrick, I associate 13 specimens, all from Uapou. All of the specimens in Meyrick's series from Hiva Oa that I have seen (20) are referable to D. flexura, new species, which follows.

Obviously, castanopis is closely related to the two new species flexura and amorpha, and the three are not easily separated by superficial characters; however, a comparison of the figures of the genitalia and the island localities will suffice.

Dichelopa amorpha, new species

FIGURES 83, 285b–d

Alar expanse 18–25 mm.

Labial palpus light ochraceous buff; second segment dresden brown, mixed with ochraceous buff scales on outer side; third segment dresden brown except apex. Antenna light ochraceous buff, each segment edged dresden brown outwardly; scape light ochraceous buff below, dresden brown above. Head ochraceous tawny. Thorax dresden brown; tegula tawny basally. Forewing ground color dresden brown overlaid with ochraceous tawny scales; from about basal fourth of costa a rectangular, oblique, ochraceous buff mark extends to cell, broadens and extends to dorsum; from middle of costa an outwardly curved, similarly colored mark extends to cell, then broadens to tornus; these marks are bordered by slender, irregular, fuscous lines and the pale portions are usually mottled; in the females these marks are frequently paler or are obscured (Figure 285d); cilia dresden brown mixed with ochraceous tawny. Hindwing gray, paler basally and very strongly mottled grayish fuscous; cilia grayish. Foreleg ochraceous buff; femur and tibia overlaid dresden brown on outer sides; tarsal segments fuscous, narrowly annulated ochraceous buff distally; midleg similar but tarsal segments not so strongly marked; hindleg ochraceous buff, suffused grayish. Abdomen gray dorsally, ochraceous buff ventrally.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24318, 24322, 24524. Harpe with costa moderately arched; cucullus produced, bluntly pointed; sacculus sclerotized to base of cucullus and with a small pointed process ventrally near base. Gnathos pointed. Transtillar lobe armed posteriorly with six to ten slender spines. Uncus spoon-shaped distally, bluntly pointed. Vinculum U-shaped. Tegumen about as long as wide. Anellus kidney-shaped. Aedeagus slightly curved and with a conspicuous point ventrally on distal end. Vesica armed with a cluster of three or four slender cornuti.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24525, 24526. Ostium small, oval. Sterigma very narrow. Antrum sclerotized a short distance on each side. Inception of ductus seminalis well before antrum. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signum absent.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100755.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the male holotype, 6 and 23 paratypes (30 Jan 1968) all with the same data; and 1 paratype Nuku Hiva, Toovii, Ooumu, 900 m, 16–19 Jul 1977 (Montgomery).

Dichelopa amorpha is very closely related to castanopis from Uapou but can be distinguished from it by the weaker spines on the transtilla, the more pointed uncus and the rather sharply pointed projection on the ventral surface at the distal end of the aedeagus. In the female the sclerotization of the antrum is more extensive in castanopis than in amorpha and the posterior ends of the papillae anales more pointed in the former than in the latter. Superficially the two are nearly indistinguishable, particularly because they are both variable, but the two whitish costal marks of the forewing of castanopis almost always suffice to separate the two.

FIGURE 83.—Dichelopa amorpha, new species; a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

The males of amorpha measure 18–20 mm, the females 21–25 mm.

Dichelopa flexura, new species

FIGURES 84, 285e–h, 288h

Alar expanse 16–23 mm.

Labial palpus ochraceous buff; second segment strongly overlaid ochraceous tawny and cinnamon brown on outer side; third segment ochraceous tawny on outer side. Antenna ochraceous tawny, each segment narrowly edged outwardly cinnamon brown; scape ochraceous tawny. Head ochraceous tawny. Thorax ochraceous tawny; tegula seal brown distally. Forewing ground color seal brown but so heavily overlaid ochraceous tawny the ground color is largely obscured; from basal fourth of costa an outwardly oblique rectangular ochraceous-buff mark extends to cell and continues as a slender line, on inner side, nearly to dorsum; from middle of costa an outwardly curved, similarly colored mark extends to end of cell; both of these marks are narrowly edged with fuscous when present but in some specimens these marks are either obsolete or are absent (Figure 285h); cilia seal brown mixed with a few ochraceous-tawny scales. Hindwing grayish, lighter basally, strongly mottled grayish fuscous. Foreleg ochraceous buff; femur and tibia ochraceous tawny on outer sides; tarsal segments fuscous narrowly edged ochraceous buff distally; midleg similar but tarsal segments ochraceous tawny; hindleg ochraceous buff suffused grayish. Abdomen buckthorn brown dorsally, ochraceous buff laterally, ochraceous tawny ventrally.

FIGURE 84.—Dichelopa flexura, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed, and transtillar lobe enlarged; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24316, 24317, 24320, 24321. Harpe broad basally, costa highly arched; cucullus fleshy, digitate; sacculus strongly sclerotized. Gnathos a strong hook. Transtillar lobe armed with about a dozen strong spines. Uncus curved, spoon-shaped; inner distal surface clothed with stout setae. Vinculum rounded. Tegumen slightly longer than broad. Anellus reniform. Aedeagus moderately stout, slightly curved distally; on ventral surface a short hook; vescia armed with a cluster of slender cornuti.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24323, 24523. Ostium transverse. Sterigma very narrow. Antrum narrowly sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis dorsal, slightly before antrum. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signum absent.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100756.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (20 Feb 1968), 42 and 13 with the same data as holotype; and 2 and 2 paratypes, Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m), 1 Mar 1968.

As indicated under castanopis, it and flexura are very closely related. A comparison of the figures of the genitalia, particularly those of the males (Figure 84) will demonstrate the differences. In the males it will be seen that the transtillar lobes of flexura have many more spines than do those of castanopis; flexura is also closely related to amorpha but the transillar spines are much more numerous and smaller in flexura than in amorpha.

The alar expanse of the males and females of flexura averages about the same.

Dichelopa harmodes Meyrick

FIGURES 85, 286a–f

Dichelopa harmodes Meyrick, 1929a:494; 1934c:345.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:153; 1958 [1955–1970]:100, pl. 50: figs. 4–4b.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24363, 24365, 24367, 25275, 25278. Harpe broad basally, costa strongly arched; cucullus short, rounded; sacculus sclerotized. Gnathos curved, terminating in a blunt point. Socius an elongate flat pad clothed with fine setae. Uncus short, strongly curved; distal end very broad, heavily clothed with setae on inner surface. Transtillar lobe clothed with short stout spines. Vinculum narrowly rounded. Tegumen narrow, slightly longer than harpe. Anellus reniform. Aedeagus slender, curved, outer half very slender; vesica armed with four or five long, hairlike cornuti.

Female genitalia slides JFGC 11955, 12165, 12167; USNM 24366, 24368, 24369, 25276, 25277, 25279. Ostium small, round. Sterigma very narrow; median anterior edge convex. Antrum a narrow sclerotized ring. Inception of ductus seminalis dorsal, slightly before antrum. Ductus bursae slender, membranous. Bursa copulatrix enlongate, oval, membranous. What appears to be a signum is a tiny, thornlike, slightly curved external process in some specimens.

TYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, 2000 ft (610 m.)

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva, Hiva Oa, Nuku Hiva, Uapou.

Our series of harmodes consists of the following. Nuku Hiva: Pakiu Valley, 1800 ft (548 m), Em. 20 Jan to 22 Feb 1968, 10, 8 (all reared); Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 44, 34, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 2. Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m), 20 Feb 68, 1, 31. Fatu Hiva: Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 23 Mar 1968, 27, 17; Mt. Teaoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 21, 66; Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m), 3 Apr 1968, 34, 8.

FOOD PLANT.—Metrosideros collina (Forster), var?

In Meyrick's original description he recorded harmodes from the three islands listed above. In the Bishop Museum there are also specimens from Uapou Island.

This species is rather variable, the series including specimens with highly contrasting markings and those almost uniformly gray.

Dichelopa hadrotes, new species

FIGURES 86, 286g,h

Alar expanse 14 mm.

Labial palpus sordid white on inner side, gray on outer side. Antenna grayish fuscous. Head gray. Thorax gray, suffused grayish fuscous. Forewing ground color gray; base of costa grayish fuscous; most of forewing speckled grayish fuscous; cilia gray. Hindwing grayish fuscous, darker toward margins. Fore- and midleg sordid white strongly suffused fuscous on outer side; hindleg sordid white slightly suffused grayish fuscous. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally, sordid white ventrally.

FIGURE 85.—Dichelopa harmodes Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed, and transtillar lobe enlarged; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 86.—Dichelopa hadrotes, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed, and transtillar lobe enlarged; b, aedeagus.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25265. Harpe with costa slightly arched; sacculus narrowly sclerotized; cucullus bluntly pointed. Gnathos expanded distally into a broad plate. Transtillar lobe broad and flat; posterior edge armed with a series of spines. Uncus short, curved, very broad, Vinculum rounded. Tegumen arched, as broad as long. Anellus a transverse, curved plate deeply indented posteriorly. Aedeagus nearly straight; vesica armed with a single slender cornutus.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100757.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (23 Jan 1968).

This species is similar to harmodes but lacks the oblique, transverse fascia of the forewing of that species, and the genitalia easily distinguish hadrotes from harmodes.

We have a female from Tunoa Ridge that may be the female of hadrotes, but it is somewhat rubbed, so there is no way of knowing.

Dichelopa choleranthes Meyrick

FIGURES 87, 287a–f

Dichelopa choleranthes Meyrick, 1929a:493.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:87; 1958 [1955–1970]: 99, pl. 49: figs. 3–3b.

FIGURE 87.—Dichelopa choleranthes Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24337, 24338, 25266, 25267. Harpe nearly as broad as long; costa very highly arched, inner surface densely clothed with fine, long setae; cucullus slender, spatulate; sacculus broadly sclerotized. Gnathos rather weak, curved, pointed. Socius an elongate pad densely clothed with fine setae. Uncus curved, reniform distally, each lobe clothed with a dense cluster of setae. Transtillar lobe armed with very small, fine spines. Vinculum rounded. Tegumen nearly as long as harpe, constricted basally, Anellus a reniform, sclerotized plate. Aedeagus nearly straight, slender; vescia armed with one or two long, spiculate cornuti.

Female genitalia slides USNM 25268, 25269. Ostium round, small. Sterigma scarcely differentiated. Antrum, a narrow sclerotized ring. Inception of ductus seminalis dorsal, slightly before antrum. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous. What appears to be a signum is a tiny sclerite posteroventrally on the bursa copulatrix.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, 3500 ft (1067 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

Before me are the following specimens. Nuku Hiva: Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 7. Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m), 20 Feb 1968, 44. 39. Fatu Hiva: Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 8; Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 4.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

This species is very similar to harmodes but the median, triangular, fuscous spot on costa of forewing and the male genitalia with the two dense clusters of setae on the uncus of choleranthes immediately distinguish it from harmodes. In the females of both harmodes and choleranthes there is a tiny sclerite posteroventrally on the bursa copulatrix, that of harmodes slightly more prominent than that of choleranthes.

Both species are found at the higher altitudes on the islands.

Dichelopa chionogramma, new species

FIGURES 88, 287g

Alar expanse 22 mm.

Labial palpus mars yellow; second segment fuscous on outer side; third segment fuscous. Antenna fuscous, spotted with mars yellow. Head mars yellow. Thorax mars yellow. Forewing ground color mars yellow; costa narrowly fuscous; several scattered fuscous lines, blotches and spots dispersed over the wing surface; from basal fifth of costa a pure white, broken, inverted Y extends almost to dorsum; from near middle of costa a pure white transverse line extends outwardly to tornus; extreme terminal edge and cilia fuscous. Hindwing grayish fuscous, mottled on underside; cilia grayish to fuscous. Foreleg mars yellow suffused fuscous; midleg and hindleg sordid buff, suffused grayish fuscous. Abdomen fuscous, dusted with mars yellow scales.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25282. Harpe short and broad; cucullus bluntly pointed. Gnathos short, pointed. Uncus very broad distally, clothed with fine setae. Vinculum rounded. Transtillar lobe oblongovate, densely clothed with short setae. Tegumen arched, longer than broad. Anellus a broadly oval sclerotized plate. Aedeagus longer than harpe, pointed distally.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Toovii, Ooumu, 900 m.

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (16–19 Jul 1977, Montgomery).

The genitalia suggest a relationship to harmodes and choleranthes but chionogramma has none of the coloring of those species and is easily distinguished by the conspicuous white markings of the forewing.

Dichelopa peropaca Meyrick

FIGURES 89, 288a–c

Dichelopa peropaca Meyrick, 1929a:493.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]: 242; 1958 [1955–1970]: 104, pl. 52: figs. 1–1b.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24379, 25257, 25258, 25259, 25260. Harpe very slightly sclerotized except for sacculus; basal half very broad with costa highly arched; cucullus broadly digitate. Gnathos very long, nearly reaching transtilla, curved, pointed distally. Uncus claviform, profusely clothed with setae anteriorly. Transtilla well developed, armed with long, strong spines posteriorly. Vinculum a narrow band. Tegumen broad basally, narrow posteriorly. Anellus a reniform plate. Aedeagus rather slender, slightly curved, slightly hooked distally; vescia unarmed in the four specimens examined.

Female genitalia unknown.

TYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, 2000 ft (610 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

Our series is from several localities. Fatu Hiva: Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m), 3 Apr 1968, 12; Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 30; Omoa, 20 ft (6 m), 11 Mar 1968, 1; Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 20. Teavapuhiau, Ouia, 750 m, 1–3 Aug 1977 (Montgomery).

FIGURE 88.—Dichelopa chionogramma, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed, and transtillar lobe enlarged; b, aedeagus.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

This is essentially a high altitude species, although we collected one male at Omoa, which had apparently been blown down from the mountains.

Meyrick described the species from a single specimen, but it is a common species. As will be seen from the illustrations peropaca is extremely variable. The type shows only a single conspicuous costal light spot, but the majority of specimens exhibit well-developed yellowish or silvery transverse fasciae and a pale pretornal spot. The ground color of of the forewing varies from a light brown to fuscous.

Dichelopa platyxantha, new species

FIGURES 90, 288d–f

Alar expanse 22–28 mm.

Labial palpus light ochraceous buff; second segment with some fuscous suffusion on outer side; third segment tipped with fuscous. Antenna buckthorn brown. Head light ochraceous buff. Thorax buckthorn brown with some light ochraceous buff scales mixed. Forewing ground color light ochraceous buff; basal patch well defined, buckthorn brown with some ground color in center; outer edge of basal patch irregular; from just before middle of costa a buckthorn brown transverse fascia broadens and extends to tornus; before termen, between veins 2 and 6, a transverse buckthorn brown dash, followed in terminal area by a series of ill-defined spots of same color; terminal edge narrowly buckthorn brown; cilia light ochraceous buff except beyond tornus, buckthorn brown; underside strongly mottled grayish fuscous. Hindwing drab, paler basally; cilia drab; underside mottled grayish fuscous. Foreleg light ochraceous buff; tibia and tarsi annulated blackish fuscous; midleg similar; hindleg light ochraceous buff; tarsi spotted light brownish. Abdomen fuscous dorsally, light ochraceous buff ventrally.

FIGURE 89.—Dichelopa peropaca Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25256. Ostium slitlike, transverse. Antrum sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis lateral, slightly before antrum. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signum absent.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100758.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Mt. Teoiaua, 2000 ft (610 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype and 17 paratypes as follows: Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 9; Tahuna, 2025 ft (617 m), 27 Mar 1968, 8.

This, and Dichelopa exulcerata Meyrick (1926:273) from Rapa, are the largest species known in Dichelopa.

It is interesting to note that platyxantha and peropaca were collected in the same localities on the same dates, and that all specimens of peropaca are males and all specimens of platyxantha are females. If it were not for the larger size and much paler color of platyxantha I should think these were opposite sexes of the same species, and they may be, but we have no way of knowing at this time.

FIGURE 90.—Dichelopa platyxantha, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

This is also a variable species, the transverse fasciae of the forewing being obsolete in some specimens and the range of ground color varies from light ochraceous buff to buckthorn brown.

Dichelopa dryomorpha Meyrick

Dichelopa dryomorpha Meyrick, 1929a:492.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:121; 1958[1955–1970]:100, pl. 50: figs. 1–1a.

TYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History)

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Tahuata.

DISTRIBUTION.—Tahuata.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

The 16 original specimens (, ) are the only known examples of this species. The male wings and genitalia are figured by Clarke (1958[1955–1970], pl. 50); the figures are not repeated here.

Dichelopa orthiostyla Meyrick

FIGURES 91, 288g

Dichelopa orthiostyla Meyrick, 1934C:343.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:228.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24371, 24373. Ostium conical. Sterigma a very narrow, sclerotized band. Antrum not differentiated. Inception of ductus seminalis well before ostium. Ductus bursae rather short, membranous. Bursa copulatrix oval, membranous. Signum absent.

TYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Temetiu, slope north of summit, altitude 3860 ft (1176 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

The only specimens of this species that I have seen are from the original series. Even though we collected on Mt. Feani, a northward extension of Mt. Temetiu, we did not encounter orthiostyla.

Dichelopa dorsata, new species

FIGURES 92, 287h

Alar expanse 18 mm.

Labial palpus dark grayish brown, slightly paler on inner surface. Antenna dark grayish brown. Head dark grayish brown. Thorax fuscous; tegula dark grayish brown. Forewing ground color grayish brown overlain by grayish ocherous scales; on dorsum a large, conspicuous blackish brown blotch, the inner edge of which is outwardly oblique; this blackish brown blotch fades outwardly and merges with ground color; on middle of costa an ill-defined quadrate fuscous spot; from costa, at vein 10, a slender, outwardly oblique fuscous line extends to vein 7, then continues to termen slightly beyond tornus; cilia mixed grayish ocherous and grayish brown. Hindwing light dusky drab; cilia concolorous. Foreleg ocherous white on inner surface of femur and tibia, grayish drab outwardly; tarsal segments fuscous on outer surface; midleg similar except all outer surfaces fuscous; hindleg ocherous white with very slight grayish suffusion. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally, ocherous white ventrally.

FIGURE 91.—Dichelopa orthiostyla Meyrick, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 92.—Dichelopa dorsata, new species; ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24386. Ostium transverse, oval. Sterigma a very narrow band. Inception of ductus seminalis dorsolateral, well before ostium. Ductus bursae very short, membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous, four times the length of ductus bursae. Signum absent.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100759.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype. The dark dorsal blotch of forewing readily distinguishes dorsata from any other described species of this genus, but judging from the female genitalia dorsata is probably closely related to orthiostyla.

Dichelopa phalaranthes phalaranthes Meyrick

FIGURES 93, 289a

Dichelopa phalaranthes Meyrick, 1934c:344.—Clarke, 1955[1955–1970]:245.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24400. Ostium a very small transverse slit. Antrum a very narrow sclerotized ring. Inception of ductus seminalis well before antrum. Ductus bursae very long, membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signum absent. Anterior apophyses sharply pointed; lamella antevaginalis and lamella postvaginalis membranous.

FIGURE 93.—Dichelopa phalaranthes phalaranthes Meyrick, ventral view of female genitalia.

TYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Kaava Ridge, 2460 ft (750 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Meyrick described this species from three females from Hiva Oa. Of these, two, the type (Figure 289a) and one other still exist, but the second specimen is unrecognizable.

As can be seen from the illustrations of phalaranthes and aporrhegma, new subspecies (Figure 289a,b), they are very similar. The buff spots of phalaranthes are strongly marked with ferruginous but those of aporrhegma are nearly unmarked. The costal edge on the underside of the hindwing is strongly marked with grayish fuscous in phalaranthes but only slightly marked in aporrhegma.

The female genitalia of phalaranthes and aporrhegma are, as they should be, strikingly similar. In the absence of male genitalia of phalaranthes I cannot justify specific separation based on female genitalia alone.

Dichelopa phalaranthes aporrhegma, new subspecies

FIGURES 94, 289b,c

Alar expanse 10–15 mm.

Labial palpus light buff; second segment with few slightly infuscated scales on outer side. Antenna scape buff; flagellum light ochraceous buff. Head buff. Thorax buff. Forewing ground color light buff; basal fourth of costa buckthorn brown; from middle of costa an outwardly oblique incomplete fascia, mixed with light ochraceous-buff scales, extends to tornus where it joins a buckthorn brown shade, the latter extending around termen to apex; extreme termen, from vein 4 to vein 7, light buff; on costa, before apex, two or three small buckthorn brown spots; from middle of cell to middle of dorsum, some buckthorn brown and light ochraceous-buff scales indicating a poorly defined, incomplete, transverse fascia; underside of forewing almost wholly grayish fuscous except for a large buff spot astride veins 10 and 11; cilia buff except at tornus grayish fuscous. Hindwing grayish fuscous, paler toward base; cilia grayish. Forleg buff; tarsal segments strongly marked fuscous; midleg similar; hindleg light buff. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally; light buff ventrally.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24527 24528. Harpe broad basally; costa very strongly arched; sacculus strongly sclerotized basally, cucullus pointed. Gnathos arms slender, joined distally as a blunt point. Uncus curved ventrad, very broad distally; apically, inner surface profusely clothed with setae. Vinculum rounded. Tegumen narrow, as long as harpe. Anellus an oval, sclerotized plate, indented posteriorly. Aedeagus broad basally, tapering gradually to a sharp point; vesica unarmed.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24336, 24529. Ostium small, round. Sterigma lightly sclerotized. Antrum slightly and narrowly sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis left lateral, from well before antrum. Ductus bursae slender, long, membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100760.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype, 11 and 5 paratypes all with the same data (30 Jan 1968).

In pattern aporrhegma is similar to Dichelopa fulvistrigata Meyrick(1929a:494) but the uncus is not divided in aporrhegma as it is in the latter species. Obviously; aporrhegma is no more than a subspecies of phalaranthes with differences as indicated under the nominate race.

FIGURE 94.—Dichelopa phalaranthes aporrhegma, new subspecies: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Dichelopa ochroma, new species

FIGURES 95, 289d

Alar expanse 14 mm.

Labial palpus light buff. Antenna ochraceous tawny. Head light buff. Thorax ochraceous tawny; tegula light buff except base ochraceous tawny. Forewing ground color ochraceous tawny; at extreme base a small buff spot; from basal fourth of costa a broad, outwardly oblique, transverse fascia extends to fold, narrows and continues to dorsal third; outer edge of fascia irregular, narrowly edged slightly more ochraceous than ground color; from costa, beyond middle, a broad, outwardly oblique buff transverse fascia extends to vein 7, narrows and continues to vein 2 at tornus; underside fuscous except where fasciae show through; cilia buff except grayish fuscous around tornal edge. Hindwing grayish fuscous, lighter basally. Forleg ochraceous tawny; tarsal segments annulated fuscous; midleg buff with two grayish fuscous patches on outer side of tibia; tarsal segments with slight infuscation; hindleg buff. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally; light buff ventrally.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24335. Harpe broadest at base, tapered to a bluntly pointed cucullus, costa not strongly arched; sacculus strongly sclerotized. Gnathos elements strong, curved, joined terminally as a sharp point. Socius long, slender, digitate. Uncus as long as tegumen, clavate, distally anterior surface clothed with strong setae. Transtillar lobe well developed; posterior margin armed with a comb of strong spines. Vinculum rounded. Tegumen nearly twice as long as wide. Anellus an oval sclerotized plate with median indentation posteriorly. Aedeagus slender, thickened basally, terminating in a point; vesica unarmed.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100761.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (30 Jan 1968).

This species has somewhat the coloring of the subspecies aporrhegma but the banding of forewing is clearcut in ochroma and not broken as in the former. The harpe of ochroma is narrower and longer than that of aporrhegma and the costa is not as highly arched.

Dichelopa gnoma, new species

FIGURES 96, 289e

Alar expanse 8 mm.

Labial palpus grayish fuscous; third segment tawny. Antenna scape grayish fuscous distally; flagellum grayish proximally, shading to fuscous distally, each segment ocherous white-scaled dorsally. Head grayish fuscous. Thorax grayish fuscous. Forewing ground color grayish fuscous with faint golden luster; basal patch fuscous; on costa, just before middle, a pair of fuscous bars indicating an ill-defined transverse fascia; from outer third of costa a fine, fuscous line extends outwardly to vein 5 near termen, then continues along termen to near tornus; entire surface sprinkled with tawny scales; cilia grayish fuscous mixed with tawny. Hindwing fuscous; cilia grayish fuscous. Foreleg and midleg grayish fuscous; tarsal segments fuscous with paler annulations; hindleg grayish fuscous. Abdomen fuscous dorsally; ocherous white ventrally.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24387. Harpe nearly as broad as long; costal edge gently arched; cucullus small, triangular; sacculus sclerotized. Gnathos spoon-shaped distally. Transtillar lobe large, armed with 5 ot 6 strong spines. Uncus bilobed, each lobe clothed with stout, short setae. Vinculum broadly rounded. Tegumen about as broad as long. Anellus transverse, oval; posterior edge concave. Aedeagus short, stout, curved, distally abruptly pointed; vescia armed with a single, long slender cornutus.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100762.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Hanavave, 10 ft (3 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (12 Apr 1968).

This species is similar to dryomorpha but is much smaller. Also, gnoma is a much lighter species than dryomorpha and lacks the purplish reflections of the forewing of the latter species.

FIGURE 95.—Dichelopa ochroma, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed, and transtillar lobe enlarged; b, aedeagus.

Dichelopa paragnoma, new species

FIGURES 97, 289f

Alar expanse 12 mm.

Labial palpus grayish fuscous on outer side; ocherous white on inner side; apex of third segment ocherous white. Antenna scape grayish fuscous except ocherous white apex; flagellum ocherous white, with a few grayish spots basally, shading to grayish fuscous distally. Head grayish fuscous; side tufts grayish fuscous mixed with dull ocherous scales. Thorax grayish fuscous with ocherous scales mixed anteriorly. Forewing ground color grayish fuscous with scattered ocherous scales; from costa, at about basal two-fifths, an outwardly oblique fuscous fascia extends to dorsum; the inner margin of the fascia terminates on middorsum, the outer edge on tornus; from apical fourth of costa an outwardly oblique, irregular line extends to termen just beyond tornus; the line is edged inwardly by irregular dull ocherous scaling; cilia grayish ocherous mixed with dull ocherous. Hindwing fuscous; cilia pale grayish with a fuscous basal line. Foreleg grayish fuscous, tarsal segments annulated ocherous white; midleg similar; hindleg dull ocherous white; outer surface suffused grayish. Abdomen fuscous dorslly; cinereous ventrally.

FIGURE 96.—Dichelopa gnoma, new species, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe removed, aedeagus in situ and transtillar lobe enlarged.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24388. Ostium transverse oval. Sterigma a narrow band. Antrum dilated, sclerotized, with a protuberance ventrally on left side. Inception of ductus seminalis dorsal from antrum. Ductus bursae rather short, membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signum absent.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100763.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Puamau.

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (8 Feb 1968).

This species is very closely related to gnoma but it is a much larger moth. Moreover, the median transverse fascia of forewing is complete in paragnoma and scarcely indicated in gnoma. Also, the two species are from different islands and, therefore, are unlikely to be conspecific.

FIGURE 97.—Dichelopa paragnoma, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

Dichelopa praestrigata Meyrick

FIGURES 98, 289g

Dichelopa praestrigata Meyrick, 1929a:492.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:257; 1958[1955–1970]:104, pl. 52: figs. 2–2b.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24393, 25263. Harpe broad basally, lightly sclerotized except for sacculus; cucullus bluntly rounded. Gnathos short, curved, pointed. Uncus broad distally; on each side, anteriorly, a tuft of setae. Transtillar lobe fleshy with numerous tiny spines posteriorly. Vinculum rounded. Tegumen nearly as broad as long. Anellus subtriangular with deep cleft on posterior edge. Aedeagus slender, curved, distal end spatulate; vesica unarmed.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24394. Ostium oval, transverse; papillae anales slender. Antrum slightly rugose. Inception of ductus seminalis dorsal at antrum. Ductus bursae slender, membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signum absent.

TYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE.-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, 3500–4000 ft (1067–1219 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

We have 8 from our expedition as follows. Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m), 20 Feb 1968, 3; 3400 ft (1036 m), 1 Mar 1968, 5.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Meyrick described praestrigata from 30 examples, including males and females, all from Hiva Oa. Dichelopa praestrigata can be distinguished from other members of this genus, except the new species meligma, by the yellowish flagellum and fuscous scape, and also by the nearly smooth transtillar lobes. From meligma it can be distinguished by its much paler hind wing.

Dichelopa meligma, new species

FIGURES 99, 289h

Alar expanse 12–18 mm.

Labial palpus fuscous; inner surface slightly paler. Antenna scape fuscous; flagellum ochraceous buff. Head fuscous. Thorax fuscous; tegula concolorus. Forewing ground color fuscous; surface marked by numerous, scattered ochraceous buff scales; from basal fifth of costa to dorsum an ill-defined blackish fuscous transverse line; a similar line from middle of cell to tornus; both these lines bordered, in part, by ochraceous-buff scales; from costa, at outer fourth, a broken blackish fuscous line extends outwardly to vein 6 then parallels termen nearly to tornus; cilia grayish fuscous mixed with ochraceous-buff scales. Hindwing grayish fuscous with slight brassy shine; cilia grayish fuscous. Fore- and midlegs grayish fuscous; darker on outer side; hindleg grayish. Abdomen fuscous.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24389. Harpe short and broad; costa moderately arched; cucullus short and bluntly rounded; sacculus sclerotized to base of cucullus. Gnathos sharply pointed. Transtillar lobe fleshy, distally clothed with very fine spines. Uncus dilated distally, with median cleft; anterior surface clothed with setae. Vinculum rounded. Tegumen slightly longer than harpe, rather broad. Anellus cordiform. Aedeagus slender, slightly curved; vescia unarmed.

Female genitalia USNM 24391. Ostium small, round. Sterigma a narrow scelerotized band. Antrum slightly rugose and very lightly sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis well before antrum. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signum absent. Papillae anales slender, sparsely clothed with setae.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100764.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype, 3 and 1 paratypes with identical data (22 Mar 1968), and 1 paratype from Fatu Hiva, Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m) 3 Apr 1968.

FIGURE 98.—Dichelopa praestrigata Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed, and transtillar lobe enlarged; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 99.—Dichelopa meligma, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed, and transtillar lobe enlarged; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

This species might be confused with praestrigata but has a much darker hindwing than that species, the forewing shows only a trace of transverse fascia and is marked by numerous ochraceous-buff scales. The male genitalia of praestrigata and meligma are similar, but the cucullus and aedeagus of the latter are shorter than those of the former.

The female of meligma is considerably larger than the male.

Dichelopa zona, new species

FIGURES 100, 290a

Alar expanse 12 mm.

Labial palpus cinnamon brown; inner surface clay color. Antenna clay color, shading to sepia distally; scape sepia. Head sepia. Thorax sepia; tegula mostly clay color. Forewing ground color sepia but so heavily overlaid with clay color that the ground color is largely obscured; basal patch small, outer edge from basal fifth of costa, outwardly oblique to fold then inwardly straight to dorsum; from near middle of costa a fascia extends obliquely to tornus; cilia pale grayish brown. Hindwing grayish brown, paler toward base; cilia light grayish brown. Foreleg blackish fuscous on outer side; buff on inner side; midleg similar, but not so strongly marked; hindleg buff with some grayish suffusion. Abdomen drab dorsally, somewhat paler ventrally.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24395. Harpe about as long as tegumen; costa moderately arched; cucullus rather long, broad, sacculus sclerotized for most of its length. Gnathos a sharply pointed hook. Socius a fleshy lobe clothed with very fine, weak setae. Uncus dilated distally, with median cleft; anterior surface clothed with fine setae. Vinculum U-shaped. Tegumen about as broad as long, constricted basally. Anellus a sclerotized, cordate plate. Aedeagus slender, slightly curved, about as long as harpe; vescia unarmed.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100765.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (30 Jan 1968).

Dichelopa zona is closely related to praestrigata from Hiva Oa, but differs from it by the reduced basal patch of forewing and darker hindwing (Figure 289g, 290a). Also, the cucullus of zona is longer than that of praestrigata and the costa of harpe is not so strongly arched.

Dichelopa porphyrophanes Meyrick

FIGURES 101, 290b

Dichelopa porphyrophanes Meyrick, 1934C:344.—Clarke, 1955[1955–1970]:255.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24399. Ostium transverse, oval. Antrum a slender sclerotized cylinder. Inception of ductus seminalis well before antrum, left lateral. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signum absent; lamella antevaginalis and lamella postvaginalis membranous. Distal end of anterior apophyses dilated.

TYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Uapou, Teoatea, Hakahetau Valley, 1950 ft (579 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Uapou, Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

The type of porphyrophanes is the only specimen of this species I have seen. The second specimen mentioned by Meyrick, from Hiva Oa, is missing but is doubtfully the same as the type.

Dichelopa pyrsogramma Meyrick

FIGURES 102, 290c

Dichelopa pyrsogramma Meyrick, 1934c:343.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:267.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24312. Harpe broadset about middle; costa strongly arched, cucullus bluntly pointed. Gnathos rather narrow, pointed distally. Socius elongate, weak, sparsely clothed with fine setae. Uncus clavate, distally clothed on each side by a cluster of stout setae. Transtillar lobe fleshy, terminating in a cluster of short spines. Vinculum rounded. Tegumen narrow, slightly longer than harpe. Anellus an oval, sclerotized plate, deeply cleft posteriorly. Aedeagus slender, curved, weak, pointed; vescia unarmed.

FIGURE 100.—Dichelopa zona, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed, and transtillar lobe enlarged; b, aedeagus.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24313. Ostium round. Sterigma very narrow, moderately sclerotized. Antrum narrow, sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis well before antrum. Ductus bursae very slender, membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signum absent.

TYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Ooumu summit, 3890 ft (1186 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

The following 9 specimens are before me. Nuku Hiva: Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (769 m), 30 Jan 1968, 2. Toovii, Ooumu, 900 m, 16–19 Jul 1977, 4, 3 (Montgomery).

FIGURE 101.—Dichelopa porphyrophanes Meyrick, ventral view of female genitalia.

FOOD PLANT.—Cyrtandra?

The holotype is a female, and now we are able to associate the sexes.

This is one of the smallest species of Dichelopa and is very similar to Dichelopa honoranda Meyrick (1926:272) from Rapa. The broad fasciae of the forewing are more constrasting in honoranda than in pyrsogramma, and the latter is a slightly smaller species.

Although the type is labeled “on Cyrtandra sp.,” there is no indication that the species was reared from that plant.

Dichelopa pachydmeta Meyrick

FIGURES 103, 290d

Dichelopa pachydmeta Meyrick, 1929a:493.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:232; 1958[1955–1970]:103, pl. 51: figs. 3–3b.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25264. Ostium very small, round. Antrum a small, weakly sclerotized ring. Inception of ductus seminalis slightly before antrum. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signum absent.

TYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, 3500–4000 ft (1067–1219 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

The specimen before me is from Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m), 1 Mar 1968, 1.

The genitalia of the male were figured by Clarke (1958[1955–1970]) and are not repeated here. The wings of the type, figured by Clarke (1958[1955–1970], pl 51) are in poor condition and are hardly recognizable; therefore, they are refigured here.

This and pyrsogramma are similar in appearance and are about the same size, pachydmeta being slightly larger. The outer light fascia of the forewing is complete in pyrsogramma but covers only the tornal area in pachydmeta, and the latter has a darker hindwing than that of pyrsogramma. All specimens of this species were taken at high elevations, where it is rare.

FIGURE 102.—Dichelopa pyrsogramma Meyrick; a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed, and transtillar lobe enlarged; b, aedeagus.

Dichelopa cirrhodoris Meyrick

FIGURES 104, 290

Dichelopa cirrhodoris Meyrick, 1934c:344.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:91.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24327, 24328. Ostium transverse, oval. Sterigma narrow, moderately sclerotized. Antrum narrowly sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterolateral surface of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous, short. Signum absent.

TYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa.

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

Our collection contains only one specimen Hiva Oa: Atuona, 12 Feb 1968, 1.

Presumably this is a high altitude species since the original series came from 1350 and 2460 ft (412 and 750 m), which probably accounts for our finding only one specimen at low altitude.

In wingshape cirrhodoris reminds one of Dichelopa argyrospiloides Clarke (1971:118) of Rapa, but the forewing contains more yellowish coloring and the hindwing is paler than in that species.

FIGURE 103.—Dichelopa pachydmeta Meyrick, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 104.—Dichelopa cirrhodoris Meyrick, ventral view of female genitalia.

Dichelopa canitia, new species

FIGURES 105, 290f

Alar expanse 18–22 mm.

Labial palpus buffy brown; extreme apex of third segment pale ochraceous tawny. Antenna pale ochraceous tawny, each segment marked with a narrow fuscous bar. Head buffy brown. Thorax olive brown. Forewing ground color buffy brown; basal patch outwardly oblique from basal fifth, olive brown, with outer edge nearly straight, terminating on middorsum; at outer edge of basal patch, near middle, a slender black line; from middle of costa an ill-defined olive brown fascia extends almost to tornus; at outer edge of this fascia a slender black line; midway between this fascia and apex, a slender, oblique, black line; whole surface of forewing irrorate with ochraceous-tawny scales; cilia buffy brown. Hindwing pale grayish strongly mottled darker gray. Foreleg femur and tibia buffy brown; tarsal segments olive brown marked with light ochraceous tawny; midleg similar but tarsal segments not so strongly marked; hindleg buff. Abdomen buffy brown.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24521. Ostium small, round, membranous. Anterior apophyses dilated anteriorly. Papillae anales very broad anteriorly, bluntly pointed posteriorly. Antrum narrowly sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis well before antrum. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous; accessary bursa membranous. Signum absent.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100766.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (30 Jan 1968) and 5 paratypes as follows: 2 same data as holotype and 3, Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m) 23 Jan 1968.

FIGURE 105.—Dichelopa canitia, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 106.—Dichelopa argosphena Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed, and transtillar lobe enlarged; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

This species is strikingly similar to argema, new species, from Fatu Hiva but lacks the whitish costal spots on the undersides of fore- and hindwings of that species. Dichelopa canitia is also related closely to argosphena but that species has a series of small white spots around termen of forewing that canitia lacks.

Dichelopa argosphena Meyrick

FIGURES 106, 290g, h

Dichelopa argosphena Meyrick, 1934c:343.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:54.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24613. Harpe very broad basally, costa strongly arched; inner face of harpe clothed with long setae; sacculus moderately sclerotized; cucullus digitate. Gnathos lateral arms forming a “U” terminating in a median point where they meet. Socius elongate, profusely clothed with long setae. Uncus strongly curved ventrad, divided into two long lateral elements, each armed with tiny teeth on inner side. Transtillar lobe elongate, terminating in a cluster of small setae. Vinulum rounded. Tegumen about as long as harpe. Anellus a reniform, sclerotized plate. Aedeagus moderately stout basally, curved gradually, tapering to a slender point; vescia unarmed.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24315, 24333. Ostium very small, round. Sterigma lightly and evenly sclerotized. Antrum slightly sclerotized. Ductus seminalis left lateral, well before antrum. Ductus bursae slender, membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signum absent.

TYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Kaava Ridge, 2460 ft (750 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

Despite the type-locality cited above, the type is labeled “Hivaoa, Marquesas. Kakahopuanui, alt. 2460 feet.” Adamson (1936:44) clearly shows Kaava Ridge, but there is no locality “Kakahopuanui” on it. All other data agree.

We have a male, an exact match for the type, from Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m), 1 Mar 1968, an extension of Kaava Ridge. In addition, I associate with this male the following specimens: Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m), 20 Feb 1968, 5 and 3400 ft (1036 m), 1 Mar 1968, 2.

FIGURE 107.—Dichelopa argema, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

The females (15–16 mm) average larger than the males and the costal white spot of fore wing, conspicuous in the males, is mostly obscured by scattered fuscous scales. The series of tiny white spots around apex and termen, so conspicuous in the males, is well preserved in the females. In the females there is a conspicuous pale spot on costa of hindwing absent in the males. The undersides of the wings in both sexes are mottled.

Because of the divided uncus it is obvious that argosphena is most closely related to fulvistrigata of Tahiti and Dichelopa iochorda Meyrick (1926:273) of Rapa.

Dichelopa argema, new species

FIGURES 107, 291a

Alar expanse 19–22 mm.

Labial palpus light grayish buff on inner side, drab on outer side; third segment drab. Antenna scape drab, flagellum slightly darker. Head drab. Thorax drab. Forewing ground color drab with slight leaden appearance; basal patch bordered outwardly with an irregular fuscous line, the latter mixed with ochraceous–buff scales; from two-fifths of costa an outwardly oblique grayish fuscous fascia extends to outer end of cell and edged outwardly and inwardly with fuscous and ochraceous-buff scales; beyond this fascia a subrectangular light buff spot marked with grayish scales; outer edge of this light spot bordered by a fine line of fuscous and ochraceous-buff scales, this latter line extends irregularly to termen at the end of vein 2; costa marked with very short, transverse fuscous dashes; at apex a few small light buff spots; on middle of dorsum two or three tiny light buff spots; cilia grayish fuscous. Hindwing grayish fuscous; costal edge marked with a conspicuous light buff patch at middle. Foreleg grayish buff on inner surface, grayish fuscous outwardly; tarsal segments marked with ochraceous buff scales; midleg similar; hindleg drab. Abdomen grayish fuscous.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24334, 24522. Ostium very small, round. Sterigma evenly and lightly sclerotized. Antrum narrowly sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis lateral and from about anterior two-fifths of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signum absent.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100767.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (22 Mar 68) and 8 paratypes, with the same data; and 1 and 1 paratypes, Fatu Hiva, Teavapuhiau, Ouia, 750 m, 1–3 Aug 1977 (Montgomery).

This species is similar to argosphena (female) but is a larger species and lacks the series of small white dots around termen of forewing. Moreover, the whitish costal spot of hindwing of argema is larger and more prominent than that of argosphena.

The female genitalia of argosphena and argema are nearly identical. Unfortunately the single male paratype has lost the abdomen. The undersides of both fore- and hindwings of argema are only lightly mottled, not strongly so as in argosphena.

Family OLETHREUTIDAE

Key to the Genera of Olethreutidae

Genus Eucosma Hübner

Eucosma Hübner, 1823 [1818–1837], 2:28.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Eucosma circulana Hübner, 1823 [1818–1837]:363; subsequent designation by Fernald, 1908:4.

Eucosma agriochlora Meyrick

FIGURE 291b

Eucosma agriochlora Meyrick, 1929a:495.—Viette, 1949a:320.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:39; 1958 [1955–1970]:347, pl. 172: fig. 2–2a.

TYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Marquesas Islands, Nuka Hiva.

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

The only specimen of this species that is known is the type. We did not encounter this species.

Genus Crocidosema Zeller

Crocidosema Zeller, 1847:721 [type-species: Crocidosema plebejana Zeller, 1847:721; by monotypy].

Parasuleima Clarke, 1965:77 [type-species: Crocidosema(?) insulana Aurivillius, 1922:267, pl. 11: fig. 20; by original designation]. [New synonym.]

After studying large samples of Crocidosema Zeller, from Rapa Island, the Marquesas Islands, Caroline Islands, Marshall Islands, and other tropical and temperate areas, I am convinced that Crocidosema(?) insulana Aurivillius, despite it's peculiarities, is a synonym of C. plebejana Zeller.

Crocidosema plebejana Zeller

FIGURES 108, 291 c, d

Crocidosema plebejana Zeller, 1847:721.—Lederer, 1859:367.—Wocke, 1871:263 [No. 1269].—Ragonot, 1894b:221 [No. 1221].—Staudinger and Rebel, 1901:110 [No. 1968].—Rebel, 1910a:25; 1911:348 [No. 281]; 1915:140; 1935:262.—Amsel, 1936:351.—Rebel, 1939:6; 1940a:36; 1940b:55.—Hartig and Amsel, 1951:72.—Hartig, 1956:109.—Bradley, 1961:121.—Agenjo, 1963a:5.—Bradley, 1965:93.—Clarke, 1971:126, fig. 104; 1976:44, fig. 16, pl. 4e.—Dugdale, 1977:67.—Kawabe and Kusui, 1978:166.—Bradley et al., 1979:134, pl. 33: figs. 1, 2.—Diakonoff, 1982:38.—Powell in Hodges et al., 1983:36 [No. 3274].

Crocidosema plebeiana Zeller.—Meyrick, 1886b:276.—Walsingham, 1892:506, 544; 1897:127; 1907:675, pl. 10: fig. 15; 1908:1002.—Meyrick, 1908:720.—Spuler, 1910:273, pl. 85: fig. 45.—Walsingham, 1914 [1909–1915]:231.–232.—Fletcher, 1921 a:52.—Heinrich, 1921:822, p1s. 99A, 102C, D, 103E; 105G, 106B; 108A—D.—Willcocks, 1922:29, 335.—Heinrich, 1923:190, figs. 10, 29, 29a, 325.—Meyrick, 1924c:546.—Gurney, 1925:231.—Ballard, 1925:521.—Swezey, 1926c:75.—Meyrick, 1926:273.—Bottimer, 1926:817.—Meyrick, 1927a:72.—Buxton and Hopkins, 1927, p. 29; 1928b:47.—Hudson, 1928:248, pl. 49: fig. 10.—Meyrick, 1929a:494.—Forbes, 1930:91.—Meyrick, 1930b:225.—Heinrich, 1931:11, pl. 7: fig. 23—Forbes, 1931:350.—Bedford, 1931:391; 1932:622.—Fletcher, 1932:20.—Cowland, 1933:583.—Meyrick, 1934a:109; 1934c:346.—Auctorum, 1936b:134.—Swezey, 1936:198.—Wolcott, 1936:482.—McDunnough, 1939:50.—Ghesquière, 1940:96, pl. 5d; 1941:768.—Wells, 1943:265.—Thompson, 1945:163.—Russo, 1947:420.—Viette, 1949a:319.—EI Zoheiry and Asem, 1952:472, pls. 1–3; 1953:229.—Swezey, 1954:196.—Clarke, 1958 [1955–1970]: 319, pl. 158: figs. 1–1a, 2–2a.—Kamel and Shazli, 1959:193, figs. 1A–G, 2A–H.—MacKay, 1959:91, fig. 79.—Bretherton, 1960:96.—Biezanko et al., 1961:33.—Janmoulle, 1962:39.—Kimball, 1965:261.—Ragimov and Saleimanov, 1965:41.—Huggins, 1966:256.

FIGURE 108.—Crocidosema plebejana Zeller: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe removed and aedeagus in situ:b, ventral view of female genitalia.

Crocidosema plebiana [sic!] Zeller.—Swezey, 1910:141; 1912b:209.—Fullaway, 1914:20.—Willcocks, 1916:vii, 320, pl. 7: figs. 5, 6.—Swezey, 1929a:278; 1942b:211.—Krauss, 1953a: 124.—Beardsley, 1961:359.—Butler, 1961:384.—Linsley and Usinger, 1966:163.—Beardsley, 1966:163, 169, 174.

Crocidosema(?)insulana Aurivillius, 1922:267, pl. 11: fig. 20.

Eucosma plebeiana (Zeller).—Walsingham, 1914 [1909–1915]:231.—Philpott, 1923:151.—Williams, 1927:459.

Crocidosema ptiladelpha Meyrick, 1917:18.

Crocidosema synneurota Meyrick, 1926:276.

Proteopteryx blackburnii Butler, 1881:393, 394.

Penthina altheana Mann, 1855:555.

Grapholitha altheana (Mann).—Lederer, 1859:343.—Heinemann, 1863 [1863–1870]:241.

Steganoptycha altheana (Mann).—Wocke, 1871:260.

Parasuleima insulana (Aurivillius).—Clarke, 1965:77, figs. 75–77.

Stechanoptycha [sic!] altheana (Mann).—Hartmann, 1879:191 [No. 1221].

Steganoptycha signatana.—Walsingham, 1894:537, 541 [not Steganoptycha signatana Douglas].

Grapholitha peregrinana Möschler, 1866:139.

Steganoptycha obscura Wollaston, 1879:341.

Paedisca lavaterana Milliére, 1863:290, pl. 34: figs. 9–13.

TYPES.—In the British Museum (Natural History) (ptiladelpha, synneurota, blackburnii, plebejana); Vienna Museum(?) (altheana); depository unknown (signatana, peregrinana, obscura, lavaterana); Naturhistoriska Riksmuseum, Stockholm (insulana).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—“Syracuse, 10 May” (plebejana); Ecuador (ptiladelpha) Albermarle, Galapagos Islands (synneurota); Hawaiian Islands (blackburnii); Madeira (signatana); Masatierra (insulana); Type-locality unknown (altheana, peregrinana, obscura, lavaterana).

DISTRIBUTION.—Circumglobal in warmer areas. Meyrick recorded plebejana from Nuku Hiva, Hiva Oa, and Tahuata (1929a:495) and from Eiao, Tahuata, and Fatu Hiva (1934c:346). We have a long series from Fatu Hiva, Hiva Oa, and Nuku Hiva, dates from January to April.

FOOD PLANTS.—Various malvaceous plants, and others: Crataegus sp., also Eucalyptus sp., Cucurbita pepo L., Abutilon avicennae Gaertner, Sida rhombifolia L.

The male genitalia of the Marquesan specimens show a close relationship to those of the population of Rapa, exhibiting four long setae from the cucullus. Although the genitalia of this species have been figured previously they are repeated here from specimens from the Marquesan population.

Genus Duessa Clarke

Duessa Clarke, 1976:26.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Duessa pleurogramma Clarke 1976:28; by original designation.

Duessa marquesana, new species

FIGURES 109, 291e,f

Alar expanse 10–11 mm.

Labial palpus sordid white; second segment overlaid grayish fuscous and with a fuscous spot about middle on outer side; third segment fuscous. Antenna pale ochraceous buff; scape fuscous dorsally. Head fuscous anteriorly fading to sordid white posteriorly. Thorax sordid white shaded fuscous anteriorly; tegula sordid white, base fuscous. Forewing ground color sordid white; extreme base of costa narrowly fuscous; on costa, about middle, a subquadrate blotch; apex fuscous; on costa, between the subquadrate blotch and apex, a series of five, short, oblique fuscous dashes; astride end of cell a fuscous, longitudinal dash followed by a similarly colored elongated blotch before termen; on tornus an ill-defined fuscous patch followed by some leaden metallic scales; on dorsum, at basal third, a quadrate fuscous mark (ill–defined or obsolete in some specimens); ochraceous buff scales scattered irregularly over surface of wing; midtermen narrowly fuscous; cilia sordid white, grayish, and fuscous mixed. Hindwing grayish, lighter basally; cilia sordid white to grayish with darker subbasal line. Fore–, mid-, and hindlegs sordid white variously marked fuscous. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally, sordid white ventrally.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24606, 24621. Harpe very narrow basally, cucullus very large, expanded; inner surface of cucullus clothed with pear-shaped, bulbous setae; sacculus with a pointed process before cucullus and one near base. Socius pendant, thick basally. Uncus short, tringular. Vinculum rounded. Tegumen narrow, elongate. Anellus triangular. Aedeagus short, stout; vesica armed with a cluster of cornuti.

FIGURE 109.—Duessa marquesana, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe removed and aedeagus in situ, and modified scales of harpe in insert; b, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24546. Ostium small, oval. Inception of ductus seminalis at about middle of ductus bursae ventrally. Ductus bursae midsection strongly sclerotized. Bursa copulatrix finely granular. Signa two truncated thornlike processes. Lamella postvaginalis sclerotized.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100768.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (23 Jan 1968), 4 and 5 paratypes as follows: Nuku Hiva: Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 3, 3; Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m) 30 Jan 1968, 1; Fatu Hiva: Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 1. Hiva Oa: Kakaho Puanui, 2460 ft (750 m), 5 Jan 1932, Le Bronnec, 1

Although strikingly similar to Duessa pleurogramma Clarke, marquesana is a considerably smaller insect. Moreover, the former lacks the pear-shaped setae found on the cucullus of the latter.

Genus Strepsicrates Meyrick

Strepsiceros Meyrick, 1881:678 [preoccupied].

Strepsicrates Meyrick, 1888a:73 [replacement name].

TYPE-SPECIES.—Sciaphila ejectana Walker, 1863 [1856–1866]:350; subsequent designation by Fletcher, 1929:211.

Strepsicrates holotephras (Meyrick)

FIGURES 110, 291g, h

Spilonota holotephras Meyrick, 1924a:67; 1927a:71 [Microlepidoptera]; 1929a:495; 1932c:307.—Swezey, 1942b:210.—Viette, 1949a:320.—Steiner, 1954:281, 291.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:161.

Strepsicrates holotephras (Meyrick).—Clarke, 1958 [1955–1970]:596, pl. 292: figs. 1–1a, 2–2b; 1971:128, fig. 105, pl. 16c,d

Eucosma eumarodes Meyrick, 1924a:68.

Strepsicrates ejectana (Walker).—Clarke, 1976:7, 48 [not Sciaphila ejectana Walker].

TYPES.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Fiji, Lautoka (holotephras); Fiji, mountains near Lautoka (eumarodes).

DISTRIBUTION.—Samoa, Fiji, Marquesas Islands, Tahiti, Rapa, Southern Mariana Islands, Philippine Islands.

Our series consists of 125 specimens from the following three Islands. Nuku Hiva: Pakiu Valley, 1000 to 1800 ft (350 to 548 m), 19 Jan to 3 Feb 1968, 6, 11; Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 1, 1; Taiohae, 30 Jan 1968, 1. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 11 Feb to 8 Mar 1968, 22, 42; Tahauku, 26 Feb 1968, 1; Mt Feani, 3800 (1158 m), 20 Feb 1968, 1. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 10–21 Mar 1968, 11, 27; Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m) 22 Mar 1968, 1.

FOOD PLANTS.—Psidium guajava L., Psidium littorale Raddi, Eugenia jambos L., Eugenia uniflora L., Metrosideros collina var.? villosa A. Gray (all Myrtaceae).

Unquestionably this common and widespread species occurs on other of the Marquesas Islands.

In my paper (Clarke 1976:48) I recorded this as Strepsicrates ejectana (Walker). Subsequently I examined Walker's type and it is not, in my opinion, conspecific with holotephras. I cannot vouch for the synonym shown by Diakonoff (1968:84), so I have eliminated it from this paper.

Genus Tritopterna Meyrick

Tritopterna Meyrick, 1921b:151.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Tritopterna chionostoma Meyrick, 1921b:152; by monotypy.

Tritopterna eocnephaea (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURES 111, 292a,b

Acroclita eocnephaea Meyrick, 1934c:345.—Viette, 1949a:320.

FIGURE 110.—Strepsicrates holotephras (Meyrick): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe removed and aedeagus in situ; b, ventral view of female genitalia, spines of bursa copulatrix in insert.

FIGURE 111.—Tritopterna eocnephaea (Meyrick): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe removed and aedeagus in situ; b, ventral view of female genitalia.

Tritopterna galena Clarke, 1971:124, fig. 103, pl. 17c,d [new synonym].

TYPES.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum (eocnephaea), in the United States National Museum (galena).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Hiva Oa, Kaava Ridge, 2400 ft (731 m) (eocnephaea); Rapa, Teumukopuke (galena).

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands, Rapa Island. In the Marquesas the known distribution is as follows. Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 18 Jan 1968, 1; Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 4, 8. Hiva Oa: Kaava Ridge, 2400 ft (731 m), Le Bronnec, 6 specimens? Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 9 Apr 1968, 1; Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 1, 2; Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 1; Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m), 3 Apr 1968, 1. Teavapuhiau, Ouia, 750 m, 1–3 Aug 1977, 2 (Montgomery).

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Meyrick described this “species” from six specimens of which I have seen four. Although Meyrick did not designate a type in his description, there is one specimen marked “Acroclita eocnephaea, type” in his handwriting. I accept this specimen as holotype. The type and two additional males that I have examined definitely belong to the genus Tritopterna Meyrick and it is amazing that Meyrick, who had a good “eye,” should have missed his own genus. The fourth specimen, in the series before me, is a female of the genus Duessa Clarke (1976:26), treated in the preceding discussion.

In our series, collected in 1968, there are several females with a well-defined white spot on dorsum.

When I described T. galena from Rapa (1971:124), I did not recognize Meyrick's “Acroclita” eocnephaea but examination of his type, and ours from Rapa, leaves no doubt about the synonymy.

Genus Dudua Walker

Dudua Walker, 1864 [1856–1866]: 1000.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Dudua hesperialis Walker, 1864 [1856–1866]: 1000; by monotypy.

Dudua eumenica (Meyrick)

FIGURES 112, 292c–e

Argyroploce eumenica Meyrick, 1929a:496.—Viette, 1949a:320.

Platypeplus eumenica (Meyrick).—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:134; 1958 [1955–1970]:572, pl. 285: figs. 1–1a.

Dudua eumenica (Meyrick).—Diakonoff, 1973:420.

TYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, 3500 ft (1067 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

I have before me the following 29 and 55. Nuku Hiva: Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m) 23 Jan 1968, 1 30 Jan 1968, 16, 22; Em. 10–15 Feb 1968, 1, 4; Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 1, 1; Pakiu Valley, 1800 ft (548 m) 19 Jan 1968, 1. Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m), 20 Feb 1968, 2, 4; 1 Mar 1968, 1; Trail to Mt. Feani, 2500 ft (762 m), 20 Feb 1968, 1. Ootua, 800 m, 27–30 Jul 1977, 1, 2. (Montgomery). Fatu Hiva: Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 1, 13; Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 2, 6; Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (716 m), 3 Apr 1968, 1, 2. Teavapuhiau, Ouia, 750 m, 1–3 Aug 1977, 1 (Montgomery).

FOOD PLANT.—Glochidion ramiflorum (Forster f.) Mueller-Argovensis. In my field notes I recorded finding the food plant, a small tree, growing on a hillside in mixed forest with Metrosideros and other trees and shrubs, ferns, etc.

The larva feeds mainly on leaves but occasionally attacks young fruits. In a late stage (apparently the last instar) the larva cuts the petiole causing wilting and death of the leaf. The larva folds the leaf lengthwise, but apparently drops to the ground to pupate. The hanging, wilted, rolled leaf is conspicuous and characteristic. In the rolled and still green leaves, larvae can almost always be found.

Unlike its near relative D. aprobola (Meyrick), eumenica comes to light readily. It is common at the higher altitudes.

Dudua eumenica is the first known host for the parasite Apanteles mendanae Wilkinson, 1931, according to C.F.W. Muesebeck (personal communication) who determined our reared specimens.

FIGURE 112.—Dudua eumenica (Meyrick): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe removed and aedeagus in situ; b, ventral view of female genitalia.

Genus Cryptophlebia Walsingham

Cryptophlebia Walsingham, 1899:105 [type-species: Cryptophlebia carpophaga Walsingham, 1899:106; by monotypy and original designation].

Metriophlebia Diakonoff, 1969:89 [type-species: Eucosma chaomorpha Meyrick, 1929a:495; by monotypy and original designation]. [New synonym.]

Cryptophlebia pallifimbriana Bradley

FIGURES 113, 292f

Cryptophlebia pallifimbriana Bradley, 1952:688, fig. 5, pl. 24: fig. 5.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24307. Ostium funnel-shaped. Antrum a moderately sclerotized band. Inception of ductus seminalis lateral, from left side, at anterior edge of a sclerotized section of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae membranous in anterior half, sclerotized posteriorly. Bursa copulatrix membranous posteriorly, finely spinulate anteriorly. Signa two curved, spinelike processes. Lamella antevaginalis strongly sclerotized.

TYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fiji, Natoon [?Natovu].

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands, Austral (Tubuäi) Islands, Society Islands, New Hebrides, Fiji, Tahiti, Vulcan Island, New Guinea.

Our specimens are from Fatu Hiva, Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, at light, 5.

FOOD PLANT.—Inocarpus lagifer (Parkinson) Fosberg, and probably others.

Bradley (1952, fig. 5) figured the male genitalia, but our collection contains no males, so male genitalia are not figured here.

Cryptophlebia chaomorpha (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURES 114, 292g,h

Eucosma chaomorpha Meyrick, 1929a:495.—Viette, 1949a:320.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:82; 1958 [1955–1970]:352, pl. 175: figs. 3–3a.

FIGURE 113.—Cryptophlebia pallifimbriana Bradley, ventral view of female genitalia with ornamentation of bursa copulatrix in insert.

FIGURE 114.—Cryptophlebia chaomorpha (Meyrick): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe removed and aedeagus in situ; b, ventral view of female genitalia.

Metriophlebia chaomorpha (Meyrick).—Diakonoff, 1969:90, fig. 3, pl. 7: fig. 22.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24301, 24302, 24303. Harpe rather slender, costa angulate; cucullus narrowly pointed, profusely setose on inner surface; sacculus with prominent triangular projection. Uncus triangular, with median excavation. Vinculum a narrow band. Tegumen rounded, lightly sclerotized. Anellus triangular, elongate. Aedeagus slender, bulbous at base; apex clothed with very small, fine spines; vesica armed with a series of dentate cornuti.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24304, 24305, 24306. Ostium pyriform. Antrum very narrowly sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis lateral, from posterior fourth of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae very slender posteriorly, broadening anteriorly; at junction with bursa copulatrix conspicuously granular. Bursa copulatrix membranous, very weakly rugose anteriorly. Signa two scimitar-like processes. Lamella antevaginalis strongly sclerotized. Lamella postvaginalis narrowly sclerotized on each side.

TYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Marquesas Islands.

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands, Seychelles, Mahé Island.

Our collection contains the following. Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 26 Jan 1968, 5; Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m) 29 Jan 1968, 4, 10. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 12 Feb 1968, 1.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Cryptophlebia chaomorpha (Meyrick) is closely related to C. isomalla (Meyrick) and C. batrachopa Meyrick (= C. colivora Meyrick), new synonym, and the three form a species group. If one wishes to separate this group from the remaining species of Cryptophlebia, Diakonoff's Metriophlebia should be used.

Cryptophlebia rhynchias (Meyrick)

FIGURE 293a

Platypeplus rhynchias Meyrick, 1905:586.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:273.

Argyroploce rhynchias (Meyrick).—Meyrick, 1929a:496.—Fletcher, 1932:31.—Swezey, 1942b:211.—Viette, 1949a:320.—Comstock, 1966:63.

Olethreutes rhynchias (Meyrick).—Williams, 1951:64.

Cryptophlebia rhynchias (Meyrick).—Bradley, 1952:687, fig. 6, pl. 24: fig. 6, pl. 25: figs. 6, 6a.—Clarke, 1958 [1955–1970]:327, pl. 162: figs. 3–3a.—Comstock, 1966:63.—Dugdale, 1977:67.

TYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Ceylon, Yatitantota.

DISTRIBUTION.—Australia, Ceylon (Sri Lanka), India, Southern Mariana Islands, Mauritius, new Hebrides, Fiji, Samoa, Sudest Island, Society Islands, Austral Islands, and Marquesas Islands (?).

FOOD PLANTS.—Canavalia (fruits); Erythrina; Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh (pigeon pea stem borer).

Bradley (1952) did not record rhynchias from the Marquesas Islands although Meyrick (1929a) did. We were on three of the Marquesas Islands, over a three months' period, and did not encounter rhynchias, which raises some doubt about Meyrick's record.

Genus Cydia Hübner

Cydia Hübner, 1825 [1816–1826]:375.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Phalaena pomonella L., 1758:538 [No. 270]; subsequent designation by Walsingham, 1897:125, 130.

In previous papers I have used Laspeyresia (sensu auct.) for congeners of the species described below. In a recent paper by Brown (1979:566) he has left no doubt about the proper usage of Cydia.

Cydia pseudomalesana, new species

FIGURES 115, 293b,c

Alar expanse 10–14 mm.

Labial palpus light ochraceous buff. Antenna light ochraceous buff. Head and thorax light ochraceous buff, the latter slightly darker posteriorly. Forewing ground color light ochraceous buff heavily overlaid with rust colored or grayish scales, particulary toward dorsum; entire costa marked with prominent oblique rust colored or fuscous strigulae, the outer ones alternating with leaden metallic dashes; ocelloid patch marked with two to four short, longitudinal black dashes, and bordered inwardly and outwardly by transverse leaden metallic bars: termen very narrowly fuscous; cilia grayish fuscous. Hindwing fuscous toward margins, much lighter basally; cilia ochraceous buff to grayish fuscous with darker subbasal line. Hindwing of male with narrow line of modified whitish scales. Fore-, mid-, and hindlegs light ochraceous buff variously marked with fuscous. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally, light ochraceous buff ventrally.

FIGURE 115.—Cydia pseudomalesana, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe removed and aedeagus in situ; b, ventral view of female genitalia.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24590. Harpe nearly of equal width throughout; cucullus slightly wider, rounded distally. Socius indicated by a few weak setae. Vinculum subtrianular. Tegumen narrowed posteriorly. Anellus triangular. Aedeagus broad basally, narrowed distally.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24543, 24544, 24591. Ostium crescent-shaped. Sterigma with two long, curved sclerotized patches. Antrum elongate, sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis slightly posterior to junction with bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae with posterior two-thirds sclerotized, anterior third membranous and broadened. Bursa copulatrix membranous, except granular at junction with ductus bursae. Signa two, curved, thornlike.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100769.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Omoa.

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown; probably seeds of leguminous plants.

Described from the holotype (16 Mar 1968), 8 and 11 paratypes as follows. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 16–18 Mar 1968, 3, 3; Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 1; Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 3. Eiao: N. Uplands, 400 m, 7 Aug 1977, at light, 4, 4 (Montgomery); Hiva Oa, Ootua, 800 m, 27–30 Jul 1977, 1 (Montgomery).

This is a variable species with the size of the costal strigulae different in different examples and the color of the hindwing varying from specimen to specimen, but the genitalia place them all together.

Meyrick (1920:352, 353) described Laspeyresia malesana and L. pycnochra, both from Madras and both were reared from pods of leguminous plants. The male of malesana and a female of pycnochra are extant and it appears very probable that they represent the same species, but without both sexes of each it is impossible to tell. The species described here is very obviously related to the above-named species but differs in several respects: The male sex scaling on the inner margin of the hindwing of pseudomalesana shows no evidence of a black line as in malesana and the “spine-cluster” near base of cucullus of malesana is composed of short, stout setae curved basad. In pseudomalesana this “spine-cluster” is composed of longer setae directed transversely. Moreover, the sacculus of malesana is notched but entire in pseudomalesana. The female pseudomalesana has a longitudinal division of the sclerotized patches on each side of the ostium, such as are present in pycnochra, but they are not as pronounced. Both male and female of pseudomalesana show strongly contrasting costal strigulae, absent in both malesana and pycnochra.

Cydia pseudomalesana has female genitalia that are very close to the African Laspeyresia platydryas Meyrick (Clarke, 1958 [1955–1970] pl. 224: fig. 2–2b). See also Cydia pycnochra (Clarke, 1958 [1955–1970], pl. 225: fig. 3–3c).

Family ORNEODIDAE

Genus Orneodes Latreille

Orneodes Latreille, 1796:148 [no included species]; 1802:418.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Phalaena Alucita hexadactyla Linnaeus, 1758, ed. 10, p. 542, by monotypy by Latreille (as Pterophorus hexadactylus F.), 1802:418).

Orneodes pterochroma, new species

FIGURES 116, 294a

Alar expanse 9 mm.

Labial palpus white; second segment faintly marked grayish fuscous apically; third segment with faint grayish shade subapically on outer side. Antenna light buff. Head white. Thorax white with very faint yellowish suffusion laterally. Forewing ground color white; extreme base of costa pale ochraceous buff, followed by two faint grayish fuscous spots; remaining plumes with three broad light buff fasciae, each preceded and followed by fuscous scales; each plume with fuscous subapical spot; base of sixth plume light ochraceous buff; cilia mixed white and buff. Hindwing first to fifth plumes with six clusters of fuscous scales, some with light buff scales between; sixth plume light ochraceous buff, except outer third with four small fuscous spots. Abdomen white; posterior segments irrorate with fuscous.

FIGURE 116.—Orneodes pterochroma, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25136. Harpe broadest at base terminating in a point distally. Uncus very slender, curved, pointed. Vinculum U-shaped; saccus long, slender, straight. Tegumen shorter than broad. Anellus a sclerotized tube. Aedeagus about four times as long as harpe; vesica armed with a cluster of lightly sclerotized cornuti.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100753.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Atuona.

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (23 Feb 1968).

Similar to O. xanthozona, new species, pterochroma may be distinguished from it by the light ochraceous buff specialized scales of the sixth plume of the hindwing.

Orneodes xanthozona, new species

FIGURES 117, 294d

Alar expanse 8–9 mm.

Labial palpus white; second segment with fuscous apex; third segment with subapical fuscous bar. Antenna pale ochraceous buff; scape white. Head white. Thorax white with a few grayish scales posteriorly; tegula faintly and sparsely marked grayish. Forewing ground color white; base of costa with five small spots of warm buff and fuscous scales mixed, followed by three broad warm buff fasciae, each bordered on inner and outer edges by fuscous scales; remaining five plumes with three broad, warm buff fasciae each preceded and followed by fuscous scales and each with scattered fuscous scales toward their bases; each plume with fuscous apex; cilia white and pale grayish mixed. Hindwing each plume with a series of five pairs of fuscous spots, some with pale yellowish scales between; apex grayish fuscous preceded by a fuscous spot; cilia white and grayish mixed. Foreleg white; tibia and tarsal segments fuscous on outer side; midleg and hindleg white. Abdomen white dorsally with scattered fuscous and warm buff scales; ventrally white.

FIGURE 117.—Orneodes xanthozona, new species; a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25137. Harpe slender; costa rough-edged; cucullus bluntly pointed. Uncus long, slender, pointed. Vinculum U-shaped. Tegumen shorter than broad. Anellus a sclerotized tube. Aedeagus about four times the length of harpe; vesica armed with a cluster of fine cornuti.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25138. Ostium V-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis ventral from bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae membranous posteriorly, with an elongate sclerotized area dorsolaterally in anterior half. Bursa copulatrix finely granular anteriorly, rugose in posterior half. Signum absent.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100754.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Omoa Valley.

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (20 Mar 1968), and 6 paratypes as follows: Omoa Valley, 5 Apr 1968, 1; Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m) 23 Mar 1968, 2; Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 2; Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m), 3 Apr 1968, 1.

This species is strikingly similar to O. atomoclastus Meyrick (1934d:401) from St. Thomé, West Africa, but the midsection of the transverse bands is yellower than in that species. Unfortunately, the abdomen of Meyrick's type is missing, so that a proper comparison cannot be made. The markings of the Fatu Hiva species, however, are darker and more pronounced than those of atomoclastus.

Family GELECHIIDAE

Key to the Genera of Gelechiidae

Genus Stoeberhinus Butler

Stoeberhinus Butler, 1881:402.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Stoeberhinus testaceus Butler, 1881:402; by monotypy.

Stoeberhinus testaceus Butler

FIGURES 118, 293e,f

Stoeberhinus testaceus Butler, 1881:402, fig.2.—Walsingham, 1887a:171; 1907:486, pl. 13: fig. 28.—Swezey, 1926c:75; 1929a:277.—Williams, 1931:158.—Sakimura and Linford, 1940:453.—Swezey, 1944:144.—Beller, 1948:24.—Krauss, 1953b:219.—Beardsley, 1961:354.—Bradley, 1961:139.—Beardsley, 1966:183.—Clarke, 1971:142, fig. 115, pl. 19a–d.—Sugerman, 1972:279.—Zimmerman, 1978:1806, fig. 1350.

FIGURE 118.—Stoeberhinus testaceus Butler; a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Stoeberhinus testaceous [sic] Swezey, 1910:138 [unjustified emendation].

Stoeberhinus testacea Butler.—Meyrick, 1925:255; 1926:274; 1927a:84; 1929a:497; 1932a:206; 1934c:346.—Gaede, 1937:552.—Viette, 1949a:319; 1949b:103.—Comstock, 1966:64.

TYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Honolulu, Hawaii.

DISTRIBUTION.—New Hebrides, Fiji, Samoa, Tutuila, Society Islands, Austral Islands, Marquesas Islands, Tuamotus, Galapagos, Hawaii.

From the Marquesas we have 215 specimens from the three islands, Nuku Hiva, Hiva Oa, and Fatu Hiva, from January through March. Meyrick recorded this species (1934c) also from Tahuata and Uahuka. S.L. Montgomery contributed 5 , 5 from Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Dry vegetable matter; also Heritiera littoralis Dryander (Beller, 1948:24).

Undoubtedly testaceus will be found throughout the year on most, if not all, the archipelagoes of the warmer parts of the Pacific.

Genus Autosticha Meyrick

Autosticha Meyrick, 1886b:281.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Automola pelodes Meyrick, 1883:34; by monotypy.

Autosticha pelodes (Meyrick)

FIGURES 119, 293g,h

Automola pelodes Meyrick, 1883:34.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:238.

Autosticha pelodes (Meyrick)—Meyrick, 1886b:281.—Walsingham, 1907:487, pl. 14: fig. 1.—Swezey, 1909:21; 1910:138.—Meyrick, 1921b:167; 1925:256 [No. 18]; 1929a:497.—Gaede, 1937:555.—Viette, 1949a:319; 1949b:104.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]: 238; 1969 [1955–1970]; 322, pl. 160: fig. 1–1–d.—Zimmerman, 1978:1797, figs. 1340–1345.

TYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—“Hawaii.”

DISTRIBUTION.—Hawaii, New Hebrides, Malaya (Selangor), Marquesas Islands, Celebes, Java, Samoa.

Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 17 Jan 1968, 2. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 25 Feb to 6 Mar 1968, 1, 9. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11 Mar 1968 to 8 Mar 1968, 12, 42; Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m), 3 Apr, 1968, 1; Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 1.

FOODS.—Decaying vegetable matter.

Meyrick (1929a:497) recorded pelodes from Tahuata and also from Rapa, but the latter seems to have been a misidentification of Autosticha merista Clarke (1971:143).

Autosticha leucoptera, new species

FIGURES 120, 293d

Alar expanse 11 mm.

Labial palpus light buff; second segment pale ochraceous buff on outer side with a few scattered fuscous scales toward apex. Antenna pale ochraceous buff. Head light buff, laterally pale ochraceous buff. Thorax pale ochraceous buff; tegula light buff. Forewing ground color light buff; at two-fifths two small fuscous spots, one on fold and the other in cell; at end of cell a third fuscous spot; on termen, three ill-defined fuscous dots; cilia buff. Hindwing very thinly scaled, light buff with a few scattered brownish scales basally. Fore- and midlegs pale ochraceous buff; hindleg light buff. Abdomen light buff.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24574. Harpe about twice as long as broad, narrowed basally; cucullus narrowly rounded; sacculus with long, curved, spinous process distally. Gnathos slender, curved, sharply pointed. Uncus curved, nearly as long as harpe, slightly dilated distally. Vinculum U-shaped with short median projection. Tegumen U-shaped, broadest at middle, narrow laterally. Anellus a strongly sclerotized curved plate. Aedagus stout, broadest at middle; vesica armed with a single stout cornutus.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100770.

FIGURE 119.—Autosticha pelodes (Meyrick); a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 120.—Autosticha leucoptera, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Atuona.

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown. Probably decaying vegetable matter. Described from the unique holotype.

Although the male genitalia of leucoptera and pelodes are strikingly similar, the spinelike projection from the ventral margin of the harpe is longer in leucoptera than in pelodes, and the harpe of the former is narrower than in the latter. The color of leucoptera is much lighter than pelodes and texture of the scales of leucoptera is similar to species of Odites.

Genus Chelophoba Meyrick

Chelophoba Meyrick, 1935a:71.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Chelophoba aganactes Meyrick, 1935a:72; by monotypy.

Chelophoba melaina, new species

FIGURES 121, 294b,c

Alar expanse 10 mm.

Labial palpus sordid white; second segment, except apex, fuscous on outer side; apex with triangular tuft anteriorly; third segment with four oblique, fuscous annuli. Antenna sordid white, each segment with a fuscous band basally above. Head pale cinereous; face sordid white. Thorax cinereous; tegula black basally, sordid white apically; laterally and posteriorly, in male, black scaling. Forewing ground color in basal half cinereous, outer half sordid white; at outer edge of basal half two or three fuscous blotches; outer half strongly marked with fuscous and cinereous; in fold, near middle, a fuscous spot mixed with light ochraceous-buff scales, at end of cell a similarly marked spot; a few ochraceous-buff scales scattered over wing; at apex and around termen two or three ill-defined fuscous spots; in male, on underside of forewing basally, specialized black scales; cilia mixed cinereous and fuscous. Hindwing very pale gray, whitish basally; in male, in anal angle, an elongate patch of specialized black scales; also in male, along base of costa and costal edge of cell, black scaling; cilia grayish. Fore- and midleg sordid white variously marked with blackish scales; hindleg sordid white; in male, tibia strongly marked with black scales. Abdomen mixed black and sordid white dorsally; ventrally sordid-white.

FIGURE 121.—Chelophoba melaina, new species; a, venation of right wings; b, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; c, aedeagus; d, ventral view of female genitalia.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24572. Harpe long and slender, broadening to a rounded cucullus. Gnathos a short, slender, curved hook. Uncus a flat, rounded pad strongly armed with setae ventrally. Vinculum a narrow ring with a slender saccus. Tegumen slightly longer than harpe, narrowed posteriorly. Anellus a triangular plate with a lobe on each side. Transtilla(?) an irregular plate with lateral lobe directed anteriorly. Aedeagus bulbous basally, slender distally; vesica unarmed.

Female genitalia USNM 24573. Ostium small, transverse; lamella postvaginalis strongly sclerotized, triangular. Antrum not appreciably differentiated. Inception of ductus seminalis lateral, from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae membranous except for slight sclerotization posteriorly. Bursa copulatrix membranous except for broad granular area around middle. Signum indicated by a concentration of granules in a disclike area.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100771.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Omoa.

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (18 Mar 1968) and 1 paratype from the same locality (15 Mar 1968).

In placing this species in Chelophoba I do so with some misgiving. The wing venation of this species is identical to that of C. aganactes, and the male genitalia appear to be congeneric; in fact they are extremely similar. In the Marquesan species the scape is short, not elongate as in C. aganactes, the ocellus is missing and the third segment of the labial palpus is not roughened posteriorly, or certainly not appreciably so. The short scape and the short triangular apical tuft of second segment of labial palpus are like these two details found in Homoshelas Meyrick.

Chelophoba melaina is further distinguished from C. aganactes by the presence of several small patches of yellow scales of the forewing, and in the male, by the presence of a patch of black scales in the anal angle of hindwing (Figure 294b), on the underside of costa of hindwing and laterally on thorax.

There are several species, described in the genus Chelaria by Meyrick, that appear to go with Chelophoba melaina. To mention but a few (Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]), these are C. antiastis Meyrick, C. corynetis Meyrick, C. iophana Meyrick, C. isopogon Meyrick, C. praemaculata Meyrick, C. silvestris Meyrick, C. tephroptila Meyrick and C. xylotechna Meyrick, and perhaps others. The last named has a signum identical to that of Chelophoba melaina, new species.

Currently, Chelaria is considered a junior objective synonym of Hypatima Hübner, 1825. (Sattler, 1973:182).

Genus Pitycona Meyrick

Pitycona Meyrick, 1918a:116.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Pitycona xeropis Meyrick, 1918a:117; by monotypy.

Pitycona attenuata, new species

FIGURES 122, 294e

Alar expanse 6.5 mm.

Labial palpus extremely light buff; second segment grayish posteriorly, toward apex; third segment gray on outer surface and basally on inner surface. Antenna gray with paler annulations toward distal end; scape gray. Head gray; face buff. Thorax gray; tegula pale gray. Forewing ground color gray, somewhat mottled grayish fuscous; on fold a fuscous spot and at end of cell a similarly colored spot; apical portion of wing grayish fuscous with three small clusters of buff scales on costa; cilia gray. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia gray. Foreleg buff; tarsal segments marked grayish fuscous; midleg buff; tibia blotched with grayish fuscous on outer side; tarsal segments grayish fuscous on outer side; hindleg similar to midleg. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally, paler ventrally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24575. Ostium minute, round. Sterigma broadly sclerotized. Antrum moderately long, cylindrical. Inception of ductus seminalis slightly anterior to antrum. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous, elongate. Signum absent.

FIGURE 122.—Pitycona attenuata, new species; a, ventral view of female genitalia; b, venation of right wings.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100772.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Omoa.

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (13 Mar 1968).

In attenuata vein 2 of the forewing is not as strongly preserved at the margin as it is in the type of the genus, xeropis; but in both species it is weak. In xeropis vein 6 of hindwing is very weakly indicated but rather well developed in attenuata.

Of the three species now recognized as belonging to this genus (xeropis, porphyroscia, and attenuata) the latter is by far the smallest.

Genus Ephysteris Meyrick

Ephysteris Meyrick, 1908:724.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Ephysteris chersaea Meyrick, 1908:725; by monotypy.

Ephysteris longicornis, new species

FIGURES 123, 294f

Alar Expanse 10–12 mm.

Labial palpus pale ochraceous buff; second segment fuscous on outer side, the color continued apically around second segment to inner side; third segment with broad fuscous annulus. Antenna fuscous; scape with a pale ochraceous-buff spot apically and anteriorly. Head fuscous but base of scales buff; face mostly buff. Thorax fuscous. Forewing ground color grayish heavily overlaid and irrorate with fuscous; from basal third of costa an outwardly oblique fuscous shade extends to fold; on middle of costa a triangular fuscous shade; from tornus, an ill-defined outwardly oblique fuscous bar extends to about vein 9; cilia grayish speckled with fuscous. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia concolorous. Foreleg fuscous; tarsal segments with pinkish buff annulations; midleg similar to foreleg; tibia and tarsal segments with pinkish buff annulations; hindleg pale ochraceous buff marked with fuscous.

Abdomen fuscous dorsally; ventrally fuscous, liberally mixed with pale ochraceous buff.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24571; BM 21336. Harpe strongly curved, broad basally, with basal lobe. Gnathos a sharply curved hook, about as long as uncus. Uncus hood-shaped with median posterior point. Vinculum narrow with prominent saccus. Tegumen slightly longer than harpe; broad basally. Anellus an elongate semitubular plate. Aedeagus as long as tegumen and uncus combined, slender, with curved tip and bulbous base.

Female genitalia slide BM 21319. Ostium broad, opening from a sclerotized posterior portion of the ductus bursae. Inception of the ductus seminalis dorsal from about middle of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signum a cross with a central longitudinal keel.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100773.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype and 11 paratypes all from the same locality and with the same date (20 Feb 1968); also 2 paratypes, one Hiva Oa, 4000 ft (1219 m), 31 Dec 1924, beaten from herbage; one, Hiva Oa, 3500 ft (1067 m), 28 Jan 1925, at light, both St. George Expedition, C.L. Collenette.

This is the first species of the genus Ephysteris to be definitely recorded from the Pacific Islands. Clarke (1965:85) described the genus Echinoglossa (type: E. trinota Clarke) from the Juan Fernandez Islands. Subsequently, Povolny (1967:126) placed trinota in the genus Ephysteris and Sattler (1973:197) accepted this placement. If, in fact, Echinoglossa is a synonym of Ephysteris, despite several obvious differences, then longicornis is the second species recorded from the Pacific. Sattler (in litt., 24 September 1979) informed me that there is an additional unidentified species in the British Museum (Natural History) from the Gilbert Islands.

FIGURE 123.—Ephysteris longicornis, new species, a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 124.—Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller): a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Ephysteris longicornis exhibits a character, vein 6 of the hindwing missing, shared by only one other species in the genus. It also bears a remarkable, though superficial, resemblance to certain species of the Hawaiian genus Merimnetria (xylospila Meyrick, nigriciliella Walsingham).

Genus Phthorimaea Meyrick

Phthorimaea Meyrick, 1902:103.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Gelechia (?Bryotropha) operculella Zeller, 1873:262, pl. 3: fig. 17; by original designation and monotypy.

Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller)

FIGURES 124, 294g

Gelechia (? Bryotropha) operculella Zeller, 1873:262, pl. 3: fig.17.

Meyrick (1929a:496) erroneously recorded this species from Hiva Oa (3500–4000 ft), but the two female specimens Meyrick recorded as this species are the females of Ephysteris longicornis, new species, described in the preceeding discussion.

I am including figures of the adult and the male and female genitalia to aid in identification should operculella be discovered in the islands; also the genus is retained in the key for the same reason.

Family COSMOPTERIGIDAE

Key to the Genera of Cosmopterigidae

Genus Asymphorodes Meyrick

FIGURE 125

Asymphorodes Meyrick, 1929a:498.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Asymphorodes valligera Meyrick, 1929a:498; by original designation.

The genitalia of species of Asymphorodes are typically cosmopterigid. Zimmerman (1978: 1057) states, “…with epitygmata (genital “flaps”) well developed, vinculum well developed and the valvae thus articulated far from base of tegumen; uncus absent; gnathos (?) divided into two brachia; right lobe of anellus obsolete; left lobe closely appressed to aedeagus. Female with ostium sclerotized, protruding; ovipositor long….”

FIGURE 125.—Distribution map of the genus Asymphorodes.

The “genital flaps” result from a modification of the eighth sternum and are generally specific. The males usually exhibit modifications of the fourth to seventh abdominal segments and these modifications are specific.

I cannot view the vinculum as “well developed” but consider the articulation of the harpes (valvae) as approximate to base of the tegumen. The gnathos generally has two well-developed brachia but sometimes one may be absent, or at most, developed as a small stub. I interpret the “lobe of anellus” of Zimmerman as the manica. The ostium is not always protruding but sometimes may be sunk in a deep pit of the seventh sternum. As far as I am able to ascertain, the signum is usually absent.

In all species that I have examined there is always present in the male a hairpencil on the underside of the hindwing, from base, which fits into a fold along the cell.

Key to the Species of Asymphorodes

This key will work for most specimens of a species, but one must take into consideration that some species are quite variable. Also, one must remember that individual workers will interpret coloration differently. Generally, however, errors can be eliminated by the use of the figures of the wings and genitalia.

Asymphorodes macrogramma, new species

FIGURES 126, 295a

Alar expanse 6 mm.

Labial palpus light buff; second segment with brownish mark at middle on outer side. Antenna fuscous with paler annulations; scape light buff with fuscous dorsally on distal half. Head light buff. Thorax fuscous with slight light buff posteriorly, tegula fuscous, tip light buff. Forewing ground color light buff variously marked fuscous; base of costa broadly fuscous to fold then extended along fold to middle of wing; at basal third of costa a wedge-shaped fuscous mark; from middle of costa an outwardly oblique fuscous streak that fuses with a fuscous blotch at end of cell; apex fuscous, cilia light buff. Hindwing gray; cilia a shade lighter. Foreleg light buff; tibia and tarsal segments marked blackish fuscous; midleg light buff; tibia with two fuscous spots; hindleg light buff with ill-defined, small, darker markings. Abdomen fuscous dorsally; ventrally light buff with light grayish suffusion; 8th sternum strongly modified.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25140. Harpe broad basally; neck short and narrow; cucullus moderately expanded. Brachia unequal, the right shorter than the left; left brachium attenuated distally. Tegumen longer than broad. Aedeagus S-shaped with a small barb dorsodistally; manica not appreciably modified.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100774.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m).

FIGURE 126.—Asymphorodes macrogramma, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 8th sternum.

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (30 Jan 1968).

The species is similar to Herlinda fasciola, new species, but the markings are not as distinct as in that species.

Asymphorodes holoporphyra Meyrick

FIGURES 127, 295b

Asymphorodes holoporphyra Meyrick, 1934c:352.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:161.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24230, AB190. Ostium large, round, emerging from a short, sclerotized tube, the tube situated in a deep depression in the posterior margin of the seventh segment. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae arising at posterior edge of bursa copulatrix, moderately sclerotized in posterior half. Bursa copulatrix very finely rugose.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mount Temetiu, slope north of Summit, 3860 ft (1176 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

When Meyrick described this species he recorded a male specimen. This example is in the British Museum (Natural History) and lacks its abdomen. Unfortunately, the genitalia cannot be figured.

Asymphorodes didyma, new species

FIGURES 128, 295c

Alar expanse 18–20 mm.

Labial palpus ochraceous buff; third segment almost wholly suffused fuscous. Antenna ochraceous buff, spotted fuscous; scape ochraceous buff, shaded prout's brown dorsally. Head, thorax, and forewing ground color prout's brown; from basal fifth of costa an outwardly oblique, ill defined, fascia of color slightly paler than ground color, reaches beyond fold; in middle of cell a small blackish fuscous spot; at end of cell an oblique blackish fuscous mark surrounded by ochraceous buff scales; cilia grayish fuscous in tornal area, prout's brown along termen. Hindwing grayish fuscous, slightly darker apically; cilia concolorous. Foreleg ochraceous buff, blackish fuscous on outer side; midleg ochraceous buff, suffused fuscous on outer side; hindleg ochraceous buff; tarsal segments lightly suffused fuscous. Abdomen first three segments fuscous dorsally, remainder grayish dorsally; ventrally warm buff.

FIGURE 127.—Asymphorodes holoporphyra Meyrick, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 128.—Asymphorodes didyma, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slides USNM 25116, 25117. Ostium emerging from a short sclerotized cylinder, the latter at the base of a deep, V-shaped cleft in the posterior margin of the 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior portion of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae slender, membranous, about as long as bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Toovii, Ooumu, 900 m.

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described form the holotype (16–19 Jul 1977, Montgomery) and 1 paratype with identical data.

This species is similar to size to holoporphyra from Hiva Oa, but displays none of the purple coloration described by Meyrick. The holotypes of both species are females and the genitalia show striking differences (see Figures 127, 128).

Asymphorodes plemmelia, new species

FIGURES 129, 295d

Alar expanse 10 mm.

Labial palpus light buff. Antenna pale ochraceous buff, becoming darker toward apex. Head pale ochraceous buff. Thorax pale ochraceous buff; anterior part of thorax and tegula infuscated; processes of male metascutum not appreciably developed. Forewing ground color fuscous; base of costa narrowly light buff; at three-fifths of costa a light buff dash and before apex a triangular spot of the same color; dorsum pale ochraceous buff; cilia grayish fuscous, darker toward apex. Hindwing light gray, darker apically; cilia concolorus. Foreleg light buff; femur, tibia and tarsal segments blackish fuscous on outer side; midleg and hindleg light buff. Abdomen light buff ventrally, grayish fuscous dorsally; 8th sternum modified.

FIGURE 129.—Asymphorodes plemmelia, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 8th sternum.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24995. Harpe broad at base; neck moderately slender; cucullus expanded distally. Brachia moderately slender, dilated and nearly black distally. Tegumen shorter than broad. Aedeagus stout, nearly straight; manica with a blunt process dorsodistally.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100775.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 2000 ft (610 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (1 Mar 1968). This species might easily be confused with semiluteus, new species, but the dark markings of the forewing of plemmelia do not intrude on the lighter color of the dorsum as in that species. Moreover, the hind tibia and tarsal segments are unmarked in plemmelia but marked in semiluteus. The genitalia immediately separate the two.

Asymphorodes trigrapha, new species

FIGURES 130, 295e

Alar expanse 13 mm.

Labial palpus light buff; second segment with broad fuscous apical annulus and fuscous dash basally on outer side; third segment narrowly fuscous anteriorly. Antenna fuscous; scape light buff anteriorly. Head grayish fuscous; face light buff. Thorax fuscous mixed with a few slender light buff scales; metascutum with thornlike processes. Forewing ground color fuscous; from basal fifth of costa a broad, outwardly oblique, irregular buff fascia extends to fold; at three-fifths of costa a light buff blotch and beyond that a light buff costal dash; on costa, preapically, three short white oblique dashes; entire surface covered with a sprinkling of yellowish scales; cilia grayish fuscous except for two prominent tufts of light scales the bases of which are nearly white. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia slightly lighter. Foreleg light buff marked with fuscous; midleg similar; hindleg light buff; tibia with two oblique fuscous bars on outer side; tarsal segments marked fuscous. Abdomen fuscous dorsally, light buff ventrally; 8th sternum consisting of a pair of fleshy flaps.

FIGURE 130.—Asymphorodes trigrapha, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 8th sternum.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24854. Harpe broad basally; neck moderately long and wide; cucullus broadly expanded. Brachia long, sharply curved before middle, each terminating in a small but distinct hook. Tegumen shorter than wide. Aedeagus very long, slender, and very sharply curved; manica a long ridge dorsally.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100776.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (23 Jan 1968).

Asymphorodes trigrapha is related to myronotus but differs from it by the three pale subapical costal dashes and the absence of the yellow dorsum as found in myronotus.

Asymphorodes nephocirca Meyrick

FIGURES 131, 295f,g

Asymphorodes nephocirca Meyrick, 1929a:500.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:215.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24741, 24837, 25134. Harpe very long in proportion to combined tegumen and brachia; broad basally, neck short and moderately thick, remainder of harpe curved, cucullus expanded. Brachia very short, broad basally, flattened, sharply pointed. Tegumen very short. Aedeagus slender, curved; manica with no appreciable modification dorsodistally.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24742, 24744, 24838. Ostium very small, round, situated at the base of a shallow cleft in the posterior edge of the 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from near posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae long, slender, membranous, from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous; granular in anterior half.

ORIGINAL MATERIAL.—”.9–10 mm. Marquesas, Tahuata, Hiva Oa, up to 800 feet, December, January, at light and beaten from herbage; 6 ex.”

LECTOTYPE.—Female, 10 mm. “Tahuata, Marquesas. Beaten from herbage. 10.1.25. St. George Expedn. C.L. Collenette.” A small white label reads “Brits. Mus, 1925–488,” and a smaller one “P595.” A large, black-bordered label bears the inscription “Asymphorodes nephocirca Meyr. Tr. Ent. Soc. Lond. 76. p. 500 (1929)” and the word “TYPE”. Slide JFGC No. 12001. Lectotype hereby designated.

Lectotype is in the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Tahuata.

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

Our series of this species consists of 164 specimens as follows. Nuku Hiva: Pakiu Valley 1800 ft (548 m), 19 Jan 1968, 2, 5; Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 1; Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 2; Taiohae, 15 Jan 1968, 1. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 12 Feb to 8 Mar 1968, 17, 106; Tahauku, 26 Feb 1968, 1, 1. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11 Mar to 8 Apr 1968, 3, 22; Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m), 3 Apr 1968, ; Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 1; Hanavave, 12 Apr 1968, 1. Tahuata: As indicated under “Lectotype.”

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Striking features of this species are the disproportionate sizes of the harpe, and the brachia and tegumen complex. Also the eighth sternum of the male consists of very large, simple lateral “flaps.” In the female the ostium is small, weak, and inconspicuous.

Although the food plant is unknown, specimens were beaten from Eugenia uniflora L. on which the species may feed, exhibiting habits similar to those of other species of this genus.

Asymphorodes acrophrictis Meyrick

FIGURES 132, 296a,b

Asymphorodes acrophrictis Meyrick, 1934c:351.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:35.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24808, 24922. Harpe broad basally gradually tapered to a narrow, elongate neck; cucullus broadly expanded. Brachia of unequal length; right brachium broad basally, narrow at middle, dilated and flattened distally; left brachium short, curved, pointed. Tegumen broader than long. Aedeagus thick, slightly curved; manica with pointed process dorsally.

FIGURE 131.—Asymphorodes nephocirca Meyrick: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 8th sternum; d, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 132.—Asymphorodes acrophrictis Meyrick: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 8th sternum; d, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24811, 24923. Ostium rather broad, opening from a stout, short, tubular process, the tubular process arising from the base of the V-shaped margin of the 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae slender, membranous. Bursa couplatrix membranous, very lightly spiculate in anterior two-thirds. Signum absent.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Uapou, Teavanui Pass, 2900 ft (884 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

Nuku Hiva: Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 18, 20; Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 1; Taiohae, 26 Jan 1968, 1.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

The abdomen of the male type is missing, and we have no additional material from Uapou. There are, however, specimens from Nuku Hiva that appear identical. Most are from high elevation, as are the specimens from Uapou recorded by Meyrick. I place the Nuku Hiva material here with some misgiving because many species that appear to be identical are different on different islands.

The male metascutum of acrophrictis lacks the thornlike processes.

Asymphorodes astathopis (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURE 295h

Limnoecia astathopis Meyrick, 1934c:348.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:57.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Temetiu, slope north of summit.

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

The type lacks the abdomen and is otherwise in poor condition (See Figure 295h). The three whitish transverse bands appear to distinguish this species from any other currently known from the Marquesas. We did not encounter astathopis on our expedition.

The type was collected at 3860 ft (1176 m).

As indicated above, the type is in very poor condition but from what can be seen of the venation it does not differ from species of Asymphorodes. Moreover, astathopis appears to be closely related to the following species (diamphidius); therefore, I am transferring astathopis to Asymphorodes.

Asymphorodes diamphidius, new species

FIGURES 133, 296c,d

Alar expanse 7–8 mm.

Labial palpus ocherous white; third segment blackish fuscous anteriorly. Antenna ocherous white basally shading to fuscous on most of the flagellum. Head blackish fuscous, face ocherous white. Thorax blackish fuscous; tegula concolorous. Forewing ground color blackish fuscous; on basal third a white transverse bar; at middle and apical third of costa a white spot; a similarly colored spot on tornus; at apex a small white dot; cilia grayish fuscous but darker along termen. Hindwing fuscous; cilia grayish fuscous. Foreleg ocherous white, heavily overlaid blackish fuscous on outer side; midleg ocherous white with slight grayish fuscous suffusion on outer side of tibia; hindleg ocherous white with tibia and tarsal segments strongly marked with blackish fuscous. Abdomen blackish fuscous dorsally; ocherous white ventrally; 8th sternum modified.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24724. Harpe about twice as long as brachia; neck very short, narrow; cucullus rather broadly dilated. Brachia long, slender, curved, sharply pointed; a cluster of 4 or 5 very slender setae at the base of each brachium. Tegumen very short, scarcely more than half the length of brachia. Aedeagus slender, curved, with a small hook apically; manica with a shallow keel dorsally.

FIGURE 133.—Asymphorodes diamphidius, new species; a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 8th sternum; d, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24725. Ostium small, round. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix on left side. Ductus bursae relatively short, about as long as bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100777.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (1 Mar 1968), 18 and 41 paratypes from the type-locality, dated 20 Feb and 1 Mar 1968.

As indicated under astathopis this species is very closely related to it, but diamphidius differs from astathopis by the blackish fuscous head and thorax and the presence of only one complete white bar on the forewing.

Asymphorodes spintheropus (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURES 134, 296e

Stagmatophora spintheropa Meyrick, 1934c:348.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]: p. 219.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24231. Ostium small, round, emerging from a sclerotized cone, the latter set in a deep excavation of the posterior edge of the 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior edge of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae very slender, membranous, about half the length of bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Uapou, Tekohepu summit.

DISTRIBUTION.—Uapou.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

The type lacks the left forewing but is in otherwise fair condition. The type is the only specimen known.

FIGURE 134.—Asymphorodes spintheropus (Meyrick), ventral view of female genitalia.

In general structure the female genitalia of spintheropus match those of other species of Asymphorodes, so I do not hestitate to transfer spintheropus to this genus. I do not know what Meyrick saw that prompted him to place spintheropus in Stagmatophora. From what can be seen of the venation there is nothing to prevent spintheropus from being placed in Asymphorodes and the labial palpi are right.

Asymphorodes valligera Meyrick

FIGURES 135, 296f–h, 297a–c

Asymphorodes valligera Meyrick, 1929a:498.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:322.

Asymphorodes ingravescens Meyrick, 1934c:350.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:171. [New synonym.]

Male genitalia USNM 24653, 24656, 24657. Harpe constricted at neck then slightly broadened, then constricted again before expanded cucullus. Brachia longer than tegumen; right brachium broader than left and somewhat flattened. Tegumen shorter than broad. Aedeagus slender, slightly curved, with small hook dorsally at apex; manica with broad conspicuous hook dorsally.

Female genitalia USNM 24654, 24655. Ostium short, cylindrical, protruding, set in a deep excavation of 7th segment; lamella postvaginalis granular. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae slender, short, less than half the length of bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous, finely granular.

ORIGINAL MATERIAL.—” 12–14 mm…Marquesas, Hiva Oa, 3000–3500 feet, December, January, amongst herbage and at light; 15 ex.”

LECTOTYPE.—Male, 11 mm, “Hiva Oa, Marquesas. Beaten from herbage 3000–3500 ft., 27.1.1925. St. George Expedn. C.L. Collenette.” Slide JFGC 11992. Lectotype hereby designated.

Lectotype is in the British Museum (Natural History) (valligera); type is in the Bernice P. Bishop Museum (ingravescens).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Hiva Oa, 3000–3500 ft (914–1067 m) (valligera); Hiva Oa, Mt. Temetiu, altitude 3860 feet (1176 m) (ingravescens).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

In the USNM collection there are before me the following specimens. Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m) 1 Mar 1968, 36, 106; same locality, 3800 ft (1158 m), 20 Feb 1968, 31, 15; Tahauku, 27 Feb 1968, 1. Ootua, 800 m, 27–30 Jul 1977, 1 (Montgomery).

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Obviously, Meyrick had a mixed series as is evident from the specimens in the British Museum.

The specimen I have selected as the lectotype, certainly one of the original series, is slightly smaller than the dimensions given by Meyrick. I have a female, an exact match for the lectotype in color and pattern, measuring 12 mm.

As can be seen from illustrations, the species is extremely variable with sharply defined markings (Figure 296h), or suffused markings (Figures 296g, 297b,c). Obviously this variability in pattern led Meyrick to describe valligera and ingravescens as separate species. All forms occur together.

Asymphorodes leucoterma Meyrick

FIGURE 297d

Asymphorodes leucoterma Meyrick, 1929a:499.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]: 187.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa.

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

The holotype, the only specimen of this species that is known, is in very poor condition. The type consists of one forewing, head with one antenna, and three legs. The forewing is folded lengthwise so that only the dorsal half is seen as in Figure 297d. Although there are three whitish streaks on costa and termen, the large conspicuous ocherous-white spot on tornus is the most characteristic feature of this species; but it appears from the description that it was not mentioned by Meyrick.

FIGURE 135.—Asymphorodes valligera Meyrick: a, venation of right wings; b, lateral apsect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; c, aedeagus; d, 8th sternum; e, ventral view of female genitalia.

Asymphorodes admirandus Meyrick

FIGURES 136, 297e

Asymphorodes(?) admiranda Meyrick, 1934c:349.

Asymphorodes admiranda Meyrick.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:36.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24228 (type), 24234. Ostium small, oval. Sterigma with deep median cleft each edge of cleft strongly sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior part of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae short, membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Uapou, Vaihakaatiki, Hakahetau Valley.

DISTRIBUTION.—Uapou, Nuku Hiva.

In addition to the specimens recorded by Meyrick we have the following: Nuku Hiva: Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 3.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Meyrick described this as Asymphorodes(?), but the species definitely belongs in this genus.

Asymphorodes pollutus Meyrick

FIGURES 137, 297f

Asymphorodes polluta Meyrick, 1929a:500.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:254.—Bradley, 1957:100.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24731. Harpe very slender; cucullus much broadened. Left brachium broad basally, strongly curved at middle and sharply pointed. Right brachium curved, divergent, flattened in outer two-thirds. Tegumen broader than long. Aedeagus slender, curved distad, with a small dorsal point distally; manica with very large dorsal projection, dilated distally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24732. Ostium small, subconical, set in a very deep excavation of the posterior margin of 7th segment. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae slender, membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous, finely granulate anteriorly.

FIGURE 136.—Asymphorodes admirandus Meyrick, ventral view of female genitalia. bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae slender, membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous, finely granulate anteriorly.

FIGURE 137.—Asymphorodes pollutus Meyrick: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 8th sternum; d, ventral view of female genitalia.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, 3500 ft (1067 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa, Solomon Islands.

We have only four specimens of this apparently uncommon species. Hiva Oa: Trail to Mt. Feani, 2700 ft (823 m), 20 Feb 1968, 1; Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m), 1 Mar 1968, 3.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Although Meyrick described pollutus from a defective specimen (lacked the hindwings), he was quite right in stating that it is an easily recognizable form. There is nothing in the genus that can be confused with it.

Fortunately, we now have a male and female so that the genitalia can be figured.

Asymphorodes aporia, new species

FIGURES 138, 297g

Alar expanse 12 mm.

Labial palpus light buff; third segment with slender longitudinal line anteriorly. Antenna pale ochraceous buff. Head light buff with pale ochraceous buff suffusion on crown. Thorax light buff; tegula mottled fuscous; metascutum of male with thornlike processes. Forewing ground color light buff variously streaked and mottled fuscous; in middle of cell a fuscous spot and at end of cell a similar spot; cilia grayish fuscous with mixture of pale ochraceous buff scales at middle of termen. Hindwing grayish fuscous, lighter toward base; cilia grayish fuscous. Foreleg pale buff strongly marked blackish fuscous on outer side; midleg pale buff; hindleg pale buff; tibia with grayish fuscous spot on outer side distally. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally, grayish buff ventrally.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24940. Harpe moderately broad, gradually tapered to a short, narrow neck; cucullus moderately expanded. Brachia short, slender, curved. Tegumen shorter than broad. Aedeagus slightly curved; manica with claviform process dorsally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24941. Ostium very small, round, emerging from center of a sclerotized ring. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior margin of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae very slender, membranous. Bursa copulatrix rugose in anterior half.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100781.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (30 Jan 1968) and 2 paratypes with identical data.

Although aporia might at first be confused with nigricornis, especially in rubbed specimens, they are readily distinguished by a comparison of their antennae. In aporia the antenna is pale ochraceous buff but in nigricornis the antenna is blackish fuscous. Also, the mottling in nigricornis is darker than in aporia.

Asymphorodes hypostema, new species

FIGURES 139, 297h

Alar expanse 11 mm.

Labial palpus sordid white; second segment with fuscous longitudinal line posterolaterally. Antenna light buff. Head and thorax sordid white. Forewing ground color sordid white (lustrous) extreme base of costa and basal angle fuscous; at basal third, in fold, a fuscous shade; on middorsum a fuscous spot and another at end of cell; apical part of wing, beyond cell, shaded fuscous; cilia grayish fuscous. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia a shade lighter. Foreleg sordid white (tibia and tarsi missing); midleg sordid white; tibia with grayish fuscous spot distally; hindleg sordid white; tibia with grayish fuscous spot distally. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally, sordid white ventrally; eight sternum modified.

Male genitalia USNM 24958. Harpe broadest at base; cucullus slightly expanded. Brachia of about equal length, strongly curved distad and sharply pointed. Tegumen slightly broader than long. Aedaegus slightly bent distad terminating in a small dorsal hook; manica with a battledore-shaped process dorsodistally.

FIGURE 138.—Asymphorodes aporia, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, tip of brachium enlarged; c, aedeagus; d, 8th sternum; e, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 139.—Asymphorodes hypostema, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 8th sternum.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100782.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (23 Jan 1968).

This moth is closely related to pollutus, but lacks the three discal spots of the forewing of that species. Also, the basal angle of hypostema and a spot on dorsum are fuscous, but both these features are absent in pollutus.

Asymphorodes brevimacula, new species

FIGURES 140, 298a

Alar expanse 10–13 mm.

Labial palpus ocherous white. Antenna fuscous, scape ocherous white anteriorly. Head white, face ocherous white. Thorax white; base of tegula infuscated; thornlike processes from metascutum of male present. Forewing ground color white; at base of costa a fuscous spot, the color continuing very narrowly along extreme costal edge to about two-fifths; at two-fifths a broken, irregular fuscous transverse fascia; on dorsum, just before the fascia, a small fuscous spot; at three-fourths of costa a transverse fuscous fascia extends to base of vein two, sometimes continued to tornus and sometimes confluent with a fuscous spot on fold, the latter lying between the two transverse fasciae; cilia light buff, with a few grayish cilia at apex. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia buff. Foreleg ochraceous white heavily overlaid fuscous on outer side; midleg and hindleg ocherous white. Abdomen grayish dorsally, ocherous white ventrally; 7th tergum and sternum of male not appreciably modified.

FIGURE 140.—Asymphorodes brevimacula, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 8th sternum; d, ventral view of female genitalia.

Male gentialia slide USNM 24824. Harpe rather elongate basally; neck rather long, slender; cucullus moderately expanded. Brachia stout basally, tapering to a sharp point. Tegumen shorter than broad. Aedeagus moderately stout, gently curved; manica with a small triangular keel dorsodistally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24825. Ostium small, round, emerging from a short, sclerotized cylinder, the latter set at the base of a deep median excavation of the posterior margin of the 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100783.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (20 Feb 1968), 5 and 3 paratypes all from Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m) and 3800 ft (1158 m), 20 Feb and 1 Mar 1968.

In superficial appearance brevimacula is similar to xanthostola, but the ground color of the former is white or whitish but that of the latter is yellowish or ocherous. The tergum and sternum of the male of brevimacula is not modified as in xanthostola (Figures 140c, 153c,d).

Asymphorodes hemileucus, new species

FIGURES 141, 298b

Alar expanse 6.5–7 mm.

Labial palpus blackish fuscous except creamy white apex; third segment creamy white. Antenna white to buff with some fuscous scaling in male; in one female annulated blackish fuscous toward apex. Head white. Thorax and tegula black. Forewing ground color, slightly less than half, black; beyond that white to creamy white; cilia white to creamy white. Hindwing creamy white with very slight grayish suffusion; cilia creamy white. Foreleg and midleg creamy white; tibia and tarsal segments of both legs marked blackish fuscous; hindleg creamy white, base of tibia and tarsal segments marked with blackish fuscous. Abdomen white to creamy white.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24729. Harpe more than twice the length of tegumen; neck strongly constricted; cucullus slightly dilated. Brachia long, slender, curved, sharply pointed; right brachium slightly longer than left. Tegumen about as long as broad. Aedeagus slender, curved, with small point dorsally at apex; manica with small setaceous pad dorsally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24730. Ostium round, set in a deep concavity in the 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior edge of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae slender, membranous, about as long as bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous; spiculate on inner surface anteriorly.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100784.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (30 Jan 1968) and 2 paratypes as follows: 1, 1, Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968.

In size this species is slightly smaller than cuneatus new species, and the dark basal portion does not extend beyond the middle of forewing. Moreover, hemileucus lacks the wedge-shaped pale mark on dorsum of forewing, which is present in cuneatus.

Asymphorodes cirsodes Meyrick

FIGURES 142, 298c

Asymphorodes cirsodes Meyrick, 1929a: 500.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]; 91.

FIGURE 141.—Asymphorodes hemileucus, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus and 8th sternum in situ; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 142.—Asymphorodes cirsodes Meyrick: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 8th sternum; d, ventral view of female genitalia.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24701. Harpe broad basally; neck short and very narrow; cucullus slightly expanded distally. Brachia nearly twice as long as tegumen, curved, with slightly hooked point distally. Tegumen very short and broad. Aedeagus moderately slender, curved, with a small dorsal point distally; manica with a prominent, broad dorsal keel.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24700, 24702. Ostium small, round, emerging from a dome-shaped process at base of deep posterior invagination in 7th sternum; lamella postavaginalis granular, clothed with dense, short scales. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior edge of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae membranous, slender. Bursa copulatrix membranous, nearly three times as long as broad.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, 3500 ft (1067 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

I have before me three specimens as follows. Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m), 20 Feb 1968, 1; Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m) 1 Mar 1968, 2.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

There are three species, cirsodes, regina, new species, and remigiata, new species that are strikingly similar in superficial appearance. Asymphorodes regina is the larger of the three, remigiata the smaller, with cirsodes between the two in size, and each occupies a different island. (A comparison of Figures 142, 164, and 166 will facilitate identification.)

Asymphorodes myronotus Meyrick

FIGURES 143, 298d

Asymphorodes myronota Meyrick, 1929a:500.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:123.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24703, 24706, 24707, 24711, 24761, 24763, JFGC 12004. Harpe broad basally; neck very narrow; cucullus only slightly dilated distally. Brachia rather stout basally, narrowed distally, pointed; a long seta from base of each brachium. Tegumen broader than long. Aedeagus slender, curved, with small dorsal point distally; manica without keel.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24704, 24705, 24708, 24709, 24712, 24762, 24764. Ostium small, round, opening from a sclerotized tube. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae slender, membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous, rather narrow, elongate.

ORIGINAL MATERIAL.—”. 9–11mm…Marquesas, Hiva Oa, to 1200 feet, December, at light, 8 ex.”

LECTOTYPE.—Female, 10 mm. “Hiva Oa, Marquesas. At light, 26.12.24. St. George Expedn. C.L. Collenette.” Two small white labels bear the inscriptions “Brit. Mus. 1925–488” and “P590,” respectively. On a large black—bordered label are “Asymphorodes myronota Meyr.” and “Tr. Ent. Soc. Lond. 76. p. 500 (1929) Type .” In addition there is the usual British Museum round, red-bordered type label with “Type H.T.” Slide No. JFGC 12004. Lectotype hereby designated.

Lectotype is in the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, to 1200 ft (366 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

Before me are the 41 specimens listed below. Nuku Hiva: Pakiu Valley, 1800 ft (548 m), 17–28 Jan 1968, 5, 5; Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 1; Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 1. Hiva Oa: Puamau, 8 Feb 1968, 4, 6; Trail to Mt. Feani, 1200 ft (366 m), 6 Mar 1968, 1, 3; Mt. Feani, 2000 ft (610 m), 20 Feb 1968, 1; 1 Mar 1968, 1 2; Tahauku, 26 Feb 1968, 1; Atuona, 27 Feb and 4 Mar 1968, 2. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11 and 21 Mar 1968, 4, Omoa Valley, 20 Mar 1968, 2, 2.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

This species is similar to remigiata, new species, and rubbed specimens might be confused with it, but myronotus averages smaller than remigiata and the dorsal stripe of myronotus is distinctly yellowish, that of remigiata whitish.

FIGURE 143.—Asymphorodes myronotus Meyrick: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 8th sternum; d, ventral view of female genitalia.

Although the food of myronotus is unknown it is probably a refuse feeder.

This is one of the species of Asymphorodes in which the 7th abdominal segment of the male is not modified.

Asymphorodes cuneatus, new species

FIGURES 144, 298e

Alar expanse 8 mm.

Labial palpus second segment blackish fuscous except apex cream white; third segment cream white with blackish fuscous subapical annulus. Antenna with scape ocherous white; flagellum blackish fuscous. Head cream white. Thorax blackish fuscous except for ocherous white spot posteriorly. Forewing ground color blackish fuscous to apical third, then ocherous white; a cream white spot on costa at basal fifth and another slightly beyond middle; at basal third of dorsum a cream white spot and at middle of dorsum a wedge-shaped cream white mark; cilia ocherous white. Hindwing gray; cilia somewhat lighter. Foreleg blackish fuscous except for cream white markings on inner surface; midleg missing; hindleg cream white. Abdomen blackish fuscous dorsally, ocherous white ventrally. Lobes of eighth sternum small, fleshy.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24726. Harpe with neck greatly constricted; outer two-thirds of nearly equal width, except cucullus slightly expanded. Brachia slender, curved, sharply pointed and slightly crossed. Tegumen about as wide as long. Aedeagus slender, slightly curved, nearly as long as harpe.

FIGURE 144.—Asymphorodes cuneatus, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 8th sternum.

Female genitalia unknown.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100785.

TYPE LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described form the holotype (27 Mar 1968).

This species is similar to hemileucus, new species, and seminiger, new species, but the pale apical portion of the forewing of cuneatus is much more restricted in size than it is in those two species.

Asymphorodes seminiger, new species

FIGURES 145, 298f

Alar expanse 10–11 mm.

Labial palpus light buff. Antenna scape cream white; flagellum cream white basally shading to light brown apically. Head cream white. Thorax cream white; tegula blackish fuscous. Forewing ground color basal half blackish fuscous; outer half cream white shading to buff; on base of dorsum a prominent buff streak, wider outwardly than at base; slightly beyond dark basal half of wing, in center, a tiny blackish fuscous dot; at apical third of costa a brown streak; cilia light buff. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia paler. Foreleg buff; femur and tibia blackish fuscous on outer side; tarsal segments warm buff; midleg buff; tibia and tarsal segments marked lightly with grayish fuscous; hindleg buff. Abdomen fuscous dorsally, buff ventrally. Epitygmata oval, fleshy.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24727. Harpe long, slender, narrowest at neck; cucullus only slightly expanded. Brachia curved, thick basally, tapering to a sharp point. Tegumen short, broad. Aedeagus nearly half the length of harpe, slightly curved, pointed; manica produced as a long, curved hook dorsally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24728. Ostium small, emerging from a strongly sclerotized irregular plate (Figure 145). Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae very slender, membranous, about as long as bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100786.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (30 Jan 1968) and 8 paratypes as follows: 6, 1, Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968; 1, Tunoa Ridge, 23 Jan 1968, 2900 ft (884 m).

Of the three new species, cuneatus, hemileucus, and seminiger, the latter is the largest. Also, seminiger has a blackish spot in the pale area beyond the blackish basal portion of the wing.

Asymphorodes albicoma, new species

FIGURES 146, 298g

Alar expanse 7 mm.

Labial palpus white; outer side of second segment and apical part of third segment sordid white. Antenna white; flagellum with very faint yellowish tinge. Head white. Thorax white; tegula fuscous basally. Forewing ground color white; apical half with some very faintly yellowish scales; on basal fourth of costa a fuscous blotch that extends about two-thirds distance to dorsum; from slightly before middle of dorsum, an outwardly oblique fuscous bar extends to slightly beyond middle of costa; this bar is broader on costa than on dorsum; at the end of cell a small fuscous spot; around apex and termen a fuscous line; cilia pale yellowish white. Hindwing pale gray; cilia lighter. Foreleg white, heavily overlaid blackish fuscous on outer side; midleg and hindleg white; on hind tibia proximally a blackish fuscous dot. Abdomen white; dorsally suffused grayish fuscous.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24723. Harpe very slender basally; terminal half sickle-shaped. Brachia long, slightly curved, sharply pointed; a single, slender seta from base of each brachium. Tegumen about as long as brachia. Aedeagus long, slender, slightly curved, with a small recurved hook apically; manica with broad dorsal keel subapically.

FIGURE 145.—Asymphorodes seminiger, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 8th sternum; d, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 146.—Asymphorodes albicoma, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 8th sternum.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100787.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (23 Jan 1968).

In albicoma the dark basal patch does not cover the entire base of the wing as in seminiger and hemileucus.

Asymphorodes semiluteus, new species

FIGURES 147, 298h

Alar expanse 7–9 mm.

Labial palpus pale ochraceous buff; second segment with a fuscous blotch at middle on outer side. Antenna light ochraceous buff; scape light tawny. Head pale orange yellow. Thorax pale orange yellow; tegula blackish fuscous. Thorax of with thornlike processes from metascutum. Forewing ground color blackish fuscous; on costa, at basal fourth, an ill-defined pale orange yellow, outwardly oblique dash; slightly beyond middle of costa a rectangular pale orange yellow mark; subapically, on costa, a subtriangular pale orange yellow spot; dorsum broadly pale orange yellow, interrupted at middle and at tornus by extensions of the blackish fuscous ground color; on termen two small pale orange yellow spots; cilia mixed grayish and pale orange yellow at tornus, blackish fuscous along termen. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia somewhat lighter. Foreleg pale ochraceous buff; all segments blackish fuscous on outer side; midleg pale ochraceous buff; tibia with blackish fuscous dash proximally; hindleg pale ochraceous buff; tibia with two fuscous dashes on outer side; first segment with a fuscous blotch. Abdomen fuscous dorsally; ventrally pale ochraceous buff. The 7th tergum and 8th sternum modified (Figure 147).

Male genitalia slide USNM 24844. Harpe broad basally; neck elongate, narrow; cucullus slightly expanded. Brachia considerably longer than tegumen, curved, pointed. Tegumen shorter than broad. Aedeagus moderately slender, curved; manica with a rounded keel dorsodistally.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100791.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described form the holotype (20 Feb 1968) and 3 paratypes, Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m), 1 Mar 1968.

FIGURE 147.—Asymphorodes semiluteus, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 8th sternum.

This species might be confused with nigricornis, but semiluteus is a smaller insect and its light colored antenna immediately distinguishes it from the former. Moreover, the modifications of the 8th sterna of the two render separation of them very easy.

Asymphorodes nigricornis, new species

FIGURES 148, 299a

Alar expanse 11 mm.

Labial palpus light ochraceous buff; second segment infuscated in outer side; third segment blackish fuscous on outer side, except apex. Antenna blackish fuscous; scape light ochraceous buff with a blackish fuscous line posteroventrally. Head light ochraceous buff. Thorax light ochraceous buff except anteriorly, and tegula blackish fuscous except tip light ochraceous buff; male with thornlike processes from metascutum. Forewing ground color light ochraceous buff, largely obliterated by blackish fuscous markings; basal fourth blackish fuscous followed by irregular areas of ground color; middle half of wing blackish fuscous interrupted by a spot of ground color slightly beyond middle of costa, and two spots of similar color on dorsum; in middle of cell a small blackish fuscous discal spot encircled by a ring of ground color; apical third of wing blackish fuscous with a subapical spot of ground color on costa and a similarly colored spot slightly beyond tornus; near end of cell a triangular light ochraceous-buff spot; cilia grayish fuscous to blackish fuscous with a few light ochraceous-buff scales along termen. Hindwing fuscous; cilia somewhat lighter. Foreleg light ochraceous buff; tibia and tarsal segments blackish fuscous on outer side; midleg light ochraceous buff; tibia with a proximal fuscous spot and a distal fuscous shade; tarsal segments lightly marked fuscous; hindleg light ochraceous buff; tibia with three fuscous marks on outer side; tarsal segments with light grayish suffusion. Abdomen blackish fuscous dorsally, buff, infuscated ventrally. Posterior segments of male not modified but intersegmental membrane following 7th tergum with a pair of sclerotized nodules.

FIGURE 148.—Asymphorodes nigricornis, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 7th tergum.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24843. Harpe broad, neck narrow; cucullus moderately expanded. Brachia broad and flattened distally and nearly black toward tips. Tegumen as long as broad. Aedeagus moderately slender, gently curved, truncate distally with a dorsal point; manica with a low dorsal keel.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100779.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (27 Mar 1968).

This species is similar in appearance to semiluteus, new species, but is at once distinguished from it by the very dark antennae and the simple eighth sternum.

Asymphorodes cicatricula, new species

FIGURES 149, 299b

Alar expanse 11–12 mm.

Labial palpus pale ochraceous buff; second segment slightly infuscated anteriorly; third segment almost wholly fuscous. Antenna blackish fuscous. Head buffy brown on crown, narrowly ochraceous laterally; frons pale ochraceous buff. Thorax buffy brown. Forewing ground color buffy brown; on costa, at basal fifth, an outwardly oblique, transverse pale ochraceous-buff dash that reaches fold; at three-fifths of costa an outwardly oblique, pale ochraceous-buff dash preceded by a short, black, parallel dash; preapically a slender, pale ochraceous-buff transverse line extends to tornus; in middle of cell a black, oval spot surrounded narrowly by pale ochraceous-buff scales and at end of cell a similar spot; on fold, at middle of wing an elongate black dash surrounded by pale ochraceous-buff scales; at apex a small pale ochraceous-buff spot followed at extreme tip by a tiny black dot; cilia mixed gray, buffy brown and light ochraceous buff. Hindwing dark gray; cilia slightly lighter. Fore-, mid-, and hindlegs pale ochraceous buff strongly marked blackish fuscous. Abdomen fuscous dorsally; posterior margins of three or four posterior segments narrowly edged pale ochraceous buff; ventrally pale ochraceous buff.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24943, 24944. Ostium small, round, emerging from a sclerotized tube, the tube situated in a deep excavation of the 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae moderately short, membranous except posteriorly lightly sclerotized. Bursa copulatrix membranous.

FIGURE 149.—Asymphorodes cicatricula, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100780.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (30 Jan 1968) and 2 paratypes with identical data.

This species is similar to nigricornis, new species, but the dark markings of that species are much darker than those of cicatricula. Moreover, the scape of nigricornis is light ochraceous buff, that of cicatricula blackish fuscous.

One female paratype is considerably paler in color than the holotype.

Asymphorodes amblysoma, new species

FIGURES 150, 299c

Alar expanse 11–12 mm.

Labial palpus light buff. Antenna pale ochraceous buff; scape light buff. Head light buff; pale ochraceous buff laterally. Thorax dark buffy brown; tegula buff-tipped; metascutum with thornlike processes. Forewing ground color dark buffy brown; across middle of wing an ill-defined grayish shade; in some specimens an ill-defined fuscous spot at end of cell; cilia buffy brown. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia a shade lighter. Foreleg light buff; tibia and tarsal segments marked grayish fuscous on outer side; midleg light buff; hindleg buff; tibia with small grayish patch on outer side distally. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally, light buff ventrally; 7th and 8th segments of male strongly modified.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24757, 24758. Harpe broad basally, gradually tapered distad but no distinct, narrow neck formed; cucullus greatly expanded. Brachia short, stout, curved; right brachium slightly dilated distally. Tegumen shorter than broad. Aedeagus slender, sharply curved; manica with a long, slender curved process dorsally.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24759, 24760. Ostium small, round, emerging from a sclerotized bell-shaped process situated in a deep pit in the 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from near posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae membranous, slender, longer than bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous, finely spiculate.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100788.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (27 Mar 1968), 7 and 10 paratypes all with identical data; and 1 paratype, Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m), 3 Apr 1968.

There is no doubt that amblysoma is very closely related to lenticula, new species, from Nuku Hiva and there is little to distinguish the two superficially. Indeed, worn specimens are indistinguishable. The genitalia, however, establish beyond doubt that the two species are distinct.

Asymphorodes chalcopterus, new species

FIGURES 151, 299d

Alar expanse 11–12 mm.

Labial palpus light ochraceous buff; second segment fuscous posteriorly on the outer side; third segment almost wholly infuscated. Antenna fuscous, except scape light ochraceous buff. Head light ochraceous buff, crown lighter; face shining. Thorax buff; tegula brownish olive with brassy hue; thornlike processes from metascutum of not well developed. Forewing ground color brownish olive, the whole wing with brassy hue; costa, from slightly beyond base to outer two-thirds, narrowly buff; cilia light brownish olive; terminal cilia mixed with ochraceous buff. Hindwing grayish; cilia slightly lighter. Foreleg ochraceous buff, strongly overlaid fuscous on outer side; midleg similar but not so strongly marked; hindleg buff; tarsal segments slightly infuscated. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally, buff ventrally and with some shiny scales laterally; 7th sternum of male with a median pair of small sclerotized oval patches bearing small specialized scales; 8th sternum consisting of two flaps each narrowed distally; posterior edge of 7th sternum of female broadly excavated, the edge of this strongly sclerotized.

FIGURE 150.—Asymphorodes amblysoma, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 7th segment; d, 8th sternum; e, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 151.—Asymphorodes chalcopterus, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 7th segment; d, 8th sternum; e, ventral view of female genitalia.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24714, 25170. Harpe more than three times the length of tegumen; sacculus broadly expanded; harpe very abruptly and strongly constricted beyond sacculus; cucullus broad distally. Brachia of about equal length, flattened and nearly black distally. Tegumen broader than long. Aedeagus long and slender with a crooked distal end; manica with dorsal rounded projection.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24715, 25171. Ostium very small, round. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae membranous, very slender, about as long as bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous, short, oval.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100778.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (1 Mar 1968), 3 and 4 paratypes from Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m), 1 Mar 1968.

This species appears to be related to myronotus but is at once distinguished from it by its brassy hue. The divergent brachia of chalcopterus further distinguish it from myronotus.

Asymphorodes lenticula, new species

FIGURES 152, 299e

Alar expanse 11–13 mm.

Labial palpus pale ochraceous buff; third segment grayish fuscous anteriorly. Antenna pale ochraceous buff shading to grayish fuscous distally. Head light ochraceous buff; face pale ochraceous buff. Thorax prout's brown; male with thornlike processes from metascutum. Forewing ground color prout's brown; on middle of costa a pale ochraceous buff spot; in middle of cell a well-defined fuscous spot and a similar spot at end of cell; apical third of costa with several small light ochraceous-buff dashes; cilia grayish to prout's brown with two or three light ochraceous-buff dashes about middle of termen. Hindwing pale grayish, darker toward apex; cilia grayish. Foreleg pale ochraceous buff; femur, tibia and tarsal segments suffused fuscous on outer side; mid- and hindleg pale ochraceous buff. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally, pale ochraceous buff ventrally; 7th and 8th segments of male modified.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24847, 24899, 24900, 24902, 24946, 24947, 24948, 24950, 24954, 25017, 25113. Harpe short and broad basally; neck short; cucullus broadly expanded. Brachia short, scarcely longer than tegumen, curved, pointed. Tegumen shorter than broad. Aedeagus very short, nearly straight; manica with a sickle-shaped process dorsally.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24901, 24903, 24962, 24963, 24997, 24998. Ostium small, opening from a dome-shaped sclerotized structure, the latter at the base of a U-shaped invagination of the posterior margin of 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae membranous, ribbonlike, about as long as bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix granular.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100793.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva, Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (30 Jan 1968), 6 and 12 paratypes with identical data as the holotype; 24, 13 paratypes from Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, and Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m), 1 Mar 1968, 1, 3. Hiva Oa, Ootua, 800 m, 27–30 Jul 1977, 1 (Montgomery).

The shape of the harpe suggests a close relationship between lenticula and xanthostola but the brown forewing of the former immediately distinguishes it from the latter; also the scape of lenticula is fuscous or dark gray, that of xanthostola is buff.

FIGURE 152.—Asymphorodes lenticula, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 7th segment; d, 8th sternum; e, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 153.—Asymphorodes xanthostola Meyrick: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 7th segment; d, 8th sternum; e, ventral view of female genitalia.

In addition to the type series there are two female specimens from Tunoa Ridge that appear to be somewhat different, but in the absence of males their exact position cannot be determined.

Asymphorodes xanthostola Meyrick

FIGURES 153, 299f–h

Asymphorodes xanthostola Meyrick, 1934c:350.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:327.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24684. Harpe very long, nearly five times length of tegumen; very narrow basally; cucullus greatly enlarged (Figure 153a). Left brachium slightly shorter than right, both pointed. Vinculum not differentiated. Tegumen slightly wider than long. Aedeagus bulbous basally, slender, curved; manica with dorsal, flattened hook distally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24685. Ostium a short, slightly protruding, sclerotized cylinder with median point on posteroventral edge. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae membranous, from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix elongate, oval, membranous. Lamella postvaginalis a granular area clothed with coarse deciduous scales.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Temetiu, slope north of summit, 3860 ft (1177 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

In the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, are the following specimens from Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani. 3400 and 3800 ft (1036 and 1158 m), 20 Feb and 1 Mar 1968, 19, 37.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Meyrick described this common species from a long series from Hiva Oa and also recorded it from Uapou. It has not been recorded from any of the other islands.

Asymphorodes chrysophanes, new species

FIGURES 154, 300a

Alar expanse 9 mm.

Labial palpus light buff. Antenna light buff slightly infuscated basally and with ill–defined annulation toward apex. Head straw colored, face light buff. Thorax straw colored with brownish suffusion anteriorly; thornlike processes of metascutum of male not developed. Forewing ground color straw colored, lustrous, variously marked with brown; base of costa brown; on costa a patch of ground color slightly beyond middle and a similar spot on costa before apex; cilia grayish in tornal area, brown and straw colored along termen. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia slightly lighter. Foreleg light buff with slightly blackish fuscous marking on tibia and tarsal segments; midleg light buff; hindleg light buff. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally; pale ochraceous buff ventrally; 7th tergum and 8th sternum modified.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25007. Harpe broad basally; neck short and narrow; cucullus broadly expanded distally. Brachia stout at base, short; left brachium rather abruptly angled about middle; right brachium flattened distally. Tegumen shorter than broad. Aedeagus short, stout, nearly straight; manica with a curved process dorsally.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100789.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Atuona.

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (12 Feb 1968). Similar to nebrias, new species, chrysophanes lacks the discal spots found in that species. In the male, the thornlike processes of the thorax are not developed in chrysophanes as they are in nebrias.

Asymphorodes mesoxanthus, new species

FIGURES 155, 300b

Alar expanse 12 mm.

FIGURE 154.—Asymphorodes chrysophanes, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 7th segment; d, 8th sternum.

Labial palpus pale yellow orange. Antenna pale yellow orange, suffused grayish distally; scape fuscous basoposteriorly. Head orange buff. Thorax orange buff. Forewing ground color orange buff; at extreme base of costa a fuscous blotch; from basal third of costa a fuscous fascia extends to dorsum; at apical third of costa a broad fuscous blotch extends to tornus and has a median extension that reaches termen and apex; cilia grayish at tornus and pale yellow orange along termen. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia grayish except yellowish along costa. Foreleg pale yellow orange; femur with fuscous spot on outer side; midleg pale yellow orange; hindleg pale yellow orange; tibia with median grayish fuscous dash and fuscous distal blotch on outer side. Abdomen fuscous dorsally; pale yellow orange ventrally.

Female genitalia slides USNM 25130, 25131. Ostium small, round, emerging from a dome-shaped, sclerotized structure, the latter at the base of a U-shaped excavation in the posterior margin of 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae membranous, ribbonlike, about as long as bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix granular.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Uapou, above Hakahetau, 800 m.

DISTRIBUTION.—Uapou.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (23–24 Jul 1977, Montgomery) and 1 paratype with identical data.

Although very similar to Asymphorodes xanthostola Meyrick, mesoxanthus is darker in color and has the dark apical shade of forewing that is lacking in xanthostola. Moreover, xanthostola lacks the two dark markings of the hind tibia found in mesoxanthus. The genitalia of both indicate close relationship, but the dome-shaped structure of the 7th sternum is longer in mesoxanthus than in xanthostola.

FIGURE 155.—Asymphorodes mesoxanthus, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

Asymphorodes adynatus, new species

FIGURES 156, 300c

Alar expanse 12–14 mm.

Labial palpus sordid white. Antenna sordid white with faint grayish annulations; scape sordid white. Head sordid white with slightly yellowish tinge. Thorax sordid white, suffused grayish fuscous anteriorly; base of tegula grayish fuscous; male with thornlike processes from metascutum. Forewing ground color sordid white; base of costa fuscous; at basal third a fuscous transverse fascia; at apical third, from costa to tornus, a fuscous fascia, this crossed at middle by a fuscous longitudinal bar, the latter extending to apex; base of dorsum narrowly fuscous; cilia grayish. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia a shade lighter. Foreleg sordid white overlaid fuscous on outer side; midleg sordid white; hindleg sordid white; tibia with ill-defined grayish fuscous blotch on outer side distally. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally, sordid white ventrally. Posterior edge of 7th tergum of male with U-shaped exacavation.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24942. Harpe base moderately broad, neck narrow; cucullus appreciably expanded. Brachia slender, curved, longer than tegumen. Tegumen slightly broader than long. Aedeagus about twice as long as tegumen, slightly curved, pointed; manica with sickle-shaped process dorsally.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24827, 24996. Ostium small, opening from a small dome-shaped process, this process at base of a deep, U-shaped excavation of the posterior edge of 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae short, weak, membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous; inner wall covered with tiny granules.

HOLOTYPE.-USNM 100790.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (1 Mar 1968) 1 paratype with identical data, and 1 paratype, Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m), 20 Feb 1968.

FIGURE 156.—Asymphorodes adynatus, new species; a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 7th tergum and sternum; d, 8th sternum; e, ventral view of female genitalia.

This species is similar to xanthostola Meyrick in pattern, but the ground color of the forewing of adynatus is sordid white not “ocherous-yellow” as in the former species. However, the genitalia give adequate characters for separation.

Asymphorodes melanosoma, new species

FIGURES 157, 300d

Alar expanse 12–14 mm.

Labial palpus second segment light buff; third segment almost wholly fuscous. Antenna mostly fuscous but somewhat paler distally. Head buff laterally, grayish on vertex. Thorax blackish fuscous; tegula grayish tipped; metascutum with thornlike processes. Forewing ground color blackish fuscous; from basal fifth of costa an outwardly curved white fascia reaches dorsum; from middle of costa a white transverse fascia, broadest on costa, extends to middorsum; subapically, on costa, a white spot; on midtermen a tiny white spot; cilia grayish to grayish fuscous. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia concolorous. Fore-, mid-, and hindleg basically light buff marked with fuscous; tarsal segments conspicuously marked fuscous. Abdomen dorsally fuscous; ventrally light buff strongly suffused fuscous; 7th and 8th segments modified.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25142, 25513. Harpe broadest at base; neck rather long and slender; cucullus moderately expanded. Brachia rather stout, slightly curved; right brachium swollen beyond middle. Tegumen broader than long. Aedeagus moderately slender, nearly straight; manica with a thornlike process dorsally.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Teavapuhiau, Ouia, 750 m.

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FIGURE 157.—Asymphorodes melanosoma, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 7th tergum and sternum; d, 8th sternum.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (1–3 Aug 1977, Montgomery), and 1 paratype with identical data.

Although melanosoma might at first be confused with spintheropus it is easily distinguished from it by the absence of the four blue metallic spots of the forewing, and by the presence of a prominent white transverse fascia from middle of costa. In addition, melanosoma is a larger species than spintheropus.

Asymphorodes chalcocoma, new species

FIGURES 158, 300e

Alar expanse 10 mm.

Labial palpus pale ochraceous buff; third segment almost wholly overlaid fuscous. Antenna fuscous; scape pale ochraceous buff anteriorly. Head fuscous with brassy reflections; face pale ochraceous buff. Thorax fuscous; tegula with especially brassy hue; male with thornlike processes from metascutum. Forewing ground color fuscous, the whole with brassy hue and with no contrasting markings; cilia fuscous. Hindwing grayish fuscous, darker toward apex; cilia concolorous. Foreleg light buff; tibia and tarsal segments fuscous on outer side; midleg similar; hindleg light buff; tibia brown on outer side; tarsal segments fuscous on outer side. Abdomen fuscous dorsally; light buff ventrally; 7th and 8th segments of male modified.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25133. Harpe broad basally; neck slender, short; cucullus moderately expanded. Brachia unequal, the right brachium longer than the left, the former long and crooked, the left short and curved. Tegumen shorter than wide. Aedeagus about twice the length of tegumen; manica with digital dorsal process.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Ootua, 800 m.

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (29–30 Jul 1977, Montgomery).

Except for size, chalcocoma, is almost indistinguishable superficially from porphyrarcha. The former, however, is smaller than the latter and the scape of chalcocoma is pale ochraceous buff anteriorly. The labial palpus and the legs of porphyrarcha are much darker than those of chalcocoma.

Asymphorodes oculisignis Meyrick

FIGURES 159, 300f,g

Asymphorodes oculisignis Meyrick, 1934c:349.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:223.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24733, 24801. Harpe broad; neck rather elongate; cucullus broadly expanded. Brachia rather slender, slightly longer than base of harpe. Tegumen shorter than broad. Aedeagus slender, curved; manica with a large flattened distally dilated hook dorsally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24749. Ostium emerging from a large, sclerotized structure; lamella postvaginalis a large granular area. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Temetiu Summit, 3900 ft (1189 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

I have examined 25 specimens as follows:

Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani 3400 ft (1036 m), 1 Mar 1968, 5, 17 and 3800 ft (1158 m), 20 Feb 1968, 1, 1. Ootua, 800 m, 27–30 Jul 1977, 1 (Montgomery).

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Although similar to valligera, oculisignis can be distinguished from the former by its spotted pattern.

FIGURE 158.—Asymphorodes chalcocoma, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 8th sternum.

This species, also, has thornlike processes from the metascutum. Eighth sternum consisting of a pair of fleshy flaps.

The altitude of Temetiu Summit, given as 3900 ft, is probably close, but as late as 1968, during our visit, the exact elevation was not known.

Asymphorodes homosoma, new species

FIGURES 160, 300h

Alar expanse 8–10 mm.

Labial palpus fuscous; third segment with white longitudinal line posteriorly. Antenna fuscous with narrow white annulations. Head, thorax, and forewing ground color fuscous; subapically on costa a sordid whitish wedge-shaped spot; cilia gray. Hindwing and cilia gray. Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg grayish, variously marked fuscous. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally, pale grayish ventrally.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24739. Harpe broad basally; neck strongly constricted; cucullus slightly narrower before middle than at the ends. Brachia of nearly equal length, strongly curved. Tegumen shorter than broad. Aedeagus slender, curved; manica with prominent keel dorsodistally with setae on outer edge.

FIGURE 159.—Asymphorodes oculisignis Meyrick: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 7th sternum; d, 8th sternum; e, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 160.—Asymphorodes homosoma, new species; a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 7th tergum and sternum; d, 8th sternum; e, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24737, 24740. Ostium round, set deeply in a cavity in the posterior edge of the seventh sternum; the edges of the cavity are broadly sclerotized; lamella postvaginalis finely granular. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae short, slender, membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100792.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Taiohae.

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (4 Feb 1968) and 1 and 10 paratypes all from the type locality (16 Jan to 4 Feb 1968).

Although homosoma is, for all practical purposes, superficially indistinguishable from acerbus, the two species can be distinguished easily on genitalia and especially by the development of the male posterior terga and sterna (Figures 160, 189).

When Meyrick described acerbus he had two specimens, one from Nuku Hiva and one from Fatu Hiva. Undoubtedly the Nuku Hiva specimen belongs to homosoma.

In certain light the forewing, head and thorax of homosoma give a bronzy reflection.

Asymphorodes bipunctatus, new species

FIGURES 161, 301a

Alar expanse 9–10 mm.

Labial palpus pale yellow orange. Antenna scape deep chrome with some fuscous scaling; flagellum fuscous. Head deep chrome. Thorax deep chrome; tegula concolorous; thorax of male with thornlike processes from metascutum. Forewing ground color deep chrome; extreme costal edge blackish fuscous to just before apex; from base of wing, just inside dorsum, a blackish fuscous streak extends almost to middle of wing; at basal third an ill-defined buff fascia; at outer three-fifths, just inside costa, a very pale buff triangular mark; from tornus to about base of vein 7, then angled to costa, an ill-defined, narrow buff line; in center of cell a black dot narrowly edged with buff; at end of cell a similar spot; along termen three very small, faintly indicated buff spots; underside of forewing blackish fuscous; cilia on outer part of dorsum and tornus, grayish fuscous; cilia along termen deep chrome. Hindwing fuscous; cilia grayish fuscous. Foreleg buff, all segments blackish fuscous on outer side; midleg similar but not so heavily marked; hindleg buff; tarsal segments grayish. Abdomen fuscous dorsally, buff ventrally. For modifications of posterior segments see figures.

FIGURE 161.—Asymphorodes bipunctatus, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 7th tergum and sternum; d, 8th sternum.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24802. Harpe broad basally; neck extremely narrow, remainder of harpe broadened toward cucullus. Tegumen longer than broad. Aedeagus long and slender, slightly S-shaped, with small, but distinct hook distally; manica with a shallow, elongate keel dorsally.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100794.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (30 Jan 1968) and 9 paratypes, all with identical data.

The only species with which bipunctatus might be confused is the new species, leptotes. In bipunctatus the basal longitudinal streak lies between the dorsum and the fold; in leptotes the longitudinal line lies along the fold, is much stronger, and longer. The male posterior abdominal segments of the two are distinct.

Asymphorodes coesyrias Meyrick

FIGURES 162, 301b

Asymphorodes coesyrias Meyrick, 1929a:498; 1934c:349.—Clarke, 1955[1955–1970]:95.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24638, 24686. Harpe broad at base, slender at neck, remainder sickle-shaped. Brachia long and slender. Tegumen shorter than broad. Aedeagus slender, curved distad and with small hook dorsally at apex; manica with a long, curved dorsal process.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24639, 24687. Ostium an inverted cone from base of deep cleft in posterior margin of 7th segment. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae rather short, membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous with slight, fine granulation in anterior half.

ORIGINAL MATERIAL.—”, 9–10 mm. Marquesas, Nuku Hiva, Hiva Oa, Tahuata, to 300 feet., December, January, at light; 9 ex.”

LECTOTYPE.—“Type, H.T.” “Hiva Oa, Marquesas, at light, 300 ft.,…2.1.25, St. George Expedn., C.L. Collenette” “Brit. Mus. 1925–488.-P.535” “Asymphorodes coesyrias Meyr., Tr. Ent. Sec. Lond. 76, p. 498(1929).” “Type .”

Lectotype . “Asymphorodes coesyrias Meyr., teste K. Sattler, 1980.” Lectotype hereby designated.

Lectotype is in the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa.

DISTRIBUTION.—According to our series of 96 specimens the distribution is as follows: Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 5 Feb 1968, 1. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 12 Feb to 8 Mar 1968, 33, 48 Tahauku, Em. 12 and 20 Mar 1968, 2. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 16 Mar to 5 Apr 6, 2 Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 1, 2 Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m), 3 Apr 1968, 1.

FOOD PLANTS.—Tamarindus indica L., Eugenia uniflora L.

As the records show, this attractive species is common and widespread.

We were successful in rearing this species from Tamarindus indica where the larva cuts off some of the leaflets and ties these to living leaflets and then feeds in this mass. The larva feeds in both the dead and living tissue where it is found in association with Cryptoblabes ardescens (Meyrick). Pupation occurs between two leaflets. The larva of coesyrias is found in a similar situation on Eugenia uniflora. The moths were also beaten from this plant.

Asymphorodes ergodes Meyrick

FIGURES 163, 301c

Asymphorodes ergodes Meyrick, 1934c:351.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:131.

FIGURE 162.—Asymphorodes coesyrias Meyrick: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus, c, 7th tergum and sternum; d, 8th sternum; e, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 163.—Asymphorodes ergodes Meyrick: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 7th tergum and sternum; d, 8th sternum.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24232. Harpe broad basally, angulated beyond narrow neck; cucullus moderately expanded. Brachia slender, curved, sharply pointed. Tegumen broader than long. Aedeagus slender, curved.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Avaoa Valley.

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

As far as I am able to ascertain, the holotype is the only known specimen. The lateral flaps of 8th sternum have a digitate process dorsoposteriorly.

Asymphorodes remigiata, new species

FIGURES 164, 301d

Alar expanse 12–14 mm.

Labial palpus buff; second segment suffused grayish on outer side; third segment fuscous except base. Antenna creamy white shading to pale buff distally. Head white. Thorax white; tegula fuscous. Forewing ground color fuscous; on costa, slightly beyond middle, a very small creamy white or light buff streak; at apical fourth of costa a small similarly colored wedge-shaped mark; at end of cell a small ill-defined mark slightly darker than ground color; dorsum creamy white shading to light buff at tornus, or pale buff for entire length of dorsum; cilia pale grayish with slight yellowish tinge or light buff beyond tornus. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia somewhat paler. Foreleg creamy white; fuscous on outer side; midleg creamy white with faint grayish markings on outer side; hindleg creamy white, marked with grayish fuscous on outer side. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally; ventrally creamy white suffused grayish; anal tuft buff. (For modification of eighth sternum, see Figure 164.)

FIGURE 164.—Asymphorodes remigiata, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 7th tergum; d, 7th sternum; e, 8th sternum;f, ventral view of the female genitalia.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24690. Harpe long, constricted beyond base, then strongly curved; cucullus rounded. Brachia of about equal length, curved, slightly expanded distally; from base of each brachium a very long slender seta. Tegumen about as broad as long. Aedeagus rather stout, curved; manica expanded distally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24691. Ostium small, round, slightly protruding, emerging from a deep, broad cleft in posterior edge of seventh sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae membranous, shorter than bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous posteriorly, rugose anteriorly.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100796.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Taiohae.

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (17 Jan 1968), 12 and 8 paratypes as follows: Nuku Hiva: Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 5, 2; Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 1; Pakiu Valley, 1800 ft (548 m), 17–28 Jan 1968, 6, 6.

Although similar to regina, new species, remigiata is a smaller insect that lacks the grayish fuscous median area of the thorax, and the antennae shade to yellowish or pale buff distally. The genitalia are markedly different as can be seen by a comparison of the figures.

Asymphorodes emphereia, new species

FIGURES 165, 301e

Alar expanse 14 mm.

Labial palpus cream color. Antenna buff. Head and thorax buff. Forewing ground color whitish; extreme base of costa and basal angle grayish fuscous; from slightly beyond middle of costa to middle of dorsum an irregular grayish fuscous fascia, broadest at middle; on tornus a grayish fuscous shade extending outwardly to costa, slightly before apex, and with a median extension of the grayish fuscous shade to apex; cilia grayish fuscous at tornus but buff along termen. Hindwing very pale grayish, darker at apex; cilia concolorous. Foreleg buff; tibia and tarsal segments strikingly black on outer side; midleg buff; tibia with small grayish spot on outer side distally; hindleg buff; tibia with fuscous spot distally and three fuscous dashes on tarsal segments. Abdomen buff ventrally, fuscous dorsally; 7th tergum and sternum, and 8th sternum modified (Figure 165c,d).

Male genitalia slide USNM 24826. Harpe broad basally, neck gently narrowed; cucullus rather strongly expanded. Tegumen much shorter than wide. Aedeagus strongly S-shaped with small, sharp hook distally; manica with a long, curved finger-like projection dorsally.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100795.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 2400 ft (731 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (1 Mar 1968).

Although widely different in appearance, emphereia is closely related to regina, new species, as is evident from the modifications of the 7th terga and sterna and the 8th sterna of the two species.

In superficial appearance, emphereia is similar to brevimacula, new species, but it is a larger insect.

Asymphorodes regina, new species

FIGURES 166, 301f

Alar expanse 17–18 mm.

Labial palpus cream white; second segment with longitudinal grayish fuscous streak on outer side; third segment grayish fuscous anteriorly. Antenna shaft buff; scape cream white. Head cream white except median dorsal streak grayish fuscous. Thorax cream white; tegula grayish fuscous. Forewing ground color grayish fuscous; costa cream white with slender longitudinal grayish fuscous streak inside extreme edge; dorsum cream white; at end of cell a suffused fuscous spot; in middle of cell a similarly colored, larger oval spot; cilia grayish fuscous. Hindwing costa and apical third grayish fuscous, basal two-thirds much paler; cilia grayish. Foreleg fuscous on outer side, cream white on inner side; midleg cream white; tibia with slight grayish suffusion on outer side; tarsal segments with faint grayish streaks; hindleg cream white; tarsal segments with faint grayish streaks. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally; cream white ventrally; eighth sternum clothed with long, coarse scales, forming a prominent anal tuft. (For seventh tergum and eighth sternum, see Figure 166d,e.)

FIGURE 165.—Asymphorodes emphereia, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed and detail of brachium above; b, aedeagus; c, 7th tergum and sternum; d, 8th sternum.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24688, 24689. Harpe four times as long as tegumen; abruptly narrowed slightly beyond base; cucullus greatly expanded. Brachia about equal in length, curved, pointed, with few tiny teeth on ventral surface distally. Tegumen slightly longer than wide. Aedeagus slender, S-shaped; manica with large dorsal keel.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100797.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (27 Mar 1968) and 1 paratype with identical data.

This species resembles cirsodes but is a much larger species with pure pale buff antenna, not marked with fuscous as in cirsodes.

FIGURE 166.—Asymphorodes regina, new species: a, lateral view of male genitalia with aedeagus removed and detail of brachium above; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum and sternum; d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum.

Unfortunately, the female of regina is unknown.

Asymphorodes sphenocopa Meyrick

FIGURES 167, 301g,h

Asymphorodes sphenocopa Meyrick, 1929a:449.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:290.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24929. Harpe broad basally forming a short, narrow neck distad; cucullus moderately expanded. Brachia very broad basally; right brachium very broad and flattened distally (not apparent in figure). Tegumen broader than long. Aedeagus curved, moderately stout; manica with prominent dorsal keel.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24930, 24931. Ostium small, emerging from a dome-shaped structure situated at the base of the deep U–shaped excavation in the posterior margin of the 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae very slender, membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous; spiculate in anterior half. Signum absent.

FIGURE 167.—Asymphorodes sphenocopa Meyrick: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum; f, ventral view of female genitalia.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, 200 ft (61 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

The series before me consists of the following 166 specimens. Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 14 Jan to 6 Feb 1968, 39, 121 Pakiu Valley, 1800 ft (548 m), 19 Jan 1968, 4 Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 2.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

The great preponderance of the above series was collected near sea level, as were the original specimens.

The males of this species possess the prominent thornlike structures of the metascutum.

Asymphorodes poliopterus, new species

FIGURES 168, 302a

Alar expanse 7–10 mm.

Labial palpus cream white; second segment lightly suffused fuscous on outer side; third segment lightly infuscated toward apex. Antenna in male, cream white, darker toward apex and in some specimens fuscous distally; in female white and fuscous annulated. Head cream white; in some specimens slightly suffused fuscous. Thorax cream white; tegula fuscous. Forewing ground color grayish fuscous; dorsum narrowly cream white; at end of cell a fuscous spot; cilia buff with scattered fuscous cilia mixed toward apex. Hindwing pale gray, slightly darker toward apex; cilia buff. Foreleg buff, strongly marked fuscous on outer side; midleg similar, but only tarsal segments marked strongly; hindleg buff; tibia with fuscous dash on outer side distally; tarsal segments spotted fuscous. Abdomen fuscous dorsally; ventrally whitish suffused fuscous; abdominal segments 6, 7 and 8 strongly modified (Figure 168c—e).

Male genitalia slides USNM 24855, 24856, 24910, 24911, 24912, 24913, 24915. Harpe dilated basally; neck very slender, short; cucullus slightly dilated distally. Brachia strongly curved basally, sharply pointed; right brachium longer than left. Tegumen shorter than broad. Aedeagus S–shaped, slender; manica with a thickened keel dorsolaterally.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24815, 24857, 24909. Ostium small, round, emerging from a sclerotized domelike structure. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae slender, sclerotized in posterior half. Bursa copulatrix membranous.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100800.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Atuona.

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa, Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (26 Feb 1968), 28 and 75 paratypes as follows. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 8 Feb to 6 Mar 1968, 23 and 55 Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 13 Jan to 5 Feb 1968, I, 15. Eiao, N. uplands, 400 m, 7 Aug 1977, 4, 5 (Montgomery).

Meyrick (1929a:500) described Asymphorodes interstincta from Fakarava, Paumotus (Tuamotus) from a single female. The present species, poliopterus, very closely resembles interstincta, and the female genitalia are similar if not identical. The type of interstincta was damaged by museum pests, and the female genitalia are fragmentary so no detailed comparison could be made with the genitalia of poliopterus. Because the female genitalia throughout the genus are very similar, it is not possible to identify poliopterus with interstincta with certainty. Hence I have described poliopterus as new to avoid a mis–identification. Asymphorodes poliopterus is nearly related to phaeochorda.

Asymphorodes canicoma, new species

FIGURES 169, 302b

Alar expanse 8–9 mm.

FIGURE 168.—Asymphorodes poliopterus, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum; d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum; f, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 169.—Asymphorodes canicoma, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum; f, ventral view of female genitalia.

Labial palpus fuscous except apex of second segment and base of third segment, sordid white. Antenna grayish with fuscous annulations; scape sordid white. Head sordid white with slight yellowish tinge in some specimens. Thorax fuscous; apex of tegula sordid white; metascutum of male with thornlike processes. Forewing ground color fuscous; from basal fourth of costa an outwardly oblique series of the three sordid white blotches; at middle of costa a sordid white blotch and in middle of cell a similarly colored short dash; on dorsum, before tornus, an ill-defined sordid white blotch; on termen an elongate sordid white mark; at end of cell a blackish fuscous spot narrowly surrounded by sordid white scales; cilia grayish. Hindwing grayish, darker toward apex. Foreleg sordid white heavily overlaid fuscous on outer side; midleg sordid white with three oblique fuscous marks on tibia; tarsal segments marked grayish fuscous; hindleg sordid white with two conspicuous fuscous marks on tibia; tarsal segments marked fuscous. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally; grayish ventrally with some sordid white at posterior margins of segments; 6th, 7th, and 8th segments of male strongly modified; posterior edge of 7th sternum of female heavily sclerotized.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24924. Harpe very broad basally, abruptly narrowed to a short, slender neck; cucullus slightly expanded distally. Brachia broad basally, curved, pointed; right brachium longer than left. Tegumen broader than long. Aedeagus rather slender, S-shaped; manica with a rounded keel dorsally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24925. Ostium small, emerging from an oval sclerotized process. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae slender, membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous, lightly spiculate in anterior half. Signum absent.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100801.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (3 Apr 1968), 15 and 12 paratypes as follows. Fatu Hiva: Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m), 3 Apr 1968, 2 Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 8, 4 Omoa Valley, 5 Apr 1968, 2 2 Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 3, 6.

This species is similar to nigricornis, new species, but is a smaller moth and lacks the discal spot in the middle of the cell. Moreover, nigricornis has three large and distinct yellowish costal spots absent in canicoma.

Asymphorodes lucidus, new species

FIGURES 170, 302c

Alar expanse 7–8 mm.

Labial palpus very light buff; second segment lightly suffused grayish on outer side; third segment grayish fuscous on outer side. Antenna drab. Head drab. Thorax drab; tegula slightly lighter distally; metascutum of with well-developed thornlike processes. Forewing ground color shining drab without markings; cilia drab. Hindwing gray; cilia lighter. Foreleg buff, marked grayish fuscous on outer side; midleg buff with slight grayish suffusion on tibia and tarsal segments; hindleg buff with grayish suffusion on outer side of tibia and tarsal segments. Abdomen fuscous dorsally; buff ventrally with grayish suffusion at middle.

Male genitalia USNM 24951. Harpe base broad, outer edge of base at right angles to the very short, narrow neck; cucullus slightly expanded. Brachia stout proximally, tapering to a sharp point. Tegumen longer than broad. Aedeagus long, slender, curved; manica with a moderately high keellike structure dorsally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24952. Ostium emerging from a short, broad, sclerotized tube, the latter situated at the base of a very deep excavation in the 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior edge of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae membranous, slender, from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous with slight granulation anteriorly.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100802.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Atuona.

FIGURE 170.—Asymphorodes lucidus, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum; d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum; f, ventral view of female genitalia.

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (29 Feb 1968), 3 and 10 paratypes, all from Atuona with dates 12 Feb to 8 Mar 1968.

This unicolorous moth with a silvery sheen, appears to be closely related to leptotes, new species, but is a much smaller species and has an unmarked forewing; leptotes is a well marked moth, notably with a dark median longitudinal streak.

Asymphorodes diffidentia, new species

FIGURES 171, 302d

Alar expanse 8–9 mm.

Labial palpus pale ochraceous buff. Antenna grey with slightly darker annulations, scape ochraceous buff. Head, thorax, and forewing ground color ochraceous buff; on basal angle of forewing a brown spot; cilia pale grayish to ochraceous buff. Thorax lightly infuscated. Hindwing grayish; cilia concolorous. Fore-, mid-, and hindleg pale ochraceous buff. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally, pale ochraceous buff ventrally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24985. Ostium small, round, emerging from a short domelike structure, the latter situated at the base of a V-shaped excavation in the posterior margin of the 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae membranous, from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous, finely spiculate anteriorly.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100803.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (27 Mar 1968) and 2 paratypes with identical data. One paratype is considerably darker than the holotype.

This nearly unicolorous moth is probably most nearly related to lucidus, new species, but because of the great similarity of the female genitalia in this genus it is difficult to be sure.

FIGURE 171.—Asymphorodes diffidentia, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

Asymphorodes culminis, new species

FIGURES 172, 302e

Alar expanse 12 mm.

Labial palpus shining cream white. Antenna grayfish fuscous, slightly darker distally than proximally; scape cream white. Head, thorax, and forewing ground color shining cream white; extreme base of costa narrowly blackish fuscous; cilia at tornus pale grayish, remainder white with a yellowish tinge. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia somewhat lighter. Foreleg cream white; tibia and tarsal segments blackish fuscous on outer side; midleg and hindleg cream white. Abdomen fuscous dorsally; lustrous silvery white ventrally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24973. Ostium small, round, emerging from a small, sclerotized, dome-shaped process. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae membranous, from near posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous posteriorly, spiculate anteriorly.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100804.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (20 Feb 1968).

Although similar to Asymphorodes sericeus, new species, the forewing of culminis is immaculate, except for the blackish fuscous base of costa, and is devoid of any mark on the inner angle as found in sericeus.

Asymphorodes fractura, new species

FIGURES 173, 302f

Alar expanse 7–8 mm.

Labial palpus white. Antenna buff; scape white. Head white. Thorax white; male with thornlike processes from metascutum. Forewing ground color silvery white; basal half of wing toward costa suffused fuscous; outwardly toward apex, dark markings more intense, blackish fuscous; at three-fifths of costa a silvery white, outwardly oblique mark invades the blackish fuscous color; beyond this silvery white mark a small wedge-shaped spot of the same color; on tornus an outwardly oblique fuscous dash; parallel to termen an elongate blackish fuscous line; around apex and termen a narrow line of blackish fuscous scales; cilia around apex and termen white; cilia before tornus light grayish. Hindwing pale grayish, darker toward apex, cilia grayish. Foreleg white; tibia and tarsal segments fuscous on outer side, midleg white; tibia with fuscous dash distally; hindleg white; tibia with two elongate fuscous marks on outer side; tarsal segments marked fuscous. Abdomen white with slight grayish suffusion dorsally; 6th, 7th, and 8th segments of male modified.

FIGURE 172.—Asymphorodes culminis, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 173.—Asymphorodes fractura, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum; d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum; f, ventral view of female genitalia.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24982. Harpe broad basally, tapering to a very narrow neck; cucullus expanded distally. Brachia thick at base, slender, pointed distally. Tegumen broader than long. Aedeagus strongly curved distally; manica a long, low ridge dorsally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24983. Ostium very small, opening from a sclerotized conical structure, the latter at the base of a deep cleft in the 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae very short, membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100805.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (23 Jan 1968), 1 paratype, same data as holotype, and 1 paratype, Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968.

This species is similar to admirandus but is more heavily marked.

Asymphorodes lucerna, new species

FIGURES 174, 302g

Alar expanse 10–11 mm.

Labial palpus light buff; second segment suffused fuscous on outer side; third segment grayish fuscous anteriorly. Antenna light buff. Head light buff, dorsally suffused grayish. Thorax drab; metascutum with thornlike processes. Forewing ground color drab; both thorax and forewing lustrous; cilia drab. Hindwing pale grayish basally, darker toward apex; cilia drab. Foreleg light buff; tibia and tarsal segments fuscous on outer side. Midleg and hindleg light buff. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally, buff ventrally, lightly infuscated; 6th, 7th and 8th segments of male modified.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24990, 24991. Harpe broad basally; neck moderately narrow; cucullus slender basally then broadly expanded distally. Brachia broad basally but slender for most of their length, curved. Tegumen shorter than broad. Aedeagus moderately thick, curved, with a small hook dorsoapically; manica with a very long, curved process dorsally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24994. Ostium small, round, emerging from a sclerotized domelike structure, the latter situated in a shallow U-shaped excavation in the posterior edge of the 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae membranous, from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix finely granular in posterior third, lightly rugose in anterior two-thirds.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100806.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (27 Mar 1968), 1 and 1 paratypes with identical data.

Although similar in superficial appearance to acerbus, the antenna is of light buff in lucerna but bronze gray in acerbus, and lucerna is a much larger moth. The male genitalia seem to indicate that lucerna is closely related to valligera.

Asymphorodes phalarogramma, new species

FIGURES 175, 302h

Alar expanse 14 mm.

FIGURE 174.—Asymphorodes lucerna, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum; d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum; f, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 175.—Asymphorodes phalarogramma, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

Labial palpus light buff. Antenna grayish fuscous; scape pale ochraceous buff. Head pale ochraceous buff, slightly darker laterally. Thorax pale ochraceous buff; tegula brownish drab, lustrous. Forewing ground color brownish drab, lustrous; in middle of cell an oval whitish spot; cilia concolorous. Hindwing grayish; cilia concolorous. Foreleg light buff; tibia and tarsal segments blackish fuscous on outer side; midleg light buff; tibia and tarsal segments with slight grayish suffusion; hindleg light buff; tibia with grayish blotch on outer side distally. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally; buff ventrally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24992. Ostium small, emerging from a sclerotized conical process, the latter at the base of a V-shaped excavation in the posterior edge of the 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae membranous, shorter than bursa copulatrix, from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix rugose in anterior three-quarters.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100807.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, trail to Mt. Feani, 2000 ft (610 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (20 Feb 1968).

Similar in appearance to lucerna, phalarogramma has a whitish spot in the middle of the cell, lucerna has none and phalarogramma has a grayish fuscous antenna, that of lucerna is light buff.

Asymphorodes leucoloma, new species

FIGURES 176, 303a

Alar expanse 12 mm.

Labial palpus light buff; second segment suffused grayish fuscous on outer side; third segment almost wholly overlaid fuscous. Antenna fuscous. Head drab; face buff. Thorax drab, lustrous. Forewing ground color drab, lustrous; from slightly beyond base to apical third, costa narrowly edged with sordid buff; cilia drab. Hindwing sordid white basally, slightly darker toward apex; cilia very pale gray. Foreleg buff; femur, tibia, and tarsal segments blackish fuscous on outer side; midleg missing (similar ?); hindleg pale buff; tarsal segments suffused grayish. Abdomen fuscous dorsally, but somewhat lighter posteriorly, shining buff ventrally.

FIGURE 176.—Asymphorodes leucoloma, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24993. Ostium small, emerging from a short, heavily sclerotized ring, the latter situated at the base of a broadly U-shaped excavation in seventh sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae membranous, ribbonlike. Bursa copulatrix membranous, finely spiculate anteriorly.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100808.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa. Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (1 Mar 1968).

This species is similar to both lucerna and phalarogramma but both lack the pale costal streak. The female of leucoloma can be distinguished from both of the above by the broad U-shaped excavation of the seventh sternum.

Asymphorodes paraporia, new species

FIGURES 177, 303b

Alar expanse 10 mm.

Labial palpus light buff; third segment fuscous anteriorly. Antenna light buff basally, shading to very pale grayish toward apex and with slightly darker annulations; scape light buff. Head pale buff, warm buff laterally. Thorax warm buff, streaked with pale buff, anteriorly grayish fuscous; male with thornlike processes from metascutum. Forewing ground color pale ochraceous buff largely overlaid with blotches of grayish fuscous; on costa, at two-thirds, a light buff spot followed on costa before apex by another similarly colored spot; on basal angle a fuscous spot; on middle of fold a short, blackish fuscous line; at end of cell a blackish fuscous spot; cilia at tornus pale grayish, shading to pale ochraceous buff along termen. Hindwing dark gray, cilia paler gray with an ocherous tinge basally. Foreleg light buff shaded fuscous on outer side; midleg light buff; tibia with two grayish fuscous dashes on outer side; tarsal segments with ill-defined fuscous dashes on outer sides; hindleg light buff; tibia with grayish fuscous mark on outer side distally. Abdomen fuscous dorsally, light buff ventrally; 6th, 7th, and 8th segments of male modified.

FIGURE 177.—Asymphorodes paraporia, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum; d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum; f, ventral view of female genitalia.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25114. Harpe broad basally; neck short, narrow; cucullus slightly expanded. Brachia of about equal length. Tegumen as long as broad. Aedeagus slender, curved; manica not modified.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25004. Ostium small, round, opening from a sclerotized tube. Seventh sternum folded on the left side with a flap covering the ostial aperture. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae short, about half as long as bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signa two small, irregular, dentate plates.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100809.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (23 Jan 1968) and 1 paratype, Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968.

Although superficially similar to aporia, new species, paraporia is very different in female genitalia having two signa while aporia has none. Moreover, paraporia is a smaller moth than aporia.

Asymphorodes chalcosoma, new species

FIGURES 178, 303c

Alar expanse 8–9 mm.

Labial palpus warm buff; third segment fuscous on outer side. Antenna fuscous. Head fuscous with silvery sheen, face warm buff. Thorax fuscous; tegula with silvery sheen; thornlike processes from metascutum present. Forewing ground color fuscous, lustrous; no definite markings; cilia fuscous. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia concolorous. Foreleg buff; tibia and tarsal segments fuscous on outer side; midleg buff; tibia suffused grayish fuscous on outer side; hindleg buff, the whole leg overlaid fuscous on outer side. Abdomen fuscous above, grayish ventrally with posterior margins of segments buff; 6th, 7th, and 8th segments modified.

FIGURE 178.—Asymphorodes chalcosoma, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum; d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25108. Harpe broad basally; neck slender; cucullus narrow. Brachia curved, slender, of about equal length. Tegumen slightly longer than broad. Aedeagus elongate S-shaped; manica with a shallow keel dorsally.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100810.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (23 Jan 1968) and 1 paratype with identical data as holotype. No females are available.

In general appearance chalcosoma is very similar to lucidus, new species, but is darker and slightly larger. The genitalia are almost identical, but the abdominal segments differ (Figures 170, 178). Moreover, the two species are from different islands.

Asymphorodes aenigma, new species

FIGURES 179, 303d

Alar expanse 10 mm.

Labial palpus buff; third segment fuscous anteriorly. Antenna flagellum fuscous; scape buff, mottled with fuscous. Head crown fuscous with purple reflections and buff scales posteriorly; face buff. Thorax fuscous. Forewing ground color tawny olive; on midcosta a fuscous suffusion; apical third suffused fuscous; cilia grayish fuscous. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia concolorous. Foreleg and midleg warm buff; tibia and tarsal segments fuscous on outer side; hindleg warm buff; tarsal segments suffused fuscous. Abdomen blackish fuscous dorsally; warm buff ventrally.

FIGURE 179.—Asymphorodes aenigma, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25111. Ostium cup-shaped, situated distantly posterior to a shallow excavation in the posterior margin of the 7th segment; lamella postvaginalis rugose. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae slender, membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100811.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (1 Mar 1968).

It is not quite clear to what aenigma is related. At first glance it appears like an oversized lucidus, new species, but is larger and darker.

Asymphorodes montgomeryi, new species

FIGURES 180, 303e

Alar expanse 12 mm.

Labial palpus light buff; third segment suffused fuscous anteriorly. Antenna flagellum gray; scape warm buff; posterodorsally fuscous for its entire length. Head warm buff. Thorax gold color; tegula fuscous; male with thornlike processes from metascutum. Forewing ground color fuscous; on costa at basal third an elongate gold colored mark; at apical third a similar gold mark; dorsum, from base to tornus, narrowly gold colored; cilia grayish fuscous to fuscous. Hindwing dark gray; cilia grayish fuscous. Foreleg cream white; tibia and tarsal segments blackish fuscous on outer side; midleg cream white to light buff; tibia with grayish fuscous blotch on outer side distally; tarsal segments blackish fuscous on outer side; hindleg light buff; tibia with grayish streak on outer side distally; tarsal segments grayish. Abdomen fuscous dorsally, cream white ventrally, segments, 6, 7, 8 of male modified.

FIGURE 180.—Asymphorodes montgomeryi, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum; d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25125. Harpe broad basally; neck short, very narrow; cucullus slightly expanded. Brachia slender, of about equal length, curved. Tegumen shorter than broad. Aedeagus slender, curved; manica with a shallow keel dorsally.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Ootua, 800 m.

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (27–30 Jul 1977).

The pattern of montgomeryi is similar to that of myronotus but is much more golden in hue. The posterior abdominal segments of the male of montgomeryi are greatly modified, not so in myronotus.

I take great pleasure in naming this species for the collector who has contributed substantially to our knowledge of the Marquesan fauna.

Asymphorodes nuciferae, new species

FIGURES 181, 303f,g

Alar expanse 10–12 mm.

Labial palpus light buff shaded pale ochraceous buff on outer side. Antenna ochraceous buff with pale, but slightly darker annulations. Head pale ochraceous buff. Thorax light sayal brown; tegula tipped light buff; thornlike processes from metascutum strongly developed in male. Forewing ground color sayal brown; at basal third a narrow light buff transverse fascia; about midcosta a triangular light buff mark extending to outer discal spot; subapically, an inwardly oblique, light buff fascia extends to tornus; in middle of basal fascia a few fuscous scales, in some specimens forming a distinct discal spot; at end of cell a conspicuous fuscous spot surrounded by light buff scales; in female markings less distinct than in male giving a more mottled appearance (Figure 303g); cilia light buff, but terminal cilia mixed with sayal brown. Hindwing shining light buff; cilia light buff. Foreleg and midleg light buff marked with grayish fuscous; hindleg light buff. Abdomen light buff; 6th tergum, 7th tergum and sternum, and 8th sternum strongly modified (Figure 181).

Male genitalia slide USNM 24645. Harpe broad basally, neck short and very slender; cucullus dilated. Brachia slender, curved, slightly flattened, with small hook at distal end. Tegumen about as broad as long. Aedeagus long, slender, slightly S-shaped with small point at distal end dorsally; manica a long keel dorsally, clothed with strong setae.

Female genitalia USNM 24646. Ostium small round, from base of a broad, deep excavation in 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior edge of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae short, slender. Bursa copulatrix membranous.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100812.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Atuona.

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva, Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Cocos nucifera L.

Under my field note NH9 (Nuku Hiva): Larvae were found on Cocos nucifera skeletonizing the undersides of leaflets in patches. Feeding tube, constructed across skeletonized area or along midrib, made of frass and silk. Only one larva was collected but there was much evidence of feeding. Under field note HO10 (Hiva Oa): Larva skeletonizing under surface of leaflet, feeding beneath a mass of brown frass and silk.

Described from the holotype (Em. 21 Mar 1968), 6 and 12 paratypes as follows: Nuku Hiva: Pakiu Valley, 800–1000 ft (244–305 m), Em. 21 Feb 1968, 25 Mar 1968, 1, 1; Taiohae, 14 Jan 1968, 1; Hiva Oa; Atuona, Em. 18–29 Mar 1968, 5, 10.

The male of this species possesses the thornlike processes of the metascutum as in dimorpha and porphyrarcha.

Asymphorodes favilla, new species

FIGURES 182, 303h

Alar expanse 12 mm.

FIGURE 181.—Asymphorodes nuciferae, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum; d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum; f, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 182.—Asymphorodes favilla, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

Labial palpus buff; second segment dusted with gray on outer side; third segment almost wholly grayish fuscous. Antenna buff; base of flagellum and scape suffused grayish. Head warm buff, lustrous. Thorax warm buff suffused grayish; tegula grayish fuscous anteriorly. Forewing ground color grayish; costa slightly lighter; no markings on wing; cilia pale grayish. Hindwing gray; cilia slightly lighter. Foreleg buff; tibia and tarsal segments grayish fuscous on outer side; midleg buff; hindleg buff; tibia with grayish fuscous distally on outer side. Abdomen fuscous dorsally; buff ventrally.

Female genitala slide USNM 25023. Ostium small, round, emerging from a sclerotized conical structure; lamella postvaginalis formed as a deep pocket on left side. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae slender, membranous, shorter than bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100813.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 2000 ft (610 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (1 Mar 1968).

The folded left side of the 7th sternum over the pocket containing the ostium, suggests a relationship to nuciferae, new species. The two species are widely different in phenotype.

Asymphorodes trichogramma, new species

FIGURES 183, 304a,b

Alar expanse 7–9 mm.

Labial palpus very light buff; second segment with slight grayish suffusion on outer side; third segment grayish anteriorly. Antenna pale ochraceous buff in male; in female, annulated fuscous and light buff; scape light buff. Head light buff with pale ochraceous buff suffusion on crown. Thorax buff to pale ochraceous buff; tegula buffy brown; metascutum of male with prominent thornlike processes. Forewing ground color buffy brown; on costa three light buff outwardly oblique streaks, the second longer than first and third; these streaks separated by parallel blackish fuscous dashes; on costa, before apex, a light buff dash preceeded and followed by blackish fuscous; dorsum, from base to tornus, light buff; termen light buff mixed with a few blackish fuscous marks; cilia light buff to pale ochraceous buff. Hindwing light gray; cilia considerably paler. Foreleg light buff marked fuscous on outer side; midleg similar; hindleg light buff; tibia with two grayish fuscous dashes on outer side; tarsal segments spotted grayish fuscous. Abdomen fuscous dorsally, light buff ventrally; 6th, 7th, and 8th segments of male strongly modified.

FIGURE 183.—Asymphorodes trichogramma, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum; d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum; f, ventral view of female genitalia.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24932, 24933, 24937. Harpe broad basally, constricted distad forming a short, slender neck; cucullus moderately expanded. Brachia stout basally terminating in a sharp point; right brachium broadened and flattened distally. Tegumen as broad as long. Aedeagus S-shaped, slender; manica with dorsal keel.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24934, 24935, 24936, 24938. Ostium very small, round, emerging from an oval sclerotized process, the latter at the base of a deep U-shaped excavation in the posterior edge of the 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae slender, membranous, from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous; spiculate in anterior half.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100814.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Atuona.

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa, Fatu Hiva, Easter Island.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (25 Feb 1968) and 269 paratypes as follows. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 10 Feb to 8 Mar 1968, 55, 180; Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 12–17 Mar 1968, 4, 9; Easter Island: Hanga-Roa, 26–27 May, 1971, 10, 7 Rano-Kao, 21 May 1971, 2 (Peña). Eiao, N. uplands, 400 m, 7 Aug 1977, 2 (Montgomery).

Asymphorodes trichogramma is similar to sphenocopa in general appearance, but the latter species lacks the pale dorsum that is present in the former. Moreover, trichogramma, except for the light colored dorsum, is a much darker moth than sphenocopa.

Although Campos and Peña (1973:225) recorded the presence of the genus Asymphorodes on Easter Island (based on my determination of Peña's material), this is the first specific record for a species of Asymphorodes from that island.

Asymphorodes sericeus, new species

FIGURES 184, 304c–e

Alar expanse 8–10 mm.

Labial palpus white; very slight darkening of third segment distad. Antenna buff; scape white. Head white. Thorax white; prominent, thornlike processes present from metascutum of male. Forewing ground color white; on fold, two ill-defined, small grayish spots; beyond these, two similar spots toward costa; on tornus a large, ill-defined grayish blotch; cilia grayish at tornus, yellowish along termen. Hindwing gray; cilia somewhat paler. Foreleg white; tibia edged with fuscous; tarsal segments fuscous on outer side; midleg and hindleg white. Abdomen fuscous dorsally, buff ventrally; 6th to 8th segments of male strongly modified (Figure 184 c–e).

Male genitalia slides USNM 24829, 24830. Harpe broad basally, very constricted at neck; neck very short; cucullus expanded. Tegumen about as long as broad. Aedeagus of about equal thickness throughout, curved; manica with a long, claviform process dorsally.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24831, 24832. Ostium small, round, emerging from a long tubular structure, the latter set in a deep median excavation of the posterior margin of the 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior edge of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae membranous, arising at posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix mostly membranous, slightly rugose. Signa indicated by a pair of patches of small, thornlike, sclerotized points.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100799.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m).

FIGURE 184.—Asymphorodes sericeus, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum; d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum; f, ventral view of female genitalia.

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (23 Jan 1968), 18 and 61m; paratypes with identical data.

This species is variable, some specimens are immaculate (mostly females) and some are marked with several spots (Figure 304c–e). In using the term “white” in my description I do so with some reservation because the ground color is “off white,” but not buff, and the whole light surface presents a shining, silky aspect.

The segments of the male abdomen are strongly modified and suggest a relationship to circopis and acritopterus, new species, but sericeus exhibits none of the brown markings found in those two species.

Asymphorodes circopis Meyrick

FIGURES 185, 304fg

Asymphorodes circopis Meyrick, 1929a:499; 1934c:349.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:90.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24647, 24649, 24652, 24558,24659. Harpe broad basally, neck very short and slender; cucullus slightly expanded. Brachia sharply bent before middle; right brachium much longer than left and arising from a very broad base. Tegumen about as long as wide. Aedeagus S-shaped, slender; manica with a large triangular keel dorsodistally.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24648, 24650, 24660, 24661. Ostium small, round, emerging from an inverted sclerotized cone, the whole situated in a cuplike structure. Lamella postvaginalis granular. Seventh sternum deeply, but narrowly, incised posteriorly. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior edge of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae slender, sclerotized in posterior half. Bursa copulatrix membranous; very finely spiculate in anterior half.

ORIGINAL MATERIAL.—”. 11–12 mm…Marquesas, Nuku Hiva, 1500 feet, January, beaten from tree and at light; 3 ex.”

LECTOTYPE.—“Lectotype” is marked “Type H.T.,” but it is a “1500 feet Jan. 25, St. George Expedn…C.L. Collenette. Brit. Mus. 1925.” “Asymphorodes circopis Meyr. Tr. Ent. Soc. Lond. 76, p. 499.” Lectotype hereby designated.

Lectotype is in the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, 1500 ft (457 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 20 Jan to 26 Feb 1968, 17, 22, Hiva Oa: Atuona, 10 Feb to 8 Mar 1968, 8, 31.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

This and the following species, A. acritopterus, new species, are indistinguishable superficially. Even the genitalia of the males are similar, but the female genitalia are distinct and the posterior abdominal segments of the males present excellent characters for separation. (Figures 185, 186).

Asymphorodes acritopterus, new species

FIGURES 186, 305a,b.

Alar expanse 8–12 mm.

Labial palpus second segment light buff with fuscous mark at base and a fuscous annulus at apex; third segment fuscous. Antenna fuscous; scape with a small buff spot dorsodistally. Head fuscous; face buff. Thorax and tegula fuscous; thornlike processes from metascutum of male present. Forewing ground color in basal half fuscous overlaid proximally with grayish scales; ground color of outer half mostly grayish; on costa beyond basal patch, a buff spot, this followed by a fuscous subtriangular mark, the latter based on costa, which fuses with a fuscous subquadrate mark at end of cell; along termen a fuscous line with usually three small buff spots along its outer edge; cilia grayish fuscous. Hindwing grayish; cilia a shade lighter. Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg buff, marked with fuscous. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally, ventrally buff; terminal segments of male strikingly modified (Figure 186c–e).

Male genitalia slides USNM 24651, 24662, 24663. Harpe with broad base; neck half as long as basal portion, narrow; cucullus slightly expanded. Brachia bent before middle; right brachium arising from a broad base and curved transversely touching left brachium; right brachium longer than left. Tegumen about as long as broad. Aedeagus S-shaped, slender; manica with subtriangular keel dorsodistally.

FIGURE 185.—Asymphorodes circopis Meyrick: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum; d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum; f, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 186.—Asymphorodes acritopterus, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum, d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum; f, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24664, 24665. Ostium small, round, emerging from a bulbous process set in base of asymmetrical pit in posterior edge of 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior edge of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae membranous anteriorly, strongly sclerotized in posterior half. Bursa copulatrix membranous.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100815.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Omoa.

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (17 Mar 1968), 9 and 23 paratypes all from Fatu Hiva, Omoa, 14 Mar to 10 Apr 1968.

This is very similar to the foregoing, circopis, from which it is distinguished as discussed under that species. All of the specimens of acritopterus were collected at practically sea level, and the species appears to be confined to Fatu Hiva.

Asymphorodes spodogramma, new species

FIGURES 187, 304h

Alar expanse 6–7 mm.

Labial palpus cream white. Antenna pale buff. Head cream white; vertex with slight yellowish cast. Thorax cream white; tegula grayish fuscous. Forewing ground color cream white; from base along fold, a broad, longitudinal, grayish fuscous streak that ends before tornus; at end of cell a fuscous streak; on costa, beyond middle, two slender, outwardly oblique grayish fuscous streaks; termen to apex with scattered grayish fuscous scales; cilia pale buff. Hindwing whitish; cilia pale buff. Foreleg cream white; tibia and tarsal segments marked grayish fuscous; midleg similar but not so strongly marked; hindleg cream white. Abdomen grayish dorsally; ventrally pale buff; 6th, 7th, and 8th segments of male strongly modified.

FIGURE 187.—Asymphorodes spodogramma, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum; d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25141. Harpe broadest at base, neck short and narrow; cucullus moderately expanded. Brachia of about equal length, curved. Tegumen shorter than broad. Aedeagus S-shaped, slender, with a small barb dorsodistally; manica with high keel dorsally.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100821.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Atuona.

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (10 Feb 1968) and 2 paratypes from Atuona, 10 Feb and 3 Mar 1968.

The abdominal segments point to a close relationship between spodogramma and acritopterus, new species, but the latter is a much larger moth (8–12 mm) than the former and acritopterus lacks the longitudinal streak of the forewing, so characteristic of spodogramma.

Asymphorodes balanotis Meyrick

FIGURES 188, 305c–e

Asymphorodes balanotis Meyrick, 1934c:351.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:63.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24235, 24795. Harpe base broad, neck abruptly angled; outer three-fourths sickle-shaped; cucullus broadened. Brachia slender, wavey; right brachium considerably longer than left. Tegumen slightly broader than long. Aedeagus slender, slightly bent distally; manica with deep keel dorsally.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24794, 24796. Ostium emerging from a deep pit in 7th sternum; 7th sternum with deep median cleft; edges of cleft sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior edge of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae very slender. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signa two elongate, dentate plates.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Avaoa Valley.

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

Hiva Oa: Atuona, 12–28 Feb 1968, 3, 3. Ootua, 800 m, 27–30 Jul 1977, 3 (Montgomery). Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11–21 Mar 1968, 5, 7. Eiao: Vaituha (acc. Meyrick, 1934c).

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

The iridescent modified scale patch of the hindwing and the dorsal horny processes from the metascutum distinguish this species () from any other described form. The females of balanotis and those of Microzestis inelegans Meyrick are superficially similar, and might be confused, but the genitalia (Figures 188, 208) easily distinguish the two. Between the 6th and 7th sterna of the female of balanotis there is median, cuplike structure.

Two of our specimens are labeled “beaten from Pandanus tectorius.”

Asymphorodes acerbus Meyrick

FIGURES 189, 305f,g

Asymphorodes acerba Meyrick, 1929a:501.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:33.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24735, 24743. Harpe sharply angled between base and cucullus; cucullus narrow proximally, dilated distally. Brachia broad basally, gradually tapered to a sharp point, right brachium slightly longer than left. Tegumen slightly broader than long. Aedeagus slender, nearly straight; manica with small, weak keel dorsodistally.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24736, 24745, 25132. Ostium a short, sclerotized tube deeply set in a deep excavation of seventh sternum; posterior edge of sternum broadly sclerotized; lamella postvaginalis granular. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior edge of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae very slender, very short. Bursa copulatrix membranous.

ORIGINAL MATERIAL.—”. 9–10 mm…Marquesas, qiesas, Nuku Hiva, Fatu Hiva, January, at light; 2 ex”.

FIGURE 188.—Asymphorodes balanotis Meyrick: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum; d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum; f, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 189.—Asymphorodes acerbus Meyrick: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum; d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum; f, ventral view of female genitalia.

LECTOTYPE.—Female, 9 mm. “Fatu Hiva, Marquesas. At light. 5.1.25. St. George Expedn. C. L. Collenette.” A small white label reads, “Brit. Mus. 1925–488,” and another small one “P616.” A large black–bordered label bears the inscription “Asymphorodes acerba Meyr. Tr. Ent. Soc. Lond. 76, p. 501 (1929). TYPE.” In addition there is the usual round, red-bordered British Museum label with “Type. H. T.” Lectotype hereby designated.

Lectotype is in the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva.

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

This common species is represented in the USNM collection by the following 195 specimens. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 28 Feb 1968, 1. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11–29 Mar 1968, 27, 166; Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 1.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

The preponderance of females is interesting: 6 to 1. This species is primarily a low elevation insect, found only occasionally at higher altitudes.

The thornlike processes of the metascutum of the male are present in acerbus.

Meyrick described this as “dark bronzy-grey” but the ground color in fresh specimens is nearer fuscous with bronzy reflections, as in homosoma, new species.

Asymphorodes porphyrarcha Meyrick

FIGURES 190, 306a

Asymphorodes porphyrarcha Meyrick, 1929a:501.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:255.

Asymphorodes xestophanes Meyrick, 1934c:351.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:328. [New synonym.]

Male genitalia slides USNM 24640, 24643, 24920. Harpe narrow basally, outer half narrow, cucullus rounded. The harpe is strongly ankylosed with lateral fleshy flaps on eighth sternum, each flap with a median point. Brachia twice as long as tegumen, dilated distally. Tegumen sub rectangular. Aedeagus slender, curved; manica dilated distally.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24641, 24642, 24644, Ostium a small sclerotized ring slightly protruding. Seventh sternum deeply cleft posteriorly. Antrum not differentiated. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix on right side. Ductus bursae slender, membranous, about one-third length of bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous with a few fine granules anteriorly.

ORIGINAL MATERIAL.—”f;. 12–14 mm. Marquesas, Hiva Oa, 3500 feet, January, at light or beaten from herbage; 6 ex.”

LECTOTYPE.—Male, 12 mm. “Hiva Oa, Marquesas. At light. 3500 ft., 28.1.25. St. George Expedn. C. L. Collenette.” A small white label reads “Brit. Mus. 1925–488,” and another small one “P574.” A large rectangular, black–bordered label bears the inscription “Asymphorodes porphyrarcha Meyr. Tr. Ent. Soc. Lond. 76. p. 501 (1929) TYPE.” The usual round, red-bordered British Museum label with “Type H. T.” is attached.

Lectotype hereby designated.

Lectotype (porphyrarcha) is in the British Museum (Natural History); holotype (xestophanes) is in the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Hiva Oa, 3500 ft (1067 m) (porphyrarcha); Hiva Oa, Avaoa Valley, 1350 ft (411 m) (xestophanes).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa, Fatu Hiva.

The series before me consists of the following. Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m), 1 Mar 1968, 8, 4. Ootua, 800 m, 27–30 Jul 1977, 1 (Montgomery). Fatu Hiva: Teavapuhiau, Ouia, 750 m, 1–3 Aug 1977, 1 (Montgomery).

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

The male possesses the same thornlike structures of the metascutum as in Asymphorodes dimorpha (Busck, 1914:105) from Hawaii, and as illustrated by Zimmerman (1978, figs. 755, 756, 757). The type of xestophanes in the Bishop Museum is in miserable condition, consisting of one badly rubbed forewing and two hindwings. The head and abdomen are missing. On the basis of the one remaining forewing I place xestophanes in the synonymy under porphyrarcha, and associate the 14 specimens as listed above.

FIGURE 190.—Asymphorodes porphyrarcha Meyrick: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum; d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum; f, ventral view of female genitalia.

Asymphorodes honoria, new species

FIGURES 191, 305h

Alar expanse 11 mm.

Labial palpus missing. Antenna benzo brown with slightly paler annulations. Head benzo brown; face buff. Thorax benzo brown; tegula pale grayish apically; metascutum with prominent thornlike processes. Forewing ground color benzo brown; from basal fifth of costa an irregular, oblique, transverse buff fascia extends to slightly beyond fold; at three fifths of costa an irregular buff blotch crosses end of cell and nearly reaches tornus; in middle of cell a blackish fuscous spot followed at end of cell by a similarly colored but larger elongate spot; subapically on costa a wedge-shaped buff mark and along termen a buff dash; cilia grayish fuscous and benzo brown mixed with a few buff scales. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia slightly lighter. Foreleg buff, strongly marked fuscous on outer side; midleg buff; tibia with three fuscous blotches on outer side; tarsal segments marked fuscous; hindleg buff; tibia with a small fuscous spot at middle and a large blotch distally on outer side. Abdomen fuscous dorsally, buff ventrally; 6th, 7th, and 8th segments of male strongly modified.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24939. Harpe extreme base narrow, then broadened distad ending in a narrowly constricted neck; cucullus broadly expanded. Brachia rather long, curved, pointed. Tegumen broader than long. Aedeagus slender, curved; manica with narrow keel dorsally.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100816.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (3 Apr 1968).

This species reminds one of circopis but the dark basal patch of the forewing of honoria is much shorter than that of circopis. The manica of honoria is much narrower than that of circopis and the terminal abdominal segments of the males are strikingly different as can be seen in the figures. Unfortunately the female of honoria is unknown.

FIGURE 191.—Asymphorodes honoria, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum; d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum.

Asymphorodes phaeodelta, new species

FIGURES 192, 306b

Alar expanse 10–11 mm.

Labial palpus ocherous white; third segment almost wholly blackish fuscous on inner surface. Antenna blackish fuscous and white annulated; scape ocherous white with a small fuscous spot near apex dorsally. Head ocherous white with median ocherous suffusion. Thorax light ochraceous buff; tegula ochraceous tawny. Forewing ground color light ochraceous buff; at basal angle an ochraceous tawny suffusion and a similarly colored short streak on base of costa; from basal fourth to apical fourth of costa a triangular, sayal brown patch based on costa, extends to tornus; in middle of triangular patch, on costa, a light ochraceous buff patch; terminal area of wing sayal brown; on fold, at inner edge of triangle, a small fuscous spot; cilia buff at tornus, remainder brown. Hindwing grayish, paler toward base; cilia light grayish. Foreleg buff; tibia and tarsal segments blackish fuscous on outer side; midleg buff; tibia with fuscous mark proximally and distally on outer side; tarsal segments marked fuscous; hindleg buff; tibia suffused fuscous on outer side; tarsal segments marked fuscous. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally; ocherous white ventrally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24842, 25455. Ostium small, round, emerging from a dome-shaped, sclerotized structure, the latter at the base of a deep excavation in the posterior margin of the 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae slender, membranous, from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous, finely spiculate.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100817.

FIGURE 192.—Asymphorodes phaeodelta, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Taiohae.

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (26 Jan 1968) and 3 paratypes, all from the type-locality, 25 Jan to 5 Feb 1968.

Although the females show distinct annulations of the antennae, the male antennae are probably not annulated, as is the case with some other species.

The relationship of phaeodelta probably lies with the new species group leptotes–nebrias, but can easily be distinguished from those two species by the triangular mark on the costa.

Asymphorodes leptotes, new species

FIGURES 193, 306c,d

Alar expanse 10–12 mm.

Labial palpus light buff; third segment suffused grayish anteriorly. Antenna scape pale orange yellow with fuscous line posteriorly; flagellum grayish fuscous with faint paler annulations. Head pale orange yellow. Thorax pale orange yellow; tegula brown; male with thornlike processes from metascutum. Forewing ground color pale orange yellow; from base, along fold, a blackish fuscous line extends almost to end of cell; beyond the outer end of this line a blackish fuscous spot; base of costa blackish fuscous; slightly beyond middle of costa a blackish fuscous dash followed by a buff dash; underside of forewing blackish fuscous; cilia on outer part of dorsum and tornus grayish, remainder along termen pale orange yellow. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia a shade lighter. Foreleg buff; blackish fuscous on outer side; midleg similar but not strongly marked fuscous; hindleg buff marked on tibia and tarsal segments with fuscous. Abdomen blackish fuscous dorsally; ventrally buff; posterior segments modified (Figure 193 c–e).

Male genitalia slides USNM 24806, 24807. Harpe broad basally; neck very short and slender; cucullus expanded. Branchia slender, sharply pointed, abruptly curved just before middle. Tegumen slightly longer than broad. Aedeagus long, slender, nearly straight; manica with a moderately high keel dorsally.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24800, 24803. Ostium small, round, emerging from a short, sclerotized tube, at base of excavation in posterior margin of 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae short, slender, sclerotized posteriorly. Bursa copulatrix membranous, finely spiculate in anterior half.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100818.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (30 Jan 1968), 3 and 6 paratypes with identical data; and 4, 1 paratypes from Nuku Hiva, Toovii, Ooumu, 900 m, 16–19 Jul 1977 (Montgomery).

The markings on some of the specimens are suffused, or not as well developed as shown in illustrations of the wings (Figure 306c,d).

This, and bipunctatus, new species, might be confused as indicated under bipunctatus. The two occur together but can most readily be distinguished by the terminal abdominal segments of the males.

Asymphorodes mediostriatus, new species

FIGURES 194, 306e

Alar expanse 11–12 mm.

Labial palpus light buff; third segment fuscous anteriorly. Antenna scape light buff; flagellum brown basally shading to fuscous distally. Head light buff, side tufts light orange yellow. Thorax light orange yellow; tegula fuscous; thorax of male with thornlike processes from metascutum. Forewing ground color light orange yellow; from base to apex a blackish fuscous longitudinal stripe; on base of costa a blackish fuscous mark, and similarly colored marks on midcosta and on costa before apex; in some specimens the basal mark and the one on midcosta are joined and confluent with the median longitudinal line; on dorsum a few blackish fuscous scales in some specimens; in middle of cell a discal spot is sometimes indicated by a ring of light buff scales around a blackish fuscous spot; underside of forewing blackish fuscous; cilia light grayish fuscous at tornus, light orange yellow toward apex. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia slightly lighter. Foreleg light buff; femur with blackish fuscous dash on outer side; tibia and tarsal segments blackish fuscous on outer side; midleg and hindleg light buff; hind femur with grayish suffusion distally on outer side. Abdomen fuscous dorsally, buff ventrally; 6th tergum, 7th tergum and sternum, and 8th sternum of male strongly modified (Figure 194c–e).

FIGURE 193.—Asymphorodes leptotes, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum; d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum; f, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 194.—Asymphorodes mediostriatus, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum; d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum; f, ventral view of female genitalia.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24797. Harpe broad basally, abruptly narrowed at neck; neck very short; remainder of harpe sickle-shaped; cucullus slightly expanded. Brachia broad basally, abruptly narrowed and very weak, terminating in a small hook; right brachium slightly longer than left. Tegumen shorter than broad. Aedeagus relatively short, slightly longer than tegumen; manica with a long, curved dorsal process clothed with setae distally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24798. Ostium small, round, at the base of a peculiar cavity on the left side of the 7th sternum. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae slender, about half the length of bursa copulatrix, sclerotized on posterior half. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signa two rugose, narrow plates.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100819.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (23 Jan 1968), 5 and 5 paratypes as follows: Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 5, 3; Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 2.

This is one of the few species in the genus that have signa, an unusual feature. It is similar in coloring to semiluteus, new species, but is a larger moth and easily distinguishable on genitalia.

Asymphorodes nebrias, new species

FIGURES 195, 306f,g

Alar expanse 8–11 mm.

Labial palpus ochraceous buff; second segment with grayish fuscous apical annulus; third segment grayish fuscous on outer side. Antenna grayish fuscous with slightly paler annulations; scape ochraceous buff. Head ochraceous buff with median grayish suffusion. Thorax ochraceous buff; tegula grayish fuscous basally; male with thornlike processes from metascutum. Forewing ground color ochraceous buff; at base of costa a grayish fuscous mark and a similar mark at basal angle; at base of fold a grayish fuscous streak; in middle of cell a short grayish fuscous dash, and at end of cell a similarly colored spot; much of wing marked by grayish suffusion; cilia grayish fuscous at tornus, remainder ochraceous buff. Hindwing gray; cilia slightly lighter. Foreleg buff; outer side blackish fuscous; midleg and hindleg buff. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally; buff ventrally; 6th, 7th, and 8th segments of male strongly modified (Figure 195c–e).

Male genitalia slides USNM 24839, 24840, 24845, 24846, 24945, 24946, 24957, 24959, 24961, 25120. Harpe about one-third longer than brachia and tegumen combined; broad basally, neck very short; cucullus expanded. Brachia slender, curved, slightly longer than tegumen. Tegumen slightly broader than long. Aedeagus moderately slender, sharply curved about middle; manica with no appreciable modification.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24841, 24848. Ostium small, round, emerging from a sclerotized tube, the latter set at the base of a deep, median excavation in the 7th abdominal sternum. Lamella postvaginalis a large granular patch. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae slender, threadlike, from near posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous, somewhat thickened and slightly rugose anteriorly.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100820.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m).

FIGURE 195.—Asymphorodes nebrias, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum; d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum; f, ventral view of female genitalia.

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (23 Jan 1968) 11 and 9 paratypes with identical data.

In some specimens the dark markings of the forewing are more contrasting than in the holotype (Figure 306g).

In coloration nebrias is similar to bipunctatus, new species and leptotes, new species, but is easily distinguishable on genitalia.

There is considerable variation in the posterior margin of the 6th tergum of the males, varying from a bluntly pointed median projection to one that is broadly truncate as shown in Figure 195.

Asymphorodes phaeochorda Meyrick

FIGURES 196, 307a–c

Asymphorodes phaeochorda Meyrick, 1929a:499; 1934c:350.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:244.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24858, 24859, 24869, 24870, 24893, 24895, 24896, 24897, 24905, 24906, 24911. Harpe broad and short basally; neck short, slender; cucullus slightly dilated distally. Brachia rather slender, bent proximally; right brachium longer than left. Tegumen broader than long. Aedeagus somewhat S-shaped; manica indicated mainly by setae dorsally.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24813, 24814, 24860, 24861, 24894, 24907, 24908. Ostium small, round. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous.

ORIGINAL MATERIAL.—”. 9–10 mm…Marquesas, Nuku Hiva, Hiva Oa, Tahuata, Fatu Hiva, up to 1200 feet, January, at light; 35 ex.”

LECTOTYPE.—Female, 7 mm. “Nuku Hiva, Marquesas. At light, 21.1.25 St. George Expedn. C. L. Collenette.” A small white label reads “Brit. Mus. 1925–448.” A black-bordered, rectangular label bears the inscription “Asymphorodes phaeocorda [sic] Meyr. Tr. Ent. Soc. Lond. 76. p. 499, 1929. Type .” Also, there is the usual red-bordered, round British Museum label “Type. H. T.,” plus a small white one with “P559.” Slide JFGC No. 11993. Lectotype hereby designated.

Lectotype is in the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva.

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

Our series consists of 509 specimens as follows. Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 13 Jan to 1 Feb 1968, 57, 265. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 12 Feb to 5 Mar 1968, 29, 108. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11 Mar to 8 Apr 1968, 7, 38. Eiao: N. uplands, 400 m, 7 Aug 1977, 1, 4 (Montgomery).

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Meyrick recorded this species, undoubtedly the commonest in the islands, from Eiao, Tahuata, Uahuka, Hatutu, Hiva Oa, and Fatu Hiva, up to an elevation of 2460 feet (750 m). It should be noted that most of our material of this species was taken practically at sea level, very little at high elevation.

The males of phaeochorda possess prominent thornlike processes from the metascutum. Also, the 6th, 7th, and 8th segments of the abdomen are strongly modified (Figure 196 c–e) and indicate a close relationship to leptotes, new species, and circopis.

Asymphorodes plectographa Meyrick

FIGURES 197, 306h

Asymphorodes plectographa Meyrick, 1929a:498.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:252.

Male genitalia slide JFGC 11998. Harpe very narrow basally, strongly curved; cucullus expanded. Right brachium broad basally, tapering to a sharp point; left brachium, curved slightly, broadened distally. Tegumen short, broad. Aedeagus moderately slender, curved; manica with shallow keel dorsally.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, 3500 ft (1067 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

The holotype is the only specimen known of this species. (For modifications of the 6th and 7th terga and 8th sternum, see Figure 197a–d.)

FIGURE 196.—Asymphorodes phaeochorda Meyrick: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum; d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum; f, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 197.—Asymphorodes plectographa Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with right side removed, with left side of 8th sternum attached and brachia to right; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum; d, 7th tergum and sternum.

Asymphorodes ochrogramma, new species

FIGURES 198, 307d

Alar expanse 10–12 mm.

Labial palpus buff; second segment fuscous on outer side; third segment with fuscous subapical annulus. Antenna fuscous, annulated pale ochraceous buff basally; scape pale ochraceous buff. Head mixed gray and pale ochraceous buff. Thorax fuscous mixed with pale ochraceous buff; metascutum of male with thornlike processes. Forewing ground color fuscous; near basal fifth of costa an irregular, oblique, ill-defined, pale ochraceous-buff fascia extends to fold; from middle of costa a slender, outwardly oblique pale ochraceous-buff line extends to end of cell where it joins a black dot; on costa, before apex, a small pale ochraceous-buff dash; inside termen two pale ochraceous-buff dashes; on fold, about middle, a black spot; some scattered pale ochraceous-buff scales over most of wing; cilia grayish at tornus, fuscous along termen. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia concolorous toward apex, paler toward base. Foreleg pale ochraceous buff; tibia black on outer side; tarsal segments marked with black, midleg similar but not so strongly marked; hindleg pale ochraceous buff; tibia with two blackish fuscous blotches on outer side; tarsal segments marked blackish fuscous on outer side. Abdomen fuscous dorsally, buff ventrally with a fuscous spot on each segment laterally; 6th, 7th, and 8th segments of male strongly modified (Figure 198c–e).

Male genitalia slides USNM 24753, 24754. Harpe base short and broad; neck very short, slender; cucullus dilated. Brachia long, slender, curved. Tegumen longer than broad. Aedeagus slender, slightly curved; manica with a shallow, triangular keel dorsodistally.

FIGURE 198.—Asymphorodes ochrogramma, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 6th tergum; d, 7th tergum and sternum; e, 8th sternum; f, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24755, 24756. Ostium small, round, emerging from a domelike structure, the latter with a posteroventral thornlike process; lamella postvaginalis a very broad granular area. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae lightly sclerotized in posterior half. Bursa copulatrix membranous, finely and sparsely spiculate in anterior half.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100798.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (30 Jan 1968), 3 and 49 paratypes with identical data, and 2 paratypes from Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968. Also, 27 paratypes from Nuku Hiva, Toovii, Ooumu, 900 m, 16–19 Jul 1977 (Montgomery).

This species shows an obvious relationship to several species (e.g., trichogramma, phaeochorda) through the modifications of the posterior abdominal segments of the males (Figures 183, 196). The species are quite different in appearance, and there should be no difficulty in identifying the various taxa.

Genus Labdia Walker

Labida Walker, 1864 [1856–1866]:823.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Labdia deliciosella Walker, 1864 [1856–1866]:823; by monotypy.

Labdia dicyanitis Meyrick

FIGURES 199, 307e

Labdia dicyanitis Meyrick, 1934c:347.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:116; 1971:157, fig. 126, pl. 21f.

TYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Marquesas Islands, Uahuka, Hane Valley, 30 ft (9.14 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands, Rapa.

In addition to the record of the type series from Uahuka we record the following. Nuku Hiva: Pakiu Valley, 1800 ft (548 m), 19–28 Jan 1968, 1, 2. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 11–27 Feb 1968, 1, 7; trail to Mt. Feani, 2000 ft (610 m), 1 Mar 1968, 1; 2200 ft (670 m), 20 Feb 1968, 1; Tahauku, 26 Feb 1968, 1, 1. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11–30 Mar 1968, 10, 81; Omoa Valley, 16 Mar to 9 Apr 1968, 4, 2; Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 1; Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 1, 1.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

As can be seen by the record, this species is very common in the Marquesas; and in all probability it will be found on most of the islands. The great preponderance of females (95 to 20) is an interesting phenomenon.

There is a great variation in size, not confined to one or the other sex, which leads me to suspect that the larva may be a borer or leafminer.

Herlinda, new genus

TYPE-SPECIES.—Herlinda phaeoxantha, new species; by present designation. The gender of the generic name is feminine.

Antenna serrate in male, simple in female, about four-fifths length of forewing; scape with pecten. Labial palpus, upturned, divergent, not reaching vertex; second segment slightly roughened anteriorly; third segment acute, about as long as second. Head smooth, covered with tightly appressed scales; ocellus absent. Thorax smooth. Posterior tibia roughened with hairlike scales. Forewing smooth, lanceolate, 11 veins, 1b simple, 1c absent; 2 and 3 coincident; 4 distant from 2 + 3; 5 absent, or faintly indicated; 6 and 7 stalked out of 8, 7 to costa slightly before apex; 8 obsolete at base or approximate to 9; 10 from well before 9; 11 from middle of cell. Hindwing with 8 veins, but 2, 3, 4, and 5 weakly indicated; 6 and 7 stalked, 7 to costa; hairpencil present (in male) on underside, from near base, fitting into fold along cell.

Male genitalia asymmetrical.

Female genitalia signum absent.

FIGURE 199.—Labdia dicyanitis Meyrick: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus in situ; b, ventral view of female genitalia.

This genus may be distinguished from Microzestis Meyrick (1929a:501) by the absence of vein 1 c of the forewing and the simple vein 1 b.

I am assigning four very small new species to this genus: phaeoxantha, iota, fasciola, and oligoria. There are some very slight differences in venation and labial palpi, but I think the species are so similar that they belong together.

Herlinda fasciola, new species

FIGURES 200, 307f

Alar expanse 6 mm.

Labial palpus white; basal two-thirds of second segment fuscous; third segment with three fuscous annuli. Antenna cream white barred with fuscous for most of its length; scape cream white marked with fuscous dorsally. Head cream white with fuscous scales laterally. Thorax fuscous; tegula white apically; in male, thornlike processes from metascutum present. Forewing ground color fuscous; from basal fifth of costa an outwardly oblique, broad, white fascia extends to dorsum; at end of cell a fuscous spot broadly surrounded by white scales; slightly before tornus, on dorsum, a white blotch; cilia cream white. Hindwing very pale gray; cilia concolorous. Foreleg cream white; tibia and tarsal segments marked blackish fuscous on outer side; midleg cream white; tibia and tarsal segments barred with blackish fuscous; hindleg cream white; tibia with two fuscous marks on outerside. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally; ventrally cream white; 8th sternum modified.

Male genitalia slides USNM 25121, 25122. Harpe broad basally; neck very slender, short; cucullus slightly expanded. Brachia of about equal length, slender, curved. Tegumen broader than long. Aedeagus slender, strongly curved; manica with shallow keel dorsally.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100823.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Omoa.

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (14 Mar 1968) and 1 paratype with identical data.

At first glance fasciola might be confused with iota, new species, but iota lacks the distinct fascia of the forewing found in fasciola. Moreover, the aedeagus of fasciola is longer, more slender, and more strongly curved than that of iota. The 8th sterna are markedly different (Figures 200, 201).

Two females from Hiva Oa, Atuona, 24 Feb 1968, are superficially indistinguishable from the males of fasciola, but their genitalia differ from each other and there is no way of associating either of them with the males.

Herlinda iota, new species

FIGURES 201, 307g,h

Alar expanse 6–7 mm.

Labial palpus white; second segment blackish fuscous in basal half on outer side; third segment with black basal and median bands and black apex. Antenna flagellum grayish; scape white with black median spot dorsoposteriorly. Head white. Thorax white with a few blackish scales mixed posteriorly; tegula white with scattered blackish scales anteriorly. Forewing ground color white; extreme base of costa gray; from near base of costa an ill-defined outwardly oblique blackish bar; from middle of costa to slightly before tornus an outwardly oblique, broken, black fascia, often reduced to a series of spots; at end of cell a black dot; beyond this dot a dusting of blackish scales; cilia sordid white. Hindwing pale grayish; cilia a shade lighter. Foreleg white, heavily overlaid blackish on outer side; midleg white with longitudinal black streaks on tibia and tarsal segments; hindleg sordid white. Abdomenon sordid white, suffused grayish dorsally; ventrally sordid white with median grayish tinge.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24721, 25105. Harpe very broad basally, sharply angled to a short, narrow neck; cucullus moderately expanded. Brachia unequal; left brachium broadly expanded and flattened distally; right brachium stout basally, abruptly narrowed, pointed. Tegumen shorter than broad. Aedeagus strongly curved; manica with dorsal protuberance.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100825.

FIGURE 200.—Herlinda fasciola, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 8th sternum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Taiohae.

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (28 Jan 1968) and 7 paratypes from the same locality 14 Jan to 4 Feb 1968.

Similar in size to Asymphorodes balanotis, this species lacks the dark coloring of that species. Moreover, iota has a white forewing marked with contrasting blackish spots.

Herlinda oligoria, new species

FIGURES 202, 308a

Alar expanse 5–6 mm.

Labial palpus second segment black except white apex; third segment white except black median annulus and apex. Antenna flagellum buff and blackish annulated; scape buff with black apex. Head white. Thorax white with a few blackish scales posteriorly; tegula white with some blackish scales anteriorly. Forewing ground color white sparsely irrorate black; near base, inside costa, a blackish spot; at basal fifth of costa a smaller, less distinct, similar spot; at middle of costa an outwardly oblique, short black dash; subapically, on costa, a conspicuous black blotch; in middle of cell a conspicuous black spot, and at end of cell a similar one; subterminally a slender, interrupted, black line; cilia white. Hindwing very pale grayish; cilia whitish. Foreleg white, heavily overlaid blackish fuscous; midleg white, marked blackish fuscous on outer side of tibia and tarsal segments; hindleg sordid white; terminal tarsal segment with blackish spot. Abdomen sordid white with median grayish suffusion dorsally and ventrally.

FIGURE 201.—Herlinda iota, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 8th sternum.

FIGURE 202.—Herlinda oligoria, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, 8th sternum.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25106. Harpe broad basally; neck narrow; cucullus slightly expanded. Brachia equal in length, rather slender, curved. Tegumen shorter than broad. Aedeagus short, curved; manica with low keel dorsally.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100824.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Atuona.

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (24 Feb 1968) and 1 paratype with same data except dated 23 Feb 1968.

This species is very similar to iota, new species. The second segment of the labial palpus is almost entirely black and the third segment lacks the basal black annulus found in iota. Furthermore, there is no dark tornal spot of the forewing of oligoria as in iota. In the male genitalia of oligoria the brachia are of equal length, and the left brachium is not flattened and expanded distally as in iota.

Each is confined to a single island.

Herlinda phaeoxantha, new species

FIGURES 203, 308b

Alar expanse 7 mm.

Labial palpus light ochraceous buff; second segment with conspicuous clay color blotch in basal half on outer side; third segment with clay color blotch at middle on outer side. Antenna ochraceous buff with fuscous spots. Head light ochraceous buff with some fuscous scales laterally. Thorax light ochraceous buff strongly overlaid fuscous. Forewing ground color light ochraceous buff with fuscous irroration over most of the wing; on middle of costa an elongate fuscous shade with two spots of clear ground color invading it on costal edge; a fuscous blotch subapically; cilia light ochraceous buff with a slender line of fuscous scales along termen to apex. Hindwing pale grayish; cilia lighter with yellowish tinge. Foreleg pale ochraceous buff; tibia and tarsal segments blackish fuscous on outer side; midleg pale ochraceous buff; tibia with a fuscous blotch proximally and another distally on outer side; two similar spots on tarsal segments; hindleg pale ochraceous buff; tibia with grayish fuscous shade proximally and distally on outer side. Abdomen fuscous dorsally, light buff ventrally, suffused grayish fuscous.

FIGURE 203.—Herlinda phaeoxantha, new species: a, venation of right wings; b, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; c, aedeagus; d, 8th sternum.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25152. Harpe broad basally; neck slender, moderately long; cucullus slightly expanded. Brachia unequal; left brachium stout, pointed; right brachium slender, evenly curved, pointed. Tegumen slightly longer than broad. Aedeagus distal half at right angles to basal half.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100826.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, trail to M. Feani, 2200 ft (670 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (20 Feb 1968).

Probably nearest to iota, new species, but entirely different in coloring, lacking any of the basic white ground color of that species.

Adeana, new genus

TYPE-SPECIES.—Labdia leucoxantha Meyrick, 1927a:87; by monotypy and present designation. The gender of the name is feminine.

Antenna simple, slightly thicker in male than in female, about four-fifths the length of forewing; scape with pecten. Labial palpus slender, recurved, exceeding vertex; third segment acute, slightly longer than second. Head smooth, covered with tightly appressed scales; ocellus absent. Tongue well developed, heavily scaled. Thorax smooth. Posterior tibia roughened above with hairlike scales. Forewing smooth, lanceolate, costa nearly straight, termen strongly oblique, apex produced, 11 veins; 1b simple; 1c absent; 2 distant from 3; 3 and 4 coincident; 5 out of the stalk of 7 and 8; 6 out of 7; 7 to costa; 9 from near end of cell; 10 equidistant from 9 and 11; 11 from beyond middle of cell. In the male there is a patch of modified scales from the underside of the tornal area obscuring the venation. Hindwing with 8 veins; 2, 3, 4 about equidistant; 5 connate with the stalk of 6 and 7; 7 to costa.

Male genitalia asymmetrical; uncus and socius absent.

Female genitalia ostium protruding, signum absent.

This genus is closely related to Asymphorodes but 1b of forewing of Adeana is simple, that of Asymphorodes is furcate; veins 3 and 4 of forewing are coincident in Adeana, separate in Asymphorodes. The genitalia are quite different also; the males have a distorted left brachium and the females have a prominent protruding ostium in Adeana. Both these characters are lacking in Asymphorodes. Adeana is also closely related to Labdia but differs from it by the coincidence of veins 3 and 4 and the simple vein 1b of forewing.

Adeana leucoxantha (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURES 204, 205, 308c,d

Labdia leuxoxantha Meyrick, 1927a:87; 1934c:347.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]: 187.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24633, 24634, 25109. Harpe very slender, reaching to or beyond right brachium; cucullus narrow. Right brachium twice as long as tegumen, terminating in a slender hook; left brachium broad, divided into two arms distally, the outer arm a strongly curved hook. Prospicuous long and slender. Tegumen about as wide as long, strongly sclerotized. Aedeagus short, bulbous proximally.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24632, 25110. Ostium strongly protruding (Figure 204), sclerotized distally. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae long and slender, membranous. Bursa copulatrix finely spiculate in anterior two-thirds.

ORIGINAL MATERIAL.—”.10–11 mm…Upolu, Mulifanau, November; 1 ex. Also 3 from Ellice Islands (Nui and Faunafuti), September.”

LECTOTYPE.—Female, 11 mm. Labeled “Cotype.” “S. Pacific, Ellice Is., Nui, 21.1×.1924, P.A. Buxton and G.H. Hopkins.” A small white label reads “Brit. Mus. 1927–119.” An additional label has the following: “Labdia leucoxantha Meyrick, Det: E. Meyrick.” Lectotype hereby designated.

Lectotype is in the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Ellice Islands, Nui.

DISTRIBUTION.—Ellice Islands, Samoa, Tahiti, Marquesas Islands.

Our series of leucoxantha consists of 95 specimens as follows. Nuku Hiva: Pakiu Valley, 1800 ft (548 m), 17 and 28 Jan 1968, 2; Taiohae, 14 Jan to 4 Feb 1968, 1, 4. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 8 Feb to 7 Mar 1968, 7, 23; Puamau, 8 Feb 1968, 7, 2; Tahauku, 26 Feb 1968, 1. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11 Mar to 9 Apr 1968, 19, 16; Omoa Valley, 16–25 Mar 1968, 5, 6; Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m), 3 Apr 1968, 1; Hanavave, 12 Apr 1968, 1.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Meyrick had the habit of seldom selecting or marking a type, so all of the specimens listed by Meyrick in the original description are eligible for lectotype selection. One of the specimens from the Ellice Islands was incorrectly marked as “type” and this specimen lacks the abdomen. Consequently, I have selected a as lectotype as indicated above.

FIGURE 204.—Distribution map of Adeana leucoxantha (Meyrick).

FIGURE 205.—Adeana leucoxantha (Meyrick): a, venation of right wings; b, ventral view of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; c, aedeagus; d, 8th tergum; e, 8th sternum; f, ventral view of female genitalia.

Genus Iressa Clarke

Iressa Clarke, 1971:159.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Iressa neoleuca Clarke, 1971:159; by monotypy and original designation.

Iressa neoleuca Clarke

FIGURES 206, 308e,f

Iressa neoleuca Clarke, 1971:159.

HOLOTYPE.—In the National Museum of Natural History.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Rapa, Haurei.

DISTRIBUTION.—Rapa, Marquesas Islands, Tahiti.

From the Marquesas Islands I have before me the following. Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 14 Jan 1968, 1. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 12–29 Feb 1968, 2; 29 Feb 1968, 1 Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11 Mar to 10 Apr 1968, 19, 49; Omoa Valley, 20–21 Mar 1968, 2.

In addition to those above, and those recorded from Rapa (Clarke, 1971:162) we have 4, 6 from Tahiti: from Fautaua River, 17–24 Oct 1961, 2, 1; Pamatal, 1000 ft (304 m) 1–7 Jan 1968, 2, 5.

Iressa microsema, new species

FIGURES 207, 308g

Alar expanse 7 mm.

Labial palpus second and third segments blackish fuscous except apices, which are light buff. Antenna light buff, spotted with blackish fuscous, except apically wholly blackish fuscous; scape light buff with blackish fuscous spot dorsally at apex. Head fuscous; posterolaterally light buff; face light buff. Thorax fuscous mixed with buff scales. Forewing ground color fuscous; from basal fifth of costa a slender, outwardly curved light buff streak; from middle of costa a small, slender, wedge-shaped light buff spot; from apical fifth of costa a light buff wedge-shaped spot; in fold, about basal fourth, a tiny light buff spot; along termen three irregular light buff spots; cilia fuscous. Hindwing gray; cilia concolorous. Foreleg light buff; tibia and tarsal segments blackish fuscous on outer side; midleg light buff; tibia and tarsal segments spotted with blackish fuscous on outer side; hindleg light buff; tibia suffused grayish on outer side; tarsal segments marked fuscous. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally; light buff ventrally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25115. Ostium small, round, emerging from a sclerotized cylinder; lamella postvaginalis lightly rugose. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae threadlike, about half as long as bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signum absent.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100822.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Omoa.

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (18 Mar 1968) and 1 paratype from Omoa, 12 Mar 1968.

Although dissimilar in appearance to Iressa neoleuca the type of the genus, microsema belongs here structurally.

Genus Microzestis Meyrick

Microzestis Meyrick, 1929a:501.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Microzestis inelegans Meyrick, 1929a:502; by monotypy.

In Meyrick's description of this genus he states “Ocelli posterior;” but I have not been able to find an ocellus in our long series. He states further, “Antennae…scape elongate, without pecten.” The scape does have a pecten. In the forewing 1c is present; the base of 6 and 9 are obsolete. In the hindwing vein 7 is not apparent, vein 6 running to costa then back to termen.

Microzestis is very closely related to Asymphorodes and has an identical type of genitalia. The only appreciable differences between the two lie in the absence of vein 1c of the forewing of Asymphorodes and the stalked veins 6 and 7 of hindwing of latter genus.

FIGURE 206.—Iressa neoleuca Clarke: a, venation of right wings: b, lateral view of head and labial palpus; c, ventral view of male genitalia with aedeagus and 8th sternum in situ; d, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 207.—Iressa microsema, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

Microzestis inelegans Meyrick

FIGURES 9, 208, 309a–d

Microzestis inelegans Meyrick, 1929a:502.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]: 170.

ORIGINAL MATERIAL.—”. 5–7 mm…Marquesas, Tahuata, Hiva Oa, to 850 feet, January, at light; 9 ex.”

LECTOTYPE.—Female, 5 mm. “Tahuata, Marquesas. At light, 850 ft., 12-1-25, St. George Expedn. C.L. Collenette.” A small white label reads “Brit. Mus. 1925–488” and another “P634.” A large black-bordered, rectangular label bears the inscription “Microzestis inelegans Meyr. Tr. Ent. Soc. Lond. 76, p. 501, 1929 Type .” Also there is a round red-bordered label with “Type H.T.” Lectotype hereby designated.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24804, 25034. Harpe very broad basally; neck short, cucullus with thick patch of setae near base. Brachia stout and sharply curved basally; left brachium broad and flat distally. Tegumen shorter than broad. Aedeagus moderately slender, sharply curved distad; manica with shallow keel dorsally.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24805, 25025, 25033. Ostium small, round, emitted from a short tubular process. Cleft in posterior margin of seventh segment narrow, V-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix rugose and granular in anterior two-thirds.

Lectotype is in the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Tahuata.

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

Our series of this common species consists of 286 specimens as follows. Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 17 Jan to 5 Feb 1968, 40, 43 Pakiu Valley, 800 ft (244 m), 31 Jan to 4 Feb 1968, 3. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 12 Feb to 5 Mar 1968, 16, 49. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11–20 Mar 1968, 67, 68. Tahuata: (Meyrick, 1929a).

FOOD.—Algae?

The larvae of this moth construct flat webs on the surfaces of rocks (Figure 9) and apparently feed on algae, or some other minute plant life, under the webs. The species is common but we were able to rear only a few specimens.

FIGURE 208.—Microzestis inelegans Meyrick: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia; d, 8th sternum.

Genus Anatrachyntis Meyrick

Anatrachyntis Meyrick, 1915b:325 [type-species: Gracilaria? falcatella Stainton, 1859:121; by original designation].

Sathrobrota Hodges, 1962:73 [type-species: Batrachedra rileyi Walsingham, 1882:198; by original designation].

Zimmerman (1978:1040) properly indicated the synonomy of Anatrachyntis and showed that Pyroderces Herrich-Schäffer is a distinct genus based on genitalia. Pyroderces is also distinct from Anatrachyntis as can be demonstrated by the forewing venation: in Anatrachyntis veins 2 and 3 are closely approximate and parallel; 2, 3, and 4 are well separated and equidistant in Pyroderces.

The species included below consistently have veins 2 and 3 closely approximate and parallel as in the type of the genus. Vein 6 of the forewing of species of Anatrachyntis is usually well preserved, but in some specimens it is weakly indicated or obsolete.

Although Zimmerman (1978) placed the three species he included in Anatrachyntis his figure 732 appears to be incorrect. He illustrates a single vein where 2 and 3 of forewing should be. 1 have seen his slide and can only conclude that his specimen is aberrant.

Anatrachyntis incertulella (Walker)

FIGURES 209, 309e

Gelechia incertulella Walker, 1864 [1856–1866]:658.

Pyroderces incertulella (Walker).—Meyrick, 1929a:497.—Viette, 1949a:318.—Swezey, 1954:146.

Stagmatophora (Proterocosma) incertulella (Walker).—Walsingham, 1907:515, pl. 15: fig. 20.

Aeoloscelis aulacosema Lower, 1904:172.

Stagmatophora (Proterocosma) tridigitella Walsingham, 1907:515.

Pyroderces subcarnea Meyrick, 1924c:553.

Anatrachyntis incertulella (Walker).—Clarke, 1971:150, fig. 122, pl. 19h.—Zimmerman, 1978:1044, figs, 734, 735, 740,741.

TYPES.—In the British Museum (Natural History) (incertulella, tridigitella, subcarnea); in the South Australian Museum (aulacosema).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Sandwich Islands (Hawaii) (incertulella); Rapa (tridigitella); Rodriguez Id. (subcarnea); MacKay, Queensland (aulacosema).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hawaiian Islands, Australia, Fiji, Pitcairn, Austral Islands, Okinawa, Tahiti, Marquesas Islands.

Our records from the Marquesas are as follows. Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 17 Jan to 6 Feb 1968, 1, 2 Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 1. Toovii, Ooumu, 900 m, 16–19 Jul 1977, 1 (Montgomery). Hiva Oa: Atuona, 16–28 Feb 1968, 3, 2 Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m), 20 Feb 1968, 3. Fatu Hiva: Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 3, 8; Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 4, 17; Omoa, 17 Mar 1968, 1; Omoa Valley, 5 Apr 1968, 2. Teavapuhiau, Ouia, 2437 ft (750 m), 1–3 Aug 1977, 1 (Montgomery).

FOOD PLANT.—Pandanus tectorius Parkinson, and probably other species of Pandanus.

Undoubtedly, this species will be found wherever Pandanus grows.

Anatrachyntis megacentra (Meyrick)

FIGURES 210, 309f

Pyroderces megacentra Meyrick, 1923b:59.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]: 198.—Bradley, 1961:147.

Anatrachyntis megacentra (Meyrick).—Clarke, 1971:153, fig. 123, pl. 191.

TYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fiji, Dreketi River.

DISTRIBUTION.—Fiji, Rapa, New Guinea, Java, Solomon Islands (Guadalcanal), Marquesas Islands.

The following were collected in the Marquesas. Hiva Oa: Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m), 20 Feb 1968, 1. Fatu Hiva: Mr. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 3; Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 1, 5; Omoa Valley, 5 Apr 1968, 1.

FIGURE 209.—Anatrachyntis incertulella (Walker): a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus in situ; b, disarticulated harpes with aedeagus and prospicuus; c, tegumen and brachia; d, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 210.—Anatrachyntis megacentra (Meyrick): a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus in situ; b, oblique view of female genitalia.

FOOD PLANTS.—Pandanus spp., larva in flowers also in dried fruits and fruitstalks.

As can be seen, altitude is no barrier to the distribution of this species in the islands. In Rapa (Clarke 1971:155) all specimens of megacentra were found virtually at sea level. None of the specimens collected in the Marquesas was reared, but the species apparently feeds on species of Pandanus growing at high elevations, in addition to Pandanus tectorius Parkinson, which grows at low level on the islands.

In the Rapa paper (Clarke, 1971, fig. 123b) I figured the ventral view of the female genitalia, but in this work I am illustrating the oblique view to show the protruding ostium.

Anatrachyntis cyma (Bradley), new combination

FIGURES 211, 309g

Stagmatophora cyma Bradley, 1953:112, figs. 6, 7.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fiji, Vitti Levu, Lami, Suva.

DISTRIBUTION.—Fiji, Marquesas Islands.

Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 19 Jan 1968, 1; Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 1. Toovii, Ooumu, 2925 ft (900 m), 18–19 Jul 1977, 1 (Montgomery). Hiva Oa: Ootua, 2600 ft (792 m), 27–30 Jul 1977, 1 (Montgomery). Fatu Hiva: Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 7, 9; Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 2, 1; Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m), 3 Apr 1968, 1. Teavapuhiau, Ouia, 813 ft (350 m), 1–3 Aug 1977, 1 (Montgomery).

FOOD PLANT.—Pandanus sp. (male flowers).

Bradley (1953) described this species from Fiji and placed it in the genus Stagmatophora. A careful examination of the characters, particularly the venation, convinces me that cyma belongs with Anatrachyntis incertulella (Walker) and A. megacentra (Meyrick). The larvae of all three species attack the inflorescence or fruits of Pandanus. Moreover, the genitalia are structurally similar, further evidence of their close relationship.

Anatrachyntis lunulifera (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURES 212, 309h

Pyroderces lunulifera Meyrick, 1934c:347.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]: 192.

Pyroderces similis Bradley, 1953:112, figs. 2, 3.

Anatrachyntis similis (Bradley).—Clarke, 1971:150, fig. 121, pl. 23a.

TYPES.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum (lunulifera); in the British Museum (Natural History) (similis).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Marquesas Islands, Fatu Hiva, Vaikoao, Oomoa, 1600 ft (487 m) (lunulifera); Fiji, Viti Levu, Lami, Suva (similis).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fiji, Rapa, Marquesas Islands.

Our series of lunulifera is from the following localities. Nuku Hiva; Taiohae, 20 Jan 1968, 1; Pakiu Valley, 1800 ft (548 m), 17–28 Jan 1968, 3, 3. Toovii, Ooumu (900 m), 16–19 Jul 1977, 6, 1 (Montgomery). Hiva Oa: Atuona, 27 Feb 1968, 1; Mt Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m), 20 Feb 1968, 1. Ootua, 2600 ft (792 m), 27–30 Jul 1977, 1, 3 (Montgomery). Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11 Mar to 5 Apr 1968, 6, 37; Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 7, 7; Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 18 , 46; Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m), 3 Apr 1968, 4, 5. Teavapuhiau, Ouia, 2460 ft (750 m), 1–3 Aug 1977, 6, 10 (Montgomery).

Meyrick (1934c:348) records this species also from the islands of Eiao, Tahuata, and Uapou, all in the Marquesas.

FOOD PLANT.—Pandanus (ex male flowers).

I have compared slides of the genitalia from our series of similis with those from our series of the Marquesan lunulifera and they are identical. Also, I have compared the genitalia of specimens from our Rapa series with those of the type of similis.

FIGURE 211.—Anatrachyntis cyma (Bradley): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe removed and aedeagus in situ; b, lateral outline of male genitalia; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 212.—Anatrachyntis lunulifera (Meyrick): a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus in situ; b, ventral view of female genitalia.

Clarke (1971, fig. 121) figures the genitalia, but they are repeated here for the sake of completeness.

Genus Trissodoris Meyrick

Trissodoris Meyrick, 1914a:775.—Clarke, 1965 [1955–1970]:550, pl. 271:figs. 1–lc; 1971:147, figs. 21, 119, pl. 20e,f.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Stagmatophora honorariella Walsingham, 1907:515, pl. 15: fig. 21; by original designation.

Trissodoris honorariella (Walsingham)

FIGURES 213, 214, 310a,b

Stagmatophora honorariella Walsingham, 1907:515, pl. 15: fig. 21.

Trissodoris honorariella (Walsingham).—Meyrick, 1914a:776; 1927a:92.—Fletcher, 1929:17.—Meyrick, 1934c:348.—Sweezey, 1942b:212.—Bradley, 1957:100.—Clarke, 1965 [1955–1970]:550, pl. 271: figs. 1–1c; 1971:147, figs. 21, 119, pl. 20e,f.—Inoue et al., 1982, 1:272, 2:107, pl. 227: fig. 19.

Trissodoris honorielle [sic:] Viette, 1949a:318.

Stagmatophora quadrifasciata Walsingham, 1907:516, pl. 15: fig. 22.

Trissodoris quadrifasciata (Walsingham).—Meyrick, 1914a:776; 1927a:92.—Sweezey, 1954:146.—Bradley, 1957:100.

TYPES.—In the British Museum (Natural History) (honorariella, quadrifasciata).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Pitcairn Island (honorariella); New Guinea (quadrifasciata).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hawaii, Pitcairn Island, Fiji, Samoan Islands, New Hebrides, Australia, Buru, Sarawak, Sri Lanka (Ceylon), Marquesas Islands, Tahiti, New Guinea, Caroline Islands, Japan.

From the Marquesas we have the following. Nuku Hiva: top of Pakiu Valley, 1800 ft (548 m), Em. 2 Feb 1968, 1, and 19 Jan 1968, 1; Taiohae, 26 Jan 1968, 1. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 15 Feb to 14 Mar 1968, 15, 14; trail to Mt. Feani, 2500 ft (762 m), 20 Feb 1968, 1. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 4 Mar to 6 Apr 1968, 1, 9. Eiao: N. uplands, 400 m, 7 Aug 1977, 1, 1 (Montgomery).

FOOD PLANTS.—Pandanus spp.

Clarke (1971, fig. 119) figures the genitalia of this species, but the figures are repeated here for completeness. The species is common, particularly at low elevations, and is widely distributed throughout the Pacific.

Melnea, new genus

TYPE-SPECIES.—Ascalenia armigera Meyrick, 1923b:60; by monotypy and present designation. The gender of the generic name is feminine.

Antenna about three-fourths the length of the forewing, serrulate and short ciliated in male, filiform and short ciliated in female; scape without pecten. Labial palpus slightly more than twice as long as head; second and third segments of nearly equal length; second segment slightly dilated distally; third sharply pointed. Tongue well developed, heavily scaled basally. Head with tightly appressed scales; ocellus absent. Thorax smooth. Posterior tibia roughened above with scales. Forewing smooth, lanceolate, costal and dorsal edges convering toward apex, termen strongly oblique, 12 veins; 1b furcate; 2 and 3 approximate toward base, parallel; 4 remote from 3; 5 and 6 nearly parallel, obsolete toward base; 7 and 8 stalked, 7 to apex; 8 to costa; 9 approximate to base of stalk of 7 and 8; 10 nearer to 9 than to 11; 11 from middle of cell. Hindwing with 8 veins; 2, 3, and 4 widely separated; 4, 5, closely approximate toward base; base of 5 obsolete; 6 and 7 stalked, 6 to termen well before apex; 7 to apex; 8 very short, to costa near base.

Male genitalia asymmetrical; uncus rudimentary; socius absent.

Female genitalia ostium lateral; signa present; ovipositor apparently developed for piercing.

This genus appears to be most closely related to the North American Synploca Hodges (1964:295) but differs in several respects. In the forewing of Synploca vein 6 is out of the stalk of 7 and 8, but in Melnea 6 is separate and 5 is separate and not connate with the stalk of 7 and 8 as in Synploca. In the hindwing veins 6 and 7 are obsolete in Synploca, stalked in Melnea, and vein 8 reaches well out on costa in Synploca but reaches costa near base in Melnea.

FIGURE 213.—Distribution map of the genus Trissodoris Meyrick.

FIGURE 214.—Trissodoris honorariella (Walsingham): a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus in situ; b, ventral view of female genitalia.

In the male genitalia the harpes of Synploca are symmetrical but in Melnea they are asymmetrical. Moreover, the aedeagus of Melnea is not massive as in Synploca.

The ostium of Melnea opens laterally (almost dorsolaterally) but that of Synploca is ventral.

Melnea armigera (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURES 215, 310c

Ascalenia armigera Meyrick, 1923b:60.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:55.—Bradley, 1961:148.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24000, 24970. Harpes asymmetrical; right harpe broad at base, costa arched; cucullus narrow with 4 stout setae dorsally; left harpe broad at base, costa arched; cucullus slender, with a finger-like process at base ventrally, with four stout setae near apex dorsally, and a strong seta at base dorsally. Uncus rudimentary. Vinculum broad, irregular. Tegumen arched; posteriorly a triangular area with a strong seta on each side. Anellus an elongate sclerotized plate. Aedeagus slender, S-shaped.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24971, 24972. Ostium oval, opening laterally. Inception of ductus seminalis from ductus bursae posteriorly. Ductus bursae membranous, rather broad. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signa two small dentate plates.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fiji, Labasa.

DISTRIBUTION.—Fiji, Solomon Islands, Tahiti, Marquesas Islands.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

We obtained only two specimens in the Marquesas: Nuku Hiva, Taiohae, 27 Jan 1968, 1, and 19 Jan 1968, 1. Also, before me are 9 specimens from Tahiti, Punaauia, Bel Air Hotel, 5–7 Jan 1968, 2, 4; Faaa, Pamatal, 1000 ft (304 m), 1 Jan 1968, 1, 2.

In addition to the above I have a specimen from Koror, Palau (Micronesia) Townes No. 1243) that appears to be armigera, but it is darker than the other specimens I have examined.

As far as I am able to ascertain the records from Nuku Hiva, Tahiti, and Palau are the first outside of Fiji and the Solomons.

Genus Cosmopterix Hübner

Cosmopterix Hübner, 1825 [1816–1826]: 424.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Tinea zieglerella Hübner 1805–1810 [1796–1838], pl. Tinea 44: fig. 306. (Opinion 866, 1969: 150–151.)

Key to the Species of Cosmopterix

Cosmopterix ceriocosma (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURES 216, 310e

Labdia ceriocosma Meyrick, 1934c:347.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:80.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24637, 25496. Harpe narrow basally, with short sclerotized ridge; cucullus broad, clothed with fine setae. Right brachium greatly developed, distally greatly broadened; left brachium undeveloped. Prospicuus well developed, curved, distal half clothed with setae. Tegumen nearly twice as long as broad. Anellus an irregular, sclerotized plate ankylosed with aedeagus. Aedeagus stout, widest about middle, truncated distally.

FIGURE 215.—Melnea armigera (Meyrick): a, ventral view of male genitalia with aedeagus in situ; b, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 216.—Cosmopterix ceriocosma (Meyrick): a, ventral view of male genitalia with one harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24636, 25497. Ostium oval, emerging from posterior end of a raised diamond–shaped sclerotized area. Antrum not differentiated. Inception of ductus seminalis from near posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae slender, membranous, except for a pair of small sclerotized patches at junction with bursae copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix granular, signa two small, oval plates, each with a central tooth. In association with the female genitalia, the seventh sternum bears two conspicuous pairs of deciduous, modified scales.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Omoa.

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva, Hiva Oa.

Hiva Oa: Atuona, 26 Feb 1968, 1. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 14 Mar to 8 Apr 1968, 2, 4.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Aside from the genitalia, the most outstanding distinguishing feature of ceriocosma is the series of black strigulae on the outer half of the costa of forewing.

Cosmopterix nonna, new species

FIGURES 217, 310f

Alar expanse 16 mm.

Labial palpus blackish fuscous with median longitudinal white stripe; second segment sordid white on inner side. Antenna blackish fuscous spotted with white; well before apex a broad and a narrow white band; apex white; scape with a longitudinal white stripe. Head blackish fuscous; face bronze. Thorax blackish fuscous; tegula edged white. Forewing ground color blackish fuscous; from base of costa a slender white stripe turns inward to cell and ends at middle of dark basal part of wing; on fold a very slender white longitudinal dash; between fold and dorsum a similar dash; beyond the dark basal half of wing, a broad light ochraceous-buff area preceded by a silvery white border and followed by a transverse fascia of the same color; at base of the ochraceous-buff area, in costal third, a small black spot; at outer edge of this light area, on costa and at tornus, some fuscous scaling; outer apical area attenuated, blackish fuscous with median, longitudinal, silvery white stripe; cilia grayish fuscous to fuscous. Hindwing fuscous; cilia grayish. Legs ocherous white marked with blackish fuscous. Abdomen blackish fuscous dorsally, paler ventrally.

FIGURE 217.—Cosmopterix nonna, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25495. Ostium small, round, from the posterior end of a narrow sclerotized sac. Antrum not differentiated. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae slender, membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous with very slight granulation. Signa two large round plates each with a marginal tooth.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100848.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (1 Mar 1968).

This handsome species might at first be confused with C. ceriocosma (Meyrick) but is easily distinguished from it, not only by the genitalia, but by the absence of the black strigulae on the outer part of the costa of forewing. Moreover, ceriocosma is found at low elevation (near sea level) but, apparently, nonna occurs at higher altitudes. This is the largest of the Marquesan species of Cosmopterix.

The species of Cosmopterix have an antennal pecten consisting of a single, elongate scale. This single scale is easily lost, and in the case of nonna, this scale is missing from the unique specimen.

Cosmopterix diandra, new species

FIGURES 218, 310g

Alar expanse 10–13 mm.

Labial palpus striped blackish fuscous and white. Antenna blackish fuscous with a white stripe for most of its length, three terminal segments white, preceded by six blackish fuscous segments, the latter preceded by two white, two blackish fuscous and two more white segments; scape with buff longitudinal stripe dorsally. Head sepia with fine median and lateral whitish lines. Thorax sepia with fine median whitish line; tegula sepia with inner edge whitish. Forewing ground color sepia; at outer two-thirds a broad, transverse, pale ochraceous buff band shading to light ochraceous buff outwardly; on the inner margin of this transverse band a silver spot at costa and a similar spot dorsally, the latter narrowly edged by black scales; on the outer edge of the transverse band two, sometimes confluent, silver spots each with a cluster of black scales at inner edge; from outer edge of the transverse band a median whitish line extends to apex; fold a white line; between fold and costa two slender whitish longitudinal lines, the second based on costa; between fold and dorsum a short longitudinal whitish dash; cilia grayish to sepia except at apex, whitish. Hindwing fuscous; cilia grayish fuscous. Fore-, mid-, and hindlegs pale ochraceous buff mixed with white and streaked with fuscous. Abdomen covered with dull golden scales dorsally, pale ochraceous buff ventrally, with whitish silvery scales laterally at the posterior margins of the segments. Female abdomen with tufts of short, stout scales ventrolaterally.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24966. Harpe stout basally, cucullus broadly expanded. Right brachium large, stout, terminating in a thick curved process; left brachium very short, triangular. Prospicuous slender, short. Tegumen longer than broad. Aedeagus bulbous basally, short, stout.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24967. Ostium small, round, emitted from a long protruding process. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior margin of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae long, slender membranous. Bursa copulatrix long, oval, profusely and coarsely granular. Signum absent.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100827.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m).

FIGURE 218.—Cosmopterix diandra, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, semilateral view of female genitalia with detail of bursa to left.

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (30 Jan 1968), 10 and 11 paratypes as follows. Nuku Hiva: Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 6, 5; Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 3, 6; Fatu Hiva: Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 1.

This species is similar to Cosmopterix aculeata Meyrick (1909:419) from Sri Lanka (Ceylon), but the fold is white for its entire length, and the two median stripes are much broader (X3); on the inner edge of the subapical transverse band are two short, broad, silver metallic bars without any indication of the outer black spots that are found in aculeata.

Cosmopterix melanarches Meyrick

FIGURES 219, 310h

Cosmopterix melanarches Meyrick, 1929a:497.—Viette, 1949a:318.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]: 198; 1971:155, fig. 124, pl. 21e.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Raiatea (Society Islands).

DISTRIBUTION.—Raiatea, Rapa, Marquesas Islands.

Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 13 Jan to 5 Feb 1968, 2, 3. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 12–14 Feb 1968, 4, 1. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 1 Mar to 9 Apr 1968, 14, 7.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown, probably a grass.

None of the Marquesan specimens was taken in association with cow dung as they were on Rapa. The specimens listed above were taken at light.

The genitalia are repeated here for completeness. I wish to point out that the prospicuous on the left side of the male genitalia was omitted to avoid confusion of structures.

Acanthophlebia, new genus

TYPE-SPECIES.—Acanthophlebia argentea, new species, by monotypy and present designation. The gender of the generic name is feminine.

Antenna serrate, finely ciliate (); scape with pecten. Labial palpus slender, recurved, greatly exceeding vertex; third segment slightly longer than second, acute. Head smooth, clothed with tightly appressed scales; ocellus absent. Tongue well developed, heavily scaled. Thorax smooth; posterior tibia slightly roughened with loosely appressed scales. Forewing smooth, lanceolate, costa nearly straight, termen strongly oblique, apex pointed, 11 veins; 1b simple at base, terminating in a broad, shallow, curved pit with a strong spine at end, near margin of wing on underside; 1c present; 2 from angle of cell; 3 and 4 coincident and approximate to 2; 5 obsolete; 6 and 7 stalked, 7 to costa; 8 and 9 out of stalk of 6 and 7; 10 closer to 11 than to 9; 11 from slightly beyond middle of cell. Hindwing very narrow with reduced venation; cell open; 3 + 4? apparently present; 6 and 7 stalked, 7 to apex; on underside of wing, near margin, a coarse spine.

Male genitalia asymmetrical; uncus and socius absent.

Female genitalia unknown.

This genus is closely related to Asymphorodes and Adeana but is distinguished from both by the greatly reduced venation of the hindwing.

The peculiar spines on the undersides of the wings, undoubtedly confined to the male, are probably found only in this genus. These spines can be seen with a moderately low powered binocular microscope without denuding the wings.

Acanthophlebia argentea, new species

FIGURES 220, 308h

Alar expanse 5 mm.

Labial palpus second segment dusky neutral gray on outer side with a white spot at apex, silvery on inner surface; third segment black with longitudinal white stripe. Antenna black with grayish annulations; scape black with a white spot near base and one at apex dorsally. Head dark neutral gray with a white stripe laterally. Thorax brassy with silver metallic dorsolateral line; tegula brassy. Forewing ground color black; basal fourth of costa broadly silver metallic; from basal angle a silver metallic streak extends to about one-third; between these two silver marks an elongate patch of brassy scales bordered on each side by a slender black line, the metallic marks show blue or violaceous iridescence; from about middle of costa a silver metallic fascia, with blue or violaceous reflections, extends to dorsum; at apical fourth a similar fascia; cilia gray at tornus, black along termen to apex. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia slightly paler. Foreleg femur and tibia lustrous gray; tarsal segments black; two basal tarsi with white tips; midleg similar; hindleg metallic black; tibia with white spot at middle and at apex; two white spots on tarsi. Abdomen black; 8th sternum slightly modified.

FIGURE 219.—Cosmopterix melanarches Meyrick: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus in situ; b, harpe with prospicuus attached; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 220.—Acanthophlebia argentea, new species: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, venation of right wings; d, 8th sternum (dashed line indicates missing parts of specimen).

Male genitalia slide USNM 25139. Harpe broad basally, neck hardly differentiated, very short; cucullus narrow distally. Brachia long, curved, dilated distally. Tegumen shorter than wide. Aedeagus slender, S-shaped; manica with a high keel dorsally.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100828.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Omoa.

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the unique holotype (11 Mar 1968).

This species brings to mind the American Fabiola tecta Braun (1935:45) but argentea is a smaller species and has a blue or violaceous iridescence in the apical half of the forewing lacking in tecta.

Family BLASTOBASIDAE

Genus Blastobasis Zeller

Blastobasis Zeller, 1855:171.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Oecophora (Scythris) phycidella Zeller, 1855:171; subsequent designation by Walsingham and Durrant, 1907:47.

Blastobasis inana (Butler)

FIGURES 221, 310d

Gracilaria inana Butler, 1881:404 [No. 44].

Blastobasis inana (Butler).—Walsingham, 1907:648, pl. 25: fig. 3.—Swezey, 1910:141.—Zimmerman, 1978:992, figs. 696–699.

Blastobasis explorata Meyrick, 1918b:158.

TYPES.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Honolulu (inana); Pusa, Bengal, India (explorata).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hawaiian Islands, India, Marquesas Islands.

From the Marquesas we have 97 specimens from three islands. Nuku Hiva: Taiohae 19 Jan to 1 Feb 1968, 3, 1. Hiva: Oa: Atuona, 10 Feb to 22 Mar 1968, 21, 52; Tahauku, 26 Feb 1968, 1. Ootua, 800 m, 27–30 Jul 1977, 1 (Montgomery). Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 10 Mar to 5 Apr 1968, 6, 12.

FOOD PLANTS.—Garden beans (Swezey): coffee berries, dead sugar cane, Dioscorea (yam) Zimmerman; Eugenia uniflora L.

Nearly all of our specimens were collected at light. The one specimen reared from Eugenia was from a larva that was feeding in a mass of mature and dried fruits in company with larvae of Strepsicrates holotephras (Meyrick), Asymphorodes coesyrias Meyrick, and an unidentified phycitid.

This is the first record of the occurrence of this species in the Marquesas Islands, and I am indebted to Zimmerman's figures (vide ante) for the determination. The strong spine from the base of the inner face of the harpe is a distinguishing feature.

Family HELIODINIDAE

Genus Lissocnemitis Meyrick

Lissocnemitis Meyrick, 1934c:352.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Lissocnemitis argolyca Meyrick, 1934c:352; by monotypy.

Lissocnemitis argolyca Meyrick

FIGURES 222, 311a,b

Lissocnemitis argolyca Meyrick, 1934c:352.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]: 53; 1971:182, pl. 24f.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24227, 24999, 25001. Harpe with small loop at base of costa; sacculus narrowly sclerotized; cucullus narrowly rounded. Gnathos a long, pointed process. Uncus elongate, bluntly pointed, clothed with stout setae. Vinculum triangular. Tegumen bulbous basally, narrowed at middle, then broadened to base of uncus. Anellus triangular, with posteromedian hump. Aedeagus stout, pointed distally.

Female genitalia slides USNM 25000, 25002, 25003. Ostium very broad, transverse, slitlike. Antrum broadly sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis at end of convoluted bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae short, broad. Bursa copulatrix a posteroventral irregular sac, anteriorly long and convoluted. Signum a small sclerotized plate.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Atuona Valley.

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands, Rapa.

Our series contains the following. Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 5 Feb 1968, 1; Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 1; Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 1. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 15–24 Feb 1968, 1, 1; Mt. Feani, 3400–3800 ft (1036–1158 m), 20 Feb and 1 Mar 1968, 22, 22. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 14 Mar to 10 Apr 1968, 4; Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 mar 1968, 1.

FIGURE 221.—Blastobasis inana (Butler): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 222.—Lissocnemitis argolyca Meyrick: a, male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

The holotype was collected 6 July 1929 (by Mumford and Adamson) and is in fair condition. Fortunately, the abdomen was intact.

A and 2 from Mt. Feani are considerably larger than the average, and show some grayish streaks (Figure 311b).

Family IMMIDAE

Genus Imma Walker

Imma Walker, 1859 [1856–1866]: 195.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Imma rugosalis Walker, 1859 [1855–1856]: 195; by monotypy.

Key to the Species of Imma

Imma philomena, new species

FIGURES 223, 311c

Alar expanse 23 mm.

Labial palpus ochraceous buff; third segment slightly infuscated anteriorly on outer side; third segment brownish gray. Antenna ochraceous buff basally, shading to brownish distally. Head ochraceous buff. Thorax brownish gray. Forewing ground color brownish gray; from slightly beyond middle of costa, a slender, outwardly oblique, broken, irregular blackish fuscous line extends to tornus; terminal line blackish fuscous; cilia warm buff. Hindwing light grayish fuscous, darker toward termen; cilia light buff. Foreleg, midleg, and hindleg ochraceous buff. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally, ochraceous buff ventrally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24918. Ostium funnel-shaped. Antrum sclerotized laterally. Inception of ductus seminalis anterior from the ductus bursae. Ductus bursae very long, coiled; posteriorly there is a slender sclerotized rod about one-fourth the length of the ductus. Bursa copulatrix very finely granular, slightly thickened at the beginning of the ductus bursae. Signum absent.

FIGURE 223.—Imma philomena, new species, ventral view of female genitali.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Tahuata, 200 ft (61 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Tahuata.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (13 Jan 1925, C.L. Collenette).

This species is closely related to ochrilactea and catapsesta but is much darker (brownish gray) than either; and philomena occupies a different island, often an important factor is distinguishing species.

Unfortunately, the single specimen available is a female and the female genitalia are not very helpful, usually, in separating the closely related species of these islands.

Imma ochrilactea Meyrick

FIGURES 224, 311d

Imma ochrilactea Meyrick, 1934c:353.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:222.

Alar expanse 23 mm.

Labial palpus light ochraceous buff; third segment apex slightly darker. Antenna light ochraceous buff basally becoming darker toward apex. Head, thorax, and forewing ground color light ochraceous buff; transverse fascia of forewing faintly indicated from slightly beyond middle of costa, outwardly oblique toward, but not reaching, tornus; terminal line very slender, brownish; cilia pale ochraceous buff. Hindwing very pale grayish, darker and more brownish toward margins. Fore-, mid-, and hindlegs pale ochraceous buff; tarsal segments slightly darker.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24917. Ostium funnel-shaped, rather broad. Inception of ductus seminalis from ductus brusae. Ductus bursae very long, coiled; posteriorly, there is a slender sclerotized rod on inner surface extending to first loop. Bursa copulatrix very finely granular, more heavily so where ductus bursae enters.

FIGURE 224.—Imma ochrilactea Meyrick, ventral view of female genitalia.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa.

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Under the description of Imma semiclara Meyrick (1929a:503) Meyrick stated that “two large females are peculiar; one from Hiva Oa, 24 mm., has fore-wings, uniform whitish-ocherous, transverse line only faintly indicated, terminal line distinct, hindwings grey-whitish, towards termen grey;…”

Later, Meyrick (1934c:353) named this moth ochrilactea without further description. I have given a brief description following Ridgeway Color Standards (1912) hence the discrepancies in the color descriptions.

Several species, ochrilactea, assita, new species, philomena, new species, and catapsesta are closely related, but ochrilactea is much paler in coloring than the others. Unfortunately, only a single female of ochrilactea is available for study. Because of its pale washed-out appearance there remains the question of whether or not it is distinct from some of the others; the female genitalia are of little help.

Imma semiclara Meyrick

FIGURES 225, 311e

Imma semiclara Meyrick, 1929a:503.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:283; 1969 [1955–1970]:155, pl. 77: figs. 1–1b.—Heppner, 1982:271.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24666. Harpe narrow basally, broadening toward cucullus; cuculus broad, outer margin concave; clasper long, exceeding outer margin of cucullus. Vinculum U-shaped. Tegumen highly arched. Anellus two very lightly sclerotized elongate plates, the tip of each clothed with setae. Aedeagus simple, long, slender, bulbous proximally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24667. Ostium small, round. Inception of ductus seminalis at about two-thirds length of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae membranous, very long, convoluted; some granulation anteriorly. Bursa copulatrix granular. Signum indicated by a concentration of granules in wall of bursa copulatrix.

FIGURE 225.—Imma semiclara Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

TYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, at 100 ft (305 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

The specimens before me are from Nuku Hiva: Taiohoe, 16 Jan to 5 Feb 1968, 4, 5. Toovii, Ooumu, 900 m, 16–19 Jul 1977, 1 (Montgomery).

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

In addition to Nuku Hiva, Meyrick recorded this species from Hiva Oa and Tahuata. We did not find it on Hiva Oa and, judging by the behavior of other members of the genus, perhaps Meyrick had a mixed series. Although most specimens are recorded from near sea level, the Montgomery specimen indicates that altitude is no barrier to the distribution of this insect, at least on Nuku Hiva.

Imma gloriana, new species

FIGURES 226, 311f,g

Alar expanse 22–24 mm.

Labial palpus light ochraceous buff; second and third segments shaded with grayish anteriorly. Antenna buckthorn brown. Head light ochraceous buff anteriorly, somewhat darker posteriorly. Thorax raw umber with some ochraceous buff scales anteriorly. Forewing ground color raw umber; extreme edge of costa pale ochraceous buff; from slightly beyond middle costa to dorsum slightly before tornus a distinct, irregular, slender, light buff line bordered outwardly by a narrow fuscous shade; subterminal line indicated by a series of small buff spots; terminal line very fine, fuscous; cilia raw umber; underside of forewing mostly light ochraceous buff. Hindwing fuscous, paler basally, cilia yellowish to light buff; underside of hindwing mostly light ochraceous buff; Fore-, mid-, and hindlegs light ochraceous buff; tarsal segments of midleg spotted grayish. Abdomen pale olive buff dorsally, chamois ventrally; anal tuft of male black.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24670. Harpe broad, broadest at cucullus; distal edge of cucullus very slightly convex; clasper strong, slightly curved, pointed, extending beyond outer edge of cucullus. Vinculum broadly U-shaped. Tegumen short, broad, rounded distally. Anellus two very light sclerotized plates, each distally pointed and clothed with setae. Aedeagus slightly longer than tegumen and vinculum combined, S-shaped, bulbous proximally.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24671, 24921. Ostium small, round. Inception of ductus seminalis from well forward from ductus bursae. Ductus bursae membranous; granular where it joins the bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix finely granular. Signum small, round, formed by a concentration of granules.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100829.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva, Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (23 Jan 1968), and 2 paratypes as follows. Nuku Hiva: Toovii, Ooumu, 900 m, 16–19 Jul 1977, 1 (Montgomery). Fatu Hiva: Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 1.

Although gloriana looks very different from semiclara, it is, obviously, more closely related to it than to any of the other Marquesan species. Both exhibit a broad harpe with clasper extending beyond the outer margin of cucullus. In the females both lack the sclerotized rod in the wall of the ductus bursae posteriorly, and both have a signum.

Imma feaniensis, new species

FIGURES 227, 311h

Alar expanse 24–26 mm.

Labial palpus light ochraceous buff, suffused brownish; second segment buffy brown anteriorly; third segment buffy brown. Antenna buffy brown, slightly paler basally. Head light buffy brown. Thorax buffy brown with a light ochraceous buff spot posteriorly; apex of tegula slightly lighter. Forewing ground color buffy brown; from slightly beyond middle of costa outwardly to dorsum slightly before tornus, an irregular, indistinct, fuscous transverse line; subterminal line ill-defined, indicated by a few short brownish dashes; terminal line slender, blackish fuscous; underside with light buff streak; cilia wood brown. Hindwing fuscous with a longitudinal light buff streak; underside light buff except margins; cilia pale ochraceous buff. Fore-, mid-, and hindlegs light buff suffused grayish. Abdomen grayish buffy brown dorsally, buff ventrally.

FIGURE 226.—Imma gloriana, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 227.—Imma feaniensis, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24674. Harpe narrow basally, broadening to a truncated cucullus; outer two-thirds of sacculus clothed with an elongate patch of modified scales; clasper strong, curved, pointed, not reaching terminal edge of cucullus. Vinculum U-shaped. Tegumen rounded posteriorly. Anellus two elongate, lightly sclerotized plates, each clothed with setae terminally. Aedeagus long, slender, slightly curved, bulbous proximally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24675. Ostium very small, oval. Inception of ductus seminalis at about posterior third of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae very long, convoluted, membranous; posteriorly, a short, slender sclerotized rod on inner wall. Bursa copulatrix granular. Signum indicated by concentration of granules of bursa wall.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100833.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (20 Feb 1968) and 2 paratypes with identical data.

This species appears to be closely related to gloriana, new species, but feaniensis has a pale streak on the hindwing, absent in gloriana, and the transverse line of the forewing of gloriana is more sharply defined than that of feaniensis.

Imma rotia, new species

FIGURES 228, 312a,b

Alar expanse 24–26 mm.

Labial palpus dusky brown. Antenna brown basally shading to light ochraceous buff distally. Head dusky brown. Thorax dusky brown. Forewing ground color dusky brown; from slightly beyond middle of costa to dorsum before tornus an irregular, ill-defined (almost imperceptable in some specimens) slender line; in middle of this line, at end of cell a buff spot, and sometimes in the transverse line at end of fold, an ill-defined similarly colored spot; subterminal line consists of a series of very tiny buff spots; cilia dusky brown. Hindwing base whitish, shading to grayish fuscous at margins. Foreleg and midleg dusky brown. Hindleg grayish. Abdomen dorsoanteriorly grayish shading to grayish fuscous posterodorsally; ventrally dusky brown; posterior segments of male with buff lateral tufts.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24627. Harpe of about equal width throughout except slightly broader at cucullus; cucullus with undulating outer margin; clasper exceeding outer edge of cucullus. Vinculum U-shaped. Tegumen broadly rounded posteriorly, anellus two closely appressed, lightly sclerotized, elongate plates; distal end of each clothed with setae. Aedeagus simple, slender, slightly curved, bulbous proximally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24677. Ostium small, oval. Inception of ductus seminalis from about middle of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae very long, convoluted, membranous with some granulation; slightly before ostium a short, rather broad sclerotized rod in wall of ductus. Bursa copulatrix granular. Signum not indicated in this species.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100832.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (20 Feb 1968) 5 and 2 paratypes with identical data.

FIGURE 228.—Imma rotia, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Although similar to feaniensis, new species, the forewing is much darker in rotia than in that species, and rotia lacks the light colored streak of the hindwing of feaniensis.

Imma assita, new species

FIGURES 229, 312c,d

Alar expanse 26–28 mm.

Labial palpus light ochraceous buff. Antenna argillaceous. Head, thorax and forewing ground color argillaceous; from slightly beyond middle of costa, to dorsum just before tornus, an ill-defined irregular transverse line, primarily indicated by a fuscous spot at costa and a similar one at end of cell; subterminal line indicated by a series of small buff or yellowish spots; terminal line very narrow, fuscous; cilia argillaceous, whitish tipped. Hindwing grayish fuscous except costal half sordid whitish; cilia sordid whitish. Foreleg pale buff; tibia and tarsal segments argillaceous on outer side; midleg pale buff; tarsal segments argillaceous; hindleg pale buff. Abdomen argillaceous dorsally; ventrally pale buff with some argillaceous shading.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24682. Harpe narrow basally, broadening to a wide cucullus; terminal margin of cucullus strongly convex; clasper strong, acutely pointed, not reaching margin of cucullus. Vinculum broadly U-shaped. Tegumen about half as long as harpe, distally rounded. Anellus two elongate, slightly sclerotized plates, each clothed with setae distally. Aedeagus slender, elongate, slightly bent; bulbous proximally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24683. Ostium very small, oval. Inception of ductus seminalis from about middle of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae membranous except granular anteriorly; wel before ostium a short, slender, sclerotized bar. Bursa copulatrix granular. Signum indicated by a small concentration of granules.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100831.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype, 15 and 15 paratypes as follows: 3 and 2 with identical data as holotype; Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 11, 7; Tahuna, 2000 ft (610 m), 27 Mar 1968, 1, 5. Teavapuhiau, Ouia, 750 m, 1–3 Aug 1977, 1 (Montgomery).

The two species, catapsesta and assita, are closely related and closely similar in appearance, but the transverse line of assita is emphasized by the two fuscous spots of forewing, which are absent or poorly defined in catapsesta. Moreover, the terminal line in assita is very narrow and of nearly equal width throughout but that of catapsesta has a broad spot at apex. In the male genitalia the terminal edge of cucullus is nearly straight in catapsesta and very strongly convex in assita. In the females the signum of catapsesta is strongly developed, that of assita hardly indicated.

Imma catapsesta Meyrick

FIGURES 230, 312e,f

Imma catapsesta Meyrick, 1934c:352.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:76.—Heppner, 1982:268.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24680. Harpe very narrow basally, broadening to the wide cucullus; outer margin of cucullus nearly straight, clasper very short, acutely pointed. Vinculum U-shaped. Tegumen broad basally, narrowed distally. Anellus two very slightly sclerotized, narrow plates, each clothed with setae distally. Aedeagus long slender, very slightly curved; bulbous proximally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24681. Ostium rather broad, oval. Inception of ductus seminalis well forward on ductus bursae. Ductus bursae very long, convoluted; posteriorly a long, slender, sclerotized rod in wall of ductus; junction with bursa copulatrix granular. Bursa copulatrix membranous, very slightly rugose. Signum consisting of a concentration of granules in wall of bursa.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva.

FIGURE 229.—Imma assita, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 230.—Imma catapsesta Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva: (Fatu Hiva, Uahuka, Uapou, Hiva Oa?).

Our series of 24 specimens is as follows. Nuku Hiva: Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m) 30 Jan 1968, 5, 3; Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 968, 8, 3; Taiohae, 18 Jan to 4 Feb 1968, 3, 1. Toovii, Ooumu, 900 m, 16–19 Jul 1977, 1 (Montgomery).

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

When Meyrick described catapsesta he included in his series, specimens from Fatu Hiva, Uahuka, Uapou, and Hiva Oa, as well as specimens from Nuku Hiva. I am of the opinion that Mcyrick had a mixed series. Certainly our specimens from Fatu Hiva are distinct and are described herein as assita, new species.

The four specimens from Taiohae average smaller (20–23 mm) than the other examples, but I can find no structural or superficial differences to justify separation.

Imma impariseta, new species

FIGURES 231, 313a

Alar expanse 21–23 mm.

Labial palpus pale ochraceous buff; second segment with prominent fuscous streak on outer side anteriorly; third segment with fuscous streak on outer side. Antenna fuscous; scape pale ochraceous buff anteriorly. Head pale ochraceous buff; fuscous on vertex. Thorax grayish fuscous with warm buff scaling anteriorly; tegula pale ochraceous buff; grayish fuscous scales on inner edge. Forewing ground color buff heavily overlaid grayish fuscous, mixed with warm buff scales; from slightly beyond midcosta a jagged blackish fuscous transverse line extends to dorsum; at costa and at dorsum a buff-suffused spot precedes this line; terminal line dentate, blackish fuscous, widest at apex; at inner edge of terminal line a series of small warm buff spots; cilia grayish fuscous with buff basal line. Hindwing fuscous around margin except more grayish toward anal angle; costal half, except apex, very light buff. Foreleg pale ochraceous buff with ill-defined grayish markings; midleg similar but grayish markings more distinct; hindleg pale ochraceous buff with suggestion of grayish on outer side of tibia. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally; ventrally pale ochraceous buff.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24678. Harpe of nearly equal width throughout; cucullus narrowly rounded; clasper broad basally, pointed, almost reaching ventral edge of cucullus. Vinculum U-shaped. Tegumen elongate, narrow. Anellus two rather broad, lightly sclerotized plates, each distally clothed with setae. Aedeagus slender, slightly curved, bulbous basally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24627. Ostium transverse, oval. Inception of ductus seminalis at about posterior third. Ductus bursae membranous except granular where it joins bursa copulatrix; posteriorly a short, slender, sclerotized rod in wall of ductus. Bursa copulatrix granular. Signum suggested by a slight concentration of granules.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100830.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (22 Mar 1968) 2 and 1 paratypes as follows: Fatu Hiva, Omoa, 15 Mar 1968, 2; Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 1.

A female was selected as holotype because the single available male is in poor condition.

This species is very similar to fulminatrix, but the entire costal area of the hindwing of impariseta is very pale buff, while only part of the cell of fulminatrix is buff. Also, the signum is well developed in fulminatrix, but there is only a suggestion of a signum in impariseta.

Imma fulminatrix Meyrick

FIGURES 232, 313b

Imma fulminatrix Meyrick, 1934c:353.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]: 144.—Heppner, 1982:269.

Female genitalia slide JFGC 12136. Ostium small, shield-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis at approximately the posterior third of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae very long, slender; at posterior end a slender sclerotized strip. Bursa copulatrix very finely granular, with a heavily granular area at beginning of ductus bursae. Signum consists of a very strongly granular area of the wall of the bursa copulatrix.

FIGURE 231.—Imma impariseta, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 232.—Imma fulminatrix Meyrick, ventral view of female genitala.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Kakaho Puanui, 2464 ft (751 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

The type has a hindwing similar to that of impariseta, new species, from Fatu Hiva, but the cell of the latter is wholly yellowish, that of fulminatrix is half gray as described by Meyrick. Also, fulminatrix lacks the pale subterminal line and the dentate terminal line found in impariseta.

Imma heppneri, new species

FIGURES 233, 312g,h

Alar expanse 19–24 mm.

Labial palpus light buff; second segment distal half, and streak posteriorly, blackish fuscous on outer side; third segment almost wholly blackish fuscous. Antenna fuscous. Head mixed light buff and grayish fuscous. Thorax grayish fuscous, anteriorly light buff; tegula grayish fuscous narrowly edged light buff. Forewing ground color light buff heavily overlaid and blotched grayish fuscous; costa very narrowly edged light to warm buff; from slightly beyond middle of costa an irregular, jagged, blackish fuscous line (most intense at end of cell) continues to dorsum before tornus; dorsum sprinkled with elongate warm buff scales; apical third of wing with warm buff scales; subterminal line consisting of a series of small, warm buff spots, terminal line slender, blackish fuscous; cilia fuscous with a sprinkling of light buff scales. Hindwing grayish fuscous, darker toward margins; cilia grayish. Foreleg light buff; tibia fuscous on outer side; tarsal segments marked fuscous; midleg similar; hindleg light buff; tibia with grayish streak on outer side. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally, segments narrowly edged with light buff; ventrally light buff.

FIGURE 233.—Imma heppneri, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24668. Harpe narrow, broadening at cucullus; cucullus rounded; clasper slender, not reaching margin of cucullus. Vinculum U-shaped. Tegumen elongate, narrowly rounded posteriorly. Anellus consisting of two broad, slightly sclerotized plates posteriorly clothed with setae. Aedeagus slender, nearly straight, bulbous proximally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24669. Ostium small, round. Inception of ductus seminalis from about posterior third of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae membranous except granular at junction with bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix finely granular. Signum thornlike.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100834.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (23 Jan 1968), 8 and 4 paratypes, all with identical data.

The three species, fulminatrix Meyrick, impariseta, new species, and heppneri, new species, all have similar forewings, but heppneri is at once distinguished from the other two by the solid color of the hindwing.

It gives me great pleasure to name this species for John B. Heppner who proposed the family Immidae to which this taxon belongs.

Family CHOREUTIDAE

Genus Choreutis Hübner

Choreutis Hübner, 1825 [1816–1826]:373.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Phalaena (Tortrix) pariana Clerck, 1764 [1759–1764], pl. 10: fig. 9; subsequent designation by Walsingham, 1980:987.

Choreutis chelaspis chelaspis (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURES 313c

Simaethis chelaspis Meyrick, 1929a:504; 1934c:353.—Clarke. 1955 [1955–1970]:83.

Anthophila chelaspis (Meyrick).—Clarke, 1969 [1955–1970]: 4, pl. 2: figs. 3–3b.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24926. Harpe of nearly equal width throughout; cucullus broadly rounded, clothed with strong setae; sacculus clothed with an elongate cluster of long, strong setae. Uncus broadly rounded. Vinculum U-shaped, broadest at middle. Tegumen weak, arched. Anellus consisting of a basal plate with a posteromedian protuberance and two lateral, broad arms. Aedeagus moderately stout, about as long as harpe, twisted proximally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24927. Ostium round. Antrum a sclerotized cylinder. Inception of ductus seminalis arising slightly anterior to antrum. Ductus bursae long, slender, membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous, finely granular. Signum a small dentate plate.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa.

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa, Fatu Hiva.

The series of this common species before me consists of the following. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 12–24 Feb 1968, 2, 1; Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m), 20 Feb 1968, 6, 1; trail to Mt. Feani, 2200 ft (670 m), 20 Feb 1968, 1. Ootua, 800 m, 27–30 Jul 1977, 1, (Montgomery). Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 4–21 Mar 1968, 44, 41; Omoa Valley, 21 Mar 1968, 2 Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m), 22 Mar 1968, 8, 8. Teavapuhiau, Ouia, 750 m, 1–3 Aug 1977, 6, 5 (Montgomery).

FOOD PLANT.—Ficus?

Presumably the nominate subspecies is confined to the two islands, Hiva Oa and Fatu Hiva, those from Nuku Hiva being quite distinct as indicated below. Meyrick (1934c:353) recorded this subspecies from the island of Uapou, but the specimens from Uapou may represent another subspecies.

Choreutis chelaspis euthenia, new subspecies

FIGURES 234, 313d

This taxon is very similar to the nominate subspecies. It differs from chelaspis chelaspis in the forewing by the much broader subterminal band, the greater amount of whitish scales in the tornal black blotch, the more prominent and extensive ochraceous scaling surrounding the leaden metallic streak from near base to four-fifths, and broader, more conspicuous whitish fascia at basal third. On the hindwing there is less whitish scaling in C.c. euthenia than on the hindwing of C.c. chelaspis, and it is closer to the margin.

FIGURE 234.—Choreutis chelapsis euthenia, new subspecies: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100835.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Ficus?

Described from the holotype (30 Jan 1968), 48 and 48 paratypes as follows. Nuku Hiva: Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 27, 20Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m), 23 Jan 1968, 1 Pakiu Valley, 1800 ft (548 m), 28 Jan 1968, 1 Taiohae, 16–27 Jan 1968, 20, 27.

There are no appreciable structural differences between this and the nominate subspecies, the differences residing primarily in variations in pattern. The differences in pattern and markings described above are constant and consistent throughout the series.

Family YPONOMEUTIDAE

Key to the Genera of Yponomeutidae

Genus Plutella Schrank

Plutella Schrank, 1802:169.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Phalaena Tinea xylostella Linaeus, 1758:538 (=Cerostoma maculipennis Curtis, 1832 [1824–1839]); by monotypy.

Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus)

FIGURES 235, 313e

Phalaena Tinea xylostella Linnaeus, 1758:538.—Hühner, 1796 [1796–1838]:119.

Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus), Schrank, 1802:169.—Guenée, 1845:339; [1846]:101—Herrich—Schäffer, 1854 [18431856], 5:106—Wocke, 1871:281.—Wollaston, 1879:434—Bartlett—Calvert, 1886:345.—Moschler, 1891:341—Gundlach, 1891:380.—Vieete, 1952:3.—Paulian and Viette, 1955:153.—Viette, 1958:4.—Bradley, 1966:219.—Bradley and Pelham—Clinton, 1967:127.—Bradley, 1967:510, fig. 7.—Clarke, 1971:173, fig. 135, pl. 22b.—Chiu and Chien, 1972:145152; 1974:48, 55, 56, fig. 1.—Koshihara and Yamado, 1976:110–114.—Gozmány, 1978:62.—Gressitt and Nadkarni, 1978:87.—Leraut, 1980:84 [No. 1675].—Hodges et al., 1983:26 [No. 2366].—Lorimer, 1983:13, 21, 75.—Shin et al., 1983:525, pl. 35: fig. 600.—Liu and Sun, 1984:1608–1609.]

Cerostoma maculipennis Curtis, 1832 [1824–1839], [No. 420]; 1837:214 [No. 1031(3)].—Westwood, 1854:223, pl. 49: fig. 1548.—Walsingham and Durrant, 1897:173–175.

Cerostoma xylostella (Linnaeus).—Curtis, 1837:214 [No.1031(4)].—Stainton, 1859 [1858–1859]:315 [No. 1347].

Alucita xylostella (Linnaeus).—Godart and Duponchel, 1838 [1827–1838]:11, pl. 293: fig. 10.

Cerostoma annulatellus Wood, 1839:223, pl. 49: fig. 1547.

Plutella cruciferarum Zeller, 1843:283.—Stainton, 1849b:2; 1854:68, pl. 3: figs. 3a—3c; 1859 [1858–1859]:312 [No. 1332]; 1869:328.—Heinemann, 1870 [1863–1870]: 117.—Fry, 1880:347.—Snellen, 1882:542.—Meyrick, 1886c: 177.—Hampson, 1891:42.—Walsingham, 1891:92.—Ormerod, 1891:1–34.—Rebel, 1892:243, 272.—Hinneberg, 1894:352, 357.—Walsingham, 1894:543.—Meyrick, 1894a:24; 1895:702.—Rebel, 1896:102–148.

FIGURE 235.—Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed, with corema intact; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Plutella maculipennis (Curtis).—Stainton, 1849b:2.—Berg, 1880:85–91, 99–109.—Rebel, 1901:137.—Dyar, 1903:492 [No. 5503].—Rebel, 1906:44.—Walsingham, 1907:652.—Matsumura, 1908:237 [No. 1994].—Maxwell—Lefroy and Howlett, 1909:538, fig. 345.—Spuler, 1910:452, pl. 47: fig. 44.—Rebel, 1910a:25; 1910b:430 [No. 125]; 1911:350 [No. 236].—Fullaway, 1913:43, 46.—Shiraki, 1913:340.—Duport, 1913:59.—Meyrick, 1914b:59.—Walsingham, 1914 [1909–1915]:343.—Barnes and McDunnough, 1917:183 [No. 7683].—Marsh, 1917:1–10, pl. 1, 2.—Rebel and Zerny, 1917:443 [No. 113].—Senior—White, 1917:121.—Cotton, 1918:281.—Auctorum, 1919:4.—Britton, 1920:96.—Hutson, 1920:C10.—Swezey, 1920:383.—Auctorum, 1920:326; 1921:458.—d'Emmerez de Charmoy and Gebert, 1921:186.—Timberlak et al., 1921:609.—Bréthes, 1923:162–163, figs. 1, 2.—Forbes, 1923:341.—Wolcott, 1923:205.—Miles, 1924:45–48.—Perry, 1924:13.—Essig, 1926:742.—Buxton and Hopkins, 1927:30, pl. 2.—Hopkins, 1928b:47.—Meyrick, 1928:802.—Bondar, 1928:259–260.—Illingworth, 1929:251.—King, 1929:373–390, pl. 1.—Swezey, 1929c:283.—Thorpe, 1929:621–634.—Romanova, 1930:139–152.—Forbes, 1930:100.—Muggeridge, 1930:253–264, figs. 1–9.—Meyrick, 1931:283.—Ghosh, 1932:5.—Busck, 1934:187.—Meyrick, 1935a:92.—Zerny, 1935:135.—Corbett, 1935:53.—Amsel, 1936:354.—Isaac, 1936:170.—Wolcott, 1936:485.—Walker and Anderson, 1937:443–448.—List, 1937:676.—Hardy, 1938:343372, figs. 1–10, pl. 9.—Robertson, 1939:330A—364A, figs. 1–10.—McDunnough, 1939:89 [No. 8878].—Bour—quin, 1939:409–413, figs. 1–3.—Rebel, 1939:7.—Brooksand Allen, 1940:56—Ghosh, 1940a: 129–130, pl. 62: figs. 1–4.—Lloyd, 1940:451–484, pls. 18, 19.—Ghes—quiére, 1940:39, fig. 3.—Rebel, 1940a:38; 1940b:55.—Ghesquiére, 1941:763.—Reid et al., 1941:1–35, figs. 1–7.—Reid et al., 1942:1, fig. lc.—Walker and Anderson, 1943:343–344.—Jones and Kimball, 1943:182.—Swezey, 1944:144.—Lima, 1945:317–319, figs. 201–203.—Kanervo, 1946:143–153, fig. 1.—Ahmad, 1949:205.—Ullyett, 1947:7–202, figs. 1–30.—MacNay, 1948:77.—Paulian, 1949:351, fig. 4.—Lamont and Callan, 1950:206.—Ford, 1951:90, 91, pl. 12: fig. 17.—Skala, 1951:182, pl. 18.—Hill, 1852:59.—Agenjo, 1952:69.—MacNay, 1953:66–94.—Paramonow, 1954:78.—Inoue, 1954:34.—Auctorum, 1954:280.—Weber, 1954:369.—Harcourt, 1955:900 [No. 9751]; 1956:155–160, figs. 1–7.—Tanada, 1956:320–329, figs. 1–4.—MacNay, 1957:92.—Harcourt, 1957:554, figs. 1, 2.—G. Peterson, 1957:206.—Hassanein, 1958:326, figs. 1–3.—Wakely, 1958:139.—Janjua and Haque, 1958:148, 157.—MacNay, 1959a:32–43.—Dale and Herring, 1959:12.—Friese, 1960:20.—Simmonds and Rao, 1960:278.—Harcourt, 1960a:419, figs. 1, 2; 1960b:517, fig. 1.—Gupta and Thorsteinson, 1960:241–250.—MacNay, 1961:251.—Beri, 1961:69–70.—Harcourt, 1961:820, figs. 1, 2.—Butler, 1961:384.—De-Bach, 1962:72.—Butler and Usinger, 1963:241.—Pastokhov, 1964:42.—Wolff, 1964:51.—Benander, 1965:22.—Kimball, 1965:291.—Azuma, 1965:56.—Hua, 1965:1–4, pl. 1A–5B.—Merovee, 1966:497.—Gozmány, 1967:89.—Johansson and Svensson, 1968:127.—Abraham and Padmanaban, 1968:513–519.—Kawabe, 1968:539.—Tello, 1968:233.—Diakonoff, 1968:263, 307, fig. 759.

Plutella maculipemmis [sic] (Curtis).—Ghosh, 1925:7.

Plutella annulatella (Wood).—Herrich-Schäffer, 1851 [1843–1856], 5:107.

Cerostoma brassicella Fitch, 1856:170.

Plutella limbipenella Clemens, 1861 [1859–1861]:6; 1872:90.

Plutella mollipedella Clemens, 1861 [1859–1861]:6; 1872, 91.

Gelechia cicerella Rondani, 1876:20, pl. 1: figs. 3–5.

Cerostoma dubiosella Beütenmuller, 1889:27.

TYPES.—Linnean Society, London (xylostella); Melbourne Museum Australia? (maculipennis); Philadelphia Academy of Sciences, Philadelphia (limbipenella, mollipedella); lost (brassicella, dubiosella); depository unknown (annulatella, cicerella).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Europe (xylostella, maculipennis); England (annulatella); North America (limbipenella, mollipedella, brassicella, dubiosella); Italy (cicerella).

DISTRIBUTION.—Cosmopolitan.

From the Marquesas we have only two specimens. Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 3 Feb 1968, 1; Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 14 Mch 1968, 1.

For the complete known distribution of this widespread, economic species, consult Series A. (Agricultural), Map 32 (revised), published by the Commonwealth Institute of Entomology, London, 1967.

FOOD PLANTS.—Cultivated and wild Cruciferae.

Genus Prays Hübner

Prays Hübner, 1825 [1816–1826]:413.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Phalaena curticellus Donovan, 1793 (= Prays caenobitella Hübner, 1810 [1796–1838], 5 (Tineae), pl. 45; fig. 309 [20 June 1813]); subsequent designation by Fletcher, 1929:183.

Prays ignota, new species

FIGURES 236, 313f,g

Alar expanse 10–12 mm.

Labial palpus light ochraceous buff; third segment with distal half prout's brown on outer side; third segment almost wholly prout's brown. Antenna fuscous, scape light ochraceous buff anteriorly. Head light buffy brown dorsally with light ochraceous buff scaling laterally; frons light ochraceous buff. Thorax dresden brown; tegula pale ochraceous buff-tipped. Forewing ground color dresden brown; on middle of costa a buff quadrate spot and before apex a similarly colored wedge-shaped spot; before tornus an irregular buff blotch; and sometimes on dorsum, near base, a subtriangular blotch with a dresden brown spot near edge; in center of wing an ill-defined series of double buff spots running longitudinally; cilia mixed buff and brown. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia lighter. Foreleg light ochraceous buff overlaid fuscous on outer side; midleg similar but not so strongly marked; hindleg light ochraceous buff; tibia and tarsal segments shaded grayish fuscous. Abdomen fuscous dorsally; light ochraceous buff ventrally.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24550, 24551. Ostium round. Sterigma a V-shaped, sclerotized plate truncated anteriorly; inner edges of the “V” armed with strong setae. Antrum not appreciably developed. Inception of ductus seminalis ventrad at junction of ductus bursae and bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signum an elongate triangular plate with serrate edges.

FIGURE 236.—Prays ignota, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100836.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (20 Feb 1968) and 3 paratypes with the same data.

As can be seen by the illustration (Figure 313f,g) the species is variable. The example shown in Figure 313f has much reduced white areas of the forewing.

The Japanese P. iota Moriuti (1977:124) is probably most nearly like ignota but lacks the white apical blotch of the latter species. Moreover, ignota lacks the two spinous processes of the sterigma of iota and the signum of ignota is long and slender but that of iota is nearly oval in general shape. Unfortunately, the male of ignota is unknown.

Eftichia, new genus

TYPE-SPECIES.—Eftichia chrysoleuca, new species, by monotypy and present designation. The gender of the name is feminine.

Antenna about three-fifths length of forewing, simple; scape with pecten. Labial palpus less than twice the length of head, slightly upturned; second and third segments of about equal length, third segment acutely pointed. Maxillary palpus vestigial. Tongue well developed, naked. Head roughened above; ocellus present. Thorax smooth. Abdominal terga unspined. Forewing smooth, termen oblique, costal and dorsal margins nearly parallel, stigma present, 12 veins, all separate; 1b furcate; 1c strongly developed; 2 distant from 3; 3, 4, and 5 approximate at base; 5 and 6 parallel; 7 to termen; 10 distant from 9; 11 from before middle of cell; upper internal vein preserved. Hindwing with 8 veins; 2 remote from 3; 3 and 4 stalked from angle of cell; 5 much nearer to 6 than to the stalk of 3 and 4; 7 and 8 parallel. Hind tibia smooth.

Male genitalia uncus absent; gnathos and socius present.

Female genitalia unknown.

Eftichia is probably closest to Kessleria Nowicki, 1864, but differs from it by the stalking of veins 3 and 4 in the hindwing.

Eftichia chrysoleuca, new species

FIGURES 237, 313h

Alar expanse 10–11 mm.

Labial palpus second segment grayish fuscous with whitish scaling above near apex; third segment white. Antenna ocherous white with a fuscous spot dorsally at base of shaft. Head white, suffused ocherous white above. Thorax ocherous white; tegula white, suffused fuscous basally. Forewing ground color white; basal half of costa golden brown giving rise to a triangular fascia of the same color truncated at dorsum; beyond middle, a broad transverse fascia of the same color as basal fascia; on apical third of costa four golden-brown marks, the third largely covered with fuscous scales; on apex a small brownish dash, a similarly colored blotch before termen and a golden-brown spot on termen between veins 6 and 5; cilia mixed white and golden brown. Hindwing grayish fuscous with slight metallic sheen; cilia grayish with slight yellowish tinge. Foreleg ocherous white, suffused grayish fuscous; midleg ocherous white, tibia and tarsal segments suffused grayish fuscous; hindleg ocherous white; each tarsal segment with a grayish fuscous spot. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally, ocherous white ventrally.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24552. Harpe very broad at cucullus; at junction of sacculus and cucullar edge, a stout spine. Gnathos a moderately broad sclerotized band. Uncus absent. Socius a long, curved, digitate process. Vinculum rounded; saccus very short. Tegumen narrow, rounded. Anellus membranous. Aedeagus slender, curved; vesica armed with a single cornutus.

Female genitalia unknown.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100837.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

FIGURE 237.—Eftichia chrysoleuca, new species: a, venation of right wings; b, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; c, aedeagus.

Described from the holotype and paratypes with identical data, 20 Feb 1968.

This species reminds one of several species of Argyresthia, particularly A. oreasella Clemens (1861:7) of North America. In A. oreasella, however, there is only one golden transverse fascia but in E. chrysoleuca there are two.

Genus Zelleria Stainton

Zelleria stainton, 1849a:22.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Zelleria hepariella Stainton, 1849a:22; subsequent designation by Fletcher, 1929:239.

Zelleria leucostrota Meyrick

FIGURES 238, 314a

Zelleria leucostrota Meyrick, 1929a:504.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:187.

Zelleria leucostra [sic] Meyrick.—Viette, 1949a:317.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24554, 24555. Ostium very small, crescentic. Antrum slender, cylindrical, sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis dorsal, well before antrum. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous, very weak. Signum absent. Lamella antevaginalis membranous. Lamella postvaginalis broadly sclerotized, with deep median cleft.

LECTOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva.

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva, Tahuata, Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Meyrick described leucostrota from four specimens from Nuku Hiva and Tahuata (no specific localities) from 200 to 3500 ft (61 to 1067 m). The specimen that I have examined is labeled Hiva Oa, a locality not listed by Meyrick. Meyrick gave the alar expanse as 15–16 mm. The specimen of this species in the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History from Hiva Oa, Atuona (24 Feb 1968), measures only 12 mm.

Dr. Sattler, of the British Museum (Natural History) (in litt., 4 Jan 1979) wrote the following: “In our collection there are four specimens which have lost the abdomen. The lectotype; although labeled 'type ' is also a female. I'm sorry the paralectotype (sent to me for study) is in such poor condition. However, the lectotype does not look any better.”

FIGURE 238.—Zelleria leucostrota Meyrick, ventral view of female genitalia.

Genus Terthroptera Clarke

Terthroptera Clarke, 1971:172.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Terthroptera eremosesia Clarke, 1971:172; by monotypy and original designation.

Terthroptera astochia, new species

FIGURES 239, 314b

Alar expanse 10 mm.

Labial palpus white, outer sides of second and third segments grayish fuscous. Antenna grayish fuscous; scape with a white patch dorsally. Head light olive buff dorsally, grayish fuscous laterally; face white. Thorax grayish fuscous. Forewing ground color sordid white; basal sixth of wing grayish fuscous; costa marked with about a dozen small grayish fuscous bars or spots; a few similar spots on dorsum; remainder of forewing irrorate with grayish fuscous; cilia gray and grayish fuscous mixed. Hindwing gray; cilia slightly lighter. Foreleg buff; femur and tibia suffused grayish on outer side; tarsal segments fuscous; midleg similar but tibia grayish fuscous on outer side and tarsal segments sordid white on inner side; hindleg sordid white suffused grayish. Abdomen grayish dorsally, grayish fuscous ventrally.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24556. Harpe of almost equal width throughout, sharply bent at middle; at outer ventral edge of cucullus a short, truncate process. Gnathos not developed. Uncus very short and wide, hardly perceptible. Vinculum broad; saccus conical, about as long as harpe. Tegumen short and broad. Anellus a pair of arms fused basally, with aedeagus emerging between. Aedeagus rather slender, curved; vescia unarmed.

FIGURE 239.—Terthroptera astochia, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100838.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype, 20 Feb 1968. Terthroptera astochia is very similar to T. eremosesia Clarke (see Clarke, 1971, pl. 22f) from Rapa, but is a smaller insect and it is not so strongly marked as the latter species. Unfortunately the female of neither species is known.

Family GRACILLARIIDAE

Genus Epicephala Meyrick

Epicephala Meyrick, 1880a: 168.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Epicephala colymbetella Meyrick, 1880a: 169; by monotypy.

Epicephala colymbetella Meyrick

FIGURE 240

Epicephala colymbetella Meyrick, 1880a:169; 1907:53; 1912a: 14; 1912b: 14, fig. 8.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]: 96.—Vari, 1961:42.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24626. Harpe costa nearly straight; cucullus narrowly rounded; sacculus heavily sclerotized, terminating in a pair of sharp points. Vinculum very broad and heavily sclerotized; saccus long, slender. Tegumen elongate triangular. Aedeagus stout, nearly straight; cornutus short, curved.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24627. Ostium broad, surrounded by an elongate sclerotized plate. Inception of ductus seminalis posterior from ductus bursae. Ductus bursae very broad, scarcely distinguishable from the bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix granular anteriorly. Signum absent.

Meyrick (1929a: 504) recorded colymbetella from Nuku Hiva, but he misidentified his species. The Marquesan species is Epicephala spinula, new species, described below. The true colymbetella is confined to Australia.

Epicephala spinula, new species

FIGURES 241, 314c,d

Epicephala colymbetella.—Meyrick, 1929a:504 [not Epicephala colymbetella Meyrick, 1880].

Alar expanse 9–12 mm.

Labial palpus white, suffused grayish on outer side, except base of second segment. Antenna grayish fuscous, somewhat lighter distally. Head white. Thorax white; tegula grayish fuscous. Forewing ground color fuscous; before middle of costa a short, outwardly oblique white dash; beyond middle of costa a slender, outwardly oblique curved mark, narrower distally than proximally; dorsum white except for three narrow, inwardly directed intrusions of ground color; subapically a short, transverse, slender metallic bar; beyond the metallic bar a white apical area with a dull ochraceous buff central space at the base of which is a small black spot; apical portion of costa and termen narrowly blackish fuscous; cilia on dorsum and tornus grayish, white on termen and around apex; apical cilia tipped grayish fuscous. Hindwing grayish with slight brassy hue; cilia grayish. Foreleg white, overlaid blackish fuscous on outer side; midleg white; tibia with three fuscous marks; hindleg white; tibia with fuscous mark distally. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally; white ventrally with fuscous stripes. Abdomen of male with two pairs of coremata.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24630. Harpe divided; costal part slender, heavily clothed with setae; at middle of outer face a group of stout setae and at base large protuberance bearing a single, long seta; sacculus a broad curved plate with a single strong seta distally. Vinculum broad, with a moderately well-developed saccus. Tegumen elongate, triangular. Anellus a very slightly sclerotized plate with a small lobe posteriorly on each side bearing fine setae. Aedeagus long, slender, slightly bent; cornuti apparently absent.

FIGURE 240.—Epicephala colymbetella Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 241.—Epicephala spinula, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, coremata; d, ventral view of female genitalia.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24560, 24628, 24629. Ostium broad, funnel-shaped; on each side posteriorly a large, sclerotized, rugose plate. Antrum a narrow sclerotized ring. Inception of ductus seminalis lateral, from posterior portion of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae long and broad, rugose for most of its length. Bursa copulatrix very small, membranous. Signum a band of granules encircling middle of bursa copulatrix.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100839.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Mt. Teoaiua, 2000 ft (610 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva, Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (22 Mar 1968), 2 and 5 paratypes as follows: Fatu Hiva: Omoa Valley, 5 apr 1968, 3. Teavapuhiau, Ouia, 750 m, 1–3 Aug 1977, 1 (Montgomery). Nuku Hiva: Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 1, 1. Nuku Hiva, at light, 100 ft (30.5 m), 15 Jan 1925, 1 (“St. George Expedn. C.L. Collenette, Brit. Mus. 1925-488”).

This is the species Meyrick misidentified as Epicephala colymbetella Meyrick (see ante). The two species are similar but colymbetella is smaller (8 mm) than spinula (9–12 mm). In colymbetella the costal and dorsal white streaks meet in the middle of the wing, breaking up the central dark ground color. In spinula the dark central portion is not broken by the white streaks.

Genus Caloptilia Hübner

Caloptilia Hübner, 1825 [1816–1826]:427.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Tinea upupaepennella Hübner, 1796 [1796–1838], pl. 30: fig. 203; subsequent designation by Fletcher, 1929:38.

Caloptilia deltanthes (Meyrick), new combination

FIGURES 242, 314e

Gracilaria deltanthes Meyrick, 1934c:354.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24558. Harpe simple, narrow basally, broad toward cucullus; cucullus truncate. Uncus narrowly rounded. Vinculum elongate, triangular. Tegumen narrow, weakly sclerotized. Anellus a weakly sclerotized irregular plate. Aedeagus long, slender, straight; vesica unarmed.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24557, 24960. Ostium small oval; lamella postvaginalis sclerotized. Antrum a tiny sclerotized cylinder. Inception of ductus seminalis slightly anterior to antrum. Ductus bursae very slender, almost threadlike, membranous, coiled at junction with bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signa two, slender, bladelike.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Uapou, Teoatea, Hakahetau.

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

Uapou: above Hakahetau, 800 m, 23–24 Jul 1977, 1 (Montgomery).

Nuku Hiva: Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m), 30 Jan 1968, 2, 2; Pakiu Valley, 1800 ft (548 m), 17, 19 Jan 1968, 2.

Fatu Hiva: Teavapuhiau, Ouia, 750 m, 1–3 Aug 1977, 3 (Montgomery).

FOOD PLANT.—Glochidion ramiflorum (Forster F.) Mueller-Argovensis.

Of the three original specimens, the holotype is lacking the right forewing. Of the others Mr. Gordon Nishida of the Bernice P. Bishop Museum wrote, “We have only one paratype which is in poor condition. The paratype specimen is missing the abdomen and several other parts…”

Caloptilia deltanthes is one of the few species that is found on more than one island, and probably will be found on other than Uapou, Nuku Hiva, and Fatu Hiva.

Only one of our specimens from Tapuaooa was reared and was found in association with Dudua eumenica (Meyrick).

Caloptilia insidia, new species

FIGURES 243, 314f

Alar expanse 12 mm.

Labial palpus light buff; outer half and ventrally third segment purplish fuscous. Antenna grayish; scape purplish fuscous. Head purplish fuscous, face buff. Thorax purplish fuscous. Forewing ground color iridescent purplish fuscous; from base an oblique, narrow, triangular sulphur yellow mark, one angle of which reaches dorsum but no part of which reaches costa; from slightly before middle of costa a transverse sulphur yellow bar reaches dorsum as a point; on dorsum, slightly before tornus, a small sulphur yellow spot; cilia concolorous with ground color except at apex and part of termen, buff. Hindwing fuscous; cilia concolorous. Foreleg purplish fuscous; midleg femur and tibia purplish fuscous; tarsal segments buff, shaded outwardly grayish; hindleg femur buff, remainder purplish fuscous. Abdomen fuscous dorsally, shining buff ventrally.

FIGURE 242.—Caloptilia deltanthes (Meyrick): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 243.—Caloptilia insidia, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24559. Harpe simple, narrow basally, broad toward cucullus; cucullus broad, truncate, bluntly pointed at dorso-distal margin. Uncus bluntly pointed. Vinculum elongate, triangular. Tegumen moderately sclerotized, twice as long as broad. Anellus a weakly sclerotized, irregular plate. Aedeagus long, slender, straight, pointed; vesica unarmed.

Female genitalia unknown.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100840.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 2500 ft (762 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa, Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype and 1 paratype, with identical data (1 Mar 1968); and 2 paratypes, from Fatu Hiva, Teavapuhiau, Ouia, 750 m, 1–3 Aug 1977 (Montgomery).

This species is very similar to deltanthes but lacks the broad triangular patch from the costa and the yellow spot at apical fourth of costa. Also, the triangular basal marking of forewing is much narrower (compare figure 314e with 314f).

Family TINEIDAE

Key to the Genera of Tineidae

Genus Decadarchis Meyrick

Decadarchis Meyrick, 1886:290.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Decadarchis melanastra Meyrick, 1886:291; by monotypy.

Key to the Species of Decadarchis

Decadarchis clistopa Meyrick

FIGURES 244, 314G

Decadarchis clistopa Meyrick, 1929a:506.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]: 94.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25101. Harpe as broad as long; costa strongly arched, armed with a dense cluster of setae. Uncus lightly sclerotized laterally. Vinculum a sclerotized band; saccus subrectangular, terminating distally in a sharp point. Tegumen a moderately broad sclerotized band. Anellus Y-shaped ventrally, cup-shaped dorsally. Aedeagus slender, nearly straight; vesica armed with a single, short, strong cornutus.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, 100 ft (30.5 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

The species is known only from the holotype. The specimen appears somewhat rubbed but the genitalia of the male are intact and are figured. Abdomen with strong, paired, deciduous coremata.

Decadarchis physocapna Meyrick

FIGURES 245, 314h

Decadarchis physocapna Meyrick, 1929a:506.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]: 249.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25100. Harpe oval; costa with a dense patch of strong setae on basal half; cucullus bluntly pointed. Uncus slightly sclerotized laterally. Vinculum rather broad; saccus broad, terminating in a point. Tegumen a narrow sclerotized band. Anellus a subtriangular plate ventrally, cup-shaped dorsally, Aedeagus slender, curved, pointed; vesica armed with a single weak cornutus.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, 1200 ft (365 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

The only known specimen of physocapna is the holotype. The specimen is rather rubbed, the markings are indistinct and the cilia are missing.

The male genitalia are intact and are figured. Posteriorly, there is a pair of strong, but deciduous coremata.

Decadarchis psammaula Meyrick

Figures 246, 315a,b.

Decadarchis psammaula Meyrick, 1921a:459.—Lepesme, 1947:319.—Viette, 1949a:316.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]: 262.—Dugdale, 1977:66.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25010. Harpe very short, broad; costa almost wholly clothed with setae; cucullus bluntly pointed. Uncus divided posteriorly, narrowly sclerotized laterally. Vinculum broad, pointed distally. Tegumen a narrow band. Anellus Y-shaped posteriorly, cup-shaped proximally. Aedeagus slender, curved; vesica apparently unarmed, except for a few spicules.

FIGURE 244.—Decadarchis clistopa Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus.

Female genitalia slides USNM 25011, 25012. Ostium small, U-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis slightly before ostium, dorsally. Ductus bursae long, slender, membranous. Bursa copulatrix ornamented with a reticulum of very fine ridges. Signum a broad curved plate; capitulum prominent.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Tahiti.

DISTRIBUTION.—Tahiti, Marquesas Islands, Malaya, Fiji.

Our series, including reared specimens, is as follows. Nuku Hiva: Pakiu Valley, 800–1000 ft (244–304.8 m), 12 Feb to 12 Mar 1968, 13, 5; Taiohae, 28 Jan 1968. 1. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 13 Feb to 26 Mar 1968, 5, 7. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11–17 Mar 1968, 2.

FIGURE 245.—Decadarchis physocapna Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus.

FOOD PLANT.—On “spun tips of coconut leaves” (Meyrick 1921a:459). Several specimens were reared by us. My notes are as follows: “Pupa and larva in rolled edge of dead leaflet tissue. Larvae appear to have fed on dead tissues on underside of leaflet.

Decadarchis celestra, new species

FIGURES 247, 315c

Alar expanse 15 mm.

Labial palpus light buff, shaded grayish fuscous on outer side. Antenna fuscous; scape narrowly buff distally. Head fuscous. Thorax fuscous; tegula with grayish and buff scales distally. Forewing ground color light buff variously marked with fuscous; base fuscous, this color extends over most of the dorsal part of wing; from basal fourth of costa an outwardly oblique fascia extends to the dark dorsal shade; from middle of costa a similar, outwardly oblique fascia extends half way to tornus; at outer fourth of costa an outwardly oblique fascia extends to a point inside apex then turns costad at right angles; a fuscous line along termen nearly forms a V with the outer costal streak; apex with a blackish fuscous dot; cilia mixed buff and fuscous. Hindwing pale grayish; cilia a shade lighter. Foreleg light buff, strongly overlaid fuscous on outer side; midleg light buff; tibia and tarsal segments marked blackish fuscous; hindleg light buff; tarsal segments lightly marked grayish fuscous. Abdomen light buff; male abdomen with strong eversible coremata posteriorly.

FIGURE 246.—Decadarchis psammaula Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 247.—Decadarchis celestra, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25043. Harpe short and broad; costa arched and clothed with cluster of stout setae; cucullus rounded. Uncus lightly sclerotized laterally. Vinculum a narrow band; saccus broad, sharply pointed. Tegumen a lightly sclerotized band. Anellus subrectangular ventrally, cup-shaped dorsally. Aedeagus slightly curved; vesica armed with a single curved cornutus.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100841.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tunoa Ridge, 2900 ft (884 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (23 Jan 1968) and 1 paratype with the same data.

Nearest to Decadarchis incongrua, new species, celestra is a smaller species and may be distinguished from the former by the two well-defined oblique transverse fascia of the forewing, absent in incongrua.

Decadarchis incongrua, new species

FIGURES 248, 315d

Alar expanse 14–18 mm.

Labial palpus grayish fuscous on inner surface, fuscous on outerside. Antenna fuscous; apex and ventral surface of scape grayish. Head grayish fuscous. Thorax fuscous; apex of tegula grayish. Forewing ground color fuscous; ill-defined grayish blotches along costa but no distinct markings; at apex a fuscous spot in a narrow grayish circle, cilia fuscous. Hindwing grayish, cilia concolorous. Foreleg fuscous; midleg buff marked fuscous; hindleg sordid buff; tibia with grayish suffusion distally on outer side; tarsal segments marked fuscous. Abdomen grayish dorsally, sordid buff ventrally; with strong posterior abdominal coremata.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25071. Harpe slightly longer than broad; costa strongly arched and armed with a dense cluster of strong setae. Uncus lightly sclerotized laterally. Vinculum a broad band; saccus sharply pointed. Tegumen a narrow sclerotized band. Anellus cup-shaped with an elongated ventral plate. Aedeagus nearly straight; vesica armed with a single slender cornutus.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100842.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fatu Hiva, Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Fatu Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (3 Apr 1968) and 5 paratypes with identical data.

Similar to percnomicta, incongrua lacks any well-defined markings on the forewing. Moreover, the vesica of incongrua is armed with a well-defined cornutus, absent in percnomicta.

Decadarchis coleosema Meyrick

FIGURES 249, 315 e,f

Decadarchis coleosema Meyrick, 1934c:354.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]: 95.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25037. Harpe very broad, stubby, thickest beyond middle; on costa a dense patch of short setae; cucullus rounded. Uncus lightly sclerotized laterally. Vinculum very broad basally, sharply pointed distally. Tegumen narrowly sclerotized laterally. Anellus cup-shaped proximally, narrow. Aedeagus slender, slightly curved, pointed; cornutus a single spine.

Female genitalia slides USNM 25025, 25036. Ostium posteroventral edge U-shaped. Antrum not differentiated. Inception of ductus seminalis slightly before ostium. Ductus bursae membranous gradually widening toward junction with bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix very finely rugose. Signum a small, curved plate; capitulum prominent.

FIGURE 248.—Decadarchis incongrua, new species; a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus.

FIGURE 249.—Decadarchis coleosema Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, slope north of summit, 3860 ft (1176 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

Nuku Hiva: Toovii, Ooumu, 16–19 Jul 7, 5, (Montgomery). Hiva Oa: Mt. Temetiu, 3860 ft (1176 m) (LeBronnec and Tauraa).

FOOD.—Probably refuse and decaying vegetable matter.

Meyrick described coleosema from four specimens but did not indicate the sexes except for the “type female.” We did not encounter this species on any of the islands we visited.

Decadarchis aspera, new species

FIGURES 250, 315g

Alar expanse 20 mm.

Labial palpus sordid white; second segment with two blackish fuscous bars on outerside: Antenna grayish with fuscous annulations; scape pale ochraeous buff, and deeply notched. Head sordid white. Thorax fuscous; apex of tegula sordid white. Forewing ground color light buff but heavily suffused and blotched with grayish; extreme base of wing fuscous, this extending along costa to about one-fourth; beyond the dark base, costa is narrowly light buff; at basal angle, one fourth of dorsum and middorsum, prominent tufts of raised fuscous scales each edged with white scales outwardly; at base, inside costa, a similar but less conspicuous tuft; at outer end of fold another such, but somewhat flattened, tuft; at end of cell a fuscous spot edged with sordid white scales; at apex a fuscous spot; cilia ochraceous buff mixed with a few grayish fuscous scales. Hindwing gray; cilia ochraceous buff. Foreleg light buff suffused grayish; tibia and tarsal segments blackish fuscous on outer side; midleg light buff; tibia blackish fuscous on outer side, except distally sordid white; hindleg light buff. Abdomen grayish dorsally, buff ventrally; male with pair of dense deciduous coremata posteriorly.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25096. Harpe short and broad; costa strongly arched and almost entirely armed with a large patch of coarse, short setae. Uncus sclerotized laterally. Vinculum very broad; saccus pointed. Tegumen a narrow sclerotized band. Anellus cup-shaped. Aedeagus slender, curved; vesica armed with a single long slender cornutus.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100843.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Mt. Feani, 3800 ft (1158 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (20 Feb 1968).

This is the only species of Decadarchis that I know that has such prominent scale tufts on the forewing. In male genitalia it is similar to percnomicta Meyrick. On the basis of the tufting of the forewing one might suspect a generic difference, but the genitalia are typically Decadarchis.

Decadarchis percnomicta Meyrick

FIGURES 251, 315h

Decadarchis percnomicta Meyrick, 1934c:355.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]: 240.

Male genitalia slides USNM 25042, 25102. Harpe very short, broadest before cucullus; costa almost completely armed with short, stout setae. Uncus narrowly sclerotized laterally. Vinculum broad; saccus pointed. Tegumen a narrow ring. Anellus cup-shaped basally, posteriorly a rectangular plate. Aedeagus broadest at apex; vesica armed with a single cornutus.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Eiao: above Vaituha, altitude 1200 ft (365 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Eiao.

Eiao: N. Uplands, 400m, 7 Aug 1977, 26 (Montgomery).

FOOD.—Unknown.

FIGURE 250.—Decadarchis aspera, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus.

FIGURE 251.—Decadarchis percnomicta Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus.

In addition to the type male there are the two specimens listed above.

The type is somewhat rubbed and does not show the scale tufts on dorsum as in the Montgomery specimens.

Strong coremata (deciduous) are present from the intersegmental membrane between the 8th segment and male genitalia.

Decadarchis rufimacula Meyrick

FIGURES 252, 316a

Decadarchis rufimacula Meyrick, 1934c:355.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]: 274.

Male genitalia slide AB 28 Nov 1940. Harpe twice as long as broad; costa only slightly arched, clothed with short stout setae; cucullus rounded. Uncus sclerotized laterally. Vinculum broad; saccus short, pointed. Tegumen a narrow band. Anellus a deep, cup-shaped structure. Aedeagus slender, curved; vesica armed with a single slender cornutus.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25049. Ostium small, funnel-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis dorsal, from ductus bursae, slightly before ostium. Ductus bursae long and slender. Bursa copulatrix finely rugose. Signum sickle-shaped; capitulum prominent.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Uapou, Teoatea, Hakahetau, 1950 ft (594 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

Uapou: Teoatea, Hakahetau, 1950 ft (594 m). Nuku Hiva: Toovii, Ooumu, 900 m (Montgomery).

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

The holotype male lacks the right forewing, but otherwise is in fair condition.

With the holotype I associated the female from Nuku Hiva.

Decadarchis tritogramma, new species

FIGURES 253, 316b

Alar expanse 13–14 mm.

Labial palpus white; basal two-thirds of second segment fuscous on outer side. Antenna light ochraceous buff. Head white. Thorax white; tegula fuscous anteriorly. Forewing ground color white; base of costa broadly fuscous; on middle of costa an outwardly oblique fuscous mark extending into cell; on middorsum an elongate fuscous dash; along outer part of costa to apex and subterminally, a fine fuscous line; at apex a small fuscous spot; cilia white mixed with fuscous outwardly. Hindwing whitish basally, light buff outwardly. Fore- and midleg grayish fuscous; hindleg buff; tarsal segments marked grayish fuscous. Abdomen pale buff; male with posterior deciduous abdominal coremata.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25065. Harpe short, oval; on costa an elongate patch of stout setae. Uncus lightly sclerotized laterally. Vinculum a broad sclerotized band; saccus short, broad, pointed. Tegumen a narrow band. Anellus a deep, cup-shaped structure. Aedeagus slender, slightly curved, pointed; vesica armed with a short, weak cornutus.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100844.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Tapuaooa, 2500 ft (762 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Nuku Hiva.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (30 Jan 1968) and 2 paratypes with identical data.

Unfortunately, the female is unknown. Of the Marquesan species of this genus, tritogramma appears to be most closely related to incongrua, new species, but the latter species lacks the contrasting dark markings of the forewing of tritogramma.

Decadarchis minuscula (Walsingham)

FIGURES 254, 316c,d

Ereunetis minuscula Walsingham, 1897:155; 1907:716—Swezey, 1909: 12, pl. 2: figs. 7–9; 1910:142.—Busck, 1911:80.—Swezey, 1912a:155.—Walsingham, 1914 [1909–1915]:347.—Bridwell, 1919a:22.—Wolcott, 1923:205.—Muir, 1929:206.—Swezey, 1929b:281.—Forbers, 1930:147.—Williams, 1931:156, figs. 7–9.—Wolcott, 1936:501.—Auctorum, 1936a:34; 1939:177.—Swezey, 1940b:458.—Wolcott, 1948:739.—Beardsley, 1961:354.

FIGURE 252.—Decadarchis rufimacula Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed (genitalia distorted on slide); b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 253.—Decadarchis tritogramma, new species: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus.

Decadarchis minuscula (Walsingham).—Meyrick, 1929a: 505.—Harris, 1937:486.—Ghesquière, 1940:86.—Vesey-Fitzgerald, 1941:158.—Swezey, 1942:215.—Lepesme, 1947:318.—Viette, 1949a:316.—Swezey, 1952:378.—Davis, 1953:85.—Swezey, 1954:21, 147, 160, 187.—Diakonoff, 1968:265, 308, fig. 762.—Clarke, 1971:211, fig. 164, pl. 26e,f.

Lepidobregma minuscula (Walsingham).—Zimmerman, 1978:352, figs. 169, 171a, 173, 175, 177, 179, 180.

TYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—West Indies.

DISTRIBUTION.—Pantropical. West Indies, Virgin Islands, United States, Ceylon (Sri Lanka), Australia, Hawaii, Marquesas Islands, Rapa, Tahiti, Fiji, Solomon Islands, Seychelles, Caroline Islands, Samoa, Nigeria, Belgian Congo, Tanganyika, Java, Guyana (from gall on mango).

Our large series from the Marquesas is from the following islands. Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 13 Jan to 18 Feb 1968, 127 85. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 12 Feb to 6 Mar 1968, 19 14. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11 Mar to 5 Apr 1968, 21, 27. Eiao: N. Uplands (400 m), 7 Aug 1977, 1, 1 (W.C. Gagne).

FIGURE 254.—Decadarchis minuscula (Walsingham): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FOOD PLANTS.—The dead or decaying tissue of many hosts such as coconut, Pandanus, Acacia, Cacao, Thespesia, and Tamarindus indica L. Swezey (1910:142) records minuscula from “in dead stems…decaying pods of various legumes, and on dead leaves of banana, papaia, palm, Pandanus, pineapple, etc….”

This common moth came readily to light, but also we were able to rear specimens from Thespesia and Tamarindus.

Decadarchis flavistriata (Walsingham)

Figures 255, 316e

Ereunetis flavistriata Walsingham, 1907:716, pl. 25: fig. 18.—Swezey, 1909:9. pl. 2: figs. 1–6; 1910:142; 1915a:101.—Auctorum, 1923:199.—Timberlake et al., 1924:442; 1926:320.—Williams, 1927:459.—Illingworth, 1927:394; 1928:44.—Swezey, 1929b:281.—Williams, 1931:152, pl. 25: figs. 1–2, pl. 26: figs. 1–6.—Ito and Carter, 1932:44.—Bianchi, 1940:385.—Linford, 1940:437–445.—Sakimura and Linford, 1940:453.—Swezey, 1940:458.—Auctorum, 1941:10.—Viette, 1951:14.—Beardsley, 1961:354.—Shiroma, 1963:209.

Decadarchis flavistriata (Walsingham).—Veitch, 1923:9, pl. 2: fig. 2.—Lepesme, 1947:322.—Bradley, 1961:163; 1962:270.—Clarke, 1971:213, fig. 165, pls. 27e, 29d.

Erecthias [sic!] flavistriata (Walsingham).—Corbett, 1922:184.

Decadarchis euophthalma Meyrick, 1924b:83.—Bradley, 1961:163.

Erechthias flavistriata (Walsingham).—Meyrick, 1915a:233 [No. 269]; 1929a:505.—Viette, 1949a:316.—Swezey, 1954:57.

Neodecadarchis flavistriata (Walsingham).—Zimmerman, 1978:341, figs. 168, 171e, 172, 175–177, 179, 180–182.

TYPES.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Lanai, Hawaii (flavistriata), Solomon Islands (euophthalma).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hawaii, New Zealand, Solomon Islands, Polynesia, Java, Malaya, New Hebrides, Fiji, Marquesas Islands, Rapa, Kermadec Islands.

The Marquesas records are from the following islands. Nuku Hiva: Pakiu Valley, 1000 ft (305 m) and 1800 ft (548 m), 19 Jan to 16 Mar 1968, 2, 2 (March dates are for specimens reared from Cocos nucifera). One specimen was beaten from dry banana leaves. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 11 Feb and 4 Mar 1968, 1, 1. Fata Hiva: Omoa, 11–15 Mar 1968, 3; Omoa Valley, 16 Mar 168, 3.

FOOD PLANTS.—Sugarcane (Viette and others): Cocos nucifera L. (flowers; Meyrick): Pandanus tectorius Solander (dry, dead fruits, leaves).

In Fiji flavistriata is known as the “budmoth of sugarcane.” The larva of this species will probably feed on any dry dead vegetable matter.

The genitalia of flavistriata were figured by Clarke (1971, fig. 165) but are repeated here for completeness.

Decadarchis simulans (Butler)

FIGURES 256, 316f,g

Tinea simulans Butler, 1882:43.

Decadarchis simulans (Butler).—Meyrick, 1927a:113; 1929a:506.—Swezey, 1942b:215; 1954:187, 188.—Bradley, 1957:109.—Comstock, 1966:67.—Dugdale, 1977:66.—Zimmerman, 1978:359, figs. 105c, 183, 186, 188, 191.

Decadarchis melanastra Meyrick, 1886b:291.

Comodica decaspila Lower, 1905:114.

Ereunetis simulans (Butler).—Walsingham, 1907:714, 715, 737, pl. 15: fig. 15.—Swezey, 1909:13, pl. 2: figs. 10–12; 1910:142.—Rebel, 1915:142.—Swezey, 1929a:278.—Illingworth, 1929:249.—Auctorum, 1936a:34.—Holdaway and Look, 1942:254.—Suehiro, 1960:293.—Beardsley, 1961:354.—Auctorum, 1965:29.—Sugerman, 1972:279.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25008. Harpe broad and stubby; from middle of costa a large swelling profusely clothed with setae; cucullus with outer edge dentate. Uncus divided posteriorly, lightly sclerotized laterally. Vinculum very broad and flattened distally. Tegumen a rather narrow ring. Anellus cup-shaped proximally. Aedeagus long and slender; cornutus long, slender.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25009. Ostium U-shaped, narrow. Antrum a sclerotized tube. Inception of ductus seminalis from base of antrum, dorsally. Ductus bursae membranous posteriorly, sclerotized anteriorly and formed as a broad loop where it joins the bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix ornamented with a reticulum of fine ridges. Signum a sickle-shaped process; capitulum well developed.

FIGURE 255.—Decadarchis flavistriata (Walsingham); a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 256.—Decadarchis simulans (Butler): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

TYPES.—In the British Museum (Natural History) (simulans, melanastra); in the South Australian Museum? (decaspila).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Hawaii, Honolulu (simulans); Fiji (melanastra); Cookstown, Queensland (decaspila).

DISTRIBUTION.—Widespread in the tropical Pacific. Hawaii, Solomon Islands, Fiji, Samoa, Elice Islands, Midway, Society Islands, Australia, Marquesas Islands.

Our series from the Marquesas Islands is as follows. Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 17 Jan to 5 Feb 1968, 10. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 23–27 Feb 1968, 3. Tahuata: (Meyrick, 1929a:506).

FOOD PLANTS.—Numerous plants, where the larva feeds on dead and decaying tissue. Zimmerman (1978:359) records the following hosts: Coffea, Hibiscus tiliaceus L., Samanea saman (Jacquin) Merrill, Sapindus oahuensis Hillebrand ex Radlkofer.

Prehistorically this widespread species probably was carried from place to place in native canoes. Now, its habit of feeding on dead vegetable matter probably contributes to its distribution in commerce.

It should be noted that only females were collected by us in the Marquesas. The male genitalia have been figured from a male from Tahiti.

Decadarchis penicillata (Swezey), new combination

FIGURES 257, 317a,b

Ereunetis penicillata Swezey, 1909:13; 1910:142; 1915b:69; 1917:297; 1954:146.

Pantheus penicillatus (Swezey).—Zimmerman, 1978:354, figs. 105d, 170, 171b, 174, 175, 178.

Male genitalia slides USNM 25044, 25070. Harpe of about equal width throughout; costa armed with an elongate patch of stout setae; outer margin of cucullus with shallow excavation. Uncus lightly sclerotized laterally. Vinculum a broad band; saccus sharply pointed. Tegumen a narrow sclerotized band. Anellus cup-shaped with a short, truncated ventral process. Aedeagus slender, curved, pointed, nearly twice as long as harpe; vesica armed with two rows of dentate cornuti and an elongate pair.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25045. Ostium funnel-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis well before ostium. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix lightly rugose anteriorly and posteriorly. Signum broad, spoon shaped; capitulum large, prominent.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Kilauea, Kauai.

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands, Hawaiian Islands.

We have five specimens from the Marquesas as follows. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 15–23 Feb 1968, 3; Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 15 Mar 1968, 1, 1.

FOOD PLANT.—Pandanus leaves (dried).

This species appears to be related to Decadarchis cirrhogramma Clarke (1971:205), having the same type of signum and the excavation of the outer edge of the cucullus, but differing from the latter by the dentate cornuti.

Zimmerman (1978:354) gives an excellent account of this species, but had no females. We have one female the genitalia of which are typical of the genus Decadarchis, as are those of the male, so I am placing the species in this genus.

Genus Erechthias Meyrick

Erechthias Meyrick, 1880b:261.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Erechthias charadrota Meyrick, 1880b:268; subsequent designation by Meyrick, 1915a:233.

Under this genus Robinson (1983:306) synonymized eleven (11) genera, among them the genus Decadarchis Meyrick.

Admittedly, the genitalia of Decadarchis and Erechthias are strikingly similar, and obiously they are closely related, but I am retaining the genus Decadarchis based on the key characters. Some of the genera treated by Robinson are obvious synonyms of Decadarchis, not Erechthias; others I do not know so cannot comment on them; moreover, they are beyond the scope of this study.

FIGURE 257.—Decadarchis penicillata (Swezey): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Erechthias zebrina (Butler)

FIGURES 258, 316h

Argyresthia zebrina Butler, 1881:403.

Erechthias zebrina (Butler).—Fletcher, 1921a: 178.—Meyrick, 1927a:111; 1929a:505; 1930a:322.—Viette, 1949a:316.—Clarke, 1971:196, figs. 152, 153, pl. 27h.—Zimmerman, 1978:365, figs. 192, 194, 195.

Ereunetis zebrina (Butler).—Walsingham, 1907:715, pl. 25: fig. 16.

Ereunetis xenica Meyrick, 1911b:301.

Comodica lanceolata (Walsingham).—Walsingham, 1914 [1909–1915]: 346.

Erechtias[sic'] zebrina (Butler).—Ghesquière, 1940:86.

Tinexotaxa travestita Gozmány, 1968:306, figs. 8–11.—Davis, in Hodges et al., 1983:5 [No. 303.]

TYPES.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Honolulu, Hawaii (zebrina); Saint Thomas, Danish West Indies (lanceolata); Seychelles, Cascade Estate, Mahé (xenica).

DISTRIBUTION.—Pantropical: Brazil, Saint Thomas, Puerto Rico, Mexico, Panama Canal Zone, Cuba, Jamaica, Seychelles, Mauritius, Borneo, Fiji, Society Islands, Ceylon (Sri Lanka), China, India, Java, Sumatra, Assam, Belgian Congo, Cameroun, Madagascar, Hawaii, Rapa, Marquesas Islands, Caroline Islands.

Our specimens from the Marquesas consist of the following. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 15 Feb to 3 Mar 1968, 4, 5; Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11–30 Mar 1968, 1, 2.

FOODS.—Fruits of Cola acuminata Schott and Endlicher, and of false cotton; galls of Lophira alata Banks (Clarke, 1971:196); also abandoned cocoons (Ghesquière, 1940:87).

The genitalia of this species have been illustrated by Clarke (1971, fig. 153) and Zimmerman (1978, figs. 192, 194, 195) but are repeated here for completeness.

Genus Tinea Linnaeus

Tinea Linnaeus, 1758:496.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Phalaena Tinea pellionella Linnaeus, 1758:536; subsequent designation by International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature, 1957, Opinions, Declarations, International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 15 (Opinion 450): 254. (See Robinson, 1979:62).

Tinea oxymora Meyrick

FIGURES 259, 317c

Tinea oxymora Meyrick, 1919:274.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]: 230; 1970 [1955–1970], 8:99, pl. 49: figs. 3–3b.

Male genitalia slides USNM 25027, 25030, 25040. Harpe simple, narrow, of nearly equal width throughout; cucullus with oblique, straight outer edge. Gnathos unusually long and narrow, pointed distally. Uncus elongate, triangular, twice as long as tegumen. Vinculum a weak, narrow band; saccus slender, about half as long as harpe. Tegumen short, broad. Anellus tubular with a small ventral plate. Aedeagus straight, as long as harpe, distally armed with a cluster of stout, short spines; vesica armed with a single, weak cornutus.

Female genitalia slides USNM 25031, 25041. Ostium funnel-shaped; lamella antevaginalis two sclerotized plates clothed posteriorly with long setae. Inception of ductus seminalis well before ostium. Ductus bursae membranous, about as long as bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signum three or four small sclerotized plates each with a long, attenuated spine.

LECTOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Peru, Chosica.

DISTRIBUTION.—Peru, Marquesas Islands.

Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 14 Jan 1968, 1. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 15 Feb to 6 Mar 1968, 11, 4. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 14 Mar 1968, 1.

FIGURE 258.—Erechthias zebrina (Butler): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 259.—Tinea oxymora Meyrick: a, lateral aspect of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral veiw of female genitalia.

FOODS.—Probably refuse and decaying vegetable matter.

The venation shows nothing to prevent retention of this species in Tinea, although the genitalia suggest that a new genus may be necessary to accomodate oxymora.

Despite the fact that this species was described from Peru, there appears to be no doubt about the identity of the Marquesan examples. The species is probably a refuse feeder, a “tramp species,” but all of our material was collected at black light.

Wyoma, new genus

TYPE-SPECIES.—Wyoma dysgnoia, new species; by monotypy and present designation. The gender of the generic name is feminine.

Antenna simple, slightly thicker in male than in female, about as long as forewing; scape with weak pecten. Labial palpus drooping; second segment with strong cluster of bristles on outer side distally; third segment shorter than second. Maxillary palpus long, folded, four-segmented. Tongue well developed, naked. Head roughened with hairlike scales. Forewing smooth, costa very slightly arched, termen oblique, apex rounded; 12 veins, all separate; 1b simple; 2 from near angle; 4 nearer to 5 than to 3; 7 to costa slightly before apex; 9 nearer to 8 than to 10; 10 distant from 11; 11 from basal fourth. Hindwing with 8 veins, all separate; anal veins obsolete; 2 from well before angle; 3 nearer to 2 than to 4; 4 to 6 about equidistant; 7 to costa slightly before apex.

Male genitalia symmetrical; uncus and gnathos present; socius absent.

Female genitalia, presence or absence of signum not known (genitalia badly disintegrated; Figure 260d).

Apparently this genus is closely related to Tinea, having similar male genitalia; but the female genitalia are very different. The venation of both fore- and hindwings of Wyoma is simple, all veins being separate. In Tinea, however, 6 and 7 are stalked in forewing, and 5 and 6 are stalked in hindwing.

Wyoma dysgnoia, new species

FIGURES 260, 317d

Alar expanse 8–11 mm.

Labial palpus second segment shining creamy white on inner surface, fuscous on outer surface; third segment sordid white with broad grayish fuscous annulus basally. Antenna fuscous dorsally; creamy white ventrally; head grayish fuscous on vertex; face white. Thorax fuscous. Forewing ground color fuscous; on basal third a large whitish wedge-shaped mark with two short, outwardly oblique fuscous dashes; slightly beyond middle of costa a subrectangular whitish mark containing two fuscous dashes; beyond this mark two small whitish transverse marks followed at apex by a triangular yellowish spot; dorsum mottled whitish and fuscous; above tornus a subtriangular yellowish mark; cilia mixed grayish and fuscous with a small yellowish group at apex. Hindwing light gray; cilia sordid white strongly suffused light brownish basally. All legs buff strongly marked fuscous. Abdomen fuscous dorsally; ventrally buff, suffused grayish; from each side of the second pleuron of the male an eversible sac.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25074. Harpe simple, of nearly equal width throughout; cucullus pointed. Gnathos elements fused forming a curved point. Uncus triangular. Vinculum broad; saccus nearly as long as harpe. Tegumen subquadrate. Anellus membranous. Aedeagus slender, straight, longer than harpe; bulbous at base.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25104. Ostium elongate, slitlike. Antrum lightly sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis from anterior end of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae very slender, membranous. Bursa copulatrix with two heavily sclerotized sections, the posterior one narrower than the anterior; at the posterior end of each sclerotized section a conspicuous “collar” and each section criscrossed by multiple narrow ridges; (anterior part of bursa destroyed).

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100845.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Atuona.

FIGURE 260.—Wyoma dysgnoia, new species: a, venation of right wings; b, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; c, aedeagus; d, female genitalia (damaged).

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa.

FOOD—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (25 Feb 1968) 3 and 1 paratypes, 23–27 Feb 1968.

This reminds one of Erechthias zebrina (Butler) but is distinguished from it by the costal markings and the genitalia.

I have not been able to place this species in any genus known to me, although the venation appears to agree with that of Tineola Herrich-Schäffer, but the female genitalia of dysgnoia are very unlike those of T. bisselliella (Hummel, 1823:13) the type of Tineola.

The markings of the forewing of dysgnoia vary from specimen to specimen, while retaining the same general pattern. In one specimen the markings differ on each side.

Genus Phereoeca Hinton and Bradley

Phereoeca Hinton and Bradley, 1956:45.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Tineola uterella Walsingham, 1897:165, by original designation.

Phereoeca allutella (Rebel)

FIGURES 261, 317E

Tineola Allutella Rebel, 1892:270, pl. 17: fig. 3; 1896:124.—Staudinger and Rebel, 1901:240 [No. 4623].

Tineola allutella Rebel.—Walsingham, 1894:537, 542.—Rebel, 1906:44.—Walsingham, 1908:1026.—Rebel, 1911:367 [No. 360].—Busck, 1934:188–189.

Tinea allutella (Rebel).—Fletcher, 1933:76.—Busck, 1934:188.—Ghesquière, 1940:6; 1941:762.

Phereoeca allutella (Rebel).—Hinton and Bradley, 1956:46.—Hinton, 1956:258, 327.—Petersen, 1957 [1957–1958]:342, fig. 153; 1958 [1957–1958]:422.—Gozmány, 1967:23, 25.—Gozmány and Vari, 1973:16, 17.—Zimmerman, 1978:298, figs. 135, 136, 137, 138, 139.—Aiello, 1979:125–136, figs. 1–14.

Tinea pachyspila Meyrick, 1905:619.—Fletcher, 1914:466, fig. 342; 1921:191.—Meyrick, 1927a:116.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:232 [synonymy by Zimmerman, 1978].

Male genitalia slides USNM 25018, 25026. Harpe slender, broadest basally; costa with prominent protuberance at basal third. Gnathos consisting of two slender, curved elements. Uncus long, narrow, truncated. Vinculum a slender band; saccus long; slender. Tegumen elongate. Anellus membranous. Aedeagus moderately slender, slightly curved, slightly swollen distally.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25032. Ostium elongate, dorsad of two sclerotized protuberances. Antrum strongly sclerotized. Inception of ductus seminalis slightly anterior to antrum. Ductus bursae membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signum absent.

LECTOTYPE.—Male, 10 mm. A small printed label reads “Simony [Prof. Dr. Oscar Simony] '89 Palma.” A second label has the inscription “Tineola Allutella Reb.,” with “type” below in red. A third, red label reads “Paratypus.” A fourth label “ hiervon micro. Präp. Kopulat.—Apparat,” is pinned below. My lectotype label is attached. Lectotype hereby designated.

The species was described from four examples. I have selected the specimen from which G. Petersen made a genitalic preparation, his Gen. Präp 6003.

Lectotypes are in the Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna (allutella); in the British Museum (Natural History) (pachyspila).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Tenerife (allutella); Ceylon (pachyspila).

DISTRIBUTION.—Madeira, Canary Islands, Africa, Seychelles, Sri Lanka (Ceylon), India, Java, Samoa, Hawaiian Islands, Marquesas Islands, Panama.

At this time it appears that allutella is established on only one island in the Marquesas. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 27 Feb to 7 Mar 1968, 3, 2.

FOOD.—Flannel, furs, refuse, etc.

The distinctive feature of the male genitalia is the prominent protuberance from the costa of the harpe.

Genus Trichophaga Ragonot

Trichophaga Ragonot, 1894a: 123.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Trichophaga coprobiella Ragonot, 1894a: 121; by original designation.

FIGURE 261.—Phereoeca allutella (Rebel): a, lateral view of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Trichophaga mormopis Meyrick

FIGURES 262, 317f

Trichophaga mormopis Meyrick, 1935b:575.—Ghesquière, 1940:5.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:211.—Gozmány, 1967:7, figs. 5, 6.—Zimmerman, 1978, p. 305, figs. 143, 144, 145.

Trichophaga percna Corbet and Tams, 1943b: 131, fig. 5; 1943c: 107, 119, fig. 214.—Hinton, 1956:328.—Gozmány, 1967:7.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25046. Harpe with arched costa; cucullus curved inwardly, sharply pointed; sacculus with median ridge. Gnathos with lateral elements fused at middle. Uncus large, hoodlike, with deep median cleft. Vinculum with ventral median projection; saccus long, slender distally. Tegumen much longer than broad. Anellus membranous basally with a large sclerotized hood dorsoposteriorly. Aedeagus twice as long as harpe, straight, bulbous proximally, armed with row of teeth on opposite sides distally.

TYPES.—In the Musée du Congo Belge, Tervueren, Belgium (mormopis); in the British Museum (Natural History) (percna).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Belgian Congo, Elizabethville (mormopis); Gold Coast, Accra (percna).

DISTRIBUTION.—Belgian Congo, Hawaiian Islands (Oahu, Maui), India, Sri Lanka (Ceylon), Malaya, Formosa, Fiji, Fatu Hiva.

Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11 Mar 1968, 1.

FOODS.—Furs, skins, woolen materials, feathers.

We have only a single male as listed above. No female is available for study. This widespread species is transported in commerce and is undoubtedly well established in the Marquesas Islands.

Genus Comodica Meyrick

Comodica Meyrick, 1880b:254.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Comodica tetracercella Meyrick, 1880b:255; by monotypy.

Comodica signata, new species

FIGURES 263, 317g

Alar expanse 8–9 mm.

Labial palpus pale ochraceous buff proximally, shading to white distally; third segment pale ochraceous buff on inner surface, fuscous on outer surface. Antenna flagellum light buff ventrally, dorsally buff at base shading to fuscous at apex; scape pale ochraceous buff. Head light ochraceous buff anteriorly, dark tawny olive on vertex. Thorax fuscous, with light ochraceous buff posteriorly; tegula light ochraceous buff. Forewing ground color ochraceous buff; from base, nearly to apex, a fuscous median streak, broadest about middle; at about one-third of costa an outwardly oblique fuscous dash reaches median streak and is followed by a parallel white streak; beyond this another outwardly oblique dash, this in turn followed by a fine, outwardly curved white line that crosses the median streak at tornus; beyond the outwardly curved white line two short fuscous dashes with ground color between; extreme outer edge of costa white; on base of dorsum a fuscous blotch followed by three outwardly oblique fuscous dashes; cilia light ochraceous buff. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia a shade lighter. Foreleg pale ochraceous buff; tarsal segments marked fuscous; midleg pale ochraceous buff; tarsal segments marked with two blackish fuscous dashes; hindleg pale ochraceous buff; tibia with blackish fuscous hairlike scales dorsally. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally, pale ochraceous buff ventrally.

Female genitalia slides USNM 25072, 25073. Ostium very small. Inception of ductus seminalis slightly before ostium. Ductus bursae long, slender, membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signum slender, thornlike.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100846.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Nuku Hiva, Taiohae.

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (2 Feb 1968) and 3 paratypes, Hiva Oa, 29 Feb and 7 Mar 1968; 2 paratypes, Nuku Hiva, Taiohae, 14 and 25 Jan 1968.

FIGURE 262.—Trichophaga mormopis Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus.

FIGURE 263.—Comodica signata, new species, ventral view of female genitalia.

In placing this species in Comodica I recognize several minor differences between the Marquesan specimens and the type of the genus as described by Meyrick. Although the third segment of the labial palpus is shorter than the second it is not “much shorter” as described. Meyrick described the hindwing as having all veins separate. In one Marquesan specimen 5 and 6 are distinctly separate, in the one figured (Figure 317g) 6 is obsolete toward base, but it's direction suggests that it would have been stalked with 5 had it been complete; 6 does go to apex of hindwing as described.

The female genitalia of a Comodica species have not been figured previously. For the figure of male genitalia, see Clarke (1970 [1955–1970], 8, pl. 28: figs. 2–2b.

This species is probably nearest the Fijian species Comodica disparata (Meyrick) (1923a:24) but differs from it by the darker thorax and darker ground color of the forewing.

Genus Setomorpha Zeller

Setomorpha Zeller, 1852 [1854]:93.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Setomorpha rutella Zeller, 1852 [1854]:94; by monotypy.

Setomorpha rutella Zeller

FIGURES 264, 317h

Setomorpha rutella Zeller, 1852 [1854]:94.—Walsingham, 1891:81.—Miller, 1932:10, 22, 50.—Leefmans, 1934 [1933–1934]:89.—Diakonoff, 1938:399–414, figs. 1–10.—Ghesquière, 1940:11, pl. 3: fig. 4; 1941:763.—Corbet and Tams, 1943c:111, 119, figs. 200, 235, 262, pl. 5: figs. 9, 10.—Paulian and Viette, 1955:146.—Hinton, 1956:261.—Viette, 1956:533.—Gozmány, 1966:257; 1967:29, fig. 30.—Diakanoff, 1968:284, 308, fig. 773.—Clarke, 1971:188, fig. 145, pl. 25e.—Dugdale, 1977:66.—Zimmerman, 1978:378, figs, 201, 202, 203, 204.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Naturhistoriska Riksmuseum, Stockholm.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Africa.

FIGURE 264.—Setomorpha rutella Zeller: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

DISTRIBUTION.—General in the tropical and subtropical regions.

Hiva Oa: Atuona, 11 Feb 1968. 1.

FOODS.—Many stored animal and vegetable materials.

Although the genitalia of this species have been figured several times previously, I am repeating the illustrations used in Clarke (1971, fig. 145). For a more extensive bibliography than that shown above, see Diakonoff (1938:405–409) and Davis (in Hodges et al., 1983).

Genus Clepticodes Meyrick

Clepticodes Meyrick, 1927b:332.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Clepticodes horocentra Meyrick, 1927b:332; by monotypy.

Clepticodes clasmaticus Meyrick

FIGURES 265, 266, 318a

Clepticodes clasmatica Meyrick, 1934b:479.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:93.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25038. Harpe with a broad base, extended narrowly into a long distal portion; cucullus narrowly rounded; sacculus produced as a digitate process. Socius a broad, flat pad. Vinculum very broad basally, pointed distally. Tegumen a narrow sclerotized band. Anellus consisting of a crescentic proximal portion with a fleshy lobe on each side posteriorly. Aedeagus stout, long, nearly straight; vesica armed with a large cluster of strong cornuti.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25039. Ostium funnel-shaped. Antrum not differentiated. Inception of ductus seminalis from anterior end of bursa copulatrix. Ductus bursae long, wide, membranous. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signum complex; consisting of a palmate series of ridges and a narrow, sclerotized band encircling the bursa copulatrix.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fiji, Vunidawa.

DISTRIBUTION.—Fiji, Gilbert Islands (Tarawa Atoll), Fatu Hiva. From the Marquesas there are before me the following specimens: Fatu Hiva, Omoa, 13 Mar to 8 Apr 1968, 7.

FOOD.—Unknown.

This is the first record of this species from the Marquesas Islands and as far as I know, is the most eastward extension of its range in the Pacific.

Genus Crypsithyrodes Zimmerman

Crypsithyrodes Zimmerman, 1978:267.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Blabophanes obumbrata Butler, 1881:396; by monotypy and original designation.

Crypsithyrodes concolorellus (Walker)

FIGURES 267, 318b

Tinea concolorella Walker, 1863 [1856–1866]:475.

Crypsithyrodes concolorella (Walker).—Robinson, 1980:103, figs. 5, 41.

Tinea ignotella Walker, 1864 [1856–1866]:1003.—Robinson, 1980:103.

Blabophanes obumbrata Butler, 1881:396.

Monopis obumbrata (Butler).—Walsingham, 1907:728.

Crypsithyris enixa.—Illingworth, 1923, p. 185 [not Crypsithyris enixa Meyrick].

Crypsithyris sladeni Bradley, 1957:111, pl. 2: fig. 28, pl. 12: figs. 111, 112.

Crypsithyrodes obumbrata (Butler).—Zimmerman, 1978, figs. 106–112.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25019. Harpe parallel-sided to beyond middle, then narrowed to a bluntly pointed cucullus. Gnathos divided distally into two slender, divergent arms. Socius a broad, flattened pad. Uncus extended distally to form a point on each side. Vinculum broad basally; saccus pointed. Tegumen a broad band. Anellus triangular. Aedeagus slender, slightly bent, armed.

Female genitalia slide USNM 25020. Ostium cup-shaped. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior third of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae slender, membranous, except for a short sclerotized section in posterior half. Bursa copulatrix membranous. Signum absent.

FIGURE 265.—Clepticodes clasmaticus Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus.

FIGURE 266.—Clepticodes clasmaticus Meyrick: a, venation of right wings; b, ventral view of female genitalia; c, 8th segment of male.

FIGURE 267.—Crypsithyrodes concolorellus (Walker): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Honolulu, Hawaii.

DISTRIBUTION.—Hawaii, Rennell Island, Caroline Islands (Kusaie; currently Kosrae), Marquesas Islands.

Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 13–27 Jan 1968, 3. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 18 Feb to 8 Mar 1968, 18, 3.

FOOD.—Unknown.

My notes on this moth, 11 April 1953, collected on Kusaie, are as follows:

“I had Fredy (guide) lead me to Yela Cave which was reported to house swifts and to contain guano. The swifts were there in small numbers, and under the few, limited nesting sites, there were deposits of trash, excrement, etc. Over these [deposits] a very nice tineid (new) was hovering, so I collected a good series.”

It should be noted that the Marquesan specimens are from two villages indicating the possible association with human habitation. All were collected at black light.

Zimmerman (1978:269) has discussed Meyrick's misdetermination of obumbrata as enixa, and has indicated the appearance of the latter name in Hawaiian entomological literature.

Genus Praeacedes Amsel

Praeacedes Amsel, 1954a:55.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Praeacedes deluccae Amsel, 1954:55; by monotypy.

Praeacedes thecophora (Walsingham)

FIGURES 268, 318c

Tinea thecophora Walsingham, 1908:1024.—Rebel, 1911:366 [No. 354]; 1940a:45.

Titaenoses thecophora (Walsingham).—Petersen, 1958 [1957–1958]:417.

Praeacedes deluccae Amsel, 1954a:55, fig. 7; 1955:29.

Tinea despecta Meyrick, 1919:274.—Viette, 1949a:316.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:114.

Praeacedes thecophora (Walsingham).—Petersen, 1958 [1957–1958]:417.—Clarke, 1971:191, figs. 148, 149.—Zimmerman, 1978:274.

TYPES.—In the British Museum (Natural History) (thecophora, despecta); Delucca collection, Malta (deluccae).

TYPE-LOCALITIES.—Brazil (thecophora); British Guiana (despecta); Malta (deluccae).

DISTRIBUTION.—North, Central, and South America, Borneo, Sri Lanka (Ceylon), Taiwan (Formosa), Azores, Teneriffe, Rapa, Hawaii, Marquesas Islands.

Hiva Oa: Atuona, 15 Feb and 8 Mar 1968, 1, 2.

FOOD.—Refuse; decaying vegetable matter?

This is the second record of the occurrence of this species in the Marquesas Islands. Meyrick (1934c:333, 355) recorded it as Tinea despecta Meyrick. It is generally associated with human habitations and is probably much more abundant in the Marquesas than our records show.

Genus Trachycentra Meyrick

Trachycentra Meyrick, 1886b:288.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Trachycentra calamias Meyrick, 1886b:288; by monotypy.

Trachycentra calamias Meyrick

FIGURES 269, 318d

Trachycentra calamias Meyrick, 1886b:288; 1907:142; 1929a:507.—Swezey, 1942b:215.—Viette, 1949a:316.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:69.—Dale and Herring, 1959:13.

Male genitalia slide USNM 25021. Harpe saccus broad, triangular with an outer, long, curved process; neck long, narrow; cucullus large, oval. Gnathos consisting of two long, curved arms. Uncus very lightly sclerotized, pointed. Socius very small, slender. Vinculum narrow, short. Tegumen very long, slender. Anellus a lightly sclerotized plate. Aedeagus short, straight, lightly sclerotized.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Tonga.

DISTRIBUTION.—Tonga, Fiji, Marquesas Islands, Samoa, Society Islands.

FIGURE 268.—Praeacedes thecophora (Walsingham): a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 269.—Trachycentra calamias Meyrick: a, ventral view of male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus.

Hiva Oa: Trail to Mt. Feani, 1200 ft (365 m), 1. Nuku Hiva: (Meyrick, 1929a:507).

FOOD PLANTS.—Hibiscus tileaceus L., Erythrina (under bark); Cocos nucifera L.

We collected a series of larvae but were able to rear only a single specimen (Em. 15 Mar 1968). Unfortunately, we did not discover the cannibalistic habit of the larvae until it was too late.

The larva of calamias is a case maker and carries its case as it burrows and feeds under the bark.

Swezey (1942b:215) states that “larvae of this moth were found feeding in the core of a coconut tree top which was damaged by the rhinoceros beetle. Some of the larvae were boring into the living tissues of the mass of undeveloped leaves, free without cases. Other larvae were feeding in the mass of rotting tissues and those which were apparently the older ones were in brown cases many of which were covered with fibers placed longitudinally and overlapping like thatch. Pupation took place within these shaggy cases.”

In the male there are two large deciduous coremata posteriorly from inside the abdomen.

Genus Opogona Zeller

Opogona Zeller, 1853:504.

TYPE-SPECIES.—Opogona dimidiatella Zeller, 1853:507; by monotypy.

Opogona regressa Meyrick

FIGURES 270, 319a

Opogona regressa Meyrick, 1916:620; 1932b:231.—Lepesme, 1947:315.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:269.

Male genitalia slides JFGC 12006; USNM 24977, 24978. Harpe bulbous basally, the cucullus produced; sacculus produced distally as a sharp point and with a fleshy process from ventral edge. Socius greatly enlarged and armed with stout setae. Saccus about as long as harpe (obscured in drawing). Tegumen broad and short. Anellus a small, subrectangular, sclerotized plate. Aedeagus slender, straight, about as long as harpe.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24979. Ostium very small, oval. Inception of ductus seminalis from anterior two-thirds (?) of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae threadlike, very long. Bursa copulatrix surface armed with large granules. Signum a strong, transverse bar with ventral keel, and a cross bar at each end.

HOLOTYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Fiji, Natova.

DISTRIBUTION.—Fiji, Marquesas Islands.

FOODS.—Decayed vegetable matter? Coconut flowers.

The 20 specimens before me are from the following localities. Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 21 Jan to 6 Feb 1968, 3, 2. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 5 Feb to 27 Mar 1968, 1, 2. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11 Mar to 9 Apr 1968, 5, 6; Omoa Valley, 16 Mar 1968, 1.

FIGURE 270.—Opogona regressa Meyrick: a, male genitalia with left socius and harpe, and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

The type of regressa lacks its head and abdomen but the specimens from the Marquesas agree in all superficial particulars, and the male genitalia of a Hiva Oa specimen (USNM 24977) agree with those of a from Fiji reared from coconut flowers. (Slide JFGC 12006, in the BMNH).

This is the first record of the occurrence of regressa in the Marquesas Islands.

Opogona trissostacta Meyrick

FIGURES 271, 319b,c

Opogona trissostacta Meyrick, 1934c:354.—Clarke, 1955 [1955–1970]:318.

Male genitalia slides USNM 24980, 24981. Harpe of equal width except cucullus produced as a pointed process; from base of inner surface a long, fleshy process that extends well over costal edge. Socius a fleshy pad armed with short, stout setae. Vinculum narrow, bandlike; saccus as long as harpe. Tegumen short and broad, Aedeagus very slender, straight, pointed.

Female genitalia slide USNM 24986. Ostium very small, opening ventrally from a slit. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior half of ductus bursae. Ductus bursae membranous, very slender except anteriorly where it broadens before bursa copulatrix. Bursa copulatrix lightly sclerotized posteriorly, ornamented with transparent pits anteriorly. Signum a curved, sclerotized plate with a spinelike point on each side anteriorly.

HOLOTYPE.—In the Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Kaava Ridge, Kakahopuanui, 2460 ft (750 m).

DISTRIBUTION.—Marquesas Islands.

Nuku Hiva: Toovii, Ooumu, 900 m, 16–19 Jul 1977, 1 (Montgomery). Hiva Oa: trail to Mt. Feani, 2500 ft (762 m), 20 Feb 1968, 1, 1 Mar 1968, 1; Mt. Feani, 3400 ft (1036 m), 1 Mar 1968, 1. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11–15 Mar 1968, 1, 1; Mt. Upe, 2025 ft (617 m), 3 Apr 1968, 1.

FOOD PLANT.—Reynoldsia sp., rotten bark (Montgomery specimen).

The type is in poor condition; the abdomen and left hindwing are missing and the forewings are rubbed.

The signum of trissostacta is strikingly like that of aurisquamosa but in habitus trissostacta is very similar to Opogona allaini (Clarke, 1971:227) from Rapa.

Opogona aurisquamosa (Butler)

FIGURES 272, 319d,e

Argyresthia? aurisquamosa Butler, 1881:403.

Opogona aurisquamosa (Butler).—Walsingham, 1907:713, 737, pl. 25: fig. 14.—Swezey, 1909:16, pl. 3: figs. 1–3; 1910:142; 1912a:155; 1919:10.—Bridwell, 1919a:25.—Auctorum, 1922:15.—Meyrick, 1929a:505.—Williams, 1931:156, pl. 27: figs. 1–3.—Meyrick, 1934c:354.—Swezey, 1940a:366; 1942a:133.—Holdaway and Look, 1942:259.—Viette, 1949a:316.—Swezey, 1954:116, 160.—Clarke, 1971:222, fig. 174, pl. 28c,d.

TYPE.—In the British Museum (Natural History).

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hawaii, Honolulu.

DISTRIBUTION.—Tahiti, Easter Island, Marquesas Islands, Fiji, Kermadec Islands, Rapa.

From the Marquesas we have the following. Nuku Hiva: Taiohae, 13 Jan to 3 Feb 1968, 10, 27; Pakiu Valley, 1800 ft (548 m), 19–26 Jan 1968, 2, 2. Hiva Oa: Atuona, 12 Feb to 7 Mar 1968, 11, 22; Mt. Feani, 1200 ft (365 m), 6 Mar 1968, 2, 1. Fatu Hiva: Omoa, 11 Mar to 10 Apr 1968, 36, 67; Omoa Valley, 16–21 Mar 1968, 4, 1; Hanavave, 12 Apr 1968, 1.

FOOD PLANT.—Pandanus tectorius Parkinson and probably other dead vegetable matter.

Undoubtedly aurisquamosa will be found on all of the Marquesas Islands. Meyrick recorded this species (1934c:354) from Eiao and Uahuka.

Although the genitalia were figured by Clarke (1971, fig. 174), the figures are repeated here for completeness' sake.

FIGURE 271.—Opogona trissostacta Meyrick: a, male genitalia with left harpe and aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 272.—Opogona aurisquamosa (Butler): a, oblique view of male genitalia with aedeagus removed; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

FIGURE 273.—Opogona discordia, new species: a, male right harpe; b, aedeagus; c, ventral view of female genitalia.

Opogona discordia, new species

FIGURES 273, 319f

Alar expanse 9–12 mm.

Labial palpus cream color. Antenna light ochraceous buff; scape blackish fuscous with blueish reflections. Head fuscous with blueish reflections; face cream color. Thorax massicot yellow; base of tegula blackish fuscous with blueish reflections. Forewing ground color massicot yellow; dark markings blackish fuscous with blueish reflections; on base of costa a large oval dark mark, on midcosta a quadrate mark and beginning on dorsum and extending to apex a large, irregular dark area (in some specimens a tiny, ill—defined spot on dorsum near base); cilia brown. Hindwing grayish fuscous; cilia slightly lighter. Foreleg cream color, marked grayish fuscous on outer side; midleg cream color; tibia suffused fuscous; hindleg cream color; tibia with long, grayish, hairlike scales dorsally. Abdomen grayish fuscous dorsally, cream color ventrally.

Male genitalia slide USNM 24225. Harpe of about equal width throughout; sacculus extended as a short hook; cucullus subtriangular, fleshy. Socius a broad pad armed with stout setae. Uncus short, pointed. Vinculum a broad band; saccus slightly longer than harpe. Tegumen short and broad. Aedeagus very slender, pointed.

Female genitalia slides USNM 24226, 24784. Ostium very small, oval, emerging ventrally from a slit. Inception of ductus seminalis from posterior half of ductus bursae(?). Ductus bursae very slender, membranous. Bursa copulatrix sclerotized posteriorly; membranous in anterior half and ornamented with coarse granules. Signum a crescentic band with a long, pointed bar at each end.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 100847.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Hiva Oa, Atuona.

DISTRIBUTION.—Hiva Oa, Tahiti.

FOOD PLANT.—Unknown.

Described from the holotype (3 Mar 1968), 8 and 1 paratypes as follows: Hiva Oa, Atuona, 11 Feb to 8 Mar 1968, 7 Puamau, 8 Feb 1968, 1 Tahiti, Punaauia, Bel Air Hotel, 7 Jan 1968, 1.

This species is distinguished from other members of the genus (aurisquamosa, trissostacta, etc.) by its scattered dark markings.

Literature Cited

Abraham, E.V.

1958.   Pests of Cashew (Anacardium occidentale) in South India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, 28(4):531–543, figures 1–4.

Abraham, E.V., and M.D. Padmanaban

1968.   Bionomics and Control of the Diamond-back Moth, Plutella maculipennis Curtis. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, 33(3):513–519.

Adamczewski, S.

1951.   On the Systematics and Origin of the Generic Group Oxyptilus Zeller (Lep. Alucitidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Entomology, 1(5):303–387, plates 9–20.

Adamson, A.M.

1936.   Marquesan Insects: Environment. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin, 139: 1–73, plates 1–8. [Pacific Entomological Survey Publication, 9.]

1939.   Review of the Fauna of the Marquesas Islands and a Discussion of Its Origin. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin, 159: 1–93, illustrated. [Pacific Entomological Survey Publication, 10.]

1943.   Enemies and Diseases of the Honeybee in Trinidad. Proceedings of the Agricultural Society of Trinidad and Tobago, 43(1):37–53.

Agenjo, Ramón

1952.   Faunala Lepidopterológica aolmeriense: Premio “Alonson de Herrera 1950,” del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientìficas. 370 pages, 24 plates. Madrid.

1963a. Algunos lepidópteros de Punta Umbrìa, provincia de Huelva. La canaria Eilema albicosta (Rghfr., 1894) neuva para España y Europa, (Lepidoptera). Graellsia, Revista de Entomólogos Españoles, 20(1–3):1–20, plate 1. 1963b. El microlepidóptero etiopicco Doraba laisalis (Wik., 1859) plaga del piemiento y la berenjena en Somalia, hallado en Punta Umbrìa, provinciade Huelva, nuevo para la fauna Paleárctica. Graellsia, Revista de Entómologos Españoles, 20(1–3):23–28. figures 1–3.

Ahmad, Taskhir

1949.   Insect Fauna of Afghanistan, IV: Lepidoptera. The Indian Journal of Entomology, 8(2):202–223.

Aiello, Annette

1979.   Life History and Behavior of the Case-bearer Phereoeca allutella (Lepidoptera: Tineidae). Psyche, 86(2–3): 125–136, figures 1–14.

Aitken, Audrey D.

1963.   A Key to the Larvae of Some Species of Phycitinae (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae) Associated with Stored Products, and Some Related Species. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 54(2): 175–188, figures 1–24.

Amsel, H.G.

1936.   Zur kenntnis der Kleinschmetterlings-fauna Sardiniens. Veröffentlichungen aus dem Deutschen Kolonial- und Ubersee-Museum in Bremen, 1(3): 344368, figures 1–4, plate 15.

1954a. Neu Pterophoriden, Gelechiiden und Tineiden aus Palästina und Malta. Bulletin de la Sociétéfouad Ier d'Entomologie (Le Caire), 38:51–57, figures 1–8.

1954b. Die Microlepidopteren der Brandt'schen IranAusbeute. Arhiv for Zoologi, 6():255–326, plates 1–33.

1954–1957. Microlepidóptera Venezolana, I. Boletin de Entomologa Venezolana, 10():1–336; () plates 1–110.

1955.   Über Mediterrane Microlepidopteren und einige Transcaspische Arten. Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, 31(83):1–64, illustrated.

Andrews, E.A.

1916.   Notes on Insect Pests of Green Manures and Shade Trees. Indian Tea Association Scientific Department Quarterly Journal. pt. 1: 18–21.

Anonymous

1802.   Prodromus Lepidopterorum Britannicorum. A concise Catalogue of British Lepidopterous Insects, with the Times and Places of Appearance in the Winged State 1–39. Addenda 1–6. Reprint 1951 [According to E.W. Classey, original actually written by A.H. Haworth.]

Appert, J.

1964.   Fauna Parasitaire du Niébé (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. = Vigna catjang (Burm.) Walp.) en République du Sénégal. L'Agronomie Tropicale, 19(10):788–799.

Atmore, Edward A.

1884.   Importation of Ephestia passulella and E. ficulella at King's Lynn. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, 20:258–259.

Auctorum

1919.   Notes and Exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian

Entomological Society for 1918, 4(1):1–8.

1920.   Notes and Exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1919, 4(2):323–333.

1921.   Notes and Exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1920, 4(3):458.

1922.   Notes and Exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1921, 5(1):8–20.

1923.   Notes and Exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1922, 5(2):179–204.

1927.   Notes and Exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1926, 6(3):347–349.

1928.   Notes and Exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1927, 7(1):6–8.

1936a. Notes and Exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1935, 9(1):33–36.

1936b. Notes and Exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1935, 9(2):133–137.

1939.   Notes and Exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1938, 10(2):175–177.

1941.   Notes and Exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1940, 11(1):9–11.

1942.   Notes and Exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1941, 11(2):133–134.

1947.   Notes and Exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1946, 13(1):1–31.

1948.   Notes and Exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1947, 13(2):199–222.

1952.   Notes and Exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1951, 14(3):343–370.

1953.   Notes and Exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1952, 15(1):1–20.

1954.   Notes and Exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1953, 15(2):263–291.

1965.   Notes and Exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1964, 19(1):2–38.

1975.   Notes and Exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1973, 22(1):1–25.

1979.   A Field Guide to the Smaller British Lepidoptera. 271 pages. London: British Entomological & Natural History Society. [Based on L. T. Ford, 1949.]

Aurivillius, C.V.S.

[1898]. Zu den von J. Chr. Fabricius aus Dänischen Sammlungen Beschreibenen Lepidopteren. Entomologisk Tidskrift, 18(3–4):139–174. [Title page says 1897, but actually issued 1898.] [Contribution.]

1922.   In Carl Skottsberg, editor, The Natural History of Juan Fernandez and Easter Island, 3(2):263–270, plate 11. Uppsala.

Azuma, Seiji

1965.   Heterocera from the Yonaguni Island, Southern Ryukyus (Lepidoptera): Okinawa Seibutsugakka, Okinawa Seibutsugakkai Shi. Biological Magazine of Okinawa, 2(4):52–57, figures 1–4.

Balachowsky, A.S.

1972.   Entomologie appliquée a L'agriculture. Volume 2, pages 1059–1634, illustrated. Paris.

Ballard, E.

1925.   Some of the Causes of Low-grade Cotton. The Review of Applied Entomology, series A, 13(10):520–521.

Banks, N.

1909.   Notes and News. Entomological News, 20:396–397. [For dates of Guérin-Meneville's Iconographie du Règne Animal].

Barnes, William, and A.W. Lindsey

1921.   The Pterophoridae of America, North of Mexico. Contributions to the Natural History of the Lepidoptera of North America, 4(4):281–478, plates 41–54. index.

Barnes, William, and J. McDunnough

1917.   Check List of the Lepidoptera of Boreal America. viii + 392 pages. Decatur, Illinois: Herald Press.

Barrett, C.G.

1875.   On the Species of Ephestia Occurring in Britain. The Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, 11:269–273.

1905.   The Lepidoptera of the British Islands. Volume 10, 1–381, plates 425–469. London: Lovell Reeve and Co., Ltd.

Bartlett-Calvert, William

1886.   Catálogo de los Lepidópteros, Rhopalóceros i Heteróceros de Chile. Santiago de Chile, University Annals, 69:311–352 [reprint pages 1–44].

Batra, H.N.

1956.   Some Insects of Economic Importance in Kulu Valley, Punjab. Plant Protection Bulletin (New Delhi), 8(3–4):18–23.

Batra, H.N., and H.S. Bhattacherjee

1961.   Short Notes: Occurrence of Hymenia recurvalis (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) as a Bad Pest of Some Leafy Vegetables. Indian Journal of Entomology, 22(3):128–130.

Beardsley, John W.

1961.   A Review of the Hawaiian Braconidae (Hymenoptera). Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1960, 17(3):333–366.

1966.   Insects and Other Terrestrial Arthropods from the Leeward Hawaiian Islands. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1965, 19(2):157–185.

Bedford, H.W.

1931.   A Report on the Work Carried out at the Khartoum Laboratory during 1929. The Review of Applied Entomology, series A, 19(6):391–392.

1932.   The Weed “Hambuk” (Abutilon ssp.) and the Part It Plays in the Conservation of Parasites of the Various Species of Bollworm which Attack Cotton in the Sudan. The Review of Applied Entomology, series A, 20(11):622.

Beirne, Bryan P.

1952.   British Pyralid and Plume Moths. Pages 1–208, figures 1–189, plates 1–16. London: Frederick Warne and Co.

Beller, Samuel

1948.   A Summary of the Insects and Flora of Guam. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine. Division of Foreign Plant Quarantines, Honolulu, T. H. [mimeographed]. p. 24–31.

Benander, Per

1965.   Notes on Larvae of Swedish Micro-Lepidoptera, II. Opuscula entomologica, 30(1–2):1–23.

Berg, Carlos

1880.   Observations acerca de la Familla Hyponomeutidae. Anales de la Sociedad Científica Argentina, 10:85–91, 99–109.

Beri, Y.P.

1961.   Studies on the Application of Dyar's Law to the Larval Stages of Plutella maculipennis Curtis. The Indian Journal of Entomology, 23(1):69–70. [Actually published March 1962.]

Bethune-Baker, George T.

1894.   XXV: Descriptions of the Pyralidae, Crambidae, and Phycidae collected by the late T. Vernon Wollaston in Madeira. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1894:581–586.

Beutenmuller, William

1889.   Two New Species of Tineidae from the Alleutian Islands. The Canadian Entomologist, 21:27.

Bhattacherjee, N.S., and M.G. Ramadas Menon

1963.   External Structure of the Various Stages of Hymenia recurvalis (Fabricius) (Pyralidae: Lepidoptera). Indian Journal of Entomology, 24(4):252–264, plate 1: figures 1–14.

Bianchi, F.A.

1940.   Notes on the Role of the Self-Introduced Insects in the Economic Entomology of Hawaii. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1939, 10(3):377–388.

Biezanko, C.M., and A. Ruffinelli, and C.S. Carbonell

1961.   Nuevas Especies de Lepidoptera para la Fauna del Uruguay. Actas y Trabajos del Primer Congresso Sudamericano de Zoologia, 3(4:Entomología):31–46. La Plata, Argentina. [Published 8 September 1961.]

Bigot, L.

1966.   Les Oxyptilus et Trichoptilus de la Faunae française. Alexanor, 4(6):272–286, illustrated.

Billberg, G.J.

1820.   Enumeratio Insectorum in Museo Gustàv Johàn Billberg. 138 pages. Stockholm.

Blackwelder, Richard E.

1947.   The Dates and Editions of Curtis' British Entomology. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 107(5):1–27, plates 1–4.

Boisduval, J.B.A.D. de

1883a. Mémoire sur les Lépidoptères de Madagascar, Bourton et Maurice. Nouvelles Annales du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle, series 3, 2:149–270, illustrated.

1883b. Faune entomologique de Madagascar, Bourton et Maurice. Lépidoptères. 122 pages, 16 plates. Paris: A la Libraire Encyclopédique de Roret.

Boles, H.P., and F.O. Marzke.

1966.   Lepidoptera Infesting Stored Products. In Smith, editor, Insect Colonization and Mass Production. xxi + 618 pages, illustrated. New York and London: Academic Press.

Bollmann, Hans-Günther

1955.   Die Raupen mitleleuropäisher Pyraustinae (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Beiträge zur Entomologie, 5():521–639, figures 1–279.

Bondar, Gregoria

1928.   Séria praga do repolho na Bahía—Plutella maculipennis Curtis. Correio Agricola 6(11–12):259–260. [Published also in 1929, Boletin Laboratoria Patologia Vegetal, 8:35–38 and in Chacaras Quintaes, 38(6):602, 1 figure.]

1940.   Insectos Nocivos e Molestias do Coqueiro (Cocos nucifera) no Brasil. Instituto Central de Fomento Economico da Bahia Boletim, 8:1–160.

Bottimer, L.J.

1926.   Notes on Some Lepidoptera from Eastern Texas. Journal of Agricultural Research, 33(9):797–819, figures 1–3.

Bourquin, Fernando

1939.   Metamorphosis de Plutella maculipennis (Lep. Plutellidae). Physis (Buenos Aires), 17:409–413, figures 1–3.

Bovingdon, H.H.S.

1933.   Report on the Infestation of Cured Tobacco in London by the Cacao Moth Ephestia elutella Hb. Empire Marketing Board (London), 67:1–88, figures 1–4, plates 3, 4.

Bradley, J.D.

1951.   Notes on the Family Arrhenophanidae (Lepidoptera: Heteroneura), with Special Reference to the Morphology of the Genitalia, and Descriptions of One New Genus and Two New Species. The Entomologist, 84(1059):178–185.

1952.   Some Important Species of the Genus Cryptophlebia Walsingham, 1899, with Descriptions of Three New Species (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). Bulletin Entomological Research, 43(4):679–689, figures 1–8, plates 24, 25.

1953.   New Microlepidoptera from Fiji. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society, 15(1):109–114, figures 1–9.

1957.   Microlepidoptera from Rennell and Bellona Islands. The Natural History of Rennell Island, British Solomon Islands. Volume 2(19):87–112, plates 1–12.

1961.   Microlepidoptera from the Solomon Islands: Additional Records and Descriptions of Microlepidoptera Collected in the Solomon Islands by the Rennell Island Expedition 1953–1954. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Entomology, 10(4):113–168, plates 5–19.

1962.   Microlepidoptera from the New Hebrides. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Entomology, 12(5):249–271, plates 14–27.

1965.   Ruwenzori Expedition 1952, Microlepidoptera. Volume 2(12):81–148, 215 figures. London: British Museum (Natural History).

1966.   Some Changes in the Nomenclature of British Lepidoptera, Part 4. Entomologist's Gazette, 17(4):213–235.

1967.   Some Lepidoptera of Economic Importance in Commonwealth Countries. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae, 15:501–519, figures 1–12.

Bradley, J.D., and E.C. Pelham-Clinton

1967.   The Lepidoptera of the Burren, Co. Clare, W. Ireland. Entomologist's Gazette, 18:115–153.

Bradley, J.D., W.G. Tremewan, and Arthur Smith

1979.   British Tortricoid Moths, Tortricidae: Olethreutinae. i–viii, 1–336, pl. 1–43. London: The Ray Society.

Braun, Annette F.

1935.   Notes and New Species of Microlepidoptera. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 61:45–52.

Bretherton, R.F.

1960.   Crocidosema plebeiana Zeller at Portland. The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation, 72(4):96.

Bréthes, Juan

1923.   La Polilla del Repollo (Putella maculipennis Curt.). Anales de la Sociedad Rural Argentina, 57(4): 162–166, figures 1–3.

Bridwell, John Colburn

1919a. Some Notes on Hawaiian and Other Bethylidae (Hymenoptera) with Descriptions of New Species. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1918, 4(1):21–38.

1919b. Miscellaneous Notes on Hymenoptera. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1918, 4(1): 109–165.

Britton, Wilton Everett

1920.   Check-list of the Insects of Connecticut. State Geological and Natural History Survey, Bulletin (Hartford), 31:1–397. [State of Connecticut Public Document No. 47.]

Brooks, J.W., and T.C. Allen

1940.   What's New in Farm Science: Derris-nicotine Dust

Controls Two Cabbage Insects. In Annual Report of the Director. Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Bulletin, 449(2):56.

Brower, Auburn E.

1983.   A List of the Lepidoptera of Maine, Part 2: The Microlepidoptera, Section 1: Limacodidae through Cossidae. Department of Entomology Technical Bulletin (Orono, Maine), 109: ix + 60 pages.

Brower, J. H.

1976.   Cytoplasmic Incompatibility: Occurrence in a Stored-product Pest Ephestia cautella. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 69:1011–1015.

Brown, Richard L.

1979.   The Valid Generic and Tribal Names for the Codling Moth Cydia pomonella (Olethreutinae: Tortricidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 72(4):565–567.

Bruner, S.C.

1931.   Informe del Departamento de Entomologia y Fitopatologia. Estación Experimental Agronómica Santiago de las Vegas. 1929/1930, 1–74, 14 figures.

1935.   La Maruca y Otros Insectos de las Habas de Lima. Estación Experimental Agronómica Santiago de las Vegas, Boletin, 56:1–52, 25 figures.

Bruner, S.C., F. Agete, and Y.L. Bouclé

1930.   Informe: Sobre Tratamientos de Habas de Lima Verdes para Destruir el Insecto Maruca testulalis (Lepidoptera-Pyralidae). Revista de Agricultura Comercio y Trabajo (Ministerio de Agricultura, Cuba), 12(10):31–36.

Buckler, William

1882.   Natural History of Ephestia passulella. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, 19:104–106.

Burges, H.D.

1956.   Some Effects of the British Climate and Constant Temperatures on the Life-cycle of Ephestia cautella (Walker). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 46(4):813–835, figures 1–5.

Busck, August

1911.   [Note.] Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 13(2):80–81.

1914.   New Microlepidoptera from Hawaii. Insecutor In-scitiae Menstruus, 2(7):103–107.

1934.   Microlepidoptera of Cuba. Entomologica Americana, 13(4):151–217, plates 30–36.

Butani, Dhamo K.

1958.   Note on Hymenia fascialis C., a Pest of Sugar Beet. Current Science (India), 27(5):182–183.

Butler, Arthur Gardiner

1879.   Part III. In Illustrations of Typical Specimens of Lepidoptera Heterocera in the Collection of the British Museum, xviii + 82 pages, plates 41–60.

1880.   On a Second Collection of Lepidoptera Made in Formosa by H. E. Hobson, Esq. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1880:666–691.

1881.   On a Collection of Nocturnal Lepidoptera from the Hawaiian Islands. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 5, 7(40):317–333; (41):392–408, figures 1, 2.

1882.   On a Small Collection of Lepidoptera from the Hawaiian Islands. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1882:31–45, 1 figure.

1883.   On Lepidoptera from Manchuria and the Corea. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 5, 11:109–117.

1884a. The Lepidoptera Collected by Herr Palisa at Caroline Island in May, 1883. Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences (Washington, D.C.), 2:93–96.

1884b. On a Collection of Lepidoptera Made by Major J.W. Yerbury at or near Aden. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1884:478–503, plate 46.

1886a. On Lepidoptera Collected by Major Yerbury in Western India. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1886:355–394, plate 35.

1886b. XV: Descriptions of 21 New Genera and 103 New Species of Lepidoptera-Heterocera from the Australian Region. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1886:381–441, plates 9, 10.

Butler, George D., Jr.

1961.   Insects and Other Arthropods from Laysan Island. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1960, 17(3):379–387.

Butler, George D., Jr., and Robert L. Usinger

1963.   Insects and Other Arthropods from Kure Island. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1962, 18(2):237–244.

Buxton. P.A., and G.H.E. Hopkins

1927.   Researches in Polynesia and Melanesia: An Account of the Insects of Samoa, Tonga, the Ellice Group and the New Hebrides in 1924–1925. Medical Entomology, pts. 1–4. Memoirs of the London School of Hygene and Tropical Medecine, 1:1–260, figures 1–43, plates 1–12.

Campos, S., Luciano, and Luis E. Peña G.

1973.   Los Insectos de Isla de Pascua. Revista Chilena de Entomologia, 7:217–229.

Chapman, T.A.

1908.   Notes from the Pyrenees. The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation, 20:50–53, plates 6–8.

Chittenden, F.H.

1897.   Some Little–known Insects Affecting Stored Vegetable Products. Division of Entomology, U. S. Department of Agriculture Bulletin, new series, 8:7–9, 39–43, figures 1, 10.

1911.   The Fig Moth. United States Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology, Bulletin, 104:1–40, figures 1–4, plates 1–4.

1913.   Papers on Insects Affecting Vegetable and Truck Crops: The Spotted Beet Webworm. United States Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology, Bulletin, 127(1): 1–11, figures 1–2, plates 1–4.

Chiu, Shiu-chen [Sally Chiu Wan] and Ching-chin Chien.

1972.   Observations on Apanteles plutellae Kurd., a Larval Parasite of Diamond-back Moth (Plutella xylostella Lin.). Bulletin of Plant Protection, 14(4): 145–152.

1974.   Mass Production and Field Liberation of a Larval Parasite (Apanteles plutellae) of the Diamond-back Moth. Journal of Taiwan Aricultural Research, 23(1):48–60, figures 1–10.

Clarke, J.F. Gates

1955–1970. Catalogue of the Type Specimens of Microlepidoptera in the British Museum (Natural History) Described by Edward Meyrick, 1:i–viii, 1–332, plates 1–4 (1955); 3:1–600, plates 1–298 (1958); 4:1–521, plates 1–252 (1963); 5:1–581, plates 1–283 (1965); 6:1–537, plates 1–267 (1969); 7:1–531, plates 1–265 (1970); 8:1–261, plates 1–60 (1970).

1965.   Microlepidoptera of Juan Fernandez Island. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 117(3508): 1–106, figures 1–111, plate 1.

1971.   The Lepidoptera of Rapa Island. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 56:282 pages, 175 figures, 29 plates. Washington, DC.

1976.   Insects of Micronesia: Microlepidoptera: Tortricoidea. 9(1):1–144, figures 1–65, plates 1–13. Honolulu, Hawaii: Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

Clemens, Brackenridge

1859, 1861. Contributions to American Lepidopterology. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1859:256–328; 1861(3):4–15.

1872.   The Tineina of North America, edited by H.T. Stainton. xv + 282 pages, illustrated. London.

Clerck, C.A.

1759–[1764]. Icones Insectorum rariorum cum nominibus eorum trivialibus, locisque e C. Linnaei…Systema Naturae allegatis. Sectio primo, plates 1–12 (1759); Sectio segundo, plates 13–55 ([1764]). Holmiae.

Cockayne, E.A.

1952.   A Note on Hymenia recurvalis Fabricius. The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation, 64(3):71–72, plate 3: figures 12–14.

Cockerell, T.D.A.

1916.   Sunflower Insects in California and South Africa, Canadian Entomologist, 48(3):76–79.

Cogburn, Robert R.

1973a. Stored-Product Insect Populations in Port Warehouses of the Gulf Coast. Environmental Entomology, 2(3):401–407.

1973b. Stored-Product Insect Populations in Boxcars Delivering Flour and Rice to Gulf Coast Ports. Environmental Entomology, Environmental Entomology, 2(3):427–431.

Common, I.F.B.

1979.   The Larvae and Pupae of Imma acosma (Turner) and I. vaticina Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Immidae), and the Taxonomic Relationships of the Family. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society, 18:33–38.

Comstock, John Adams

1966.   Lepidoptera of American Samoa with Particular Reference to Biology and Ecology. Pacific Insects Monograph, 11:1–74.

Corbet, A. Steven, and W.H.T. Tams

1943a. II: Revisional Notes on Achroia grisella (F.) and A. innotata (Wlk.) (Pyralidae: Galleriinae). In Observations on Species of Lepidoptera Infesting Stored Products. The Entomologist, 76(957):28–30, figures 7, 8, plate 1: figures 9, 10.

1943b. VIII: Trichophaga tapetzella (L.) and Allied Species (Tinaeidae: Tinaeinae). In Observations on Species of Lepidoptera Infesting Stored Products. The Entomologist, 76(962): 130–132, figures 3–5.

1943c. Keys for the Identification of the Lepidoptera Infesting Stored Food Products. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, series B, 113:55–148, figures 1–287, plates 1–5.

Corbett, G.H.

1922.   Moths from Coconut Spikes. Malayan Agricultural Journal, 10:184–185.

1935.   Division of Entomology. In Annual Report for the Year 1934. (Department of Agriculture Straits Settlements and Federated Malay States), general series, 21:43–56. Kuala Lumpur.

Cotes, E.C.

1894.   Miscellaneous Notes from the Entomological Section. Indian Museum Notes, 3(3): 110–141, illustrated.

Cotes, E.C., and C. Swinhoe. See Swinhoe and Cotes.

Cotton, R.T.

1918.   Insects Attacking Vegetables in Porto Rico. The Journal of the Department of Agriculture of Porto Rico (Rio Piedras), 2(4):265–317.

1950.   Notes on the Almond Moth. Journal of Economic Entomology, 43(5):733.

Cowland, J.W.

1933.   Gezira Entomological Section, G.A.R.S. Final Report on Experimental Work, 1931–32. The Review of Applied Entomology, series A, 21(11):582–583.

Cramer, Pieter

1777–1782. De uitlandsche Kapellen, &c.—Papilons exotiques des trois parties du monde, l'Asie, l'Afrique et l'Amerique, 2:1–151, plates 97–192 (1777); 4:1–252, plates 289–400 (1780–1782). Amsterdam: S.J. Baalde. [Pages 33–252 and plates following page 253 of volume 4 evidently by Stoll. With regard to the proper authorship in Cramer, 1777–1782, E.L. Todd, 1959 (U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin, 1201:23), has indicated the following: “In the Catalogue of the Books, Manuscripts, Maps and Drawings in the British Museum (Natural History), 1903, 1:398, there is a statement that the pages of volume 4 beyond page 32 of Cramer's De Uitlandsche Kapellen Voorkomende in de Drie Waereld-Deelen Asia, Africa en America should be credited to Caspar Stoll. Except for the signed footnotes and the 29 page Proeve, which were written by Stoll, I consider Cramer to be the author of the entire volume. In the bibliographic citations in the supplementary work, Aanhangsel van het Werk, de Uitlandsche Kapellen Voorkomende in de Drie Waereld-Deelen Asia, Africa en America, Stoll credits the species described in volume 4 to Cramer.”]

Curran, C.H.

1926.   The Identification and Control of Adult Lepidopterous Insects Attacking Stored Products. Scientific Agriculture (Ottawa), 1926:383–388, figures 1–6.

Curtis, John

1824–1839. British Entomology: Being Illustrations and Descriptions of the Genera of Insects Found in Great Britain and Ireland Containing Coloured Figures from Nature…. Volumes 5, 6 (1832), pages unnumbered, 94 plates with associated text, plates irregularly numbered. London. [Complete work contains 769 colored plates in 16 parts for arrangement in 8 volumes. An additional edition was published in 1862. For details see Sherborn and Durrant, 1911; Blackwelder, 1947.]

1837.   A Guide to an Arrangement of British Insects; Being a Catalogue of All the Named Species Hitherto Discovered in Great Britain and Ireland. 2nd edition, vi + 294 pages.

1841–1849. Observations on the Natural History and Economy of the Different Insects Affecting the Turnip Crop—Corn-Crops…Peas and Beans….IV. [various pagings] plates. London. [Each part has special title page. 1: Insects, Injurious and Beneficial; 2: Turnips-Diseases and Pests; 3: Maize-Diseases and Pests; 4: Peas-Diseases and Pests. Not seen.]

Dale, P.S., and J.L. Herring

1959.   A List of Pests of Plants Recorded from Western Samoa. West Samoa Department of Agriculture, Forests, and Fisheries (Laufasi Ola) Information Circular, 4(): 12–15.

Davis, C.J.

1953.   New Host and Insect Records from the Island of Hawaii. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1952, 15(1):85–86.

1958.   Recent Introductions for Biological Control in Hawaii, III. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1957, 16(3):356–358.

DeBach, Paul

1962.   An Analysis of Successes in Biological Control of Insects in the Pacific Area. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1961, 18(1):69–79.

de Bussy, L.P.

1916.   Verslag over het Deli-Proefstation gedurende het jarr van 1 Juli 1914 tot 30 Juni 1915 [Report on the Deli Experiment Station during the year from 1 July 1914 through 30 June 1915]. Mdededeelingen van Deli Proefstation (Medan), 9(4):90–140.

d'Emmerez de Charmoy, D., and S. Gebert

1921.   Insect Pests of Various Minor Crops and Fruit Trees in Mauritius. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 12(2): 181–190.

de Joannis, M.J.

1913.   In Duport, Liste des espèces de Lépidoptères citees par les travaux les plus récents comme nuisibles a diverses cultures dans l'Inde et à Java. Bulletin Economique de l'Indochine, new series, 102:309–375, Gouvernement Général de l'Indochine, Hanoi-Haiphong.

1929–1930. Lépidoptères Hétérocères du Tonkin. Annales de la Société entomologique de France. 98(4):[129–320] 361–552 (1929); 99(suppl.): [321–596] 559–834; plates 1–6 (1930).

DeLucca, C.

1949.   Microlepidoptera New to the Maltese Islands. The Entomologist, 32(1034):148–149.

Diakonoff, A.

1938.   Indo-Malayan and Papuan Microlepidoptera; 1: Notes on the Tropical Tobacco Moth, Setomorpha rutella Zeller (Tineidae). Treubia, 16(3):399–414, figures 1–10.

1952–1955. Microlepidoptera of New Guinea. Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandsche Akadamie van Wetenschappen, AFG. Natuurkunde, 1, 49(1): 1–168 (1952); 2, 49(3):1–166 (1953); 3, 49(4): 1–164 (1954); 4, 50(1):1–192 (1954); 5, 50(3): 1–212 (1955).

1968.   Microlepidoptera of the Philippine Islands. United States National Museum Bulletin, 257: v + 484 pages, 846 figures.

1969.   Tortricidae from the Seychelles and Aldabra (Lepidoptera). Tijdschrift voor Entomologie, 112(3):81–100, figures 1–3, plates 1–13.

1973.   The South Asiatic Olethreutini (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae), Zologische Monographiēn van het Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, 1:xxi + 690 pages, 732 figures, 15 plates. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

1982.   On a Collection of Some Families of Microlepidoptera from Sri Lanka (Ceylon). Zoologische Verhandelingen, 193:1–124, figures 1–65, plates 1–18.

Diakonoff, A., and John B. Heppner

1980.   A Change of Names in the Choreutidae (Lepidoptera). Entomologische Berichten, 40:196.

Dick, J.

1951.   Sugar-cane Entomology in Natal, South Africa. In Proceedings of the International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists. Seventh Congress, Brisbane, 1950, pages 377–394, illustrated. Brisbane.

Dickens, G.R.

1936.   The Scent Glands of Certain Phycitidae (Lepidoptera). Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London, 85(14):331–362, figures 1–27.

Dognin, Paul

1904.   Hétéres nouveaux de l'Amerique du Sud. Annales de la Société Entomologique de Belgique, 48:115–134.

Druce, Herbert

1888a. 1: List of the Lepidoptera Heterocera collected by Mr. C.M. Woodford at Suva, Viti Levu, Fiji Islands, with the Descriptions of Some New Species. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1888:219–231, plate 13.

1888b. 2: List of the Lepidoptera Heterocera, with Descriptions of the New Species, Collected by Mr. C.M. Woodford at Aola, Guadalcanar Island, Solomon Islands. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1888:570–580, plate 29.

Drury, D.

1770 [1773]. Illustrations of Natural History; Wherein Are Exhibited Upwards of Two Hundred and Forty Figures of Exotic Insects…. Volume 1, xxvii + 130 pages, 50 plates; volume 2, vii + 90 pages, 50 color plates. London: B. White. [There is a note in the British Museum (Natural History)'s copy, as follows: “…names of the Insects according to the System of Linnaeus.” The note was issued with volume 2. These names should therefore be dated 1773 (vide volume 2, page vi).]

Dugdale, J.S.

1977.   Notes on Lepidoptera of Lakeba and Moce Is., Lau Group, Fiji, with an Annotated List of the Macrolepidoptera. Lau-tonga, The Royal Society of New Zealand Bulletin (Wellington), 17:63–89.

Duport, L.

1913.   Notes sur quelques maladies et ennemis des plantes cultivees on Extreme-Orient, Gouvernement general de l'Indochine. Bulletin Economique de l'Indochine (Hanoi-Haiphong), new series, 99(102, 105):1–147, 781–803.

Dyar, Harrison G.

[1903].  A List of North American Lepidoptera and Key to the Literature of this Order of Insects. United States National Museum Bulletin, 52: viii + 723 pages. [Title page says 1902, but actually issued 14 January 1903.]

1914.   Report on the Lepidoptera of the Smithsonian Biological Survey of the Panama Canal Zone. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 47(2050): 139–350.

Elton, E.T.G.

1956.   Aantasting van moll-platen door de Kleine wasmot Achroia grisella Fabr. (Lep., Pyralidae). Entomologische Berichten, 16:12–14.

El Zoheiry, H.E.M.S., and M.A. Asem

1952.   The Chinese Jute or Hollyhock Moth Crocidosema plebiana Zell, as an Anticipated Cotton Pest. In Transactions of the 9th International Congress of Entomology, pages 472–477, plates 1–3. Amsterdam.

1953.   The Review of Applied Entomology, series A, 41(8):229.

Emmet, A.M., editor

1979.   A Field Guide to the Smaller British Lepidoptera. 271 pages. London: The British Entomological and Natural History Society.

Esaki, Teiso

1932.   Nippon Konchuzukan: Iconographia insectorum japanicorum, 1:1–123; 1–15; 1–2241, illustrated. Tokyo. [Pagination partly in Japanese, partly in English.]

Essig, E.O.

1920.   Important Dried Fruit Insects in California. The Monthly Bulletin (California State Department of Agriculture), supplement, 9(3):119–125, figures 33–37.

1926.   Insects of Western North America, xi + 1035 pages, 766 figures. New York: MacMillan.

Essig, E.O., and W.M. Hoskins

1944.   Insects and Other Pests Attacking Agricultural Crops. California Agricultural Extension Service Circular, 87:1–155, figures 1–108.

Fabricius, J.C.

1775.   Systema Entomologiae, sistens Insectorum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species….832 pages. Flensburg and Leipzig: Libraria Kortii.

1781.   Species Insectorum. Volume 2, 517 pages. Hamburg: E. Hohn.

1787.   Mantissa Insectorum. Volume 2, 382 pages. Hafniae: C.G. Proft.

1793–1794. Entomologica Systematica Emendata et Aucta: Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species adjectis synonimis, locis, observationibus, descriptionibus. 3 (Glossata) (1):1–487; (2):1–349. Hafniae: C.G. Proft.

1798.   Entomologiae Systematicae Supplementum. 572 pages. Hafniae: Proft et Storch.

Felder, Rudolph, Cajetan Felder, and A.F. Rogenhofer

1864–1875. Lepidoptera. In H.K. von Scherzer, editor, Reise der Österreichischen Fregatte Novara um die Erde, in den Jahren 1857, 1858, 1859: Zoologischer Theil, 2(2):1–20, 140 plates. Wien: Aus der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Hof-und Staatsdruckerie.

Fernald, C.H.

1891.   [Contribution]. In John B. Smith, List of the Lepidoptera of Boreal America. v + 124 pages. Philadelphia.

1898.   The Pterophoridae of North America. Revised edition, 84 pages, 9 plates. Boston.

1908.   The Genera of the Tortricidae and Their Types. 66 pages. Amherst, Massachusetts.

Ferrière, C.

1929.   The Asiatic and African Species of the Genus Elasmus Westw. (Hym., Chalcid.). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 20(4):411–423.

Fitch, A.

1856.   [Insects] Infesting Garden Vegetables. In First and Second Report on the Noxious, Beneficial and Other Insects of the State of Ne York, 1:170–176.

Fletcher, D.S.

1979.   The Generic Names of Moths of the World, I.W.B. Nye, editor, xx + 243 pages, 18 figures. London: Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History). [See especially for dates of publication of Felder et al., 1864–1875.]

Fletcher, T. Bainbrigge

1909.   The Plume-Moths of Ceylon. Spolia Zeylanica, 6(21):1–39, plates A, F, map.

1910a. No. XI: Lepidoptera, Exclusive of the Tortricidae and Tineidae, with Some Remarks on their Distribution and Means of Dispersal Amongst the Islands of the Indian Ocean. The Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, 13(2):265–323.

1910b. No. XIV: The Orneodidae and Pterophoridae of the Seychelles Expedition. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, series 2 (Zoology), 13(3):397–403.

1914.   Some South Indian Insects and Other Animals of Importance, xxii + 565 pages, 440 figures, 50 plates. Madras. [Printed by the Superintendent, Government Press.]

1917.   Report of the Proceedings of the Second Entomological Meeting, Pusa. 340 pages illustrated. Calcutta.

1919.   Second Hundred Notes on Indian Insects. Agricultural Research Institute of Pusa Bulletin (Calcutta), 89:v, 1–102, figures 1–58.

1920.   Report of the Imperial Entomologist. In Scientific Reports of the Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, 1919–1920, pages 68–94, plates 4–10. Calcutta.

1921a. Life-Histories of Indian Insects. Microlepidoptera. Memoirs of the Department of Agriculture in India, Entomological Series, 6(1–9):i–ii, 1–217, plates 1–68.

1921b. Report of the Imperial Entomologist. In Scientific Reports of the Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, 1920–1921, pages 41–59, plates 3–8. Calcutta.

1926.   On Walker's Types of Plume-moths in the National Collection: Redescriptions and Notes. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1925(3–4):599–639.

1929.   A List of the Generic Names Used for Microlepidoptera. Memoirs of the Department of Agriculture in India, Entomological Series, 11:i–ix, 1–244.

1931.   Alucitidae (Pterophoridae). In Catalogue of Indian Insects, 20:i–iv, 1–61. Calcutta.

1932.   Alucitidae (Pterophoridae), Tortricina and Gelechiadae. In Life-Histories of Indian Microlepidoptera (Second Series). The Imperial Council of Agricultural Research Scientific Monograph, 2:1–58, plates 1–35. Calcutta: Government of India.

1933.   Cosmopterygidae to Neopseustidae. In Life-Histories of Indian Microlepidoptera (Second Series). The Imperial Council of Agricultural Research Scientific Monograph, 4:1–85, plates 1–77. Delhi.

Fleury, A.C.

1932.   Division of Quarantine Administration. California Department of Agriculture Monthly Bulletin (Sacramento), 20(12):793–806.

Forbes, W.T.M.

1923.   The Lepidoptera of New York and Neighboring States. Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station Memoir, 68:1–729, illustrated.

1930.   Scientific Survey of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands. New York Academy of Sciences, 12(1):1–171, plate 1.

1931.   Supplementary Report on the Heterocera or Moths of Porto Rico. Journal of the Department of Agriculture, 15(4):339–394, plates 1–6.

Ford, L.T.

1949.   A Guide to the Smaller British Lepidoptera. 230 pages. London.

1951.   The Plutellidae. In Proceedings and Transactions of the South London Entomological and Natural History Society for 1949–1950, pages 85–93, plate 12.

Fox, K.J.

1978.   The Transoceanic Migration of Lepidoptera to New Zealand—A History and a Hypothesis on Colonisation. The New Zealand Entomologist, 6(4):368–379.

Fraenkel, G., and M. Blewett

1946a. The Dietetics of the Caterpillars of Three Ephestia Species, E. kuehniella, E. elutella, and E. cautella, and of a closely related species, Plodia interpunctella. Journal of Experimental Biology, 22:162–171, illustrated.

1946b. Linoleic Acid, Vitamin E and Other Fat-Soluble Substances in the Nutrition of Certain Insects, Ephestia kuehniella, E. elutella, E. cautella and Plodia interpunctella (Lep.). Journal of Experimental Biology, 22:172–190.

Friese, Gerrit

1960.   Revision der palaarktischen Yponomeutidae unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Genitalien (Lepidoptera). Beiträge zur Entomologie, 10():1–131, figures 1–91, plates 1–3.

Fry, Heinrich

1856.   Die Tineen und Pterophoren der Schweiz, xii + 430 pages. Zurich: Meyer und Zeller.

1880.   Die Lepidopteren der Schweiz, xxvi + 454 pages. Leipzig: ilhelm Engelmann.

Fujimoto, Shigehiro

1956.   Lepidopterous Larvae on Stored Grain in Japan. University of Osaka Prefecture, College of Agriculture, Entomological Laboratory, Publication, 2:19–23, plate 6.

Fukaya, M.

1939.   Breeding Experiments on Ephestia cautella Walk., with Soybean Refuse and Rice Bran. [In Japanese.] -Oyo-Dobuts. Zasshi, 11:96–98 [Revie of Applied Entomology, series A, 27:619.]

Fullaway, D.T.

1913.   Report of the Entomologist. In Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station Report for 1912, pages 43–50.

1914.   A List of Laysan Island Insects. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1913, 3(1):20–22.

Gaede, M.

1937.   Gelechiidae. In Bryk, Lepidopterorum Catalogus, 79:1–630. 's-Gravenhage: W. Junk.

Gater, B.A.R.

1925a. Annual Report of the Entomological Division for 1924. The Malayan Agricultural Journal (Kuala Lumpur), 13(7):220–226.

1925b. Investigations on “Tuba.” The Malayan Agricultural Journal (Kuala Lumpur), 13(10):312–329.

Gentry, Joseph W.

1965.   Crop Insects of Northeast Africa-Southwest Asia. Agriculture Handbook, 273:1–210, figures 1–41. Washington, D.C.

Ghesquiére, J.

1940.   Catalogues raisonnés de la fauna entomologique du Congo Belge: Lépidoptères, Microlépidoptères (première partie). Annales du Musée du Congo Belge, C. Zoologie. series 3(2), 7(1):1–120, figures 1–14, plates 1–5. Tervueren, (Belgique).

1941.   Microlépidoptères de l'Afrique tropical nuisikles aux plantes cultivees ou a des matieres vegetales ou animales. Revue de Botanique Appliquee et d'Agriculture Tropicale, 21 (Bulletins 235, 236):762–770.

1942.   Catalogues raisonnés de la Fauna entomologique du Congo Belge: Lépidoptères, Microlépidoptères (deuxième partie). Annales du Musée du Congo Belge. C. Zoologie, series 3(2), 7(2):121–240, plate 6. Tervueren. (Belgique).

Ghosh, C.C.

1923.   Report of the Assistant Director of Agriculture (Entomology) for the year ending June 30, 1922, pages 1–14. Rangoon.

1924a. Report of the Entomologist, Mandalay, for year ending June 30, 1923, pages 1–26. Rangoon.

1924b. Report of the Entomologist, Mandalay, and Sericultural Work for the year ending June 30, 1924, pages 1–8. Rangoon.

1924c. Report by the Entomologist, Mandalay, for the year ended 30th June 1923, pages 1–19. Rangoon.

1925.   Report of the Entomologist, Mandalay, and Sericultural Work for the year ended the 30th June 1925, pages 1–10. Rangoon.

1932.   Report of the Entomologist, Burma for the Year ended 31 March, 1932, pages 1–14. Rangoon.

1940a. The Diamond Back Moth (Plutella maculipennis Curt.). In Insect Pests of Burma, pages 129–130, plate 62: figures 1–4. Rangoon.

1940b. Sorghum Leaf Rolling Caterpillar (Marasmia trapezalis Gn.). In Insect Pests of Burma, page 74, plate 25: figures 1–5. Rangoon.

1940c. Insect Pests of Burma, pages i–ii, 1–216, i–xv, 106 figures, 87 plates. Rangoon.

Godart, J.B., and P.A. J. Duponchel

1827–1838. Nocturnes. In Histoire naturelle des Lépidoptères ou Papillons de France, 7(1):1–528, plates 101–132 (1827); 8(2):1–400, plates 211–236 (1831); 11(8):1–720, plates 287–314 (1838). Paris: Méquignon-Marvis. [See plate 293: figure 10.]

1842.   Histoire naturelle des Lépidoptères ou Papillons de France: Supplement aux Tomes (Quatrième, 4:1–554, plates 51–90. Paris: Méquignon-Marvis, Libraire-Éditeur.

Gozmány, L.A.

1958.   Notes on Hungarian Phycitidae (Lepidoptera). Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici, new series 9, 50:223–225, figure 1.

1966.   A Tineid Material (Lepidoptera) from Bangui, Central African Republic. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 12():251–266.

1967.   The Tineid Moths of the Royal Museum of Central Africa, Tervueren, Belgium (Lepidoptera: Tineidae). Annales du Musée Royal de L'Afrique Centrale, series 8 (Sciences Zoologiques) (Tervueren, Belgium), 157:1–100, figures 1–98.

1968.   Some Tineid Moths of the Ethiopian Region in the Collections of the British Museum (Nat. Hist.), II. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 14(3–4):301–334, 48 figures.

1978.   Symmocid, Holcopogonid, Pterolonchid, Ethmiid, and Plutellid Species from Tunisia (Lepidoptera). Faunistische Abhandlungen Staatliches Museum für Tierkunde in Dresden, 7(7):61–63.

Gozmany, L.A., and L. Vári

1973.   The Tineidae of the Ethiopian Region. Transvaal Museum Memoirs (Pretoria), 18:vi + 238 pages, 570 figures.

Green, E. Ernest

1903.   Notes on Insect Pests from the Entomological Section, Indian Museum, edited by Lionel de Niceville. Indian Museum Notes, 5(3): 103–194, plates 1–20.

Gressitt, J. Linsley

1954.   Insects of Micronesia Introduction. Pages viii + 257, map, 70 figures. Honolulu, Hawaii.

Gressitt, J.L., and Nalini Nadkarni

1978.   Guide to Mt. Kaindi: Background to Montane New Guinea Ecology. Wau Ecology Institute Handbook, 5: vi + 135 pages, illustrated. Hong Kong: Wing Tai Cheung Printing Co.

Guenée, A.

1845.   Essai sur une nouvella classification. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, series 2, 3(3):297–344.

[1846].  Europaeorum Microlepidopterum Index Methodicus, sive Pyrales, Tortrices, Tineae et Alucitae Linnaei….vi + 106 pages. Paris: Roret. [Title page dated 1845; actual publication date May 1846.]

1852.   Noctuélites. In J.B.A.D. Boisduval and A. Guenée, Histoire naturelle des insectes: Species général des Lépidoptères, 5(1): xcvi + 407 pages; 6(2): 444 pages. Paris: Librairie Encyclopedique de Roret.

1854.   Deltoides et Pyralites. In J.B.A.D. Boisduval and A. Guenée, Histoire naturelle des insectes: Species général des Lépidoptères, 8: 448 pages, 10 plates. Paris: Librairie Encyclopedique de Roret.

1862.   Lépidoptères. In G. Maillard, Notes sur l'Île de la Réunion, 2(annexes)(G): 72 pages. Paris.

Guérin-Méneville, F.E.

1829–1844. Iconographie du Règne Animal de G. Cuvier….Insectes. 2: plates 1–104. 3:1–576. [For dates of this publication see Banks, 1909, McDunnough, 1918, van der Vecht, 1957.]

Gundlach, Juan

1881.   Contribution á la Entomologia Cubana. [1]: 445 +xxi pages. Habana.

1891.   Apuntes para La Fauna Puerto-Riqueña, Séptima parte. Anales de la Sociedad Española de Historia Natural (Madrid), 20:323–384.

Gupta, P.D., and A.J. Thorsteinson

1960.   Food Plant Relationships of the Diamond-back Moth (Plutella maculipennis (Curt.), I: Gustation and Alfaction in Relation to Botanical Specificity of the Larva. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 3(3):241–250.

Gurney, W.B.

1925.   Insect Pests of Cotton in New South Wales. The Review of Applied Entomology, series A, 13(5):230–231.

Hagstrum, David W., and Claudia F. Tomblin

1973.   Oviposition by the Almond Moth, Cadra cautella, in Response to Falling Temperature and Onset of Darkness. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 66(4):809–912.

1975.   Relationship between water Consumption and Oviposition by Cadra cautella (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae). Journal of the Georgia Entomological Society, 10(4):358–363.

Hampson, George Francis

1891.   The Lepidoptera Heterocera of the Nilgiri District. In Illustrations of Typical Specimens of Lepidoptera Heterocera in the Collection of the British Museum, 8:iv + 144 pages, plates 139–156.

1893.   The Macrolepidoptera Heterocera of Ceylon. In Illustrations of Typical Specimens of Lepidoptera Heterocera in the Collection of the British Museum, 9:v + 182 pages, plates 157–176.

1894–1896. Moths. In W.T. Blanford, The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma, 2:xxii + 609 pages, 325 figures (1894); 4: xxviii + 594 pages, 287 figures (1896). London: Taylor and Francis.

1896.   XIII: On the Classification of Three Subfamilies of Moths of the Family Pyralidae: The Epipaschiinae, Endotrichinae, and Pyralinae. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1896:451–550, illustrated.

1897.   VII: On the Classification of Two Subfamilies of Moths of the Family Pyralidae: The Hydrocampinae and Scoparianae. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1897(2):127–240.

1898.   1: A Revision of the Moths of the Subfamily Pyraustinae and Family Pyralidae, Part I. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1898:590–761, figures 1–87, plates 49, 50.

1899.   A Revision of the Subfamily Pyraustinae of the Family Pyralidae, Part II. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1899:172–291, figures 86–161, plates 16–19.

1912a. The Moths of India: Supplementary Paper to the Volumes in “The Fauna of British India,” Series IV, Part V. The Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 21(4):1222–1272, plate G.

1912b. Descriptions of New Species of Pyralidae of the Subfamily Pyraustinae. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 8, 9:242–269.

1912c. Descriptions of New Species of Pyralidae of the Subfamily Pyraustinae. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 8, 10:557–573.

1917.   A Classification of the Pyralidae, Subfamily Gallerianae. Novitates Zoologicae, 24:17–58.

Hannemann, Hans-Joachim

1964.   Kleinschmetterlinge oder Microlepidoptera, II: Die Wickler (s.l.) (Cochylidae und Carposinidae). Die Züenslerartigen (Pyraloidea). In Dahl, Die Tierwelt Deutschlands, 50:i–viii, 1–401, figures 1–296, plates 1–22.

Harcourt, D.G.

1955.   The Biology and Ecology of the Diamondback Moth, Plutella maculipennis Curtis, in Eastern Ontario. Dissertation Abstracts, 15(5):900. Michigan University Microfilms. [Publication 9751.]

1956.   Biology of the Diamondback Moth, Plutella maculipennis (Curt.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), in Eastern Ontario, I: Distribution, Economic History, Synonymy, and General Descriptions. In 37th Report of the Quebec Society for the Protection of Plants, 1955:155–160, figures 1–7.

1957.   Biology of the Diamondback Moth, Plutella maculipennis (Curt.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), in Eastern Ontario, II: Life-history, Behaviour, and Host Relationships. The Canadian Entomologist, 89(12):554–564, figures 1–2.

1960a. Biology of the Diamondback Moth, Plutella maculipennis (Curt.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), in Eastern Ontario, III: Natural Enemies. The Canadian Entomologist, 92(6):419–428, figures 1–2.

1960b. Distribution of the Immature Stages of the Diamondback Moth, Plutella maculipennis (Curt.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), on Cabbage. The Canadian Entomologist, 92(7):517–521, figure 1.

1961.   Design for a Sampling Plan for Studies on the Population Dynamics of the Diamondback Moth, Plutella maculipennis (Curt.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 93(9):820–831, figures 1, 2.

Hardy, J. Eliot

1938.   Plutella maculipennis Curt., Its Natural and Biological Control in England. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 29(4):343–372, figures 1–10, plate 9.

Hargreaves, H.

1933.   Report of the Government Entomologist for 1932. In Report of the Department of Agriculture of Uganda (Entebbe)for 1932. 2:50–54.

Harris, W. Victor

1937.   Annotated List of Insects Injurious to Native Food Crops in Tanganyika. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 28(3):483–488.

Hartig, Federico

1956.   Prodromus dei Microlepidotteri della Venezia Tridentina e delle Regioni adiacenti. Revista del “Museo di Storia Naturale della Venezia Tridentina (Trento, Italy),” 33(1–3):89–148.

Hartig, Federico, and H.G. Amsel

1951.   Lepidoptera Sardinica. Fragmenta Entomologica, 1(1):1–152, illustrated.

Hartmann, August

1879.   Die Kleinschmetterlinge des europäischen Faunengebietes. Erscheinungszeit der Raupen und Falter, nahrung und biologische Notizen. Mitteilungen des Münchener Entomologischen Vereins, 1877:143–200.

Hassanein, M.H.

1958.   Biological Studies on the Diamond-back Moth, Plutella maculipennis Curtis [Lepidoptera: Plutellidae]. Bulletin de la Société Entomologique d'Egypte, 42:325–337, figures 1–3.

Hedemann, W. von

1896.   Beitrage der Kenntniss der MicrolepidopterenFauna von Dänish-Westindien II. Stettiner Entomologischen Zeitung, 57:3–11.

Heinemann, H. von

1863–1870. Die Schmetterlinge Deutschlands und der Schweiz, Part 2, 1(1):1–248 (1863); 1(2):i–iv, 1214 [key] (1865); 2(1):1–388 (1870). Braunschweig: C.A. Schwetschke und Sohn.

Heinrich, Carl

1921.   Some Lepidoptera Likely To Be Confused with the Pink Bollworm. Journal of Agricultural Research, 29(11):807–836, plates 93–109.

1923.   Revision of North American Moths of the Subfamily Eucosminae of the Family Olethreutidae. United States National Museum Bulletin, 123:iv + 298 pages, 432 figures on 59 plates.

1931.   Notes on and Descriptions of Some American Moths. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 79(13):1–16, plates 1–7.

1956.   American Moths of the Subfamily Phycitinae. United States National Museum Bulletin, 207:viii + 581 pages, 1138 figures.

Hemming, Francis

1937.   Höbner, a Bibliographical and Systematic Account of the Entomological Works of Jacob Hübner and of the Supplements Thereto by Carl Geyer, Gottfried Franz von Frölich and Gottlieb August Wilhelm Herrich-Schaeffer. Volume 1, xxxiv + 605 pages; volume 2, ix + 274 pages. Royal Entomological Society of London.

Heppner, John B.

1977.   The Status of the Glyphipterigidae and a Reassessment of Relationships in Yponomeutoid Families and Ditrysian Superfamilies. Journal of the Lepidopterist's Society, 31 (2); 124–134.

1982.   Review of the Family Immidae, with a World Checklist (Lepidoptera: Immoidea) Entomography, 1:257–279.

Hering, E.

1901.   Uebersicht der Sumatra-Pyralidae. Entomologische Zeitung herausgegeben von dem entomologischen Vereine zu Stettin, 62:219–348.

1906.   Neue exotische Kleinfalter des Stettiner Museums. Stettiner Entomologische Zeitung, 67(1):51–160.

Herrich-Shàffer, G.A.W.

1843–1856. Systematisches Bearbeitung der Schmetterlinge von Europa, zugleich als Text, Revision und Supplement zu Jacob Hübner's Sammulung Europäischer Schmetterlinge. Band I: Die Tagfalter (Papilionides-Hesperides). Band II: Die Schwärmer, Spinnen und Eulen (Hepialides-Cossides-Zygaenides, Sesiides, Sphingides, Bombycides, Noctuides-Nycteolides). Band III: Die Spanner (Geometrides). Band IV: Die Zünsler und Wickler (Pyralides-Tortricides). Band V: Die Schaben und Federmotten (Tineides-Micropteryges-Pterophorides). Band VI: Schusswort. Umrisstafeln Macrolepidopteren. Erkllarung. Umrisstafeln Microlepidoptera. Erläuterung. Nachträge. Systema Lepidopterorum Europae. Index Universalis. Regensburg: G.L. Manz. [Published in irregular installments in 69 parts. For dates of publication of parts, figures, see Catalogue of Books, Manuscripts, Maps, and Drawings in the British Museum (Natural History), 1922, 6:457.]

Hill, Alex R.

1952.   A Survey of Insects Associated with Cultivated Raspberries in the East of Scotland. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, 88(1054):51–61.

Hill, G.F.

1915.   Insect Pests of Plants, Northern Territory of Australia. Bulletin of the Northern Territory, 13:1–16.

Hinneberg, C.

1894.   Grapholitha tetragrammana Stgr. und Plutella incarnatella Steudel, zwei bisher wenig beobachtete Kleinschmetterlingsarten. Entomologische Zeitung…entomologischen Vereine Stettin, 55(7–9):345–357.

Hinton, H.E.

1942.   Notes on the Larvae of Three Common Injurious Species of Ephestia (Lepidoptera, Phycitidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 33(1):21–25, figures 1–15, plate 1.

1943.   The Larvae of the Lepidoptera Associated with Stored Products. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 34(3):163–212, figures 1–128.

1956.   The Larvae of the Species of Tineidae of Economic Importance. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 47(2):251–346, figures 1–216.

Hinton, H.E., and J.D. Bradley

1956.   Observations on Species of Lepidoptera Infesting Stored Products, XXI: Two New Genera of Clothes Moths (Tineidae). The Entomologist, 89(1113):42–47, figures 1–4.

Hinton, H.E., and A. Steven Corbet

1943.   Common Insect Pests of Stored Food Products: A Guide to Their Identification. British Museum (Natural History) Economic Series, 15:1–44, figures 1–87.

Hodges, Ronald W.

1962.   A Revision of the Cosmopterigidae of America North of Mexico, with a Definition of the Momphidae and Walshiidae (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea). Entomologica Americana, new series, 42:1171, figures 1–199.

1964.   A Review of the North American Moths of the Family Walshiidae (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea) Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 115(3485):289–329, figures 1–66.

1978.   The Moths of America North of Mexico: Gelechioidea. Cosmopterigidae, 6(1):5–166, i–x, plates 1–6. London: E.W. Classey Limited and The Wedge Entomological Research Foundation.

Hodges, Ronald W., Tatiana Dominick, Donald R. Davis, Douglas C. Ferguson, John G. Franclemont, Eugene G. Munroe, Jerry A. Powell

1983.   Check List of the Lepidoptera of America North of Mexico. xxiv + 284 pages. London: E.W. Classey Limited and The Wedge Entomological Research Foundation.

Holdaway, F.G., and William C. Look

1942.   Insects of the Garden Bean in Hawaii. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1941, 11(2):249–260.

Holland, W.J.

1903.   The Moth Book, xxiv + 479 pages, 263 figures, 48 plates. New York: Doubleday, Page and Company.

1920.   Lepidoptera of the Congo, Being a Systematic List of the Butterflies and Moths Collected by the American Museum of Natural History Congo Expedition, Together with Descriptions of Some Hitherto Undescribed Species. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 43(6):109–369, figures 1–9, plates 6–14.

Hopkins, G.H.E.

1928a. Pests of Economic Plants in Samoa and other Island Groups. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 18(1):23–32, figure 1, plate 2, 23 references.

1928b. Review of Applied Entomology, series A, 16(1):46–47.

Hori, Hiroshi

1933.   Studies on the Japanese Pterophoridae (II): On the Genera Deuterocopus, Adaina and Marasmarcha, with the Descriptions of Two New Genera and a New Species. Bulteno Scienca de la Fakultato Terkultura Kjuŝu Imperia Universitato Fukuoka, Japanujo, 5(4):386–400. [With English summary.]

Hua, Ho Thian

1965.   The Life History and Control of the Diamondback Moth in Malaya. Division of Agriculture Bulletin, 118:1–26, figures 1–5, plates 1A–5B. [Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives Malaysia.]

Hübner. Jacob

1796–1838. Sammlung Europäischer Schmetterlinge. Augsburg. [one volume of text and eight volumes of plates. For dates of publication, see Hemming, 1937.]

1816–1826. Verzeichnis bekannter Schmettlinge [sic!]. Pages 1–431.

1818–1837. Zuträge zur Sammlung exotischer Schmettlinge bestehend in Bekundigung einzelner Fleigmuster neuer oder rarer nichteuropäischer Gattungen, Erstes Hundert: 1–40, figures 1–200 (1818); Zwentes Hundert: 1–40, figures 201–400 (1823); Drittes Hundert: 1–48, figures 401–600 (1831); Viertes Hundert: 1–48, figures 601–800 (1832); Fünftes Hundert: 1–52, figures 801–1000 (1837). Augsburg. [See Hemming, 1937(1):438–487.]

1819–1832. Sammlung exotischer Scmetterlinge. Volume 2, pages 1–4, color plates 1–225. Augsburg.

Hudson, G.V.

1928.   The Butterflies and Moths of New Zealand, xi + 388 pages, 52 plates. Wellington: Ferguson & Osborn, Ltd.

Huggins, H.C.

1966.   Notes on the Microlepidoptera. The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation, 78(11):256.

Hulst, George D.

1900.   A New Genus and Species of Phycitinae. The Canadian Entomologist, 32(1):13–14.

1903.   [Contribution.] In H. G. Dyar, A List of North American Lepidoptera and Key to the Literature of this Order of Insects. United States National Museum Bulletin, 52:414–448.

Hummel, Arvid-David

1823.   Observations sur les Insectes de 1823. In Essais Entomologiques, 1(3):1–48, 1 plate. St. Petersbourg.

Hutson, J.C.

1920.   Report on the Work of the Entomological Division. In Ceylon Department of Agriculture Administration Reports for 1919, pages C8–C10. Peradeniya.

1924.   Pests and Diseases: Ceylon Entomology. Tropical Agriculturist (Peradeniya), 62(5):288–289.

1926.   Report on the Work of the Entomological Division. In Ceylon, Department of Agriculture Administration Reports for 1925, pages D15–D17.

1931.   Report on the Work of the Entomological Division. In Ceylon Agriculture Department Technical Reports for 1930, pages 70–77. Peradeniya.

Illingworth, J. F.

1923.   Some of the Early References to Hawaiian Entomology. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1922, 5(2):184–186.

1927.   A Report on Insects and Other Animal Organisms Collected in the Pineapple Growing Section at Mauna Loa, Molokai, June, 1926. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1926, 6(3):390–397.

1928.   Insects Collected in the Pineapple Growing Section on the Island of Lanai, August, 1927. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1927, 7(1):42–46.

1929.   Preliminary Notes on Pests of Agricultural Crops of Kona, March 15, 1928. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1928, 7(2):248–254.

Inoue, Hiroshi

1954.   Micropterygidae-Phaloniidae. In Check List of the Lepidoptera of Japan, 1:i–xii, 1–112. Tokyo: Rikusuisha.

1955.   Alucitidae–Epicopeidae. In Check List of the Lepidoptera of Japan, 2:113–217. Tokyo: Rikusuisha. [Corrigenda to Part 1.]

1956a. Geometridae. In Check List of the Lepidoptera of Japan, 3:219–364. Tokyo: Rikusuisha. [Corrigenda to Parts 1 and 2.]

1956b. Drepanidae–Notodontidae. In Check List of the Lepidoptera of Japan, 4:365–429. Tokyo: Rikusuisha. [Corrigenda to Parts 1, 2, 3.]

1958.   Noctuidae. In Check List of the Lepidoptera of Japan, 5:431–619. Tokyo: Rikusuisha.

Inoue, Hiroshi, and T. Maenami

1968.   The Moth-fauna of Izu Schichito or Izu Islands. The Japan Heterocerists' Journal, 50:519–534, figures 1–10.

Inoue, Hiroshi, Masao Okano, Takashi Shirôzu, Shigero Sugi, Hideho Yamamoto

1959.   Lepidoptera. In Iconographia Insectorum Japonicorum Colore naturali edita, 1:1–284, plates 1–184, figures 1–7. Tokyo.

Inoue, H., S. Sugi, H. Kuroko, S. Moriuti, A. Kawabe

1982.   Moths of Japan. Volume 1, 966 pages; volume 2, pages 7–552, plates 1–392.

Isaac, P.V.

1936.   Report of the Imperial Entomologist. In Indian Agricultural Research Institute of Pusa, Scientific Reports 1933–34, pages 168–174. Delhi.

Issiki, Syuti, A. Mutuura, Y. Yamamoto, I. Hattori, H. Kuroko, T. Kodama, T. Yasuda, S. Moriuti, and T. Saito

1969.   Early States of Japanese Moths in Color. Pages i–iv, I–237, plates 1–67. Osaka: Hoikusha Publishing Co. Inc.

Ito, K., and Walter Carter

1932.   Notes on Insects Found on Pineapple Planting Material. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1931, 8(1):41–44.

Janjua, Nazeer Ahmad, and Heshamul Haque

1958.   Moths of Karachi. Agriculture Pakistan, 9(2): 120–159.

Janmoulle, E.

1962.   Espèce nouvelle pour la Faune belge. Lambillionea, 1962(3–6):39.

Janse, A.J.T.

1917.   Check-List of the South African Lepidoptera Heterocera. 1–219, i–xv (index). Pretoria: Buckley and Van Duyn.

1935.   Extrait des résultats scientifiques du voyage aux Indes Orientales Néerlandaises de LL. AA. RR. le Prince et la Princesse Léopold de Belgique. Pyralidae. Mémoires du Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, 4, fasc. 12(1):1–18, plates 1–6.

1949–1954. The Moths of South Africa 5(1):1–464, plates 1–202.

1968.   Tineidae. In On the Types of South African Microlepidoptera. Transvaal Museum Memoirs, 16:1–127, plates 1–118. [Published by the Transvaal Museum, Pretoria.]

Jensen, H.K.

1959.   En Klaekning of Ephestia cautella Wlk. Flora og Fauna, 65(2):64–65, figures 1–4.

Johansson, Roland, and Ingvar Svensson

1968.   Pältsa-expedition 1964 (Lepidoptera). Opuscula Entomologica, 33(1–2):119–128, figures 1–5.

Jones, Frank Morton, and Charles P. Kimball

1943.   The Lepidoptera of Nantucket and Marthas Vinyard Islands, Massachusetts. 217 pages. Nantucket, Massachusetts: Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association, IV.

Kalshoven, L.G.E.

1954.   Twee soorten cacaomot in Nederland. Berichten van de Afdeling Tropische Production van het Koninklijk Institut voor de Tropen, 246:1–14, figures 1–4.

Kamel, Esmat, and Ahmed Shazli

1959.   Life-history and Morphology of Crocidosema plebeiana Z., in Egypt. Bulletin de la Société Entomologique d'Egypte, 43:193–201, figures 1A–G, 2A–H.

Kanervo, V.

1946.   Sporadic Observations Concerning Diseases in Certain Species of Insects, 3: Diseases Attacking Plutella maculipennis Curt. Annales Entomologici Fennici, 12(4): 143–153, figure 1. [In Finnish, with summary in English; Su∅men Hyonteistieteellinen Aikakauskirja.]

Kawabe, Atsushi

1968.   The Micro-moths Fauna of Izu Islands (I). The Japan Heterocerists' Journal, 50:535–540.

Kawabe, Atsushi, and Yoshihisa Kusui

1978.   Moths of the Ogasawara (Bonin) Islands. Tinea, 10(18): 163–172, figures 1–9.

Keifer, H.H.

1931.   Notes on Some California Lepidoptera of Economic Interest. Monthly Bulletin of the Department of Ariculture State of California, 20(10–11):613–626, figures 1–13.

Kimball, Charles P.

1965.   Arthropods of Florida and Neighboring Land Areas. Lepidoptera of Florida: An Annotated Check List. Pages i–v, 1–363, plates 1–26. Gainesville, Florida.

King, Kenneth M.

1929.   Insects Affecting Field Crops and Gardens in Saskatchewan, 1922–1927. Scientific Agriculture, 9(6):373–390, plate 1.

Klima, A.

1937.   Pyralididae: Subfamilies Scopariinae et Nymphulinae. In Bryk, Lepidopterorum Catalogus, 84:1–226. 's-Gravenhage: W. Junk.

1939a. Pyralidae: Subfamily Pyraustinae I. In Bryk, Lepidopterorum Catalogus, 89:1–224. 's-Gravenhage: W. Junk.

1939b. Pyralidae: Subfamily Pyraustinae II. In Bryk, Lepidopterorum Catalogus, 89:225–384. 's-Gravenhage: W. Junk.

Kloet, George Sidney, and Walter Douglas Hincks

1945.   A Check List of British Insects. Pages i–lix, 1–483.

Arbroath: T. Buncle & Co. Ltd.

1972.   Lepidoptera. In A Check List of British Insects, 2nd edition (revised), 2:i–viii, 1–153. London: Royal Entomological Society.

Knocke, Christel

1963.   Formenbildung bei Ephestia cautella (Walker) an Kakao aus Verschiedenen Herkunftsländern. Entomologische Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Staatsinstitut und Zoologischen Museum Hamburg, 2(42):1–14, figures 1–3, plate 1.

Koshihara, Tatsuo, and Hideo Yamada

1976.   A Simple Mass-Rearing Technique of the Diamond-Back Moth, Plutella xylostella (L.), on Germinating Rape Seeds. Japan Journal of Applied Entomology, Zoology, 20:110–114.

Krauss, N.L.H.

1944.   Notes on Insects and Other Arthropods from the Islands of Molokai and Maui, Hawaii. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for the Year 1943, 12(1):81–94.

1953a. Notes on Insects Associated with Lantana in Cuba. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1952, 15(1): 123–125.

1953b. Insects and Other Invertebrates from Palmyra Atoll and Christmas Island. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1952, 15(1):217–220.

Krishnamurth, N.I.

1936.   The Avare Pod-Borers. Department of Agriculture. Mysore Agricultural Calendar (Bangalore), 1936:25–33.

Kuwayama, Satoru, Kazue Kuribayashi and Kishiro Oshima

1925.   Insect Pests and Fungus Diseases of Sugar Beet, with Special Reference to Their Controlling Methods. Bulletin Hokkaido Agricultural Experiment Station (Kotoni, Sapporo, Japan), 36:1–138, plates 1–3.

Lamont, Norman, and E. McC. Callan

1950.   Moths New to Trinidad, B.W.I. Zoologica, Scientific Contributions of the New York Zoological Society, 35, 3(17):197–207.

Latreille, P.A.

1796.   Pricis des caractères génériques des Insectes, disposés dans un ordre naturel. Pages i–xiii, 1–201 [+ 202–208 unnumbered]. Paris: Prévôt.

1802.   Familles Naturelles et Genres. In Histoire Naturelle, Générale et Particulière des Crustacés et des Insects, 3:i–xii, 1–468. Paris: F. Dufart.

1809.   Genera Crustaceorum et Insectorum: Secundum Ordinem Naturalem in Familias Disposita, Iconibus Exemplisque Plurimis Explicata. 4:1–399, plates 13–16. Paris: Amand Koenig.

Lederer, Julius

1859.   Classification der europaischen Tortricinen. Wiener Entomologische Monatschrift, 3(1):328–346, 366–389.

1863.   Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Pyralidinen, Die Gattungen der Pyralidinen mit irhen Arten. Wiener Entomologische Monatschrift, 7(10):331–378; (11):379–426; (12):427–502, plates 2–19.

Leech, John Henry

1886.   British Pyralides, including the Pterophoridae. Pages i–viii, 1–121, plates 1–18. London: R.H. Porter.

1901.   XV: Lepidoptera Heterocera from China, Japan, and Korea…. Part V: With Descriptions of New Species, by Richard South, F.E.S. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1901:385–514, plates 14, 15.

Leefmans, S.

1933–1934. Ziekten en Plagen der Cultuurgewassen in Nederlandsch Oost-Indie in 1930. Mededeelingen van het Institut voor Plantenziekten, 81:i–vii, 1–84 (1933); 82:1–92(1934).

Lehmensick, Rudolph, and Rudolph Liebers

1937.   Die Oberflachenstruktur von Motteneiern als Bestimmungsmerkmel. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie, 24:436–447, figures 1–8, plates 1–2.

Le Marchand, S.

1935.   Sur la presence, en France, d'un nouveau Galleriidae: Corcyra cephalonica. Amateur de Papillions, 7:309–311.

Leonard, M.D., and A.S. Mills

1931.   A Preliminary Report on the Lima Bean Pod-Borer and Other Legume Pod-Borers in Porto Rico. Journal of Economic Entomology, 24(2):466–473.

Lepesme, P.

1947.   Les Insectes de Palmier. 904 pages, 638 figures. Paris: Paul Lechevalier.

Leraut, Patrice

1980.   Liste Systématique et Synonymique des Lépidoptères de France, Belgique et Corse. Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France (Supplement á Alexanor), 334 pages.

Lhomme, Léon

1935.   Catalogue des Lépidoptères de France et de Belgique. 2(1):1–172.

Light, S. Stuart

1927.   Report of the Entomologist. Tea Research Institute of Ceylon Bulletin (Kandy), 1:16–20.

Lima, A. da Costa

1945.   Lepidopteros. In Insetos do Brasil, 5(1):1–379, figures 1–235. Rio de Janeiro: Escola Nacional de Agronomia.

1950.   Lepidoteros. In Insetos do Brasil, 6(2): 1–420, figures 1–331. Rio de Janeiro: Escola Nacional de Agronomia.

Linford, M.B.

1940.   Pineapple Fruit Injuries Caused by Larvae of the Moths of Ereunetis flavistriata and Pyroderces rileyi. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1939, 10(3):437–445.

Linnaeus, Carolus

1758.   Systema Naturae….10th edition, volume 1, pages 1–824. Holmiae: Laurentii Salvii.

1767.   Systema Naturae….12th edition, volume 1, number 2, pages 533–1327, index, and addenda. Holmiae: Laurentii Salvii.

Linsley, E.G., and R.L. Usinger

1966.   Insects of the Galapagos Islands. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, series 4, 33(7): 113–196.

List, George M.

1937.   Possible Migration of Diamondback Moth. Journal of Economic Entomology, 30(4):676.

Liu, M.Y., and C.N. Sun

1984.   Rearing Diamondback Moth (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae) on Rape Seedlings by a Modification of the Koshihara and Yamada Method. Journal of Economic Entomology, 77(6): 1608–1609.

Lloyd, D.C.

1940.   Host Selection by Hymenopterous Parasites of the Moth Plutella maculipennis Curtis. Proceedings of Royal Society of London, 138(B):451–484, plates 18, 19.

Lorimer, R.I.

1983.   The Lepidoptera of the Orkney Islands, vii + 103 pages. Northamptonshire: V.B. Pike, Kettering.

Lower, Oswald B.

1900.   Descriptions of New Australian Lepidoptera. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 25(3):403–423.

1901.   Descriptions of New Genera and Species of Australian Lepidoptera. Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of South Australia, 25(2):63–98.

1904.   Descriptions of New Species of Australian Ela-chistidae, etc. Transactions and Proceedings and Report of the Royal Society of South Australia, 28:168–180.

1905.   New Australian Lepidoptera, No. 22. Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of South Australia, 29:103–115.

Lucas, Daniel

1955 [1956]. Nouveaux Lépidoptères Nord-Africans. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Naturelles et Physiques du Maroc, 35(3rd trimester):251–258.

Mabille, P.

1880.   Diagnoses Lepidopterum Malagassicorum. Société Entomologique de Belgique, Comptes Rendu, series 3, 23:16–27, 104–109.

MacKay, Margaret Rae

1959.   Larvae of the North American Olethreutidae (Lepidoptera). The Canadian Entomologist, 91 (supplement 10): 1–338, figures 1–161.

Mackie, D.B.

1931.   The Indian Pod Borer. The Monthly Bulletin, Department of Agriculture, State of California, 20(3):234–235.

MacNay, C. Graham

1948.   A Summary of the More Important Insect Infestations and Occurrences in Canada in 1947. Seventy-eighth Annual Report of the Entomological Society of Ontario, 78:71–89.

1953.   Summary of Important Insect Infestations, Occurrences and Damage in Canada in 1952. Eighty-third Annual Report of the Entomological Society of Ontario, 1952, 83:66–94.

1957.   Summary of Important Insect Infestations, Occurrences and Damage in Canada in 1956. Annual Report of the Entomological Society of Ontario, 87:86–102.

1959a. Saskatchewan: Insects of the Season 1958 in Saskatchewan. The Canadian Insect Pest Review, 37(1):32–43.

1959b. Summary of Important Insect Infestations, Occurrences and Damage in Agricultural Areas of Canada in 1958. Annual Report of the Entomological Society of Canada, 89:73–87.

1959c. General-Feeding and Miscellaneous Insects. The Canadian Insect Pest Review, 37(2): 123–145.

1961.   Summary of Important Insect Infestations, Occurrences, and Damage in Agricultural Areas of Canada in 1960. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario, 91:247–263.

Mann, Josef

1855.   Die Lepidopteren, gesammelt auf einer entomologischen Reise in Corsika im Jahre 1855. Verhandlungen des Zoologischbotanischen Vereins in Wien, 5:529–572.

Marion, H.

1954.   Contribution a l'étude des Pyralidae de Madagascar. Mémoires de l'Institut Scientifique de Madagascar, series E (Entomology), 5(3):39–62, figures 1–14, plate 1.

1955.   Synonymie de quelques pyrales decrites de Madagascar. Naturaliste Malagache, 6():76–78. [Lépidoptères].

Marsh, H.O.

1911.   Papers on Insects Affecting Vegetables: The Hawaiian Beet Webworm. United States Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology, Bulletin, 109(1):1–15, figures 1–2, plate I.

1917.   Life History of Plutella maculipennis, the Diamond-back Moth. Journal of Agricultural Research, 10(1):1–10, plates 1, 2.

Martin, Edward L.

1961.   British Pyralid and Plume Moths. A Supplement. Coridon, series B(2):5–8, plate C4.

Marumo, Nobukatsu

1923.   List of the Lepidoptera of the Islands Tanegashima and Yakushima. Journal of the College of Agriculture, Imperial Univeristy of Tokyo, 8(2):135–206, plate 3.

Maskew, F.

1916, 1920. Quarantine Division Report for the Month of December, 1915. Monthly Bulletin California State Commission of Horticulture, 5:74–76 (1916), 9:298–302 (1920).

Mathlein, Rolf

1961.   Studies on Some Major Storage Pests in Sweden, with Special Reference to Their Cold Resistance. Statens Vāxtskyddsanstalt Meddelanden [National Institute for Plant Protection Contributions], 12(83):1–49, figures 1–6.

Mathur, R.N.

1959.   Immature Stages of Indian Lepidoptera Pyralidae, Sub-family Pyraustinae. Indian Forest Records, new series (Entomology), 9(10):183–210, figures 1–85.

Mathur, R.N., and Pratap Singh

1963.   Immature Stages of Indian Lepidoptera No. 13 Pyralidae, Sub-Family Pyraustinae. Indian Forest Records, new series (Entomology), 10(6):117–148, 76 figures.

Matsumura, S.

1901.   Die schädlichen Lepidopteren Japans. Allgemeine Zeitschrift fur Entomologie, 6(2):21–25.

1908.   Catalogus Insectorum Japonicum. iii + 307 pages.

1920.   Conspectus of Japanese Injurious Insects. Pages 1–971 + 116, plates 1–61, text figures.

1925.   An Enumeration of the Butterflies and Moths from Saghalien, with Descriptions of New Species and Subspecies. Jorunal of the College of Agriculture, Hokkaido Imperial University (Sapporo), 15(3):83–196, plates 8–11.

1931.   6000 Illustrated Insects of Japan-Empire. Pages i–xxiii, 1–1497 + 1–191, many text-figures, 10 color plates.

Maxwell-Lefroy, H.

1906.   Indian Insect Pests, iv + 309 pages, unnumbered illustrations. Calcutta.

Maxwell-Lefroy, H., and F.M. Howlett

1909.   Indian Insect Life: A Manual of the Insects of the Plains (Tropical India). xii + 786 pages, 536 figures, 84 colored plates. Calcutta: Thacker, Spink and Co. [Reprint edition 1971, same pagination.] New Delhi: Today and Tomorrow's Printers and Publishers.

May, A.W.S.

1946.   Pests of Cucurbit Crops. Queensland Agricultural Journal, 62(3):137–150, plates 38–47.

McDunnough, J.

1918.   Dates of Issue of the Plates of Guërin's Iconographie du regne Animal (Lepid.) Entomological News, 29:378–379.

1939.   Check List of the Lepidoptera of Canada and the United States of America, Part II: Microlepidoptera. Memoirs of the Southern California Academy of Sciences, 2(1):1–171.

McKerral, A.

1924.   Chapter IV. In Report on the Operations of the Department of Agriculture, Burma, for the Year Ended the 30th June 1924, pages 9–16.

Mere, R.M.

1952.   A Pyrale New to Britain, Entomologist's Garzette, 3(2):57, unnumbered figure.

Merovee, E.

1966.   Kapasakoi (Plutella maculipennis Curt.) Fotoperioodiline reaktsioon, Akadeemia Nauk Estonskoi SSR. Isv. Bioloogiline Seeria, 15(4):497–567.

Meyrick, E.

1879a. Descriptions of Australian Micro-Lepidoptera. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 3:175–216.

1879b. Descriptions of Australian Micro-Lepidoptera, II Crambites. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 4:205–242.

1880a. Descriptions of Australian Micro-Lepidoptera, III: Tineina. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 5:132–182.

1880b. Descriptions of Australian Micro-Lepidoptera, IV: Tineina. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 5:204–272.

1881.   Descriptions of Australian Micro-Lepidoptera. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 6:629–706.

1882.   Descriptions of Australian Micro-Lepidoptera. Proceedings of the Linnean Society, New South Wales, 2(7):149–547.

1883.   Notes on Hawaiian Micro-Lepidoptera. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, 20:31–36.

1884.   XV: On the Classification of the Australian Pyralidina. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1884:277–350.

1885.   On Lepidoptera from St. Vincent. The Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, 22:105–106.

1886a. On the Classification of the Pterophoridae. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1886:1–21.

1886b. VIII: Descriptions of Lepidoptera from the South Pacific. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1886(3):189–296.

1886c. Description of New Zealand Micro-Lepidoptera. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute, 1885, new series, 18:162–183.

1887.   XII: On Pyralidina from Australia and the South Pacific. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1887:185–268.

1888a. Notes on New Zealand Tortricina. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute, 1887, new series 3, 20:73–76.

1888b. IX: On the Pyralidina of the Hawaiian Islands. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1888:209–246.

1894a. 1: On a Collection of Lepidoptera from Upper Burma. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1894:1–29.

1894b. XVIII: On Pyralidina from the Malay Archipelago. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1894:455–480.

1895.   A Handbook of British Lepidoptera. vi + 843 pages, illustrated. London.

1899.   Macrolepidoptera. In David Sharp, editor, Fauna Hawaiiensis. 1(2):123–275, plates 3–7 (color). Cambridge University Press.

1902.   A New Genus of Gelechiadae. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, 38:103–104.

1904.   New Hawaiian Lepidoptera. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, 40:130–133.

1905.   Descriptions of Indian Microlepidoptera. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 16(4):580–619.

1906.   Descriptions of Indian Micro-Lepidoptera. Journal Bombay Natural History Society, 17:133–153.

1907.   Descriptions of Australasian Micro-Lepidoptera, XIX. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 32(1):47–150.

1908.   Description of African Micro-Lepidoptera. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1908 (October):716–756.

1909.   Descriptions of Indian Micro-Lepidoptera. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 19(2):410–437.

1910.   Lepidoptera-Heterocera (Pyrales), Family Pterophoridae. In M.P. Wytsman, Genera Insectorum, 100:1–22, 1 plate (color): figures 1–18, Tervueren, Belgium.

1911a. Revision of Australian Tortricina. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 36(2):224–303.

1911b. The Percy Sladen Trust Expedition to the Indian Ocean in 1905, No. XII: Tortricina and Tineina. The Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, series 2 (Zoology), 14(2):263–307.

1912a. Adelidae, Micropterygidae, Gracilariadae and Tortricidae. In P.O.C. Aurivilius and H. Wagner, Lepidopterorum Catalogus, 6:1–68. Berlin: W. Junk.

1912b. Leopidoptera-Heterocera (Tineaea), Family Gracilariadae. In M.P. Wytsman, Genera Insectorum, 128:1–36, 1 plate (color). Tervueren, Belgium.

1913a. Article V: A Revision of New Zealand Pyralidina. Transactions of the New Zealand Institute, 1912, 45:30–51.

1913b. Pterophoridae, Orneodidae. In P.O.C. Aurivillius and H. Wagner, Lepidopterorum Catalogus, 17:1–44. Berlin: W. Junk.

1914a. Descriptions of Indian Micro-Lepidoptera. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 22(4):771–781.

1914b. H. Sauter'a Formosa-Ausbeute. Supplementa Entomologica, 3:45–62.

1915a. Article 27: Revision of New Zealand Tineina. Transactions of the New Zealand Institute, 47:205–244.

1915b. Exotic Microlepidoptera, 1:321–336.

1916.   Exotic Microlepidoptera, 1:609–640.

1917.   Descriptions of South American Micro-Lepidoptera. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1917(1):1–52.

1918a. Exotic Microlepidoptera, 2:113–128.

1918b. Exotic Microlepidoptera, 2:145–160.

1919.   Exotic Microlepidoptera, 2:273–288.

1920.   Exotic Microlepidoptera, 2:337–368.

1921a. Exotic Microlepidoptera, 2:449–464.

1921b. XIV. New Micro-Lepidoptera. Zooligische Mededeelingen uitgegeven vanweg's Rijks-Museum van Natuurlijke Historie te Leiden, 6(2–3): 145–202.

1923a. Exotic Microlepidoptera, 3:1–32.

1932b. Exotic Microlepidoptera, 3:49–64.

1924a. Exotic Microlepidoptera, 3:65–80.

1924b. Exotic Microlepidoptera, 3:81–96.

1924c. XXVI: Micro-Lepidoptera of Rodriguez. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1924:544–557.

1925.   Lepidoptera-Heterocera, Family Gelechiadae. In M.P. Wytsman, Genera Insectorum, 184:1–290, 5 plates (color).

1926.   On Microlepidoptera from the Galapagos Islands and Rapa. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, of London, 74:269–278.

1927a. Part III: Lepidoptera. In Insects of Samoa and Other Samoan Terrestrial Arthropoda, 2 (Micro-Lepidoptera): 65–116. London: British Museum (Natural History).

1927b. Exotic Microlepidoptera. 3: 321–352.

1928.   A Revised Handbook of British Lepidoptera. vi + 914 pages, illustrated. London.

1929a. The Micro-Lepidoptera of the “St. George” Expedition. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 76:489–521.

1929b. Pacific Pyrales of the “St. George” Expedition. Transactons of the Entomological Society of London, 77:155–169.

1930a. Microlepidoptera of Mauritius. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 78:309–323.

1930b. Ergebnisse einer Zoologischen Sammelreise nach Brasilien, Insbesondere in das Amazonasgebiet, ausgeführt von Dr. H. Zerny, V Teil: Microlepidoptera. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien, 44:223–268, plates 1, 2.

1931.   Microlepidoptera. In Reports of an Expedition to Brazil and Paraguay in 1926–7, Supported by the Trustees of the Percy Sladen Memorial Fund and the Executive Committee of the Carnegie Trust for Scotland. Journal of the Linnean Society (Zoology), 37(252):277–284.

1932a. Exotic Microlepidoptera, 4:193–208.

1932b. Exotic Microlepidoptera, 4:225–241.

1932c. Exotic Microlepidoptera, 4:289–230.

1934a. Pyrales and Microlepidoptera of the Society Islands. Pacific Entomological Survey Publication, 6(A22): 109–110. [Also issued as Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin, 113, with same pagination.]

1934b. Exotic Microlepidoptera, 4:465–496.

1934c. Pyrales and Microlepidoptera of the Marquesas Islands. Pacific Entomological Survey Publication, 7(A28):333–355. [Also issued as Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin, 114, with same pagnination, but (teste Zoological Record) issued in 1935.]

1934d. III: Micro-Lepidoptera. In The Percy Sladen and Godman Trusts Expedition to the Islands in the Gulf of Guinea, October 1932–March 1933. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 10, 14:401–411.

1935a. [Contribution.] In Caradja, Aristide and E. Meyrick, Materialien zu einer Microlepidopteren Fauna der Chinesischen Provinzen Kiangsu, Chekiang und Hunan, pages 1–96. Berlin: Friedlander and Sohn.

1935b. Exotic Microlepidoptera 4:561–576.

Miles, Herbert W.

1924.   The Diamond-back Moth, Plutella maculipennis. The Annual Report of the Kirton Agricultural Institute, 1923, pages 45–48.

Miller, N.C.E.

1932.   A Preliminary List of Food-Plants of Some Malayan Insects. Department of Agriculture, Straits Settlements and Federated Malay States Supplement to Bulletin, 38:1–54.

Milliére, P.

1863.   I: Iconographie et description de Chenilles et Lépidoptères. Annales de la Société Linnéenne de Lyon, new series, 9:1–290, pl. 34: figs. 9–13. [Extrait, 9:281–312, plates 1–4.]

Mills, A.S., and M.D. Leonard

1931.   The Eggs of the Lima Bean Pod-Borer in Porto Rico. Journal of Economic Entomology, 24(3):763.

Mo, Tjoa Tjien

1953.   Pegawai Balai Penjelidikan Hama Tumbuh-Tum-buhan Di Bogor. Memberantas Hama-Hama Kelapa Dan Kopra, pages 1–270, illustrated. Djakarta.

Mohanty, P.K., and B. Nayak

1982.   Chromosomal Studies in Sixteen Species of Indian Pyralid Moths (Pyralidae). Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera, 20(2):86–96, figures 1–48.

Monteil, L.

1934.   Les Insectes nuisibles au colonnier en Afrique Équatoriale Française. Agronomie Coloniale, 193:11–18.

Moore, Frederic

1867.   9: On the Lepidopterous Insects of Bengal. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1867:44–98.

1884–1887. The Lepidoptera of Ceylon. Volume 3, 9:1–88, plates 144–157 (1884); 10:89–176, plates 158–171 (1885); 11:177–304, plates 172–181 (1885); 12:305–392, plates 182–195 (1886); 13:393–578, plates 196–215 (1887). London.

1889.   List of the Lepidoptera of Mergui and Its Archipelago Collected for the Trustees of the Indian Museum, Calcutta, by Mr. John Anderson, F.R.S., Superintendent of the Museum. The Journal of the Linnean Society, 21:29–60, plates 3, 4.

Moriuti, Sigeru

1956.   Preliminary Notes on the Life History of the Diamondback Moth. Entomological Laboratory, College of Agriculture, University of Osaka Prefecture Publication, 2:25–38, figures 1–8.

1977.   Fauna Japonica; Yponomeutidae S. Lat. (Insects: Lepidoptera). iv + 327 pages, frontispiece, 95 plates. Tokyo: Keigaku Publishing Co., Ltd.

Möschler, H.B.

1866.   Aufzählung der in Andalusien 1865 von Herrn Graf v. Hoffmannsegg gesammelten Schmetterlinge. Berliner Entomologische Zeitschrift, 1866: 135–146.

1891.   Die Lepidopten-Fauna der Insel Portorico. Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen naturforschenden Gesellschaft, 16:69–360, 1 plate.

Moutia, André

1932.   Divisional Reports: Entomological Division. In Annual Report of the Department of Agriculture, Mauritius (Reduit), for 1931, 2(1):9–12.

Muggeridge.J.

1930.   The Diamond-back Moth. Its Occurrence and Control in New Zealand. The New Zealand Journal of Agriculture, 41(4):253–264, figures 1–9.

Muir, F.

1929.   Some Remarks on Function as a Base for Classificaton, and Its Relationship to Form. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1928, 7(2):205–206.

Mullen, M.A., and R.T. Arbogast

1977.   Influence of Substrate on Oviposition by Two Species of Stored-Product Moths. Environmental Entomology, 6(5):641–642.

Munroe, Eugene

1972.   Pyraloidea, Pyralidae In The Moths of North America North of Mexico, fasc. 13(1A): 1–134. London.

Mutuura, Akira

1953.   Studies on the Pod Borer of the Small Red Bean and Caw Bean. Studies 3 Species of the Pod Borer of the Soybean. Osaka, Naniwa University Faculty of Agricultural Entomological Laboratory Publication, 1:1–16, 1 table, plates 1–5.

Nakayama, Shonosuke

1929.   A List of More Important Injurious Insects in Chosen. Annals of the Agricultural Experiment Station, Suigen, Korea, 4(3):261–301.

Nazmi, A.A.

1963 [1964]. [Lepidoptera]. In A Redescription of the Pyraustinae of Egypt (U.A.R.) Bulletin de la Société Entomologique d'Egypte, 47:201–250, figures 1–26.

de Niceville, Lionel

1903.   Notes on Insect Pests from the Entomological Section, Indian Museum, 5(3):1–216, plates 1–20. [See V: Insect Pests of Cereals and Crops, 133–134.]

Nohira, Von Akio

1916.   Ueber die Pterophoriden Japans (1). Verzeichnis der Bekannten Arten. The Entomological Magazine, 2(l):37–38.

Norris, N.J.

1934.   Contributions to the Study of Insect Fertility III: Adult Nutrition, Fecundity and Longevity in the Genus Ephestia (Lepidoptera, Phycitidae). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1934:333–360.

Nowicki, Maximiliano

1864.   Microlepidopterorum Species Novae. 31 pages, 1 plate. Cracoviae: Thomas Szczurkowski.

Noyes, Winefred M.

1930.   Moth Pests in Cocoa and Confectionery. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 21(1):77–121.

Ogilvie, Lawrence

1923.   Notes on Plant Diseases and Pests. Agricultural Bulletin of the Bermuda Department of Agriculture, 2(12):7–8.

1924.   Preliminary Report of the Plant Pathologist for the Period September 27th to December 31st, 1923. In Report of the Board and Department of Agriculture for the Year 1923, pages 28–34. Bermuda.

1926.   Report of the Plant Pathologist for the Year 1925. In Bermuda Report of the Department of Agriculture for the Year 1925, pages 36–63.

Okada, Tadao

1915.   An Unusual Outbreak of Sponge Gourd Leaf Roller during the Year. Konchu Sekai, 19:496–500, illustrated.

Okumura, George T.

1966.   The Dried-Fruit Moth. California Department of Agriculture Bulletin, 55(4): 180–186, figures 1–6.

Ormerod, Eleanor A.

1891.   Report to the Royal Agricultural Society of England on the…Diamond-Back Moth. Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England, series 3, 3(3): 1–34.

Pagenstecher, Arnold

1884.   Beiträge zur Lepidopteren-Fauna von Amboina. Jahrbücher des Nassausichen Vereins für Naturkunde, 37:150–326.

1886.   Beitrage zur Lepidopteren-Fauna des Malayischen Archipels [III:] Heteroceren der Aru-In-seln, Kei-Inseln und von Südwest-Neu-Guinea. Jahrbücher des Nassauischen Vereins für Naturkunde. 39:104–194.

1888.   Beiträge zur Lepidopteren-Fauna Malayishen Archipels, V: Verzeichniss der Schmetterlinge von Amboina. Jahrbücher des Nassauischen Vereins für Naturkunde, 41:87–217.

1894.   Beiträge zur Lepidopteren-Fauna des Malayischen Archipels, (IX.), 1: Über Javanische Schmetterlinge; 2: Über Einige Schmetterlinge von der Insel Sumba. Jahrbücher des Nassauischen Vereins für Naturkunde, 47:25–58, pl. 1.

1900.   Die Lepidopteren-Fauna des Bismarck-Archipels, Mit. Berucksichtigung der thiergeographischen und biologischen Verhaltnisse systematisch dargestelt. In C. Chun, Zoologica, 12(29): 1–268, plates 1–2.

Pak, Sea-Wook

1964.   Some Moths from Dagelet Island. Korean Journal of Zoology, 7(2):58.

Paramonow, S.

1954.   Hauptschädlinge der Ökulturen der Ukraine. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie, 35(1):63–81.

Pastokhov, M.K.

1964.   Cabbage Moth. Zaskeh Rost ot Vered. i Baleznie, 9(5): 42–44, illus. [In Russian.]

Patel, H.K., R.C. Patel, and V.C. Patel

1964.   Short Notes. In Record of Some New Insect-Pests of Different Crops, Ornamental Plants, Weeds and Stored Products in Gujarat State. Indian Journal of Entomology, 26(3):366.

Patel, R.C., and H.L. Kulkarny

1956.   Bionomics of the Pumpkin Caterpillar-Margaronia indica Saund. (Pyralidae: Lepidoptera). Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 54(1):118–127, figures A–E, tables 1–5.

Paulian, Renaud

1949.   Recherches sur les insectes d'importance biologique de Madagascar (1): Les chenilles du chou a Madagascar. Mémoires de l'Institut Scientifique de Madagascar, series A, 3(3):347–352, figures 1–5.

Paulian, Renaud, and P. Viette

1955.   Essai d'un catalogue biologogique des Lépidoptrès Hétérocères de Tananarive. Mémoires de l'Institut Scientifique de Madagascar, series E (Entomologica), 6:141–281, figures 1–114, plates 5–12.

Pearce, W.T.

1891.   Larvae of Ephestia sp? Feeding on Cork-Packing in Grape-Casks. The Entomologist, 24:18.

Pemberton, C.E.

1932.   Irritation Caused by the Sting of the Bethylid Wasp, Holepyris Hawaiiensis Ashm. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1931, 8(1): 125–126.

1954.   Invertebrate Consultants Commitee for the Pacific: Report for 1949–1954. 56 pages. Washington, D. C.: Pacific Science Board.

Perry, W.M.

1924.   Report of the Horticulturist. In Thompson, Report of the Virgin Islands Agricultural Experiment Station, 1923, pages 7–13, figures 1, 2.

Petersen, Von Günther

1957–1958. Die Genitalien der paläarktischen Tineiden (Lepidoptera: Tineidae). In Beiträge zur Entomologie 1957, 7(l/2):55–176, figures 1–149, plates 1–4 (1957); 7():338–379, figures 150–203, plate 6 (1957); 7(): 557–598, figures 204–247, plates 11, 12 (1957); 8(): 111–118, figures 248–252 (1958); 8():398–430, figures 253–267, plate 2–3 (1958).

Peterson, Alvah

1956.   Lepidoptera and Plant Infesting Hymenoptera. In Larvae of Insects, 1:1–315, figures 01–H12. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Edwards Brothers, Inc.

Peterson, George D., Jr.

1957.   Recent Additions to the List of Insects which Attack Crops and Other Important Plants in Guam. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1956, 16(2):203–207.

Philpott, Alfred

1923.   Article 14: Notes and Descriptions of New Zealand Lepidoptera. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute, 54:148–154.

1929.   The Male Genitalia of the New Zealand Thyrididae, Pyralidae, Galleriidae and Phycitidae. Transactions of the New Zealand Institute, 60:473–480, figures 1–14.

Pierce, F.N., and J.W. Metcalfe

1935.   The Genitalia of the Tineid Families of the Lepidoptera of the British Islands. An Account of the Morphology of the Male Clasping Organs and the Corresponding Organs of the Female, xxii + 116 pages, 68 plates. Warmington, England: F.N. Pierce.

1938.   The Genitalia of the British Pyrales with the Deltoids and Plumes: An Account of the Morphology of the Male Clasping Organs and the Corresponding Organs of the Female, xiii + 69 pages, 29 plates. Warmington, England: F.N. Pierce.

Pillai, R. Madhavan

1921. Short Notes on the Insect Pests of Crops of Travancore. 53 pages. Trivandrum, Travancore: Department of Agriculture.

Poos, Fred

1926.   A New Pest of Spinach in Virginia. Virginia Truck Experiment Station Bulletin, 56:491–497, figure 90.

Porritt, Geo. T.

1882.   Note on Ephestia passulella. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, 19:142.

1883.   Further Note on Ephestia passulella. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, 20:41.

Povolny, Dalibor

1967.   Genitalia of Some Nearctic and Neotropic Members of the Tribe Gnorimoschemini (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae, 37:51–127.

Press, J.W., and B.R. Flaherty

1973.   Reduction of Fecundity and Egg Hatch in Three Stored-Product Phycitid Moths after Repetitive Sublethal Carbon Dioxide Exposures. Environmental Entomology, 2(1):147–148.

Ragimov, Z., and S. Suleimanov

1965.   Plant Protection from Pests and Diseases. Zaschita Rasteniĭ ot Vreditelei i Boleznei (Leningrad), 10(6):41.

Ragonot, E.L.

1885.   Revision of the British Species of Phycitidae and Galleridae [sic]. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, 22:17–32, 52–58.

1888.   Nouveaux genres et espèces de Phycitidae et Galleriidae. 51 pages. Paris: Published by the author.

1891.   Classification des Pyralites, Sous-fam. Pyralidinae. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, 60:15[113]–114[212].

1894a. Description d'une nouvelle espece de Tinéite (Trichophaga coprobiella) provenant d'Obock (mer Rouge). Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, 63:120–124, 1 figure.

1894b. Notes synonymiques sur les Microlépidoptères et descriptions d'espèces pau commues ou inédites. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, 63:161–226, plate 1.

1901.   Monographie des Phycitinae et des Galleriinae. In N.M. Romanoff, Mémoires sur les Lépidoptères, 8:i-xli, 1–602, plates 24–57. Paris: Imprimerie General Lahure.

Rainwater, H. Ivan

1963.   Agricultural Insect Pest Hichhikers on Aircraft. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1962, 18(2):303–309.

Rao Sahib, Y., Ramachandra, Rao, and M.C. Cherian

1926.   Notes on the Life-History and Habits of Elasmus nephanticlis, Rohw. Madras. In Presidency Department of Agriculture, Yearbook for 1926, pages 39–50.

Razowski, Jósef and Zygmunt Ŝliwínski

1961.   Motyle (Lepidoptera)—szkodniki materialów w domostwach i magazynach. [Butterflies (Lepidoptera) as material pests in households and storage.] Polskie pismo Entomologiczne, series B, 1–2[21–22], 5:31–55.

Rebel, H.

1892.   Beitrag zur Microlepidopterenfauna des Canarischen Archipels. Annalen des K. K. Naturhistorischen Hofmuseums (Wien), 7:241–284, plate 17.

1896.   Dritter Beitrag zur Lepidopterenfauna der Canaren. Annalen des K. K. Naturhistorischen Hofmuseums (Wien), 11:102–148, plate 3.

1898.   Vierter Beitrag zur Lepidopterenfauna der Canaren. Annalen des K. K. Naturhistorishen Hofmuseums (Wien), 13:361–381.

1901.   Pyralidae-Micropterygidae. II: Famil. In O. Staudinger, and H. Rebel, Catalog der Lepidopteren des palaearctischen Faunengebietes, pages 368. Berlin: R. Friedlander and Sohn.

1906.   Fünfter Beitrag zur Lepidopterenfauna der Kanaren. Annalen des K.K. Naturhistorischen Hofmuseums (Wien), 21:22–44.

1910a. Bericht der Sektion für Lepidopterologie. Verhandlungen der K.K. Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien, 60(1):4–40 [March].

1910b. Beitrag zur Lepidopterenfauna der Ionischen Inseln. Verhandlungen der K.K. Zoologisch-botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien, 60():418–431 [30 December 1910].

1910c. Lepidoptera von den Samoainseln. In Karl Rechinger, Botanische und zoologische ergebnisse einer wissenschaftlichen forschungsreise nach den Samoainseln, dem Neuguinea-Archipel und den Salomonsinseln von März bis Dezember 1905. Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, 85:412–432, figures 31–35.

1911.   Sechster Beitrag zur Lepidopterenfauna der Kanaren. Annalen des K.K. Naturhistorischen Hofmuseums (Wien), 24:327–374, plate 12.

1915.   Neuer Beitrag zur Lepidopterenfauna der Samoa-Inseln, 2: Beiheft zum Jahrbuch der Hamburgischen Wissenschaftlichen Anstalten. Mitteilungen aus dem Naturhistorischen (Zoologischen) Museum in Hamburg, 32:121–158, plate 1, 2.

1935.   Lepidopteren von den Ägäischen Inseln. Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse (Wien), 144(1): 253–262.

1939.   Die Arthropodenfauna von Madeira nach den Ergebnissen der Reise von Prof. Dr. O. Lundbland Juli-August 1935. Arkiv for Zoologi, 32A(5):1–13.

1940a. Die Lepidopterenfauna des Azorischen Archipels. Societas Scientarum Fennica. Commentationes Biologicae, 8(1): 1–49, 1 map.

1940b. Eine Lepidopteren-Ausbeute von Madeira: Societas Scientarum Fennica. Commentationes Biologicae, 8(1):50–59, 2 plates.

Rebel, H., and H. Zerny

1917.   Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der mit Untestützung der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien aus der Erbschaft Treitl von F. Werner unternommenen zoologischen Expedition nach dem Anglo-Ägyptischen Sudan (Kordofan), 1914, 1: Lepidoptera. Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse (Wien), 93:423–446, 1 plate

Reid, W.J., C.E. Smith, L.B. Reed, and C.O. Bare

1942.   Studies in the Control of Cabbage Caterpillars with Derris in the South. United States Department of Agriculture Circular, 615:1–26, figures 1–9.

Reid, W.J., Jr., Chas. E. Smith, L.B. Reed, and W.A. Thomas.

1941.   Field Studies of Insecticides Used to Control Cabbage Caterpillars in the South. United States Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin, 782:1–35, figures 1–7.

Ribbe, Carl

1886.   Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Lepidopteren-Fauna der Aru-Inseln. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, “Iris”, 1886, 3:73–90.

Richards, O.W., and G.V.B. Herford

1930.   Insects Found Associated with Cacao, Spices and Dried Fruits in London Warehouses. The Annals of Applied Biology, 17(2):367–395, plates 23–32.

Richards, O.W., and W.S. Thomson

1932.   A Contribution to the Study of the Genera Ephestia, Gn. (including Strymax, Dyar), and Plodia, Gn. (Lepidoptera, Phycitidae), with Notes on Parasites of the Larvae. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 80:169–250, plates 5–12, figures 1–130.

Robertson, Phyllis L.

1939.   Diamond-back Moth Investigation in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Science and Technology, 20(5A):330A–339A, figures 1–4; (6A):341 A–364A, figures 5–10.

Robinson, Gaden S.

1979.   Clothes-Moths of the Tinea pellionella Complex: A Revision of the World's Species (Lepidoptera: Tineidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), 38(3):57–128, figures 1–103.

1980.   Cave-dwelling Tineid Moths: A Taxonomic Review of the World Species (Lepidoptera: Tineidae). Transactions of the British Cave Association, 7(2):83–120, figures 1–44.

1983.   Darwin's Moth from St. Paul's Rocks: A New Species of Erechthias (Tineidae). Systematic Entomology, 8(3):303–311, figures 1–12.

Robson, R.W.

1945.   French Oceania. In The Pacific Islands Handbook 1944, pages 92–122. The MacMillan Company, New York.

Romanova, V.P.

1930.   On Pests of Mustard in the Northern Caucasus. Bulletin of Northern Caucasus Plan Protection Station, pages vi–vii, 139–152, 6 figures. [Article in Russian; see also Review of Applied Entomology, series A, 19:563–564.]

Rondani, Camillo

1876.   Papilionaria aliqua microsoma. Bulletino della Società Entomologica Italiana, 8(1):19–24, plate 1.

Roonwall, M.L. and G.D. Bhasin

1954.   A List of Insect Pests of Forest Plants in India and the Adjacent Countries. Indian Forest Bulletin, new series, 171(1):5–93.

Ross, Edward S.

1955.   Embioptera. In Insects of Micronesia, 8(1):i–iii, 1–5. Honolulu: Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

Rungs, C.

1953.   Contribution à la connaissance des enemies de l'arganier Argania spinosa (L.) Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Naturelles du Maroc, 32(1[1952]):61–76.

1957.   Notes de Lépidoptèrologie Marocaine (XXII). Bulletin de la Société de Sciences Naturelles et Physiques du Maroc, 36(3):277–298, figures 1–6.

Russell, T.A

1934.   Report of the Plant Pathologist, 1933. In Report of the Department of Agriculture for the Year 1933, pages 28–36. Bermuda.

Russo, G.

1947.   Cotton Pests: Research and Observations Made in Italy during 1941. The Review of Applied Entomology, series A, 35(12):419–420.

Sachet, Marie-Hélène

1975.   Flora of the Marquesas, 1: Ericaceae–Convolvulaceae. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany, 23:iii + 34 pages, 1 map.

Sakimura, K., and M.B. Linford

1940.   An Annotated List of Insects from Lanai. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1939, 10(3):451–454.

Sattler, K.

1973.   A Catalogue of the Family-Group and Genus-Group Names of the Gelechiidae, Holcopogonidae, Lecithoceridae and Symmocidae (Lepidoptera). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Entomology, 28(4):155–282. London.

Saunders, W.W.

1851a. XVIII: On Insects Injurious to the Cotton Plant. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, new series, 1:163–166, plate 12: figures 5–7.

1851b. [Contribution.] Proceedings of the Entomological Society of London, 1851:71.

Schaus, William

1940.   Moths of the Families Geometridae and Pyralididae. In Scientific Survey of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands, 12(3):291–417. New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.

Schaus, William, and W.G. Clements

1893.   On a Collection of Sierra Leone Lepidoptera. vi + 46 pages, 3 plates. London: R.H. Porter.

Schmid, Michael, and Bradford M. Endicott

1968.   Mariposas de Venezuela. 67 pages, 142 figures. Caracas.

Schrank, Franz von Paula

1802.   Fauna Boica. Volume 2, part 2, 412 pages. Ingonstadt: J.W. Kruell.

Scott, L.B.

1940.   The Bean Pod Borers in Puerto Rico. The Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico (Rio Piedras), 24(2):35–47, figures 1–2, 1 table.

Semper, Georg

1867.   Beitrage zur Entwicklungsgeschichte einiger ostasiatischer Schmetterlinge. Verhandlungen der Kaiserliche-Königlichen Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien, 17():697–702.

Senior-White, Ronald

1917.   Entomology: Insect Pests. Tropical Agriculturist (Peradeniya), 48(2):115–121.

Sevastopulo, D.G.

1935.   XXXVI: A Preliminary List of the Pyralidae of Calcutta. The Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 38(1):204–205.

Shaffer, Jay C.

1978.   Bredin—Archbold—Smithsonian Survey of Dominica: Phycitinae (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 9I(1):5–26.

Sharma, R.C.

1964.   Observations of Some Insect Pests of Jowar (Sorghum vulgare) at Ajmer (Rajasthan). Bulletin of Entomology (Madras), 5:28–30.

Sherborn, C. Davies, and J. Hartly Durrant

1911.   Note on John Curtis' British Entomology, 1824–1839, 1829–1840, and 1862. The Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, Series 2, 12[vol. 47]:84–85.

Shibuya, Jinshichi

1928a. The Systematic Study on the Japanese Pyralinae (Lepid.), May 20, 1928.Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido Imperial University (Sapporo), 21(4): 149–176, plates 3, 4.

1928b. The Systematic Study on the Formosan Pyralidae. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido Imperial University (Sapporo), 22(1): 1–300, plates 1–9.

1929.   On the Known and Unrecorded Species of the Japanese Pyraustinae (Lepid.). Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido Imperial University (Sapporo), 25(3): 151–242 [June].

Shin, Yoo-Hang, Kyu-Taek Park, and Sang-Ho Nam

1983.   Insecta. In Illustrated Flora and Fauna of Korea, 27(9):1–1053, plates 1–48. Republic of Korea: Ministry of Education.

Shiraki, Tokuichi

1910.   Injurious Insects of Formosa. Bulletin of the Agricultural Experiment Station (Formosa), 1:1–330, plates 1–51.

1913.   Investigations on Injurious Insects. Extra Reports of the Agricultural Experiment Station, Government of Formosa, 8:1–678, two indexes [15 + 17 pages].

Shiroma, E.S.

1963.   Christmas Island Insects. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1962, 18(2):208–209.

Simmonds, F.J., and V.P. Rao

1960.   Record of Plutella maculipennis Curt., and Some of Its Parasites in Kashmir, India. The Canadian Entomologist, 92(4):278.

Simmonds, H.W.

1922.   Visit to Vanualevu and Taveuni. Fiji Islands Department of Agriculture Agricultural Circular (Suva), 3(2):22–25.

1924.   Annual Report of the Year 1923. Fiji Department of Agriculture Council Paper, 53:1–15.

1925.   Pest and Diseases of the Coconut Palm in the Islands of the Southern Pacific. Fiji Department of Agriculture Bulletin, 16.

1932.   Annual Report of the Government Entomologist, 1931. In Annual Bulletin of Divisional Reports of the Department of Agriculture, Fiji, 1931, pages 9–12. Suva.

Simmons, Perez, W.D. Reed, and E.A. M'Gregor

1931.   Fig Insects in California. United States Department of Agriculture Circular, 157:1–71, figures 1–38.

Singh, S.R.

1960.   The Hawaiian Beet Web—worm (Hymenia recurvalis F.), a Serious Pest of Indian Spinach (Amar—anthus viridus Linn.). Fiji Department of Agriculture Agricultural Journal, 30(1):35–38, 1 unnumbered figure.

Skala, Von Hugo, Haid

1951.   Einige Blattminen aus verschiedenen Kleinfalter-familien, Zeitschrift der Wiener Entomologischen Gesellschaft, 62(): 182, plate 18.

Smith, John B.

1903.   Check List of the Lepidoptera of Boreal America, v + 136 pages.

Snellen, P.C.T.

1872.   Bijdrage tot de Vlinder—Fauna van Neder—Guinea, Zuidwestlijke gedeelte van Afrika. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie…, 15:1-110, plates 1–8 's—Graven—hage.

1875.   Opgave der Geometrina en Pyralidina, in Nieuw Granada en op St. Thomas en Jamaica….In Tijdschrift voor Entomologie…, 18:187–264, plates 11–14. 's—Gravenhage.

1880.   Nieuwe Pyraliden op het Eiland Celebes gevonden door Mr. M. C. Piepers. In Tijdschrift voor Entomologie…., 23:198–250. 's—Gravenhage.

1882.   Microlepidoptera. In De Vlinders van Nederland, l:i—xiii, 1–536; 2:537–1196, plates 1–14. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

1883.   Lepidoptera van Celebes verzameld door Mr. M.C. Piepers, met aanteekenigen en beschrijving der nieuwe soorten. In Tijdschrift voor Entomologie…, 26:119–144, plates 6–8. 's—Gravenhage.

1884.   Lepidoptera van Celebes, verzameld door Mr. M.C. Piepers, met aanteekeningen en beschrijving der nieuwe soorten. In Tijdschrift voor Entomologie…, 27:35–54, plates 3–5. 's—Gravenhage.

1891.   A Catalogue of the Pyralidina of Sikkim Collected by Henry J. Elwes and the late Otto Moller. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London for 1890, pages 557–647, plates 19–20.

1892.   Systematische Lijst. In P.J. Veth, Midden—Sumatra…, IV: Natuurlijke Historie, 1, (Fauna), 8(Lepidoptera): 1–84, plates 1, 2(1886); 85–92, plates 3–5(1892). Leiden.

1901.   Bockaankondiging. In Tijdschrift voor Entomologie…, jaargang 1900, 43:247–261.

Støme, Lauritz

1959.   Ephestia cautella (Wlkr.) (Lep. Pyralidae), New to Norway. Norsk Entomologisk Tidsskrift, 11(1–2):20–21, figure 1.

South, Richard

1890.   Additions to the British List of Deltoids, Pyralides, and Crambi, since 1859. The Entomologist, 23(329):297–305.

Spuler, Arnold

1908.   Die Schmetterlinge Europas. Volume 1, pages 1–cxxviii, 1–384, figures 1–114. Stuttgart: E. Nagele.

1910.   Die Schmetterlinge Europas. Volume 2, pages 1–523, figures 1–239. Volume 3, plates 1–91. Stuttgart: Nagele and Dr. Sproesser.

Stainton, H.T.

1849a. An Attempt at a Systematic Catalogue of the British Tineidae and Pterophoridae. iv + 32 pages. London.

1849b. A Catalogue of British Tineidae and Pterophoridae. 4 pages. London: John Van Voorst.

1851.   Supplementary Catalogue of the British Tineidae and Pterophoridae. iv + 28 pages. London: John Van Voorst.

1854.   Lepidoptera: Tineina. In Insecta Britannica, 3: i–viii, 1–313, plates 1–10.

1858–1859. A Manual of British Butterflies and Moths. Volume 2, parts 15–23, pages 1–216 (1858); parts 24–33, pages 1–xi, 217–480 (1859). London.

1859.   VI. Descriptions of Twenty—five Species of Indian Microlepidoptera. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, new series, 5:111–126 (September).

1869.   The Tineina of Southern Europe, vii + 370 pages, illustrated. London: John van Voorst.

Staudinger, O.

1871.   I: Macrolepidoptera. In Staudinger and Wocke, Catalog der Lepidopteren des Europaeischen Faunengebiets, pages 1–xxxviii, 1–200. Dresden: Herman Burdach.

Staudinger, O., and H. Rebel

1901.   I: Famil. Papilionidae—Hepialidae. In Staudinger and Rebel, Catalog der Lepidopteren des palaearc—tischen Faunengebiets, pages 1–xxx, 1–411. Berlin: R. Friedlander and Sohn.

Stebbing. E.P.

1903.   Notes on Insect Pests from the Entomological Section, Indian Museum. Indian Museum Notes, 6(1):63–89.

Steele, R.W.

1970.   Copulation and Oviposition Behavior of Ephestia cautella (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae). Journal of Stored Products Research, 6:229–245.

Steiner, L.F.

1954.   Notes and Exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society, 15(2): 281–291.

Stephens, James Francis

1829.   Insecta—Haustellata. In A Systematic Catalogue of British Insects, 2:1–388. London: Baldwin and Cradock.

1834.   Haustellata. In Illustrations of British Entomology; or, a Synopsis of Indigenous Insects: Containing Their Generic and Specific Distinctions; with an Account of Their Metamorphoses, Times of Appearance, Localities, Food, and Economy, as Far as Practicable, 4:1–433, plates 33–41. London: Baldwin and Cradock.

1852.   XII: Lepidoptera. In John Edward Gray, editor, Catalogue of British Micro—Lepidoptera, I. Sub—Div. (IV, continued): Lepidoptera Vespertina. In List of the Specimens of British Animals in the British Museum. i–vi, 1–54.

Stoll, Caspar

1791.   [Contribution.] In P. Cramer, Supplement à l'ouvrage, intitulé les Papillons exotiques, des trois parties du monde, l'Asie, l'Afrique; et l'Amerique; par Mr. Pierre Cramer, contenant les figures exactes des Chenilles et des Chrysalides de Suriname;…Papillons et Phalènes. Volume 5, pages 1–viii, 1–384, plates 1–42. Amsterdam: Chez Nic. Th. Gravius.

Strand, Embrik

1918.   H. Sauter's Formosa—Ausbeute: Pyralidae, Sub—fam. Pyraustinae. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift (“Iris”), 32():33–91, plate 1.

1919.   H. Sauter's Formosa—Ausbeute: Pyralididae, Subfam. Sterictinae, Endotrichinae, Pyralidinae und Hydrocampinae (Lep.). Entomologische Mitteilungen, 8():49–62.

Suehiro, Amy

1960.   Insects and Other Arthropods from Midway Atoll. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1959, 17(2):289–298.

Sugerman, Bernard B.

1972.   Insects and Other Arthropods from Kwajalein Atoll (Marshall Islands). Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1971. 21(2):271–289.

Swaine, G.

1954.   Annual Report of the Entomologist, Morogoro, for 1952. In Tanganyika Department of Agriculture Annual Report, 1952, pages 50–54.

Sweeney, R.C.H.

1963.   Entomology. In Nyasaland Protectorate Annual Report of the Department of Agriculture for the Year 1961–62, 2:160–166.

Swezey, Otto H.

1909.   The Hawaiian Sugar Cane Bud Moth (Ereunetis flavistriata) with an Account of Some Allied Species and Natural Enemies. Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association Experiment Station Division of Entomology Bulletin, 6:1–41, plates 1–4.

1910.   The Feeding Habits of Hawaiian Lepidoptera. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1909, 2(3):131–143.

1912a. Insects Associated with “Mamake” (Pipturus albi—dus), a Native Hawaiian Tree. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1910, 2(4): 153–163.

1912b. Moths from Olinda, Maui. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1911–1912, 2(5):208–209.

1915a. A Preliminary List of the Hymenopterous Parasites of Lepidoptera in Hawaii. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society, January 1914- April 1915, 3(2):99–109.

1915b. List of Additions to the Lepidopterous Fauna of Hawaii Since the Publication of the Fauna Hawaiiensis. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1914, 3(2):65–69.

1917.   Exhibition of “Types” of Some Recent Hawaiian Lepidoptera. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomologica Society for 1917, 3(4):296–297.

1919.   Insects Occurring on Plants of Lobelioideae in the Hawaiian Islands. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1918, 4(1):9—I4.

1920.   Some New Hawaiian Lepidoptera. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1919, 4(2):376–386.

1924.   Notes on Insect Pests in Samoa. Hawaiian Planters' Record (Honolulu), 28(2):214–219.

1926a. Casinaria infesta (Cress.) in Hawaii (Hym.). Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for the Year 1925, 6(2):296–297.

1926b. Recent Introduction of Beneficial Insects in Hawaii. Journal of Economic Entomology, 19(5):714–720.

1926c. Lepidoptera. Bulletin of the Bernice P. Bishop Museum, 31:73–79.

1929a. List of Lepidoptera at the Bishop Museum, Collected by J. August Kusche on Kauai in 1919 and 1920. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1928, 7(2):273–278.

1929b. The Hosts of Cremastus hymeniae Viereck in Hawaii (Hymenoptera). Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1928, 7(2):281.

1929c. Notes on the Egg-Parasites of Insects in Hawaii. Proceedings of the Hawiian Entomological Society for 1928, 7(2):282–292.

1936.   Fruit-eating and Seed-eating Insects in Hawaii. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1935, 9(2): 196–202.

1940a. Notes and Exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for the Year 1939, 10(3):365–366.

1940b. Melittobiopsis ereunetiphila Timberlake, an Efficient Parasite on the Sugar Cane Bud Worm in Hawaii. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1939, 10(3):457–458.

1942a. Notes and Exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1941, 11(2): 133–134.

1942b. Notes on Food Habits of Lepidoptera in Samoa. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1941, 11(2):202–216.

1943.   Host Plant Records of Some Kauai Lepidoptera. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1942, 11(3):279–284.

1944.   Keys to Some Lepidopterous Larvae Found in Gardens and Homes in Hawaian Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1943, 12(1): 138–145.

1946.   Insects of Guam, II. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin, 189:1–237, illustrated.

1952.   Insect Fauna of a Coconut Tree. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1951, 14(3):377–378.

1954.   Forest Entomology in Hawaii: An Annotated Check–list of the Insect Faunas of the Various Components of the Hawaiian Forests. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Special Publication, 44:i—ix, 1–266, figures 1–32.

Swinhoe, C.

1884.   On the Lepidoptera Collected at Kurrachee. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1884:503–529, plates 47, 48.

1885.   On the Lepidoptera of Bombay and Deccan, Part IV: Heterocera. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1885:852–886, plates 56, 57.

1886.   On the Lepidoptera of Mhow, in Central India. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1886:421–465, plates 40, 41.

1890.   The Moths of Burma. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1890:161–296.

1900.   Noctuina, Geometrina and Pyralidina. In Catalogue of Eastern and Australian Lepidoptera Heterocera in the Collection of the Oxford University Museum, 2:i–vi, 1–630, 8 colored plates. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Swinhoe, C., and E.C. Cotes

1887–1889. A Catalogue of the Moths of India, 1 (Sphinges): 1–40, 2 (Bombyces):41–255, 3 (Noctues, Pseudo–Deltoides, and Deltoides):256–461, 4 (Geometrites):462–589, 5 (Pyrales):590–670, 6 (Crambites, Tortrices, and Addenda):671–777; 7 (Index):778–812. Calcutta. [The authors may read Cotes and Swinhoe or Swinhoe and Cotes, depending on the part.]

Takahashi, Fumiki

1956.   On the Effect of Population Density on the Power of Increase of the Almond Moth, Ephestia cautella, II: On the Relations between the Larval Density and the Duration of Postembryonic Period, Percentage of Survival and the Size of the Moth. Japan Journal of Applied Zoology, 21(4):179–185.

1963.   Changes in Some Ecological Characters of the Almond Moth Caused by the Selective Action of an Ichneumon Wasp in Their Interacting System. Researches on Population Ecology (Kyoto University), 5(2): 117–129.

Takahashi, Fumiki, and Akira Mutuura

1964.   The Influences of Low Temperature on Prei—maginal Development of the Almond Moth, Cadra cautella (Walker), and on the Occurrence of Abnormal Male Copulatory Organs .Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology, 8(2):129–135, figures 1–3.

Tams, W.H.T.

1935.   III: Lepidoptera. In Insects of Samoa and Other Samoan Terrestrial Arthropoda, 4:169–289, figures 1–12, plates 6–18. London: British Museum (Natural History).

Tams, W.H.T., and Sir George F. Hampson

1924.   List of the Moths Collected in Siam by E. J. Godfrey…. Including Descriptions of 3 New Genera and 3 New Species. Journal of the Natural History Society of Siam, 6(3):229–289, plate 17.

Tanada, Yoshinori

1956.   Microbial Control of Some Lepidopterous Pests of Crucifers. Journal Economic Entomology, 49(3):320–329, figures 1–4.

Tello, Jaime

1968.   Fauna de Caracas. In Historia Natural de Caracas. 2:199–263. Caracas.

Thevasagayam, E.S., and L.C.S. Canagasingham

1960.   Some Observations on the Insect Pests of Dhal (Cajanus Cajan) and Their Control. Tropical Agriculturist Agricultural Journal of Ceylon. 116(4):287–298, figures 1, 2.

Thomas, P.M., G.N. Bhardwaj, S.K. Bhalla, and O.V. Sa—danand

1960.   Flour Moth. Allahabad Farmer, 34(2):114–122.

Thomas, R.T. Simon

1958.   Insects Bred from Cultivated and Ornamental Plants in Netherlands New Guinea. In Tijdschrift voor Entomologie…, 101(3–4):223–228.

Thompson, W.R.

1945.   Parasites of the Lepidoptera. In A Catalogue of the Parasites and Predators of Insect Pests, (Parasite Host Catalogue) (6): 131–258. Belleville, Ontario: The Imperial Parasite Service.

Thorpe, W.H.

1929.   Biological Races in Hyponomeuta padella L. Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology, 36:621–634.

Timberlake, P.H., E.M. Ehrhorn, O.H. Swezey

1921.   Report of Committee on Common Names of Economic Insects in Hawaii. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1920, 4(3):607–609.

1924.   Records of the Introduced and Immigrant Chal—cid—Flies of the Hawaiian Islands (Hymenoptera). Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1923, 5(3):418–449.

1926.   New Species of Hawaiian Chalcid—Flies (Hymenoptera). Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1925, 6(2):305–320, 1 plate.

Todd, E.L.

1962.   [Contribution.] In Beardsley, Notes and Exhibitions [of Specimens]. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society, 18(1):5.

Tuli, S., and P.B. Mookherjee

1963.   Ecological Studies on Cadra (Ephestia) cautella (Walker). The Indian Journal of Entomology, 25(4):379–380.

Tutt, J.W.

1892.   The British Noctuae and Their Varieties. Volume 2, pages 1–xviii, 1–180. London: Swan, Sonnenschein and Co.

1906.   A Natural History of the British Lepidoptera, a Textbook for Students and Collectors. pages 1–xiii, 1558, plate 1. London: Swan, Sonnenschein and Co.

Ullyett, G.C.

1947.   Mortality Factors in Populations of Plutella maculipennis Curtis (Tineidae: Lep.), and Their Relation to the Problem of Control. South Africa Department of Agriculture and Forestry Entomology Memoirs, 2(6):7–202, figures 1–30.

Ullyett, G.C., and D.B. Schonkin

1940.   A Fungus Disease of Plutella maculipennis Curt., in South Africa, with Notes on the Use of Ento—mogenous Fungi in Insect Control. Union of South Africa, Department of Agriculture and Forestry, Science Bulletin, 218:1–24, figures 1–8.

Van der Goot, P.

1934.   Ziekten en Plagen der Cultuurgewassen in Ne—derlandsch—Indie in 1932. In Mededeelingen van het Instituut voor Plantenziekten, 83:i—vii, 1–80. Buitenzorg.

Van der Vecht, J.

1957.   On Some Hymenoptera from the Collection of Guérin—Méneville in the Leiden Museum. Zoologische Mededeelingen, 35(3):21–31.

van Deurs, Wilh

1952.   Nye og sjaeldne sommerfugle 1950–1951. Entomologiske Meddelelser, 26(3):279–280.

Van Deventer, W.

1904.   Over de ontwikkelingstoestanden van eenige Microlepidoptera van Java. In Tijdschrif voor Entomologie…, 46:79–90, plates 9–10.

Vari, L.

1961.   Lithocolletidae. In South African Lepidoptera, vii—xix, 1–238, plates 1–112 [figures 1–499], Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.

Vayssiére, P., and J. Mimeur

1925.   Les Pyrales du Cotonnier (Sylepta derogata F. et Glyphodes indica Saund.) en Afrique Occidental Francaise. Agronomie Coloniale, 90:255–268.

Veitch, Robert

1923.   The Minor Pests on Sugar Cane in Fiji. Agricultural Report (Sydney), 7:9, plate 2: figure 2.

1929.   Report of the Chief Entomologist. In Annual Report of the Department of Agriculture and Stock, 1928–1929, pages 67–71. Queensland.

Venkatraman, T.V. and M.J. Chacko

1961.   The Natural Enemies of Marasmia trapezalis (Guen.), a Pest of Maize and Jowar. Current Science, 30(2):73–75, figures 1–3.

Vesey—Fitzgerald, Desmond

1941.   Some Insects of Economic Importance in Seychelles. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 32(2): 153–160.

Viette, Pierre E.L.

1949a. Catalogue of the Heterocerous Lepidoptera from French Oceania. Pacific Science, 3(4):315–337.

1949b. Les Lépidoptéres Gelechiidae du Pacifique sud. Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Series 2, 21(1):98–104.

1951.   Supplément au Catalogue des Lépidoptères Hétérocères de I'Océanie Française. Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France, 56(1): 14–16.

1952.   Lepidoptera. In Results of the Norwegian Scientific Expedition to Tristan da Cunha, 1937–1938, 23:119, figures 1–19, plates 1–3, map. Oslo: Jacob Dybwad.

1956.   Les types de Tinéides (s.l.) de Zeller d'Afrique de sud. Arkiv för Zoologi utgivet av Kungl. Svenska Vetenskaps—Akademien, series 2, 8(6):531–539, figures 1–12.

1957.   La faune entomologique de L'ile de la Réunion, Mémoires de l'Institute Scientifique de Madagascar, series E (Entomologie), 8:138–226, illustrated.

1958.   Lépidoptères Tinéides (s.l.) et Pyrales. Commentationes Biologicae (Societas Scientiarum Fennica), 17(8): 1–12, figures 1–3.

von Hedemann, W.

1894.   Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Microlepidopteren—Fauna von Dänisch—Westindien. Entomologische Zeitung…entomologischen Vereine Stettin, 55(7-9):280–302.

Vos, H.C.C.A.A.

1953.   Introduction in Indonesia of Angitia cerophaga Grav., a Parasite of Plutella maculipennis Curt. General Agricultural Research Station, 134:1–32, figures 1–13. Bogor, Java.

Wakely, S.

1958.   Notes on the Tineina. The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation, 70(5): 137–139.

Walker, Francis

1856–1866. List of the Specimens of Lepidopterous Insects in the Collection of the British Museum, 9:146–252 (1856); 11:493–764 (1857); 15:1521–1888 (1858); 16:1–254 (1859); 17:255–508 (1859); 18:509–798 (1859); 19:799–1036 (1859); 27:1286 (1863); 28:287–561 (1863); 29:563–835 (1864); 30:837–1096 (1864); 32(supplement 2): 323–706 (1865); 34(supplement 4): 1121–1533 (1866); 35(supplement 5): 1535–2040 (1866).

1864.   Catalogue of the Heterocerous Lepidopterous Insects Collected at Sarawak, in Borneo, by Mr. A. R. Wallace, with Descriptions of New Species. Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society, Zoology, 7:160–198.

Walker, Harry G., and Lauren D. Anderson

1937.   Control of Larvae of Diamond—back Moth, Plutella maculipennis Curtis. Journal of Economic Entomology, 39(3):443–448.

1943.   Control of Aphids and Diamond—back Moth Larvae on Collards with Rotenone—nicotine Dusts. Journal of Economic Entomology, 36(2):343–344.

Wallace, Alfred R., and Frederic Moore

1866.   List of Lepidopterous Insects Collected at Takow, Formosa, by Mr. Robert Swinhoe. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1866:355–365.

Wallengren, Von H.D.J.

1860.   Lepidopterologische Mittheilungen, II. Wiener Entomologische Monatschrift, 4(6):161–176.

Walsingham, Lord (Thomas de Grey)

1882.   Notes on Tineidae of North America. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 10:165204.

1887a. A Revision of the Genera Acrolophus, Poey, and Anaphora, Clem. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1887:137–173, plates 7, 8.

1887b. In F. Moore, The Lepidoptera of Ceylon 3(13):i—xv, 491–529, plates 196–215. London.

1891.   III: African Micro-Lepidoptera. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1891:63–132, plates 3–7.

1892.   On the Microlepidoptera of the West Indies. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1892:491–549, 1 plate.

1894.   XXII: Catalogue of the Pterophoridae, Tortricidae, and Tineidae of the Madeira Islands, with Notes and Descriptions of New Species. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1894:535–555.

1897.   Revision of the West-Indian Microlepidoptera, with Descriptions of New Species. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1897: 54–182.

1899.   Description of Two New Species of Tineina from Bengal. Indian Museum Notes, 4(3):105–107, plate 7.

1907.   Microlepidoptera. In David Sharp, editor, Fauna Hawaiiensis or the Zoology of the Sandwich (Hawaiian) Isles, 1(5):469–759, plates 10–25. Cambridge: University Press.

1908.   Microlepidoptera of Tenerife. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1907:911–1034, figures 241–243, plates 51–53.

1909–1915. Lepidoptera—Heterocera. In Godman and Salvin, Biologia Centrali-Americana, Zoology, 42(4):i—xii, 1–24 (1909); 25–40 (1910); 41–112 (1911); 113–168 (1912); 169–224 (1913); 225392 (1914); 393–482 (1915); figures 1–30, plates 1–10. London.

Walsingham, Lord, and John Hartley Durrant

1897.   The Diamond-back Moth: Plutella cruciferarum, Z. (1843), a Synonym of Cerostoma maculipennis, Crt. (1832). The Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, series 2, 8(33): 173–175.

1907.   Revision of the Nomenclature of Microlepidoptera. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, 45:46–52.

Wang, P'ing-Yuan

1963.   Notes on Chinese Pyralid Moths of the Genus Diaphania Hübner. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 12(3):358–367, plates 1–2.

Warren, W.

1888.   I: On Lepidoptera Collected by Major Yerbury in Western India in 1886 and 1887. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1888:292–339.

1891.   VI: Descriptions of New Genera and Species of Pyralidae Contained in the British-Museum Collection. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, including Zoology, Botany, and Geology, series 6, 8:61–70.

1892.   LXIV: Descriptions of New Genera and Species of Pyralidae Contained in the British-Museum Collection. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 6, 9:429–442.

Watson, J.R.

1917.   Florida Truck and Garden Insects. University of Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin, 134:35–127.

Wattal, B.L., and N.L. Kalra

1960.   Pyralis pictalis Curt. (Pyralidae: Lepidoptera) Larvae as Predators of Bed Bug, Cimex hemipterus Fab. (Cimicidae: Hemiptera). Indian Journal of Malariology, 14(1):77–79, plate 1.

Weber, P.W.

1954.   Recent Liberations of Beneficial Insects, III. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1953, 15(2):369–370.

1955.   Recent Liberations of Beneficial Insects in Hawaii, IV. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1954, 15(3):635–638.

Wells, W.G.

1942.   Annual Report of the Department of Agriculture and Stock, 1941–42. 1–27. Queensland.

1943.   Review of Applied Entomology, series A, 31(6):265.

Westwood, J.O.

1838–1840. An Introduction to the Modern Classification of Insects 2:i—xi, 1–587, figures 1–133; synopsis, pages 1–158. London: Longman, Orme, Brown, Green and Longmans.

1854.   Index Entomologicus; or, a Complete Illustrated Catalogue, Consisting of Upwards of Two Thousand Accurately Coloured Figures of the Lepidopterous Insects of Great Britian, by W. Wood: A New and Revised Edition, with Supplement, vii + 298 pages. 59 plates. London.

Whalley, Paul E.S.

1960.   The Genus Ephestia Guénée (Lep., Phycitinae). Entomologist's Gazette, 11(4): 183–184.

1961.   A Revision of Two Species Complexes in the Pyraustinae (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae), 1: Cotachena histricalis Walker; 2: Syngamia floridalis Zeller. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Entomology, 10(3):99–111, 12 figures, plate 4.

1962.   40: Pyraloidea from Rennell and Bellona Islands. In The Natural History of Rennel Island, British Solomon Islands, 4:97–120, illustrated. Copenhagen.

1964.   Catalogue of the Galleriinae (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae) with Descriptions of New Genera and Species. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, 9(10):561–618, plates 14–44.

Wileman, A.E., and Richard South

1918.   New Species of Pyralidae from Formosa. The Entomologist, 51(665):217–219.

Wilkinson, D.S.

1931.   Four New Species of Ichneumonoidea. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 22(3):393–397, plate 20.

Willcocks, F.C.

1916.   The Insect and Related Pests of Egypt: The Insect and Related Pests Injurious to the Cotton Plant, Sultanic Agricultural Society, 1(1):i-xvii, 1–339, plates 4–10. Cairo.

1922.   A Survey of the More Important Economic Insects and Mites of Egypt. Sultanic Agricultural Society (Technical Section), 1:i-v, 1–482. Cairo.

Williams, Francis X.

1927.   Notes on the Habits of the Bees and Wasps of the Hawaiian Islands. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society for 1926, 6(3):425–464.

1931.   Handbook of Insects and Other Invertebrates of Hawaiian Sugar Cane Fields. 400 pages, 190 figures, 41 plates. Honolulu: Hawaiian Sugar Planter's Association Experiment Station.

Williams, J.R.

1951.   Colony of Mauritius. In Annual Report of the Department of Agriculture, 1949, Entomological Division (Mauritius), pages 59–66.

Wiltshire, E.P.

1957.   The Lepidoptera of Iraq. Pages 1–162, plates 1–17. Dorking, England: Adlard and Son, Bartholomew Press. [Published for the Ministry of Agriculture, Government of Iraq.]

Wise, K.A.J.

1955.   Pests of Stored Products in New Zealand, I: Family Phycitidae (Lepidoptera). New Zealand Journal of Science and Technology, 36(5):523–530.

Wocke, M.F.

1871.   II: Microlepidoptera. In Staudinger and Wocke, Catalog der Lepidopteren des Europaischen Faunengebiets, pages 201–426. Dresden: Herman Burdach.

Wolcott, George N.

1923.   Insectae Portoricensis: A Preliminary Annotated Check-List of the Insects of Porto Rico, with Descriptions of Some New Species. The Journal of the Department of Agriculture of Porto Rico, 7(1):1–313, illustrated.

1933.   The Lima Bean Pod-Borer Caterpillars of Puerto Rico. The Journal of the Department of Agriculture of Puerto Rico, 17(3):241–255.

1936.   Insectae Borinquenses: A Revised Annotated Check-List of the Insects of Puerto Rico. The Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico, 20(1):1–627, illustrated.

1948.   The Insects of Puerto Rico. The Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico, 32(3):417–748.

Wolff, Neils L.

1959.   Bemaerkninger om nogle danske Pyralider (Lepidoptera) (notes on some Danish Pyralid Moths). Flora og Fauna, 65(4):113–133, figures 1–9.

1964.   The Lepidoptera of Greenland. Meddelelser om Grönland, 159(11):1–74, figures 1–55, plates 121.

Wollaston, Mrs, Vernon T.

1879.   XXXVII: Notes on the Lepidoptera of St. Helena, with Descriptions of New Species. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, (series 5), 3:xxvii, 219–233; xxxvii, 329–343; xlvii, 415–441.

Wood, W.

1839.   Index Entomologicus; or, a Complete Illustrated Catalogue Consisting of 1944 Figures of the Lepidopterous Insects of Great Britain, xii + 226 pages, 54 plates. London.

Yano, Koji

1963.   Taxonomic and Biological Studies of Pterophoridae of Japan (Lepidoptera). Pacific Insects, 5(1):65–209, illustrated.

Yatomi, K., and S. Yamashita

1938.   On the Effect of Temperature and Humidity upon the Hatching of the Eggs of Ephestia cautella Walk. (Preliminary Report). Oyo-Dobuts. Zasshi, 10:133136. [In Japanese.] [Also in Review of Applied Entomology, series A, 26:671 (1938).]

Zacher, Freidrich

1916.   Die afrikanischen Baumwollschädlinge, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der von Busse und Kersting in Togo gesammelten Arten. Arbeiten aus Kaiserlichen Biologischen Anstalt für Landund Forstwirtschaft, 9(1):121–230, figures 1–83.

Zaguliaev, A.

1965.   Moli i ognevki-vrediteli zapasov. Zashchita rasteniu ot vreditelet i boliznei, 10(1):31–32, figures 1–4.

Zeller, P.C.

1843.   Ueber Phalaena Tin. xylostella Lin. (Plut. xylost. auctor.). Stetteiner Entomologische Zeitung herausgegeben von dem entomologischen Vereine zu Stettin, 4:281–283.

1847.   Bemerkungen uber die auf einer Reise nach Italien und Sicilien beobachteten Schmetterlinge. Isis von Oken, 40(10):721–771; 40(12):882–914.

1848.   Die Gallerien und Nachthornigen Phyciden. Isis von Oken, 8:569–618; 9:641–691.

1852 [1854]. Lepidoptera Microptera, quae J. A. Wahlberg in Caffrorum Terra Collegit. Kongl. Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar for Ar 1852, pages 1–120.

1853.   Drei Javanische Nachfalter. Bulletin of the Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou, 26:502–516, plate 4.

1855.   Die Arten den Gattung Butalis. Linnaea Entomologica, 10:169–269 [Page 169 is misprinted “196”.]

1867.   Einige von Herrn Pickard Cambridge, besonders in Aegypten und Palästina, gesemmelte Microlepidoptera. Entomologische Zeitung hereausgegeben von dem entomologischen Vereine zu Stettin, 28(1012):365–415, plate 2.

1873.   Beiträge zur Kenntniss der nordamerikanischen Nachfalter, besonders der Microlepidopteren. Verhandlungen der K.K. zoologisch-botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien, 23:201–334, plates 3–4.

Zerny, H.

1935.   Die Lepidopterenfauna des grossen Atlas in Marokko und seiner Randgebiet. Mit Beiträgen von L. Schwingenschus (Wien). Mémoires de la Société des Sciences Naturelles du Maroc, 42:1–163, 2 plates.

Zimmerman, Elwood C.

1938.   Cryptorhynchinae of Rapa. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin, 151:1–75, figures 1–6, plates 1–4.

1958a. Macrolepidoptera. In Insects of Hawaii, 7:i–ix, 1–542, 423 figures. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. [See bibliography.]

1958b. Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea. In Insects of Hawaii, 8:i–ix, 1–456, figures 1–347. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

1978.   Microlepidoptera. In Insects of Hawaii. Volume 9(1):i-xviii, 1–882, figures 1–607, plates 1–7; (2):883–1903, figures 608–1355. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Zimmerman, Elwood C., and N.D. Riley

1966.   Gracilaria Haworth, 1828 (Insecta, Lepidoptera): Proposed Addition to the Official List of Generic Names. Z. N. (S.), 1757. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 23(4): 186–187.

1967.   Further Comment on the Case of Gracilaria versus Gracillaria (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Z. N. (S), 1757. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 24(5):267–268.

Zincken, Johann

1818.   Die Linneischen Tineen in irhe natürlichen Gattungen autgelost und beschreiben. Germar Magazin Entomologie, 1818, 3:113–176.

Figures 274–319

FIGURE 274.—a, Neoxychirota isolate, new species, paratype; b, Stangeia distantia, new species, paratype; c, Marasmarcha pumilio (Zeller), ; d, Achroia grisella (Fabricius), ; e, Cryptoblabes ardescens (Meyrick), ; f, g, Ernophthora denticornis (Meyrick) (f ; g, ); h, Ernophthora iospila, new species, holotype.

FIGURE 275.—a-d, Ernophthora dryinandra (Meyrick) (a, b, ; c,d, ); e-g, Ernophthora lechriogramma, new species, (e, holotype; f, g, paratypes; h, Ernophthora palassoptera, new species, holotype.

FIGURE 276.—a,b, Ernophthora aphanoptera, new species (a holotype; b, , paratype); c, Ernophthora maculicostella (Ragonot), ; d, Ernophthora chrysura (Meyrick), ; e, Zamagiria exedra, new species, holotype;f, Cateremna halmophila Meyrick, ; g, Cateremna decipula, new species, paratype (right wings reversed); h, Ernophthora chrysura (meyrick), .

FIGURE 277.—a,b Ctenomeristis ochrodepta Meyrick (a, ; b, ); c, Delcina diaspora, new species, holotype; d, Phycita orthoclina Meyrick, ; e,f, Cadra cautella (Walker) (e, ;f, ); g, Spoladea recurvalis (Fabricius), ; h, Marasmia trapezalis (Guenee), .

FIGURE 278.—a,b, Psara jasiusalis (Walker) (a, ; b, ); c, Psara orphnopeza, new species, holotype; d, Herpetogramma phthorosticta (Meyrick), (right wings reversed); e, Htrpttogramma cleoropa (Meyrick), f, Talobotys vibrato Meyrick, ; g, Tessema sensilis, new species, holotype; h, Glyphodes phormingopa (Meyrick), .

FIGURE 279.—a, Bradina tormentifera Meyrick, ; b, B. fidelia, new species, paratype; c, B. perlucidalis Hampson, ; d, B. stricta, new species, holotype (right wings reversed); e, B. emphasis, new species, holotype; f, B. eremica, new species, holotype; g, Stemorrhages euthalassa (Meyrick), ; h, Chrysophyllis lucivaga Meyrick, holotype.

FIGURE 280.—a, Diaphania indica (Saunders), ; b, Aulacodes eupselias Meyrick, ; c, Cangetta eschatia, new species, holotype; d, Maruca testulalis (Geyer), ; e-h, Piletocera signiferalis (Wallengren) (e,f, ; g,h, ).

FIGURE 281.—a, Aethaloēssa calidalis tiphalis (Walker), ; b, Pyralis pictalis (Curtis), ; c, Idioblasta isoterma Meyrick, holotype; d,e, I. lacteata Warren (d ; e, ); f, I. acleropa (Meyrick), holotype.

FIGURE 282.—a, Idioblasta procellaris (Meyrick), ; b, I. transversata, new species, paratype; c, I. stenogramma, new species, holotype; d, I. amydrosoma, new species, holotype; e, I. acrogramma, new species, holotype; f,I. linearis, new species, holotype.

FIGURE 283.—a, Eudonia citrocosma (Meyrick), ; b, E. clavula, new species, holotype; c, E. spectacularis Meyrick, ; d, E. opostactis (Meyrick), ; e, E. officialis (Meyrick), ;f, E. achlya, new species, holotype; g,h, E. clerica (Meyrick) (g, ; h, ).

FIGURE 284.—a, Eudonia ara, new species, paratype; b, E. aplysia, new species, paratype; c, E. chrysomicta (Meyrick), ; d,e, E. dupla, new species, paratypes (d, ; e, ); f, E. chrysomicta (Meyrick), ; g, E. munroei, new species, paratype.

FIGURE 285.—a, Dichelopa castanopis Meyrick, holotype; b-d, Dichelopa amorpha, new species, paratypes (b, ; c,d, ); e,f, Dichelopa flexura, new species, paratypes (e, ; f, ); g,h, D. flexura, new species, paratypes.

FIGURE 286.—a-f, Dichelopa harmodes Meyrick (a, , Nuku Hiva; b, , Hiva Oa; c, , Fatu Hiva; d, (right wings reversed); e, ; f, D. harmodes?, ); g, D. hadrotes, new species, holotype; h, D. hadrotes?, .

FIGURE 287.—a-f, Dichelopa choleranthes Meyrick (a, b, ; c-f, ); g, D. chionogramma, new species, holotype; h, D. dorsata, new species, holotype.

FIGURE 288.—a-c, Dichelopa peropaca Meyrick (a, b, ; c, D. peropaca?, ); d-f, Dichelopa platyxantha, new species (d, holotype; e,f, paratypes); g, Dichelopa orthiostyla Meyrick, holotype; h, Dichelopa flexura, new species, paratype.

FIGURE 289.—a, Dichelopa phalaranthes phalaranthes Meyrick, holotype; b,c, D. p. aporrhegma, new subspecies (b, holotype; c, paratype (right wings reversed); d, D. ochroma, new species, holotype; e, D. gnoma, new species, holotype; f,D. paragnoma, new species, holotype; g, D. praestrigata Meyrick, h, D. meligma, new species, holotype.

FIGURE 290.—a, Dichelopa zona, new species, holotype; b, D. porphyrophanes Meyrick, holotype; c, D. pyrsogramma Meyrick, (right wings reversed); d, D. pachydmeta Meyrick, e, D. cirrhodoris Meyrick, f, D. canitia, new species, holotype; g, h, D. argosphena Meyrick (g, ; h, ).

FIGURE 291.—a, Dichelopa argema, new species, paratype; b, Eucosma agriochlora Meyrick, c,d, Crocidosema plebejana Zeller (c, d,); e,f, Duessa marquesana, new species (e, holotype; f, paratype); g,h, Strepsicrates holotephras (Meyrick) (g, h, ).

FIGURE 292.—a, b, Tritopterna eocnephaea (Meyrick) (a, b, ); c, e, Dudua eumenica (Meyrick) (c, d, e, ); f, Cryptophlebia pallifimbriana Bradley, g, h, C. chaomorpha (Meyrick) (g, h, ).

FIGURE 293.—a, Cryptophlebia rhynchias (Meyrick), (photo courtesy British Museum (NH)); b,c, Cydia pseudomalesana, new species (b, holotype; c, paratype); d, Autosticha leucoptera, new species, holotype; e,f, Stoeberhinus testaceus Butler (e, f, ); g,h, Autosticha pelodes (Meyrick) (g, h, ).

FIGURE 294.—a, Orneodes pterochroma, new species, holotype; b, c, Chelophoba melaina, new species (b, holotype; c, paratype); d, Orneodes xanthozona, new species, paratype; e, Pitycona attenuata, new species, holotype; f Ephysteris longicornis, new species, holotype; g, Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller), .

FIGURE 295.—a, Asymphorodes macrogramma, new species, ; holotype; b, A. holoporphyra Meyrick, holotype; c, A. didyma, new species, holotype; d, A. plemmelia, new species, holotype; e, A. trigrapha, new species, holotype; f, g, A. nephocirca Meyrick, (f, ; g, ); h, A. astathopis (Meyrick), holotype.

FIGURE 296.—a, b, Asymphorodes acrophrictis Meyrick, a, ; holotype; b, ; c, d, A. diamphidius, new species (c, holotype; d, paratype); e, A. spintheropus (Meyrick), holotype (right wings reversed); f–h, A. valligera Meyrick (f, g, ; h, (typical).

FIGURE 297.—a–c, Asymphorodes valligera Meyrick (a–c, ); d, A. leucoterma Meyrick, holotype; e, A. admirandus Meyrick, holotype; f, A. pollutus Meyrick, ; g, A. aporia, new species, paratype; h, A. hypostema, new species, holotype (right wings reversed).

FIGURE 298.—a, Asymphorodes brevimacula, new species, holotype; b, A. hemileucus, new species, paratype; c, A. cirsodes Meyrick, (right wings reversed); d, A. myronotus Meyrick, ; e, A. cuneatus, new species, holotype; f, A. seminiger, new species, holotype; g, A. albicoma, new species, holotype; h, A. semiluteus, new species, holotype (right wings reversed).

FIGURE 299.—a, Asymphorodes nigricornis, new species, holotype; b, A. cicatricula, new species, holotype; c, A. amblysoma, new species, paratype; d, A. chalcopterus, new species, holotype; e, A. lenticula, new species, holotype; f–h, A. xanthostola Meyrick (f, g, ; h, ).

FIGURE 300.—a, Asymphorodes chrysophanes, new species, holotype (right wings reversed); b, A. mesoxanthus, new species, holotype; c, A. adynatus, new species, holotype (right wings reversed); d, A. melanosoma, new species. holotype; e, A. chalcocoma, new species, holotype; f, g, A. oculisignis Meyrick (f, ; g, ); h, A. homosoma, new species, paratype.

FIGURE 301.—a, Asymphorodes bipunctatus, new species, holotype; b, A. coesyrias Meyrick, (right wings reversed); c, A. ergodes Meyrick, holotype; d, A. remigiata, new species, paratype (right wings reversed); e, A. emphereia, new species, holotype; f, A. regina, new species, paratype: g, h, A. sphenocopa Meyrick (g, ; h, ).

FIGURE 302.—a, Asymphorodes poliopterus, new species, paratype; b, A. canicoma, new species, paratype; c, A. lucidus, new species, holotype; d, A. diffidentia, new species, holotype; e, A. culminis, new species, holotype; f, A. fractura, new species, holotype (right wings reversed); g, A. lucerna, new species, holotype; h, A. phalarogramma, new species, holotype.

FIGURE 303.—a, Asymphorodes leucoloma, new species, holotype; b, A. paraporia, new species, holotype c, A. chalcosoma, new species, paratype; d, A. aenigma, new species, holotype (right wings reversed); e, A. montgomeryi, new species, holotype; f, g, A. nuciferae, new species (f, holotype; g, paratype; h, A. favilla, new species, holotype.

FIGURE 304.—a, b, Asymphorodes trichogramma, new species, paratypes, (a, b, ); c-e, A. sericeus, new species (c, holotype (right wings reversed); d, paratype; e, paratype); f,g, A. circopis Meyrick (f, ; g, ) h, A. spodogramma, new species, paratype.

FIGURE 305.—a,b, Asymphorodes acritopterus, new species, paratypes (a, ; b, ); c–e, A. balanotis Meyrick (c, holotype; d, ; e, );f, g, A. acerbus Meyrick (f,; g, ); h, A. honoria, new species, holotype.

FIGURE 306.—a, Asymphorodes porphyrarcha Meyrick, ; b, A. phaeodelta, new species, holotype; c, d, A. leptotes, new species (c, holotype; d, paratype); e, A. mediostriatus, new species, holotype; f, g, A. nebrias, new species (f, holotype; g, paratype); h, A. plectographa Meyrick, holotype.

FIGURE 307.—a–c, Asymphorodes phaeochorda Meyrick (a,b, ; c, ); d, A. ochrogramma, new species, , paratype; e, Labdia dicyanitis Meyrick, f, Herlinda fasciola, new species, holotype; g, h, H. iota, new species, paratypes.

FIGURE 308.—a, Herlinda oligoria, new species, holotype (right wings reversed); b, H. phaeoxantha, new species, holotype; c,d, Adeana leucoxantha (Meyrick) (c, d, ); e, f, Iressa neoleuca Clarke (e, f, ); g, I. microsema, new species, holotype; h, Acanthophlebia argentea, new species, holotype (right wings reversed).

FIGURE 309.—a–d, Microzestis inelegans Meyrick (a, ; b, ); c, d, (right wings reversed); e, Anatrachyntis incertulella (Walker), ; f, A. megacentra (Meyrick) ; g, A. cyma (Bradley) ; h, A. lunulifera (Meyrick), .

FIGURE 310.—a, b, Trissodoris honorariella (Walsingham) (a, ; b, ; c, Melnea armigera (Meyrick) ; d, Blastobasis inana (Butler), ; e, Cosmopterix ceriocosma (Meyrick), ; f, C. nonna, new species, holotype; g, C. diandra, new species, paratype; h, C. melanarches Meyrick, .

FIGURE 311.—a, b, Lissocnemitis argolyca Meyrick (a, ; b, ); c, Imma philomena, new species, holotype; d, I. ochrilactea Meyrick, holotype; e, I. semiclara Meyrick, ; f, g, I. gloriana, new species (f, holotype (right wings reversed); g, paratype); h, I. feaniensis, new species, paratype.

FIGURE 312.—a, b, Imma rotia, new species, paratypes (a, b, ); c, d, I. assita, new species, paratypes (c, ; d, ); e, f, I. catapsesta Meyrick (e, ; f, ); g, h, I. heppneri, new species, paratypes (g, ; h, ).

FIGURE 313.—a, Imma impariseta, new species, holotype; b, I. fulminatrix Meyrick, holotype (right wings reversed); c, Choreutis chelaspis chelaspis Meyrick, ; d, C. c. euthenia, new subspecies, holotype; e, Plutella xylostella (Linnaeus), ; f, g, Prays ignota, new species, paratypes; h, Eftichia chrysoleuca, new species, holotype.

FIGURE 314.—a, Zelleria leucostrota Meyrick, ; b Terthroptera astochia, new species, holotype; c,d, Eicephala spinula new species (c, holotype; d, paratype); e, Caloptilia deltanthes (Meyrick), f, C. insidia, new species, holotype; g, Decadarchis clistopa (Meyrick), ; holotype; h, D. physocapna Meyrick, holotype.

FIGURE 315.—a,b, Decadarchis psammaula Meyrick (a, ; b, ); c, D. celestra, new species, holotype (right wings reversed); d, D. incongrua, new species, paratype; e, f, D. coleosema Meyrick (e, ; f, ); g, D. aspera, new species, holotype; h, D. percnomicta Meyrick, holotype.

FIGURE 316.—a, Decadarchis rufimacula Meyrick, ; b, D. tritogramma, new species, holotype; c, d, D. minuscula (Walsingham) (c, ; d, ); e, D. flavistriata (Walsingham), ; f, g, D. simulans (Butler) (f, Tahiti; g, ); h, Erechthias zebrina (Butler) .

FIGURE 317.—a, b, Decadarchis penicillata (Swezey) (a, ; b, underside showing patch of modified scales (right wings reversed)); c, Tinea oxymora Meyrick, ; d, Wyoma dysgnoia, new species, holotype; e, Phereoeca allutella (Rebel), ; f, Trichophaga mormopis Meyrick, ; g, Comodica signata, new species, holotype; h, Setomorpha rutella Zeller, .

FIGURE 318.—a, Clepticodes clasmatica Meyrick, ; b, Crypsithyrodes concolorella (Walker), ; c, Praeacedes thecophora (Walsingham) ; d, Trachycentra calamias Meyrick, (right wings reversed).

FIGURE 319.—a, Opogona regressa Meyrick, ; b, c, O. trissostacta Meyrick (b, ; c, ); d, e, O. aurisquamosa (Butler) d, ; e, ); f, O. discordia, new species, holotype.

Index to Animal Names

(Synonyms and page numbers of principal entries are in italics.)

Acanthophlebia, new genus, 180, 312

argentea, new species, 312, 315

acerbus Meyrick, Asymphorodes, 185, 232, 249, 267, 270

Acharana Moore, 57

achlya, new species, Eudonia, 100, 108

Achroia Hübner, 5, 21

alvearia (Stephens), 23

alveariella Guenée, 23

anticella (Walker), 23

cinercola (Hübner), 21, 23

cinereola (Hübner), 23

grisella (Fabricius), 8, 21, 23

infranella Lucas, 23

obscurevitella Ragonot, 23

acleropa (Meyrick), Idioblasta, 89, 94

acritopterus, new species, Asymphorodes, 185, 263, 266, 267

Acroclita Lederer, 157

acrogramma, new species, Idioblasta, 88, 96, 97

acrophrictis, Meyrick, Asymphorodes, 182, 191, 194

aculeata Meyrick, Cosmopterix, 180, 312

Adeana, new genus, 180, 290, 312

leucoxantha (Meyrick), 290

admirandus Meyrick, Asymphorodes, 184, 199, 249

adynatus, new species, Asymphorodes, 183, 225, 227

aechmialis Guenée, Aulacodes, 81

aenigma, new species, Asymphorodes, 185, 255, 256

Aethaloessa Lederer, 49, 85

aurantiaca (Hampson), 85, 86

?calidalis (Guenée), 85

floridalis (Zeller), 85

fulvidalis (Wallengren), 85, 86

octavialis (Walker), 85, 86

secutalis (Walker), 85, 86

tiphalis (Walker), 85, 86

witalis (Felder), 85, 86

aganactes Meyrick, Chelophoba, 173, 175

agriochlora Meyrick, Eucosma, 14, 153

albicoma, new species, Asymphorodes, 182, 211, 213

albicostalis Walker, Cateremna, 40

albifascialis (Boisduval), Spoladea, 50, 51, 52

allaini Clarke, Opogona, 389

allutella (Rebel), Phereoeca, 375

almella (Meyrick), Ctenomeristis, 42

altheana (Mann), Crocidosema, 155

Alucita Fabricius, 19, 336

alvearia (Stephens), Achroia, 23

alveariella Guenée, Achroia, 23

amblysoma, new species, Asymphorodes, 184, 217

amorpha, new species, Dichelopa, 121, 123, 124, 126

amydrosoma, new species, Idioblasta, 89, 96, 97

Anatrachyntis Meyrick, 180, 297

aulacosema (Lower), 297

cyma (Bradley), 300

falcatella (Stainton), 297

incertulella (Walker), 297

lunulifera (Meyrick), 300

megacentra (Meyrick), 297

rileyi (Walsingham), 297

similis (Bradley), 300

subcarnea (Meyrick), 297

tridigitella (Walsingham) 297

angustalis (Fabricius), Spoladea, 50, 51, 52

animalis Guenée, Spoladea, 50, 51, 52

annulatella (Wood), Plutella, 336, 338

antiastis Meyrick, Chelaria, 175

anticella (Walker), Achroia, 23

Apanteles Foerster, 160

mendanae Wilkinson, 160

aphanoptera, new species, Ernophthora, 32

aplysia, new species, Eudonia, 100, 113

aporia, new species, Asymphorodes, 183, 201, 254

aporrhegma, new subspecies, Dichelopa, 4, 121, 136, 138

aprobola (Meyrick), Dudua, 10, 160

aquatilis (Boisduval) Maruca, 54, 56

ara, new species, Eudonia, 100, 111

ardescens (Meyrick), Cryptoblabes, 4, 24, 233

argema, new species, Dichelopa, 121, 151, 152

argentea, new species, Acanthophlebia, 312, 315

argillacea Butler, Tatobotys, 61

argolyca Meyrick, Lissocnemitis, 12, 315

argosphena Meyrick, Dichelopa, 121, 151, 152

Argyresthia Hübner, 341

oreasella Clemens, 341

argyritis Hampson, Glyphodes, 64

argyrospilodes Clarke, Dichelopa, 147

armigera (Meyrick), Melnea, 303, 306

ARRENOPHANIDAE, 78

Ascalenia Wocke, 303

Asopia Treitschke, 87

aspera, new species, Decadarchis, 349, 358

Aspithra Ragonot, 34, 36

assita, new species, Imma, 318, 320, 327, 330

astathopis (Meyrick), Asymphorodes, 185, 194, 196

astochia, new species, Terthroptera, 342, 343

Asymphorodes Meyrick, 12, 13, 180, 290, 293, 312

acerbus Meyrick, 185, 232, 249, 267, 270

acritopterus, new species, 185, 263, 266, 267

acrophrictis Meyrick, 182, 191, 194

admirandus Meyrick, 184, 199, 249

adynatus, new species, 183, 225, 227

aenigma, new species, 185, 255, 256

albicoma, new species, 182, 211, 213

amblysoma, new species, 184, 217

aporia, new species, 183, 201, 254

astathopis (Meyrick), 185, 194, 196

balanotis Meyrick, 185, 267, 286

bipunctatus, new species, 184, 232, 233, 274, 279

brevimacula, new species, 183, 203, 205, 237

canicoma, new species, 185, 241, 244

chalcocoma, new species, 185, 228

chalcopterus, new species, 184, 217, 220

chalcosoma, new species, 185, 254, 255

chrysophanes, new species, 183, 223

cicatricula, new species, 184, 216, 217

circopis Meyrick, 185, 263, 266, 272, 273, 279

cirsodes Meyrick, 183, 205, 208, 238, 239

coesyrias Meyrick, 184, 233, 315

culminis, new species, 183, 247

cuneatus, new species, 182, 205, 210, 211

diamphidius, new species, 185, 194, 195

didyma, new species, 182, 187

diffidentia, new species, 184, 246

dimorpha (Busck), 12, 257, 270

emphereia, new species, 183, 237

ergodes Meyrick, 182, 233

favilla, new species, 185, 257

fractura, new species, 183, 247

hemileucus, new species, 182, 205, 211, 213

holoporphyra Meyrick, 182, 187, 188

homosoma, new species, 185, 229, 232, 270

honoria, new species, 184, 272, 273

hypostema, new species, 183, 201, 203

ingravescens Meyrick, 197

interstincta Meyrick, 241

lenticula, new species, 184, 217, 220, 222

leptotes, new species, 184, 233, 246, 274, 279

leucoloma, new species, 185, 251, 252

leucoterma Meyrick, 182, 197

lucerna, new species, 185, 249, 251, 252

lucidus, new species, 185, 244, 246, 255, 256

macrogramma, new species, 182, 186

mediostriatus, new species, 184, 274

melanosoma, new species, 185, 227, 228

mesoxanthus, new species, 184, 223, 224

montgomeryi, new species, 183, 256, 257

myronotus Meyrick, 183, 191, 208, 210, 220, 257

nebrias, new species, 184, 222, 274, 277, 279

nephocirca Meyrick, 185, 191

nigricornis, new species, 184, 201, 214, 217, 244

nuciferae, new species, 184, 257, 259

ochrogramma, new species, 185, 281

oculisignis Meyrick, 183, 228

paraporia, new species, 184, 252, 254

phaeochorda Meyrick, 183, 279, 283

phaeodelta, new species, 184, 241, 273, 274

phalarogramma, new species, 184, 249, 251, 252

plectographa Meyrick, 183, 279

plemmelia, new species, 183, 188, 189

poliopterus, new species, 183, 241

pollutus Meyrick, 183, 199, 201, 203

porphyrarcha Meyrick, 185, 228, 257, 270, 272

regina, new species, 182, 208, 237, 239

remigiata, new species, 183, 208, 235, 237

semiluteus, new species, 185, 189, 213, 214, 216, 277

seminiger, new species, 182, 211, 213

sericeus, new species, 183, 247, 261, 263

sphenocopa Meyrick, 184, 239, 261

spintheropus (Meyrick), 185, 196, 197, 228

spodogramma, new species, 182, 266, 267

triaula (Meyrick), 12

trichogramma, new species, 12, 183, 259, 261, 283

trigrapha, new species, 185, 189, 191

valligera Meyrick, 179, 185, 197, 228, 249

xanthostola Meyrick, 184, 205, 220, 223, 224, 227

xestophanes Meyrick, 270

atomoclastus Meyrick, Orneodes, 169

attenuata, new species, Pitycona, 12, 175, 177

Aulacodes Guenée, 49, 81

aechmialis Guenée, 81

eupselias Meyrick, 81

aulacosema (Lower), Anatrachyntis, 297

aurantiaca (Hampson), Aethaloessa, 85, 86

aurisquamosa (Butler), Opogona, 13, 389, 392

Automola Meyrick, 171

Autosticha Meyrick, 4, 11, 169, 171

leucoptera, new species, 171, 173

merista Clarke, 171

pelodes (Meyrick), 4, 171, 173

Bactra Stephens, 4

balanotis Meyrick, Asymphorodes, 185, 267, 286

barbicornis (Felder and Rogenhofer), Piletocera, 83

basistrigalis (Walker), Psara, 57

batrachopa Meyrick, Cryptophlebia, 164

bifenestralis (Mabille), Maruca, 56

bifurcalis (Snellen), Marasmia 52, 54

bipunctatus, new species, Asymphorodes, 184, 232, 233, 274, 279

bisselliella (Hummel), Tineola, 375

Blabophanes Zeller, 381

blackburnii (Butler), Crocidosema, 155

BLASTOBASIDAE, 5, 12, 315

Blastobasis Zeller, 315

explorata Meyrick, 315

inana (Butler), 12, 315

Botys Latreille, 52, 56, 57

bractiatella (Walker), Pryalis, 87, 88

Bradina Lederer, 1, 49, 67

emphasis, new species, 67, 72, 74, 75

eremica, new species, 67, 73, 74, 75

Fidelia, new species, 67

impressalis Lederer, 67

perlucidalis Hampson, 1, 67, 70

stricta, new species, 67, 70

tormentifera Meyrick, 67, 70

brassicella (Fitch), Plutella, 338

brevimacula, new species, Asymphorodes, 183, 203, 205, 237

Cadra Walker, 5, 23, 47

cahiritella (Zeller), 47

cautella (Walker), 8, 36, 47, 49

defectella Walker, 47

desuetella (Walker), 47

formosella (Wileman and South), 49

passuelella (Barrett), 47

caenobitella Hübner, Prays, 338

cahiritella (Zeller), Cadra, 47

calamias Meyrick, Trachycentra, 385, 387

?calidalis (Guenée), Aethaloessa, 85

Caloptilia Hübner, 12, 346

deltanthes (Meyrick), 346, 348

insidia, new species, 346

upupaepennella (Hübner), 346

Cangetta, Moore, 49, 81

eschatia, new species, 81

rectilinea Moore, 81, 83

canicoma, new species, Asymphorodes, 185, 241, 244

canitia, new species, Dichelopa, 121, 149, 151

capensis (Zeller), Diaphania, 80

carpophaga Walsingham, Cryptophlebia, 162

Caryolestis Meyrick, 12, 13

castanopis Meyrick, Dichelopa, 121, 123, 124, 126

catapsesta Meyrick, Imma, 318, 319, 327, 330

Cateremna Meyrick, 24, 38

albicostalis Walker, 40

decipula, new species, 40

halmophila Meyrick, 38, 40, 42

microdoxa (Meyrick), 38

cautella (Walker), Cadra, 8, 36, 47, 49

celestra, new species, Decadarchis, 350, 352

Cenoloba Walsingham, 5

obliteralis (Walker), 5

Ceratoclasis Lederer, 83

ceriocosma (Meyrick), Cosmopterix, 306, 309, 310

Ceroprepes Zeller, 42

Cerostoma Latreille, 338

chalcocoma, new species, Asymphorodes, 185, 228

chalcopterus, new species, Asymphorodes, 184, 217, 220

chalcosoma, new species, Asymphorodes, 185, 254, 255

chaomorpha (Meyrick), Cryptophlebia, 10, 162, 164

charadrota Meyrick, Erechthias, 368

Chelaria Haworth, 175

antiastis Meyrick, 175

corynetis Meyrick, 175

iophana Meyrick, 175

isopogon Meyrick, 175

praemaculata Meyrick, 175

silvestris Meyrick, 175

tephroptila Meyrick, 175

xylotechna Meyrick, 175

cheiaspis (Meyrick), Choreutis, 334, 336

Chelophoba Meyrick, 169, 173

aganactes Meyrick, 173, 175

melaina, new species, 12, 173, 175

chersaea Meyrick, Ephysteris, 177

chionogramma, new species, Dichelopa, 121, 130

chionostoma Meyrick, Tritopterna, 157

Chnaura Lederer, 85

choleranthes Meyrick, Dichelopa, 119, 128, 130

CHOREUTIDAE, 5, 334

Choreutis Hübner, 334

cheiaspis (Meyrick), 334, 336

cheiaspis euthenia, new subspecies, 334, 336

pariana (Clerck), 334

Choropleca Durrant, 4

chrysoleuca, new species, Eftichia, 339, 340, 341

chrysomicta (Meyrick), Eudonia, 100, 117, 119

chrysophanes, new species, Asymphorodes, 183, 223

Chrysophyllis Meyrick, 5, 49, 75

lucivaga Meyrick, 8, 75

chrysura (Meyrick), Ernophthora, 36, 38

cicatricosa Lederer, Marasmia, 52

cicatricula, new species, Asymphorodes, 184, 216, 217

cicerella (Rodani), Plutella, 338

cinercola (Hübner), Achroia, 21, 23

cinereola (Hübner), Achroia, 23

circopis Meyrick, Asymphorodes, 185, 263, 266, 272, 273, 279

circulana Hübner, Eucosma, 153

cirrhodoris Meyrick, Dichelopa, 119, 147

cirrhogramma Clarke, Decadarchis 368

cirsodes Meyrick, Asymphorodes, 183, 205, 208, 238, 239

citrocosma (Meyrick), Eudonia, 100, 102

clasmaticus Meyrick, Clepticodes, 381

clavula, new species, Eudonia, 100, 102

cleoropa (Meyrick), Herpetogramma, 61

Clepticodes Meyrick, 349, 381

clasmaticus Meyrick, 381

horocentra Meyrick, 381

clerica (Meyrick), Eudonia, 100, 108, 111, 113, 116

clistopa Meyrick, Decadarchis, 350

Cnaphalocrocis Lederer 52

coesyrias Meyrick, Asymphorodes, 184, 233, 315

coleosema Meyrick, Decadarchis, 349, 355, 358

colivora Meyrick, Cryptophlebia, 164

colymbetella Meyrick, Epicephala, 343, 346

commercialis (Meyrick), Eudonia, 117, 119

Comodica Meyrick, 349, 377

disparata (Meyrick), 379

signata, new species, 377

tetracercella Meyrick, 377

concolorellus (Walker), Crypsithyrodes, 381

convectalis (Walker), Marasmia, 52, 54

corynetis Meyrick, Chelaria, 175

COSMOPTERIGIDAE, 5, 180

Cosmopterix Hübner, 12, 180, 306

aculeata Meyrick, 312

ceriocosma (Meyrick), 306, 309, 310

diandra, new species, 306, 310

melanarches Meyrick, 306, 312

nonna, new species, 306, 309, 310

zieglerella (Hübner), 306

CRAMBINAE, 21, 88

creonalis (Walker), Marasmia, 52, 54

Crocidosema Zeller, 153

altheana (Mann), 155

blackburnii (Butler), 155

insulana Aurivillius, 153, 155

laveraterana (Milliére), 155

obscura (Wollaston), 155

peregrinana (Möschler), 155

plebeiana (Zeller), 153, 155

plebejana Zeller, 11, 153

ptiladelpha Meyrick, 155

signatana (Walsingham), 155

synneurota Meyrick, 155

cruciferarum Zeller, Plutella, 336

Crypsithyrodes Zimmerman, 349, 381

concolorellus (Walker), 381

enixa (Illingworth), 381, 385

ignotella (Walker), 381

sladeni (Bradley), 381

obumbrata (Butler), 381, 385

Cryptoblabes Zeller, 4, 24, 49, 233

ardescens (Meyrick), 4, 24, 233

rutilella Zeller, 24

Cryptophlebia Walsingham, 9, 153, 162

batrachopa Meyrick, 164

carpophaga Walsingham, 162

chaomorpha (Meyrick), 10, 162, 164

colivora Meyrick, 164

isomalla (Meyrick), 164

pallifimbriana Bradley, 10, 162

rhynchias (Meyrick), 10, 14, 164

Ctenomeristis Meyrick, 23, 42

almella (Meyrick), 42

ochrodepta Meyrick, 42, 44

cucurbitalis Guenée, Diaphania, 80

culminis, new species, Asymphorodes, 183, 247

cuneatus, new species, Asymphorodes, 182, 205, 210, 211

curticella (Donovan), Prays, 338

Cydia Hübner, 153, 164, 166

malesana (Meyrick), 10, 166

pomonella (L.), 164

pseudomalesana, new species, 10, 164, 166

pycnochra (Meyrick), 166

cyma (Bradley), Anatrachyntis, 300

cypripennalis Hampson, Glyphodes, 64

Decadarchis Meyrick, 12, 13, 349

aspera, new species, 349, 358

celestra, new species, 350, 352

cirrhogramma Clarke, 368

clistopa Meyrick, 350

coleosema Meyrick, 349, 355, 358

decaspila (Lower), 365, 368

euophthalma Meyrick, 365

flavistriata (Walsingham), 12, 350, 365

incongrua, new species, 350, 355, 361

melanastra Meyrick, 365, 368

minuscula (Walsingham), 12, 350, 361

pandani (Clarke), 13

penicillata (Swezey), 12, 350, 368

percnomicta Meyrick, 349, 355, 358

physocapna Meyrick, 350

praedatrix (Meyrick), 13

psammaula Meyrick, 349, 350

rufimacula Meyrick, 349, 361

semifusca Bradley, 13

simulans (Butler), 12, 349, 365, 368

strangulata (Meyrick), 13

tritogramma, new species, 349, 361

decaspila (Lower), Decadarchis, 365, 368

decipula, new species, Cateremna, 40

defectella Walker, Cadra, 47

Delcina, new genus, 5, 24, 42

diaspora, new species, 42, 44

deliciosella Walker, Labdia, 283

deltanthes (Meyrick), Caloptilia, 346, 348

deluccae Amsel, Praeacedes, 385

denticornis (Meyrick), Ernophthora, 26

despecta (Meyrick), Praeacedes, 385

desuetella (Walker), Cadra, 47

diamphidius, new species, Asymphorodes, 185, 194, 195

diandra, new species, Cosmopterix, 306, 310

Diaphania Hübner, 5, 49, 75, 78

capensis (Zeller), 80

cucurbitalis Guenée, 80

gazorialis (Guenée), 78, 80

hyalinata (Shiraki), 78

indica (Saunders), 8, 78, 80

indicalis (Moore), 78

vitralis Hübner, 78

zygaenalis (Guenée), 78, 80

diaspora, new species, Delcina, 42, 44

Dichelopa Lower, 4, 8, 9, 13, 119

amorpha, new species, 121, 123, 124, 126

aporrhegma, new subspecies, 4, 121, 136, 138

argema, new species, 121, 151, 152

argosphena Meyrick, 121, 151, 152

argyrospilodes Clarke, 147

canitia, new species, 121, 149, 151

castanopis Meyrick, 121, 123, 124, 126

chionogramma, new species, 121, 130

choleranthes Meyrick, 119, 128, 130

cirrhodoris Meyrick, 119, 147

dichroa Lower, 119

dorsata, new species, 119, 133, 135

dryomorpha Meyrick, 119, 133, 138, 139

exulcerata Meyrick, 132

flexura, new species, 121, 123, 124, 126

fulvistrigata Meyrick, 4, 136, 152

gnoma, new species, 119, 138, 139, 140, 141

hadrotes, new species, 119, 126, 128

harmodes Meyrick, 119, 126, 128, 130

honoranda Meyrick, 146

iochorda Meyrick, 4, 152

meligma, new species, 119, 141, 144

ochroma, new species, 119, 138

orthiostyla Meyrick, 133, 135

pachydmeta Meyrick, 119, 146

paragnoma, new species, 119, 139, 141

peropaca Meyrick, 121, 130, 131, 132

phalaranthes Meyrick, 121, 135, 136

platyxantha, new species, 121, 131, 132

porphyrophanes Meyrick, 121, 144

praestrigata Meyrick, 119, 141, 144

pyrsogramma Meyrick, 119, 144, 146

zona, new species, 121, 144

dichroa Lower, Dichelopa, 119

dicyanitis Meyrick, Labdia, 283

didyma, new species, Asymphorodes, 182, 187

diffascialis (Hübner), Spoladea, 50

diffidentia, new species, Asymphorodes, 184, 246

dimidiatella Zeller, Opogona, 387

dimorpha (Busck), Asymphorodes, 12, 257, 270

discordia, new species, Opogona, 13, 393

disparata (Meyrick), Comodica, 379

distantia, new species, Stangeia, 5, 16, 19

dixolophella Dyar, Zamagiria, 36, 38

Dolichosticha Meyrick, 52, 54

dorsata, new species, Dichelopa, 119, 133, 135

dryinandra (Meyrick), Ernophthora, 28

dryomorpha Meyrick, Dichelopa, 119, 133, 138, 139

dubiosella (Beütenmuller), Plutella, 338

Dudua Walker, 153, 160

aprobola (Meyrick), 10, 160

eumenica (Meyrick), 10, 160, 346

hesperialis Walker, 160

Duessa Clarke, 153, 155

marquesana, new species, 10, 155, 157

pleurogramma Clarke, 10, 155 157

dupla, new species, Eudonia, 100, 113, 116

dysgnoia, new species, Wyoma, 373

Echinoglossa Clarke, 177

trinota Clarke, 12, 177

Eftichia, new genus, 339, 340

chrysoleuca, new species, 339, 340, 341

ejectana (Walker), Strepsicrates, 157

elachia Butler, Pyralis, 87, 88

emphasis, new species, Bradina, 67, 72, 74, 75

emphereia, new species, Asymphorodes, 183, 237

enixa (Illingworth), Crypsithyrodes, 381, 385

eocnephaea (Meyrick), Tritopterna, 10, 157

Ephestia Guenée, 47

Ephysteris Meyrick, 12, 169, 177

chersaea Meyrick, 177

longicornis, new species, 12, 177, 179

Epicephala Meyrick, 12, 343

colymbetella Meyrick, 343, 346

spinula, new species, 343, 346

Epimima Meyrick, 54

Erechthias Meyrick, 12, 348, 368, 370

charadrota Meyrick, 368

lanceolata (Walsingham), 370

travestita (Gozmány), 370

xenica (Meyrick), 370

zebrina (Butler), 370

eremica, new species, Bradina, 67, 73, 74, 75

eremosesia Clarke, Terthroptera, 342, 343

ergodes Meyrick, Asymphorodes, 182, 233

Ernophthora Meyrick, 23, 26

aphanoptera, new species, 32

chrysura (Meyrick), 36, 38

denticornis (Meyrick), 26

dryinandra (Meyrick), 28

iospila, new species, 26

lechriogramma, new species, 30

maculicostella (Ragonot), 34

palassoptera, new species, 32

phoenecias Meyrick, 26

eschatia, new species, Cangetta, 81

Eucosma Hübner, 153, 162

agriochlora Meyrick, 14, 153

circulana Hübner, 153

Eudioptis Hübner, 78, 80

Eudonia Billberg, 14, 99

achlya, new species, 100, 108

aplysia, new species, 100, 113

ara, new species, 100, 111

chrysomicta (Meyrick), 100, 117, 119

citrocosma (Meyrick), 100, 102

clavula, new species, 100, 102

clerica (Meyrick), 100, 108, 111, 113, 116

commercialis (Meyrick), 117, 119

dupla, new species, 100, 113, 116

exterminate (Meyrick), 100

mercurella (Linnaeus), Eudonia, 99

munroei, new species, 100, 116, 117

officialis (Meyrick), 100, 105, 108

opostactis (Meyrick), 100, 105, 108

psednopa (Meyrick), 100

spectacularis (Meyrick), 100, 102, 116

tivira (Clarke), 100

eumarodes (Meyrick), Strepsicrates, 157

eumenica (Meyrick), Dudua, 10, 160, 346

euophthalma Meyrick, Decadarchis, 365

eupselias Meyrick, Aulacodes, 81

Eurhodope Hübner, 24

euthalassa (Meyrick), Stemorrhages, 75

euthenia, new subspecies, Choreutis, 334, 336

Euzophera Zeller, 38

exedra, new species, Zamagiria, 36, 38

exodias (Meyrick), Spoladea, 51, 52

explorata Meyrick, Blastobasis, 315

exterminate (Meyrick), Eudonia, 100

exulcerata Meyrick, Dichelopa, 132

Fabiola Braun, 315

tecta Braun, 315

falcatella (Stainton), Anatrachyntis, 297

farinalis (Linnaeus), Pyralis, 87

fascialis (Cramer), Spoladea, 50, 51

fasciola, new species, Herlinda, 187, 285

favilla, new species, Asymphorodes, 185, 257

feaniensis, new species, Imma, 318, 322, 325, 327

fidelia, new species, Bradina, 67

fimbrialis (Dognin), Pilocrosis, 64

flavistriata (Walsingham), Decadarchis, 12, 350, 365

flexura, new species, Dichelopa, 121, 123, 124, 126

floridalis (Zeller), Aethaloessa, 85

formosana (Shiraki), Spoladea, 51, 52

formosella (Wileman and South), Cadra, 49

fractura, new species, Asymphorodes, 183, 247

fulminatrix Meyrick, Imma, 318, 330, 332, 334

fulvidalis (Wallengren), Aethaloessa, 85, 86

fulvistrigata Meyrick, Dichelopa, 4, 136, 152

galena Clarke, Tritopterna, 160

GALLERIINAE, 21

gazorialis (Guenée), Diaphania, 78, 80

Gelechia Hübner, 179

GELECHIIDAE 5, 169

gilvidorsis (Zeller), Marasmarcha, 19

gloriana, new species, Imma, 318, 322, 325

Glyphodes Guenée, 49, 64

argyritis Hampson, 64

cypripennalis Hampson, 64

phormingopa (Meyrick), 64

stolalis Guenée, 64

gnoma, new species, Dichelopa, 119, 138, 139, 140, 141

GRACILLARIIDAE, 5, 343

grisella (Fabricius), Achroia, 8, 21, 23

griseodactylus (Pagenstecher), Marasmarcha, 19, 21

hadrotes, new species, Dichelopa, 119, 126, 128

halmophila Meyrick, Cateremna, 38, 40, 42

Hapalia Hübner, 88

harmodes Meyrick, Dichelopa, 119, 126, 128, 130

HELIODINIDAE, 5, 315

hemileucus, new species, Asymphorodes, 182, 205, 211, 213

hepariella Stainton, Zelleria, 341

heppneri, new species, Imma, 318, 332, 334

Herlinda, new genus, 12, 180, 283

fasciola, new species, 187, 285

iota, new species, 285, 288, 289

oligoria, new species, 285, 286, 288

phaeoxantha, new species, 283, 285, 288

Herpetogramma Lederer, 49, 59

cleoropa (Meyrick), 61

phthorosticta (Meyrick), 59, 61

servalis Lederer, 59

hesperialis Walker, Dudua, 160

hexadactyla (Linnaeus), Orneodes, 166

holoporphyra Meyrick, Asymphorodes, 182, 187, 188

holotephras (Meyrick), Strepsicrates, 157, 315

Homoshelas Meyrick, 175

homosoma, new species, Asymphorodes, 185, 229, 232, 270

honoranda Meyrick, Dichelopa, 146

honorariella (Walsingham), Trissodoris, 303

honoria, new species, Asymphorodes, 184, 272, 273

horocentra Meyrick, Clepticodes, 381

Hyalea Guenée, 85

hyalinalis (Boisduval), Diaphania, 80

hyalinata (Shiraki), Diaphania, 78

Hydrocampa Stephens, 50

Hydrocampe Latreille, 54, 56

Hymenia Hübner, 50, 51

Hypatima Hübner, 175

Hyposmocoma Walsingham, 12

hypostema, new species, Asymphorodes, 183, 201, 203

Idioblasta Warren, 1, 88

acleropa (Meyrick), 89, 94

acrogramma, new species, 88, 96, 97

amydrosoma, new species, 89, 96, 97

isoterma (Meyrick), 89, 92

lacteata Warren, 1, 88, 89, 94, 99

linearis, new species, 88, 94, 98

procellaris (Meyrick), 88, 89

stenogramma, new species, 88, 94, 96, 97

straminata Warren, 1, 89, 92

transversata, new species, 88, 92, 96

ignota, new species, Prays, 338, 339

ignotella (Walker), Crypsithyrodes, 381

Imma Walker, 318

assita, new species, 318, 320, 327, 330

catapsesta Meyrick, 318, 319, 327, 330

feaniensis, new species, 318, 322, 325, 327

fulminatrix Meyrick, 318, 330, 332, 334

gloriana, new species, 318, 322, 325

heppneri, new species, 318, 332, 334

impariseta, new species, 318, 330, 332, 334

ochrilactea Meyrick, 318, 319, 320

philomena, new species, 318, 320

rotia, new species, 318, 325, 327

semiclara Meyrick, 318, 320, 322

IMMIDAE, 5, 318

impariseta, new species, Imma, 318, 330, 332, 334

impressalis Lederer, Bradina, 67

inana (Butler), Blastobasis, 12, 315

incertulella (Walker), Anatrachyntis, 297

incongrua, new species, Decadarchis, 350, 355, 361

indica (Saunders), Diaphania, 8, 78, 80

indicalis (Moore), Diaphania, 78

indicata (Fabricius), Lamprosema, 59

inelegans Meyrick, Microzestis, 267, 293, 295

infranella Lucas, Achroia, 23

ingravescens Meyrick, Asymphorodes, 197

insidia, new species, Caloptilia, 346

insulana Aurivillius, Crocidosema, 153, 155

insulana (Aurivillius), Parasuleima, 153, 155

interstincta Meyrick, Asymphorodes, 241

iochorda Meyrick, Dichelopa, 4, 152

iophana Meyrick, Chelaria, 175

iospila, new species, Ernophthora, 26

iota, new species, Herlinda, 285, 288, 289

iota Moriuti, Prays, 339

Iressa Clarke, 180, 293

microsema, new species, 293

neoleuca Clarke, 293

isolata, new species, Neoxychirota, 5, 14, 16

isomalla (Meyrick), Cryptophlebia, 164

isopogon Meyrick, Chelaria, 175

isoterma (Meyrick), Idioblasta, 89, 92

jasiusalis (Walker), Psara, 57, 59

Kessleria Nowicki, 340

Labdia Walker, 12, 180, 283, 290

deliciosella Walker, 283

dicyanitis Meyrick, 283

lacteata Warren, Idioblasta, 1, 88, 89, 94, 99

Lamprosema Hübner, 59

indicata (Fabricius), 59

lanceolata (Walsingham), Erechthias, 370

Laspeyresia Hübner, 164

malesana Meyrick, 166

platydryas Meyrick, 166

pycnochra Meyrick, 166

lavaterana (Milliére), Crocidosema, 155

lechriogramma, new species, Ernophthora, 30

lenticula, new sp>ecies, Asymphorodes, 184, 217, 220, 222

Lepidobregma Zimmerman, 363

leptotes, new species, Asymphorodes, 184, 233, 246, 274, 279

leucoloma new species, Asymphorodes, 185, 251, 252

leucoptera, new species, Autosticha, 171, 173

leucostrota Meyrick, Zelleria, 341

leucoterma Meyrick, Asymphorodes, 182, 197

leucoxantha (Meyrick), Adeana, 290

limbipennella Clemens, Plutella, 338

Limnoecia Meyrick, 194

linearis, new species, Idioblasta, 88, 94, 98

liophanes Meyrick, Marasmarcha, 19, 21

Lissocnemitis Meyrick, 315

argolyca Meyrick, 12, 315

longicornis, new species, Ephysteris, 12, 177, 179

lucerna, new species, Asymphorodes, 185, 249, 251, 252

lucidus, new species, Asymphorodes, 185, 244, 246, 255, 256

lucivaga Meyrick, Chrysophyllis, 8, 75

lunulifera (Meyrick), Anatrachyntis, 300

macrogramma, new species, Asymphorodes, 182, 186

maculicostella (Ragonot), Ernophthora, 34

maculipennis (Curtis), Plutella, 336, 337, 338

maledicta (Warren), Psara, 57

malesana (Meyrick), Cydia, 10, 166

malesana Meyrick, Laspeyresia, 166

Marasmarcha Meyrick, 19

gilvidorsis (Zeller), 19

griseodactylus (Pagenstecher), 19, 21

liophanes Meyrick, 19, 21

phaeodactyla (Hübner), 19

pumilio (Zeller), 19, 21

Marasmia Lederer, 47, 52

bifurcalis (Snellen), 52, 54

cicatricosa Lederer, 52

convectalis (Walker), 52, 54

creonalis (Walker), 52, 54

neoclesalis (Walker), 52, 54

perinephes (Meyrick), 52, 54

suspicalis (Walker), 52, 54

trapezalis (Guenée), 52, 54

Margaronia Hübner, 75

marquesana, new species, Duessa, 10, 155, 157

Maruca Walker, 5, 49, 54

aquatilis (Boisduval), 54, 56

bifenestralis (Mabille), 56

nigroapicalis De Joannis, 56

simialis (Snellen), 56

telulalis Viette, 56

testulalis (Geyer), 8, 54, 56

testularis Matsumura, 56

mediostriatus, new species, Asymphorodes, 184, 274

megacentra (Meyrick), Anatrachyntis, 297

melaina, new species, Chelophoba, 12, 173, 175

melanarches Meyrick, Cosmopterix, 306, 312

melanastra Meyrick, Decadarchis, 365, 368

melanosoma, new species, Asymphorodes, 185, 227, 228

meligma, new species, Dichelopa, 119, 141, 144

Melnea, new genus, 180, 303, 306

armigera (Meyrick), 303, 306

mendanae Wilkinson, Apanteles, 160

mercurella (Linnaeus), Eudonia, 99

Merimnetria, 179

nigriciliella (Walsingham), 179

xylospila (Meyrick), 179

merista Clarke, Autosticha, 171

mesoxanthus, new species, Asymphorodes, 184, 223, 224

Mestolobes Butler, 88, 92

Metriophlebia Diakonoff, 164

microdoxa (Meyrick), Cateremna, 38

microsema, new species, Iressa, 293

Microzestis Meyrick, 180, 293

inelegans Meyrick, 267, 293, 295

minuscula (Walsingham), Decadarchis, 12, 350, 361

mirabilis (Butler), Piletocera, 83

mollipedella Clemens, Plutella, 338

Monopis Hübner, 4

Monoptilota Hulst, 44

montgomeryi, new species, Asymphorodes, 183, 256, 257

mormopis Meyrick, Trichophaga, 377

munroei, new species, Eudonia, 100, 116, 117

Myelois Hübner, 87

myronotus Meyrick, Asymphorodes, 183, 191, 208, 210, 220, 257

nebrias, new species, Asymphorodes, 184, 222, 274, 277, 279

neoclesalis (Walker), Marasmia, 52, 54

Neodecadarchis Zimmerman, 365

neoleuca Clarke, Iressa, 293

Neoxychirota, new genus, 5, 14, 16

isolata, new species, 5, 14, 16

nephocirca Meyrick, Asymphorodes, 185, 191

Nephopteryx Zeller, 47

Nesoxena Meyrick, 12, 13

nigrescens (Butler), Piletocera, 83

nigriciliella (Walsingham), Merimnetria, 179

nigricornis, new species, Asymphorodes, 184, 201,

214, 217, 244

nigroapicalis De Joannis, Maruca, 56

nonna, new species, Cosmopterix, 306, 309, 310

nuciferae, new species, Asymphorodes, 184, 257, 259

obliteralis (Walker), Cenoloba, 5

obscura (Wollaston), Crocidosema, 155

obscurevitella Ragonot, Achroia, 23

obumbrata (Butler), Crypsithyrodes, 381, 385

ochrilactea Meyrick, Imma, 318, 319, 320

ochrodepta Meyrick, Ctenomeristis, 42, 44

ochrogramma, new species, Asymphorodes, 185, 281

ochroma, new species, Dichelopa, 119, 138

octavialis (Walker), Aethaloessa, 85, 86

oculisignis Meyrick, Asymphorodes, 183, 228

Odezia Boisduval, 51

Odites Walsingham, 173

Oeobia Hübner, 59

officialis (Meyrick), Eudonia, 100, 105, 108

Olethreutes Hübner, 164

OLETHREUTIDAE 5, 152

oligoria, new species, Herlinda, 285, 286, 288

operculella (Zeller), Phthorimaea, 4, 180

Opogona Zeller, 13, 348, 387

allaini Clarke, 389

aurisquamosa (Butler), 13, 389, 392

dimidiatella Zeller, 387

discordia, new species, 13, 393

regressa Meyrick, 13, 387, 389

trissostacta Meyrick, 13, 389, 392

opostactis (Meyrick), Eudonia, 100, 105, 108

oreasella Clemens, Argyresthia, 341

Orneodes Latreille, 166

atomoclastus Meyrick, 169

hexadactyla (Linnaeus), 166

pterochroma, new species, 166, 167

xanthozona, new species, 167

ORNEODIDAE, 5, 166

orphnopeza, new species, Psara, 57

orthiostyla Meyrick, Dichelopa, 133, 135

orthoclina Meyrick, Phycita, 44

Orthomecyna Butler, 88

Oxychirota Meyrick, 5, 16

paradoxa Meyrick, 5, 16

OXYCHIROTIDAE, 5, 14, 15

oxymora Meyrick, Tinea, 370, 373

pachydmeta Meyrick, Dichelopa, 119, 146

pachyspila (Meyrick), Phereoeca, 375

Pachyzancla Meyrick, 57

palassoptera, new species, Ernophthora, 32

pallicaudalis Snellen, Psara, 57

pallifimbriana Bradley, Cryptophlebia, 10, 162

pandani (Clarke), Decadarchis, 13

Pantheus Zimmerman, 368

paradoxa Meyrick, Oxychirota, 5, 16

paragnoma, new species, Dichelopa, 119, 139, 141

paraporia, new species, Asymphorodes, 184, 252, 254

Parasuleima Clarke, 153

insulana (Aurivillius), 153, 155

pariana (Clerck), Choreutis, 334

passuelella (Barrett), Cadra, 47

pellionella Linnaeus, Tinea, 370

pelodes (Meyrick), Autosticha, 4, 171, 173

Pempelia Hübner, 47

penicillata (Swezey), Decadarchis, 12, 350, 368

percna Corbet and Tams, Trichophaga, 377

percnomicta Meyrick, Decadarchis, 349, 355, 358

peregrinana (Möschler), Crocidosema, 155

perinephes (Meyrick), Marasmia, 52, 54

perlucidalis Hampson, Bradina, 1, 67, 70

peropaca Meyrick, Dichelopa, 121, 130, 131, 132

Phacellura Agassiz, 78

phaeochorda Meyrick, Asymphorodes, 183, 279, 283

phaeodactyla (Hübner), Marasmarcha, 19

phaeodelta, new species, Asymphorodes, 184, 241, 273, 274

phaeoxantha, new species, Herlinda, 283, 285, 288

Phakellura Guilding, 78

Phalaena Linnaeus, 50

phalaranthes Meyrick, Dichelopa, 121, 135, 136

phalarogramma, new species, Asymphorodes, 184, 249, 251, 252

Phereoeca Hinton and Bradley, 349, 375

allutella (Rebel), 375

pachyspila (Meyrick), 375

philomena, new species, Imma, 318, 320

phoenicias Meyrick, Ernophthora, 26

phormingopa (Meyrick), Glyphodes, 64

Phthorimaea Meyrick, 4, 5, 11, 169, 180

operculella (Zeller), 4, 180

phthorosticta (Meyrick), Herpetogramma, 59, 61

Phycis Fabricius, 50

Phycita Curtis, 23, 44

orthoclina Meyrick, 44

spiciella (Fabricius), 44

PHYCITINAE, 21, 25

physocapna Meyrick, Decadarchis, 350

pictalis (Curtis), Pyralis, 87

Piletocera Lederer, 49, 83

barbicornis (Felder and Rogenhofer), 83

mirabilis (Butler), 83

nigrescens (Butler), 83

signiferalis (Wallengren), 83, 85

violalis Lederer, 83

Pilocrosis Lederer, 64

fimbrialis (Dognin), 64

Pionea Guenée, 88

Pitycona Meyrick, 169, 175

attenuata, new species, 12, 175, 177

porphyroscia Meyrick, 177

xeropis, Meyrick, 175, 177

platydryas Meyrick, Laspeyresia, 166

Platypeplus Walsingham, 160

platyxantha, new species, Dichelopa, 121, 131, 132

plebeiana (Zeller), Crocidosema, 153, 155

plebejana Zeller, Crocidosema, 11, 153

plectographa Meyrick, Asymphorodes, 183, 279

plemmelia, new species, Asymphorodes, 183, 188, 189

pleurogramma Clarke, Duessa, 10, 155, 157

Plutella Schrank, 336

annulatella (Wood), 336, 338

brassicella (Fitch), 338

cicerella (Rodani), 338

cruciferarum Zeller, 336

dubiosella (Beütenmuller), 338

limbipennella Clemens, 338

maculipennis (Curtis), 336, 337, 338

mollipedella Clemens, 338

xylostella (Linnaeus), 12, 336, 338

poliopterus, new species, Asymphorodes, 183, 241

pollutus Meyrick, Asymphorodes, 183, 199, 201, 203

pomonella (L.), Cydia, 164

porphyrarcha Meyrick, Asymphorodes, 185, 228, 257, 270, 272

porphyrophanes Meyrick, Dichelopa, 121, 144

porphyroscia Meyrick, Pitycona, 177

Praeacedes Amsel, 349, 385

deluccae Amsel, 385

despecta (Meyrick), 385

thecophora (Walsingham), 385

praedatrix (Meyrick), Decadarchis, 13

praemaculata Meyrick, Chelaria, 175

praestrigata Meyrick, Dichelopa, 119, 141, 144

Prays Hübner, 336, 338

caenobitella Hübner, 338

curticella (Donovan), 338

ignota, new species, 338, 339

iota Moriuti, 339

procellaris (Meyrick), Idioblasta, 88, 89

pronoealis Walker, Pyralis, 87, 88

psammaula Meyrick, Decadarchis, 349, 350

Psara Snellen, 49, 57

basistrigalis (Walker), 57

jasiusalis (Walker), 57, 59

malaedicta (Warren), 57

orphnopeza, new species, 57

pallicaudalis Snellen, 57

stultalis (Walker), 57

psednopa (Meyrick), Eudonia, 100

pseudomalesana, new species, Cydia, 10, 164, 166

pterochroma, new species, Orneodes, 166, 167

PTEROPHORIDAE, 5, 16

Pterophorus siceliota Zeller, 16

ptiladelpha Meyrick, Crocidosema, 155

pumilio (Zeller), Marasmarcha, 19, 21

pycnochra (Meyrick), Cydia, 166

pycnochra Meyrick, Laspeyresia, 166

Pygospila Guenée, 75

PYRALIDAE, 21

PYRALINAE, 21, 86

Pyralis Linnaeus, 50, 86, 87

bractiatella (Walker), 87, 88

elachia Butler, 87, 88

farinalis (Linnaeus), 87

pictalis (Curtis), 87

pronoealis Walker, 87, 88

suggeralis Walker, 87, 88

PYRAUSTINAE, 21, 49

Pyroderces Herrich-Schäffer, 297, 300

pyrosogramma Meyrick, Dichelopa, 119, 144, 146

quadrifasciata (Walsingham), Trissodoris, 303

rapae Clarke, Stangeia, 5, 19

rectilinea Moore, Cangetta, 81, 83

recurvalis (Fabricius), Spoladea, 50, 51

recurvella (Zincken), Spoladea, 50, 52

regina, new species, Asymphorodes, 182, 208, 237, 239

regressa Meyrick, Opogona, 13, 387, 389

remigiata, new species, Asymphorodes, 183, 208, 235, 237

rhynchias (Meyrick), Cryptophlebia, 10, 14, 164

rileyi (Walsingham), Anatrachyntis, 297

Rinecera Butler, 83

rotia, new species, Imma, 318, 325, 327

Rovanoa [author?], 52

rufimacula Meyrick, Decadarchis, 349, 361

rutella Zeller, Setomorpha, 379

rutilella Zeller, Cryptoblabes, 24

Salbia Guenée, 52

Salebria Zeller, 47

Sathrobrota Hodges, 297

Sciaphila Treitschke, 157

Scoparia Haworth, 100

SCOPARIINAE, 21, 99

secutalis (Walker), Aethaloessa, 85, 86

semiclara Meyrick, Imma, 318, 320, 322

semifusca Bradley, Decadarchis, 13

semiluteus, new species, Asymphorodes, 185, 189, 213, 214, 216, 277

seminiger, new species, Asymphorodes, 182, 211, 213

sensilis, new species, Tessema, 63, 64

sericea (Drury), Stemorrhages, 75

sericeus, new species, Asymphorodes, 183, 247, 261, 263

servalis Lederer, Herpetogramma, 59

Setomorpha Zeller, 349, 379

rutella Zeller, 379

siceliota (Zeller), Stangeia, 16

signata, new species, Comodica, 377

signatana (Walsingham), Crocidosema, 155

signiferalis (Wallengren), Piletocera, 83, 85

silvestris Meyrick, Chelaria, 175

simialis (Snellen), Maruca, 56

similis (Bradley), Anatrachyntis, 300

simulans (Butler), Decadarchis, 12, 349, 365, 368

Siriocauta Lederer, 56

sladeni (Bradley), Crypsithyrodes, 381

spectacularis (Meyrick), Eudonia, 100, 102, 116

sphenocopa Meyrick, Asymphorodes, 184, 239, 261

spiciella (Fabricius), Phycita, 44

Spilonota Stephens, 157

spintheropus (Meyrick), Asymphorodes, 185, 196, 197, 228

spinula, new species, Epicephala, 343, 346

spodogramma, new species, Asymphorodes, 182, 266, 267

Spoladea Guenée, 5, 49, 50

albifascialis (Boisduval), 50, 51, 52

anguslalis (Fabricius), 50, 51, 52

animalis Guenée, 50, 51. 52

diffascialis (Hübner), 50

exodias (Meyrick), 51, 52

fascialis (Cramer), 50, 51

formosana (Shiraki), 51, 52

recurvalis (Fabricius), 50, 51

recurvella (Zincken), 50, 52

Stagmatophora Herrich-Schäffer, 197

Stangeia Tutt, 5, 16

distantia, new species, 5, 16, 19

rapae Clarke, 5, 19

siceliota (Zeller), 16

Stemorrhages Lederer, 49, 75

euthalassa (Meyrick), 75

sericea (Drury), 75

Stenia Guenée, 56

stenogramma, new species, Idioblasta, 88, 94, 96, 97

Stoeberhinus Butler, 4, 11, 169

testaceus Butler, 4, 11, 169, 171

stolalis Guenée, Glyphodes, 64

straminata Warren, Idioblasta, 1, 89, 92

strangulata Meyrick, 13

Strepsiceros Meyrick, 157

Strepsicrates Meyrick, 153, 157

ejectana (Walker), 157

eumarodes (Meyrick), 157

holotephras (Meyrick), 157, 315

Strepsimela Meyrick, 83

stricta, new species, Bradina, 67, 70

stultalis (Walker), Psara, 57

subcarnea (Meyrick), Anatrachyntis, 297

suggeralis Walker, Pyralis, 87, 88

suspicalis (Walker), Marasmia, 52, 54

Syngamia Guenée, 85

synneurota Meyrick, Crocidosema, 155

Synploca Hodges, 303, 306

Talanga Moore, 75

Tanaoctena Turner, 4

Tatobotys Butler, 49, 61

argillacea Butler, 61

vibrata Meyrick, 61, 63

tecta Braun, Fabiola, 315

telulalis Viette, Maruca, 56

tephroptila Meyrick, Chelaria, 175

Terthroptera Clarke, 342

astochia, new species, 342, 343

eremosesia Clarke, 342, 343

Tessema, new genus, 5, 63, 64

sensilis, new species, 63, 64

testaceus Butler, Stoeberhinus, 4, 11, 169, 171

testulalis (Geyer), Maruca, 8, 54, 56

testularis Matsumura, Maruca, 56

tetracercella Meyrick, Comodica, 377

thecophora (Walsingham), Praeacedes, 385

Tinea Linnaeus, 44, 306, 346, 349, 370, 373

oxymora Meyrick, 370, 373

pellionella Linnaeus, 370

TINEIDAE, 5, 348

Tineola Herrich-Schäffer, 375

bisselliella (Hummel), 375

uterella Walsingham, 375

Tinexotaxa Gozmány, 370

tiphalis (Walker), Aethaloessa, 85, 86

tivira (Clarke), Eudonia, 100

tormentifera Meyrick, Bradina, 67, 70

TORTRICIDAE, 5, 119

Trachycentra Meyrick, 349, 385

calamias Meyrick, 385, 387

transversata, new species, Idioblasta, 88, 92, 96

trapezalis (Guenée), Marasmia, 52, 54

travestita (Gozmány), Erechthias, 370

triaula (Meyrick), Asymphorodes, 12

trichogramma, new species, Asymphorodes, 12, 183, 259, 261, 283

Trichophaga Ragonot, 349, 375

coprobiella Ragonot, 375

mormopis Meyrick, 377

percna Corbet and Tams, 377

tridigitella (Walsingham), Anatrachyntis, 297

trigrapha, new species, Asymphorodes, 185, 189, 191

trinota Clarke, Echinoglossa, 12, 177

Trissodoris Meyrick, 12, 180, 303

honorariella (Walsingham), 303

quadrifasciata (Walsingham), 303

trissostacta Meyrick, Opogona, 13, 389, 392

tritogramma, new species, Decadarchis, 349, 361

Tritopterna Meyrick, 153, 157

chionostoma Meyrick, 157

eocnephaea (Meyrick), 10, 157

galena Clarke, 160

tyres Guenée, Pygospila, 75

upupaepennella (Hübner), Caloptilia, 346

uterella Walsingham, Tineola, 375

valligera Meyrick, Asymphorodes, 179, 185, 197, 228, 249

vibrata Meyrick, Tatobotys, 61, 63

violalis Lederer, Piletocera, 83

vitralis Hübner, Diaphania, 78

witalis (Felder), Aethaloessa, 85, 86

Wyoma, new genus, 13, 349, 373

dysgnoia, new species, 373

xanthostola Meyrick, Asymphorodes, 184, 205, 220,223, 224, 227

xanthozona, new species, Orneodes, 167

Xenephestia Gozmány, 49

xenica (Meyrick), Erechthias, 370

xeropis Meyrick, Pitycona, 175, 177

xestophanes Meyrick, Asymphorodes, 270

xylospila (Meyrick), Merimnetria, 179

xylostella (Linnaeus), Plutella, 12, 336, 338

xylotechna Meyrick, Chelaria, 175

YPONOMEUTIDAE, 5, 336

Zamagiria Dyar, 24, 36, 38

dixolophella Dyar, 36, 38

exedra, new species, 36, 38

laidion (Zeller), 38

zebrina (Butler), Erechthias, 370

Zelleria Stainton, 336, 341

hepariella Stainton, 341

leucostrota Meyrick, 341

zieglerella (Hübner), Cosmopterix, 306

Zinckenia Zeller, 50, 51

zona, new species, Dichelopa, 121, 144

zygaenalis (Guenée), Diaphania, 78, 80

Host Index

(Taxonomic names in italics)

Abutilon avicennae Gaertnerd, 155

Acacia, 365

aculeata (Willdenow) Persoon, Sesbania, 56

acuminata Schott and Endlicher, Cola, 370

acutangula (L.) Roxburg, Luffa, 80

aegyptiaca Miller, Luffa, 80

alata Banks, Lophira, 370

algae, 295

Alysicarpus vaginalis (L.) de Candolle, 21

Amaranthus sp., 52

anguina L., Trichosanthes, 80

animal materials, 381

apple, 23

Arachis hypogaea L., 56

Artocarpus sp., 5

avicennae Gaertner, Abutilon, 155

banana, 5

beans, 56, 315

beets, 52

Bidens henryii Scherff, 5, 32

breadfruit, 5

Cacao, 365

cajan (L.) Millspaugh, Cajanus, 56, 164

Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh, 56, 164

Canavalia sp., 164

candida de Candolle, Tephrosia, 56

Cannabis sativa L., 56

Carica papaya L., 5

carrot, 52

Celosia cristata L., 52

cereum (L. f.) Forster f., Vaccinium, 5, 30

Cheirodendron marquesense F. Brown, 5

chenopodiaceous weeds, 52

clover, Alyce, 21

coconut, 5, 352, 387

cocoons, 370

Cocos nucifera L., 5, 257, 365, 387

Coffea, 368

coffee berries, 315

Cola acuminata Schott and Endlicher, 370

collina (Forster) A. Gray, Metrosideros, 5, 7, 126, 157

comb of honeybee, 23

conjugatum Bergius, Paspalum, 54

corallodendron L., Erythrina, 80

Cordia lutea Lamarck, 3

corn, 52

cotton, 52

cowpea 57

Crataegus sp., 155

cristata L., Celosia, 52

Cruciferae, 338

cucumber, 52

Cucurbita lagenaria (L.) L., 80,

pepo L. 81, 155

Cyperaceae, 5

Cyrtandra sp., 146

Delonix regia (Bojer) Rafinesque, 56

Derris elliptica (Roxburg) Bentham, 56

Dioscorea sp., 315

eggplant 52

eggs of bedbug, 88

elliptica (Roxburg) Bentham, Derris, 56

Erythrina corallodendron L., 80

Erythrina sp., 164, 387

Eucalyptus sp., 155

Eugenia jambos L., 157

uniflora L., 26, 157, 233, 315

feathers, 377

ferns, 5

Ficus sp., 334, 336

flannel, 375

floridulus (Labillardière) Miscanthus, 54

fruits, dried, 23

furs, 375, 377

Gliricidia saepium (Jacquin) Walpers, 56

Glochidion ramiflorum (Forster f.) Mueller-Argovensis, 5, 160, 346

Gossypium herbaceum L., 80

grains, 88

grandiflora (L.) Persoon, Sesbania, 56

guajava L., Psidium, 5, 26, 157

Helianthus sp., 52

hemp, 56

henryii Scherff, Bidens, 5, 32

herbaceum L., Gossypium, 80

Heritiera littoralis Dryander, 171

Hibiscus rostellatus Guillemin and Perrottet, 56

tiliaceus L., 5, 368, 387

honeybee combs, 23

hypogaea L., Arachis, 56

Indian corn, 54

indica L., Mangifera, 5, 26

indica L., Tamarindus, 5, 26, 233, 365

Inocarpus lagifer (Parkinson), 162

jambos L., Eugenia, 157

lagenaria (L.) L., Cucurbita

lagifer (Parkinson), Inocarpus, 162

lichens, 5

littorale Raddi, Psidium, 157

littoralis Dryander, Heritiera, 171

Lophira alata Banks, 370

Luffa acutangula (L.) Roxburg, 80

aegyptiaca Miller, 80

lutea Lamarck, Cordia, 3

Mangifera indica L., 5, 26

mango, 5

marquesense F. Brown, Cleirodendron, 5

Metrosideros collina (Forster) A. Gray, 5, 7, 126, 157

millet, 54

Miscanthus floridulus (Labillardière), 54

mosses, 5

Mucuna urens (L.) de Candolle, 56

multiflorus Willdenow, Phaseolus, 56

Musa sp., 5

Nicotiana tabacum L., 56

nucifera L., Cocos, 5, 257, 365, 387

oahuensis Hillebrand ex Radlkofer, Sapindus, 368

Oparanthus rapense (F. Brown) Scherff, 26

orientalis L., Siegesbeckia, 5

Oryza sativa L., 56

Oxalis sp., 21

palmata Roxburg, Trichosanthes, 80

Pandanus spp., 7, 303, 365, 368

Pandanus tectorius Solander, 5, 26, 297, 300, 365, 389

paniculatum L., Paspalum, 5, 54

papaya L., Carica, 5

Paspalum conjugatum Bergius, 54

paniculatum L., 5, 54

scrobiculatum L., 54

peanut, 56

peas, 56

pepo L., Cucurbita, 81, 155

Phaseolus multiflorus Willdenow, 56

vulgaris L., 56

pigeon pca, 164

Pisum sativum L., 56

populnea (L.), Thespesia, 5, 365

pruriens (L.) Medicus, Stizolobium, 56

Psidium guajava L., 5, 26, 157

littorale Raddi, 157

pumpkin, 80

purslane, 52

raisins, 23

ramiflorum (Forster f.) Mueller-Argovensis, Glochidion, 5, 160, 346

rapense (F. Brown) Scherff, Oparanthus, 26

refuse, 358, 373, 375, 385

regia (Bojer) Rafinesque, Delonix, 56

Reynoldsia sp., 389

rhombifolia L., Sida, 155

rostellatus Guillemin and Perrottet, Hibiscus, 56

saepium (Jaquin) Wallpers, Gliricidia, 56

saman (Jacquin) Merrill, Samanea, 368

Samanea saman (Jacquin) Merrill, 368

Sapindus oahuensis Hillebrand ex Radlkofer, 368

sativa L., Cannabis, 56

sativa L., Oryza, 56

sativum L., Pisum, 56

scrobiculatum L., Paspalum, 54

sepium (Jacquin) Walpers, Gliricidia, 56

Sesbania aculeata (Wildenow) Persoon, 56

grandiflora (L.) Persoon, 56

tomentosa Hooker and Arnott, 57

Sida rhombifolia L., 155

Siegesbeckia orientalis L., 5

skins, 377

sorghum, 54

spinach, 52

Stizolobium pruriens (L.) Medicus, 56

sugar beets, 52

sugarcane, 54, 315, 365

tabacum L., Nicotiana, 56

Tamarindus indica L., 5, 26, 233, 365

tectorius Solander, Pandanus, 5, 26, 297, 300, 365, 389

Tephrosia candida de Candolle, 56

vogelii Hooker f., 56

Thespesia populnea (L.), 5, 365

tiliaceus L., Hibiscus, 5, 368, 387

tobacco, 56

tomato, 52

tomentosa Hooker and Arnott, Sesbania, 57

Trichosanthes anguina L., 80

palmata Roxburg, 80

unguiculata (L.) Walpers, Vigna, 56

uniflora L., Eugenia, 26, 157, 233, 315

urens (L.) de Candolle, Mucuna, 56

Vaccinium cereum (L.f.) Forster f., 5. 30

vaginalis (L.) de Candolle, Alysicarpus, 21

vegetable matter, 49, 171, 358, 373, 381, 385, 387

Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walpers, 56

vogelii Hooker f., Tephrosia, 56

vulgaris L., Phaseolus, 56

woolens, 377

REQUIREMENTS FOR SMITHSONIAN SERIES PUBLICATION

Manuscripts intended for series publication receive substantive review within their originating Smithsonian museums or offices and are submitted to the Smithsonian Institution Press with Form SI-36, which must show the approval of the appropriate authority designated by the sponsoring organizational unit. Requests for special treatment—use of color, foldouts, case-bound covers, etc.—require, on the same form, the added approval of the sponsoring authority.

Review of manuscripts and art by the Press for requirements of series format and style, completeness and clarity of copy, and arrangement of all material, as outlined below, will govern, within the judgment of the Press, acceptance or rejection of manuscripts and art.

Copy must be prepared on typewriter or word processor, double-spaced, on one side of standard white bond paper (not erasable), with 1″ margins, submitted as ribbon copy (not carbon or xerox), in loose sheets (not stapled or bound), and accompanied by original art. Minimum acceptable length is 30 pages.

Front matter (preceding the text) should include: title page with only title and author and no other information; abstract page with author, title, series, etc., following the established format; table of contents with indents reflecting the hierarchy of heads in the paper; also, foreword and/or preface, if appropriate.

First page of text should carry the title and author at the top of the page; second page should have only the author's name and professional mailing address, to be used as an unnumbered footnote on the first page of printed text.

Center heads of whatever level should be typed with initial caps of major words, with extra space above and below the head, but with no other preparation (such as all caps or underline, except for the underline necessary for generic and specific epithets). Run-in paragraph heads should use period/dashes or colons as necessary.

Tabulations within text (lists of data, often in parallel columns) can be typed on the text page where they occur, but they should not contain rules or numbered table captions.

Formal tables (numbered, with captions, boxheads, stubs, rules) should be submitted as carefully typed, double-spaced copy separate from the text; they will be typeset unless otherwise requested. If camera-copy use is anticipated, do not draw rules on manuscript copy.

Taxonomic keys in natural history papers should use the aligned-couplet form for zoology and may use the multi-level indent form for botany. If cross referencing is required between key and text, do not include page references within the key, but number the keyed-out taxa, using the same numbers with their corresponding heads in the text.

Synonymy in zoology must use the short form (taxon, author, year:page), with full reference at the end of the paper under “Literature Cited.” For botany, the long form (taxon, author, abbreviated journal or book title, volume, page, year, with no reference in “Literature Cited”) is optional.

Text-reference system (author, year:page used within the text, with full citation in “Literature Cited” at the end of the text) must be used in place of bibliographic footnotes in all Contributions Series and is strongly recommended in the Studies Series: (Jones, 1910:122)” or “…Jones (1910:122).” If bibliographic footnotes are required, use the short form (author, brief title, page) with the full citation in the bibliography.

Footnotes, when few in number, whether annotative or bibliographic, should be typed on separate sheets and inserted immediately after the text pages on which the references occur. Extensive notes must be gathered together and placed at the end of the text in a notes section.

Bibliography, depending upon use, is termed “Literature Cited,” “References,” or “Bibliography.” Spell out titles of books, articles, journals, and monographic series. For book and article titles use sentence-style capitalization according to the rules of the language employed (exception: capitalize all major words in English). For journal and series titles, capitalize the initial word and all subsequent words except articles, conjunctions, and prepositions. Transliterate languages that use a non-Roman alphabet according to the Library of Congress system. Underline (for italics) titles of journals and series and titles of books that are not part of a series. Use the parentheses/colon system for volume(number):pagination: “10(2):5–9.” For alignment and arrangement of elements, follow the format of recent publications in the series for which the manuscript is intended. Guidelines for preparing bibliography may be secured from Series Section, SI Press.

Legends for illustrations must be submitted at the end of the manuscript, with as many legends typed, double-spaced, to a page as convenient.

Illustrations must be submitted as original art (not copies) accompanying, but separate from, the manuscript. Guidelines for preparing art may be secured from Series Section, SI Press. All types of illustrations (photographs, line drawings, maps, etc.) may be intermixed throughout the printed text. They should be termed Figures and should be numbered consecutively as they will appear in the monograph. If several illustrations are treated as components of a single composite figure, they should be designated by lowercase italic letters on the illustration; also, in the legend and in text references the italic letters (underlined in copy) should be used: “Figure 9b.” Illustrations that are intended to follow the printed text may be termed Plates, and any components should be similarly lettered and referenced: “Plate 9b.” Keys to any symbols within an illustration should appear on the art rather than in the legend.

Some points of style: Do not use periods after such abbreviations as “mm, ft, USNM, NNE.” Spell out numbers “one” through “nine” in expository text, but use digits in all other cases if possible. Use of the metric system of measurement is preferable; where use of the English system is unavoidable, supply metric equivalents in parentheses. Use the decimal system for precise measurements and relationships, common fractions for approximations. Use day/month/year sequence for dates: “9 April 1976” For months in tabular listings or data sections, use three-letter abbreviations with no periods: “Jan, Mar, Jun,” etc Omit space between initials of a personal name: “J.B. Jones.”

Arrange and paginate sequentially every sheet of manuscript in the following order: (1) title page, (2) abstract, (3) contents, (4) foreword and/or preface, (5) text, (6) appendixes. (7) notes section, (8) glossary, (9) bibliography, (10) legends, (11) tables. Index copy may be submitted at page proof stage, but plans for an index should be indicated when manuscript is submitted.