SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION

Emphasis upon publication as a means of “diffusing knowledge” was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: “It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge.” This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series:

Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology

Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics

Smithsonian Contributions to Botany

Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences

Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology

Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology

Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space

Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology

In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world of science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world.

Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review. Press requirements for manuscript and art preparation are outlined on the inside back cover.

S. Dillon Ripley

Secretary

Smithsonian Institution

SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 352

Distribution and Systematics of Peromyscus (Mammalia: Rodentia) of Nayarit, Mexico

Michael D. Carleton, Don E. Wilson,
Alfred L. Gardner, and Michael A. Bogan

SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS

City of Washington

1982

ABSTRACT

Carleton, Michael D., Don E. Wilson, Alfred L. Gardner, and Michael A. Bogan. Distribution and Systematics of Peromyscus (Mammalia: Rodentia) of Nayarit, Mexico. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, number 352, 46 pages, 14 figures, 8 tables, 1982.—Distributional patterns, ecological data, and the systematic status of Peromyscus maniculatus, P. boylii, P. simulus, P. madrensis, P. pectoralis, P. spicilegus, and P. melanophrys are presented for the state of Nayarit, Mexico. The Peromyscus boylii species group is accorded special emphasis because of the uncertainty regarding the relationships and taxonomic level of forms included within it. On the basis of morphometric analyses of external and cranial measurements, examination of chromosomal preparations, and documentation of sympatry, madrensis, simulus, and spicilegus are considered species distinct from boylii, instead of subspecies thereof. In Nayarit, Peromyscus simulus is confined to the coastal-plain region (sea level to 100 m); Peromyscus madrensis occupies the Tres Marias Islands; Peromyscus spicilegus inhabits intermediate montane zones (100 to 1600 m) but has been found as high as 2100 m; and Peromyscus boylii occurs at high elevations (1900 to 2100 m) in the eastern mountains.

OFFICIAL PUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution's annual report, Smithsonian Year. SERIES COVER DESIGN: The coral Montastrea cavernosa (Linnaeus).

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data

Main entry under title:

Distribution and systematics of Peromyscus (Mammalia, Rodentia) of Nayarit, Mexico.

(Smithsonian contributions to zoology; no. 352)

Bibliography: p.

1. Peromyscus—Classification. 2. Peromyscus—Geographical distribution. 3. Mammals—Classification. 4. Mammals—Geographical distribution. 5. Mammals—Mexico—Nayarit—Classification. 6. Mammals—Mexico—Nayarit—Geographical distribution. I. Carleton, Michael D. II. Series.

QLI.S54 no. 352 [QL737.R638] 591s [599.32′33] 81–18373 AACR2

Distribution and Systematics of Peromyscus (Mammalia: Rodentia) of Nayarit, Mexico

Michael D. Carleton, Don E. Wilson, Alfred L. Gardner, and Michael A. Bogan

____________

Michael D. Carleton, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560. Don E. Wilson, Alfred L. Gardner, and Michael A. Bogan, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C. 20560.

Introduction

The state of Nayarit, situated along coastal west-central Mexico approximately from 21° to 23° N latitude, encloses an area of striking topographic diversity, including broad expanses of coastal plain near sea level as well as western portions of the Sierra Madre Occidental, where ridges and peaks exceed 2000 meters. In northeastern Nayarit, the western flanks of the Sierra Madre Occidental rise precipitously above the coastal plains, but in the central sector, south of the Rio Grande de Santiago, mountainous terrain merges more gradually into coastal plain. In the region south of San Blas, foothills closely border the seacoast, pinching off the broad coastal plain that dominates southern Sinaloa and northwestern Nayarit. The Rio Acaponeta, Rio San Pedro, and Rio Grande de Santiago (Figure 1) form the principal drainage of the Sierra Madre Occidental in Nayarit, and their tributaries delimit numerous minor mountain systems. As expected, Nayarit, with its pronounced topographic relief and coastal exposure, harbors a variety of environments and distinctive biotic zones. Following the classificatory arrangement of life zones by Goldman (1951), Nayarit contains elements of the Lower Tropical, arid and humid subdivisions of the Upper Tropical, Lower Austral, Upper Austral, and Transition zones. Along river valleys, lower-elevational plant communities deeply penetrate the mountainous interior of Nayarit and interdigitate with upper vegetational belts in a complicated pattern. In view of its complex physiography, Nayarit occupies an important position in understanding patterns of mammalian distribution and problems of taxonomy in western Mexico, especially for small mammals of limited vagility.

In this report, we present information on the distribution and specific status of Peromyscus in Nayarit, based upon new collections made by staff of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (also see Fisher and Bogan, 1977; Gardner, 1977; Bogan, 1978; and Diersing and Wilson, 1980). Recent studies on the Peromyscus boylii species group in western Mexico reflect an uncertainty regarding the relationships and taxonomic level of forms included within it (for example, Hooper, 1968; Lee et al., 1972; Schmidly and Schroeter, 1974; Kilpatrick and Zimmerman, 1975; and Carleton, 1977, 1979). The boylii species group realizes some of its greatest diversity along the western coast of Mexico, and much of this diversity is demonstrated by populations occurring in the state of Nayarit. The type-localities of madrensis Merriam, 1898b (Maria Madre Island), and simulus Osgood, 1904 (San Blas), are in Nayarit, and the type-locality of spicilegus Allen, 1897 (Mineral San Sebastian), lies in Jalisco just across the southern border of Nayarit. Moreover, populations assignable to either spicilegus, rowleyi, or levipes might be expected to occur in the mountainous regions of eastern Nayarit. All five of these taxa are pertinent to any discussion of the boylii complex. Accordingly, our objectives are: (1) to document the species of Peromyscus occurring in the state of Nayarit; (2) to review the relationships within the Peromyscus boylii species group based on the Nayarit collections housed in the National Museum of Natural History; and (3) to provide additional information on the geographic and ecologic range of each of these species.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.—We wish to thank Clyde Jones for providing many helpful suggestions and assistance. John C. Hafner and Richard W. Thorington, Jr., critically reviewed the manuscript. We also thank Barbara A. Bacon and Cindy Ramotnik for assistance in measuring the specimens and proofing data sheets, David F. Schmidt for his careful preparation of the maps and figures, and Peggy Gillis for painstakingly typing the manuscript. The Direccion General de la Fauna Silvestre kindly provided collecting permits. During portions of the study, we were assisted in the field by Barbara A. Bacon, Catherine A. Blount, Robert D. Fisher, Kenneth N. Geluso, Pedro Huerta, Clyde Jones, Patricia Mehlhop, Oscar Jorge Polacko, Mary Pope, Robert Reynolds, C. Brian Robbins, Daniel F. Williams, and Bruce Woodward. We also thank Sr. Sergio Garcia Ramirez, Subsecretario de Gobernacion, for granting access to the Tres Marias Islands.

Materials and Methods

All specimens reported herein are housed in the National Museum of Natural History (under the designation USNM for the former United States National Museum). The majority resulted from recent (1975–1977) surveys of Nayarit conducted by personnel of the Fish and Wildlife Service, but some specimens were collected during the Nelson and Goldman expeditions in Mexico (see Goldman, 1951). Animals generally were processed as conventional study skins and skulls; complete skeletons, whole carcasses preserved in 10% formalin, and karyotypes were also prepared. Fluid-preserved specimens were used to examine male accessory reproductive glands and glandes penes and to determine the number of mammary glands.

In accordance with Carleton's (1980) suggestions, we treat banderanus as a species of Osgoodomys and omit it from the formal species' accounts. This mouse has been collected at three sites in southwestern Nayarit: Chacala, 30 m, 5; Navarrete, 50 m, 1; Paso de Soquilpa, 100 m, 4. These coastal, lowland localities fit the distributional pattern of banderanus as seen in other parts of western Mexico, where it is a coastal-plain species only penetrating the interior along river valleys and inland basins.

The 17 samples included in the numerical analyses are listed below with their locality, sample size, and an identifying abbreviation. Additional specimens examined and complete locality information are provided in the species' accounts (also see Table 1). Specific nomenclature for taxa of the boylii species group follows Carleton (1977).

Peromyscus boylii: Ocota Airstrip, 37 (= BOYOCO); Santa Teresa, 10; and 13 km SW Santa Teresa, 31 (= BOYSTE).

P. madrensis: Tres Marias Islands, Maria Cleofas, 36 (= MADCLE); Maria Madre, 18 (= MADMAD); Isla San Juanito, 17 (= MADJON).

P. maniculatus: El Refilion, 71 (= MANREF); 2 mi E San Pedro Lagunillas, 55 (= MANLAG).

P. melanophrys: Arroyo de Jiguite, 2 (= MELANO).

P. pectoralis: Arroyo de Jiguite, 4; and 1.8 mi NW Coapan, 3 (= PECTOR).

P. simulus: 1 mi S Cuautla, 59 (= SIMCUA); San Blas and vicinity, 7 (= SIMSAN); Teponahuaxtla, 10 (= SIMTEP).

P. spicilegus: 8 mi S Ahuacatlan, 29 (= SPIAHU); Chacala, 26 (= SPICHA); El Refilion, 37 (= SPIREF); 2 mi E Jalcocotan, 35 (= SPIJAL); Mesa del Nayar, 8; and 2 mi WNW Mesa del Nayar, 5 (= SPINAY).

The occurrence of a mesoloph, mesolophid, and ectolophid was recorded for specimens of the following six population samples.

Peromyscus boylii: Ocota Airstrip, 38; 13 km SW Santa Teresa, 44.

P. madrensis: Tres Marias Islands, 37.

P. simulus: 1 mi S Cuautla, 56.

P. spicilegus: El Refilion, 36; 2 mi E Jalcocotan, 36.

Three states of complexity of these enamel ridges were scored for the first upper and first lower molars of the right side, and their occurrence expressed as a percentage of the total population sample. The states were defined as (0) loph(id)s absent or present only as a small, poorly-defined spur, (1) loph(id)s present and partially extending to the margin of the tooth, (2) loph(id)s present and completely extending to the margin of the tooth, often terminating as a conspicuous style(id).

Twenty-three measurements, four of the skin and 19 of the skull, were recorded to characterize the morphology of the population samples. The total, tail, hind foot, and ear lengths were transcribed from the skin tag and rounded to the nearest 1.0 mm; dimensions of the skull were measured to the nearest 0.01 mm using a craniometer (Anderson, 1968). Specimens exhibiting any trace of gray juvenal pelage were excluded from statistical analyses. The measurements taken (and their definitions where necessary) were (1) total length of skin, (2) length of tail, (3) length of hind foot, (4) length of ear, (5) greatest length of skull, (6) condyloincisive length, (7) length of auditory bulla, (8) postpalatal length (from the anterior margin of the mesopterygoid fossa to the medial and posterior border of the basioccipital), (9) length of mesopterygoid fossa (from the posterior tip of the pterygoid process to the anterior margin of the fossa), (10) palatal length (from the posterior margin of the incisive foramina to the anterior border of the mesopterygoid fossa), (11) length of incisive foramina, (12) alveolar length of maxillary toothrow, (13) greatest zygomatic breadth, (14) mastoidal breadth (distance between the lateral borders of the mastoid processes), (15) greatest breadth across molars (distance between the labial margins of the second upper molars), (16) postdental palatal breadth (taken at the constriction of the palate behind the molars and in front of the lateral pterygoid fossae), (17) greatest width of mesopterygoid fossa, (18) depth of braincase (taken from the skull in lateral view with the horizontal crosshair aligned on the tip of incisors and ventralmost curvature of the auditory bulla; distance from that level to the dorsalmost contour of the braincase), (19) breadth of braincase (taken behind the squamosal root of the zygomatic arches), (20) least interorbital width, (21) rostral breadth (distance between the lateral projections of the incisive capsules), (22) nasal length, and (23) rostral length.

Preparation of chromosomal material, definition of fundamental number (FN), and descriptive terminology for chromosomal morphology follow Patton (1967). Specimens were karyotyped from the following localities.

Peromyscus boylii: Ocota Airstrip; 2art, 1art 13 km SW Santa Teresa, 1art.

P. madrensis: Tres Marias Islands, Maria Cleofas, 5art, 7art Maria Madre, 3art Isla San Juanito, 7art.

P. maniculatus: 8 mi S Ahuacatlan, 2art, 2art 1.8 mi NW Coapan, 1art 2 mi E Jalcocotan, 2art 2 mi E San Pedro Lagunillas, 1art.

P. melanophrys: Arroyo de Jiguite, Rio Santiago, 4art, 2art Mesa del Nayar, 1art, 1art.

P. pectoralis: Arroyo de Jiguite, 1art, 1art 1.8 mi NW Coapan, 3art, 1art.

P. simulus: 4 km S Aticama, 1art 4 km N Cuautla, 1art 1.2 mi S El Casco, Rio Chilte, 2art, 2art.

P. spicilegus: Agua Escondida, 2art, 3art 8 mi S Ahuacatlan, 5art, 4art Arroyo de Jiguite, 2art, 2art Arroyo la Taberna, 2 mi WNW Mesa del Nayar, 1art Mesa del Nayar, 3art, 3art Chacala, 2art, 6art 1.8 mi NW Coapan, 1art, 2art 10 km N Jala, 2art 2 mi E Jalcocotan, 6art, 5art 1 km S La Villita, 4art, 2art 13 km SW Santa Teresa, 1art Tempiste, 2art.

The Biomedical Computer Programs (BMD; Dixon, 1973) and the Numerical Taxonomy System of Multivariate Statistical Programs (NTSYS; Rohlf et al., 1972) were used for statistical analyses. Basic data description (means and variances) was done with BMD01D. Character means of each sample thus obtained were standardized (means of zero, standard deviation of one) and used to compute matrices of average distance and correlation coefficients among the samples (or OTU's). The unweighted pair-group method, using arithmetic averages (UPGMA). was used to cluster the OTU's, and cophenetic correlation coefficients were calculated. Standardized character means also were used to produce a character correlation matrix that was subjected to a principal component analysis. Overall discrimination among the groups was examined by subjecting the raw data for each a priori recognized group to a stepwise discriminant analysis (BMD07M). Plots of the groups onto the two canonical variates were obtained from this analysis. Evaluation of forms occurring in sympatry was made with two-group discriminant analyses (BMD04M). Computer programs were first applied to all 17 population samples of Peromyscus from Nayarit and subsequently to the 13 samples of the boylii species group. We have not shown the results of all the analyses because of their redundancy. The computer analyses were done either on the IBM 360/65 at the U.S. Department of Interior's Washington Computer Center or on the Honeywell belonging to the Smithsonian Institution. All statistical methods are discussed in Neff and Marcus (1980).

FIGURE 1.—State of Nayarit, Mexico. (Numbers refer to localities given in Table 1.)

TABLE 1.—Gazetteer of collecting localities (see Figure 1)

The Peromyscus boylii Species Group in Western Mexico

Since Osgood (1909) first defined the Peromyscus boylii group, it has proven to be one of the most difficult complexes in the genus in terms of delimiting the number of biological species. Our comprehension of the relationships and level of differentiation of forms included in it has been hindered by the apparent complexity of their distributions, the subtleness of their morphological differentiation, and a surfeit of available names. During the past 20 years, many contributions have appeared that substantially modified some of Osgood's (1909) subspecific and specific arrangements and that seriously questioned the correctness of others. Because of the confusing array of names involved and their sometimes inconsistent or misleading application in the literature, it is appropriate to provide first a historical review of the systematic treatment of the boylii species group and the evidence bearing upon its intrarelationships. Our discussion focuses on taxa whose distribution is localized in western Mexico (namely madrensis, simulus, and spicilegus); however, for purposes of clarity and context, it must also encompass forms (such as rowleyi, levipes, evides, and aztecus) whose taxonomy is inextricably linked with the western Mexican populations.

In preparing his taxonomic study of the genus Peromyscus, Osgood confronted an imposing number of described forms, 167 alone named after 1885 by his own count (1909). Prior to his revision, Peromyscus boylii and its relatives were represented by some 22 taxa, 14 of them described as species. Osgood's delineation of the “Peromyscus boylii group” reduced that number to four, with a majority of the former species placed in synonymy under boylii (Table 2). Proceeding via a southerly transect through western Mexico, his chain of intergrading subspecies of boylii included rowleyi, spicilegus, simulus, levipes, and evides; a distinctive insular race, madrensis, occurred off the coast of Nayarit. Although maintained as separate species, hylocetes and oaxacensis were viewed by Osgood as somehow part of the same complex, fitting into spicilegus and the other subspecies through aztecus and evides.

TABLE 2.—Classifications of the Peromyscus boylii species group

OSGOOD, 1909

boylii (Baird) (incl. attwateri, aztecus, evides, levipes, madrensis, rowleyi, simulus, and spicilegus)

hylocetes Merriam

oaxacensis Merriam

pectoralis Osgood

HALL AND KELSON, 1959

boylii (Baird) (incl. attwateri, aztecus, cordillerae, evides, glasselli, levipes, madrensis, rowleyi, sacarensis, simulus, spicilegus, and utahensis)

hylocetes Merriam

oaxacensis Merriam

pectoralis Osgood

perfulvus Osgood

polius Osgood

HOOPER, 1968

aztecus (Saussure)

boylii (Baird)

evides Osgood

hondurensis Goodwin

hylocetes Merriam

oaxacensis Merriam

pectoralis Osgood

polius Osgood

CARLETON, 1977, 1979

attwateri Allen

aztecus (Saussure) (incl. cordillerae, evides, hylocetes, and oaxacensis)

boylii (Baird) (incl. ambiguus, baetae, glasselli, levipes, rowleyi, sacarensis, and utahensis)

madrensis Merriam

pectoralis Osgood

polius Osgood

simulus Osgood

spicilegus Allen

stephani Townsend

winkelmanni Carleton

HALL, 1981

attwateri Allen

aztecus (Saussure)

boylii (Baird) (incl. ambiguus, beatae, cordillerae, glasselli, levipes, madrensis, rowleyi, sacarensis, simulus, spicilegus, and utahensis)

evides Osgood

hylocetes Merriam

oaxacensis Merriam

pectoralis Osgood

polius Osgood

stephani Townsend

winkelmanni Carleton

In reading Osgood's (1909) species accounts, it is readily apparent that he regarded his treatment of the boylii complex as inconclusive, a tentative taxonomic framework to be assessed further by additional collections. He suspected that two species were intermixed in some of his samples (e.g., series of boylii levipes) and predicted that some of his “races” of boylii (e.g., aztecus and levipes) one day would be discovered sympatrically (a prophesy repeatedly fulfilled after 50 years—Alvarez, 1961; Hall and Dalquest, 1963; Musser, 1964; Carleton, 1977). In view of his skepticism, it is not clear why he rendered certain taxonomic decisions regarding the group, unless one weighs them against the developing evolutionary viewpoints of his period.

Osgood undertook the revision of Peromyscus during a time of transition in the species concept, a change from that of the Linnaean species to the polytypic species and an awareness of geographic variation. Indeed, his work on Peromyscus heralded the emergence of the polytypic species in the field of systematic mammalogy and still stands as a seminal effort on geographic variation in mammals. Thus, he noted the existence of “intergrades” or of certain samples “approaching” others in morphology and searched for breaks “in the continuous series of definable forms…” (Osgood, 1909:157). Osgood found evidence of “breaks” for levipes and hylocetes and levipes and oaxacensis by documenting their co-occurrence at certain localities, and accordingly, he retained hylocetes and oaxacensis as species. Lacking such documentation for the remaining “definable forms,” he relegated them to subspecies of boylii (actually he failed to recognize instances of sympatry in some of his locality samples, see Hall and Dalquest, 1963; Carleton, 1977). Osgood (1909:159) interpreted variation in the boylii group as indicative of varying degrees of reproductive isolation: “Possibly here is another example of two subspecies [in this case, levipes and oaxacensis] of the same group occurring together, for levipes appears to intergrade with spicilegus, spicilegus with evides and aztecus, and quite probably aztecus with oaxacensis.” Moreover, he seemed to emphasize variation in pelage color as evidence of intergradation. For example, he remarked (1909:146), “Most Mexican specimens of rowleyi show slight tendencies toward spicilegus, being slightly deeper colored,” and again (p. 151), “The type of simulus, which was selected with particular reference to its cranial characters, is somewhat darker and nearly the same color as spicilegus. It may therefore be regarded as slightly intermediate.” Today, however, the suite of cranial traits is now recognized as diagnostic for simulus and spicilegus and others in the boylii group, but coat color in Peromyscus is regarded as particularly subject to convergence where two closely related species occupy similar habitat.

Osgood's (1909) arrangement of the boylii group remained essentially intact over the next halfcentury. Hall and Kelson's (1959) classification repeated that of Osgood except for the accommodation of newly described subspecies of boylii and a new species (Table 2). In 1945, Osgood named perfulvus and provisionally allied it to the boylii group, but Hooper (1955) later reassigned perfulvus to the melanophrys group. Hoffmeister (1951) suggested the transfer of polius from the truei group, where Osgood (1909) originally placed it, to the boylii group.

Information resulting from more recent field collections indicated the need for further reassessment of Osgood's (1909) taxonomic scheme. Alvarez (1961), Hall and Dalquest (1963), and Musser (1964) reported the coexistence of levipes and aztecus at several localities in eastern Mexico. In western Mexico, evides and levipes were found in sympatry (Hooper, 1961; Musser, 1964), as were spicilegus and levipes and spicilegus and hylocetes (Hooper, 1955). In addition, Hooper (1955) suspected that two forms were confused under the name of simulus in the coastal lowlands of Sinaloa and Nayarit, and Baker and Greer (1962) cited the strong differentiation of simulus from populations of boylii occurring at higher elevations (spicilegus and rowleyi).

In his synopsis of the genus Peromyscus, Hooper (1968) incorporated some of these findings into a revised classification of the boylii species group (Table 2). He recognized aztecus and evides as species distinct from boylii and reiterated Osgood's (1909) notion that the boylii complex embraced morphologically different populations having differing levels of interfertility. His disposition of simulus and spicilegus, forms whose distinctiveness was also supported by distributional and morphological arguments, is not wholly clear, but he did not list them as species.

Hooper's (1968) perceptive overview served to identify problem areas within the boylii group and, consequently, to stimulate further research. Musser (1969) corroborated Hooper's (1968) opinion that hondurensis was only a geographic variant of oaxacensis. Lawlor (1971) allocated stephani, a species hitherto classified in the subgenus Haplomylomys, to the boylii species group, and Schmidly (1973) raised attwateri from a subspecies of boylii to specific status. A notable development in the past decade is the use of biochemical and karyologic data to analyze relationship in the boylii group (Avise et al., 1974; Kilpatrick and Zimmerman, 1975; Lee et al., 1972; Schmidly, 1973; Schmidly and Schroeter, 1974).

Based on evidence from distributional patterns, anatomy of the glans penis, and morphometric analyses, Carleton (1977, 1979) proposed several changes in the composition of the boylii group (Table 2). In regard to forms inhabiting parts of Nayarit, he suggested that madrensis, simulus, and spicilegus were species distinct from boylii proper. In raising spicilegus to species rank, Carleton (1977) redescribed its range to exclude certain populations in Chihuahua, Durango, Sinaloa, and Nayarit, which represented the western extension of true boylii (that is, conspecific with rowleyi and levipes), and to include samples in Michoacan, which had been identified as evides (Osgood, 1909; Hall and Kelson, 1959; Hooper, 1968). Peromyscus simulus, apparently restricted to the coastal lowlands of Sinaloa and Nayarit, was viewed as sufficiently differentiated to warrant specific segregation from the populations of boylii inhabiting the Mexican highlands, although it is clearly more closely related to boylii than to the geographically contiguous species spicilegus. The origin of populations on the Tres Marias Islands, madrensis, was obscure, but because its distinctiveness exceeded the range of variation observed within samples of either boylii or spicilegus from the mainland, Carleton (1977) reinstated it as a species pending further study.

Hall's (1981) recent classification (Table 2) basically repeats that of Hooper (1968).

In summary, a markedly different interpretation of propinquity within the boylii group has emerged since Osgood's (1909) study. Instead of a circuitously intergrading mosaic of subspecies, Osgood's Peromyscus boylii is believed to consist of at least six discrete species: boylii (including the subspecies rowleyi and levipes among others), attwateri, simulus, madrensis, spicilegus, and aztecus (with the races cordillerae, evides from Guerrero and Oaxaca, hylocetes, and oaxacensis). On the basis of their distribution and morphology, these species can be further sorted into two moieties, one consisting of aztecus, spicilegus, and winkelmanni, and the other of boylii, attwateri, madrensis, simulus, stephani, pectoralis, and perhaps polius. The morphology and distribution of specimens from Nayarit must be evaluated with regard to these alternative hypotheses.

MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSES.—In the distance phenogram using all 17 samples, examples of maniculatus are most dissimilar. The remaining samples are distributed among three clusters, associated primarily on the basis of size (Figure 2). The largest forms, madrensis and melanophrys, comprise one cluster; the smallest ones, pectoralis and simulus, form another; and intermediate-sized animals, boylii and spicilegus, constitute a third. The samples of each of the four boylii group taxa cluster together; however, the heterogeneity of Osgood's (1909) P. boylii is demonstrated by the interspersion of his “races” of boylii among other species of Peromyscus.

The cohesiveness of the geographic samples of boylii, simulus, madrensis, and spicilegus is reaffirmed in the clustering exercise using only 13 OTU's (Figure 3). The two examples of boylii form a pair group with those of spicilegus, and simulus clusters with this complex at a still lower level of similarity. The three samples of madrensis are amalgamated at the lowest level of similarity. In addition, these three OTU's, each from a separate island, exhibit greater distance coefficients with respect to one another compared to those observed for samples of boylii, simulus, or spicilegus;, this result was apparent in every clustering analysis performed.

FIGURE 2.—Cluster analysis (UPGMA) of 17 population samples of Peromyscus generated from the distance matrix. (Coefficient of cophenetic correlation = 0.786; identification of sample abbreviations given in “Materials and Methods.”)

FIGURE 3.—Cluster analysis (UPGMA) of 13 population samples representing Peromyscus boylii species group generated from the distance matrix. (Coefficient of cophenetic correlation = 0.870; identification of sample abbreviations given in “Materials and Methods.”)

In the phenogram generated from the correlation matrix, the integrity of certain aggregations is lost. Representatives of boylii again are paired with those of spicilegus, but examples of simulus and madrensis are intermixed in a separate pair group (Figure 4). This finding suggests a fundamental likeness in shape and proportion of the skulls of specimens of simulus and madrensis, although examples of the two fall at the opposite extremes of size range among boylii– group forms in Nayarit (“Appendix”). The behavior of the correlation coefficient as a measure of proportion has been noted by Eades (1965) and Minkoff (1965).

The association of OTU's in the principal component analysis resembles the results obtained in the clustering analysis. Four aggregations of population samples, which correspond to boylii, madrensis, simulus, and spicilegus, are readily evident (Figure 5). The discontinuity between any pair of members within an aggregation is generally surpassed by that observed between members from different taxonomic samples. The largest within–group hiatus involves the sample of madrensis from Maria Cleofas. The samples are graded along the first principal component from small (examples of simulus) to large (those of madrensis;) predictably, most dimensions are strongly correlated with principal component one (Table 3). The dispersion of samples on principal components two and three reflects conformational differences among the four taxa (Figure 5; Table 3). For example, specimens of boylii possess relatively longer pinnae, more inflated auditory bullae, and a broader and deeper braincase. Individuals of spicilegus have longer toothrows, absolutely and relatively smaller auditory bullae, and a longer, broader mesopterygoid fossa. Despite their larger size in most dimensions, examples of madrensis have relatively smaller pinnae, shorter toothrows, flatter skulls (in profile), and a narrower mesopterygoid fossa. Specimens of simulus agree with those of madrensis in many proportional features of their skulls.

FIGURE 4.—Cluster analysis (UPGMA) of 13 population samples representing the Peromyscus boylii species generated from the correlation matrix. (Coefficient of copherietic correlation = 0.899; identification of sample abbrevations given in “Materials and Methods.”)

FIGURE 5.—Scatter plots of principal components using 13 population samples representing the Peromyscus boylii species group: a, I vs. II; b, I vs. III. (See Table 3; identification of sample abbreviations given in “Materials and Methods.”)

TABLE 3.—Results of principal component analysis using samples of the Peromyscus boylii species group (see Figure 5)

In order to evaluate further the distinctiveness and integrity of the groups divulged in the cluster and principal component analyses, a stepwise discriminant function analysis was performed, and the first two canonical variates were extracted. We used nine groups (see Table 4), mainly corresponding to the previously identified population samples, and all 23 variables. We omitted two samples of simulus because of inadequate sample sizes and combined the three samples of madrensis because many specimens lacked complete data.

The same four groups are clearly delineated (Figure 6). The 95 percent confidence limits of certain samples of spicilegus (SPIAHU and SPICHA) and one of boylii (BOYSTE) overlap slightly. Nevertheless, their centroids are significantly removed from one another, and the basic pattern of phenetic affinities is unambiguous. Furthermore, the few errors in classification based upon posterior probabilities occurred only between groups within boylii or spicilegus; no specimens of simulus or madrensis were misclassified (Table 4). The five variables that contributed most to classification function between groups are: length of hind foot, alveolar length of maxillary toothrow, length of auditory bulla, postdental palatal breadth, and greatest breadth of mesopterygoid fossa. Most of these variables also displayed relatively high correlation coefficients on the second and third principal components and accounted for much of the separation of samples along these axes (see Table 3).

The repeatedly demonstrated integrity of the geographic samples representing boylii, simulus, madrensis, and spicilegus intimates some degree of genetic homogeneity within each and raises the question of their level of reproductive isolation. Still, the fact that a battery of multivariate taxonomic programs can consistently distinguish between groups of specimens does not qualify as final, or even strongly persuasive, proof of their reality as biological species. Conceivably, the same results could obtain within a species whose range encompasses abrupt environmental gradients and, therefore, exhibits steep clinal variation. The existence of pronounced vertical relief and sharply defined biotic zones within Nayarit meets this requirement and establishes such a possibility as an explanation for the variation observed within Osgood's (1909) P. boylii. A consideration of other lines of evidence is necessarily warranted.

TABLE 4.—Identification of specimens into groups based upon posterior probabilities of classification

FIGURE 6.—Scatter plot of canonical variates I and II generated from discriminant function analysis of nine population samples representing the Peromyscus boylii species group. (Perpendicular lines = 95% confidence intervals of individual canonical variate scores around a group's centroid.)

CRANIAL, EXTERNAL, AND REPRODUCTIVE TRAITS.—In his descriptive and comparative sections, Osgood (1909) frequently enumerated several features of the skull (among them size, inflation of the tympanic bullae, configuration of the interorbital region, and shape of the braincase) to characterize the taxa he included under P. boylii. As discovered by subsequent authors (Hooper, 1955, 1961; Alvarez, 1961; Hall and Dalquest, 1963; Musser, 1964; Carleton, 1977), these same features do not exhibit the intergradation suspected by Osgood and still serve adequately to differentiate the various forms. The trenchant cranial traits are summarized here, principally as they apply to the Nayarit populations.

A bony ledge or shelf projects into the posteromedial areas of the orbit in examples of spicilegus. As a consequence, the borders of the interorbital region appear more angled or acutely constricted in contrast to the evenly contoured or hourglass–shaped interorbit observed in specimens of boylii proper (Figure 7). As noted by Carleton (1977), this distinction seems to vary with age. A pronounced supraorbital shelf occurs in older individuals (as judged by toothwear) of spicilegus, whereas it is less obvious in juveniles and sub–adults, which are more easily confused with boylii. Compared to the supraorbital shelf in aztecus, evides, hylocetes, and oaxacensis, that in spicilegus is weakly developed, a condition Osgood (1909:149) called “incipient.” Examples of aztecus can be more reliably distinguished from boylii based on this character. The interorbital area in specimens of simulus and madrensis is hourglass-shaped, similar to the condition in boylii, but the posteromedial borders of the orbits (i.e., the frontal bones) are more square edged as compared to boylii; however, this condition does not match the “shelf” evident in samples of spicilegus.

The braincase of spicilegus appears more elongate compared to the rounded shape observed in boylii, simulus, and madrensis. Nevertheless, it is not clear whether the cranial cavity of spicilegus is actually relatively longer or whether the presence of a supraorbital shelf merely imparts an elongate appearance. Hall and Dalquest (1963) noted a similar contrast in configuration of the braincase between aztecus and boylii in Veracruz.

The inflation of the auditory bullae varies markedly among the forms. The bullae in examples of spicilegus are diminutive compared to those of boylii (“Appendix”; Figure 8), a finding in agreement with Carleton (1977). The distinction is remarkable considering that it is reflected by a single linear measurement, length of the auditory bulla. Undoubtedly, a volumetric index would disclose a greater contrast. The auditory bullae of simulus and madrensis more closely resemble those in spicilegus. Other differences in size and proportions of the skulls are mentioned in the morphometric analyses.

Among the populations surveyed, those of madrensis exhibit the simplest dental topography. A mesolophid is absent in the sample of 37 specimens, an ectolophid is infrequently found and, if present, only weakly developed, and the mesoloph is typically incomplete (Table 5). Most specimens of simulus possess a conspicuous mesoloph; otherwise, the dentition of simulus is comparatively simple like that of madrensis. In contrast, representatives of boylii. and spicilegus have relatively complex teeth (Table 5). Both boylii and spicilegus also differ from madrensis and simulus with regard to the presence and size of the second primary fold on the lower third molar. In the former two forms, the second primary fold (sensu Hooper, 1957) is usually present as a prominent inflexion, which, after wear, persists as an enamel island. In madrensis and simulus, the lower third molar lacks a second primary fold, or it exists only as a shallow indentation of the enamel, which often disappears with wear. The general pattern of dental variation within each of the populations supports some of Hooper's (1957) findings. Accessory styles and lophs occur more often on the upper first molar as compared to the lower one, and the ectolophid typically surpasses the mesolophid in frequency of occurrence. Also, populations that inhabit more humid, forested environments (boylii and spicilegus) display relatively complex enamel configurations, whereas those that occupy arid, open habitats (madrensis and simulus) have simpler dentitions.

FIGURE 7.—Dorsal view of skulls of several forms of the Peromyscus boylii species group: a, P. simulus (USNM 509628), Cucharas, Rio Acaponeta; b, P. madrensis (USNM 512599), Tres Marias Islands, Maria Cleofas; c, P. boylii (USNM 523738), 13 km SW Santa Teresa; d, P. spicilegus (USNM 523741), 13 km SW Santa Teresa.

FIGURE 8.—Ventral view of skulls of several forms of the Peromyscus boylii species group: a, P. simulus (USNM 509628), Cucharas, Rio Acaponeta; b, P. madrensis (USNM 512599), Tres Marias Islands, Maria Cleofas; c, P. boylii (USNM 523738), 13 km SW Santa Teresa; d, P. spicilegus (USNM 523741), 13 km SW Santa Teresa.

TABLE 5.—Frequency of occurrence of certain dental traits in species of the Peromyscus boylii species group in Nayarit (see text for discussion)

Pelage differences within the boylii group are slight, expressed in terms of degree and hence unreliable as diagnostic traits. Osgood's (1909) descriptions of pelage color accurately characterize the boylii-group forms occurring in Nayarit. The dorsum of all is basically tawny, differing in the degree of saturation and concentration of dusky hairs; the venter is a shade of grayish white. The dorsal appearance of individuals of spicilegus is rich tawny, their flanks, sides, and cheeks bright ochraceous. In spicilegus, the expanse of ochraceous color on the cheek, especially below and slightly anterior to the orbit, covers a larger area than in boylii, madrensis, and simulus. As noted by Osgood (1909), examples of simulus in Nayarit are practically inseparable from those of spicilegus based on pelage characteristics; however, specimens of simulus from arid scrub-thorn habitat in Sinaloa are noticeably paler. The dorsal fur of individuals of boylii is generally a paler hue and finer in texture as compared to spicilegus. The coat color seen in the island populations, madrensis, is still paler in tone, closer to buff. An ochraceous pectoral streak occurs in some individuals of each population sample, but its frequency varies. A pectoral streak is uncommon in spicilegus (16.4 percent of 152 adult skins) and simulus (15.0 percent of 60), common in boylii (44.4 percent of 90), and typical in madrensis (93.0 percent of 57). Samples of boylii exhibit the most conspicuously bicolored, densely furred tails, but the definition of bicoloration does not approach the condition observed in leucopus or maniculatus. Bicoloration of the tail is less pronounced in specimens of spicilegus as compared to those of boylii. Individuals of simulus and madrensis have an indistinctly bicolored tail, the venter slightly paler than the dorsum and not sharply demarcated; some tails are almost monocolored. Moreover, in specimens of madrensis, the tail usually is as dark below as above over the distal one-third to one-half of its length. In boylii, the terminal portion of the tail is wholly clothed in white hairs in some individuals from Ocota Airstrip (12 of 48) and Santa Teresa (10 of 44). A terminal white tip is not evident in our samples of madrensis and simulus and on only three out of approximately 175 spicilegus.

Our samples of boylii, madrensis, simulus, and spicilegus can be readily separated from one another based on the anatomy of the glans penis. Examination of fluid-preserved and reconstituted material representing all populations listed in “Materials and Methods,” as well as others, sustains Carleton's (1977) observations and reaffirms the distinctiveness of the four forms in Nayarit. In males of boylii, the glans is long (8–9 mm) and narrow (1.0–1.3 mm) with a short protractile tip (2.0–2.5 mm); the spines on the dorsal surface of the glans are conspicuously larger and more widely spaced than those on the ventral side; and there are well-defined dorsal and ventral lappets (terminology follows Hooper, 1958). All specimens identified as spicilegus lack dorsal and ventral lappets; the body of the glans is marked by longitudinal furrows and covered evenly with small spines; the glans is long (8.5–9.5 mm) but relatively wide (1.5–2.0 mm) and with a long protractile tip (2.7–3.2 mm). Examples of simulus agree with those of boylii in the presence of dorsal lappets and the distribution of spines; however, the ventral lappet is weakly developed in simulus, and its phallus is appreciably shorter (5.5–6.5 mm), absolutely and relatively wider (1.3–1.5 mm), and has a shorter protractile tip (1.5–1.8 mm). Examples of boylii, simulus, and spicilegus were figured in Carleton (1977). Because the two specimens of madrensis available to Carleton (1977) were rehydrated from dry study skins, his interpretation of their morphology was tentative. The study of six additional glandes from freshly fixed specimens (two each from Maria Madre, Maria Cleofas, and Isla San Juanito) now allows a more accurate description. The glans is moderately long (8.3–9.0 mm) and wide (1.5–1.7 mm) and has a protractile tip (2.0–2.4 mm) as proportionately short as in boylii. Dorsal lappets are present although not as distinct as in boylii and simulus; there is no ventral lappet. A dorsal-ventral asymmetry in size and distribution of spines is apparent, but the contrast is less striking than that observed in examples of boylii and simulus.

Adult male boylii, madrensis, simulus, and spicilegus have the same basic complement of accessory reproductive glands as reported for the subgenus Peromyscus by Linzey and Layne (1969). Preputial glands were not visible macroscopically or detected under a dissecting scope. Six mammary glands (two inguinal pairs, one axillary pair) are evident in all reproductively active females of boylii, madrensis, simulus, and spicilegus.

KARYOLOGY.—Recent investigations have demonstrated notable differences in chromosomal morphology among members of the boylii species group (for example, Lee et al., 1972; Schmidly and Schroeter, 1974; Kilpatrick and Zimmerman, 1975). Of the boylii-group taxa in Nayarit, karyotypic samples were available for all and usually represented several localities within their distributions (see “Materials and Methods”). Examples of boylii, madrensis, simulus, and spicilegus have a diploid count of 48, as typical of Peromyscus, but exhibit considerable diversity in autosomal morphology both within and between taxa.

In specimens of simulus, the autosomes consist of one pair of large and one pair of small subtelocentrics, one pair of small submetacentrics, and 20 pairs of evenly graded, large to small acrocentrics to equal a fundamental number of 52 (Figure 9a). The X chromosome is a large subtelocentric, and the Y a small submetacentric or subtelocentric. The only variation detected involved the morphology of the Y chromosome, which is submetacentric in one male from the Rio Chilte but subtelocentric in another male from the same place and the male from near Aticama. The karyotype observed in our samples of simulus agree with that reported for simulus from Sinaloa (Schmidly and Schroeter, 1974) and is essentially identical to that found in b. boylii, b. utahensis, and b. rowleyi (Hsu and Arrighi, 1968; Lee et al., 1972; Schmidly and Schroeter, 1974).

The common fundamental number among samples of madrensis is 54: one pair of large and one pair of medium-sized subtelocentrics, two pairs of small submetacentrics, and 19 pairs of acrocentrics sorted from large to small (Figure 9b). A male and female from Maria Cleofas possessed a heteromorphic pair among their acrocentrics, one chromosome having small but distinct short arms (FN=55). The autosomal complement of the other 18 specimens of madrensis was uniform. The sex chromosomes consist of a large subtelocentric X and a small subtelocentric Y. Except for the pair of medium-sized subtelocentrics, the chromosomal assortment found in madrensis closely resembles that in simulus.

Two strikingly different karyotypes are represented in the two samples of boylii, one from Ocota and the other 13 km SW Santa Teresa. The mice from Ocota (three karyotyped) have a high FN, 66, consisting of the following autosomes: two pairs of large and five pairs of medium-sized subtelocentrics, one pair of large submetacentrics, one medium and one small pair of metacentrics, and 13 pairs of large to small acrocentrics (Figure 10a.). The X chromosome is a large submetacentric, and the Y a small submetacentric in one male and a small acrocentric in the other. Autosomal polymorphism in the size of homologues was noted in a medium-sized pair of subtelocentrics (in one male) and in the medium-sized pair of metacentrics (in the other male and in the female). In each case, the presumptive homologues have the same morphology, but one chromosome is larger than the other.

FIGURE 9.—Representative karyotypes: a, Peromyscus simulus (USNM 511658), 1.2 km S El Casco, Rio Chilte; b, P. madrensis (USNM 512574), Tres Marias Islands, Maria Cleofas.

The single specimen (a female) karyotyped from 13 km SW Santa Teresa has several unpaired autosomes, including a large subtelocentric, a medium submetacentric, and one large and one small acrocentric (Figure 10b). Two pairs of large and one pair of medium-sized subtelocentrics, one pair of medium submetacentrics, one pair of small metacentrics, and 16 pairs of evenly graded, small to large acrocentrics compose the remainder of the autosomal set. With the heteromorphism, the fundamental number is 56. A large pair of subtelocentrics represents the X chromosomes; the Y is unknown. The karyotype of the Santa Teresa female, especially the presence of a large unique acrocentric, recalls the chromosomal configuration reported for two specimens of boylii levipes from Pinal de Amoles, Queretaro (Schmidly and Schroeter, 1974).

FIGURE 10.—Karyotypes of Peromyscus boylii: a, male (USNM 523883) from Ocota; b, biarmed chromosomes of specimen (USNM 523739) from 13 km SW Santa Teresa.

TABLE 6.—Variation in nonbanded karyotypes of Peromyscus spicilegus from Nayarit (no. of acrocentric pairs not including heteromorphic sets; FN = no. of autosomal arms; SM = submetacentric; ST = subtelocentric)

The karyotypic formula in spicilegus is characterized by a large number of biarmed chromosomes, 17 to 19 pairs, and consequently a high fundamental number, which ranges from 79 to 84 in our sample of 58 specimens from 12 different localities (Table 6). In the typical chromosomal spread, the autosomes consist of a graded series of 15 pairs of large to small subtelocentrics, one pair of medium-sized metacentrics, one pair each of medium and small submetacentrics, and one pair of large and four pairs of medium to small acrocentrics (Figure 11). A large subtelocentric X and small metacentric Y constitute the sex chromosomes.

Considerable diversity exists, however, within and between populations of spicilegus (Table 6). Variation is most conspicuous in the ratio of acrocentric to biarmed chromosomes. The distinction between the two most commonly occurring karyotypes, FN=82 and FN=80, usually involves a small pair of chromosomes, which are acrocentrics in some individuals but clearly subtelocentrics in others. Such differences, plus some autosomal heteromorphism, result in an FN range of 79 to 84. Variation also is evident in the morphology of the X chromosome, whose alternate form is a large submetacentric (Table 6). Although variable, the karyotype of spicilegus is distinctive, and the range and nature of the chromosomal variation we observed does not suggest hybridization between spicilegus and any of its congeners.

Schmildy and Schroeter (1974) and Kilpatrick and Zimmerman (1975) interpreted the chromosomal variation in their samples (the latter authors also employed electrophoretic data) as evidence of intergradation between boylii rowleyi and spicilegus. As noted by Carleton (1977), however, the name spicilegus does not properly apply to those populations in Durango and Sinaloa that they and Lee et al. (1972) surveyed as examples of boylii spicilegus. The confusion stems from Osgood's (1909) revision, wherein he greatly expanded the range of spicilegus to encompass not only the western mountains of Jalisco and Nayarit but also much of the Sierra Madre Occidental and the western reaches of the Mexican Plateau. In doing so, his boylii spicilegus became an accretion of spicilegus, a species of intermediate elevations and more tropical environments, and the westernmost segments of true boylii. The karyotypic information supplied by the above authors confirms the identity of their populations with rowleyi and other subspecies of boylii but is not evidence of intergradation between boylii rowleyi and spicilegus. In fact, a marked karyotypic difference exists between spicilegus proper and those mice in Durango and Sinaloa that have been called boylii spicilegus. Examples of spicilegus consistently display a predominance of biarmed chromosomes and concomitantly high fundamental numbers (79–84) in contrast to specimens of boylii, which have a majority of acrocentrics and comparatively low fundamental numbers (52–66).

FIGURE 11.—Karyotypes of Peromyscus spicilegus: a, common karyotypic configuration as exemplified by a male (USNM 511676) from 10 km N Jala; b, example of autosomal heteromorphism as seen in a male (USNM 511672) from Mesa del Nayar.

Schmidly and Schroeter (1974) urged that simulus be raised to a species on the basis of its divergent karyotype. We endorse the change in taxonomic status but for reasons other than karyotypic differentiation. The authors had specimens from Sinaloa and from near San Blas, Nayarit, the type-locality of simulus. The animals from Sinaloa contained mostly acrocentrics (FN=52), whereas those from near San Blas had a large proportion of metacentrics (FN=82). Unknown to those authors, populations of spicilegus range into lower elevations and intermingle with those of simulus in the area south and east of San Blas. As first noted by Carleton (1977) and further documented herein, the Nayarit specimens with a high fundamental number represent spicilegus. This is the ubiquitous karyotype found in populations inhabiting intermediate montane zones in Nayarit (i.e., spicilegus) and is not characteristic of those found on the coastal plain of Nayarit. Mice from the latter region (for example, from near Cuautla and El Casco) possess a low ratio of metacentric to acrocentric chromosomes (FN=52), a karyotype identical to that which Schmidly and Schroeter (1974) reported for simulus from Sinaloa. Based upon its karyotype alone, simulus is not divergent from populations of boylii, which also display relatively low fundamental numbers (Table 7).

Much of the karyotypic variation known in boylii (sensu stricto) resides in those southern Mexican populations known as levipes or ones previously misidentified as spicilegus (Table 7). On the other hand, populations in the United States and northern Mexico (recognized as the subspecies boylii, rowleyi, and utahensis) are chromosomally uniform in having 20 acrocentric pairs and just three biarmed pairs. Our only two localities of boylii were obtained in the eastern highlands of Nayarit, a region Osgood (1909) placed within the distribution of boylii spicilegus. The one specimen from Santa Teresa falls within the range of variation described for other boylii, but the three from Ocota possess three additional pairs of biarmed chromosomes, yielding a higher fundamental number, 66, than previously recorded for the species. The karyotype of the Ocota specimens resembles that reported for a specimen from Michoacan, which Schmidly and Schroeter (1974) identified as evides. Carleton has examined that specimen (Texas Cooperative Wildlife Collection 27265) and considers it an example of boylii levipes, not evides. Thus, in Michoacan as in Nayarit, populations having dissimilar karyotypes but judged to be conspecific on the basis of external, cranial, and penile morphology, live in close geographic proximity. Understanding the nature and pattern of this extraordinary chromosomal variation within boylii (sensu stricto) requires further investigation.

GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION AND SYMPATRY.—In the absence of critical genetic information, the sympatric occurrence of two forms and the absence of morphological intermediates at the locality of sympatry constitute the systematist's most persuasive arguments for their “goodness” as biological species. Indeed, it was the accumulation of precisely this sort of information that first altered our perception of relationships in Osgood's boylii group.

The southern Mexican and Central American populations known as levipes played a central role in the development of our present understanding of boylii-group systematics. Hooper (1955) reported both levipes and spicilegus from 2 mi W San Andres, Jalisco; examples of the two were segregated ecologically, spicilegus in a canyon bottom and levipes just upslope on exposed rimrock. Along the eastern slopes of the Sierra Madre Oriental, specimens of levipes were trapped together with aztecus in Veracruz (Alvarez, 1961) and in Hidalgo (Musser, 1964). The populations that Osgood (1909) arranged under boylii evides were first recognized as sympatric with levipes in Michoacan (Hooper, 1961; but Carleton, 1977, allocated these to spicilegus) and then in Guerrero (Musser, 1964). Other instances of sympatry or contiguous allopatry of levipes with each of these three forms have been documented (Carleton, 1977). In addition, three specimens of spicilegus and one of simulus were reported from the same locality east of San Blas, Nayarit (Carleton, 1977).

TABLE 7.—Number of biarmed (BA) and acrocentric (A) chromosomes and fundamental number (FN) in populations of the Peromyscus boylii species group (references: 1 = Hsu and Arrighi, 1968; 2 = Lee et al., 1972; 3 = Schmidly and Schroeter, 1974; 4 = Kilpatrick and Zimmerman, 1975; 5 = Carleton, 1977; 6 = Lee and Elder, 1977; 7 = this study)

On the basis of skull configuration, two localities of sympatry were suspected among the material recently collected from Nayarit. One site, Cucharas on the Rio Acaponeta, 100 m, involved examples of simulus and spicilegus; the other, Rancho Viejo, 13 km SW Santa Teresa, boylii and spicilegus. Two-group discriminant function analyses were performed on reference samples of simulus (SIMCUA, N=50) versus spicilegus (SPIJAL, N=35) and boylii (BOYOCO, N=37) versus spicilegus (SPIJAL, N=35), using only the 19 cranial variables. The resultant discriminant multipliers were then used to calculate discriminant scores for the unknowns, from Cucharas and near Santa Teresa, and for the reference specimens, and these were plotted in frequency histograms.

In both cases, the discriminant scores of known references are distributed in a bimodal fashion (Figure 12); however, the ranges of discriminant scores abut and even overlap slightly in the simulus-spicilegus comparison. Specimens that fall in the zone of overlap or contact are young animals of spicilegus or very old individuals of simulus and boylii, a reminder that age variation must be considered when comparing skulls. The length of the maxillary toothrow, zygomatic breadth, breadth of mesopterygoid fossa, and rostral length contribute most to the separation of the simulus and spicilegus reference samples (Table 8). Length of auditory bulla, length and breadth of mesopterygoid fossa, postdental palatal breadth, and rostral breadth account for much of the distinction between boylii and spicilegus (Table 8).

Unknowns from the two localities in question are clearly associated with either one or the other reference populations (Figure 12), suggesting that there are two species in sympatry at each locality. Examination of the glandes penes of some of the specimens collected at Cucharas and near Santa Teresa disclosed the same distinctive morphologies as described for simulus, boylii, and spicilegus. The discriminant scores of these particular specimens align them with the reference samples predicted on the basis of their phallic morphology and provide further confirmation that two kinds are present at these places. A karyotype was available for one of the specimens from 13 km SW Santa Teresa. This individual (USNM 523740) possesses a high fundamental number (FN=82), which is typical of spicilegus, and was included among spicilegus from 2 mi E Jalcocotan in the discriminant function analysis. Regrettably, the one karyotypic example of boylii (FN=56) from Santa Teresa is a juvenile, and it was not entered into the discriminant function program. The hypothesis that boylii intergrades with spicilegus and that spicilegus merges into simulus is not substantiated by the pattern of morphological variation observed at these two sites.

FIGURE 12.—Frequency histograms of discriminant scores determined by two-group discriminant function analyses comparing reference samples: a. Peromyscus boylii (BOYOCO) and P. spicilegus (SPIJAL) with unknowns from 13 km SW Santa Teresa; b, P simulus (SIMCUA) and P. spicilegus (SPIJAL) with unknowns from Cucharas. (See Table 8; arrows denote mean discriminant scores of four reference samples.)

TABLE 8.—Discriminant multipliers for 19 cranial variables derived from discriminant function analyses of reference samples of spicilegus and boylii and spicilegus and simulus

Character

SPIJAL:
BOYOCO

SPIJAL:
SIMCUA

Greatest length of skull

  .076

–.007

Gondyloincisive length

  .001

  .006

Length of auditory bulla

–.195

  .089

Postpalatal length

–.116

–.082

Length of mesopterygoid fossa

  .214

–.006

Palatal length

–.022

  .095

Length of incisive foramen

–.026

  .044

Alveolar length of maxillary toothrow

  .068

  .221

Greatest zygomatic breadth

–.046

–.123

Mastoidal breadth

–.062

–.058

Greatest breadth across molars

–.003

  .061

Postdental palatal breadth

  .207

–.104

Breadth of mesopterygoid fossa

  .115

  .256

Depth of braincase

–.056

  .087

Breadth of braincase

  .071

  .088

Least interorbital width

  .059

–.001

Rostral breadth

  .169

  .006

Nasal length

  .025

–.025

Rostral length

–.088

  .132

Nevertheless, certain geographic samples persuaded Osgood (1909) that these races did in fact merge with one another and with other populations of boylii. These instances can be easily accommodated in retrospect and merit comment for their historical role as purported intermediates. Much of the confusion resulted from the composite nature of populations that Osgood united under the name boylii spicilegus. He thought that Mexican b. rowleyi exhibited tendencies toward spicilegus, which was partially true in that his definition of b. spicilegus embraced segments of true boylii as well as the lower-elevation species spicilegus. Similarly, he viewed his sample of b. spicilegus from Santa Teresa as “approaching simulus” in morphology. The 10 specimens from Santa Teresa are examples from the westernmost range of boylii proper, not spicilegus, and boylii resembles simulus in skull conformation. Osgood (1909) listed two localities of b. spicilegus that contained specimens “approaching evides,” one of them Plomosas, Sinaloa, and the other Barranca Ibarra, Jalisco. Specimens from both localities are examples of spicilegus. The belief that they represented intergrades toward evides may have arisen from their similarity to populations in Michoacan, which Osgood (1909) arranged as evides, but which Carleton (1977, 1979) interpreted as the southern representatives of spicilegus.

SUMMARY—Based on the information revealed herein, together with similar lines of evidence regarding these Peromyscus in other parts of western Mexico (Hooper, 1955; Carleton, 1977), we treat madrensis Merriam, 1898a, simulus Osgood, 1904, and spicilegus Allen, 1897, as species distinct from boylii. The hypothesis that madrensis, simulus, and spicilegus represent intergrading (or potentially intergrading) races of a single species, P. boylii, finds no support in the patterns of variation we see in the Nayarit collections. Instead, the concordance of several kinds of data—the morphometric analyses, aspects of cranial and reproductive anatomy, chromosomal information, and distributional records—indicates substantial morphological discontinuity between the four sets of populations in Nayarit and, by inference, the occurrence of reproductive incompatibility.

The morphological distinctiveness of spicilegus (disembarrassed of some populations that Osgood arranged under boylii spicilegus) and the documentation of its sympatry with simulus at lower elevations and boylii at higher elevations compel its recognition as a separate species.Peromyscus spicilegus is more closely related to aztecus (including the subspecies evides, hylocetes, and oaxacensis), a southern Mexican and Central American species, than to geographically contiguous boylii and simulus. Peromyscus madrensis and simulus are nearer in affinity to boylii proper. Although not insular in its distribution like madrensis, the geographic isolation of simulus is equally as effective, being altitudinally separated from boylii by approximately 2000 meters of mountainous terrain that is inhabited by intervening populations of spicilegus (Figure 13). Therefore, the test of sympatry in the case of madrensis and simulus will likely remain irrelevant to their justification as distinct species; however, such recognition is warranted on the basis of their unique combination of traits, which separates them from populations of boylii and which, in degree, matches the differentiation observed between boylii and some other species of Peromyscus. When divorced of aztecus, evides, madrensis, simulus, and spicilegus, the residual populations comprising boylii form a more morphologically cohesive unit and seemingly represent but a single species. Yet even after the removal of some of Osgood's (1909) “definable forms,” the populations included in boylii exhibit substantial variation, especially as revealed in the karyological data, and require further investigation over a broader area of their distribution.

FIGURE 13.—Mainland Nayarit indicating locality records and elevational associations of Peromyscus boylii (circles), P. spicilegus (triangles), and P. simulus (stars). (Dashed/dotted line = 100 m contour; hatched area = elevations between 1000 and 2000 m; vertical lines = elevations at 2000 m and higher.)

Peromyscus of Nayarit

Key to the Species of Peromyscus of Nayarit

Peromyscus maniculatus labecula Elliott

Peromyscus labecula Elliott, 1903:143.

Peromyscus maniculatus labecula.—Osgood, 1909:87.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Ocotlan, Jalisco.

GENERAL DISTRIBUTION.—West-central Mexico from Durango south through Zacatecas, Guanajuato, Mexico, and Puebla to Morelos in the east and from Nayarit southward through Jalisco to Colima in the west.

DISTRIBUTION IN NAYARIT.—Limited to the southwestern part of the state, south and west of the Rio Grande de Santiago. Most abundant at elevations between 1000 and 1500 meters.

DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS.—Upper parts grizzled grayish brown with a broad medial strip of darker-colored hairs from top of head to base of tail. Hairs tricolored with dark bases and tips and a paler middle section. Underparts white with dark gray bases of individual hairs showing through. Feet white; ears short with distinct white rims; tail short and sharply bicolored, white below and dark brown above.

The karyotypes in our samples of P. maniculatus labecula (2n=48; FN=84) consist of 19 pairs of biarmed autosomes arrayed evenly from small to large and four pairs of medium-sized to large uniarmed pairs (Figure 14a). The X chromosome is a large subtelocentric, and the Y either a medium-sized subtelocentric (the male from Coapan) or a small subtelocentric (those from near Ahuacatlan and Jalcocotan). This chromosomal formula resembles that found in P. m. fulvus and in some populations of P. m. luteus and P. m. rufinus (Bowers et al., 1973).

The small body size and short, bicolored tail of Peromyscus maniculatus readily distinguish it from pectoralis, simulus, and spicilegus, the species with which it is most often collected. Osgood (1909) and Hooper (1955) noted that the smallest examples of P. maniculatus labecula occur in the western lowlands of Nayarit. This observation is borne out by the smaller size of specimens from areas near El Casco and Tepic, localities that represent the lowest elevations recorded for the species in the state. Some specimens are quite similar to Peromyscus melanotis, a species as yet unrecorded for the state, but one that may occur in the mountains of eastern Nayarit.

ECOLOGICAL NOTES.—Peromyscus maniculatus is not geographically or ecologically widespread in Nayarit. The southwestern part of the state is ruggedly dissected ridge and valley country, with little or no coastal plain. The ridges are covered with tropical deciduous forest grading into oak woodland associations at the upper elevations. Valley bottoms are often sharply cut by small streams, whose meandering patterns have created open grassy or brushy areas. In this type of situation, maniculatus often occupies the more open valley bottoms, and spicilegus and pectoralis the wooded or rocky slopes.

We found maniculatus associated with grassy areas at several localities in Nayarit. Just east of Jalcocotan, maniculatus commonly occurred in grassy orchards and old field situations in the valley bottom, and spicilegus on the rocky slopes and in the deciduous forest on the ridgetops. At El Refilion, maniculatus was also concentrated in grassy areas. A trapline that had yielded three spicilegus and two maniculatus from an ecotonal zone of brushy woodland caught one spicilegus and 24 maniculatus when moved to the grassy areas in an attempt to collect more maniculatus. This species also showed an affinity for wetter areas at this site, where several were taken at the bottom of a small ravine off the river, and others from mesic areas along the road where water seeped out of the bank and flowed to the road. A trapline set among water hyacinth along the edge of the lake near San Pedro Lagunillas also produced numerous maniculatus. Hooper (1955) collected this species from an open, grassy plain and from a sparse growth of grass and weeds in pine-oak forest in Jalisco.

FIGURE 14.—Representative karyotypes: a, Peromyscus maniculatus labecula (USNM 511686) from 1.8 mi NW Coapan; b, P. melanophrys micropus (USNM 523917) from Arroyo de Jiguite.

The animals from areas near EI Casco, at the confluence of the Rio Chilte and the Rio Grande de Santiago, are the only ones we found at an elevation lower than 700 m. These river valleys are at an elevation of 60 m and are steeply cut through the surrounding, higher terrain. Perhaps these mice have used the rivers as dispersal corridors from higher elevations to the south.

We collected lactating females in January and males with scrotal testes in March, October, and November. Reproductively inactive individuals were also collected in each of these months, the only times for which data is available.

Other rodents collected at the same localities with Peromyscus maniculatus are P. simulus, P. pectoralis, P. spicilegus, Reithrodontomys fulvescens, Neotoma mexicana, Baiomys taylori, Sigmodon alleni, S. arizonae, S. hispidus, S. mascotensis, Oryzomys palustris, O. melanotis, Rattus rattus, Mus musculus, and Liomys pictus.

SPECIMENS EXAMINED.—8 mi (by rd) S Ahuacatlan, 1500 m, 13; 1.8 mi (by rd) NW Coapan, 1560 m, 2; 1.2 mi (by rd) S El Casco, Rio Chilte, 60 m, 2; El Refilion, 850 m, 141; Estanzuela, 1380 m, 1; 2 mi E Jalcocotan, 1500 m, 8; 2 mi E San Pedro Lagunillas, E side lake, 1300 m, 101; Tepic, 1000 m, 3; 1 mi W Tepic, 792 m, 2; 5 mi W Tepic, 792 m, 1.

Peromyscus boylii (Baird)

Hesperomys boylii Baird, 1855:355.

Peromyscus boylii.—Mearns, 1896:139.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Middle Fork of American River, near Auburn, Eldorado Co., California.

GENERAL DISTRIBUTION.—Southwestern United States southward through the Mexican Plateau and highlands of southern Mexico and Guatemala to El Salvador and Honduras.

DISTRIBUTION IN NAYARIT.—Found only in the mountains (1900–2100 m) in the eastern part of the state.

DIAGNOSIS.—A species of the subgenus Peromyscus characterized by a medium-sized skull with rounded braincase and moderately inflated bullae; supraorbital shelf lacking except in very old individuals; teeth relatively complex; bicoloration of tail moderately pronounced; glans penis long and comparatively thin, with a proportionately short protractile tip, and with dorsal and ventral lappets present and typically well defined; karyotype variable with three to 10 pairs of biarmed autosomes (2n=48; FN=52–66).

TAXONOMIC REMARKS.—The patterns of variation in boylii need to be evaluated over its entire distribution before delimiting formal subspecific limits. Specimens from Nayarit are not easily assigned to either rowleyi or levipes, the two subspecies having ranges nearest our localities in Nayarit; therefore, we have deliberately not allocated our samples to any of the currently accepted geographic races. Formerly, Osgood's (1909) name combination boylii spicilegus would have applied to the populations in eastern Nayarit, but as shown herein and elsewhere (Carleton, 1977), Osgood's perception of the taxon was a composite.

ECOLOGICAL NOTES.—Peromyscus boylii is restricted to the pine and pine-oak forests of the higher mountains that form part of the Sierra Madre Occidental in the eastern part of the state. Near Santa Teresa, this species was abundant on rocky hillsides, and its burrows obvious at the base of rocks. When we collected in that area in January, 1977, each burrow entrance was lined with acorns. Burrows were occasionally found at the base of trees. Examples of spicilegus came from the rocky bottom of a steep-sided arroyo in the same area. At Ocota in southeastern Nayarit, boylii was common throughout mature stands of yellow pine intermixed with several kinds of oak. Entrances to nests were evident at the base of a small cliff overlooking a broad valley and in the banks of small arroyos.

In the January collection of boylii, we found most males to be scrotal and most females lactating, and we found numerous juveniles.

The few rodent species co-occurring with Peromyscus boylii include P. spicilegus, Reithrodontomys fulvescens, Neotoma mexicana, and Sigmodon arizonae.

SPECIMENS EXAMINED.—Ocota Airstrip, 1900 m, 62; Santa Teresa, 2100 m, 10; 13 km SW Santa Teresa, Rancho Viejo, 2100 m, 61.

Peromyscus simulus Osgood

Peromyscus spicilegus simulus Osgood, 1904:64.

Peromyscus boylei simulus.—Osgood, 1909:151.

Peromyscus boylii simulus.—Miller and Kellogg, 1955:495.—Hall and Kelson, 1959:636.

Peromyscus simulus.—Carleton, 1977:41.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 88088, adult male, skin and skull from San Blas, Nayarit. Holotype examined.

GENERAL DISTRIBUTION.—Known only from the coastal plain of southern Sinaloa and northwestern Nayarit.

DISTRIBUTION IN NAYARIT.—Limited to the broad coastal plain and associated river valleys in northwestern Nayarit, from sea level to 200 m elevation.

DIAGNOSIS.—A species of the boylii species group, subgenus Peromyscus, characterized by a small skull with truncate rostrum and short toothrow (usually less than 4.0 mm); teeth comparatively simple; supraorbital shelf not present; tail indistinctly bicolored or monocolored; glans penis short and broad with dorsal lappets and weakly developed ventral lappet; and karyotype with six biarmed autosomes (2n=48; FN=52). Comparisons with other species in the boylii group are given above.

ECOLOGICAL NOTES.—Lowland tropical forest of the Arid Upper Tropical Zone is the common habitat of simulus. Near Tacote, individuals of simulus were commonly found in a small arroyo surrounded by Cochlospermum, Bombax, Lysiloma, Byrsonima, Crescentia, Cocoloba, and Bursera but were absent from drier hillsides containing Agave, Acacia, Cassia, and Sabal palms. Peromyscus simulus was extremely abundant (72% trap success the first night) in a small, coastal palm grove just south of Cuautla. In addition to Scheelea palms, the grove contained Guazuma and Bursera. Large numbers of simulus were taken also in thickets of Acacia, Pithecellobium, and Asclepias at the edge of the grove. Further inland from the palm grove, simulus occurred in a mangrove (Conocarpus) swamp.

Populations of simulus penetrate the interior of Nayarit and contact other species of Peromyscus where river valleys provide access. Both simulus and spicilegus were taken at Cucharas, 100 m elevation, on the Rio Acaponeta. Individuals of simulus seemed to be localized on the 200-m-wide floodplain of the river, which cuts rather sharply through a series of low hills. Traps set on those hillsides, which were covered with tropical deciduous forest consisting of Enterolobium, Hymenaea, Gliricidium, Acacia, Hura, Bombax, Cochlospermum, and Luhea, yielded spicilegus. A similar situation obtains near El Casco, 60 m elevation, where the Rio Chilte joins the Rio Grande de Santiago. There, maniculatus inhabited the hillsides, and simulus occupied the broad valley of the Rio Grande de Santiago.

Pregnant females and males with scrotal testes were taken in February, juveniles in May, and lactating females and males with scrotal testes in September. Nonreproductive animals were also collected in February and May.

Other rodents collected sympatrically with Peromyscus simulus include P. spicilegus, P. maniculatus, Osgoodomys banderanus, Reithrodontomys fulvescens, Neotoma mexicana, Hodomys alleni, Baiomys taylori, Sigmodon alleni, S. hispidus, Oryzomys melanotis, O. palustris, Rattus rattus, Liomys pictus, and Perognathus pernix.

SPECIMENS EXAMINED.—4 km S Aticama, 50 m, 1; 4 km N Cuautla, sea level, 1; 1 mi S Cuautla, sea level, 127; Cucharas, Rio Acaponeta, 100 m, 7; 1.2 mi (by rd) S El Casco, Rio Chilte, 60 m, 4; Navarrete, 50 m, 3; Paso de Soquilpa, 8.8 mi E San Blas, 100 m, 8; San Blas, 6; 1.4 mi N (by rd) Tacote, 15 m, 10; Teponahuaxtla, 50 m, 15.

Peromyscus madrensis Merriam

Peromyscus madrensis Merriam, 1898a:16.—Carleton, 1977:41.

Peromyscus boylei madrensis.—Osgood, 1909:152.

Peromyscus boylii madrensis.—Miller and Kellogg, 1955:495.—Hall and Kelson, 1959:635.

HOLOTYPE.—USNM 89223, adult male, skin and skull from Maria Madre Island, Tres Marias Islands, Nayarit. Holotype examined.

GENERAL DISTRIBUTION.—Confined to the Tres Marias Islands, about 50 miles off the coast of Nayarit.

DISTRIBUTION IN NAYARIT.—Maria Madre Island, Maria Magdalena Island, Maria Cleofas Island, and San Juanito Island.

DIAGNOSIS.—A species of the Peromyscus boylii species group, subgenus Peromyscus, distinguished by its large skull and relatively small toothrow and auditory bullae; dentition relatively simple; tail long, indistinctly bicolored, and with terminal one-third as dark below as above; hind feet large (24–28 mm) and pinnae relatively small (17–20 mm); phallus comparatively small with dorsal lappets weakly developed and no ventral lappet; karyotype with four pairs of biarmed autosomes (2n=48; FN=54).

TAXONOMIC REMARKS.—The origin of the mammalian fauna of the Tres Marias Islands poses interesting biogeographical questions. In view of the nearness of the Tres Marias Islands to continental Mexico, it might be assumed that the few kinds of mammals living there are only slightly differentiated from mainland forms, at most recognizable as subspecies thereof. Instead, recent studies (Bogan, 1978; Diersing and Wilson, 1980) have affirmed the singular distinctiveness of populations on the Tres Marias with respect to their proximate mainland relatives; so it is with the Tres Marias mouse, Peromyscus madrensis.

In naming madrensis as a species, Merriam (1898a) expressly considered spicilegus its nearest ally. Osgood (1909) echoed this viewpoint but redefined both madrensis and spicilegus as subspecies of boylii; however, Carleton (1977), in raising spicilegus to specific level, questioned whether madrensis properly belonged as a subspecies of either spicilegus or boylii and reinstated it as a species based upon its unique traits. The additional specimens of madrensis now available support this action and allow a better evaluation of its probable derivation from continental species.

Despite their similarity in size, which probably led Merriam and Osgood to regard them as near relatives, madrensis and spicilegus differ substantially in a suite of characteristics that suggests a distant phyletic affinity. Trenchant differences involve cranial proportions, development of a supraorbital shelf, dental complexity, morphology of the glans penis, and the number of biarmed chromosomes. With respect to each of these features, spicilegus more closely resembles aztecus of southern Mexico and Central America, whereas madrensis agrees with boylii and, in particular, with simulus.

A prediction of close kinship between madrensis and simulus appears, at first glance, unexpected, if not wholly improbable. Examples of madrensis and simulus fall at opposite extremes in the size range of boylii-group forms in Nayarit. Nevertheless, the shape and proportions of the skulls of madrensis and simulus are quite similar, an observation corroborated by the results of the clustering exercise using the correlation coefficient to estimate phenetic resemblance (see Figure 4). Also, the bacular length and length of the glans penis are relatively short in both madrensis and simulus in contrast to the proportionately long phallus of boylii (see Carleton, 1977, fig. 6). Like specimens of simulus, those of madrensis frequently lack well-developed accessory dental styles and lophs. Karyotypically, madrensis differs from simulus only in possessing one more pair of biarmed chromosomes, giving a FN of 54 rather than 52. The karyotype of madrensis is more like that of simulus than any other species of Peromyscus in mainland Nayarit. Accordingly, we believe that madrensis evolved either from simulus or from the ancestral stock that gave rise to simulus and boylii.

The origin of madrensis from simulus or a simulus like ancestor is also zoogeographically reasonable. The range of Peromyscus simulus occupies the lowland coastal plain in Nayarit, which places it as the geographically most proximate ancestral source in contrast to the montane distributions of spicilegus and boylii. The geological history of the Tres Marias Islands is poorly known. Hanna (1926) suggested that the area has been above sea level since the Pliocene; the presence of Pliocene reefs on the eastern side of the islands indicates that the area was insular or at least peninsular at that time. The four islands composing the Tres Marias were almost surely united, but a connection with the mainland cannot be established with certainty. A lowering of the sea level by 120 meters, generally accepted as maximal at that latitude during the Pleistocene, would still leave about 30 km of oceanic barrier. The possibility of rafting at a time when the water gap was narrower is enhanced by the location of the Tres Marias opposite the mouth of the Rio Grande de Santiago. Whether the ancestral madrensis became isolated from its coastal progenitor by severance of a land bridge or by rafting cannot be determined at this point.

The morphological distinctiveness of madrensis does not necessarily argue for a long time span in isolation. Some features, especially its large body size, may be evolutionarily labile, due either to release from competition with other rodents or to a reduction of predation pressure (see, for example, Heaney, 1978; Wassersug et al., 1979). Interestingly, the taxonomic distances separating our three samples of madrensis exceed those recorded between any of the geographic samples of boylii, simulus, or spicilegus (Figure 3), suggesting a higher degree of intraspecific differentiation in connection with their insularity.

ECOLOGICAL NOTES.—On Maria Cleofas, the southernmost island, Peromyscus madrensis was abundant in a variety of habitats. Maria Cleofas is the least disturbed of the four islands and harbors an extensive, 30-m-high forest on its eastern part. Specimens of madrensis were trapped in this forest as well as in lower, shrubby vegetation near the shore. An arroyo with a fresh-water stream also contained large numbers of these mice.

In 1897, Nelson and Goldman collected madrensis on Maria Magdalena (Nelson, 1899), an island 16 km to the northwest of Maria Cleofas. No specimens of madrensis were obtained here despite four days of intensive effort to locate them. Their absence now is probably due to the presence of one or more of the introduced species that now abound on Maria Magdalena. Rattus rattus occurs throughout Maria Magdalena, even at an elevation of 500 m near its center. This commensal, currently unknown from Maria Cleofas, was unknown from Maria Magdalena at the time of Nelson and Goldman's expedition (Nelson, 1899). Domestic goats and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginiana), also abundant on the island, have drastically altered the undergrowth and have left a conspicuous browse line on trees.

Four miles northwest of Maria Magdalena is Maria Madre, the largest of the island complex. This is the only inhabited island, currently serving as a penal colony of approximately 1000 people. Peromyscus madrensis was found only in the interior highlands, away from areas where Rattus rattus was taken. At one time, the interior was covered by a forest that included abundant Spanish cedar (Cedrela mexicana), but extensive logging has left only a few forested patches. Examples of madrensis were caught along arroyos and on the surrounding hillsides.

San Juanito, the smallest island, lies three km northwest of Maria Madre. Nelson and Goldman failed to capture madrensis in 1897 and attributed their absence to the occurrence of numerous land crabs (Nelson, 1899). Nonetheless, madrensis were found to be fairly common on the level, elevated plateau that forms most of the island. The vegetation is low (four to five m in height), spiny, and dense.

Our collections, made in March, contain pregnant, lactating, and nonreproductive females, males with scrotal testes and males with abdominal testes, and juveniles of both sexes.

SPECIMENS EXAMINED.—Tres Marias Islands, Maria Cleofas, 42; Maria Madre, 26; Maria Magdalena, 1; Isla San Juanito, 24.

Peromyscus pectoralis pectoralis Osgood

Peromyscus attwateri pectoralis Osgood, 1904:59.

Peromyscus pectoralis.—Bailey, 1906:57.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—Jalpan, Queretaro.

GENERAL DISTRIBUTION.—Southwestern Coahuila and Durango southward through Zacatecas, San Luis Potosi, Aguascalientes, Nayarit, and Jalisco to Queretaro and Hidalgo in eastern Mexico.

DISTRIBUTION IN NAYARIT.—Previously known only from two localities in the extreme southern part of the state, Ixtlan and near San Jose del Conde (Schmidly, 1972). Probably occurs throughout most of the southeastern quarter of the state; known elevational range from 100 to 1560 meters.

DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS.—Of the three species of Peromyscus trapped with it, pectoralis is most similar in coloration and size to spicilegus. Specimens of pectoralis can readily be separated by their more diluted pelage color, relatively longer tail, small and delicate hind feet, and slightly built body. The skull of pectoralis is more gracile in appearance compared to that of spicilegus, especially as reflected in the slender rostrum, smoothly rounded braincase, and short toothrow. From melanophrys, pectoralis can be identified by its smaller size and much shorter tail. Examples of pectoralis differ from maniculatus in having longer and indistinctly bicolored tails. The smoothly globose braincase and the rounded (semicircular) outline of the fronto-parietal suture, which terminates laterally as conspicuous anterior projections of the parietals, distinguish pectoralis from all other Peromyscus that we have seen from Nayarit.

Our karyotypic samples conform to previous reports for the species (Hsu and Arrighi, 1968; Kilpatrick and Zimmerman, 1975): three pairs of large subtelocentrics; one pair each of medium subtelocentrics, small submetacentrics, and small metacentrics; and 17 pairs of acrocentrics graded evenly in size from small to large (FN=58). A large subtelocentric X and small metacentric Y form the sex chromosomes. One specimen, a male from 1.8 mi NW Coapan, exhibited autosomal heteromorphism in which two pairs of autosomes, both acrocentric in other pectoralis karyotyped, each consisted of an acrocentric and a subtelocentric chromosome (FN=60). Kilpatrick and Zimmerman (1975) discovered no chromosomal variation in pectoralis they examined, based on many samples throughout its range.

ECOLOGICAL NOTES.—Peromyscus pectoralis, like maniculatus, is limited to the topographically diverse southern part of the state. Within this area, it occupies habitats generally indistinguishable from those of spicilegus. Dry, forested slopes and rocky hillsides often harbor both species. At Rancho Zapotito on the Jaliscan border, pectoralis was the only Peromyscus collected.

Although typically found at higher elevations, pectoralis was not uncommon at the place where Arroyo Jiguite joins the Rio Grande de Santiago. This low elevational record (100 m) parallels the situation noted for maniculatus at nearby Rio Chilte. Again, a likely explanation for these unexpectedly low elevational records involves the dispersion of populations along the Rio Grande de Santiago, which provides a sharply cut corridor through the highlands extending southward and eastward from the area.

Reproductively inactive animals were collected in January, October, and November. One male taken in November had scrotal testes.

Peromyscus pectoralis occurs sympatrically with P. melanophrys, P. maniculatus, P. spicilegus, Reithrodontomys fulvescens, Neotoma mexicana, Baiomys taylori, Sigmodon alleni, S. arizonae, S. mascotensis, Oryzomys melanotis, O. palustris, Rattus rattus, Liomys irroratus, and L. pictus.

SPECIMENS EXAMINED.—Arroyo de Jiguite, Rio Grande de Santiago, 100 m, 3; 1.8 mi (by rd) NW Coapan, 1560 m, 7; Rancho Zapotito, 1100 m, 2.

Peromyscus spicilegus Allen

Peromyscus spicilegus Allen, 1897:50.—Carleton, 1977:41.

Peromyscus boylei spicilegus.—Osgood, 1909:149 [part].

Peromyscus boylii spicilegus.—Miller and Kellogg, 1955:495 [part].—Hall and Kelson, 1959:636 [part].

HOLOTYPE.—AMNH 8323/6657, adult male, skin and skull, from Mineral San Sebastian, Mascota, Jalisco. Holotype examined.

GENERAL DISTRIBUTION.—Southern Sinaloa and Durango in the north, through Nayarit, Zacatecas, Jalisco, and Colima, to western and central Michoacan in the south. Known elevational limits from 15 m (2 mi E San Blas, Nayarit) to 2100 m (13 km SW Santa Teresa, Nayarit); most localities lie between 500 and 1600 meters.

DISTRIBUTION IN NAYARIT.—Throughout the southern half of the state and extending northward through the central part along the flanks and foothills of the Sierra Madre Occidental, generally between 100 and 1600 m elevation. Absent from the coastal plain that dominates the west-central sector of Nayarit.

DIAGNOSIS.—A species of the subgenus Peromyscus distinguished by a medium-sized skull with a moderately developed supraorbital shelf and small auditory bullae; teeth relatively complicated, and second primary fold usually prominent on lower third molar; tail weakly bicolored; glans penis long and wide with relatively long protractile tip, body of glans marked with shallow longitudinal furrows, dorsal and ventral lappets absent; and karyotype with 17 to 19 pairs of biarmed autosomes (2n=48; FN=79–84).

TAXONOMIC REMARKS.—Many of the samples that Osgood (1909) arranged under boylii spicilegus, primarily those in southern Chihuahua and the highlands of Sinaloa and Durango, have been regarded as boylii rowleyi (Hooper, 1955; Baker and Greer, 1962). These reassignments plus the reallocations by Carleton (1977) removed populations of boylii that had mistakenly been classified as spicilegus. In addition, Carleton (1977) extended the southern distributional limits of spicilegus to encompass populations in Michoacan that had been allocated previously to evides.

As noted by Osgood (1909) and Hooper (1968), spicilegus shares many characteristics with aztecus, particularly with the race a. evides, and one could argue that spicilegus is a subspecies of aztecus. Despite the apparent closeness of their affinity, Carleton (1979) pointed out differences and urged retention of spicilegus as a species.

If a rassenkreis-like situation exists with respect to the aztecus complex, then populations of spicilegus and aztecus hylocetes represent the noninterbreeding end points of the chain. Thus, examples of a. hylocetes intergrade morphologically with those of a. oaxacensis of the highlands of central Oaxaca, and the latter with a. aztecus on the eastern flanks of the Sierra Madre Oriental and with a. evides in the Sierra Madre del Sur of Oaxaca and Guerrero. In the coastal sierras of the latter two states, populations of a. evides range lower in elevation, and it is the relatively smaller size and brighter coloration of these specimens that suggest a relationship to spicilegus in Michoacan.

The key to the taxonomic status of spicilegus involves understanding the relationships of populations in Michoacan. In his description of spicilegus evides (type-locality: Juquila, Oaxaca), Osgood (1904) only mentioned the intermediacy of some specimens from Los Reyes, Michoacan, to those of spicilegus in Jalisco and evides from its type-locality. The series from Los Reyes was formally allocated to boylii evides in Osgood's (1909) revision. This action established the precedent for regarding the Michoacan animals as boylii evides (Hall and Villa, 1949; Hall and Kelson, 1959) and later as Peromyscus evides (Hooper, 1961, 1968). Carleton (1977), however, drew attention to their strong phenetic resemblance to spicilegus. The latter finding constitutes the most persuasive argument for leaving spicilegus as a species at this point, for, in Michoacan and Jalisco, populations of a. hylocetes occupy the highlands of the Cordillera Transvolcanica and are largely altitudinally segregated from the smaller form spicilegus, which inhabits the lower slopes. Hooper (1955) reported a locality of sympatry for spicilegus and a. hylocetes in western Jalisco.

ECOLOGICAL NOTES.—In many respects, spicilegus is the most eurycious species of Peromyscus in Nayarit, as it occurs throughout the intermediate montane belt and occupies a broad spectrum of habitats within that zone. At lower and middle elevational localities, arid, rocky hillsides may be the preferred habitat. In such areas, spicilegus is usually found on the hillsides, and other species of Peromyscus are mostly in arroyo bottoms or broader, grassy valleys. Peromyscus spicilegus is common in the pine-oak zone in the southern part of the state. At the highest elevation where spicilegus was obtained (Rancho Viejo, 2100 m), they were living on the sides of a steeply cut arroyo that dissected a broad valley in pine forest. In the forest proper, boylii was the common species.

Indications of reproduction were noted as follows: males with scrotal testes were caught in January, March, September, and October; lactating females in January, September, and October; and juveniles in February and March. Nonreproductive animals were taken in the same months, as well as in November.

Peromyscus spicilegus was captured together with P. boylii, P. simulus, P. pectoralis, P. melanophrys, P. maniculatus, Osgoodomys banderanus, Reithrodontomys fulvescens, Neotoma mexicana, Hodomys alleni, Baiomys taylori, Oryzomys fulvescens, O. melanotis, O. palustris, Sigmodon alleni, S. arizonae, S. mascotensis, Rattus rattus, Mus musculus, Liomys irroratus, and L. pictus.

SPECIMENS EXAMINED.—Agua Escondida, 1380 m, 5; 8 mi (by rd) S Ahuacatlan, 1500 m, 46; Arroyo de Jiguite, Rio Grande de Santiago, 100 m, 6; Arroyo Taberna, 2 mi WNW Mesa del Nayar, 1200 m, 5; Chacala, 30 m, 37; 1.8 mi (by rd) NW Coapan, 1560 m, 10; Cucharas, Rio Acaponeta, 100 m, 8; El Refilion, 850 m, 61; 3.5 mi (by rd) E El Venado, 100 m, 1; Estanzuela, 1380 m, 9; 10 km N Jala, 1600 m, 3; 2 mi E Jalcocotan, 500 m, 49; Jalisco, 1000 m, 2; 1 km S La Villita, 760 m, 11; Mesa del Nayar, 1300 m, 9; Pedro Pablo, 820 m, 1; 2 mi E San Pedro Lagunillas, E side lake, 1300 m, 2; Rancho Viejo, 13 km SW Santa Teresa, 2100 m, 6; Tempiste, Rio Ameca, 840 m, 2.

Peromyscus melanophrys micropus Baker

Peromyscus melanophrys micropus Baker, 1952:255.

TYPE-LOCALITY.—3 mi N Guadalajara, Jalisco.

GENERAL DISTRIBUTION.—Known only from extreme southern Durango (Crossin et al., 1973), Nayarit, and Jalisco.

DISTRIBUTION IN NAYARIT.—We have collected specimens only from Mesa del Nayar in the eastern mountains and from Arroyo de Jiguite on the Rio Grande de Santiago in the center of the state. These constitute the first records of this species from the state of Nayarit.

DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS.—Upper parts buffy or pale reddish with individual hairs gray at bases, paler at tips. Underparts with individual hairs gray at bases and white at tips, giving overall grayish appearance. Tail much longer than head and body, sparsely haired at base but becoming more densely haired distally and ending with a small tuft. The extremely long tail readily distinguishes melanophrys from all other Peromyscus in the state.

Chromosomal preparations from animals collected at Mesa del Nayar and Arroyo de Jiguite are uniform. The autosomal complement consists of one small, one medium, and three large subtelocentric pairs, one small metacentric pair, and 17 acrocentric pairs evenly graded, large to small, yielding a fundamental number of 58 (Figure 14b). The X chromosome is a large subtelocentric. The morphology of the Y chromosome is difficult to ascertain because of its minute size, which is decidedly smaller than any of the autosomes. This karyotype contrasts slightly with that reported for Zacatecan P. melanophrys consobrinus (Hsu and Arrighi, 1968), which typically possesses one less biarmed pair (FN=56); however, those authors noted some polymorphism in their small sample. The tiny size of the Y chromosome in the Nayarit samples agrees with that documented in the Zacatecan melanophrys by Hsu and Arrighi (1968), who reported a minute metacentric in one male but a minute acrocentric in others.

ECOLOGICAL NOTES.—This species inhabits arid rocky areas over most of the central Mexican Plateau (Baker, 1952). Two individuals were collected from a rocky arroyo at Mesa del Nayar, Nayarit, a locality on the western extension of the Sierra Madre Occidental, elevation 1300 m. Peromyscus melanophrys probably occurs throughout mountainous eastern Nayarit, as the species is known from similar areas in Durango to the north and Jalisco to the south.

We also collected 10 melanophrys from Arroyo de Jiguite on the Rio Grande de Santiago at an elevation of 100 m together with specimens of pectoralis, another highland form. Nearby at Rio Chilte, we found maniculatus, also more commonly considered a species of higher elevations. We assume that these species are reaching this lowland area along the corridors provided by the Rio Grande de Santiago and the Rio Huayanamota. It would be interesting to determine the ecological requirements of each of the species that occur in such close proximity within this general area: maniculatus, pectoralis, melanophrys, simulus, and spicilegus.

The two specimens from Mesa del Nayar are a juvenile female and a male with scrotal testes. The Arroyo Jiguite sample, taken in January, includes males with scrotal testes, others with abdominal testes, and a juvenile. Some females were lactating, others were not, and one was a juvenile.

Peromyscus melanophrys was recorded sympatrically with P. pectoralis, P. spicilegus, Reithrodontomys fulvescens, Neotoma mexicana, Oryzomys melanotis, O. palustris, Sigmodon alleni, S. mascotensis, S. arizonae, Rattus rattus, Liomys pictus, and L. irroratus.

SPECIMENS EXAMINED.—Arroyo de Jiguite, Rio Grande de Santiago, 100 m, 10; Mesa del Nayar, 1300 m, 2.

Appendix

Measurements (in mm) of Selected Samples of the Peromyscus boylii Species Group

Literature Cited

Allen, J.A.

1897.   Further Notes on Mammals Collected in Mexico by Dr. Audley C. Buller, with Descriptions of New Species. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 9:47–58.

Alvarez, T.

1961.   Taxonomic Status of Some Mice of the Peromyscus boylii Group in Eastern Mexico, with Description of a New Subspecies. University of Kansas Publications of the Museum of Natural History, 14:111–120.

Anderson, S.

1968.   A New Craniometer and Suggestions for Craniometry. Journal of Mammalogy, 49:221–228.

Avise, J.C., M.M. Smith, and R.K. Selander

1974.   Biochemical Polymorphism and Systematics in the Genus Peromyscus, VI: The boylii Species Group. Journal of Mammalogy, 55:751–763.

Bailey, V.

1906.   A New White-footed Mouse from Texas. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 19:57.

Baird, S.F.

1855.   Characteristics of Some New Species of North American Mammalia, Collected Chiefly in Connection with the U.S. Surveys of a Railroad Route to the Pacific. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 7:333–336.

Baker, R.H.

1952.   Geographic Range of Peromyscus melanophrys, with description of New Subspecies. University of Kansas Publications of the Museum of Natural History, 5:251–258.

Baker, R.H., and J.K. Greer

1962.   Mammals of the Mexican State of Durango. Publications of the Museum, Michigan State University, Biological Series, 2:25–154.

Bogan, M.A.

1978.   A New Species of Myotis from the Islas Tres Marias, Nayarit, with Comments on Variation in Myotis nigricans. Journal of Mammalogy, 59:519–530.

Bowers, J.H., R.J. Baker, and M.H. Smith

1973.   Chromosomal, Electrophoretic, and Breeding Studies of Selected Populations of Deer Mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) and Black-eared Mice (P. melanotis). Evolution, 27:378–386.

Carleton, M.D.

1977.   Interrelationships of Populations of the Peromyscus boylii Species Group (Rodentia, Muridae) in Western Mexico. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 675: 47 pages.

1979.   Taxonomic Status and Relationships of Peromyscus boylii from El Salvador. Journal of Mammalogy, 60:280–296.

1980.   Phylogenetic Relationships in Neotomine-Peromyscine Rodents (Muroidea) and a Reappraisal of the Dichotomy within New World Cricetinae. Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 157: 146 pages.

Crossin, R.S., O.H. Soule, R.G. Webb, and R. H. Baker

1973.   Biotic Relationships in the Canon del Rio Mezquital, Durango, Mexico. Southwestern Naturalist, 18:187–200.

Diersing, V.E., and D.E. Wilson

1980.   Distribution and Systematics of the Rabbits (Sylvilagus) of West-Central Mexico. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 297: 34 pages.

Dixon, W.J.

1973.   BMD: Biomedical Computer Programs. 773 pages. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Eades, D.C.

1965.   The Inappropriateness of the Correlation Coefficient as a Measure of Taxonomic Resemblance. Systematic Zoology, 14:98–100.

Elliott, D.G.

1903.   A List of a Collection of Mexican Mammals with Descriptions of Some Apparently New Forms. Field Columbian Museum Publication, 71, Zoological Series, 3:141–152.

Fisher, R.D., and M.A. Bogan

1977.   Distributional Notes on Notiosorex and Megasorex in Western Mexico. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 90:826–828.

Gardner, A.L.

1977.   Taxonomic Implications of Karyotypes of Molossops and Cynomops (Mammalia: Chiroptera). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 89:545–550.

Goldman, E.A.

1951.   Biological Investigations in Mexico. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 115: 476 pages.

Hall, E.R.

1981.   The Mammals of North America. Volume 2, vi + 601–1181 + 90 [index]. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Hall, E.R., and W.W. Dalquest

1963.   The Mammals of Veracruz. University of Kansas Publications, Museum of Natural History, 14:165–362.

Hall, E. R., and K.R. Kelson

1959.   The Mammals of North America. Volume 2, viii + 547-1083 + [79] pages. New York: Ronald Press.

Hall, E.R., and B. Villa

1949.   An Annotated Checklist of the Mammals of Michoacan. University of Kansas Publications of the Museum of Natural History, 1:431–472.

Hanna, G. D.

1926.   Expedition to the Revillagigedo Islands, Mexico, in 1925: General Report. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, series 4, 15: 93 pages.

Heaney, L.R.

1978.   Island Area and Body Size of Insular Mammals: Evidence from the Tri-colored Squirrel (Callosciurus prevosti) of Southeast Asia. Evolution, 32:29–44.

Hoffmeister, D.F.

1951.   A Taxonomic and Evolutionary Study of the Pinon Mouse, Peromyscus truei. Illinois Biological Monographs, 21: 104 pages.

Hooper, E.T.

1947.   Notes on Mexican Mammals. Journal of Mammalogy, 28:40–57.

1955.   Notes on Mammals of Western Mexico. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 565: 26 pages.

1957.   Records of Mexican Mammals. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 586: 9 pages.

1957.   Dental Patterns in Mice of the Genus Peromyscus. Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 99: 59 pages.

1958.   The Male Phallus in Mice of the Genus Peromyscus. Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 105: 24 pages.

1961.   Notes on Mammals from Western and Southern Mexico. Journal of Mammalogy, 42:120–122.

1968.   Classification. In J. A. King, editor, Biology of Peromyscus (Rodentia). Special Publication of the American Society of Mammalogists, 2:27–74.

Hsu, T.C., and F.E. Arrighi

1968.   Chromosomes of Peromyscus (Rodentia, Cricetidae), I: Evolutionary Trends in 20 Species. Cytogenetics, 7:417–446.

Kilpatrick, C.W., and E.G. Zimmerman

1975.   Genetic Variation and Systematics of Four Species of Mice of the Peromyscus boylii Species Group. Systematic Zoology, 24:143–162.

Lawlor, T.E.

1971.   Evolution of Peromyscus on Northern Islands in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Transactions of the San Diego Society of Natural Hisotry, 16:91–124.

Lee, M.R., and F.B. Elder

1977.   Karyotypes of Eight Species of Mexican Rodents (Muridae). Journal of Mammalogy, 58:479–487.

Lee, M., D.J. Schmidly, and C.C. Huheey

1972.   Chromosomal Variation in Certain Populations of Peromyscus boylii and Its Systematic Implications. Journal of Mammalogy, 53:697–707.

Linzey, A.V., and J.N. Layne

1969.   Comparative Morphology of the Male Reproductive Tract in the Rodent Genus Peromyscus (Muridae). American Museum Novitates, 2355: 47 pages.

Mearns, E.A.

1896.   Preliminary Diagnoses of New Mammals from the Mexican Border of the United States. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 19:137–140. [Advance sheet, 25 May 1896, pages 1–4.]

Merriam, C.H.

1898a.  Mammals of Tres Marias Islands, off Western Mexico. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 12:13–19.

1898b.  Descriptions of Twenty New Species and a New Subgenus of Peromyscus from Mexico and Guatemala. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 12:115–125.

Miller, G.S., and R. Kellogg

1955.   List of North American Recent Mammals. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 205: xii + 954 pages.

Minkoff, E.

1965.   The Effects on Classification of Slight Alterations in Numerical Technique. Systematic Zoology, 14:196–213.

Musser, G.G.

1964.   Notes on Geographic Distribution, Habitat, and Taxonomy of Some Mexican Mammals. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 636: 22 pages.

1969.   Notes on Peromyscus (Muridae) of Mexico and Central America. American Museum Novitates, 2357: 23 pages.

Neff, N.A., and L.F. Marcus

1980.   A Survey of Multivariate Methods for Systematics. 243 pages. New York. [Privately published.]

Nelson, E.W.

1899.   Mammals of the Tres Marias Islands. North American Fauna, 14:15–19.

Osgood, W.H.

1904.   Thirty New Mice of the Genus Peromyscus from Mexico and Guatemala. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 17:55–77.

1909.   Revision of the Mice of the American Genus Peromyscus. North American Fauna, 28: 285 pages.

1945.   Two New Rodents from Mexico. Journal of Mammalogy, 26:299–301.

Patton, J.L.

1967.   Chromosome Studies of Certain Pocket Mice, Genus Perognathus (Rodentia: Heteromyidae). Journal of Mammalogy, 48:27–37.

Rohlf, F.J., J. Kishpaugh, and D. Kirk

1972.   Numerical Taxonomy System of Multivariate Statistical Programs. 87 pages. Stony Brook: State University of New York.

Schmidly, D.J.

1972.   Geographic Variation in the White-ankled Mouse, Peromyscus pectoralis. The Southwestern Naturalist, 17:113–138.

1973.   Geographic variation and Taxonomy of Peromyscus boylii from Mexico and the Southern United States. Journal of Mammalogy, 54:111–130.

Schmidly, D.J., and G.L. Schroeter

1974.   Karyotypic Variation in Peromyscus boylii (Rodentia: Cricetidae) from Mexico and Corresponding Taxonomic Implications. Systematic Zoology, 23:333–342.

Wassersug, R.J., H. Yang, J.J. Sepkoski, Jr., and D.M. Raup

1979.   The Evolution of Body Size on Islands: A Computer Simulation. American Naturalist, 114:287–295.

REQUIREMENTS FOR SMITHSONIAN SERIES PUBLICATION

Manuscripts intended for series publication receive substantive review within their originating Smithsonian museums or offices and are submitted to the Smithsonian Institution Press with approval of the appropriate museum authority on Form SI–36. Requests for special treatment—use of color, foldouts, casebound covers, etc.—require, on the same form, the added approval of designated committees or museum directors.

Review of manuscripts and art by the Press for requirements of series format and style, completeness and clarity of copy, and arrangement of all material, as outlined below, will govern, within the judgment of the Press, acceptance or rejection of the manuscripts and art.

Copy must be typewritten, double-spaced, on one side of standard white bond paper, with 1¼″ margins, submitted as ribbon copy (not carbon or xerox), in loose sheets (not stapled or bound), and accompanied by original art. Minimum acceptable length is 30 pages.

Front matter (preceding the text) should include: title page with only title and author and no other information, abstract page with author/title/series/etc., following the established format, table of contents with pubs reflecting the heads and structure of the paper.

First page of text should carry the title and author at the top of the page and an unnumbered footnote at the bottom consisting of author's name and professional mailing address.

Center heads of whatever level should be typed with initial caps of major words, with extra space above and below the head, but with no other preparation (such as all caps or underline). Run-in paragraph heads should use period/dashes or colons as necessary.

Tabulations within text (lists of data, often in parallel columns) can be typed on the text page where they occur, but they should not contain rules or formal, numbered table heads.

Formal tables (numbered, with table heads, boxheads, stubs, rules) should be submitted as camera copy, but the author must contact the series section of the Press for editorial attention and preparation assistance before final typing of this matter.

Taxonomic keys in natural history papers should use the alined-couplet form in the zoology and paleobiology series and the multi-level pub form in the botany series. If cross-referencing is required between key and text, do not include page references within the key, but number the keyed-out taxa with their corresponding heads in the text.

Synonymy in the zoology and paleobiology series must use the short form (taxon, author, year:page), with a full reference at the end of the paper under “Literature Cited.” For the botany series, the long form (taxon, author, abbreviated journal or book title, volume, page, year, with no reference in the “Literature Cited”) is optional.

Footnotes, when few in number, whether annotative or bibliographic, should be typed at the bottom of the text page on which the reference occurs. Extensive notes must appear at the end of the text in a notes section. If bibliographic footnotes are required, use the short form (author/brief title/page) with the full reference in the bibliography.

Text-reference system (author/year/page within the text, with the full reference in a “Literature Cited” at the end of the text) must be used in place of bibliographic footnotes in all scientific series and is strongly recommended in the history and technology series: “(Jones, 1910:122)” or “…. Jones (1910:122).”

Bibliography, depending upon use, is termed “References,” “Selected References,” or “Literature Cited.” Spell out book, journal, and article titles, using initial caps in all major words. For capitalization of titles in foreign languages, follow the national practice of each language. Underline (for italics) book and journal titles. Use the colon-parentheses system for volume/number/page citations: “10(2):5–9.” For alinement and arrangement of elements, follow the format of the series for which the manuscript is intended.

Legends for illustrations must not be attached to the art nor included within the text but must be submitted at the end of the manuscript—with as many legends typed, double-spaced, to a page as convenient.

Illustrations must not be included within the manuscript but must be submitted separately as original art (not copies). All illustrations (photographs, line drawings, maps, etc.) can be intermixed throughout the printed text. They should be termed Figures and should be numbered consecutively. If several “figures” are treated as components of a single larger figure, they should be designated by lowercase italic letters (underlined in copy) on the illustration, in the legend, and in text references: “Figure 9b.” If illustrations are intended to be printed separately on coated stock following the text, they should be termed Plates and any components should be lettered as in figures: “Plate 9b.” Keys to any symbols within an illustration should appear on the art and not in the legend.

A few points of style: (1) Do not use periods after such abbreviations as “mm, ft, yds, USNM, NNE, AM, BC.” (2) Use hyphens in spelled-out fractions: “two-thirds.” (3) Spell out numbers “one” through “nine” in expository text, but use numerals in all other cases if possible. (4) Use the metric system of measurement, where possible, instead of the English system. (5) Use the decimal system, where possible, in place of fractions. (6) Use day/month/year sequence for dates: “9 April 1976.” (7) For months in tabular listings or data sections, use three-letter abbreviations with no periods: “Jan, Mar, Jun,” etc.

Arrange and paginate sequentially EVERY sheet of manuscript—including ALL front matter and ALL legends, etc., at the back of the text—in the following order: (1) title page, (2) abstract, (3) table of contents, (4) foreword and/or preface, (5) text, (6) appendixes, (7) notes, (8) glossary, (9) bibliography, (10) index, (11) legends.